Pod Insights On with Kara Swisher The 2024 Election Post-Mortem: How Trump Beat the Odds About this episode Despite the chaos of January 6th, 34 felony convictions, and his party’s underperformance in the 2022 midterms, Donald J. Trump is once again president.
How did he defy political gravity to win again? Why did former President Joe Biden run despite overwhelming evidence that voters didn’t want him to? Was there a coverup to conceal his decline, as Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book, “Original Sin” alleges? Why did former Vice President Harris run such a cautious campaign and refuse to distance herself from Biden? And was she doomed by Biden’s late withdrawal, or did her own mistakes cost her the election?
As America enters its 250th year and a new political era, Kara speaks with the authors of 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America to answer these questions and understand how we got here. The trio breaks down how Trump beat back his Republican primary opponents, the Biden campaign’s fatal missteps, the Harris campaign’s stifling paralysis, and why Trump is now governing more like a king than a president.
Isaac Arnsdorf is a senior White House reporter for The Washington Post. His reporting on the first Trump assasination attempt was essential to the Posts’s 2025 Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News, and he’s the author of "Finish What We Started," about the MAGA movement post January 6th.
Josh Dawsey is a political investigations and enterprise reporter for The Wall Street Journal. Josh was part of teams at The Washington Post that won the Pulitzer Prize in 2022 for coverage of Jan. 6 and in 2024 for coverage of the role of the AR-15 in American life.
And Tyler Pager is a White House correspondent for The New York Times. In 2022, he won the Gerald R. Ford Journalism Prize for Distinguished Reporting on the Presidency.
Questions? Comments? Email us at [email protected] or find us on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, and Bluesky @onwithkaraswisher.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript 10,900 words · 11 speakers
Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:00 Kara Swisher? Three people. I would never be. I can't even write it with myself.
0:02 Speaker 01 I mean, a book of this scope on this turnaround is better with friends.
0:18 Kara Swisher? Hi, everyone. From New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network, this is On with Kara Swisher, and I'm Kara Swisher. My guests today are Isaac Arndt Dorff, Josh Dossie, and Tyler Pager, three political reporters and the authors of 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America. It's easy to get swept up in the chaos of Trump 2.0 and forget how wild last year's presidential election was. But it's important to look back, analyze the presidential race with the benefit of hindsight, and draw out the key takeaways. And that's exactly what this book does. Isaac Arndt Dorff is a senior White House reporter for The Washington Post. His reporting on the first Trump assassination attempt was essential to the Post's 2025 Pulitzer Prize for Breaking
1:01 Kara Swisher? News, and he's the author of Finish What We Started: About the MAGA Movement Post January 6. Josh Dossie is a political investigations and enterprise reporter for The Wall Street Journal. Josh was part of the Washington Post teams that won the Pulitzer Prizes in 2022 for coverage of January 6 and in 2024 for coverage of the role the AR-15 has played in American life, or really, death. And Tyler Pager is a White House correspondent for The New York Times. In 2022, he won the Gerald R. Ford Journalism Prize for distinguished reporting on the presidency. This conversation is very insightful, so stick around.
1:48 Speaker 02 Support for the show comes from TikTok. There is a scientifically documented correlation between listening to podcasts and curiosity. So since you're here, you probably enjoy discovering new things. One great place to indulge your curiosity is TikTok. Whether it's how to forecast volcanic eruptions, strange phenomena that the James Webb Space Telescope picked up near the beginning of time, or a literal deep dive on the ocean's deepest reefs, TikTok has a wealth of fascinating videos just waiting to be discovered. Your next discovery is waiting on TikTok. Learn more at tiktok.com/discovermore.
2:30 Speaker 03 Ripple has been powering modern finance for a decade. We're leading the charge to bridge the gap between existing financial systems and the future of finance. You can have it all: legacy, stability, and digital innovation. Systems that work with your other systems. Because with the right partner, the question isn't crypto or traditional finance. The question is simply, why choose? A new standard of modern finance. It's happening with Ripple. For informational purposes only, availability of products can vary and may be provided by different Ripple entities.
3:02 Speaker 04 Now for a quick message from Anthropic, the team behind Claude, the AI built for businesses. Customers count on their bank, and banks count on their most important systems. Now those systems count on Claude, and nine of the Fortune 10 companies use it for critical work. See why leading companies trust Claude at claude.ai/span.
3:28 Kara Swisher? Isaac, Josh, and Tyler, thanks for coming on, An.
3:30 Speaker 01 Thanks for having us, Kara. Good to be here.
3:32 Speaker 05 Thanks for having us.
3:33 Kara Swisher? We're going to talk about your new book, 2024, and I want to set the table by getting your assessment of how powerful President Trump is right now. The Supreme Court limited nationwide injunctions, which were one of the few restraints on his authority, although it's complicated. Senator Tom Tillis and Representative Don Bacon both recently announced their retirement, thinning the already depleted ranks of Republican lawmakers willing to stand up to him. And his signature so-called Big Beautiful Bill is working its way through Congress. It's deeply unpopular, though, with the American public by every poll that you could look at, but by the time this episode airs, it may have passed. So talk about how strong is Trump right now. Why don't we start with you, Josh, and then Tyler, and then Isaac?
4:13 Speaker 05 Yeah, I think he's extraordinarily powerful, particularly in the Republican Party. I mean, as you saw, anytime any Republican senator has moved to vote against him or signaled that he would vote against him as one of his nominees, they could sort of stick the MAGA mob on them, and these folks quickly leave office. I mean, Tom Tillis is not running again. Don Bacon, as you said, is not running again. A lot of these senators you know privately do not like this bill. They've expressed... All sorts of misgivings about it, but publicly are still planning to vote for it. And as you sort of saw in our book, right? Like Trump sort of understood how to pressure people in a way. He did on the campaign trail, he's doing it now. He just sort of wears people down. He just goes over and over and over at them.
4:58 Speaker 05 And then he has this sort of cacophony of his base and his supporters in the background that make it painful if you don't go along with what he wishes. So for a large portion of the country, maybe he's not entirely powerful. But for the Republican Party, I think he's as powerful, if not more powerful than ever before.
5:15 Kara Swisher? Okay, Tyler?
5:16 Speaker 06 Yeah, and I think just to add on to that, one of the things that differentiates this this term from the first term is that he and his aides have a better understanding of how to use the layers of government to get what they want. And I think he has figured out how to use the administrative state to achieve his goals in a way that he was unable to in the first term, in part because he was not surrounded by complete loyalists. And I think that's another thing that was a huge priority of his, and we've seen him be able to use that to his advantage, is across the administration in even some positions that most people don't even think about, there are people that are just loyal to Donald Trump.
