497: Ethan Thornton—I Like a Lotta Problems

Ethan Thornton doesn't shy away from problems—he goes looking for them. At just 22, the founder of Mach Industries is tackling some of the biggest challenges in American defense manufacturing, rethinking how weapons are designed, built, and produced. In this episode, Ethan takes Mike deep into the problem he believes America can no longer afford to ignore: How did we get to a place where China has such an enormous advantage in manufacturing, production capacity, and the ability to produce things at scale? And, more importantly, what are we going to do about it? Ethan explains why the future of American defense may depend less on building increasingly sophisticated—and increasingly expensive—weapons, and more on figuring out how to build more capable weapons that cost dramatically less. He breaks down the theory behind that approach, why affordability and scale can be weapons in their own right, and why innovation in defense manufacturing isn't simply about creating better technology—it's about changing the economics of warfare. And that may be the biggest problem Ethan is trying to solve: not simply how to build the next generation of weapons, but how to build them faster, cheaper, and at a scale that can restore America's manufacturing advantage. Because when it comes to solving big problems, Ethan doesn't just like a challenge—he likes a lotta problems. Big thanks to our awesome sponsors ZipRecruiter.com/Rowe https://bit.ly/TWIHIxZipRecruiter—The recruiting site that really is the smartest way to hire. Post a job for FREE and find a qualified candidate in 24 hours. American-Giant.com/Mike https://bit.ly/AGxTWIHI—American Giant makes clothes that last, and they make them 100% in America. Use code MIKE to get 20% off your order. American Giant—American Made. GoodRanchers.com/ROWE https://bit.ly/TWIHIGoodRanchers—Sourcing 100% of their meat from American farms and ranches and delivering straight to your door. Get $50 off anything on their site and get DOUBLE the FREE meat with every order when you start a plan. K12.com/Rowe https://bit.ly/TWIHIxK12—Find a K12-powered school near you and see what's possible for your child with K12's Career and College Prep.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:03Mike Rowe?

  Hello friends, it's The Way I Heard It. My guest today will give you hope for the future, or scare the hell out of you, I can't decide. He's inspirational, he's dealing with absolute mortal stakes, creating completely consequential tools slash weapons that are going to determine, in all likelihood, the fate of the world, or at least play a pretty big role in it. And he's 22.

• 0:37Speaker 01

  That's the crazy part. Oh, and also, he owns a company that he started, which is worth...

• 0:43Mike Rowe?

  1.8 billion.

• 0:45Speaker 01

  With a B.

• 0:46Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. And in other news, his name is Ethan Thornton. And it's a name you're gonna want to remember. He's been getting a fair amount of press here of late, for all the reasons I just mentioned, in no particular order. But if you look at all of it on the page, that's one thing. When you see this guy speak, as we did at an energy conference about four months ago, it's another thing altogether. And what's happening, I think, in the military-industrial aerospace world, is this coming together

• 1:27Mike Rowe?

  of young entrepreneurial patriots...

• 1:32Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 1:33Mike Rowe?

  ...who are dedicated to building the arsenal that they believe we need to fight and prevail in an asymmetrical war. This conflict seems inevitable, we don't know when, but somewhere between China and Taiwan, well, I guess is the Strait.

• 1:58Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 2:00Mike Rowe?

  But it just seems inevitable that things are gonna get spicy.

• 2:08Speaker 01

  And whether it's inevitable or not, we still have to prepare for it.

• 2:12Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 2:13Speaker 01

  And he has a lot of knowledge in this area, way more than your average 22-year-old, I would say.

• 2:19Mike Rowe?

  Way more than your average 50-year-old.

• 2:22Speaker 01

  Or 63, maybe.

• 2:23Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. Or, look, I'd say way more even than people who are firmly entrenched...

• 2:28Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 2:29Mike Rowe?

  ...in this industry. What's really happening, I think, is that the rules of engagement have changed so quickly...

• 2:39Speaker 01

  Yes.

• 2:40Mike Rowe?

  So quickly, that our whole playbook has not quite been rendered completely obsolete, but kind of.

• 2:50Speaker 01

  It's getting there, for sure.

• 2:52Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 2:53Speaker 01

  Everything is about unmanned vehicles and unmanned deliverables of payloads and whatnot.

• 3:01Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. And look, it's easy to look at all this and go, "Oh, God, here we go, it's the Terminator." Or, "Oh, man, why are we accelerating into this future that just seems so uncertain and so scary?" But I think that's the wrong way to say it. This is inevitable. We can't stop progress, and we can't stop the world from spinning. And this is the way it's spinning.

• 3:31Speaker 01

  And at this moment, we are behind in this race.

• 3:35Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. You're gonna have a hard time balancing a lot of what you hear with the fact that it's coming from a guy. And I hate to make it about this, and I'm sure it annoys him, but it's both amazing and inspiring that he's 22.

• 3:50Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 3:51Mike Rowe?

  And he has the attention of the Pentagon, he has the attention of Sequoia, a giant venture firm, who's put a lot of money behind the tools he's created. You'll see those tools, he'll talk about them, he'll show them to you. This is the future of what our arsenal is destined to become, because we're not gonna out-manufacture China. They made 1,000 ships last year, we made three.

• 4:18Speaker 01

  Yep.

• 4:19Mike Rowe?

  We're not gonna catch up this way, and we're not gonna win the next conflict. Or more importantly, as Ethan will tell you, we're not gonna be able to prevent the next conflict unless we perfect and mass-produce what you're about to see. And I'm not betting against him.

• 4:39Speaker 01

  No. And you know what I love about this guy, more than anything else, and I know you already know, and that is that he is a patriot. He's 22, and he loves this country, and he wants to help this country be the best that it can be. I love that.

• 4:54Mike Rowe?

  He dropped out of MIT...

• 4:55Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 4:56Mike Rowe?

  ...to build this company.

• 4:57Speaker 01

  Mach Industries.

• 4:58Mike Rowe?

  Mach is the name of the company. He was a Thiel fellow, which helped accelerate his rise. The name of the episode is "I Like A Lot Of Problems." And that's a direct quote from a guy, you know, when he said it, it made me think of every great pitcher I've ever seen, especially the relief pitchers. It's the bottom of the ninth, the bases are loaded, "You want the ball? Give me the ball. I can do this. It ain't bragging if it's true."

• 5:31Speaker 01

  Yep.

• 5:32Mike Rowe?

  Listen for yourself, see what you think. "I like a lot of problems," Ethan Thornton, right after this. In a recent survey conducted by me, it was determined that the only employers who don't use ZipRecruiter today are those employers who actually enjoy the process of interviewing hundreds of people before finding one that may or may not work out. In a subsequent survey, also conducted by me, it was determined that those employers do not exist. So, if you're an employer struggling to hire today, your course of action is simple. Post a job for free at ziprecruiter.com/row. These guys have proven themselves a million times over by helping countless employers,

• 6:17Mike Rowe?

  myself included, get through the hiring process faster and more effectively than ever before. And now they have a new feature that instantly shows you the most interested, passionate, and qualified candidates first. That saves hours of time and helps people like me find candidates who can function in a non-traditional environment, like MicroWorks. In other words, ZipRecruiter worked for me, they'll probably work for you. Post a job for free at ziprecruiter.com/row. Watch what happens. Odds are, you'll find a great fit for your company in just 24 hours or less. ZipRecruiter.com/row.

• 6:56Mike Rowe?

  I know your time is valuable, but I'm not quite sure how valuable. Like, what's the... What was your morning like, and what happens to you later today?

• 7:12Speaker 02

  It's a good question. It varies, a lot. Today, pretty nice, I woke up, ate some breakfast.

• 7:19Mike Rowe?

  Nice.

• 7:20Speaker 02

  What'd I get up to? I ate a Starbucks, which was kinda weird, but it was on the drive-in, it was the easiest. I got like a sausage and egg sandwich, it was pretty solid.

• 7:31Mike Rowe?

  So you're still at that point where your metabolism, it doesn't really matter what you eat?

• 7:35Speaker 02

  Yeah, and I'll actually go days without eating, on accident, pretty often.

• 7:38Mike Rowe?

  Really?

• 7:39Speaker 02

  So like yesterday, it was like midnight, and I was like, "Crap, I haven't eaten today." So then I ate like a whole pepperoni cheese pizza at like midnight, which was fun.

• 7:48Mike Rowe?

  Why typically does it like... Explain to me the circumstances by which you could simply forget to eat? Because I'm assuming you're not hungry while you're forgetting, you're so focused, preoccupied on whatever the situation is.

• 8:01Speaker 02

  Yeah, I just get really excited about stuff, and I'll just like get into it and like have my head down and then wake up. And so there'll be days where I eat like five meals, recovering from that. This is kinda one of those days. And then, yeah, yesterday was a fun couple meetings with my team, and so just didn't realize until like midnight. So, ate a bunch last night. So I did that, and then I got into work. It's been like a lot of engineering stuff today. So we're standing up a new program. We announced it last week for the Navy. It's basically like 40-foot wingspan, near-vertical takeoff aircraft. So basically, the goal is within the area helicopter takes off, takeoff within that area. And I'll get to why we don't just take off vertically and then carry 1,000-pound payload, about 1,400 miles.

• 8:45Speaker 02

  So, the biggest vehicle we've shipped to date is 13 feet. We got asked to bid on this. I frankly didn't really expect to win on it, but we did a lot of work to get an architecture together I'm super excited for. We just won it. So now we're standing up all the functions to go and deliver on that. That's a lot of work, right now. That aircraft is super exciting, though.

• 9:02Mike Rowe?

  What's it called?

• 9:03Speaker 02

  It's called Atlas.

• 9:04Mike Rowe?

  Okay.

• 9:05Speaker 02

  When you think about the future warfare, I think that the key thing to understand is that there will be massive decentralized strike capability. So adversaries and the US will have the ability to use unmanned systems to strike basically anywhere from things that aren't a centralized location, right?

• 9:22Mike Rowe?

  And what are the ramifications that will result, as a result, from that eventuality that didn't exist decades before?

• 9:32Speaker 02

  It's a great question. I think a ton. And I think it's important to discuss and get into each of those. I think the first is that centralized assets are a lot more at risk. And we see this, I mean, we see this a lot.

• 9:44Mike Rowe?

  For example?

• 9:45Speaker 02

  This is Ukraine's playbook, 101, right? So Operation Spiderweb, probably about a year and a half ago now, Russia had their strategic bombers in Russia, basically their airfields. Ukraine snuck a couple of shipping containers into Russia and launched quadcopters from those shipping containers and knocked out, who knows the actual number, but a significant portion of Russia's...

• 10:05Mike Rowe?

  Quadcopter is a drone with four...

• 10:07Speaker 02

  With four props.

• 10:08Mike Rowe?

  Rotors, basically.

• 10:09Speaker 02

  Exactly.

• 10:10Mike Rowe?

  And is this... Yeah, I'm gonna do this a lot, because I know how fast your mind works, and I really want people to understand. I mean, look, we're gonna hit manufacturing, obviously, certainly asymmetrical warfare. I think it's really important for people to kind of understand. But mostly, dude, I just wanna understand from a manufacturing standpoint, how your brain works and how you came to this. And I will have introduced you properly in a preamble, and I'm sure you're sick to death of being lumped into, "Oh, and he's 22," so I don't wanna, need to dwell on that, but dude, you're 22. Yeah, yeah.

• 10:51Mike Rowe?

  And so you're having the most consequential conversations that I think are going on today in our country. You are at the... You're at the big boy pants table, dude. And I'm just so interested to know not just what you're doing and why and how, but through what kind of lens do you view it?

• 11:19Speaker 02

  It's a great question. So first off, look, I don't think age has much to do with it. And I think there are folks who brag about getting things done at a certain age. And then there are folks who get discredited about doing further things at a certain age. And I just, I try to avoid that being in the calculus, right? Like, I like to show up and exist based on merit of what I've done and what I look to do and what's happening today. But I do understand it's a bit strange for my age. And so it is something that gets talked about.

• 11:42Mike Rowe?

  It's strange in this time. But the guy who was just sitting here produced a movie called Young Washington. And what you're really struck by, you know, when you go back a few generations, or in this case, a couple centuries, that cat was 21 years old, you know, when he was in the thick of the French and Indian War, which led to the Seven Years' War, which of course led to the Revolution and the first real world war in modern times. And so, yeah, I'm not freaked out by any stretch that you're young. I hope we're entering a new time because so many people that I've talked to in the last year are south of 40.

• 12:22Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 12:23Mike Rowe?

  And they're doing the coolest stuff there is and the most important.

• 12:27Speaker 02

  Yeah. And I think, look, I think there are folks who will be 70 to do these things. I think there will be folks who are 20 to do these things. I think it's just, I hope we exist in a future where like these things can happen regardless.

• 12:37Mike Rowe?

  You worried?

• 12:38Speaker 02

  Do I worry?

• 12:39Mike Rowe?

  Are you worried about the future?

• 12:41Speaker 02

  I am. I think it's important to be institutionally optimistic about America, but not so institutionally optimistic that you have, like, you fail to realize the risks that are present. I think it's a balance. And I think if you fall on either end of that balance, it can be quite dangerous. So what I mean by that is like, American democracy is, is unique because it was set up to be very, very dynamic. And actually, like, in many ways, most specifically touched on with the Second Amendment, actually set up to have a feedback loop on making sure that it changes at the right rate. And we're just talking Washington. If you went back and installed American democracy back then, I think it would make our founding fathers throw up. But similarly, if you went and installed the government that existed back then today, it wouldn't work.

• 13:26Speaker 02

  And so democracy has to be this living, breathing thing that adopts as society changes. And ideally gets better over time. And I think that has been the track of American democracy for the last 250 years. You really have to track the climate here, not the weather, because you can swing wildly up and down. But generally, it has been a massive success story of a group of people governing themselves and having extreme agency on fixing and ideally looking ahead to preemptively fix a lot of the problems we're facing. So yes, I have like significant concerns about the future. But I think it's important to balance that with the fact that I believe very, very deeply in representative democracy and in capitalism to be the best system to solve those problems. Now, I think talking through the problems I'm concerned about,

• 14:10Speaker 02

  one is near peer competition with China. And I think I've discussed that at length. I think second one is the invention of machine intelligence. And of course, there's the LLM perspective here. There's the physical intelligence perspective here. We as a company through autonomous warfare systems play in this world. But you see democracy be stressed when there's great power competition. You see democracy be stressed incredibly whenever there's radical technological change.

• 14:35Mike Rowe?

  What was the first one you called peer what?

• 14:38Speaker 02

  Great power competition with China and near peer warfare.

• 14:40Mike Rowe?

  Near peer?

• 14:41Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 14:42Mike Rowe?

  I don't know the term. How'd that evolve? What's it mean?

• 14:44Speaker 02

  Yeah, absolutely. It basically means another country existing that you are generally somewhat adversarial to that has similar powers to your own. And so we haven't had this since the 90s. Soviet Union was one. Obviously, we had, we had a number of them in the 40s. Right now, China is that. And that doesn't mean you necessarily go to war, right? But it does mean that you exist in a geopolitical landscape of two parties that are actuating.

• 15:09Mike Rowe?

  Is it fair to think of this as near peer when they made a thousand ships last year and we made three?

• 15:15Speaker 02

  It's a good question. I think, we'll get into how I think we solve this. And I do have institutional confidence, actually. So I think it is near peer. I think if you assess certain aspects, we are far ahead. And if you assess others, we're far behind. So certainly, like raw manufacturing horsepower, we're way behind. We're probably more behind than America's been since like the mid 1800s. That said, if you assess on innovation, if you look at the technologies that define the world today, and then you look at America's work shaping the technologies that will likely define tomorrow, we are ahead. And so it really, I think your confidence depends on which of those two things you think is important.

• 15:49Mike Rowe?

  If I understand your thesis, you've weighed and measured the geopolitical manufacturing capabilities and concluded that there's just no way we're going to catch up. So we have to out innovate. And to the extent that that means autonomous weaponry, right? I mean, what other way is there?

