Trump Ushers in 300,000 Tons of Foreign Mystery Meat and Sends American Farmers Into Bankruptcy

Allowing Argentina to dump 300,000 tons of beef on American markets will inevitably mean bankrupt ranchers and rotten hamburgers. Missouri farmer Joe Maxwell explains. (00:00) Trump Importing Foreign Beef (02:35) The Farming Crisis (15:49) How Did This Beef Deal Come to Pass? (30:36) Is This Beef Fit for Human Consumption? Joe Maxwell is a fourth-generation Missouri farmer, former Missouri Lieutenant Governor, and nationally recognized advocate for fair and competitive markets. A retired First Sergeant in the Missouri National Guard, Maxwell also served ten years in the Missouri General Assembly and holds degrees in agricultural economics and law from the University of Missouri. He is President of Farm Action Fund, where he has helped lead national efforts to challenge corporate concentration in agriculture and restore economic opportunity for farmers and rural communities. In 2026, Maxwell launched the Rural Independence Initiative, a rural-led movement bringing Americans together across political lines to confront monopoly power, restore competitive markets, defend state and individual freedoms, and rebuild economic independence in rural America. - https://farmactionfund.us/rural-independence-initiative/ Paid partnerships with: Black Rifle Coffee: Promo code "Tucker" for 30% off at https://www.blackriflecoffee.com American Financing: NMLS 182334, nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-685-5696 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit http://www. AmericanFinancing.net/Tucker. Dutch: Use code TUCKER for $50 off your vet care at https://dutch.com/tuckerDefend: Enter code "Tucker" for 20% off your purchase at https://defendcellcam.com Alp Pouch: Shop the new Frontier collection at https://AlpPouch.com/Tucker Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Now, more than ever, we need someone on our side. But Rob Whitman? Whitman's votes drove up costs, cut Medicaid, and risked 350,000 Virginians' health care to pay for tax breaks for himself and his donors. He's not on our side. Shannon Taylor will fight corruption, cut taxes, and bring down costs. This November, vote for Shannon Taylor. She's for us. Paid for by HMP, the HouseMajorityPact.com. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

• 0:33Speaker 01

  Joe Maxwell, thank you so much for doing this. The president has announced that we're going to be importing a lot of beef from Argentina, a huge amount of beef from Argentina. And in his justification for this, he did not mention beef prices in the United States. He said, "We're doing this because Argentina's in trouble, and we're trying to help Argentina." So I think this was very confusing for a lot of people watching. What do you think is going on here?

• 1:00Speaker 02

  Well, you're absolutely right. The president's actually made two announcements about importing beef from Argentina. The first time, which was quite a shock to all of us out here in rural America, was that he was going to quadruple the amount of beef coming in the United States. And his basis was that the people of Argentina were struggling to survive, and he liked the president. Most recently, he has announced another 330,000 metric tons, of which he's purchased 80,000 metric tons from Argentina again. And so we're beginning to really dig into that and take a look at what is the real motivation?

• 1:45Speaker 02

  It clearly isn't in our... We know for a fact it's not America's farmers and ranchers. We're seeing the cattle market go down, right after we just started making a profit. And we don't see the results in the grocery store. Consumers still can't afford their food.

• 2:01Speaker 01

  So I think, I mean, there are a lot of potential motives here. One is geopolitical. The president of Argentina is a close ally of the prime minister of Israel, unlike President Maduro, who was an opponent of... Right, so that's certainly a factor in this. There may be others. What would the others be?

• 2:18Speaker 02

  Yeah. Well, first, let's, you know, I respect the geopolitical landscape. But we have to put America first. Farmers and ranchers, 63 farmers a day are going out of business, while people can't afford their groceries. There is a serious problem in rural America. Farmers and ranchers are in crisis, not unlike what the president described of those folks in Argentina. So I respect that those folks may be struggling to survive, but so are America's farmers and ranchers. So I just want to make that point, Tucker, that, you know, you've got to balance that, and we don't see that happening in the White House. What are some of the others?

• 3:02Speaker 01

  Ask you to pause. Why, for those of us not in the business, why is there a crisis in ranching? If meat prices are at an all-time high, when oil prices go up, the oil companies thrive. But meat prices have gone up, and ranchers are going out of business. What is the problem, do you think?

• 3:18Speaker 02

  Well, you mentioned oil companies. Our gas prices in my little town just went up again. Crude oil's down, gas is up, makes no sense. But the reason is, is those companies, a handful of companies, control the oil from the wellhead, well, actually, from under the ground, all the way to the gas pump. With cattle and much of what farmers and ranchers raise, we're price takers. We don't set the price. We have to pay our inputs, whatever we're told by a handful of companies the price is. Then we hold up what we raise and say, "How much will another handful of companies give us for it?"

• 4:01Speaker 02

  There are four companies that control 85% of all the cattle in the United States. Two of them are Brazilian. And we have to ask them, "How much will you give me for that?" So when we see prices in the grocery store go up, there's not a correlation that America's farmers and ranchers are going to receive a greater benefit from that price, because in the middle, it's so heavily concentrated between the meat packers and the retail groceries. Four grocery, big-box stores control 69% of all the groceries in the United States.

• 4:42Speaker 02

  So that concentration between the farmer and the consumer can cause the consumer to be price gouged on price, and the farmer to be short-paid for what the real value of their goods are, in this case, beef.

• 4:58Speaker 01

  That doesn't sound like an efficient market. That's not the capitalism I was promised.

• 5:04Speaker 02

  Well, Tucker, I have an ag economics degree. I don't hold myself up as an economist, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist or a professor at my old econ class to understand that capitalism doesn't work if it doesn't have the restraint of competition.