5:53 Kara Swisher? Isaac?
5:54 Speaker 01 In terms of his legal, his functional power, he and his advisors have been very clear about the way that they view the mandate that the country gave him and the way that he has been going about governing as as like a king or an emperor. I mean, that is how he is acting. Whether the other institutions of government and civil society are going along with that has been a little bit more mixed. I mean, I think that initial period of what people called the great capitulation has sort of passed and more pockets of resistance have started to emerge. And then, you know, politically, the picture is also a little bit in flux.
6:37 Speaker 01 The unpopularity of his trade policies and the turn against him, the shift against him in public opinion on his signature issue of immigration. So I think that that story is, we're in the middle of it right now, and we don't know which way it's going to go.
6:52 Kara Swisher? Yeah, Isaac was mentioning political liabilities. Give me each of you, Tyler and Josh, one. Tyler first.
6:58 Speaker 06 Yeah, I mean, I think Isaac noted this, but just to hit it harder, the immigration thing and his aggressive crackdown is a political liability. We've been writing about the tension between his zero tolerance policy for undocumented immigrants and agriculture and hospitality industry, saying, if you follow through with this crackdown, we are going to not be able to produce the nation's food supply. And so I think we're already seeing there that Trump is being squeezed in some ways by two parts of his base.
7:27 Kara Swisher? Josh?
7:28 Speaker 05 I mean, the core calculation on the campaign from Trump and his advisers were that the economy was why he would win. And every poll they did internally, they showed a double-digit issue they were winning on the economy over Harris and Biden, almost really until the end. And when folks like Trump and Stephen Miller and others would want to talk about immigration, his top pollster, Tony Fabrizio, would say, just talk about the economy. That's going to win us this election. And Trump, historically, no matter what has gone right or wrong for him, he's polled extraordinarily well on the economy. And now those numbers have gone down a little bit. You see him haranguing Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, every day, you know, to lower rates. You see all sorts of threats he's making
8:12 Speaker 05 against companies, you know, you better not raise your prices because of tariffs. I think the economy and whether or not he could actually bring prices down at some point, you know, that is going to be an issue if he doesn't show the kind of progress that people voted for him to show.
8:26 Kara Swisher? Yeah.
8:26 Speaker 01 And we have to talk about national security also. I mean, the Iran strike did not have majority support. You know, once Trump made that decision, most Republicans fell in line behind him. But there was a, you know, a lot of open fighting within the coalition about that intervention beforehand. And as we learn more about the effectiveness in, you know, in the longer term and, and what's going to happen in the region, that could change again.
8:51 Kara Swisher? Right. Not obliteration, as we found out. So after Trump won last year, one of the leading narratives used to explain the victory was this post-pandemic inflation led to losses for incumbents around the world. But you begin the book by painting a picture of a very vulnerable Trump at the start of his campaign. Was he beatable? And if so, why? Let's hear from each of you, Tyler, you first, then Josh, then Isaac.
9:15 Speaker 06 I think one of the scenes in the book that is most dramatic is Donald Trump's campaign launch at Mar-a-Lago, he couldn't even get members of Congress to show up.
9:23 Kara Swisher? Yeah, it was kind of sad.
9:24 Speaker 06 It was this sad event. The next day, the New York Post sort of chided him by saying Florida man makes an announcement. There was all this energy and enthusiasm, and this was coming after the midterms. And if you recall, the Republicans were supposed to do quite well in those midterm elections, and they did not. The big winner of that election for the Republicans was Ron DeSantis. He romped to victory in Florida. The New York Post puts him on the cover saying "to future." And a lot of the energy was around sort of this idea that Trump was not the sort of kingmaker he was, because a lot of lawmakers wouldn't even show up to his announcement speech. I think one of the real turning points in this election, and as we catalog in the book, is the indictments of him.
10:08 Speaker 06 Immediately after the indictments, a lot of lawmakers came rushing to Trump's defense, and he was able to use that to argue that they were coming after him and his entire base of supporters. And so that sort of politi-- the way he politicized those indictments was hugely critical in him winning back a lot of support from the Republican Party.
10:28 Kara Swisher? Josh?
10:29 Speaker 05 Yeah, I think that's right. I think after the indictments, you saw a lot of the other Republicans really struggle to galvanize on a message against him. In fact, most of them came out and defended Trump. And when I was talking to Trump for this book, on the interview, he said even he was surprised at how quickly so many of his Republican critics came out and just immediately, you know, defended him and said, you know, "We're with Trump against the legal justice." And the point of the challenge, Kira, was that most of them were running campaigns saying they were sort of like Trump, kind of like Trump, but Trump is also great. And what we found is that for some of those core voters on the right, they could not find attacks that actually they would believe against Trump.
11:14 Speaker 05 DeSantis, others commissioned all these focus groups, polling, they were trying to come up with a way to beat him. But there were other voters in the middle who, you know, we believe, based on our reporting, that over time could have fallen away from him, but through a confluence of factors, some of the charges, some of the way the other candidates behaved, he sort of coalesced and consolidated all of that support. But it wasn't fait accompli, it didn't have to be that way.
11:38 Kara Swisher? Didn't have to be that way. Isaac, do you think he would have been beatable if not for the indictment?
11:43 Speaker 01 Yeah, absolutely. Well, it's not just if not for the indictments, though. And you know, the DeSantis people will go down insisting that at the point that he was going to get indicted four times and that was going to dominate the news coverage, there was nothing that they possibly could have done to stop him. And the reality is, they waited too long. DeSantis missed his chance, that he didn't actually announce until after the first indictment. And that gave Trump this huge head start to start this comeback and to reassert his control over the party and regain all that support, such that if that's what pushed all the other Republicans to come to his support. If you imagine the counterfactual where DeSantis had really jumped in right away, had seized
12:27 Speaker 01 on that momentum he had coming out of the midterms, and Trump looked like old news, then by the time the indictments came around, it would have looked like kicking someone who was down, not forcing everyone to defend someone who was winning.
12:40 Kara Swisher? Right. So explain for people why DeSantis waited and how Florida law constrained his ability to announce earlier.
12:46 Speaker 01 Well, they also will downplay the role of this. But the truth is, Florida had a law that you couldn't be the sitting governor and run for president at the same time. And so, DeSantis, if he wanted to keep his day job, had to change that. And in order to change that, he really couldn't do it until the end of the session, because otherwise, all the legislators would lord it over him the whole time, right? But they really won't just come out and admit that. And instead, the strategy that they came to accommodate this factual necessity was that they were going to do a state-house strategy, that they were gonna focus on the legislative session, have DeSantis keep his head down, and then that would form the springboard, his legislative accomplishments in Florida would form the springboard for him to launch
13:31 Speaker 01 the national campaign. And the reason that didn't work is because Trump just spent the entire time pummeling him, and he just had nothing to answer for. And so by the time he stuck his head up, and he showed up and started talking about Florida, everyone was like, are you running for president or are you running for governor?