• 16:11Speaker 02

  Absolutely. And I want to be clear. I think in two decades, we are moving more atoms than China. And I don't think you achieve that by making China move fewer atoms. I deeply believe in innovation as the means of fixing America's manufacturing problem as well. And so we'll, happy to talk about that. On some timeline, we do have to produce more. Now, the issue is it takes a while to build a supply chain. It takes longer to build a labor force. And we're behind China in that regard. And so, yes, in the absolute near term, as you talk about hardened military power, I think the goal needs to be asymmetry through innovation. And that's really what I found in Mach to do out of the gate.

• 16:46Mike Rowe?

  Asymmetry through innovation is fancy talk for saying.

• 16:50Speaker 02

  Sorry, I apologize.

• 16:51Mike Rowe?

  No, man. Look, I don't want you to edit anything. I, it's really important, I think, for people to understand how your process works. But for the average person, asymmetrical innovation. So we, maybe talk about that in terms of survivability vis a vis weapon systems.

• 17:12Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 17:12Mike Rowe?

  Right? Because I, I mentioned ships, but ships, who cares? What kind of ships exactly? And how much do those ships cost? And if things get kinetic, how much does it cost me to take one of those ships off the, off the board?

• 17:26Speaker 02

  Exactly. And so, look, I think the best way to think about exactly what I'm saying is I think by properly pushing as fast as possible on drone development, you can have things where if I spend a dollar and you're China and you spend $10, I have the advantage on the battlefield. And so innovation is pushing on drones. Asymmetry is my dollar gets further than your dollar, which correlates to my machine, my operator gets further than your operator.

• 17:50Mike Rowe?

  So back to Ukraine, you're talking about these, what'd you call them? Quadcopters?

• 17:54Speaker 02

  Quadcopters.

• 17:55Mike Rowe?

  Right. So they're basically brought internally, right? And unloaded from a container and they're up and deployed. And how much do those things cost? And what are they taking off the board?

• 18:08Speaker 02

  Absolutely. So we don't know the exact numbers, but it was on the order of 100 to 200 quadcopters and several billion dollars of Russian, basically strategic bombers. And those quadcopters probably cost on the order of a few thousand dollars apiece. And you see similar things. So like, one of the products we're working on as a company, it's called Pike. It's a long range, basically, long range cruise missile. Now, the interesting thing is we can fit a lot of them into a shipping container, into a 20-foot shipping container. And each one of those can go about 1,000 miles and disable a ship. And those things cost hundreds of thousands to make compared to hundreds of millions, depending on the type of ship.

• 18:45Mike Rowe?

  Chuck, you got a Pike in there somewhere?

• 18:47Speaker 01

  Yeah, it's, it's near the end of the list, though.

• 18:49Mike Rowe?

  Oh, yeah. So you've, we've got some photos from the specific things you're making. But I'm not sure what I'm allowed to show people.

• 18:58Speaker 02

  I think anything you have, we can show. Some of it might be outdated. So I don't think we've released the new version of Pike yet.

• 19:05Mike Rowe?

  Well, what's the old version of Pike look like?

• 19:07Speaker 01

  Okay, I'll, I'll pull it up.

• 19:08Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. Because, you know, and you also mentioned Atlas. And I want, how do I say this right?

• 19:16Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 19:16Mike Rowe?

  I don't want people to think in terms of video games. But by the same token, I mean, what are we doing here? I mean, that's impossible. Did you ever read Ender's?

• 19:27Speaker 02

  Oh, yeah. One of my favorite books.

• 19:29Mike Rowe?

  Oh, Orson Scott Card.

• 19:30Speaker 02

  Yes. He has, I mean, there are a lot of books in like the Ender series. They're all incredible.

• 19:39Mike Rowe?

  I want to thank my friends at American Giant for continuing to prove that high quality clothing can still be made in these United States for a fair price. They've been at it now for 15 years. So clearly, they know what they're doing. And what are they doing exactly? Well, they're sourcing locally grown cotton and they're building their factories in towns across the nation where they can find and hire a local labor force that cares about making a quality product. It's simple. It's not easy, but it is simple. Consequently, when you buy a piece of clothing from American Giant, you're not just buying a sweatshirt or a T-shirt or another pair of jeans. You're investing in a local supply chain. I want to thank them also for putting the MicroWorks logo

• 20:22Mike Rowe?

  on a limited line of tees and sweatshirts and then donating the proceeds to my foundation. I appreciate that a lot. We're using that money to fund our next round of work ethic scholarships, and I am grateful. Check out the high quality staples, hoodies, tees, denim, all built to be worn year after year at American-giant.com/mike. It's quality you can feel and a true American success story you can be proud to support. Use code MIKE at 20% off your first order at American-giant.com/mike. American-giant.com/mike.

• 20:58Speaker 03

  American Giant, American-made. American Giant, American-made.

• 21:07Mike Rowe?

  Ender was, if I remember, sometime in the future, you're only allowed two kids. He was a twin, right? So he was a third.

• 21:16Speaker 02

  Third.

• 21:16Mike Rowe?

  They call him the third. And he basically has this facility. He's just unbeatable at a very specific kind of video game. And there's like some big giant national competition, but, but of course it's not actually a game at all.

• 21:31Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 21:32Mike Rowe?

  He's, he's, he's basically the unknowing general in some intergalactic war.

• 21:37Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 21:38Mike Rowe?

  Yeah, man. When did you read that?

• 21:41Speaker 02

  I think I've probably read that book like five times. So I read it first time, I think like second or third grade and then.

• 21:49Mike Rowe?

  That is not a second. That's not a second grade book, dude.

• 21:53Speaker 02

  It's a good book, though.

• 21:54Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. Oh, you know, somebody gave me Lord of the Flies in the sixth grade, which I read and like.

• 21:59Speaker 02

  It's another good book.

• 22:00Mike Rowe?

  Scared the hell out of me.

• 22:01Speaker 02

  It's important to read both of those books. You shouldn't read Ender's Game without reading Lord of the Flies.

• 22:05Mike Rowe?

  And you shouldn't read either one until you're out of high school, but whatever. So you're making the, do you see the point that I'm fumbling around to make? It's like, this is not a game, but to think about it in terms of winning is very much gamesmanship.

• 22:25Speaker 02

  I think you need to think of it as physics and of sort of economic warfare. We do war games. So the military war games, we war game as a company. And yes, you're like running these cases on both strategy and technology. And I see a large portion of my job today is hopefully having a good understanding. Definitely not a perfect understanding, but a good understanding of those things to ideate products.

• 22:46Mike Rowe?

  What's that thing do?

• 22:47Speaker 02

  So this is the asset I was describing, that we will be able to launch from a shipping container and go about a thousand miles and disable a ship or hit another target. Now, this is the old version. So the way we build aircraft is we build the first aircraft, which just flies. It's generally the same architecture and that proves, proves to the customer that you can fly it. And then proves to ourselves that we know how to fly that architecture. And these each happen in like three months. So we designed this, we went from program kickoff to flight in 71 days on this aircraft.

• 23:17Mike Rowe?

  How big is this?

• 23:18Speaker 02

  That aircraft is about nine feet long.

• 23:20Mike Rowe?

  Okay. That's important to point out because if you don't have any, like, you know, you ought to put like a Stretch Armstrong or some sort of thing next to it to give it some kind of scale.

• 23:28Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 23:28Mike Rowe?

  But it's only nine feet long.

• 23:30Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 23:31Mike Rowe?

  I mean, and it can hump a thousand pounds, how far?

• 23:34Speaker 02

  So it's, it's a, I shouldn't disclose the exact payload.

• 23:36Mike Rowe?

  No, don't do it.

• 23:37Speaker 02

  It's smaller than a thousand pounds, but a thousand miles.

• 23:40Mike Rowe?

  Okay.

• 23:40Speaker 02

  And so now the one we are assembling right now on our factory to fly in the next few weeks, which I'm pretty excited about, is the Block Two. So the way we think about Block Two vehicles is full performance. And so the Block Two will look very, very, very different than this one. And actually, so this one took off from a runway. That one will use a solid rocket motor to launch, has folding wings, has folding tails. It's more of like a tube launched thing. So Block Two is when you can do first kind of full performance. These actually work on the battlefield. And then generally you do a third redesign, which is when you bring it into rate manufacturing. When you're in the prototyping process, you don't want to obsess too much about rate. You want to make sure you're like not breaking any manufacturing principles, but you don't want to be obsessing about like every single bolt, the same way you would be when you're mass manufacturing. So the second one is important because we can actually start selling it.

• 24:25Speaker 02

  It's just more expensive to produce. More importantly, we can start deploying it on the battlefield and having an impact. And then the third one, and generally like the goal is to do these every three months. I think Block Two will be done on about that timeline. Block Three, once you're in manufacturing, takes a bit longer and hopefully we compress that over time.

• 24:43Mike Rowe?

  How much?

• 24:44Speaker 02

  But how much time?

• 24:45Mike Rowe?

  No, how much money? What do these things cost?

• 24:48Speaker 02

  So the goal is hundreds of thousands of dollars. And that really depends, a lot of your cost is in the jet engine. A lot of your cost is in the solid rocket motor that launches it. The actual airframe itself is very cheap. And then most of your cost is in the avionics and warhead. So for certain applications, you have super, super simple avionics. For applications, so like if the adversary is not jamming you, if you can access GPS, then your avionics are super simple. If you're fighting China and they're jamming you and they're like, other things we probably shouldn't talk about, like then your avionics get significantly more sophisticated. So you basically.

• 25:23Mike Rowe?

  Sorry, go ahead.

• 25:23Speaker 02

  No, you're good. So you have anywhere from like on the low end, I think we could probably get this thing down to like 200K. Don't quote me on that. We aren't done with the third one yet, so I don't know yet. Up to still hundreds of thousands of dollars on the sophisticated end.

• 25:37Mike Rowe?

  How should I think about the Pike? Is it the Pike or just Pike?

• 25:41Speaker 02

  I don't know. You tell me.

• 25:42Mike Rowe?

  You don't care. All right. I hear by Chris it, the Pike.

• 25:48Mike Rowe?

  How should I think about it in terms of what it's comparable to? What's it replacing, if anything?

• 25:55Speaker 02

  So we have different products that are different levels of novel. And so we have stuff like Glide that is like very, very different than anything that's existed before. Same applies for Stratus. And we can pull up pictures of these things.

• 26:06Mike Rowe?

  Yeah, yeah. Give me a Glide.

• 26:08Speaker 02

  Pike, real quick, if you want me to say on it.

• 26:10Mike Rowe?

  Yeah, yeah, yeah.

• 26:11Speaker 02

  Is quite similar to the existing cruise missiles we have. So cruise missiles, I think are going to be one of the most important tools in a potential near peer conflict, Russia or China. Now, I actually don't expect us to go to war with China. This is like a very important thing for me to say. I think from, in terms of how it guides my thinking, I think we will be in basically a great power competition, basically a Cold War with China for the next few decades. I see our job is not to win a war against China. It is to be able to win a war against China such that we can deter a war with China. And same goes for Russia, same goes for other countries. So this one specifically, I think we're going to need hundreds of thousands of cruise missiles. This is not an area we will be the only player. There are other companies building good cruise missiles.

• 26:53Mike Rowe?

  What's a cruise missile cost?

• 26:55Speaker 02

  So a Tomahawk, which is our main cruise missile, or a JASM, costs on the order of like two to three million dollars. So my goal is to be about an order of magnitude cheaper than that.

• 27:05Mike Rowe?

  Yeah, like by 10th, it sounds like.

• 27:07Speaker 02

  Yes, that's the goal. And that said, like, we won't be the only player on Pike. The thing is, I think we could all make Pikes. Like GM could retool tomorrow to make Pikes and I don't think we'll have enough. And so there are specific products where we really try to like change thinking and bring in like a completely new style of war. And there's stuff like this where it's very clear we're going to need cruise missiles. We've shot a lot of our cruise missiles. The actual numbers are classified, but it's a massive number of cruise missiles.

• 27:32Mike Rowe?

  Do you know the number? I know it's classified, but.

• 27:34Speaker 02

  I don't have a clearance. I generally know the contours of the number. It's bad. We need a lot more cruise missiles and we need to replenish that arsenal. And so we really, in like the next two years, the country, we need to get about a hundred times better at producing cruise missiles. And so Pike for us will be a large portion of that. More importantly, arguably, we make the jet engine for it and we make the solid rocket motor for it. And there really aren't good suppliers for either of those. So right now, if we wanted to go and buy those two, it'd take like a year to get delivery. And so we'll also sell those jet engines and solid rocket motors to other companies to help them win.

• 28:08Mike Rowe?

  This is a bit of a sidebar, but I really want to, like, how do you work with the primes? What kind of layer kick are we talking about? Cause I, I think of Lockheed and I think of General Dynamics and I think of, I don't know, Raytheon and L3, the usual suspects. And they're doing what they do. Are you delivering to them? Are you delivering straight to the feds?

• 28:28Speaker 02

  Delivering straight. So we're our own prime. I hate the word prime. I never want to be a prime.

• 28:32Mike Rowe?

  Subprime, subprime doesn't work.

• 28:34Speaker 02

  But yes, we are our own prime with the government on, on our programs. Now that said, we are a supplier to a number of those companies. So MACH's model, I view defense is like very much non-zero sum. Like if we win, other players in the market win. Two levels. One level is like, we're all on the same team, right? Like our job is to deliver capability that secures warfighter safety and make sure we win as a country. And so I think there's like no room for this zero sum thinking of like, I'm making Pikes, so X player can't make something like Pike. Past that though, as a company, they're never going to allow there to be a monopoly, right? The government has been like very intentional to make sure that there are several players capable of delivering most things that exist. For those two reasons, we spend a lot of effort actually building components to help other people win.

• 29:20Speaker 02

  So we sell jet engines, we sell solid rocket motors, we sell testing services. And so like actually about half of our revenue as a company comes from selling components to these primes.

• 29:30Mike Rowe?

  Gotcha.

• 29:30Speaker 02

  And to startups.

• 29:32Mike Rowe?

  Okay.

• 29:34Mike Rowe?

  So who do you think of as a cohort? I mean, Lockheed's too big. Is it Anduril? Is it, what about Apex? People who are also manufacturing like those satellites at scale?

• 29:46Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 29:46Mike Rowe?

  I feel like everything you're saying is underpinned by an enthusiasm or a willingness, or at least an ability to just make a bunch of them. Like we need a lot of stuff, which opens up the whole stockpiling question.

• 30:00Speaker 02

  It does. It absolutely does. So, I mean, to answer your first question, for us, they're the primes and we're a very, very, very different business than the primes. And so the primes have architected their companies to be excellent at shipping large platforms on multi-decade schedules. That is not what we look to be excellent at, right? We look to be excellent at making the unmanned systems that are asymmetric in warfare and designing those in a matter of months and getting them into production in hundreds of thousands of units, also within a matter of months. Now, companies looking to do a similar thing, it's really us. Anduril's certainly a player there. Shield AI is a player there. And like the multi-domain, specifically in the air context, it's kind of those three. You have Castellian on the hypersonic side. You have Sironic on the naval boat side. You have Apex on the satellite side.

• 30:45Speaker 02

  As relates to what we do, it's kind of our three, which I think is really important. I think you want several players in the space. And then we each take a very different slice of the problem. So like MACH is much more manufacturing centric and we tend to start at a component and hardware level. Anduril is a lot more kind of battlefield OS centric around lattice. They actually acquire a lot of the companies that build their hardware, end up buying most of their components. So those are actually like complementary in the long term is kind of the goal. And then Shields sits somewhere in the middle of that stack. They're very specific about which aircraft they build. Really, they've built two aircraft to date, which is obviously different than the other two players. And they're really good on the single drone pilot side. So if that makes sense, like the actual drone that's being flown is a different software than the thing that flies thousands of drones.

