This Is How Chinese Manufacturers Are Countering Trump's Trade War

President Trump has announced tariffs on basically every trading partner. However there is a real sense that the ultimate goal is to hamper the growing perceived economic threat from China. One vision, for how the trade war could be "won" in some sense is by isolating China from the rest of the world. But that's not happening. And in fact, if anything, China is deepening its relationship with other trading nations, particularly in Asia right now. On this episode we speak with Cameron Johnson, a partner at the consulting firm Tidalwave Solutions. Cameron is based in Shanghai, and has an on-the-ground perspective on the state of Chinese manufacturing, having worked alongside producers and end buyers. He talks about the scale of Chinese manufacturing dominance, what Chinese firms are doing to counteract the tariffs, and he argues that in artificial intelligence, China is already way ahead in many respects. Only Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlotsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Finance is increasingly being built on digital rails. But as the adoption of virtual assets, tokenization and stable coins grows, can regulation not only keep pace but help accelerate it? Find out more later in the podcast.

• 0:16Speaker 01

  This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. I'm Carol Muster. Getting hired at SpaceX requires exceptional ability and may include having Elon Musk review a candidate's resume. So writes Bloomberg Business Week's Lauren Grush. She reports that the company culture is defined by Musk and job candidates must understand that a commitment to SpaceX means adhering to this culture and exhibiting loyalty to Elon Musk. To get hired, candidates must demonstrate their achievements from past jobs and hands-on experience matters more to recruiters than advanced degrees, with the company looking for people with raw innate intelligence. A spokesperson for SpaceX didn't respond to a request for comment on its recruiting and hiring practices.

• 0:59Speaker 01

  But according to recruiters, advisors and those who've interviewed for jobs there, it's the space exploration dream that draws people to the company. And Musk invokes that dream regularly to remind workers why they're there. Prospective hires are told that the job will require stamina, including in job ads that candidates quote "must be willing to work extended hours and weekends as needed." One major perk for all that hard work? Employees' access to equity, either the right to buy shares or payment in the form of restricted stock units that vest over time. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at chatgpt.com.

• 1:39Speaker 02

  For big business, AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise turned into a world of pain. Costs spiraling, data trapped, security and governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of reach. That's why enterprises turned to Boomi to connect data, apps and AI, helping them operate securely, efficiently and at scale. Boomi turns a world of AI pain into a world of AI gain. As Boomi says, "We got you." Head to Boomi.com. That's B-O-O-M-I dot com.

• 2:13Speaker 03

  Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news.

• 2:29Joe Weisenthal?

  Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. I'm Jill Weisenthal.

• 2:34Tracy Alloway?

  And I'm Tracy Alloway.

• 2:36Joe Weisenthal?

  Tracy, I don't know this for sure, but I kind of have this feeling that there's a bit of a fantasy, perhaps on the part of Americans or the administration or so forth, that in this trade war, that non-China Asian countries, they could be our partner, they could be our big trading partner, and that somehow China could be isolated from them.

• 2:58Tracy Alloway?

  Maybe. I mean, I know there's a lot of concern about Chinese goods basically flowing over the border into places like Vietnam. So I think it's a little bit more nuanced than that. You know, one thing I find really funny, and my definition of fun might differ to a lot of other people's, but you know, if you look at the real exchange rate,

• 3:16Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 3:16Tracy Alloway?

  so currency adjusted for inflation and stuff like that, the real effective exchange rate for the dollar is up like 20% since January. And the real effective rate for the yuan, the Chinese yuan, is down 14%. So if you're trying to like make your own goods competitive, American goods competitive, it feels like we're heading in the opposite direction.

• 3:42Joe Weisenthal?

  Wait, isn't that really true? That even with the nominal, the massive nominal decline in the US dollar against all these currencies, that on a real basis, it's actually up massively?

• 3:51Tracy Alloway?

  According to Bank of America.

• 3:53Joe Weisenthal?

  Huh, that's pretty crazy. I would not have, I certainly would not have guessed that. And also, this sort of gets back to the point that like with the tariffs and with the trade war, I still don't know what the goal is. And it changes a lot. I don't know the degree to which any of it was successful. But under the Biden administration, I had some sense of, okay, we have this specific goal with trade policy and other tech transfer policies to be At or near or ahead of the frontier of cutting edge in a certain key areas. And when it comes to trade policy under this administration, it strikes me as all over the map.

• 4:28Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah, so there's the question, obviously, of whether the US needs to be manufacturing things like toys in America, whether people would be interested in taking those manufacturing jobs. And then finally, as you pointed out, the goals are so confusing because on the one hand, it seems like, all right, it's about bringing manufacturing back to the States. But on the other hand, the Trump administration has said that it's a way of raising revenue as well. And then you have Trump saying, I'm going to strike all these deals. So deals are seen as a win for him as well. But then if he needs to raise revenue, is he actually going to strike deals?

• 5:04Joe Weisenthal?

  Totally. Well, anyway, there's a million questions and we will have hundreds of more episodes in our lifetime, probably, that revolve around this topic. But I think it's a good time to get some perspective from the perspective of the Chinese business community, Chinese manufacturing and so forth, Chinese policy, et cetera, and like how a lot of this is being perceived from the Chinese perspective and the response to the aggressive actions.

• 5:29Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah, because US policy isn't happening in a vacuum, right? Like China is reacting to it and, you know, sometimes China can move pretty fast, so we should talk about it.

• 5:39Joe Weisenthal?

  Totally. Well, I'm very excited to say, I think we do have the perfect guest. We are going to be speaking with Cameron Johnson. He is a senior partner at Title Wave Solutions. He's based in Shanghai, but he's temporarily here in the US, visiting us. Someone who has his finger on the pulse of Chinese business and manufacturing. Cameron, thank you so much for coming on Odd Lots.

• 5:58Speaker 06

  Thanks for having me, guys. It's great to be here in New York with you.

• 6:00Joe Weisenthal?

  What's Title Wave Solutions? What do you do?

• 6:02Speaker 06

  So it's a boutique firm focused on supply chain and manufacturing advice and consulting. Think if you're a business that needs a supply chain map and a risk assessment, maybe you need some operational efficiencies, maybe you need to understand the policy roadmap for the next five years that the various governments around the world are doing. Those are some of the things that we focus on.

• 6:19Tracy Alloway?

  Given recent events, how busy have you actually been?

• 6:22Speaker 06

  You know, interestingly enough, in April, business was quite slow because it started off that we thought it was going to be kind of a normal Q1 was OK. April was kind of starting off to be a normal year, but then when the tariffs came in, everything stopped. And so essentially in China, what you had is you had a couple of weeks where almost nothing moved in the supply chains. Walmart came out eventually and said, let's get some stuff moving and that kind of unclogged things. But April was really tough. And then after Geneva is kind of the fire hose came on and everything and everybody was, how do we move products around? How do we move production around? How do we get talent in different areas that we need to get it into? So it's actually been quite a rampage since then.