13:48 Kara Swisher? Right, right. According to the book, no one outside Biden's inner circle seriously believed he would run. So Josh, back when Trump team thought they'd be facing a different Democratic challenger, who were the three potential rivals they feared most?
14:01 Speaker 05 Well, it depended exactly who you ask in his circle, but there was a lot of fear of Shapiro in Pennsylvania. And I don't know that they had a ton of fear for anyone other than a Rust Belt candidate because they believe those main three or four states were key to the election. But I think the Trump folks were not fearful of Kamala Harris.
14:22 Kara Swisher? Yeah. So after Democrats outperformed expectations in 2022, Biden decided to run again, essentially by default. He never declined to run, so therefore he was running. So was Biden beatable in this case in the Democratic Party?
14:35 Speaker 06 The bigger question is, why didn't any Democrats step up and put pressure on Biden? They sort of all just fell in line. And in part, that was because the Biden team made it extremely difficult for anyone to mount a challenge. First, they took advantage of agita over the primary calendar and the order, which had Iowa, New Hampshire first. And there was a process in which they were changing that or considering changing it. And the Biden people basically just proposed their own order, putting South Carolina first. So by pushing South Carolina to the front, it made it very hard for anyone to really mount a challenge because that's the state that Biden was always going to do the best in. The other thing they did is they created this advisory board. And it sounds very niche
15:17 Speaker 06 and not that it matters all that much, but they basically stocked it with anyone that could run for president. And what they said was this would be a board of prominent Democrats that could travel, surrogate, fundraise on behalf of the president. And they told some people about it and some of them found out about it when the was published in the press. And so it was sort of this trick to get everyone that might run against Biden to bring them inside the tent. And I think it's also, you know, if you look at someone like Dean Phillips, who tried to run, he's a backbencher member of Congress that most people didn't know. So it was hard for him to raise money or get a national profile. But the structural factors there really made it so that Biden was on a glide path to the nomination.
15:57 Kara Swisher? Right.
15:57 Speaker 06 And the one thing, Carrie, I just want to add quickly to that is that Voters kept saying, we do not want Biden to run again. Poll after poll showed the majority of Democrats thought he was too old. And even internal data that we got for this book, the DNC was measuring voter enthusiasm through different metrics. And one of the striking things they found was this digital community of volunteers and activists who wanted to support Democrats dwindled after Biden won. And as he geared up to run again, people were just not excited for him. And that was not a secret. And so the idea that people didn't know Biden was old or did not know that that was a challenge is just not true because everyone across the party knew it.
16:35 Kara Swisher? Yeah, you could see it. So Biden dared the case was that even though his approval ratings were very low, once voters realized they had a binary choice between him and Trump, they remembered how destructive Trump was, they would vote against Trump for Biden. But Trump actually got more popular as the race went on. Isaac, how did Democrats misjudge the electorate so completely?
16:53 Speaker 01 So I think about that when I was talking to the Democrats, they were always talking about what was on the nightly news, you know, like what were so called regular people consuming and watching. And then the Trump campaign was much more focused on, you know, like they would say, their reaction to the Harris-Trump debate, which, you know, you would admit Trump didn't do that well in was, it doesn't matter because if you were watching that debate, you're a high information voter and we don't care about those people, right? They were, they recognized that, you know, the midterm electorate, the more reliable voters were shifting Democratic and they were going out to find new, new low propensity voters who they thought looked like a Trump supporter. And, you know, that's hard. There was a lot of reason to be skeptical that they could pull that off, but they absolutely did.
17:38 Speaker 01 And they were focused on, you know, podcasts and, and, you know, we call it life in the YouTube comments, you know, you kind of think about it as like the scummy underworld of the internet, but they, they turned it into real people. And, you know, the Democrats also just, you know, like with Biden's age, like with the economy, they just never came up with any answer. They, they recognized that they needed answers to these problems, to these political vulnerabilities, and they still never managed to articulate one and stick to it and drive that message. And that caught up with them.
18:12 Kara Swisher? Yeah. So the point of going after low propensity voters in March, Trump essentially kicked out Ronna McDaniel. As Chair of the Republican National Committee and his campaign took over the RNC, Suzy Wiles, Trump's campaign manager, had her team dig into the data of 2016 and 2020 election and found that Trump could win by just matching his totals with men from 2016, which went against conventional wisdom, which basically said candidates should appeal to persuadable voters, which were often reduced to white suburban women. Josh, two questions for you. First, how come no one realizes sooner? And two, what decisions flowed from Wiles's analysis?
18:47 Speaker 05 So the analysis that we obtained in an internal memo that we write about in the book is that the biggest slippage from Trump from 2016-
18:55 Kara Swisher? By the way, which I presume Suzy Wiles handed to you, but go ahead. Go ahead. You don't have to tell me.
19:00 Speaker 05 She did not, actually, but we won't discuss where we did get it. But, but the internal memo says, and this was written back in February of 2024, that the biggest slippage of voters from 2016 to 2020 for Trump, the conventional wisdom was that folks were upset about COVID in 2020 and upset about the, you know, BLM handling of the protests in the streets and the rest, but that his biggest slippage was actually white men and that they needed to do what they could to dredge up support against white men. We have a chapter in the book called "It's a Man's World," but what we look at is how they kind
19:41 Speaker 05 of crafted their entire campaign strategy around trying to get more white men to vote. So they did sort of the manosphere of podcasts. They like went on every sort of podcast they thought would appeal to white men. They scheduled events like around UFC and football games and all sorts of other masculine sort of seeming events to try and appeal to white men. They did advertising that was all meant to appeal to white men, watching, you know, NFL on Sundays. The whole campaign strategy was less about how do we get independent voters, suburban women, and all sorts of others to come out, and more about how do we get people to come out who only vote for Trump and may not come out at all, may just stay at home,
20:25 Speaker 05 right? The white men who voted for him in 2016. You know, so so it was a different play. And that's why I think you saw in some of these cases where he would say insensitive and incendiary things and the campaign wouldn't even do that much to walk them back or try to walk them back because it was a play to get more white men to vote for him.
20:43 Kara Swisher? Yeah, so Biden's campaign pushed for an unusually early debate. And so in June 27, Biden had his disastrous performance. According to Jack Tapper and Alex Thompson's book, Original Thin, there were essentially two Joe Bidens, one who was sharp and one we saw on the debate stage. They claim there was a cover up by Biden's inner circle to hide the second Biden from the public. Talk about those allegations. Let's hear from each of you, Tyler, Isaac, and then Josh.
