The Objective Science of Marijuana & Understanding the Certainty Trap

Women apologize more than men. Why is that? This episode looks at the likely reason and it may surprise you. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797610384150 Marijuana has come a long way. A few decades ago, it was considered a very dangerous and illegal drug. Today, recreational use of marijuana is legal in a lot of places and smoking it is just not a big deal. While people have their beliefs about it, what does the science say? What is in marijuana? How has it changed? Is it dangerous or not? Here to tackle all those questions and more is Godfrey Pearlson. He is a psychiatric researcher, physician, and Yale neuroscience professor. He has authored a book on the subject called The Science of Weed: An Indispensable Guide to Cannabis (https://amzn.to/48IZJcF). You know that feeling you get when you know you know you are right and someone else is wrong? In some ways It is maddening but in other ways it feels very satisfying to feel right. Yet, it might also be a sign that you have fallen into the certainty trap. And that can be a problem. Joining me to explain the certainty trap and the dangers it presents is Ilana Redstone. She is a professor of sociology at the University of Illinois at Urbana– Champaign and author of the book, The Certainty Trap: Why We Need to Question Ourselves More―and How We Can Judge Others Less (https://amzn.to/3YEBWGp). Your furnace and central air conditioner are pretty reliable and ask very little of you. But there is one thing those systems really need that a lot of people just don’t attend to. And it could be costing you money and putting strain on the equipment. Listen and I will explain. Source: Jeff May author of My House is Killing Me (https://amzn.to/40HBBoN). PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!!! INDEED: Get a $75 SPONSORED JOB CREDIT to get your jobs more visibility at https://Indeed.com/SOMETHING Support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Terms & conditions apply. SHOPIFY: Sign up for a $1 per-month trial period at https://Shopify.com/sysk . Go to SHOPIFY.com/sysk to grow your business – no matter what stage you’re in! MINT MOBILE: Cut your wireless bill to $15 a month at https://MintMobile.com/something! $45 upfront payment required (equivalent to $15/mo.). New customers on first 3 month plan only. Additional taxes, fees, & restrictions apply. HERS: Hers is changing women's healthcare by providing access to GLP-1 weekly injections with the same active ingredient as Ozempic and Wegovy, as well as oral medication kits. Start your free online visit today at https://forhers.com/sysk DELL: Dell Technologies’ Early Holiday Savings event is live and if you’ve been waiting for an AI-ready PC, this is their biggest sale of the year! Tech enthusiasts love this sale because it’s all the newest hits plus all the greatest hits all on sale at once. Shop Now at https://Dell.com/deals Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Mike Carruthers?

  If you listen to Something You Should Know regularly, you know we talk about sleep quite a bit here. And one of the things I've learned from those conversations is just how important a good night's sleep is. And I've always been someone who loves his sleep. So I was intrigued when I heard about Beam Dream. It's a delicious nighttime drink formulated to help you fall asleep faster, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed. It contains ingredients like reishi, magnesium, L-theanine, epigenin, and melatonin. They have lots of great flavors. I tried the cinnamon cocoa flavor, and I love the idea of having something warm and delicious as part of winding down at night.

• 0:45Mike Carruthers?

  And it's less than 20 calories per serving. Dream has improved more than 30 million nights of sleep, and they back it up with a 30-day money-back guarantee. If you don't sleep better, you get your money back. And right now, there's a terrific offer. Go to shopbeam.com/YSK. Use code S Y S K and get 50% off during Beam's Cyber Sale. Only available while flavors are in stock. With this incredible discount, that means you'll pay just 83 cents per night for the best sleep of your life. So seriously, think about it. I mean, how much would you pay for a truly great night of sleep? Beam is just 83 cents per night.

• 1:29Mike Carruthers?

  So go to shopbeam.com/YSK now. That's shopbeam.com/YSK.

• 1:41Mike Carruthers?

  Today on Something You Should Know, the interesting reason women apologize a lot more than men. Then, an objective look at marijuana. What it is, how it's changed, and who uses it.

• 1:54Speaker 01

  About 15% of the US population have used in the last week. And about forty-five to fifty percent of adults, we're talking about adults here in both cases, say they've tried at some point in their life. It's the most commonly used illicit stuff in the U.S. and Europe at the moment.

• 2:13Mike Carruthers?

  Also, something important your furnace really wants you to do, and the dangers of falling into the certainty trap.

• 2:21Speaker 02

  And what that means is it's the feeling of moral outrage, righteous indignation, contempt for somebody who disagrees, particularly on a heated or contentious topic.

• 2:34Mike Carruthers?

  All this today on Something You Should Know.

• 2:39Mike Carruthers?

  I imagine most of us shop for clothes online, at least some of the time, and there's always that little mystery. Is what shows up at your door actually going to look like what you think you ordered? We've all had that experience. I know my wife has ordered dresses that look beautiful in the pictures, but when they arrive, eh, not so beautiful. Cheap-looking, disappointing, and that's one of the reasons we've become such big fans of Quince. When we order from Quince, we are confident we're going to get something really nice. The quality is consistently good, and the prices are surprisingly reasonable. I've bought their cashmere sweaters,

• 3:21Mike Carruthers?

  which are gorgeous, and they start at just sixty dollars for cashmere. My wife buys tons of stuff from Quince, and we keep coming back. Quince works directly with ethical factories and cuts out the middlemen, offering prices fifty to eighty percent less than similar brands. And with the holidays coming, that's a pretty compelling combination: beautiful clothes and gifts without spending a fortune or wondering what's really going to show up at the door. I really do recommend Quince. It's one of those companies that has earned our trust. Give the gift of quality this holiday season. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers, or go to quince.com.

