Pod Insights Speaking of Psychology Why numeracy counts in everyday life, with Ellen Peters, PhD About this episode From deciding whether to buy a house to weighing the risks and benefits of taking a new medication, many important life decisions hinge on understanding numbers, statistics and probability. Ellen Peters, PhD, author of “Innumeracy in the Wild: Misunderstanding and Misusing Numbers” discusses what it means to be numerate; how numeracy
affects people’s health, financial security and other life outcomes; and how can you improve your confidence and ability with numbers.
Please take our listener survey at at.apa.org/SoPSurvey.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:00 Speaker 00 This episode is brought to you by Indeed. You're ready to level up your business, but the pressure to find the right person to make that happen is intense. Indeed sponsored jobs can help carry the load. It boosts your job post to help it reach quality talent fast. Cut through the chaos with Indeed sponsored jobs. Get a $75 sponsored job credit at indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring now? Then this is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.
0:30 Speaker 01 Visible puts the ultimate wireless hack in the palm of your hand. With unlimited 5G wireless data and hotspot designed to keep you connected. Powered by Verizon's 5G network. And no contract holding you back. Plans start at $25 a month. Or get the premium Visible Plus Pro Plan and save $10 on your first month when you use promo code HACK. Make the switch at visible.com. Terms apply. See visible.com for details.
1:00 Kim Mills? It's hard to make good decisions if you don't understand numbers. Whether it's choosing a health insurance plan, deciding whether to buy a house, or weighing the risks and benefits of taking a new medication. Many important life decisions hinge on understanding numbers, statistics, or probability. Today, we're going to talk to a psychologist who studies how people process numbers, perceive risk, and make decisions about what it means to be numerate and why numeracy matters. We'll discuss how common innumeracy is and how it affects people's health, financial security, and other life outcomes. We'll also talk about how you can improve your confidence and ability with numbers,
1:42 Kim Mills? even if you're many years past your last high school math class. Welcome to Speaking of Psychology, the flagship podcast of the American Psychological Association that examines the links between psychological science and everyday life. I'm Kim Mills.
2:00 Kim Mills? My guest today is Dr. Ellen Peters, Director of the Center for Science Communication Research at the University of Oregon, and a professor in the Department of Psychology and the School of Journalism and Communication. She studies how people understand numerical information, perceive risk, and make decisions. She also studies how doctors, public officials, and other communicators can present numerical information in a way that helps people understand it better. Dr. Peters is an APA Fellow and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. She's the author of hundreds of peer-reviewed academic papers and of the 2020 book, "Innumeracy in the Wild: Misunderstanding and Misusing Numbers." Dr. Peters, thank you for joining me today.
2:43 Speaker 03 Kim, it's a pleasure to be here. Thanks for inviting me.
2:47 Kim Mills? Let's start, as we often do on this podcast, with a definition. What does it mean to be numerate or innumerate? How do you measure people's numeracy?
2:57 Speaker 03 So, we call it objective numeracy because it has to do with how well people answer problems in a math test. So, objective numeracy is the ability to understand and use basic probability and mathematical concepts. And so, it's kind of like numeracy is to numbers, like literacy is to words.
3:17 Kim Mills? Now, what are some of the most common ways that math and numbers come up in everyday life? And how well do people understand these things?
3:24 Speaker 03 Oh, gosh. So, numbers come up in all kinds of ways. So, I often work with people in health. I work with physicians or folks in public health, and it comes up when it comes to prescription drugs you take, for example. And even in a couple of different ways. So, just with prescription drugs alone, numbers come up when it comes to how likely you are to benefit from the drug or how likely you are to suffer from side effects. But numbers also come up when it comes to you figuring out, "When do I need to order my next round of medication?" And so, there's kind of numbers all over the place. All kinds of other hazards, too. We've been looking a bit lately at wildfire risks, for example, and other kinds of natural hazards.
4:09 Speaker 03 And the numeric information involved helps people better understand, "How likely might I end up in a situation like this?"
4:17 Kim Mills? And how do they figure that out? I mean, what kind of data do you get to make that determination when we're talking about, say, wildfires?