• 6:58Joe Weisenthal?

  So we're recording this on July 16th and I have to admit, I don't know what the tariff rate is on China these days. I don't know where things stand in terms of what the latest deadline is. I've sort of lost track of it all, like many people in the market. A lot of this has suddenly become noise. But I can ask on July 16th, from what's been announced so far, whether it's tariffs or various other actions, is the state of business in China meaningfully different than it was prior to April 2nd? Or would you say mostly things are kind of the same and adjusting to different tariff rates? Had there been some major shift in flows or supply chain?

• 7:38Speaker 06

  No, there hasn't been. What you do see though is a lot of moving around of pieces and parts, you know, toys, furniture, these kinds of things. If they were made in China before, they're definitely not now.

• 7:47Joe Weisenthal?

  OK.

• 7:47Speaker 06

  But that doesn't necessarily mean you're pulling your factories out. One of the things we have seen is that a lot of companies now are upskilling, right? They've, they're going to put the higher margin and higher level products in China. They'll put the lower products outside of China. Think of Vietnam versus China. China can make any SKU you want, known demand, essentially. Vietnam can't make that many. So when you actually look at the trade flows, Vietnam produces far fewer SKUs and ships them to the States. China ships it to the rest of the world.

• 8:15Tracy Alloway?

  Wait, talk more about shifting, I guess, lower-quality production into other areas. Because, again, a lot of people, when they think of China, will still think of basic goods manufacturing, right? When, in fact, I think it's progressed quite a lot since then.

• 8:30Speaker 06

  It has, and often, you know, when you look at kind of the last 10 years to a short history, when the first trade war came out, a lot of companies wanted to do China plus one, plus two, right? You have a primary manufacturer in China, then you have, you know, a sister factory, maybe in Southeast Asia, Latin America, that kind of thing. What has happened now is that those factories now outside of China are also being upskilled, but they're also being more specialized. In China, you can still upskill, and because of the local ecosystems that offer you far more advantage than anywhere else in the world, particularly for certain products, you'll still keep that and eat the margin within the tariffs. But in other places, it gives you more flexibility. So now, if you're in Vietnam, for example, sure, you might have a 20% tariff from the States, but when you compare with China, you're still getting that that margin, and you'll be OK.

• 9:12Speaker 06

  The reality is, when you actually look at what's happening overall in the tariff schedules, it's a mess. Nobody knows what's going on. And in fact, we're hearing now that some companies actually are reshoring manufacturing back to China. Because when you actually look at how the tariffs are working, 20%, then supposedly 40% on the transshipment, at 20%, certain goods are more competitive to maybe made in China, even with eating the tariffs. And essentially, it would go something like, Joe, you're making a certain type of cup, maybe it's a Christmas branded cup, right? So you need a little bit more specialized machinery, people, talent. OK, it's 50% from China, 20% from Vietnam. It's difficult, maybe, to get in Vietnam because they're not as specialized. So here's, Joe, you as the manufacturer, you're going to go to the packaging supplier

• 9:57Speaker 06

  who gives you your cardboard and plastic, you're going to go to your raw material supplier, you're going to go to this, to that, and you're all going to ask them to take two or three points off their sales to you. And all of a sudden, that 55% or 50% automatically becomes 20%. So that's how companies in the granular are starting to work around some of these challenges.

• 10:16Joe Weisenthal?

  If I did have a Christmas cup that I wanted to design, right now, how quickly could I have a manufactured product that then could ship? No, I'm serious.

• 10:26Tracy Alloway?

  Do you know there's a whole, like, Christmas town in China that specializes in Christmas goods?

• 10:30Joe Weisenthal?

  That sounds familiar. Could I have a cup by this Christmas season?

• 10:33Speaker 06

  You could have any cup of any design of any material in on demand.

• 10:38Joe Weisenthal?

  How quickly?

• 10:40Speaker 06

  Well, it depends on the design. It depends how many parts of the process you need.

• 10:43Joe Weisenthal?

  Sure.

• 10:43Speaker 06

  If you already have the design, you have the CAD and everything, you're looking at probably two months.

• 10:46Joe Weisenthal?

  Ah.

• 10:47Speaker 06

  Maybe less. If it's at scale, for example, you want to shelve every Starbucks in the country, then of course it would be much longer. But if you're looking just for specialized runs, maybe you're a company where you want to Christmas giveaways for your staff. Maybe it's a couple hundred, a couple thousand. That you can do very quickly.

• 11:02Tracy Alloway?

  This is something that actually came up in a previous episode with Sarah LaFleur, where we were talking about apparel, but I think it applies more broadly. But she emphasized the importance of basically just China's expertise in doing this and the supply network that it's actually built up. So if you are a foreign investor or a US company or whatever, and you go to China, like immediately, people kind of know what to do now if you're asking for a factory. So I'm curious, is that replicable in a reasonable amount of time by places like Vietnam?

• 11:37Speaker 06

  It is, and you are seeing it being replicated overall. I argue that supply chains aren't relocating, but they're expanding and replicating. So essentially, again, if you're a cup producer in China, now you're going to make it in Vietnam or Thailand. So you have this now mini ecosystem. You go to your different suppliers in China and say, hey, I need this product next to me in Ho Chi Minh. You need to figure out how to get me that. Oh, this packaging guy. Okay, you have a sister company maybe in Hanoi. Okay, now I need to figure out how to access that. So you're seeing the replication of supply chains around the region. For example, I look at supply chain ecosystems in five key components. The first is advanced infrastructure. It's not just ports and railroads. It's also things like 5G, the electrical grid, sewers. Second is talent and educational apparatus. Where are you going to get the workers from?

• 12:20Speaker 06

  But also, as things evolve, for example, AI, how are you going to train them up into these new areas? The third is government support, which is kind of obvious. The fourth is raw material access and/or the ability to process it. When you actually look at what China does, it doesn't have a lot of raw materials, but it has expertise in the processing. And the fifth is technology. Now, China has this in most industries across the board. The US has it, for example, in aerospace. Europe does too. But just in terms of, so that's how I evaluate a supply chain ecosystem. So when I work with customers or even policymakers, and they say, well, what about Vietnam? I look at it in context of those five key areas because that will tell me where the gaps are and where we need to actually improve.

• 12:59Joe Weisenthal?

  Talk about that process. I mean, if Vietnam had the talent to... Be China, it would be China, or it would be at that scale. So obviously, there's a gap, and this is something that's come up before. What does, all right, let's say there's a Chinese company that makes X or Y. Let's say they're making sporting goods or something like that. They want to have more production of the low end in Vietnam, but presumably, there is still some deficiency of some of these five categories, including infrastructure, including access to raw materials. What is their process for making it such that, given the gap between China and Vietnam, that that manufacturing in Vietnam does become economical?

