Why physics and philosophy need each other

Physicist Carlo Rovelli urges conversations between physics and philosophy in a search for answers about the universe.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  WNYC is supported by Bear. Science is about asking questions, testing, trying again. It's not easy, but it's relentless. It evolves, and that's why science delivers. Learn more at sciencedelivers.com.

• 0:17Speaker 01

  Hi, it's Ira, and you're listening to Science Friday. Before there was what we call science, there was a term called natural philosophy, dating back to Aristotle, that explained basically the same principles we call science today: nature, physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy. And I'm thinking about this now because my next guest, physicist and author Carlo Rovelli, has a new book called On the Equality of All Things: Lessons on Physics and Philosophy. And there's that connection once again. And while it's a small book, there's a lot in there, from quantum physics to the nature of time. And I'm glad to have Carlo with me again. Welcome back.

• 0:57Speaker 02

  Thank you very much. It's wonderful being here.

• 0:59Speaker 01

  You say the scientific revolution we are undergoing is momentous, yet its full philosophical significance has yet to be properly realized and understood. Tell us a little more about that thought.

• 1:13Speaker 02

  Yes. I think that science and philosophy have always talked to one another. Major scientists were influenced by philosophers, and philosophy was influenced by science in a larger sense. Our philosophical view of the world was changed by Copernicus, was changed by Darwin, when we understood we're cousins with all the other animals, was changed by classical mechanics, by electromagnetism, and now, I think, is being changed a lot by especially the physics discovery of the 20th century, relativity, and even more quantum mechanics.

• 1:53Speaker 02

  We need a rethinking of philosophical basis at the light of quantum mechanics. And that's what my book is about.

• 2:01Speaker 01

  What do you mean by that? You say that dialogue between philosophy and science is fruitful and indeed necessary.

• 2:09Speaker 02

  Oh, yes, it's necessary. It's easily to see this historically. All major figures in science have got a lot of inspiration from philosophy. Schrödinger was reading philosophy, Heisenberg was. Einstein read Kant when he was 15, actually, on space and time, and clearly influences science on space and time. But also vice versa. If you think of the greatest philosophers ever, like Kant. Kant was started off by thinking about the Newtonian revolution, what could it mean, and tried to make sense of it. So it's a dialogue, it's a constant dialogue.

• 2:53Speaker 02

  Of course, this dialogue is not particularly relevant when science is just solving minor problems. If you want to understand iron atom better than another kind of element, atom, you don't need philosophy. But when you are rethinking basic ideas about the universe, like has happened with quantum mechanic and relativity, then there are philosophical issues coming in. Quantum mechanics is extraordinary, not just because it gives us all the beautiful technology that we have today, but also because it's telling us that the way we were thinking about reality before doesn't work.

• 3:30Speaker 01

  Well, but a lot of quantum mechanics and a lot of the new kinds of thinking involves ideas that we lay people really can't comprehend. I mean, are we too caught up on our limited human experience of the world to be able to grasp the way things truly are, as quantum mechanics people want us to?

• 3:51Speaker 02

  Quantum mechanics, it's a bit complicated, but not more complicated than classical mechanics, and it's not harder to understand than the fact that the Earth is spinning or is going around the Sun for a man of contemporary of Copernicus. It requires a rethinking of something intuitively clear, but not right. And this is a kind of difficulty in quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics nowadays is talked in high school, the basis, and calculations. Every student in physics and mathematics learn how to do calculations.

• 4:35Speaker 02

  So it's not, there's nothing really mysterious about it, once you start understanding it. What is really mysterious is that it's telling us that the world is not exactly the way we thought before.

• 4:46Speaker 01

  And how can philosophers help us bridge that understanding?

• 4:51Speaker 02

  Philosophy has always been a wide exploration of ways of thinking, right? Philosophy is not just one, it's multiple. There are many philosophers, many ideas, in many centuries, in many countries, in many continents, and explores explore way of thinking. And sometimes they're able to point out assumptions which are not obvious. Think about what Einstein did. Einstein, when he understood relativity, what he did was not math, especially relativity, the math was already done by others.

• 5:36Speaker 02

  Not even measurement, he was never went in a laboratory. He just realized that we had a wrong idea in our mind. The wrong idea in our mind is when you think about two events, if you snap your both hands, you get two snaps, and you ask whether they're simultaneous or not, it's natural for us to think that this is an absent fact, whether they happen at the same time or not. And Einstein realized that that doesn't mean anything, because simultaneity depends of who is looking at it. It's relative. That's the core of thinking understood. How did he understand that? He learned from the philosophers, the idea, be careful about your intuition about time.