• 31:28Mike Rowe?

  So you're talking about speciality in like the whole pie. Did the pie get divvied up? Like, did you guys have a retreat somewhere and thought, okay, look, we're going to focus on this. You do this. Or is it really just your own core competencies kind of rising to whatever the medium is?

• 31:46Speaker 02

  It's definitely more of the latter. And I think we will compete with each other. So like Anduril has a competitive product called Barracuda and we will compete. Now, I think that's a very good thing and I don't think it's zero sum competition.

• 31:59Speaker 02

  So one, like, it is actually important that you still have at least two players in each of these categories that are competing to make sure the US always has the ability to buy what is best and that you don't get a monopoly. And then, yeah, really, I think the businesses are built around the competencies of the early team that founded them. I'm like pretty obsessed with manufacturing and hardware engineering.

• 32:19Mike Rowe?

  So credit where it's due, you're giving props to the government for encouraging the kind of competition that has got us to where we are. But it feels like you're also saying.

• 32:34Mike Rowe?

  Like somebody moved our cheese, man, when we were sleeping. Like, the rules changed pretty quick. And when I think of the way appropriations work and the calcification that can happen when it comes to, I'm just making stuff up. But how do you make an F-35? How much does that cost? How much time does it take? How much congressional, you know, stuff is attached? How much money is flying around? How many people are getting elected? And how do you think the system as it's existed is disincentivizing the very mobility you're espousing?

• 33:16Mike Rowe?

  If I only had 60 seconds to tell you why I subscribe to Good Ranchers, which is pretty much the case, I guess I'd start with Integrity. They source the best tasting meat I've ever eaten exclusively from ranches in the United States. No exceptions. Their whole company is based on American meat delivered from American ranchers straight to your American door. And that alone, in my opinion, is reason enough to at least try them. Our grocery stores are filled today with imported meat deceptively labeled. And Good Ranchers is the best way to know exactly what you're getting. And then, of course, there's the value. For a limited time, you can get $50 off your first Good Ranchers order. That means you can build your own box, starting as low as $129. Just visit GoodRanchers.com/Row.

• 34:00Mike Rowe?

  Get $50 off anything on their site. That's GoodRanchers.com/Row for $50 off. You'll also get double the free meat with every order on top of the $50 off when you start a plan today, which I hope you'll consider doing, at GoodRanchers.com/Row. American meat, delivered.

• 34:32Speaker 02

  I think in certain ways, yes, in certain ways, no. So I think on the, like, we need multiple companies perspective, no. So like, the Secretary of Defense walked up in the 90s and basically said, we need consolidation. We have hundreds of companies, we need consolidation. But they only push it as far as like five or six companies. And I think that is the most consolidated we'll see. And so I, I think five or six is probably even maybe on the order of the right number of like, actual big integrators. But you definitely don't want to go below that. And I think that the Pentagon has understood that and continues to understand that. I think the biggest difference is cost plus contracting. Right? So there's this narrative a while ago, which actually makes sense at first glance. That is, we don't want defense contractors to become wildly rich

• 35:17Speaker 02

  selling stuff to the taxpayer. And that's like a great thesis. And I completely agree with, with sort of the contours of that thesis. The way they enforced that was by setting basically a cost plus contract, which is you're responsible for delivering this. You will get paid X percent of your cost on the program.

• 35:35Mike Rowe?

  X percent of, so the cost isn't fixed?

• 35:38Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 35:38Mike Rowe?

  The government's willing to say, okay, maybe it costs a million more than you said it was going to cost for this missile.

• 35:44Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 35:44Mike Rowe?

  And your profit margin is the plus?

• 35:47Speaker 02

  Yes, your profit margin is fixed. Regardless of if you spend 500 million, or a billion, or 1.5 billion. You're taking, let's say, a 20% cut.

• 35:54Mike Rowe?

  Okay.

• 35:55Speaker 02

  Well, the incentive structure, if you're a company in that. Now, ideally, a lot of us want to actuate our companies differently. But these are public companies over multi-decade timelines. These companies end up spending a lot more money than they need to. Because by spending more money, they make more money.

• 36:08Mike Rowe?

  Is this how we get the $20,000 toilet?

• 36:11Speaker 02

  It is exactly how we get the $20,000 toilet. And so you need firm fixed price. You need like, this costs X. And if I fail to deliver it at X, I eat that cost. If I think it costs $400,000 and it costs $450,000, I go out of business. But if it costs $200,000, I make that money. And I get to reinvest it into feeding that tech engine. Which is also how you get innovation. Right? It's very, very hard to innovate as a company when your margins are small. And so what you want is a bunch of companies competing on a mission set. The best company winning that mission set, based on price and capability. And then that company having more capital to pump into continuing to innovate on the next mission set. So that's the most important difference.

• 36:53Speaker 02

  I think the second one is the way these programs used to run is the Pentagon would write like thousands of pages of requirements. Right? They wouldn't really even tell you the mission. They'd say, you need to design a vehicle that looks like this. And in many cases, it'd be quite specific. That's good to some degree. You want specificity on the system you're giving to the warfighters. But it takes the engineers out of the loop. Right? And so you're paying this company to engineer you a product, but you're telling them exactly how to do it. And so what they've moved towards, which I love, is here's my mission set. I need something that goes 1,400 miles, carrying a thousand pound payload, that costs this much, that is this survivable. That then allows my engineers

• 37:31Mike Rowe?

  To figure it out.

• 37:32Speaker 02

  To figure it out. And you end up shipping something that is like wildly different. And in many cases, a bit strange compared to what you'd expect. We'll be right on some of those bets and we'll win those contracts. We'll be wrong on some of those bets and someone else will engineer a better solution and they'll win those contracts. And that's really how you get innovation. And that's how you don't end up in a, like, a position we're in today, which is where you've had a pretty sclerotic kind of defense industrial base that ships capabilities that look very, very similar on a multi-decade timeline.

• 38:00Mike Rowe?

  Right. That's inertia. And over time, I guess if it's taking you in the right direction, it's your friend. But again, it just feels like all the old rules are exactly that. What did it feel like watching the Ukraine thing spin out from your perspective? Seeing the tech? What surprised you over the last four, five years?

• 38:26Speaker 02

  That's a great question. I haven't been surprised by the technologies that ended up being important. But I've been very surprised by just how important they are and how excellent the Ukrainians are at implementing them. Very, very, very successfully. So I was in high school when the Ukrainian war started. I was a senior in high school. I've been working on a lot of things that became MOC. So like, I had this thesis that these unmanned systems were going to be incredibly important and some idea of what I thought they'd look like. But I thought, as is usually the case, that this would take decades to propagate. So that's why I was going to MIT. I was on Air Force Ratsy Scholarship. I really wanted to go fly for like a decade and then go do these things.

• 39:03Mike Rowe?

  As in, you would be a pilot?

• 39:04Speaker 02

  Yes. So I went on, on Air Force Ratsy Scholarship. I'm still very disappointed that I didn't get to fly. Like, I would have loved to have been born 10 years earlier and have gotten to go do that. But I'm sitting there and I'm watching the war in Ukraine play out. And it just made it so painfully obvious how powerful this asymmetry can be. Like, the Ukrainians, by every single account, should have lost that war. And they used excellent strategy and very, very quickly built an industrial base that shipped asymmetric systems to radically change the course of that war. And so like, the specific moment kind of where I, in many ways, decided to start the company, as in like, drop out and do it full time, was that convoy rolling into Kyiv.

• 39:46Speaker 02

  And just imagining how powerful some of the products that I really, really wanted to build would have been. Like, if you have excellent precision and can go hundreds of miles downrange for like $10,000, $20,000, I literally imagine a world where you could take out the engine block of every car in that convoy, not kill a Russian soldier, who in many cases are being forced to be there. So you actually do, to some degree, want to minimize collateral to the greatest degree. And so you don't really even have to kill anyone. You just like shut down their warfighting machine. And they have to leave. Like, they, they have to leave if that happens. And yeah, at that point-

• 40:19Mike Rowe?

  You got a tool for that in your bag of tricks?

• 40:21Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 40:22Mike Rowe?

  We have a picture of that thing?

• 40:23Speaker 02

  Yeah, what's that called? No, no.

• 40:25Mike Rowe?

  No, we don't have that.

• 40:27Speaker 02

  But, I mean, that's one of the missions, right? And this is what the Pentagon does now is like, here's a mission, go engineer a system around it.

• 40:34Mike Rowe?

  How many engineers working for you?

• 40:37Speaker 02

  It's probably close to 220 now.

• 40:40Mike Rowe?

  How many total employees?

• 40:41Speaker 02

  About 400.

• 40:43Mike Rowe?

  So you're in high school, you want to fly. Eh. You're looking at the Ukraine thing spin out. You got some sort of scholarship to MIT, I guess, at this point. You were a TEAL fellow?

• 40:53Speaker 02

  I was. That was actually after I'd started the company. So basically, path, I grew up, I really wanted to be a doctor, actually. So I'd really wanted to be a neuroscientist, neurosurgeon.

• 41:03Mike Rowe?

  You, you don't know what the hell to do with yourself, do you? I mean, really?

• 41:06Speaker 02

  I'd gotten, I'd gotten a research kind of opportunity, summer coming out of my sophomore year. And I was like, all in. Like, that was the path I was going to be on.

• 41:13Mike Rowe?

  This is high school?

• 41:13Speaker 02

  This is high school.

• 41:14Mike Rowe?

  Texas?

• 41:15Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 41:15Mike Rowe?

  What town?

• 41:16Speaker 02

  This would have been, so it was at, it was, would have been in San Antonio. I was growing up in, in Barney, about 30 minutes from San Antonio. But then COVID happened and everything shut down. So then I was super bored, dug a hole in the ground, got some coal, started forging knives. And then kind of turned that into like a knife-making business.

• 41:35Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. I love it. I just love it. All right. I mean, oh, gosh. I mean, this is so many unintended consequential moments. I mean, this is, so you're a product of the war in Ukraine, COVID. And I guess some, what is it?

• 41:53Speaker 02

  Boredom.

• 41:54Mike Rowe?

  Boredom? Yeah, you get bored and you got a, like, this manufacturing itch? You got to make something?

• 42:00Speaker 02

  Yeah, I, I don't think I've ever been bored. I just find things to do quite quickly. And yeah, when COVID happened, that was like the thing to do. So I started doing that. And that got me obsessed with like mechanical and aerospace engineering. I had a bunch of family members in defense, so this wasn't like a new thing. I was thinking about, but yeah, I started a company. I say company, it's like my buddies and I like making knives. It's not, not anything special. Doing like knives and furniture and stuff.

• 42:26Mike Rowe?

  Well, there's your name right there, man. Knives and furniture and stuff on a big old billboard, right? Put it down by the Stuckey's in between the Target, the Costco. Knives and furniture and stuff. All right, so you're making, what kind of furniture are you making?

• 42:41Speaker 02

  I was kind of bad at making furniture. I'd make like, I'd make tables, I made some bar stools, a lot of cutting boards. It was mostly knives. I really loved making knives. So I'd make like kitchen knives, I made throwing axes. Some one-off person would hire me to design them a sword and I'd make that on occasion. But I like kitchen knives a lot. And so, yeah. And then war in Ukraine starts and I, I'd use that money to basically fund like some engineering projects on like stuff that I-

• 43:07Mike Rowe?

  Your knife and furniture money?

• 43:09Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 43:09Mike Rowe?

  Okay.

• 43:10Speaker 02

  And stuff.

• 43:11Mike Rowe?

  And stuff.

• 43:11Speaker 02

  Don't forget the stuff.

• 43:12Mike Rowe?

  Never forget the stuff. Yeah, you know what? We're, I'm going to dig a little deeper into the stuff. It's a good point, Chuck. It's some troubling little parenthetical you've got in your, in your title there.

• 43:25Speaker 02

  No bad parts of the stuff. It was just stuff.

• 43:28Mike Rowe?

  Weapons. So, I mean, I guess technically a knife. Well, a knife is a tool. Anything can be a weapon, I suppose. But what was the first weapon you ever made?

• 43:40Speaker 02

  Yeah, it would have been, and I've talked a lot about this, but like I, I made this like, the hydrogen bet we should talk about is really stupid. I worked on hydrogen for a while, but I made this hydrogen powered, basically shoulder cannon thing. And then started making like balloons and drones and stuff after that. The hydrogen thing, basically, I had three interests at that time. It was hydrogen balloons and fixed wing aircraft. When I got to MIT, so I guess that spring, my senior year war in Ukraine starts and it's like, okay, I decided to not do the med school path, go full bore on this, was gonna join the air force, had a scholarship to go do that. And then the war in Ukraine really gets going. And I, I realized just how important these unmanned systems would be. From the context of how good they were for the Ukrainians, but also

• 44:23Speaker 02

  how bad they could be if the US doesn't adopt unmanned warfare very, very, very quickly.

• 44:29Mike Rowe?

  Can you just tell me about that moment real quick? Cause it, it seems like if you walk that back, was there a day, was there a newscast, was there a headline, was there a, like an inciting incident that made you just completely derail your whole trajectory?

• 44:43Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think one on like the tech side was, is that convoy I described and realizing just how fragile stuff like this was gonna be in the future. One, realizing how easy it would be to counter, which is the positive side. The bad side being if we don't figure out how to secure these things, how bad it could be for us, the country. And then from sort of an emotional and motivational standpoint, I mean, it was the fact that like the war in Ukraine is probably the closest we've come to a good and evil fight in a very, very long time. It was a picture, it was like Zelensky with his face painted, hanging out with his wife and kids and just thinking about everything he's going through. And then thinking about everything the Ukrainian people are going through, trying to secure their freedom is like a very shocking reminder that good and evil still exists in the world and that it

• 45:27Speaker 02

  is very, very, very important to make sure that we can provide sovereignty for the good in the coming decades.

• 45:32Mike Rowe?

  And you see it as a fairly black and white proposition?

• 45:35Speaker 02

  That conflict specifically?

• 45:37Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 45:38Speaker 02

  Look, I don't think any conflict is black and white. I spent a good bit of time in Ukraine. We have a full-time team working in Ukraine. There's certainly corruption in Ukraine. There's a lot of corruption. It's a former USSR country. There's, there's a massive amount of corruption. There's nuance to the geopolitical state that like made Putin somewhat backed into a corner. But that in no way excuses invading a sovereign country that has a well-functioning democracy that is good to its citizens. And so, yeah, I see it as black and white as much as there is black and white in the world.

• 46:10Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. You have a team in Ukraine?

• 46:13Speaker 02

  Yes, I have like a few people. We shouldn't go down the Ukraine path. Hopefully, we can sit down in like a year and discuss.

• 46:22Mike Rowe?

  It's fine, man. It's really a, uh, it's so fluid. It's all so fluid. Is that another part of your morning? Like maybe during a breakfast, you forget to eat, you get some memo saying this, this happened and that impacts stuff you can share? The problem with blaming our public school system for falling test scores and climbing illiteracy rates is that blame doesn't do anything to fix the problem. The data is crystal clear. Our public schools are failing this generation of kids. And concerned parents are looking for new ways to give their kids a leg up. Who can blame them? That's why K12's

• 47:02Mike Rowe?

  career and college prep program is growing in popularity month after month. This is tuition free, online, public education that actually prepares students for lucrative careers in construction, healthcare, cybersecurity, lots of other fields that are expanding exponentially every day. This is an ingenious way for students to get the industry certifications they need to hit the ground running. And it allows them to earn college credits along the way. Whether they want to head to a university or just jump straight into a high demand trade, doesn't really matter. K12's career and college prep gives them something a diploma can no

• 47:42Mike Rowe?

  longer guarantee. A head start. It's practical. It's smart. It works. It's long overdue. Give your student the opportunity to explore the right fit for them right now with K12's career and college prep. Go to K12.com/row to learn more. That's the letter K, the number 12.com/row.

