Every Property Adviser Is Biased. Including Us.
- 18m
- Transcript
Summary
Written by a model from the transcript; not yet reviewed.
This episode explores the hidden financial incentives and inherent biases of property advisors, mortgage brokers, lawyers, and builders. The hosts examine how different professionals get paid—such as real estate fees on new builds, bank commissions, or hourly billing—and how these structures create pressures to push specific strategies or prolong work. Rather than dismissing all advice as corrupt, the discussion highlights that many professionals occasionally tell clients not to invest when their personal situations, such as impending parenthood, make it unwise. The episode concludes with practical tests listeners can use to evaluate whether an advisor is trustworthy, including transparency about fees and evidence that advisors do not blindly follow their own financial self-interest.
- Advisors who are upfront about their fees and financial incentives before you ask are generally more trustworthy. 14:13
- Look for advisors who can still make money or provide services even if you decide not to buy a property right now. 15:07
- Check whether an advisor explicitly publishes information detailing who they are not the right fit for. 17:04
Chapters
- 0:08Podcast Introduction and Bias Premise
Hosts introduce the episode’s focus on hidden incentives behind property advice.
- 0:54Opes Partners’ Own Incentives
Hosts explain how their free wealth plans and referrals to sister companies create financial incentives.
- 1:54Balancing Bias with Honesty
Hosts argue that sharing downsides can build trust and credibility.
- 3:08Real‑World Example: IVF and Property
A listener’s personal situation illustrates how advisors weigh financial advice against life events.
- 4:32Comparing Incentives Across Professions
They compare property advisors to carpet salespeople, lawyers, and builders to show common bias patterns.
- 5:55Mortgage Advisor Incentives and Regulations
Discussion of how mortgage brokers’ commissions influence their recommendations and the regulatory safeguards.
- 14:13Identifying Trustworthy Advice
Hosts outline three practical criteria for evaluating a property advisor’s trustworthiness.
- 18:07Wrap‑Up and Takeaway
Final recap of bias issues and encouragement to rate and subscribe.
Highlights
- 1:11
New Build Real Estate Feesdata
The host explains that recommending new builds from a sister company generates a standard real estate fee of around $25,000, creating an inherent incentive to promote new build investing.
- 2:20
The guest shares an example of meeting a young couple who were a builder and an interior decorator, and advising them against buying new builds so they could build equity through renovation instead.
- 5:14
Mortgage Broker Bank Commissionsinsight
The guest outlines how mortgage brokers earn commission from banks based on loan sizes, creating a theoretical incentive to secure larger mortgages.
- 5:18
Advise Against Investing During IVFstory
The host recounts an instance where an advisor told a listener preparing for IVF and a drop to a single income that it was not a good time to buy property.
- 6:25
Every Three Year Refinancing Incentiveinsight
The host highlights that mortgage advisors face an incentive to switch clients between banks every three years when clawback agreements expire.
- 7:21
Hourly Billing Lawyer Conflictinsight
The guest notes that lawyers charging by the hour have a financial incentive to prolong disputes rather than settle them quickly.
- 9:56
Bank Mobile Mortgage Limitationsinsight
The host points out that mobile mortgage managers employed directly by a single bank cannot offer competing loan products from other financial institutions.
Quotes
“I can tell you this because every single person who's ever been recommended a property from us gets a disclosure statement saying that fee.”
Unnamed speaker · 1:17 “If I think about a lawyer that's charging by the hour, it would be in their best interest not to settle this disagreement quickly, but to battle it out, get every last dollar because you have been aggrieved and you should just carry on fighting this to get every last dollar.”
Unnamed speaker · 7:21 “Because mortgage advisors get paid every time they originate a mortgage. That's when most of the commission comes, right?”
Unnamed speaker · 5:55 “If I can show both sides, I know that I'll get 40,000 people tuning in. But if I only showed one side and came across as really biased, that's only going to go out to like 500 people, right?”
Unnamed speaker · 13:29
About this episode
Everyone who gives you property advice gets paid somehow, including us. So, why are we telling you this? Because sunlight is the best disinfectant ... and once you can see the incentives, you can judge the advice. In this episode, Ed and Andrew lay their own incentives bare, then show you how to spot everyone else’s. You’ll learn: Is your property adviser biased? The hidden incentive behind every piece of property advice How to work out whose advice you can actually trustThe takeaway? You don’t need advice with no bias ... that doesn’t exist. You need advice where the bias is out in the open. Let us know your thoughts by leaving us a voice message on the Property Academy Hotline https://www.speakpipe.com/PropertyAcademy For more from Opes Partners: https://www.opespartners.co.nz/newsletter-sign-upStay ahead of the NZ property market https://www.opespartners.co.nz/private-property-sign-up?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=promo&utm_campaign=pp_signupInstagram https://www.instagram.com/opes_partners/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@opespartners
Transcript
3,781 words · 2 speakers
Topics
- Opes Partners
- BNZ
- Christchurch
- Westpac
- ANZ
- Opus Accelerate
- Opus Property
- New Zealand
Page updated · transcript and summary are machine-generated