21:08 Speaker 06 Yeah, look, I I think the story of Joe Biden's age is complicated and nuanced. And as I said earlier, I think one of the things that we really focused on in the book is how age was ever present in every single conversation. And in our book, we recount many examples of Joe Biden performing inadequately, him forgetting staffers' names and, you know, people not being able to get access to him. You know, it's hard to exactly prescribe the word cover up to our reporting because I think it is a more nuanced and complicated story than that. I think, you know, one of the really remarkable scenes in our book is Biden goes out to the Air Force Academy and he trips over a sandbag.
21:51 Speaker 06 And that video gets played over and over again on social media. And it is, look, old man Joe incapable of walking across the stage. Immediately upon returning to the White House, he walks in and runs into Jeffrey Katzenberg, who is the billionaire movie producer and co-chair of the Biden campaign that helps with fundraising. And Biden says, I got sandbagged, Jeffrey. And Jeffrey responds and says, I'm glad that happened. And his point is that we need to spend more time focused on. Dealing with the realities of an octogenarian president.
22:23 Kara Swisher? Katzenberg was glad the tripping happened early before people were really paying attention, I think, too.
22:27 Speaker 06 Right, that was his point, is that it happened early and it was more than a year before the election and they could adjust for that.
22:33 Kara Swisher? Right.
22:33 Speaker 06 And so they make a lot of accommodations to position Biden to perform his best. So that's some of the physical things we see. You know, the stairs on Air Force One, instead of taking the really big, long stairs that we've seen many presidents trip over, he does the shorter stairs. He wears sneakers more. He doesn't do the dinners at international summits. Katzenberg wanted Biden to be much more rigorous about his age and his health. One of the things that he kept telling Biden and his aides to do was to go to a doctor, an ENT, to work on his voice. He was worried about how raspy it sounded and how that further underscored concerns about Biden's age. And so I think the thing about Biden is that age was everything that they were thinking
23:16 Speaker 06 about because they wanted to present him in the best possible light for voters. And so obviously, that was more an intensive process with an octogenarian than another president, but it was interesting. I've had many conversations with Biden people, Biden allies, Biden critics, people that have worked for other administrations, and they say every president accommodations are made for it because presidency is a demanding job and you want them to be their best. That being said, obviously, it was taken to a greater degree with Biden. And so there's, there's a lot in the book that sort of captures the complicated way Biden dealt with, with age.
23:50 Kara Swisher? Isaac, go ahead, Isaac, and Josh.
23:51 Speaker 01 Yeah, I think the, the fallacy of the, the way that the Biden team was approaching this is basically their argument was, you know, when he's in the Oval Office, when he's in the Situation Room, he's really sharp, he can do the job, and he just doesn't speak as well, he doesn't debate as well, he doesn't campaign as well as he used to. The problem with that argument is that the number one job of the president is to communicate. And so it's, he can't do the job if he can't communicate, if he can't make the case to the public for his leadership, his agenda, his accomplishment. That is the president's job. You know, this dichotomy that they were trying to, to establish between doing the job and speaking about the job is just the complete wrong way of thinking about it.
24:35 Kara Swisher? Josh?
24:35 Speaker 05 I mean, one of my favorite scenes in the book is near the end of the book where Trump comes and meets with Biden in the Oval Office after Trump has won. And they have a pretty erudite, interesting conversation for 90 minutes. Biden is going around the world and giving his opinions on different world leaders. And Trump, they leave the Oval Office and Trump says to Susie Wiles, like, where was that guy during the debate? Like, he seemed like a totally different guy. And I think what our book sort of captures is that, you know, there were lots of days where Biden, you know, was sharp and could have long meetings like that and held it together. And then there were other moments where, you know, he would forget senators' names or trail off in meetings or obviously the debate performance. And, you know, it was sort of uneven, I think.
25:19 Speaker 06 One sort of amazing anecdote in the book is at the very end, when I got Joe Biden's cellphone number and called him.
25:25 Kara Swisher? Yeah.
25:26 Speaker 06 So for months, I'd been trying to interview Joe Biden for this book. We had an interview that Josh did with Donald Trump, and we thought it was very important to get Biden's take on the election. I spoke to many of his aides, made the pitch, and they just said he wasn't available. Their excuse was that he was writing a memoir, and so his participation in our book would conflict with his memoir.
25:46 Kara Swisher? Yeah, whatever.
25:47 Speaker 06 I tried to make the case that that's absolutely not true. But anyways, eventually, I got Joe Biden's cellphone number directly. And one evening, I called him. I didn't leave a message. He didn't pick up. And a little bit while later, he called me. So I answered it. The president's on the phone, and I tell him what I'm doing. He says he's about to have dinner. It's around 7:00 PM, but I should call back tomorrow. So it's like, great, Joe Biden's going to do an interview for the book. Immediately, I get a lot of texts and messages from Biden's aides. I didn't answer them. They made clear they didn't want him speaking, but he said he wanted to talk. So the next morning, I call him back. He answers this time. He's standing on the Amtrak train platform, so he's about to board the train. To go from Wilmington to Washington. And I asked him if he has any regrets, what he thinks about Trump.
26:31 Speaker 06 And then he hangs up to board the train, but sort of suggests that he might be open to continuing the conversation. Immediately, I get a flood of calls and texts from Biden's aides who are freaking out that I got his phone number. I tried to call him later, went straight to voicemail. Listeners, his voicemail is just him saying his first name, Joe. And then I tried one more time the next day, still just got Joe. The next day, I call and it is replaced by a Verizon Wireless message that the number had been changed and could no longer be reached. So that is my brief sordid in trying to get an interview with Joe Biden for the book.
27:04 Kara Swisher? This is why they lost. What are you talking about? This is why they lost. So funny. That is so funny. And you never talked to him?
27:11 Speaker 06 I mean, I got those, that brief time when he was about to board the train in Wilmington.
27:15 Kara Swisher? That's not an interview, though. That's not an interview.
27:17 Speaker 05 And I can state for the record that Trump's cell phone number has not been changed.
27:21 Kara Swisher? I know. He'll pick up anything.
27:22 Speaker 05 He'll call his old number. He'll answer, he'll answer the phone in the White House and say, hello.
27:26 Kara Swisher? Hello. Yeah, he'll talk to the pizza place. We'll be back in a minute.
27:38 Speaker 02 Support for the show comes from TikTok. There is a scientifically documented correlation between listening to podcasts and curiosity. So since you're here, you probably enjoy discovering new things. One great place to indulge your curiosity is TikTok. Whether it's how to forecast volcanic eruptions, strange phenomena that the James Webb Space Telescope picked up near the beginning of time, or a literal deep dive on the ocean's deepest reefs. TikTok has a wealth of fascinating videos just waiting to be discovered. Your next discovery is waiting on TikTok. Learn more at tiktok.com/discovermore.
28:21 Kara Swisher? Support for this show comes from Delete Me. Have you ever Googled yourself and found your home address, phone number, or the name of a family member? It's unsettling. Here's what you do to clean up your online data footprint. Go to joindelete.me/kara and enter the code Kara. You get 20% off Delete Me. Delete Me removes your personal information that's being sold online. Delete Me was named the top pick for data removal services by Wirecutter, so you know you're in good hands. I really like Delete Me. I use it all the time. It's always surprising how much data people have about me. I am very privacy forward, and I still find so much stuff of mine online, some of which is incorrect, some of which is compiled in a really disturbing way. And you have to sort of control it like weeds.
29:05 Kara Swisher? Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me. Now, at a special discount for our listeners, get 20% off your Delete Me plan when you go to joindelete.me/kara and use the promo code Kara at checkout. The only way to get 20% off is to go to joindelete.me/kara and enter the code Kara at checkout. That's joindelete.me/kara, code Kara.
29:34 Kara Swisher? Support for this show comes from Hers. Losing weight on your own can often feel like a fight you never win. Luckily, weight loss by Hers offers access to the FDA-approved Wegovy pill and the Wegovy pen. Wegovy is the first-ever GLP-1 weight loss medication available in a pill, but also comes as a pen, so you've got options. With Wegovy, you can lose up to 20% of your body weight. People lost an average of 14% body weight at 64 weeks in a clinical trial of Wegovy alongside diet and exercise. To get started with Wegovy, just go to forhers.com and complete an online consultation with a licensed provider who will determine if your prescription is appropriate. And Hers doesn't stop there. Nutrition and lifestyle guidance are part of the plan,
30:17 Kara Swisher? along with access to 24/7 messaging with your care team, so support is always in reach. Ready to reach your goals? Visit forhers.com/kara to access personalized, affordable care for weight loss, hair, menopause, and more. That's forhers.com/kara. Individual results may vary, and stopping treatment may result in weight regain.
30:40 Kara Swisher? So after the debate, Biden pushed back against the idea that he was polling poorly or that biology is undefeated. And your book makes it seem like Biden's internal circle insulated him against that reality too much. And even though there was plenty of publicly available polling showing his support was cratering. Tyler, how is it possible that Biden didn't see or believe the polls the rest of the country was seeing? He surely had to have seen this.
31:04 Speaker 06 Yeah, he was definitely confronted with it. I think one of the striking scenes in our book is he does this George Stephanopoulos interview and George says to him, "Mr. President, the polls show this." And he says, "That's not what I'm seeing." And so the way to understand that moment is twofold. One, the pollsters, Biden's own pollsters, watching that interview freaked out. And they were like, "What is he saying? George is reading accurate polling and that is closer to our understanding of the race." So pollsters were worried about their reputation that Biden was going out there saying that the polls were inaccurate. So that's one part of it. And those pollsters never actually met with Joe Biden. For the entirety of the campaign, they never had, since he launched, they never had a meeting with the president, which is sort of unheard of. The other thing,
31:48 Speaker 06 another, I think, really relevatory scene in the book, is when Nancy Pelosi meets with Joe Biden and she confronts him about the polls too and says she's really concerned about the polling and not only Biden losing, but it impacting Congress too. And Biden gets his aide, Mike Donlin, on the phone to go back and forth with Nancy Pelosi about how they disagree about what the polls show. And I think that is one of the things to understand about Mike Donlin. Mike Donlin has long held a contrarian view of polling. He does not take much stock in it. He often has a different view than the conventional wisdom. And so Mike Donlin and Steve Verratti together really focused on polling that largely bolstered their view that Biden could win and he could stay in the race.
32:32 Kara Swisher? They also did less polling than usual, right?
32:34 Speaker 06 Absolutely. He did a lot less polling. And I think that's evidenced by the fact that the pollsters, who are respected pollsters that work with top Democrats, Molly Murphy, Jeff Pollock, Jeff Guerin, never met with the president to discuss the polling. The one time they were supposed to meet with him, as we recount in the book, They had the meeting scheduled for 2:00 PM. It was pushed to 4:00 PM. Then it was pushed again, pushed again, and it never happened.
32:53 Speaker 05 You just mentioned Donald, and I thought one thing worth noting was how much they tried to restrict access to Biden around polling and other information. One of the scenes in the book is after the debate goes so poorly DNC staffers, campaign staffers are having donors hang up on them. They can't raise any money. Everyone's on them, he's gotta go. And they can't talk to Biden. A lot of the staff, senior staff, wanna talk to Biden about what's going on. And Donald and Machete, you know, are not setting up meetings. And instead, Adrian Elrod, one of the staffers, calls Morning Joe and gives Joe Scarborough a presentation or tells him how bad the data is and maybe it's time for Biden to go. Cause they thought it was the only way they could get to the president.
33:35 Speaker 05 I mean, the folks who were right around Biden just really took access to him and just kept so many people from having any ability to give him information.
33:45 Speaker 01 But to be clear, that's the staff, the advisors hiding the world from Biden, right? It's not, it's not hiding Biden from the world, right? That's something else. It's, this is like classic advisors, you know, covering for themselves and, and trying to protect their own hide.
34:03 Kara Swisher? Yeah, yeah. By the way, people don't know Steve Rochetti, a very lovely man, was his campaign chair. But they were all insistent that he wasn't old. I was in conversations with, and I'm not even a political reporter. I was like, he seems old to me. I don't know. All right. On July 13th, a gunman tried to kill President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. Isaac, in the book, you report for the first time that Iran tried to capture Secretary Mike Pompeo in France. People in the campaign, including Trump, have thought Iran might have been behind these assassination attempts. Talk about how it affected Trump psychologically and how the effects played out in the campaign. Even though it was a horrible tragedy, it was also helpful for Trump, including the way he reacted and the visuals around it.
34:44 Speaker 01 Well, and he was musing in the interview with Josh. You know, I wonder if it could have been different if that hadn't happened.
34:50 Kara Swisher? I doubt he was saying, thanks, Iran.