• 5:23Speaker 01

  Right.

• 5:23Speaker 02

  Right? That's one of the base fundamentals. A lot of us have been trying to get, both Democrats and Republicans have brought us to this horrible stage, where a handful of companies can have so much influence over Congress and the Oval Office. And the fact is that when we try to do something to force antitrust enforcement, or try to put new laws in place to modernize those, many of those were passed in the early 1900s or late 1800s. People scream, you know, the free market, the folks who want to wrap themselves in the free market, which I pull myself out for, the free market, they want to call me a socialist.

• 6:07Speaker 02

  Because I want to implement the fundamentals and make sure they're in place, like the restraint of competition, in our capitalist system. Otherwise, a handful of people get all the wealth. We launched the Rural Independence Initiative to look, to try to have these kind of conversations. It's been both, both major parties have gotten us in this position. Started with Ronald Reagan, and Bill Clinton put it on steroids. And what we now see is this restraint in the market, where new companies can't even enter the market. We can't even get new competition. Entrepreneurship is almost dead in most sectors in America.

• 6:51Speaker 02

  And so we say free market, and you said capitalist. I'm a capitalist. I've owned companies, businesses, own a farm. But capitalism doesn't work unless we allow competition. And both parties have eroded competition to where there isn't any. Companies, four companies control, give you an idea on egg prices when avian flu came out. Eggs are staples, so I hope most of the viewers get this. So your eggs went up 300% in the grocery store.

• 7:31Speaker 02

  The largest egg producer in the United States, Cal Mayne's, profits went up tenfold. The avian flu was serious. Animals died. But the fact is, they only lost about 6% to 7% of the flock. So they screamed "avian flu," which gave them an excuse to hike up prices, gouge the consumer, rake in billions of dollars. One company made more money in a quarter than it made in the whole year before. And, and, why? Because USDA, this is kind of telling, Tucker. USDA economists came out and said, "Well, we see prices are way far above what they

• 8:15Speaker 02

  ought to be based upon the facts. We expect other people to come in, in the emerging market, or in this market, and lower the price of eggs." And four months later, the report came and said, "We're not sure why nobody came in." But no one did, because the concentration is so heavy, you can't get into the market. With four companies controlling retail groceries, with their sweetheart deals with the big four producers of any food item, you can't get in. And it allows those companies to gouge the consumer and short-pay the farmer, and they reap all the money. They've extracted the wealth out of rural America.

• 8:55Speaker 02

  We've launched the Rural Independence Initiative to put aside party politics, strip yourself of party identity, let's roll up our sleeves, and let's work together. And let's, let's understand that capitalism does not work without the constraint, restraint of competition.

• 9:12Speaker 01

  Boy, I would think you'd have the overwhelming majority of the public on your side with that initiative.

• 9:18Speaker 02

  We sure hope so. We just launched, we are cross-party effort. When we make an endorsement of a candidate, we don't tell the public if it's a D or an R, or a I. You know, it should be the person, right? It ought to be that they stand up against this power, this influence in Washington, DC, they're willing to go toe-to-toe. We endorse Congressman Massey. Now, we didn't win that. We worked hard, others did too. So did Congressman. But we're endorsing candidates that will go toe-to-toe with this power and not bend to the influence in Washington, DC.

• 10:00Speaker 02

  This beef deal is really about the White House, and to some degree, members of Congress, bending to the influence of this monopolistic oligarchy power. And the influence that they have, when they get market share, market power, they therefore get economic power. I talked about eggs gouging the consumers, they make billions of dollars, then they invest that in lobbyists and campaign contributions in order to stay in that power. And so, but what happens is, is that that influence, then, the Batista family can just walk into the Oval Office. That's the owners of the world's largest meat packer.

• 10:44Speaker 02

  Is JBS owned by one family from Brazil? And they can walk into the Oval Office and have a sit-down. They can negotiate between the President of Brazil, the President of the United States. So those two can get together. That's the power these companies and corporations and folks now have and the influence they have, not only over our government, but other governments. And we have to come together as a people and push back against that power.

• 11:16Speaker 01

  Just because the battles stop doesn't mean war stops hurting the people who fight them. No, for many veterans, the effects of what they've been asked to do continue long after they return home. They're injured physically and psychologically, and those injuries can last a lifetime. Groups like the Hunter Seven Foundation are here to help them. Hunter Seven Foundation works to identify, to study, and to address the long-term health effects of toxic exposure during military service to help veterans get care, get answers, and advocate for their health and their future. It's a nonprofit. Hunter Seven relies on the support from other proud American companies, and Black Rifle is one of those. Black Rifle Coffee proudly supports organizations that stand up for soldiers who risk their

• 11:59Speaker 01

  lives because no veteran should have to fight for their health by themselves. They should have the entire country's support. To learn more about this good cause, find resources for yourself or a loved one, or help support the mission, visit hunterseven.org today. That's hunterseven.org. So how do you think this specific deal came to pass?

• 12:22Speaker 02

  I think we mentioned the geopolitical climate.

• 12:26Speaker 01

  Yes.

• 12:27Speaker 02

  There's no doubt with the first deal last October, November, the quadrupling, the importation of beef from Argentina was because of an election in Argentina. And it wasn't looking good for an ally of the President, someone he considers a friend. I'm not an expert on geopolitics, so I won't say it was good to have him re-elected or not. I just don't know. But I do know that that's a fact. And therefore, we quadrupled the importation to raise and secure the economic future.

