20VC: Wix's Founder on What Wall St Gets Wrong About AI and Wix | Will Base44 Win the Vibe Coding Wars | The Truth About the Economics of Vibe-Coding | The Buyback Disaster: Lessons Learned with Avishai Abrahami

Avishai Abrahami is the Co-Founder and CEO of Wix, the NASDAQ-listed website creation platform serving millions of businesses worldwide. Today, Wix generates more than $2BN in ARR and has a market capitalization of approximately $2.1BN, after reaching a peak valuation of $17BN over the past two years. The company also acquired Base44, one of the fastest-growing AI application-building platforms, scaling it to $150M in ARR in record time. AGENDA: 00:00 The SaaS Apocalypse: What Does Wall Street Still Not Understand About Wix? 07:00 Is the Market Valuing Wix's Core Business at Less Than Zero? 12:55 Will AI Kill Wix... or Make Base44 Bigger Than the Entire Company? 19:15 "You Are NOT Going to Vibe Code Shopify" — Why Everyone Is Getting AI Wrong 23:00 Would You Really Pay $80M for a One-Person Startup? 24:15 The Buyback Disaster: Would Avishai Do It All Again? 31:00 Why Every AI Customer Support Startup Keeps Failing (According to Wix) 37:00 Should a 22-Year-Old Still Learn to Code in the Age of AI? 42:20 Has AI Been Overhyped? Avishai's Most Controversial Prediction Yet 49:00 The Hardest Lessons on Leadership, Marriage & Building Through Chaos

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  You're not going to vibe code Shopify, no matter how good you are. Today, we are trading on other companies' news. We're not trading on Wix news. I really don't care. We make about $400 million a year, okay? And free cash flow. So we make cash and we invest about 200 and something million into Base44. We all give too much credit for AI and what it can do. If I would be in the university studying today, I would be terrified. If I'm here, I need to be fully committed to what I'm doing because I've chosen to be here.

• 0:30Harry Stebbings?

  This is 20 VC with me, Harry Stubbings. Now, it's a tough time for some public company CEOs with the SaaS apocalypse. That is more true for this CEO than almost any other. The Wix market cap is about $2.8 billion. They are doing $2.1 billion in revenue. They have Base44, which is their vibe coding product, which is now well over $150 million in ARR, growing incredibly quickly. And quite frankly, the public markets just won't give them a break. Whether it's justified or not, it's been pretty brutal. The buyback has been about as successful as the Titanic voyage. And poor Avishai, their CEO, is going through it.

• 1:13Harry Stebbings?

  I wanted to sit down with him and hear how he thought about how Base44 makes such a big part of their business today and what that looks like moving forwards. How he reflects on the buyback, what public market investors don't see that they should see. This and so much more in what I think is probably the most frank and honest conversation Avishai has had in recent years about the Wix business. But before we dive into the show today, founders face a different set of challenges at every stage of growth. For Sid Shait, co-founder and CEO of Dematrix, JP Morgan delivered the guidance and expertise to help navigate what came next. He credits JP Morgan's high-touch approach with supporting Dematrix as it grew and expanded internationally.

• 1:58Harry Stebbings?

  Whether you're in the early days or expanding into new markets, JP Morgan helps startups navigate complexity with real confidence, offering personalized guidance and deep sector expertise. Find out how JP Morgan helps founders at jpmorgan.com/growwithoutlimits. JP Morgan is the bank of the innovation economy. While JP Morgan supports growth, Corgi protects it. My word, what an arresting first line. Get your ass covered with Corgi Insurance and I'll tell you why. If you're running a business right now, you already know this pain all too well. Getting insurance, it's really slow, it's confusing, and my word, it's full of paperwork. Well, that's exactly why Corgi is here to change the game.

• 2:42Harry Stebbings?

  Corgi is the first and only insurance carrier designed specifically for tech companies, allowing you to get covered in minutes instead of days. Corgi provides essential coverages for all growth stages, such as DNO, EDO liability, cyber, commercial, general liability, and more. Get your ass covered. I love the way we say ass with Corgi Insurance alongside thousands of other startups at corgi.com/20vc today. That's corgi.com/20vc. You won't regret it. While Corgi covers risk, Flex gives you room to move. Business owners run their whole financial life on Flex. One platform from business revenue to their personal spend. Float every purchase for 60 days.

• 3:27Harry Stebbings?

  Tap capital that grows with your revenue and pay vendors in 170 countries across 32 currencies. Plus, the whole back office, bills, expenses, accounting, all in one place. So you spend less time reconciling and more time growing. That's why thousands of owners use Flex, named one of Fast Company's most innovative companies of 2026. Visit flex.on, that's F-L-E-X dot O-N-E, and use the code 20VC. You have now arrived at your destination. Avishai, it is so good to have you on the show, dude. I've wanted to make this one happen for a while. Thank you so much for joining me.

• 4:08Speaker 00

  My pleasure. I'm so happy to be here. I've watched a lot of episodes and as I said, I learned a lot. So I'm very excited to be on the spotlight.

• 4:15Harry Stebbings?

  Dude, you know, I've just got to start with just a weird thing, but I like to bring people to personality in life a little bit. I spoke to Erhan at Monday before the show and he told me that you stay up insanely late. Is that true? And what does the sleep schedule look like just before we dive in?

• 4:30Speaker 00

  So I usually go to sleep at around 5 to 6 a.m. And I'd wake up around 11, 11:30. It's been my routine pretty much as I remember myself. I think there's something good about it for a CEO, as surprisingly as it might sound, because I have a few hours where I can actually think and work on things and plan things and do things. And as opposed to always being, you know, in a meeting, go have to fight to get a clear schedule. So I have probably four hours where I can do really work and not just talk to people.

• 5:01Harry Stebbings?

  Do you mind what time people come in in the morning? If you're sleeping till 11:30, you're going to be in the office at 12:31. Do you mind if people are the same?

• 5:10Speaker 00

  Actually, I don't mind. I don't mind, but most people don't like that schedule, right? So most people will not agree with that and be volunteering for that. It also created another thing which I like is that when you're a small company, people want the CEO to solve their problems, you know, like how do we mitigate between arguments? And but by the time I would arrive, most of the things would be solved by themselves. So the thing that were left for me to handle would be the more, well, the harder things to solve in between people, communication skills and other things. So I mean, that actually helps the organization be more mature.

• 5:43Harry Stebbings?

  Your Whoop or your Aura must absolutely hate you and your sleep score must be shit, respectfully.

• 5:48Speaker 00

  Actually, Aura did at some point added the sleep profile where they defined that. So there is this theory, right, which is a very, I would say, Northern California, which is you have to go to sleep at like 9:00 p.m. or something. And that was the beginning. And then at some point they added, well, that's an early sleeper. Then they had a normal sleeper, which I think is around 12:00 a.m. And then they added very late sleepers. Okay, so they kind of like this as well. There are different profiles and apparently by the way, those are genetic profiles. So it's very hard to move between them.

• 6:20Harry Stebbings?

  Well, thank God, otherwise your sleep score would have been in the basement.

• 6:23Speaker 00

  What time do you go to sleep?

• 6:25Harry Stebbings?

  I go to sleep at about 2 a.m. So I'm pretty late, but I'm not quite as late as you.