• 4:05Mike Carruthers?

  Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns, now available in Canada and the U.K. too. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, please let them know it was Something You Should Know. It's the best way to support the show.

• 4:22Speaker 03

  Something You Should Know, fascinating intel, the world's top experts, and practical advice you can use in your life today. Something You Should Know with Mike Carruthers.

• 4:34Mike Carruthers?

  If you're looking for a really good podcast episode to listen to, I'd say you've come to the right place. Welcome to Something You Should Know, and we start today with apologies. Perhaps you have apologized to someone today, or someone has apologized to you for some reason. It's a proven fact that women apologize more than men. So why would that be? Well, a study in the journal of Psychological Science found that over the course of 12 days, women apologized 217 times, men apologized just 158 times. The authors of the study concluded

• 5:14Mike Carruthers?

  that men were actually just as willing to apologize as women. The difference was that men had a higher threshold for what bothered them. We tend to apologize for something we feel might be offensive or hurtful. Men and women in general have different levels of sensitivity. A woman might snap at a friend and feel bad and then apologize, while a man might just think, "No big deal, he'll get over it." And that is something you should know. Say the word marijuana to people, and you'll hear a lot of opinions. Some people believe it's benign, nothing wrong with it, it's less dangerous than alcohol, and after all,

• 5:58Mike Carruthers?

  almost half the states in the US have legalized recreational use of marijuana. Other people will say it's a gateway drug, it damages your brain, and affects your behavior in a negative way. I'm sure you've heard all of this before, but what is the objective truth about marijuana? What does the science say about it? That is what Godfrey Pearlson is here to reveal. He is a psychiatric researcher, physician, and Yale neuroscience professor. He's also author of a book called "The Science of Weed: An Indispensable Guide to Cannabis." Hi, Godfrey, welcome to Something You Should Know.

• 6:35Speaker 01

  Mike, very good to be with you. Thank you.

• 6:38Mike Carruthers?

  So we have two words that get used a lot referring to marijuana. Marijuana and cannabis. And they're two different words, so I suspect they mean two different things. But could you clear that up for me? Are they synonymous or do they mean different things?

• 6:54Speaker 01

  Cannabis is a plant, cannabis sativa, that grows in the wild, but has been cultivated by humans for thousands of years. Initially for food, then for fibers, hemp, to make ropes, strong ropes. And then later as an intoxicant. Marijuana is something that was first used in the early part of the 20th century. And marijuana is a word that was slang word that was used by Mexicans, spelt with an H rather than a J. And it was respelt with a J and used in a pejorative sense, like these evil marijuana users are corrupting our youth.

• 7:38Speaker 01

  So because of those connotations, a lot of people in the cannabis research field prefer to use the term cannabis rather than marijuana.

• 7:48Mike Carruthers?

  So how long? Oh, before I ask that, let me just mention that as you're listening to this, as Godfrey is speaking, if you hear these little pops and clicks, it's in the audio. We have tried everything to get rid of it, can't get rid of it. It's not too bad or distracting, so, but that's what it is. And we're moving on with it. So, Godfrey, how long has marijuana been a thing in society? Where, hey, you know, these kids over here are smoking it. I mean, when did it become kind of not mainstream, but the fringes of mainstream where people started using it to get high? And those were those kids and it came with a label. When did all that start?

• 8:28Speaker 01

  The way this progressed is that Napoleon's soldiers were in Egypt around 1810. Alcohol was not available because of the culture, but cannabis was. So Napoleon's soldiers began using it. Some of them brought it back to France. So it spread among the elites in Europe as a kind of... Drug for upper-class people to use for amusement at parties. And then gradually spread to some individuals in the US. It wasn't until around 1900, when waves of Mexican immigrants came to the country

• 9:07Speaker 01

  as laborers, that they introduced it as a drug that was used by working-class individuals for recreation. And that spread to American youth gradually.

• 9:18Mike Carruthers?

  So do you have, do you have it at your fingertips or off the top of your head? You know, the, the numbers of like, how many people have used marijuana or have tried it? Or, you know, just kind of to frame the picture here?

• 9:31Speaker 01

  About 15% of the US population have used in the last week. And about 45 to 50% of adults, we're talking about adults here in both cases, say they've tried at some point in their life. So this is a very prevalent drug. It's the most commonly used illicit stuff in, in the US and Europe at the moment.

• 9:54Mike Carruthers?

  Before we go any further, I want to try to get a reading on you. Just for transparency's sake, I think it would be good to know that, yes, you're a researcher and a scientist and all that, but where do you stand on this issue? Are you pro marijuana? Do you think it's not so good? Are you somewhere down the middle or where?

• 10:14Speaker 01

  I'd say I'm down the middle. I, I grew up in the 60s, so I was exposed both to the drug and the propaganda from both sides about it. And I'm a naturally skeptical person. So if, if something has a good side and a bad side, I'm, I'm not going to try and minimize one or exaggerate the other.