• 48:05Speaker 02

  Not really. I talk to my people and I try to have people own like a very clear thing in the company. So sometimes it'll be, yeah, we have Pike Flight coming up, this news on, on Atlas. There's an article that came out today, actually, that I think was pretty hilarious. And it was, it was a good article. It basically said like Ethan Thornton is trying to do everything all at once. Um, not a point of pride for me, but I think if you're trying to get a lot done in the world, you do have to operate like that to some degree. And the article was very fair. There are like bad sides to doing that. There are good sides

• 48:48Speaker 02

  to doing that. But the key thing is for, for us, the company, we have no choice but to do that. If we want to get done what we need to get done. And if you're gonna do that well, you just have to really trust your people. You have to find the right people. You have to empower them deeply. You have to get feedback from them and give them feedback. I think there have been times at the company where we've done that quite poorly. Like you have to keep in mind, I went from like, auto tech funded the defense business by, or the Blue Carries, the knife furniture and stuff. But I went from like my only job ever being like an auto tech to like 85 million dollar investment to like go build a company. And there's like a period where I was very bad at building a company. I'm certainly not perfect and I have very long ways to go. I think we've gotten better though. Sort of the trust

• 49:29Speaker 02

  and empowerment portion. And today, what that looks like for me is I'm not critical path on, on anything. And that's by design. If I were to have to disappear for two weeks to do X, like the company would run well. And so in that world, your job basically becomes one, set like a very clear direction for the company. So have like a clear view of the world as exists today, and then try to propagate that into the world as will exist in a few years. And then try to do that to say, here are the technologies. We really, really need to make sure it go right. Um, so that's a portion of my job. Another portion of my job is kind of just to accelerate the work that's happening, is hiring excellent people. This is raising more capital. This is adding new products. And then the management portion, if you do your job right, becomes quite light. Once you've built trust with

• 50:14Speaker 02

  people. And it's like a year-long period of building trust with someone.

• 50:17Mike Rowe?

  Who bet on you? Like who's the, I don't know, the mentor, the, because the last valuation I saw MACH is creeping up on $2 billion.

• 50:29Speaker 02

  It is. It's a good, I, I think I said it. It's a good like emergent accident from, I think, doing the right thing.

• 50:36Mike Rowe?

  That's a better question. Have the headlines made your thesis more relevant than you thought they were gonna be? Or is it an enthusiasm, on the investor's side anyway, to just have a seat at a consequential table?

• 50:53Speaker 02

  Yeah, absolutely. Look, no one exists in a vacuum. Like if investors hadn't bet on us, we wouldn't be anywhere. And a number of excellent investors, I'm, I'm super grateful, did bet on us. Now, those people are good investors because they bet on the right things. And so I, I like to think we've executed well with that capital. If we had gone and burned the first $85 million, we wouldn't have gotten the next X and X and X. But yeah, I mean, I'm super grateful. Bedrock, Jeff Lewis bet, it was Sequoia bet super early and then Cosla bet very early. And then since then, we've been super fortunate to bring on more firms and sort of expand that circle. People bet too, right? Like anyone who joins a company and, and puts their career on the line to do that is making a massive bet. And look,

• 51:36Speaker 02

  I think anyone who works at a company like MACH is not doing it because it's a job. Like betting on a job is one thing, when someone can find a new job. But like you're asking someone to pick up, like this is my mission for the next two decades. Like when I'm sitting down to rest 20 years from today, hanging out with family and thinking back about my life, like this is, this is when I did the best work I've ever done. And so you're asking folks to make that bet. I'm super grateful that many, many excellent people have made that bet. On the headline piece, look, I think, I think it is my job to have a good understanding of where things will go. And so I haven't been massively surprised by how important drones have become. Unfortunately, about like the state of the world and how much conflict there is. Like that is why I started the company is because I do think

• 52:16Speaker 02

  we're going into this time of great power competition and with that more instability in the world. Now, I'm not a pessimist about that, right? I'm an optimist. I think America will get through this, but I think we need to work incredibly, incredibly hard to get through this.

• 52:32Mike Rowe?

  I read that article, by the way.

• 52:34Speaker 02

  Which one?

• 52:35Mike Rowe?

  The one you mentioned that came out today.

• 52:37Speaker 02

  Oh.

• 52:38Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. And I don't want to conflate it with one I read earlier. I'm not sure where you said it, but it was something along the lines of, obviously you want to win, you've assumed risk, you're playing in a, you know, in a huge financial market. But if you don't, you were very sanguine about it. You're like, look, I just want somebody to win on our side.

• 53:00Speaker 02

  Yep.

• 53:01Mike Rowe?

  Who sees it the way I see it. And honestly, I mean, that's such a, um, such a patriotic thing to say.

• 53:09Speaker 02

  Thank you.

• 53:10Mike Rowe?

  That, that I think, well, you answered the question and, you know, you, you take that as a compliment, uh, cause it must be true. So then talk about your patriotism. Why do you give a damn?

• 53:23Speaker 02

  That's a great question. I believe very, very, very deeply in as much sovereignty for every individual in society as possible. I think it is our, our job as a democracy, and I think capitalism is a tool of this, to give people as much freedom as they possibly can. And I think throughout human history, the American Constitution has done the best job of doing that. Now, it's, it's still imperfect. That's why it is changeable. That's why we should each work every day to make it better. It's certainly not completely secure. Like, we could wake up in 50 years and that not be the case. Again, why we should fight so hard for it. But I think America is pretty singular. I think the other folks that have done it very, very right did it largely because of

• 54:05Speaker 02

  the American model of getting it right the first time. I think like my favorite example of this is like post-World War II. America has the nuke, right? No one else has the nuke. I think if you give that nuke to the Roman Empire, if you give that to the Spartans, if you give that to, like, most other powers that have existed throughout human history, I think you get a very different result.

• 54:26Mike Rowe?

  What do you think would have happened?

• 54:28Speaker 02

  I think, I think you would have seen-

• 54:31Mike Rowe?

  Caligula with a nuke.

• 54:32Speaker 02

  I think it's dangerous, right? I think someone would have made a very good case to go and invade the USSR. I think someone made a very, very good case to, to make the entire world America. And I think you have to do that some degree as a great power. Like, you have to accept your responsibility as the great power on Earth, because otherwise you won't be the great power for long. I think, to boil it down, like, America is, we're very, very unique in that we obsess about our goodness, and I think most of our greatness does come from that fact. I think our allies fight alongside us. I think every citizen of America, to the degree they're patriotic, fights because we're good and not for anything else. And I think that is actually a very, very, very important thing to maintain in the coming decades.

• 55:17Speaker 02

  We absolutely can't forget that. So like, a, an example here. I think many people are starting to use, make a case for capitalism, because it's the most financially efficient engine. And I do believe that to be true, but that's actually not why we have capitalism. The reason we have capitalism is because it provides significantly more personal sovereignty to the individual than socialism, or communism, or other things. Now, I should balance that. I don't believe in like, anarcho-capitalism, right? I believe in a well-regulated capitalist market that creates positive-sum environments and makes sure bad monopolies don't exist. But I think, provided thoughtful regulation, good regulation is built behind that, I think capitalism is both of those things, but the argument for it to exist is the former.

• 56:00Speaker 02

  And so I think we need to just view American democracy through that lens to the greatest degree possible.

• 56:06Mike Rowe?

  How do you explain whatever moment socialism is having right now?

• 56:10Speaker 02

  I think it's very understandable, and I think we'll, we'll see a lot more of it. So, one, again, I do believe in thoughtful policy. So, one, I think as a country builds abundance, you do have a responsibility to create a safety net around that abundance to a certain degree. Like, things that we count as rights today weren't rights 200 years ago. The reason for that is if we had tried to install them as rights 200 years ago, everything would have broken. But today, it is, the basically, cost, which is you grow less quickly as an economy, is worth having a, a social net for people. So like, I will say that is a portion of my belief. On the political matrix, I sit certainly low, but not all the way low on the libertarian scale.

• 56:53Speaker 02

  That said, I think a push for socialism comes from a crisis of agency. When people feel like they can pull themselves up from the bootstraps, and I think the feel is important here, and the actual ability to do so is important here. I think both have to be true for an argument for capitalism to be made by the vast majority of America. And so I think first and foremost, we're having a crisis of agency in many ways. And I think portions of this are true, because it is harder to do so than I think it was 50 years ago. If you track like, the cost of a house compared to the average salary, it's wildly hard to do so. And so, one, I think we have to fix that. Now, I, I will not argue fixing that via the government. I think we need to fix that with excellent technology that makes it cheaper to build

• 57:35Speaker 02

  houses, that allows like, just net abundance to increase, but I think we need to fix that. And then I think there's the separate sense, which is like, how do people feel about their agency?

• 57:46Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 57:47Speaker 02

  And I think that's also where we're having a crisis right now. So, one, I think a lot more people need to be significantly more optimistic. Like, in a capitalist democracy, if people stop being optimistic, the entire thing breaks down. So the existence of optimism creates optimism, and when enough people feel like they don't have agency, they actually lose their agency. And so it's a paradoxical thing, and I would never tell someone who's working two jobs and is a single mother with three kids, like, "Hey, you just have to be optimistic." That's not the answer. We need to fix a lot.

• 58:16Mike Rowe?

  No, but it's also true, I think, that, what's the difference between not having agency and not believing you have agency?

• 58:24Speaker 02

  No difference.

• 58:26Mike Rowe?

  Correct.

• 58:27Speaker 02

  And I think there are structural reasons that people, make people believe they don't have agency.

• 58:30Mike Rowe?

  Would you rather be living in a country where the majority of citizens believe the results of an election, of a fair election, are fraudulent? Or, in a country where the majority of its citizens believe the results of a fraudulent effect election were fair?

• 58:50Speaker 02

  I'd argue neither.

• 58:51Mike Rowe?

  No, no. No, there, there is no door. It's only the curtain or the box.

• 58:59Speaker 02

  I would rather live in the country where the elections are fair, but people don't think they're fair, and then work to show the truth that the elections are fair. And this is where, if you actually think the elections are fair, it is extremely evil to spread discourse that the elections might not be fair. This is not like a partisan thing.

• 59:18Mike Rowe?

  Right.

• 59:19Speaker 02

  Like, both parties are completely involved in doing this, but if elections just become unfair, there's also like, there's no way to fix that system. Like, that is an immediately broken system. And so first and foremost, you need to make sure elections are fair. And then, you have to show the truth about that. And that could be politicians, that could be anyone.

• 59:37Mike Rowe?

  That's a good, I mean, it's not exactly what I asked, but it's a great-

• 59:40Speaker 02

  Sorry, I might have misunderstood the question.

• 59:42Mike Rowe?

  No, no, you didn't. You just are so self-possessed that you know the correct answer should be given irrespective of the query, which is exactly right. That's what should be happening. We should be taking steps to absolutely debunk any threat, any belief that something, that widespread mischief is afoot. We have to get rid of that.

• 1:00:07Speaker 02

  For sure, but widespread mischief can also become afoot. And so you also like, it is also bad for everyone to go around saying, "You know what? The elections are fair, the elections are fair, the elections are fair."

• 1:00:17Mike Rowe?

  Yeah, la, la, la, head in the sand, right.

• 1:00:18Speaker 02

  Yes, you need to dig in on which ways the elections might not be fair, and fix those. But, don't spread conspiracy theories, and if you're, anyway, don't spread ideas that it might not be fair if it is fair. And so I think both have to be true. This is just democracy. I think like, any power system is inherently unstable. Let's say you're Russia, right now, and you have a dictatorship. That is a very unstable system, because Putin is gonna die someday, and he will be replaced by someone, and there is a high, high, high level of variance when that happens. And he will die and be replaced someday. And so, a lot of people make the argument for like, benevolent monarchy. Well, it turns out that is a very unstable system. And so first of all, you want a somewhat stable system, but democracy is also deeply,

• 1:01:03Speaker 02

  deeply, deeply unstable. Like, the second the citizens in a democracy either don't believe in their own agency, like, they think they have no ability to influence politics, or stop caring, democracy fails, pretty immediately. The issue is, it's very hard for an individual to have agency in the system. If 399 million people think they don't have agency, and one person thinks they have agency, then the system breaks. And so, you actually want as many people as possible to believe that they have the most agency possible, and when enough people believe that, they get agency.

• 1:01:34Mike Rowe?

  I'm gonna make this relevant to what you do in your day job, really, because I think, you know, so much of what is awry at the moment, it's trust. And trust in the military-industrial complex has been a thing that people have been sweating ever since, who was it? Eisenhower warned us of it, right? And so when I think about the general collapse of trust in our key institutions, right? Whether it's journalism, politics, media, government, and so forth, like, I think I can put it all under the fraud umbrella. People right now are feeling like, "You know what, man? I pay an awful lot of taxes, and I live in California, and it's, it's a lot, but I'll

• 1:02:16Mike Rowe?

  do it, and I'll eat my peas, but please don't tell me stories about, you know, these billion-dollar boondoggles and all this incredible graft that's going on. That, that makes me wanna cheat on my taxes." You know? It makes me feel righteous for thinking that maybe, "Look, if this is the way, I have to fight." So if that kind of thinking, you know, infects our elections, if it infects the way we think about our defense, then what I'm getting at is it infects the thing that you started this conversation by saying was paramount to you, and that's sovereignty.

• 1:02:56Mike Rowe?

  So, I feel, like, when I listen to you talk, man, I feel very optimistic, and I'm glad you're on the case, 'cause we need, I wanna see more of these bells and whistles, Chuck. I wanna, I want people to understand exactly what he's building. But I also wanna try and make the point that you're fighting against something bigger.

• 1:03:18Mike Rowe?

  Here's a crazy idea. What if there was an academy out there that paid students to learn instead of the other way around? Specifically, men and women who want to work in the skilled trades. And what if this academy not only paid for your training, but also covered all the expenses associated with your training, like travel and food and lodging? And finally, what if this academy guaranteed you a job at the end of the training period? Well, that's exactly what's happening at America's Workforce Academy by Meta. This is a five-week, highly immersive pre-apprenticeship program that gets you all the necessary certifications you'll need to start a career in the skilled trades immediately. I'm talking about AI-proof,

• 1:04:01Mike Rowe?

  six-figure jobs, helping to build out the new infrastructure that our economy is depending on. Electricians, plumbers, HVAC techs, welders, fiber optic technicians, these jobs, they are all in demand like never before. And again, every graduate of America's Workforce Academy is guaranteed a job on a Meta website. I first announced this program a few months ago, and I have been watching the response ever since. It's extraordinary. This is a nationwide, unprecedented fast track to a long-term career in a skilled trade. If you or your spouse or your kid or your grandkid are looking for a straight path into a career

• 1:04:44Mike Rowe?

  with no cost at all, check out the opportunities for yourself at meta.com/america'sworkforceacademy. That's meta.com/america'sworkforceacademy. It's not just, oh, no, the Chinese are going for Taiwan. It's that, and I want to ask you about that. That's external. It's the rot that's happening right now that scares the bejesus out of me. And I don't know if you got a weapon in your bag of tricks to fix that. It'd be awesome if you did.

• 1:05:20Speaker 02

  Hopefully, it's, it needs to be a tool for starters and not a weapon. I think it really, really comes down to people like you, actually, having me on and then hopefully also pushing this to the greatest degree that like, we have agency, we live in a democracy, we live in a capitalist system. I completely agree with you. A1 problem, graft. A2 problem, competence. And there's a crisis of both in government. And so, we live in a democracy, we can vote, we can talk a lot and create discourse that gets other people to vote. But we need to vote principally, I think, in the near term against those two things. Now, there's probably things that come lower than that. Like, we need to figure out how

• 1:06:03Speaker 02

  we're going to deal with AI as a country. And there needs to be very thoughtful policy written around that. And that's half. And then we also live in a capitalist system. And you and I can work on and invest in and found companies that we think need to exist in that capitalist system. And so I think that the biggest thing is actually folks like you, folks like Sean, who I went on the other day, like talking about the level that we actually have power in this system. And it's, it's, the answer is somewhere in the middle, and I think it often is. There is a massive amount of graft, and there is a massive level of incompetence. We shouldn't shy away from that and be like, ah, we're, we're optimistic. It doesn't matter. This isn't here. We need to go and find it. And we need to be like, very, very, very objective about where it exists and vote it out. On the same side,

• 1:06:48Speaker 02

  things aren't doomsday. Like, we are still the most powerful country on earth. We have one of the better functioning democracies on earth. If you look at history, things are better in 2026 than they've basically been for like, the hundreds of thousands of years that humanity has existed. We're in a good spot.