• 13:40Speaker 06

  Well, part of it is, again, just the lower SKU level, right? So if you look at how hockey sticks, for example, are produced, there's five levels of hockey stick, the best to the worst, and you have five different levels. And so in that regard, you'll send a couple, you know, probably level five and four, maybe four and three, to Vietnam to be produced.

• 13:57Joe Weisenthal?

  It sounds like you've had a hockey stick client.

• 13:59Speaker 06

  I've had multiple clients.

• 14:01Joe Weisenthal?

  Okay.

• 14:02Speaker 06

  But, you know, ultimately, you look at where you can get the largest amount of volume, not just the cheap, not at the cheapest prices, but at the least amount of problems, right? If you're selling, let's say, a level five hockey stick, where, you know, it's not NHL grade, the cost is going to be lower, and the tariffs actually hit more and bite more. If you're making NHL-grade hockey sticks, which they do make in China, it doesn't really matter what the tariff is at that point, because they are expertise level, and you have to have that quality regardless. And so the other thing, Joe, to your point about China versus Vietnam, and pretty much China versus the rest of the world, China has about 220 million workers in manufacturing, about 28% of its population. Vietnam has 15 million, about 30.

• 14:44Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 14:44Speaker 06

  And so the scale is a quality all into itself. And people just really don't understand that the difference is not just China moving forward in technology and in different ways of doing business. All of that is true, but it really is just the massive scale of ability of talent, where you can call and say, "I need a Christmas cup in three months." And it doesn't matter what the size, shape, or material is, they'll figure out how to do it, and nobody else in the world can do that.

• 15:23Speaker 00

  What's next for virtual assets? I'm Jacob Rees, host of Economy Scale, a series exploring growth in key global sectors. And this episode, we're diving into the digital forces shaping finance. Sean McHugh from Dubai-based Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority has this to say.

• 15:39Speaker 07

  We're seeing a lot of institutional players come in, digital asset dedicated hedge funds, high-frequency traders and that sort of thing, and folks who service institutional clients.

• 15:48Speaker 00

  As more capital enters the market, adaptive regulation is likely to become increasingly key. Reese Merrick of Ripple says.

• 15:56Speaker 08

  A lot of regulators globally would like to keep the industry at arm's length. That's the opposite here. I think also what you'll find is that regulation and frameworks can come out, but some of them are maybe a slight iteration on some 80-year-old policy and not actually in line with what the technology can do and offer. And again, that's very different in Dubai.

• 16:15Speaker 00

  Listen to the full episode wherever you get your podcasts. This series is brought to you by Bloomberg Media Studios and the Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism.

• 16:25Speaker 01

  This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute, brought to you by ChatGPT. I'm Carol Muster. Getting hired at SpaceX requires exceptional ability and may include having Elon Musk review a candidate's resume. So writes Bloomberg Businessweek's Lauren Grush. She reports that the company culture is defined by Musk and job candidates must understand that a commitment to SpaceX means adhering to this culture and exhibiting loyalty to Elon Musk. To get hired, candidates must demonstrate their achievements from past jobs and hands-on experience matters more to recruiters than advanced degrees, with the company looking for people with raw innate intelligence. A spokesperson for SpaceX didn't respond to a request for comment on its recruiting

• 17:07Speaker 01

  and hiring practices, but according to recruiters, advisors and those who've interviewed for jobs there, it's the space exploration dream that draws people to the company. And Musk invokes that dream regularly to remind workers why they're there. Prospective hires are told that the job will require stamina, including in job ads that candidates, quote, "must be willing to work extended hours and weekends as needed." One major perk for all that hard work? Employees' access to equity, either the right to buy shares or payment in the form of restricted stock units that vest over time. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute, brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at ChatGPT.com.

• 17:48Joe Weisenthal?

  Tracy, it just clicked to me that there's an interesting lesson here that relates to the episode we did on snack food warehouses in the US, which is that with technological advance comes the ability to have more SKUs. So as warehouses in the US got more roboticized, the sheer variety that they could hold at a given time made sense because you can have robots go behind and pick them out and so forth. And so it's interesting to hear like about like SKU diversity as being this major sort of gap between China versus the rest of the world.

• 18:20Tracy Alloway?

  I'm smiling because you just reminded me of Peetos from that episode. Peetos, the pea cheetos.

• 18:26Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, that's right. That's right.

• 18:28Tracy Alloway?

  Anyway, I better move on and stop laughing.

• 18:31Joe Weisenthal?

  Because you'll get hungry.

• 18:32Tracy Alloway?

  I will.

• 18:32Speaker 06

  And we don't have those in China, so I don't know what those are.

• 18:34Tracy Alloway?

  OK, but on this note, how do labor costs actually fit into this entire process? And can you maybe compare and contrast Vietnam and China right now?

• 18:43Speaker 06

  So labor costs, it really, again, it really depends on the industry. For example, if you work in certain industries like composites, your labor cost actually is a small component of the overall cost. It really isn't the materials, right? The, maybe the carbon or glass fibers, the resin systems, the machinery. So it's not equivalent. What you have to look at really is what's work or productivity and efficiency? Because at that point, the cost really doesn't matter as much, particularly with tariffs, right? The reason for tariffs ultimately, according to the US, is they want to reshore, but they also want to deal with Chinese overcapacity or industrial policy. But the reality is in Asia, labor across the board is not as important as it is, such as I have this ecosystem, I have access to cheaper raw materials. I have plentiful electricity.

• 19:28Speaker 06

  You know, one of the challenges in Asia overall is just the stability of the electrical grid. And as China continues to build out more and more of its own electrical infrastructure, you're seeing more of this actually play. For example, a certain amount of, I think it's about 20% of Vietnam's electricity ultimately comes from China. And so you're seeing more and more of this spillover. So it's less about what is the cost per worker? Because, for example, in China, particularly with entry-level white-collar workers, 10 years ago, you might have 25,000 to 30,000 RMB per month, which is roughly $4,000 to $5,000. It would be maybe your first entry-level job. Now that level is half. And part of that is because the economy is challenged. There's more plentiful graduates every year, about 10 million. And at the same time, businesses are just using them for different things than they were in the past. So labor is not, it's a part of the key component, right?

• 20:12Speaker 06

  It's part of that key, five key areas, the talent, you definitely have to look at it. But there's a lot of other parts in the picture as well.

• 20:18Joe Weisenthal?

  How do the governments of other Asian nations feel about, you know, there's obviously anxiety in the US about what the rise of Chinese manufacturing, which is an age-old story, means, you know, meant that we had the China shock, for American manufacturers, et cetera, to the, or European ones. Is there similar anxiety among Malaysia, for example? I don't know if they still make the Proton Saga, the car. But, you know, these countries have their own sort of longtime national champions and so forth. Do they feel anxiety about the growing presence of Chinese power, both as imports, but also just setting up shop at home?

• 20:58Speaker 06

  To some degree, there's always a hesitation. But the reality is that the counterbalance to that, the United States is not doing anything.

• 21:04Joe Weisenthal?

  Sure.

• 21:04Speaker 06

  So, for example, one of the, one of the things we've seen, particularly in the last couple of months, is when you talk about how is China versus the US, for example, in Southeast Asia, Chinese leaders are going all around Southeast Asia, talking to them about, hey, here's the market opportunities, here's what we're looking at. The US is saying, come to DC, and then we'll figure out what we're gonna do. They're very different, and there is a lot of hesitation. You know, for example, China, you know, my experience, I went to Southeast Asia recently. They're essentially discussing six key areas with these different countries. The first is Chinese firms will continue to do FDI or investments in your countries. American firms are not. American firms are gonna retrench to North America. Think of Apple as a prime example. So that basically takes away a key component of US diplomacy and also influence. Second is, we have legions of young, educated workers.

• 21:47Speaker 06

  They're ready and willing to go other places. They wanna work overseas. They wanna get that experience. Maybe they have better job opportunities. The third is, we can share technology. And again, when people look, like, there was an article yesterday about how China is restricting technology. That's actually not what's happening. If you want the technology of 2025, you're probably not gonna get it. But if you want the technology of 2023, no problem. Because we're a couple generations ahead. So when you look at what the discussions are in the region, All you need is that because you're probably at a 2020 or below in terms of technology. You need those couple of extra steps to actually fuel your growth. The fourth is there's still a lot of commitment to do infrastructure in region, but it's not going to be a BRI, a Belt and Road kind of thing. But it will be, hey, well, you need certain ports. We'll work that, we'll build those out.

• 22:32Speaker 06

  You need, again, maybe electrical grids or railroads. Connected Kunming now down to Singapore. Those are the things that you're going to start to see more and more of because again, they fuel and countries are like, listen, I have to have economic growth. I have to be able to continually raise the standard of living of my people. The fifth is there's a lot of discussion and Foreign Minister Wang Yi had a discussion recently with the ASEAN countries about doing more trade agreements, free trade agreements with Southeast Asia. And the sixth one, to your point, and this is one in my most recent trip to Southeast Asia. I had never heard this before and I've been going there since I was a kid. Essentially, there's an understanding that there are local manufacturing or industries that are indigenous to these countries and the Chinese are acknowledging that we may not, we're not interested in blowing those up. Those, that's my interpretation.

• 23:17Speaker 06

  But essentially that we're going to be sensitive to local concerns. Now, to your point, does that mean that happens in all cases? I don't know. But the reality is, is that there is an understanding of there's an opportunity here because the US is withdrawing. But at the same time, it's just not good business to make people unhappy when we're doing business.

• 23:33Tracy Alloway?

  You mentioned going to Washington and we opened this discussion by talking about how, well, we don't really know what the tariffs are. And I think it's difficult for anyone who's trying to track them now. You mentioned that production is already moving in response to this. Is there any concern that like in two months, Trump is just going to reverse position and the tariffs are going to go away or be altered and that changes the economic calculation for setting something up in, say, Vietnam?

• 24:06Speaker 06

  I think there's just a lack of confidence overall of the direction we're going. And there's no clarity whatsoever. And you're right, this kind of back and forth, it is, but it isn't, it is, but it isn't. Supply chains take probably 15 to 20 years to fully develop. You may be able to build a factory in a couple, but that, again, that doesn't mean you have the raw materials, the people and the other key components that you need to build out your business. And so, yeah, it's not only uncertain, but all these other countries are going, China's not doing that to us. I'll give you an example, Bangladesh, right? Population larger than Russia. They have a zero percent tariff to China. They have a 35% to the US. So which one do you think they're going to prefer more? They're obviously going to do more business with China. And ultimately, this is the issue with the tariffs. If the tariff was, listen, this is the standard rate per country. Of course, it fluctuates depending on market need and so on.

• 24:50Speaker 06

  We want to have more market access into your own countries for American products. There's a general understanding that that's probably what could happen. It may be imperfect in all cases. But the reality is, is that the way it currently is, it basically puts the US in a horrible light. And the people who we need the most are the ones who are suffering the most. And how long do we think that's really going to be able to last before they're like, that's enough? We're going to go with the Chinese.

• 25:15Joe Weisenthal?

  What does China import from Bangladesh? Because my impression is that China just does not import that much, period. Not just from the US, but is not a big importer of anything these days, in part because of how much it's been able to build out its domestic capacity and a range of things.

• 25:30Tracy Alloway?

  Scrap metal, maybe?

• 25:31Speaker 06

  Yeah, you know, clothes, processed raw materials, you know? And again, it's China, expansion 1.0 was kind of what we had up until 2020. Meaning, in the country, you're world-class at most everything you have. Now we're seeing China 2.0, which is China for the world. So it's less about Bangladesh selling to China. It's more about as the Chinese supply chains and supply chains in general continue to evolve, replicate, relocate, now Bangladesh, who wants a piece of that supply chain puzzle, that's what they want. And remember, one of the things that China's discussing with ASEAN and Southeast Asia is market access for your products back into China. So you could have Chinese manufacturers who move to Bangladesh because maybe it is cheaper or they have better raw material access for India, for cotton, for example, and then they could produce and sell it back into China.

• 26:16Speaker 06

  So there's a lot of things that can actually happen across the board with supply chains that we haven't even experienced yet.

• 26:21Tracy Alloway?

  Do you see anyone maybe shifting focus, Chinese companies shifting focus into selling domestically in the domestic market? Because of course, that would dovetail with one of the government's key ambitions, which is to try to boost consumption in an economy where saving has been pretty traditional.

• 26:43Speaker 06

  We do see some shift to that, but domestic demand overall is not fantastic. There's a lot of hangover from the COVID years. Some Western products are still seen as a better option than Chinese products. And also, China historically is a saving nation. The Chinese are never going to buy like the Americans, ever. And this is one of the actually debates I have with economists who say they need to buy more. Sure, but what does that actually mean? What is the actual rate you have to hit? Because if you expect them to do a US rate, that's never going to happen. So you do see people and companies are still spending on machinery upgrades. They're still buying iPhones and Huawei's and ITOS and Xiaomi cars and everything else. But they're not spending like Americans would spend. And they're saving more than they used to.

• 27:28Speaker 06

  Again, I would argue a lot of that's from the COVID years. But it's also has to do with other challenges inside the country. The social welfare uncertainty, these kinds of things as the population gets older.

• 27:38Joe Weisenthal?

  Actually, talk about what is the sort of debate that's happening in China with regards to this idea of so-called Chinese overcapacity? Because American economists love to talk about this. Sometimes it feels like cope to me. It's like, oh, we can't compete, therefore they must be cheating, right? Therefore, they must be flooding our market because they have this overcapacity. On the other hand, you do see comments from leaders in Beijing from time to time, talking about the provinces engaging in unhelpful, unproductive race to the bottom competition between each province's champion, et cetera. Explain to us like how this question of quote, "overcapacity" is sort of metabolized in China.

• 28:20Speaker 06

  Well, overcapacity is very much in the eye of the beholder. If you're a consumer, in many cases, you love overcapacity. Yeah, yeah, I love it. Because prices keep going down, right? I think you're right. Part of it is, is that when you actually look at the build out of initiatives and like a five-year plan structure. Yeah. A lot of it is, we need to do X, Y, and Z. You know, we need to have more AI data centers. We need to have more EV companies. And so different regional governments, champions will undertake those initiatives. And so that ultimately will contribute to a build out of the overcapacity argument. I think the other thing to realize is that when we actually look at how a lot of this is done. It's done in a way to figure out how to build out an ultimate supply chain, not an end product. Okay, that's interesting. Here, we want to make a Ford truck. Great, that's the goal. But in China, it's actually reversed.

• 29:05Speaker 06

  How do we actually figure out how to make a million Xiaomi cars every year? Well, first you have to figure out how to deal with the raw materials, the battery suppliers, with the different parts suppliers and so on. So it's actually a full breakdown. So the overcapacity actually isn't just in the final product. Yeah. It's in all the ancillary products in the tier one, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh suppliers as well throughout the entire country. Now, it's not the same in all industries. I don't want your listeners to get the wrong idea. But you take, for example, EVs. The leaders in EVs are not the SOEs, they're all the private companies. And so one of the significant shifts we've seen in China is that the SOEs and the traditional automotive manufacturers had now have a far less, not just dominant position, but influence in the market. It's all the private companies generally.

• 29:49Speaker 06

  And so is that overcapacity? That's definitely one of the overhangs for sure. And one of the challenges, you know, I was just in Europe last week, and this is one of the debates I keep having with them. You were fine with overcapacity for Germany and Japan. And they ultimately, they're exported more, much more every year than whatever China does. Not that the Chinese do it, you have an issue. It's like, come on, guys, like, you can't have everything. The other thing is, is that in many cases, this is how you develop world-class technology. For example, in EVs, is you have this intense, this nezhuang, this extremely intense internal competition, because that's ultimately what it is. What was the word you used? It's internal, basically fierce internal competition, right? There's another interesting word that has come out a lot, particularly because of the

• 30:31Speaker 06

  recent moves with the age twenties, is called chabuza. Basically mean you're strangling us. And so the Chinese have used this in terms of the Americans saying, hey, you're strangling our industry with semiconductor controls and everything else. And now there's a new discussion about the new chabuza in China is, oh, we have rare earths, so now we can also do it, right? So and this is kind of an interesting, when you talk about overcapacity, part of my discussion, when you look at supply chains, it really depends on the supply chain, but also where it is. For example, overcapacity is great if you're Australia because you're getting cheap automotive cars out of China, right? The Japanese don't like it because they're losing market share, as an example. So where does it actually work out? One of the interesting things about overcapacity is it's not just overcapacity, again, in the final product, it's the entire supply chain.

• 31:15Speaker 06

  So this is one of the things that's contributing to China global. In China, because of this nature and this fierce internal competition, companies, a lot of them, cannot make very much money, if any, so they have to go out. So what you're seeing now, as they go out, they're building supply chains, BYD is a perfect example, they're actually bringing that entire ecosystem with them. So while it may be overcapacity inside China, the benefits to other parts of the ecosystem outside of China is now you get access to cheaper technology and products overall that you can build locally.

• 31:43Tracy Alloway?

  I have so many questions, I have to focus. But, okay, net-net, would you say that the crackdown on Chinese technology has accelerated China's technological development or hindered it?

• 31:55Speaker 06

  I'd say it's definitely accelerated it because, again, referring to those five parts of the supply chain ecosystem earlier, it essentially focused everything in the entire country and all the companies into this, we have to figure out how to make this work, right? Because it's, now it's an existential threat to our businesses. The one thing I've learned since I've been in China as a kid, never focus the Chinese on a problem because they will attack and kill that problem. And with that, you also see the expenditure of massive amounts of resources, and it is very intensive, it is sometimes wasteful, but the end result is pretty clear. You have world-class companies and technology.

• 32:30Tracy Alloway?

  Speaking of resources, so one thing I remember from my time in Hong Kong was the Chinese government crackdown on education companies and what they termed wasteful capital. And they basically came out and said they wanted to encourage more money to go into high-tech businesses. Is that still happening? And then also, do you see money, government money, maybe lending standards being eased up for other industries? Basically, is China using financing to encourage other types of industries to be able to like expand, go abroad, things like that?

• 33:08Speaker 06

  So they're not necessarily using financing like, hey, here's an import-export bank for you, such as the US, for example, with Boeing. What they are doing, though, is particularly on, you know, with different incentives, think AI, for example, they are providing the entire ecosystem, different levels of support. Maybe that support is some finance. Maybe the support is a guarantee of we'll buy X amount of your product over X number of years. Maybe it's, we're going to work with universities to tweak and change our educational programs so we can actually train the new engineers in terms of a more effective way to go into business. That's where we see the changes. 10 years ago, it would be more financial stimulus, financial incentives going out, and tax incentives and so on going into the system. But now we're seeing these tweaks and changes because they understand that money isn't everything. You also have to build out all these other components to

• 33:53Speaker 06

  actually move forward in an industry.

• 34:13Speaker 01

  This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute, brought to you by ChatGPT. I'm Carol Muster. Getting hired at SpaceX requires exceptional ability and may include having Elon Musk review a candidate's resume. So writes Bloomberg Businessweek's Lauren Grush. She reports that the company culture is defined by Musk, and job candidates must understand that a commitment to SpaceX means adhering to this culture and exhibiting loyalty to Elon Musk. To get hired, candidates must demonstrate their achievements from past jobs, and hands-on experience matters more to recruiters than advanced degrees, with the company looking for people with raw, innate intelligence. A spokesperson for SpaceX didn't respond to a request for comment on its recruiting and hiring practices, but according to recruiters,

• 34:58Speaker 01

  advisors, and those who've interviewed for jobs there, it's the space exploration dream that draws people to the company. And Musk invokes that dream regularly to remind workers why they're there. Prospective hires are told that the job will require stamina, including in job ads that candidates, quote, "must be willing to work extended hours and weekends as needed." One major perk for all that hard work? Employees' access to equity, either the right to buy shares or payment in the form of restricted stock units that vest over time. That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute, brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at ChatGPT.com.

• 35:36Speaker 09

  Running a small business takes everything you've got. But with Chase for Business, you're not alone. They bring together local support and a broad range of resources to more than 7 million customers. With a deep understanding of your day-to-day needs, they provide products and guidance built to help you thrive. Right now, earn $500 when you open a new Chase Business Complete Checking account for new business checking customers with qualifying activities. Offer expires January 21, 2027. Chase Business Complete Checking has the flexible tools you need to accept payments, make deposits, and manage your finances with confidence. Learn more at chase.com/podcastbizoffer. Chase, make more of what's yours. Fees may apply to Chase Business Complete Checking accounts. The $500 offer is available

• 36:20Speaker 09

  for new business checking accounts with qualifying activities through 1/21/2027. Eligibility and qualification requirements must be met. Additional restrictions may apply. Please speak with a business banker for more information. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., member FDIC.

• 36:36Joe Weisenthal?

  Talk to us about AI. You know, obviously, we had the DeepSeek moment that was just earlier this year. Kind of feels like ancient history. Have you tried Kimmy yet? Have you heard of this one? There's some company called Moonshot, and they have a new model called Kimmy. And some people are saying it's better than DeepSeek. I'm not sure. Have you tried it? Yeah, you know, they all kind of, it seemed fine. It seemed very good. You know, they all kind of look the same. But how does the AI race look for? We know how it looks from the perspective of your DeepSeek moments, et cetera. What does the AI race look like in China?

• 37:08Speaker 06

  You know, it's interesting. It really depends on who you talk to. But my personal belief is that China's ahead in AI, and it's not even close. When you look at the

• 37:15Joe Weisenthal?

  Great.

• 37:16Speaker 06

  Yeah, when you look at the

• 37:17Joe Weisenthal?

  Great.

• 37:17Speaker 06

  When you look at the DeepSeek moment, it was a watershed. But there's 100 DeepSeek Equivalents that are coming online, we've only seen 10 of them, right? I don't know what the equivalents are in the States. Sure. But when you look at, again, things like infrastructure, China has copious amounts of electricity they can build out. They're constantly building out their electricity grid. Last year in 2024, they had 380 gigawatts built out. The US only had 60, maybe 80. I don't remember off the top of my head. But essentially, that gives them a huge runway to build out all of these AI, all of these data centers. The talent. I was at the semiconductor show in Shanghai at the end of March and they had a booth there, SMEU. And essentially, this, the goal of this organization is to help young graduates get into the fields of the future.

• 37:59Speaker 06

  Last year, when I talked to them, it was very much, oh, we're trying to help young graduates get internships and introductions. This year was, hey, we're going to have 100,000 graduates going to five key industries. AI, quantum computing, robotics, semiconductors and batteries. Now, 100,000 per year, that's more than all of the Western world combined. By the end of the decade, they want to have half a million. That's more than the entire world combined. And when you actually look at how China is building out, again, in this AI situation, and I'll sidestep a bit. When you just look at battery chemistry. Yeah. China has 50 graduate programs of battery chemistry and metallurgy in it. The US doesn't really have that. They have a couple of professors. And so when you look at, again, the talent, the government's support, it's not just, hey, guys, we want to use AI.

• 38:43Speaker 06

  It's every kid in the country now, from kindergarten all the way on up. I mean, even my own kids now, they are mandated, starting this fall, to have AI education. The entire apparatus in the whole country. And so, again, when you look at these different areas, I'm like, hey, wait a minute, guys. Like, this is not comparable. I'll give you an example. I was in southern China at a consumer goods manufacturer who I've known and I do work with. They have DeepSeek in the factory. They have Five Factores in China, a couple Southeast Asia. And I'm like, why do you, who make consumer, why do you have DeepSeek? And he goes, oh, Cameron. We have a lot of different products and we want to figure out how to use it. We have over a hundred R and D and technical guys. Business is slow because consumer goods in the trade war. I'm trying to have them figure out while we have the time, how to use it.

• 39:28Speaker 06

  So I go talk to the technology team. The technology team is talking to the entire supply chain, how to use DeepSeek and these different programs to do more efficient business and solve problems. So he shows me his WeChat system. He's got hundreds of people in a WeChat group. They're plastic providers, they're raw material producers, the packaging guys. And there's like, oh yeah, they'll say, you know, I looked at the WeChat feed. Oh, this didn't work, try this, do that. I don't know what this means, what are you seeing here? The entire supply chains are having this massive compounding knowledge throughout all of it. From the raw material producer all the way down to the final component manufacturer, the OEM. Then he says, by the way, this is now happening in Vietnam and Thailand because there it's a lot of Chinese management.

• 40:13Speaker 06

  And now their suppliers, which are Vietnamese or Thai. So you're seeing this massive compound through it, all of the supply chains. And that's just one company, Joe. Is Boeing doing that? Is Dow Chemical doing that? Is BMW doing that? I would argue no. And this is why, in my mind, China is very far ahead in the AI race. People look at it as we have breakthroughs, we have this and that, and that's absolutely true. The US is a hundred percent ahead in that. But I call it the metaphysical versus the tangible. The US and the West is going to be great at the metaphysical discoveries and everything else.

• 40:42Joe Weisenthal?

  We're going to build the digital god first.

• 40:44Speaker 06

  That's right. The technology and the adaptation and the integration is all going to be Chinese.

• 40:50Tracy Alloway?

  Joe, this is kind of depressing from a US perspective.

• 40:53Joe Weisenthal?

  I mean, I've been depressed forever.

• 40:55Tracy Alloway?

  Okay.

• 40:56Joe Weisenthal?

  I was born depressed. I wouldn't go there.

• 40:58Tracy Alloway?

  No, you weren't.

• 40:59Joe Weisenthal?

  No, I wasn't.

• 41:00Tracy Alloway?

  Joe is generally a happy person, I think. You mentioned young people and the education system quite a bit here. But I imagine this is still a shift in the labor force, right? So if more factory jobs are going from China to Vietnam, that means fewer factory jobs domestically. How does all of this, the trade war, the responses from private companies in China, how does that play into domestic politics at a time when there's been a lot of anxiety within China about things like youth unemployment?

• 41:36Speaker 06

  It unifies it more than disunifies it. Because again, it gives them a focus. We need to stand up against the attacks that we're receiving. It's actually having the opposite effect in many ways. I think the other thing is people understand that the industry of today is not going to be the industry of tomorrow. So we have to upscale. We have to train our workers. We have to automate more. If we do have a part or component that really just isn't profitable for us, we can send it to Southeast Asia and it will be profitable. So we need to explore that. So you're seeing the different ways that they can attack that problem.

• 42:05Joe Weisenthal?

  I have one more question, and I'm also worried it's going to be sort of leading to a depressing answer. But I think it was 2049 that Deng Xiaoping targeted for like, okay, by 2049, we'll have achieved a modern socialist state, maybe a modern communist state or something like that. And it seems like one way you could get there is just like have robots do everything. And I know there's a lot of investment in China in humanoid robotics, which if you could really have, you know, a robot that more or less moved like a person, pretty incredible productivity gains. There's efforts here, obviously, and Tesla's in that space. Can you talk a little bit about like the state of the Chinese humanoid robotics industry,

• 42:48Joe Weisenthal?

  their contribution to essentially reducing the burdens of human labor? And what the sort of competitive vision for that industry is?

• 42:59Speaker 06

  I think the competitive, the competitive vision is still being built out because again, we don't know exactly what they can and can't do. For example, humanoid robots will be great at repetitive tasks, whether they're on an assembly line or maybe it's, I have.

• 43:11Joe Weisenthal?

  I saw a video of a full service gasoline station where the robot filled up the tank.

• 43:15Speaker 06

  Sure. I mean, again, those are repetitive. You can only program them for a certain number of variables.

• 43:19Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 43:20Speaker 06

  But things like, you know, when I was working in carbon fiber, we did a lot of textile production where you had to essentially thread very thin fibers. Into eyelet holes to feed into the machine. That will be done by humans for a very long time because it's a very, it seems simple, but it's actually very complex. We have to line everything up, tie everything in accurately and so on. I think the area to look at for robotics in general is again, do you have the supply chain ecosystem?

• 43:45Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah.

• 43:46Speaker 06

  And China has that from all the way from the raw material processing, for example, for the magnets, all the way down into the installation. And that's why ultimately, again, given where we are currently, China will continue to grow ahead. It's great that Tesla does it, they absolutely should. Competition is better for everybody, but you still get your magnets from China. Now, will they become a problem in the future? Maybe not, maybe it will. I think that's to be debated. Ultimately, when you look at how it will affect society, we just don't know. I think the one thing to look at, though, is as they continue to grow the supply chain ecosystems in these areas, and regardless of industry, whether it's robotics, it's semiconductors, it's making paper. The reality is, is because you have all of that in your country, you can tinker with it a lot better than other places in the world.

• 44:28Speaker 06

  So when you actually talk about the innovation advancements and the ability to tinker on the fly, which China is world-class at, it's often because they have all the different pieces and component parts you talked about, the Christmas city earlier. And that's because you can get everything for Christmas in that city. You can get the screws, you can get the tinsel, you can get a color red, you can get a pink, whatever it may be. And all of that, because that ecosystem exists there, it gives you far more flexibility in the future to build something out.

• 44:54Tracy Alloway?

  Joe, how do you think New Jersey would respond to gas pumping robots?

• 45:00Joe Weisenthal?

  Oh, yeah.

• 45:02Tracy Alloway?

  It could go either way.

• 45:03Joe Weisenthal?

  It could go either way. Like, is the required full-service gas a benefit for the workers? Or is it just a guaranteed benefit for the drivers? Can I say my guilty play, my guilty thought?

• 45:13Tracy Alloway?

  Oh, okay.

• 45:14Joe Weisenthal?

  Which is that, like, I like getting gasoline in New Jersey.

• 45:16Tracy Alloway?

  Sure.

• 45:17Joe Weisenthal?

  You know, like, yeah, I like being lazy and I like having an excuse. Because if I'm not, like, in New Jersey, I'll pump it myself to save the money. But I like having an excuse like, oh, you know, I had to do it, and then I just get to sit in my cars. I don't complain.

• 45:27Tracy Alloway?

  That's not that bad, Joe. Not that guilty. I have just one more question, and it's a really basic one, but maybe you could walk us through, or at least give us some color, on how the actual paperwork works for these tariffs? Like, the hoops that companies are having to jump through in order to get goods to the US, given that the tariff rate seems to change day by day?

• 45:53Speaker 06

  I would refer them to my best customs broker because I don't, I don't deal with that. Because particularly to your point, because it's constantly changing and evolving. The rules are changing. One day you can't move H20 chips and the next day you can, right? One day you don't have any reverse, the next day you can, but they're still tariffed and taxed. And but at what rate are they tariffed and taxed? Because if you get it out of Southeast Asia, it's now a different tariff rate than China, but they both come from China. How does that actually work? The reality is it's so complex now that hire a professional, because that's what I do.

• 46:21Joe Weisenthal?

  Well, I guess I'll ask you one more question then. And it relates to the very beginning of the conversation about Chinese manufacturers building out more of their supply chain in Vietnam and other Asian countries. And one of the things you hear about is we have to guard against so-called like transshipment, which I just take to mean there's something is made in China and then it stops for a cup of coffee in Vietnam and then puts on another boat and suddenly, you know, it's a disguised important made to look like Vietnam. It sounds like though the vision is that that just becomes irrelevant or that that's an unnecessary thing, that actually it is a Chinese company, but it's actually made in Vietnam. And that ultimately the idea of like transshipment, the idea of just like something passing through

• 47:02Joe Weisenthal?

  Vietnam is like a temporary thing, but in the end it will just be made in Vietnam and that the companies and that the vision is not to use Vietnam as a pass through. The vision is to use Vietnam as the source.

• 47:14Speaker 06

  No, you're correct. I think the issue with transshipment is the definition that is used now is very 2018. It's not really what's happening. Of course, it still happens on occasion. I'm not denying that. But when you actually look at what's happening, it's the raw materials and semi-processed intermediate goods that are coming into Vietnam and then being processed and moved on. Now, at what point is that Vietnamese versus Chinese? You know, that actually is the debate that nobody knows the answer to. And we haven't received guidance on from the government about what that actually is. Is it X amount of content like it has when the MSA or is it something else? We don't know.

• 47:45Joe Weisenthal?

  You know, one of the things you hear, and we've talked about this on the podcast, is that anyone who's been in China for 10, 20, 30 years has seen extraordinary advances in standard of living over this period of time. I've never been to Vietnam. Given all this investment, would someone who's 40 years old in Vietnam today or younger, like in the last 10 years, would you say the quality of life and the quality of infrastructure has massively changed in some of these other countries?

• 48:12Speaker 06

  Yeah, I would say that. It's also that the standard of living, the job opportunities, right? Or the government's going to have more money in their coffers for social services because they have better taxation, because there is more money coming in. All of that has improved across the board in the region, absolutely.

• 48:27Tracy Alloway?

  I actually have one last question, which is, this isn't the first time that we've seen the US impose tariffs on China. Obviously, in the first Trump administration, we had restrictions, although clearly not as stringent as they are now. I kind of think of them as like maybe practice tariffs for China. So I'm curious, what was the most surprising thing that you learned or witnessed or saw from the first round of tariffs?

• 48:56Speaker 06

  From the original trade war tariffs?

• 48:57Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah.

• 48:58Speaker 06

  I think the thing that I was most surprised at is that the US didn't understand that it's basically squeezing a balloon. If you squeeze them out of China, they'll go somewhere else, but particularly to Southeast Asia. And that by doing that, the calculus of ABC anywhere but China has now actually cemented Chinese influence in Southeast Asia. And it will never, will never go back to the opposite, particularly with what we're currently doing. And so the surprising things are more for me is on the US side of strategically, how do we think about these things? And how do we forecast out 5, 10, 15, 20 years? Is that even if that was a consideration, it really wasn't given much credence. Those are the things that surprised me more. Of course, a company, if they're tariffed, is going to go outside and build somewhere else.

• 49:42Speaker 06

  Of course, companies that have internal intensive competition are going to want to go to new markets where they can make more profits. That's going to happen, that's business. But when you actually look at geopolitics and the evolution of geopolitics, particularly in regards to China, if you, again, if you try to force China into a situation, you're not going to expect the outcome, right? And the outcome in this particular case of trade war 1.0 is it cemented Chinese influence in Southeast Asia. The outcome of trade war 2.0, although we don't know it, is essentially now cementing China's lead in supply chains in Asia, Africa, and Europe.

• 50:16Joe Weisenthal?

  We're going to get really freaked out in this country when it's LatAm, when it's like in our hemisphere.

• 50:20Speaker 06

  Well, they're already being freaked out. And I mean, the reality is that when you talk to Chinese businesses, particularly private businesses outside of China, they know that they have to abide by local rules. And so one of the things that has been most surprising to me is that the US doesn't encourage more Chinese firms, particularly in industries where we have to have the technology, battery and so on.

• 50:40Joe Weisenthal?

  Come here.

• 50:41Speaker 06

  Not just come here, but you do it our way, right? 51% JV versus 49% and America has to be in charge. All data siloed. You know, there are certain things you can do that are low hanging fruit. And one of the arguments that I use often is, for example, with these advanced supply chains. For example, with EVs, China, Chinese firms, China has invested hundreds of billions of dollars in the last 20 years developing this out. Why does the US or Europe want to spend the same? It's stupid. If you want to build it out, invite them to do it. Pay them the royalty fee, whatever it comes out to. Take the technology and then fork it and make it indigenous. So instead of 20, 10 years, 20 years behind, now you're two. That's a much different conversation. And these are things, to your point, Chrissy,

• 51:25Speaker 06

  that we just don't see or that we're not taking advantage of.

• 51:28Joe Weisenthal?

  Cameron Johnson, thank you so much for coming on. That was a fascinating conversation.

• 51:33Speaker 06

  Thanks for having me, guys.

• 51:34Tracy Alloway?

  Fascinating and depressing.

• 51:48Joe Weisenthal?

  Well, that was certainly a very fascinating conversation. I mean, there's a lot to pick up from this idea that China is ahead in AI and that it's not particularly close is like a really interesting contention. Yes, it's an interesting contention because I think here in the US, the way people talk about AI is that this is still an area where we maintain some semblance of a, quote, lead, unquote.

• 52:12Tracy Alloway?

  Yeah, I also thought. Well, I guess the emphasis on the sort of like iterative process of Chinese companies was important because China does have this like background of taking a particular piece of technology or a way of doing things and then improving on it. So it seems like maybe AI just kind of speeds that up, or maybe AI itself is a place where it can kind of deploy that strategy. The other thing I was thinking about is just the importance of the supply network that Cameron was emphasizing and how difficult it is to replicate that. Like, could you imagine a Christmas village in the US?

• 52:50Joe Weisenthal?

  No. And or a shoe town and sock town and all of these things. No, it's almost impossible to imagine. You know, I think this is something we've talked about, Sam D'Amico of Impulse Labs, you know, the idea that the supply chain is the product, right? And I think hearing him talk about overcapacity, as in it's not about the overcapacity of end products per se, it's about that overcapacity to the extent that is a meaningful lens of the entire, the entire chain, right? And all the different suppliers. I thought that was like a really interesting idea. You know, another thing that I think is important, and it sounds trivial, but setting aside the cost of labor, until we have perfect humanoid robotics, there is no substitute

• 53:35Joe Weisenthal?

  for population, right? And so just the fact that the sheer number of workers, whether we're talking potentially factory workers or the sheer number of STEM graduates, which to some extent might be about educational priorities, but to another extent is also just going to be about the sheer number of people in the world, it ends up being a meaningful qualitative difference.

• 53:55Tracy Alloway?

  What was the stat that Cameron threw out? A hundred thousand STEM graduates or something per year?

• 54:00Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, like more than.

• 54:02Tracy Alloway?

  More than all the Western countries combined. That's stunning.

• 54:05Joe Weisenthal?

  Yeah, the fact that there's like multiple battery majors and that the US doesn't have any, just anyway, I don't know.

• 54:10Tracy Alloway?

  We gotta go to Shoe City.

• 54:12Joe Weisenthal?

  We gotta go to Shoe City.

• 54:13Tracy Alloway?

  All right. Shall we leave it there?

• 54:14Joe Weisenthal?

  Let's leave it there.

• 54:15Tracy Alloway?

  This has been another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

• 54:21Joe Weisenthal?

  And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart. Follow our guest Cameron Johnson. He's at Cam R. Johnson. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armin, Dashell Bennett at Dashbot, and Kale Brooks at KaleBrooks. For more Odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg.com/oddlots, where we have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes. And you can chat about all of these topics 24/7 in our Discord, discord.gg/oddlots.

• 54:44Tracy Alloway?

  And if you enjoy Odd Lots, if you want us to go to China to visit Shu City, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free. All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.

• 55:36Speaker 10

  If you're a business owner, you need a card that can keep up. With the Delta SkyMiles Reserve Business American Express Card, everyday purchases transform into miles you can use towards future travel. So business as usual can lead to a well-deserved getaway. And for a limited time, card members can earn 200,000 bonus miles, the highest miles offered this year. Whether you're traveling for business or planning your next adventure, now's a great time to make every purchase go further. Apply today at www.delta.com/podcast. Offer ends November 4th. Minimum spending requirements and terms apply.

• 56:12Speaker 11

  This is Robert Smith from Business History. If you're listening to this, there's a good chance you're a small business owner. And like every small business owner, you started with a dream to do what you love and watch it grow. What you probably didn't dream about? Keeping up with cyber threats. That's where Mastercard can help with access to tools that help identify cyber threats to better protect your business. Building your dream business? Priceless. For cybersecurity in a changing world, there's Mastercard.

• 56:39Speaker 11

  Learn more at mastercard.com/smallbusiness.

• 56:42Speaker 12

  Congratulations, you've built a dashboard. But now comes the follow-up question, and the follow-up to the follow-up, and the dashboard for that. Meet Hex. Give everyone the power to ask their own questions, explore data, and build with AI, all in natural language. Because every answer should spark another question, limited only by your curiosity, not your data team's bandwidth. Go deeper than dashboards. Join over 2,000 leading data organizations. Visit hex.ai.