• 10:36Mike Carruthers?

  The image of marijuana has certainly changed over the last several decades when, you know, in the 50s and 60s, it was associated with hippies and it had this kind of horrible connotation that if you smoked marijuana, this was horrible, you, it was illegal, you could go to jail, it's going to ruin your brain. And over time, it's gotten much more socially acceptable.

• 11:01Mike Carruthers?

  But if it was so bad then, why is it not so bad now?

• 11:07Speaker 01

  You're correct. A plurality of the US adult population now supports legalizing recreational cannabis. More people, and in fact, support same-sex marriage. So that's been quite a journey from Nixon in the 70s to the present. And I'd attribute that to a few reasons. One is that people have used it and tried it and found that it had few ill effects. A second thing is that the anti-cannabis movement, and Just Say No, and Dare, and similar initiatives, so overstated the case against cannabis and demonized it to such an extent

• 11:49Speaker 01

  that it was clear that much of what they were saying was incorrect. So people became skeptical of the marijuana is bad message. The other thing is advocacy, first of all, on the part of users, but secondly, on the part of business in terms of companies that want to make a profit from selling cannabis, what people call canabiz, or big cannabis analogous to big tobacco. And the other is states in the US that want to have a sin tax and balance their budgets by selling cannabis in dispensaries that they can tax. So I think it's a combination of all of those things.

• 12:34Mike Carruthers?

  What are the dangers of marijuana? Because we've heard for so long it's a gateway drug that, you know, usually you look at people who are on much more serious drugs and really hooked. They started with marijuana. What are the real dangers to marijuana use?

• 12:52Speaker 01

  Well, some are clearly known and others are suspected, but unclear because not enough research has been done. But the real risks are cannabis use disorder. Basically, people become addicted to the drug and suffer moderately severe withdrawal symptoms when they quit. So they find it difficult to quit. For teens, the main risk is psychosis. So teenage individuals who smoke high potency cannabis that contains a lot of THC and smoke it often have an increased risk for developing schizophrenia and allied psychotic illnesses.

• 13:34Speaker 01

  It's not exactly clear what the magnitude of that risk is, but may raise the odds to maybe three or four times what you'd expect in the population. Then there are risks from motor vehicle accidents in drivers. Again, compared to alcohol, those risks are not huge, but they're significant. And probably in older people, there are risks of falls, just because cannabis does lead to gait instability. Then there are suggestions that it may raise the risk for heart attack and stroke in older individuals and possibly raise the risk for certain kinds of cancers. But that's very, very uncertain, in part because people tend, in some cases, to smoke

• 14:19Speaker 01

  cannabis alongside tobacco or use it with other substances. And it's hard, from an epidemiologic point of view, to separate those things.

• 14:27Mike Carruthers?

  I have heard that the marijuana that kids smoked in the 60s is very different and much less potent than the marijuana today. Is that a fair statement?

• 14:40Speaker 01

  That is a fair statement. So the cannabis we have today is a triumph of selective breeding. Essentially growers, mainly in California, develop stronger and stronger strains of cannabis to contain more and more THC. And as part of the genetics of the cannabis plant, the more THC you produce, the less CBD there is in there to counterbalance it. So that we have more tetrahydrocannabinol, the chemical in the cannabis plant that is mostly responsible for getting us high and less of the CBD that may offset THC's effects.

• 15:25Speaker 01

  But just as a caveat, if people switch from near beer to whiskey, they don't drink pints of near beer. So they want to get high, so they smoke enough of the cannabis to get them high. So if there's more THC in the plant, then they'll smoke less of it.

• 15:45Mike Carruthers?

  So it sounds like, because we also hear about medicinal marijuana, that kind of legitimizes, oh, well, maybe it could be good for you. But it doesn't sound like it's good for you. I mean, that all things being equal, you're better off not smoking it than smoking. It doesn't do anything for you.

• 16:01Speaker 01

  I'd actually push back on that because if we think about other substances that tend to be abused, many of them are analogous to cannabis in that they have a good side and a dark side. So opioids are still used widely for pain control. In fact, they're the go-to drug for severe acute pain, even in hospitals and orthopedic clinics. And cocaine is still used in eye drops and as an anesthetic drug. So the fact that a substance is abused in

• 16:41Speaker 01

  some cases and has ill effects, isn't to say that it doesn't also have good effects. And there is a medicinal side to cannabis and cannabis derivatives. So for example, CBD that we spoke about, one of the main constituents of the cannabis plant. Doesn't get people high, but it does have psychoactive effects in calming anxiety. And that was recently approved for use by the Federal Drug Administration for treating childhood epilepsy. And THC in cannabis may be an effective pain reliever, although the key experiments to look at that in chronic pain have yet to be done in a proper double-blind placebo-controlled way.

• 17:25Speaker 01

  So there may be medicinal benefits to the cannabis plant that are quite separate than its effects as a recreational drug.

• 17:36Mike Carruthers?

  But if you're just hanging around with your buddies saying, you know, why don't we smoke some marijuana or, you know, maybe we should just go read a book, you probably should go read a book.

• 17:45Speaker 01

  Yeah, I'd agree with that, but there's a human urge that's built into most of us to alter our mental state. And people have been doing this for millennia, either with mushrooms or with alcohol. So if you have to pick among your recreational drugs, and most people do, then in many respects, cannabis is a safer drug than alcohol.

• 18:12Mike Carruthers?

  We are talking about marijuana, and we're talking with Godfrey Pearlson. He's a psychiatric researcher and author of the book, The Science of Weed: An Indispensable Guide to Cannabis. Well, here's something you should know about your bones. We all hear about calcium and vitamin D, and they're important, but there's another ingredient in healthy bones that hardly anybody talks about: collagen. Think of your bones like a building, right? Collagen provides the framework, while minerals like calcium help give it strength. Here's the problem, though: As we get older, our bodies naturally produce less collagen. That's why I was interested in Native Path Bone Health Collagen. It's not just ordinary collagen.

• 18:57Mike Carruthers?

  It contains a specialized form called Fortabone, and there's some interesting research behind it. In a study of 131 post-menopausal women, researchers saw

• 19:09Mike Carruthers?

  Improvements in bone mineral density after 12 months. Up to 7.7% in an important part of the hip. Native Path gives you the same 5 grams of Fortabone used in that research in an easy-to-mix daily formula. I just got mine because bone health is something I'd rather pay attention to now than wish I had later. And here's a great reason to try Native Path Bone Health Collagen right now. You can save up to 48%, get free shipping, and it's backed by a 365-day money-back guarantee. Now, that's a pretty compelling offer if you've been thinking about doing something to support your bone health.

• 19:54Mike Carruthers?

  Go to getbetterbones.com/sysk. That's G-E-T betterbones.com/sysk. This episode is sponsored by Vinted. You know, I remember interviewing an organizing expert who offered this really clever trick for figuring out which clothes you should get rid of. You go to your closet and you look at the clothes hanging there. And chances are, the ones toward the middle are the clothes you wear most often. But the clothes pushed way over to the left or the right, some of those you probably haven't worn in years, and yet there they hang, taking up space. But here's the thing, you could turn those clothes into money.

• 20:39Mike Carruthers?

  That's where Vinted comes in. Vinted is a secondhand marketplace app where you can sell clothes you no longer wear and make some extra money. Listing on Vinted is so quick and simple, and when something sells, Vinted creates a prepaid shipping label for you. And here's what I really like. Vinted charges no seller fees, so whatever you earn from selling your clothes, you keep. Think about that. Clothes that you aren't wearing, taking up space, could be putting money back in your pocket. So here's my suggestion. Take five minutes, go look at the far ends of your closet and see what's hanging there. You might be surprised. Download the Vinted app for free and start listing.

• 21:24Mike Carruthers?

  With no seller fees, you keep every dollar you earn. That's Vinted, V-I-N-T-E-D.

• 21:32Mike Carruthers?

  So Godfrey, one of the criticisms of marijuana has always been that it is a gateway drug, that people who end up on harder drugs will frequently tell you that they started with marijuana. And is that a fair criticism?

• 21:48Speaker 01

  There's an association, but correlation isn't the same as causation. So that nearly everybody who uses harder drugs also started on alcohol and tobacco. So people who are risk takers are going to try what's out there. And I think it's fair to say that the majority of people who try recreational cannabis do not progress to more addictive or more harmful drugs. So epidemiologically, there's solid evidence for that. So the joke that I hear from my cannabis-using research subjects is if cannabis is a gateway drug, it's a gateway to your refrigerator because of the munchies.

• 22:33Mike Carruthers?

  Yeah. What about the munchies?

• 22:35Speaker 01

  When epidemiologists have looked at people who use cannabis regularly, you'd expect that they would be couch potatoes who are eating snack foods and eating Cheetos and Doritos while watching TV or playing video games and gaining lots of weight. But in fact, the average user loses a small amount of weight for reasons that we don't quite understand.

• 23:01Mike Carruthers?

  Since the rules have changed and loosened up, I would assume that attitudes have as well. Have there been surveys? Like, what do people think about this topic? Is there still a big push to keep it outlawed? Or have people said, yeah, whatever?

• 23:19Speaker 01

  Partly, that's a generational effect. But exactly as you say, attitudes have shifted. And the modal attitude now in surveys is that cannabis is a safe drug with no harms, which is quite incorrect, since, as you and I have discussed, there definitely are harms that should not just be disregarded. But people have convinced themselves, in general, in the US population, that cannabis is harmless.

• 23:50Speaker 01

  So that women, for example, feel increasingly comfortable using it to combat nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, which I think is a horrible decision. Or teenagers feel that it's a safe drug to use, which again, in that particular group who's at risk for psychotic symptoms, again, is a very bad decision. We just have to not exaggerate the risks, though, because scare tactics don't work.

• 24:18Mike Carruthers?

  Yeah, well, it sounds like what you're saying is much like someone in your position would talk about alcohol, like, it's not going to go anywhere. So it's here, so let's maybe take a more grown-up approach to it, rather than try to hide it under the rug and pretend it's horrible and not here, because it is here, and people use it, a lot of people use it.

• 24:40Speaker 01

  Yeah, I absolutely agree with you. And people have taken risk mitigation strategies to reduce the harms of alcohol very consciously in terms of social engineering. So, for example, in Scotland, there were problems with drunkenness and intrafamilial abuse and fights and so on, violence, that were directly attributable to excessive alcohol use. And alcohol was readily available cheaply in very large containers in supermarkets. So the Scottish authorities decided to put a hefty tax on that.

• 25:20Speaker 01

  So alcohol was less available, and all of those statistics on fights and violence, within a year, dramatically reduced. So just by sensible social policies and controlling price points, you can have a huge effect on what people use. The other side of that, though, is if you price the drug out of the market, people just go back to dealers and away from dispensaries and away from a supply of cannabis that's been vetted in some way in terms of content and contaminants. So you can't push too hard on that. Nevertheless, social policy can really control drug use and moderate harms.

• 26:05Mike Carruthers?

  Talk about what marijuana does to people, particularly for people who have never smoked it. You might assume that it's analogous to drinking alcohol, but you know, when people drink, people react differently. There are mean drunks and happy drunks. What is it that marijuana does to you? Or is it like that, where it depends on who you are and it does different things? For those people who haven't tried it, what would they get if they did?

• 26:38Speaker 01

  Again, that's a really interesting question. I'm glad you brought that up. With any substance that has psychoactive effects, there are huge inter-individual differences. So, most people who use cannabis will, recreationally, will just have a sense of pleasant relaxation. They'll chill out, they'll relax, they may become more reflective, feel they're being more creative, they'll become more giggly and find things funny or silly, and their sense of time will be distorted.

• 27:18Speaker 01

  So musicians who like to improvise find cannabis a useful drug because they can see the space in between the notes. So there are positive effects, but for some people, it's a drug that immediately produces anxiety and in some cases paranoia. And that are people who are not repeat customers, people who get anxious and paranoid and are just not going to use the drug again. But it's not like there are mean drunks. People may become disinhibited, but it's not a drug that generally provokes violence in the way that alcohol does. That's less of an association with cannabis. It doesn't increase impulsivity to the degree that alcohol does.

• 28:02Speaker 01

  So for example, we've done experiments where we've challenged people with either alcohol acutely or cannabis acutely in the lab and have them drive on a driving simulator. People who are mildly drunk with a blood alcohol concentration of about .1

• 28:19Speaker 01

  Will speed up on corners and drive really fast and ignore warnings. Whereas people who are intoxicated on cannabis will weave more, be aware that they're intoxicated and drive a bit more slowly. So they're still involved more in crashes, but not nearly as much as alcohol and for very different reasons. Because different drugs have different psychological effects on people as you intuited.

• 28:45Mike Carruthers?

  Well, I have certainly learned more from this discussion about marijuana than I ever knew before. I'm not someone who partakes. So I haven't had the big urge to understand it and research it and learn more about it. But I know an awful lot of people who take it and who like it. So I'm glad we had this discussion so I could learn more about it. Gottfried Perlson has been my guest. He is a psychiatric researcher, physician and neuroscience professor at Yale University and author of the book, "The Science of Weed: An Indispensable Guide to Cannabis." And there is a link to his book in the show notes. Thank you for coming on today and talking about this, Gottfried.

• 29:28Mike Carruthers?

  Gifts mean more when they have the power to give more. They can inspire more discovery, give more confidence and unwrap more of who you are. This Black Friday, give a gift that goes beyond the box. The Dell XPS 13 laptop. With a beautiful design and cutting-edge performance, it helps you unlock more possibilities. It's the thinnest, lightest XPS laptop yet, with touchscreen, a backlit keyboard and long-lasting battery life to power you through your day. Built with a durable aluminum chassis, weighing just 2.2 pounds, and Intel Core processors,

• 30:10Mike Carruthers?

  it's fast, reliable and portable enough to keep up wherever you go.

• 30:16Mike Carruthers?

  Visit dell.com to explore the possibilities with XPS. While shopping, you'll also find great perks like Dell Rewards, fast free shipping, premium support, and financing with flexible payment options. Plus, you can find great deals on monitors and accessories. That means you can score a whole new setup now for less. This Black Friday sale is one you don't want to miss. Head to dell.com/deals. That's dell.com/deals.

• 30:53Mike Carruthers?

  Hiring the wrong person is expensive, but it's also exhausting. Because now, you haven't solved your problem, you've created a new one. You've spent time interviewing and training somebody, but it's the wrong person. And it's just not working. So when you're hiring, you don't just need a person, you need the right person. And that is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. Sponsored Jobs helps you reach candidates with the skills and experience and other qualifications you're looking for, and boosts your job and search results so the right people are more likely to see it.

• 31:35Mike Carruthers?

  In fact, Sponsored Jobs posted directly on Indeed are 95% more likely to report a hire than non-sponsored jobs. So give yourself a better shot at finding the right person. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more results. When you need the right person to cut through the chaos, this is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves at indeed.com/podcast.

• 32:16Mike Carruthers?

  Just go to indeed.com/podcast right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need the right hire fast? Then this is a job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs.

• 32:39Mike Carruthers?

  There is a feeling I know you have felt. It is that feeling you get when you know you're right. Even though there may be another side to the story, you are, without a doubt, certain in your position. Nothing could change your mind. You might even be outraged that other people think you're wrong because you, in fact, know they're wrong. I can't imagine not having had that feeling at some point in your life, and that feeling is what we're about to discuss with Ilana Redstone. She's a professor of sociology at the University of Illinois and author of the book, "The Certainty Trap: Why We Need to Question Ourselves More and How We Can Judge Others Less."

• 33:23Mike Carruthers?

  Hi, Ilana. Welcome to Something You Should Know.

• 33:25Speaker 02

  Thank you. Thank you so much for having me.

• 33:27Mike Carruthers?

  So let's start by you expanding on what I just said about the certainty trap and what it is exactly.

• 33:34Speaker 02

  The easiest way to understand the certainty trap is to think about how we feel when we're in it. And what that means is it's the feeling of moral outrage, righteous indignation, contempt for somebody who disagrees, particularly on a heated or contentious topic. And that comes from a couple of different things, including treating our knowledge, sort of what we know, as definitive rather than provisional. It can come from treating our preferred, say, policy as having all benefits and no costs, treating complex situations as though they're simple.

• 34:17Speaker 02

  Any and all of the above are just examples.

• 34:20Mike Carruthers?

  Being certain about some things seems like it would be a good idea because you can't wonder and think, "Well, what about what..." on everything. You have to... I mean, I'm pretty certain my pen is blue. I'm not really going to debate that with you.

• 34:35Speaker 02

  I think that's right. I think that there's and there's no reason that we should all be wandering around just in some kind of philosophical stupor all day. And so there are things that are just, they're not worth debating. And so one of the distinctions, I think, that's important here is the certainty and then the trap. So the trap part is the contempt because of the implications that it has for our, particularly for our political conversation. But not all certainty is what I'm treating as a trap, if that makes sense.

• 35:12Mike Carruthers?

  It does seem, though, that human beings are kind of wired to make judgments about things and people and we, you know, we some, we size up people and we, we make judgments about them and, and the things they're saying and what, and that's kind of seems like human nature.

• 35:28Speaker 02

  I think you're right. I think it is. I think it is human nature. I think that ultimately, I'm asking people to do something that does go against arguably human nature. It feels good to be morally outraged. It feels good to be righteously indignant. I'm trying to help people understand that this has implications for our political conversation, for political polarization, for how we get along, for social trust. We can then make choices about how we want to move forward. I think we're better off doing that once we understand what those choices imply.

• 36:09Mike Carruthers?

  So help me understand the, the moral outrage part of this because you could take, take a politically charged topic like abortion. Somebody could be pro-life and somebody could be pro-choice and they could be very convinced that they're right, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're outraged by the other person. You believe what you want to believe. I believe what I want to believe, but I'm not outraged by your wanting to believe what you believe.

• 36:42Speaker 02

  I think that's a great, I think it's a great example. And so this is the distinction between the certainty and the trap. So the, the problem that I'm trying to solve for is really viewing people who disagree with contempt. So if you're, as you're describing with, with respect to abortion, live and let live. I have my position, you have yours. Then that's not necessarily a problem of contempt. I can give you a different example. Let's say I'm, let's say I'm pro-choice and I'm viewing someone who is, depending on how I want to phrase it, they are pro-life or anti-choice. And let's say that instead of kind of thinking, well, I have this opinion, you have that opinion, and we're on different sides of this.

• 37:25Speaker 02

  I now think that you're a misogynist who is trying to control my body. Right? That's a different, that's a different way of coming at that topic, where I'm making assumptions about someone's intent, their motives, et cetera, rather than sort of the first scenario which you described, which is I have my opinion and you have yours. And the certainty trap, what I'm saying in the certainty trap is not necessarily that our assumptions are wrong. I don't have a crystal ball that tells me what's going inside, going on inside someone's mind. But it's telling me, it's, it should be telling us to be willing to stop and question

• 38:10Speaker 02

  the, the assumptions that we're making and ask ourselves, could we be wrong? And what would it mean if we were?

• 38:17Mike Carruthers?

  So interestingly, when I first saw your book and this topic, I didn't think it was about that. I thought it had more to do with more everyday, day-to-day stuff, that we judge other people and the things they say, not about politics so much. But you know, and it starts in school, like the kid who doesn't have such nice clothes. People make fun of that kid and bully him or her. And that, and, and then take what they say with a grain of salt, because they're not as cool as the cool kids are. And it's more that than it is these very specific, highly-charged political conversations.

• 39:01Speaker 02

  It is that. It's that as well. And so, and I'll give you an example, sort of just from where that, what that can look like. So when I was having a conversation just a couple of weeks ago with a friend of mine who was in an argument with her husband. And the argument was about, they were, it started out about just a difference of opinion in parenting styles. Anyway, it ended up getting to be a fairly heated argument. And to the point where he had, he was planning to cancel a guy's weekend trip that was coming up. And he felt that she should cancel a work trip that was the following weekend. Basically, they should focus on the marriage, etc. As she's telling me this, and I'm listening to her, my first thought is, wow, that feels really unfair.

• 39:46Speaker 02

  Like, his, his treating, his guy weekend is not the same thing as your work trip that you rarely, she rarely, rarely takes work trips. And that feels really, in my head, I was thinking, that feels really controlling and manipulative. This is what I was thinking about him, for better or for worse. So then, a couple of days later, she comes back, and she, they've talked, and she said, you know what, he's, he's really concerned about us taking time away from the marriage while things are not, while we're not really on solid ground, while we're not on solid footing, whether that means the increased likelihood of infidelity, or, or just that it, that it could create distance between the two of them. And suddenly, the assumptions that I had jumped to

• 40:30Speaker 02

  about him being manipulative, feeling sort of manipulative and controlling, I had to, I was stopped in my tracks. And I was sort of like, wow, I can, I can see how he got there. I can see how he, whatever I originally thought about his decisions about canceling travel and work trips, I, when she said that, I could see, wow, I see how he could get there in a way that has nothing to do with being manipulative, being controlling, it's just out of concern for their marriage, etc. That's the difference between being in the certainty trap and out of it. Does that make sense?

• 41:06Mike Carruthers?

  Yeah, that makes sense. My example that, that I was thinking about was...

• 41:12Mike Carruthers?

  Because I see this all the time of people who are so dismissive of, say, the guy, the homeless guy who needs five bucks for whatever he needs it for. And people, you know, don't even see those people or dismiss them because of their appearance, because they they're homeless. They make assumptions about them. And I'm more the person that goes up and talks to them and gives them a little money and tries to hear their story a little bit. But most people are very certain that that is the dregs of society and stay away.

• 41:47Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think that's right. I mean, I think that example works too. I think all of those conclusions that we draw about people that allow us to, as you said, I mean, I think the word dismissive is really is really apt here, to just sort of be dismissive, to to look the other way. You know, another example I can think of would be when I'm, I used to be the person on the on the plane who would get annoyed at children who were crying, particularly babies who were crying, right? This was years ago before I had kids.

• 42:20Mike Carruthers?

  Right, it's always before you have kids.

• 42:22Speaker 02

  It's always before you have kids. And I would think, oh, my gosh, you know, like, what is this person do? Like, how is this parent, you know, whatever the situation is? Like, there must be something that they could be doing that is that would keep that child quiet. And they're not doing it because they just don't care about, you know, how much it's bothering other people. And then, you know, when I had kids and I was the person holding the crying child on the long flight, and I had no idea what else I could do to try and quiet the child, like, I'd done everything. And I could imagine, and I could, I could easily imagine that there were other people on that flight that were viewing people that were, excuse me, that were viewing me the same way I had viewed others in those years before. That's certainty. That's that's the way it's about how we judge people.

• 43:08Mike Carruthers?

  And doesn't it seem that lately, like in the past, I don't know, 10, 20 years or so, there's been more of that certainty and less of the less of the open-mindedness that, you know, before, two people on opposite sides of an issue and opposite sides of anything could still talk and be friendly. But now it's now we've thrown in this moral outrage piece that prevents that from happening because you're wrong and I'm right, rather than we just disagree.

• 43:44Speaker 02

  It does seem to me like, I mean, I'm 51. It does seem to me like it has it is worse in the last, say, 20 years. I think there are, you know, people have a lot of theories about why that's the case, include, you know, social media is one of the things that is often mentioned. Social media rewards, if what you're trying to do is build a following, social media tends to reward outrage. So that's creates an incentive. I don't mean to say that that's the only factor, but I think it's probably one of them. And I also think that there are, there have been changes in how we think about

• 44:26Speaker 02

  education, what's true about the world and how we treat that information that has shifted in the last 20 years.

• 44:36Mike Carruthers?

  What I see, and you see this in politics mostly, or at least most clearly, is when a person holds a position and then someone who disagrees with that position, not only disagrees with the position, but then attacks the person for thinking what they think, that because you think that, you're an idiot. And God, what, it didn't used to be like that.

• 45:01Speaker 02

  Right, it's that idea that the person who disagrees with me must be an idiot or hateful in some way. That's the, that's the problem that I'm trying to solve with the certainty trap. And it doesn't mean that you can't say, this is right, this is wrong, this is good and this is bad. What it means is you need to be clear about it and clear about what those principles are that that are sort of driving your opinion. And not, and that means, kind of as you were saying, that means not attacking, attacking someone's character.

• 45:36Mike Carruthers?

  Well, what I wonder is what is the motive here? Because no one actually believes that if I'm morally outraged and call you an idiot for thinking what you think, I'm not going to change your mind. If anything, I'm going to make you dig your heels in more. So what's the goal here? Why the moral outrage? It doesn't work. It doesn't... Somebody can't post something on Facebook and attack a whole group of people and go, "There, that should fix that. They'll change their minds now." No, they won't. Nobody will.

• 46:12Speaker 02

  It's a good question. I mean, so I don't want to sound like I think there's one goal that sort of answers that question equally for everybody. I can give you one answer, though. So I'm in the sociology department at the University of Illinois. And sociology, higher education, just on the political spectrum, I'm not saying anything new here, higher education leans left. Sociology within higher education is one of the disciplines that leans left within higher education. So that tends to be the orientation of a lot of the students that I see, for example. I would not say that when I interact with students, I would not say that their goal is necessarily to change minds.

• 46:57Speaker 02

  And I'm generalizing. There's obviously variability within students. I would say that they genuinely feel certain and believe that they are doing the right thing when they are saying, "This is wrong. This is hateful," et cetera. Right? Like, I think that it comes from, at least from what I've seen, not necessarily an instrumental goal of saying, "I'm going to tell you you're racist and then you're going to change your mind," but a feeling that I need to call this out when I see it. And that's my... Maybe they wouldn't word it this way, but that's my moral duty.

• 47:40Mike Carruthers?

  Yeah, but to what end? But nothing comes of it, so, big deal.

• 47:46Speaker 02

  Right, well, that part of that is, well, I don't even, actually, I'm not even sure I agree with that. I don't think nothing comes with it. I think, sorry, nothing comes of it. I think that what comes out of it is more extremism, more polarization, more contempt, etc. Like, I think what comes, and so part of what I'm trying to do is help them understand that that's, that that's part of what's going on. So I don't think, if what you mean by nothing, you know, what comes out of it, yeah, what comes out of it in terms of, as you started to say, changing minds, like, making the world a better place, that I don't think is where it ends up. I think it has all of these other consequences. So I don't, in other words, I don't think that that kind of behavior is neutral.

• 48:27Speaker 02

  I think it has negative consequences that I'm trying to help people understand.

• 48:32Mike Carruthers?

  Yeah, well, I think you're, you're probably right about that. Because when you dis, when I become dismissive of you,

• 48:42Mike Carruthers?

  people get defensive and dismiss back. So now the dismissor is dismissing the dismissor. It's a lot of, and it just, it just churns the pot. It just churns and churns and makes it worse.

• 48:55Speaker 02

  It does, and it, it has all kinds of implications for, again, like, I sort of said this, but for extremism, for pushing people to, further to extreme positions, for how we, how we use terms like racist, transphobic, etc., to condemn ideas, and, and, and all of what that means with the social consequences that go along with it in terms of cancel culture and everything else. It's all sort of folded in to this idea of certainty and how we think about contentious topics. Really, is that's the sort of through line between it.

• 49:34Mike Carruthers?

  And so what is the prescription? If you think you're perhaps in the certainty trap, I mean, what is it you would like to see people start doing?

• 49:44Speaker 02

  I would love to see people start out. So what, one of the things that I'll ask people to do is pick your, some issue that you think, and you think the person who has a different idea from you, it has to be, it's odious, it's objectionable, it's hateful, it's, it's only some kind of moral monster would hold that opinion. And for different people, it will be different topics. So whatever it is for you, and you can do this sitting in a room by yourself, pick that issue and challenge yourself to try and come up with a version of that person's opinion, the one that you find objectionable, that would make sense to you. And I mean something really

• 50:25Speaker 02

  specific by makes sense. I mean that you can't hang on an assumption about their intent, or that they just don't have the right information. So I call these, I have names for these fallacies, the fallacy of equal knowledge and the fallacy of known intent. So pick the objectionable point of view, try and come up with a version of that, like how the person could get to that point of view that makes sense to you. And I'll just say this again, by makes sense, you're not hanging it on an assumption about their intent, or that they just don't have the right information. Most of the time, for most issues, just going through that process helps people understand, wow, okay, I get it, there's a different way of thinking

• 51:08Speaker 02

  about this. Then you can ask yourself the question, if you encounter somebody who has that view that you find objectionable, okay, well, maybe it's because they're hateful or stupid or whatever, but I actually also came up with this other possible explanation over here that I did on my own. How do I decide which one? That's, that's destabilizing certainty, right? So now you have two possible explanations. And you can ask yourself, how likely do I think one is versus the other and why and et cetera? If you can't, there will always be some issues where you cannot come up with, there's no version of, you know, the pro-slavery argument that I think is reasonable to me. When that happens, your commitment in avoiding the certainty trap is to being very clear.

• 51:54Speaker 02

  About what kind of bedrock principle you're bumping up against. So in the slavery example, it might be something like, I think all lives have equal moral value. Or I think no human being should enslave another. And naming that principle in a way and using language that somebody who disagrees with you would understand. Does that make sense?

• 52:19Mike Carruthers?

  Yeah, that makes sense. And I really appreciate having this conversation because it makes you think about what you think, about what other people think and how to bridge the gaps and understand. I've been speaking with Ilana Redstone. She's a professor of sociology at the University of Illinois and author of the book, The Certainty Trap: Why We Need to Question Ourselves More and How We Can Judge Others Less. And there's a link to that book at Amazon in the show notes. Thanks, Ilana.

• 52:48Speaker 02

  Well, thank you so much.

• 52:53Mike Carruthers?

  If you have central air conditioning or forced air heating, there's a pretty good chance those systems are not filtering out all the junk in the air that they should, according to Jeff May, who's author of a book called My House Is Killing Me. In surveys, many people don't use the right kind of filter or change the filters often enough. The cheapest and easiest way to improve the air quality in your home is to get a really good disposable filter. The best kind is a pleated filter rated MERV 8 or higher. Jeff says you can get them at most big home improvement stores or hardware stores. And he recommends that you don't pay extra for the filters that are washable and reusable. Stick with disposable.

• 53:38Mike Carruthers?

  Experts say there's no way to really get those other ones clean. Replacing filters every three months will give you cleaner air and save you money. Dirty filters force your system to work harder. And that is something you should know. You know what'd be great? It would just be great if you would just take a moment and tell someone else you know about this podcast and make a suggestion that they give it a listen. It helps us to grow our audience and every podcaster wants their audience to grow. So please help us out and share something you should know with someone you know. I'm Micah Rutherford. Thanks for listening today to Something You Should Know.