34:51 Speaker 01 Well, and we have to be super clear. Like, there are two things that are true. Like, the threats from Iran were very real. Our reporting is that the US officials briefed the Trump campaign that Iran had active kill teams in the US during the campaign. They came very close to killing Mike Pompeo on a trip to Europe, as we report in the book. And there were also Iranian operatives who were indicted trying to kill former National Security Advisor John Bolton. And there was another scheme that was stopped in Brooklyn. So these are very real threats from Iran, targeting Trump, and a lot of precautions and security measures that were taken around that. There were also these two assassination attempts
35:35 Speaker 01 that investigators have not identified any link to Iran or any other foreign actors. They also were not, when they briefed Trump about them, they were not able to definitively rule that out, right? They couldn't prove the negative. So, you know, the Trump campaign, looking at those two separate but related things, both being true, and feeling that stress and that danger day to day, you know, there was some blending that went on. And in that September, October period of the campaign, it really affected the daily operations of the campaigns, their ability, you know, where they could go, how they could get there. There were some events that had to be reorganized at the last minute because of security.
36:20 Speaker 01 There's a great scene in the book where they went to a remote place in Wisconsin that had a small runway. So they couldn't take the big plane. So there wasn't enough room for the full Secret Service detail on Trump's plane. So the Secret Service had to take a separate plane. But the Secret Service plane was slower than the campaign charter. And so they had to wait for the Secret Service plane to get where it was going. And Trump's just, like, sitting on the tarmac going crazy because they're running behind.
36:45 Kara Swisher? So after the attempt in Butler, Elon Musk endorsed Trump, and Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg are moving towards Trump, saying he looked cool, I guess. Josh, how meaningful. Was the tech money, including around $280 million from Musk to Trump's eventual victory. Obviously, in those, in that outburst, I'd say outburst one, he's just having the new one recently. How important was it? I know Musk thinks that's the case.
37:10 Speaker 05 Well, the financial infusion from Musk was, was huge. I mean, not only was Musk giving more than $250 million to the campaign and financing sort of this aggressive effort, he was also trying to convince other billionaires and other tech guys to get on board. He became a crucial emissary for Trump. And I think there was also part of it, Kara, with that after J6 and sort of the, you know, insurrection at the Capitol and all of the different things that happened, by these guys getting back on board with Trump, it sort of became less verboten to be with them, right? You saw sort of cultural figures, tech figures, all of these folks coming back on board. There wasn't sort of as much resistance from others, right?
37:55 Speaker 05 And I think Trump immediately saw them as incredibly important figures. I mean, he only got so many seats on the dais at his inauguration, right? And, and what did he do? He gave a lot of them to these tech figures. He knew how to win the election. When I visited him at Mar-a-Lago in January, I'm sitting out on the couches in the, in the lobby, and he comes over to me, he's running like 45 minutes late, he's like, I'm sorry, I'm running late. And he whispers in my ear, he's like, Mark Zuckerberg's in there. And I'm like, what? And he's like, oh, Zuckerberg's in there. And they were mediating a lawsuit that day where he was getting money from Zuckerberg. And he loved having Zuckerberg in there. He was telling everyone at the club, like, go look at Mark Zuckerberg. And then in the middle of my interview with him, Elon Musk walks in the room and starts giving him advice on
38:39 Speaker 05 various things he should be doing. So Trump quickly understood how powerful these guys were in, in some ways, and surrounded himself with them and touted them publicly. I mean, he wanted the world to know.
38:51 Kara Swisher? But what about their actual help? I understand he used them as props. That was, and he did it masterfully, I have to say, at the inaugural. But would he have won without Musk's money, as Musk asserted in tantrum number one?
39:03 Speaker 05 I mean, it's hard to know, right? If he would have or not. I mean, I certainly think Musk filled a very key void in some of these states and financed all sorts of get out the vote efforts, all sorts of door knocking efforts, advertising efforts. I mean, you might argue in another world that Trump folks could have found money themselves and done it without Musk, but I don't know if they would have or not. I mean, at the time, I remember reporting in real time how grateful Trump's advisers, Susie Wiles and others, were for what Musk was doing because he was filling a key gap for them in these states that really needed to win.
39:40 Kara Swisher? All right. Let's get to the Harris campaign then. On July 21st, Biden withdrew from the race and endorsed Vice President Harris, effectively making her the nominee. But former President Barack Obama and Speaker Emerarda Nancy Pelosi thought a public process to choose a nominee would be better. Tyler, why do they and the rest of the Democratic Party have total influence on Biden to get him to do that? There was a very short amount of time, too, obviously, but why did that not come to pass?
40:06 Speaker 06 Yeah, I think there's two things playing at once here. One is that Biden felt, and Jim Clyburn basically told him as much, that it would be a huge hit to his legacy if he did not endorse Kamala Harris. Biden and Harris genuinely had a good relationship. Biden liked her, and also it was the first decision he made as picking her as his running mate. And so I think he was convinced that if he did not anoint her as his successor, it would mean that he regretted his decision and looked poorly on his legacy and his record. The other thing is-
40:38 Kara Swisher? Obama did it, but go ahead. Yeah.
40:40 Speaker 06 Yeah. And, yeah, he did. And I think the other thing to note is Obama and Pelosi's relationship with Biden had particularly soured. I mean, Obama and Biden's relationship has been the source of fascination for more than a decade at this point, and there is some genuine warmth there. But when it comes to politics, there is a huge schism between the two of them. Obama has long not thought that highly of Joe Biden's political skills. It's exactly right, Kara, why he did not endorse or support him moving forward ahead of the 2016 election. And so Obama's political advice to Biden was particularly unwelcome. And Pelosi, too. I mean, there just wasn't the sort of influence that anyone had over Joe Biden. And that's part of why he ran again in the first place. And that's part of the reason why it took him so long to drop out.
41:25 Speaker 06 There were just not people close to Joe Biden that would, you know, say it straight to him, or even external voices that could really access him.
41:31 Kara Swisher? Yeah, now, Trump ended up making significant gains with Latinos, black men, and low propensity voters. They're also to be a vital part of the Democratic coalition. And Isaac, what did Trump do to win them over? And what could Harris have done to keep them in the fold? Obviously, Biden being there wouldn't have helped. What happened there? Because there's somewhere they should have been strong.
41:53 Speaker 01 Yeah, well, I mean, the man strategy that Josh was talking about earlier wasn't just about white men. It was very successful with Latino men and, to a lesser but meaningful extent, with black men. And that was, you know, finding these, the Republicans were interested in finding these kind of other valences of identity that they could communicate with these voters. You know, like, sort of Latino men kind of behaving as voters more like white men. And the Trump campaign talked about reestablishing Trump as a cultural icon, you know, kind of reintroducing him or for younger voters, introducing him for the first time as the kind of celebrity figure
42:35 Speaker 01 who he was for most of his career before he was the very divisive politician. With Harris, they really struggled to fight that with like. There was this asymmetry, you know, podcasts with kind of left-leaning audiences. So you would sort of think of the left-wing analog to the manosphere. So they were podcasts with audiences that would tend to be, look like Democrats, but not overtly political. And they kept telling Harris, no, that they wouldn't have her on. So the Democrats just found that they didn't have the kinds of platforms to reach those voters, to message in this new media landscape the way that the Republicans were successful at doing.