• 1:07:03Mike Rowe?

  Is there any period in the history of the species that you would rather be alive than now?

• 1:07:09Speaker 02

  No, I'd rather be alive now. I think our democracy has been functioning in more healthy of a state before, but I think we're a few years of really hard work away from being functioning healthier than we ever have been. And the tech that exists today is significantly more exciting than it ever has been. So no, I'd rather be alive today.

• 1:07:27Mike Rowe?

  Chuck, what have you found here? You seem very excited with some action.

• 1:07:30Speaker 01

  That's his website. That's, that's Mark Industries' website. So I figured it was okay to put it up.

• 1:07:35Speaker 02

  Yeah, go for it.

• 1:07:36Mike Rowe?

  What are we looking at there, man?

• 1:07:37Speaker 02

  Uh, that's just one of our, that's not one of the six products. It's a product we kind of showed a video of. We can scroll down and I can go product by product if you want.

• 1:07:45Mike Rowe?

  Yeah, you know what? Let's just do that. And then we'll have checked that box, and then we can jump into AI and some other things. Man, I just can't wait to get your

• 1:07:54Speaker 01

  Tell me when to stop.

• 1:07:55Speaker 02

  Yeah. So this is Viper. Um, Viper is about a six and a half foot long. Please take off. Sorry. Maybe scroll down a little more. I haven't been on this website in a while. There we go. All right. So Viper gimbals the engine exhaust to take off vertically. So this is one of our first two products.

• 1:08:13Mike Rowe?

  Why is that important? Vertical takeoff?

• 1:08:15Speaker 02

  Because when everyone can strike everywhere with drones, a runway gets taken out in the first minutes of a conflict. And so what you really need is to be able to deploy this from anywhere very, very, very quickly. And the interesting thing here is you and I could deploy these things ourself. And by the time it launches, there's nothing to shoot back against. It literally launches out of the case it comes in. And so, we won an army contract to go build Viper. We've been flying it for close to a year and a half now. Goal is to bring it into production within the next 12 months, likely a lot sooner than that.

• 1:08:47Mike Rowe?

  What's its primary application?

• 1:08:49Speaker 02

  So, we iterate on vehicles a lot. So its application will expand over time. So first application is surface-to-surface strike. The same way one would think about artillery. Again, though, artillery, once you launch it, has something that can be back targeted. Right? So if I shoot a bullet out of my gun, or if I launch a missile out of my artillery system, someone can take that out with a drone quite quickly. Whereas with this, by the time I launch something, there's nothing to shoot back against. Now, this flies about 10 times further than an artillery shell with the same warhead. And then it actually costs the same amount as a guided artillery shell. So I'm pretty excited about this. Now, this use case will expand over time. And these aircraft will look quite different,

• 1:09:31Speaker 02

  but will follow the same general principle of vertical takeoff, eventually vertical landing, surface-to-surface, surface-to-air, and likely dropping things.

• 1:09:39Mike Rowe?

  And you're making these down the street here?

• 1:09:41Speaker 02

  We are. Yeah. And, yeah.

• 1:09:45Mike Rowe?

  It's so great, dude. Oh, Glide. What's Glide?

• 1:09:49Speaker 02

  Yeah, Glide, Glide we talk less about, but it's a very long-range munition. That's the best way to say it. So it's very low cost, and you can put fires hundreds to thousands of miles down range.

• 1:10:03Mike Rowe?

  Duh. All right. But we don't talk a lot about the Glide.

• 1:10:06Speaker 02

  We don't talk a lot about Glide.

• 1:10:07Mike Rowe?

  All right. What else you got, Chuck?

• 1:10:09Speaker 01

  That's Glide also?

• 1:10:10Speaker 02

  That's Glide.

• 1:10:10Speaker 01

  Okay. I'll keep going then.

• 1:10:13Speaker 02

  Stratus.

• 1:10:13Mike Rowe?

  Yeah, that's what I would have. Balloon. Yeah. So to go back, you were like, what were your things? You were like, balloons?

• 1:10:19Speaker 02

  Balloons, fixed-wing aircraft, and hydrogen. Now, hydrogen was stupid, but it got a lot of attention early on because it was different. So like, MIT was willing to help me do research on it. The military was like eager to do research on it. But like, very quickly, once we had the capital to ship products, didn't make sense to work on. And some of my assumptions about hydrogen were quite wrong. Hydrogen sucks, just generally.

• 1:10:38Mike Rowe?

  Well, I mean, I always thought it was, you know, a big part of the sun and whatnot, kind of key to the, you know.

• 1:10:45Speaker 02

  You're gonna have a lot of hydrogen in us. I like methane more than hydrogen. It's four hydrogens and a carbon. That's, that's a better way to store hydrogen.

• 1:10:54Mike Rowe?

  I mean, I don't want to hijack the flow, but like, when you realized, it's like, MIT is betting on you, you're betting on hydrogen, I'm sure money's changing hands, and promises are made, and hopes and dreams and stuff. And then you realize you're just, you're just going down the wrong road.

• 1:11:10Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 1:11:11Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. How do you, like, where do you put that disappointment?

• 1:11:14Speaker 02

  So, one, we'd always known that the performance of hydrogen would be a lot worse than like Viper, which runs on like JDE. That was actually never the goal. The really interesting thing about hydrogen is you can actually make it in the field. So if you imagine a world where all your ships are getting shot, where the grid is down, where all your oil storage drums are being blown up, it's actually quite useful to have a source of combustion that you can generate in the field. That, that principle is still true. So we were able to make hydrogen from water through electrolysis, and then we also had this aluminum fuel that was a lot more energy dense than gasoline.

• 1:11:47Mike Rowe?

  Aluminum fuel?

• 1:11:49Speaker 02

  Yeah, you like coat aluminum so that when you put it in water, it creates hydrogen. So we actually built an aluminum reactor that would make a bunch of hydrogen way back in the day. All that being said, we did it, and the performance was what we expected it to be. And it's difficult to manage. Like, it wants to explode, it wants to escape, it wants to break all your metals.

• 1:12:09Mike Rowe?

  You just can't trust a hydrogen molecule.

• 1:12:12Speaker 02

  You can't. You can't. Especially a lot of them.

• 1:12:17Mike Rowe?

  So you go, okay, no, I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna do this.

• 1:12:22Speaker 02

  Really, what it came down to was, I think the timeline that matters, and I've thought this for a while, is like 2027, 2028. One could make hydrogen make sense for those applications. You can solve the safety problems, you can solve the cost problems, you can make performance and range. But it's just, it's such a research bet that it doesn't make sense on a time.

• 1:12:38Mike Rowe?

  Let somebody else do it. You've got balloons to build.

• 1:12:41Speaker 02

  Yes, lots of balloons.

• 1:12:43Mike Rowe?

  So this thing is called a what?

• 1:12:44Speaker 02

  Stratus.

• 1:12:45Mike Rowe?

  That's the Stratus. All right. What's it do?

• 1:12:47Speaker 02

  Yeah, so Stratus, and we have two different versions of Stratus. This is the tactical version, which is the short range version. Basically, Stratus goes up to about 60,000 feet and gets in a certain wind layer to go a certain direction. So Stratus tactical is kind of one way. Stratus strategic, which we're still working on, is two-way and can actually loiter in place.

• 1:13:08Mike Rowe?

  I'm sorry, I'm not with you.

• 1:13:10Speaker 02

  So Stratus.

• 1:13:10Mike Rowe?

  Tactical.

• 1:13:11Speaker 02

  One way.

• 1:13:12Mike Rowe?

  One way.

• 1:13:13Speaker 02

  You can control the way. Winds cross hatch at altitude. So you may have a wind going this way and a wind going this way. And if you can change your altitude, you can actually draw a line in those winds. So Stratus tactical is designed to be as cheap as possible and make tens of millions of them to go in that way. Now, you can go that way for thousands of miles if you want to.

• 1:13:31Mike Rowe?

  So what's it carrying?

• 1:13:33Speaker 02

  So it really depends. You can carry a lot. And so this is one of those examples I've talked about where like you give a mission set and then you optimize the engineering and you get a platform that looks like wildly different than one would expect. It's probably the clearest example. So like balloons are kind of weird, but they're really, really cool in that they are at very high altitude and on radar, they're very hard to see. And they're very cheap. To shoot a balloon down, we've taken Stratus up to like 120,000 feet. To shoot this thing down, it's like a few thousand dollars to put up. Could be a lot cheaper as we hit rate manufacturing. To shoot it down is hundreds of thousands of dollars.

• 1:14:07Mike Rowe?

  What kind of missile would you use to take that out?

• 1:14:09Speaker 02

  So you'd use a big surface air missile, like S-300, S-400 Russian missile.

• 1:14:13Mike Rowe?

  Oh, those things, I mean, that costs millions, don't they?

• 1:14:16Speaker 02

  Yes, hundreds of thousands of dollars, being like generous, assuming they designed a better missile to take these things out.

• 1:14:21Mike Rowe?

  So this is, again, not to belabor the point, but if people are trying to follow along, the asymmetry that Ethan's talking about, I mean, that's a great example. That thing costs a few thousand dollars and it's carrying something into my space. I don't want it there. And in order to make it go away, I have to blow up $2 million missile.

• 1:14:42Speaker 02

  And folks who are very deep in defense will hear me say this and will think of a bunch of other ways to shoot this thing down. I promise we've thought about those and hardened against those. It's a very hard thing to shoot down. And then you carry basically sensors and communications. So.

• 1:14:54Mike Rowe?

  A freaking balloon, dude. Like, you know?

• 1:14:57Speaker 01

  This is old, old technology.

• 1:14:59Mike Rowe?

  I mean, it's a balloon. It's, it's like, okay.

• 1:15:02Speaker 02

  Weirdly enough, though, this has been the hardest thing we've ever engineered as a company.

• 1:15:06Mike Rowe?

  Why?

• 1:15:08Speaker 02

  The stratosphere likes to kill things. You want a really cheap, really reliable system. We had to design our own plastic for the strategic version of the balloon.

• 1:15:16Mike Rowe?

  What? Don't, can't you call DuPont or something?

• 1:15:22Speaker 02

  Tactical is an easier plastics problem. When you want something to be able to expand a lot and be at high altitude and be in the sun and do a bunch of other things. Anyway, harder than you'd think. Old technology. It was not possible to do this with balloons, though, until like probably 10 years ago. And so the really interesting thing, though, is if you can put enough of these up, it can sort of form the backbone of your force structure in many ways. Because you can sense everywhere and talk everywhere. Yeah.

• 1:15:48Mike Rowe?

  Would you think that, what was it, Richard Branson went around the world in a balloon or something?

• 1:15:51Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 1:15:52Mike Rowe?

  He did some balloon-y thing.

• 1:15:54Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 1:15:55Mike Rowe?

  Have you met him?

• 1:15:56Speaker 02

  I have not.

• 1:15:57Mike Rowe?

  You want to?

• 1:15:58Speaker 02

  Yeah, I'd love to.

• 1:15:58Mike Rowe?

  Richard, come on in here. Sorry, he's not here. What's, he couldn't make it. What's next, Chuck?

• 1:16:06Speaker 01

  All right.

• 1:16:06Mike Rowe?

  By the way, what we're looking at, if you're not watching this on YouTube and you should be, is Mock's website.

• 1:16:12Speaker 01

  You could follow along on Mock's website as you listen. You could.

• 1:16:15Mike Rowe?

  You, I guess you could.

• 1:16:16Speaker 01

  Screen experience.

• 1:16:17Speaker 02

  Yeah. I want to be clear, we hate releasing PowerPoints and renders. So like the products you'll see have flown a lot. And most of them will be hitting rate production and a few of them Battlefield use this year. So this is kind of the stuff we've already done or in the process of doing.

• 1:16:34Mike Rowe?

  Why do you hate doing that? I mean, that's kind of an industry thing, isn't it?

• 1:16:37Speaker 02

  It is. And there are times where you have to do it. So like Atlas, we released a render. We had to announce that, that contract and we wanted to announce that contract to go and build it. I think you, you need to build the right to do that. If you've never built anything and you're like, here's all this cool stuff I'm gonna go and do it. No one's gonna believe you and they shouldn't believe you. And so I think when you're a young company, you need to show, not, not tell, it's the catchphrase.

• 1:16:59Mike Rowe?

  Sure.

• 1:16:59Speaker 02

  It's a lot. This is Pike. Now, this Pike, as I mentioned, looks vastly different than the next Pike. This was basically the ground-based demonstrator. Now, one could go build other aircraft that look quite similar, that I think will be very interesting. But right now, the key focus is on the long-range missile portion.

• 1:17:16Mike Rowe?

  Interesting. Is that all of them?

• 1:17:18Speaker 02

  There's two more.

• 1:17:18Mike Rowe?

  All right, let's see.

• 1:17:19Speaker 02

  Yeah, and this is the like everything all at once article actually being super fair. But we have stuff to do. And so, and the programs are going well. We're on time, we're on budget. So this is Dart. Now Dart is my best answer, and I don't think it's a perfect answer, but my best answer to shooting down things like Glide and Viper. And so Dart will come out about six months after those products because I expect our adversaries to copy those products and hopefully look to counter the copies that emerge. So this is as cheap as you can possibly make a missile that can still intercept things that are as sophisticated as Viper and Glide.

• 1:17:55Mike Rowe?

  That's your factory in Huntington?

• 1:17:57Speaker 02

  Yes. So we have a few factories. We have vehicle factory in Huntington. And then we make our jet engines in San Luis Obispo, warheads and energetics. So our solid rocket motors and stuff is up in Victorville. And then we're opening a big factory that we'll announce in a few weeks.

• 1:18:12Mike Rowe?

  You know what I did in Victorville? I went to an ostrich ranch.

• 1:18:16Speaker 02

  Well.

• 1:18:16Mike Rowe?

  It was the.

• 1:18:17Speaker 02

  Different experiences.

• 1:18:18Mike Rowe?

  Well, I'll tell you, both are horrifying. You know, the ostrich is a heck of a mechanized, weaponized dinosaur.

• 1:18:26Speaker 02

  It's quite the bird.

• 1:18:27Mike Rowe?

  No, there's so many, their breastplate is like two and a half inches thick. Like a 38 slug bounces off it.

• 1:18:33Speaker 02

  That's crazy.

• 1:18:33Mike Rowe?

  They can go from zero to 38, 39 miles an hour in like five steps. I watched one tear the door off a pickup truck. Somebody left it open and it charged the door. It just ripped, you know, their cassowaries, their claws are like just talons. The guy that introduced me to his ostriches up there, his name was Doug. He had this big, like this rodeo belt buckle and it was cleaved, like not entirely, but three quarters of it going straight down was just like pulled apart. It's a metal belt buckle. He was kicked by one of his own ostriches. If it weren't for his belt buckle, he'd have been disemboweled. My job was to put a sock over their heads, like to run in, right?

• 1:19:17Mike Rowe?

  And then they lead them off to a farm where, you know, where you eat them and whatnot. I'm just saying, it's pretty much, you and I pretty much do the same thing.

• 1:19:25Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think so. I've done some similar stuff to that. No ostriches involved.

• 1:19:29Mike Rowe?

  Did you watch Dirty Jobs growing up?

• 1:19:30Speaker 02

  I did, I did. A little bit, not a ton. But it was, it's awesome to highlight, like, there are so many things like that that like keep our society together, that people just forget about, that like are just so important to do. And like if people weren't willing to do them, everything would fall apart. And so highlighting those people is just so, it's incredible.

• 1:19:48Mike Rowe?

  Well, thanks. And I want to kind of pivot and like drill down on some of these other things. I know you've got like, you've got like investor meeting or something. Are you and Tony Stark have drinks at six or something? I don't want to keep you, but since you invoked work ethic and, you know, I asked you before about patriotism and the country and you mentioned sovereignty and sovereignty and just identity in general. How does, like, I'm really interested in how you grew up before it was knives and furniture and stuff. And, you know, you said like auto shop, like who inspired in you the desire to tinker?

• 1:20:29Speaker 02

  Yeah. It's been a lot of people. I think one, one guy I should highlight, this probably had the biggest role is my grandpa. So he was, he is a farmer in West Texas, so in Hereford, near Amarillo. And he was, who's actually headed off, headed off to college and his, his father passed away and he took over the, the family farm. And for anyone who's not farmed in West Texas, the land just wants to kill you all the time. It's like probably not an area humans should be farming and a lot of people fail at it. And he, he stepped up at a young age and crushed it.

• 1:21:00Mike Rowe?

  What was he growing?

• 1:21:02Speaker 02

  All kinds of stuff. He and I are pretty similar in a lot of ways. So we experimented with soybeans. He grew like 20-foot tall corn so that he could get like the husks for tamales. He grew blue corn. He used to run a couple thousand head of cattle, sugar beets, all kinds. He like experiments all the time.

• 1:21:18Mike Rowe?

  What was his name?

• 1:21:19Speaker 02

  So he, his name's Ralph. He and I are still close friends. He's an awesome dude. He still farms. He's probably pushing 75 now. So one, just from a work ethic perspective, like it was amazing what he did for, for his family at a young age. Two, he's obsessed with aviation. So he, I've told this story before. He probably fabricated it a decent degree and then he told it to me when I was like eight and I'm sure I'm going to fabricate it more. But he, when he was like 21, took off on like a three week ride around the country on his Harley. And he's coming back into town and he sees this dude flying an ultralight, which is a very small aircraft, basically a kite with a motor strapped to it that you don't need a license to fly. I mean, he trades this dude, his bike for the ultralight and gets really, really into flying ultralights.

• 1:22:02Speaker 02

  My mom actually, growing up, so he was one of the first like organic farmers in Texas. He like kind of helped create that push. And he couldn't spray pesticide and he needed to kill all these bugs. So he found a supplier for lacewings down in like Mexico and he'd have all these lacewings shipped on these cards. He's like, got like 2,000 acres to drop these cards over. So actually wired.

• 1:22:22Mike Rowe?

  Explain what a lacewing is.

• 1:22:23Speaker 02

  It's a small bug. It looks like a big fly that like eats aphids and other bad bugs that destroy your crops. So he actually wired a car seat to the back of the ultralight and put my mom in it when she was like six. And they would fly around the farm, dropping these cards of lacewings all over the farm. And so.

• 1:22:41Mike Rowe?

  Your mom was a bombardier, basically.

• 1:22:43Speaker 02

  She was, she was. And then she actually in many ways started my family's obsession with aerospace. So she got based on a lot of that, really, really, really into wanting to fly. And the rest of the family, because of that, really, really wanted to fly. And so they started building kid aircraft. So like experimental aircraft that they'd build. So he has three, three sons, Ralph, Shelley, and then Nathan's the oldest. My mom, Tamara's middle, and then Christopher's the youngest. And when they were in high school, they built this, this plane and he had no college degree. It's like amazing what he's been able to do. One of the smartest people I know. They built this plane. They got really into aerospace engineering and then they built another plane and they just kind of kept doing that. That's kind of where my family's love for aviation came from. And then I, growing up, would spend a few weeks on the farm every summer.

• 1:23:29Speaker 02

  And we'd go check wells and I'd help him fix stuff in the morning. So we'd wake up at four, go do all that. And then by like noon, it'd be like 110 outside. So we'd mess around in the barn and, and work on stuff. So we'd either help him build planes, go play Call of Duty, go. I mean, we built a like a bomb. One time we went and got Tannerite and then put a bunch of gasoline on it. I don't know if you know like a thermobaric bomb, it's a type of bomb.

• 1:23:52Mike Rowe?

  Well, I know Tannerite, I did blow up some of that once on a place called Demolition Ranch, which is actually.

• 1:23:59Speaker 02

  In Bernie.

• 1:23:59Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 1:24:00Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 1:24:01Mike Rowe?

  Wait a minute. Demolition Ranch is in Bernie.

• 1:24:03Speaker 02

  It is.

• 1:24:04Mike Rowe?

  You're from Bernie.

• 1:24:04Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 1:24:05Mike Rowe?

  Taylor, were you in Bernie? Yeah. We shot that? Yeah, Demolition Ranch for somebody's got to do it.

• 1:24:09Speaker 01

  Yep. Demolition Ranch for somebody's got to do it.

• 1:24:12Mike Rowe?

  All right. See, my theory of unification, Mike's, the M to you, Mike's theory of unification. Is that if I talk to anybody long enough, we're going to stumble across some impossible triangulation. The fact that I've been to your hometown to blow things up and the fact that that's coming out because you just casually mentioned Tannerite. As people do when they talk, but please continue. I'm, I'm, I love this.

• 1:24:37Speaker 02

  I don't know if I should get into this, so cut this out if I shouldn't.

• 1:24:40Mike Rowe?

  I assure you, you should.

• 1:24:42Speaker 02

  Well, we'll see.

• 1:24:46Speaker 02

  If one, I probably shouldn't, but okay, you will cut it out. You'll cut it out if it's bad.

• 1:24:52Mike Rowe?

  Okay.

• 1:24:52Speaker 02

  Okay. Can you do that?

• 1:24:53Mike Rowe?

  Oh, yeah, yeah.

• 1:24:53Speaker 02

  Okay, perfect.

• 1:24:54Speaker 01

  I think you're describing what Mike did on this show.

• 1:24:58Mike Rowe?

  I literally think I did this.

• 1:24:59Speaker 01

  This is a demolition ranch. This is just sort of the, you know, a little clips of everything that happens on the show.

• 1:25:05Speaker 02

  That's incredible. It was great.

• 1:25:07Speaker 01

  Yeah. And you were shooting Tannerite.

• 1:25:10Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. Yeah, you can scrub forward and find that, but we definitely, it's, it's very.

• 1:25:16Speaker 02

  It's fun.

• 1:25:16Mike Rowe?

  It's volatile.

• 1:25:17Speaker 02

  And if you make a thermobaric bomb out of it, it's a lot more.

• 1:25:20Mike Rowe?

  See, there you go.

• 1:25:21Speaker 01

  That's a bridge too far.

• 1:25:23Mike Rowe?

  What makes a bomb thermobaric?

• 1:25:25Speaker 02

  What I was describing, and I probably shouldn't get into the details too much.

• 1:25:28Mike Rowe?

  Why not, man?

• 1:25:29Speaker 02

  Well, I don't want other people building bombs. Don't do this at home.

• 1:25:33Mike Rowe?

  Oh, please.

• 1:25:33Speaker 01

  Yeah. What, what do you mean, oh, please? Yeah, just, your instincts are right, Ethan. Don't talk about it.

• 1:25:38Mike Rowe?

  No, they're not. Look, here's the thing, Chuck. Look, see, that's.

• 1:25:41Speaker 02

  That's incredible.

• 1:25:42Mike Rowe?

  That is the, well, we were just trying to use demolition ranch to make a ridiculous movie trailer. And because what else, what else do you do when you, right? So I'm not saying people should do that either, but here's what's different. Like anybody, anywhere today who has any inkling, any, any, a modicum of curiosity.

• 1:26:03Speaker 01

  I mean, you go to, you can go to YouTube to figure out.

• 1:26:06Speaker 02

  Very true, very true. Yeah. So that's a great point. Yeah.

• 1:26:09Speaker 01

  I don't think it is a great point.

• 1:26:12Mike Rowe?

  It's a kind of asymmetry. It's informational asymmetry.

• 1:26:16Speaker 01

  Yes.

• 1:26:17Mike Rowe?

  And now for the first time in the history of the species, we're drinking from a fire hose. I have, look, it's all right here, man. 98% of everything that humans have figured out is accessible if you've got an iPhone or an internet connection. And so, you know, that's probably relevant in some ways to what you do. Like, how do you hide all this stuff under a bushel? How do you?

• 1:26:43Speaker 02

  It is.

• 1:26:43Mike Rowe?

  How can you keep a secret in 2026?

• 1:26:46Speaker 02

  I think it's really hard to, and some secrets absolutely need to be kept, but most things will just be found out. And that's where specifically in the context of defense, the most important thing is speed. The most important thing is speed. If I can develop a product faster than the adversary, even if they watch me develop it and they can't replicate that. And by the time they do replicate that, I have a countermeasure out, that's the best way to win. And this is the way a lot of companies like this, and one of the ways that like Skunk Works regressed is they kept everything on pen and paper behind all these gifts. It took two years to hire someone for the company.

• 1:27:16Mike Rowe?

  Right.

• 1:27:17Speaker 02

  So you kind of have to make a conscious choice between speed and extreme secrecy. Now you can execute speed with extreme secrecy on some things and we certainly do that. I definitely think speed is, is the right outcome. And then you're touching on something that's extremely, extremely important, which is this information fire hose. And there will be excellent portions to that, but if we're not careful, there will also be very bad downsides to that.

• 1:27:40Mike Rowe?

  Well, your point earlier was the minute you send any of these things into the fray, they're going to be captured. They're going to be duplicated. They're going to be autopsied and, and to your point, right? So then now it's back to manufacturing. Like if the innovation and the associated tech can be replicated that quickly. Isn't that bringing us back to a basic manufacturing challenge? Who has more?

• 1:28:08Speaker 02

  I think it's who has more faster. I don't think it's scale manufacturing. I think it's flexibility of that manufacturing. So the thing we see in Ukraine is that the assets that are winning that war change every three to six months. And so one, I do think it is possible to engineer at such a speed. The engineering is still very, very, very important.

• 1:28:27Mike Rowe?

  I'm looking at your list of tools.

• 1:28:31Mike Rowe?

  We saw the Viper, the Stratus?

• 1:28:34Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 1:28:34Mike Rowe?

  Glide, Dart, Pike and Atlas.

• 1:28:39Mike Rowe?

  One, two, three, four, five, six. Do you think of these in terms of a hierarchy? Is there something you, you think could be most consequential to the future?

• 1:28:48Speaker 02

  I think so, but I think things are different on different timelines. So like one of our things is I refuse to work on an aircraft that I don't see a world in which it could win a war. I think they're all very, very, very important. They're just like Viper and Glide are like the most important right now. I think on some timeline, Atlas will be incredibly important. And these things take time to engineer. And so if you want to have the right solution 12 months from now, you have to start today.

• 1:29:10Mike Rowe?

  Assuming we agree that it's the right solution, how many should you have stockpiled?

• 1:29:15Speaker 02

  A lot, a lot. But I don't think it's as much as people think. So, and this is like not something I would say if I were just trying to build a giant business, but like you need a lot. And if you look at Ukraine war, I think they're making 11 million a year. And so it's probably on that number, which is certainly a lot, but China will be able to make significantly more than that. You need the stockpile of the right thing. And I think this is the key point. If I can drive home like one thing. It is, China will make more. So the Shahad is this like Ukrainian or this Iranian triangle that China copied, that the US has copied, that Russia's copied, that Ukraine has copied. China will make, they, like if they wanted to, they could make 100 million Shahads a month. Like I, I truly believe this.

• 1:29:57Mike Rowe?

  C H I A D, so it is?

• 1:30:00Speaker 02

  S H A D. I don't know. I suck at spelling. I apologize, but Shahad with a.

• 1:30:06Mike Rowe?

  Shahad, okay.

• 1:30:07Speaker 02

  They'll be able to do the same with quadcopters. They'll be able to do the same with cruise missiles. If we make it a pure scaled manufacturing problem, China will win. The two things America continues to have the, the advantage on are innovation, specifically taste on what the next big product will be. And this applies to every industry, but I think is quite important in defense. And one Shahad can be taken down by something about 10 times cheaper if that thing is architected correctly. So if, if China's stockpiling Shahads, you better stockpile that thing, but you can spend 10 times less. And that's like critical for us to do so. And then the other piece is flexibility of manufacturing. I think folks often think about, there we go, there's an Iranian Shahad.

• 1:30:52Mike Rowe?

  What's it do?

• 1:30:54Speaker 02

  So it takes off and flies, flies a long ways and then nose dives and delivers a warhead. And the US makes these and it's important and the US makes these right now. And we actually helped make the US version of this. But this is like a transient thing. Like we can't be making this in three years. And so on, on engineering, you need, you need to build products that provide asymmetry. And then on manufacturing, you have to be able to keep pace with that innovation. So like someone could have the full design for Viper today. And I truly believe I could send them the CAD file and it would be 18 months before they could produce it at scale. If they really compressed that, it'd be like six to nine months. What you need to do is build a manufacturing machine that can switch from product to product in a few weeks.

• 1:31:36Mike Rowe?

  You mentioned the second world war earlier and I forget the context in which exactly you brought it up. It made me think about our country's relationship with making things broadly. And it seemed to be, I wasn't alive then and obviously you weren't either, but it seemed to be about the healthiest it had ever been.

• 1:31:57Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 1:31:59Mike Rowe?

  What's happened?

• 1:32:03Speaker 02

  So I can tell you what happened. I can't tell you if what happened was good or bad. So what happened is post-World War II, we pushed into things that are generally considered higher paying and like as an economy, not as individuals, and then created massive globalization and outsourced most of that manufacturing to other countries. Now, it's probably above my pay grade today if that was the right call. Like, we got the dollars, the reserve currency, that probably could have happened anyway, but that was, that was key. And then we didn't do a lot of things in the US that require someone to sit at a desk for like 15 hours a day and do these things. And GDP actually increased because of it. We favored increase in GDP.

• 1:32:42Speaker 02

  Well, because of that, our like internal manufacturing base rotted like crazy, very, very quickly. And so that's the position we're in today. Now, there are advantages of that and there are disadvantages of that. And I don't really know. I do believe in free global trade and I don't agree with massive protectionism. I think the balance is somewhere in the middle. You need to be able to make things as a country, but you also shouldn't be terrified to outsource things to countries that are allies to you.

• 1:33:09Mike Rowe?

  But does it bother you, for instance, and this is way outside of your, your day job, but you know, in 1980, I think like 82 or 83% of all the clothing that all the Americans wore was made here.

• 1:33:23Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 1:33:24Mike Rowe?

  And today it's like less than 2%. So, hey, how about furniture and stuff, you know? There was a time we were, we were like the furniture capital of the world. I mean, you can go through these old factories like Stickley and down in North Carolina and so, so many other places up in New England. Not all of it, but so much of it is gone. I, I just wonder if that's representative, you know, not specifically, but just as a larger sort of ethos.

• 1:33:52Speaker 02

  So I think a lot of things are, I'm quite confident on. So one is we could have handled that transition better for the people that made those things when we made that choice as a country. I think a lot of people got screwed in that process. And I think that is a huge, huge, huge failure of our policymakers and our CEOs. Like I, again, I'm libertarian. I don't believe in a massive government, but like that could have been done better. I think the next is you can't do that on defense. The fact that when you look at the F-35, a lot of those parts actually come out of China is completely, completely broken. And so, one, we could have done it better. Two, should have come out of, shouldn't have happened to defense. Like, we should have been very, very careful about making sure this doesn't happen in defense.

• 1:34:32Speaker 02

  Now, I want to see a world, and I'm optimistic about seeing a world in two decades where America moves more atoms than any other country on earth. But you also can't be religious about it. You can't say like, we absolutely have to make 100% of clothes here. We absolutely have to make 100% of furniture here. I do believe that capitalism is a powerful machine and that like there are countries that will be better at making these things and that we will want to make these things. I think it's really, really, really important that we own manufacturing on new technologies.

• 1:35:01Mike Rowe?

  What about independence, like for the, I mean, from, from energy? I mean, we met at Alex Epstein's energy conference. You've known Alex a while?

• 1:35:12Speaker 02

  Yeah, he's a great guy.

• 1:35:14Mike Rowe?

  I think he's a really important voice, too. I think he's, he's occupied an essential piece of real estate where he can articulate some of these larger ideas, but it's not just energy. It could be timber. We have more timber than anybody. We import more timber than anybody, you know? And now it's going to be critical minerals. It's going to be polymetallic nodules, you know? Taylor here just got back from the Cook Islands. We're up to our neck in this endeavor to get these things off the ocean floor.

• 1:35:42Speaker 02

  Yep.

• 1:35:43Mike Rowe?

  Copper, cobalt, manganese, you know, all of this stuff. So it like, how do you think about that stuff?

• 1:35:50Speaker 02

  It's a great question, and I think everyone will be pissed off about my answer, and that's probably mine.

• 1:35:54Mike Rowe?

  Good, good.

• 1:35:55Speaker 02

  Look, I think it sits somewhere in the middle, depending on which manufacturing process you're talking about. One, I don't want to be like nationalistic mercantile about it. Like, I think the government is generally a horrible allocator of capital. So I don't want, and this is one of the things Alex pushes for, is like, the government should not say, this is super, super important. Let's invest deeply in this. Outside of the context of defense, the government needs to do that in defense. But for most things, I do believe in capitalism. I do believe that like all boats rise together in free trade. Now, if you're going to execute free trade whatsoever, you need a strong military, right? You absolutely need a strong military to make sure that the powers you're trusting to produce your things don't become misaligned.

• 1:36:33Speaker 02

  And there is also, in that context of hard power, economic sanctions, tariffs, other things you need to apply to maintain your own sovereignty. You can't just let everything go.

• 1:36:47Mike Rowe?

  One of the things I like best about the way MicroWorks has evolved is the way it lets my foundation partner with other like-minded entities, companies, foundations, whatever. Everybody is now up to speed with the fact that the skills gap has got to get closed, but nobody's doing more about it, in my estimation, than the Pentagon. BuildFreedom.us is a partnership I'm really excited about. It's been in the works for 15 years when I originally pitched it, back in 2011, I guess, to Congress. Well, the government's on board. 400,000 AI-proof six-figure jobs are waiting in the industrial base to be filled.

• 1:37:32Mike Rowe?

  And you can find all of them at BuildFreedom.us. You know what you'll also find? $10 million that has been sent to MicroWorks, which we've earmarked to get you the training that you need. Or your son, or your daughter, or your niece, or your nephew, or your grandson, or your granddaughter. The money is waiting and the need is extraordinary. And the opportunities are incredible. These are AI-proof, six-figure jobs, building stuff that really matters in our defense industrial base. The jobs are real. The money is there. It's waiting at BuildFreedom.us. That's BuildFreedom.us, a website that truly lives up to its name.

• 1:38:17Mike Rowe?

  $10 million just waiting. BuildFreedom.us.

• 1:38:24Speaker 02

  We can have this discussion like topic by topic. Look, I think on the timber side is where people will probably disagree with me. I think it's fine to import timber. If it's cheaper to import timber than it is to cut down trees here, I think that's probably fine. And I think the people that currently do that, we should make sure have a very, very important role doing something else. Now, this isn't like a general statement, like I made like a lot of black walnut furniture and like I think we should probably cut down black walnut, but we're talking about like framing houses. I think that is probably if, if Canada's better at that, trust Canada to do that in a free trade sense. Now, don't incentivize Canada to do that, but just like leave it up to capitalism. Because the government is a horrible allocator of capital, and I will say that till I'm blue in the face.

• 1:39:05Speaker 02

  If you try to solve all of these government, these problems with specific tariff approaches or investment approaches, I think you push more towards nationalism in a way that I, I don't think is good.

• 1:39:14Mike Rowe?

  So not a top-down solution guy in general with the obvious caveat of defense?

• 1:39:21Speaker 02

  Yes, which I think many folks will take is, I'm saying that because I'm a defense company, and that's fair to say. I think I also founded a defense company because I believe in the importance of defense. But like, defense is just inherently different. Like, it is the monopoly on lethality that it is the government's like requirement to own. And I think defense is a much wider window, right? Defense isn't just like make me a viper. Defense is also critical minerals. Defense is also certainly energy plays into this. Like, we need sovereignty on energy. We can't get pulled into wars over energy. And so, look, I think it's somewhere in the middle. I think general, yeah, general principles for things where the government is the customer that are absolutely required to have ownership on for sovereignty,

• 1:40:05Speaker 02

  which is mostly defense, but a few other things. I think I do believe in like somewhat of a top-down government approach. Now, I don't believe in nationalization. I just believe in like thoughtful policy. I think it is very important, and I don't think the government should do this, and I don't think the government has to do this, but I think it's really, really important that we manufacture the next wave of technologies. I think technology will be an order of magnitude, 10 times more important in the next decade than it's been in the last few decades. And even if you look at the manufacturing problem, if America gets really, really, really good at building high-production automated factories, a lot of this gets easier, right? Suddenly, things make sense to make in the US again. Now, that is how I think we need to move more atoms as a country is by innovating our way into efficiency,

• 1:40:50Speaker 02

  which then correlates to the people who work in those factories, because you will still need people in those factories making more money. But if you try to force that top-down from a government perspective without that innovation, and the government is horrible at driving innovation, it's not a knock on our government specifically, it's just the nature of big institutions. I don't think you'll end up with that, and I think you'll end up falling behind other countries that have thoughtful policy.

• 1:41:10Mike Rowe?

  What do you think's going to happen that no one is thinking about? I mean, is Elon going to put data centers in space in orbit? Are we gonna?

• 1:41:19Speaker 02

  Yeah, it's a good question. Look, I think, yeah, let's just go, let's go down the list. I think, one, specific data centers in space point. I think AI will accelerate in the amount of compute we need, and I think that acceleration will be exponential. Now, I don't personally know if that will be in space or terrestrial. A lot of people like poke at Elon and he's like, he hasn't thought about the thermal rejection problem from satellites. I guarantee you, there are some pretty excellent SpaceX engineers, many of whom I know and am friends with, working on that specific problem, and that's solved. I think the fundamental question that unlocks data centers in space is how cheap is Starship? Like, if Starship is too expensive, it makes no sense. If Starship launches all the time and it's insanely cheap, makes sense. Like, I think a general rule is like, don't bet against Elon on big infrastructure.

• 1:42:04Mike Rowe?

  I was going to say, are you like, are you bullish on SpaceX?

• 1:42:08Speaker 02

  I am, but mostly just because I'm bullish on America. I think it's an excellent company. I have a lot of friends that work there. If I were a betting man, I would probably put 50/50 on, and it sounds like this is a cop-out. I promise I'm like willing to share controversial takes I have, but this is one where like, I think the history is not written yet, and I think it's largely dependent on how, how these people actuate. I think both futures are possible. On some timeline, you will see data centers in space. Like, if we zoom forward 50 years, you'll see like a Dyson sphere of hundreds of millions of satellites, like extracting energy directly from the sun to run giga clusters. And so, I don't know if it's too early, but it's going to happen. And then you're also going to see a ton of terrestrial compute. That's where I fall on that specific problem.

• 1:42:51Mike Rowe?

  I'm going to suggest tangentially that you are a betting man.

• 1:42:56Speaker 02

  Oh, I certainly am. I just bet on things that I can control and know about.

• 1:43:00Mike Rowe?

  Okay, all right. Just to work clear on that. Let me tell you kind of what has happened for me, because I've just selfishly, I'd like to get your take on the idea. I think Larry Fink believes at BlackRock and certainly others that we're looking at a $10 trillion infrastructure build out in the next eight to 10 years. 10 trillion. A lot of that's being fueled by AI, and that's going to require data centers. Now, the public opinion.

• 1:43:31Mike Rowe?

  Around AI and data centers is about seventy-five percent negative in this country right now. In China, it's about eighty-five percent positive. And I just had lunch with a senator who walked me through what sounds like a very coordinated attempt to manipulate public opinion in this country that's happening on social media, that's being driven in many parts, in the case of by AI itself, and it's working, says him. What say you?

• 1:44:02Speaker 02

  Okay, one, I don't trust any numbers coming out of China. I think it could be fifty percent, could be eighty-five percent regardless. There's a ton of propaganda fueling it. I don't want to become that. It's probably the biggest takeaway. I think, yeah, I think it's generally very, very true that people are pessimistic about AI. And I think they should be. Like, we should live in a society where people get a vote. And this is where there's nuance to it. If we, as a country, say AI is bad, we're not doing AI, then China will exponentially increase their economy. So will every other country on earth. And one, we'll lose global power. But two, we just won't see surplus that I do think is possible through AI. And that's a broader point. Like, technology is not good or evil.

• 1:44:46Speaker 02

  Every technology that's ever existed should be terrifying the second it's brought about. We should have been terrified about, like, the railroad and steel. They built the biggest monopolies ever. If not for Teddy Roosevelt, might have torn our country apart. And so I don't think any technology is different in this way. It should be terrifying, but ultimately can be good or evil. And I think we need to work together to make sure we make it good. And I think right now, the path we're on is quite dystopian in many ways. And so I think it is important that we push back on that in the right ways. Now, I think it is important that that pushback goes towards fixing it to be right, and not just denying that the future is going to happen. We'll wake up in two decades, and AI will be incredibly, incredibly, incredibly important for the way the world lives their lives. And so we

• 1:45:30Speaker 02

  can't say, like, America's not doing AI. That's the wrong approach for a number of reasons. But we absolutely should say, like, here's the good future. Let's make sure it happens.

• 1:45:39Mike Rowe?

  Isn't it, doesn't it rhyme with so much Second Amendment thinking? I mean, isn't, you corrected me earlier. I said these weapons. You said tools. Well, I mean, we got three hundred thirty million guns from sea to shining sea. That's just the way it is. You're not going to put the poop back in that goose. No way, no how. So what do we do? How do we educate? Does that translate to this AI genie?

• 1:46:05Speaker 02

  Wow, very, very good. This is fantastic.

• 1:46:08Mike Rowe?

  I love feedback, man. If you're keeping, how many good questions have I asked, Chuck?

• 1:46:12Speaker 01

  It's plenty. At least, at least.

• 1:46:15Mike Rowe?

  He's freaked out because now we're at maybe an hour forty-five minutes or something like that.

• 1:46:20Speaker 01

  One forty, yeah, let's say one forty-five.

• 1:46:21Mike Rowe?

  I love it, dude. I just love it. Just keep going. I'm so interested.

• 1:46:26Speaker 02

  So I will say, I have ideas about the future, but they are no more than ideas. And they'll be controversial. And I think anytime you talk about the adoption of a new technology, it will be controversial in some way. So hopefully, a lot of people watch this. And I'm sure a lot of them will dislike what I'm saying. I actually want you all to leave comments, whoever you all are.

• 1:46:47Mike Rowe?

  They will.

• 1:46:48Speaker 02

  I know they will. I'm asking them to. I will read them. I am trying to form my opinion here. I'm not forming my opinion based on anything other than, like, what is the objective truth about what is best for, like, life, liberty, and the pursuit of purpose or happiness, whatever word you use there, in society. And so these are my ideas. They will probably change.

• 1:47:07Mike Rowe?

  Interesting juxtaposition, by the way. Purpose and happiness. I wonder if you can have one without the other, but go ahead.

• 1:47:14Speaker 02

  Happy to touch on that portion, too. But look, I think, one, we need a future that is exciting for people in the right way. And so I think, look, there's a future where AI pretty immediately cures cancer. There's a future where AI hundred x's the global economy, and everyone has surplus, and everyone can, like, put their kids through college, and, like, no one has to work two jobs to live. Those are two pretty long-term ones. I think there's a world where pretty quickly AI can disseminate information incredibly well, such that I don't have an advantage over someone looking on their laptop to consume information, given that you and I are talking to congressmen and senators. Like, I think it could create a lot more clarity in society. I mean, minor stuff, I hate doing the dishes. I hate doing laundry. I think AI could fix that pretty quickly. And so I think there

• 1:47:59Speaker 02

  is a good future to be had. Now, what I'm scared of, and first of all, I should outline the framework. I think you basically have the population. I think you basically have companies, and then I think you have the government. And I think it's important to war game the future that might happen based on the incentives of each of these. And they have different power in different ways. So like, it is really only companies that get to choose if they ship a product that is, like, good for people or bad for people. And I think it is the responsibility for any CEO to ship a product that makes the world a better place. Now, on the population side, I worry that a trap of thinking in AI is going to be massive socialism. Like, it is very, very, very likely that we push for

• 1:48:40Speaker 02

  socialism, UBI, these different things to exist in the post-AI world. It's probably part of a longer conversation. I do think we will see the safety net that I described increase radically. Like, I think no one will have to worry about, are you comfortable in life? Can you have a house? Can you afford treatment for your children?

• 1:48:57Mike Rowe?

  Food, clothing, shelter, basic medical care.

• 1:48:59Speaker 02

  Exactly. I think in an AI world, those, in any case, I think likely will and absolutely should increase. But you can't consolidate power to get that, right? Like, socialism is a trap towards communism. If you push it too far, it is a trap towards authoritarianism. And I think if we get so scared about the future of AI, that we centralize its power, and this could be nationalization of the AI project. I think this is another important distinction. I, early in life, and I think a lot of people equate AI to the nuke. We had the Manhattan Project for the nuke. Why not have that Manhattan Project for AI? I think there are certain portions of, like, the defense aspect that that should happen on. The difference is, the nuke doesn't, like, tell you your information, and the nuke isn't like the financial, like, engine of a country. A world in which the government

• 1:49:44Speaker 02

  nationalizes AI is a world in which, like, the First Amendment doesn't exist, and capitalism doesn't exist. And it's a very, very scary trap. Now, do I believe in government regulation of AI? Absolutely. Should AI be able to tell anyone how to, like, design a chemical weapon or hack X? Absolutely not. And so, again, thoughtful policy needs to be written somewhere between those two. But we just need to make sure that we do not become so pessimistic about the future that we push for socialism. Because the things we're trying to see, which is more sovereignty financially, will see completely erode as relates to basically everything else in life. And so this is why I like capitalism. The second argument I outlined for capitalism is it keeps power in a sovereign place with the people who

• 1:50:28Speaker 02

  build and work for, and generally with the public, well-regulated, positive-sum capitalism. And I'm not monarch, like, I'm not anarcho-capitalist. So, one, I think it is the job of CEOs to ship good products. Like, ship a product that is good for humanity. I don't believe in massive job loss on, like, a twelve-month timeframe. I think usually when we see these technologies, it causes massive job creation. And so I think we'll see overall massive job creation. I think we'll see some job loss in specific industries. I think we will reach a point, though, where massive job loss happens to absolutely everyone. And I think there's this cognitive trap that you can fall into as a CEO or exec of this company. It's like, everyone will lose their jobs except for me because I'm the CEO of

• 1:51:12Speaker 02

  this company. That's just not true. Like, you'll reach a spot where these things, and this sounds absolutely insane, and I warned you, people are going to disagree with me on this, but in the next thousand years, there will be machine intelligence that is smart enough to do everyone's job better. And so everyone faces potential job loss.

• 1:51:26Mike Rowe?

  Thousand years or five?

