584. Why Is Trump Losing Voters and Will Texas Turn Blue?

Why are these US midterms so important, and what has Rory been seeing on the ground in Ohio? Could the Democrats really flip Texas, and is Trump alienating the Hispanic voters that were crucial to his 2024 victory? If the Republicans lose control of Congress, will Trump accept the result? Rory and Alastair are joined by Issy Stanley, reporting from Texas, as they answer all these questions and more in this week’s edition of Question Time. __________ Enjoy Rory and Alastair’s interview with Michael Lewis by searching ‘Leading’ on Spotify, Apple, or YouTube. Join The Rest Is Politics Plus. Start your free trial at therestispolitics.com to unlock exclusive bonus content – including Rory and Alastair’s miniseries – plus ad-free listening, early access to episodes and live show tickets, exclusive newsletters, discounted book prices, and a private chatroom on Discord. Go deeper into the world of The Rest Is Politics by signing up for our free newsletter HERE, featuring exclusive interviews, analysis and weekend reads from Alastair and Rory. The Rest Is Politics is powered by Fuse Energy. Stop overpaying for energy. Switch at fuseenergy.com/politics and get a free TRIP+ subscription. 🌏 Upgrade your online protection with an all-in-one security app! Get an exclusive NordVPN deal + 4 months extra here ➼ nordvpn.com/restispolitics It’s risk free with NordVPN’s 30-day money-back guarantee! Sponsored by Lloyds. Learn how to avoid scams and protect yourself. See how Darkhorse® Anti-Fraud Technology helps keep you safe from fraud. Search Lloyds protect yourself from fraud. __________ Instagram: @restispolitics Twitter: @restispolitics Email: [email protected] __________ Social Producer: Bex Tyrrell Video Editor: Oli Ortega, Tom McCagherty Assistant Producer: Jake Preston, Daisy Alston-Horne Producer: Evan Green Exec Producer: Bella Soames, Nicole Maslen Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

• 0:00Speaker 00

  I'm speaking to you 20 miles from J D Vance's hometown in Middletown, Ohio. I'm right in the heart of the midterms. And with the trip team, I'm travelling through southern Ohio, down into Appalachia and West Virginia, trying to understand Trump voters, swing voters, and what might happen in the midterms. And I'm really looking forward to discussing with Alistair both the big questions around US policy and the real perplexity of trying to understand individual motivation on the ground. How does an ordinary American voter think? Do they think that much about politics? How much do they care about the kind of things that horrify me about Trump? And are the parts of the US midterms, these midterms which are so consequential for the

• 0:43Speaker 00

  world, which we barely understand, and which maybe we'll uncover a little through the conversation today? This episode is powered by Fuse Energy.

• 0:52Speaker 01

  Most energy companies are counting on you doing absolutely nothing, not questioning what you're paying, not switching, just letting your tariff roll on, which is costing you hundreds of pounds every year.

• 1:02Speaker 00

  But the apathy goes deeper than our bills. We've almost given up on energy itself. We seem to all be accepting energy is expensive, the system's outdated, but that complacency is costing us.

• 1:14Speaker 01

  Fuse Energy does not accept that because the energy transition is not something that just happens somewhere else.

• 1:20Speaker 00

  Fuse is building an energy company which is designed to bring down the cost of energy. And right now, its tariffs are up to £100 below the offgem price cap.

• 1:30Speaker 01

  So switching isn't just about paying less, it's about expecting more from your energy company, and it only takes you three minutes.

• 1:38Speaker 00

  Switch to Fuse at fuseenergy.com/politics. Use the code POLITICS and you'll get a free trip plus subscription, allowing you to hear all the extraordinary members' content that Alistair and I are now producing for you. Visit fuseenergy.com for full terms and conditions.

• 1:57Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by Nord VPN.

• 2:00Speaker 00

  We work out ways to protect ourselves from unwanted things every day.

• 2:04Speaker 01

  Okay, Rory, how do you protect yourself from small talk?

• 2:08Speaker 00

  I say, very good to you, I've got to get on to get my kids from school.

• 2:12Speaker 01

  Yeah, you also have another one that you use quite a lot, you say, I must go, I'm on Jordan time.

• 2:17Speaker 00

  I'm on Jordan time, that's good, I'm on Jordan time, I like that. Okay, how do you, how do you protect yourself from arguing with your co-host?

• 2:23Speaker 01

  I just watch you argue with other people. No, I have this tactic, when I think I'm losing my temper, I just rub my thumb, my index finger to you, that's what I do, and I just calm down.

• 2:33Speaker 00

  Yeah, that's cool.

• 2:34Speaker 01

  And how do you protect yourself from online scams?

• 2:36Speaker 00

  Well, the answer is I find Nord VPN useful for that. It's not just a VPN app. They've built in next-gen antivirus, blocks scams, phishing attacks before they reach you, so you can carry on knowing you're secure.

• 2:46Speaker 01

  To get the best discount on your Nord VPN plan, go to nordvpn.com/restispolitics. You'll get four extra months free on the two-year plan, plus a 30-day money-back guarantee. The link is in the episode description.

• 2:58Speaker 02

  Observe the North American dad. 50s, great polo collection. He enters his vehicle information on Carvana. An offer appears in minutes. Remarkable. He squints, reads it again, smiles and says, dang, that's a good offer. The highest form of approval. No haggling, no hassle, no one called him boss. He's still on the couch. Astonishing. Sell your car today on carvana.com. Pickup fees may apply.

• 3:36Speaker 01

  Welcome to the Rest is Politics question time with me, Alastair Campbell.

• 3:39Speaker 00

  And me, Rory Stewart.

• 3:41Speaker 01

  We're going to devote this entire question time to the midterms. Let's start off with this question from Lawrence. Why are these US midterms so important? And what are the key issues at play nationally and state by state? Well, we don't necessarily want to go through every single state, but I guess the reason they're important is because they're going to be a huge test of the popularity or otherwise of the Trump administration. There is a sense, I'm a little bit cautious about this, there is a sense that they are in really deep, deep, deep trouble. People are even talking about a blue wave, where the Democrats take, you know, the House

• 4:23Speaker 01

  and looking at where the money flows, it seems to me that the Republicans have pretty much given up on ever thinking they could hold the House. But in the Senate, 35 seats up for election, and the Democrats need to win a handful to get a grip on the Senate as well. And that would then change things. Trump would probably ignore it and just carry on sort of signing executive orders and doing lots of foreign policy, but it would mean that the Congress would be able to find its teeth again, and that would make a difference to America. But listen, Rory, there's no point me blathering on, you're there and you've been there for some time, so why don't you answer the question? Why is it so important and what the hell's going on?