43:17 Kara Swisher? Yeah, the Kelsey brothers said no.
43:19 Speaker 01 Exactly.
43:20 Kara Swisher? Josh, what do you think that is? What was, from your perspective? She didn't do her first interview until over a month after Biden dropped out. And I think people didn't understand the anger towards Biden. You wrote about that in the book. And she didn't separate herself. Josh first, why, he kind of pressured her not to, which you write in the book, but why the cautious approach?
43:42 Speaker 05 Yeah, Biden called Harris and said, you know, that she should not separate herself. I think the cautious approach was that she didn't exactly know how to do it, that it would seem genuine and authentic, that she did not know what issue she should do it on. I mean, she had a lot of staff around her asking for some separation, particularly on Gaza and Israel, some on immigration, on places where Biden's numbers were just an albatross, right? They were just so incredibly behind Trump. They wanted some, some distance. And she just did not want to give distance. There was a memo that we have in the book where the Harris campaign hires sort of a moderate Republican to try and help them
44:23 Speaker 05 get right voters and center-right voters who don't like Trump. And she outlines in these long memos for Janine Malle Dillon, here are all the places we could create some distance from Biden because we desperately need it. And she doesn't do it. And there's a great scene in the book where she's on set with The View and backstage, you know, they practice his answer about if she gets a Biden question. And then instead of giving the answer where they so meticulously practiced, she says, I can't think of a single place where, you know, I would, I would do anything differently. And Rob Flaherty, her deputy campaign manager backstage, puts his head in his hands and is like, oh, my God, right? You know, that was a horrible answer. And then they try to get the, the host to even ask the question again.
45:08 Kara Swisher? Why did she heed that self-serving advice to avoid criticism? Probably the single biggest mistake she made, presumably.
45:14 Speaker 06 Yeah. So one of her communications advisors, Stephanie Cutter, went to the host during the commercial break and tried to get them to give her another chance to answer that question. I think we've spent a lot of time re-reporting out that exact day and trying to figure out what happened to her. As you say, it was probably the most, one of the most destructive things she did during the campaign, in which she largely did not have major mistakes in public. And what they say is that she just got tripped up by the phrasing of the question, is what they say.
45:43 Kara Swisher? She didn't want to do it.
45:44 Speaker 06 It was a very delicate issue for her, not a great excuse, but she basically answered the question literally, instead of hearing the question and then giving the answer that they had practiced. But I think just to build on this idea of why it was so hard for her, one of the challenges was The way that they framed her as a vice president was in the room for all the big decisions, the last person to leave, and intimately involved in everything. Now, that wasn't true, but that was the narrative that they were out there saying. And so it then makes it harder to be like, actually, I disagreed with X, Y, and Z policy, because then she opens herself up to, okay, so why did you go along with it? Why didn't you speak up? Can we get people in the room saying she actually did disagree? And the other thing, the one issue where it was very clear she disagreed with Joe Biden
46:25 Speaker 06 was Israel-Gaza, and she was under some pressure from the national security space to not publicly break with him. One of the things that, obviously, a big tension point was having a speaker of Palestinian descent at the convention. They ultimately did not do that as Gaza protests wrung out inside and outside the convention. And one of the things was, national security officials were saying, this could make it harder for the president to negotiate with Hamas to get the release of the hostages. And whether or not that's true, we don't know, but that was one of the arguments that Harris's team was hearing, is that if she created distance with the president, it could impede negotiations and diplomatic efforts in Israel and Gaza.
47:05 Speaker 01 Something that I think really comes through in the Harris section of the book is just like, her and her advisers were so inside their own head, to the point of just paralysis.
47:16 Kara Swisher? Yeah, it's exhausting.
47:16 Speaker 01 How are we going to deal with the view thing? How are we going to deal with the trans ad? How are we going to deal with the McDonald's attack? And there are all these parts in the book.
47:24 Speaker 06 Joe Rogan defining Trump.
47:26 Speaker 01 And there are all these examples in the book where, you know, they're just spinning their wheels on this on and on, and they just end up doing nothing. I mean, maybe the best example of that is in her debate prep. They literally, they're like, well, what's her answer going to be about the economy? And they keep saying like, well, let's come back to that one. And they never came, they never got to anywhere.
47:43 Speaker 05 They had insane amounts of paralysis on how to handle the transgender attacks and the cultural issues from Trump. They did all sorts of polling, they tested all sorts of answers, they worked through various things she could say if she was asked about it. She might say, what did these people think about it? And then at the end of the day, she ended up doing none of it. She just did nothing. I mean, they did weeks and weeks and weeks of polling and prep for nothing.
48:06 Kara Swisher? Right. We'll be back in a minute.
48:17 Speaker 07 Support for this show comes from Indeed. When the pressure's on and you need to hire the right person for the job, Indeed Sponsored Jobs has got your back. Instead of forcing you to spend tons of time searching, Indeed Sponsored Jobs matches you with quality candidates fast. According to their data, sponsored jobs posted directly on Indeed are 95% more likely to report a hire than non-sponsored jobs. Join the 3.3 million employers worldwide that use Indeed to connect with quality talent that fits their needs. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more results. When you need the right person to cut through the chaos, this is the job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. And listeners to the show will get a $75 sponsored job credit
49:02 Speaker 07 to help get your job the premium status it deserves at indeed.com/podcast. Just go to indeed.com/podcast right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. That's indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need the right hire fast? Then this is the job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs.
49:28 Speaker 04 Now for a quick message from Anthropic, the team behind Claude, the AI built for businesses. Customers count on their bank, and banks count on their most important systems. Now those systems count on Claude, and nine of the Fortune 10 companies use it for critical work. See why leading companies trust Claude at claude.ai/span.
49:52 Speaker 08 Visible puts the ultimate wireless hack in the palm of your hand. With unlimited 5G wireless data and hotspot, designed to keep you connected, powered by Verizon's 5G network. And no contract holding you back. Plans start at $25 a month. Or get the premium Visible Plus Pro Plan and save $10 on your first month when you use promo code HACK. Make the switch at visible.com. Terms apply. See visible.com for details.
