Could 'Severance' Become Our Reality?

What if we had the ultimate work-life balance? This fundamental question underlies the hit Apple TV+ show Severance https://tv.apple.com/us/show/severance/umc.cmc.1srk2goyh2q2zdxcx605w8vtx – now in its second season. Ahead of the season 2 finale this Friday, producer Rachel Carlson https://www.npr.org/people/1112796909/rachel-carlson sat down with the science consultant for the series, Dr. Vijay Agarwal https://montefioreeinstein.org/profiles/1902123128/vijay-agarwal. Vijay says the concept is "resoundingly" possible – and that scientists are closer than we might think. More questions about the intersections of pop culture and science? Email us at [email protected] mailto:[email protected]. Listen to every episode of Short Wave sponsor-free and support our work at NPR by signing up for Short Wave+ at plus.npr.org/shortwave http://plus.npr.org/shortwave. See pcm.adswizz.com https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences. NPR Privacy Policy https://www.npr.org/about-npr/179878450/privacy-policy

• 0:00Speaker 00

  This message comes from the Southern Environmental Law Center. No one voted for dirty air and water. That's why S E L C is fighting back to defend the healthy environment everyone depends on. Because it's not political, it's fundamental. Learn more at S E L C dot org.

• 0:17Speaker 01

  Hey, short waivers. Producer Rachel Carlson here. Before we start, you should know this episode contains Severance season two spoilers. All right, we warned you. You're listening to Short Wave from NPR. So every morning I try to wake up around 5:45 a.m. ish. I almost always hit the snooze once. OK, fine, twice. And an hour later, I'm walking into the office. I say hi to our editor, Rebecca. Hello. Hello. But what if that me walking into NPR wasn't really me?

• 1:00Speaker 02

  Or was me? I was her.

• 1:04Speaker 01

  But these two versions of myself were completely separate. What if we had the ultimate work-life balance?

• 1:20Speaker 03

  Number one, can you do this scientifically? And I think resoundingly, the answer is yes. And then number two, I think, is a bigger question, is should we be doing these things?

• 1:36Speaker 01

  These fundamental questions are at the root of the hit Apple TV Plus show Severance, now in its second season. And I love TV and I love neuroscience, so I had to hear from Dr. Vijay Agarwal. He's a neurosurgeon and Severance's science consultant. In the show, some employees at a company called Lumen Industries undergo a surgical procedure that alters their brain. Their memories are divided between work experiences, where they're known as their inns, and their personal lives, where they're known as their outies. The protagonist, Mark Scout, and many of the other characters in the show choose to get the procedure after personal trauma. It's a way of escaping their everyday lives.

• 2:17Speaker 03

  You're really escaping to the place that we traditionally in society really consider escaping from, to escape some of these more traumatic memories.

• 2:27Speaker 03

  So the amygdala and hippocampus helps us process memories, but also associates very, very strong emotions, fear and hate and love, with very specific memories. And so what better part of the brain to target than the area that allows us to, number one, process memories? And number two, associate those with some of the strongest emotions that we feel that make us human?

• 2:50Speaker 01

  Vijay says the show's creator, Dan Erickson, and the executive producers, including Ben Stiller, were set on making the show as realistic as possible when it came down to the science.

• 3:01Speaker 03

  I remember taking a marker and writing on the whiteboard and printing out articles and printing out pictures and then really discussing it as a group about how we wanted to do that. It is very much scientifically, surgically, medically accurate.

• 3:20Speaker 01

  So today on the show, the neuroscience of severance. The connection between trauma and memory, the ethics of neurotechnology, and why one neuroscientist says the show, it's not too far off from reality. You're listening to Short Wave, the science podcast from NPR.

• 3:52Speaker 00

  Stay tuned for the following announcements and messages from our sponsors. This message comes from Avalara Aviator. Aviator is the agent hub for tax and compliance. If you've listened to enough podcasts, you know a confident answer isn't necessarily a correct one. Sources matter. The same goes for AI, tax, and compliance. Aviator is grounded in 20-plus years of Avalara tax intelligence and delivers source-backed audit-defensible outcomes with human oversight built in. Because the AI said so, won't pass an audit. Visit avalara.com/aviator. This message comes from EasyCater. Making it easy for organizations to order food for meetings and events from favorite restaurants, set up meal programs for their employees,

• 4:36Speaker 00

  and manage food spend all in one place at easycater.com.

• 4:41Speaker 04

  How did we get here? That's a question we have been trying to answer a lot here at NPR. We are exploring global histories on Throughline. We're hearing from national security experts on sources and methods. We're watching the markets with Planet Money. You can support this work across all our podcasts with NPR+. Find out more at plus.npr.org.

• 5:06Speaker 01

  All right, so Vijay, we're talking about the neuroscience of the Apple TV show Severance, and some companies are developing neurotechnology now that would go into our brains in real life. How far off is reality from what's happening in the show?

• 5:21Speaker 03

  Yeah, you know, I actually think we're not that far off. So in medicine, in nerve surgery, we are currently putting in electrodes to stimulate the brain. Because if you look at the brain, it's really, at a basic level, one giant computer. And if you're able to change sort of the electrical input to the computer, you can change the way that your computer functions. You could turn it on and off, you could open up different programs, you could change the way those programs function. That's exactly what we're actually doing with the brain. And there are current companies right now that are doing that. And I like to use this example about how really a lot of the entropy that goes into scientific advancement is in really establishing the technology.

• 6:04Speaker 03

  Then, once you have the technology, then you're able to make that technology grow very, very quick. And I like to use the example of flight. You know, the Wright Brothers really did the first flight in 1903. It was only 11 years later where we started flying people commercially. And I think we have now, in this field, we've taken our first flight. And now we're getting ready to take our first commercial flight.

• 6:24Speaker 01

  Wow, okay. So then, you were kind of talking about this before, but what areas of the brain are we targeting? Or what areas of the brain would we target?

• 6:34Speaker 03

  Yeah, I love talking about that. And the area that I targeted, or we targeted, in the show was the amygdala and hippocampus. And that is such a perfect area for, I think, what Ben's vision was, which was, you know, how do we separate memories and the emotions that are associated with memories? So that's a perfect area. But in broader strokes... And the brain is really an unbelievable organ. The areas that we stimulate will be the areas that cause the effects that we want. So if we want people to be able to walk, we would stimulate the motor cortex, which is the area of the brain that controls our movement.

• 7:09Speaker 01

  Right. What are some of the ethical considerations of things like neurotechnology?

• 7:16Speaker 03

  Should we be doing it?

• 7:20Speaker 03

  So imagine being able to turn people's memories on and off and being able to enhance or decrease the sort of functional level of certain areas.

• 7:31Speaker 03

  Who do we just decide has the power to make those changes? So we are not far off from being able to control those things. But then it begs the question, who's the one holding the remote?

• 7:42Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, I feel like the episode focused on Mark's wife Gemma this season in episode seven

• 7:47Speaker 03

  Yeah.

• 7:48Speaker 01

  really gets into the potential for abuse. So maybe we can talk a little bit more about that and how you think the show deals with it.

• 7:55Speaker 03

  Yeah, so this episode seven was brilliant. There are a lot of different threads you can pull for abuse. There is that one facility where women go to have children and they can sort of separate sort of themselves from the care of the children with their regular lives. And so there was a lot of different ethical questions that came from there. And I think one of the biggest ethical questions of the show is almost like an existential question, is that if we're turning off our ability to remember, are we not confronting the memories that bring us trauma? Are we just forgetting the memories but still holding on to these very painful,

• 8:40Speaker 03

  traumatic emotions? So are we not actually healing?

• 8:44Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 8:45Speaker 03

  Because what happens is these emotions that come, a lot of times depression and severe depression actually changes the way that your brain is firing. It's actually, your neurotransmitters that are released It's an abnormal functioning of the release of these neurotransmitters. And your brain is not firing appropriately. So if we just forget the memory, do we forget the emotions that came from that memory?

• 9:09Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, Vijay, let's talk about that more. I feel like throughout the show, characters have these moments where fragments of trauma break across the severed barrier of their brains, if you want to call it that. You can see it through Gemma's experiences in all those different rooms, or even with Irving's drawings.

• 9:28Speaker 03

  Yeah, I think that's a perfect way to summarize it. So you can forget a memory, but it's a much bigger task to forget the trauma.

• 9:36Speaker 01

  Wow, yeah. So one of the big fan theories right now is about transferring consciousness, specifically that Kier and maybe other Egans could be brought back somehow by transferring his consciousness into a new body. And maybe that's what all the tests are for. So I know you can't give us any spoilers, but how would you go about advising a show on consciousness?

• 10:00Speaker 03

  Yeah, so it's interesting. And the only thing I would say to that is that, you know, I would just watch through the rest of the season.

• 10:10Speaker 01

  Okay.

• 10:10Speaker 03

  Where the season goes is pretty unbelievable. It's gonna blow your mind, no pun intended. And then you specifically asked this theory of if you're able to bring somebody else's consciousness into somebody else's body.

• 10:27Speaker 03

  And that's a very different sort of concept, because everybody's brain is different. And everybody's brain functions differently. Number one, nature and nurture.

• 10:40Speaker 03

  So you're born a certain way, but the majority of who you are, I think, is really developed by the external world. And it takes years to develop that type of person that you are. And I think it's very exemplified in the show, because although you go from an outie to an innie, the majority of the characters in the show, their personalities are maintained from their outie to an innie. Jess, who's the cinematographer, she actually directed this brilliant episode, episode seven. You could actually see Mark, played by Adam Scott, before all the trauma of Gemma dying. And it goes into this very charming, charismatic sort of guy. You see a lot of those personalities maintained in the innie, where he doesn't have the memory of Gemma dying.

• 11:27Speaker 03

  So to be able to transfer that to somebody else in somebody else's brain, I think is a very, very difficult thing to do.

• 11:33Speaker 01

  Hmm. Right now, so many researchers are interested in studying altered states of consciousness, things like psychedelics, even anesthetics as potential treatments for things like PTSD. And since we've been talking about trauma and grief and escape as big themes of the show, was that consciousness research something that you were thinking about at all when you were helping to craft some of the more scientific parts of the narrative?

• 11:58Speaker 03

  Yeah, so that's a great question. So I looked into things like ayahuasca journeys and things like that. I looked into anything that people did to process their trauma. And the thing about sort of medicine journeys is that people go to medicine journeys, I think, to confront, directly confront, the trauma.

• 12:17Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 12:17Speaker 03

  And I think that was the biggest difference that I found in those sorts of activities is that medicine journeys are to, you know, when you do an ayahuasca journey, you are like, you know, a lot of people get very, very sick, you know, they're throwing up and because it's almost like they're expelling these things from their body, they're confronting them and it's very, very painful. But I think that's the biggest difference because Mark doesn't really confront the fact that Gemma died. He escaped, tried to escape that reality. Where in a medicine journey, you are confronting that head on.

• 12:50Speaker 01

  Right.

• 12:50Speaker 03

  And then sort of deciding how to work through those emotions. So I think it's almost like a different tactic. And that's the reason why I kind of steered away from those sorts of things. And that's the big question is, is Mark really working through his pain? I don't think so. I think Mark severed to try to escape his pain.

• 13:08Speaker 01

  Does this show make you appreciate anything about how the world works, about how the brain works in a way that you hadn't thought about before working on it?

• 13:16Speaker 03

  Yeah, I think it does. You know, I've spent my whole life, my whole adult life, doing nothing but trying to understand the brain.

• 13:23Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 13:24Speaker 03

  And the more I got into, you know, they, they say the further you go in the ocean, the deeper it gets. That's a perfect metaphor for where the show is and sort of where this technology is. And so I think we're on the cusp of really delving into some very huge discoveries in terms of the brain and neuroscience. But that's the one thing that struck me is the more you really got into it, the more you understand that we just don't understand very much.

• 13:55Speaker 01

  All right. Well, Vijay, thank you so much for talking to me. I am so excited to hopefully have some of the puzzle pieces fit together.

• 14:04Speaker 03

  I cannot wait to talk to you after the last episode.

• 14:11Speaker 01

  I produced this episode and it was edited by our showrunner, Rebecca Ramirez. Tyler Jones checked the facts. The audio engineers were Kwasi Lee, Gilly Moon, and Harrison Paul. Beth Donovan is our senior director and Colin Campbell is the senior vice president of podcasting strategy. I'm Rachel Carlson. Thanks for listening to Short Wave, the science podcast from NPR.

• 14:40Speaker 01

  You even have a cameo in the show, right?

• 14:42Speaker 03

  I do.

• 14:42Speaker 01

  Is it season one?

• 14:43Speaker 03

  Season one, episode two, about minute three, but who's counting? I tell people this all the time, that, you know, it's the role of a neurosurgeon. And I've been really training for that role my whole life.

• 14:53Speaker 01

  Method acting.

• 14:54Speaker 05

  Stay tuned for the following announcements and messages from our sponsors.