• 13:06Speaker 02

  Also, we gave 20 billion taxpayer money to Argentina, and we put together a banking deal with other financiers of about 20 billion, plus this beef deal. But the other thing is just the influence of JBS. JBS has plants in Argentina. It's the influence of these large corporations. I'll give you, how does it work?

• 13:43Speaker 02

  JBS is one of the most corrupt organizations in the world, and they have confessed to bribing up to 1,800 politicians in Brazil in order to get an increase in value of their shares, to borrow billions to invest in the United States in the meat market. And they bought beef, pork, and chicken. So they are a protein company. And they, in that, so the President is looking for money for his inaugural committee.

• 14:24Speaker 02

  Pilgrim's Pride, which is JBS's poultry division, gave $5 million to the Trump inaugural committee. And for years, JBS had been trying to get on the stock exchange to get publicly listed in the United States. And shortly thereafter, they got that. Shortly thereafter, Josely Batista, one of the, there's two, Wesley and his brother, met with the President, and it's reported that they talked about beef prices and Brazilian

• 15:08Speaker 02

  tariffs. They have been, had strong relationships with the President in his prior first term. We had bailout money to try to help America's farmers and ranchers that I helped work on. The Trump-winning administration moved over $60 million of that bailout for America's farmers to JBS to help bail them out. There was a guy by the name of Al Amanza in 2017 under the first term. You can look this up. This is fact, as it's been reported and as the investigations, police investigations

• 15:53Speaker 02

  have indicated. The Brazilian police started an investigation called Weak Meat. And they believe that inspectors were being bribed to let tainted, rotted meat, abscessed meat out of Brazil, millions of pounds. And they discovered it was so. And they notified the world that there's a bunch of bad meat on the market, beef market. China, Chile, other countries, within three days, closed their ports to Brazilian beef.

• 16:34Speaker 02

  Again, JBS is a major beef producer, and we're tied into this investigation, along with a couple of other meat companies. And it took the US 97 days to close its border to Brazilian beef. 97 days. I always suspected, never did the research, it took about 97 days to bring in millions of pounds of rotten meat, and we were the only country that didn't close our border. So there has been favored status. Oh, the kicker here, Tucker, do you know where Al Amanza now works?

• 17:14Speaker 01

  No.

• 17:16Speaker 02

  He, I laugh, it's this bad. This is the kind of influence these big multinational companies have over our government. He got a job, JBS SA, that's their South American main company, their main company, he got a job, they created it, as the head of global food safety. It's undisclosed how much they pay him, but he left USDA where he was the interim FSIS, and that's the Food Safety Inspection Services for the United States of America, that runs

• 17:59Speaker 02

  the inspections to let meat in or not in to this country. And he turned around and went to work for the very people that had been caught, along with others in Brazil, other companies in Brazil, trying to move millions of pounds. And he left our borders open for 97 days in 2017.

• 18:17Speaker 01

  Cost of living is already making it hard to live here, and it's not getting any better. Unfortunately, it's likely to get worse, and a lot of Americans fill the gap with credit cards, not just for fancy dinners, but to cover things like groceries and bills. That is a disaster. It's understandable, but don't go down that road because there is a tax in effect, a survival tax of 20% interest or more. Why would you do that? Why would you hand money to the big banks when you can keep it for your family? Our friends at American Financing have a better way. If you're looking to buy your first home or refinance your current one, they're helping Americans achieve the dream of homeownership with monthly mortgage rates currently in the fives. American Financing saves its customers an average of 800 bucks per month.

• 19:00Speaker 01

  That's nearly 10 grand every year back to you. This isn't just a loan, it's a total financial reset. So debt is tough, but there's a smart way to do it and a reckless, self-destructive way to do it, credit cards. And so we recommend American Financing. They're salary-based, not commission-based, which means they actually work for you, not the banks. They're called America's Home for Home Loans for a reason. Call 800-685-5696, 800-685-5696, or visit americanfinancing.net/tucker.

• 19:34Speaker 03

  We all hear the radio ads about the IRS. They tell you to be afraid, to be scared, and they try to frighten you into calling. I'm not here to do that. Tax relief advocates is different. TRA is here to tell you that if you owe money to the IRS, whether it's 5,000, 50,000, or 500,000, we have a solution. It doesn't matter if you're sitting in your car, at work, or with your kids, no matter where you are, call now. 800-576-4705. Don't lose hope. TRA can eliminate or reduce what you owe to the IRS. Generous programs are now available that can give you a fresh start. Our passion is taxes and helping individuals fix their IRS problems. We have over 1,000 5-star reviews on Google and an A+ with the Better Business Bureau.

• 20:17Speaker 03

  You don't need to be afraid of the IRS any longer. End your tax nightmare today by visiting us online at TRA.com or call 800-576-4705. That's 800-576-4705. Tax Relief Advocates, real solutions for real people.

• 20:35Speaker 04

  Have you ever heard of the Pelosi Stock Tracker? Well, here's the stock trading app behind it. Most of us don't have access to classified information, yet our politicians seem to. For years, they've been publicly trading stocks, with some being oddly timed around certain legislation. Well, this team said, "If you can't beat them, join them and build autopilot." It connects directly to your brokerage account, like a Robin Hood or Schwab, and mimics Nancy Pelosi and other politicians' stock trades automatically. So instead of debating what stocks to buy, you just trade alongside them, hands-free. And the key thing here, your money stays in your own account. The app already has 1.3 billion invested so far. So if you wanted to check it out, search "autopilot" in the App Store

• 21:20Speaker 04

  or go to joinautopilot.com. That's joinautopilot.com. Investing has risks, like the loss of principal.

• 21:28Speaker 01

  How is that legal? How can a US government regulator leave his job and then work for the industry that he regulated? Why do we allow that?

• 21:40Speaker 02

  I don't know why we allow that, Tucker. Maybe you and I need to get together a few other folks that have similar views of... and go after both parties until they stop doing that. We call it the revolving door. It's very serious. It is the real... It's just one component of the influence that these big companies have. They can walk into the Oval Office, they can walk into any US senator, member of Congress office. Unfortunately, in our opinion, based upon farm policy,

• 22:24Speaker 02

  the majority of Ds and Rs support what they want, not what America's farmers want. And the other influence they have is, sometime for appointments, they line up their people from the industry to get jobs within the administration and are deep-seated then into the regulatory agencies. So they're, in the beginning, they're appointed and they're regulating themselves, you know, because they've got one of their folks inside. And then, after that administration leaves, the door goes the other way. They go back home. They're kind of like guaranteed a job. They usually get, I think, a... I'm not sure, but I'm sure they get a star or two

• 23:09Speaker 02

  to put on the refrigerator, like we do at home when the kids do well. And pat it on the back, you know? And that is the amount of influence. That's what happens when we fight for a free market and we fail to put the safeguards in place. It's what we get when we're distracted by so many issues that they throw at us that we, all of us, lose sight that... of what the real issues in that is protecting our economy, protecting our rural communities, protecting the people. And instead, we start thinking it's more serious if we aren't protecting JBS's future or something like that. And, you know, they...

• 23:52Speaker 02

  I often joked that, you know, it didn't matter which presidential candidate won, D or R, because, you know, it was just a matter of which Goldman Sachs executive was going to be the head of Treasury back in the day. That's what I would say. And if you look, that's kind of how it worked. There really wasn't a distinction between the parties for about 40 years as it relates to... But they fight over things and then they let their billionaires and their monopolistic corporations, you know, rob all of us. Rob the consumer at the grocery store. They short-pay the farmer. These big meat companies have been accused

• 24:37Speaker 02

  and have settled. They didn't admit they did it, but have been accused of price-fixing wages. There was something called the Aggrastat system. And they shared data so they could depress wages. So it's not just farmers and ranchers. It's also the workers that get short-paid. So that's the unfortunate state that we're in. And people are angry. Out here in rural America, we're angry. We're angry over this beef deal. We're angry that many thought things were getting better. We were starting to make a profit.

• 25:20Speaker 02

  And then, the president takes this course of action and plummets our market. And we know that our neighbors at the grocery store going in the grocery store and I... Well, we oftentimes go in the grocery store, right? So even ourselves, we're not going to see that benefit. And based upon the record that I've described, Tucker, of tainted meats and inspections and, you know, you got to wonder... Know that the global beef supply is short this year compared to last year.

• 25:53Speaker 01

  Why?

• 25:54Speaker 02

  So globally, there's less beef. I don't know all the reasons, some of which are... Most are weather-related. It's also been price-related. Farmers around the world have been underpaid for... And so if you're going to get underpaid, you're not going to do much of it anymore. So you start selling off your herd. So weather, short-paid to farmers. And so, the global supply today is less than last year. Okay? So, in 90 days, the President of the United States is saying, "We're going to bring in to this country

• 26:36Speaker 02

  700 and... over 750 million pounds of beef." Now, this order for beef wasn't anticipated. It wasn't laying out there in the world's global beef supply. It's a seller's market today, right? I mean, if you have goods and it's in short supply, then why are you going to discount it 25%? And the president claims, "Well, I bought it for 25% below the market." Well, who in the world is going to sell something that's in shorter supply this year than last year at a discount?

• 27:21Speaker 02

  Unless it's something they can't sell to anybody else. It has to make us ask, "Where are you buying this and what in the world is it?" Somebody is getting a benefit. I don't have "who", but based on past track records, I'd say "follow the money", is what I try to say. We, as people, need to ask, "Who gets the benefit from this?" It's not the farmer or rancher, cattle producer. It doesn't appear it's going to be the consumer. So who? It's somebody we're buying it from and that's going to sell something they can't sell anywhere else

• 28:05Speaker 02

  and they're going to sell it in this country. It's not just a stockpile of beef nobody wanted because we're in a decline on supply of beef in this world and demand is up. It's a seller's market right now.

• 28:25Speaker 01

  So, so many questions. I mean, you're aware that global central planners have for some time said out loud, "People eat too much beef. We need to reduce consumption of beef." They're not hiding it. You know, famously, the World Economic Forum has had a bunch of different panels on this exact topic. Do you see a connection between that ideology, whatever it is, and the decline in global beef supply?

• 28:54Speaker 02

  Yeah, I don't think that they had to leverage their plans. I think Mother Nature has leveraged a lot of the plans and this concentration in the meat market. I do believe that it's evidence that those plans or those meetings occurred and those conversations occurred. But what... I mean, we've... The Western United States, as well as other areas of the world, have faced droughts. We're facing extreme weather patterns that we've not faced before that caused costs to go up and prices didn't go up because of the concentration. Four companies control the meat market.

• 29:39Speaker 02

  Four companies. 85%. Two of them are Brazilian. This is in beef. Pork, four companies control 68 to 70% and chicken about 68%. So it's everywhere. And a lot of the same companies control all three proteins. But so I think it's a product more of the constant, and these companies are global. You know, US Tyson, Cargill, it's not just Brazilian, JBS Brazilian is the largest meat protein company in the world, but and, and they just have been short paying farmers

• 30:22Speaker 02

  all over the world. There's riots, the protests going on everywhere from India to, you know, Europe by farmers. And, and so that's what I think really has put most of the strain on the market. There's no doubt certain regulations and other things have impacted the profitability. So I don't want to take away from that, but, but the bigger fact has just been the constraints put on by Mother Nature and, and a market that's relentlessly controlled.

• 30:59Speaker 01

  So you described shrinking supply, rising demand, and then a president who says, somehow I found this huge cache of beef at below market prices and I'm going to send it to the United States. And you made the point, I don't know where this is coming from, but logic suggests it's unsellable meat and we're getting stuck with it. So that raises the question, I think I'm fairly characterizing what you said. Like, are, how, are we sure that this is fit for human consumption? Like, what's the track record of here?

• 31:31Speaker 02

  I want to make, yeah, well, track record's not good. I gave you the 2017, 97 days to close the border tainted and accessed meat when China, for God's sakes, three days shut down their border to it. I mean, we're always comparing ourselves to China and somehow they, they, they got it, the message and the memo a lot quicker than Al did. But I think that one, one of the most tragic issues, this goes to a part of your question, but I, I think what's so important is to recognize is the United States does not have mandatory

• 32:14Speaker 02

  country of origin labeling on beef and pork. This case is beef. I can tell you where this shirt I have on, the one you have on, comes from and was made. I can buy a dog treat, it'll tell me what country it was made in. When you go to the grocery store, it doesn't tell you where it comes from. So this meat is, because we don't have mandatory country of origin labeling. Now Senator Thune, Republican leader of the US Senate, has a bill, the American Beef Labeling Act, and, and in a bipartisan vote that they voted into the farm bill a few Thursdays ago before they broke. The farm bill didn't get through, but

• 32:55Speaker 02

  it was a bipartisan effort, which was very encouraging. But it's very, this story is very tragic. I absolutely believe that this has got to be meat, somebody could, they're not going to discount in a seller's market. I'm a business person. Shoot, you know, if something's in short supply, I'm not going to say, oh, I'll give you 25% off because I don't have enough of it. So that's just not logical. So it has to be something they couldn't move somewhere else. And the track record is, is that, and the president's not saying where he's getting it. That lack of transparency is one concern. And America's

• 33:36Speaker 02

  people won't know if it showed up in their grocery store or not. It's a lot of beef. We throw these numbers around, I'll try to put it into a kind of perspective. On the average last year, the, I'll get this right, the, the average pounds of beef imported into the United States per month last year was 447 million pounds. That's average all year. The president is going to bring this meat in, in 90 days.

• 34:20Speaker 02

  It is 750, over 750 million pounds of meat. In 90 days, that would be 250 million pounds a month more. That's over 50% increase per month of what the average was last year of being imported. It's a lot of beef. So we were saying, you know, it's not, so every, all the viewers need to understand, there's not, it's that much meat. It's not just laying around, as you said, Tucker. I mean, it's just not laying around. It's too big of a pile of beef. And it's a new order. It's not like it was in the pipeline. So American

• 35:05Speaker 02

  consumers aren't going to know where their beef comes from because we don't have mandatory country of origin labeling. And everyone viewing this ought to call their US senator and their member of Congress and the White House because the president does not support mandatory country of origin labeling, and demand that that be passed immediately when they return, so that we can, gosh darn, at least know if we're eating some of this junk that's coming through.

• 35:28Speaker 01

  We are strongly pro-dog on this show. We make no secret of that. Dogs are one of the great blessings of this life. And to keep them healthy, we recommend Dutch. It's the solution to skyrocketing veterinary costs. Why are those costs so high? Well, private equity, in case you didn't already know that. Big investors who bought up veterinary clinics across the country and doubled the amount they charge. So they're exploiting your love for animals to make money. And are they providing better services? Well, if you can't afford to go to the vet, you get no services at all. We did a whole show on this and it's really distressing. Dutch is the solution to this. Licensed veterinarians, easy remote appointments. Start with the code TUCKER plans at just $82 per year. That's

• 36:12Speaker 01

  like, nothing compared to what you will get if you walk into a private equity owned vet. 50% of Dutch customers say they had not seen a vet in three years because they couldn't afford it. Dutch fixes that. 10 minute calls, no waiting room, no clinic markup, free shipping on products, coverage for up to five pets. Visit dutch.com/tucker, use the code TUCKER for $50 off. Truly, Dutch is real. It works. We did a lot of research into this, used it before recommending it. Dutch.com/tucker.

• 36:45Speaker 00

  Now, more than ever, we need someone on our side. But Rob Whitman? Whitman's votes drove up costs, cut Medicaid, and risked 350,000 Virginians' healthcare to pay for tax breaks for himself and his donors. He's not on our side. Shannon Taylor will fight corruption, cut taxes, and bring down costs. This November, vote for Shannon Taylor. She's for us. Paid for by HMP, the House Majority PAC.com, not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

• 37:15Speaker 01

  What, what's the potential, or even theoretical justification for opposing labeling country of origin? Like, I don't understand that.

• 37:25Speaker 02

  Yeah. Well, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, one of the largest trade and lobbying organizations, is both, it represents, its members are 5% or so of US cattle producers, but it also has members that are the big packers. NCBA represents itself as the voice of America's cattle producers. The packers and the NCBA push hard to not have country

• 38:07Speaker 02

  of origin labeling. We had it up until 2015. And then it got tied up into a dispute with the WTO after Mexico and Canada sued the United States in the tribunal. And there was going to be a penalty placed on the US for restraint in trade. And the Congress got nervous and repealed it, 2015, and, under the Obama administration. So these groups say it's going to cost too much money. It's going to raise prices. That's the fear tactic that they use to try to get the Congress. Everybody's worried about affordability right now. We were talking about that on beef prices, fuel prices. I mentioned fertilizer in a

• 38:51Speaker 02

  minute. But, and, but the reality is, the truth, the politics behind it, is that, we just talked about it. Two of the, these four companies that control 85% of the beef in the United States are international. They're importing and exporting beef all over the world. They, they export US beef and import Brazilian beef. I mean, the same company, moving it all around the world.

• 39:24Speaker 02

  They know that the American people, and surveys, public surveys have proven this, will pay the American farmer more money. They feel and understand it's a safer product because there's been so many problems in the important world. And they'll pay more. And these companies don't want to lose their ability to co-mingle, to mix this extra, we're not talking about a chunk of steak or roast, right? We're talking about some grinder-mulsified product. And they bring that into the United States and they throw

• 40:07Speaker 02

  it in a vat, you know, a million pounds of hamburger, and they stir it all up. And they don't want to list and track all the countries that that stuff came from, that they threw in that vat.

• 40:21Speaker 01

  Oh, come on. That's so repulsive. I'm having trouble hearing this. That's disgusting.

• 40:29Speaker 02

  I understand, Tucker. I have trouble as an American farmer believing we've allowed the food system to get to such a state that that's what we're feeding the people, right? It's a god dang disgrace. But that's the reality of where we are. They have so much influence that they are able to keep mandatory country of origin labeling off. Now, I commend Senator Thune. He's the leader of the US Senate. He is from a great state that raises cattle. It didn't go to his head when he became a national leader. He stayed focused on a priority back home, and he delivered a great vote, along with the Democrats. Hats

• 41:11Speaker 02

  off to them, too, for voting for a Republican amendment. And they're fighting hard, but they're up against the wall. And every viewer should call their member of the Senate and a member of the House and the White House and demand with the President bringing in 330,000 metric tons, which equals over 750 million pounds of beef, which is over 50% increase per month. That's the amount that's going to be in the grocery store. We deserve to know where it came from. Tell us on the label before we buy it.

• 41:47Speaker 01

  Yes. So, I have read, I have no idea if it's what's true, which is why I'm glad you're here, but that China had banned beef imports from Argentina on the basis of hormones or chemicals in the meat that they believed were dangerous. Is that true?

• 42:10Speaker 02

  Yes. And I, you hear the way I talk, now, and I can't pronounce the word, it's an antibiotic. So I apologize to the listeners and viewers. But anyway, it's an antibiotic. And if I would attempt to pronounce that, I would only further embarrass myself. So, but anyway, there is, okay, so there's a very potent antibiotic that is used for humans when we're extremely serious and other antibiotics have failed. The reason it's rarely used is because it stays, its residue, the antibiotic stays in the muscle tissue for very long

• 42:54Speaker 02

  extended periods of time. It has been banned, its use in livestock has been banned in Argentina, the US, China, Canada, many countries to be used in livestock because we all worry what we eat, and if it's got just a little bit of antibiotics in it, right? Maybe you don't, maybe the listeners don't know. So, one of the reasons overuse of antibiotics in production of livestock is a real problem is because this residue stays, which is really just the antibiotic stays. You eat it, and so you have a little bit of antibiotics in

• 43:37Speaker 02

  you. Well, the bug or germ that you might have, that your body's fighting, gets a little sick, but it's not enough antibiotics to kill it. That little germ or virus, it mutates and becomes resistant to the antibiotic, creating antibiotic-resistant disease and illnesses. So that's why this one stays in the muscle tissue for a very long extended time. Very, I don't want to use the word toxic. If you're sick and you need this antibiotic, it's not toxic to your body, right? It's a good thing, you know. You've got malaria, I think it's

• 44:18Speaker 02

  used in malaria and some other things. So, but not in livestock because they don't want, the folks that have banned it, the country don't want us to have just a little bit of it, because one day we may need it. And if our body, that virus or whatever has become resistant to it, then everybody, it no longer works. And we lose that great tool, that great antibiotic, that's kind of a last resort antibiotic. So, however, Argentina, and we've already talked about South American countries and tainted beef earlier, Argentina, somebody over there is using it in the production of their cattle. Note that we just brought

• 45:00Speaker 02

  in 80,000 metric tons, which is about a little over 17 million pounds. And China caught it. And they said, we ain't, we're not taking this. This antibiotic that we detected in this meat is banned from the use in livestock here. We're not going to take meat from another country that allows that to be used. And they rejected it. So, I cannot remember, I apologize, Tucker. It was a small poundage, but they didn't test everything. They just rejected the whole thing. So, a few days later, this week, the President has announced

• 45:44Speaker 02

  one of the first places he's gone for his 330,000 metric tons of beef is Argentina. The first deal he struck was for 80,000 metric tons of the 330,000 will come from Argentina. I have no evidence, nor am I trying to make over accusations, but it does scare the heck out of me that if, if we're talking about 750 million pounds of beef, and it's not, we already talked, it's not just laying around somewhere, somebody's trying to peddle something they can't sell elsewhere. We know Argentina has some beef they need to sell. And it's

• 46:25Speaker 02

  a 25% discount. So, we should be asking to make sure this administration beefs back up the people that they let go, get them back in FSIS, and get them on the front line. And we need to be testing to make sure that Argentina beef doesn't have that residue in it that China found.

• 46:44Speaker 01

  Storm season is on the way, and that means your Wi-Fi could go down. And if it does, your security cameras go dark, too. So, at the exact moment you want to survey your property during the blackout, you can't. Unless you install cameras by Defend. Defend cameras run on cellular, not Wi-Fi, and that means they keep working even when you lose power. You don't choose a carrier, you don't sign a contract, you just mount it, open the Defend app, and bam, you're connected. It's that simple. So whether it's your ranch, your job site, your backyard, Defend works where Wi-Fi doesn't and keeps working when the grid goes down, which it may. Plans start at just $5 a month. Most people pay around 10. Plus, there are no binding contracts, meaning you can get to cancel whenever you

• 47:27Speaker 01

  want. So unlike big tech, Defend will never sell your data, not to China, not to the government, not to anybody. It's an American company built for people who want actual security. Visit defendcellcam.com and use the code TUCKER for 20% off. That's defendcellcam.com code TUCKER. Hey, it's Tucker Carlson. We launched Alp about a year and a half ago, and people are voracious for it. They can't get enough. Everywhere you go, you get the same question. When are you making more flavors? We are not in the business of disappointing people. Instead, we're in the business of satisfying them. So we have made at least three more flavors. Introducing the Alp Frontier Collection. They are Campfire Cinnamon, Sunset Mango, and Cowboy Coffee, available in 4mg and 8mg. Because if you're going to use nicotine,

• 48:12Speaker 01

  you ought to have some options. Get the new Frontier Collection now at alppouch.com/Tucker.

• 48:20Speaker 00

  Now, more than ever, we need someone on our side. But Rob Whitman? Whitman's votes drove up costs, cut Medicaid, and risked 350,000 Virginians' health care to pay for tax breaks for himself and his donors. He's not on our side. Shannon Taylor will fight corruption, cut taxes, and bring down costs. This November, vote for Shannon Taylor. She's for us. Paid for by HMP, the House Majority PAC dot com. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

• 48:49Speaker 05

  In this life, you can't win.

• 48:51Speaker 06

  When the world gets you down.

• 48:52Speaker 05

  No!

• 48:53Speaker 06

  Escape to Pluto TV.

• 48:55Speaker 05

  This is objectively fantastic.

• 48:56Speaker 06

  Relax into the movies and shows you already know and love, all for free.

• 49:00Speaker 05

  Shwing!

• 49:01Speaker 06

  Even our news is uplifting.

• 49:02Speaker 05

  You stay classy, San Diego.

• 49:04Speaker 06

  Watch School of Rock, Crazy Ex Girlfriend, Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy, The X-Files, Wayne's World, and so much more.

• 49:10Speaker 05

  We're not worthy!

• 49:12Speaker 06

  The best things on TV really are free.

• 49:14Speaker 05

  You just have to know where to look.

• 49:15Speaker 06

  Escape to Pluto TV. Stream now, pay never.

• 49:21Speaker 01

  Is it, is it possible to buy an all-American hamburger in the United States?

• 49:27Speaker 02

  It is.

• 49:28Speaker 01

  How?

• 49:30Speaker 02

  I, I, I thank you all from Maine. Is that right?

• 49:34Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 49:35Speaker 02

  I'll get you in touch with some good farmers there.

• 49:38Speaker 01

  No, I mean to go, for sure. And, and, you know, I, obviously, I, I'm not worried about meat prices. I'm blessed in that way. So, yeah, we, we, American beef in my house, period.

• 49:51Speaker 02

  Yeah, okay.

• 49:52Speaker 01

  And we get, right.

• 49:53Speaker 02

  The normal, the, the regular consumer that perhaps is too far removed from the farm to be able to do that. There are a few companies. One, I filed so many years ago, I filed the first complaint with USDA.

• 50:11Speaker 02

  Okay, I don't want people to get confused. Right now, the country does not have mandatory country of origin labeling. That's where the government says, you got to put the label in your shirt, dog treats, and also on that beef. The problem is, they don't do it on the beef now. And it should be mandatory. But what was even more egregious, or as egregious, was that companies were able to put on the label a processed meat, as well as meat products in the meat case, product of the USA. That term. This was changed, this was allowed beginning in

• 50:54Speaker 02

  George W. Bush's administration. And it was done by the administration. Every president since then had let it go along. I filed a complaint with USDA against that. And the, towards the end of the Biden administration, they ruled in our favor. And it, it was like a decade. Fight, American Grass Fed Association, there was a lot of us. I happened to be the guy that wrote the complaint. But Angela Huffman, President of Farm Action, was a big part of it. I don't want to leave anybody out. It wasn't just me. I don't want to overstate it. But Biden agreed.

• 51:37Speaker 02

  And now that meat, if, if a company is going to voluntarily use, not mandate, but if they're going to choose, out of the goodness of their little hearts, to put product of the USA on meat product,

• 51:52Speaker 02

  it has to be born, raised, slaughtered, and processed in the United States of America.

• 52:03Speaker 02

  That is now the standard for that label. It's voluntary.

• 52:09Speaker 02

  The Trump administration, while it threw out a lot of things that the Biden administration did over at USDA that we opposed on Packers and Stockyards Act rules, one thing they did keep was that rule and have really marketed it and worked to get it out into the, out into the world, out into the marketplace. So there, so if you go to your grocery store, not saying you can find it, but companies can now. If they are just buying beef, cattle, slaughtering him, cattle that was born in the US,

• 52:52Speaker 02

  not those that come over from the borders, cattle born in the US, raised in the US, slaughtered in the US and processed in the US, they can now, that, that label now has meaning. And you should look for that label. And you should encourage your grocery to get that meat and use that label. FSIS is the one that does the labeling. And that is their rule now. And it was put in by a Democrat administration and maintained by a Republican administration, which is always good, in our view, because that usually says, okay, we won that one, you know? You can make a ground with one

• 53:35Speaker 02

  party and then the other party comes in and just because... The politics, Tucker, and I know you know this. You live it, it have for years. But, you know, it's just crazy. We, we identify more as a party in America than we do as the people of America. And just because the other party wanted to do something, we naturally think it's bad. This Maha movement, which we, I work with, and we work with many of the Maha leaders is, is an example. But, but that's what they should look for. It, it is available now. Not many companies are using it. But you can encourage your grocer, your restaurant, to get that label, get the companies that are doing that.

• 54:19Speaker 02

  They're usually your regional, local meat packers that are seeking that label to differentiate themselves against the JBSs and the meat case or the Tysons and the others. And it's good for that local processor, that regional processor. It helps the farmer and the rancher. And you're guaranteed now in America that you're eating something from America and you're actually benefiting the American farmer.

• 54:47Speaker 01

  The, the beef that the president's going to import from Argentina and maybe other places, what will that be used for? Like, what percentage will go into ground beef and processed meat products as opposed to intact meat products like steak?

• 55:03Speaker 02

  It's my understanding that the president has announced that within two weeks of his announcement that he is going to have an executive order to further define what this is. From the original reporting, his statements, some of it on social media, it will be ground burger. It will be ground. Now, so it will not be whole muscles, as indicated, like a roast.

• 55:36Speaker 01

  Yep.

• 55:37Speaker 02

  Or the steak, KC or T-bone or any of those. It will be the grind for what we would call farm country, the grind off the cattle. What, what I will tell you in these plants, what is going on today is that the, the United States raises prime good stock cattle.

• 56:11Speaker 02

  But sometimes it's too, too lean. They, they want to sell 80% hamburger, 80, 20, or 73% lean, 27% fat. Of course, so they'll bring in emulsified fat from foreign countries.

• 56:36Speaker 02

  I'm sorry, emulsified lean from foreign countries to, to add to our fat coming off of our prime cattle. Because prime means marbling, more fat. So the US raises a lot of fat. It needs lean to, to make the 73% or the 80 or 90% to balance that out. You go in and look at hamburger, it'll be some percent lean, some percent fat. And the American people don't know, but a lot of that is mixed. And, and so I suspect they're bringing in lean trimmings to mix with US fat as much as anything, as well as some of the emulsified

• 57:19Speaker 02

  out of the plants, the, kind of the tailings.

• 57:23Speaker 01

  What does emulsified mean in this context? And what's a tailing?

• 57:27Speaker 02

  Okay, I call them tailings. I, I have worked in, in meat processing plants. And maybe that's not a good term. It's, it's what's left on the table after the day's done. Kind of, you know, it's, you, you sitting there and you're, somebody's standing there trimming. And so it's, they, they pick it up, like they're trimming it down, the fats off of, off the brisket or something, they put it over into a hopper. And the meat companies here many decades, several decades ago,

• 58:11Speaker 02

  started running that through a, like you make a hot dog. A hot dog is emulsified. It, it goes through this machine. So it's not chunks anymore. It becomes, it's blended with fat, becomes a...

• 58:24Speaker 01

  Like a slurry?

• 58:26Speaker 02

  Yeah, kind of like a stiff slurry. But emulsifier blends it all up, cuts it up so that there's not any chunks or anything. So it's not like a Polish sausage where you can find a chunk of pork every now and then. It's like, like a hot dog that, that, it, it's just, you know, it's, you ever look at the hot dog? It's just, you know, it's, it's been emulsified.

• 58:51Speaker 01

  Did your time...

• 58:52Speaker 02

  Oh, heavily, heavily, finely ground, I guess is a way to...

• 58:57Speaker 01

  Just a personal question. Did your time working in a processing plant make you more or less excited about hot dogs?

• 59:05Speaker 02

  I love a good hot dog.

• 59:06Speaker 01

  I do too. I do too. I don't know if you can deter me from that, but you're coming close.

• 59:11Speaker 02

  Well, I will tell you, a, a good beef hot dog made in a good plant is a good hot dog.

• 59:21Speaker 02

  It's, it's, it's the, you know, you get bad meat, you know?

• 59:30Speaker 02

  I don't know where 330,000 metric tons of beef's coming from. And it's not coming from a good, solid US plant.

• 59:39Speaker 02

  In beef, I can't remember the statistic, but over 70% or thereabouts of those workforces are trained, union shops with UFCW. The workers are high level trained. We have inspections in our plants. But overseas, that's not necessarily the case in foreign countries. I, I, I'm not necessarily running down the road to eat a hot dog from Brazil, Argentina, or Uruguay, or someone else. But if it's a good American hot dog, 4th of July, on the grill.

• 1:00:21Speaker 01

  I'm with you.

• 1:00:21Speaker 02

  I'm trying to deter anybody.

• 1:00:22Speaker 01

  I'm with you. Joe Maxwell, I can't think of anyone who could have explained it as well as you just did. And I'm grateful for that. Thank you very much for doing this.

• 1:00:31Speaker 02

  Now, thank you for having us on, Tucker. And thank you for the, thank you for the work that you do. We appreciate you and many folks out there now that are really getting to the bottom of, of what's going on. And we appreciate that.

• 1:00:42Speaker 01

  Oh, thank you. I try.

• 1:00:46Speaker 02

  I know.

• 1:00:47Speaker 01

  Thank you.

• 1:00:47Speaker 02

  Good seeing you.