Are we sure about fluoride?

Florida just became the second state to ban fluoride from its water system, which has made some public health experts pretty angry. Just how risky is fluoride really, and why is it so hard for us to get on the same page? Guest: Emily Oster, professor of economics at Brown University and CEO of ParentData For show transcripts, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠vox.com/unxtranscripts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ For more, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠vox.com/unexplainable⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ And please email us! ⁠⁠[email protected]⁠⁠ We read every email. Support Unexplainable (and get ad-free episodes) by becoming a Vox Member today: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠vox.com/members⁠ Help us plan for the future of Unexplainable by filling out a brief survey: ⁠⁠⁠voxmedia.com/survey⁠⁠⁠. Thank you! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Speaker 00

  Support for the show comes from TikTok. If you listen to this show, you probably enjoy discovering new things. It is built into the DNA of the show that curiosity is its own reward and that there's always a deeper dive to do. And one place to explore some of the topics we've covered here is TikTok. Whether it's how to forecast volcanic eruptions, strange phenomena that the James Webb Space Telescope picked up near the beginning of time, or a literal deep dive on the ocean's deepest reefs, TikTok has a wealth of fascinating videos just waiting to be discovered. Your next discovery is waiting on TikTok. Learn more at tiktok.com/discovermore.

• 0:49Noam Hassenfeld?

  You're busy. We know that, so we'll keep this quick. Introducing Amex Corporate, now featuring the Corporate Cash Back Card. For one annual flat fee, get 1.5% cash back on eligible business purchases, plus intelligent expense management with the unmatched expertise and backing of American Express. Built to simplify, designed to scale. Get started at go.amex slash Amex Corporate. Terms and cap apply.

• 1:20Noam Hassenfeld?

  If you've heard the name Emily Oster, it's probably because you or someone you know is having a baby.

• 1:25Speaker 02

  Yeah, so I started writing about pregnancy when I got pregnant with my first kid, who is now 14.

• 1:30Noam Hassenfeld?

  And when she started talking to her doctors, she immediately heard about all the things she couldn't have.

• 1:35Speaker 02

  You can't have hot dogs, you can't have jelly meats, you can't have sushi, you can't have coffee, you can't have alcohol.

• 1:39Noam Hassenfeld?

  There was a lot of can't, but not a lot of why. So Emily asked her doctors, what exactly was the risk she was avoiding? Like, how strong was the evidence?

• 1:49Speaker 02

  Like, okay, if I avoided ham, how much would that change my risk of listeria? Like, how much do we really know and how large is any given risk?

• 1:59Noam Hassenfeld?

  Emily thought these were pretty basic questions, and she was kind of shocked when her doctors just didn't have the answers.

• 2:09Noam Hassenfeld?

  Emily's a health economist at Brown. So in order to get the kind of answers she was looking for, she decided to go straight to her comfort zone, the actual studies. Some of what she found lined up with conventional wisdom, like cigarettes, definitely bad. But a lot of it wasn't as black and white as she'd been told. The data said a ham sandwich every once in a while wasn't so bad. Neither was a cup of coffee. But then some things that seemed helpful, like bedrest, way riskier than you might think. And then, when her friends started getting pregnant, they started coming to her for advice, so much that she decided to write a book. It's called Expecting Better, and it was an instant bestseller. There were clearly lots of people out there who wanted something like this.

• 2:56Noam Hassenfeld?

  At the same time, the book was kind of controversial. It went against lots of conventional wisdom about what pregnant people should or shouldn't do. Some people thought Emily was being a little cavalier. But Emily just saw herself as laying out the evidence. She didn't want to tell people what to do. Her point was that pregnant people shouldn't be talked down to, that they can handle the data and they can make their own decisions.

• 3:21Speaker 02

  We can tell people a number, and then we need to help them understand the number. For me, that's sort of one of my ways into a lot of these questions.

• 3:31Noam Hassenfeld?

  Over the years, Emily's kept getting questions from parents. And recently, she's been hearing a lot about one particular concern.

• 3:39Speaker 03

  Tonight, growing questions about whether fluoride in drinking water is doing more harm than good.

• 3:44Speaker 04

  The incoming administration will advise all US water systems to stop adding fluoride to their water supplies. Florida's set to become the second state in the nation to ban fluoride in water.

