An Election Day Special With Nate Silver

Nate Silver tells us he is calling this midterms the “rock and a hard place election” — the background conditions are great for Democrats to win both the House and the Senate, but for that to come to pass, the party has to pull off some things that haven't happened in generations, like winning Texas. To believe that will happen requires a certain leap of faith, which is anathema to pollsters. Still, the polls generally believe Democrats are favored, but many professional pollsters would end up with egg on their face if the night does not go that way. Silver — the founder of Silver Bulletin — joins us today to discuss why popular narratives around polling error are wrong, prediction markets, why he doesn't think AI will replace pollsters, and what he is paying attention to tonight as the polls close. Read more: When Will We Know Who’s Won the Midterm Elections? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-11-02/when-will-we-know-who-s-won-the-midterm-elections?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=podcast&utm_campaign=odd_lots&utm_content=article Trump’s DOJ Turns to Supreme Court in California Ballot Case https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-11-02/trump-s-doj-turns-to-supreme-court-in-california-ballot-clash?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=podcast&utm_campaign=odd_lots&utm_content=article Only http://Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots https://www.bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots?in_source=oddlotspodcast Subscribe to the Odd Lots Newsletter http://bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots Join the conversation: discord.gg/oddlots https://discord.gg/oddlots See omnystudio.com/listener https://omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Finance is increasingly being built on digital rails. But as the adoption of virtual assets, tokenization and stable coins grows, can regulation not only keep pace but help accelerate it? Find out more later in the podcast.

• 0:16Speaker 01

  This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. I'm Carol Muster. Getting hired at SpaceX requires exceptional ability and may include having Elon Musk review a candidate's resume. So writes Bloomberg Business Week's Lauren Grush. She reports that the company culture is defined by Musk and job candidates must understand that a commitment to SpaceX means adhering to this culture and exhibiting loyalty to Elon Musk. To get hired, candidates must demonstrate their achievements from past jobs and hands-on experience matters more to recruiters than advanced degrees, with the company looking for people with raw innate intelligence. A spokesperson for SpaceX didn't respond to a request for comment on its recruiting

• 0:58Speaker 01

  and hiring practices, but according to recruiters, advisors and those who've interviewed for jobs there, it's the space exploration dream that draws people to the company and Musk invokes that dream regularly to remind workers why they're there. Prospective hires are told that the job will require stamina, including in job ads that candidates quote, "must be willing to work extended hours and weekends as needed." One major perk for all that hard work? Employees' access to equity, either the right to buy shares or payment in the form of restricted stock units that vest over time. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at chatgpt.com.

• 1:39Speaker 02

  For big business, AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise turned into a world of pain. Costs spiraling, data trapped, security and governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of reach. That's why enterprises turned to Boomi to connect data, apps and AI, helping them operate securely, efficiently and at scale. Boomi turns a world of AI pain into a world of AI gain. As Boomi says, "We got you." Head to Boomi.com. That's B-O-O-M-I.com.

• 2:14Speaker 03

  Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio, news.

• 2:30Joe Weisenthal?

  Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal.

• 2:34Tracy Alloway?

  And I'm Tracy Alloway.

• 2:35Joe Weisenthal?

  Tracy, I often say, I'm kind of, I'm really glad we're not political reporters.

• 2:40Tracy Alloway?

  Oh, I know. I know.

• 2:43Joe Weisenthal?

  I'm glad that.

• 2:44Tracy Alloway?

  I wake up every morning and thank God.

• 2:46Joe Weisenthal?

  That we didn't go down that path. But here's the problem. I've said this many times. Here's the problem, and we've been writing about this. We did, we were in Chicago, we had that conversation with James Robinson and stuff like that. I sort of think politics unfortunately does matter. And actually, even if we wanted to say like, no, look, I just covered markets, I just covered the economy. Unfortunately, I'm coming to the conclusion that not only do politics matter, they're probably going to keep mattering more and more.

• 3:14Tracy Alloway?

  Everything is politics now. You can't get away from it.

• 3:16Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 3:17Tracy Alloway?

  And certainly this week, so we're recording this on October 29th. The episode is going to come out on November 3rd.

• 3:23Joe Weisenthal?

  It's Election Day special.

• 3:25Tracy Alloway?

  That's right.

• 3:25Joe Weisenthal?

  You're listening to our Election Day special.

• 3:27Tracy Alloway?

  It's a pretty big week for politics, so we should talk, to put it mildly. I know, I know.

• 3:33Joe Weisenthal?

  Anyway, let's just jump right to it. Joining us here on our Election Day special, Nate Silver, everyone knows him, founder of the Silver Bulletin Newsletter, famous for 538 modeling elections, knowing a lot about polling and data and all that stuff. Nate, thank you for joining our Election Day special.

• 3:50Speaker 06

  Of course. Thanks, Joe. Thanks, Tracy.

• 3:51Joe Weisenthal?

  Let's just talk about like, how unpopular is President Trump right now as of October 29th or Election Day? And to what degree? I mean, midterm is historically pretty bad for the party in power, but just get a big picture, how historically unpopular is President Trump and what is the knock-on effects for various Republican candidates in competitive races?

• 4:12Speaker 06

  Yeah, so Trump's approval rating is at about 37%. By some measures, that's the worst approval rating for a president at a midterm since Harry Truman, I think, in 1946, if I'm getting that right. And remember, we had a midterm in 2018 where Trump and Republicans lost 41 House seats when he was somewhat less unpopular and were gassed and cost 430 a gallon or whatever it is. So, look, I kind of call this the rock versus the hard place election, right? The background conditions like couldn't be better for Democrats, right? The historical trends in midterms, voter anxiety about the economy, the Iran war, Trump's a lame duck and 80 years old, they've done really well and with turnout, they're doing well in early voting so far.

• 4:54Speaker 06

  They had a very good year in 2025 with New Jersey and Virginia. It's really very consistent indicators. I mean, they might have a couple of problems. Some of their candidates are seen as too far left, right? So that's kind of the rock. And the hard place is, yeah, they'll probably win the House. They'll probably pick up some governorships and state legislatures, but they do have to win in some really red states, just how the math works to win the Senate, right? States as red as Texas.

• 5:16Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 5:17Speaker 06

  Kansas, Alaska, South Carolina is in play, if you believe the polls. And so it's kind of this big, and this is why I like, I would say I'm a little bit anxious, not just for the implications for the country, but because like, it's kind of a, become a tricky race for like, models and polls and forecasts, right? There's no, there's no gimme. You either have to lie and say it's a toss-up. It's not, you can't, that's not an honest answer at this point, right? That's hedging.

• 5:42Joe Weisenthal?

  Well, you have to take a kind of leap of faith that a Democrat could win in Texas.

• 5:45Speaker 06

  You have to kind of take.

• 5:46Joe Weisenthal?

  And it's like, yeah.

