Prof G Markets: Has Apple Lost Its Mojo? + BlackRock’s $23B Bet on the Panama Canal

Still listening on the Prof G Pod Feed? Head over to the Prof G Markets feed and hit follow: Apple Podcasts Spotify Scott and Ed open the show by discussing Disney’s latest round of layoffs, why a private equity firm is taking Walgreens private, and Ontario’s decision to cancel its Starlink contract. They then analyze BlackRock’s decision to buy the ports on either side of the Panama Canal, breaking down why it could be a highly profitable move. They also discuss what Apple’s newest product launches reveal about the state of the company. Scott explains why he’s begun offloading his Apple stock, while Ed makes a prediction about where shares are headed in the next six months. Subscribe to the Prof G Markets newsletter Join us for a live recording at SXSW Order "The Algebra of Wealth," out now Follow the podcast across socials @profgpod: Instagram Threads X Reddit Follow Scott on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard? But not the pipeline? That's bull spend. And marketers are calling it out in dashboard confessions.

• 0:09Speaker 01

  My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had: impressions.

• 0:17Speaker 00

  Cut the bull spend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 0:30Speaker 02

  Energía baja. Falta de concentración? Nevra mental? You might be dehydrated. Gatorade Zero Powders han sido diseñados científicamente para ayudarte a mejorar el balance de hidratación en el cuerpo. Hechos con la mezcla número uno de electrolitos, sin colores ni sabores artificiales. Shop now online or at retailers nationwide. Gatorade: Hydrates Better Than Water. Is it in you? Signos de dehidratación leve y moderada. Consulta a tu médico si los síntomas persisten.

• 1:00Speaker 03

  Welcome to Sephora.

• 1:01Speaker 00

  I'm looking for a perfume that's not too perfumey?

• 1:05Speaker 03

  I got you.

• 1:06Scott Galloway?

  Serum moisturizer or moisturizer serum?

• 1:09Speaker 03

  Let's get into layering.

• 1:11Speaker 00

  My concealer is making me look worse?

• 1:14Speaker 03

  Sounds like the wrong shade. Let's get you matched.

• 1:18Speaker 05

  There's only one store that really gets what you're going for. Get beauty from people who get beauty. Only at Sephora.

• 1:25Speaker 03

  Hi, I, uh... Let's get you a basket.

• 1:29Scott Galloway?

  Today's number: $145 million. The co-founder of fintech startup Aspiration was arrested last week for allegedly conspiring to defraud his investors of $145 million. By the way, we called bullshit on this company four years ago. Speaking of climate change, Ed, what do climate change deniers and pedophiles have in common? What's that? They're both fucking the next generation.

• 2:03Scott Galloway?

  Ah, that's good.

• 2:05Ed Elson?

  Great joke.

• 2:06Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, the pedophile stuff never gets old. What's going on with you? What are you, what are you up to?

• 2:11Ed Elson?

  I'm doing very well. I'm in New York. I'm excited for South by Southwest. We're going to be heading over this weekend. Of course, this episode will be out by the time we're there, but I think it's going to be great. You know what I'm really excited for, though, is the flight back.

• 2:25Scott Galloway?

  Why is that?

• 2:26Ed Elson?

  Flying with you.

• 2:26Scott Galloway?

  Oh, I'm sorry. I meant to tell you that there's just not enough.

• 2:30Ed Elson?

  Not enough seats? There's only seven seats on the plane?

• 2:33Scott Galloway?

  Yeah.

• 2:35Ed Elson?

  How many seats are on the plane?

• 2:36Scott Galloway?

  I don't know. I'm, I'm, I haven't counted. Um, I can't go here. There's no way I don't come across as the world's biggest douchebag talking about the number of seats.

• 2:46Ed Elson?

  You're right. I'm, I'm setting you up for failure. How about let's set you up for success here and just talk about this aspiration situation? Because you wrote about this four years ago. This is, by the way, one of my first jobs at Prof G Media was you were talking about this company, Aspiration. And it was my job to go in and do the research because you had this feeling that this company, which was selling credit cards, but also positioned itself as helping with climate change. You said, this is definitely a bullshit company. You had the team look into it. I looked into it and we determined, yes, this company is fake. We have a clip from what you said about this company on the Prof G Pod.

• 3:28Scott Galloway?

  One example, one example of reaching too far into the barrel, aspiration, a finance firm that claims its products can, open quote, change climate change, end quote. In August, the company announced it was going public via SPAC at a $2.3 billion valuation. Change climate change. That would be awesome, except there's a catch.

• 3:51Scott Galloway?

  This is a fucking debit card. He's so good.

• 3:54Ed Elson?

  Banger. And now the guy's been arrested for fraud. By the way, it never went public because I think investors eventually caught on to this. But he's now been arrested. You called it.

• 4:03Scott Galloway?

  It was such an attempt to drape yourself in social justice while offering something pretty borderline fraudulent. They were, they were saying that we take a portion of your credit card fees and invest in sustainable companies. And if you read their, you know, their website and I got, we got some financial information. We dug in. This was a shitty little credit card company, charging onerous fees, claiming to do something they weren't doing and saying, oh, but we're, we're a new economy company. And they had famous investors, they had actors. A friend of mine, it ends up, was an investor and called me and sort of, I don't want to say put pressure on me, but said, do you want to speak to management? There that's, I think you got this wrong. I'm like, I said to him,

• 4:48Scott Galloway?

  I said, we'll just call him Bob. I'm like, Bob, this is a fucking fraud. This is WeWork with a climate change veneer smeared over it. I thought that was going to get more attention than the WeWork post because I thought it was even more obvious a fraud.

• 5:02Ed Elson?

  Few people actually knew what aspiration was, which I think is why it was so prescient of you to, to point it out. I just want to point out what some of the red flags we found with this company were. So the first, the first red flag was that they were trying to SPAC and there were just a bunch of kind of bullshit companies that were SPACing. They did have a giant celebrity investor list. One of those investors was Leo DiCaprio. That was kind of a red flag. And then as we looked into it, it started to get worse and worse. So they had this ESG fund that they called the Redwood Fund and they charged these exorbitant fees on it. But when we looked at the actual portfolio, what we found is that it was just a regular portfolio and they even had positions in Southwest Airlines,

• 5:43Ed Elson?

  which of course burns through fuel and also a fracking company, which was hilarious. Their worst crime though, was this thing called EBIT Dam.

• 5:53Scott Galloway?

  God, like community-based EBITDA, WeWork.

• 5:56Ed Elson?

  Exactly. This was earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and marketing.

• 6:02Ed Elson?

  And according to this company, they were EBIT dam profitable. But then you look at the fine print and you realize they were spending 150% of their revenue on marketing. So they're trying to position themselves as a profitable company, but they're saying, oh, this marketing thing, we're spending basically all of our money on marketing, but don't worry about that. We're profitable. And that was sort of our, that was, I would say, our biggest red flag. This company is bullshitting their, their investors. And so it never backed and now the guy's going to jail.

• 6:30Scott Galloway?

  I loved Adam Newman's initial redefinition of EBITDA. And it was like earnings before everything else, earnings before Dolly Parton, earnings before March Madness. It was just, it was like, let's pretend that profits are top line revenues before expenses. Let's just get rid of this pesky thing called expenses so we can say, pretend that we're profitable. But yeah, I'm, I'm, I appreciate the recognition and drinks on me this week in Austin.

• 7:00Ed Elson?

  Can't wait. Let's get into our weekly review of market visals.

• 7:10Ed Elson?

  The S and P 500 declined, the dollar slid, Bitcoin was volatile and the yield on 10 year treasuries climbed. Shifting to the headlines, Disney is laying off nearly 200 employees or 6% of its workforce in its ABC News Group and Disney Entertainment Networks divisions. As part of the cuts, the company is also shutting down political and data journalism site 538, which it acquired in 2013. Walgreens is officially going private after closing a $10 billion deal with Sycamore Partners. The private equity firm is expected to keep Walgreens core US retail business while potentially selling off or spinning out other parts of the company. And finally, Ontario canceled a Starlink contract worth 100 million Canadian dollars

• 7:54Ed Elson?

  after US tariffs on Canadian imports took effect. Scott, let's get your thoughts, starting with Disney deciding to lay off 200 employees, nearly 6% of the workforce at ABC and their entertainment networks.

• 8:07Scott Galloway?

  I, it just makes sense. This is part of capitalism and that is they need, they need to consolidate, bulk up. And then cut costs. These companies should have one back end as far as news. And if they have different front facing brands that appeal to different audiences, that's fine. But last year, Disney's linear networks revenue declined 9% and operating income was down 16%. They're not alone here. U.S. linear TV advertising will decrease an estimated 4% annually through 2030, which doesn't seem like a lot, but when it's going for another five years, 4%, it means it's going to be, it's going to lose a quarter of its revenue or a fifth.

• 8:48Scott Galloway?

  And that means, you know, that's just real pain because some of those costs are fixed. So you're talking probably, they're probably going to shed another 20 or 30% of their workforce over the next five years. I just had lunch with a fairly famous news anchor who is fantastic at what she does. And she's one of the lucky ones. She's still making a lot of money, but I think she, her salary got cut by 30%. And you're seeing, you're seeing cuts across the most famous anchors of like 20 to 80%. Joy Reid, Chuck Todd, Jim Acosta, and Lester Holt, all fantastic at what they do or did, all too expensive. And George Stephanopoulos, his contract's been renewed, though he had to take a pay cut from his previous $20 million deal.

• 9:33Scott Galloway?

  He's lucky he got his deal a few months ago. I think it'd even be less now. Rachel Maddow renegotiated. She is the friends or the, the anchor of MSNBC. She had to reduce her pay from 30 to 25 million. Yeah, Crimea River, that's not too much. Anyway, so I, look, the market is doing what it's supposed to do. It's reshaping the winners and the losers. You're going to see, I think, private equity come in here. You're going to see a lot of consolidation. I think Disney is a survivor because of this unique singular positioning around family and just the incredible IP they have. I also wonder if this is an interesting take private opportunity. But anyways, what are your thoughts?

• 10:09Ed Elson?

  Yeah, I find this interesting because I visited the ABC studio last week. One of the producers on ABC News took me around and it was really cool. And I was just kind of struck by how impressive this operation was. Like the office looks like a cross between like NASA airspace control and also like the trading floor of Goldman Sachs. And it's filled with people like gaffers and technicians and coordinate. I was asking him like, what do all of these people do? He's like, oh, this guy's on this team, this guy's on this team. I mean, it's thousands of people, literally. It's actually 3,300 people. But in the back of my mind, the whole time as I'm walking around, I'm like, this is amazing. But there is no way this makes any sense economically.

• 10:53Ed Elson?

  The fact that you have, as you said, revenues down 9%, operating income down 16%, 6 million people cancelling their cable subscriptions in 2024. And yet the operation looks like it's the headquarters of the CIA. So I was sort of walking around like, okay, something has to give here. And that's what we're seeing. In this case, the thing that's giving is the workforce. And as you say, this isn't the first time we've seen this headline. And yeah, I don't think it's the last time we'll see this headline. I think we're going to see many, many more headlines like this.

• 11:25Scott Galloway?

  Well, if you look at the means of production, and I did some analysis here, we're making three to four times the revenue per employee. And granted, we're small, but the means of production are so much less expensive in podcasting. Now, granted, there's very, you know, there aren't that many winners. But if you can figure out kind of a new media platform and keep it kind of lean and mean, you can just see what's, what's happening here. It's just incredibly challenging for these folks. I described, I was jokingly describing the anchors as pilots for Pan Am in the seventies and that it's high prestige, they're banging stewardesses, everyone's impressed by them. But I'm like, your days are numbered, pretty soon you're going to be, you know.

• 12:09Scott Galloway?

  On an Embraer from Lubbock, Texas to Amarillo, making thirty eight thousand bucks a year.

• 12:13Ed Elson?

  That's a great analogy.

• 12:14Scott Galloway?

  I personally, the way I register it is ten years ago, when I was asked to come on CNN, I just was so excited. I remember the first time Anderson had me on his show and I was so, I thought, wow, I've made it. And now, unless it's a someone I'm personal friends with, or I don't go on because it's like the juice isn't worth the squeeze. To come across as intelligent and the work and the prep you need to do, not that many people are watching it.

• 12:38Ed Elson?

  But I just got asked for the first time to go on CNN and then they canceled on me in the last minute. Most hilarious part is that I was, I was in for the 5:00 AM slot. They've, they pushed me to next week, so I'll do it again. But I think the juice is worth the squeeze for me. I'll say that.

• 12:53Scott Galloway?

  A hundred percent. And plus, you, I mean, you're literally, you're going to be exposed to dozens and dozens of new fans.

• 13:00Scott Galloway?

  5:00 AM on CNN. That is literally like a ninety year old that can't sleep.

• 13:04Ed Elson?

  I'll take it.

• 13:05Scott Galloway?

  I think that's great. Congratulations. I didn't know about that.

• 13:07Ed Elson?

  Well, it hasn't happened yet and they'll probably cancel on me again.

• 13:10Scott Galloway?

  But yeah, broadcast television. What's interesting though, is it's still, there's, you'll see this, there's still a prestige value. And that is when people see you on, I used to go on Fox every week. And when people see you on TV, for some reason, there's just this veneer of prestige, romanticism, or credibility that you don't get anywhere, unless of course you have a guest role on The White Lotus, but.

• 13:35Scott Galloway?

  Ah, let's bring this back to me. Let's bring this back to me. Anyways, linear TV, it's not doing well.

• 13:42Ed Elson?

  It's not doing very well. Agreed.

• 13:45Scott Galloway?

  Captain fucking obvious.

• 13:47Ed Elson?

  Let's talk about Walgreens, which is going private, being bought out by this private equity firm, Sycamore Partners. This is kind of a big moment for this very iconic American company. This company's been around for a hundred twenty years. It's been a public stock for almost a hundred years. It's been public since nineteen twenty seven. And now you have this icon of. American consumerism and it's being bought out by a PE firm for a tenth of what it used to be. Ten years ago, this company was worth $100 billion. The price tag today is $10 billion. Your reactions to this news, Scott?

• 14:28Scott Galloway?

  I think they're just overstored. I think it's they're doing the right thing. Again, capitalism and the markets are where I can't believe this thing was ever worth $100 billion. What I'd be curious, and I don't know if you have any information on this, is that my go to is, well, this is Amazon, another victim of Amazon, but I don't really know. Did you, do you have any thoughts on what's actually going on here?

• 14:47Ed Elson?

  I think it's a whole confluence of things and the way I would summarize it is just bad management. I think probably that one of their worst mistakes is just their inability to modernize their pharmacy business, which they really depend on. And those Walgreens pharmacies were incredibly traditional when you compare it to the pharmacies at somewhere like CVS. And I think they woke up one day and telehealth had taken off and reimbursement rates had come way down. And they just got crushed, especially against CVS, which was establishing itself in in the pharmacy benefit manager business too. They also bought Village MD, which was a disaster. They were just too late to the party. They they bought that company after COVID. It didn't work.

• 15:29Ed Elson?

  They ended up taking a $6 billion impairment charge. And then I think the final thing were these lawsuits. They just got a ton of lawsuits and most of them they settled on. And just this year, a couple of months ago, they got sued by the DOJ for essentially selling opioids illegally. So I think just it's kind of simple from a management perspective. It's been a disaster. I think the question is, what does Sycamore do with this company? Where do they go from here? It's expected they're going to split it up into three units where you have Walgreens Pharmacy. They also own Boots in the UK, which I'm sure you're very familiar with now, which is their UK pharmacy.

• 16:12Ed Elson?

  And then a healthcare unit, which is called Shields Health. And Sycamore did a similar thing to Staples, which they bought back in 2017. One interesting stat from the team that I'd like to get your reaction to. One in five private equity owned companies go bankrupt within 10 years of acquisition. And that is 10 times higher than the rate of publicly owned companies. So I guess the question I would pose to you is, what does Sycamore do with this company? And could they just bankrupt the company possibly based on that stat?

• 16:43Scott Galloway?

  I mean, clearly, they're going to cut costs. They're probably going to change management and severely reduce costs. And the issue, the hard part about retail is that you have to enter into these very risky business contracts called a lease. And everybody wants the same real estate. And the owners of this real estate are smart at maximizing their revenue by, by signing up for a 10 year lease. So when you pick, I mean, you have to be very thoughtful. So, and the kind of the history of retail is Restoration Hardware goes public and they think we got to grow. So they sign a bunch of bad leases. They're really promiscuous. And then similar to Walgreens, three and four Walgreens are not profitable. And it's a 10 year weeping sore.

• 17:26Scott Galloway?

  Unless you declare bankruptcy, you can't get out of that lease. So you're just losing money. So real estate ends, what are they going to do? They're going to let a ton of these leases expire and hopefully shore it up. As it relates to private equity and bankruptcy, that's not surprising because private equity is usually, let's take all of its cash flows and use it to lever up such that we can have more upside and finance the acquisition with cheap debt. And when it doesn't work, they declare bankruptcy. Now, having said that, the debtors or the bondholders charge a certain interest rate that calculated in the risk of default. And when the bondholders, when it defaults, the bondholders get to seize the assets. And when a private equity company or a private equity backed company has, you know, when

• 18:09Scott Galloway?

  it goes bankrupt, generally speaking, the private equity, all the equity capital they put in, they also get wiped out. So it does lever up and, you know, go risk on, on a company. But it also creates a certain sense of urgency. I think private equity has been good and net good for society. I'm not one of these people that says, oh, they're ruining everything. I don't think that's true. There's a lot of entrepreneurs who've made a lot of money selling to private equity. And the thing I like about private equity is they're usually very good at getting management vested in terms of the upside of success. They're actually quite generous, whereas venture capitalists I find are primarily just, with rare exception, just mendacious fuck douchebags who pretend to give a shit about anybody and then wash the founders out.

• 18:52Scott Galloway?

  Speaking for a friend, but so I like, I enjoy working with private equity. I think debt tightens the focus, if you will. And most of the time, these things, you know, it does make sense. And also, there's, there's two parties to the trade. The company doesn't have to sell the private equity. They don't, they've, they've entered into this agreement knowingly. The people who are financing this debt enter into this trade knowingly and are getting a good, hopefully a good interest rate to reflect the risk. But this is a company that's a shadow of itself. It sounds to me, what I would want to know is what percentage of their leases are coming up for renewal that we can get out of? Because that's the obligation here that is most scary.

• 19:33Scott Galloway?

