Controversy In Yellowstone

Thirty years ago, park rangers reintroduced grey wolves into Yellowstone National Park. They wanted to restore the ecosystem and get the elk population, which had decimated the plant community, in check. And it worked – or so the popular narrative suggests. But is it really so simple? Today on the show, we explore how the Yellowstone ecosystem has changed since wolves returned and whether those changes can really be pinned solely on wolves. Plus, how the narrative of the Yellowstone wolf legacy could affect wolf reintroduction elsewhere. (encore) Curious about other science controversies? Email us at [email protected] mailto:[email protected]. Listen to every episode of Short Wave sponsor-free and support our work at NPR by signing up for Short Wave+ at plus.npr.org/shortwave http://plus.npr.org/shortwave. See pcm.adswizz.com https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences. NPR Privacy Policy https://www.npr.org/about-npr/179878450/privacy-policy

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  This message comes from Google Workspace with Gemini. One subscription that does it all. Personalized AI and premium business versions of Gmail, Google Docs, Drive and more. Try it free for 14 days at g o o dot g l e slash Workspace with Gemini.

• 0:17Emily Kwong?

  Hey, short waveers. Emily Kwong here. Real quick before the show, let's talk about public media. Public media has been in the news a lot this year. And public media is what makes NPR shows like Short Wave special. It's made for you. When you listen to an NPR podcast, the people who make it aren't thinking about shareholders or advertisers, we're thinking about you and delivering on a promise to help you understand the world a little better. From its very founding in the US, public media was also meant to tell stories from underrepresented communities, providing cultural insight that expands your perspective. At NPR, we still believe in all of that. We always will.

• 0:59Emily Kwong?

  But as of this fall, federal funding for public media, including NPR and local NPR stations, has been eliminated. And now we're heading into an uncharted future. But we know you won't let public media go away. We rely on your support to bring you Short Wave now more than ever. This year, we have loved bringing you stories about, among many other things, what happens inside a top secret nuclear facility, whether kids should be taking melatonin, why flowers are blooming early, how nightmares work, and what happens when AI cannibalizes its own data. And we cannot wait to bring you more episodes like that in 2026. So, thank you if you already go the extra mile as an NPR Plus supporter.

• 1:42Emily Kwong?

  If not, you can join the Plus community now. There has never been a better time. You get a bunch of perks like bonus episodes and more from across NPR's podcasts. Support public media by signing up for NPR Plus today at plus.npr.org. Thank you so much.

• 2:04Emily Kwong?

  You're listening to Short Wave from NPR.

• 2:09Emily Kwong?

  Hey, Short Wavers. Emily Kwong here with producer Burleigh McCoy. Hi, Burleigh.

• 2:12Speaker 02

  Hey, Emily.

• 2:13Emily Kwong?

  OK, what do you got for us today?

• 2:15Speaker 02

  So I've brought you a complicated story about wolves in Yellowstone National Park.

• 2:19Emily Kwong?

  I've never been to Yellowstone. I've always wanted to go. Are the wolves a big deal there?

• 2:23Speaker 02

  Yeah, so I live in Montana, and most anyone in the Mountain West will tell you, people have big feelings about wolves here.

• 2:30Emily Kwong?

  Yeah.

• 2:31Speaker 02

  Some years ago, I remember driving by this huge billboard with a picture of a majestic-looking wolf with a message like, "Protect the wolves." And someone had shot an arrow through its forehead.

• 2:41Emily Kwong?

  Oh, that sends a message. Why?

• 2:44Speaker 02

  Well, wolves are predators, and some people view them as a menace. Even though they used to be native in the area, they were hunted almost to the point of extinction in the late 18 and early 1900s, often with poison that killed other animals. It was nasty. Then 30 years ago, around a few dozen wolves were reintroduced.

• 3:04Emily Kwong?

  Uh huh.

• 3:04Speaker 02

  And now there's a big scientific debate about how they've affected the ecosystem.

• 3:09Emily Kwong?

  OK, 30 years of wolf reintroduction. We're recognizing that anniversary with this episode. What is the debate?

• 3:18Speaker 02

  Well, first, I'll say most everyone agrees that the absence of wolves and other predators caused a spike in the elk population. And these elk ate up all the trees and shrubs, especially by the rivers. And because of this, the beavers left. So no more dams, the rivers changed, they got deeper and faster. So wildlife ecologist Avery Schaller says, after the wolves came back...