• 3:55Speaker 02

  A couple of years ago, this started surfacing more and more frequently. And the questions people were asking me, you know, I'm hearing fluoride is dangerous. How do I understand this? And so I've sort of kept updating my writing on this as it has become, obviously, now a very big topic of discussion, very exciting. Everyone is an expert on water fluoride.

• 4:14Speaker 05

  Worse, I just found out there's literally hydrogen in our water. Yeah, we're drinking this.

• 4:23Noam Hassenfeld?

  This is why I wanted to talk to Emily. Because most of what I've been hearing about fluoride has sounded pretty extreme. On one side, you've got the fluoride haters.

• 4:32Speaker 04

  Fluoride science is completely made up.

• 4:34Speaker 03

  It's literally insane.

• 4:36Speaker 04

  Allowed to stand because our governments are completely corrupt.

• 4:38Noam Hassenfeld?

  You do not need fluoride treatments. They are poison. On the other side, you've got the people that think the haters are just ridiculous. Fluoride has been subject to public health smear campaigns and mass hysteria.

• 4:54Speaker 05

  This conspiracy started in the 40s because people thought they were putting fluoride in the water to turn us all into communists. So no, water fluoridation in the US does not make you dumber.

• 5:03Noam Hassenfeld?

  On either side of this fluoride debate, you have people just yelling at each other with complete certainty.

• 5:10Speaker 02

  Dude, it's like, that's not helping.

• 5:13Noam Hassenfeld?

  And then there's Emily.

• 5:15Speaker 02

  I fundamentally believe that people are smart enough to work through understanding evidence, and the thing we're doing now is not working.

• 5:26Noam Hassenfeld?

  I'm Noam Hassenfeld, and today on Unexplainable, the bitter struggle over an unassuming chemical. How can we get on the same page about fluoride?

• 5:51Noam Hassenfeld?

  In 1901, a dentist in Colorado noticed this strange brown stain on a bunch of his patient's teeth. Over time, he realized their teeth weren't just stained, they were healthier. People with these weird stains had way less tooth decay. They even had fewer missing teeth. Eventually, scientists realized this was happening because this part of Colorado had unusually high levels of fluoride in the water. They realized that high levels of fluoride stained teeth, but they wondered whether lower levels might still help with tooth decay. So they did an experiment.

• 6:28Noam Hassenfeld?

  This is Grand Rapids, Michigan, a town becoming widely known to dentists and municipal authorities for its fight against tooth decay. It started in the 40s when officials added just a bit of fluoride to the water, way less than what was in the water in Colorado. Only excessive amounts of fluoride can cause mottling of teeth. And then they waited.

• 6:51Noam Hassenfeld?

  After six years of fluoridation, the study shows that the six-year-old children who drank the water from birth had 65% less tooth decay. Pretty soon, other cities were getting their own experiments. Studies in Newburgh, New York, Sheboygan, Wisconsin, Marshall, Texas, and other cities show substantially the same results as those obtained at Grand Rapids. Within a few years, the difference started to become pretty clear. Something has happened to the teeth of young children, something that today is almost a dental miracle. Children's teeth just don't have as many cavities anymore.

• 7:31Noam Hassenfeld?

  When Emily started reading and writing about fluoride, she started hearing stories like this from her family.

• 7:36Speaker 02

  My aunt wrote to me and was like, I know fluoride is important for teeth because my teeth are terrible and your father's teeth are even worse, but my kid's teeth are great. And so, you know, at some point between when my father was a kid and when I was a kid, they started adding fluoride to the water.

• 7:53Noam Hassenfeld?

  Emily's family tooth stories were a couple of interesting data points, sure, but obviously not enough to prove that adding fluoride to water is worth it, or that it doesn't come with downsides. So she read every study she could find, all to get at this question: Has fluoride actually been good for us? And just how good?

• 8:16Speaker 02

  So there is a lot of evidence of the impact of fluoride on tooth decay, like fluoride treatments. So that's like a thing you can randomize access to. And there is also some evidence from early municipal water fluoride introduction that introducing fluoride reduced the risk of cavities in kids. There is also some evidence on the flip side. So Israel pulled fluoride out of the water, and there is a little bit of evidence from there suggesting that the rate of cavities went up over time.

• 8:46Noam Hassenfeld?

  Okay.

• 8:47Speaker 02

  I think what we don't have is something where we could be like, this is exactly the size of the impact there would be if we pull fluoride out of water. But there's also a huge amount of evidence that like fluoride is good for teeth.

• 8:58Noam Hassenfeld?

  So we know fluoride is good for our teeth, prevents tooth decay. What do we know about the downsides?

• 9:04Speaker 02

  So at high dose levels fluoride can be problematic for developing brains for kids or for exposure during pregnancy.

• 9:13Noam Hassenfeld?

  Okay.

• 9:14Speaker 02

  The studies from which we conclude that almost exclusively come from places where there are very high levels of fluoride naturally occurring in the water. Like there are areas of China and India in particular where the groundwater supplies have very high levels of fluoride, you know, maybe five or six times as high as what you would see in a municipal water system in the US. And there you see that, you know, moving from like four fluoride units to five does seem like it may have some small negative impacts on development in kids. And so that's kind of the piece of evidence that makes people concerned about fluoride, that at these higher levels, it has these impacts on basically on IQ and other neuro developmental metrics.

• 9:59Noam Hassenfeld?

  If I'm being honest, when I first read about Emily taking fluoride concerns seriously, I was a little surprised. Like, most of the things I read were pretty quick to just say fluoride, good. All those potential downsides are just a conspiracy, which is not at all what Emily was saying. Yeah, do we have any idea of how big an impact it has on IQ?

• 10:23Speaker 02

  It's, you know, a half a point of IQ per like unit of fluoride at these higher levels. It's a little bit of a hard number.

• 10:32Noam Hassenfeld?

  Okay.

• 10:32Speaker 02

  To look at, but I guess what I would say is like, small but significant impact.

• 10:37Noam Hassenfeld?

  But still an impact.

• 10:37Speaker 02

  But still an impact, absolutely.

• 10:39Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 10:39Speaker 02

  A small, but still an impact.

• 10:40Noam Hassenfeld?

  So is that to say that at low levels of fluoride in the water, we notice no harmful effects? And then at high levels, we start to see some effects?

• 10:50Speaker 02

  Yeah, so that's basically if you sort of take all of these studies together, of which I want to be clear, there are many. So there are many, many studies over the relationship between fluoride and IQ, some of which are run in places with very high fluoride, some of which are run in places with very low fluoride. If you kind of aggregate those and sort of take like a meta-analysis, which takes all of those together and you organize them, it is the dose that makes the poison. But at lower levels, you are not seeing those negative effects while you are getting these positive effects on teeth.

• 11:20Noam Hassenfeld?

  When I was doing some background research for this episode, I did find a few studies that seemed to disagree with Emily that showed fluoride could have negative effects even at low levels, like the levels in American water systems.

• 11:34Speaker 02

  Yeah, so it's like a very tricky space because there are many, many studies. Many of them are very small. None of them are like the gold standard randomized control trial study.

• 11:46Noam Hassenfeld?

  Emily says there are some specific issues with these studies. Like, for one thing, a lot of them measured the fluoride levels in people's urine, which is a problem because those levels can be impacted by someone's general diet, not just how much fluoride they're getting from the water.

• 12:02Speaker 02

  And then on top of that, you have the issue that, you know, there's 40 studies of something and people would be like, but what about this one study? And you're like, yeah, that's how statistics are. Like, there's a distribution of effects.

• 12:14Noam Hassenfeld?

  There's still some scientific debate on this. But when Emily looks at the big picture of all the studies out there, the vast majority show that low levels of fluoride are safe.

• 12:25Speaker 02

  I mean, I think that the basic message is that municipal water levels in the US do not have fluoride at levels you would be concerned about.

• 12:32Noam Hassenfeld?

  There are a few places in the US where fluoride levels do seem to be too high. But according to recent numbers from the CDC, that applies to just 0.01% of the population.

• 12:43Speaker 02

  When you look at large-scale testing data, it does not look like we are seeing a lot of places that are at higher levels.

• 12:50Noam Hassenfeld?

  So when parents have come to Emily with questions about fluoride in the water and they're pushing for an answer, she basically just tells them.

• 12:57Speaker 02

  You should just consume the water and not think about this question anymore.

• 13:03Noam Hassenfeld?

  Other people have landed in a different place. Even if there are issues with those smaller studies, they say they're worth paying attention to. And Emily gets that not everyone is going to agree on this. Even if they look at the same exact data. It's a similar place to where she lands in her book on pregnancy. She writes about friends who read the same data she did and still decided to give up coffee. Even if Emily didn't think a cup of coffee was worth worrying about. Some people might just have a really low tolerance for risk. They might think any amount of uncertainty is too much.

• 13:36Speaker 02

  It's not crazy to say, I'm worried about levels of fluoride. Because at some level, you should be worried. But I try to be sort of careful in this information to sort of say like, there's absolutely nothing that should make you concerned about neurodevelopmental effects of the water fluoride that you see. Does that mean that some people will not choose to like, drink a lot of bottled water or drink some other alternative? No. And really, the way we need to communicate that is to help people understand, yes, you know, here's why that concern is coming up, but here's why it may not be relevant to the situation you're in. One of the things I say all the time is like, no option is completely safe. You know, so I don't want you to come to me and say like, I, you know, I'm not going to drink the water with fluoride.

• 14:21Speaker 02

  So my new plan is to go to this like, stream out in the mountains and get my water from there. It's like, you know, that's got parasites in it. That's got like Giardia. Like, you're going to be very sick if you use that. And that's actually much worse. And so just making sure that, you know, people have thought about the potential downsides of the alternative also.

• 14:44Noam Hassenfeld?

  Maybe you're going to get in a car crash on the way to the stream.

• 14:46Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think the stream itself is much more risky. Don't drink out of the stream.

• 14:51Noam Hassenfeld?

  Right, okay, that's the message for the episode. Do not drink out of the stream.

• 14:55Speaker 02

  Animals pooped in that.

• 14:59Noam Hassenfeld?

  It's not just fluoride, though. It can feel hard to talk about all kinds of things in public health right now. So what can we do to get back on the same page? Emily's got some ideas in a minute.

• 15:19Noam Hassenfeld?

  Support for the show comes from Sonos. Hey, Sonos, give me some music.

• 15:25Noam Hassenfeld?

  All right, one of life's great mysteries. You're listening to music in the living room. You gotta grab something from the kitchen. You don't want to take the speaker with you, but you also don't want to miss that beat drop. And this is where I introduce you to the magic of Sonos. Sonos sent me a couple of speakers to try out, so I've got to move two here in the living room. And then I walk down the hall.

• 15:50Noam Hassenfeld?

  I get in here to the kitchen, and I got a brand new Sonos Play right here on the counter. I can open the fridge,

• 16:01Noam Hassenfeld?

  grab a seltzer.

• 16:08Noam Hassenfeld?

  And yeah, I didn't miss a second. And I can make each speaker louder or softer in the Sonos app, or if I'm using AirPlay, so I can make it louder in the kitchen without blasting whoever is still in the living room. It's all just easy, and it sounds amazing. These speakers are crisp. They've got great bass. And I'm especially impressed with the new Sonos Play. It packs this truly awesome sound in a much smaller size. So I don't know, if I want to

• 16:41Noam Hassenfeld?

  head outside for a minute.

• 16:44Noam Hassenfeld?

  It's super easy and yeah, pretty nice out. Visit sonos.com and build your system. Sonos, love the sound, feel the system.

• 16:59Speaker 00

  Support for the show comes from Quince. Fall is my absolute favorite season. I love fall colors. I love fall leather. I love the specific light you sometimes get on a fall afternoon. And I really love fall clothes, which Quince has. This fall, Quince is offering pieces with premium materials like 100% Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton, and merino wool. The style Styles are timeless, versatile, and designed to become the dependable pieces you reach for day after day. Their 100% Mongolian cashmere sweaters start at just $60, giving you the softness and quality you'd expect from a luxury brand without the luxury

• 17:41Speaker 00

  price tag. I think my favorite thing about Quince's clothes is that they're just good wardrobe staples. I got three black shirts from them, each in a slightly different style, and they are just correct. They fit the way they are supposed to, they look nice, they feel nice, and they go well with the rest of my closet. Find your next fall favorites at Quince. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns, now available in Canada and the UK, too. And when Quince asks you where you heard about them, please let them know it was unexplainable. It's a great way to support the show.

• 18:24Speaker 04

  Support for the show comes from Fetch Pet Insurance. If you have a dog or cat, here's something you need to know. According to Forbes, 1 in 3 pets will need emergency treatment this year. And every 6 seconds, a pet parent gets hit with a vet bill over $1,000. Vet bills don't have to hit that hard. Fetch is pet insurance that covers accidents, illnesses, and emergency visits, and pays back up to 90% of eligible vet bills. No wonder pet parents give Fetch an excellent rating on TrustPilot. Get a free quote in minutes at fetchpet.com/save. That's fetchpet.com/save.

