211. Small Screens, Strong Signals: Mastering Modern Communication

In the age of virtual communication, here’s how to ensure your messages convey what you mean. Texts. Emails. Slacks. Zooms. We’re communicating in more ways than ever, but Andrew Brodsky https://www.fastersmarter.io/guests/andrew-brodsky/ has a word of warning: Your virtual communication might be sending messages you’re not aware of. Brodsky is the author of PING: The Secrets of Successful Virtual Communication. https://fastersmarter.io/ping And as a professor of management at the University of Texas McCombs School of Business, he researches the impact of technology on workplace communication. “In virtual communication, there's often missing information,” he says. “As recipients of it, we're searching to fill in the gaps. The problem [is] that the recipient who's making these guesses is often guessing incorrectly.” As his research reveals, variables like typos, the time you schedule a meeting, and even your choice of email signature affect how your messages are received — and how you’re perceived. In this episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart https://www.fastersmarter.io/, host Matt Abrahams and Brodsky explore his PING framework (perspective-taking, initiative, nonverbal awareness, and goals) for mastering digital communication. From understanding when to choose email over a phone call to navigating cameras-on versus cameras-off meetings, he offers practical strategies for ensuring your virtual messages communicate exactly what you intend. To listen to the extended Deep Thinks version of this episode, please visit FasterSmarter.io/premium https://www.fastersmarter.io/premium/ Episode Reference Links: Andrew Brodsky https://www.fastersmarter.io/guests/andrew-brodsky/Andrew’s Book: Ping https://fastersmarter.io/pingEp.31 Quick Thinks: How to Shine Online and Excel at Virtual Communication https://www.fastersmarter.io/31-quick-thinks-how-to-shine-online-and-excel-at-virtual-communication/ Ep.53 Step Up and Stand Out: How to Create the Right Environment for Communication https://www.fastersmarter.io/53-step-up-and-stand-out-how-to-create-the-right-environment-for-communication/ Connect: Premium Signup >>>> Think Fast Talk Smart Premium https://www.fastersmarter.io/premium/Email Questions & Feedback >>> [email protected] Transcripts >>>Think Fast Talk Smart Website https://www.fastersmarter.io/211-small-screens-strong-signals-mastering-modern-communication/Newsletter Signup + English Language Learning >>>FasterSmarter.io http://fastersmarter.io/Think Fast Talk Smart >>>LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/think-fast-talk-smart/,Instagram https://www.instagram.com/thinkfasttalksmart/, YouTube https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6caGRBUYZCmgDGM2RK6mxKB9jG_ccmm3Matt Abrahams >>>LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/maabrahams/ Chapters: (00:00) - Introduction (01:09) - What Is Virtual Communication? (01:55) - Choosing the Right Channel for Your Goal (04:40) - The Ping Framework: Secrets to Virtual Communication (08:36) - Understanding Communication Richness (11:38) - Nonverbals in Virtual Communication (15:22) - The Final Three Question (22:32) - Conclusion ******** Thank you to our sponsors. These partnerships support the ongoing production of the podcast, allowing us to bring it to you at no cost. Learn more about how Notion https://www.notion.com/?utm_source=podcasts&utm_medium=thinkfast can support your business at notion.com/thinkfast. https://www.notion.com/?utm_source=podcasts&utm_medium=thinkfast Join our Think Fast Talk Smart Learning Community and become the communicator you want to be. https://learning.fastersmarter.io/?redirect_from=podpage

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Matt Abrahams?

  In the moment, conflict is difficult for everyone. In our October newsletter, out now, you will learn ways to help yourself handle these challenges better. Not only do you get specific advice, we're also providing an infographic to help you remember. Find our newsletter on the Think Fast, Talk Smart LinkedIn page or at fastersmarter.io under Resources.

• 0:27Matt Abrahams?

  If you think about your communication over a week, or even a day, or even an hour, think of how many different types of virtual communication you use. Texting, slacking, emails, virtual calls. We need to make sure that we are as efficient and as effective as we can be when we are communicating virtually. I'm Matt Abrahams, and I teach strategic communication at Stanford Graduate School of Business. Welcome to Think Fast, Talk Smart, the podcast. Today, I'm excited to speak with Andrew Brodsky. Andrew is an expert in workplace technology, communication, and productivity. He teaches and conducts research at the Macomb School of Business at the University of Texas, Austin.

• 1:12Matt Abrahams?

  His latest book is Ping: The Secrets of Successful Virtual Communication. Welcome, Andrew. Your work is so relevant and of the moment. I appreciate you being here.

• 1:23Speaker 01

  Thanks for having me on the show. I've been a longtime fan of your work, so I'm really excited getting to talk.

• 1:27Matt Abrahams?

  Thank you for that. So shall we get started?

• 1:29Speaker 01

  Yes, let's go for it.

• 1:31Matt Abrahams?

  Excellent. So your latest book and work focus on virtual communication. I'm curious, what counts as virtual communication for you? Is it just Zoom, Meet, or Teams? Or is it something even more than that?

• 1:43Speaker 01

  For virtual communication, it's simply defined as anything that involves communicating through some kind of electronic device or a computer. So that is, of course, Zoom, Teams, those video calls. But it goes all the way down to text messaging, instant messaging, email. And now phone calls are virtual because they all happen via our smartphones or voice-over-IP. So anything that happens electronically. So basically, not face-to-face interactions and not snail mail, where you're writing letters and sending them via the post office.

• 2:17Matt Abrahams?

  I'm not even sure younger folks know how to do that latter part anymore. When we communicate virtually, we have choices about tools and channels, et cetera. Do you have advice and guidance for which tools are better for which certain communication goals? So do I use a text to let my boss know I'm going to be late? Do I send an email? What's advice and guidance on these different channels?

• 2:40Speaker 01

  I wish I could say that there is just one best mode, although that would make for a very short book. The key general advice here is you want to think about what are the core things you're trying to do here and what mode serves that best. For instance, if we're considering meetings versus email, are you relaying information? Do you want to have a back and forth? Once you get the basics down, you start to think more into the granularity of what you're trying to achieve in interaction and then the dynamics that are going on in each one. For instance, let's talk about brainstorming. So brainstorming, many people think is better in person. We can bounce ideas of each other. We got a nice whiteboard in front of us.

• 3:23Speaker 01

  But generally, what research shows is that the earlier stages of brainstorming are better done separately and electronically. And the reason is a fewfold. When we're sitting in a group, only one person can talk at a time. That's productivity loss right there. If you're all trying to generate 20 ideas, it doesn't really work well in a meeting with 10 people because you don't have time to say 20 ideas out loud. But if you're all typing them down separately, that is much more productive. When we have a group of people staring at us, we're afraid often of saying something really non-conforming because they'll judge us. But when we're sitting behind our computer typing, that fear that presence of the other people's lost sailing. And lastly, when we hear an idea in person during brainstorming, our mind kind of sticks

• 4:08Speaker 01

  on that idea and it's hard to come up with divergent thoughts from that. So basically, research shows that early stages of brainstorming, you get more and more novel ideas when you do it separately and virtually. But then later on, when you're trying to decide an idea or tweak an idea, that's when you want to meet as a group because that's when you have that back and forth. That's when it's good to work off of each other.

• 4:32Matt Abrahams?

  So what I'm hearing you say is the biggest determinant of which channel you use is what you're trying to accomplish. If you're expecting some back and forth, or you really rely on somebody else's response, maybe the more interactive approaches are better. But if you're really trying to do things like ideate and brainstorm, it might make more sense to do that more isolated, where you don't need that real time connection.

• 4:57Speaker 01

  Exactly, and those are some key examples of thinking about when one versus another might work better or worse.

• 5:02Matt Abrahams?

  Yeah, I think so many of us just want to get the message out that we don't really think about the channel and how that channel can impact what we're trying to do. So that's a really key bit of advice. Your new book has the subtitle, "The Secrets of Successful Virtual Communication." So I gotta ask, what are some of these secrets? Let us in.

• 5:20Speaker 01

  When it comes to books on business or improvement, I really like when there's a framework to organize all the stuff because it helps me remember it. So I think the best answer for this is to think about the framework that I introduced in the book, which is the PING framework, which should be easy to remember because the book's titled PING. The PING framework stands for P, Perspective Taken. And that's the idea that when you're interacting virtually, you're often much more self-focused. So whether you're just looking at text on a screen or even if you're doing video, there's just a little square of the person you're looking at. And it's not the same as when they're standing right in front of you. So we end up looking at things from our own perspective, and we tend to be much more overconfident than we should be about our communication because we're not taking the other person's perspective

• 6:05Speaker 01

  and realizing that it's different than us. They might read our emotions different. I is initiative. So it's thinking about what is missing from a given mode? And how can I add it back in? One of the examples that I often talk about with my students and executives is about when it comes to small talk. So I know it's been a topic on your show previously, but the thing about small talk, many people hate it for good reason. It takes up time, so it's a productivity waste. But on the other side of that, small talk is useful for building trust. We trust what we know. We trust who we know. Creates warp. Research has found that, for instance, in negotiation studies,

• 6:47Speaker 01

  when they had participants negotiate over text-based communication, there was much less small talk than when there was in person. So what they did is they had some of those participants who were engaging in a text-based negotiation have a quick phone call where they just schmoozed for a few minutes, and then they went to text-based communication and negotiate. And those negotiators ended up doing a whole lot better than those who didn't engage in schmoozing beforehand. So taking that initiative, just to have a short phone call before some intense interaction can be really useful. Then N, nonverbal. That's the idea that we send a lot of different nonverbal behavior over virtual communication than we do in person. And it's important to be aware of that. Typos can send emotion.

• 7:30Speaker 01

  Time of day can send signals of power. There's a whole bunch of different things that happen virtually that just don't happen in person. And those are really key for making sure that our messages are interpreted as we intend. And then lastly is G for goals. There's not one best mode. It depends on what your goal is in a situation. For example, cameras on versus cameras off calls. The idea here is people have strong preferences on it. But research shows that it depends what your goal is here. So if your goal is you want to make a strong impression for someone you don't know well, you want to show you're engaged, video's on is really good for that. But if you are trying to save energy, if you're trying to focus, video off is better

• 8:14Speaker 01

  because research has evidence showing Zoom fatigue or video conferencing fatigue. This idea that being on camera is really exhausting because we're staring at ourselves, analyzing nonverbal behavior. And there are all these things that happen when we're not in person that can drain energy from interactions. So if it's a new interaction, maybe video's on are better. But if it is someone you know really well, strong impression's already built, they know you're going to be engaged, then you might as well turn that video off because it'll help you to save energy. Bringing it all together, P framework, P perspective-taking, I initiative, and nonverbal, G goals. Throughout my book, I tie each of the recommendations into that framework to help make it more memorable and more usable.

• 8:58Matt Abrahams?

  I love a good framework, and I love one that I can remember, and Ping is very memorable. You spend in your book a lot of time talking about richness. What does richness mean in the context of communication? And why should we be concerned about it?

• 9:12Speaker 01

  Richness is this idea about how similar is a mode to face-to-face interactions? And that's generally how it's defined. But you can't think about it as a single dimension. There are different components that make up richness. The two main ones are synchronicity, whether it's real time or not, and cue variety. How similar are the degree of cues or nonverbal behaviors to those that are in person? And just because two modes seem similar in one dimension doesn't mean they aren't. For instance, email and instant message, both have a similar type of cues available.

• 9:53Speaker 01

  You can use emoticons, text, but they differ in terms of expected synchronicity. People tend to respond to instant messages quicker, hence instant messages. But the thing is, even small differences on richness have a huge impact on the outcomes of our interactions. Thinking about video calls and in-person interactions. Fairly similar, except you can't see the bottom half of the person, where too many video meetings is probably a good thing. What also happens is with video calls, there's a very slight lag due to data transfer speeds over the internet, whereas in person, there's no lag because you're just talking to each other.

• 10:33Speaker 01

  Some studies have found that even that slight lag in video calls can make conversations run a little more awkwardly. There can be more silences, we can interrupt each other more because we're both waiting for the other person to finish, or we thought they finished, but they didn't. Even these lags in the milliseconds can end up changing the conversational dynamics. And there's a variety of other ways that richness also plays into interactions. As an example, when we're interacting virtually, it can feel awkward to use richer modes of communication. So if you're Reaching out to help someone or to reconnect with an old colleague. There's this idea that people would just rather do via email. And the research shows email just feels less awkward.

• 11:17Speaker 01

  What authors who studied this found is that richer modes like telephone or video end up being more effective. It builds trust more because it's richer. And then when participants rated it after the fact, they note that it's not actually any more awkward. So we think it's going to be awkward before the fact to move from email to just calling someone or having a video meeting. But in reality, it works out better and it's not any less awkward. That said, especially in the work context, try and proceed a call with an instant message or email. That way, you're not interrupting whatever the other person is doing. So you could still get the benefits of that mode without necessarily having to interrupt or the fact of forcing them to talk whenever you decide.

• 12:00Matt Abrahams?

  Thank you for defining richness and for giving some useful examples and insight into what it is and how we can consider using it. I want to dive deeper into what you just said about alerting people in advance of reaching out. In your Ping model, the nonverbal piece, you've got a lot of ways of looking at nonverbal that I don't think many of us think of. You even use the example of the time of day you set a meeting can be a way of establishing power. Can you share your way of looking at nonverbal communication when we're virtual? Most of us who study nonverbal communication think about what do you do with your body and your voice? But there's also the use of time, the use of space. Can you share some of your thoughts on that?

• 12:43Speaker 01

  For nonverbal communication, one of the most illustrative examples to think about this is one that Haley Blunden from American University actually led a research project with me on. And it's on email typos. In this set of studies, we've had three findings. First, email typos generally make you look less intelligent.

• 13:05Speaker 01

  The second finding was that email typos can relay emotion. It's like putting your fist up in the air, where your fist up in the air can make you seem happier or more proud or more excited, but it depends on the context. So in angry emails, typos made you seem angrier. In happy emails, they made you seem happier. And then we had a third finding, which was in the context of emotional messages, there was a decreased penalty on intelligence for typos. So put simply, typos make us look less intelligent. But if there's another reason, such as emotion, the other person says, oh, it's because they're emotional. This matches other research.

• 13:45Speaker 01

  Studies show that having "sent from my iPhone" in your email signature decreases the penalty of typos because they assume it's sent from your iPhone. Knowing someone's from a different culture reduces the penalty for intelligence for grammar errors because English might not be their first language. So the key kind of theory behind all of this is this idea that in virtual communication, there's often missing information. As recipients of it, we're searching for reasons for this missing information. Whatever is there is what we attach it to. If it's clear the person was emotional or rushed or whatever else, we use that information to fill in the gaps in our understanding and assume it's because of that.

• 14:28Speaker 01

  The problem becomes that the person on the recipient's side who's making these guesses is often guessing incorrectly. So realizing how other people interpret our messages and making sure we add in extra information to make sure they don't have to fill in those gaps can be one of the most useful things that you did.

• 14:47Matt Abrahams?

  Wow, that's a lesson in attribution theory, but also in some practical things. You've just totally changed my perspective on something. One of the first things I do when I upgrade my phone is I remove the automatic signature that says "sent from iPhone", because I felt like that was not useful information. But based on what you've just said, maybe what I should do is change it to say, "sent from iPhone while likely rushing", so that everybody who gets one of my typos attributes it to that and not to the fact that I'm not as intelligent.

• 15:20Speaker 01

  It depends if your goal there is to typos or not because that also is sending other information as well. You didn't feel the need to sit down at your computer to email them. Maybe sometimes it's a good signal that you're sending it from the go. Maybe other times that's a bad signal. That can be seen as a power play potentially. So you do have to be wary of what other information you're sending from that. But with typos, it helps. With other things, it may not.

• 15:44Matt Abrahams?

  And that's that nonverbal piece I was thinking about. So people are reading into, "Oh, he just sent me a text. She sent me an email about that. Maybe there's some meaning behind it. Maybe she was more thoughtful than he..." So not only do we make choices for ourselves, but we have to think about the impact of the choice of channel. What message is that sending? Andrew, this has been a fantastic conversation. I am certainly considering changing a lot of my behaviors based on what we've said. Before we end, I like to ask all my guests three questions. One I make up for you and the other two are similar for everyone. Are you up for that?

• 16:22Speaker 01

  Yep, definitely.

• 16:23Matt Abrahams?

  Excellent. We'll be right back to finish our conversation. But first, we're going to take a quick break for a word from our sponsors. Their support covers the cost of production so we can bring you this show for free.

• 16:35Matt Abrahams?

  This podcast is sponsored by Squarespace. The best communicators don't just get their message across, they make it easy for people to know what to do next. Your website can do the same thing. With Squarespace, you can build a polished online presence that clearly shows people who you are, what you offer, and how they can work with you. If you offer coaching, consulting, classes, or other services, Squarespace lets you showcase those offerings, take payments, and use Acuity Scheduling so people can book time with you directly. And with built-in analytics, you can see how people are finding and engaging with your site, helping you make smarter decisions about where to focus. So your online presence doesn't just look professional, it helps people take action. Go to Squarespace.com/thinkfast

• 17:20Matt Abrahams?

  for a free trial. And when you're ready to launch, use offer code THINKFAST to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.

• 17:30Matt Abrahams?

  Hi, Matt here. Sometimes the biggest obstacle to getting something done isn't the idea, the plan, or even the budget. It's finding the right person to help you execute. And the longer that takes, the easier it is to lose momentum. That's where today's sponsor Upwork can help. Upwork gives businesses fast access to highly skilled freelance professionals across areas like marketing, design, software development, AI, and business operations. And with Business Plus, you can access the top 1% of talent on Upwork. AI-powered shortlisting gives you a curated list of freelancers matched to your goals in under six hours. So you can spend less time searching for the right person and more time actually moving the work forward.

• 18:12Matt Abrahams?

  Visit upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That's upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's U.P.W.O.R.K. dot com. Upwork.com. So not everybody has the benefit of actually seeing you as I do as we're speaking. What's your advice and guidance on what we do with what's behind us when we're virtually communicating? Are there some best practices we should follow?

• 18:41Speaker 01

  The evidence when it comes to video backgrounds or how you look on video does show that they do matter. Having good lighting, having a good camera. And in terms of what's behind you. So there's been some studies on the virtual backgrounds. And they show that having virtual background of a bookshelf or plants tend to be seen as most professional. Blurred is somewhere in the middle. And then the novelty ones, an example they used in the study was a walrus on ice, were seen as the least professional. So you want to use some common sense if you're using a virtual background. But then there's another set of studies about what shows in your actual background. And what they've found is that when there are things that show who you are.

• 19:25Speaker 01

  So you want to, of course, have the professional stuff. So a bookshelf's always good, maybe some plants. So in my case, a picture of my dogs and a couple of other little tidbits about me can be useful for creating some social cohesion. An example in the study, they had things that showed people were parents, or number one dad mug. And they found that for other people who are parents, they felt they could trust that person more. So having those opportunities to potentially have conversations, to show a window into who you are while remaining professional can be incredibly helpful.

• 19:58Matt Abrahams?

  So the fact that I have a Lego flower that I made behind me gives some insight into something about me, and I'll take that as a positive. The one thing I want to advise people against, and I assume you would agree with this, is you need to be authentic. I can imagine somebody hearing what you just said and said, "Oh, I'm going to manipulate by putting a number one dad mug, and I don't have any kids." We need to be authentic, because just like you mentioned around AI, that if the language you use influences how people see you, if somebody were to find out that you're not telling the truth, that would be a problem.

• 20:29Speaker 01

  Exactly. And I have some research to it in virtuality and authenticity, and it's a major factor that drives satisfaction of the other party. So it's not just being authentic in what you say or do, but also being seen as choosing the right mode, making sure that you don't have unintentional nonverbal behavior leaking through. When video calls, for instance, people might see that we're trying to be happy for them, but we're actually not, because maybe something happened earlier in our day that's really bad. So authenticity is a topic that is not just relevant in person, but is incredibly relevant to virtual interactions, especially because the person can't physically see you. So they're making a lot of assessments of authenticity to fill in those gaps.

• 21:11Matt Abrahams?

  Really, I want to put an exclamation point. Authenticity is so important in all communication, and what I'm hearing you say is in virtual communication, it's even more important. Let me ask question number two. I'll be curious to hear your answer. Who is a communicator that you admire, and why?

• 21:27Speaker 01

  I'm guessing there may have been a chance you would have gotten this answer before, because he's many peoples, but for me, it's Adam Grant. I took his first class that he taught at Wharton. It was just inspirational, the degree to which he motivated students. It was one of the driving factors that drove me to getting a PhD and coming into academia, was just seeing the impact he had on students and how he was able to just draw everyone into a topic that many people came in thinking wasn't going to be that interesting.

• 21:58Matt Abrahams?

  So this notion of your passion and connecting that and sharing that and making it relevant to others. Final question. What are the first three ingredients that go into a successful communication recipe?

• 22:12Speaker 01

  For successful communication, I recommend three things that start with pausing and taking a breath. We're overloaded by communication, especially virtual communication. We've got full inboxes, we've got back-to-back video meetings, and it's so easy to just keep on going and not take a second to pause. And step two is, consider if what you're doing is actually the best. We tend to fall in this trap of the default bias, which is this idea that we just do whatever we've normally done, or what's right in front of us. So if we always have a meeting for X, we continue to have a meeting for X. Or if we have an email for Y, we give an email for Y. Or if the conversation is already

• 22:55Speaker 01

  happening in email, we don't take the initiative to say, "Hey, let's switch this to a phone call. I think that'd be more productive." And so actually getting out of that default mindset can be incredibly helpful for improving productivity, your relationships, and your overall well-being, because you may find that you decrease your communication load by being thoughtful about what's the most productive mode and when, as opposed to just going with the flow. And lastly, my third ingredient is keep learning. Especially when it comes to technology and communication technology, there's new advances every day. People are changing how they use things. So keeping up with the research, the science, and understanding what are the best strategies for what, how is that changing, can be one

• 23:39Speaker 01

  of the best things that you can do, because communications technology is such a dynamic landscape.

• 23:46Matt Abrahams?

  I really like those three things. I'm going to take them in reverse order. Staying up to date and really challenging yourself to explore and learn the new technology makes a big difference. There are things that, as you said, are getting better all the time. I think about when we all first went to virtual and where we are today, not just in our comfort level with it, but just what we can do. I like to talk about turning habits into choices. Many of us communicate in that default mode, and taking the time to make a conscious choice rather than just do what you've always done, might make the communication better and your life easier. And then finally, taking a pause. We are often rushing in all of our communication and taking that beat, taking that moment can really make a difference.

• 24:30Matt Abrahams?

  And if we do it in the presence of others to show that we're listening or to show that we're being thoughtful, it can have an added benefit. Andrew, this has been a great conversation. You've shared so many useful tips and helped me, and I hope everybody listening, think a little bit differently about how we show up, when we communicate verbally, and what tools and channels we choose to use. Thank you so much.

• 24:54Speaker 01

  Thanks for having me on. I appreciate it.

• 24:58Matt Abrahams?

  Thank you for joining us for this episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart, the podcast. To learn more about virtual communication best practices, please listen to episode 53 with Jonathan Lavov and episode 31 with me. This episode was produced by Ryan Campos and me, Matt Abrahams. Our music is from Floyd Wonder. With thanks to the Podium Podcast Company. Please find us on YouTube and wherever you get your podcasts. Be sure to subscribe and rate us. Also, follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram. And check out fastersmarter.io for deep dive videos, English language learning content, and our newsletter. Please consider our premium offering for extended Deep Thinks episodes, Ask Matt Anythings, and much more

• 25:41Matt Abrahams?

  at fastersmarter.io/premium.

• 25:47Matt Abrahams?

  Before we wrap up, I just want to say thank you for listening. It really means a lot to hear how people all over the world are using these ideas in their own lives. It inspires me and the whole team that brings you this show. If you want more episodes and resources, feel free to follow, subscribe, and explore past conversations. We're grateful for your support of Think Fast, Talk Smart.