Time to believe the quantum computing hype?

Quantum computing hype is everywhere. Trump says we'll have one by 2028, Microsoft by 2029. IBM is investing billions. Is it really happening? Science journalist Sophia Chen joins us to discuss her article, "What is a quantum computer good for? Absolutely nothing — yet," and break down what's real and what's hype in the quantum computing race. Further reading ⁠Meta is reportedly working on smart glasses that would be recording all the time⁠ ⁠Sonos laid off some of its veteran product and design executives⁠ ⁠Cash App fraud⁠ ⁠Starlink deployments on record pace⁠ ⁠Play-Doh for adults is the new Lego for adults⁠ ⁠Slate is hoping a little Razzmatazz will help sell its trucks⁠ ⁠What is a quantum computer good for? Absolutely nothing — yet⁠ ⁠A new paper argues Microsoft exaggerated its quantum claims a year ago⁠ ⁠Drama over quantum computing’s future heats up⁠ ⁠The race is on for quantum-safe cryptography⁠ Subscribe to The Verge for unlimited access to theverge.com, subscriber-exclusive newsletters, and our ad-free podcast feed. We love hearing from you! Email your questions and thoughts to [email protected] or call us at 866-VERGE11. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

• 0:02Speaker 00

  Hello and welcome to The Vergecast, the flagship podcast of probabilistic computing. I'm Jake Kastrenakis, Executive Editor of The Verge, and today we are talking about quantum computers. Quantum is hot right now. Trump just issued an executive order saying that America, quote, "stands at the cusp of a quantum revolution." The order demands that America accelerate deployment and commercialization of quantum computing. Meanwhile, his science adviser promised that the US government will develop a computer, quote, "powerful enough for scientific discovery by 2028." Meanwhile, Microsoft just unveiled Myrona II, its second-generation quantum computing chip. Last year, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said that its team had created a new state of matter that had only been theorized 100 years ago.

• 0:47Speaker 00

  This year, the new Myrona II chip has apparently, quote, "put the team on a path to achieve a scalable quantum computer that is commercially valuable by 2029." These are big, ambitious goals. Like I said, quantum is hot right now. There are a lot of big promises and a lot of money flowing into the space. We were really interested in what's real and what's the hype. So we had science writer Sophia Chen dig into this for us. She's joining me today, along with Verge Tech Editor Marina Galperina. But first, here's what's happening on The Verge today. This is 90 Seconds on The Verge for Thursday, July 9, 2026. It's only July, but Anthropic has launched what my colleague Hayden Field is calling Claude wrapped. It's a new dashboard that shows how much time

• 1:30Speaker 00

  you're using Claude, your top days, how much time you're spending, that sort of thing. If you're using Claude enough to bother checking this feature, you might want to take a break. Fortunately, Anthropic is also adding a feature that can send you reminders to sign off. So maybe take a look at that. Meanwhile, OpenAI is finally upgrading ChatGPT's voice mode with a new model that it says is far more capable.

• 1:51Speaker 01

  I don't want the needles to be too big. What do you think?

• 1:54Speaker 02

  If you go up, it's gonna get kind of baggy.

• 1:57Speaker 01

  Although baggy is very popular now, don't you think?

• 2:00Speaker 00

  ChatGPT's voice mode has been on a two-year-old model until now, and it's been pretty bad. You might have seen that one guy on TikTok who gets ChatGPT to give dumb or bizarre responses. The old model is part of the reason why. I think that guy might have single-handedly embarrassed OpenAI enough into upgrading it. OpenAI even gave him early access to test the new model. So we'll see if he can break it. Finally, Character AI, the AI chatbot role-playing service, is getting into AI-generated vertical video microdramas. I watched a couple of episodes. It only took a couple of minutes, you know? And they completely break my brain. I think everyone should watch these just to understand how bewildering they are and to recognize what the end state is of TikTok-ified attention spans.

• 2:45Speaker 00

  You can read more at theverge.com. That's 90 Seconds on The Verge for Thursday, July 9, 2026.

• 2:52Speaker 03

  Growing teams need a corporate card built for more, something that doesn't sacrifice speed for control. Introducing the American Express Corporate Cash Back Card. Get 1.5% cash back on eligible business purchases, advanced spending controls, and real-time visibility, plus intelligent expense management. Get started at go.amex slash amexcorporate. Terms and cap apply.

• 3:21Speaker 04

  Support for the show comes from Engine. Running a small business means every dollar has to work hard. But if your team is still booking travel the old way, it's costing you more than you think. Engine is the fastest-growing travel and spend platform in the country, built specifically for businesses like yours. Book a trip in as little as two and a half minutes, earn up to 10% back on hotels. And in 2025, Engine customers save more than $300 million on travel with zero booking fees, no contracts, and no BS. More than 1,000 businesses join Engine every month. Join them and get $500 when your business signs up and starts traveling at engine.com/box.

• 4:05Speaker 00

  All right, this seems to happen every few years. Noise around quantum computing has reached a fever pitch. Everybody is super excited. There are press releases left and right about new quantum computing developments, and then nothing happens most of the time. So just to start us off, Sophia, why is there so much attention on quantum right now?

• 4:24Speaker 05

  I think that a big part of what's driving the interest is there's this Cold War-esque framing where it's China versus the US over quantum computing. And then in addition to that, the big tech companies are investing billions of dollars into this new technology. You've got, you know, Google, IBM. You've got these smaller startups. You've got Amazon, all these big names. And then periodically, they'll come out with like this real flashy press release about what they've done. And like 80% of it is like gobbledygook, but it seems like everybody is really excited.

• 5:04Speaker 06

  This is a question that we get from commenters all the time who are complaining they don't understand what we're writing about. What is a quantum computer? How is it different than a classical computer?

• 5:14Speaker 05

  A quantum computer is a fundamentally new type of computer. And so they already exist in an experimental form. So Google, IBM, Amazon, and academic physicists have already made quantum computers, but they're these very small-scale prototype devices. And they're not meant to be consumer gadgets. And it's very likely that actually a quantum computer is going to be this specialized data center that you log into via the cloud. What makes a quantum computer different from a classical computer? So by classical computing, I mean like your laptop, what's in your phone, like GPUs that train AI. These are all classical computers. And so for a classical computer, the basic mathematical language is binary. So ones and zeros.

• 5:58Speaker 05

  And so to run any piece of software, your classical computer has to translate the commands into ones and zeros. The computer represents the ones and zeros using transistors, where a one corresponds to a transistor that's on, or zero corresponds to a transistor that's off. A quantum computer, on the other hand, doesn't use binary bits at all. It uses quantum bits, or qubits, which are probabilities of zero and one. And as an analogy, I like to tell people to imagine flipping a coin. Before the coin lands, it's neither heads nor tails. It's a probability of both. It's in this in-between state. So a qubit is also in this in-between state, like the coin flipping.

• 6:43Speaker 05

  It's neither a one or a zero, but a probability of both. And so quantum mechanical objects, like electrons and atoms, they exist in these probabilistic states, which is why we call this a quantum computer when it deals with probabilities like this. It's a computer that obeys the math of quantum mechanics. And when you represent information in this way, you can do different types of math that are difficult for a classical computer.

• 7:10Speaker 00

  This is what I think is like so fascinating about these. I think our current model for computing is so based around consumer electronics, right? Obviously, these high-powered data centers exist today, but ultimately, it's a lot of the same technology, just scaled up. And this idea of having a specialized computer that operates on its own is sort of a different model, right? But these things, they operate at like deep, deep, deep, like close to absolute zero temperatures, is my understanding. And I think we are entering a situation where we only need a few of these to actually work to get the benefits. Is that right? And then the question is, what are those? What are we trying to achieve here?

• 7:54Speaker 05

  Okay, so actually, that's a common misconception about the cryogenic temperatures. So some quantum computing designs do require absolute zero temperatures, but then it really depends on the qubit hardware. So the stuff that you're thinking of is made by IBM and Google. They're these superconducting qubits. And, you know, the picture of that chandelier, like it's those things that need to go in the, you know, cryogenic temperatures. Whereas there's other emerging platforms, so like using atoms. So like those have different requirements. And my understanding is that those do not need cryogenic temperatures. That's an argument for the companies that are doing that, that, you know, that'll be easier to scale.

• 8:38Speaker 05

  And actually, Google has recently made an announcement that they were gonna try doing neutral atoms in addition to superconducting qubits. Definitely, like in terms of the metrics. So like, you know, when we talk about silicon chips and transistors, we're talking about like 100 billion transistors in the side, size of a fingernail. Like, it's like a totally different scale. So like, when we're talking about qubits, like, we don't need that many. But actually, one of the big questions is how many do we actually need to make something useful? So right now, companies are making things in the hundreds of physical qubits. Qubit is both the unit of information and also the name of the hardware. And what they're finding is actually a unit of information needs multiple qubits

• 9:24Speaker 05

  because that's their way of reducing errors. And so, so yeah, that's something that people are working on figuring out right now. And they're also trying to figure out, you know, what applications are good for the the computers that they currently have.

• 9:41Speaker 06

  So you've interviewed a lot of physicists for this story. Have they told you if quantum computers are good for anything yet?

• 9:48Speaker 05

  No, they do not think they're good for anything. The current, the existing quantum computers are not good for anything yet.

• 9:55Speaker 06

  Right, so who's invested in this? Who's hoping to benefit?

• 9:59Speaker 05

  So people are so excited about quantum computing because it's a completely different paradigm for computing. And they've come up with all these algorithms, which are simply too difficult to implement now, but they are very exciting. I guess the most near-term application, I would say, is in molecular simulation. So using the quantum computers to simulate complicated molecules and to simulate chemical reactions. And these are really interesting to the pharmaceutical industry for developing new drugs. It's also interesting for, you know, maybe EV companies, like people who are making batteries, like different material science applications.

• 10:43Speaker 05

  And so that's one goal application. And then another goal application is they seem to be good at optimization, potentially. And so, you know, that could be useful in any sort of industry that, you know, does logistics. And then also, the banks are interested in it for financial forecasting.

• 11:06Speaker 06

  But how close are we to that actually happening?

• 11:10Speaker 05

  So, okay, so we're, that's a difficult question. It's, we're probably a while from a lot of these applications. The way that I like to think about it is like, these physicists have written like a very beautiful symphony and they just have, they're, they just have like a couple crappy clarinets. Like, they can't play what the beautiful music that they've prepared. They have to improve the hardware and I want to give them some credit because it's actually really, really difficult. It's quite different from like working in classical computing because they have to build everything from the ground up. They have like basic material science problems they have to solve, like how to make the

• 11:51Speaker 05

  chips, like what combination of metals and semiconductors to use for different parts. They have to use customized lasers, like there's very little like off the shelf equipment that they can use to make quantum computers. Like, and you mentioned cryogenic cooling earlier, like some of them have, they have to have these special refrigerators. And they also have to figure out lots of basic engineering questions, like how do we want to arrange the wires so that they don't interfere with each other, like very basic things like this. And so it's really, really difficult and they are making progress, but, but a lot of these applications, they, they just aren't going to happen anytime soon.

• 12:33Speaker 00

  The thing that I think is so hard to untangle is the difference between the hype and excitement that these companies come out with whenever they have any little advancement, which in fairness, I'm sure that these are very, very hard problems and it is very exciting that they're trying to tackle them. But, you know, this is like two years in a row now, we've had Microsoft come out and be like, we have this new chip. It's exciting. It's getting us so close to quantum. And then when you actually dig into what they've done, you read these quotes where it's always revealing just how far they really are. So with the Myrona 1, there was, there was this line where they said, "This architecture offers a clear path to fit a million qubits on a single chip."

• 13:17Speaker 00

  They're currently at, I think it's eight qubits, right? So they have a path. Myrona 2, right, once again, the team is on a path to achieve a scalable quantum computer. So the Myrona 1 was eight qubits and they're trying to get to 1 million. And I guess my question is like, how do we weigh these two different statements, right? Where they're putting out these very aggressive dates, right? Trump wants a quantum computer by 2028. Microsoft wants something by 2029, right? Is a scalable quantum computer actually just some technology that they say can scale by 2029? Or is it a functional thing that can be used by 2029? And I think this is where it gets hard to, for the layperson to understand what is happening

• 14:02Speaker 00

  here.

• 14:03Speaker 05

  I think in this conversation, it's important to say that when it comes to overhype, Microsoft is in a league of its own. Like, so basically, like, Google and IBM, like, I mean, I would definitely say like they also have hyped things, but like, the, the thing that people complain about Microsoft about is like whether or not their quantum computer even exists, whereas for Google and IBM, people don't dispute that, yeah.

• 14:28Speaker 04

  Support for the show comes from Engine. Running a small business means every dollar has to work hard, but if your team is still booking travel the old way, it's costing you more than you think. Engine is the fastest growing travel and spend platform in the country, built specifically for businesses like yours. Book a trip in as little as two and a half minutes, earn up to 10% back on hotels. And in 2025, Engine customers save more than $300 million on travel with zero booking fees, no contracts, and no BS. More than 1,000 businesses join Engine every month. Join them and get $500 when your business signs up and starts traveling at engine.com/box.

• 15:12Speaker 07

  Your heart can tell you a lot about your health. Apple Watch Series 12 measures your heart rate every five seconds with the most accurate heart rate sensing in wearable. So your vitals app, now with heart rate variability, can tell you when something is off. And your readiness score can let you know when to rest and when to push. Hear the story in every heartbeat with Apple Watch Series 12. The features described are for wellness purposes only and not for medical use. iPhone 11 or later required. Based on Apple conducted study of heart rate accuracy, August 2026. Visit apple.com slash apple watch series 12.

• 15:45Speaker 03

  Growing teams need a corporate card built for more, something that doesn't sacrifice speed for control. Introducing the American Express Corporate Cash Back Card. Get 1.5% cash back on eligible business purchases, advanced spending controls, and real-time visibility, plus intelligent expense management. Get started at go.amex slash amex corporate. Terms and cap apply.

• 16:10Speaker 08

  This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends, like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an Ultra. Because it's not just a superior like beer, it's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com slash superior access to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser-Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.

• 16:42Speaker 00

  I think it's less a question and more, you know, how do we, how are we supposed to understand this distinction between the hype and the real achievements they're making and the, the realities of the fact that they have eight qubits and they want to reach a million in like two or three years?

• 17:05Speaker 05

  I guess in the case of, I'll just use IBM as an example because I think they are more of a realist. They have come up with a roadmap where they plan to make this data center by 2029 and they, it's unclear whether or not this, this size of computer is going to be useful. One of the big problems previously was that the more qubits you attach to each other and use for computation, the more errors there were. And so they've, they've figured out that problem at a small scale where they're like, okay, we can build a more complex quantum computer and not have it create more errors.

• 17:49Speaker 05

  Instead, there are fewer errors the larger we make it. So, so they have like a roadmap where they, they talk about this. I think for the layperson, one important thing to keep in mind is just like, while they say they're scaling this up, to always ask like, what are the applications at that stage? And so for IBM, by 2029, they want to make this data center and they want it to be made of 200 logical qubits. So basically, it can encode 200 units of quantum information. When I talked to other experts, they were like, we're not sure what that would be good for. But at the same time, there's these algorithm developers who are also trying to figure

• 18:33Speaker 05

  out, like, is there a simpler algorithm that might be interesting for industry? And so like, there's a lot of development all happening, happening at once. I think one of the biggest misconceptions is that a quantum computer is a classical computer that is faster. That is just not the case and it's not going to be good at a lot of things classical computers are good at. Like I mentioned, like, it's not going to be good at email, it's not going to be good at word processing, it's not going to be good at, you know, this podcast recording, like live streaming. It's, it's, it's not good for any of that stuff. It's, it's supposed to be good at molecular simulation, which supercomputers like require a lot of compute to do right now.

• 19:14Speaker 05

  And these simulations take a really, really long time or they're prohibitive. And so, yeah, so it's, it's a completely different class of computer.

• 19:23Speaker 00

  The one thing we haven't gotten into yet is encryption. And it's funny because that, that feels very different to me from molecular biology and like interesting and important science research. But I get the impression, and so, yeah, I'm curious from your perspective, but my impression is that the encryption issue is a lot of why there is this arms race around quantum right now.

• 19:52Speaker 05

  The encryption issue is very convoluted to talk about because what, basically, it was an argument to make quantum computers, but also, it was also a reason to be scared of quantum computers as well. So in 1994, this computer scientist, he developed a quantum computing algorithm. This was before any quantum computers even existed. So his name is Peter Shore. He came up with this algorithm for factoring prime numbers. And so the current encryption system that we use, the RSA family of algorithms, they rely on computers being really, really bad at factoring prime numbers. And so the fear was that once quantum computers existed, that they would be able to break

• 20:36Speaker 05

  all RSA encryption. And currently, none of the existing quantum computers can do this. Basically, that was a real motivator for cryptographers to develop better encryption. We have what's known as post-quantum cryptography. So these are algorithms, encryption algorithms that quantum computers are not supposed to be able to break. And they're not in widespread use yet. One of the executive orders that Trump signed recently, he was ordering that the government computing systems migrate to post-quantum cryptography by 2030 or 2031.

• 21:09Speaker 00

  Is that going to be necessary? Do you really think that that's like a possibility?

• 21:13Speaker 05

  I do think that it's probably a win for encryption. I don't know what it means for quantum computers, but, um, yeah, I think, I think that, uh, yeah, I think, I think, I think it's probably a good thing for encryption.

• 21:27Speaker 06

  Of course, the question everyone's been wondering about, is US going to beat China?

• 21:34Speaker 05

  Well, China is doing quite well. The guy to watch in China is this guy named Pan Jianwei. And they are using photons to make a quantum computer. And they also had this quantum satellite that they were doing things relating to a related technology, quantum sensing and also quantum cryptography. And I mean, I don't know. I don't know. I don't know what it means to win.

• 22:02Speaker 00

  I mean, it is this interesting thing, right? Where I think because this hardware is so specialized, we don't need hundreds or thousands of quantum computers. We need a handful of capable ones. And if you can crack encryption, then that's great. The government probably just needs one of those computers. Getting there first seems really important if that's the case. And it's so interesting that the US government is putting out these, I would say outrageously ambitious timelines to get to a quantum computer. It's still, from the sound of it, feels like we are at this R and D phase where perhaps there actually has been some meaningful movement over the past few years.

• 22:46Speaker 00

  But it seems like there is still a large gap before this stuff is actually like implementable and usable in a meaningful way.

• 22:55Speaker 06

  Well, there's a confusion because the flashy announcements don't cover the really incremental esoteric things that Sophia addressed in the article. Because they're not as interesting to the layperson because they're confusing.

• 23:08Speaker 00

  Well, should we talk about that? About the fact that there's at least one physics researcher who--

• 23:14Speaker 06

  Oh, the drama.

• 23:16Speaker 00

  Right? They think that Microsoft maybe didn't even create what they said they created.

• 23:21Speaker 06

  Right. Is it the same thing that happened last year? The girlies are fighting again.

• 23:25Speaker 00

  Yeah, Sophia, is that something that we should, you know, take seriously?

• 23:32Speaker 05

  Yeah, I think so. So basically, the critique was that, yeah, Microsoft did not create a Majorana particle, which is the basic building block of their quantum computer. In June, Henry Leg, this academic physicist, he published a peer-reviewed critique. And it was a criticism of Majorana I from last year. But he says that the same critique applies to Majorana II. And he's not the only one. I've talked to other physicists as well who have a lot of criticisms about Microsoft's approach. And in particular, that what they write in their papers does not match their announcement or their plans for scaling.

• 24:14Speaker 00

  So that's the Microsoft situation. Google and IBM, you said, are a little bit more sober in their approach. What are we expecting from them in the next couple of years?

• 24:24Speaker 05

  So for the last couple of years, Google has been doing these, what they call quantum advantage experiments, where they're doing these algorithms which don't have much practical use or any practical use. But they are trying to show that they can do it better than a supercomputer. And at the same time, this year, they also announced that they are going to make a neutral atom quantum computer. So their current quantum computing chip, Willow, is made from superconducting circuits. And so now they're branching out to a different hardware platform.

• 25:01Speaker 05

  With IBM, they are planning on making a data center-sized quantum computer by 2029 with 200 logical qubits. And I think at the same time, everybody's just, they're working on improving error correction. So this idea that, you know, they need a special technique to correct errors in a quantum computer. And so being able to use fewer qubits to represent one piece of information and then also figuring out how to do that at scale. So, yeah, I think in the rest of the industry, they are working on figuring out how to do error correction better and make things bigger.

• 25:46Speaker 00

  You know, and should I say, Microsoft, of course, disagrees with those researchers' criticisms of their work. I think what's really interesting right now is, for so long, I think this stuff has been really hyped as just around the corner. And we are actually seeing hard dates this time. And we will kind of just be able to answer those questions in a couple of years' time, right? Like, I think before, it was always, this stuff is right around the corner, but when is around the corner? And it sounds like there is progress happening. I'm not sure if I believe how aggressive they are.

• 26:24Speaker 06

  Well, they're using terms like practical and scalable, both of which have very specific meanings, right, Sophia?

• 26:31Speaker 05

  I don't know, but I think it's-- Well, I guess like, by practical, in my definition, it means something that they wouldn't be able to do with a non-quantum computer that also has some sort of commercial value. And by scalable, it means, I think by scalable, what they mean is that they can build them bigger without running into this problem of more errors. There are some bullish researchers, like these are, someone I spoke to in academia was like, I think that we could do a scientific simulation by 2028 that was scientifically

• 27:16Speaker 05

  interesting, might not be a commercially interesting simulation. And so she was studying like a simplistic model of photons interacting with electrons, which applies to photosynthesis, and it also applies to solar cells. And so she was very optimistic. I talked to some other people who were like, maybe by 2030, 2035. And then I had another guy who was just like, I feel that they have totally underestimated how difficult it is to scale. Like, I think it's going to be a couple decades. So the responses to that are all over the map.

• 27:54Speaker 06

  So you think we're going to write the same article next year and the year after?

• 27:59Speaker 05

  Yes. And actually, I think it'll be very similar. And I think the only thing that will change is that there will be like one little section in there about the nerdy incremental stuff. Because you probably won't let me write more than that because it's pretty boring.

• 28:14Speaker 00

  Sophia, I really do want to have you back every single year to write this. So did they do it again? And I know it's going to be the same for a while, but I find this stuff really, really fascinating. And I think the upside is like, this stuff is exciting. As you get closer, I think the possibility of even these, you know, quote unquote scientifically interesting experiments, that's very meaningful. And that is a start. But cutting through, I think, their very excitable language about how close they've gotten is very difficult, particularly with a subject this naughty and dense. So I appreciate you coming on and speaking with us. The story is fantastic. If you all haven't read it yet, check it out, it's on theverge.com.

• 28:59Speaker 00

  All right. Want to say thanks to Sophia and Marina for joining me today, and thank you all for listening. If you like what we do here and want ad-free podcasts, you can become a paid subscriber to The Verge at theverge.com/subscribe. The Vergecast is produced by Josh Kahas, Eric Gomez, Brendan Kiefer, Travis Larchuk, and Aaron Locasio. David is back tomorrow. Or is he? See you later.

• 29:23Speaker 04

  Support for the show comes from Engine. Running a small business means every dollar has to work hard. But if your team is still booking travel the old way, it's costing you more than you think. Engine is the fastest-growing travel and spend platform in the country, built specifically for businesses like yours. Book a trip in as little as two and a half minutes, earn up to 10% back on hotels. And in 2025, Engine customers save more than $300 million on travel with zero booking fees, no contracts, and no BS. More than 1,000 businesses join Engine every month. Join them and get $500 when your business signs up and starts traveling at engine.com/box.

• 30:07Speaker 09

  Fall savings are happening now at The Home Depot. Save up to $500 on select appliances. Plus, enjoy free delivery when you spend $998 or more. From prepping to cooking to cleaning up, Frigidaire has you covered. The custom Flex Temp drawer switches from fridge to freezer. With more than 15 cooking modes, including stone-baked pizza mode, you can enjoy restaurant-quality pizza in as little as two minutes. Then clean up with the Frigidaire dishwasher, featuring the industry's fastest normal wash cycle. Shop fall savings now at The Home Depot. Off the ballot, October 21st, US only. See you online for details.