• 6:19Speaker 02

  Perhaps time is not the way it looks usually to us. You see, let me put it this way. We grow up on the Earth, and so we get used to the way things are on the Earth. But then we are like a little kid who grows up in his own village and thinks that the entire planet is like its own village, right? Thinks that everybody speaks that language, eats those things. Then the kid goes out and say, oh, boy, there are different languages, there are different habits, different ideas. He grows up, that's growing up. And so science, a little bit is humanity growing up. Here on Earth, where Earth is relatively small, so we never see the kind of alteration

• 7:03Speaker 02

  of time and space that relativity describes, but just because Earth is small. Look, if you have a friend everywhere else in the galaxy or in another galaxy, imagine a friend in another star. You can have a conversation with this friend, but when you send a message, time, the message goes there and comes back, even if the shorter, the closest star, it's a question of years. Earth is so small that light can go from Beijing to New York in less than amount of time that we perceive, right? So in terms of time of light of light, Earth is so minuscule, and because of that, we got

• 7:46Speaker 02

  the illusion that we're all living at the same time, because you can call Beijing and have the sense that we are together. So it's the reason we have difficulty of understanding Einstein relativity is because we do not have the proper experience of the slowness of light, because we live too close to one another to perceive the time of light of light. So the smallest, the smallness of the Earth give us a false impression about reality. So this openness of mind sometimes has helped that philosophy.

• 8:22Speaker 01

  You write about a conversation with a student on this topic about how there is, you know, you have to think about the relativity of where you are and the relativity of objects to themselves, that led to one of the reasons you wrote this book. Tell me about that, and why was such a catalyst for you?

• 8:42Speaker 02

  It was, because of course I am a great fan of philosophy, but it doesn't mean that I agree with all philosophers. So this was a situation in which I found myself in a very interesting disagreement with a brilliant young philosopher, who ultimately did not believe in relativity, in Einstein relativity, not even Galilean relativity, because he believed that motion is absolute, the velocity is absolute. He couldn't digest the idea, I mean, he couldn't understand the idea that motion is relative and velocity is relative. And the main discovery of 20th century physics is precisely that most things are relational,

• 9:27Speaker 02

  relative like velocity. When we say this object is not moving, what we mean is not moving with respect to something else, right? If you're on an airplane, you say it's not moving, you mainly are not moving around in the airplane, but of course you're moving, because the airplane is moving. And if you're on Earth, you say this is not moving, my tree is not moving, because it's ground under the Earth, but the Earth is moving, so the tree is moving with the Earth. So what is something which is really, really, really not moving? Well, it doesn't mean anything, because to be moving means to change position with respect to something else.

• 10:05Speaker 02

  And I think this relationality is what quantum mechanics has discovered to be universal in reality. So reality is much more a network of relations than things with properties. This is a profound philosophical rethinking of reality. And this kind of steps, this step is what is, what we need to understand to make sense of quantum mechanics, also to make sense of relativity. Reality is always seen from a perspective, and is what it looks like with respect to a perspective, with respect to me, with respect to you. With respect to each perspective, things are different.

• 10:48Speaker 02

  What moved to me doesn't move to you if you're moving with respect to me. And that's universal. So this relationalism, I think, is a core of the message that modern physics is giving us.

• 11:03Speaker 01

  Well, would you expand that to include one of the core ideas, uncertainty? You know, science used to be talked about, we know this stuff to be sure, and then along comes quantum mechanics and says, well, it's probabilistic.

• 11:15Speaker 02

  Yes, that's right. That's right. Let me put it this way. Question number one, what do we know with certainty? And I think that a good scientist, in fact, a good human being...

• 11:29Speaker 02

  Should answer that the answer, what we know with certainty, is nothing at all. We know things with a very good credibility, things we are very convinced about, but with certainty, there is nothing that we know. And science is not about certainty. It's about finding good reason for believing in this or into that and being always open to change your mind. So certainty is a bad ideal, a bad mythology. And related to that, another central question of my book, I think these are the two central questions of my book, certainty. The second one is, what is the foundation of everything? What is the basis of everything?

• 12:13Speaker 02

  What is a single substance, a single thing, a single field from which everything derives? Well, I think that the best answer to that is that this is a bad question. We're not interested, right, we're not interested in the ultimate explanation. There's no ultimate explanation. I do quantum gravity, right? Is quantum gravity the ultimate explanation or something? No, not at all. Is physics an ultimate explanation? No. This, of course, everything is physical, but we do understand things in its proper terms. We understand chemical phenomena with chemistry, whether it's a biological phenomenon with biology.