4:24 Speaker 03 So with wildfires, it's often more visual. So it's a map. But sometimes that map will also come with a likelihood of how likely is my area, for example, to be at wildfire risk? So I know, for example, that there's an area of town that's quite near my daughter's house that's at a higher risk of wildfire than some of the rest of our city. So we can find out numerically, well, how likely is the risk at her house versus some other part of town?
4:55 Kim Mills? How common is innumeracy among US adults? And are there differences based on sex or other demographics?
5:04 Speaker 03 Yeah, so innumeracy is fairly common. It turns out that about a third of working age adults in the United States perform at what's considered the lowest proficiency level in innumeracy. And so in some ways, you can actually consider this about a third of working age adults functionally innumerant. They can't do things, for example, or likely would not be able to do things, for example, like calculating the difference in percentages of patients who survive one treatment compared to another. They don't have the math skills that are necessary to understand that that kind of information. And it's not that they can't do anything with numbers. These are often very smart people, but when it comes to numbers, they just they don't have a lot of abilities.
5:49 Speaker 03 So they can do things, they can do sort of simple processes with numbers, like counting and sorting the numbers, or doing very simple arithmetic, like simple addition, for example.
5:58 Kim Mills? And it's not just a question of whether you can do it in your head, right? I mean, even if you need a piece of paper, it's just that you understand the relationships and you can make calculation?
6:06 Speaker 03 Yeah, exactly. So when we give an innumeracy test to people, for example, a lot of people do the math problems in their head, but they don't have to. They could actually pull out a piece of paper and try to figure it out. And it is the case, you asked this a minute ago, and I kind of missed the question, but it is the case that some systematic differences in innumeracy exist across the population. So you see things like Like women tend to be less numerate than men, controlling for other characteristics of them. But there are other things too. We actually tend to become less numerate as we age. So as our minds slow down, our abilities with numeric processes that we haven't memorized. Because if you've memorized them, you've stored them in long-term memory. But if it's a new information that you have to actually process,
6:50 Speaker 03 that's the kind of numeracy that tends to decline as we age. Less numerate people are also more likely to be lower in income, to have minority status, and of course, to have lower education. That's actually one of the reasons I really value studying numeracy, because understanding numeracy and understanding how people process numbers also ends up being associated with understanding how we understand inequities that exist across our society.
7:18 Kim Mills? So how does numeracy compare with literacy? Are they on the same level? Are we as illiterate as we are innumerate in this country?
7:28 Speaker 03 Yeah, it's a good question. So it's a little hard to compare them. But the comparisons that I've seen are that we are more innumerate than we are illiterate. And you can almost even see that just in how people talk about it. People are quite embarrassed to be illiterate. They don't want to admit it, but everybody's willing to admit that they're innumerate. Like, I'm just bad at math and anyone could... And it's sort of an indication that innumeracy perhaps is more common, but it's also an indication that people might not understand how important it is and how important it is to be able to process numbers well in our information-rich society.
8:06 Kim Mills? How do we compare with other countries? Are, like, other European countries or Asian or African countries, are they as innumerate as we are in this country? I mean, one-third is a pretty high number.
8:16 Speaker 03 Yeah, it is a pretty high number. So the last data that I know about are back in 2020. And there's more recent data available, but I don't know what the cross-country comparisons are. But back in 2020, we tended to be on the less numerate side. So if you look just at the proportion of people, for example, who are in that very low... Um, that those very low numeracy levels. Um, a- at that point in time, the US had about twenty-nine percent of people in that very low numeracy levels. Um, countries like Italy were similar. They had thirty-two percent in that least numerate. Spain had thirty-one percent. Um, but then some other countries, um, and remember, we're comparing to the US at twenty-nine percent.
8:58 Speaker 03 Japan had only eight percent of people, uh, in that least numerate. Finland, only thirteen percent. Same with the Czech Republic, uh, as well as the Netherlands. And so that there actually are quite a few countries who are more numerate than the United States is.
9:12 Kim Mills? And is this a failure of our educational system? Or is there something else going on?
9:17 Speaker 03 Personally, I think it is about our education system. When I talked about the proportion of least numerate people in countries, we're talking about the people who are at the very lowest levels of math ability. You can also look at the other side. And we have a lot of extremely numerate people in the United States. Um, but we also ha- so we have these big disparities of numeracy in the US. We also have big disparities in our educational systems. And so to me, what it looks like is that our educational systems are failing portions of our population who end up being less numerate.
9:49 Kim Mills? What are some of the most common errors that people make when they're trying to understand numerical information?
9:55 Speaker 03 Not spending enough time on it. Just simply not looking at the numbers for very long, not trying to transform a number from one way of looking at it to another. And let me, let me give you an example of that. So what, one of the things that we study, um, i- in my field of judgment and decision making is something called framing effects. So framing effect is like ninety percent of people will survive if they get this treatment. Or in the alternative frame, ten percent of people will, will perish if they get this treatment. And they are logically equivalent. Ninety percent surviving versus ten percent, um, dying is the exact same number. But what happens is to be able to understand that, you actually have to do that math. You actually have to take the ninety percent survival and say, oh,
10:40 Speaker 03 that means that ten percent of the people die. But a lot of people, even if they can do that math, they don't do it. They just don't. Tend to look at the numbers and think about them. They don't, people who are less numerate in particular, just don't have the same habits with numbers that people who are highly numerate do. Someone who's highly numerate will look at the 90% survival and more or less, I would, in fact, I would bet that you more or less automatically transformed it. The minute I said 90% survival, you thought 10% dying. Not everybody does. Those kind of math operations aren't as easily accessible to them and they're a little bit harder and so they're just simply more likely to walk away from them. And so I think those are some of the biggest errors that people make. They don't put in the time and it is a little more effort
11:25 Speaker 03 for them. And so as a result, they end up using other information that's not as helpful. So if they're given, if they're told about a treatment that has, where they have a 10% chance of dying, they're going to feel much worse than if they're told that they would have a 90% chance of survival, even though it's the same treatment.
11:45 Kim Mills? Right. We tend to latch on to the negative.
11:48 Speaker 03 We tend to latch on to the negative, but we also tend to latch on to information in the form it's given and without changing it. And by changing information, you get more meaningful information. You get, you get to understand the more complex set of information that's in front of you. It's not just that you're, you're most likely to survive, but you might actually die. And, and by, by doing that transformation, you understand that in a deeper way.
12:13 Kim Mills? What about the concept of probability? How well do people understand that? I mean, I've heard people say, well, you know, everything's 50/50, either it will or it won't. And that's not how probability works.
12:25 Speaker 03 Yeah, that, that is so interesting. And it's actually a really interesting problem in medical decision-making because to an individual person, it is, that is true. It's going to happen to me or it's not going to happen to me. But if you take a step back and you look at a population of people that's similar to that person, then you can get to predicted likelihoods. So the, the predicted likelihood that a medication will help you, for example. And people are not very good with probabilities. It's one of the, it's one of the types of math that we tend to have the most problems with. And in fact, most objective numeracy tests deal with probabilistic kinds of information because they tend to be harder and people, and probabilities are important in a lot of everyday life events.
13:09 Kim Mills? You've done research that's looked at how numeracy affects people's health outcomes, their financial outcomes and, and other aspects of life. What are the consequences in the day-to-day area of innumeracy?
13:23 Speaker 03 Yeah, so we actually kind of already started one of those. So one of the ways that numeracy seems to have impact on people's lives has to do with their ability to make good decisions. Even though everybody might get the same information, they might be given the exact same choice options, people have those different habits that we started talking about. For someone who's less numerate, numbers are harder, as we were talking about. And what research ends up showing is that their decisions end up being more vulnerable to their own emotional reactions, to how information is framed, to compelling stories that they're given or, or images that they're shown. And what this means when they're judging and deciding is that they will be more vulnerable to the framing effects we talked about.
14:06 Speaker 03 Or they'll be more vulnerable to using other cognitive shortcuts, heuristic shortcuts that, that people take. They also may end up being, and in fact, research shows that they, they'll end up being more susceptible just to how they're feeling in their, in the moment, like their mood states. And then ultimately, studies show that they neglect numbers more. Even if they think they're using them, they'll end up neglecting numbers more. The people who are highly numerate have a whole different set of habits. So they're, they're more likely to seek out numbers. They're more likely to think longer about them, to transform numbers like we were talking about and do different calculations. They're even more likely to compare numbers and do just other kinds of operations with
14:48 Speaker 03 numbers that help them see a number that has meaning, rather than see a number that's dry and feels irrelevant to them. So that's kind of the first way that numeracy has an impact. And that has An impact on sort of everyday life. It's not just that math has to do with STEM education. Understanding and being able to use math has to do with the quality of your everyday life. And that then, as you, as you started to mention, that then shows up in some of the consequences that people end up with. And my lab is not the only one that studies this. One study that we've done in our lab shows that people who are highly numerate make more money. And so for each individual problem, extra problem that a highly numerate person solved,
15:30 Speaker 03 they made $4,000 more in annual income after controlling for a whole slew of other demographics. People who are more numerate also end up being much wealthier. People, on top of that, there's only one study that I know of on this. But people who are more numerate seem to be more likely to be employed rather than unemployed compared to people who are less numerate. And then you get to health gaps, and there've been a whole bunch of different health gaps that have been studied. I'll mention just a couple. People who are less numerate are 40% more likely to have at least one chronic disease. And they also take 20% more prescription drugs, according to this study.
16:10 Speaker 03 And all of this is while having less ability to follow complex health regimens that involve numbers, because they're having difficulty with numbers.
16:19 Kim Mills? Now, this is a correlation, right? We're not talking causation in this instance.
16:23 Speaker 03 For the most part, we're talking correlation. So most of the studies have been done correlational, you know, with correlational data. A lot of them control for other non-numeric aspects of intelligence, for other, and for other demographics like education. But they're still correlational data. You're absolutely right about that. There've been a few studies that have looked at experimentally manipulating numeracy. And they've found, those have found causal effects on risk perceptions, different, different kinds of behaviors, financial literacy. So there's a few studies out there. But it's actually difficult to make a large impact on adult numeracy, unless you put them through a very, very long, like, like a math course.
17:08 Speaker 03 Unless you put them through sort of a long training course.
17:12 Kim Mills? We're going to take a short break. And when we return, we'll talk with Dr. Peters about whether our increasing reliance on technology is making us more or less numerate.
17:23 Speaker 00 This episode is brought to you by Indeed. You're ready to level up your business, but the pressure to find the right person to make that happen is intense. Indeed sponsored jobs can help carry the load. It boosts your job post to help it reach quality talent fast. Cut through the chaos with Indeed sponsored jobs. Get a $75 sponsored job credit at indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring now? Then this is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.
17:53 Speaker 01 Visible puts the ultimate wireless hack in the palm of your hand. With unlimited 5G wireless data and hotspot, designed to keep you connected, powered by Verizon's 5G network. And no contract holding you back. Plans start at $25 a month, or get the premium Visible Plus Pro Plan and save $10 on your first month when you use promo code HACK. Make the switch at visible.com. Terms apply. See visible.com for details.
18:24 Kim Mills? Is technology making us more innumerate? Or is it helping us be less innumerate? I'm asking, just like in a day to day fashion, like you go to the grocery store. And if the cashier doesn't see what the change is on the register, they have no idea how to make change anymore. I mean, I used to have to do that calculation in my head when I was a checker many years ago. So I'm just astonished that people can't do these things.
18:50 Speaker 03 Yeah, I actually had a well-known psychologist actually told me a story once. He was at a checkout counter. Let's say the bill was 75 cents. How did that work? Basically, he was giving her money so that she would give him back a full dollar. And she couldn't do that on the fly, unfortunately. And so is technology helping or hurting? I think it's both. So I think it's hurting in the sense that you're talking about. People are kind of losing that ability.
19:16 Speaker 03 To to make calculations on the fly. And and that kind of thing, I suspect, will make people more vulnerable, even more vulnerable to framing effects, for example. Because if you don't do that change, that switch from ninety percent survival to ten percent dying, then you're not going to have complete information. Or you're not going to be able to figure things out at the cashier, all of those kinds of situations. I think it technology helps in other ways, though. So technology can be used to help support people. If they're not going to understand the numbers, the technology can be that backup system so they don't get cheated. Or so that they better know what the meaning of information is. So, for example, in medical decision making, a lot of researchers and and folks in the medical field
20:00 Speaker 03 have worked on decision aids. And those decision aids are very explicitly intended to help people better understand the numbers that underlie one cancer screening option versus another, for example, or or one treatment option versus another. And so the technology also supports. So I'd say it's kind of a two edged sword.
20:19 Kim Mills? You've done some research that's looked at people's actual skill and their confidence with numbers and how those two things interact. What have you found?
20:28 Speaker 03 Yeah, so I just found this fascinating. We had started to study objective numeracy kind of early in my career. And then along the way, I I came across this idea of numeric confidence and realized that it's almost equally important to objective numeracy. So we did a set of two studies in one paper that came out in in PNAS. And they're both correlational studies. But what we did, one of them was in a financial domain and one was in a medical domain. And so we had access to people's self reported financial outcomes, whether they had ever carried more than five thousand dollars in credit card debt, for example, whether they had ever defaulted on their mortgage,
21:12 Speaker 03 whether they had retirement savings. So some of the outcomes were positive and some were negative. We we transformed it so that everything was about positive outcomes. In other words, so you you have not defaulted on your mortgage is a is a positive outcome. And then we we measured their objective numeracy and we measured their numeric confidence. And what we found, and you can think about it in sort of two different ways. One thing that we found was that when people are high in numeric confidence, their objective numeracy matters. So if they're high in numeric confidence and they and they have high objective numeracy, they do really well in financial outcomes. But if they're high in numeric confidence and they're actually very low in ability, which does happen, those are the people who do the worst.
21:57 Speaker 03 And so when you're high in confidence, it can it can help you if you have the the ability and it helps you to flourish. But if you're low in ability, what we think happens is that they go ahead and take charge of their own decisions because they're confident, they can do it. But while they're confident they can do it, they may be making mistakes because they don't have the ability. And they may not be catching those mistakes again because they don't have the ability. And they may not be asking for help again because they think they have that ability. But then if you look at the people who are low in confidence, this is I found this fascinating. Objective ability almost made no difference to their financial outcomes. Whether they are high or low in objective ability, when they had low confidence, it's like they just didn't step up to the plate.
22:40 Speaker 03 They just didn't try to use their numeric abilities. And because of that, their financial outcomes were about the same, whether they're low or high in ability. Those were self-reported financial outcomes. And so we're also really interested in can we get to a more real outcome? And not that those aren't a real outcome, but they're self-reported. But I was working with a few rheumatologists at the time. This is a type of doctor who treats people with with things like arthritis. But they also treat people who have lupus, and lupus is a very serious autoimmune disease. That actually involves a lot of numeric processing. Because they have to figure out how to take medication, they have to understand the risks and benefits of their medication.
23:23 Speaker 03 They have to get to doctor's appointment. There's just kind of a whole bunch of like little numeric tasks that they have to do on an everyday basis. And so we're interested in in taking a look at the same hypothesis with them. Because if they gave us permission, we would have access into their medical records. And we could see how the physician thought they were doing in terms of how active their lupus was. And so we were with two rheumatologists helping out. We actually were able to access a sample of lupus patients who very kindly agreed to do our measures of numeracy and numeric confidence. And they allowed us, very kindly allowed us access into their medical records. And we found the same result. The people who were low in confidence, their ability didn't make a difference.
24:09 Speaker 03 But if they were very high in numeric confidence, if they were high in ability, they had, they did great. Their health was doing great. But if they were high in confidence, but they were low in ability, those are the people who are actually doing the worst. Their disease activity was the highest and they're at most risk for long-term damage.
24:26 Kim Mills? What can people do to improve their numeracy?
24:29 Speaker 03 There's a number of things people can do. The first one has to do with what we were just talking about, that that interesting relationship between objective ability and numeric confidence. The first thing people can do is figure out who they are as a math person. Because believing you're not skilled when you really are can hurt you. Because you're not doing as well, you're not taking advantage of the skills that you actually have. And so people need to be open to the possibility that they're good, that they might be good at math, so that they're more likely to use numbers in these everyday kinds of situations that we're talking about. But on the other hand, believing that you're skilled at math, when you really don't have those kind of math skills, that can really hurt, that can really hurt you. So encouraging people to figure out where they are, like, who am I as a math person?
25:14 Speaker 03 How can I match my level of numeric confidence with the level of ability that I actually have, can really help. It means that you'll ask for help if you need it. And maybe you'll try harder if you really have the skill, but you're just not confident about it. Something else, people can become more numerate. It takes practice. There's not a lot of research on this. So a little bit, this has to be taken with a little bit of a grain of salt. But people can take math classes. That would be the hardest thing. And that kind of practice would likely matter. We have done some research that suggests that just practicing in an easier way can help. You don't have to practice with particularly difficult math. But if you practice with simple math, like adding and subtracting numbers,
25:59 Speaker 03 practice by estimating the answers. You first have to estimate the answer before you see it. Because you have to get feedback about whether you're right or wrong so that you can actually learn. It turns out the learning requires knowing what you've done correctly and what you've done incorrectly. So you can do better the next time. But our research shows that even doing this in about six sessions of about 30 to 45 minutes, if I remember correctly, this can improve people's objective numeracy. And it actually did improve the consistency with which people perceived risks. So we know that that helps. We need more research on it. But again, it is hard to manipulate numeracy among adults. Another thing, and then just sort of a long series of studies in my lab and others,
26:44 Speaker 03 suggests that that idea of developing good number habits may be important. And so people should pay attention to the numbers in their lives. Try not just to read over them. Develop good number habits by spending more time, by transforming and calculating numbers, by comparing numbers. Sometimes that makes all the difference. If you know that how likely some treatment is to help you, take a look at some other plausible treatment and compare it and see which one might actually offer you more benefit. That'll help you derive more affective or emotional meaning from the numbers.
27:22 Speaker 03 And then the last thing kind of gets back to that technology question that you mentioned, Kim. And the idea is to advocate for yourself if you don't understand some number. Or if the person didn't provide a number and you feel like it might be helpful. You can ask like a physician, how statistically likely is something? What is the probability of something happening? Or if you're given too many options or too much information, you can ask a professional to simplify the information. So that to whatever is the most important information in their view. And by doing that, people actually will understand more. Sometimes less can be more.
28:02 Kim Mills? What about the people who need to convey numerical information? Whether that's doctors talking to patients or maybe journalists explaining economic data, scientists who are trying to explain climate risk? How can they help people better understand the numbers they're putting out there so that we can make better decisions?
28:20 Speaker 03 Yeah, so there's a series of recommendations that I would make for my lab and communicators will often make. The first one is to have a communication goal. And that sounds kind of silly in some ways, but I've been in all kinds of interviews where I'm sitting in like on a doctor's visit with a patient or a physical therapist's appointment with with parents of a child who's not doing well. And they often go in with this like mound of information that they pick up and they put down in front of the patient. And without really thinking about, what does this person really need to know? How can I facilitate how they understand? If you sit back and think first about what a communication goal is, that means that you
29:04 Speaker 03 can actually strategically choose what information to show. And then think about, again, strategically, how might I show it? And then we get to the kinds of research that I do, which has to do with, how do you format information? What kinds of information might you show? And one of the first recommendations that I always have is to communicate with numbers, not only words. So people, there's this funny thing that happens where people often prefer communicating with verbal terms like common. And unlikely, but people actually kind of prefer getting numbers. And not only do they prefer getting numbers, but they also better understand risks and they can react appropriately when numbers are discussed. So long as the numbers aren't too difficult, you don't want to provide too many numbers.
29:49 Speaker 03 But what ends up happening when you provide numeric information is not only do people understand better, which helps to to support informed consent processes and and other things like that. But they're also just the mere presence of numbers seems to increase people's trust in the in the message and their perceptions of the expertise of the messenger. And on social media, for example, people are more likely to to share numbers that include numeric information compared to the exact same message minus the numbers. So that's one thing, communicate with numbers. But you do have to make those numbers more manageable. And there's sort of two ways to do this. One is is to provide less information. So remember that communication goal.
30:33 Speaker 03 You want to provide information that helps to meet the goal, but not more information than that if you can help it. Because more information means just a greater likelihood of losing somebody along the way. With less information, people do understand more. So you want to avoid cognitive overload. The other part of making numbers more manageable is do the math for people. We often give people information where they have to do a little bit of math and you lose so many people along the way. Another thing would be to make numbers more meaningful. You can provide context, like we talked about this a little bit before, too. If you talk about 93% of patients will survive from treatment A, maybe you also want to give them a comparison.
31:18 Speaker 03 This is compared to 99% of people who would survive with treatment B. And by having that comparison, people can draw their own meaning. What are some of the other things? This goes back to more general communication advice from the literature. We often want to inform people and we want to help them better understand a situation that they're in so that they can make their own decisions. And you don't want to overwhelm them, like we were saying. But in the end, we also often want to tell people, what are the possible solutions here? And you want those solutions to be something that people think will work and that they're confident that they themselves can do. And so that kind of furnishing of feasible solutions is really important. And we think about that a lot when it comes to communicating about hazards.
32:02 Speaker 03 So if you're communicating about earthquakes, for example, in the Pacific Northwest, you want to make sure not only that you communicate about the risk of an earthquake and what might happen, what the likelihood might be, what those consequences might be. But you also want to tell people, what can I do about it? What can I do? What can I do that will work? And what can I do that I'm confident that I can actually do? And so those are kind of some of the the general things that I think about when it comes to communicating numbers, but also going beyond numbers to the idea that we're communicating to help people's lives. So you want to go beyond the numbers to things like furnishing solutions that are doable for people.
32:39 Kim Mills? Well, that makes perfect sense. So what are the big questions you still want to answer? What are you working on right now?
32:45 Speaker 03 Oh, you know, we are still looking a bit at the mere presence of numbers. You know, I have to admit, I come from an engineering background originally. And so I'm a little bit of a geek when it comes to numbers. And so I just, I personally just find it fascinating that the mere presence of numbers can change how much people trust, how much people think someone's an expert. And I'm curious about why. So we're sort of delving into that a bit more. We just in the past, probably a year or two, have been looking more into how can we communicate more effectively about hazards that people face? And those are the earthquakes and the wildfires. And the reason for that is I love doing psychological science. I love the brain candy of psychological science. It's just really interesting to find out how the human mind works.
33:29 Speaker 03 But I also wanted to make a difference. And so I want to make a difference in people's lives and hopefully, you know, help people to better understand something that's important to them and that will help, just help improve the quality of their life. And so that's why we've gone into some of the hazards research because I think that's important.
33:46 Kim Mills? Well, Dr. Peters, I want to thank you for joining me today. It's been very enlightening.
33:50 Speaker 03 It has been very fun. Thank you again, Kim. It's been a pleasure.
33:54 Kim Mills? You can find previous episodes of Speaking of Psychology on our website at speakingofpsychology.org, or on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts. And if you like what you've heard, please follow us and leave a review. If you have comments or ideas for future podcasts, you can email us at [email protected] . Speaking of Psychology is produced by Lee Weinerman. Thank you for listening. For the American Psychological Association, I'm Kim Mills.
35:08 Speaker 04 When fall comes back around, there's a sense of a reset. And new pieces from Lululemon's Fall Drop are an inspiration to push your goals and elevate your routines. As your calendar fills, easy-to-layer styles meet the demands of your day. And as you challenge yourself to try even more, versatile sets transition with you. The Lululemon Fall lineup brings new levels of comfort and confidence, whether you're starting something fresh or starting something over. Check out the latest arrivals in store and on lululemon.com now.
Previous Encore - How science can help you change your behavior for the better, with Katy Milkman, PhD Next Why “boy" culture is creating a crisis of connection, with Niobe Way, PhD Page updated November 1, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated