Interest Rates, the US Economy, and Demographic Change — with Matthew Klein

Matt Klein, the founder of The Overshoot, and the co-author of “Trade Wars Are Class Wars: How Rising Inequality Distorts the Global Economy and Threatens International Peace,” joins Scott to discuss the macro environment and why a recession isn’t imminent. Matt also shares how to think about the demographic shifts we’ve seen across various nations. Follow Matt on Twitter, @M_C_Klein. Scott opens by discussing the attempted mutiny in Russia, shedding light on the power dynamics and ramifications for various players on the geopolitical stage. Algebra of Happiness: are you floating? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Northwest Registered Agent. Your business identity is everything that makes your business legitimate and professional. With Northwest Registered Agent, you don't just form a business, you start a complete foundation built for privacy, credibility, and growth. That includes registered agent service, a business address, operating agreement, domain, website, professional email, phone number, and built-in privacy. In other words, your home address, personal email, and phone number stay private. Don't pay hundreds or thousands of dollars for what you can get from Northwest for free. Visit northwestregisteredagent.com/profgfree and start using free resources to build something amazing. Get more with Northwest Registered Agent at northwestregisteredagent.com/profgfree.

• 0:48Speaker 01

  Your heart can tell you a lot about your health. Apple Watch Series 12 measures your heart rate every five seconds with the most accurate heart rate sensing in wearable. So your vitals app, now with heart rate variability, can tell you when something is off. And your readiness score can let you know when to rest and when to push. Hear the story in every heartbeat with Apple Watch Series 12. The features described are for wellness purposes only and not for medical use. iPhone 11 or later required. Based on Apple conducted study of heart rate accuracy, August 2026. Visit apple.com/aplewatchseries12.

• 1:18Scott Galloway?

  Episode 256. 256 is the area code serving parts of northern Alabama. 1956, IBM invented the first ever hard disk drive. And America's first modern shopping mall opened in Edina, Minnesota. I don't understand how parents can lose their kids in a mall. Seriously, any tips greatly appreciated.

• 1:40Scott Galloway?

  Go, go, go!

• 1:49Scott Galloway?

  Welcome to the 256th episode of the Prop G Pod. In today's episode, we speak with Matt Klein, the founder of The Overshoot, a premium subscription service dedicated to tracking the global economy. We discussed with Matt the state of play regarding inflation and the financial markets trends playing out across the global economy and his thoughts on economic and financial impact of demographic change. Oh my God, that just sounded so highbrow. I'm not a primitive, heavy-browed... I don't know, arrested adolescent prop with erectile dysfunction who will be starched from the gene pool if people have their way. No, I interview people with subscriptions, financial products that understand global markets. What's happening?

• 2:33Scott Galloway?

  What's happening? We witnessed a historic weekend. Evgeny Prigozhin, the leader of the Wagner Group, essentially leading a mercenary army of somewhere between 25,000 and 50,000 people, turned direction, turned around and decided he was going to march on Moscow. And the most shocking part of all of this was that in Rostov-on-Donne, he was welcomed, even cheered on. This has revealed Putin as being exceptionally weak and also that his grip on power was a lot looser than we had thought. It also brings to light how much nuclear weapons matter, that you can be a gas station posing as an economy, but if you have 10,000 nuclear warheads and a reputation for having your enemies fall

• 3:17Scott Galloway?

  out of windows, you carry a much bigger stick than you deserve. So what is being said around what happened here? A Russian state broadcaster wrote on her Telegram channel, "The choice was between bad and monstrous," a series of decisions around bad decisions. Ukrainian President Zelensky said, "The bosses of Russia do not control anything, nothing at all, complete chaos." Putin says he let the meeting take place as far as it did to avoid bloodshed. President Biden says, "We had nothing to do with it. This was part of a struggle within the Russian system. They're keeping probably appropriately quiet. If there's a train wreck of your enemies, just stay out of the way." Our favorite geopolitical expert Ian Bremmer writes, "It undermines Putin's ability to govern, requiring greater state control of the population with the attendant surveillance

• 4:02Scott Galloway?

  and further mobilization required to enforce it." I just can't, I don't think anyone saw this coming. Supposedly our intelligence apparatus knew something was up with it. Prigozhin might be planning something, but this illegal invasion, although I would argue almost any invasion is illegal. This invasion has been a total disaster. It's hard to imagine a world leader that has fallen further faster than Putin over the last 14 months. First off, the invasion just didn't go very well and isn't going well. And two, his mercenary army, he doesn't appear to have control of it. And he had to call on somebody he doesn't have a lot of respect for, Lukashenko, the Belarusian president, to step in and negotiate a resolution.

• 4:46Scott Galloway?

  And what will happen with this resolution? You gotta think the Prigozhin's days are numbered. Without, without an army taking his command, I don't know how he doesn't end up in jail or dead. Or it strikes me that, hey, here's your new corner office and it has a big window and it's on the 11th floor. This, I can't imagine that this individual is going to be sleeping very well at night. It also just shows that Putin is a paper bearer, if you will, that sitting on a lot of oil and putting in place a series of kind of mini criminal gangs that he controls through fear, no real ideology, no real prosperity, other than the prosperity concentrated among a few elites, so to speak, in Russia.

• 5:28Scott Galloway?

  This was just a very weak foundation that is collapsing fast or appears to be collapsing fast. Also, real shout out to all the people on the far right and all the Putin apologists and sycophants who said that we should negotiate with Putin and that we had to face the reality of, of the war and the strength of the ferocious Russian army. They could not have been more wrong. And the US administration, in conjunction with its allies overseas, and obviously on the front end, the heroic valor of the Ukrainian army has just, has absolutely sent a signal to the world, including China, who probably had designs on invading Taiwan, that when

• 6:08Scott Galloway?

  the West binds together, our weapons, our strategies, our technology, our communications, our resilience, our ability to cooperate and bind together are unrivaled.

• 6:21Scott Galloway?

  The other winners here, I would argue, are India, who has been able to garner very cheap oil by playing the West off against Russia, and what looks like a GDP run that might rival, or at least have echoes of China's economic run over the last 20 years. But the nation that people aren't talking about as much, that has grown its economy faster in the last year than any large economy, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. And here's the reality. They sit on trillions of dollars, tens of trillions of dollars in oil reserves. They have pivoted from Islamism and terrorism. It used to be a cold war with Iran and a hot war with Yemen. And MBS has pivoted to capitalism, which is the kind of the gangster economic construct and the way to exert influence. Well, how does that influence exerted?

• 7:06Scott Galloway?

  Everything from bringing the most famous soccer player in the world to the Kingdom, to hosting the World Cup, although that was Qatar. It's regional, but you're going to see, I would believe, I believe the Kingdom is going to get the World Cup in probably 2030. They're creeping takeover of the US sports, specifically libs takeover of the PGA. They are now exerting their power in the tennis world or their influence. You're going to see a massive, a massive migration of human capital to Riyadh. When I was in Riyadh a couple of months ago, I was struck by how many people, talented people from Asia and Europe, had moved to Dubai and were now moving to Riyadh. Because a decent strategy for economic security is to find the biggest pile of money and stand as close as you can to it.

• 7:51Scott Galloway?

  And the biggest pile of money in the world right now is in Riyadh. We are spending about $550 billion on our infrastructure act here in the US, or over there in the US. I'm in London today. And when I was in Riyadh, some officials took me through seven projects that are above a trillion dollars each. I mean, they're building a city, NEOM, which in comparison, they want Dubai to feel like a small, cute village. I mean, they have unbelievable ambitions. Because here's the bottom line. They have about 30 or 40 years to pivot. Why? The good news is they sit on the Pacific Ocean of oil. The bad news is it's going to run out at some point.

• 8:33Scott Galloway?

  So they have three, four, or five decades to pivot to a non-fossil fuel-based economy, education, tourism. They're trying to get big into the gaming industry, entertainment, services. And they are saying, all right. This is the good news. We have an unlimited supply of capital. But we, the bad news is we have to get out of our existing business. And this notion that we're going to wave our finger at them and lecture them, okay. A vocal minority will do that. And then 98% of the rest of the world is going to decide to work with them. I think we should restore relations, or we should absolutely give a big bear hug to India and also normalize relations. And we do, we don't like to say this, but we have actually have military bases in the kingdom.

• 9:16Scott Galloway?

  But encourage more commerce between the two nations because these two nations are going to play an increasingly important role. And China fucked up here. They bet on the wrong cowboy, specifically a cowboy that runs around on a horse with his shirt off. But quite frankly, underneath that facade of masculinity is a guy who's remarkably flaccid and losing power. This is a wonderful moment for the West. We are standing with our brothers and sisters in Ukraine. Our economy is still relevant. Who the hell is doing better than the US right now geopolitically? This really has kind of a reasserted US hegemony, and that is we are still the leader. We are still the free leader. We are on the side of the righteous.

• 9:57Scott Galloway?

  We fuck up all the time, but the arc of America bends toward justice. This is a wonderful moment for us. No one could have seen this coming. We had our own insurrection, but I would argue it was mostly a few thousand crazies who were whipped up by Fox and a corrupt criminal president. But you don't see Northrop Grumman or the Navy marching towards Washington DC threatening to overthrow the government with weapons, for God's sakes. I mean, this got very scary very fast, or very strange very fast. But again, to sum it up, go USA. This is a wonderful moment for the West. We should feel proud of ourselves. In America, we love to raise a generation of young people who don't like America, but guess what? Guess what? This matters.

• 10:40Scott Galloway?

  And this was handled really well by the US and her allies. This is a great moment for us. We make the best weapons. We have the best intelligence. We back the right horses. And we aren't afraid of a murderous autocrat just because a bunch of people on the right are libertarians, so-called libertarians, think we should negotiate and be an apologist. No Neville Chamberlains in this administration.

• 11:05Scott Galloway?

  We'll be right back for our conversation with Matt Klein.

• 11:11Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from NetSuite. They say every day your business is late to AI, you might fall two days behind. So how do you keep up with the competition when they're only moving faster? Enter NetSuite Next. You probably know NetSuite, the AI-powered business management suite that securely connects all your data. It's a unified suite that brings your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into a single source of truth, trusted by over 44,000 customers. NetSuite Next is the next big leap in how business gets done, because AI is built into everything you do. It automatically surfaces customer insights throughout your day. AI agents work alongside you to solve problems and handle routine work. And anytime you have questions about anything, you can ask, just like you're having a conversation with a colleague. NetSuite is customized for a wide range

• 11:56Scott Galloway?

  of industries, so it supports the way your business truly works. Whether your company earns millions or even hundreds of millions, it's time for NetSuite Next, where your business meets AI. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get our free business guide, Aligning for the Agentic Era: How AI is Changing Everyday Work, at netsuite.com/prog. The guide is free to you at netsuite.com/prog. netsuite.com/prog.

• 12:27Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Vanta. As AI adoption grows, so does your company's security risks and requirements. New frameworks, audits, and vendors keep piling on, but your team isn't getting any bigger. Most compliance tools promise automation, but you're really stuck doing all the work by hand, chasing screenshots, validating controls, and playing catch-up when audit season comes around again. Vanta works differently. The Agentic Trust Platform is built to scale with you, not slow you down. With over 1,400 automated tests across 400-plus integrations, Vanta collects evidence and monitors your controls year-round, cutting your audit prep by 82%. Plus, you can access the Vanta agent everywhere you work, whether your team is in Vanta every day or living in tools, including Claude or Cursor. Want proof?

• 13:12Scott Galloway?

  Over 16,000 fast-growing companies like Ramp, Ryder, and Harvey save time and resources while scaling fast with Vanta. Learn more at vanta.com/prog and get $1,000 off. That's spelled V-A-N-T-A dot com slash prop G for $1,000 off.

• 13:43Scott Galloway?

  Welcome back. Here's our conversation with Matt Klein, the founder of The Overshoot and co-author of Trade Wars: Our Class Wars.

• 13:52Scott Galloway?

  Matt, where does this podcast find you?

• 13:54Speaker 02

  I'm in San Francisco.

• 13:56Scott Galloway?

  Nice. It's so unprecedented velocity and rate increases over the last five, six quarters. Give us your thoughts on the state of the markets and sort of unintended consequences and second order effects of these rate hikes.

• 14:10Speaker 02

  So the context here is that basically since about 2008, 2009, you've had interest rates being very, very low. And you have a whole, you know, half generation or so of people, consumers and businesses and investors being used to this low rate environment. And there are a lot of reasons why interest rates were low and that made sense at that time. But people built up a whole set of expectations about what was normal, what they should be, you know, what was sort of the range of possible outcomes. And then very quickly, you have a very sharp disruption to those expectations and interest rates move, you know, in the grand scheme of things, you look at like a long-term chart interest rates, you think five percentage points, maybe not that much. But, you know, zooming in on

• 14:53Speaker 02

  the past 15 years or whatever, if you're used to, you know, the short-term interest rates, you know, the cash or whatever being essentially zero, and, you know, even at the longer-term interest rates, maybe not going above three is sort of the upper end. And then suddenly, everything is above five. That is going to have a really big impact on a lot of people. This isn't the first time that's happened, by the way. You can go back to like the 1960s, you have a similar dynamic of a lot of businesses, you know, for a very long time, used to, you know, interest rates didn't go very high. And then as inflation started to build in the 1960s, you know, before oil shocks or anything like that, that put upward pressure on interest rates. It put pressure on banks that had made all these loans, you know, 6%, and they, you know, took deposits at 3%. And you can read reports from the time and how, you know, much trouble they were getting into. And

• 15:36Speaker 02

  so there, that's just, you know, that adjustment is going to be challenging. I mean, the good news is that, you know, as, as was the case then, and, you know, as is the case now, I mean, the, a lot of other parts. Economy doing relatively well. So there are going to be losses. I mean, clearly, we've seen some banks having those issues, but at the same time, you know, job growth is still pretty robust. Wage growth is still reasonably healthy. There hasn't been a huge reliance on borrowing to fund consumer spending in the past few years compared to previous expansions. It really has been coming much more out of either income growth or money that had been saved during the pandemic. And stocks have been, you know, compared to the peak at the end of 2021, kind of flat, right? But flat is a lot better than, you know, down

• 16:18Speaker 02

  substantially. I mean, so I think in that sense, there is a sort of recognition that there's these big countervailing forces here. There's some big losses for some individual sectors, but so far, it seems that things are sort of, you know, muddling through, even if, you know, a few particular banks have gotten overextended and have gotten blown up.

• 16:39Scott Galloway?

  So it feels as if we were a month away from recession for the last 18 months. And yet, as we sit here, unemployment at historic lows, the real estate market has been shockingly strong. The markets, as you've pointed out, seem somewhat resilient. Is this the recession that never happened? Or do you still think we're looking at a recession sometime later in the year, 2024? What is your recognizing? No one has a crystal ball here. What would you, where would you put your money right now?

• 17:09Speaker 02

  Yeah, I mean, that's a great, great question. I mean, if you think, if you look back to right before the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates, the expectation that they had, an expectation that was priced in the markets, is that they would maybe, maybe raise interest rates by, you know, two percentage points over the course of 2022. And they ended up doing almost five percentage points. And, you know, one might have thought, if you'd known at the beginning of 2022, what they actually ended up doing relative to what people thought was, you know, reasonable expectation, you think, wow, that's going to really tank the economy. And yet, that's not what happened, as you said. So, you know, I think this gets back to the question of

• 17:43Speaker 02

  Normally, the way that channel is supposed to work is that if you make borrowing more expensive and you make it more attractive for people to just hold cash in a bank account as opposed to, you know, buying things that create jobs and income, that that's going to slow the economy down and that's going to have all these attendant effects. And yet, that doesn't seem to really have had the impact, even with the housing market, which is the most obviously sensitive interest rates. And you have mortgage rates going from below 3% to almost 7%. And that did have a notable impact on house prices in some areas are down. Housing activity in terms of new construction has come down substantially. And yet, it seems like we've already found the floor. You look at the data from May, the most recent month that we have, and it already seems as if, you know, home sales and home construction are picking up again.

• 18:28Speaker 02

  And it suggests to me, I mean, there, you know, again, there was this sort of big painful one-time reset, but people have managed to sort of get through it because underlying wage growth is so strong, there wasn't that much, I guess there wasn't that much, you know, reliance on borrowing. You know, if you compare this to, say, like 2005, 6, 7, 8, there you had a situation where so much of consumer spending was dependent on people borrowing against rising home values. And so as soon as that was no longer possible, you had this downward cascade very quickly. That wasn't really the case this time around. You had this big cash injection from the federal government as a consequence of, you know, responding to the pandemic and trying to make sure that we didn't have a financial crisis

• 19:10Speaker 02

  because we all had to stay home in the first months of, you know, 2020. And then people saved money from that, the economy recovered. You had, you know, more cash injections to really turbocharge the recovery. And then at that point, you had a pretty healthy situation where, you know, the economy hasn't fully normalized, but it mostly gotten back to normal. And then people have the extra cash that's available. And that's, that seems to have really been, you know, a helpful cushion. I mean, you can argue from, you know, the Federal Reserve's perspective, it's unhelpful because it means they have to push harder to get the results that they want. But, you know, to your point, I mean, to the extent that you might think that, oh, we're going to have a, you know, economic downturn, it seems like this has really been preventing that and all the things, the channels you might be worrying about for a downturn. You know, I mean, obviously, you know, things could happen and, you know, the Fed might decide

• 19:54Speaker 02

  they want to, you know, keep squeezing, but their ultimate priority is to get inflation back in line. And if they think inflation is going to come back in a line without the economy going in a downturn, they're not going to, they have no interest in overdoing it. You know, that's where it gets really kind of a tricky question is, you know, can that happen?

• 20:11Scott Galloway?

  So we had what I think will be described as this this pretty serious geopolitical shock, even if it ends up, I mean, I remember this this past weekend, it's just like, I just don't think anyone was prepared for what happened or went down in Russia. Have you thought through what kind of the direct impact or the second order effects on the markets might be?

• 20:34Speaker 02

  Well, what happened this weekend is really tricky, an interesting question because I'm not even sure we know exactly what happened and you know, whether it's even over in that sense. So I think, you know, zooming out a little bit, what's interesting is that as the war has progressed and you know, obviously, it's been extremely disruptive to people who live in Ukraine and a lot of Ukraine's neighbors. But you know, things, you know, the sort of that initial shock, people have managed to adapt in various ways. You know, the you know, the energy markets got rerouted, food, you know, there was also helpful that, you know, there was a very good harvest in place like Argentina and Australia and the Southern Hemisphere wheat producing countries. But in general, there was a degree of which after that initial shock thing, you know, sort of past the worst, you know, that surprise happened. Once you, once you have the surprise, that's what, that's what matters for markets

• 21:19Speaker 02

  is surprise. But once you, once it's happened, you know, the surprise is over. I mean, it's still obviously very destructive. It's terrible for the people who live in Ukraine. You know, obviously, you'd want the war to end soon. But that, you know, and the impact on market seems to sort of stabilize there. And one of the things that sort of always a possibility once the war started is what would the impact be on Russia internally? I mean, the specifics of what happened this weekend might have been very surprising and unanticipated. But I mean, the idea that you start a war that ends up being relatively unpopular domestically and because it doesn't end the way you expect it to, you have to conscript a lot of people, you have a huge wave of immigration, it doesn't seem to be going the way you want it to. The idea that that creates some kind of instability at

• 22:04Speaker 02

  home, that in of itself is not inherently surprising. It's just a question of how it plays out. And then, you know, who ends up winning, what kind of conflicts are, what what the next person would be like. I mean, that kind of possibility presents itself. You see this, I mean, certainly wouldn't be the first time in Russian history that you're fighting someone else and then it goes badly and then there's a revolution at home. So obviously, what happened this weekend didn't play out the way it did in, say, 1905 or 1917, but. You know, that that that possibility sort of created itself as soon as the the war started. And so, you know, looking ahead, the question is, well, is it more likely that something like this will be successful in the future? And if so, like, who would be the kind of person to take over? And what would that mean? I mean, that's where it gets, I don't know if we've learned anything new in that sense. And that's really what, you know, what the impact for markets is like that risk was always

• 22:49Speaker 02

  there. Um, once the war started. And so that's sort of my my initial perspective. But again, we don't even know exactly what happened. So a war if it's over. So that makes it challenging.

• 22:57Scott Galloway?

  So we think about switching gears. We think a lot about sort of population implosion or depopulation, or more specifically, how ideally we should create more opportunities for young people such that they can afford, should they choose to have children. You've actually spent a decent amount of time focused on how demographic change affects societies, politics, markets. Can you say more about what is playing out in the U.S.?

• 23:22Speaker 02

  Sure. So the getting some sort of little historical perspective here is that after, you know, basically after World War Two, you have a big increase in populations and particularly populations of young people, the baby boom, you know, in the U.S., in Europe, and in much of much of the world, in Asia. And that process more or less peaked around the 1970s in terms of the the child boom and the share of younger people and the total population. And since then, we've had basically a shift as that cohort ages, the population of, you know, what we conventionally think of as working age people, you know, sort of 20s

• 24:02Speaker 02

  to 60s, depending upon, you know, where you draw the exact cutoff, peaked as a share of the total in a lot of places sometime around, you know, either 90s or 2000s or 2010s, depending on where exactly you're looking. And if we use sort of standard population forecasts from a place like the United Nations, which, you know, if you figure who's already alive, you can do a pretty good sense of what, you know, who's going to be alive in the future, more or less, you know, based on, you know, trends and life expectancy, and you say, okay, well, it looks as if the share of people who are going to be, we think was prime working age or. Is going to be falling as a share of the population, a lot of places. The share of people who are over the age of sixty five or over the age of seventy is going to be rising a lot, a lot of places.

• 24:42Speaker 02

  The share of people who are under the age of fifteen is going to be, has been falling, is probably going to continue to fall pretty substantially in a lot of places. And then the question is, what does that, what does that mean, um, you know, for society and, and for markets and everything else? And, you know, the first thing to say is that there's a lot of variation depending on where you're looking. So the more extreme cases are places like China, certain parts of Europe, where you're actually going to see outright population decline. And particularly outright population decline for people of sort of, what do you think was the working age? So if we take the UN forecasts seriously, the number of people in China aged, you know, twenty to sixty five, twenty to seventy is going to fall by something around half, uh, but between now and the end of the century. It's already been falling and it's going to fall, which is, um, we've not seen something like this before.

• 25:28Speaker 02

  You look at a place like the US, actually, it's relatively more benign. I mean, part of this is sensitive to forecasts about immigration and things like that. But, you know, in, in principle, in the US, you're going to see a situation where the total population will rise. Unnet a lot is going to be elderly, but you're still going to, the absolute number of people in sort of the twenties to sixties cohort is going to be rising small, you know, flat to rising. Either way, though, you're going to have some distributional challenges because in every society you have a situation where there's some people who are producing more than they consume, especially people who are working. And then you have people who consume more than they produce, which are, you know, children, elderly, the disabled, things like that. And so, you know, that's fine. That's what living in a society is.

• 26:09Speaker 02

  But obviously, if you have a big change in the balance between, you know, one group versus the other group, that's going to create some challenges in terms of, well, how are you going to distribute the cost of the lower living standards? Because if you have a situation where everyone is, where lots of people are net producers, then, you know, the workers can retain a lot of what they, they produce, they can consume a lot, and the people who are dependent on them can also live very well. Because it's their relatively small, you know, burden or whatever. Uh, on the other hand, if you have a situation where you have a relatively small share of people who are, who are doing most of the production, then that, that creates, you know, some challenges. That having been said. It doesn't necessarily tell you the outcome. You look at Japan, I think it's really the only the only real example we have, a country that's already sort of gone ahead with this demographic transition, or at least, you know, they're further ahead in the process in a lot of the

• 26:54Speaker 02

  places and then give you a sense of what, you know, one way of dealing with it. And I think that actually is a very healthy model that we should, you know, do that we're going to see that our Europeans are going to see that or what have you. I think that's very encouraging, which is they ended up just increasing the share of people with jobs, you know, they historically had relatively low share of women in the in the paid employment workforce, and that's changed a lot, very dramatically in the past 10 years. You also have a situation in Japan where people, you know, partly this is a, you know, function of fact, they have a, you know, high quality health system and generally, you know, healthy lifestyles, but people are able to be working in productive members of society and in paid employment, you know, increasingly longer. And, you know, the extent that one of the problems we've

• 27:36Speaker 02

  seen in the US and in Europe and elsewhere, of people who are older and no longer in paid employment, feeling a sense of loneliness, or, you know, they're not, they don't have things to do. I mean, that's actually, you know, could be a very constructive solution. And so, you know, how it all plays out, I think, is very sensitive on, you know, what the specific, you know, social institutional contexts are in each country and, you know, but it's really, I think that's something that, you know, has to be thought of and something that we can, we can choose to do well or do poorly. But I mean, you know, it's definitely going to be, I think, a major theme. The good news is that these are slow moving changes, but it's definitely going to be a major theme, I think, you know, in the decades ahead.

• 28:15Scott Galloway?

  So, given the shifts in the global economy, where do you see opportunity from an investment standpoint?

• 28:22Speaker 02

  That's a very tricky question. I mean, potentially, yeah, I mean, there's, you know, there are lots of play, I mean, you know, having long ago worked in investment briefly, I mean, the trick is what is already priced in versus what you think. So you can say, oh, this is going to be a great opportunity. But if the market's already discounting that or, you know, more than discounting it, then you're not going to make money doing that. So that's very challenging. I think it was late 2021 or very, very beginning of 2022, there was some, you know, report that was put out of, oh, you know, it was a really undervalued market is Russian stocks, you know, they traded a very, very low P ratio. Turns out that there was, you know, didn't know why, but it turns out that there's a reason for that, right? If you had bought Russian stocks and you think, oh, they're too cheap, but then they got a lot cheaper.

• 29:03Speaker 02

  So I'm relatively optimistic about, you know, the US economy right now, actually. But, you know, whether that translates into very good returns on buying US assets right now is, I think, sort of a different question. I don't have a view on that, that angle, but I do think actually there are a lot of reasons to be optimistic about the US. I think we've been seeing, aside from the fact that sort of the macro picture is overall healthy, where you don't really have this issue of, you know, consumer debt being a problem and you, you have relatively strong growth in employment, you also have this real uptick in investment. There's a boom in, in the construction of, of factories, particularly related to semiconductor fabs and electronics and things related to the green transition.

• 29:45Speaker 02

  You have, it looks like a big increase in equipment investment for things related to that as well. And so I think, you know, and it's really only just getting started, I think. So that I think is another reason to be relatively optimistic. Turning that into investment is a different story, but you know.

• 30:02Scott Galloway?

  We'll be right back. Support for the show comes from Vanta. As AI adoption grows, so does your company's security risks and requirements. New frameworks, audits and vendors keep piling on, but your team isn't getting any bigger. Most compliance tools promise automation, but you're really stuck doing all the work by hand, chasing screenshots, validating controls and playing catch up when audit season comes around again. Vanta works differently. The regentic trust platform is built to scale with you, not slow you down. With over 1,400 automated tests across 400 plus integrations, Vanta collects evidence and monitors your controls year round, cutting your audit prep by 82%. Plus, you can access the Vanta agent everywhere you work, whether your team is in Vanta

• 30:47Scott Galloway?

  every day or living in tools including Claude or Cursor. Want proof? Over 16,000 fast growing companies like Ramp, Ryder and Harvey save time and resources while scaling fast with Vanta. Learn more at vanta.com/provg and get $1,000 off. That's spelled V A N T A dot com slash prof G for $1,000 off.

• 31:14Speaker 03

  This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends. Like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an ultra because it's not just a superior light beer. It's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.

• 31:44Scott Galloway?

  We spend a lot of time talking about inequality. Do you think the problems surrounding inequality are overstated, understated? You write a lot about it.

• 31:50Speaker 02

  Yeah, so I mean, I, yes. So first of all, I do think inequality is actually a serious issue. I think it's also a serious issue, not just from like the social perspective or sense of fairness or whatever, but also I think macroeconomically significant. You know, I wrote a book with Michael Pettis called Trade Wars Are Class Wars. And that was a big part of the thesis was that changes in the income distribution or the big increase in inequality that we've seen over the past several decades actually had these really severe macroeconomic effects and explains a lot of the problems that people associated with trade and globalization. And then one of the perverse consequences of this was that we had situations where people in many countries were blaming foreigners for things that actually were really, um, you know, they were on the same side, essentially that, you know, as we were in the book that,

• 32:32Speaker 02

  you know, the typical person in the U.S. might think that the typical person in China was somewhat taking advantage of them, but actually it was the opposite. It was that the typical person in the U.S. and the typical person in China had very similar interests and were being taken advantage of by, you know, elites in both of their countries who are effectively working together against them. And so that I think is a very serious issue. That having been said, I do think that at least in some places, the past couple of years have actually been somewhat helpful, um, sort of counterintuitively. Um, I remember in the beginning of the pandemic, there was a big concern about this. And I remember sharing that concern that, you know, because of who was suffering from job losses. And you know what the nature of what could be done from home versus not that you had the situation where inequality was going to get all the worse and there'd be this huge,

• 33:13Speaker 02

  you know, all of the negative trends of basically you saw since the eighties were going to be reinforced and exacerbated. And yet, that doesn't seem to have happened. And I'm not, I'm not entirely sure why. Um, I think there's a variety of factors. I think it depends on what place you're looking at. Um, but certainly in the US, one thing that's really interesting is that, you know, economists have just been looking into this and that people in the lower half of the income distribution have actually seen the biggest real income gains. Uh, and that, you know, there has been, there has been a real compression in wage inequality. And, you know, which I think is a very healthy development. I think it's one of the reasons why the economy, at least particularly in the US, the consumer spending has been relatively robust and hasn't depended on credit growth the same extent. I mean, we saw credit card debt fall. It's,

• 33:58Speaker 02

  it's come back a bit, but it's still sort of below where you would have expected naively based on the pre pandemic trend. The, I think the interesting question is, is this sort of a one off shift? Or is this sort of a part of a sustained, persistent change in, in the trend? But I think that could be, you know, a potentially healthy development. I think globally, if we look, there's like still plenty of room for improvement. I think one of the things that's disappointing is the, um, the Chinese government's reaction to the pandemic where essentially they did not provide any kind of income support, uh, to people who were affected. Uh, in the beginning, there was no real unemployment benefits whatsoever. You had tens of millions of people who'd been living in the cities, uh, returning to the countryside as, um, essentially become subsistence farmers. And that had knock on

• 34:41Speaker 02

  effects there of very, very weak consumer spending in China, basically over the past several years. And so I think that's a serious problem, you know, for them and, and by extension for people in the rest of the world. But I think at least in some places in the US, and I think, um, possibly in, you know, Europe as well, we've seen sort of a, the beginnings of what might, what might be called a healthy rebalancing.

• 35:01Scott Galloway?

  So I'll put forward a series of theses and you tell me where I got it right or wrong, or what you disagree with or agree with. The US, relatively speaking, has, hasn't been this strong since the end of World War II, relative to its competitive set.

• 35:15Speaker 02

  I think that might be right. I mean, I think one thing that's, you know, in general, when people talk about like the size of, you know, the economies and, you know, is the US the biggest in the world? I think that's not really. I think that in some ways is like too narrow a view. People say, oh, is the US economy bigger than the Chinese economy or have you? And it's like, that's not really how it would play out in the grand scheme of things. You really want to look at like, what is the broader set of countries that are, you know, allied and friendly with each other. And if you think about that, and there are different ways of defining it, but like, the US alone is certainly in a very, I think, relatively good position. But certainly if we think about the US and, you know, Canada and Europe and Australia and Japan and Korea and all that, like, that's a very large block. And is by far the dominant block economically in the world. I think we've seen

• 36:00Speaker 02

  with the impact of the way the sanctions on Russia were imposed. I mean, the Russians were, I think, very surprised that the Europeans and the Asian democracies were willing to go as far as they did. I think that was sort of their strategy based on what happened after 2014 was that if anyone were to do anything, it would be the US, but otherwise, no one else would. And I think if that is what had happened, then they would have been fine. But that's not what happened. And I think, you know, we're seeing the impact of that. And so there are other, you know, large economic, you know, economies that are individually, if you look at like country by country. But I think if you look at sort of these broader blocks, I think that the, you know, the, the global alliance of democracies, they said that there, there is a sort of cohesive, you know, the G7 plus

• 36:44Speaker 02

  is, I think, very strong. I think people now say like, oh, well, you know, it's still we compare, you know, people talking about the rise of China. And obviously China is a very large country. It's a very, it has some very sophisticated technology companies there and diversified manufacturing base. But at the same time, if people think about, I think there's a little bit of historical amnesia about what people were saying about the Soviet Union in, say, the 50s and 60s, where, I mean, that was a society that created, that was ahead of the US in the space race, you know? You know, the people talking about the Sputnik moment, I mean, that was, that was what it was, was that was actually significant advances relative to what, you know, we were able to do at the time. If you think about the relative population sizes and relative economic weight, it's actually that the Soviet Union was at the time, considered a very serious, you know, peer competitor threat.

• 37:30Speaker 02

  And I think if we're thinking about it from that kind of comparison, I don't, yeah, I think that the democracies now. Are in a very, you know, strong shape, obviously not cause for complacency or anything, but also you don't need to be, I don't think one needs to be necessarily alarmed and, and, you know, fear of, you know, losing one's status or primacy. I think there's also something that, you know, would be unnecessary, given some of these relative power balances.

• 37:54Scott Galloway?

  And so greatest self inflicted wounds geopolitically, I think most people would say it's probably been Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but I would argue number two would probably be Brexit. And I know you've written about Brexit. What are your thoughts there?

• 38:10Speaker 02

  Yeah, I completely agree. Brexit was totally unnecessary. Uh, there was a really good paper that was written a few years ago that I, I remember writing about when I, when I found it. And what they did was the, um, they were looking at the change in the share of votes for the UK independence party, which doesn't exist anymore. But basically that's like a pretty good predictor of who later ended up voting for Brexit. And it turns out that the, within the UK, the places where you had the biggest increase in, in share for UKIP are the places that had the biggest cuts to social services during the period of austerity after David Cameron and the Tory Lib Dem coalition came to power in 2010. And so there was actually a very, very clear relationship between, you know,

• 38:53Speaker 02

  the financial crisis happens, this new government comes in, they, they think the big problem is that the government budget deficit is too large, government debt is too big, and they're going to kind of cut back as much as they can. And they really cut back the most on local government support services, things like, you know, mental health or social housing, stuff like that. And so, you know, they, he did some basic simulation of like, well, what, what, we'd sort of imagine what would have happened if there hadn't been these cuts, there hadn't been the, that increase in UKIP. And the extent of the increase in UKIP predicted the Brexit vote share, which it did pretty well, like what would have happened and Remain would have won quite handily. So Brexit, I think was a large mistake in the extent that I don't think they've gained anything. I think most people in the UK, you look at the polling, say they don't think they've gained anything really meaningful.

• 39:36Speaker 02

  A lot of the substantial majorities say that they wish they had some kind of closer relationship with EU than they have now. Not necessarily to rejoin, but you know, this thing is, I think I saw recently, it was like 70% want some kind of closer connection than what they have now. So I think that was definitely a mistake. And I think it's interesting that that was very much tied into the sort of macroeconomic policy mistake of you have this financial crisis, this extremely disruptive event, lots of people thrown into work, and the response is, we're going to cut back on, you know, government support for a lot of people who really needed. And to varying degrees, you saw that kind of mistake in lots of places. Uh, in the UK, I think it was among the more severe, and that's how it manifested itself. You see that in Europe, you saw things like that happen in the US as well. I mean, it's just, I think that was really, people didn't, wouldn't have thought of in

• 40:21Speaker 02

  the context of geopolitics, but I think those all, I mean, that was a horrific mistake. And the 2010s in many ways were a lost decade that was self-inflicted as a result.

• 40:32Scott Galloway?

  A horrific mistake. Matt Klein is the founder of The Overshoot, a premium subscription service dedicated to tracking the global economy, and the co-author of Trade Wars Are Class Wars: A Rising Equality Distorts the Global Economy and Threatens International Peace. At the beginning of his career, Matt worked in global macro investment research at Bridgewater Associates. Following this, he was a research associate in international economic and financial history at the Council on Foreign Relations. He joined us from his home in San Francisco. Matt, we appreciate your time today.

• 41:03Speaker 02

  Thank you very much for having me.

• 41:13Scott Galloway?

  Algebra of happiness. Are you floating? I spent a year of my life just kind of floating. Actually, I think I spent several years. The first time was right out of UCLA, I got a job at Morgan Stanley in the two-year analyst program, and then I got out, and I didn't feel like I had the grades, or I didn't have the confidence to apply to business school yet. So I was living with my mom, and I just wasn't doing a whole lot. I was just sort of floating, didn't know what I wanted to do. And then again, when I moved to New York after, I think it was 2000, after the dot bomb implosion, and I was trying to get my life back together, floating a little bit, but at least had some purpose, it was just taking a while to get going. But that year after, kind of 24 to 25, I was sort of floating.

• 41:56Scott Galloway?

  And if you're floating, I think you want to take advantage of the fact that there are some amazing organizations, such as the Peace Corps, that offer an opportunity that while you're trying to figure things out, you can do something in the agency of something bigger than yourself, and which is a decent, I think, definition. Of purpose. And I also think that's true of the armed services. I've kind of come full circle in the armed services. I used to think that that would be a terrible thing for a young person. And having been exposed to now a number of veterans and people in the armed services, I know a lot of young men and young women who, quite frankly, are floating and then they go into the armed services and they find purpose and meaning and connection and also Americor. I think it's a decent idea if you're a young person

• 42:41Scott Galloway?

  and you find yourself floating for one, two, or three months to take advantage of some of the amazing organizations that our federal government offers that where you can serve in the agency of something bigger than yourself. Are you floating? Are you floating? There's options out there.

• 42:59Scott Galloway?

  This episode was produced by Caroline Shageran. Jennifer Sanchez is our associate producer and Drew Burrows is our technical director. Thank you for listening to the Prop G Pod from the Box Media Podcast Network. We will catch you on Saturday for No Mercy, No Malice, as read by George Hahn, and on Monday with our weekly market show.

• 43:16Speaker 04

  We just moved into our new house and I didn't realize just how close we were to the neighbors. That's when my friend told me about blinds.com.

• 43:25Speaker 05

  Blinds.com isn't a medication, but it can improve how you feel about your home. Customers who shop at blinds.com experience excellent customer service from consultation to installation. Side effects include increased privacy and better sleep. Talk to your partner today and see if blinds.com is right for you. Visit blinds.com to order your free samples.

• 43:46Speaker 06

  When you shop pickup at Kroger, you can expect the savings you love and fresh groceries selected just for you. Our associates are committed to getting every detail right, carefully handpicking your items, checking for quality and freshness, and packing your order with care. Because bringing you fresh, quality groceries is what we do best. And right now, enjoy $20 off your first online order of $75 or more. Restrictions apply. See site for details. Kroger. Fresh for everyone.