• 12:55Speaker 02

  There are no really contradictions between these pictures, but it's not that one is a fundamental one and the other a derived one. They're all fundamental. They're all fundamental from a different perspective. Reality is much more complicated than a single foundation. Reality, it's, I think, a rich, interwoven fabric of knowledge we have about each and knowledge we have about one another, and it's this network of reciprocal knowledge that makes reality.

• 13:26Speaker 01

  After the break, if there's so much uncertainty, what about a theory of everything? Stay with us.

• 13:34Speaker 03

  Today, when it comes to transplants, science can feel like science fiction. We've got face transplants, pig parts in people, whole entire eyeballs. It's like, what the heck is happening in medicine right now? Join Radiolab for a live podcast taping all about the science of transplants, featuring Dr. Avir Mitra and science writer extraordinaire Mary Roach, live in New York City at The Greenspace, November 5th, 7:00 PM. Tickets at wnyc.org/events. No transplants will happen onstage.

• 14:09Speaker 01

  They used to talk about, coming up, physicists did, with a theory of everything. Do you remember that, those days?

• 14:21Speaker 02

  Yeah, yeah.

• 14:23Speaker 01

  Is that, is that a fool's errand to look for that?

• 14:25Speaker 02

  I think it is, yeah. I think it's a bad, it's a bad objective to look for a theory of everything, especially today, there's so much we don't know. We don't know what is dark matter. We're confused about so many things at a fundamental level. We don't have a quantum theory of gravity. It's, the hope of finding a theory of everything was triggered in the 80s, so long ago, half a century ago, by the existence of string theory that seemed to be a very, very general theory, but it hasn't worked. It hasn't delivered what, what it gave. It found experimental difficulties. So I think we should ask ultimate questions. We should ask one question after the other. This is wisdom.

• 15:10Speaker 01

  You said that quantum gravity is something you, you study, and it seems to be one of the great unfulfilled discoveries, right? I mean, what are, what are a couple of the big questions you want to be answered eventually?

• 15:25Speaker 02

  One of the big holes we have in the physical description of, of reality is exactly quantum gravity. That had been the, the central research of my life. This means that we know that gravitational field, gravity has quantum aspects, but we are not sure about how to describe them. And the reason this is super interesting is because what Einstein discovered is that gravity is what determines the geometry of space, you know, how big are things, what shape they have, and of time, how clock run. So quantum aspect of gravity means quantum after space and time. So understanding quantum gravity means rethinking space and time.

• 16:10Speaker 02

  You see philosophy coming, coming again. And where are we? We are not in a very bad situation, but not in a great situation either, in the sense that there are theories. There are attempts, and I've been working all my life in one of these especially, which is called loop quantum gravity. There's a tentative theory of, of quantum spacetime, of quantum gravity. And we can try to apply the theory to black holes, to see what happened inside the black holes, to see what happened at the Big Bang, or at the end of life of the black hole. It might work, it might explain dark matter, it might do stuff, but for the moment, there's no hard confirmation at all.

• 16:49Speaker 01

  Do you find this search, this uncertainty about the universe troubling, or is it energizing? Saying, hey, you know, I love, I love the chase?

• 16:57Speaker 02

  I definitely find it energizing, but even more, I find the idea that we don't need certainty, we have open questions, very relaxing, right? I mean, if, look, if there was a way to know everything, finally, fundamentally, the old truth, and I don't know it, that would be dramatic. But I don't think that's the case. We are limited beings. We are, we are just a piece of nature, little creatures, little critters that, you know, walk around this planet, and we know a little bit, and it's wonderful to know more, and it's wonderful to know that there is so much we don't know, and we can know more. That's the beauty of knowledge and increasing knowledge, without any need, in fact, of

• 17:40Speaker 02

  the anguish of knowing the final thing, getting certainty or anything like that.

• 17:44Speaker 01

  Carlo, always great to have you on the program. It's, it's a great book.

• 17:49Speaker 02

  Thank you very much. It was precious, this talk.

• 17:52Speaker 01

  You're welcome. If you want to know a lot more of what Carlo is talking about, you can pick up a copy on The Equality of Things, Carlo Rovelliet, Italian theoretical physicist and author on The Equality of Things, a small book with lots of stuff in it. And there's an excerpt from the book you can read for certain. Speaking of uncertainty, we've got a certain spot for you at sciencefriday.com/equality. This episode was produced by Charles Berquist, and if you have a head scratching question about the universe, give us a call, 877-4-CY-FRY. That's 877, the number 4, CY-FRY. Thanks for listening. I'm Ira Flatow.