  And that's why a lot of retailers, good retailers, declare bankruptcy because then they can go and cherry pick and hold on to the leases they want and get out of the contractual agreements with the leases that are hurting them. So I wouldn't be surprised, I bet this, I wouldn't be surprised if Sycamore actually does pretty well here. Do you want to hear my CVS and opiate story yet?

• 19:53Ed Elson?

  Please.

• 19:53Scott Galloway?

  My CFO came in at L2, came in to me and said, I need to speak to him. So I'm just like, there's some really crazy charges at drugstores all over Manhattan. And, and I looked at him, I'm, yeah, this is not me. This doesn't make any sense. I'm like, it must be fraud. He's like, no, it's not fraud. It's your assistant. And it ends up that my assistant was addicted to opiates and was going to every doctor in Manhattan, getting a script for opiates and then going into a CVS or a Walgreens and not only getting her opiates, but buying a thousand or $2,000 in cosmetics or gifts. And she was not only a criminal, she was a stupid criminal. And she would sign for everything and have it delivered to her house.

• 20:36Ed Elson?

  Yeah, we think it's you.

• 20:40Scott Galloway?

  Get this, she managed to spend, I think over five months or seven months, $120,000 on my corporate card at various CVS and Walgreens all over Manhattan. And I remember calling her.

• 20:51Ed Elson?

  This is probably why Walgreens failed. They lost her.

• 20:53Scott Galloway?

  They lost her. And I remember calling her, I'm like, look, we have an issue here. Uh, you, you are clearly addicted to something. Uh, there's a hundred and twenty thousand dollars on charges on my card. And all I had, I'm like, she's like, oh, I don't know what you're talking about. I'm like, that you've signed for this shit at your address. You're signature is on this stuff. You, you decided to have someone drop it off at your apartment, which wasn't like, you know, you're not exactly what I'd call a very, you know, this is, this is disorganized crime. And she immediately went into rehab, claimed disability and tried to sue us for the options that we owed her. Um, she dropped the case when I said I was going to turn it over to the Manhattan DA if she didn't drop the case. But anyways, that was my last assistant, Ed. That was,

• 21:36Scott Galloway?

  that was the, that was my last assistant.

• 21:39Ed Elson?

  I'm glad we learned that. Yeah, it's, we learn a lot about hiring decisions on this show. Let's talk about, um, Ontario and their decision to cancel, uh, the contract with Starlink. I think you predicted something like this would happen, or you at least kind of warned about it, that Starlink, you know, one big problem for Elon Musk would be if people start cancelling Starlink contracts. Kind of an incredible move. The premier of Ontario, Doug Ford, had some interesting things to say about this. And we've got a clip. So let's take a listen.

• 22:12Speaker 07

  US-based businesses will now lose out on tens of billions of dollars in revenues. They only have President Trump to blame. I'm also urging all 444 municipalities to do the same. And I'm thrilled to see some are already stepping up. For example, Mayor Patrick Brown in the city of Brampton and many other cities. As part of this government-wide procurement ban, we're going one step further. We're ripping up Ontario's contract with Starlink. It's done, it's gone. We won't award contracts to people who enable and encourage economic attacks on our province, province and our country.

• 22:55Ed Elson?

  Kind of baller. Your reaction, Scott?

• 22:58Scott Galloway?

  I think Musk, when he saw this, I think this probably sent a chill down his spine. If people start cancelling Starlink contracts, I mean, they're already throwing shit at Tesla's on the road. I just cancelled a Tesla last night on Uber. I'm starting to cancel if it's a Tesla when it comes up. I think that the Canada, I think this guy's making the right move and I think you're only going to see more of it. I think people have just had it. What's a shame is that we don't have the same type of leadership here in the United States. There hasn't been a single CEO who has stood up and said, I am not going to participate in this pay for play kleptocracy. I'm not giving to the campaign. I am not going to be paraded around.

• 23:40Scott Galloway?

  You either have laws that affect all of us or none of us, but I have had it. And we haven't had anyone that shows the balls of this leader up in Ontario. And it is so disappointing, the domino theory of cowardice that has infected the rich and Fortune 500 CEOs. I can't think of one who has spoken out all under the auspices of quote unquote shareholder value. Well, folks, your stakeholders include Americans. It is incredibly disappointing that we aren't showing a fraction of leadership that this guy is showing.

• 24:14Ed Elson?

  Well, I think you say, I mean, the domino theory of cowardice. I think this is basically showing that we're about to see the domino theory of revolt. I mean, this guy's the first one to do it and it's only $100 million, which is not a big deal for Starlink, which did $8 billion in revenue last year. But Canada overall is Starlink's second largest market behind the US. They've got half a million Starlink subscribers in Canada. And I think what this shows is, you know, this guy's the first to do it, but we're going to see a domino effect. And I think all of these other provinces follow suit. I don't think you want to be a leader in Canada who looks weak up against Donald Trump.

• 24:55Ed Elson?

  And what we're seeing is that the entire nation is sort of coming together and rallying against a common enemy. And there's just this one stat I found fascinating from YouGov. Eighty-two percent of Americans say they consider Canada to be an ally. In Canada, that number is now thirty-three percent.

• 25:14Scott Galloway?

  I think this is what is going to probably push Musk out of government, or he is going to decide, he's going to try and declare victory and leave. Because if you look at Starlink customer base, I mean Tesla is already crashing. It's, it's, it's literally imploding. I don't know if you saw those, a video of Mardi Gras and someone, a Tesla truck, or whatever you call it, was rolling down, and everyone started throwing shit at it. Starlink was his growth vehicle, and there's one and a half million customers of Starlink in the US. You referenced that there's five hundred and thirty thousand in Canada, it's second largest market, that's real. And then the number three market, Mexico, at four hundred and thirty-five thousand.

• 25:57Scott Galloway?

  And then the number four is Brazil, who probably doesn't feel that great about Musk, who was, who was threatening, you know, was fucking with their internal politics. So, you know, Starlink's value in the private markets, it's the most valuable company, one of the most valuable private companies, and the most traded in the secondary market. And I think it's a third of a trillion dollars. I think it's trading at three or three hundred and fifty billion. That number's going to come way down. Because if they can't show the kind of growth that they've been showing, also, you are, you are seeing a lot of, you want to talk about greed glands going. If I'm Telus, if I'm Telusat or Xpro, the competitors, they have no trouble raising a shit ton of money right now.

• 26:42Scott Galloway?

  And because there is about to be a big gap in the marketplace for this type of broadband provider.

• 26:49Ed Elson?

  That's what happened with Twitter, and then you saw those Twitter competitors rise up, and now Threads is-

• 26:53Scott Galloway?

  Threads, Blue Sky, Post, yeah, that's right.

• 26:56Ed Elson?

  I mean, some of them kind of failed.

• 26:58Scott Galloway?

  You're the one I invested in, but, is that what you're saying, Ed? Is that what you're saying, the one I invested in? The one I managed to pick?

• 27:05Ed Elson?

  That was what I was hinting at.

• 27:06Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, okay.

• 27:10Ed Elson?

  We'll be right back after the break with a look at BlackRock's investment in the Panama Canal. If you're enjoying the show so far, be sure to give Profty Markets a follow wherever you get your podcasts.

• 27:28Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Superhuman. The pace of modern work can be relentless. You're getting a constant influx of messages from a ton of different apps. You haven't closed all your browser tabs in a year. Everything seems urgent and staying on top of it all feels like an impossible task. Superhuman Go is an AI chat that's always there when you need it, already aware of what you're doing and doesn't ask you to start from zero. Superhuman Go, from the makers of Grammarly, help you be the best version of yourself at work. It handles the repetitive stuff so you can focus on the work that only you can do. Whether you need to summarize an endless email thread or prep for a meeting that's happening in five minutes, Superhuman Go works inside the tools and sites you already use, your browser, inbox, docs, and your project tools. And its AI chat is available on the side of your browser and it's always ready.

• 28:13Scott Galloway?

  No new tabs, no switching apps, no losing your place. This is AI that works with you, not on top of you, so that you have the time and brain space to solve the problems that matter. Check it out, find out more at superhuman.com.

• 28:31Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Upwork. Trying to scale your business? At some point, you're probably going to hit a point where you need some help. Sometimes the best way to break through that is bringing in the right talent at the right time. Upwork can help. Upwork is a one-stop platform where you can find, hire, and pay expert freelancers across more than 125 categories. Whether you need specialized skills for a single project or extra support to keep up with demand, it's easy to connect with experienced professionals, review their work, and find the right fit. You can move faster without taking on the commitment of full-time hires. And for businesses that need the very best talent, Upwork Business Plus provides access to the top 1% of freelancers on the platform. AI-powered matching connects you with qualified candidates in under six hours, cutting down the time spent searching. Upwork also takes care of contracts,

• 29:16Scott Galloway?

  payments and other administrative tasks. So you can spend less time managing logistics and more time focused on what's next. Visit upwork.com/profg right now and post your job for free. That's upwork.com/profg to connect with top talent, ready to help your business grow. That's U P W O R K dot com slash prof G upwork.com slash prof G.

• 29:42Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Vanta. As AI adoption grows, so does your company's security risks and requirements. New frameworks, audits and vendors keep piling on, but your team isn't getting any bigger. Most compliance tools promise automation, but you're really stuck doing all the work by hand, chasing screenshots, validating controls and playing catch up when audit season comes around again. Vanta works differently. The regentic trust platform is built to scale with you, not slow you down. With over 1,400 automated tests across 400 plus integrations, Vanta collects evidence and monitors your controls year round, cutting your audit prep by 82%. Plus, you can access the Vanta agent everywhere you work, whether your team is in Vanta every day or living in tools, including Claude or Cursor. Want proof?

• 30:27Scott Galloway?

  Over 16,000 fast growing companies like Ramp, Ryder and Harvey save time and resources while scaling fast with Vanta. Learn more at vanta.com/profg and get $1,000 off. That's spelled V A N T A dot com slash prof G for $1,000 off.

• 30:53Ed Elson?

  We're back with Prof G Markets. A BlackRock-led consortium has acquired two major ports on both sides of the Panama Canal for nearly $23 billion. The ports were previously owned by a Hong Kong-based conglomerate, but the deal still requires approval from Panama, which retains control of the canal. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink personally pitched the deal to Trump after the president expressed interest in having the ports and the canal controlled by the US. Scott, your initial reactions to BlackRock buying those ports from this company CK Hutchison?

• 31:30Scott Galloway?

  On the face of it, it sounds like a great idea. I mean, if you think about. The most valuable companies in the world are essentially toll booths. All right, Amazon makes a ton of their money, sort of saying, all right, rent our cloud services. But the real toll is that if you want to have access to half of the US e-commerce market, you got to be on our platform. And then we just collect a toll. It used to be 24% of third-party revenues when you, you know, put your shoe company on their platform. Now it's about, they get 45% because you have one toll road. They are the toll booth. If you want to reach online consumers, there's two big toll booths. There's Meta and there's Google. They collect a toll to reach every consumer that's increasingly spending their day online.

• 32:13Scott Galloway?

  So I love this idea of an analog toll that says, okay, we get you coming and going across this incredible feat of engineering and leadership, the Panama Canal. But you got to think to get to propel through the water a several thousand metric ton vessel and have it go another, whatever it is, 6,000 miles or 8,000 miles around this thing versus just slip through the little, that little ditch we dug through Panama. If they can figure out a way to collect money on the in and the out. I've never heard a transportation company say, the Panama Canal's gotten too expensive, so we're just going to take the long way.

• 32:49Ed Elson?

  Yeah, I think we should just like remind ourselves of the context here. I mean, I think everyone probably knows a couple of months ago, Trump said he wanted to reclaim the Panama Canal. He said the Panama Canal had been taken by China and that America needed to take it back. And then there was that notorious moment where he was asked if he would use military force to take it over and he didn't rule it out. Now, of course, it's not true that China owns the Panama Canal, but it is true that there are companies with ties to China, which own and control many of the ports that are in the Panama Canal. And one of those companies is this company, we're talking about CK Hutchison, which is this company based in Hong Kong. It's owned by this billionaire, Li Ka Xing.

• 33:33Ed Elson?

  And now they are selling those ports that are on either side of the canal to BlackRock. Now, there's been some questions around how much does this have to do with Trump? How much does this have to do? Do with geopolitics and one of the heads of CK Hutchison, which owns the ports. He said it has nothing to do with Trump. He said, quote, I would like to stress that the transaction is purely commercial in nature and wholly unrelated to recent political news concerning the Panama ports. I just want to get this out of the way. That's totally a lie. No question about it. This had everything to do with politics. It's been extensively reported that this company

• 34:14Ed Elson?

  only started looking to sell right after Trump made those comments about Panama and about China. So let's just be clear from the get go. This is 100% a geopolitical response. There's no, there's no doubt about it. Having said that, I think what the guy at CK Hutchison is trying to get at

• 34:32Ed Elson?

  is that from a commercial perspective, this was an amazing deal for them. The origins of the deal were political, but the result was a success because the value of those ports that they sold as determined by analysts was $13 billion. They sold it for 23 billion. So they got a nearly 80% premium on those assets. That is huge. And by the way, 23 billion is more than the entire market cap of the company before the deal. And as a result, shares in the company skyrocketed. They were up 20%. So it's a huge success for this company, CK Hutchison. And I think that begs the question, okay, they sold it for 80% above market value.

• 35:18Ed Elson?

  Why was BlackRock down to pay? Why were they down to splurge that much in what is now the largest infrastructure deal in the company's history? How did that make sense to them? And I have some initial thoughts, but I'll, I'll, I'll throw it back to you. What do you think was the draw for BlackRock here?

• 35:39Scott Galloway?

  I would have just thought that they believe that their average price per vessel of 341,000 that's charged to get through the Panama Canal, that they believe they can take that 341 number much higher.

• 35:52Ed Elson?

  No, I think what's in it for BlackRock and what made this worth it is what it does to their relationship with the president. Because he looks excellent now. You know, he was.

• 36:02Ed Elson?

  Talking about how he wants the US to control the Panama Canal and people were ragging on him, saying this guy doesn't know what he's doing. And he pulled it off and at no cost to the government. The whole thing was paid for by BlackRock. And there is no denying this only happened because of him. So he looks like a genius now. He gets to brag about it in his speeches. In fact, that's exactly what he did in his address to Congress. And most importantly, I think he is now grateful to Larry Fink and to BlackRock, who are officially in his good books now. And that's so important because for a long time they weren't. This

• 36:41Ed Elson?

  is the company that spearheaded the ESG movement, that told investors that DEI is central to everything they do. This is the company that, just generally speaking, the Republicans hated. And so I think Larry Fink saw this opportunity. There was a chance to get on Trump's good side, to make him look like the hero. And it only cost him, you know, a few billion dollars. So in my view, it was probably worth it.

• 37:10Scott Galloway?

  I didn't immediately connect that this gets them in Trump's good graces, but I can see the argument. If so, I can't imagine they would make this sort of capital outlay. I think that would be being a bad fiduciary, just to cozy up to a guy who's going to be in office another three years and nine months, and quite frankly, in about two years.

• 37:30Ed Elson?

  Don't you think that is an economic decision at this point? I feel like what we're seeing with these companies is actually it is

• 37:35Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, that's a good point.

• 37:36Ed Elson?

  Your fiduciary obligation to suck up to the president.

• 37:39Scott Galloway?

  I think your analysis is more thoughtful than mine. I just assumed that if they could put a toll booth on both sides of the Panama Canal, that if you do the math, I would bet it costs a lot more than an incremental $340,000 to take that ship around, to go the long way. And they sense that and say, all right, we're capturing 10% of the savings here. We should be capturing 30 or 40%.

• 38:01Ed Elson?

  Fair enough. I think in the context of what they've been doing recently, I mean, just a couple of months ago, we didn't discuss this on the podcast, but they withdrew from this. Climate Initiative with the United Nations. They also, they just released their annual report. They cut all references of DEI in their report. They backpedaled from ESG a ton. And this is just a huge turnaround from 2021. When they were kind of leading this charge, like they were at the forefront of DEI and ESG. I'll quote Larry Fink in their 2021 annual report. He said, quote, "We must embed DEI into everything we do." And then poof, suddenly the DEI is gone.

• 38:45Ed Elson?

  Suddenly the ESG is gone. And he's making phone calls to the Trump saying, hey, that thing you were talking about, this Panama thing, we're really interested and we think we can represent the US.

• 38:54Scott Galloway?

  I've switched. I'm now, when I'm interviewing people, I'm saying, oh, he's a DUI hire.

• 39:00Ed Elson?

  I think you're a DUI hire.

• 39:01Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, I've never had a DUI.

• 39:03Ed Elson?

  I'm surprised.

• 39:03Scott Galloway?

  Thanks for that. And back in the eighties and nineties, we always get fucked up and take to Sunset Boulevard and basically death traps. But anyways, ah, good times. Youth, youth.

• 39:15Ed Elson?

  We'll be right back with a look at Apple. And if you're enjoying the show so far, hit follow and leave us a review on Prof G Markets.

• 39:31Speaker 00

  Flowing ad budget on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them? That's bull spend and marketers are calling it out in Dashboard Confessions.

• 39:40Speaker 01

  I remember telling my boss, it'll be good for the brand when leads were slow. Yeah, it, it wasn't.

• 39:48Speaker 00

  Cut the bull spend. LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title and more. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 40:31Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Nutraful, the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand used by over one and a half million people. When you get to the stage of life where you start to notice hair loss, you have a few options. You can shave it all off and enjoy your new look, or you can commit to a new team whose logo you wouldn't mind constantly spotting on a hat, or you can actually restore some of your hair's former glory with Nutraful. Nutraful has formulas built for men at different life stages, such as Nutraful Men for guys aged 18 to 49, or the new Nutraful Men 50 and older. It's the first product of its kind specifically made for men over 50. You can address the key root causes of thinning wherever you are in life. Grow visibly thicker, fuller hair in three to six months. Start Nutraful today and make the hat optional.

• 41:15Scott Galloway?

  Visit nutraful.com and enter promo code PROFG for $10 off your first month subscription and free shipping. Find out why Nutraful is the best-selling hair growth supplement brand at nutraful.com, spelled N-U-T-R-A-F-O-L dot com, promo code PROFG. That's nutraful.com promo code PROFG.

• 41:42Ed Elson?

  We're back with Prof G Markets. Apple has unveiled a range of new products, including an updated MacBook Air. The MacBook Air got a $100 price cut in the US, a sign the company isn't raising prices due to tariffs, at least for now. Apple also introduced a new iPad Air and a high-end Mac Studio desktop, featuring a chip designed to handle advanced AI models. Apple's stock initially dropped 3% following the product announcement, but it recovered to finish the day flat. Scott, I just want to recognize upfront, this news in and of itself is not very interesting or important. There's a new MacBook Air out, who cares? But I think the reason it's worth covering is because, to me, it's indicative of just

• 42:25Ed Elson?

  how far Apple has fallen from a product perspective. I just want to go through the new features in this computer, this grand MacBook Air release. So the new features include... A new and improved M4 chip, okay? A new and improved video conferencing camera. It can connect to three external monitors. It comes in a new color, sky blue. And that's it. Those are the impressive new features of the new MacBook Air. And by the way, the iPad Air, which came out in the same weekend, also very underwhelming. Their big new update is an AI email summarization feature for, quote, "more stable typing experience."

• 43:08Ed Elson?

  This is the company that invented the iPhone. What happened, Scott?

• 43:13Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, this is a giant snooze. And just in terms of what I'm doing, I'm actually selling, starting to sell my Apple stock. Apple and Amazon have been my biggest holdings for the last 15 years. I bought Apple when it was trading at a P of nine, and now it's trading at a P of 37. Yeah, I think historically it's traded at an average around 18. And trailing 12 months, it's 37 or 38. Forward earnings, it's 31, 32, and it's growing 2%. And quite frankly, its product lineup is just anemic. And in addition, the overlay there is I do believe that we're going to see the rivers, the flow of the river of capital into the US. I think those rivers are about to reverse.

• 43:57Scott Galloway?

  We've talked about it ad nauseam on the show. So I am, I'm going to take the, the capital gains hit and I am selling down my Apple and my Amazon, which are trading at extraordinary multiples. And I don't, with Amazon, you could sort of justify it, I think, because of their cloud business. Apple is arguably the best brand in the world, but company's no longer growing. I think the, the mixed reality headset was just, just a comical. And so, and this notion of spatial computing is going to be the next thing. I mean, they're, they're well set up for AR. They're, they're going to be a relevant company for a long, long time. Let me put it this way, I don't see how they can justify a P of 37 or 38.

• 44:39Scott Galloway?

  On on a company that's not growing, it's top line revenue. So is it a great company? Is it going to continue to be really relevant? Yeah, it just, I just, I just think it's overvalued right now.

• 44:51Ed Elson?

  Yeah, my perspective is pretty much identical to you. I think this is kind of the final straw for me. I've been waiting for Apple to get their mojo back, but every single announcement is just such a snooze. And yeah, this is the final straw. I think I'm I'm officially bearish on Apple. I think that's the right move to sell or at least trim your holdings. By the way, that's what Berkshire Hathaway did last year. I think it was probably the right move. I think the stock will fall below $200 in the next six months, maybe the next 12. I think there are just two major problems with Apple. The first is the products and the second is, as you say, the valuation. And let's just go over the products here.

• 45:34Ed Elson?

  Every iPhone today looks the same as it did 10 years ago. And the same can be said of the iPad and the same can be said of the MacBook. The only innovation we've seen from a hardware perspective with Apple is this headset, which so far has been a disaster based on all the data that we know about. The only other exciting product was the Apple car, which they canceled last year. So they're not growing from a hardware perspective. And by the way, I I think this is why we're seeing all these ridiculous ads from Apple. I don't know if you saw their Super Bowl ad, but it was this, this, this video talking about their Gen Mojo feature, which is basically they're using AI to allow users to create new emojis.

• 46:17Ed Elson?

  And they also have these billboards plastered all over New York. You've probably seen them. It's kind of embarrassing, I think, from the company. I think the reason they're doing it is because they have nothing else to advertise. We talk about their software as well, which has been underwhelming. They just did this new iOS update. People don't like it. I also don't like it. I think one of the worst changes they did was to the Photos app, which I don't know if you've used it recently. It's just, it's extremely unintuitive. Siri is terrible. It was supposed to compete with ChatGPT. It it it won't. Apple Music is failing compared to Spotify. Apple Podcast is failing compared to Spotify and compared to YouTube. In sum, the products aren't exciting anymore.

• 46:58Ed Elson?

  And then there's this added layer of the valuation, which we can talk about it. Trading at thirty eight times earnings. The company is still valued as a growth company. And I just want to put it in perspective with other companies. Thirty eight times earnings, that is higher than Microsoft, whose revenue is growing at sixteen percent. It's also higher than Meta, whose revenue is growing at twenty two percent. It is very close to the valuation of Nvidia, which trades at forty times earnings, and they're growing at one hundred and fourteen percent. Apple's revenue last year grew two percent. It's flatlining. So it's a long way of saying I'm very aggressively with you on this. I don't think the valuation makes sense. I think the only way you can justify

• 47:43Ed Elson?

  that multiple for Apple is if you really believe in Apple Intelligence and the AI play. If you believe that AI is just gonna absolutely turbocharge all of their products and make them exciting again. But I would just burst that bubble once again and say, they just released Apple Intelligence. Forty one percent of iPhone users didn't bother to try it. And of those that did, seventy percent said they don't like it. So I don't see how we can justify this as a growth company anymore. I think this is officially a mature company, which means that it should be valued as a mature company. I don't think this can continue.

• 48:21Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, it's interesting. And it's easy for me to say because it's a very difficult business. But if Apple were coming out with its Project Titan, if Apple were just about now, and if it had not canceled Titan, it would have been coming out with a car just about now. Can you imagine how well positioned they would have been against Tesla?

• 48:37Ed Elson?

  Yeah, exactly.

• 48:39Scott Galloway?

  I think they would have found the justification for that PE just in the customer list. I think they would have built the most valuable customer list or waiting list in history. And that is, I think, several million people would have come up with five or ten grand just to be on that waiting list. And they could have said, I think that would have justified. When everyone was trying to justify the thirty eight PE, which they're gonna run out of reasons to justify, I think they could have pointed to that list. And the self-expressive benefit brand of Apple, which immediately identifies you as one of the wealthiest, most creative fourteen percent of the globe, because a billion people have iOS. The other real self-expressive benefit item in people's lives that they're willing to spend a lot of money on is their car. So I just think the Apple car would have been the most elegant way to say I'm

• 49:24Scott Galloway?

  creative and wealthy. And I think they would have done a good job. They could have outsourced the manufacturing. Anyways, I think they are kicking themselves that they didn't go the distance around Titan.

• 49:32Ed Elson?

  Just in terms of your decision to sell, when did you officially make that decision? And also, just on a slightly separate point, what are the tax implications there?

• 49:40Scott Galloway?

  The tax implications are ugly because I bought Apple at about eight bucks a share or 12 bucks a share. So I've recognized a huge gain. I've sold some along the way, but there's just no getting around it. I'm going to have to pay 22 or 23.8% taxes, which is enormous, but I think it's worth it. And my decision was, I have a friend of mine who runs a hedge fund that actually has my biggest allocation called Elena Partners, a guy named Orlando Machant, who was a tiger cub and now manages money for family offices. And he's just been sending me all these graphs about just how incredibly expensive US growth is and how inexpensive the rest of the world is. And the stat that has just blown my fucking

• 50:19Scott Galloway?

  mind is that if you were to price all US assets, they would be $70, including their equity value and their debt. And if you were to price the rest of the world sans the US, it'd be $30. So would you rather own the US at $70 or the rest of the world for 30? And I am acting on that. I am selling down my US growth portfolio and I'm investing in Europe. The problem is I'm already a little bit late. Europe is up, I think, 11 or 12%. The EU, you know, the EU markets are up substantially and the US is flat. But I am rotating out of the US and my kind of growth plays, I'm overexposed in growth because I invest in a lot of private companies in the US. But I'm going to, I'm going to get out of Amazon

• 51:00Scott Galloway?

  and Apple and reallocate that capital into Brazilian and European stocks.

• 51:06Ed Elson?

  What percentage of your Apple holdings will you sell?

• 51:10Scott Galloway?

  I'll probably sell all of it.

• 51:11Ed Elson?

  All of it?

• 51:12Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, I think I'm probably going to sell all of it.

• 51:13Ed Elson?

  You don't want to own any Apple?

• 51:15Scott Galloway?

  I'm so overexposed by virtue of what I do.

• 51:20Scott Galloway?

  You realize, when you look at diversification, you're not only going to look at your assets, you've got to look at your cash flows. Do you realize the majority of our cash flows are linked to the US tech market? That's what this podcast is. You're very invested in US tech. Who listens to this podcast such that our advertisers will pay us a lot of money such that I can pay you, you know, nine, 10 bucks an hour? The reality is tech. You're an investor in tech. You're an investor in US tech. People who are tracking South African value stocks aren't listening to this podcast. People who track American markets, which are dominated by tech, are listening to this podcast, meaning that you at Ellison, if you were really, really smart about diversification, you would not be investing in US tech.

• 52:02Scott Galloway?

  Because you are very tied, this is what I didn't understand when I was your age. I was so over invested in US tech. Running a brand strategy firm in Northern California, my entire livelihood was tied to the fortunes of tech. All my clients were either Kleiner Perkins portfolio companies, or HP, or Apple, or, you know, I had these big kind of US tech companies. And then, because that's what I knew, and I thought, oh, this is, this is where the future is, I'd take all my excess cash flow and I'd buy tech stocks. So when 2000 came, I ended up going from being worth a lot of money for a 30, a 30 year old, 36, to being worth negative $2 or $3 million in the space of about three

• 52:44Scott Galloway?

  months. So, we are over invested in US tech by virtue of the fact of what we do for a living. So I'm going to take many of my, basically everything that's not nailed to the ground right now, and get out of US growth in tech.

• 52:57Ed Elson?

  Well, next time, I'm going to need to hear what those actual European companies are, because I look at the European.

• 53:02Scott Galloway?

  I'm going to go into an index. I might go into a levered index from Draxound, but I'm going to go into a diversified, mixed ETF or index around EU value stocks.

• 53:10Ed Elson?

  And are there any companies in there, in the index, or any? Any companies that you're seeing in Europe that you think, oh yeah, they're doing well?

• 53:17Scott Galloway?

  Well, I just like a lot. Mercedes is a great company, trading at a fairly low multiple. Porsche is on sale relative to where it was. L'Oréal is an amazing company. Shell, BP. There's just, there's a lot of, you know, LVMH has come off a lot. That's not value, but it's come off a lot. There are a lot of great European companies. I'm very excited about Europe. A lot of this is confirmation bias, but I think Europe has been, you know, we have, we've had this conversation. Europe has been left for dead. It's not. I spent a lot of time in Europe. Incredible universities, a lot of very hardworking people. It doesn't have the risk capital it should, but I think that's going to change. I think PE is getting their green glands going. And I think they're finally going to start acting like a union

• 54:00Scott Galloway?

  and take advantage of their size. So I'm very excited about Europe and I'm very, you know, the bottom line is American tech is still going to do really well. It's just too fucking expensive.

• 54:14Ed Elson?

  Let's take a look at the weekend. We'll see the consumer and producer price indices for February, and we'll also see earnings from Oracle, Adobe, and Williams Sonoma. Scott, do you have any predictions?

• 54:24Scott Galloway?

  I want you to make a prediction, Adam. I think you just made one.

• 54:27Ed Elson?

  My prediction would be that Apple is sub $200 in the next six months. I think that their numbers are flatlining, their hardware revenue is down, and they've been leaning on a narrative. And I think that narrative is fizzling out because you can just look at their products and you can look at their ads. It's becoming very clear. This is a very mature and increasingly uninteresting company. I'm not sure how I feel about you selling all of your Apple. I'm also not sure how I feel about you going totally out of US growth entirely. I think there are still, there's still a lot of value in US tech in companies like Nvidia and Google, for example, I'm pretty bullish on. But Apple, I think that's probably a good idea to trim.

• 55:09Scott Galloway?

  So I'm excited to see you in Texas. The last time I was in Texas, I was in Lubbock, and I came across a sheep farm, and there was a farmer fucking a sheep on the side of the road. And I said, in New York, we shear sheep. And he said, I'm not sharing her with anyone. I'll see you in Austin. I'll see you in the great state of Texas.

• 55:30Ed Elson?

  This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Mia Salvario is our research lead. Isabella Kinsel is our research associate. Drew Burrows is our technical director and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer. Thank you for listening to Prof G Markets from the Vox Media Podcast Network. Join us on Thursday for our South by Southwest episode, only on Prof G Markets.

• 56:59Speaker 08

  This podcast is supported by Anthropic, the public benefit corporation behind Claude. Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way, because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at claude.ai/spotify and keep thinking. That's claude.ai/spotify.