• 19:14Noam Hassenfeld?

  Okay, it's time to talk about RFK Jr.

• 19:19Speaker 06

  I think fluoride is a poison.

• 19:24Noam Hassenfeld?

  This is the guy behind the renewed push to get fluoride out of the water. The guy who's now in charge of America's health and science agencies. The same guy who's promoted all kinds of conspiracy theories. Like how 5G is a sinister plot to rule the world.

• 19:38Speaker 06

  They're putting in 5G to harvest our data and control our behavior.

• 19:45Noam Hassenfeld?

  Or how HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

• 19:47Speaker 06

  100% of the people who died in the first thousand who had AIDS were people who were addicted to poppers.

• 19:53Noam Hassenfeld?

  Or how antidepressants are the reason we have so many school shootings.

• 19:57Speaker 06

  There's a tremendous circumstantial evidence that SSRIs and benzos and other drugs are doing this.

• 20:08Noam Hassenfeld?

  The fact that this is the guy raising the alarm about fluoride. It's a big reason why it can feel so easy to write it off. Why a lot of public health experts might just wave away fluoride concerns without really getting into the details.

• 20:21Speaker 06

  This is fringe science. So what the health secretary is doing is smoke and mirrors.

• 20:28Noam Hassenfeld?

  Emily can't stand this kind of almost flippant response.

• 20:33Speaker 02

  I think that's a mistake in the way that we communicate. And the RFK case is a good one where, you know, he makes many claims. And some of those claims, I think, are more defensible than others. You know, so RFK thinks it's fine to drink raw milk. You know, like, raw milk is more likely to make you sick than pasteurized milk. But the risks of raw milk are small. And I think that we will sometimes sort of give people the impression like only a crazy conspiracy theorist would, you know, buy into this raw milk mania. And if you're doing that, then you know, you're a looney tune.

• 21:07Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 21:07Speaker 02

  I think that kind of communication, which comes up a lot, is not helpful. Because it doesn't meet people where they are and help them understand why you hold the views that you hold. And then I think it pushes them away on topics where we really should be communicating. Like, we are really sure that this is something you should do. And so in the case of fluoride, to just say, you know, concerns about fluoride or conspiracy theory writ large is not helpful because if people look into it, they're not really going to find that that's right.

• 21:41Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah, if you say the whole fluoride thing is a conspiracy and then people find a reasonable study that says there are actual downsides to fluoride at higher levels, it really does make it seem like a conspiracy.

• 21:52Speaker 02

  Exactly right. And if you are so dogmatic and you never allow for the possibility any information is counter to what you're saying, then as soon as someone sees some piece of information like that, you're going to lose them. And then, and then it's very hard to get them back. Once you have lost someone's trust, it's very hard to rebuild.

• 22:10Noam Hassenfeld?

  So would you say that public health officials should be honest about the downsides of fluoride and then let people make their own decisions? Is that the strategy you're advocating?

• 22:19Speaker 02

  I would advocate a strategy of honesty. Yes. I mean, I like, I tend to be like an over communicator, but I do think that we probably under communicate some of the nuance in the public health messaging that we said. It's obviously a tricky question, in part because the public health community right now is RFK Jr.

• 22:34Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 22:34Speaker 02

  So that is, that makes it more difficult to talk about the question of like, what should public health say?

• 22:40Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah, it is really hard because you see RFK really casting doubt on vaccines. And we got a measles outbreak happening right now, which is very different from

• 22:52Speaker 02

  Very different.

• 22:52Noam Hassenfeld?

  slight levels of tooth decay.

• 22:54Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 22:54Noam Hassenfeld?

  And I don't know, I can see the feeling of wanting to just tell people what to do.

• 23:02Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 23:02Noam Hassenfeld?

  Which makes me wonder, I guess, do you think we can handle uncertainty?

• 23:08Speaker 02

  I do. I think people are not good at risks. Nobody's good at risk, no matter how smart you are. This is like, people are not good at risks. But I fundamentally believe that people are smart enough to work through understanding some of this evidence. And I think it's disrespectful not to give them that grace to try, because I don't think we're helping ourselves by telling people what to do.

• 23:32Noam Hassenfeld?

  Mm hmm.

• 23:32Speaker 02

  The thing we're doing now is not working.

• 23:34Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 23:34Speaker 02

  So if you sort of said, like, look, we as the public health authorities are going to decide, you know, fluoride is good, measles vaccine is good, raw milk is bad, and everyone's going to do exactly what we say. I mean, I like, those are positions I'm aligned with. But the reality is you go and do that. And then what happens is people don't trust you. And then you've like, lost their trust on the raw milk. And then you lose their trust on the measles vaccine. And then now they're not doing any of those things. And if the only solution to that is then to yell that advice louder, like, but really? Dude, it's like, that's not helping. They're not listening and they're not believing you. And so I just don't think the system is working.

• 24:14Noam Hassenfeld?

  I find this persuasive, but I don't know. I can get distracted. People can get distracted. I often come back to this poll from like 10 years ago. That said, something like one in four Americans think the sun goes around the earth.

• 24:29Speaker 02

  Okay.

• 24:29Noam Hassenfeld?

  And I don't know, maybe that might make us lean towards wanting to tell people what to do and not work through the data for themselves.

• 24:40Speaker 02

  Okay, that's a fair point, but let me tell you, like, I have built an entire career on the idea that like, people can understand brats more than we thought they did.

• 24:48Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 24:48Speaker 02

  But I think that the difference between these questions and whether the sun goes around the earth is like, it doesn't matter for my life, which thing goes around which thing. It's not that it wouldn't matter if it were reversed for the like physics of the universe, but for my day to day life, it's not important. Whereas it is important, a choice I do have to make is like, do I drink this kind of water? Or do I get my kid vaccinated or whatever these things are? I think people are more willing to engage on things that matter to them and more willing to think about them.

• 25:19Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 25:19Speaker 02

  We always take these examples like, oh, nobody can understand anything because they don't understand this basic thing about physics. But why would they think about that? It's like saying like, people don't know what a sign or a cosine is.

• 25:30Noam Hassenfeld?

  It's fair.

• 25:31Speaker 02

  Right? Be like, oh, no, didn't you go to seventh grade? Didn't you get like, learn trig? I bet you couldn't draw them for me. But the thing is, it doesn't come up.

• 25:39Noam Hassenfeld?

  Okay, I mean, totally fair. On the flip side, has acknowledging uncertainty in public health ever backfired? Like, they laid out the data for everyone in the public, just made some really bad decisions?

• 25:52Speaker 02

  Yeah, I'm sure the answer to that is yes. And, you know, I don't know if I have a specific example, but I think it's absolutely right that there are settings in which, at a minimum, I think we should lead with, here is the recommendation. And maybe that's a sort of a different way to say this, is like, I wouldn't lead a discussion of the measles vaccine by saying, let me start by laying out every piece of information we have about that. I think we have to lead the discussion with, the best way to protect your kids and your family and the rest of everybody for measles is vaccination, and we know it is safe and effective. Bottom line. But then the question is like, what do you say in response to people who are uncertain? And I think that's actually the tough thing about the communication here

• 26:33Speaker 02

  is, it really does have to be kind of titrated to the person that you're talking to. I mean, this is why, like, pediatricians are the best at this kind of stuff, because they are one-on-one with a person right in front of them, and they can feel, you know, somebody is just like, this is the thing. They're like, fine, you know, I don't want to hear any more about why. And then sometimes people need more of the why. And I think what's hard about the communication, I kind of err one way, I think other people would err it another way, is, you know, how much do you lean into the assumption, most people just want to be told what to do, versus most people want a, like, pedantic 3,500-word explanation?

• 27:08Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah. I mean, I think about what happened, I guess, five years ago now, when Fauci's on the news at the beginning of the pandemic, trying to tell people what to do. And there's a lot of stuff that we're learning. He's trying to balance this collective action problem of getting people to do things that are important, while also not being sure how much uncertainty to communicate. Would it have been better, more responsible to lean into the uncertainty?

• 27:36Speaker 02

  I think it would have. I mean, I think it, one way to sort of organize this a little bit is like, the value of leaning into uncertainty and communicating that to people is highest when the uncertainty is highest.

• 27:46Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 27:46Speaker 02

  When we were doing this communication in COVID, there was a lot of uncertainty, and they knew there was a lot of uncertainty. And I think the mistake there was to convey so little uncertainty in a moment when there was so much. And so then what happened is every day you were learning that what they said yesterday was not right. There were sort of many stages of this where communicating uncertainty would, I think, have really benefited because the certainty was sort of eroded almost immediately.

• 28:17Noam Hassenfeld?

  Let's say we're three years down the line and there's a new head of the health agencies that's not a conspiracy theorist. What kind of message do you think that person should give to the American public that, I guess, deals with uncertainty responsibly and also allows us to have the trust in science that we should have?

• 28:40Speaker 02

  I think the main thing I would say, if that person asked me for advice, it would be ask people what their questions are and then try to engage those questions directly. Rather than assuming you know what their questions are, or just assuming that you're going to tell them what to do, figure out what they are concerned about, because it is not always the thing that you think. And then try to directly address those questions in an honest way.

• 29:06Noam Hassenfeld?

  Is there an example of a question that you're thinking of that someone might have a different underlying motivation?

• 29:11Speaker 02

  I mean, I think in the space of vaccines, the set of questions that people have, you know, do vaccines cause autism? Why are there so many vaccines? You know, why do we need this particular vaccine? Why do we need the hepatitis B vaccine at birth? I think that is one where it's actually very simple to explain the answer to that question. But instead of explaining the answer to that question, often we're just like, well, that's what's recommended. It's on the vaccine schedule. Like, we put it on the vaccine schedule. And actually, people would do better to explain why we have that and what are the potential other options if people are not comfortable with that.

• 29:44Noam Hassenfeld?

  And then you think that would lead people to feel, I don't know, that like they're having more agency, like they understand how the decisions are being made. Maybe they feel part of the decisions?

• 29:51Speaker 02

  That would be the hope.

• 29:53Noam Hassenfeld?

  And it doesn't seem like you feel very hopeful.

• 29:56Speaker 02

  I'm not very hopeful. Sorry.

• 30:00Noam Hassenfeld?

  Yeah.

• 30:02Speaker 02

  The truth is that like I was very frustrated during the pandemic with the messaging of the sort of public health officials. I'm frustrated with where we are now. I do wonder if we get a different administration in three years, whether that administration will have learned from the mistakes of the past. I don't think this is like an impossible thing to reset. And so maybe, maybe we'll get to some kind of balance.

• 30:25Noam Hassenfeld?

  Okay, so that that seems maybe a little maybe hopeful.

• 30:28Speaker 02

  Like, okay, a little hope. I'll leave you a little hope.

• 30:39Noam Hassenfeld?

  This episode was produced by me, Noam Hassenfeld. We had editing from Julia Longoria, sound design from Christian Ayala, music from me, and fact checking from Melissa Hirsch. Meredith Hadenot runs the show. Jorge Just is our editorial director. And Bird Pinkerton bent over to pick up the second note. Again, it was from Erin Bird.

• 31:01Speaker 05

  Hi, Newt. The abandoned runway at JFK. Come alone.

• 31:09Noam Hassenfeld?

  Thanks, as always, to Brian Resnick for co-creating the show. And if you have thoughts about the show, send us an email. We're at [email protected]. You can also leave us a review or a rating wherever you listen. Really helps us find new listeners. You can also support this show and all of Vox's journalism by joining our membership program. You can go to vox.com/members to sign up. If you do, you'll be helping make this place run. And you'll also get unlimited access to the reporting on vox.com. You'll get exclusive newsletters. And you'll get all our podcasts ad free. Think about it. Unexplainable is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. We're off next week, but we'll be back in your feed on Monday, June 2.

• 32:00Speaker 00

  Support for today's episode comes from Delta, official airline of the National Women's Soccer League. Traveling is basically magic. It creates opportunities, it fosters understanding, it expands horizons, it connects people and communities to each other and to their own potential. Those are the values that drive Delta. With up to 5,500 daily Delta and Delta Connection flights to more than 300 destinations on six continents, Delta is committed to helping you explore your world. Whatever gives you the travel bug, Delta is here to help you get there. Visit delta.com for more info. Delta, wherever the journey takes you.

• 32:46Speaker 00

  Support for the show comes from Jira by Atlassian. Your work lives in scattered places, and it's not only your team searching for context, your AI agents need it too. Jira taps Atlassian's teamwork graph to bring that context together across Jira, Confluence, Slack, GitHub, and more, and makes it easy to share with the agents you already use, like Claude, Purser, and GitHub Copilot. Assign them work directly or connect your agents through MCP. Spend less time hunting for context, less time asking, "Wait, what did we decide?" and more time actually shipping with Jira. Learn more at jira.com. That's J-I-R-A dot com.