• 6:30Speaker 00

  So Aura probably now classifies a late sleeper and that's what you're going to get.

• 6:34Harry Stebbings?

  I don't use it, dude. I don't need another fucking device to tell me that I'm shit. I'm sorry, like, you know what? Life is hard enough. I've got a girlfriend to tell me that I'm not doing well enough. I don't need a fucking Aura.

• 6:48Harry Stebbings?

  But I want to be direct. You're at a market cap today of like $2.8 billion and you do $2.1 billion in ARR, give or take. What does the market not see, Avishai, that they should see?

• 7:00Speaker 00

  Well, I think that's kind of a thing now with all SaaS companies, right? Where the multipliers went to shit. And I think a lot of it is because the market don't know how to calculate the danger for SaaS companies with AI. That's the reason. In some cases, I agree. In some cases, I disagree. But overall, I think that's what we're experiencing now. And you know, time will prove who's right, but we are working hard.

• 7:23Harry Stebbings?

  Yes and no. A lot of the SaaS apocalypse, many of them have come back and then some of them haven't come back. Essentially what they're doing.

• 7:31Speaker 00

  What did come back all the way up?

• 7:33Harry Stebbings?

  I mean, Atlassian's come up again. CrowdStrike never went down. Palo Alto Networks is up, obviously. Box is up.

• 7:39Speaker 00

  Salesforce is down. ServiceNow is down. Figma would be down. So there's a lot that at the core, okay? I think it's still down. Atlassian, if it went up, that's actually the one I'm more concerned about. And I own a lot of shares, so, but I didn't notice that it went up.

• 7:55Harry Stebbings?

  Well, there you go. I've provided you with some good news for today. I'm a bringer of good news. But essentially, you know, I had Mayor on the show from Base44. Base44 was doing $150 million in revenue last announced. I'm sure more now. It kind of ascribes zero value to the core business. Is that just completely nuts to you? Or are you like, yeah, I get that in a new world where technology creation is easier than ever? I understand that. How do you think about that?

• 8:21Speaker 00

  First of all, I think it ascribes less than zero value to the current business because if you look at peers, they're doing vibe coding. The multiplier is much higher than the one we would get for Base to be at $2 billion, right? So Base on its own should probably be at $8 billion. You know, I'm not trying to guess the stock market logic, you know? I think that most of the time when you follow companies for a long time, you understand that the market got them completely wrong, completely right. And there's always a mix and it's a cycle, right? And this cycle, I understand where it's coming from, okay? I disagree with it and I disagree with it strongly on a few companies, less on other companies. For example, Salesforce, okay? Salesforce, what is the biggest value Salesforce provide? It's not the CRM.

• 9:05Speaker 00

  It's the fact that you trust a SaaS providers with your data. You have huge banks, huge companies that actually allow Salesforce to hold all of the customer data because they trust Salesforce. You're not going to vibe code that because the trust is massive, right? It's a massive part of the value that Salesforce gives. And yes, they have the marketplace, which is a lot of functionality and other things. But the CRM itself is a very small part of the value. In my mind, I don't see how you compete with that with some kind of a Claude code project.

• 9:36Harry Stebbings?

  If Salesforce becomes a valueless database that agents are able to scrape and then provide in different interfaces, then you basically become a commodity piping provider, which would mean that you could almost just replace.

• 9:48Speaker 00

  What other platform will JP Morgan trust for their customers? Data outside of the JP Morgan closed garden DMZ secure environment? None. The answer is none. They don't trust anybody else with that, but they do trust Salesforce. And that's huge. That's not a small thing. It's huge. It means that, you know, and like it's extremely hard to change that.

• 10:10Harry Stebbings?

  I get that. And actually, I was thinking of the government contracts that Salesforce has and has won. Again, I would say trust to your point, but is that a one of one? If we go to the other providers, the other people who've been hurt by the SaaS apocalypse, they're not in that same gilded trust.

• 10:26Speaker 00

  I agree. It depends which one. By the way, Atlassian for me is actually the one where, again, I'm a shareholder, so I want to be clear, okay? And I love the company. I've been a shareholder for a long time. And when I look at Atlassian, I think that the customers are the one that are more likely to build things with Claude Code because they are developers, right? So I'm always in a bit of a concern there because I'm like, if somebody would replace their, really the management stack of the tickets and workflow, those would be those guys, okay? And yet you said this is the one that recovered. So obviously I'm missing something, right? And I think for weeks, look, our customers, most of our customers will be the pizza store next to your house, your hairdresser, or a lot of small businesses, okay?

• 11:07Speaker 00

  They're not going to use Claude Code to build their business stack. They're not going to do that for all of what they need. It's just not in the realm of possible now. Maybe in a few years they are, we'll be able to do that, but we are very far from it. We tried at Wix. You know, one of the first thing we did with Base44 is that, okay, should we integrate the business logic of our vertical offering into Base44? And we make a test and we said, can we build a hairdresser, just a business logic to manage a hairdresser business in Base44? And so we had a team, they tried, professional developers tried to do it for a week. They ended up doing a little bit. And so we said, okay, we're going to bring a stronger team, okay? Actually, the team that wrote it in Wix. And two weeks later, they still didn't achieve that. Those things are complicated. And so I don't think you're the guy that have,

• 11:52Speaker 00

  I don't know, the pizza next to your house is going to use Claude Claude to build his delivery, his scheduling, his staff management system, all of those things, and then build a website, okay, to do that. Well, some, yes, okay, some, yes. And we see it, okay? We see that some do, okay? We see it. Claude Code is much harder than Base44. Base44 gives you a lot of coming out of the box, so you can do way more with it. But we see that some do, but I don't think the majority will. So I think this is where Wix is, right? This is our, those are our customers. And to assume that they're going to one day just say, well, you know what, I'm going to start building all of those things. Maybe, but we don't see it yet.

• 12:29Harry Stebbings?

  I totally get that. But then the account would be, okay, so it's just a TAM reduction. Because some will, and maybe that's 20%, and that means the TAM that was 100% is now 80%. So it's like a smaller market.

• 12:41Speaker 00

  Well, yeah, maybe, all right. But then where are they going to go move to? Vibe coding?

• 12:44Harry Stebbings?

  Yeah, move to lovable, rapid, Base44.

• 12:46Speaker 00

  We own Base44. They might move from here to here. That's fine.

• 12:50Harry Stebbings?

  If you say, hey, you know, the hairdresser's not going to do it, the construction work is not going to do it, I get you. Do you not think they will in tomorrow's model or the year after's model? You know, I had Samuel on the show and he said, you have to build for the model of tomorrow or next year.

• 13:04Speaker 00

  Well, we are. That's Base44. That's why we invest so much into Base44. Because if that will be something that happened in that way, that's why we have Base44. Essentially, the way I look at it today is that there are three different options. One, the guy that built the pizza place, that has a place and he want to build a website and the management tools for that, he's going to be staying a Wix customer because he don't want to put the effort into that. His business in life is making pizza. So that's option number one, right? So a lot of them will stay here. Option number three, and I'm going to say, is that they're going to say, well, I'm actually really interested in that. Base44 made it so easy for me to vibe code everything I need. It's custom made for me. So I'm going to use Base44 for that. And there is, of course, the middle ground, which is like, some people will be here, some people

• 13:49Speaker 00

  will be there, which is, I'm guessing, the more likely scenario to happen in the next five, six years, right? Not everybody will be in this side or in that side, which is why we have both options.

• 14:00Harry Stebbings?

  Can I ask you, when you think about like Base44's margin profile, a lot of the providers, you know, we've had lovable, we've had Raplet, we've had Mayo on the show, and their margin is one that's hidden in a lot of cases. And it leads to negativity and skepticism around whether they're actually good businesses. How does the margin profile of a Base44 compare to the margin profile of a Wix?

• 14:21Speaker 00

  Well, Wix is way more profitable. The cost of a Wix, generating Wix website is pretty much zero in comparison, and hosting pretty much zero in comparison. So way more profitable on Wix than on Base44. The margins are much better. The retention is also better. Because you start building something, you need to put a lot of effort to finish it. It's way more challenging, but we did get the cost to go, we're continuously seeing a decline in the cost in Base44. There's a brilliant team always leading that. And we just released our own AI model. So we fine tuned a few models and then combined them and we're using that. And then we're actually achieving equivalent to the top tier models with that. So the cost of that is dramatically

• 15:04Speaker 00

  less. So I think that in two years or maybe less, this is not going to be an important question.

• 15:10Harry Stebbings?

  Can you talk to me about the decision to do your own model? It's a big technological decision to choose to do that versus use open source off the shelf or frontier models. Can you talk to me about the decision to do that and why you thought it was strategically right?

• 15:24Speaker 00

  Yeah, of course. I think there are two parts to that. Number one is quality. We have a huge amount of training data that is happening for our, that we're getting on Base44. And because we get, you know, we see what users are trying to do. I see where it fails. We understand better and better what they're trying to say and saying it with the wrong prompt. So we learn all those things. And by learning all those things, we think we can actually create a model that is better for Base44 than just, you know, the frontier models that are way more generic. We don't need the knowledge that a lot of them have on Chinese poetry, because they do, you know, they've been trained on that. But we do need the knowledge that they have to focus and increase

• 16:05Speaker 00

  the knowledge they have. What does it mean when you say, I want to create a task manager for my, for me to manage my husband? Oh, to tell my boyfriend where he's wrong. Okay, so you have that, right? So all of those things, okay? And we have a huge amount of data that we can use to create a model that is better and better. Now, it's not trying to replace the frontier models, but it's trying to make us better at Base44. So it's a different target, which is why it's easier than building a Fable or Midas, right? We're not trying to build Midas. The other thing is that we did it already on Wix, okay? So on Wix, when you generate a website today, we are running a model that we trained. And it's faster, it's cheaper, but it's also better,

• 16:47Speaker 00

  and it makes less errors. And we keep improving it because we have continuous, right, a continuous improvement loop, feedback loop, because we see when customers like something. And so every week we are trying to run it again and train it again to get to a place where it's better.

• 17:01Harry Stebbings?

  How much cheaper is own model versus using a frontier model?

• 17:04Speaker 00

  It depends, but I would say between 1% to 30%.

• 17:09Harry Stebbings?

  Wow, that's not nearly as much as I thought it was. That might be surprising, but like Chamath came out and said that, hey, when he uses open source, it's 14 to 16x cheaper.

• 17:19Speaker 00

  Yeah, but he's using it on smaller tasks. Yes, that's absolutely true. By the way, if you're using open source models, and you can use the really basic ones for a lot of different things, they work great, then it would cost you even less. But when you want to use a complicated model, for example, what you need for something like Base44, it's not going to get to that much of a level, but you can achieve 5% to 10%.

• 17:40Harry Stebbings?

  Do you think we're in the cost optimization period for Base44 yet, given you have like a Raplet who do like multi-agent and multi-model modes? They are not cost optimizing at all, but they are delivering a good customer experience. We're not in the cost optimization stage for these businesses yet, are we?

• 17:56Speaker 00

  No, I think it's more about quality. But if you, let me have 20% more quality, 20% less cost, I'll definitely go for the quality. It's a new market. It's just happening, starting. We should make it better.

• 18:08Harry Stebbings?

  Why do you not publish Base44's numbers? Like, they're amazing. Would it not be helpful to tell the story?

• 18:14Speaker 00

  Well, we do publish them every once in a while. We do tell ARIs. Mayo told you, and we do publish them every once in a while. So we do publish them. I mean, none of the players in this market are actually publishing on a weekly or monthly basis. I know, only when they raise money, we do quite more often. That's it. I think there's no need for us to start breaking the numbers because from Wix, when you do the quarterly report, as we tend to do things like move customer between one platform to the other, right? We're pushing customers in between.

• 18:42Harry Stebbings?

  Do you encourage customers to try each platform?

• 18:46Speaker 00

  Yes. But more than that, we encourage our partners and agencies to use Base44 now. So we do that. We actually spend time on that.

• 18:52Harry Stebbings?

  And you do that because you think it's the future? Because you have a worse margin profile on that? It would make sense financially to push them to the core business?

• 19:00Speaker 00

  Yeah, I think that it's part of the future. I want to be clear. I think that the future is what I said, it's going to be a combination. And I think it's a bit more complicated than that. I think that if you ever try to use any vibe coding tools and you try to build anything very complicated, it's hard. When you're trying to do visual editing, it's really annoying. It's a bit more complicated than that. But, and so I think the future is a combination of both. And we want our agencies to have all the tools they need for the future. 100% sure that Base44 would be part of the future. But also almost as confident, if not more confident, okay, that things like Wix will also be part of the future. You're not going to vibe code Shopify, no matter how good you are. The business stack is too hard.

• 19:42Harry Stebbings?

  What happens then? Stock markets just appreciate that trust is important, people want Salesforce, and Wix market cap rises again? I'm genuinely being naive here. Help me out.

• 19:53Speaker 00

  I'm not a stock trader. So this is the truth. I do that for my fun and I'm, as I said, I don't even make sense because I own a lot of Atlassian, even that I'm like, oh my God, all the developers will replace it with their own thing, which obviously doesn't happen, right? So I was wrong on both sides, except being lazy and not selling my stocks of Atlassian, yes.

• 20:14Harry Stebbings?

  Are you able to detach your happiness from the market cap or the stock price?

• 20:19Speaker 00

  Yes. I really don't care. Like, I wake up in the morning, I have one thing that I need to do. I have to focus on my business, okay? And I can control some of it, not all of it, and I focus on that. Today, we're trading on other companies' news. We're not trading on Wix news. We're trading mostly on what OpenAI or Anthropic are saying, or Google is saying. And the reality is that I cannot influence that. I cannot influence what people are thinking. To be honest, I care less about that. I really don't look, wake up in the morning and say, oh my God, I went 20% up or 20% down. Even when we went up, I was more concerned about the issues that we still have to solve, which is the same thing I do today.

• 20:54Harry Stebbings?

  I completely understand that. And I think that's a right and very healthy mindset, one that very few CEOs are able to do. So I'm thrilled for you that you're able to do that. Aaron from Monday said he was not able to do that.

• 21:06Harry Stebbings?

  And so.

• 21:06Speaker 00

  More white hair, you see that?

• 21:09Harry Stebbings?

  Slightly. He's got great surfer hair, I have to admit. Where it does become an actual tangible challenge is in M and A. One of the joys of being public is you have a tradable currency that you can buy companies with. And when you are priced lower, that currency is less valuable to buy other assets like a net space 44. With the price today, does it make M and A impossible?

• 21:32Speaker 00

  Well, we still have cash and we can get more cash if we need. I think I wish you today is that the M and A of base 44, right? Well, we bought a company with one person. I want to be clear. And then we put a lot of people from Wix into that. So that's actually complicated M and A because you have to build a company around it. We didn't get a company. Luckily, Mo is brilliant person, amazing leader. So essentially, I don't know how to do another one of those. Right? At the same time and have the same quality that we can merge the operations together. So it's very hard. And we are about to launch another product next month. So that's a different product that we built. I think that our challenge today is actually execution on not finance. So if you want to do an M and A, it will fall on the execution challenge and not on the finance.

• 22:18Harry Stebbings?

  You said one person company there. It did break news when it happened. It was a great story, one person, $80 million. And since it's been an unbelievable acquisition, obviously, it's now probably double the revenue that you bought it for price in terms of it's 160 million, give or take.

• 22:33Speaker 00

  Oh, yes.

• 22:34Harry Stebbings?

  Wild. Talk to me about like bringing that into a board meeting or bringing that into an exec meeting and being like, hey, guys. I found this one guy mail. He's great. It's a one person company. We should buy it for 80 million. What did that decision making look like and how did the discussion go?

• 22:50Speaker 00

  To be fair, very easy. You know, I actually, I never thought about it in the way that you describe it. So you're right, maybe it was surprising that it was that easy. We have a really good board, really smart people. And we explained the logic behind it and they're all like, yeah, it makes sense. And they would kind of ask us a lot of really smart questions. But none of them was that, why are we willing to pay so much for one person? That was not part of the questions. They actually focus on the business, the business logic, what we're going to do internal marketing, how are we going to build a team around it? So we got a lot of questions in regards to that also about why we think it's better than Replito or Lovable. So we explained it and until now, I never thought about it like that.

• 23:30Harry Stebbings?

  Can I ask you, you said that we have a lot of cash. How much cash do you have? I should know this and it's public, but like.

• 23:35Speaker 00

  Ah, it's complicated. I actually don't like we have a debt here, a loan there. We make about $400 million a year, okay? And free cash flow. So we make cash and we invest about 200 and something million into base 44 or a bit more than that. Yes. And so overall, I think we're okay, you know?

• 23:55Harry Stebbings?

  If I was sitting with you and we have pubs in the UK, I'm not sure if you have pubs in Israel, you probably have bars. If we were sitting in a pub, I'd say to you, Avishai, dude, let's take this private. What a mispriced asset. Would you like to take it private?

• 24:08Speaker 00

  I think it would be pretty much illegal for me to even answer that, right? I'm focusing on the company and building the company. We're doing incredible things. We have super smart talent. It's an exciting journey, so I love that. And we're going to continue to do that. And you know, I'm not buying the company, that I can tell you. And I think the stock market should be a place where smart people make money. And you know, if they think like you do that each a mispriced asset, then that's a great opportunity. If they think that AI is going to kill everything, then obviously that's a terrible opportunity. And so this is everybody's to do their own decision making and then planning.

• 24:42Harry Stebbings?

  Totally get you in terms of like the stock market and how people make money from it. You did do the buyback. How did you think about the buyback and any thoughts and reflections on that?

• 24:52Speaker 00

  Well, obviously we're terrible timing.

• 24:54Harry Stebbings?

  Dude, I didn't say it. I did. I could. I was like.

• 24:56Speaker 00

  You know, I think that, but it's very hard to time the stock market, very hard to time the stock market. I think we had too much float and I think we had a lot of money in the bank. And that was sitting there, we knew that we're not going to do a major acquisition because we are too focused on the new product coming and on base 44. So we cannot do both things. We cannot do another acquisition. So we had a billion and a half dollars that we kind of like, okay, it doesn't make sense for us just to hold it. And then we said, okay, let's, you know, let's use that opportunity where the stock is very low to buy it. Obviously, you know, the stock market jumped like this when we did it and then jumped, we went crashing down. All right, that's part of life, but I think the big question is now happen in the last three months. It's where it's going to be in three years. And I hope that by that time it was proven to be a smart decision.

• 25:37Harry Stebbings?

  I mean, if you want real bulls, then you buy back more now. Is that conversation like, is it like, no, we had that discussion. How do you reflect on future buybacks, given what you know now?

• 25:49Speaker 00

  I think that buyback are a fantastic tool for a company and companies should use that. And I think they don't use it enough. I think the concept that companies, you know, always issue more and more, it creates a delusion by issuing more shares to employees and for other things. There is something that should be balanced by with buyback when the company can. I'm really in favor of that. I think that it's another way of giving a dividend to all of your stockholders. That's my opinion. Again, I'm not a professional, you know, stock market person, you know, that's not my profession. I'm a geek, I'm an engineer, I'm a bit of a marketer, I'm a product guy.

• 26:25Harry Stebbings?

  I'm worried about the level of stock based compensation that we're seeing. It seems like we're normalizing insane levels à la Snapchat that make it very difficult for me as an investor to see the same attractiveness in terms of returns that I had before. How do you think about SBC being good to employees but also not screwing investors?

• 26:45Speaker 00

  Well, I think you have a choice, right? I think that I would say that you want to get the best talent and you want to keep, maintain the best talent. And part of it is lying them to, because they build the company, they should be invested in the dream. You should give stocks to employees. That's my opinion, right? I think that the fact that it's only in technology companies and it's not in any, in many other companies, that's a different issue, right? I would actually love to see that every fashion company give their core team stock options because I think that's way more fair. And maybe if the, if the US government would do that or the British government would actually have better people running the country and somehow finding that their compensation is related to their achievements. I think it's a really good mechanism.

• 27:28Speaker 00

  I think that when companies started making cash, right? So you collect cash, you have essentially a few options on what to do with this cash. Number one is acquisition, but you can only do so many acquisitions and maintain the company. I mean, some people master that and I look at them and I admire them. I would be able to do that. But the majority of the companies didn't, right? And a majority of acquisition fail. So I think that that's a path that some companies should pursue. Every company probably should pursue a little bit, but so this is one thing you can do with your money. The other thing you can do with your money is do a buyback, which essentially is the same as give dividends. And then you balance your stock based compensation. And I think the third thing you could do with your money is invest into hiring more engineers maybe.

• 28:11Speaker 00

  But then your EBITDA get destroyed. So the stock market hates you.

• 28:15Harry Stebbings?

  At this point though, do you give a shit if the stock market hates you? One of my neighbors is a public company CEO and he's like, honestly dude. And he's, he's one of the companies that have been hit. We haven't mentioned them, but he's like, honestly dude, at this point, can't do any worse, can I?

• 28:29Speaker 00

  Well, I'm sure we can, but it's hard. Okay. But, but again, I have a huge amount of respect for everybody who put money in Wix and bought stocks. And I do understand that my job is to do my best to create a wonderful company. I have a bigger obligation, right, to my customers. That's another big obligation that I have. I don't think there are one against the other. I think I should balance both. And then two for my employees. But I think that like, there's no stock market you can talk to, right? It's millions of people with different opinions. I don't know how to take that into consideration. I don't know how to even listen to that.

• 29:05Harry Stebbings?

  I am friends with many of these enterprise SaaS company CEOs. We've mentioned some of them. And when I chat to them all, they're like, oh my God, my talent is leaving. And you know, their stocks is not worth what it was and it's very different, morale is down. How do you advise them on how to retain talent when you are in an environment as you are?

• 29:25Speaker 00

  I think it's a huge challenge. First of all, I think it's a magical solution. There's no magic here. Everybody going to lose talent and we are losing talent. Everybody lost, everybody will lose talent. And I think a lot of times it's a healthy fit for a company. As long as you don't compromise on who you keep and you make sure that the people that you allow to stay, okay, are really great people, you're going to find you have a lot of talent that you never noticed before. Okay. And that's going to refresh a lot of the organization. So it's not about how do you prevent people from leaving? And it's more I think about how you make sure the organization keep being an organization where the vast majority are top talents. And the fact that a lot of us gets very, well, used to, very spoiled by saying, well, you know,

• 30:10Speaker 00

  we have people here working for 15 years that are always top talent and nobody ever leaves because our stock is it, whatever. That kind of made us spoiled to the fact that that's not a natural thing. Now, I do highly appreciate, there's a lot of super smart people around me that I would be extremely sad if they leave and worried. But saying that, it's still, I think that we got a bit spoiled on that. And I think we need to remember that when we got those people, they didn't have 15 years of experience working on our problems and they became, and the reason that they are here later and they are super hard because they had talent to begin with. And so we need to find a new generation, actually bring a lot of those in. So I think that's for me, the challenge. And saying all of that, just to be clear, I'm working extremely hard to keep the top talent in the company, right? But that's life.

• 30:53Harry Stebbings?

  How many people are in Wix today and how many are in base 44?

• 30:58Speaker 00

  So base 44 is around 400 people.

• 31:00Harry Stebbings?

  Wow.

• 31:01Speaker 00

  Wix in total is about, including about 3,500. You have to remember, we have a lot of small businesses, we need to support them.

• 31:08Harry Stebbings?

  3,500?

• 31:10Speaker 00

  Yes.

• 31:11Harry Stebbings?

  Hello, Jeff Bezos. What, I'm so sorry. What are 3,500 people? Where's the majority of them in customer support in?

• 31:20Speaker 00

  Customer support is our biggest department.

• 31:22Harry Stebbings?

  Wow. Are you using AI? That must get taken to like zero pretty soon.

• 31:28Speaker 00

  Well, I don't think ever it would be zero.

• 31:31Harry Stebbings?

  Not quite zero, but maybe 10.

• 31:33Speaker 00

  What, 10 customer support?

• 31:35Harry Stebbings?

  Yeah.

• 31:36Speaker 00

  Well, we have a, we are offering our services in 192 countries. It's a bit tricky to speak for 10 people to do that. We just have to remember, it's a different scale of operation when it comes to that.

• 31:47Harry Stebbings?

  Did you build your own customer support AI or do you use off the shelf providers?

• 31:52Speaker 00

  We're built on. It doesn't work.

• 31:54Harry Stebbings?

  Avishai, this is what I don't get. You know, you see all these hyped customer support companies and I'm going to get in trouble here, but I'm too old to give a shit to you. So who cares? And everyone who I speak to, whether it's Airwallex or Klarna or Nirvan or Wix, you build your own.

• 32:09Speaker 00

  We actually tried not to build our own, you know, we tried, we tested many different things. It doesn't work.

• 32:15Harry Stebbings?

  I don't get this market.

• 32:17Speaker 00

  All right, to be fair, you know, we're looking at young companies that built AI agents, right? And they prove something very quickly and then hired a bunch of salespeople and trying to sell it. And then they are going to one of those company dimension where they have super smart engineers that are really focused on that. They have more engineers supporting their support, right? And all of the HR on those companies that are trying to sell them, okay? And better engineers a lot of times. So, yes, it's not so, I, it would take time. I think in five years it's gonna be different.

• 32:46Harry Stebbings?

  Do you, it's gonna be different in five years? Again, dude, I have no idea. I'm a fricking podcaster in London.

• 32:50Speaker 00

  Maybe, I'm not sure, I'm not sure. I like, to be fair, I don't, I don't know. But, but we tried, it didn't work, we tried again, it didn't work, we tried again, it didn't work. We kept working on our solution on the side. At some point it was like, okay, that enough.

• 33:04Harry Stebbings?

  In three years' time, how big will the Wix team be then?

• 33:07Speaker 00

  Well, it's very hard to say, you know? I would love to say, well, Wix team in three years will be a thousand people on best 44 and a thousand people in Wix and everything else would be AI agents. I'm not so sure it is possible. We all give too much credit for AI and what it can do. And then when you start looking at the details, it's not really doing that well for a lot of the things. It's amazing, it's incredible, it's super powerful, but, and the but is pretty big.

• 33:36Harry Stebbings?

  You need to be more American, okay?

• 33:38Speaker 00

  All right, all right. It's gonna change everything, everything gonna happen and blah, whatever. Well, I'm gonna be by myself in the office, me and my, or most of the time we're gonna play Playstation, all right? And this is.

• 33:50Harry Stebbings?

  Now you're like Sam Altman, dude. You sell the dream. It's much, I've learnt this, it's much easier in life to be Walt Disney, tell me a story, than it is Jerry Maguire, show me the money. And the trouble with Israeli entrepreneurs, I find, is you're all like, show me the money. You're generally not that excitable, you're very realistic, you're very direct.

• 34:09Speaker 00

  Oh, I could tell you what I dream about here, but it's not about AI replacing my customer support. That's a nice thing to have. I think that we're gonna be able to have a way for AI to do so, with AI and with technology. Small businesses will be able to achieve so much more than they do today, that it'll be more efficient, grow faster, and way more profitable. And I think that is something that I'm sure will happen. So if you are, if you're running a gym, right? Or you're a personal trainer, your ability to utilize AI, to manage your business better, to sell additional products, and to reach out for new customers will be massively enhanced. And not in 10 years, not in five years, next year. And that will really have a massive effect on how you do things as a small business.

• 34:54Harry Stebbings?

  But dude, is that not a little bit paradoxical? And you're like, it'll have a massive effect next year. Great, I'm a venture capitalist, that means massive revenue growth and my companies grow fast, cool. But you just said AI is not that great and it doesn't actually do that much and like the questionability of values there.

• 35:10Speaker 00

  No, no, I actually said, well, it's really doing a lot of amazing thing, but, and the but is very big, okay? Because we all tend to, how many times you go to ChatGPT and you said, I wanna know what this thing in medicine is, or I wanna know what that is, or tell me what is the chance? And I can tell you, like, I needed to test something and I wanted ChatGPT to write me the safety protocol. I actually use Claude, not ChatGPT, sorry, Sam. I got six gates, okay? And he said, those are the gates, you have to make sure to test every one of them. So I started to ask why this one, and we started to analyze and we worked on it. From six, it became one. All of the other ones said, oh, question, you know what? You really caught me here. I might have overstepped, overemphasized that. And then it writes, well, I'm removing it from something you must test to something that you might need in the future to take a look at.

• 35:55Speaker 00

  And we all tend to do that, right? We all tend to do, to have this massive trust into AI models. And I think that's one of the things where the but is, okay? But when you take an AI model and make it work really well for something, it can be incredible. I'll give you an example, like the most basic thing we all take for granted now. You can actually have a conversation with AI model, right? You can actually have, talk to you on the phone, talk to you on your computer. We couldn't do that five years ago, four years ago. I actually do it, you know, I do it when I drive, I can actually, I have a thing I wanna do, I click on it and I love the way it works in ChatGPT. So there is a big difference between if you take AI and try to do customer support for a very complicated company, or to help you run your customers' order, your schedule,

• 36:37Speaker 00

  and if you build the right skill, the right tools for it, then it can become super efficient. And it can also call your customer and talk to them and do things. So yes, you can have that massive extra layer.

• 36:47Harry Stebbings?

  Do you find SMBs are excited or terrified by AI, both in the product and when you speak to them? There's a lot of skepticism, it's not always welcomed.

• 36:57Speaker 00

  Well, I didn't see that with SMBs, actually. I think that we see it more with everybody else. I think SMBs, when they wake up in the morning, they have so many issues, right, of running their business, that they really want something to help them run their business better, as opposed to, if I would be in the university studying today, I would be terrified. That's the truth of AI, because like, why am I learning this? Would it even exist in a year, okay?

• 37:19Harry Stebbings?

  Do you wanna hear something wild? To change a university curriculum in the UK list, so forgive me, I'm sure it's pretty similar around the world, but it takes three years to change the material that goes on or goes through a yearly program. Three years to change it. Imagine the changes that have happened in Claude. If you're doing computer science, like, it's pre-ChatGPT almost.

• 37:39Speaker 00

  I think that, actually, I don't know how long it takes here, but it takes time. It's challenging, I think.

• 37:45Harry Stebbings?

  So if you were genuinely advising a 22-year-old, imagine 22-year-old son of yours, I know you've got a newborn, so just skip a few years, what would you say to him, genuinely?

• 37:56Speaker 00

  Well, I would not be that concerned with LLMs replacing every kind of a white-collar jobs. That's not gonna happen. It's not that smart, it keep making silly mistakes, it's not very good. Actually, it's not very good at reasoning, it's very good at collecting data and reframing it. I would be less afraid of that. However, if we get another two or three jumps in algorithms, right, then we all becomes a bit like monkeys, right?

• 38:20Harry Stebbings?

  The cool question for me actually is that, you know, we're an investor in Legora, which is an AI legal service, and the cool question for me is, do we see the same rate of improvement in adjacent functions to coding that we saw in coding? You know, Andre Capathie went from doing 20% of his coding work with coding tools to 80% in six months. Do we see that same jump in amount of legal work done by AI?

• 38:45Speaker 00

  I think, you know, it depends on a few things, right? And law might be a very good example for it, but I do believe that in law, when it comes to laws, because laws, a bit like code, are mostly about textual context, and there's a tremendous amount, a huge amount, endless amount, way too much amount of legal written documents, right, and cases. And so I think that this is one of the perfect places for it to be useful, but every time I see a doctor trying to do research by using LLMs, okay, I get horrified, because that's the wrong tool. It will probably read, it will answer you, what's up, it read somewhere on Reddit, okay, that somebody wrote, and for the analytic perspective, it's equivalent to the best research done on nature, right? There's no difference.

• 39:30Speaker 00

  It holds them all in this giant thing that it has, I'll try to verify it somewhat, most of the time it doesn't read the research, when it actually answers you, even if you use the highest level of, so for legal stuff, I think that's really good. For a lot of other things, I really think that it's not the right algorithm.

• 39:49Harry Stebbings?

  Do you buy that for the health? I'm just being honest here, like, I think OpenAI and ChatGPT is a lot better than the majority of doctors at this point, actually. And on top of that, you know, health is now the second biggest usage of ChatGPT.

• 40:02Speaker 00

  Well, I'm invested in a company called K Health, I don't know if you're familiar with it?

• 40:06Harry Stebbings?

  Yeah, yeah, yeah, Alon.

• 40:07Speaker 00

  Yeah, Alon, and they've proven that they diagnose better than most of them doctors. All right, that's not the same as doing research, right?

• 40:14Harry Stebbings?

  No, it's very different to doing research.

• 40:16Speaker 00

  And for that, absolutely, I think that if you have, because most of the time you go to a doctor, they diagnose you have a flu, go home, and they give you some pill and they tell you, oh, don't take the pill, and you get healthy in five days, and you would get healthy without a pill in five days. So nobody knows, you know? And so when it comes to the specific cases, yeah, I think that it makes sense that AI, when it comes to understanding the natural scenario that you go through, then yes, absolutely. So legal, the legal system will have a lot of those. But there's no research in legal. Well, what is research? And, but you do have research in medicine. I think when it comes to research, it's not a good tool, so it's a bit different.

• 40:51Harry Stebbings?

  Do you think frontier models will really only be used for a very small use case, or kind of small amount of use cases, like science research, molecular biology, astrophysics, very, very difficult complex?

• 41:06Speaker 00

  All right, they cannot do those things. You cannot do research on astrophysics with LLM, they don't have the capacity for that. It's not what they do. You're gonna, they might answer you, but they don't run the models, the simulation, the background. You want to have the simulation background, you have to move from like the deep minds, right? They do some of that, but not ChatGPT.

• 41:25Harry Stebbings?

  Fine, but like, model providers, you don't think they will do that in three years' time?

• 41:28Speaker 00

  Maybe, but then they have to connect different kind of models and different kind of architecture to their LLMs. It's not that trivial.

• 41:35Harry Stebbings?

  I don't think it is, but I do think your isomorphic labs and your latent labs and your Chai Discovery, who specialize in very, very complex reasoning around.

• 41:45Speaker 00

  Oh, yeah, but that's not, I agree, but that's not just, probably not just an LLM, unless they just try.

• 41:51Harry Stebbings?

  No, I totally agree with that, yes, 100%.

• 41:54Speaker 00

  So those are completely in the malls, absolutely, yes, you can. Obviously, you did the protein folding, right? DeepMind did that, amazing, an amazing achievement, of course.

• 42:03Harry Stebbings?

  You come across as quite chilled, in a nice way, like composed, calm. Have you always been like that?

• 42:09Speaker 00

  No, I'm half Italian.

• 42:12Speaker 00

  From south of Italy, I know.

• 42:14Harry Stebbings?

  Does money make you more chilled?

• 42:16Speaker 00

  Well, I think that the Slavic wife.

• 42:18Harry Stebbings?

  What makes you more chilled?

• 42:20Speaker 00

  Yeah, it makes you more resilient.

• 42:23Harry Stebbings?

  What does it take to have a successful marriage?

• 42:25Speaker 00

  I'll tell you a story about my wife, which is one of the things that I think this is where I understood it's something different. I came home and she looks at me and she was like, listen, I have a terrible mood. You did nothing wrong. I'm going to the room to relax. You go play PlayStation. And I was like, wait, what? You have a terrible mood and it's not my fault? And she's like, yeah, you did nothing. It's not you. I need to relax a bit. You go play PlayStation. I was like, oh, my God. So I think that is the number one quality that I learned that for me it works, right?

• 42:53Harry Stebbings?

  So what's the number one quality distance?

• 42:56Speaker 00

  No, no, no, it's the fact that she is able to know that you don't load your emotion on somebody else. And first of all, the number one thing you have to learn is to say, yes, I agree. Whatever, it doesn't matter what happened. Yes, you're right.

• 43:08Harry Stebbings?

  How did making money change you as a leader, though? So I have a theory and the reason for this is I think richer investors and richer founders make better decisions. You're not operating from fear. You're not operating from losing homes, losing school fees, losing core pillars of life. I actually make much more rational decisions now I'm not doing it for the money wholly.

• 43:29Speaker 00

  I tend to agree. I think that, you know, overall, when you're less afraid of things, you're more reasonable. But you're also a bit more lazy, right?

• 43:36Harry Stebbings?

  I think a really interesting question is what does no one tell you about making money that you wish someone had told you?

• 43:41Speaker 00

  The way I look at it, okay, that's my personal opinion, is that money give you one thing beyond everything else. And that's freedom, okay? Freedom from fear, that you won't have food tomorrow. And then freedom also to know that you are here because you've chosen to be here. Because I can always, and you can always say, you know what? I want to be in Costa Rica on the beach. I want to be in Brazil, you know, dancing the carnival. Or I can change completely what I'm doing and you have the ability to do it. You don't have to wake up every day in the morning, go to work that you don't like and be just to maintain any food. And I mean, that is the number one value you get from having enough money or a lot of money. Is that freedom and that knowledge that I'm here because I've chosen to be here. There's no other reason except that.

• 44:25Speaker 00

  And I think that's for me at least is freedom to understand that if I'm here, I need to be fully committed to what I'm doing. Because I've chosen to be here. Nobody made me. There's nobody, no reason except me choosing. Maybe the CEO of work, see the stock crashing like that, see other thing happening, you know, all those things. I've chosen to be in the middle of that. And that's, I think, is tremendous amount of power.

• 44:47Harry Stebbings?

  What would you say to someone who wants to build resilience for a shitstorm that's about to come? Like you said that, dude, I mean, the pressure, the fucking headlines, the stock crashing, the this, the... It's just like hit, hit, hit. What would you advise me or someone listening who wants to learn how to be resilient for the hits that are gonna come?

• 45:08Speaker 00

  I think that the first thing to accept is that it will happen. Because we tend to think that, you know, if yesterday was easy, the day before that was easy, then tomorrow will be easy. That's not how life works, right? You never know when the next storm is coming from. You never know COVID arrives, you never know war arrives, or you never know when the stock market crash. You never know. And it will happen for sure, 100%. It will happen. We tend to believe, you know, reality is going like this. If you're here, it's gonna go slowly up and slowly down, but it doesn't. It goes in an extreme speed at some places, right? So it will go like this and then boom, and then boom. And this is how reality is. The worst thing that happens is probably gonna be some random thing that happened on some random Wednesday. It's not something that you get a lot of warning for.

• 45:51Speaker 00

  And in this sense, I think AI is the exception because it was an extreme thing that we've seen happening in slow motion, right? It took a few years. It didn't happen, boom. The first thing is to accept that it will happen. And the second thing, and this is something I remember from Babylon 5, you remember that TV series?

• 46:08Harry Stebbings?

  Yeah.

• 46:09Speaker 00

  And there was this time of flying to this conflict somewhere. And the lady on the captain on that ship was very nervous and the guy that told her, why are you nervous? And she's like, you know, we're going there, I want to make sure. I said, listen, we're gonna get there when we get there. And the weapons that we have are the weapons that we have, okay? And this is the most you can do. So you just have to think about it that this is how it is. And this actually run in my mind, it's not very smart, you know? Not like a very inspiring sentence, but for me, it's like, why? Am I doing the best that I can? Right, that's a huge question, right? And I always try to make sure that my answer for that is yes. Everything else is what can I control? I cannot control more than what I can. So I try to do the best with what I can control. And I know it's not a deep answer, but I don't think there is a deep answer here.

• 46:54Speaker 00

  The big question is, are you doing the best that you can in the situation that you are in? And if you are able to be honest with yourself and say, I think I am, then that's a lot of the pressure going away. The other thing is that I believe in meditation. I believe in neural and linguistic programming, NLP, and I did a lot of those and that's really helpful.

• 47:12Harry Stebbings?

  I totally get it. One of the things I always think to is, a mentor said to me, you're never wrong to do the right thing. And the right thing is often the hard thing.

• 47:19Speaker 00

  Oh, I agree with that 100%. Then I'll tell you the last thing I always remind myself is that you go around and you see happy people, right? A lot of these places and they are not necessarily correlated with how much money they have or where they are or whatever. So I always remind myself, the happiest people I ever seen on the planet are in Brazil. I can always move to Brazil. Are you surprised? It's not England. I mean, obviously, right? After 5pm, people in England become more happy, but they go to the pub, right?

• 47:45Harry Stebbings?

  Dude, you haven't been to England in a while. We go to the pub at 3pm.

• 47:48Speaker 00

  Two hours more happy, okay?

• 47:49Harry Stebbings?

  Yeah, yeah, yeah. Dude, Finland is actually the happiest country in the world, which is astonishing to me when you look at the hours of light in Finland. But there you go.

• 47:58Speaker 00

  I'm guessing the one who wrote that, never been to Brazil.

• 48:03Speaker 00

  But for me, my experience, so I always say, you know, what's concerned, I can actually, all of these things matter to some degree. At the end of the day, I can always go to Brazil.

• 48:11Harry Stebbings?

  Do you find it difficult to context switch in your relationship? My biggest problem now in my relationship is like, I come home and I'm stressed. I've been bashed all day by whatever's happening. And then you come home and it's like, they want to talk about life and just like normal things. And you're like, you're still in your zone. Do you struggle with that?

• 48:30Speaker 00

  I used to, I used to, it was horrible. That was very hard for me. That was very, very hard for me, I remember that. I would come home and I have this massive list of things in my mind. And then I would be either not patient from my partner or not really attentive or whatever. And that would, it was very hard for me. I learned with time, as I got older, that I stop most of it now and then I'll do it later. You'll be thinking and that's why I go to sleep at 5, right?

• 48:58Harry Stebbings?

  You time bound your thinking and it allows you to turn off for the time being with your wife?

• 49:03Speaker 00

  Yes. So I'm just doing that and then I'm turning it back on. And sometimes I write myself things that I need to think about in two hours.

• 49:09Harry Stebbings?

  That's perfection because I cannot do that at all. Final one and then we'll do a quick fire. I care very much about being a great parent. I don't have kids yet, but I very much want to. You do have kids and you're a public company CEO and under a fuckload of pressure, let's just be honest. What advice would you have for me on how to be the best father that I can be?

• 49:30Speaker 00

  Well, kids don't care so much for the amount of time that you're with them as much as they care for the quality in that time. So if you find yourself and give yourself, let's say, oh, no, I can be with them for a few hours every day or every few days, okay? Make sure that you are there and happy when you're there and have fun with them when you're there. And not when, and not coming there because you force yourself and then you want your fun and then you're fighting with everybody. Remember, it's more about how you're there than how often you are there or how long you're there.

• 50:01Harry Stebbings?

  Goes back to what we said about being like present, not stuck in your own head.

• 50:05Speaker 00

  Is it to say, I'm not sure it's so easy to do, but yes.

• 50:08Harry Stebbings?

  Impossible to do. It's like, it's like the tying happiness to stock price. Honestly, I remember interviewing Vlad from Robinhood, okay? And I interviewed him when it was worth like 20 billion and interviewed him when it was worth 120 billion. I can tell you, he was legitimately six times happier when it was worth 120 billion compared to when it was 20. It was a different fucking person. He looked different, he sounded different, he was different.

• 50:34Harry Stebbings?

  I get it. Okay, we're gonna do a quick fire. What have you changed your mind on in the last 12 months?

• 50:41Speaker 00

  Actually a bit on AI, I'll say like that. I was very concerned, very concerned with how quickly we're gonna find humans being replaced by AI. And I think I'm now looking, looking at the same thing. I think it's gonna take much longer than I anticipated.

• 50:56Harry Stebbings?

  Why?

• 50:56Speaker 00

  Because, you know, I remember that, you know, a year ago, we would hear Elon Musk speaking about, he's waiting for AGI because AGI can have conversation with it about how to solve big problem in physics and how to do a lot of things and everything. And now everybody's talking about, well, you know, we kind of achieve AGI, but it still cannot do those big questions, right? So we kind of changed the definition to fit something that doesn't do the critical things. And the more I know about AI, the more I see the frontier, the more I see things, I think they're tremendous, as I said. But I don't think they're gonna replace us that quickly.

• 51:28Harry Stebbings?

  Yeah, I think you're being far too nice. I had a picture of me and my mother on the beach for my holiday last week and I said, like, remove the people from the background to like Gemini. Dude, they changed my mother's face. They put a different woman in there. I was like, what?

• 51:41Speaker 00

  I mean, solving that might happen faster than you think.

• 51:45Harry Stebbings?

  Which competitor do you most respect and why them?

• 51:48Speaker 00

  So it's not direct. I think that the one company I really, really appreciate, Figma. I think their brilliant product, understanding of their market. And when I look at it, I'm just like, I really admire some of the thing, the quality they can bring into that. So I really like them, like really in terms of not just respect, it's almost admiration on some of the things they can do. People are almost religious about Figma. I know very little product that I like that. My designers, they love it. They go crazy about it. They'll do their grocery list on Figma, okay? They'll do everything that they can on Figma just because they love using it so much. And that takes massive skill from Figma to do it.

• 52:28Harry Stebbings?

  What's your single biggest concern today?

• 52:30Speaker 00

  It's about the same. I think that execution, I think we have good plans and good ideas. And I think the biggest challenge is always for me, execution. How do we get a team to be super efficient? How to get them to be more ambitious? I think that it's to go for a bigger goal. I think those kind of things.

• 52:46Harry Stebbings?

  You said that Base44 is 400 people today. How many people is it in two years' time?

• 52:52Speaker 00

  All right. That's one of the things that it's very hard to predict because it depends how well AI does and not and how many malls they got. I'm a huge believer in Base44, okay? I'm a huge believer in Base44. I'm a huge believer in what Wix does. I hope that Base44, and I see the way it scales, I would imagine probably 800 to 1,000. And the majority of them will actually be engineers, right? So I think that is another thing.

• 53:14Harry Stebbings?

  Final one for you, my friend. What is the kindest thing that anyone's ever done for you?

• 53:18Speaker 00

  I think there's a lot of really kind things that people did for me. And when I started, I see how often, you know, people that were way ahead of me in this business, right? Would take time to sit with me and to talk to me about things that mistakes they made and give me advice and think with me about other things. And I think that's extremely kind because this is not about giving you money. It's about giving you the most precious currency those people had, right, which is time. And when I see that, I think, and advice, it's amazing that they did.

• 53:51Harry Stebbings?

  12 months' time, who'll have a higher market cap, you or Monday?

• 53:55Speaker 00

  It's kind of like asking me to compete between which kid of mine I like more.

• 53:59Harry Stebbings?

  Your eldest.

• 54:01Speaker 00

  And so my eldest is Wix, right? But, you know, I've been lucky to be involved in a few amazing products, right? Wix, Monday and Base44. And I think I got this rare opportunity to see that happening, to see this thing happening three times. And I think that's an amazing experience. And I do believe that all three companies, all three products, right? Have tremendous market potential and potential to be helpful for many different people. And so hard for me to choose. I think Iran and Roy are really incredible CEOs, probably better than me. So maybe I'll bet on them or me, no, actually. But then Maori is a great CEO. I don't know. It's very complicated.

• 54:39Harry Stebbings?

  Avishai, it's been fantastic to have you on the show. Thank you so much for being so open, for being so wise in your love, family, parental, CEO advice. It's been fantastic, man.

• 54:51Speaker 00

  All right. Cheers, man. Thank you so much for having me. Love what you're doing.

• 54:57Harry Stebbings?

  But before we leave you today, founders face a different set of challenges at every stage of growth. For Sid Shait, co-founder and CEO of Dematrix, JP Morgan delivered the guidance and expertise to help navigate what came next. He credits JP Morgan's high-touch approach with supporting Dematrix as it grew and expanded internationally. Whether you're in the early days or expanding into new markets, JP Morgan helps startups navigate complexity with real confidence, offering personalized guidance and deep sector expertise. Find out how JP Morgan helps founders at jpmorgan.com/growwithoutlimits. JP Morgan is the bank of the innovation economy.

• 55:41Harry Stebbings?

  While JP Morgan supports growth, Corgi protects it. My word, what an arresting first line. Get your ass covered with Corgi Insurance, and I'll tell you why. If you're running a business right now, you already know this pain all too well. Getting insurance, it's really slow, it's confusing, and my word, it's full of paperwork. Well, that's exactly why Corgi is here to change the game. Corgi is the first and only insurance carrier designed specifically for tech companies, allowing you to get covered in minutes instead of days. Corgi provides essential coverages for all growth stages such as DNO, EDO liability, cyber, commercial, general liability, and more.

• 56:19Harry Stebbings?

  Get your ass covered, I love the way we say ass, with Corgi Insurance alongside thousands of other startups at corgi.com/20vc today. That's corgi.com/20vc. You won't regret it. While Corgi covers risk, Flex gives you room to move. Business owners run their whole financial life on Flex. One platform from business revenue to their personal spend. Float every purchase for 60 days. Tap capital that grows with your revenue and pay vendors in 170 countries across 32 currencies. Plus, the whole back office, bills, expenses, accounting, all in one place. So you spend less time reconciling and more time growing.

• 57:04Harry Stebbings?

  That's why thousands of owners use Flex, named one of Fast Company's most innovative companies of 2026. Visit flex.on, that's F L E X dot O N E, and use the code 20VC.