• 3:43Speaker 03

  The story goes that wolves impacted the density or behavior of elk so much that the effects cascaded, trickled down to aspens and willows, which affected... Beavers and songbirds and eventually changed the course of the rivers.

• 4:00Speaker 02

  She told me a few years after the first wolf reintroduction, one group of scientists started detailing this ecosystem-wide change and claiming the wolves were causing these huge ripple effects. The media picked up the story and ran with it. And to a large extent, that's the story that stuck.

• 4:18Emily Kwong?

  You sound skeptical of this wolf narrative. Is there another side to the story?

• 4:23Speaker 02

  There is. I talked to a lot of scientists who say this story is way too simple and overstated and that wolves are just one piece of a much larger puzzle for how elk numbers dropped.

• 4:34Emily Kwong?

  So today on the show, we explore the legacy of wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park, three decades on.

• 4:41Speaker 02

  Plus, how some scientists think wolves' effects on the ecosystem have been overplayed and the potential consequences of getting the narrative wrong.

• 4:50Emily Kwong?

  You're listening to Short Wave, the science podcast from NPR.

• 5:04Speaker 00

  Stay tuned for the following announcements and messages from our sponsors. This message comes from International Medical Corps. When crises strike, every second matters. And that's why International Medical Corps moves fast. From the flooding in Nepal to earthquakes in Venezuela, they deliver lifesaving medical care and supplies around the world while training local health workers to ensure care continues long after the emergency ends. This giving season, your generosity saves lives and builds resilience for tomorrow. Learn more or donate today at internationalmedicalcorps.org/NPR.

• 5:41Speaker 04

  This message comes from Edward Jones, where they believe rich isn't about having life all figured out. It's opening yourself to all the possibilities. That's why your dedicated financial advisor provides long-term planning built around you, meeting you where you are and helping you get closer to where you want to be. So no matter where you're starting from or wherever life takes you, you can move forward with confidence. The key to being rich is knowing what counts. Let's find your rich together. Edward Jones. Member SIPC.

• 6:14Speaker 00

  This message comes from HomeServe. Got a burst pipe, HVAC outage, or electrical issue? HomeServe has your back. Go to homeserve.com/audio for 50% less your first year. Savings compared to renewal price. Boyd in Florida.

• 6:29Emily Kwong?

  Okay, Burley, so we're talking about a dispute among scientists regarding this Yellowstone wolf narrative. So for a long time, the story went that when wolves were reintroduced in 1995, so 30 years ago, the entire ecosystem became altered. Where did that narrative come from?

• 6:48Speaker 02

  So it really starts with data collected in the 90s by then-graduate student Eric Larson at Oregon State University.

• 6:56Speaker 05

  I wasn't looking at, you know, wolves particularly at all. I was looking for reasons why aspen wasn't reproducing in Yellowstone Park.

• 7:06Emily Kwong?

  Okay, so he's a tree guy, this Eric.

• 7:08Speaker 02

  Yes, and this was a few years after wolves were reintroduced in northern Yellowstone. Eric was looking at current and archival tree ring data, and he found that growth had fallen off around the 1920s.

• 7:20Emily Kwong?

  What happened in the 1920s?

• 7:22Speaker 02

  Well, that's around the time humans had killed so many wolves that they were basically locally extinct. And the technical term for this is "extrapated." So Eric and his advisor, William Ripple, he goes by Bill, hypothesized that because the wolves were gone, elk numbers exploded, and those elk started eating the trees.

• 7:40Emily Kwong?

  I had no idea that elk ate trees. They sound voracious. So essentially, their hypothesis was less wolves meant less aspen trees?

• 7:51Speaker 02

  Yes, aspen and other vegetation like willows. So after wolves were brought back, the natural question became, did the trees come back too? So in 2001, they published a paper where they looked at tree growth in more than 100 stands of aspen, this time looking at the height of the tallest tree in the stand. And they found trees were growing better where wolves spent more time. Presumably because elk were afraid of the wolves. And leaving the trees alone.

• 8:19Emily Kwong?

  OK, I can see how a straightforward narrative then emerged from this finding that the livelihood of the trees was somehow linked to the wolves.

• 8:28Speaker 02

  Yeah, exactly. And Eric's advisor, Bill, took off with this line of reasoning. Along with another scientist, Bob Besta, they started publishing more papers about how wolves have these cascading ecosystem effects.

• 8:40Emily Kwong?

  OK, what does Eric think of all of that, the guy we met in the beginning?

• 8:44Speaker 02

  Well, he went in a different direction. Eric kept going back to those 100 Aspen stands, year after year, diligently collecting data.

• 8:53Speaker 06

  I just had a feeling, you know, that if I stuck with it for 20 years, I could show something important.

• 9:01Speaker 02

  And he ends up teaming up with another group who use the same data set, but instead they look at average growth.

• 9:07Emily Kwong?

  OK, instead of just the tallest tree.

• 9:09Speaker 02

  Right. And Eric and his new collaborators come to a different conclusion about the Aspen. Here's one of those scientists, Laney Bryce.

• 9:17Speaker 07

  Some of them are doing really, really well. Some of them haven't recovered at all. Some have died out entirely. So it's a very patchy response.

• 9:26Speaker 02

  And Bob and Bill agree. The recovery is kind of patchy.

• 9:29Emily Kwong?

  OK.

• 9:30Speaker 02

  Where those two teams disagree is how the wolves influenced this recovery. Bob and Bill say wolves have unmistakably triggered this change. Eric and his team say it's more complicated than that.

• 9:42Emily Kwong?

  OK, so people agree the trees have come back. They agree the recovery's been kind of patchy. They don't agree on what the wolves had to do with it. And I guess the real question I have is about the creature in between, the elk. Have elk numbers gone down since the wolves came back?

• 9:58Speaker 02

  Short answer, Emily, yeah. There were around 12,000 elk when the wolves were wiped out in the 20s, and the population grew over the following decades, reached a high in 1994 of close to 20,000.

• 10:11Emily Kwong?

  That's a lot of elk.

• 10:11Speaker 02

  Yeah, and that number quickly plummeted back down to around 12,000 after wolves were reintroduced the following year. But Emily, there's another variable here.

• 10:20Emily Kwong?

  What's that?

• 10:21Speaker 02

  Hunters.

• 10:22Emily Kwong?

  Oh, humans.

• 10:23Speaker 02

  Humans.

• 10:24Emily Kwong?

  So, wait, people can hunt in Yellowstone?

• 10:26Speaker 02

  No, not in Yellowstone. Hunting is prohibited in the park, but the winter of 96, 97 was really harsh, and that pushed a lot of elk outside the park in search of food.

• 10:39Emily Kwong?

  Which exposed them to hunters.

• 10:40Speaker 02

  Exactly. That year, hunters killed more than 3,000 elk. And hunters are often killing primaged females, whereas wolves usually kill the very old or the very young. So many scientists say hunters had a bigger impact on the elk population than wolves. And on top of that, Laney, the scientist from earlier, who saw the patchy aspen recovery, said they looked at where elk were spending their time and

• 11:04Speaker 07

  We didn't really see much different in elk browsing activity depending on wolf risks.

• 11:11Speaker 02

  Meaning elk might avoid eating aspen in some areas at certain times because wolves are there, but they're not avoiding the area altogether.

• 11:20Emily Kwong?

  Oh, that's a real plot twist. So it's not true that the elk are just avoiding areas where wolves are. There are some places perhaps where wolves and elk are coexisting?

• 11:31Speaker 02

  Yeah, and this finding has shifted the narrative. Wolves may be eating elk, but they aren't scaring them away entirely. And Emily, at the same time wolves disappeared, humans were also killing two other predators of elk, so cougars and bears. And their decline likely also contributed to the elk boom.

• 11:51Emily Kwong?

  All right, so we got cougars and bears and wolves. It's not just the wolves eating the elk. And that's the end of the story.

• 11:59Speaker 02

  And then there are the beavers.

• 12:00Emily Kwong?

  How many animals are involved in this?

• 12:02Speaker 02

  I know, I know, I know. I'm just gonna bring the one more in. Okay, so there's a lot. Here's the situation. Beavers need these river shrubs called willows for food and building their dams. And during the elk boom, elk ate those willows. So the beavers moved out.

• 12:17Emily Kwong?

  These elk just won't quit. That's what I'm also learning from this story is these elk, when they want to eat trees, they're gonna make sure that happens, you know?

• 12:23Speaker 02

  And elk gotta eat. But Emily, beavers have made a comeback, partially because of humans.

• 12:29Emily Kwong?

  So like, humans are one of the biggest drivers of change in Yellowstone.

• 12:32Speaker 02

  Yeah, so scientists relocated dozens of beavers in the 80s and 90s in the area just north of the park. And over time, some of them moved into the park.

• 12:41Emily Kwong?

  Wow.

• 12:42Speaker 02

  Tom Hobbs, an ecologist at Colorado State University, has studied beavers and willows in the area for the last couple of decades. And he says beavers have returned to the bigger streams and rivers in Yellowstone, but they're too big for them to dam, which means maybe the return of the beavers hasn't changed the course of the rivers.

• 13:01Emily Kwong?

  Yeah. Okay. So any, any narrative that is simplistic is just not going to work in Yellowstone, especially the one that the wolves affected the elk, which affected the trees, which affected the beavers, which affected the rivers. It's, again, all too simplistic.

• 13:13Speaker 02

  Yeah. And that's not to mention other complicating factors that we can't really get into in the length of our podcast. So not going to go there, but just know there are a lot more.

• 13:23Emily Kwong?

  Well, otherwise it'd be like an Agatha Christie level murder mystery with many people in the drawing room with different weapons.

• 13:29Speaker 02

  Isn't it already, though?

• 13:31Emily Kwong?

  Yeah. So, Burley, I have a question. Those scientists, Bill and Bob, who originally linked wolves to this environmental cascade, were like, it was the wolves. What do they have to say about all this new data?

• 13:42Speaker 02

  So they're doubling down. Earlier this year, they published a paper saying the trophic cascade in Yellowstone, which they say was due to wolves and cougars, was stronger than most trophic cascades reported globally. And other scientists just published a pre-print rebuttal saying that analysis was flawed and that the environmental effects of wolves weren't nearly as strong as they're suggesting.

• 14:05Emily Kwong?

  Arrows fired, straight into each other's research, like that billboard. Um, outside of uncovering truth for truth's sake, why is it so important to get this story right? The legacy of the wolves in Yellowstone and their reintroduction?

• 14:22Speaker 02

  Because in response to that very simple narrative we started the episode with, people in other areas are pushing to reintroduce wolves where they live in an effort to restore the ecosystem. And they're often using Yellowstone to justify it. But if people expect wolves to have these sweeping environmental changes, especially in short timeframes, it's setting up that community for failure.

• 14:44Emily Kwong?

  That's a fascinating takeaway. Yeah. Because also, in addition to it being a mistake to overemphasize the ecological power of wolf reintroduction, I'm guessing not every place is like Yellowstone, which, which has these wide open swaths of land. You know, every region's different.

• 15:02Speaker 02

  Exactly. And that brings up a huge hurdle in wolf reintroduction clashes with people. I talked to Sisto Hernandez, a rancher in the White Mountains in Arizona.

• 15:12Speaker 08

  On both sides of the border. My family's been in ranching for time immemorial.

• 15:15Speaker 02

  So wolves were reintroduced around there in the late 90s. And he's part of his tribe's council on creating a coexistence plan to compensate ranchers for livestock losses. And he doesn't like that the wolves are there.

• 15:28Speaker 08

  There isn't much to generate revenue on the reservation.

• 15:34Speaker 08

  And ranching is one of those things that we can do, and it limits us on that.

• 15:41Speaker 02

  And this is something that scientists told me over and over again, that if we get the Yellowstone narrative wrong, people could use it to justify wolf reintroduction in places very different from Yellowstone, where more people live, so more potential conflicts. They also said focusing on wolves ignores a lot. Here's Avery again, the wildlife biologist from the beginning of the episode.

• 16:04Speaker 03

  When you get this kind of tunnel vision on single species conservation, it can really ignore other bigger threats to, to wolves and other species that also matter.

• 16:19Speaker 02

  She says it's easy to focus on these grand narratives and people who see wolves as either menace or savior. But-

• 16:26Speaker 03

  There's a lot of good people doing a lot of the work in the middle. And ecology is really complex. And we're still in the early stages of seeing exactly how wolves impact the Yellowstone ecosystem.

• 16:39Emily Kwong?

  Definitely more questions than answers, but a lot of nuance. Producer Burley McCoy, hats off to you. Thank you for bringing us this story.

• 16:46Speaker 02

  You're welcome.

• 16:50Emily Kwong?

  This episode was produced by Hannah Chin and Rachel Carlson. It was edited by our showrunner, Rebecca Ramirez, and fact-checked by Burley and Tyler Jones. The audio engineer was Kwasi Lee. I'm Emily Kwong. Thanks for listening to Short Wave from NPR.

• 17:24Speaker 00

  Stay tuned for the following announcements and messages from our sponsors.