• 5:02Speaker 00

  So firstly, on why is it so important? I've long held the view that we overemphasise the importance of the midterms because Trump doesn't do much legislation and the Democrats are never going to get a two-thirds majority to allow them to really impeach him or the kinds of super majorities to drive through their own legislation. So what they'll be able to do is create endless embullances through investigations and committees and this kind of thing, but it may not be the sea change that many Democrats are hoping for. However, it will be really interesting in places like this. So I am in Ohio. I'm speaking to you 20 miles from J D Vance's childhood home. And for those members who listen to Alistair and me do the J D Vance mini-series, in a

• 5:44Speaker 00

  sense, this was the absolute epitome of the story of left behind America, and why white working-class voters moved from Democrats to Trump, and why people who didn't have graduate degrees moved to Trump. So the story that you read in J D Vance's book is a story about the Rust Belt, you know, a town that was supported by big steelworks collapsing, particularly under pressure from China. But it's also a story about opioid epidemics, left behind America, flyover states, right? This is the Midwest. So all those elements. And I don't know, I mean, let me maybe just start with this, it's a sort of weird question

• 6:27Speaker 00

  to ask you, Alistair, but how well do you know Ohio, places like Middletown and Dayton and Cincinnati? Is that a kind of part of the states you know particularly, or is it other bits you know?

• 6:35Speaker 01

  No, where do I know? I know Maine very well.

• 6:38Speaker 00

  What would be the impression that you got if you were reading about Ohio from, you know, Hillbilly Elegy or thinking about it from, I don't know, the kind of earnest articles you read in The New Yorker or The Atlantic or The New York Times of endless journalists heading out to look at real America?

• 6:56Speaker 01

  My impression of Ohio as the pages of J D Vance is of a pretty tough, he always bangs on about the importance of the Scots-Irish influence there, but I think what you were about to tell me is related to race, isn't it? Am I right?

• 7:15Speaker 00

  Yeah, there's a big race element. I mean, it's, it's interesting, the Ohio is very white and weirdly getting whiter and less educated. It's one of the only states where that's happening. It's also a state that is very defined by towns of between sort of large towns, small cities, 15,000, 20,000, up to sort of 50,000, 60,000, lots of them. It's not a classic American huge metro against rural. But I suppose the other thing that's surprising when you're on the ground is it, it looks bloody prosperous in many bits, right? Even in the heart of what's supposed to be deep Trump country. So, you know, I was in Butler County yesterday, two-thirds voting for Trump.

• 7:58Speaker 00

  At a state level, Ohio has become very Republican, two-thirds majorities in the state, state house, Republican governors, and yet by UK standards, a lot of it looks pretty wealthy, I'm afraid. And if you just look at median incomes, they're like 25% above those of the UK. There's a lot of people driving around in fancy trucks. Compared to the UK, the property prices which people grumble about, pretty affordable. A lot of median household incomes above $100,000, and housing that you can buy for $200,000, so you can buy a house for two years of income. And that's sitting alongside pockets of terrifying poverty.

• 8:38Speaker 00

  So yesterday I was looking for people to interview in Middletown, and the most obvious way to do that, because the town centres are very, very empty. I mean, that's part of the story that maybe is an equivalent of the high street story in the UK. The main street story here is there's not a lot going on, there's not a lot of foot traffic going on in the centre of these towns. So I go out to suburbs, and one striking thing about the United States is that a lot of poverty isn't expressed in the way that it would be in a British in a city, or the way that it might be if you watch The Wire, right? It's not large apartment blocks, it's detached clapboard houses on mown lawns.

• 9:22Speaker 00

  And from the outside, it's quite difficult to tell what could be a pretty comfortable middle-class family home from quite a poor home. But it can be very surprising door to door. So if I just take one example, yesterday I went up to one of these homes and sitting on the front step was a man who I guess was about my age, smoking a crack pipe, who had very few teeth left, and who I didn't think it was appropriate to interview because he would have been too vulnerable and too out of it to do an interview. That's not something I'd normally see openly on a British doorstep.

• 9:55Speaker 01

  Interesting, yeah.

• 9:56Speaker 00

  So there's that story. And then the final thing, and I'll come back to this, is that when you're in a place where two-thirds of people are voting for Trump, what of course you're dealing with the fact is that most of these people are very normal, ordinary people. They're not in any way like MAGA, they're coming for my guns, QAnon conspiracists, Hillary Clinton's kidnapping kids. They're just, you know, I rode around with a farmer in the cab of his combine as we were taking some corn, I stayed the night in a farm, I was out with another farmer yesterday.

• 10:31Speaker 00

  These guys are just ordinary, decent, courteous, generous Americans who, for some staggering, bewildering reason that I still haven't got to the bottom of, seem to think it's okay to vote for the most disgusting, humiliating, bullying, foul-mouthed, destructive, corrupt villain in the world. And when you ask them about it, they're just like, well, yeah, you know, I don't like everything he does, but I guess all politicians are pretty corrupt and at least he's trying to clean up corruption. And yeah, maybe not be working in Iran, but at least he's trying to do the right thing. He's the first president who's tried to do anything about Iran in 30 years. And he's trying to deal with the nuclear weapons and, you know, may not be working out with the terrorists, but at least he's trying to do

• 11:14Speaker 00

  something. At least he's trying to clean up Washington. So it's really interesting. And I think it would drive you absolutely bananas, these very, very reasonable, nice people basically parroting Trump's lines.

• 11:27Speaker 01

  Have you found anybody who was a Trump supporter who is now saying, no, I've had enough? Because I'll tell you, my Rory has been in the States. He's, he has been to Ohio and he's been to Texas and he's been around in different parts of the country. And his conclusions, he said to me, thinks that the size and the strength of the Trump base is overestimated. He thinks that's an exaggerated thing. He says that on Iran, he has found nobody who really understands what the strategy is and nobody who thinks that prices are coming down, as Trump keeps saying. And the other observation he made, I'd be really interested if you agree with this, that the, the corruption issue is finally cutting through to people, that they're fine. When, when their lives felt okay, they didn't

• 12:09Speaker 01

  mind a bit of Trump doing what Trump does. But now that their lives are being hit by Iran and he's still going on about ballrooms and how much he's making in the family business and the book about Kushner, Krishna, he says that's starting to cut through. I just wonder whether that was your take as well.

• 12:24Speaker 00

  Well, I, I, I think Rory's right, but I, my guess is that what will turn out to be the case is it'll be a small percentage of people who are going to flip away from Trump. And that's all it needs to take. That's all it needs to take in somewhere like Ohio for a Democrat to become Senator, Sheriff Brown, to win the Senator race against Husted, for Amy to take out Vivek in the governor race.

• 12:47Speaker 01

  Oh, you're on, you're on, you're on first name terms with them already? Amy and Vivek?

• 12:51Speaker 00

  Yeah, exactly.

• 12:52Speaker 01

  Don't you tell our listeners of yours who Amy and Vivek are.

• 12:54Speaker 00

  No, that's, that's how all the voters talk about it. It's not, it's not me. It's how the voters talk about it, weirdly. Even people who hate Vivek Ramaswamy.

• 13:03Speaker 01

  Vivek, who was responsible for the most disgusting ad of the campaign so far.

• 13:07Speaker 00

  Yeah. Well, just a quick explainer on anybody in the world who didn't see this was absolutely unbelievable. So Vivek Ramaswamy is a businessman who is close to J D Vance, who had a go at being presidential candidate. He's a billionaire investor who had links into Cincinnati. And he is running for Republican government position that should have felt pretty safe in Ohio. And he's, it doesn't feel very safe anymore. Running against him is a candidate, Amy Acton, who was the head of public health in Ohio. She's a Democrat. She has a very, very sad personal story because when she was young, her mother married

• 13:47Speaker 00

  again and her stepfather abused her and her brother. All this recorded in court documents from when she was, when she was a child. And Vivek Ramaswamy managed to track down her mother, who seems to have been living in a car outside a church, and persuaded this woman who appears to be pretty vulnerable and who sided with Amy Acton's stepfather against her daughter, so decided to believe her partner against her daughter about this sex abuse claim, to give an interview saying, my daughter is a liar. And it's completely disgusting. I mean, you know, it's horrible playing in family politics and it's going entirely against what the court found. And it's shocked people so much. The Republican

• 14:31Speaker 00

  Senator John Husted, the incumbent Republican governor have demanded that this get taken down. But Trump has doubled down, Vivek Ramaswamy's doubled down. And it's just a sense of how kind of coarse and disgusting American politics has become. I mean, I keep coming back to this, the weirdness of the fact that these very, very nice, welcoming, moderate farmers, you know, one of the guys who invited me in was a big Rest is History listener. That's how he got in touch with me. And I actually occasionally distance the Rest is Politics. It's sort of unbelievable that this guy can be voting for Trump comfortably, given all that.

• 15:03Speaker 01

  So he's probably listening to Dominic Sandbrook's right wing propaganda. That's probably what's going on.

• 15:09Speaker 00

  So my, my, my point, I guess, is that Rory is almost certainly right, that there's absolutely no doubt that the fuel prices are pretty crazy. You know, people are saying that they're paying almost twice as much to fill their trucks. The diesel prices for farmers are terrible. So farmers is a big issue in Ohio. And I've been with farmers and they're being hit every which way by Trump on their diesel prices. The tariff war is making it difficult for them to get the prices on exports and soybeans. The deals he did with Millet on Argentinian beef are undercuffing their beef prices, et cetera, et cetera. Fertilizer costs are going up, et cetera. But my guess is most of them will still stay with the Republicans and Trump. And what Rory's identifying is a key group of voters who'll flip over, which will be very, very beneficial for the Democrats. But I'm, my guessing is Butler County is

• 15:54Speaker 00

  still voting Republican.

• 15:55Speaker 01

  Let's, um, let's bring in Izzy, who writes our newsletter. She's also in the States and she's currently in Texas. So if the technology works and Izzy can join us.

• 16:04Speaker 00

  It turns out another enormous advantage of the US ally state is that Izzy and me are coming in on massive, super fast broadband from the wealthiest country in the world. Well, it's actually pretty slow and choppy from you in London there.

• 16:16Speaker 03

  I was going to warn you that mine's been, mine's been dropping out. So, uh, yeah, America might be letting us down here.

• 16:22Speaker 01

  Yeah, it wouldn't be the first time. Izzy, Carl wants to know, what is our take on James Talarico's chances of turning Texas blue? Now, in a, just for context, Texas turning Democrat would normally be sort of considered genuinely, genuinely sort of eye opening. But Talarico does seem to be making an awful lot of impact. Elon Musk is spending an absolute fortune to try and stop him. But you're there. Tell us what you think is happening.

• 16:51Speaker 03

  Yeah. I mean, it's, it's probably the most closely watched race right now in the midterms. It's Texas hasn't elected a Democrat statewide in 30 years. It's now seeming a lot closer than that. So it's very interesting. The thing that makes it particularly interesting, the reason that I'm down here, is the Latino population. So Texas has a 40% Latino population. And in San Antonio, where I've been, it's 64%. And the New York Times this week called them America's most important swing voters. So they hold a lot of power at the minute. They hold a lot of power in the Texas race. And they have been, they've lent Democrat for sort of decades. And in 2024, there was a big swing towards Trump. Now it seems like that swing is coming back the other way and they're coming back

• 17:36Speaker 03

  towards the Democrats. So we wanted to find out, you know, why did so many Latino people vote for Trump in 2024? And what's changed since? So, I mean, I've met with people all across the political spectrum. You know, I've been with Democratic church pastors, with Republican group leaders. And the thing that you hear the most is sort of gas groceries, yes, like you were saying, same thing in Ohio. That's really hitting home. But then also crucially, it's ICE enforcement. I was in a church on Sunday and I walked in, it's a Latino congregation, and there was a woman crying in the aisle. And there was sort of a group of people around comforting her. And I said to the friar, you know, what's happened? What's going on? And he sort of looked at me like I was a bit mad and didn't

• 18:21Speaker 03

  know. And he said that the Monday before, her husband had been taken by ICE and detained. And you know, this woman, she's a grandmother, her children are the altar boys in the church, her husband doesn't have a criminal record. He's sort of a normal guy. And he's been detained in a center just south of the city and she doesn't know if or when he's going to be released. So that's happening everywhere. One in five Latinos, I think it was a recent poll, says they know someone that's been detained or deported. And it's really hitting home and really sort of taking precedent over anything else or anything that might have drawn them to Trump in 2024. So that's, yeah, that's sort of the main, the main thing that's come across. The economy, yes, but then also this, this fear that's set

• 19:06Speaker 03

  in around their families, their friends, their communities, and, and the targeting by ICE.

• 19:13Speaker 00

  One of the extraordinary things there is that. Paradoxically, this is why people assumed that Latino community wasn't going to vote for Trump. Because immigration had been absolutely, you know, he didn't make any secret of what he was going to do. This whole ICE thing was the core of his whole campaign. And yet there was a massive Latino swing towards Trump. So 2020 election, Biden 61%, Trump 36%, Democratic lead 25 points amongst Latino population. By 2024, and this is one of the reasons that I and others got it wrong, is something unbelievable happened. Harris was 51%, Trump 48%. So a 25-point Democratic lead amongst Latino fell down to a three-point lead.

• 19:57Speaker 00

  And so one of the reasons that polls and everybody got wrong is that Latinos in huge numbers swarmed to vote for Trump, right?

• 20:03Speaker 03

  Yep.

• 20:04Speaker 00

  And now you're telling us that they're very upset because it turns out that Trump is anti-immigration and pro-ICE. But that was what his whole campaign was promising.

• 20:12Speaker 03

  No, absolutely. That's, I think what makes it so interesting is, so someone that I was speaking to, she's sort of a community leader. And she was saying that 2024 was essentially a single-issue vote among Latinos. And that was on abortion and it was on culture war issues like transgender rights. Because a huge proportion of the community is Catholic, so they're very closely aligned. You know, obviously this is sweeping statements, but they're more closely aligned with the Republicans on those cultural and social issues. And they're also, for the, you know, big part, anti unchecked immigration. They don't want loads of people coming. They want it to be safe. They want their families who have been there, you know, maybe a lot for generations to have that safety. But what's happened now is it's gone beyond that.

• 20:56Speaker 03

  So this leader of the Republican group that I was speaking to, you know, she's third-generation American. Her grandparents came over from Mexico. And even she was saying that Trump has now gone too far. You know, it's reached a point where ISIS got so bold that they're parking up outside of churches on Sunday mornings and taking people in. And now it's, this friar that I met was telling me it's All Souls Day this weekend when you go and you take flowers to your loved one's graves. And people are afraid to go and do that. You know, he said that he has people asking him to take flowers to their, their children's graves. And he said, you know, I never expected part of my priesthood to be protecting my flock from my own government.

• 21:36Speaker 03

  So I think the sense is, is that yes, they, they were aligned with Trump on social issues in 2024 and on immigration in many ways in 2024. They didn't think Biden did enough, but now they just think it's gone way too far.

• 21:48Speaker 01

  The current interview that's out on leading was with Michael Lewis, who's written this book Blockers, which is partly about Elon Musk and the work of Doge. And of course, one of the chapters is about the attempts that they made to get the kind of addresses of all the illegal, undocumented people. And there's this guy who's sort of saying, no, you can't have them, but eventually they kind of, I think, get what they want. But I've, I've been fascinated to watch the way that Talarico has been, it seems to me he's really making an issue of Elon Musk's attempt to influence the race.

• 22:24Speaker 01

  Musk has pumped in 158 million into this one Senate leadership race alone for the, for the Republican candidate Paxton. Now, Tesla and SpaceX have both got big bases there, but it seems to me he's, rather than just sort of hope that it goes away. Talarico is now, he's got this wonderful line, I'm standing for every Texan who can't afford their own senator. He's making an issue of the money in politics. I just wondered whether that is something that you've picked up and whether you think actually that he's, he's turning what is, sounds like a disadvantage, big money against him, to his own advantage.

• 23:02Speaker 03

  Hugely. I mean, I think the corruption, people see it as sort of corruption at the very top of politics. And yeah, both parties on a local level, the interesting thing, if you watch sort of their adverts on, I was watching Fox News and watching their adverts. And they're almost indistinguishable. So both parties on a local level are having up the exact same thing. So social security, safe border, healthcare and eradicating corruption in politics. So they, I think, recognize there's very little mention of sort of the national parties on both sides. I think they recognize that that populist message of maybe an elite who is, you know, working against the everyday American is really catching on. And that's something that you hear a lot on the doors as well.

• 23:46Speaker 03

  I went block walking with a Democrats campaign and that was coming up a lot.

• 23:50Speaker 00

  Can I come in, can I come in, Alistair, and just see if we can develop with Izzy a sort of contrast between Ohio and Texas? Because one of the weird things about America is it's just so bloody big and it's so difficult to generalize. I mean, I find this even traveling around Ohio, you, you kind of get it into your head that industrial cities are in a particular direction. Then you turn up in Cincinnati and it turns out the Procter and Gamble has invested in regenerating it. And it's all looking quite on the rise. And then you turn up on Dayton and it's not quite clear whether you're in Connecticut or whether you're actually in, in Ohio. And then suddenly you're in Middletown where it feels like you're in Baltimore.

• 24:30Speaker 00

  So broadly speaking, we've got these two battlegrounds, which are a really good way, I suppose, of talking about how one tries to think about American politics. And in both of them, the Republicans might suffer very serious upsets and the Democrats might come through in a way that perhaps people didn't predict, particularly at the Senate level six months ago. And yet they are really, really different places. Texas has a rapidly growing population. Ohio's got a pretty stagnant population. Texas is much younger. Ohio's older. Texas, as you said, is very Latino. Ohio is very white.

• 25:05Speaker 00

  So I, I just wanted to sort of raise that and then maybe throw back to you, Alistair, about how, how on earth one thinks about unified messages and unified campaigns in a country which is quite as big and diverse as the US, where almost every state you look at, I mean, how many got on to Kentucky? Right, which went from being, you know, a moderate median state in the 1990s and is now, you know, Pikesville, Kentucky, the most Trump place in the whole of the United States, despite the fact that everybody's really poor and white and are suffering under Trump policies.

• 25:38Speaker 01

  Yeah, no, look, it is, as you say, a very, very large country.

• 25:45Speaker 01

  And the politics as you're defining in Ohio, it can change very quickly, place to place. One of the reasons why I think the Democrats are feeling a bit more confident maybe than they did is because essentially you have a national leadership. And in Trump's case, it seems to me that his messaging is all over the place. He did a, it was almost like his closing event for the campaign where he was basically, because Obama got under his skin the other day, he was attacking Obama's record. He then said this extraordinary thing about, I'm going to give everybody $5,000. And if you kept five, maybe some of you can come to Mar-a-Lago, but you can't buy very much for $5,000. Maybe a burger and a round of golf or something, you know, it's like, he, he couldn't be more out of touch.

• 26:28Speaker 01

  Whereas I think the Demo, and so for example, My Rory was saying that Obama, he is being used very, very strategically. So for example, he went to, to Michigan where Abdul al-Sayed is the subject of the most extraordinary racist campaigning. But Abdul al-Sayed does have a bit of a problem with, you know, some of the black population apparently don't like him very much. Okay, so Obama is being used there. I don't think you're going to see Obama in Texas. They use, so you have the national campaign message carrier. You use them strategically slash tactically according to specific interests. And by the way, Obama's speech in Ohio for Abdul in Michigan was pretty impressive.

• 27:13Speaker 01

  And then you do have a national message. But as, as Izzy says, what's really weird is how sometimes they can sound like very, very similar things. They're basically saying, vote for us for the same thing that the other guys say we can't deliver. But I think then what you get in America, partly because of the money, you have a lot of radio and TV advertising. But they also have massive mobilization exercises as well. So when you say, Izzy, you've been out and about doing these walking, they're, they're presumably in the key swing areas, they are covering like every sidewalk, as they call it. They're covering every area that they have to because they employ people to do that. It's just a different scale of campaigning.

• 27:54Speaker 00

  I mean, the other thing I've been picking up on is just how ruthless they can be. So in the congressional district we were in yesterday. Um, this, this, the Republican candidate, this guy called Conroy, who was meant to be taking out a Greg Lansman, who's the Democrat congressperson, and at one point looked like he was going to win. And he seemed to be central casting for the Republicans. He was a, a guy who'd been a CIA special operative and before that a special forces guy. And I'm always allowed to talk so openly about having been a CIA special operations guy. But he then dropped a couple of points behind in the polling and the Republican super PAC has pooled all his funding. He has literally no money now.

• 28:36Speaker 00

  Meanwhile, 10 million has then been moved over to Ramaswami and Ramaswami's using another 10 million to put his Amy Axon ads out. Anyway, Izzy, over to you.

• 28:45Speaker 03

  Yeah, I mean, I went on a, a block walk, which is the equivalent of, you know, door knocking in the UK. And it was fascinating because it's so different. I mean, I don't know if you guys remember at the local elections in the UK when I went out with the local Labour candidate councillor in, um, in Islington. And that was him and he was on his own, this sort of, I think he was 25 or something year old guy going up to every door. And he was very sweet, but it wasn't the most professional operation. Out here, it's, I mean, it's insane. I went with this, um, guy who, as you say, is paid to go and knock doors from 10 till 4pm every day and he'll go and he'll, that's his job. And I think the main difference is, you know, the parties have very similar messaging on a local level.

• 29:30Speaker 03

  The main difference is just from what I could see, who they blame for the problems that they have. So it's either corrupt Ken Paxton or Tala Frico, depending on which party you're in. Um, and other than that, it's just how much money can you pour into it and how much time can you spend knocking on doors?

• 29:47Speaker 00

  Corruption's a huge, huge thing here too. Um, I mean, I, I, I'm mesmerized by corruption in the US, particularly at local state level. I mean, the Ohio state situation, the, the, the kind of senior figure in the Republican state party has been put away in jail for 20 years for racketeering. So a lot of the election stuff, and, and then, as you say, Paxton's stuff is kind of eye watering. I mean, this kind of amazing sort of video of him stealing people's Montblanc pens going through X-rays and things. It's a kind of really kind of colorful, mad stuff that again, it was, British democracy feels very tame by comparison. And, and again, this point about all the ads being the same, everything in Ohio, they're, they're all being attacked for supporting data centers.

• 30:32Speaker 00

  It's both Republicans and Democrats, the ads running against them as this guy supported a data center. They, they all obviously were supporting data centers two, three years ago. Now it's considered toxic, so they're all using that against each other.

• 30:44Speaker 01

  This thing about, about the money, so, and these super PACs, and of course, you know, you've got people like Talarico who's saying, we're going to get, we need to get rid of all the, the sort of super PAC stuff. But the one that's controlled by the Republican Party leadership, they have been pulling funding. You said there, Rory, they pull, they just pull the funding when they think the guy's just not going to win it. They, they were not going to waste any more money on a losing candidate. They've been pulling out, according to my Rory, they've been pulling out money from Republican-held districts in Nebraska, Iowa, New Jersey, and in one district that Trump won by 18 points, they're spend, now spending money.

• 31:23Speaker 01

  Now, so that does suggest that, that they're spending money in Nebraska, they're spending money in Kansas, uh, they've spent $5 million in South Carolina for Lindsey Graham's sister. Um, now, they may, they may just have so much money that they can sort of shovel it out everywhere, but what you're saying is they're actually normally very ruthlessly targeting with their money. They spend money where they think they might be losing. Um, so that does suggest that they're panicking a bit. So come on, I'm going to put you both on the spot. Who's going to win in Ohio, Rory, and who's going to win in Texas, Izzy? You've been there long enough, you're going to know, you've got to tell me.

• 32:04Speaker 00

  Well, um, look, again, it's all about turnout, says he going with a big cop out. But if the turnout happens in the way in which people anticipate, we're going to see a massive upset in Ohio. So current polling suggests that this state, which was Republican, I mean, it went from being the great hinge state, the bellwether state, which was won by Clinton and Obama and predicted every presidential election from the 1960s through. Suddenly something happened under Trump and it went very Republican. And we ended up with these, you know, two thirds majority in the state legislatures and things. It looks as though if the polls are right, that's going to change. They might actually lose the governorship. Amy Axon might take the governorship.

• 32:50Speaker 00

  Sherrod Brown looks like he's on course to come back in as a senator. And we could see some real upsets at the state level too. So that, that's what people are saying. I think, um, uh, I'm going to be careful about letting my optimism get away with myself and getting in too hard behind the polls this time around. But over to Izzy.

• 33:10Speaker 03

  Yes, I mean, you two have always told me that predictions are a fool's game. So I will not be drawn into predicting the outcome of the, uh, the Texas elections. It, polling currently has it neck and neck. Um, something that I did, someone told me that was interesting is that in 2024, you know, people voted for Trump at the top of the ballot, but actually as you went further down, it was more blue in places. So, you know, that suggests that at the midterms, there could be more different results during 2024. But yes, I will, I will not be making my prediction after three days in Texas.

• 33:43Speaker 00

  Um, Alison, should we take, and Izzy, take a quick break because there's some great listener questions, which we can come back to after the break.

• 33:50Speaker 03

  And just before I leave you guys, um, I'm going to be writing about this in more detail in the newsletter. And then I'm also going after this to Louisiana, which is one of the poorest states in the US and then Chicago. Um, so we're going to be doing lots of dispatches. Rory's also going to be doing a, a diary. So look out for that in the newsletter and sign up if you haven't already. And you can do that at therestispolitics.com/newsletter.

• 34:16Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Lloyds. In today's political climate, it's increasingly difficult to tell what's true and what isn't. And actually, if you think about it, that goes a very, very long way beyond politics.

• 34:27Speaker 01

  It's also a strategy for a lot of people. Musk, for example, he trades in misinformation. Some of the most important and powerful politicians in the world trade in misinformation. It is really, really hard to work out how you find out what's true.

• 34:40Speaker 00

  And if you think about it, it's, it's media influencers, it's also fraud. It's, it's crime. Uh, we're in a world in which so much is getting weaponized in different directions.

• 34:51Speaker 01

  It's all getting so much more sophisticated. So it's great to see Lloyds contracting this with 100 million pounds worth of investment in their dark horse anti-fraud technology. They use intelligent monitoring and real time alerts to keep an eye on transactions for unusual behavior. And last year, Lloyds prevented more than one billion pounds of attempted fraud.

• 35:10Speaker 00

  Visit lloydsbank.com to find out more about how Lloyds protects you from fraud. Based on Lloyds Banking Group data, 2023 to 2025.

• 35:20Speaker 04

  What if you could run your Oracle databases everywhere you run your business? Good news, you can. Oracle AI database runs in every major cloud, so you can use your live data for all your AI and analytics needs. Learn more at oracle.com/migrate.

• 35:37Speaker 04

  Oh, you sound horrible.

• 35:38Speaker 05

  Oh, I feel worse. This flu is not playing around. Dad, you promised you'd be in my band and it's showtime. Then it's Dayquil Intense Flu time.

• 35:48Speaker 06

  For fast and powerful relief of your flu symptoms, try Dayquil Intense Flu.

• 35:52Speaker 05

  Hit it. Yeah.

• 35:54Speaker 06

  Dayquil Intense Flu, the fast-acting daytime coughing, aching, aching, aching fever power through your flu medicine. Use it directly, keep out of reach of children.

• 36:09Speaker 00

  Welcome back to the Rest is Politics question time with me Rory Stewart.

• 36:13Speaker 01

  And me, Alastair Campbell. Now, you mentioned data centers before, and I think I said to you a couple of weeks ago, this Republican strategist, you said he'd never known an issue like data centers for uniting a different coalition of people against them and as a result against AI right now. Amy, data centers have been a huge part of this campaign. Are data centers actually a political flashpoint?

• 36:39Speaker 00

  Well, I mean, the first thing is this weird thing that we were discussing just before the break, which is how both parties are using data centers to attack their opponents. The second thing is I was out in Wilmington, Ohio, uh, on the site of a data center. It's very difficult to generalize, but a lot of this is about the fact that the data centers are placed in places where you have, uh, good access to electricity substations and sewerage. And that is a shorthand for saying you dump the data centers right next to people's houses and schools. Um, and so we're literally standing in a brand new housing estate where people have

• 37:20Speaker 00

  spent $400,000 buying houses, which was supposed to be looking over an agricultural field. And now the farmers just sold the field for $88 million to Amazon. And there is a huge factory site about to go in, you know, about 50 yards, as far as one can see from your, uh, sort of back door. You're going to be sitting right on top of an industrial facility. And so as you can imagine, the residents are furious, although one of the residents weirdly wasn't, one of the residents whose house was about to be right next to it was very pro data center. And there's a lot of questions about industrial zoning and how much benefit people are or are not going to get. And you have these very, very strange coalitions coming together.

• 38:04Speaker 00

  So the man that is standing there with us in Wilmington. Uh was a former tech employee uh who had grown an enormous white beard. So he basically looked like a hippie, but he actually was the sort of, he's become a professional Santa Claus. One of the ways in which he gets employed is as a professional Santa Claus. Now, he's leading a part of the campaign against this data center.

• 38:32Speaker 01

  So does that mean he just works one week, one week every year?

• 38:35Speaker 00

  Yeah, it doesn't sound like a great job to me.

• 38:37Speaker 01

  That's not a full-time job.

• 38:38Speaker 00

  No, it doesn't sound like a great job, although actually I think in America, Christmas goes on for many, many months. I think in the new marketing of the United States, you can probably run for a good three, four months in Ohio.

• 38:49Speaker 00

  And, and I think he's also an example of, you know, who is the American voter, right? So this guy, he says he's teased for being a socialist communist Republican. So he was very, you know, much on the pro-Israel side. He thought that Ilhan Omar, who is a Somali-born woman, who's the congressman representative from Minnesota, is an illegal migrant who needs to be, you know, it's a real kind of racist stuff. But then he also said he wasn't sure he was very comfortable with Trump. He also looked like a kind of sixty-eight hippie. He also was very pro-transgender. He was relaxed about gay rights. So, I mean, you know, I, I, I do think, you know, without, as usual, overcomplicating everything,

• 39:34Speaker 00

  the idea that it's easy, even in Ohio, to find a kind of classic voter, even around data centers, is pretty difficult. Um, what's your sense of this data center stuff? Because this covenant, you talked about it with the budget.

• 39:46Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 39:47Speaker 00

  Um, I'm not quite sure how to read what Andy Burnham's just done there. And I'd, I'd love just a second from you on that, because that covenant could be an amazing way of accelerating data center building, which is, I suppose, the way the government would spin it. But it also could be like a charter for all communities around the country to say, no, sorry, you know, we've got nothing against data centers in principle, but it doesn't meet the following regulatory standards here, so no, you can't have it here.

• 40:18Speaker 01

  Yeah, I think, I think it's an attempt to do two seemingly contradictory things. One, to show the people that if we are going to develop the modern economy that we say we want to do, then we are going to have to get into this AI world, whether you like it or not. Data centers and sovereignty, he talked about sovereignty on this, they are going to be part of that. So you have to make that argument first, and then I think they're trying to say, we will have, the covenant idea is that it will be incumbent upon the AI companies to adhere to certain standards that are set by government.

• 40:58Speaker 01

  So I guess it is the beginning of the opening of the door to some sort of regulation, which of course the, in the States, they don't want. So a lot of the complaints you see in the, in the United States, there was a huge piece in one of the newspapers the other day, where people just feel because AI, because Trump's basically saying AI is the future, we've got to lead the world, they can do what they want. They're literally just getting planted here, there and everywhere. Now, some of them have been rejected, but it then depends on local politics. So I think what Andy Burnham's trying to do is to have a standard, a standard that these companies have to meet. And then, and I do think it's interesting, this idea that they, they can either, if they're connected to the grid, fine, but, and then they're going to, you know, have to pay for that, or they generate their own, their own uh energy,

• 41:43Speaker 01

  and that again, subject to standards that fit the, are broad rate environmental objectives. So I think, I think that's what it's about, but all I know is what John Healy said in the budget on, on Wednesday.

• 41:54Speaker 00

  Here's a question for you from Francesca. Why is US political advertising so unhinged? I mean, we've been sitting here watching a lot of ads. We've been sitting in sports bars with the, which has had Fox Sports on and the ads, I mean, we talked about Amy Acton. And then there's the ads against Vivek Ramaswamy. He's accused of being a fraudster who tried to sell a fraudulent Alzheimer drug. You know, I don't think he's been convicted of any of this stuff. I mean, these allegations are so close to libelous, being made by both sides of political spectrum, and are so much rawer, more personal than anything we ever see in the UK.

• 42:31Speaker 01

  I'd love to know what, what effect they actually have. I think part of the problem is that, I mean, American advertising has always been pretty unhinged in parts. Um, but I wonder, given that Trump is the loudest voice in American and global politics, and given that he is unhinged a lot of the time, and ever more extreme, it becomes harder and harder and harder to get attention without going beyond the extremities that you've already passed. Now, funnily enough, the, the only advertising I've seen in this, I've, I've been, I haven't seen as much as you because I'm not there, but I've been following some of it. Some of the adverts that Talarico has done in Texas have been absolutely stunning, stunning pieces of work.

• 43:15Speaker 01

  Beautifully filmed, beautifully set, really strong messaging. Um, and even though, even when he's attacking, he's a bit like Burnham on this, even when he's attacking, he comes over as saying something positive. Now, do, does, in answer to the question, why they sound unhinged, why are they so negative? Because historically, negative campaigning in American politics has been shown to be more effective, unless somebody comes along who does the positive campaigning well, as Bill Clinton did, as Barack Obama did, as James Talarico is doing. So I think it, I, I think we shouldn't get too worried about, when you're in these bars, how much are the people in these bars even watching what's on? Are they even noticing it?

• 43:59Speaker 00

  Not paying any attention. They're watching the sport, they're having a beer, this stuff comes on, and I, I don't think they pay any attention at all. Not least because I think the, it, it, it's the same ad being run in every break. So how can you watch the same Vivek Ramaswamy attack on Amy Acton replayed, you know, eight times in a sports game? You're not going to watch it every time, are you? It's, it's really weird.

• 44:25Speaker 01

  But they have, again, they, they raise so much money. They, look, the ad, the advertising spend, you can relate it. And if you go back to historically through presidential elections, the advertising spend definitely has an impact on the outcome. I think there's no doubt about that. But I wouldn't say that just because some of the ones that we see are relentlessly horrible, unhinged, to use the word that was in the question, is question. I still think that positive messaging has a place. And I'm hoping that those guys who've been identified as positive messaging messengers are going to win. I actually think some of Abdul Al-Sayed's communications has been phenomenal.

• 45:06Speaker 01

  Uh, I think we mentioned last week, that guy Tommy, who turned up clearly trying to get him going, and he just turned it beautifully into, he exposed the guys are racist without calling him a racist. James Talarico, really check out Talarico's ads, they're very, very, very smart, really professionally done. And they carry a sense of positivity, which I just think, I think there's more of a market for that than people think.

• 45:28Speaker 00

  I think the sad thing, of course, is that some of Kamala Harris's ads were very positive and warm and beautifully put together. And I thought some of the communication that we saw around the Democratic Congress was very positive. And it's interesting here that when I talk to people about why Kamala Harris didn't win, the story that I'm hearing from almost everybody is that Biden clung on too long and that there wasn't a primary. What I'm not hearing anymore is that she was too woke, too Californian, that she wasn't a good candidate. So much of the blame is now being put on Biden and the, the lack of a primary, that they sort of, I'm almost suggesting if Biden had gone earlier and that Kamala Harris had won a primary, she would have had a decent chance against Trump.

• 46:11Speaker 00

  The, the other statistic I keep worrying about in, in relation to your negative ad point is that in uh, a poll done in nineteen sixty-four, roughly seventy-seven percent of Americans trusted the government in Washington to do what is right, just about always or most of the time. Right, three quarters of Americans, three quarters of Americans. And today, the number is seventeen percent. Seventeen percent of people trust. So presumably, one contributor to that is if every ad you see is saying that the two main candidates are corrupt dishonest crooks

• 46:55Speaker 00

  over fifty years. That really, I mean, and this feeds into the, you know, this narrative I keep hearing when I'm saying that how can you possibly support Trump, which is the question I sort of want to get on to now. So many of them say, well, they're all the same, aren't they? So let me come on to this. This is a question from Jim, which is literally that. How can people possibly vote for Trump? And I want to try to bring you into this because I mean, you must kind of feel my pain. It's really weird, right? The, this is a guy who, I mean, we can't even remember the things that he's done. You know, it's beating Mark Carney with an ice hockey stick. It's Greenland. It's setting up something

• 47:39Speaker 00

  called Alligator Alcatraz for immigrants in Florida. It's ICE. It's NATO. It's cozying up to Putin. It's defunding the universities. It's cozying up to Musk. It's making money off shifts in the oil price. It's an irresponsible war in Iraq. It's so disgusting and horrible, right? And yet here I am, sitting with these very nice, decent Americans who are just like, yeah, well, I guess, you know, I don't agree with everything he does, but I'm going to be voting for him. Over to you.

• 48:11Speaker 01

  Well, what, so what, what I think it is, is that he, this is something Michael Lewis talked about, not in the interview that's out this week, but the first time. He said he's got this visceral connection to other people's anger. He's such an angry man, deep inside. And Mary Trump, I mean, I love that interview with Mary Trump, because I think it was the best explanation of the kind of sheer emptiness inside him. But he's got, he is an extraordinary communicator. He's got energy. And you say they're in these sports bars with, with Fox Sports on there, but an awful lot of the MAGA base, so I think Rory's right, that it's probably exaggerated in terms of its intensity now, but they're

• 48:52Speaker 01

  listening to these, to Fox News and these right wing talk shows all day long. They're getting this stuff at them all day long. And they're getting relentless propaganda in one direction. Added to which, for most of them, politics is probably playing a fairly slight part in their lives. I don't know if you're getting that sense, but okay, there's an election going on, but they don't, it's not the most political nation in the world. It's not like Europe, where people tend to talk about politics all the time. But the other thing, where you need to get a bit of hope, Rory, I mean, because you sounds to me like you're just, you're going out there looking for people who agree with you about Trump, but you're not finding enough of them, right? But he's going into these

• 49:33Speaker 01

  elections, he's going into these elections with the, as the least popular president. The only one who even got close for about a few weeks was Harry Truman. Okay. Seventy five percent of voters rate the economy negatively. Seventy three percent think he's handling gas prices wrongly. Disapproval, disapproval on cost of living, sixty nine. Disapproval on Iran, sixty five. Disapproval on the economy, sixty four. And the other thing, this goes back to what Izzy was talking about. Before, he managed to get this coalition, which was founded, a lot of it on Latino voters, and young voters and first time voters. He's way behind on all of them. Latino voters, minus thirty eight. Voters under thirty, minus

• 50:16Speaker 01

  sixty three. And his approval rates, even amongst the white, white, working class, non-college educated people, which was at sixty six percent, it's now down at fifty one. And strong approval, that's people who are absolutely going to vote for him, it's only at thirty five. And then you go through all the issues, he's way behind. So I think there's a disconnect, which, now, the one thing, the only thing I'd say is, I think he has always out polled the polls, that is true. But I think there was a point where he was an asset on the ballot. I think he's now become a liability. It's why you don't see these candidates, you don't

• 50:58Speaker 01

  see many of them demanding that Trump come to help them out in the campaign. They're wishing him to stay away.

• 51:04Speaker 00

  The, the Pew voting, top voting issues in the midterms, they list the economy up in like eighty eight, eighty two to eighty eight percent.

• 51:13Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 51:14Speaker 00

  Of voters. It's a future of democracy, high for Democrats, less high for Republicans, but number two. Healthcare, high for Democrats, but only about fifty percent of Republicans does it really matter. Education, and then immigration. And then you're coming down quite steeply. And foreign policy, just over half of voters care about compared to sort of eighty percent on the economy. I guess that kind of makes sense. But when it gets down to investigations into Trump and his administration, only seven percent of Republican candidate supporters care about it at all.

• 51:52Speaker 01

  Yeah, yeah.

• 51:54Speaker 00

  Woke issues are well down this time. Policies related to gay, lesbian, transgender people. Don't feature much for either Republicans or Democrats. So, you know, I think that's probably what, you know, Rory's picking up, your Rory's picking up when he's going around saying that this increasing cost of living. I wonder whether there isn't a phenomenon of the shy, the shy anti-Trump voter. You remember, we always used to talk about the shy Trump voter who wasn't being picked up in the polls. I wonder whether you're not, whether with some of these people, they, because being a Republican for the last ten years has been being a Trump Republican, and it's become quite tribal. And it's a big cost emotionally to say, I'm going to defect away. And you've become associated with defending

• 52:39Speaker 00

  Trump for ten years. So it's quite difficult to say to a visiting British podcaster that the guy's a monster. But maybe quietly, you might not turn out, you might not vote because you're pissed off about these things, but you're not really prepared to say it to the British podcaster. How about that? The, the secret anti-Trump.

• 52:58Speaker 01

  If you go back to what we were talking about in the main episode about those elections, a lot of it was about mobilization and motivation. So the Arab, the people voting for the Arab parties who may be in previous elections set us out, the people in the Lula second, second round of the election who thought, no, I'm really worried about Bolsonaro, I'm coming out. I think if the Democrats really can mobilize and really can motivate, they should be pretty strong. The last poll that Rory sent me, by the way, was from Fox News of all people. And it listed, they had the top issue, eighty eight percent of voters were concerned, this was a list which included kind of everything you've listed, was, was corruption. Interestingly. Now, that's a relatively new thing. And I think that's

• 53:41Speaker 01

  what he meant by corruption's cut through. And it didn't matter when things were good.

• 53:46Speaker 00

  That's, that's really interesting, because that's, that wasn't showing, wasn't showing in the Pew research. So that's really interesting. It's coming through. A final question from Susie, which I'd, I'd love some thoughts on is, if the Democrats do well in the midterms, what lesson will they draw in terms of the kind of candidate they're going to run for the presidency? And I guess maybe what Susie's getting to is, does this, will this convince the Democrats that the strategy is to go more Bernie AOC? Or is the strategy going to be go more of the kind of middle of the road, centrist stuff that we were getting from Jim Heinz when we were interviewing him, the, the Connecticut congressman who we're interviewing? Which, which direction are we going to see the Democratic Party going, do you think?

• 54:29Speaker 01

  Well, the truthful answer is, we don't know, because they have yet, I think, to, to, to come together and make that strategic decision. And you've seen in this campaign, you've seen some very different styles of campaigning from different leaders. You've seen some very different, you know, in terms, I mentioned the, the strategic use of Obama. But likewise, where Bernie Sanders is going, where AOC is going, there are some national figures who are not necessarily, to me, I don't get a sense of where this is going to head. And I think that's a problem. I think that's a real problem. I wish to hell they could just decide and get on with it. And I'll tell you the other worry I have for the Democrats if they do well. And they're going to get, Congress will, you know, get

• 55:12Speaker 01

  its teeth back and it will have a purpose again, because Trump has absolutely just sort of, you know, made the thing a bit of a, I don't know what it is, I don't know how it even sees itself right now. I would worry if the Democrats, I understand, will understand the temptation just to make the whole thing about Trump and his family and corruption. And that is a big issue and they should go for it. But if the whole of America thinks that is all that they care about, is kind of getting revenge because they can, they've got the chance to do it. I think that would, that might backfire. Ultimately, they do have to have an agenda. They've got to have an agenda for the economy. They've got to have an agenda for America's place in the world. And Trump, in a way, is giving them it. He's giving them it because not being, I am absolutely convinced that once Trump is gone.

• 55:57Speaker 01

  Reasonable decent people, including some of the people that you say are reasonable and still say they're voter, I think they will have a think, there'll be a real collective, what the hell was that about? What on earth was that about for our country? And so I think what would be far better-

• 56:10Speaker 00

  Well, we've got to hope, except Alastair. Well- Except, let me push back on that. I mean, that's what we all thought would happen after 2016. We all thought in 2020, these people are going to come to their senses. They're going to be like, what the hell was that about? And then he's convicted of seven felonies and January the sixth-

• 56:25Speaker 01

  The Democrats fucked it up, the Democrats screwed it up.

• 56:28Speaker 00

  And we're just like, okay, you know, the United States had a momentary aberration. These Republicans are going to come to their senses. The Congressman of the Senate is going to repudiate Trumpianism and MAGA stuff and America's going to regain its senses. Instead of which, they elect the guy in by kind of thumping, he takes the Senate, takes the Congress, wins the popular vote, and all the senators and congressmen just roll over. So I'm much less confident. I think we've got a JD, potential JD Vance run with still a lot of MAGA elements behind it.

• 56:58Speaker 01

  Yeah, maybe, but I don't, JD Vance can't do what Trump does in terms of public connection. I just don't think he can do it. But, no, but the, look, you're absolutely right. It is, but don't underestimate the role that the Democrats played in allowing that to happen. And that is why I say, in the end, this is about the Democrats getting their act together. They have got to get their act together. They have got to get the right leader for these times. They've got to decide who that is. And that could be a big battle. They've got to have that battle and somebody has to emerge from that. But I, I, I sort of, I feel that there'll be, I think rather than having a kind of Congress inquiry into

• 57:37Speaker 01

  this, inquiry into that, you almost want a sort of a commission of inquiry into the state of American democracy, rule of law, role of the media, just a bigger picture thing, where you don't make it all about Trump. If you make it all about Trump, I think the Democrats will be making a mistake post midterms. Trump will do what he does. Trump will probably become crazier on the foreign policy field because he won't want to deal with Congress. But I think that the, the body politic has got, surely got to face up to the damage that has been done to America. The fact that you and I, every audience we do, by the way, have you done any American audiences yet where you've asked

• 58:18Speaker 01

  them about America and China? I did one the other day, asking which is the greatest threat to global stability. I promise you, Rory, it was 95% said America, you know. The, the damage he's done to their soft power around the world is off the scale.

• 58:36Speaker 00

  But, but the most worrying thing you said, to finish on, is that, as you say, potentially what happens is that he loses the midterms and rather than this meaning, a kind of Trump who is more moderate, neutered, crippled, lame duck, it's instead a Trump who causes more chaos in foreign policy, because the midterms is out the way, he doesn't have anything to lose, and he's not going to be able to get much of his domestic agenda through. So potentially, we could have a story which sounds like good news for those of us who think Trump is a real clear and present danger of the Democrats doing one of the midterms, but bad news, because actually Trump may turn out to damage the world more over the next two years than he has in the previous two years, which is quite difficult to envision.

• 59:19Speaker 00

  Anyway, thank you, Alastair. I'm now, you know, as Izzy heads up towards the only former industrial heartland of the United States and the kind of big manufacturing cities, I'm heading into the hills. I'm going in reverse in JD Vance's family history from Middletown back into West Virginia and the Kentucky Appalachian hills, these smaller, very, very white communities, some of the poorest parts of the United States, small villages, small towns, very, very deep, deep Trump country, and asking the questions there about a very different type of United States. So when we come back to you with the midterm results in a week's time, you'll have, I hope, lots of different bits of the United States being presented to you by the trip team.

• 1:00:05Speaker 00

  Very good. And, and just to follow up, as Izzy's mentioned, she's writing in the newsletter, for those who haven't signed up, and go to restlesspolitics.com forward session newsletter. It is getting better and better and better, that newsletter. So Izzy's going to be writing detailed stuff on her journeys. I'm going to be writing again next week, a midterm diary about all of this. And I hope listeners appreciate what we're doing, which is getting out of the kind of big abstractions into pretty granular stuff. We know, I'm in a better position now to tell you about the micro-differences between voting in Wilmington, Cincinnati, Dayton, I can take you congressional district by congressional district, while Alastair tries to keep the big picture in mind.

• 1:00:46Speaker 01

  Exactly, exactly. All right, Rory, I'll see you next week when we'll know the results and we'll be doubtless finding a time to talk about them. See you soon.

• 1:00:55Speaker 00

  Thank you very much. Bye-bye.

• 1:01:05Speaker 02

  Honey, that flu keeping you up? Yeah, I don't got this. You need Nyquil Intense Flu.

• 1:01:11Speaker 06

  Undo your flu symptoms with Nyquil Intense Flu. The nighttime sniffling, aching, aching fever, best sleep with a flu medicine. You do got this. Use as directed. Keep out of reach of children.