• 1:51:29Speaker 02

  I think it's a lot sooner than that. But I think we can all agree on a thousand years. I'm trying to be like, I think we need to just be like, post-partisan and just like, talk about issues in such a way that, like, regardless of your background, it makes sense from first principles.

• 1:51:40Mike Rowe?

  Well, your point earlier about speed, I think, is really well taken here. It's very cushy and philosophical to kind of sit back and stroke your chin and look a thousand years down the line, or a hundred even, or really, any period outside of your time and probably your kids' time on the planet. And, you know, go, oh, yeah, this probably this, but the speed with which this is happening has not given the average Joe enough time.

• 1:52:09Mike Rowe?

  He's drinking from a fire hose.

• 1:52:10Speaker 02

  He is, he is. And I was being super worried there and I can like distill down for each of those three groups, what I think needs to happen.

• 1:52:17Mike Rowe?

  Okay.

• 1:52:17Speaker 02

  So I think, I think for the population, it's like, vote for thoughtful AI regulation that creates the world you want to see and push back hard on bad AI, of which I think there's like a lot and it's probably going to get worse. And that is our job. I think we can't fall into like, a socialist headspace there. I do think it is fair to fight for some level of that safety net increasing, but don't favor nationalization because we'll lose all of our sovereignty. I think as a company, ship excellent products. As an investor, invest in companies that ship excellent products. And if the first, if the first group is going to act correctly, the companies that win will be the ones that ship good products for humanity.

• 1:52:55Mike Rowe?

  Sure.

• 1:52:55Speaker 02

  So this is not like breaking the capitalist framework, like build good products for humanity and count that people will like, buy them and not regulate them out, which I think they have the right to regulate out bad products. And then on the political side, is why like Teddy Roosevelt, I think politic, politics has to change massively around new technology. And right, he stepped up, early 1900s and the world had shifted a lot, right? You had this idea of a multi-state corporation that could form a monopoly. You had for the first time, like massive environmental and health degradation through this stuff. And like, he was balanced somewhere in the middle of going and installing very, very thoughtful policy that changed government within the constitution, didn't break the constitution,

• 1:53:38Speaker 02

  reinforced the constitution by changing government to work with the times of today. I think we could have done a much better job at this, in the era of social media, all three groups. I think a lot of the problems we see today are because we're each fed completely different algorithms and it's just a main line of dopamine into our arms that also can destroy the rest of our lives. So if I could rewind 20 years, I think we should have done things quite differently. But we have the opportunity to do this right, on the AI side. And so on the political side, like step up, be a good human being who writes thoughtful regulation that is best for this group.

• 1:54:11Mike Rowe?

  The people.

• 1:54:12Speaker 02

  The people. And that's where the graft comes in. And you also need competence because these things are quite opaque. These, these answers are rarely obvious.

• 1:54:20Mike Rowe?

  And if that group doesn't trust that group, and that group in the middle, the manufacturers, well, they'll let the market sort that out and they'll sell whatever product is good for the next quarter. And so it's just back to fraud. We have to somehow, somehow there has to be a tool.

• 1:54:36Speaker 02

  Yeah. And so I think.

• 1:54:37Mike Rowe?

  To clean this up.

• 1:54:38Speaker 02

  Vote for people you trust. And I think we've forgotten the idea of voting for someone who's just good. Right? Like, we vote when a policy like aligns with a policy that's best for us. I think we've forgotten the idea of like a positive sum policy that's best for the country. And then we've certainly forgotten the idea that like politicians should be good people you can trust, because there will always be back rooms and you have to trust your leader to behave the right way.

• 1:55:00Mike Rowe?

  And maybe, and maybe they shouldn't, you know, stay in office 60 years?

• 1:55:06Speaker 02

  I think that's different. I think it'd be hard for me to disqualify anyone based on age, but as a general rule, I probably agree. Without, sorry, with being way too nebulous, that's my answer.

• 1:55:16Mike Rowe?

  Five questions, speaking of AI, so I just, I've started to do this just to see what comes out, but we ask the AI, you know, the AI. Is there anything to call it the AI?

• 1:55:27Speaker 02

  Sure. Or just AI.

• 1:55:29Mike Rowe?

  Five questions Ethan Thornton has never been asked. Uh oh. If you were born in 1925 instead of 2005, what do you think you'd be building right now?

• 1:55:40Speaker 02

  I definitely would have started building, okay, well, 1920, I would have been 18 in 1938. So I think I would have stayed with like the Air Force style trajectory I was on. If I were doing what I'm doing today, I think I would definitely be building aircraft.

• 1:55:57Mike Rowe?

  What skill did you learn on the farm that investors in Silicon Valley simply don't understand?

• 1:56:04Speaker 02

  Great question. Great question.

• 1:56:06Speaker 01

  That AI kicks ass.

• 1:56:07Mike Rowe?

  It does. It's pretty good. But to be fair, you did say, if Mike Rowe were asking, what would he say? So they, you know, what I'm looking for is a little credit.

• 1:56:17Speaker 01

  Yeah, yeah.

• 1:56:18Mike Rowe?

  Not all of it.

• 1:56:19Speaker 01

  It's all you, bud.

• 1:56:21Speaker 02

  I think things break. I think when you're on the front end of the tech cycle, you have this like very optimistic view of technology. You're like an investor in this lab and everything's pristine. And then you're dealing with like 50 year old farm equipment and it's deeply broken.

• 1:56:36Mike Rowe?

  Was that the big Ralph lesson for you?

• 1:56:39Speaker 02

  The one that investors I think would understand least, certainly.

• 1:56:42Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 1:56:42Speaker 02

  I think there are many, many Ralph lessons, but that one I think is big. And then like, it becomes much easier to advocate for something like planned obsolescence when you're on the investor side. I think when you're on the farmer's side, things like that, like literally make your life hell and become like unthinkable decisions to make.

• 1:56:58Mike Rowe?

  Sidebar, but isn't it, it's such a hell of a thing that what 2% of the population is feeding 330 million people three times a day. And the tech and the, the miracle of modern agriculture is so misunderstood and having such a unintended deleterious effect on the farmers. I'd, tell Ralph he's welcome here anytime. I'd love to pick his brain on that one.

• 1:57:23Speaker 02

  He'd love that.

• 1:57:24Mike Rowe?

  I mean, what a miracle. What a miracle your, your pop has seen evolve.

• 1:57:30Speaker 02

  Absolutely. Absolutely. And we need to keep doing it. Like we, things didn't freeze in 1980. So like, we need to, we need to keep shipping.

• 1:57:39Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 1:57:39Speaker 02

  Excellent tech that makes it easier and easier.

• 1:57:42Mike Rowe?

  What would make a 21 year old Ethan Thornton reject a job offer from today's Ethan Thornton?

• 1:57:50Speaker 02

  What would I have rejected? Or what do I think I do today that I would have rejected?

• 1:57:54Mike Rowe?

  What would make you reject a job offer from you today? You're applying for a job and it's you sitting there.

• 1:58:05Speaker 02

  I like working on a lot of things at the same time. I just like the way my brain has always worked. I like having like 10 lines in the water and like comparing line to line. And I find that I end up doing, doing better on those things. I would have really struggled to be like, this is the specific aircraft you're working on for the next 12 months. I think that's probably the biggest.

• 1:58:25Mike Rowe?

  So it's back to the notion of just, give me the problem. Don't tell me how to fix it.

• 1:58:31Speaker 02

  Yes.

• 1:58:31Mike Rowe?

  Just give me the problem and give me enough runway. Although apparently you're, you don't need one of those anymore. Come up with all that vertical taking off. You want to figure it out?

• 1:58:42Speaker 02

  Yes. I think we're good at giving folks the problem. So like, I think on the engineering side, we have plenty of problems to give folks, folks have problems to work on. I think it's much more, I like a lot of problems, kind of in parallel.

• 1:58:54Mike Rowe?

  I like a lot of, write that down, would you? I love that. What's the biggest misconception people have about patriotism among your generation?

• 1:59:03Speaker 02

  Wow. Okay. So first off, I think the biggest misconception we have about patriotism generally is that we are patriotic about America because it's America. I think we need to be patriotic about America for what it does excellently well, and we need to push to fix what it doesn't.

• 1:59:19Speaker 01

  That's a great answer. That is a great, great answer. Wow.

• 1:59:23Mike Rowe?

  That's very good. If you could force every member of Congress to spend one month working somewhere, where would you send them?

• 1:59:32Speaker 02

  I mean, it would be fun to, to work with them.

• 1:59:39Mike Rowe?

  What are you reading right now? When's the last time you read something for fun?

• 1:59:44Speaker 02

  I like everything I do. So like, I think anything I read is for fun. I hate balance. I hate like doing things I don't think are fun. And I think it's important to like, set yourself on a trajectory where you are excited about it. So.

• 1:59:56Mike Rowe?

  I think you're asymmetrical in that way.

• 1:59:58Speaker 02

  Well, I think I'm just, I'm less, less afraid to be wrong. Like when I started in Mach, I told Ashton, who co-founded the company with me, I told our investors, like, there's a 99.99% chance this goes, this goes wrong. Now we're going to execute with a lot of work ethic and, and like, be super thoughtful and I hope to succeed. But like, I think you, you reach that point in life by being completely unafraid to like break the mold of the way most people live. Like if you hate your job, quit. And that is easier for me to say than it is for a lot of people to say. And I think that is a problem that we need to fix. So again, I'm not like, this goes for me. And I was very fortunate to have an incredible background and I want to work really, really hard to have more people

• 2:00:43Speaker 02

  have that luxury. But I think, yeah, a lot of people are trapped economically into doing work they don't like on the day to day to survive. I hope that is not the case in two decades. And if there's like a single thing that should be a case for optimism on AI, it is that like, one can very clearly draw a worldview, a world model where that is not the case. But yeah, I mean, I've been fortunate to have, to be comfortable enough to like be able to drop out of MIT and like, live in the office for like nine months and be like, hell or high water, I will be doing something that is aligned on these two things.

• 2:01:15Mike Rowe?

  And forget to eat. Forget to eat for a day or two.

• 2:01:18Speaker 02

  But to answer your question on the reading portion, I'm about to start a book called Power and Progress. I haven't read it yet. I just ordered it. So I know nothing about it. But I was told by someone that it is an excellent tale of basically how technologies are brought to humanity.

• 2:01:33Mike Rowe?

  Ah, who told you?

• 2:01:36Speaker 02

  The guy that told me was, his name is Benedetto and he is the CEO of Ferrari. And this is going to make me sound super pretentious on the last conversation.

• 2:01:44Mike Rowe?

  Not too shit at all, man. No, this is good. No, way to land the plane, Ethan. Everybody, everybody likes you.

• 2:01:49Speaker 02

  I'm not buying a Ferrari. I drive like my dad's old F-150. I was talking to him and he's like an incredibly thoughtful guy who's done a lot before joining Ferrari. So like actually largely like incredible background getting to where he is. And he invented like mem semiconductors. He's done a lot of cool things. And we were talking about similar conversation to you and I are having. What does it mean to bring technology to humanity the right way? I think history is incredibly, incredibly important as you look to operate. And so I want to learn as much as I can about when it's gone very, very well and when it's gone poorly.

• 2:02:23Mike Rowe?

  Three people who you most admire that you're not related to.

• 2:02:26Speaker 02

  That I'm not related to. So I think A1 is my co-founder, Ashton. Like so he and I played football together at MIT. He dropped out of MIT around the time I did, when we had like nothing as a company. And I think it's, it's easy to take the risks I was describing when you're like CEO of the company, right? Like you can chart your own path and like ultimately you kind of live or die by the path. So it's very, very easy to take that risk. I think it is so much harder to take that risk when you're like, you're not at the wheel and where you have all the downsides to taking the risk with significantly fewer of the upsides.

• 2:03:04Mike Rowe?

  Sure.

• 2:03:05Speaker 02

  And so I think it was just an incredible filter for like mission alignment. Like that dude walked through a ton in the last few years that I think most people would have been like walked away from. And so incredibly, incredibly tough.

• 2:03:18Mike Rowe?

  Do you feel like he was betting on you?

• 2:03:21Speaker 02

  No, no, I don't think so. No, he wouldn't have joined if I, he didn't think I was competent. But I think I could have been working on like bullshit.

• 2:03:27Mike Rowe?

  Yeah.

• 2:03:28Speaker 02

  SaaS and like he, he wouldn't have joined. Um, no, I think he really, really wanted to do what, what was right and was willing to do a lot to make that happen.

• 2:03:39Mike Rowe?

  You know what? Let's just leave it there. Never mind the other two. That's such a great answer, man. He's your friend. He's your partner. I mean, that's a.

• 2:03:48Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 2:03:49Mike Rowe?

  That's gonna, I mean, look, if he's as important to you as he is today, think of where you guys will be.

• 2:03:56Speaker 02

  School. That's cool. Yeah, that's all you can ask for in life is like build things together as friends over decades and.

• 2:04:03Mike Rowe?

  Well, let's leave it there. Speaking of building, I had no idea you were into the knife thing, but we chatted briefly before we came on and you asked me about my friend Josh, who makes knives.

• 2:04:13Speaker 02

  Thank you.

• 2:04:13Mike Rowe?

  And I'm like, you know, so here, take a look at this thing. And as you open it up, I'll just remind you.

• 2:04:19Speaker 02

  I really, really appreciate it. I thought you were about to just show me. This is incredible.

• 2:04:22Mike Rowe?

  No, no, no, no.

• 2:04:23Speaker 02

  Thank you so much.

• 2:04:24Mike Rowe?

  Just know, this is a former lineman who now has maybe the dominant brand in the country. And he's doing it all in Missoula, started in his garage. And now he's got, I don't know, I think 120 people working for him. But oh, here's the other thing he did. He made a knife for my foundation and he's given like 10% of every sale in perpetuity back to MicroWorks.

• 2:04:55Speaker 02

  Wow.

• 2:04:55Mike Rowe?

  Yeah. It's like, I don't know, it's over $200,000. But he's cranking these things out now. And that thing is basically, it's a, you could be a surgeon. It is.

• 2:05:08Speaker 02

  So sharp.

• 2:05:09Mike Rowe?

  It's ridiculously sharp. And please don't cut yourself on here. I don't.

• 2:05:14Speaker 02

  It shaves. That's very impressive. That's incredible.

• 2:05:17Mike Rowe?

  Yep. It's called the, the rocker. That's the new one. It's a wooden handle traditions thing. It's great. And please take it with my compliments.

• 2:05:23Speaker 02

  Thank you so much. I really appreciate it.

• 2:05:25Mike Rowe?

  Take with his compliments. Buddy, I'm rooting for you. I'm rooting for all of us. And I'm just so, uh, I'm just so glad you're on the case.

• 2:05:34Speaker 02

  I appreciate it. Thank you for having me on.

• 2:05:36Mike Rowe?

  Anytime.

• 2:05:37Speaker 03

  If you like what you heard... And even if you don't... Won't you please... Won't you please... Pretty please... Pretty please... Subscribe! Well, I hate to beg and I hate to plead, but please, pretty frickin' please, please sub... Oh, please sub... Subscribe!

• 2:06:07Speaker 04

  Most people overpay for car insurance. Not because they're careless, but because switching feels like too much hassle. That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance assistant. Jerry compares rates side by side from over 50 top insurers and helps you switch with ease. Jerry even tracks market rates and alerts you when it's best to shop. No spam calls, no hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year. Switch with confidence. Download the Jerry app or visit jerry.ai/libsyn today. That's J-E-R-R-Y dot A-I slash L-I-B-S-Y-N.

• 2:06:44Speaker 05

  Good news! Your credit score went up. But is it the score your lenders use? Not all credit scores are the same. The score you see in a free credit app may be different from the score a lender sees when you're applying for a mortgage, auto loan, or credit card. In fact, 90% of top lenders use FICO scores. So you may not be seeing the score that matters most to your financial decisions. For the moments that matter, get the score that matters: your FICO score. Visit myfico.com and get started for free today.