The Economist Who Called 2008 Says The Debt Crisis Warning Is A Myth — We Had To React

Welcome to Impact Theory with Tom Bilyeu. In today’s episode, we dive deep into the economic insights of Professor Steve Keen—a renowned economist who famously predicted the 2008 financial crisis. Keen challenges mainstream economic models and reveals the fundamental misconceptions that lead economists to repeatedly misjudge the state of the economy, especially when it comes to debt. We’ll unpack why conventional wisdom about government and private debt is dangerously flawed, explore the real mechanics of money creation in modern economies, and explain why ignoring private debt can leave entire nations blindsided by financial turmoil. Along the way, we’ll touch on provocative ideas like debt jubilees, the dangers of unchecked debt cycles, and the delicate balance between innovation, lending, and inflation. Strap in as we question what you really know about economics, challenge widely held beliefs, and uncover the models shaping your financial future—whether you realize it or not. Quince: Free shipping and 365-day returns at https://quince.com/impactpod Whatnot: Download the Whatnot app today and get free shipping on your first order. Ketone IQ: Visit https://ketone.com/IMPACT for 30% OFF your subscription order ATT Business: Switch to AT&T Business at business.att.com http://business.att.com Incogni: Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code IMPACT at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/impact Pique: 20% off at https://piquelife.com/impact Netsuite: For the first time ever you can try NetSuite Next for free. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, go to https://NetSuite.ai/Theory https://netsuite.ai/Theory. Built for every industry. Ready for every boardroom. Sign up for my AI Masterclass: https://tombilyeu.com/ai-masterclass?utm_campaign=TBS-Livestream&utm_source=you https://tombilyeu.com/ai-masterclass?utm_campaign=TBS-Livestream&utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=social tube&utm_medium=social https://tombilyeu.com/ai-masterclass?utm_campaign=TBS-Livestream&utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=social Check us out wherever you get your podcasts: Spotify:https://open.spotify.com/show/1nARKz2vTIOb7gC9dusE4b?si=a8daffd2bf1f48fd Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/tom-bilyeus-impact-theory/id1191775648 Do you need my help STARTING a business? Join me here inside ZERO TO FOUNDER: (https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder) Get the exact systems, mindset shifts, and principles that built a $1B brand delivered straight to your inbox every week. Subscribe for free (https://tombilyeu.com) https://tombilyeu.com Check out our Video game - Project Kyzen: (https://projectkyzen.io/) https://projectkyzen.io/ Catch Me Streaming on Twitch - (https://twitch.tv/tombilyeu) Link to IT discord:https://discord.gg/TZKJ2etPbT Tom's Favorite Things List: https://amzn.to/41Ftt7e For Business inquiries: [email protected] mailto:[email protected] FOLLOW TOM: Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/tombilyeu/ Twitter:https://twitter.com/tombilyeu YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@TomBilyeu See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  As a small business owner, sometimes it feels like no matter how much planning you do, there's always surprises, like an urgent, expensive repair. But here's a surprise you will like. With Progressive, small business owners save 13% on their commercial auto insurance when they pay in full. So enjoy a surprise for once. Get a quote in as little as eight minutes at progressivecommercial.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Discounts not available in all states or situations.

• 0:28Speaker 01

  Ever notice how life's best stories don't happen in your living room? They happen on the open road, out on the water, or parked under the stars. At Progressive, they get that you want to focus on the experience, not worry about the what ifs. That's why they offer quality insurance designed for your ride, whether that's a boat, RV, or motorcycle. Adventure with confidence. Visit progressive.com and see how easy it is to protect your favorite way to get away. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Not available in DC. Prices vary based on how you buy.

• 1:01Speaker 02

  Steve Keen is an economist. He starts out, actually was a tennis player who could have potentially gone pro and is also a very left-leaning, like with Marxists. He loves Marx. So Marxist views, thinks Marx is the best economic mind ever, or certainly of his day. That one, I don't have teased out well enough. And so you know me, I'm violently opposed to Marxism, and I'm learning a lot from this guy. And so this is where always seek disconfirming evidence, because you've got to find the holes in your own game. So anyway, economist, very left-leaning, very much somebody who believes that Marx

• 1:44Speaker 02

  had the right ideas, but had a conclusion he wanted more, and so ended up breaking his own train of logic. I respect Steve Keen for that dramatically, that he can go, okay, here are the parts that I like about this thing, here is where this goes off the rails. I don't think he covers it in this video, so I'm not going to talk about it, but he can actually point to you the moment where Marx ends up going off the rails, the thing that he gets very wrong. So really, really a fascinating thinker. Don't turn off to him, even if he seems like maybe he's partisan. I think that's the wrong interpretation of him. I think this really is somebody who's trying to actually identify what makes the economy work. And so I doubt this will be the last video that we do with Steve Keen. We are trying to get him on the show.

• 2:28Speaker 02

  Okay, so economist who ends up being one of the people that predicts 2008 coming. He gets a lot of credit for that, but he didn't get wealthy because he doesn't play in the stock market at all. He knows that we move in these booms and bust cycles. He thinks he has a better explanation for it, but doesn't want to be in the markets. I think partly it's philosophical, and unfortunately, I think he's wrong about that. I think that's a huge mistake, anyway. Okay, so that's Steve Keen. He's now going to try to explain why economists keep getting the economy so wrong, why they fail to see problems coming. He sees a massive problem coming right now, which he and I both see the same problem coming, but he's pointing to a thing to pay attention to that was just not on my radar in this way.

• 3:13Speaker 02

  I've already done a deep dive on private debt, so it was on my radar, but not in this way. And I think this is going to be a load-bearing pillar, in my view, going forward. So strap in.

• 3:24Speaker 03

  Nations are drowning in debt. The world could soon owe more than it earns.

• 3:30Speaker 04

  Our national debt is now larger than our entire annual economic output.

• 3:35Speaker 05

  There's going to be a government debt crisis in the near future. And I want to go through now and show why these warnings are completely wrong.

• 3:43Speaker 06

  Meet Steve Keen. He's the world-class professor and famously predicted the 2008 global financial crisis years before it happened. Now he's lifting the hood on the GAO's terrifying debt projections to show the glaring mathematical blind spot the mainstream media completely missed. The USA currently has $31.5 trillion in public debt.

• 4:04Speaker 05

  And that is...

• 4:05Speaker 02

  So first of all, that number is now 39 million and approaching 40 million. So it's grown a lot since that number came out. And so what's really interesting is to see, one of the things, one of his philosophies, not philosophies, one of his core beliefs is that the economic textbooks are written by people that have one glaring, fundamental misunderstanding of how economies actually work. And as we go through this, I'll help fill out some of the gaps in what he explains, because the first time he went through this, I was so dizzy. My first reaction was, this is idiotic. I spent hours researching this from a position of, this guy's obviously wrong, and let me

• 4:48Speaker 02

  just put together the best argument as to why he's wrong. And the more I went through it, I was like, wait, wait, hold on. Actually, so the core misunderstanding that he's going to be getting into is that the federal government and the Fed have to be understood that the way that they end up creating money and injecting it into the system is very different than the way that loaning money that already exists works. And so if you map banks as being an intermediary that simply loan deposits out to people, you will never be right about the economy, ever.

• 5:28Speaker 02

  If you understand that the way that banks actually do this is that banks create money in the act of loaning it. And so now you need to watch the private debt as it grows and shrinks, and forget about government debt, which is a totally different phenomenon, then you'll be able to actually understand where things are going. Okay, I'm going to leave that there for now. I don't expect people to understand it yet. This is going to get more clear as we go.

• 5:54Speaker 05

  It simply sounds boring. In fact, if you get this wrong, you make up myths about the economy, so you have to understand. This is a serious warning. There's only one trouble. It's based on completely mythical, completely fallacious visions. The Government Accountability Office has just published a report to Congress telling the Congress that unless there's urgent and sustained action to improve the fiscal outlook for the economy, there's going to be a government debt crisis.

• 6:22Speaker 02

  Okay, so the important thing to anchor yourself with is the punchline is going to end up being, he agrees that there is a crisis coming, he even agrees that there's a debt crisis. He just does not agree it's a government debt crisis. Okay, going back to this idea of when the government creates money, that's, again, they're creating money out of thin air. And so you end up, we're going to have to get into the math of this, and I believe he does that in a minute. So just know, when the government creates money, it ends up being good for GDP. He's going to show the math. Okay, and I'll slow it down, I'll walk us through that. But for now, just put in your mind, government creates debt, that improves GDP. So basically, people's lives are getting better. Again, we'll go into that more. If you think that banks are a part of that system, you're right.

• 7:07Speaker 02

  If you think banks are simply loaning out deposits, you're so wrong, you will forever be confused about the economy. That's what you need to understand right now at this part in our journey.

• 7:17Speaker 05

  And debt as a share of the economy is projected to grow at an unsustainable rate. I mentioned government debt there because they don't mention whether it's government or private. They simply talk about government debt as if that's the only form of debt, which is something that neo-classical economists in general do all the time. And I want to go through and now and show why these warnings are completely wrong, because economists do not understand money. Ridiculous, because everybody thinks economists are experts on money, but fundamentally, they don't include money in their MacRic and McModels, and their arguments about money are based on fallacious concepts of how money is created. But let's see what they're warning the government of in America right now.

• 8:02Speaker 05

  And this is the same thing that is being told to the British government, to the Australian government, to the Spanish government, governments all around the world are being told, government debt is dangerous, you must reduce it. So the Government Accountability Office has said that government debt will reach 106% of GDP, according to their projections, by 2029. It'll grow twice as fast as the economy over the next 10 years, and they claim in 30 years' time, it'll hit 250% of GDP. So it's unsustainable for government, it's unsustainable for debt, and here they, just by leaving out any word, all they're thinking of is government debt. Over the long term, it's unsustainable for government debt to grow faster than the economy grows.

• 8:46Speaker 05

  This is the projections they're making.

• 8:48Speaker 02

  A really important thing to say here is that they are right. So if the debt grew faster than the economy, you really are going to be in trouble. What he's going to show is that that isn't what ends up happening once you take into consideration how money actually works. Remember, we have a math formula that's coming, that's going to talk about how GDP is based on the amount of money in the system and how often it turns over. And if the only way to get money into the system is through government debt, which

• 9:28Speaker 02

  by the way, is true, then you find yourself in a position where the only way to grow the economy is to either speed up the velocity of money, and I'm going to leave that alone for now, just because it'll get overly complicated. But for now, there's only two variables in his mental model. Okay, so his mental model says that GDP is the amount of money in the system times how many times it turns over. Okay, so if I've got a dollar, how many times does it move through the economy? So I buy something for a dollar, person that I paid that dollar then buys something for a dollar. So that'd be two. So that'd be two turnovers. The actual velocity, it's known as velocity of money. The actual velocity of money, how many times it turns over right now, I believe in the US is 1.8.

• 10:13Speaker 02

  I can't remember if he talks about that here, but that just is a true number. And so it's usually somewhere between 1.8, maybe 2.2, somewhere in there. Okay, so now, you've only got two variables. If you want to increase GDP, you can add more money to the system, government debt, or you can increase velocity, get people to buy more stuff and move that dollar around faster. Okay, if you understand that much so far, you will understand if you have that mental model, then anybody saying that government debt is going to be a problem is nonsensical because you can't bring on government debt without increasing GDP.

• 10:54Speaker 02

  So the government debt is a function of growing GDP in his mental model. Okay, if he ends up being right about that, then of course, it makes no sense to say, as government debt grows, that we create a problem in the economy. Okay, if you've got that much so far, you're in good shape. We're hitting pause for a moment, but there's plenty more ahead, so don't go anywhere.

• 11:17Speaker 02

  Thanks for sticking around. Let's get right back into the action. All right, keep on.

• 11:22Speaker 05

  They're projecting forward what they think is going to happen to government debt over the next 30 years. And you can see there's been rises and falls in government debt as a percentage of GDP from 1900 till today. But they simply project continued growth. And notice the ratio of government debt to GDP is rising exponentially.

• 11:41Speaker 02

  Okay, so another important thing to note. What he's saying is they're modeling out something that's ahistorical. We just don't see that. It does not go up, up, up, up, up, up, up forever. We have like all these ups and downs. So already, he's saying their projections. And by the way, he's a big believer in that the climate is going to be a catastrophe. There's a reason Quince sells cashmere for $60, and it isn't the cashmere. It's real 100% Mongolian cashmere. It's the same stuff luxury labels charge a fortune for. Quince just works directly with ethical factories and cuts out the middleman. So there's no need for a markup and no logo tax. The $60 goes to the actual sweater, not the fancy name on the tag.

• 12:22Speaker 02

  That's why everything they make runs 50 to 80% less. And it's not just the cashmere. I ordered a few things myself. Their fleece joggers, a couple of their tees, which I wear obsessively. First thing I noticed was the quality. Soft, well-made, built to hold up. They make down jackets and wool outerwear now, too. So upgrade your stuff to things you'll actually wear. Find your next fall favorites at Quince. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, let them know it was Impact Theory. It's the best way to support the show.

• 13:06Speaker 02

  Let's talk about what it means to actually be visible in today's day and age. When you build something public, whether it's a business or an audience, anything on social media, you become a target. This is something that legitimately keeps me up at night because our data isn't just on the obvious broker sites. It's on old news portals, public forums, obscure directories, places you would never think to look. That's where Incogni's exposure scanner comes in. It hunts down your personal information across the wider web, not just the 420-plus broker sites Incogni already removes your data from automatically. They can't harm you if they can't find you.

• 13:47Speaker 02

  Go to incogni.com/impact and use code IMPACT for 60% off an annual plan. Try it risk-free for 30 days. That's incogni, I-N-C-O-G-N-I, dot com slash impact and use code IMPACT. Let's talk about your sales pipeline reviews. If your CRM is half-empty fields and notes nobody finished, every review turns into guesswork. I've seen it so many times in my own sales team, and that's where today's sponsor, Pipe Drive, comes in. An intelligent, AI-powered sales CRM that is loved by growing sales teams. Pipe Drive just launched Meeting Intelligence built right into the CRM.

• 14:30Speaker 02

  Before the call, it pulls the deal history and past conversations into one brief. During the call, it records and takes notes. After, it drafts the CRM updates for your rep to review and approve. The record stays complete, and you see what's actually happening. Switch to a CRM built by salespeople for salespeople and join the over 100,000 companies already using Pipe Drive. My link gets you an exclusive 30 days free instead of the usual 14-day trial. So make sure you use it. No credit card or payment is needed. Just head to pipedrive.com/impact to get started today. That's pipedrive.com/impact, and you can be up and running in just minutes.

• 15:14Speaker 02

  ... and I think he's ironically making the same mistake there, where he's taking these models that just go up forever and not looking at all the fluctuations that we see historically. Anyway, I digress. He's pointing out here that history looks nothing like the forward projection. So we should automatically have an alarm bell that goes off that says, "These are fake numbers."

• 15:33Speaker 05

  They go almost totally vertical unless we do something about the level of government spending. And equally, because you pay interest on government debt, they're making the same projections about what's going to happen to interest payments. So they're saying the historical high was right back in the early 1990s, when interest payments were 3.2% of GDP. Now they're at the same level, and they project them to triple over the next 30 years. So this is a serious warning. There's only one trouble. It's based on completely mythical, completely fallacious visions of how money is created in a capitalist economy. And this is not something specific to the Government Accountability Office. This is something that all economists learn when they're at university.

• 16:18Speaker 05

  So this is an extract from Mankiw's textbook on macroeconomics. And just to read it through, "When the government spends more than it receives in tax revenue, the resulting budget deficit lowers national savings. The supply of what they call loanable funds, and fundamentally, you can regard that as the money that's in your bank accounts because that's the money you have available to lend out to somebody else. The supply of loanable funds decreases. When the government borrows to finance its budget deficit, it crowds out firms that would otherwise borrow to finance investment. And what they've, the simple supply and demand model that Mankiw uses to illustrate his argument, argues that a budget deficit reduces the supply of loanable funds because it takes funds that households would have lent to firms, and instead it goes to the government.

• 17:02Speaker 05

  So that is the mindset that all people who accept mainstream neo-classical economics have in their heads. And the people who staff the Government Accountability Office are all predominantly economists. They learn this stuff. They think it's correct. But the trouble is, it's not. They learn what they get taught at university, which uses supply and demand diagrams, as you saw in the extract from Mankiw. But banks don't draw supply and demand curves to decide how much money to lend to you. They use double-entry bookkeeping. And that is something which instantly sounds boring. You know, double-entry bookkeeping, men's accountants, and all this dreadful, dull stuff. In fact, if you get this wrong, you make up myths about the economy.

• 17:45Speaker 05

  So you have to understand double-entry bookkeeping to know how banks actually operate and how money is created in a capitalist economy. So what double-entry bookkeeping does, first of all, is classify all financial claims as either financial assets or financial liabilities.

• 18:01Speaker 02

  The one misspeak that he did there is that it isn't either/or. It is both an asset and a liability, always and forever. So you end up with matter and antimatter. And this is a big part of his argument, is that what he's saying is people do not seem to understand that when you create debt, you create this, you have both a liability and the asset. And so if you were to pay off that debt, then you lose both the liability and the asset. And so they just zero out. And people are not thinking about the fact that as you pay off debt, that money ceases to exist.

• 18:40Speaker 02

  And so if he's right, and GDP is a function of the amount of money in the system times the velocity of money, how many times it turns over, pulling money out of the system is going to slow your GDP. So that's where understanding this matter/antimatter thing is very important. Because if you understand that they cancel each other out, then you understand why he's saying that this growing isn't a problem because they cancel each other out. And pulling it out of the system becomes a problem because they cancel each other out, because they affect directly your GDP. All right.

• 19:19Speaker 05

  Transactions twice on each line. Once is a credit entry, and once is a debit entry. That's what makes accounting very hard to learn. But you also record all transactions from two perspectives, from the creditors and the debtors. So each transaction requires at least two of what I call godly tables in Ravel to show the overall dynamics. Now, my side of economics, which goes right back to Joseph Schumpeter back in the early 1900s and even earlier, back under disputes between different schools of economic thought back in the 1800s. My side has been saying that that's wrong. Banks are not intermediaries. Banks create money by creating debt. And that argument has only been made by critics of the economics for decades.

• 20:04Speaker 05

  But in 2014, the Bank of England actually came out and said, "The critics like me are right, and the textbooks are wrong."

• 20:12Speaker 02

  He is 100% correct. So I didn't even know that neo-classical economists think of banks as intermediaries. There are actually people, it might even be Ben Bernanke, don't quote me on that. But there was like a really big economist who was like, "The right way to think about a bank is that they take a little bit of money for delineating between who's worthy of lending money to and who's not." And while that is a role that they play, the reality is that they're part of the central banking system. And so when they create a loan, they are creating money out of thin air. That money didn't exist, and now it exists. And now banks are held accountable in terms of

• 20:52Speaker 02

  they have to have assets on the book that match the solvency rate, if you will. Like, they need to have more assets than they have liabilities. Otherwise, they're insolvent. So they have rules on them like that, which is exactly how a bank can end up failing, is they find themselves having to write off enough of their assets that their liabilities become more than their assets.

• 21:16Speaker 02

  But it is very important to understand that part of it if we're going to begin mapping how neoclassical economists get themselves in trouble because they're thinking of the bank as simply an intermediary of deposit money, which would not create new money, which would therefore not affect GDP. Whereas if it is what it really is, and I'm shocked to hear that anybody argues this, but because we have a federal central banking system, when a bank creates that new loan, they're not pulling from deposits. Okay, that's a very important thing to understand. They are not pulling from deposits.

• 21:58Speaker 02

  They have a license from the Fed to just create that money. And so, poof, it now exists.

• 22:06Speaker 07

  Reserves are determined by the amount of notes that people want to hold or need for their transactions and the amount of notes and reserves that banks want to hold, given the level of interest rates in the economy. It is not chosen or fixed by the central bank, as is sometimes described in some economics textbooks.

• 22:20Speaker 05

  So this report was published called Money Creation in the Modern Economy, and it opened with the statement that money creation in practice differs from some popular misconceptions. Banks do not act simply as intermediaries, lending out deposits, others save us place with them, and nor do they multiply up central bank money. So it's criticizing two models that economists use to purportedly describe the monetary system. One is called loanable funds, the other is called the money multiplier. The Bank of England said both of those models are wrong. And when you put this model together, you find that there's no particular impact of private debt on the economy. Well, if this video is alerted you to the fact that what you thought you knew about economics is wrong, you'll thoroughly enjoy the free book bundle that has been requested by over 5,000 people already.

• 23:05Speaker 05

  It's worth $50, but it's free right now. Click in the link in the description or go to stevekeen.com and click on the black button and fill in your information. About 60 seconds, you'll get the free book bundle. And after that, if you want to study with me personally and use my proprietary software, Ravel, there'll be an invite to join that course as well. So this is showing the conventional model that banks are just intermediaries in Ravel. And what I have is that there are two types of depositors in this model. There are savers who lend out money. There are borrowers who borrow that money and then use it for other purposes. The debt that's created through the banking system is not an asset of the savers. It's an asset of the banks. And it's quite easy to go through and modify this in Ravel.

• 23:49Speaker 05

  If the textbook model was right, then you would be correct to ignore private debt. But it's not correct. And I can easily modify that and say it's not true that debt is an asset of the savers. And it's not true that the savers lend the money and that the interest is paid to them. It's the banks that own the debt and it's the banks that earn the interest income. So I can rapidly amend that. And now I'm just going to say I'm not using the textbook model. So to simplify my presentation here, I'm just pretending that banks instantly spend their interest income. In the real world, they take time. That would make a more complicated model. And I just want to focus on the essence of the reality that if you say that banks are not money creators,

• 24:31Speaker 05

  then you can ignore private debt in your models of the economy. But as soon as you realize that banks actually create money, that creates additional demand and you cannot ignore the banking sector when you're looking at the macroeconomy. So I've just changed that one detail.

• 24:46Speaker 02

  So the one thing I think he gets a little fast and loose on, so it'll be interesting as I research him more to see if he brings me around to his side or not, is this idea that the interest of the money doesn't cause the demand. And I do think that the interest rates do have an effect, which is partly why the Fed comes in. Now, I think that Jeff Snyder is correct, that the Fed is far less leading than they are reacting. But if you make money more expensive, people will borrow less money, like simple as, because they're going into it assuming that they're going to have to pay this debt back. Now, Keen has a whole thing around debt jubilee, but when people borrow, right now, they know they're going to have to pay it back. And so at a minimum, they're going to have to make those interest payments.

• 25:28Speaker 02

  So as interest payments go up, and you can see this in the housing market right now today, as interest rates go up, people borrow less money. So I haven't quite been able to figure out why he's dismissive of that. I don't know if he's just gotten so used to trying to simplify, simplify, that he's sort of forgotten that there's a very real psychological impact to all of this. Look at Japan, I've talked about that many times before. You break their psychology with the bubble bursting in 1989, plus some uniquely cultural elements for them, and they just stop spending. No matter how much you try to stimulate the economy with cheap interest rates, they're just like, I don't want to owe anything. And so they won't borrow. So that's a psychological play. So, yeah.

• 26:09Speaker 02

  There, I will say that a more sensible way to read that is that if a bank sees, uh-oh, the economy is beginning to drag, if we lower interest rates, that will stimulate demand unless there's some other psychological principle at play and we can begin to push people forward. So take that into consideration.

• 26:30Speaker 05

  And I'm going to start with zero lending. And of course, with zero lending, nothing happens. But let's say there's lending now, you know, $1 per year type lending. You get a rising level of money in the borrower's accounts. The loans create deposits. The private debt ratio rises, but nowhere near as much as it did in the previous simulation. And GDP is rising.

• 26:55Speaker 02

  For anybody that's not looking at their camera or their screen, basically what you're seeing is in this scenario, because they are creators of money, what you see is all these things moving in tandem. So remember, the foundational thing that people are reacting to is if your debt grows faster than your GDP, you have a problem. And what he's showing is when you start modeling this accurately, that it's money creation, the debt itself is driving the GDP. So you can't get these out of lockstep.

• 27:26Speaker 05

  ... economic activity and GDP rises. Now, that's completely missed by the mainstream. They ignore the level of private debt. Now, if you have at the same time a lending goes negative, which I'm showing now, then GDP falls.

• 27:41Speaker 02

  God bless him, he's explained this so many times in so many different videos that you really do have to sort of aggregate everything he says. I think he does end up explaining the math of this later, but it would be very helpful right now. So I'll remind everybody of the formula that we were talking about before in his mental model. And I need to research this more to find out if this is a universal model. But in his mental model, GDP is simply the calculation of the amount of money in the system times the rate that it turns over. And so, given that, obviously, if you start putting less money into the system, then GDP is going to start coming down. Now, one thing that would need to be tracked is

• 28:21Speaker 02

  if you just slow the rate of lending, is that fine? Because here, I believe, for those numbers to be true, you'd have to assume that loans are actually being paid back. And that's the destructive force. So as the loans are paid back, you change that math equation on the GDP because it's money in the system times velocity. And so now, as people pay the debt back, because you're thinking of, well, I borrowed money from Drew, I paid Drew that money back, that money still exists, it's just not in my pocket, it's now in Drew's pocket. What he's saying is, no motherfuckers, that's not how this works. This is central bank money. And so when they loan you money and you pay it back, it ceases to exist. It stops being an asset for the bank. It just goes away.

• 29:05Speaker 02

  And so that money is destroyed as it gets paid back. Okay, so given that, that's how we, if you really want to understand these numbers, why they start ticking down, you have to understand that.

• 29:20Speaker 05

  Classical economists do, unfortunately do. Then you ignore the extent to which the economy's operation depends upon the level of credit creation by the private sector. So you can see in this very simple model, private debt goes up, so does GDP. Private debt falls, so does GDP. This is being ignored by the mainstream. So their advice about the private banking is completely wrong. Because banks lend, they create money as well as creating debt. That money turns over and causes more macroeconomic activity. So you can't ignore private debt and understand the macroeconomy. But that is what all mainstream economists do. And they continue doing it even after they got caught by surprise by the global financial crisis,

• 30:04Speaker 05

  which was caused by private money lending. They didn't see it coming, they ignored the whole thing. They didn't see the damage that was going to do. And now they're continuing to advise us as if they're experts on the monetary system. So by ignoring private debt and obsessing about government debt, you'll see that they, this is the line they worry about. They're ignoring this one, they ignored it back at the time of the global financial crisis, which is here. They're still ignoring it today. They refuse to learn from history. Now, why do they refuse to learn from history? Because history refutes their theory. And unfortunately, the way that academics in general behave, particularly those in the social sciences, is they ignore evidence which contradicts their belief system.

• 30:48Speaker 05

  They ignore anything that challenges their paradigm. Now, I've been publishing this chart for 20 years. And I've only had one or two economists ever even try to understand what's going on. And in the mental model that economists have, which they call loanable funds, that's true because banks don't lend money. In the real world, they do. You take a look on the real world and this is the pattern you see between credit and unemployment.

• 31:12Speaker 02

  Oh man, pause, pause, pause. Yeah, you've got to look at your screens. This is one of the charts I was waiting for to come up. So private credit as mapped against employment. And they are, like he said, effectively just mirror images of each other. So as private debt goes up, people have more money, which means they're paying companies for more stuff, which means that companies can employ people. As private debt goes down, people have less money and therefore they're buying less from different stores. And so those stores can, or companies can afford to hire fewer people. And so if you want to get people spending again, then you've got to put money back into the system via this private debt mechanism. And then people will start spending more again and jobs will come back.

• 31:55Speaker 02

  We're hitting pause for a moment, but there's plenty more ahead, so don't go anywhere.

• 32:00Speaker 02

  Let's talk about how much you're paying to stay safe online. Count it up, a VPN, a password manager, something to block ads and trackers. The service scrub your data off of broker lists, a tool to flag scam emails. That's five, five subscriptions, apps, logins, and most people still have gaps. That's the problem Surfshark solves. It's not a VPN. It's an all in one security suite, one tool that protects your connection, your personal info, and your devices all at the same time. Go to surfshark.com/tomb or use code TOMB for four extra months of Surfshark, backed by a 30 day money back guarantee.

• 32:44Speaker 02

  That's S U R F S H A R K dot com slash TOMB. Surfshark.com slash TOMB. Use code TOMB for four extra months of Surfshark.

• 33:00Speaker 00

  For a small business owner, every day is full of surprises. Some great, some not so great, like when a client cancels their order at the last minute. But here's a surprise you will like. Progressive provides small business owners with 30 customizable coverage options to help keep their business going strong. So go ahead, surprise yourself. Get a quote in as little as eight minutes at progressivecommercial.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates and third party insurers. Coverage is not available in all states or for all vehicles and coverage selections.

• 33:30Speaker 01

  Ever notice how life's best stories don't happen in your living room? They happen on the open road, out on the water, or parked under the stars. At Progressive, they get that you want to focus on the experience, not worry about the what ifs. That's why they offer quality insurance designed for your ride, whether that's a boat, RV, or motorcycle. Adventure with confidence. Visit progressive.com and see how easy it is to protect your favorite way to get away. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Not available in DC. Prices vary based on how you buy.

• 34:04Speaker 02

  Thanks for sticking around. Let's get right back into the action.

• 34:08Speaker 02

  Now, this, this is ultimately going to be a like blocky, overly simplistic breakdown of how the economy works. Obviously there, for anybody paying attention, you know that COVID caused a 30% spike in six years of inflation. So inflation is very real. He doesn't address any of that here. He's, I feel like he's got sort of PTSD. He's been screaming into the void for so long, trying to get people to listen to him, and nobody will listen, that there's, you know, maybe some frustration, some anger, and he's not walking through some of the more nuanced stuff about like, okay, obviously inflation matters. We're creating a problem for ourselves right now. The amount of interest that you spend on government debt is extremely destructive,

• 34:53Speaker 02

  which is why people keep paying attention to it. And so he's not talking about it here. He's talked about it elsewhere. The way, and this will be an oversimplification that I don't think you would like, but I think it's, it's pretty close to accurate. So his philosophy would go something like this. You want to build up government debt quite literally forever. You never want to pay it off quite literally as a matter of principle. Do not, don't worry about paying off your government debt. It's adding money to the system. And just like private money adds money to the system, you, you want to do that. So government debt is actually running, your deficits and everything are creating new money. That new money goes to your GDP calculation and it's causing the money to go up.

• 35:35Speaker 02

  Now, I will say, if you don't then follow on to his thing, which is he wants debt jubilees. And I would assume he wants them on like a consistent schedule. And so every, I don't know if it's once debt reaches a certain level. Every so many years, but like at some point you do, and one specific prescription that he's given people is give everybody a hundred thousand dollar check. But that hundred thousand dollar check has extremely tight restrictions on it. So you, if you have debt, you must put it towards debt. If you are, if you're a non debt holder, you must invest it in companies and those companies must pay down their debt. But that way you get equity in companies and all stuff. Pretty, pretty interesting.

• 36:20Speaker 02

  And he was saying, one of the reasons that the actual borrowing of money is, is so important, the non money creation side of it, is that it, it goes in a truly capitalistic way into the companies that will then innovate and all that. So it, without the debt jubilee, what he's saying is crazy because your interest levels would just rise to the point where it's, it's a patent absurdity and you run into trouble. And so I want to be very clear. The way the economy is set up right now, you can't just do this. But what he's trying to do is get people to understand how all of this works so that we could start migrating to a system that recognizes this, like basically economy good when money going in via debt, economy bad when money coming out via paying off the debt.

• 37:01Speaker 02

  And so this is why, even if you look at Japan, this is why when they get into, oh shit, I need to pay off my debt, the economy stalls. Because he's saying you're not putting new money into the system. You've got to put new money into the system. And so I don't know the Japanese situation well enough, but marrying this to that, I have a feeling it's going to play out something like this. Part of the reason that Japan struggled for as long as they did was all their money sought returns elsewhere. So the money wasn't actually inflationary inside of Japan. It was being invested outside. And so now, part of the reason that Japan may find that all of this inflationary thing actually pulls them out of that rut, even though the inflation is terrifying, is that it's causing Japan to pull their money back locally. First of all, because they can actually get a return on it.

• 37:46Speaker 02

  So it'll be interesting to see how those dynamics play out. I haven't researched that one yet enough, so these are just early thoughts. But it's very, very interesting when you start seeing this relationship between private debt and the health of the economy. Again, though, I want to just state emphatically, this system is sinister. We should not be in this system. This system, right now, the way that we're doing it, is kind of like what we do with healthcare, where it's like, we do a good thing on one side and then a bad thing on the other. So on healthcare, we socialize the shit out of it. And then we let the free market control part of it. And so when you have a guaranteed payer in the government, everything just gets more expensive and it completely deranges. So you either need a free market system or you need a single health payer.

• 38:30Speaker 02

  You can look at other countries and see if single health payer works out better. I would say it solves some problems better, like no one's going to be at the bottom floor. But if you want like something done quickly or done by the best of the best, you're going to come to America. So trade offs. Same idea here. It's like, yes, we let people rack up debt and that lets the economy run hot and everybody's loving life when it's working well. But the second that they get scared and they start paying things off, then they create their own problem. You get a 2008 and it just blows up in everybody's face. Now you've got to stimmy check everybody to death to get the economy working again. But because we don't do jet debt jubilees in any meaningful way, you get this inflationary effect flywheel. It gets crazy and completely runs amok.

• 39:14Speaker 02

  And the last thing I'll say, and we don't need to play more of this, but is you do run into a moral hazard. And so there, if everybody knows, oh, every 10 years, this is all going to get reset, then I'm just going to spend frivolously and I know that it's going to get reset and I'll basically spend right up to the 100K, maybe a little bit more. It's, it's going to be paid for. And so that's where the behaviors just start to become unhinged. So it is important, and that's just one of the reasons. It, it is important that economists know what Steve is talking about. But boy, you couldn't broadcast that because people are going to get super weird with what they do with debt.

• 39:53Speaker 08

  But to your point, it were, it would then stimulate the economy in a very different way. For example, if I know that in eight years, a hundred thousand dollars is going to be cleared out, I'm going to go bigger on a house, I'm going to go bigger on the car, I'm going to buy a land.

• 40:05Speaker 02

  And guess what that will do to the price of everything?

• 40:09Speaker 08

  So you're saying because I'm spending more, it would make things more expensive?

• 40:12Speaker 02

  Of course.

• 40:13Speaker 08

  I was going the other way where then it would then boost GDP, earnings, record earnings, record profits. I would be more.

• 40:20Speaker 02

  I love you.

• 40:20Speaker 08

  Yeah, let's go back.

• 40:21Speaker 02

  A thousand percent. This is brilliant. So you're getting on to the complexities of why you can't just go, oh, cool, Steve, let's just pump more money into the system. So the cost of things is always a ratio between how many of that thing people want and how much money is available to buy it. And so you're a hundred percent right. If real wages are growing, meaning I'm actually getting richer, I can buy more stuff, I'm in a great place. If nominal wages are growing and I can buy less, I'm getting more dollars, but I can buy less stuff, then people, even though their money's going up, and this is what we have today, nominal wages are up, but real wages are down. And so it doesn't matter that people are quote unquote, making more money. They feel poor because they are poor.

• 41:06Speaker 02

  And so it, if you could do it in the perfect ratio, and this is where the economy gets so complicated that people just sort of check out, but you always want innovators out there creating a new thing, making things cheaper. And then we can flood the system with money to eat all of that innovation. Now, I think that's evil. I think things should be getting cheaper over time and people should just manage their money. But if we decide we, hey, we want to be fast and loose and let's just lubricate all these wheels and let's just get crazy, rack up debts, run forever wars, fuck it, be completely unconstrained. It's a choice. It's the one we've made. So that's where we are today, whether we want to be or not. But that's why you have to be careful because what ends up inevitably happening

• 41:51Speaker 02

  is that such a delicate balance between the actual rate that people can innovate. And so to, to really drive home how wrong that can go. 2008, we fucking go crazy and we bail everybody out.

• 42:08Speaker 02

  Wasn't really a big deal. We didn't get insane inflation. So everybody goes, look at that. There was all this slack demand in the economy. And the second we had money flowing into the economy, baby, they just meet demand. This is fantastic. We were just missing money, like actual money. And the second people had the money, then factories rev things up, they make more stuff, people buy it, they, they already wanted these things, the economy could already produce them, we just didn't have the money. Now that we have it, boom, good. And that's why, God, 2008, I mean shitty if you lost your house, but everybody that got bailed out, it wasn't a big deal. Then COVID comes and people go, hey, remember, we have all this pent up demand, no worries, fucking flood, all the money. You had economists screaming, this is way more money than we need. And they were like, no, no, no, it's

• 42:53Speaker 02

  good, man. There's all this slack demand. Like you're just gonna build it up. It's gonna be cool. And then prices jumped by 30% because there wasn't slack demand. So now you had more money chasing the same, actually had more money chasing less goods. That was the real catastrophe if you have COVID, is you put more money in and broke the supply, the ability to make the stuff because ships weren't going anywhere, people weren't going to work. And so you have this like insane catastrophe of the 30% inflation, the phase shift, as Jeff Snyder calls it, that's still causing people to have a much shittier life today than in 2019. And so all of those things have to be reckoned with, including like what happens to people's psychology. So because that will either cause

• 43:35Speaker 02

  them to spend more or less, take on more debt or less, based on just where they think things were going. And that diffuses so widely. It's not like, if you're listening to this, you're not one of the people we have to worry about. You'll be sensible, you'll figure it out. But like, the vast majority of humanity just goes, oh shit, I've got a bunch of money, Pokemon cards have been going up, fuck it, YOLO. Like, if people don't remember the GameStop thing during COVID, that shit was wild, NFTs, wild. Like, it was just, it was like a totally different universe. And now, understanding macroeconomics and looking back on that, I'm like, oh my God, I couldn't see any of it when it was happening. So, the economy is extraordinarily complicated to tie this all up in a bow. I think Steve

• 44:17Speaker 02

  Keen is on to something with the fact that neoclassical economists are not paying, they're not modeling money creation, as if banks are part of the central banking system that creates money from nothing and destroys it when it gets paid back. And instead are thinking of it as, I give the bank money and the bank loans that money out. So when the money comes back to me, I've now got my principal back plus interest. And now the economy's grown and it's all good. And nobody stops to think, well, wait a second, where did the money come from on the interest? It comes from deficit spending. It's so crazy. I remember talking about this probably a year ago. And I did a whole deep dive about money only comes into existence via debt, but the, the two things just didn't connect for me. And

• 44:59Speaker 02

  so it's so interesting. And we'll, we'll do more Steve Keen videos in the future, and you'll be able to hear from himself, how he feels about Marx, fucking loves him. It is so fascinating to me that somebody who reveres a thinker, who I think has done more damage to society, maybe than any human ever to live, and is very on his side from, he's a brilliant thinker, all that. But to Steve's credit, he does say, but he had an outcome that he wanted to achieve from a philosophical standpoint, and he betrayed his logic to get there. So he, he's honest about that. But I just, I'm shocked that he still has a positive valence. Anyway, that's for a future date. Man, do I hope

• 45:39Speaker 02

  that this added a ton of value because this, he is really expanding my connective tissue with the cause and effect of the economy. I think this is going to be very important to my entire economic worldview. I hope that it is similarly enlightening to you guys. We'll spend more time with him. Just super, super important ideas. Some people want you to say your sign off. Be legendary. Oh, really? That, that's like, we want to make sure that's a must. Somebody said, remind him, Drew. All right, everybody. Until next time, my friends. Be legendary. Take care. Let's go. Let's go.

• 46:13Speaker 09

  Everyone in the chat, say the thing. Say the line, Bart.

• 46:19Speaker 02

  Let's talk about a pattern that is guaranteed to be killing your progress. You know what you need to do. You need consistent nutrition. We all do. You need vitamins, probiotics, greens. We all know that we should be doing more of it. When your morning gets chaotic, you skip it. When you travel, you skip it. When your routine breaks, everything tends to break. And that inconsistency compounds against you every single day. AG1 is designed to solve the execution problem. One scoop, eight ounces of water, and you're done. You're getting 75 plus ingredients, vitamins and minerals, pre and probiotics, nutrient dense superfoods, everything that used to require six, seven different supplements, and perfect

• 47:00Speaker 02

  planning now happens in one drink that takes about 30 seconds to make. Right now, AG1 is giving you $87 worth of free gifts with your first subscription. You get a welcome kit, travel packs, vitamin D3 plus K2, and flavor samples. Click the link in the show notes or visit drinkag1.com/impact to claim this offer.

• 47:23Speaker 10

  You're listening to this podcast, so I know you've got a curious mind. Here's a helpful fact you might not know yet. Drivers who switch and save with Progressive save over $900 on average. Pop over to progressive.com, answer some questions, and you'll get a quick quote with discounts that are easy to come by. In fact, 99% of their auto customers earn at least one discount. Visit progressive.com and see if you can enjoy a little cash back. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. National average 12-month savings of $946 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2024 and May 2025. Potential savings will vary.