• 5:47Speaker 06

  You have to kind of take, you have to kind of take a leap of faith on some of this stuff, right? And a probabilistically leap of faith.

• 5:54Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 5:54Speaker 06

  But it would be, at this point, it would be a really bad night for pollsters if Democrats don't win the Senate.

• 6:01Joe Weisenthal?

  Okay.

• 6:02Tracy Alloway?

  Just to sort of test our priors a little bit, everyone's treating this as a referendum on Trump, which kind of like, makes me nervous when everyone's doing the same thing. But in your view, is that an accurate way to measure it? Like, do we have hardcore evidence that people are voting on Trump rather than voting on a local representative?

• 6:21Speaker 06

  I think the best evidence is that Trump is no longer featured in Republican campaign commercials, right? Trump is not being talked about anymore on Republican podcasts. However, Trump himself is trying to make himself like the main character of this story when I don't think very many Republicans want that, right? Ironically, they had this Republican convention, was it in Dallas just after Labor Day? And like, that's when Republican polls kind of went from bad to worse. I don't think that's the main cause or necessarily even the secondary cause. But yeah, I mean, the, the behavior you'd expect if people are being kind of game theory optimal is that Trump is taking a backseat and trying to let his more moderate candidates distance themselves a little bit. And instead, we've seen the opposite, right?

• 7:02Speaker 06

  I mean, if Trump hadn't endorsed Ken Paxton in Texas, I'm not sure that James Talarico would have a slight lead there. If Trump hadn't chosen to go to war with Iran, I tend to think the Senate would be a toss-up and not lean, lean D. So, no, he's the central character. And it's also kind of like, it's kind of like the last time Trump is on the ballot, barring extra constitutional shenanigans.

• 7:26Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, which, who knows? Now, this gets to the question of like, could it be a bad night for pollsters? And there is, this seems to, this view has congealed in the general public that starting at least since 2016, pollsters always overestimate Democrats.

• 7:44Speaker 06

  Yeah.

• 7:44Joe Weisenthal?

  I think your view is that that's actually just factually incorrect. But why don't you tell us about what we know about polling error?

• 7:51Speaker 06

  So what we know, number one, is that polling errors are correlated, that if a poll misses high on the Democrat in Iowa, probably in a similar state like Kansas or Nebraska, all three states are competitive this year, good chance you'll have a correlated error.

• 8:04Joe Weisenthal?

  Okay.

• 8:05Speaker 06

  So therefore, you cannot look at individual races as a Monte Carlo random draw.

• 8:09Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 8:10Speaker 06

  But A, they're less correlated in midterms than in presidential years because you have different candidates on the ballot in every state. That's important. In 2022, we saw this kind of really big red wave in like New York, New Jersey, tri-state area. And Republicans did really well in Florida. The rest of the map was relatively good for Democrats. John Fetterman won and people like that, given that Biden had like a 39% approval rating. You know, number two, we have had systematic polling errors that underestimated Trump in 2016, 2020, 2024, a little bit more modest, but still directionally the same, right? In every election in the Trump era where Trump is not on the ballot, you have not had that error. And in fact, in like New Jersey and Virginia last year, you had a massive underestimation of Democrats in governor's races.

• 8:54Speaker 06

  And so like, first of all, it could all be noise, right? If you like, code up a, you know, have Claude or whatever, or GPT, code up a SIM to just show you like what random polling error looks like in the past 20 elections, it looks kind of like, you know, it's impossible to distinguish it, right? But one story might be that like, Trump has this kind of magical power to attract low turnout voters that also happen to be hard for pollsters to reach.

• 9:20Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 9:21Speaker 06

  And where they get screened out as being unlikely voters. Those voters don't seem to want to show up for like a Roger Marshall in Kansas or a Ken Paxton in Texas, right? It seems very, you know, Trump got a lot of young men last year who flipped to 2024, who flipped to him. Young men don't usually turn out in midterms. They're watching the NFL or whatever, right? And like, there's a consistent story where like, conveniently this problem of like these missing voters aren't an issue if they don't vote.

• 9:49Tracy Alloway?

  This was actually going to be my next question, but like, what are you seeing in terms of early signs of turnout? And then what, what are the chances that a former Trump voter actually votes Democrat rather than just decides not to show up?

• 10:04Speaker 06

  As compared to general elections or presidential elections, turnout is relatively, speaking, more important in midterms. Differential turnout can, is almost always a factor in some of these bigger waves. I'm not an early voting expert, but there are people who are pretty good at it, right? It can be very ad hoc if you don't kind of set clear rules ahead of time. And they seem to be seeing good numbers for Democrats, better numbers in the polls? I don't know, because the polls are really good for Democrats, right? But it provides like, some more consensus evidence for it, particularly high turnout among black voters who may fear being disenfranchised, high turnout, or not high turnout, but comparatively high turnout among unlikely voters, people who in the voter files have voted in no more than one of the past four elections.

• 10:48Speaker 06

  Democrats are getting a lot of those, but they're getting more than Republicans, right? I think some pollsters are finding there's very little D to R crossover.

• 10:55Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah.

• 10:55Speaker 06

  If you're any type of Democrat at all, this is not a year to indulge in a moderate Republican, right? Maybe a little bit of the reverse. But like, I mean, things tell a consistent story. It's just kind of this existential thing about whether people believe the story or not.

• 11:08Joe Weisenthal?

  Why is Trump so unpopular? Like, is it just gas and diesel prices? What, like, break down the drivers of his unpopularity.

• 11:16Speaker 06

  Trump is kind of, well, people are bored of him and tired of him, right? I think people are just like, he's been president for, I guess, six years, right? But it feels like 10 years because he was still kind of the dominant figure of that kind of Biden interregnum. You know, he's 80 years old, but no, look, I think the basic story is that he has broken promises, most prominently on cheaper gas.

• 11:39Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 11:40Speaker 06

  And on no more stupid wars. We can talk about how much the Epstein stuff affects him too. But yeah, one of the things about Trump's per unit number is like, oh, that 37% approval, like only 19% of it is like strong approval. I think there are permission structures that have opened up for Republicans to kind of distance themselves from Trump and incentives, right? You know, Trump, his endorsement will still matter after 2026, but like, you know, J D Vance and Marco Rubio, who are nominating candidates, have a big problem in that they kind of are, when Bush was this unpopular in 2026, and it got worse, by the way, after the 06 midterm, you didn't have Dick Cheney trying to run for president, right? You had a rebellious Republican in John McCain, who ultimately got nominated instead.

• 12:23Speaker 06

  And so, you know, when you're a lame duck, the bottom can drop out potentially.

• 12:28Tracy Alloway?

  So at the moment, when we're recording this, if you look at, I guess, the polling consensus and prediction markets, it seems like the House is pretty much a lock. Senate is a toss-up at the moment. What's the actual range of outcomes for a Democratic win here? Like, what are the extremes that you could possibly see on both sides?

• 12:48Speaker 06

  I would push back on the Senate being a toss-up.

• 12:51Tracy Alloway?

  Okay.

• 12:51Speaker 06

  I think at, at Polly Market and Kalshi, Democrats are up to like 68% or something as when we're recording this and in our model, they're at 70, high 70s now.

• 13:00Joe Weisenthal?

  To win the Senate.

• 13:00Tracy Alloway?

  For the Senate.

• 13:01Joe Weisenthal?

  Okay.

• 13:01Tracy Alloway?

  Wow.

• 13:02Speaker 06

  Well, there's this kind of, both a blessing and a curse, is to actually have to put out a forecast in the form of a probability, right? Because it'd be easy to say, oh, things are looking good for Democrats, but don't get your hopes up too much because polls can be wrong and yeah, I guess it leans down, right? Like, that's chickening out, though.

• 13:22Joe Weisenthal?

  Like, the thing is, is like, we could all do that. Like, this is, I guess, like, part of what's interesting about modelers and what's interesting about prediction markets. We could all say, yeah, it looks like Democrats, like, if they're, if you're going to provide value as the creator of a model.

• 13:37Speaker 06

  Right.

• 13:38Joe Weisenthal?

  You gotta be able to say something beyond, it looks like a good night for Democrats, but who knows?

• 13:43Speaker 06

  And look, in 2024, like, our model literally was 50/50. Like, literally, we ran 80,000 simulations.

• 13:50Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, I remember that.

• 13:50Speaker 06

  And it took like the 71,000 simulation for one candidate to go ahead, right? So there are times when the correct modeling position is like, oh, people are too sure of themselves. I'm not sure if this is that election, right? If you go and look at Republican-sponsored polls, or go look at where Republicans are spending their time and their resources, and they're bracing for a landslide, right?

• 14:13Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 14:13Speaker 06

  They are having, doing telehalls in the Louisiana Senate race and things like that, right? And seem concerned about South Carolina, let alone Texas, who people kind of knew would be a competitive race. But, you know, Democrats, I think, felt like they have been betrayed by the poll.

• 14:29Joe Weisenthal?

  Does the Senate race in Louisiana this year?

• 14:30Speaker 06

  There is. I, I don't think there's been a single poll of it, but prediction markets say there's a 10% chance that Democrats will win that race, right? I think it's a little ridiculous, but like, yeah.

• 14:38Joe Weisenthal?

  But that's not nothing. Like, that's, the point is, that's far from trivial.

• 14:40Speaker 06

  No, we've had to learn these details about these very red states. Like, oh, South Carolina is, was a Trump plus 18 state. That's what I'm a little bit more skeptical about, right? But the, the strictitudes between what's differentiates Kansas from Nebraska and things like that, if the national environment is as polls say it is.

• 14:57Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 14:57Speaker 06

  Democrats are ahead by about nine points on the generic ballot, which are national polls, essentially, right? At nine points, Republicans, there's too much of a headwind for Republicans, right? And like, you know, you can predict exactly which winning tickets Democrats would draw, but the GOP has to beat that spread, right? Or it just gets too difficult. And like, I think part of the problem with mental models versus actual models, right? People say, well, I could easily see this case where there's a bust again in the polls in the Midwest, right? And I can see this case where, sure, the polls are basically right and polls are a little cautious and Democrats have a sweep, right? And people kind of like wait those 50/50. But first of all, there are the messy middle in-between stories and like, if you have a

• 15:42Speaker 06

  lead in the polls, then you kind of muddle through half the time, right? It's like an NFL game where you have a field goal lead at halftime and then lots of penalties and turnovers, right? And you wind up winning by a field goal, right? So it's ugly, but Democrats tend to win the ugly races. And like, there is more evidence, including non-polling evidence, consistent with the Democrats have a big night story. Like, if you just talked about the things we already talked about in the first 15 minutes about gas and Trump approval ratings and Iran and all that stuff, right? You know, it's not a case where you have this clash really between indicators.

• 16:29Speaker 00

  What's next for virtual assets? I'm Jacob Grease, host of Economy Scale, a series exploring growth in key global sectors. And in this episode, we're diving into the digital forces shaping finance. Sean McHugh from Dubai-based Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority has this to say.

• 16:45Speaker 07

  We're seeing a lot of institutional players come in, digital asset dedicated hedge funds, high-frequency traders and that sort of thing, and folks who service institutional clients.

• 16:54Speaker 00

  As more capital enters the market, adaptive regulation is likely to become increasingly key. Reese Merica-Ripple says.

• 17:02Speaker 07

  A lot of regulators globally would like to keep the industry at arm's length. That's the opposite here. I think also what you'll find is that regulation and frameworks can come out, but some of them are maybe a slight iteration on some 80-year-old policy and not actually in line with what the technology can do and offer. And again, that's very different in Dubai.

• 17:21Speaker 00

  Listen to the full episode wherever you get your podcasts. This series is brought to you by Bloomberg Media Studios and the Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism.

• 17:31Speaker 01

  This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. I'm Carol Muster. Millions of Americans are taking peptides, short strings of amino acids that can act as biological signals for cells. Peptides like insulin can occur naturally in the body, or they can be synthetically introduced to induce a biological process, as happens with semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic. Now, Bloomberg's Anika Inam Pooti reports peptides may be exploring their next frontier, the brain. People are taking peptides for mental clarity and cognitive benefits as alternatives to psychiatric medications and to gain a competitive edge or stave off the effects of aging. Both insulin and semaglutide are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

• 18:15Speaker 01

  Because importing or selling unapproved peptides for human use is not legal in the U.S., many people turn to online forums for guidance and overseas vendors with questionable credentials to obtain them. Unapproved peptides, which are marketed as research chemicals, have been circulating in what's become a billion-dollar gray market amid the rise of do-it-yourself medicine as people increasingly turn to social media or artificial intelligence for medical help. Doctors warn against self-experimentation and advise talking to providers before trying any new therapies. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at chatgpt.com.

• 18:53Speaker 03

  Running a business means you're always on the move. The Delta Sky Miles Reserve Business American Express Card is made for frequent travelers who want premium benefits that works as hard as they do. For a limited time, new Delta Sky Miles Reserve Business Card members can earn 200,000 bonus miles, the highest miles offered this year. And when you need to recharge or find a quiet place to work, the Delta Sky Club can turn a layover into precious productive time or a restful reset. You can enjoy 15 visits each medallion year to the Delta Sky Club when flying Delta and unlock unlimited Delta Sky Club access after spending $75,000 in purchases on your card during a calendar year.

• 19:35Speaker 03

  Plus, receive four one-time guest passes each medallion year so you can bring a colleague along. That's 15 Sky Club visits plus four guest passes for an annual value of up to $950. Value estimate based on $50 per visit rate to purchase additional visits or bring a guest to the Delta Sky Club. Apply today at www.delta.com/podcast. Offer ends 11/4/26. Minimum spending requirements and terms apply.

• 20:01Tracy Alloway?

  I feel like we've been talking about this for many, many years now, but there's this persistent tension between all the consumer sentiment surveys where people report how they're feeling about the economy. Those have been very bad for many years now versus the actual numbers in the economy on consumer spending and other things that look pretty good. Do you have a story you tell yourself for, as, you know, as a forecaster, a story to explain that discrepancy?

• 20:29Speaker 06

  Slightly hot take. I think some of the consumer confidence polling is not very good. You know, the good thing about election polls.

• 20:35Tracy Alloway?

  I don't think that's a hot take, by the way. Like, we've been talking about it for a while.

• 20:39Joe Weisenthal?

  The pollsters are not good, they're not doing best practices at polling.

• 20:42Speaker 06

  We had an article, it's a little bit, by a guest author named Joel Worthheimer, who

• 20:46Joe Weisenthal?

  Oh, Joel's been on our podcast, he's great.

• 20:48Speaker 06

  Yeah, and clearly, I think the University of Michigan survey changed the composition to online in a way that just has like way too many Democrats in the sample. So like ironically, like, ironically, like, the complaint that people make about election pollsters, which is More or less false, we can talk about that more, is kind of true of these consumer sentiment surveys that like, for better or worse, election polls get a dose of reality every two years. Election polls are made in an environment where pollsters are actively fearful of missing, particularly missing high on Democrats, right? So that's why, like, that's why people talk about, like, what's interesting, like, polls and prediction markets. Polls kind of are prediction markets, right? Or polling averages are, at least, right?

• 21:30Joe Weisenthal?

  Okay.

• 21:31Speaker 06

  A poll is a data-informed opinion at this point, right?

• 21:36Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah. Because this is because-

• 21:38Tracy Alloway?

  Because you have to wait it.

• 21:39Joe Weisenthal?

  The pollster has to do so much modeling, right? Is this what you're getting at?

• 21:43Speaker 06

  So like, Marist released a poll of Maine last week, and the top-line number, let me see if I can get this right in my head, said, said Troy Jackson, the Democrat in Maine, is up nine points, which would be a very good result for Democrats. The average, our average had been like, D-plus-three in that state, right? That's their registered voter poll. They applied a likely voter model that brought that lead down to plus-two.

• 22:04Tracy Alloway?

  People self-correct for the Democratic bias, right?

• 22:08Speaker 06

  Yeah, there's no way there, first of all, the math, just, I don't want to get too deep in the weeds, even though it's odd lots, like, the math doesn't, the math doesn't make sense, right? They decided what result they felt comfortable with and reverse-engineered.

• 22:19Joe Weisenthal?

  You see, we just, okay, we don't have to get into the math, but what you're saying is, they had a poll that said Troy Jackson was up nine percent, but in our likely voter model, it's two percent, and what you're saying, what Nate Silver is saying, it's like, I don't know how you got from nine to two.

• 22:34Speaker 06

  No, and the governor's race, they went from eleven to zero, like, the math literally doesn't add up, and like, so it's like, okay, so this is your poll, and this is your opinion.

• 22:42Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 22:43Speaker 06

  It's the way I see it, and like, and we're aggregating opinions, and so, like, on the one hand, when you see a poll like that, I'm like, I have existential doubt about the accuracy of polling, for sure, right? On the other hand, if you have a model that's like, a consensus thermometer that looks at the correlations and translates polls into probabilities, like, that's really what Flipper, my model, is doing, and like, so like, oh, actually, I kind of like that from a modeling standpoint, because it proves the kind of underlying hypothesis that, like, pollsters are rational actors, and therefore, although polls are imprecise instruments, there is a lot of incentive not to systematically miss.

• 23:21Joe Weisenthal?

  I got it. So what you're saying is because you can look at the math and say, look, you can't really justify turning a plus-nine into a plus-two, as someone who aggregates polls and then creates a model, that can give you some sort of confidence that, like-

• 23:39Speaker 06

  Confidence that the errors, in the long run, if you have elections every two or four years, will never have data approval, but confident that the errors are symmetric in the forecast.

• 23:48Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, I get, I get exactly what you're saying. So, okay, people don't pick up the phone like they used to.

• 23:53Speaker 06

  Yeah.

• 23:54Joe Weisenthal?

  I know, you know, certainly, they don't recognize it, and if someone calls me and asks for my political opinion, I'm, no way. So then there's this vision, well, why don't we just create an AI replica of Tracy Halloway, and an AI replica of Joe Weisenthal, and an AI replica of a high-school-educated oil worker in Texas, and an AI-replicated version of a HR professional who works for General Motors in the Detroit suburbs, and we just poll them, and then we don't, and they're always going to pick up the phone, what's wrong with this?

• 24:25Tracy Alloway?

  This is the digital twin idea.

• 24:26Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, the digital, why don't we just create a digital twin of all Americans?

• 24:29Speaker 06

  So the problem is like, and by the way, I think these companies are smart, I know some people that work for them, right? But like, polling cannot be outsourced to AI agents, right? Because it's one of the few sources of ground truth that we have anymore, number one, and also, the models are kind of, so, if you ask a poll to create like, a synthetic Hispanic respondent, right? Ninety-nine percent of their synthetic Hispanic respondents love soccer. It's a bit like if you ask, like, Claude to pick a number from zero to 10, like, always pick seven, right?

• 25:01Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, yeah.

• 25:02Speaker 06

  It's a bit like, I mean, this gets into the whole existential thing about how, like, large language models work, and like, they're kind of, it's kind of the ideal type or something, but like, but no, we need original data, right? Models like Flipper or Prediction Markets can aggregate that data, but, but, you know, because, like, voters aren't all that predictable, you know? I don't even like the kind of slicing and dicing that you see, oh, the Hispanic vote, right? Well, the Hispanic vote is younger Hispanics and older Hispanics, people who are relatively new to the country, and people who have been here for a long time, right? Cuban Americans, and Puerto Ricans, and Mexican Americans, and Dominicans, and everything else, and like, those groups don't always agree with one another.

• 25:37Joe Weisenthal?

  Sure.

• 25:38Speaker 06

  And people miss that, like, the Hispanic vote is one of the most swingy demographics in, in the United States, and so, like, yeah, it just, it just gets overly reductive, and kind of almost like a snake eating its tail a little bit.

• 25:51Tracy Alloway?

  I feel like turnout, in particular, would be difficult for a digital twin to model. Like, maybe you can come up with political preference based on demographics, but like, predicting whether someone is actually going to leave the House and vote seems particularly difficult to me, but tell me if I'm wrong.

• 26:06Speaker 06

  Yeah, we did a little simulation in South Carolina, which is one of the more surprising races to be polling closely, and, you know, and one where, frankly, it'd be a bit more surprised Democrats won, right? But like, you know, what if black voters in South Carolina turned out at 2024 rates, and white voters turn out at 2022 rates? Like, that shifts the top lines by like, 10 points, right? It's a deliberately extreme example, and in South Carolina, the white vote is very conservative, but, you know, that's an example of like, you know, because you have had some midterms where 2018 in particular, you had some states getting up to presidential-type turnout, but if it's differential turnout, that would, you need that for a state like South Carolina to flip.

• 26:46Joe Weisenthal?

  The Democrats at 14% in Mississippi on Polymarket.

• 26:50Speaker 06

  Yeah, that one's a little weird.

• 26:52Joe Weisenthal?

  These are funny states, these southern states are pretty funny, right? Because the top-line votes are actually offered frequently fairly close, it's just that every white is a Republican, and all the non-whites are not Republicans, and so while it looks really close, it's just like, it's just purely demographics, isn't it?

• 27:11Speaker 06

  No, so we have a concept in our model that we call elasticity.

• 27:13Joe Weisenthal?

  Okay.

• 27:14Speaker 06

  Which is how sensitive is a state to changes in the national race? And that's based on voter-level microdata, where we see if people clustered at the tails or more in the middle, and, you know, South Carolina, but especially like Louisiana, Mississippi, have very low elasticity, so that's why, so we are lower than Polymarket and Democrats in those states.

• 27:33Tracy Alloway?

  Actually, since you mentioned demographics, can we talk about gerrymandering for a second? So, to what degree do you see that, I guess, backfiring on the Republicans at this point?

• 27:43Speaker 06

  So, yeah, a gerrymander where you wind up with fewer seats than you would have under the original maps is a dummy-mander, is a term for it.

• 27:49Tracy Alloway?

  This is an actual term.

• 27:50Speaker 06

  It's a term, we have terms for everything in, in politics, only, only poker players have more terms in politics. In Florida, Ron DeSantis drew a map for kind of a presidential year baseline, and in presidential years, I expect Florida to remain a pretty red state, right? It's not robust for like, a D-plus-nine climate, where Florida goes from R-plus-13 to R-plus-4 or something, right? It wasn't designed for that, and if Democrats kind of run the table in Florida, then they could actually wind up with more seats than they would have under the old map, right? In Texas, Republicans hope to make a lot of their gains from, I guess, this may be frankly arrogant presumption that, oh, now Hispanics in South Texas are now our voters, instead of being swingy, and so, like, that probably won't be a dummy-mander, but could

• 28:34Speaker 06

  be a case where the places they hope to maintain gains, you'll have Democratic incumbents holding on.

• 28:40Joe Weisenthal?

  Intuitively, if you're a mapmaker, and your only goal is to maximize the number of seats that your party wins, you have to take some risks, right? Is this the key idea here?

• 28:51Speaker 06

  Correct, I don't even think they necessarily played it wrong, right? So, you know, again, the House is not quite a sure thing, there is a 5% chance. The way that 5% comes up is that, if there is a systematic polling error, and the map winds up being a little bit less blue, then the gerrymanders become more effective again, right? So there's like, you know, it's probably not enough for Republicans, but there's like this exponential, there's inflection point at which gerrymandering goes from not very helpful to helpful for Republicans.

• 29:18Joe Weisenthal?

  There's definitely some analogy here to like, the options market and convexity or something.

• 29:24Tracy Alloway?

  Oh, probably, yeah.

• 29:25Joe Weisenthal?

  I can't quite, I'm not smart enough to articulate it, but there's clear, someone smart enough will be able to, uh, come up with some, what we're really, what would we be talking about in the financial version of this conversation?

• 29:36Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah. Is there a potential upset that you're particularly interested in at the moment, or that you think people aren't paying enough attention to?

• 29:44Speaker 06

  I think governors' races don't get enough attention in general. According to our modeling, we could wind up with almost two-thirds of the country being represented by a Democrat, but there are lots of big gubernatorial races where, unlike in the Senate, in the Senate, you have like, lots of these one- or two-point Democratic leads. In governorships, it's the opposite, like, Abbott is ahead in Texas, but only by a couple of points. I don't think I'd bet against Abbott, given the odds that Flipper gives, but like, I think that governor race is really important, in part because Abbott is the most prolifically pro-data center governor, I think, in the country, and like, and one of the big things, I think-

• 30:23Joe Weisenthal?

  And even, he's not that pro-data center anymore.

• 30:24Speaker 06

  No, I, so, let's say you have at least one Democratic chamber of Congress, maybe, you know, even if Democrats only got to 50 Senate seats, you don't have a Senate, but like, you're going to have a lot of gridlock. I think the one policy area where you could see action before 28 is on AI, right? I mean, if the timelines are even a third as aggressive as the labs think, then they'll kind of be forced to take action, but like, I'll be looking for like, is there evidence that AI had a big effect in this race, and that people were seen as too pro-AI, got punished for it?

• 31:10Speaker 01

  This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. I'm Carol Muster. Millions of Americans are taking peptides, short strings of amino acids that can act as biological signals for cells. Peptides like insulin can occur naturally in the body, or they can be synthetically introduced to induce a biological process, as happens with semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic. Now Bloomberg's Anika Inamputi reports peptides may be exploring their next frontier, the brain. People are taking peptides for mental clarity and cognitive benefits as alternatives to psychiatric medications and to gain a competitive edge or stave off the effects of aging. Both insulin and semaglutide are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Because importing or selling

• 31:55Speaker 01

  unapproved peptides for human use is not legal in the U.S., many people turn to online forums for guidance and oversee vendors with questionable credentials to obtain them. Unapproved peptides, which are marketed as research chemicals, have been circulating in what's become a billion-dollar gray market amid the rise of do-it-yourself medicine as people increasingly turn to social media or artificial intelligence for medical help. Doctors warn against self-experimentation and advise talking to providers before trying any new therapies. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at ChatGPT.com.

• 32:33Speaker 01

  Running a business means you're always on the move. The Delta Sky Miles Reserve Business American Express Card is made for frequent travelers who want premium benefits that works as hard as they do. For a limited time, new Delta Sky Miles Reserve Business Card members can earn 200,000 bonus miles, the highest miles offered this year. And when you need to recharge or find a quiet place to work, the Delta Sky Club can turn a layover into precious productive time or a restful reset. You can enjoy 15 visits each medallion year to the Delta Sky Club when flying Delta and unlock unlimited Delta Sky Club access after spending $75,000 in purchases on your card during a calendar year. Plus, receive

• 33:15Speaker 01

  four one-time guest passes each medallion year so you can bring a colleague along. That's 15 Sky Club visits plus four guest passes for an annual value of up to $950. Value estimate based on $50 per visit rate to purchase additional visits or bring a guest to the Delta Sky Club. Apply today at www.delta.com/podcast. Offer ends 11/4/26. Minimum spending requirements and terms apply. Running a small business takes everything you've got, but with Chase for Business, you're not alone. They bring together local support and a broad range of resources to more than 7 million customers. With a deep understanding of your day-to-day needs, they provide products and guidance built to help you thrive. Right now, earn $500 when you

• 33:57Speaker 01

  open a new Chase Business Complete Checking account for new business checking customers with qualifying activities. Offer expires January 21, 2027. Chase Business Complete Checking has the flexible tools you need to accept payments, make deposits, and manage your finances with confidence. Learn more at chase.com/podcastbizoffer. Chase, make more of what's yours. Fees may apply to Chase Business Complete Checking accounts. The $500 offer is available for new business checking accounts with qualifying activities through 1/21/2027. Eligibility and qualification requirements must be met. Additional restrictions may apply. Please speak with a business banker for more information. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., member FDIC.

• 34:40Speaker 07

  Your business operates under pressure and you need control over your data, but IBM research shows only 9% of companies have real oversight of their technology. IBM's Open Hybrid Cloud approach is designed to give you visibility with built-in governance tools, data sovereignty, and compliance reporting. It's another way IBM helps you stay in control of your data. Let's create smarter business. IBM. Visit IBM.com to learn more.

• 35:10Joe Weisenthal?

  My son the other day told me he wants me to bring him up more on the podcast. He wants me to tell more.

• 35:17Tracy Alloway?

  Is he listening?

• 35:18Joe Weisenthal?

  No, but he's like, he's like, he's like,

• 35:20Tracy Alloway?

  Just tell him you mention him every day.

• 35:22Joe Weisenthal?

  Can you make me famous by telling, mentioning me more on the podcast? So I will tell a story. I've mentioned before, he's very into money. We were watching a University of Texas football game the other day, and there was this, there was this ad for the Abbott campaign. I don't know if it was the official Abbott campaign or one of these outside groups, and it said Gina Hinoza's income tax plan will cost your family thousands of dollars. And my son turns to me, he's like, Dad, we're not voting for her, right?

• 35:50Speaker 06

  Oh, no.

• 35:51Joe Weisenthal?

  It's so funny. And I was like, I was like, this is like, you are exactly who this ad was targeted towards. My seven-year-old, you know, it's like, he just like, Dad, we're not going to vote for her, right? This candidate that costs thousands of dollars.

• 36:04Speaker 06

  No, I was watching the World Series, and there were like three straight ads, and then Mike Lawler, the Westchester County District, right? I'm like, no, even in New York, you can't really, you can't really escape.

• 36:13Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah. At the end of the day, do you have a view, you know, there's the view of, well, should campaigns invest more on like, things like turnout and knocking on doors, et cetera? Or should they just spend a bunch of money on ads? Do you, have in your, any of your research, do you have views on some of these questions?

• 36:34Speaker 06

  I think with ads, you get

• 36:35Joe Weisenthal?

  Because I think like David Shor says, just buy ads.

• 36:38Speaker 06

  I think you get pretty sharply diminishing returns with ads. I like David a lot, but everyone in the system has an incentive to say that advertising really works. You know, like, I think it's better to buy ads to improve voter awareness and expand the map potentially. But look, there's a famous story about Sam Beckman-Fried, talked about some in my book, right, where for some reason Sam Beckman-Fried wanted to back an effective altruist candidate in an Oregon House primary a couple of years ago, right, and gave him like, or didn't give him, right, spent $10 million or something without his permission on his behalf. And that candidate, who at one point was leading the polls, wound up losing the election badly

• 37:20Speaker 06

  because I talked to him for my book, and he's like, well, voters just got so much mail. And who is this odd crypto billionaire funding my campaign, right? It wound up backfiring a little bit.

• 37:31Tracy Alloway?

  This is the flaw in all of advertising, right? Like, you're just annoying me with your product placements and your ads and your intrusion into my life, and it doesn't make me want to buy things from you.

• 37:42Speaker 06

  That's why you need, you know, subscription businesses like terminals and

• 37:45Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, that's correct.

• 37:46Speaker 06

  Newsletters.

• 37:47Joe Weisenthal?

  All right, here's another important question. Let's just say the Democrats end up having a very good night. What will we watch within that to know what the future of the Democratic Party is, whether the future is going to be a more DSA-inflected one, et cetera? You know, give us what we might learn about what works for successful Democratic Party politicians.

• 38:12Speaker 06

  For the internal politics of the Democratic Party, the most important race is probably Michigan, where Abdul El-Sayed beat the more moderate Haley Stevens in the primary.

• 38:18Joe Weisenthal?

  But not by much.

• 38:20Speaker 06

  Not by much, by much, that was not a great race for polls, by the way. If he wins by enough of a margin that the race is called on election night, right, then that will be like a feather in progressives' cap. Maybe people like me will say, well, he won by four and the baseline is nine, so, oh my gosh, he underperformed his work. Very bad candidate.

• 38:39Joe Weisenthal?

  I like, this is your impression of yourself.

• 38:42Speaker 06

  Yeah.

• 38:44Tracy Alloway?

  It's Nate Silver squared, right?

• 38:46Speaker 06

  You know, on the other hand, like, if, I kind of think if Democrats have like a really, really, really good night, and it's like, well, we can dominate all these moderate white guys, Adam Hamilton in Kansas is a pastor, Talarico, Talarico is kind of woke progressive, right? But like, he kind of has managed to brand himself differently. It might have helped him to have Jasmine Crockett in that primary. He got to define himself as like the sensible middle ground.

• 39:09Joe Weisenthal?

  But you talk about the Hamilton race in Kansas and what that would, yeah.

• 39:13Speaker 06

  So Kansas, I have family in Overland Park, right? And for years, it's been like, you know, Roger Marshall could be in trouble, and I kind of never really believed him. Like, yo, it's Kansas. Kansas has low-key gotten a bit more democratic. It voted Democratic on the abortion referendum, and has elected Laura Kelly as governor twice. You know, Roger Marshall has these medical billing practices that are very unflattering, and like Adam Hamilton would be like, oh, we just want cheaper gas and integrity in Kansas, right? And like, that pitch might catch kind of the opposite of, it's a relatively elastic state, right? There are, there are opinions that can change. It's pretty well-educated. So like, yeah, and you know, last week CNN had a poll showing Hamilton up four points in Kansas, but like, yeah, Kansas is one, like, I have more trouble with believing in

• 39:58Speaker 06

  the South Carolina polling than the Kansas.

• 40:00Joe Weisenthal?

  But basically, there is certainly a possibility that the day after election day, you're going to be like, look, you and Matt Iglesias are going to be like, look at Kansas, Democrats are right to nominate the middle ground white guy, and the DSA people are going to say, look, we are right to nominate AES wins by nine points. He has a great night, like the polls say, and you just keep fighting.

• 40:24Speaker 06

  No, this is like, it's a fairly clean National experiment.

• 40:28Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 40:29Speaker 06

  Natural experiment, Michigan. I went to there, you know, there's been a Muslim American elected to the US Senate. So there are reasons apart from his progressivism, why Elsie could struggle or be good. I mean, you know, he's bro-y, right? He doesn't come across as like, he's bro-y in a very Michigan way. Doesn't come across.

• 40:43Tracy Alloway?

  I was gonna say, also, it's Michigan versus Kansas, right? It might be that you like fit the candidate onto the state, right?

• 40:50Speaker 06

  And Michigan's a, you know, they have a strong gubernatorial nominee and are favored in that race. I don't know if there's some degree of coattails or something, but yeah, all we're gonna, you know, from November 4th onward, the story of the next year and a half is gonna be party infighting.

• 41:04Joe Weisenthal?

  Do you, what about this, like, isn't there something going on like Florida AG? Or there's some race in Florida, right? Where some socialist seems to be polling well. Do you know anything about that?

• 41:13Speaker 06

  Well, I mean, in the, in the Senate race.

• 41:16Joe Weisenthal?

  Is it Senate? What is it? What's happening in Florida?

• 41:18Speaker 06

  In Senate race, you had a DSA Democrat, Angie Nixon.

• 41:21Joe Weisenthal?

  Angie Nixon. Oh, she's running for Senate.

• 41:22Speaker 06

  She's running for Senate and she's not polling that well. I mean, she's, yeah, Florida, one thing we should probably count for in our models is, is net domestic migration, right?

• 41:34Joe Weisenthal?

  Okay.

• 41:34Speaker 06

  The models.

• 41:35Joe Weisenthal?

  Oh, yeah.

• 41:35Speaker 06

  Keep missing low on Florida because you have a steady flow of red voters into the state. And we're using benchmarks based on the last election, but like Florida's a moving target for that.

• 41:45Joe Weisenthal?

  It's interesting. If you look at, um, Polly Market, because I keep pulling them up as we mentioned them. And everyone has shown a little bit of a bump for the Democrat in the last several weeks. So Mississippi, South Carolina, quite a big one. Annie Andrews at 28%, which is way higher than she was just a few weeks ago when it was at 13%. No bump at all in Florida. Angie Nixon is at 10%. And that's actually lower than where she was through much of the summer.

• 42:12Speaker 06

  Yeah. And this fellow's polling, right? The New York Times had some polling that was very strong for Democrats, but not in Florida. They had Ashley Moody ahead by six or seven or something.

• 42:18Tracy Alloway?

  To what degree are prediction markets just like reflecting polling now?

• 42:21Joe Weisenthal?

  Talk to us about that.

• 42:23Speaker 06

  I think they're reflecting polling plus sentiment in kind of a, it's somewhere between smart and midwit.

• 42:35Speaker 06

  Right? So again, people in prediction markets do have to quantify ultimately their price, right? And I think that exercise is, is helpful. When they go play poker, they can be like, oh, I think that guy might be bluffing. I'm saying, I say, well, I'm getting two to one from the pot, right? Last decision I have to make, who I think is a greater than a 33% chance or not. Like, I think the prediction markets have a slightly Republican leaning clientele, right? Like Democrats are a little preachy about them sometimes. Republicans have more, more money, right?

• 43:04Joe Weisenthal?

  Well, we saw the famous like huge whiff in the LA mayor race where like, like Spencer Pratt, like, who in their right mind thought a Republican was gonna win a mayorship at a major US city?

• 43:15Speaker 06

  Yeah, but like they have like these, like the recognition that polling error is correlated. Like we talked about at the top of the show, that's an important recognition to have. The markets were actually overconfident relative to my model in 2016 on Hillary Clinton, right? So everyone knows that, but like, I think the belief that, oh, polls always underestimate Republicans is not the most sophisticated version of that necessarily.

• 43:39Joe Weisenthal?

  Is there anyone systematically making money? I mean, I'm, I'm gonna put you on the spot here or Silver Bulletin on the spot. But do you feel that someone could make money betting on prediction markets? Anytime there's a deviation between Silver Bulletin model for a given race and the prediction markets?

• 43:58Speaker 06

  Well, look, I would say when our model came out on August 11th, we moved the markets by several points, right? And so like, if you have markets that can look at our model and are influenced by our model, also look at other models, right? And on top of that, incorporate some degree of vibes. I mean, I help, they can also just get to things faster, right? If there's a scandal, the New York Times reports on Thursday morning.

• 44:20Joe Weisenthal?

  Sure.

• 44:20Speaker 06

  Then it will take several days to show up in the polling, right? And so like, yeah, I mean, I went through recently and looked at every race where you have a gap between Flipper, my model, and Polly Market. And like, I agree with Polly Market on half of those, you know? Although ironically, some of the ones I agree with, I'm like, oh yeah, Flipper's way too high in South Carolina. And then there's this good poll for Democrats, South Carolina that brings, you know, so maybe kind of arguing it to yourself a little bit. But like, yeah, so the test would be like, you have to create like some type of laboratory environment where prediction markets aren't allowed to look at polls. And my expectation is that prediction markets would be extremely terrible.

• 44:54Joe Weisenthal?

  Well, it seems like actually the test would be, you would wanna have prediction markets that aren't allowed to look at models, right? Because of course they're gonna look at.

• 45:03Speaker 06

  Fair enough.

• 45:03Joe Weisenthal?

  Right? Like that, like, because ideally you wouldn't want the so, the day the Silver Bulletin numbers dropped to influence the prediction markets. Ideally, you're looking at polls and creating a model and prediction market traders are looking at polls and creating a price. And the question is, which is the better way to derive a probability?

• 45:22Speaker 06

  Yeah, look, and like building a simulation with all these regional correlations is tricky, right? We are like, as of when we're recording this, we are like literally like 0.995 correlated with Polly Market on individual states. We have the overall Democratic win probability a bit higher. You know, I don't know. That's because it's attracting a different type of trader, right? Like that, like you get maybe more of the, you know, the whales, right? Not like the French whale from 2024, but like whales, like degenerate, rich guys with a lot of money to burn, right?

• 45:55Joe Weisenthal?

  The dream.

• 45:56Speaker 06

  Where they're maybe less likely to invest in individual races. But there's really not that, there's really not that much of a, of a gap, right?

• 46:03Joe Weisenthal?

  You've been building models for a really long time. And of course, you first sort of became a household name in 2008. So that's 18 years ago. That's crazy. So that means there are people who are gonna be voting in this election that were like born during the Obama administration.

• 46:19Speaker 06

  Oh, my gosh.

• 46:19Joe Weisenthal?

  Like at these, you know, some of these things freak me out a little bit. Can you talk objectively about like, is it unambiguous in your mind that AI has made it easier for you to build models and to do your job?

• 46:33Speaker 06

  Yeah, for sure. Look, I get to hire two world-class programmers, coders for whatever I pay for the max plans, right? A hundred or 200 bucks a month.

• 46:43Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 46:43Speaker 06

  You know, so I, I have these complex projects that you definitely couldn't one-shot or even come close to it. But I, I know this really well and I've quoted these things myself. And I know when you feed GPT or Claude a 10,000-word program and say, carefully audit this. It's quite sharp about it. Now, I would still say on like two-thirds of prompts, I have to provide quite a bit of guidance, right? It's not like, oh, cool, man. Next step, right? But like, it's great. It's a great teammate, you know? To take something in a more obscure example, so we have an NFL model. The NFL has all these complex playoff tiebreakers, right?

• 47:28Speaker 06

  They're purely algorithmic. And last year when I built our model, it took me two and a half days to code them up. And like, some of the code was buggy. We skipped a couple of tiebreakers. It was very slow, right? You know, now you have GPT or Claude do it and they do it in, in 15 minutes while you're at the gym, right? Um, and it's code is 10 times faster. Now, again, there are dangers, like they can introduce bugs and kind of hide them from you. We built a soccer model too, and like in one version of soccer model, it had the ratings like looping back around. So like the 2026 rating would inform like the 1900 rating and it got, it would do things that were, was quite weird. But you know, the combination of having like a lot of initiative and entrepreneurial spirit and expertise.

• 48:11Speaker 06

  Cause there's a certain type of person I meet. You guys are probably in that category, right? Where it's like, it's like people are saying me, I feel like I'm the most productive I've ever, ever been, right? I feel like I'm getting two days of work done in, in a 10-hour day sometimes. And, and I feel like that some of the time, but, but again, I'm probably in the 99.9th percentile of like, these models are helpful with the exact, I'm not really a coder, right? I understand model architecture. I'm an empiricist. I understand probabilities, but like my coding was always the weak point. So it's like, it's the exact thing they're really good at and is really valuable to me is the exact thing that, that they do very well.

• 48:47Joe Weisenthal?

  Your FIFA World Cup model did have Spain versus Argentina in the final.

• 48:51Speaker 06

  We had a really good, yeah. And that's the thing about, and we have NFL, you know, you have good weeks and bad weeks. And like, that's why, you know, maybe if Republicans win the House with, with the Senate, we'd say, well, 25% things happen, right? It'd be great, but like, if they win the House, maybe we'll just make Silver Bulletin AI in a sports blog. Just give up.

• 49:09Tracy Alloway?

  Just give up.

• 49:10Joe Weisenthal?

  Nate Silver, thank you so much for joining us on our election day special.

• 49:15Speaker 06

  Thank you, Joe.

• 49:29Joe Weisenthal?

  That was a fun conversation, Tracy. I think my favorite part of the conversation was Nate preemptively parodying how he will sound if Abdul Al-Sayed slightly underperforms.

• 49:41Tracy Alloway?

  It was a good impression of himself.

• 49:43Joe Weisenthal?

  Nate Silver doing the impression of an annoying white moderate guy was good. But that was fun. I'm glad. Happy Election Day, people. I'm glad Nate joined us for today.

• 49:52Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah, by the time this comes out, I guess maybe some of the polls will have changed.

• 49:56Joe Weisenthal?

  Maybe some of the polls.

• 49:57Tracy Alloway?

  We'll have some additional data, maybe.

• 49:59Joe Weisenthal?

  We'll have some more early voting data.

• 50:00Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah, exactly. One thing I thought was really interesting was this idea of polls basically all becoming models now, right?

• 50:08Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, I know.

• 50:08Tracy Alloway?

  And like, after years and years and years of being accused of, I guess, overestimating Democrats in the polls, everyone now is self-correcting. And so the question is, like, how big is that self-correction?

• 50:21Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, and it's interesting, and I guess we didn't go into the math specifically, but if you can empirically establish that your self-correction here makes no sense.

• 50:31Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah.

• 50:31Joe Weisenthal?

  Then what you do learn is, as Nate said, pollsters are self-interested players. Because who is it? What was the famous pollster in Iowa, Seltzer, Ann Seltzer, who actually, you know, right before the 2024 election, actually had Kamala Harris winning Iowa?

• 50:47Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah. No one wants to poll a Seltzer, right?

• 50:51Joe Weisenthal?

  It was so off that she retired from the game. And that's kind of, I guess, what Nate was saying, too, which is that if Republicans win the House, it's like, you know what? I think we're done. I think we're done trying to-

• 51:01Tracy Alloway?

  Just go into sports betting.

• 51:02Joe Weisenthal?

  These crazy American voters, we're done trying to understand anything about them because we have nothing, we have no usable information on them. Go ask your digital twin.

• 51:11Tracy Alloway?

  All right. Shall we leave it there?

• 51:12Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, let's leave it there.

• 51:13Tracy Alloway?

  This has been another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

• 51:19Joe Weisenthal?

  And I'm Jill Weisenthal. You can follow me at theStalwart. Follow our guest Nate Silver. He's at NateSilver538. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armin, Dashal Bennett at Dashbot, Kale Brooks at KaleBrooks, and Kevin Lozano at KevinLloydLozano. And of course, you can chat about all of these topics 24/7 in our Discord, discord.gg/oddlots. And for more Odd Lots content, you can check out our daily newsletter, which you can find at Bloomberg.com/oddlots.

• 51:47Tracy Alloway?

  And if you enjoyed this conversation, if you like it when we do our Election Day specials, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And if you're watching on video, then please leave a comment or like, or better yet, subscribe.

• 52:01Joe Weisenthal?

  And remember, if you're an Odd Lots subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free. All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

• 52:11Tracy Alloway?

  Thanks for joining.

• 52:43Tracy Alloway?

  Empower is all about helping you invest well, so you can go out and live a little. And their Free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more. Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored.

• 53:15Speaker 02

  With ChatGPT, you can do more than get answers. You can get things done. Whether you're leading a big project, planning an elaborate trip, or trying to balance work and life, ChatGPT can help. Give it a goal, plus things like files, notes, or project plans, develop a trip itinerary with daily updates, or create a prioritized schedule, so you can spend less energy sorting out the details and more on bringing your biggest ideas to life. Get started at ChatGPT.com.

• 53:42Speaker 03

  This holiday season, celebrate the ones you know by heart with a gift that says it all. Because the best gifts don't just look beautiful, they mean something, too. From engraveable pieces that tell your story, to festive charms that capture special memories, to stunning lab-grown diamonds, Pandora has meaningful jewelry for the people who inspire you and have been there through it all. Give a piece that says exactly what words can't. Pandora, more than a gift. Shop new styles in-store or online at pandora.net.