Can John Ternus find Apple's next big thing?

Today, I’m talking with Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, who is the world’s best-sourced Apple reporter. Earlier this month, Apple hosted its annual iPhone hardware event, and this event was special, for a number of reasons. It was new Apple CEO John Ternus’ first major product launch. It was also the debut of the foldable iPhone Duo. So I wanted Mark on the show to explain why this event was so important, and how John Ternus’ Apple will look a lot different from Tim Cook’s. Read the full interview transcript on The Verge. Links: Apple iPhone Duo launch event: the 5 biggest announcements | The Verge The iPhone Duo is Apple’s first foldable | The Verge Tim Cook’s CEO-like pay package shows he isn’t going anywhere | Bloomberg Apple’s Phil Schiller steps down from running App Store | Bloomberg Apple’s new CEO will need to soon overhaul his management team | Bloomberg Apple’s Ternus takes the reins as CEO, with AI as job No. 1 | Bloomberg Subscribe to The Verge to access the ad-free version of Decoder! Credits: Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Decoder is produced by Greg Ott, Kate Cox, and Nick Statt. This episode was edited by Eileen Felix. Our editorial director is Kevin McShane. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Support for the show comes from CrowdStrike. It's not a huge stretch to say that AI is the next major computing platform. Every platform shift changes the way we build software, and it changes security, too. CrowdStrike is defining cybersecurity in the AI era with AI Detection and Response, or AIDR, a solution for seeing, monitoring, and securing AI across the enterprise. Learn more about how leading companies are turning to CrowdStrike to secure AI and secure their business at crowdstrike.com/decoder.

• 0:35Speaker 01

  Maybe that late-night ping is an urgent email from your CEO, or maybe it's a deep fake targeting your business. Doppel is the AI-native social engineering defense platform fighting back against impersonation and manipulation. As attackers use AI to make their tactics more sophisticated, Doppel uses it to fight back, automatically dismantling cross-channel attacks, building team resilience, and providing agentic email protection. Doppel, outpacing what's next in social engineering. Learn more at doppel.com, D-O-P-P-E-L dot com.

• 1:15Speaker 02

  Company spend can be complicated. Managing it shouldn't be. Amex Corporate connects cards, expenses, and payments all in one place. That's less time managing work and more time doing work that matters. Built to simplify, designed to scale. This is Amex Corporate. Get started at go.amex slash Amex Corporate. Terms apply.

• 1:45Speaker 03

  Hello and welcome to Decoder. I'm Neelai Patel, editor-in-chief of The Verge, and Decoder is my show about big ideas and other problems. I'm talking with Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who's the world's best-sourced Apple reporter. Earlier this month, Apple hosted the annual iPhone event, virtually every detail of which was reported ahead of time by Mark. But this event was special for a number of reasons. It was new Apple CEO John Ternus's first product launch since taking over for Tim Cook less than two weeks prior. It was also the debut of the iPhone Duo, Apple's first foldable smartphone. The timing of those two things was not at all coincidental, as you'll hear Mark explain. Apple takes these events and the stories they tell extremely seriously. And this year's story says a great deal about what's happening at Apple, how Cook managed a wholesale change in Apple's leadership ranks over the past year, and how all of

• 2:28Speaker 03

  that might change Apple's culture, and what that tells us about Ternus's plan to navigate Apple from what you might call the iPhone era into the AI era. Okay, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman on the future of Apple. Here we go.

• 2:52Speaker 03

  Mark Gurman, you're the chief Apple correspondent and the managing editor of consumer technology at Bloomberg. Welcome to Decoder.

• 2:58Speaker 04

  Good to be here, finally. Thanks for having me, and it's been a while, so good to catch up on all things Apple.

• 3:03Speaker 03

  I'm really excited to talk to you. The team and I were talking. Obviously, Apple just had its big event. They announced the iPhone Duo. It was John Ternus's first event as CEO. This is a Decoder episode. We got a new CEO. We got a new org chart inside of Apple. There's been a lot of shuffles. You've been chronicling them very, very deeply over the past few years. Let's just start with the event. I have a very basic question for you. Do you ever get nostalgic for a time when you didn't know what was going to happen at the iPhone event?

• 3:31Speaker 04

  Do I ever get nostalgic for a time?

• 3:34Speaker 03

  Do you ever wish that you, Mark Gurman, were about to be surprised?

• 3:37Speaker 04

  Honestly, I never think about it that way. I'm just fixated on delivering the goods and delivering the news, and people love their Apple, right? People want to know everything that's coming down to the last minute, so I'm here to provide it for them. And the thing with me, and I don't know if most people know this about me, but I hope people know this about me, I'm a huge Apple fan through and through, and I've always been. And I'm so lucky to be able to cover a company that I love and a company that I am obsessed with, and a company whose products I use. There are so many people who cover companies that they couldn't care less about. That's not me. And so I do what I do because I love Apple, and I love covering Apple. I love the community around it, and I love talking about it.

• 4:19Speaker 04

  And it's always fun to get a peek at the future and help keep not only myself informed, but, you know, people informed around me.

• 4:26Speaker 03

  That actually leads me to a lot of things, because I've known you forever. We've been working in and around the same spaces forever. You got your start as an Apple blogger at the Apple rumor sites. There's a whole culture around Apple that has grown up and changed over the years, and you can kind of trace them to different eras of hardware, to different CEOs, to different sizes of the company. This was the first event with John Ternus as CEO. They announced a big new product in the iPhone Duo. Do you sense that community is changing? How do you think that community has changed over the years? Do you think Ternus is going to lead to a difference in what that community feels like?

• 5:04Speaker 04

  I have to say, this event really didn't feel much different than a Tim Cook event, right? If they felt pretty interchangeable, it could have been Tim up there introducing it. It could have been Ternus up there introducing it. The one thing I will say that did feel slightly different is that Ternus came out swinging with a point of view on AI. The first thing he came out was about the Intelligent Personal Hub. Now, here's the big difference between Tim Cook and John Ternus in terms of their management style. You're inside Apple, you're an executive, you'll come to him with an idea, you'll come to him with a viewpoint, a decision, opinion, and he'll just pepper you with more questions. He won't make a singular decision in many cases. It's very much communal decision-making, collaborative decision-making, right?

• 5:48Speaker 04

  John Ternus, you come to him, you want him to make a decision. He'll make a decision, he'll have an opinion. Now, you may hate his opinion, you may completely disagree with him, but he has a viewpoint, right? That's the big difference, talking to people about Ternus and Tim. Okay? Ternus comes out talking about his view on AI. I may disagree with it. A lot of people may disagree with it. They may think the OpenAI anthropic approach is superior, but at least he came out and had a viewpoint. And Apple's been at this AI game now for two years since they launched Apple Intelligence at WWDC in 2024, and it's been a mishmash of things. They haven't really come out with a very strong narrative and viewpoint, and they finally did it. And so, like I said, whether you agree with it or not, they did do that.

• 6:32Speaker 04

  And I thought that was a really interesting way to kick off the keynote.

• 6:35Speaker 03

  All right, we're just going to get into the weeds of Apple nerds disagreeing about things.

• 6:38Speaker 04

  Okay, let's do it.

• 6:38Speaker 03

  I sat through that event, and I appreciated the same thing that you saw, which is, oh, we're telling a story. John Ternus is on the stage, and the first thing he is doing is telling a story about this product and how it fits into the universe of technology. And then I took a beat, and I was like, oh, but they're also just making sure that he's successful at his first event by playing Apple's greatest hits. Because Intelligent Personal Hub is just a replay of Steve Jobs saying the iMac was the digital hub. And at the very end of the event, he said, there's one more thing, and it was the iPhone Duo. And there was just a part of all of that that, to me, felt like Apple saying, look, our new CEO can put on the clothes of the old CEO.

• 7:22Speaker 03

  He can do this exact same dance that you're expecting. And underneath it, what I felt was, to your point, I don't buy this story about the Intelligent Hub.

• 7:32Speaker 04

  No, I don't buy it either.

• 7:33Speaker 03

  Because all of the things we're seeing AI do happening in cloud services, like it's the same week that Meta launched Muse, right? And you can feel what you want about Meta launching Muse, but they've, Mark Zuckerberg is giving everybody eight gigs of storage and eight gigs of RAM in the cloud, and Muse can go do a lot of things that AI and iPhone absolutely cannot do at this point in time. And I just felt like there was a part where they were playing it really safe with John by having him basically show up and be the new lead singer of Journey, right? Like, you can't get it wrong if you're going to do Lights. If you're going to show up on stage and do Don't Stop Leaving, you're going to be fine for a minute. And it's all the stuff that comes after that's going to really show his real personality. But it sounds like you thought that that's his point of view.

• 8:13Speaker 04

  Well, it's a couple of things. At a very high level, Apple's going to tell a story around what they have, right? If Apple invented ChatGPT, they would have invented ChatGPT, and they would have told a good story around that. Apple has gone as far as it's able to, at least for now, on AI, so it's telling the story, the best version of that story that they can with what they have to work with, right? With the bird they have in their hand. So that's the one thing. And then I agree with you on the Intelligent Personal Hub, how that compares to the iMac back in 98. And it feels like they're trying to sell this pivot from the Mac was the center of everything with the peripherals around it, then you got to iCloud, right? In 2011, the center of everything with the peripherals around it, and now it's this intelligence right at the center with everything around it. But what's so fascinating is Apple held a major product launch event in September of

• 8:58Speaker 04

  the year 2026 and did not introduce a single notable new AI feature. The first 15 minutes or so of the keynote was simply a replay, a re-narrativization of what they introduced over the past two years with Apple Intelligence. And so they tried to just tell that story in a more concrete way. And then the other thing is, they don't have any AI devices at the very core. And so they need to prop up the iPhone as their AI device because they don't have an alternative. But of course, they're only going to do that until they have that killer device, and then they're going to change that whole narrative. So it's a very narrative, PR, and marketing-driven company. And I'm not saying that to be critical. I mean, if I ran the company, obviously, I'm going to tout what I have.

• 9:42Speaker 04

  I'm not going to veer from that. But it is interesting how they're playing this. And I agree, they did play it very safe. There's nothing safer than John Ternus introducing a new iPhone, right? It's like the safest thing you can do. No major new AI product, no smart home hub, nothing in the spatial space, just straight down the middle.

• 10:02Speaker 03

  And it seems like that next wave of smart home products, which we're expecting later this year, and I say we're expecting, I'm expecting it because that is something you have reported.

• 10:10Speaker 04

  I'm expecting it, yes.

• 10:11Speaker 03

  Yeah, Mark Gurman is expecting new products from Apple. That is the first cut at some truly AI-native devices, right? Because you have Siri AI and it is functional now in a way that it previously was not functional, you can try some new classes of devices.

• 10:26Speaker 04

  There is about a half dozen AI-native devices coming in the next year and a half or so. The first will be the Smart Home Hub, which is basically an Amazon Echo show, but Apple-style, a square screen, an entirely new operating system. The idea is, what would a Siri AI operating system look like? This is that intercom, video conferencing, proactive intelligence. So you walk up to it, it recognizes who you are, and it will show content personal to you. It will know who is speaking. Obviously, the Amazon Echo can do that, but Apple's doing it in its own aptly way with AI-based Face ID. They're working on a home security system. They're working on another version of the Smart Home Hub that I just talked about

• 11:11Speaker 04

  that is attached to a robotic arm. So you put it on your desk, it can move around. It's actually a category that's pretty popping in Asia and in China right now. And then you've got the wearables, the smart glasses. I still believe those are going to be introduced and ship in 2027, so not too far from now. Trust me, you'll be wearing them within 365 days. You will be wearing them and have video hands-on of you wearing them at the Steve Jobs Theater. And if that is not the case, either something went horribly wrong for you or something went horribly wrong for Apple. And then you'll also have the AirPods with cameras. That's an interesting thing that we should talk about, but they'll have the AirPods with cameras. And then a few other wearables that I won't get into.

• 11:55Speaker 03

  So this is what I was talking about when I said there were eras at Apple and people's relationship really changed with the company. The Steve Jobs era was defined by devices. And in particular, Steve Jobs himself getting up and doing a keynote and famously putting up pictures of all the existing smartphones and saying, well, these all suck, and here's the reasons they all suck, and here's the iPhone, and here's why it's better. And that created one kind of relationship between Apple's enormous community of fans, its leader, and the products. And I think that was very successful. I think the Tim Cook era has been meaningfully different. I think it's largely a story about scale. To some extent, it's a story about values. To a huge extent, it's a story about privacy, right? Apple has marketed itself as the privacy company. It's fought the FBI to keep the iPhone encrypted.

• 12:38Speaker 03

  There's a lot there with Tim Cook's version of the company that's more corporate. It's certainly, it's just a vaster company. It's safer, it's not as rough around the edges as the Jobs Apple. But it wasn't as device-based. I don't think the Vision Pro has the same kind of mainstream cultural impact as even like the hockey puck mouse that Jobs like put out. Like, there was a thing that he could do with products that Tim Cook, Apple, could not quite do with products. And that just feels really different to me.

• 13:05Speaker 04

  I'm going to correct you on that because every time I put an article or a post out about the Vision Pro being unlike support, I get what amounts to basically a notch or two below a death threat from like dozens of people. So people are passionate about it.

• 13:18Speaker 03

  Dozens.

• 13:18Speaker 04

  Well, I think, honestly, I think what it is, is that people have created businesses around spatial computing and apps, and they're just pissed off that they've invested all this time and money on a category that's probably going to die out. And then you have consumers who spent four grand on this product, and they're like, I saved up for this thing, I'm living with this thing, and I'm pissed off to hear the realities. But I...

• 13:41Speaker 03

  No, and the comparison there, I think is good, right? People have invested in it, they care deeply about it. The comparison I'm making is the relationship people have to Apple in the Cook era is as an institution, right? It's just like this big thing that spans the globe.

• 13:56Speaker 04

  It's IBM.

• 13:56Speaker 03

  That has massive scale, yeah. And in the Jobs era, it was all about really, really innovative new products that redefine categories over and over again. You're describing a whole bunch of new products that came up in the Cook era that John Ternus is going to launch. How do you expect the culture of Apple to change around its products or its relationship to the culture to change as we go from one CEO to another?

• 14:17Speaker 04

  But think about what they did. You've got the coolest new iPhone in Apple product in maybe 10, 20 years, introduced one week after Tim Cook steps down. And then for the next 12 to 18 months, you've got, I don't know, six or seven new product categories, maybe you have 25 pretty breakthrough things. And so Tim Cook made a decision that even though his tenure at a product company was pretty limited in major new things, the Apple Watch turned out to be a success, even though it started as a complete dud, as you remember. The AirPods are sort of a unique beast in which they're an accessory, but it's not a, you know, a platform on its own yet. It's going to get there. And the Vision Pro was a failure.

• 15:01Speaker 04

  Tim Cook could have ended his tenure as CEO with the iPhone Duo, right? Could have just waited. Typical transitions at Apple, they happen mid-October, they happen mid-April, they happen January 1st. It was a specific decision that was made for John Turnus to be the one to introduce the iPhone Duo. And it was a specific decision made for John Turnus to be the one to introduce this whole new product roadmap. Even though, as you know, because of the length of hardware development cycles in R&D, these things were in the oven for five to 10 years. And so it's really interesting that this decision was made to let Turnus be the face of this whole new era of products, rather than allow Tim Cook to take the credit for it. And I think that's to your point where they're trying to draw the line in the sand of this new era.

• 15:46Speaker 04

  If Cook is already going to step down in the next three years, let's just do it now and let Turnus take the credit for everything.

• 15:59Speaker 05

  Support for the show comes from Upwork. The most successful business owners don't do it all themselves. They know how to delegate. Upwork lets you build a team of highly skilled specialists for every function your business needs. Upwork gives your business fast access to highly skilled specialists so you can fill critical skill gaps, launch projects faster, and scale support up or down without committing to full-time headcount. You can browse profiles, review past work, and get help scoping the role so you can hire with confidence and get started quickly. Upwork also has Business Plus, which lets you access the top 1% of talent on Upwork. With AI-powered shortlisting, you can get matched to the right freelancer in under six hours.

• 16:41Speaker 05

  And when it comes to things like contracts and payments, Upwork can help there too. Plus, it's free to sign up and posting a job is easy. Visit upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That is upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's U-P-W-O-R-K.com. Upwork.com.

• 17:06Speaker 05

  Support for the show comes from Shopify. Things don't happen by chance. If you want something, you have to take that first step. And when it comes to starting a business, you can take that step with Shopify. Everything you need to start selling is included and ready from day one. Shopify powers millions of businesses worldwide, from household names to small businesses just getting started. Their templates and AI tools help you get a stunning site up and running fast. No coding needed. If questions come up, Shopify's built-in AI assistant Sidekick is ready to help you build. Troubleshoot and keep moving. The best part is that all Shopify's tools are conveniently located in one easy-to-use platform. And because Shopify handles the setup and checkout,

• 17:48Speaker 05

  you have more time to focus on growing your business and the tools to do it. If you're ready to hear the sound of your first sale today, head over to Shopify.com/decoder to start your free trial today. That's right, you can start your free trial at Shopify.com/decoder. That's Shopify.com/decoder.

• 18:12Speaker 00

  Support for the show comes from CrowdStrike. AI is already fundamentally changing how companies build products and run their businesses. If you listen to the show, you probably already know this. But while AI drives innovation, every new model and agent also creates new cybersecurity vulnerabilities. That's why CrowdStrike built AI Detection and Response, or AIDR. AIDR helps organizations discover where AI is being used, monitors AI activity at runtime, and helps teams detect, investigate, and respond to threats involving AI systems. As companies adopt AI, security has to be built in from the start. More than 70% of the Fortune 100 trust CrowdStrike to protect their businesses.

• 18:57Speaker 00

  Now CrowdStrike is helping secure the AI era. You can learn more about AI Detection and Response at crowdstrike.com/decoder.

• 19:17Speaker 03

  You've obviously done a lot of reporting. I think you were the first to break the news that Cook would be searching for a successor. You were, I think, among the very first to break that it would be Turnus. Tell me about that process. This is a big decision. Cook is going to play a huge role at the company. He has a massive compensation program tied pretty much to having to talk to Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. It seems like that's his job.

• 19:39Speaker 04

  For $47 million a year, I would talk to Trump and Xi Jinping on the phone every day.

• 19:44Speaker 03

  I would need at least 50, but that's just me. They're like, that's his job, right? Is to go do politics, much the same way that Eric Schmidt at Google was in charge of governments after Larry Page became CEO. There's a whole pattern here of CEOs.

• 19:58Speaker 04

  Brad Smith, Microsoft, even though he wasn't CEO, but yeah.

• 20:01Speaker 03

  He's the president of the company. Yeah, there's a, there's a parallel here. Tell me about this decision of Tim Cook wanting to elevate, of making John Ternus the face of the product side of the company in this new role.

• 20:11Speaker 04

  So 2023 rolls around and Tim Cook starts every executive team meeting, all high-level meetings with people at Apple, the executive levels. We need to start taking succession seriously. We need to start thinking about who the next people are. And at that time, there was a really a strong realization that many of the people at the top of Apple, either they have half a billion in the bank or they're billionaires, that this era is going to start to age out really quickly. And so Tim Cook knew that he wanted to take a step back. Jeff Williams, the number two, the COO, knew he wanted to retire. The CFO, Luca Maestri, he wanted to retire. The general counsel, Kate Adams, she wanted to retire. And they were all about the same age, right? Give or take a few years. And so they basically

• 20:56Speaker 04

  came up with this plan that we'd go one by one over the next few years. So it started with the CFO, Luca, retires very end of 2024, and he's replaced by the new CFO, Kevin Perret. Then 2025 rolls around, they have Jeff Williams, the COO, he retires, replaced by his deputy, Salvi Khan. Then into 2026, they have the transition from the general counsel, and they got a great replacement for her from Meta, Jennifer Newsted. And then end of 2026, the big one, Tim Cook to John Ternus. And so they played this out very, very slowly. And what Tim Cook has done, and I do think this is going to change in the Ternus era as we progress here, is he's, he came up with this strategy that

• 21:41Speaker 04

  I call Hotel California, right? You never want to leave. Tim Cook, he's staying around as executive chairman. The general counsel, he had her stay around an extra six, nine months to run government affairs. Jeff Williams stayed around three, four months after stepping down as COO to just oversee the design team, the watch team, and the health teams as part of a transition. The CFO, Luca Maestri, his CFO role, the vast majority of it went to successor, but he kept three things. He kept oversight of information systems and technology. It's basically like your, your IT department, corporate information security, which is, you know, security for the, for the organization, and corporate real estate.

• 22:22Speaker 04

  So campuses and retail stores and facilities and what have you. It was kind of a BS job. I'll be honest with you. It was more so keeping him on the payroll and keeping him around in case things hit the fan. They had a financial issue and they needed like the adult or the grandfather in the room to take the bull by the horn and fix things as they transitioned to the new guy. But now Luca, he's still there, still getting paid, and he's teaching a class once a week at Apple University. So he's a professor there now. I'm not sure how much longer that's going to run for, but he's still there. And so all these old school Apple guys are either retired or semi-retired, or like a notch between semi-retirement, retirement. And then we have Phil Schiller, who the same

• 23:02Speaker 04

  week that Ternus took over as CEO, I reported that Schiller is leaving his remaining responsibilities of running the App Store and running Apple events. And he's at Apple now for the next little while, working on special projects. They're not saying what that is, but he's there. He's reporting to Ternus. He's still on the Apple leadership website, and he's around if needed in sort of an advisory capacity. And we'll see how long that lasts. But really, this is just a gigantic end-to-end change in the guard at Apple. It's the biggest executive overhaul I've certainly seen in my career reporting on Apple. Don't forget, when Tim Cook took over for Steve Jobs, there was no overhaul. Many of the guys under Cook were the same guys under Jobs. So a lot of them have been there for a while. So this

• 23:45Speaker 04

  is definitely a new era, a new generation, and you're going to see more changes, right? The head of marketing, the head of retail, some of the other people, they're in their, their mid 60s almost. They've got hundreds of millions of dollars. They can't do this forever. They're talking internally about retirement. So you're going to see another wave of changes in the next few years as well, I believe.

• 24:05Speaker 03

  You mentioned Phil Schiller, who I've known for ages at Apple because I'm old. He's transitioning out of his role running the App Store. And you had a piece of reporting that suggests part of it is because John Ternus and Eddie Q want to extract even more money from developers. They want to keep that Apple tax high. They want to find more ways to have services revenue. And Schiller wasn't interested in that. Schiller famously has always thought that Apple was squeezing its developers too much. There's, there's reporting, there's emails from some of these lawsuits. What's going on there?

• 24:35Speaker 04

  Yeah, it's very interesting. I mean, obviously, one part of it is that Schiller is 66. He wants to spend more time with his family, but for real, when it comes to him, he wants to do more philanthropy. He's been involved in all sorts of stuff in that regard. But at the same time, this is a new era for Apple. Eddie Q has a firm grip over all Apple services now, really for the first time in a while. And John Ternus, very close with Eddie Q. And they are looking at new ways to make more money on the App Store, whether that's additional advertising slots, whether this is, there's additional subscription opportunities. Obviously, there's going to be a reinvention of the App Store coming in the next few years to, to make more use of AI and to fill in to Siri AI as well. And Phil Schiller, you know, according to my reporting, believes, you know, regulators

• 25:18Speaker 04

  are still hot on Apple's trail. Developers are still unhappy with Apple. And as they go into this new generation, he wants to, you know, distance a little bit from it. But he still loves Apple, you know, more than anything. And he's still part of Apple here for the foreseeable future. And to be clear, there was no big blow up or anything between him and Eddie Q and Ternus or anything like that. It just, with all these considerations, felt like a natural time for him to, to step off. And he's also stepping away from Apple events, right? So it's not just dropping the App Store, it's dropping his two remaining responsibilities, which was a lot, right? He was part of the Hotel California crew, but he had the most responsibility between the App Store and Apple events. Those are big things.

• 25:58Speaker 03

  And worth noting, he's not wrong with the regulators. There's still an outstanding Department of Justice antitrust case against Apple regarding the App Store and CarPlay and all this other stuff that was started under the Biden administration and has not gone away in the Trump administration.

• 26:11Speaker 04

  First of all, surprising that it hasn't gone away under the Trump administration, given the alliance between Donald Trump and Tim Cook. And that has always been shocking to me. I thought that was going to get blown up a year ago. And then the other thing is, nobody knows any of this more than Schiller, because he's the one at the center of every meeting. He's the one doing the depositions. He's the one on the stand. So if anyone has the pulse of these governments and the pulse of developers, it's him.

• 26:36Speaker 03

  The Big Decoder trope is that the structure of a company is connected directly to its culture. If you, tell me how your company is roughly organized. I can tell you where about 80% of your problems are, and that, oh, they're 20% the magic. And every now and again, I get pushback on this from a CEO. He says, no, no, it doesn't matter. It's all about the people. And I feel like Apple is both, right? The structure of Apple has been the same for a long time. Steve Jobs used to call it the world's biggest startup. And then you just had these people who had been there forever. They're just the same cast of characters under Cook as they were under Jobs. And you could probably shuffle them any way you wanted, but it was the same people.

• 27:08Speaker 04

  That's right.

• 27:09Speaker 03

  And so of course, the culture persisted. You're describing a wholesale turnover at the top. And then it also seems like there's some structure changes happening underneath John Ternus, right? Johnny Ive was the chief design officer of the company, which always felt to me like part of that Hotel California strategy.

• 27:26Speaker 04

  Oh, that was, that was its own, that was like Hotel Puppertino. I mean, that was its own, that was its own level.

• 27:33Speaker 03

  But they were, they were afraid of him leaving because he was so tied to a Jobs era. And then they, they managed to work him out of the company. We can talk about OpenAI in a bit. Johnny Srugi is the chief hardware officer now. That's not a title Apple has ever had before. That also feels like potentially a transition title of some time.

• 27:47Speaker 04

  Can we talk about Srugi for a minute? Right now, Srugi's the second most important person at Apple. He created Apple Silicon, which, let's just face it, you cover the whole industry, I cover the whole industry. That's their key differentiator. That's what allows them to do different stuff. That's their competitive advantage. Letting this guy walk out the door would have been a nightmare scenario, especially right now. Last year, last fall, late summer, early fall, he goes to Tim Cook, tells him he's done. Okay? This is right when planning for Ternus taking over is kicking into high gear. Tim says, I need you to stick around as part of the transition and have you go elsewhere and have you go to Nvidia or wherever he was thinking about going. Certainly not retiring. This guy's not ready to retire, I don't think. Here's what we'll do. When

• 28:31Speaker 04

  Ternus becomes CEO, we'll make you chief hardware officer. So you're going to keep your existing team, and then you're going to get all of the Ternus stuff. And then you'll undoubtedly be the second most important person at Apple. Srugi agrees, takes a new pay package, I'm sure, and now is in that chief hardware officer role. I do not believe that is a long-term thing. I think that he's already back to wanting to transition to something new, transition out of Apple. He has really not a lot left to do, right? He conquered the Mac, like he dumped Intel, he dumped Qualcomm, right? What's left? This is a guy who wants new challenges and new things. And he's done it all at Apple, and

• 29:16Speaker 04

  there's no next thing to go after. They've really done it all. So it'll be interesting to see how quickly that happens, I think, a year or two. And then when that happens, this recombination of the hardware engineering teams into one group, they're going to have to break that up again. Because there's no successor to Srugi who has that industry clout and that leadership capability to be a singular hardware figurehead at the company.

• 29:39Speaker 03

  If you have managed to acquire Intel's disastrous modem business and fix it, what worlds left are there to conquer?

• 29:45Speaker 04

  Exactly.

• 29:46Speaker 03

  It was, it was the hardest thing you could have possibly wanted to do. And he did it. Those modems are shipping in, in the new phones.

• 29:51Speaker 04

  And no complaints, right? Like, if, if I were to place a bet with you two years ago, how is this Apple modem thing going to go? I would have guessed it's going to be a disaster. But I-

• 30:00Speaker 03

  Well, they did have to, they did have to slow down the Qualcomm modems to make their modems look-

• 30:04Speaker 04

  Fine, but-

• 30:05Speaker 03

  There, there was some stuff in there, for sure.

• 30:07Speaker 04

  Fine, but I'm talking about articles, people's, about people's calls dropping, not being able to load webpages and whatnot, like- All things considered, pretty seamless.

• 30:18Speaker 03

  True. So this is the question that I'm really getting at is we're talking about a lot of new people. And inside of it, a return to form in terms of just what that leadership page looks like, right? There's no chief design officer who's a legend in his own right. You're saying soon there won't be a chief hardware officer who's a legend in his own right. The heads of design listed on that page, Alan Dy left and went to Meta. Now they're just vice presidents again. They're not even SVPs of design, but they report to John Ternus. We're headed back towards a more functional Apple. They'd gotten to some kind of divisional structure as they try to keep all these powerful people. What do you think that's going to do to the company? Or is that just going to be more of the same?

• 30:55Speaker 04

  You know, it's so interesting. You look at the number of things and the amount of stuff that each of these reports to John Ternus has. It's a lot. And I also think you have a problem where there are vice presidents, so a tier below the SVPs, who want to grow. But you have these senior VPs who are going to be there forever, right? Like Eddie Q, he's been there for almost four decades. And you've had people under Eddie Q who've left to newer jobs and big things outside of the company because they wanted to replace Eddie internally, but they know that he's never leaving, right? They knew that he was going to stick around for a long time. And so you're losing good people at the VP level.

• 31:37Speaker 04

  So I think eventually you're going to see an additional layer, right? I think you're going to see this chief hardware officer idea become some new thing they're going to try. Like, for example, could they make Craig Federighi, who runs software, like chief software and AI officer or something at one point, and then elevate some of the people under him to that senior VP level? Give them more responsibility, give them more money to keep more people around. So I think that leadership structure is going to be in flux for a while till they figure out how to do this. I mean, the old, old Apple, they had VPs, they had senior VPs, they had executive VPs. You can imagine they're going to play with these things in order to keep people. Because I think one of their biggest problems, other than AI at this point, is retention of key players.

• 32:20Speaker 03

  I actually would draw the connection between retention and AI. The not having that bench of younger people with new ideas or disruptive ideas, I think prevented them from seeing AI for what it was.

• 32:31Speaker 04

  That's a really good point.

• 32:32Speaker 03

  And I think about what came to be known as the Cook Doctrine, where Tim Cook would often say, "We want to own and control every foundational technology that goes into our phones." And this is really just a statement of Apple's own paranoia about being chained to Intel for a long time, or whatever it might be. They couldn't see a way to owning and controlling AI because it's just massive investment. They had just blown a bunch of money trying to make a car, and they kind of missed it, right? They don't have a model of their own that competes at the frontier. And so they've distilled Google's model. And this feels like a pretty big jump away from the Cook Doctrine. Do you think they're going to have to compete in AI by making their own investments on the frontier? Or do you think they're happy where they are?

• 33:11Speaker 04

  It is one of the craziest things that I've ever heard is Reg and these other executives in these interviews over the last year saying that we never owned search. We don't need to own AI. First of all, two completely different things. Second of all, to your point, they have spent so many tens of billions, hundreds of billions in talking their mouths off of owning something as simple as a cellular modem. And when I say simple, I mean something as commoditized as a cellular modem. Spending billions to buy, trying to fix the Intel modem business. So you're willing to do that, to own something like a modem, but you're not willing to own AI? It's ridiculous. And they know that. That's why they tried to own their AI and held it from the ground up.

• 33:54Speaker 04

  They ran into a wall, and they had no choice but to partner with Google on fixing up their models. The idea internally has always been that we are going to work with Google as a stopgap solution until we're able to do our own models from the ground up, okay? Let's put that aside. At the same time, I've seen absolutely zero evidence that they're actually working on that Plan A again. I've seen no evidence that they're hard at work on building fresh, Apple-made models from the ground up. I've seen no evidence that they're running around to make big AI acquisitions. I've seen no evidence that they want to start throwing huge pay packages at AI researchers for Meta, Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI.

• 34:38Speaker 04

  And so right now, it feels like we are at a standstill. It feels like they want to see how this Google deal and how working with third parties goes for the next several months. And then they'll make a decision if they want to go back to sort of building and competing with the other guys. I think they want to see how things play out. I think they want to see the Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs. I think now with all the news about AI safety, they want to see how this all plays out. And maybe they'll make a decision in six months of where they want to go. But as of right now, I've seen no evidence that the transition of moving back to in-house stuff is happening.

• 35:12Speaker 03

  And to be fair, it's an advantage that there's no chance that Siri will kill us all. It simply is not capable enough to do it.

• 35:19Speaker 04

  Neil, they fell backwards into that. It was not a strategy. This was not, Apple's current AI product was not the result of good work. It was, right? It was the ultimate failing upwards.

• 35:32Speaker 03

  Let me ask you about that, because right next to that, I mentioned Johnny Ive. He's obviously working with Sam Altman. They're going to build some set of products at OpenAI. A lot of Apple designers have gone over to OpenAI. There's a very contentious lawsuit between the two companies. Apple accuses OpenAI of stealing internal information and product plans. OpenAI says, "This is just the normal course of business. We're just having conversations and job interviews. We'll see how that plays out." The threat is that Ive will design the next class of products using natural language input as the next generation user interface, the same way that the multi-touchscreen was the next generation user interface on the iPhone. And that will disrupt all the old paradigms. And I know that that's what he's thinking, because when he made his very romantic

• 36:15Speaker 03

  launch video with Sam Altman, he described the phone and the laptop as legacy devices, which I thought was a very powerful thing for him to say, given that he designed the paradigmatic examples of those things.

• 36:26Speaker 04

  And Apple makes the best legacy devices, and they don't want that to be their final chapter. They want to make the best new generation AI devices. And here we are, them trying to make, still continue to make the best legacy devices, but they really need both.

• 36:42Speaker 03

  Well, so I see it two ways. One, Apple has to get ahead of the curve somehow, right? And if they don't have the frontier AI model, they can literally listen to anything you say and do anything you want, then what are they going to make this device out of? And then on the other side, you have OpenAI, and if they don't have an Instagram app, everyone will still carry their iPhone with them. And then they will just use their iPhone because it has a big screen and potentially unfolds into an even bigger screen. And so they're kind of pointed at each other, each missing the thing the other one has. How do you think that gets resolved?

• 37:15Speaker 04

  Okay, so I think Apple is terrified of whatever OpenAI is building, and we can talk about that. It's a hockey puck-sized AI computer type of device that you talk to without a display or whatnot. I think Apple's terrified. In fact, like the latest development in their lawsuit is Apple wants the court to show them and give them access to the upcoming device so they can analyze if it has any of their materials in it. So good luck to them on that one. At the same time, I do think Apple has the ability to fast-follow anything OpenAI does. Like, if OpenAI puts out some remarkable product and it gets the steam, Apple's just going to copy this thing and follow pretty fast. Unlike the smart glasses where they're coming five years, you know, seven years after everyone else.

• 37:59Speaker 04

  I think if this donut or hockey puck thing is successful, Apple will follow them just immediately. I think the models are getting commoditized to a point where they can fast-follow and have a very effective product. If Apple goes to Anthropic and says, "Do you want to copy this OpenAI device? And obviously, they're not going to give us their secret sauce and models. Will you partner with us on this?" Yes. If they come to Google, "We need even better models. Will you partner on this?" Yes, right? Google has no legitimate hardware business that's going to be destroyed over partnering with Apple and hardware. Anthropic has no hardware business. Apple can get this done. So yes, they're afraid on one hand. On the other hand, I really don't think they need to be that worried.

• 38:40Speaker 04

  Because if it's a success, they can just copy it, which is, I guess, this is what they're accusing OpenAI of doing from the beginning anyways. In terms of the lawsuit, it is very clear that OpenAI employees have done some shady things. I'm surprised that the iPhone engineer, or former iPhone engineer at the center of the lawsuit, this is the one who they've accused of taking material with him and sharing it with people and whatnot. I'm shocked that OpenAI has not cut bait on him and moved forward. I think their fear is if they cut bait on this guy, employees are going to revolt. How could we trust working at a company like this if you are going to get sued by Apple, even a company that big, and you're just going to cut bait on someone, right? So we'll see what happens. We'll see what happens. They've done shady things, but a lot of the stuff, like you said, is common business practice, stuff that Apple probably even does too.

• 39:25Speaker 03

  It's very notable to me that none of the filings in the case so far have any mention of Johnny Ive. Neither company wants to point out that Steve Jobs, number two, is at the center of all this because he's leading the design of this product. Do you think that's notable?

• 39:39Speaker 04

  I think it's by design. I think it's notable. And I even think the origin story of this lawsuit is Johnny Ive himself. I think Apple's point of view is that Johnny Ive was on Apple's payroll for half a decade or more post the Apple Watch. And during that time...

• 40:01Speaker 04

  Basically destroyed the Apple design team from within and took everyone with him to build a competitor to the products that he developed at Apple, right? That is Apple's viewpoint. And I think there's a lot of anger towards IVE at the very center of this, particularly, you know, from Tim Cook and some of those other players there. I think Johnny Ive's perspective is that all the Apple products today, they are direct siblings of everything Johnny Ive developed there. Even the iPhone Duo, you can see Johnny Ive's work in there, right? It's all part and parcel with Johnny Ive. I think that he believes that he created the product portfolio that's the basis of this $3, $4 trillion company.

• 40:43Speaker 04

  And he was tired after, you know, carrying that company post Steve Jobs and very sad about Steve Jobs' death and wanted to move on. And that him and Tim Cook came to an agreement that he only needed to work at Apple for a few days a week, right? And so what if he wants to eventually leave Apple and build something new and have people follow him? That's up to that. So I think it's two very different sides of the same story and you can side with whoever you want to side with. But I think it's really unfortunate that things did not work out for Apple and for Johnny Ive together in this instance. And I think he saw AI as the new core technology that he can develop something really cool around, just like the iPhone was developed around the cool technologies back then of

• 41:28Speaker 04

  the App Store and multi-touch and what have you.

• 41:31Speaker 03

  You know, it's really interesting about that, and this is a whole different podcast, is all of IVE's best products are designed around limitations, right? The iMac was designed around the limitation of the CRT display and so on and so forth. And AI doesn't have any limitations because it always just tells you it can do everything. And I'm just dying to know what he identifies as the limitation that makes the magic of the next IVE product. Like I said, that's a whole different podcast, but it's just on my mind as I think about what might he do to make this more than just a hockey puck that's listening all the time?

• 42:00Speaker 04

  I'm psyched to play with it and to see it. And I think this screenless idea is both a blessing and a curse. I think that we're going to really see how effective AI is when we're using it without a screen and having it in the background. But at the same time, there are things about displays that are not replaceable with screenless devices. Gaming, massive market. Video conferencing, massive use case. Watching video, another massive market and use case. And I just don't know how OpenAI takes over the world with a device that can't video chat, can't do gaming, can't do video.

• 42:36Speaker 04

  And we've seen historically that being an iPhone companion, that just doesn't cut it.

• 42:47Speaker 05

  Support for the show comes from Framer. There used to be a dilemma that most businesses encountered when they were building a website. You could use a one-size-fits-all template that didn't differentiate you and didn't really do what you needed it to do. Or you could build something from scratch, but it was expensive and the process was slow. Framer gives you a third option. Framer is the AI website builder that helps creators, teams, and businesses ship production-ready sites faster than ever while getting every detail right. Prompt, inspect, edit, and publish in one place at a whole new pace. Agents and humans work in tandem. Agents bring speed and scale. People bring taste, judgment, and control.

• 43:29Speaker 05

  That's why leading brands like Perplexity and Miro build their websites in Framer. Learn how you can get more out of your site from a Framer specialist or get started building for free today at framer.com/decoder for 30% off a Framer Pro annual plan. That's framer.com/decoder. Rules and restrictions may apply. Support for the show comes from Pipe Drive. Sales teams spend up to 50% of their time on admin work rather than selling, building relationships, and closing deals. They could really use a tool that covers all the admin stuff. That way, sales teams could actually focus on the work they were hired to do. That's where Pipe Drive comes in.

• 44:12Speaker 05

  It's an intelligent, AI-powered sales CRM loved by growing sales teams. Their new meeting intelligence features, like an AI note taker, are built right into the CRM. Pipe Drive automatically pulls deal history, email records, and previous conversations. You can walk into a call already briefed. During meetings, Pipe Drive's AI note taker records and takes notes. Then it turns those notes into accurate, auto-drafted CRM updates, ready for you to review and approve. The end result: less admin, more selling. Switch to a CRM built by salespeople for salespeople and join the over 100,000 companies already using Pipe Drive. Our link gets you an exclusive 30 days free instead of the usual 14-day trial.

• 44:56Speaker 05

  No credit card or payment needed. Just head to pipedrive.com/decoder to get started. That's pipedrive.com/decoder, and you could be up and running in minutes.

• 45:11Speaker 06

  At T-Mobile, the new iPhone 18 Pro is here with a big leap in battery life. And you can get it for nothing upfront. With so many reasons to choose T-Mobile, you'll want to talk about it.

• 45:20Speaker 07

  I heard at T-Mobile, you can get iPhone 18 Pro for nothing upfront and get $1,000 off. Pass it on.

• 45:29Speaker 08

  Pay nothing today. No taxes, no fees, nothing down. Pass it on.

• 45:34Speaker 09

  Hey, Mickey, pass it on! iPhone 18 Pro has the most advanced iPhone camera ever. Pass it on.

• 45:41Speaker 10

  At T-Mobile, you can get iPhone 18 Pro for nothing upfront. Pass it on.

• 45:46Speaker 06

  At T-Mobile, get $1,000 off the amazing iPhone 18 Pro with no trade-in needed.

• 45:52Speaker 11

  With 36 monthly bill credits when you switch to T-Mobile on a qualifying plan, if you cancel an entire account before receiving all bill credits, credit stop and balance on required finance agreement is due. Example: $1,199.99 iPhone 18 Pro, 256GB. Bill credits in if you pay off device early. Qualifying credit, new line, cord in and service. $85 more per month with autopay plus taxes and fees required. $35 device connection charge due at sale. Visit tmobile.com.

• 46:17Speaker 03

  Actually, this brings me to you mentioned the AirPods with a camera. AirPods are a success because they have a huge attach rate to iPhones. People buy iPhones, they buy an AirPod. People buy iPhones, they buy a set of AirPods. There you go. You got a huge business just out the gate.

• 46:31Speaker 04

  And then you lose them every six months. You break them, you've got to buy new ones, so.

• 46:35Speaker 03

  You mentioned that adding a camera to AirPods might turn them into a platform unto themselves. That would obviously compete with some of these screenless devices or these AI-native devices. How would that work?

• 46:44Speaker 04

  Okay, so these AirPods basically have the visual intelligence feature that you have on your iPhone. You could point at something, you could take action on it, you can get more information. It's built into the AirPods, it's no different. So like, one use case is you're on your computer and you have your phone, I want to add something to my calendar. I just point my iPhone camera at my email and I say, add this to my calendar, and it adds it to my calendar and parses all the links. The AirPods could do that for you now. You can tell your AirPods, when I get to the pasta aisle at Whole Foods, stop me, ping me when you see the tomato sauce I'm looking for, and it'll do that. When you're walking around a city and you ask it to get directions to the nearest Walgreens,

• 47:28Speaker 04

  instead of telling you, turn right in 40 feet, it'll say, turn right by the black sedan parked at the corner. So using visual information to provide you context to help you throughout your day. It's a game changer, I think, and I think it's going to be a really sought-after product. And I think that the changes we saw with the AirPods 5 at this Apple event, where now you're getting really solid ANC, even though it's not, you know, in our ear, with some pro features like the volume swipe at about 150 bucks, right? That's a really good product at a really good price. I think that's setting the stage for needing to make the AirPods Pro that much better. And that's where the cameras come in as that core differentiator.

• 48:11Speaker 03

  So this brings me to the last thing I want to talk to you about, which is Apple and privacy. The things you're describing at with AirPods are science fiction ideas that have been around forever. I tried Microsoft HoloLens 10 years ago, and they were doing augmented reality demos that are very much the things you're describing. They had me change spark plugs in an ATV. I'll never forget doing this with our big silly glasses on my face. And the problem has been, one, the technology, right? It's very hard to shrink that technology and have the appropriate battery life. And then the other problem is, well, you've got a camera pointed at everything around you all the time, and people don't like that. I'm always joking that I think the killer app for Meta's glasses is facial recognition, right? If you just gave me a pair of glasses that would tell me everyone's names and faces

• 48:54Speaker 03

  at events, I would be the single greatest politician in world history. And the problem with that is that it requires a worldwide surveillance database of everyone taking each other's pictures all day long. And that is probably not an appropriate trade-off for me to be the greatest politician in the world. But I'm just letting you know, I think that product would be cool for my personal benefit. The social cost would be too high. This is Apple's brand is privacy, and they're up against people calling the Meta glasses pervert glasses. They're in a world where people hate flock cameras and all that surveillance that's happening online. They're doing WatchOS 27 with an always-on listening feature that just does transcripts, it doesn't record or store any audio.

• 49:31Speaker 04

  Total surveillance device. I can't believe they, I'll be honest with you, I can't believe they did it.

• 49:34Speaker 03

  I can't believe they did it. Right, it's just listening, and you can double-click it and it'll show you a transcript of the last 15 seconds of what someone said to you without their permission.

• 49:40Speaker 04

  First of all, read the room.

• 49:41Speaker 03

  It doesn't even light up.

• 49:42Speaker 04

  No, I know, but no, that's not true. It does light up. But read the room.

• 49:45Speaker 03

  Oh, they, I was told it doesn't light up.

• 49:47Speaker 04

  They're, okay, first of all, we can get into this, but I was not at the Apple event for obvious reasons, and I haven't been at one since 2019, so I did not.

• 49:55Speaker 03

  Well, you already know what's going to happen.

• 49:56Speaker 04

  Well, I didn't have the briefings, okay? But according to the literature on their website, when you're doing that feature, it lights up with a microphone icon when you do the live rewind. Maybe it doesn't light up for the Siri recaps, I don't think it does, the all-day listening. But like, the last 15-second things, it supposedly shows a microphone. But, Eli, is this podcast a video?

• 50:16Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 50:17Speaker 04

  Okay, I'm wearing an Apple Watch. Can you see anything on my screen?

• 50:20Speaker 03

  No.

• 50:20Speaker 04

  Right?

• 50:20Speaker 03

  It's crazy to me.

• 50:21Speaker 04

  So I can't believe they did that because really you're going to take a backlash like this and then do it again with a visual intelligence six, nine months from now?

• 50:30Speaker 03

  And then you're going to do it with a pair of smart glasses and you're going to walk into all of the other things. And it feels like Apple knows that there is a next generation of user interfaces coming that is AI powered that requires an amount of ambient capture, whether that's just listening so you can talk to it, or whether it's a visual so you can see the world around you. And they haven't solved the social privacy aspect.

• 50:52Speaker 04

  Nope.

• 50:53Speaker 03

  There are white papers about how they might have solved the technical database privacy aspect, right? They've got private cloud compute and they're going to encrypt the data. They're not going to store this and that. And I don't think any of that's going to overcome the social privacy aspect.

• 51:05Speaker 04

  They didn't do a good job on articulating the social aspect of it at all. They could have showed more demos. They could have discussed it a bit deeper. They sort of just thrown goat it. I know they only have very limited time in the keynote, but I don't think they spent enough time breaking things down here. I quite frankly, think they did a, did not do a good job rolling this feature out. I asked myself, would I be comfortable using this feature? Yeah. But then I tell everyone around me the last week, hey, I've been recording you the whole time. They're going to freak out and they're not going to trust Apple, right? So it's a really interesting one. I'm pretty shocked they did it. What is the, the net new Apple Watch buyers because of this feature? Like, what

• 51:46Speaker 04

  is the, the, the bigger challenge? Doing this feature or not doing this feature? And I think that doing this feature is a bigger drawback than, than not doing the feature. There's no, here, there is no cost of not doing something.

• 52:00Speaker 03

  Well, there is a cost if you think there's about to be a wave of AI devices that are doing always on transcripts and meeting recordings and OpenAI is going to do something. I mean, we have seen a way.

• 52:12Speaker 04

  But we're not there yet, right? Like this could have waited six months.

• 52:15Speaker 03

  So you can just foreclose it, right? You can just, this is like Microsoft stuff. You're like, here's a preview of a feature. Don't even consider that stuff. Eventually this will get good. And you've just foreclosed the competitor.

• 52:24Speaker 04

  Well, the other thing is, is they had nothing else for the watch. So they had to kind of just do something, right? This is the weakest Apple Watch update we've seen in a long time. And they're kind of lost as what to do next. Now they're sort of recalibrating it. They're going to have a major watch revamp at the end of next year and so forth. But they had to do something. If it were me, I would have ripped off the Band-Aid at the same time with all the audio plus visual intelligence stuff next year. Do it all together. Tell a really coherent privacy story.

• 52:51Speaker 03

  But do you think that stuff is compatible with Apple's reputation for privacy? This is the real question I'm getting at is they might not have told the right story about the watch. They're going to have to tell the right story about AirPods with cameras in them in a world where people are shooting spray foam at flock cameras because they don't want them in their communities, right? There, there's a connection between these two ideas. And it doesn't seem like Apple knows how to tell that story.

• 53:13Speaker 04

  Well, clearly not because they haven't done it. But here's the story on the, the AirPods. They can't record actual video. They can't take actual pictures. They have an extremely low frame rate. I'm talking about a few frames per second. And the actual data that gets input into them, it's like, have you ever used a Roomba and you look at the app, kind of what does the Roomba see? It's like, it's like wireframes of the environment. Like, it would not be able to tell you and me apart, right? It just would see.

• 53:48Speaker 03

  But then how can it do the brands of tomato sauce in the aisle?

• 53:52Speaker 04

  Well, in terms of non-people would be able to do that. And it could read, it could read text. So it would be pretty heavily reliant on reading text and seeing color and whatnot. But like, being able to differentiate two people, right? It would be very difficult for it. It's almost like, it's like a fake reproduction of what's around you. I don't have a good explanation for it, but I'm sure, you know, if they wanted to, they'll give a good one. I'm not sure they're going to break it down. They might just say, just trust us, we're Apple. It's not taking pictures. It's not taking video. It doesn't know what it's seeing to some extent. So we'll see how they play it. But I would have done all this stuff together, ripped off the Band-Aid and spent a lot of time focused on it. There was no need to do this audio intelligence feature at the end of 26 when you could have done it at the end of 27 with everything else.

• 54:36Speaker 03

  Unless you're just trying to slowly boil the frog, right? You're, you're going to get people mad about this and then you're going to do the next one the next time. We'll see. I, it just seems like this next generation of devices involves some kind of ambient listening that we are not ready for as a society. Like, people are really mad about Meta glasses.

• 54:55Speaker 04

  They soiled the water for, for Apple and a lot of other companies, you know? Meta being the first mover on this created an industry-wide problem. And I think even though Apple has such a strong privacy stance, there's people who don't believe them. There's people who don't care what they have to say. There's people who are going to be angry about the Apple glasses and whatnot. And I think Apple, to some extent, is on such a high horse with this privacy message that it came away surprised that there would be some backlash to Apple doing this. They think, I believe, that people are, are overblowing it when it comes to Apple, right? And everyone should just be focused on Meta. And just because Meta has done a poor job protecting people's privacy doesn't mean we're going to. And so we'll see what happens.

• 55:36Speaker 03

  The, the one thing, when, when, when I talk to the folks there, they never make the connection between Apple and Meta in the, in the sense that Meta's apps run on Apple's phones. People are mad about Meta and they still think the phones, Apple's phones are listening to them. And they can't quite make that connection because it undoes a lot of their own messaging. If you believe your iPhone is listening to you, that's not just Meta's problem. It is also Apple's problem. And they kind of have to actively ignore that relationship because otherwise everything else falls apart. And I think that's why there's this blind spot, right? If people's watches start generating transcripts, it's exactly the same relationship as my iPhone is listening to me and that's why I saw an ad for a vacation that I only talked to my friend about.

• 56:20Speaker 04

  I'm curious what they're going to do. I have a feeling they're just going to bulldoze their way through it. They're going to just try to tell a good story. They're going to do a ton of PR briefings about it. They're going to do a ton of white papers about it and get as nerdy and in-depth as they can on this stuff. And you know what they're going to do? They're going to throw out a lot of comparisons. And I even heard Ternus do this in one of the interviews and Apple's statement on some of these features. I could totally imagine them saying, why is it any different recording from smart glasses if you could just hold your phone up and record people, right?

• 56:48Speaker 03

  You know, by the way, it's, it's very funny you just mentioned that because that is exactly what Mark Zuckerberg just said to our friend Alex Heath.

• 56:53Speaker 04

  Oh, that's funny.

• 56:54Speaker 03

  He literally said, how is it different than if, like, this is the industry's approach. And I think the answer is people are like, yeah, I can see you doing that and I feel very comfortable telling you to stop. Like, there, there's something different about that.

• 57:05Speaker 04

  Yeah. The other thing, I didn't even realize this. Someone pointed this out to me the other day. It's like, your Apple Watches had the voice memos app for, I don't know, eight years at this point. Who stopped anyone from recording their whole day with the voice memos app on the, on the Apple Watch anyways, right? This is just a more privacy centric version of that. So Apple's solving a problem here. They're not creating one. So, you know, it just depends on how you look at these things. I think they'll bulldoze their way through it. It's going to be a problem, but I think they'll be fine.

• 57:32Speaker 03

  All right. Last two before I let you get out of here. We've talked around the iPhone Duo a lot. We've mentioned it a lot. It's the thing that just came out. We haven't talked about it. What do you think?

• 57:39Speaker 04

  I think it's incredible. I think, and this is a bold take, I think foldables will become the new normal within a decade. If you look at the market share of smartphones and end of 2006, smartphones had like 6% of the market. Now they have 85% of the market. They went over 50% of the market after five, six years. The iPhone itself was not the, the source of that, but the iPhone got everyone into the smartphone game. I think the iPhone Duo is going to do the same for the phone market. I think it's going to become the new normal.

• 58:12Speaker 03

  Even though they're a late mover to foldables?

• 58:14Speaker 04

  Yeah. I think the Apple brand is that strong. Really, I really do. I think the fit and finish, the software integration is going to get people really excited about this category. I think that Apple upgrade eventually, that's the releasing program will expand internationally. I think that's going to get people in it. I think that some point they're going to stop advertising sticker prices and focus on the monthly prices. And they're going to get people locked into this thing. They're going to have a family of iPhone Duos over time. You'll see every phone maker just transitioning, transitioning to foldables. Samsung, half the line is already foldables. Very soon, the candy bar style is going to become legacy.

• 58:47Speaker 03

  That's a big prediction, although I will say I, their iPhone handoff feature where you can move a number between phones seems to point to a future where I, for example, have the folding phone for work and then a much smaller, lighter phone for the weekends with the family. Like, you can see that vision taking shape only because it's now easy to port a number between devices, just whenever you want, which I think is incredible. Last question. We've talked a lot about Apple, its culture, its, its set of products. What do you think its biggest challenges are in the new era under John Ternus? And what do you think its biggest opportunities are?

• 59:20Speaker 04

  I would say I think the biggest challenge and the biggest opportunity are the same thing. Ternus is Apple the next three to five years is still Tim Cook's Apple, right? That's just the reality. He's going to still be there in the background. He's still going to loom large. And the product pipeline is still going to be coming out of an era that started under Tim Cook. But in five years from now, they are going to need to start thinking of what actually replaces the iPhone as the next thing. We went from the Mac to iCloud to AI as the center. What is Apple's new thing after the phone? What is Apple's new thing after the current generation of AI? And Ternus's tenure as CEO, I think, will go down as a success if he's able to find that next new centerpiece. It's got

• 1:00:05Speaker 04

  a few years before he needs to start cooking on that, but I'm talking about something that can be in development for five to 10 years. Tim Cook never had the opportunity to have his new centerpiece of the company. He never had the opportunity to put his stamp on products at the company for two reasons. Both things that he tried to do as his centerpiece, both failed spectacularly. Obviously, the Vision Pro with the car, right? The car, that was Apple's multi-trillion dollar market cap opportunity and they just blew it. Ternus will need to successfully, will need to successfully hit that.

• 1:00:39Speaker 03

  You know, I'd actually put a third thing on that list. It was the very beginning of the Cook era. Jobs, literally on his desk bed, said he'd figured out TV and Cook had to spend however long pretending he knew what that meant because I don't, I don't think it had been solved. And so there was like this first wave of Apple's going to redefine TV because like the last page of the Isaacson biography had that Jobs quote.

• 1:01:02Speaker 04

  They haven't even done a new Apple TV box in four years.

• 1:01:06Speaker 03

  That's a long time. It's funny because like you don't need one. It never occurs to me that I need to upgrade this thing. But maybe, maybe there's going to be some AI feature in it that I, that I can't live with that.

• 1:01:15Speaker 04

  Well, Siri AI, they've been waiting for the Siri AI update. And this could be a whole other podcast, but Siri AI has been the gate to all of these new product categories. The AirPods were supposed to be out already, the Apple TV, the HomePod, the Smart Home Hub, all these devices were supposed to come. Couldn't do any of them until Siri AI. Now Siri AI is here. Floodgates are open.

• 1:01:35Speaker 03

  All right. Well, Mark, we're going to have to have you back on the show to talk about those floodgates and all these new products very soon. I can't believe you haven't been on until now. Thank you so much for being on the code.

• 1:01:42Speaker 04

  Yeah. And obviously I'd love to have you on my new podcast, Power on Podcast, launching very shortly. So thanks in advance.

• 1:01:51Speaker 03

  Yeah, it'd be great. We'll be looking out for it. Thanks, man.

• 1:01:56Speaker 03

  I'd like to thank Mark Gurman for taking the time to join me on Decoder and thank you for listening. I hope you enjoyed it. Tell us, let us know what you thought about this episode or really anything else at all. Drop us a line. You can email us at [email protected]. We really do read all the emails. Or you can hit me up directly on Threads or Blue Sky. We're also on YouTube. You can watch full episodes at DecoderPod. We also have a TikTok and an Instagram. They're both at DecoderPod as well. They're a lot of fun. If you'd like Decoder, please share it with your friends and subscribe wherever you're podcasts. Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Decoder's producers are Greg Ott, Kate Cox, Nick Statt. This episode was edited by Eileen Felix. Our editorial director is Kevin McShane. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. We'll see you next time.