50:22 Kara Swisher? The title of the book is 2024. This is the last question. How Trump retook the White House and the Democrats lost America. So did Trump win in 2024? Did the Democrats lose? And each of you, what's the key takeaway from your reporting as we look towards 2026 and 2028? Let's start with Josh, then Tyler, then Isaac.
50:43 Speaker 05 Yeah, I think it was a bit of both, but I think Trump made a series of shrewd choices as we sort of highlight in the book to win the election. I mean, he, for example, on abortion, right? Instead of going for a national 15 week ban, like some of his advisors wanted him to, he realized that was not going to play well and did not go to those instincts. He ended up, as much as he questioned the election was stolen in 2020 and said all of these false things about the election, he taped ads promoting early voting. His advisors, they believe that was a huge difference in the election. He often, even though he would go on these stimwinder tensions at rallies, followed the script way more than he did in the past. He cultivated donors.
51:26 Speaker 05 He spent hours and hours and hours making phone calls for money that he would never do in the past. I mean, he was, he was a more disciplined candidate. And I know some of your listeners will probably laugh at me for saying that, but he just was. Like, I've been covering for this long. He ran a more disciplined race. I think on the Democratic side, now let Tyler talk about this more, but there were all of these red flags for the Democratic Party, what voters wanted, what they said they wanted, the enthusiasm, the donor frustrations that sort of went unheeded. And then as the election went on, it was clear, you know, that Trump was winning on a lot of fronts in September, October, and there wasn't much done to sort of recalibrate the race. Now, one might argue, was there anything they could have done at that point? I don't know the answer.
52:09 Speaker 05 But I think what the book shows is a series of compelling choices on the Democratic side, where they missed these warning signs of which way this was heading. They were losing the electorate. The candidates, both Biden and Harris, had lots of problems with different photo demographics, and there just wasn't enough done about it to keep them in the game.
52:27 Kara Swisher? All right.
52:28 Speaker 06 Yeah, to focus in on how the Democrats lost, I think they did not listen to what their voters wanted. They shoved their nominee down the voters' throat and said, "We don't care that you think he's too old. We don't care that you don't want this. We are giving you this." I think also with that, the Biden aides did not present Biden with the truth always. And I think one of the compelling anecdotes in our book that hasn't been reported is that right before October 7th, when Hamas attacked Israel, there was a window that September where some of Biden's closest aides were preparing to approach him and say, "Look, this is going to be really, really hard. Think about your responsibilities as
53:09 Speaker 06 a president, as a father, and are you the best person to do this? You know, we'll support you, we'll help you do this, but really think critically about this. The filing deadlines are coming up. He had already announced he's running, but they were really going to have a tough, or what they thought was a tough conversation." Now, people often say that and don't follow through, and obviously here they didn't. October 7th happened and it sort of fell by the wayside. But Democrats ignored what their voters were telling them for months and months and months. And then again, when they anointed Kamala Harris, the party came behind her. But she too was never the most popular Democratic figure. I mean, I covered her campaign in 2019, then it flamed out very quickly. She didn't even make it to the Iowa caucuses, and she launched with these huge rally in California. And
53:52 Speaker 06 so I think Democrats just ignored what voters said, and they just never came up with a message about why they were running and what they were going to do. They were focused on what they had done, not what they were going to do. Elections are often about the future, not about the past.
54:08 Kara Swisher? Right. Isaac?
54:09 Speaker 01 So the downside for the Republicans of how Trump won by expanding the electorate with low propensity voters who were drawn to his personal appeal, is that's very dependent on his personal appeal and people who don't historically vote that much. And whether that's going to prove to be durable, you know, again, it was, there was good reason to be skeptical that they would pull it off in 2024, and they did. So it could happen.
54:33 Kara Swisher? Well, they need a new character, is what you're saying.
54:35 Speaker 01 There's good reason to be skeptical that you can build- An enduring political majority coalition on people who are just excited about one guy and don't routinely vote. As for the Democrats, you know, the Democrats who outperformed Harris in 2024 were consistently more moderate, more Republican-like on the key issues. And what Trump did was actually position the Republicans on the popular side of the key issues, even abortion, which if you would have said that in 2022 would have sounded insane, but he did. And so that's the challenge that the Democrats have is finding an issue where they have the popular position and that voters are going to identify them with that.
55:20 Speaker 01 And, you know, I really haven't seen any Democrats articulate yet what that possibly could be. But, you know, a situation where you're just kind of Republican-like, that's not gonna
55:32 Kara Swisher? Buy the real thing.
55:34 Speaker 01 Right.
55:35 Kara Swisher? All right. Thank you so much again. The book is 2024. Are you writing 2028 already?
55:40 Speaker 01 We should probably finish your chef fist first.
55:45 Kara Swisher? Anyway, thank you guys so much.
55:46 Speaker 01 Thank you, Kara.
55:47 Kara Swisher? Thank you. On with Kara Swisher is produced by Christian Castor-Russell, Kateri Yokum, Megan Burney, Allison Rogers, and Caitlin Lynch. Nishat Kurwa is Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Special thanks to Brad Sylvester and Eric Litkey. Aliyah Jackson engineered this episode. And our theme music is by Trackademics. Go wherever you listen to podcasts, search for On with Kara Swisher and hit follow. And don't forget to follow us on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube at On with Kara Swisher. Thanks for listening to On with Kara Swisher from New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network, and us. We'll be back on Thursday with more.
56:30 Speaker 02 Support for the show comes from TikTok. There is a scientifically documented correlation between listening to podcasts and curiosity. So since you're here, you probably enjoy discovering new things. One great place to indulge your curiosity is TikTok. Whether it's how to forecast. Cast volcanic eruptions, strange phenomena that the James Webb Space Telescope picked up near the beginning of time, or a literal deep dive on the ocean's deepest reefs. TikTok has a wealth of fascinating videos just waiting to be discovered. Your next discovery is waiting on TikTok. Learn more at tiktok.com/discovermore.
57:14 Speaker 09 Are you ever shopping online and suddenly a discount that helps you save pops up? It makes your day, sometimes even your week. Want that feeling month after month? Well, new customers who save by switching their home and auto insurance to Progressive save hundreds. Cue your happy dance. Get your quote today at progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company affiliates and other insurers not available in all states.
57:41 Speaker 10 Ready to transform your career in real time from where you are? Brown University's flexible online master's programs will help expand your business influence and your network in just 16 months. Choose from management, business analytics, or organizational leadership programs that will prepare you for today's most pressing business challenges without putting your life on hold. Scholarships available. Tap to learn more.
Previous The Red Scare Returns? Lessons from McCarthyism in the Age of Trump 2.0 Next Taking on Trump Family Corruption with Rep. Robert Garcia Page updated November 1, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated