How Crypto Is Reshaping Finance and Challenging the Status Quo with Solana Founder Anatoly Yakovenko

Welcome to another episode of Impact Theory with Tom Bilyeu! In today's conversation, Tom is joined by Anatoly Yakovenko, the visionary founder behind Solana, for a deep dive into the future of finance and the disruptive power of crypto. Together, Tom Bilyeu and Anatoly Yakovenko explore how blockchain technology is challenging traditional financial systems, streamlining transactions, and creating new opportunities for individuals and businesses alike. You'll hear firsthand why Anatoly Yakovenko believes crypto is "eating the last big part of the world, which is finance," and why the innovation happening in stablecoins and digital assets could reshape how we think about money, trust, and ownership. From political divides and regulatory hurdles to the real-world benefits of blockchain payments, this episode cuts through the complexity of crypto and lays out a powerful vision for what's ahead. Whether you're a blockchain enthusiast, a skeptical investor, or simply curious about the next wave in financial technology, get ready to rethink how money moves in the modern world. Let’s jump into this thought-provoking discussion and see what the future holds for finance, freedom, and technology! Quince: Free shipping and 365-day returns at https://quince.com/impactpodHomeServe: Help protect your home systems – and your wallet – with HomeServe against covered repairs. Plans start at just $4.99 a month at https://homeserve.comShopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial period at https://shopify.com/impact Pique: 20% off at https://piquelife.com/impactNetSuite: Right now, get our free business guide, Demystifying AI, at https://NetSuite.com/Theory https://netsuite.com/Theory Ketone IQ: Visit https://ketone.com/IMPACT for 30% OFF your subscription orderAquaTru: 20% off your purifier with code IMPACT https://aquatru.comIncogni: Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code IMPACT at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/impactSintra AI: 72% off with code IMPACT at https://sintra.ai/impactHuel: High-Protein Starter Kit 20% off for new customers at https://huel.com/impact code impactBevel Health: Visit https://bevel.health/impact and use code IMPACT to get your first month free. What's up, everybody? It's Tom Bilyeu here: If you want my help... STARTING a business:join me here at ZERO TO FOUNDER https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder?utm_campaign=Podcast%20Offer&utm_source=podca[%E2%80%A6]d%20end%20of%20show&utm_content=podcast%20ad%20end%20of%20show: https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder?utm_campaign=Podcast%20Offer&utm_source=podca[%E2%80%A6]d%20end%20of%20show&utm_content=podcast%20ad%20end%20of%20show https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder?utm_campaign=Podcast%20Offer&utm_source=podca[%E2%80%A6]d%20end%20of%20show&utm_content=podcast%20ad%20end%20of%20show SCALING a business:see if you qualify here. https://tombilyeu.com/call: https://tombilyeu.com/call Get my battle-tested strategies and insights delivered weekly to your inbox:sign up here. https://tombilyeu.com/: https://tombilyeu.com/ ********************************************************************** If you're serious about leveling up your life, I urge you to check out my new podcast,Tom Bilyeu’s Mindset Playbook https://open.spotify.com/show/47VE90Cittmo6TGGFqg2xf —a goldmine of my most impactful episodes on mindset, business, and health. Trust me, your future self will thank you. ********************************************************************** FOLLOW TOM: Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/tombilyeu/ Tik Tok:https://www.tiktok.com/@tombilyeu?lang=en Twitter:https://twitter.com/tombilyeu YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@TomBilyeu FOLLOW ANATOLY YAKOVENKO: Twitter: https://twitter.com/aeyakovenko LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anatoly-yakovenko/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices https://megaphone.fm/adchoices See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Tom Bilyeu?

  Let's talk about the moment your side hustle becomes a real business. Now, I see way too many founders stay stuck running their business like it's a hobby. And then they wonder why nothing ever feels real. It doesn't feel real because it's not. I've helped thousands of entrepreneurs build real businesses through Impact Theory University. And the first step in the path to building a legit business is registering it. And Taylor Brands will help you do just that in a few clicks. An LLC, a limited liability company, is an official business structure. It's inexpensive to form and very simple to maintain. It's how you open a business bank account. It's how customers know they're dealing with a real company. And Taylor Brands doesn't stop at the filing.

• 0:45Tom Bilyeu?

  Their dashboard tracks what comes next based on what your business actually needs. So EIN number, registered agent, licenses and permits, bookkeeping, business banking. I tell every founder the same thing. Just make it official. Click the link in the show notes to check out Taylor Brands and get started on your business today. This is a paid advertisement.

• 1:07Speaker 01

  Crypto is eating the last big part of the world, which is finance. No human can comprehend it. The reason why America has been so successful is that we end up building things faster than anyone else.

• 1:18Tom Bilyeu?

  Do you think that crypto will completely replace fiat?

• 1:22Speaker 01

  Our government is aging. I think the Democrat leadership kind of shot themselves in the foot with crypto.

• 1:28Tom Bilyeu?

  What does the future of finance look like?

• 1:30Speaker 01

  I'm a super optimist. I think if all our problems are money problems, we're truly blessed.

• 1:38Tom Bilyeu?

  Anatoly Yakovenko, welcome to the show.

• 1:40Speaker 01

  Thanks for having me.

• 1:41Tom Bilyeu?

  So you have said that crypto will win against traditional finance, but I want to know why. What is it about crypto that's better for the average person today?

• 1:52Speaker 01

  The the basic reason is that a lot of the kind of growth over the last, you know, I think since the eighties, been software eating the world. I think this is a Mark and Jason line. And you kind of see technology as it improves, start to automate more and more pieces of what we do with like humans and fax machines and stuff like this. And crypto is eating the last part, I think, of the last big part of the world, which is finance. And finance has been really, really hard to replace with software because there's just so much trust baked into finance. Like, if you actually kind of go through the process, anyone that's been through the process of buying a house, you get all the work that people have done legally to make

• 2:36Speaker 01

  that as trustless as possible. You see that in the, you know, eight, you know, eight hundred pages of disclosures that you read, and no human can comprehend it, right? There's just no way to consume that information and make a rational decision. So you trust the people in the process, the brokers, the dealers, et cetera, to kind of not screw you over. And we have laws and stuff to kind of keep everyone in line, but because of that, it's really expensive. The cool thing about blockchain and crypto is that you can start replacing some of those pieces with software and cryptography, because we have mathematical guarantees that you cannot violate the the cryptography portion. So you can trust that particular thing.

• 3:18Speaker 01

  It's still a really slow and hard process, because we still have humans writing the software, and that software is going to have bugs and stuff like that. And you see that come out as, you know, big hacks and DeFi and stuff like that. But I think slowly but surely, you'll start seeing people replace their back office and kind of all the stuff that they do that's expensive, that some person that is doing a job can charge twenty basis points, can now be done with software, it'll get switched over.

• 3:47Tom Bilyeu?

  I've heard you talk about the current way that the financial system works is basically like a regressive tax on the entire economy. What do you mean by that? And how would crypto solve that?

• 3:59Speaker 01

  Yeah, so my engineering brain, like, think of it as roads. Like, if you have roads with potholes and tolls that are expensive, that that's a cost that's paid by everybody in that, you know, economy. Like, the cars wear down faster, you got to spend more gas because the roads are inefficient, stuff like this. And when you straighten everything out and remove all the potholes, you remove that tax on the economy. So you're paying less, less of that tax in every transaction that you do.

• 4:29Tom Bilyeu?

  If you were going to remove the analogy and just say like, these are the beats that create the expense or the friction or whatever, like what are the actual potholes?

• 4:38Speaker 01

  Yeah, basically anytime, like especially if you ever bought a house, there's always somebody that for every little fee and every person that you interact with, they charge some percentage of the sale of the house. They're doing the same amount of work, no matter what, right? This is kind of a, that little pothole or whatever, that an expensive truck full of expensive items drives over. That's a cost that those items pay and that cost is borne by the whole economy. So can we replace those with software? And I think the stablecoin is kind of the easiest product to understand. You have a ledger, right? That represents money in some bank account that has been invested in treasuries.

• 5:22Speaker 01

  And then you have a digital representation of that, that anybody can transfer on a blockchain like Solana or Ethereum. And the cost to transfer that doesn't require you to pass that, those funds through some intermediary. Like you have with a credit card payment that has to go through the credit card issuer Visa, or the transfer of whatever agent Visa. Then the credit card issuer, the credit issuer, the bank, then the receiving bank, then the actual merchant's account. Those, all those little hops, somebody charges a fee for. But on a blockchain, you've kind of virtualized all of that and replaced it with software where I can send you a token.

• 6:03Speaker 01

  The cost to send that token is the cost to move memory around in a bunch of computers. And blockchains are excruciatingly inefficient computers, right? We're talking about like doing the same computation, tens of thousands of times over and over to give you those guarantees that nothing can go wrong. But even though that is the most expensive computer ever built, it is thousands of times cheaper than humans or truck. That can charge a spread on trust and stuff like that. A very specific example, we launched a phone seeker and made it available everywhere in the world. And we had an option for credit cards or stable coins without any incentive, same price.

• 6:44Speaker 01

  And about half the people picked the stablecoin option to buy this phones, 500 bucks. And we sold like 150,000 of them. So it's roughly $40 million through both channels, credit cards and stable coins. As a merchant, we had to pay a fee on the credit cards, about 2%. And we didn't have to pay that fee on the stablecoin part. And we got the stablecoin funds immediately, we were able to use them immediately. On the credit cards, we had to wait 60 to 90 days before we actually got the funds in our bank account. So that 90 days is a cost, the 2% is a cost. And with the stablecoins, we literally had the funds and we could use them immediately to pay salaries to go build the phones and stuff like that.

• 7:28Speaker 01

  So that's a very clear example of inefficiencies that just for that one small kind of phone launch added up to like several, several engineering salaries. That's like three people's salaries that I could have paid, that I could paid for.

• 7:44Tom Bilyeu?

  Right, so we have essentially a system that's made before the internet. A system that overcame trust by essentially building all this human infrastructure around it. And everybody just sort of holds their nose and goes, I'm going to trust the credit card companies or I'm going to trust the escrow or whatever to get these things through. So assuming that we can solve the trust problem and people en masse really either become completely agnostic and the companies just integrate blockchain technology.

• 8:13Speaker 01

  Yes, you don't have to trust blockchain because you can verify it. And this is the, the benefit, the reason why it's slowly overcoming traditional finance is that you're not replacing it with, I gotta trust Joe at, you know, Bank of America and I'm trusting Vitalik at Ethereum. No, you can verify that Ethereum or Solana work.

• 8:34Speaker 01

  From the software itself, because the software is open source, you can go download it yourself. Now, vast majority of people are not going to do that, but you have a business that wants to compete with those other kind of middlemen and wants to cut them out and create a service that's cheaper and faster. They can verify that Solana is open source software and they get the what exactly what they get out of it, what they expect. So somebody like Circle can issue a stablecoin on top of Solana without trusting me or anyone else. And this is how that that replacement of trust of humans to software ends up benefiting consumers. So we, as a merchant, you know, I ironically built the built the protocol

• 9:17Speaker 01

  initially and now I'm using it for the its intended purposes, right? So me as a merchant, I could use Circle and know exactly that I'm getting that I'm getting digital dollars without paying all these intermediaries.

• 9:28Tom Bilyeu?

  Okay. The reason I say there's probably still a trust element, or the reason I believe there is a an aggressive trust element is just, uh, science isn't advanced one insight at a time. It advances one funeral at a time. People tend to get so locked into their frame of reference, their way of life, that something new is just like, I don't know, that works, I don't understand it. And so people are some will just not do it because they don't understand it. And so even if it's like, hey, the system doesn't even require you to trust it, they still need to trust that it doesn't require trust.

• 9:58Speaker 01

  Yeah, absolutely.

• 9:59Tom Bilyeu?

  So we'll have some of that. But assuming that we can overcome that, do you think that crypto on a near-ish term timeline will completely replace fiat?

• 10:10Speaker 01

  So if you have a business and you employ somebody to write a check and to put it in a mail into the mail and send it out, you're never going to replace that person. Because this is just too much risk, right? You've already paid for them to to do that job. And finance is one of those things you just, as a business owner, you just never want it to break, right? The cost is like a pain in the butt, but you just never want to touch it. So that process is, like you said, one funeral at a time.

• 10:38Speaker 01

  It's gonna take some time for these things to kinda to move. And the other part of it is that, much like the internet, I don't know. I had, I think, a very interesting experience with it because I arrived to the States in like ninety one. And my, neither me or my parents understood computers at all, right? Like, so because I was young, I immediately, like, my mind was very much malleable and I immediately, like, adopted it. Like, I was on chats as soon as my parents got me a computer and, you know, playing online games and whatever, trying to figure out IRC and stuff like that. My parents didn't understand any of it because to them it was very alien.

• 11:18Speaker 01

  And the idea that a link points to a document that goes to a different server, domains and all this stuff, just took took them a very long time to build that mental model that the web exists and how it works. I think the same problem with crypto is that you have mathematical cryptography that is really hard to understand. And then it's hard to build a mental model around it that this secret seed phrase that you keep is, like, cannot be broken with atomic bombs, right? Like, it is something that guarantees ownership and trust. And what a public decentralized ledger means is very similar to like how your county keeps track of who owns the house, right? All those mental models for people to build will take time to wrap their head around.

• 12:03Speaker 01

  I think kids and stuff like immediately get NFTs. And I don't know if you ever played Ultima Online? This is like one of the first.

• 12:11Tom Bilyeu?

  I know of it, but I didn't.

• 12:12Speaker 01

  Yeah. I was, I like, my first experience with crypto, I would say, was Ultima Online because I wrote like some very dumb visual basic scripts to mine to go farm wood and stuff like that and then I would sell it on eBay.

• 12:28Tom Bilyeu?

  So wild.

• 12:29Speaker 01

  For like cashier's checks. Those were like, those were digital currencies, like late nineties.

• 12:35Tom Bilyeu?

  That's hysterical, selling it on eBay.

• 12:38Speaker 01

  Like whatever platform, our C-Channel or whatever, it'd find, like, eventually on eBay. That's pretty funny.

• 12:45Tom Bilyeu?

  Interesting. Taking a short break, but there's more Impact Theory after. Stay tuned. There's a reason Quince sells cashmere for $60, and it isn't the cashmere. It's real 100% Mongolian cashmere. It's the same stuff luxury labels charge a fortune for. Quince just works directly with ethical factories and cuts out the middleman. So there's no need for a markup and no logo tax. The $60 goes to the actual sweater, not the fancy name on the tag. That's why everything they make runs 50 to 80% less. And it's not just the cashmere. I ordered a few things myself, their fleece joggers, a couple of their tees, which I wear obsessively.

• 13:28Tom Bilyeu?

  First thing I noticed was the quality. Soft, well-made, built to hold up. They make down jackets and wool outerwear now too. So upgrade your stuff to things you'll actually wear. Find your next fall favorites at Quince. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns, now available in Canada and the UK too. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, let them know it was Impact Theory. It's the best way to support the show. Let's talk about something that genuinely keeps me awake at night. My team at Impact Theory gets hit with phishing scams from bad actors pretending to be me all the time.

• 14:10Tom Bilyeu?

  And they keep getting more sophisticated attacks with details specific enough to look legit. AI has made a lot of things possible, including scams like this. But AI still needs raw material. It gets it from data brokers who sell your name, address, phone number, to anyone willing to pay. Incogni goes after that supply. They handle removal requests across 420-plus harmful broker sites. And they keep checking back as brokers constantly try to relist you. On the Unlimited Plan, the exposure scanner hunts down your information. Send a link and their privacy experts handle the takedown. Track your progress in the app and get a monthly risk assessment showing exactly where you stand.

• 14:54Tom Bilyeu?

  Go to incogni.com/impact and use code IMPACT for 60% off an annual plan. Incogni is I-N-C-O-G-N-I dot com slash impact. Promo code IMPACT. It's completely risk-free with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

• 15:13Tom Bilyeu?

  Thanks for staying tuned. Now, let's get back to it. Okay, so, uh, yes, maybe replaces fiat, but one funeral at a time, so not something that is gonna happen overnight. Um, but right now, stable coins is like a big deal in when you start talking politically, people are really talking about, "Hey, we gotta get stable coins." What, do you have like a pithy breakdown of what a stable coin is and why they matter so much?

• 15:41Speaker 01

  Yeah, stable coin is a bearer asset, um, which means that it's stuff that you own. Like, if you lose it, it's gone. So this is something that is very different from a bank account, where you can never lose it because the bank holds your money. They owe it to you, right? As a, you're effectively kind of lending it to the bank. But if you own a stable coin, if you lose it, it's gone. Nobody's gonna recover it. So it's kind of like old school stock certificates that you put in your safe deposit. If it burns down, those things are gone.

• 16:12Tom Bilyeu?

  Yeah.

• 16:13Speaker 01

  So that's a very different ownership model, but, um, the reason why you can implement it now is because of cryptography and all these, all these things that blockchains provide. And the reason why you can lower the cost now is because since you own it, when you transfer it to somebody else, that's a peer-to-peer transaction. There's no third party. So when you transfer it, you have full guarantees that you received it because of the cryptography and blockchain. So the problems that we had with those original stock certificates are all gone in a similar way that, you know, e-commerce in the 90s added SSL and everyone started seeing that cryptographic lock symbol and they knew that their credit card is not gonna be stolen.

• 16:54Speaker 01

  When I transfer you a token, you have full guarantee from cryptography, the same exact guarantees as you do with like e-commerce. You can see that this particular token that I transferred to you was issued by Circle and you have full control over it. So now you know that digital dollars, that Circle is selling, right, are now under your control.

• 17:17Tom Bilyeu?

  Now, why does the Trump admin, for instance, why do they care so much about this? Um, obviously...

• 17:23Speaker 01

  I think, uh, politically, it was probably just this weird environment where...

• 17:30Speaker 01

  This is, I hope I'm not gonna get in trouble.

• 17:35Speaker 01

  There's like kind of a similar problem with like people adopting technology like my parents in the 90s. I think our government is aging, right? Like, we have this kind of entrenched problem where the Senate moves forward one death at a time, one retirement at a time.

• 17:52Tom Bilyeu?

  Not exactly spring chickens.

• 17:53Speaker 01

  Yeah, so there's just a lot of really old people that don't understand it. And for whatever reason, right now, in the generation we live in, Republicans are younger. So they see this.

• 18:03Tom Bilyeu?

  Interesting.

• 18:03Speaker 01

  They see a technology, they get it more, they see the benefits of it, and they're kind of more,

• 18:10Speaker 01

  like, kind of, they truly, I think, more believe in the people can solve their own problems, given the tools, and they see it as a tool to solve problems. They don't care that it competes with banks. And I think the old-school Democrats, Warren and stuff like that, are, one, getting old, so they don't, it takes them a long time to understand anything new. And, two, it disrupts how they control the systems that they've built up through the banking regulation and all this other stuff. So they don't want to disrupt it. They see it as, like, reducing power. This is kind of my theory. So you saw a lot of kind of this adversarial behavior from the previous administration towards crypto. And the crypto people are like, why?

• 18:53Speaker 01

  Like, if you own a stablecoin, On Solana, it's a redeemable 10-cent fee to open an account effectively. No bank offers you that. But you, it's just you're paying for memory storage in all these computers. And there's no overdraft fees. There's no fees at all, right? So this is a net benefit to consumer. And it's not through regulation where banks will find every which way to, like, bypass the regulation and find a loophole to charge people fees. It's by design. Like, it is impossible for the chain to start charging fees or doing something that, like, through some weird loophole. So it should be a net benefit to consumers.

• 19:36Speaker 01

  But there was this massive resistance on the Democratic side.

• 19:41Speaker 01

  Just like in a dynamic system, like I think vast majority of founders were a fairly liberal and were probably not Republicans or ever would talk to Republicans. Just simply because one side was so against this like thing that we're building and us as engineers see it as a net benefit. They were like, what the hell? I think that shifted kind of, I don't know, huge foot gun that I think the Democrat leadership kind of shot themselves in the foot with crypto.

• 20:12Tom Bilyeu?

  How much of, and especially because as we're recording this, you've got the revolution, potential revolution going on in Iran. There's a whole sense for some people that like power to the people is a big deal. It's something that if you're Iranian, some are willing to die for just to be able to control their own destiny. How much of that is inherent in the engineers that are building crypto where it's like, no, no, no, I want to get the power away from the bankers. I want to put it in people's hands. Like, is there some of that or is this an engineering challenge purely about efficiency?

• 20:44Speaker 01

  I think a vast majority of crypto people that I that I've talked to are fairly libertarian and kind of believe that contestable markets are like the best way to deliver the most goods and services to consumers. So like, I think at a heart of-

• 21:03Tom Bilyeu?

  Contestable market, meaning there's competition?

• 21:05Speaker 01

  Yeah, like you want to like eliminate points where this is probably the biggest kind of if you're deep into the crypto nerd trenches, the hardest problem right now is called MEV, which is-

• 21:19Tom Bilyeu?

  Math?

• 21:19Speaker 01

  MEV, M E V.

• 21:21Tom Bilyeu?

  Okay. It's like math, I've heard of math.

• 21:23Speaker 01

  Maximally extractable value. So finding like points in these systems where if you if you operate in that in that whatever part of the stack, you can maximize how much value you can extract because you have a uncontestable market. There's no way for somebody to use something else. So all the- Crypto people, I feel like from an engineering point of view are against any kind of unnatural monopolies or natural monopolies.

• 21:51Tom Bilyeu?

  And so the view is the current financial system has a horrific MEV.

• 21:56Speaker 01

  And you see that right now, like with the banking lobbyists fighting the stablecoin regulation because they don't want stablecoins to give consumers rewards. So you have this.

• 22:09Tom Bilyeu?

  I don't understand why.

• 22:10Speaker 01

  Well, if you deposit money in a bank, what's the savings rate that they give you right now?

• 22:15Tom Bilyeu?

  Low.

• 22:16Speaker 01

  Like half of a percent, maybe, but the treasury yields, when they take that deposit and they put it in the in treasuries is 5%. So that difference, the spread, your dollar, they're paying you half of a percent, they're getting 5%, right? It's an astronomical 100x difference. In any kind of contestable market, that would be impossible. There's just no way that that wouldn't compress.

• 22:43Tom Bilyeu?

  So when people are giving rewards, they're basically saying, hold on a second, I can beat the legacy system simply by doing the same trick, but actually giving some of the benefits back to the customer.

• 22:53Speaker 01

  Exactly. I mean, like to grow your stablecoin business, you would offer the maximum reward you can. Maybe it's not 5% because you still got to pay for, you know, operations or whatever, but it's four. And then that shrinks the margins in the banks.

• 23:08Tom Bilyeu?

  Very interesting. I have a growing distrust of banks. My audience will be well familiar with where I fall in all this. But, okay, so basically, in one of the reasons that there's resistance to this is these guys are just using traditional business principles of like, I'm going to outperform my competitors by giving a benefit to the customer. And one of the ways they're doing that is just taking a smaller margin on the differential.

• 23:35Speaker 01

  That's the whole point of capitalism.

• 23:36Tom Bilyeu?

  Very straightforward, yes.

• 23:37Speaker 01

  It's very simple.

• 23:39Tom Bilyeu?

  Okay.

• 23:40Speaker 01

  Somebody's profit is my opportunity, right? Like as soon as, as soon as I can build something that is a competitive product for less, that's my incentive to go do it. And vast majority of time, as soon as you remove the friction for people to solve their own problems, they will solve them.

• 23:58Tom Bilyeu?

  So as an engineer, are you looking at this and going, I don't understand why the rate of adoption isn't even faster? Or is there a, not a gotcha, but like a thing you get sort of why people aren't moving on it?

• 24:09Speaker 01

  The benefit to consumers is really small. Like you as a, you're, most people have gotten so lazy that they don't want to pay for cat with cash or credit cards, even if the merchant offers them a 2% rebate, right? Like, and that 2% is just not enough to change behavior. So we have, so we have these kind of like, even if the markets are contestable, people's behaviors have gotten so lazy that they're not, they're not incentivized enough to go make the switch. But

• 24:40Tom Bilyeu?

  But it's a pretty big deal on the savings side. Like if you think about, wait, I could be getting 4% of my money instead of 0.5% of my money. I get the, the sort of 2% on a transaction, uh, but like, woo, you start talking about savings.

• 24:55Speaker 01

  So I'm, you know, and to me, like, I'm totally fine with that. Like, I think if you've built a product that is so convenient that people are willing to pay the spread, that's great. It means that you've eased people's lives, right? Like, it is, uh, it is like a lot of work to keep track of the minutia of finances for humans. And if you like, fine, I'll pay more to do less. That means I can spend most of my time doing something else that I enjoy, scrolling TikTok or whatever. But at least like, at least people are making the choice to do that. And there is an opportunity for a merchant to go fight him on it. What I obviously like really irks me is when that opportunity is taken away. Like a merchant should be able to, with a stablecoin, to incentivize their consumers to go use that

• 25:40Speaker 01

  stablecoin for purchases. And maybe that's not going to be just a 2% price difference, but an exclusive product that is like, the only way you can get this particular product is if you use, you know, a stablecoin. That's a way to start people to change behaviors. And a merchant is really incentivized to do that because 2% is on their top line number that they sell, right? We sold a $500 phone, we paid 2% on the 500 bucks, but that's not our profit margin. Our profit margin is $50, right? If you've ever run a business, right? You know exactly the difference between, uh, you're like, your bomb, like your, your cost of components and what you can sell for.

• 26:22Speaker 01

  Yeah, so that that becomes actually a huge incentive and merchants are, I think, well positioned to do that. And I think it would be a shame if they were legally not allowed to compete.

• 26:35Tom Bilyeu?

  Yeah, agreed. And certainly there for a while, we weren't driving people offshore stifling innovation. It's interesting. I never thought about the Republicans simply being younger than Democrats. But I look at, let's say, David Sacks, who's a crypto czar, he's, I think, even a little bit older than me. So certainly not a super young guy.

• 26:56Speaker 01

  No, none of them are spring chickens.

• 26:58Tom Bilyeu?

  Old as a bag of dirt. So.

• 27:00Speaker 01

  Look, look at the congressmen and senators and you start seeing like an age difference. And I'm like, okay, this is kind of, we're blessed to at least have two parties where there is competition.

• 27:11Tom Bilyeu?

  It's interesting. So when I look at them, so the thesis that I came up with was very much more along the lines of, okay, they tend to be, though not now, historically speaking, Republicans were, let's put the power in the hands of the people, keep government small, let's be fiscally responsible. Again, I am hyper aware that they are not currently fiscally responsible at all. And so my map was, oh, we see an opportunity here to, we've got a debt problem. And we're going to leverage stable coins to create appetite for US debt by creating a regulation that says you can do a stable coin. But so that we avoid any sort of rug pull that you've got to have a provable one to one backed.

• 27:54Tom Bilyeu?

  Like if you've got a dollar's worth of stable coins, you've got a dollar's worth of treasuries sitting on the balance sheet. That's not commingled with anything. And so.

• 28:01Speaker 01

  Yeah. And that that is the right way to do it. And that that's basically like, I think, this is what the genius hack does. I think it's it's like a really good bill overall.

• 28:11Tom Bilyeu?

  If you were going to grade David Sacks on what he's done so far, where would you put him?

• 28:16Speaker 01

  Probably A plus. Like, I think, yeah, I think, given the the really hard challenging problems that he's working on, I think they've done the maximum amount they can. I think market structure is just is really complicated. I'm hoping they pass it this year, but we'll see.

• 28:30Tom Bilyeu?

  Market structure, what's that?

• 28:31Speaker 01

  Digital dollars, I think everybody can understand and grasp. And that the fact that everybody wants dollars outside of the US to transact, like literally a merchant in Argentina will pay their supplier in China using USDT. Because it's the most convenient for both of them. That's great, and that creates demand for for treasuries and we need a lot of demand for treasuries because our deficits are so huge. So so barring the Congress cutting spending, I think we got to like figure out all the all the possible ways that we can incentivize people to buy or dot. So I think that part is great. The other part of it

• 29:12Speaker 01

  is for securities, if you think about when how the securities law came to be, there was this massive railroad boom in the late 19th century and your neighbor would be like, hey, buy my railroad certificate. And it was a piece of paper. And when you bought it, you had no idea that the railroad company existed, that they were actually building any railroads, or you were like, all those all those things could fail and all the possible ways you imagine, right? Somebody could create a fake certificate, somebody could create a fake railroad company, or buy, you know, sell a bunch of stock and never spend it on actually building any railroad, stuff like this. So in that free for all that led

• 29:54Speaker 01

  to kind of the failures in 1929, and a lot of laws came about with the Securities Act to prevent that from happening. And the way they're designed is they separate a lot of those functions, broker dealers, transfer agents, the issuer, all those things are different people, much like when you buy a house, you have different people that do all the all the different parts of the transaction. And the reason for separating them is that hopefully, if one of them is honest in this chain, that they catch the bugs of the other one, or the fraud that anyone else could do, and they can surface that and you don't end up with a bad transaction and they report him and the bad guys go to jail. That actually works really well. US, I think, is the best financial system that's been built in in

• 30:39Speaker 01

  the world, but it's been built in that time before the internet. So much like with e-commerce, when we built like just cryptography SSL, so you can pass a credit card through the internet without it being stolen. When I transfer a certificate to you, that's a token, you actually full have full cryptographic guarantees that Some company, SpaceX hopefully one day, issued a token as their stock on Solana. And when you receive it, you know exactly that it was issued by SpaceX. Because there's a cryptographic chain from the token when you receive it all the way to the issuer. You can validate the certificates. Your browser should be doing it for you. So all of that effectively becomes cryptographically verified.

• 31:22Speaker 01

  So all those middle guys, transfer agent brokers, all those things can go away. This is effectively what market structure is trying to resolve. That tension of all these people that are existing businesses and are making money and are part of this very successful financial system

• 31:42Speaker 01

  can be replaced with something that's cheaper and faster. And that's a good thing. But we need to do it in a way that doesn't create loopholes for people to take advantage and kind of start doing the stuff that was happening before 1929. And it's just, it's just really complicated to merge those two.

• 31:59Tom Bilyeu?

  It's, it's a regulation or they're trying to deregulate essentially in a sensible fashion away from the old.

• 32:06Speaker 01

  Create like a path for the new to have the same level playing field as the, as the old.

• 32:12Tom Bilyeu?

  Because right now there's some regulation tied to that era that trips up.

• 32:17Speaker 01

  Yeah, there's rules that just don't make sense. Like if I transfer this token to you, there is no transfer agent or broker dealer. You're, you actually received it like as if I gave you a physical stock certificate.

• 32:28Tom Bilyeu?

  But legally they're supposed to be. Got it, got it. So they're essentially forcing a middleman into the scenario, which 100 years ago made sense, but today not so much. Got it. And undermines the entire advantage of the current system. Okay. The big thing, so I'm very invested in crypto, both from things that I'm building. It's integrated into our video game to being as an investor. It's something I'm heavily invested in. And I have anxiety around the social engineering part of all this. You were talking about, look, this is a different kind of ownership. You've got this stablecoin. If you lose it, that's that, game over. Do you see that as a critical part that's going to need to be solved before we get mass adoption?

• 33:12Speaker 01

  Yeah, and this is, I think, part of, I think, TradFi as well. Like I think the biggest spend they have on security right now is effectively. Um, identity fraud, like people stealing your credit card and spending it somewhere else or pretending to be you and like applying for credit and all of this.

• 33:31Tom Bilyeu?

  And that's nightmarish. However, because I've had it happen to me, you can call the bank and be like, nope, that that's fraud and they'll for the most part back it out. And so you want to talk about something that's worth 2% of the transactions. That one feels worth the 2% of the transactions. Do you just see that as an opportunity for this? In fact, let me, let me paint a picture really quick for anybody that's gotten this far, but they're pretty new to crypto. Um, one of the big anxieties that people have is that, um, you're now in the digital world, so you're clicking on links. Is that link real? Is that being spoofed? Was that email that reached out to me, sending me the link, one letter off from the actual person

• 34:13Tom Bilyeu?

  that I'm expecting it to be, is the person in Discord actually who they say they are? Are they just spoofing that person? And so there's like, feels like a thousand ways that people can get you to do a thing that is technologically sound, but like they've moved you through what's known as social engineering over to clicking the wrong link or giving them access to your computer or God knows what, because there's no banking infrastructure. It's just scammer versus you. And if you're tired and not paying attention one day and you click a link, like the number of people that I've seen get like their NFTs just cleared out of their wallet. Oh, it's terrifying. And so I'm relatively sophisticated with this stuff and I live in a constant state of paranoia.

• 34:58Tom Bilyeu?

  And so I'm just like, will somebody please solve that problem?

• 35:02Speaker 01

  So this is where I think crypto adoption will probably be faster outside of the US is because

• 35:08Tom Bilyeu?

  Interesting.

• 35:08Speaker 01

  You have like, you have all this investment in, that's paying for with the two, with the 2% fee that everyone's willing to pay out of a convenience to basically solve this problem in TradFi. And it's also being solved in parallel in crypto without the 2% fee.

• 35:25Tom Bilyeu?

  So you're saying because of this legislation that's still slowing us down, people are solving it.

• 35:30Speaker 01

  No, I think the, the problem is that the margin. Improvement over the existing system in the US is minimal to consumers.

• 35:37Tom Bilyeu?

  Right.

• 35:38Speaker 01

  Outside of the US.

• 35:39Tom Bilyeu?

  Where it's a bigger pain point.

• 35:40Speaker 01

  You don't have these banks and third parties that are effectively very trusted. Like I, I effectively trust my bank, right? Like, I mean, stuff will happen, but for the vast majority of people, you're right. Like they actually have better UX and safety out of the traditional financial system. But outside of the US, they don't have those traditional finance systems that they can trust. Like, there's no way you can do that in Ukraine or anywhere else, or like half of Eastern Europe, even if it's part of the EU.

• 36:11Tom Bilyeu?

  Wow, that's wild.

• 36:12Speaker 01

  Right? So you, you're much, much better off actually using the tools that people are building to prevent all of the same phishing attacks, but on top of crypto rails. People, there's a ton of investment in that, like while as they're becoming more sophisticated and identifying links and responding to phishing scams and all this stuff, just like in TradFi. So I think you're going to see that adoption grow much faster outside of the US and especially cross border where that really like that trust that you have with a bank doesn't actually work as soon as you go across borders. You do something in Mexico or vice versa. It becomes much, much harder to reverse that transaction once the money's gone.

• 36:57Tom Bilyeu?

  That makes sense. We're hitting pause for a moment, but there's plenty more ahead, so don't go anywhere. You're probably paying two salespeople to do one salesperson's job. That's where today's sponsor, Pipe Drive, comes in. An intelligent AI-powered sales CRM loved by growing sales teams. Pipe Drive just launched meeting intelligence built right into the CRM. Before every call, it pulls deal history and past conversations into one brief. During the call, it records and takes notes. After it, it drafts your CRM updates to review and approve. So there's less admin and more selling. Switch to a CRM built by salespeople for salespeople and join the over one

• 37:43Tom Bilyeu?

  Hundred thousand companies already using Pipe Drive. My link gets you an exclusive 30 days free instead of the usual 14 day trial. There's no credit card payment needed. Just head to pipedrive.com/impact to get started. Again, that's pipedrive.com/impact and you can be up and running in minutes.

• 38:07Tom Bilyeu?

  Thanks for sticking around. Let's get right back into the action. Okay, so that's, I think, a good primer for people about where we are. Why this is on a long enough timeline seems pretty self evident that it will win less frictions, cheaper. If you grow up with it, you're not going to be weird about the transition. You're just going to go with it.

• 38:27Tom Bilyeu?

  Also, you can take the upside instead of the bank capturing the upside of loaning your money.

• 38:34Tom Bilyeu?

  What does the future of finance look like? So in a world where I think you said in 2026 that we're going to see something like a trillion dollars in stable coins.

• 38:43Speaker 01

  Basically, I think the you're going to go from one trillion to 10 much faster than from zero to one. And I think that part's inevitable. Like, I think the growth of stable coins is like growing, I think, faster than anyone expected. I think we're at like 300 billion, I think, issued already. And one trillion to me is like an astronomical number. Like, it's hard for me to imagine. But that means that all these funds are effectively digitally available and all these public permissionless blockchains. So this is where you start seeing that inflection point where in the internet, to me, in the late 90s, you kind of went from

• 39:27Speaker 01

  six degrees to frontier and all those people were kind of experimenting with hyper connection of humans.

• 39:35Speaker 01

  That was happening right when we hit that 500 million people on the internet mark that were active like internet users. So as you start seeing like 1 trillion, you know, we hit that 1 trillion number in digital dollars, you can build a very scalable business that with hundreds of millions of revenues a year on top of crypto rails alone. And that's a similar moment, inflection moment where crypto native businesses will just not even think about TradFi, just like Facebook didn't really think about anything outside of the internet.

• 40:10Tom Bilyeu?

  Okay.

• 40:11Speaker 01

  So it's a weird world to think about. There's no way I could have predicted Facebook in the 90s that it would be such a huge, you know, thing and own no assets at all, right? Like Facebook is just a social graph. In fact, right? Like it's just data. So.

• 40:29Tom Bilyeu?

  Who would have thought the data would be so useful?

• 40:32Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 40:32Tom Bilyeu?

  So monetizable. That's the wild thing.

• 40:34Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 40:36Tom Bilyeu?

  Yeah, it's interesting. I had, do you know Brian Johnson of Do Not Die fame or Don't Die fame?

• 40:40Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 40:40Tom Bilyeu?

  The super optimizer. I had him on the show. I mean, this has got to be eight or nine years ago. And that was what we talked about. We didn't talk about not dying. We didn't talk about AI. We talked about him saying that data was like a right and people needed to own their own data. And I remember thinking, what? Like, why do you even want to talk about this? And obviously that ends up being like this super insanely impactful thing. So when I look at this, um, the sort of data idea that I see maybe years ahead of other people, just because I've, the more I've researched money and finance, the more angry that I've gotten. So my background, the speed run, I told you a little bit about it, did not grow up with money, came into wealth through entrepreneurship. Uh, in that transition, realized I knew how to make money, but I didn't understand money itself. I certainly didn't know how to invest it.

• 41:24Tom Bilyeu?

  And so as I started learning about that, to try to help people during COVID, blah, blah, blah. You end up going down a rabbit hole of understanding that when people say money makes the world go around, they're, they're really glossing over something that's kind of terrifying that right now, because we've created this global K-shaped economy, people can feel, but they don't necessarily understand what's driving it. So. When I think about, oh, we've got this libertarian leaning ideology that's pushing people to put control of money back in the hands of people, I go, that is transformational because people don't understand the reason you can't make ends meet right now is precisely because bankers and

• 42:04Tom Bilyeu?

  politicians understand how to create an extractive system where they run deficits, print money like crazy, use the hidden tax of inflation to confiscate wealth, and then only the people that understand asset ownership are protected. And since they all understand asset ownership, they're like, meh, I don't mind. And so the bottom essentially falls out of the world every so often, which is what we're living through right now. But my maybe overly optimistic eye is as we move towards a world that's built on cryptocurrency, now it's like you get to choose what currency would you like to be in? And if you go into one like a Bitcoin or something like that, that can't

• 42:49Tom Bilyeu?

  be inflated, now you at least have that hedge. I think the big problem is people just can't build the new mental model. So it's like the generations that grew up with fiat, they're kind of screwed. But generations that grow up where it's like, yeah, this is just how money works. They don't have to understand like shadow banking and all that stuff. They can just be like, oh, I put my money in this one. It can't be inflated. Yay. Now I can actually save my way to prosperity. I don't have to invest my way to prosperity, which is the game that's being played right now. Do you think I'm overblowing it? Is that delusional? Never thought about it?

• 43:25Speaker 01

  I think I'm a super optimist. I think if all our problems are money problems, we're truly blessed.

• 43:32Tom Bilyeu?

  Wow.

• 43:33Speaker 01

  Because I think money is virtual, like Bitcoin is virtual. It is just data, right? If you double the amount of Bitcoin in a world, the world's not any wealthier, right? Like I create more Bitcoin networks, it's not marginally wealthier, but not really as if I like double the number of Teslas in the world, you can measurably say, we have more stuff now, there's more stuff per person, there's twice as many people have fully autonomous cars, I can't kill somebody. It's all good things, right? But doubling the fiat is just a Value of exchange, it's just super virtual thing. It sucks when we don't have contestable markets and there is middlemen that can extract

• 44:14Speaker 01

  that value without ever being challenged. I think that's where you start getting these hidden tax that drains the rest of the economy. The vampire squid, that that part is bad. Vampire squid? This is what? I've never heard that before. Oh, this is the the meme of what to call Goldman Sachs, the vampire squid or whatever. Just because it's tentacles everywhere and extracting every turn. But like, I think if it's contestable, if you can go and bid against their business and charge less, then you start converge at a value that that's appropriate to whatever service they're providing. I think that that part is good. So I think what like how I think of store of value, I think is actually, I've, I mean,

• 44:59Speaker 01

  I've gotten in trouble on Twitter for saying this, but if you look at the Intelligent Investor book, store of value or commodities, they don't have, they're not investable instruments. You shouldn't actually be investing in them because they don't have any model that can show that they're going to actually build something like create more in the future. So there's no fundamentals upon which to base your investment, is that the answer? Exactly. So what the traditional fundamental valuation is called discount cash flow. So you look at the future and how much money this thing will make and think of your investment as if you're buying a hot dog stand. You're going to pay money, right, to own this physical

• 45:42Speaker 01

  thing and then you're going to sell hot dogs and the cost of materials and your profit margin should tell you how much you should invest in this particular hot dog stand over another one. It's very straightforward. Right? And if the hot dog stand doesn't sell any hot dogs, it'll make zero money and you've just bought a stand that maybe you can eat your own hot dogs, but that's about it, right? It's it's pretty much useless. But there's still reason, I think, for store value to exist. And for the reasons that you said, there is a lot of middlemen and a lot of these inefficiencies that are run by humans throughout all the stack, whether it's banking and even like private sector or public sector.

• 46:26Speaker 01

  That is effectively like Bitcoin can be a small hedge. And the example that I bring up is kind of unfortunate, but like just in my lifetime, you know, roughly 50 years, I've seen one superpower collapse. That was really bad. My family had to go through that and flee to come to America, right? In 91. So just based on my priors, there's 2% chance of a superpower collapse per lifetime. Right? That and when that happens, you got to take all your stuff in a suitcase and go somewhere else. And you need enough stuff to go restart your life. So you need something that you can sell somewhere else. And Bitcoin is very easy to sell somewhere else and also very easy to take in that environment.

• 47:11Speaker 01

  So without thinking of Bitcoin as an investment, I don't care what price it is. It's a natural kind of rule of thumb. I can put 2% of my wealth into Bitcoin. And if it drops, I put more in. If it goes up, I'm over insured. I don't think of it as an investment. It is effectively an insurance hedge. When the worst thing that happens where I actually have to flee because of my entire place where I'm living has collapsed to the point that it's like unlivable. Right? Take, take all my kids and go somewhere else. Right? And then I sell my Bitcoin there and I restart my life. So if you think of it that way, a store of value with the properties of Bitcoin that there's no essential third party that could ever prevent me selling it somewhere else.

• 47:55Speaker 01

  That it's, and that means that it's truly censorship resistant from an engineering first principles. Right? It relies on extreme redundancy of the internet, relies on cryptography. So nobody can mint extra Bitcoin. Nobody can run miners long enough to prevent me from selling it when I actually need to flee. All those properties that Bitcoin has because of its simplicity and the proof of work and all this stuff are actually like the right product properties. Like if you, if you're selling this insurance thing. How would you build it? You'd probably build a Bitcoin, right? And you're like, here's my insurance product for, you know, shit hitting the fan.

• 48:35Speaker 01

  Bitcoin is a very, very decent, like, very good implementation of it. I, you know, I'm not sure what I would change about it. So this is my bull, bull, bullish reason for store value Bitcoin to exist. My bearish reason is that it has no discount cash flows. There's no other way to price it fundamentally. But that's true about gold and it has 30 trillion market cap. So.

• 49:00Tom Bilyeu?

  Yeah. Gold has historically, if it's been issued by the bank, it's gotten just as abused as anything else. But gold from a trusted party is interesting because it inflates at sort of a roughly knowable rate of around 2% a year.

• 49:17Tom Bilyeu?

  But what I've come to understand about a store of value is in a world of fiat, which we have been in exclusively in the US since 1971.

• 49:30Tom Bilyeu?

  Empires always and forever will inflate the life out of the currency until it ultimately collapses. Like it, it's just, it repeats over and over in history. They can't stop themselves. You get a good run. I mean, you get like 150 ish years. So for most people, it's like, man, I don't really have to think about it until you do. And then all hell breaks loose. And for anybody paying attention to what's going on in Iran. That's what kicked this most recent round of unrest off was their currency started to hyperinflate, not technically hyperinflate like 50%. And so that's pretty bad and people are going to react. And I didn't take the time to verify this, but supposedly purchases of Bitcoin in Iran have like just a straight vertical line.

• 50:14Tom Bilyeu?

  Cause people suddenly realize, oh, wait a second, I don't control this currency. The government is doing policies that make bad things happen to this because it's not backed by anything. So once, if something's backed by the full faith of the government and the government is no longer full of faith, then it's like, poof, that thing no longer has value. And so while I get what you're saying about there's no business fundamentals to invest with, I don't think people.

• 50:43Tom Bilyeu?

  Certainly, people do not always invest based on that. Oftentimes, I think investing is people fleeing the stability of a currency. And so, or instability, they're trying to get out of the fact that you can inflate a fiat currency, get into the stock market, art, gold, whatever. Because they're like, well, there's a far more limited supply of this and my money is likely to hopefully grow, outpace inflation, and now I've got a way to get out of the problem of the fiat currency. Because I look at the stock market today and I'm just like, none of this is about business fundamentals. None. And once you have a entire market that's not about business fundamentals, something else is happening.

• 51:27Tom Bilyeu?

  And to me, it's, you've got people that realize, oh, they're going to print more money. And because they're going to print more money, my dollars are going to devalue. So I've got to go somewhere and so I'm going to go into the stock market. But because there's a finite number of things in the stock market, just to pick one asset class, then it goes up in value because there's more money being printed. And then, like you said earlier, value is not actually going up. But when you relate it to dollars, because there's more people chasing it, the same number of things, the price appears to go up. So I'm less, I think, tense about the fact that crypto as yet another asset class that people are investing in

• 52:10Tom Bilyeu?

  that isn't tied to business fundamentals. It doesn't have as good of a cover story, I will give you that. But I look at the stock market and go, nah, it's largely a cover story. The fact that there are businesses that underpin it. Does that seem crazy?

• 52:27Speaker 01

  Yeah, I would push back on that a bit.

• 52:31Speaker 01

  I think.

• 52:33Speaker 01

  US corporations are really good at producing products. Like, I think they produce the best products and actually really rapid adopters of adopters of new technologies. A lot of the problems right now is like, we're kind of in this weird. There's definitely a recession going on, but there is accelerated growth in like a very particular segment, which is like AI data centers and kind of Mag7 adopting it as fast as they can. Like always, right? You got the, your only free lunch in finance is a perfect hedge, just like hedging diversification. I wouldn't put any eggs in one basket.

• 53:13Tom Bilyeu?

  Not even Solana?

• 53:14Speaker 01

  Yeah, no. This is my, my advice to everyone is read about like Intelligent Investor and like Kelly Portfolio Management and all this stuff and like, think through the, those problems of what each asset class you're investing in, what that serves. Do the, do the smart thing. But if you're a professional investor, the only way that you make these outsized returns is if you do this, you don't do that. You actually don't diversify and you make a big investment in something that is a contrarian bet that is underpriced by the market massively. But that is what professional, that's their job, right? And the winner lose, right?

• 53:55Speaker 01

  And they most crash out, some make a fortune and become legends.

• 54:01Tom Bilyeu?

  Yeah. Yeah, it's interesting. I think that the world probably shares your view more than mine. I think that mine is more accurate right now, but I'll ask, do you think that the, going back to your hot dog stand analogy, do you think the AI justifies the price that people are paying?

• 54:22Speaker 01

  It's, my, my guess is just like the internet, it's both overpriced and underpriced. Like, I think.

• 54:28Tom Bilyeu?

  Meaning if you knew who the winners were going to be?

• 54:31Speaker 01

  And the time scale, like, I think it is like mind boggling of how fast the progress is just from a year ago, if you're a software engineer, how much of your work you can now do with AI, like, fully automated. And how much scientific work you can do with it is, is like growing exponentially. So we're going to see, I think, some really weird things happening over the next five years, like in terms of like acceleration of. Like product development, like software boring stuff. Yeah, but I think the fact that you can take a paper that somebody published and vast majority of scientific work is software. Like you have to go simulate and do a bunch of stuff, just spit out the code that implements it exactly and then integrate into your product.

• 55:17Speaker 01

  Is like, it's crazy how fast that is. So.

• 55:22Speaker 01

  The overpriced thing is that like, like you said, we printed a lot of money since 2008, like 14 trillion, according to the Fed or something like that.

• 55:33Tom Bilyeu?

  It's wild.

• 55:33Speaker 01

  And that's sloshing around the system. And now it's shooting itself out into all of these like AI company investments. And they're building tons and tons of data centers. They're buying all the GPUs they can. My, sure, all of that stuff is maybe overpriced by a factor of two to 10, some small constant. But the wealth that was actually going to be created over the next 10 to 20 years should be way higher than that. So it's just kind of like 2001.com crashed. It took Microsoft 15 years to get back to the same valuation.

• 56:11Speaker 01

  And now I think they're 10, 10x that. So like this is kind of, cycles are much, much faster, but my, my gut expectation is that. Yeah, there's an AI bubble. It's going to crash and there's going to be a recovery and the value created is going to be 10 times more than the peak.

• 56:29Tom Bilyeu?

  Yeah, it's interesting. So to me.

• 56:31Speaker 01

  It's just, nobody knows when the crash is coming.

• 56:33Tom Bilyeu?

  Very true, very true. You're absolutely right about that. My thing is if you're looking at it and you know, whatever, whether you use Warren Buffett, whether you use the Kelly's Smart Investor or whatever.

• 56:50Tom Bilyeu?

  They're all going to give you numbers that are completely unrelated to the numbers that you will actually see. Like XAI, I think raised money at like 150x. That means 150 years.

• 57:00Speaker 01

  Yep.

• 57:01Tom Bilyeu?

  Worth of today's revenue.

• 57:02Speaker 01

  Yep.

• 57:02Tom Bilyeu?

  Is what you're pulling forward. That's wild. It's certainly historic. It's a historic.

• 57:07Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 57:07Tom Bilyeu?

  Like you're not. Not going to see gains like that. So my gut instinct is partly people are just excited. They really believe that the technology is going to be that transformative.

• 57:17Speaker 01

  And they don't have any other option.

• 57:18Tom Bilyeu?

  That's my next one. You gotta go somewhere because the currency is being inflated. You've got to find the gains. So the wild thing to me is, I'm curious how you think through this. Does everybody just think that they're smart enough to pick the winners? Are they going wide? Or are they just like, nah, in 20 years, I know it'll be fine and I don't need the money right now?

• 57:39Speaker 01

  I mean, like, I think it's a mix of they're managing other people's money and they're

• 57:46Tom Bilyeu?

  Different calculus?

• 57:47Speaker 01

  Right? So they they get paid two on 20, no matter what happens, right? They get paid less if it goes down, but right, they're managing other people's money and there's a lot of it. And the only alternatives are treasuries and investing in markets that you otherwise would, like maybe China. You can't because there's other risks there. It's just you may never be able to access it because they don't have this kind of property rights that you do in the West. So out of out of the places that you have property rights, like the Western world, your amount of investable stuff is limited. I think for large part is why crypto has been successful is that you can trust it anywhere in the world.

• 58:31Speaker 01

  You don't trust the property rights of, you know, your county, keeping track of your houses.

• 58:39Speaker 01

  It's crazy. That's just a county office. They have a blockchain on paper that tracks who owns what house and it just works.

• 58:49Tom Bilyeu?

  For the most part.

• 58:50Speaker 01

  It works like for extremely reliably and you don't have that globally because we can't trust the county in somewhere else, right? Like that.

• 59:01Speaker 01

  It's funny how that works, right? So I think a lot of the financial system we have right now, kind of these astronomical numbers, yeah, they're scary. There's a lot of debt between these companies. It's very circular. That could all unwind really quickly and suddenly. But, you know, the, it's all seems goofy, except that the difference between this and the Soviet Union is that the actual data centers are being built. There's actual physical stuff that with GPUs that consumes energy and churns out intelligence. Those exist. No matter what the numbers in the stock market do, those things are real, right? They're physically real and people are using them.

• 59:45Speaker 01

  And that's the actual wealth that's being created and the actual input like flywheel that's spitting up the economy. So even if we'll see a crash and we might, we might not, you can look at the outputs and see those things being produced. And I think that part is unprecedented, the amount of energy that is required to build these things and the amount of energy that's being turned on and the data centers and the silicon that's being made, that growth is like going bonkers. So no matter what happens with the numbers, I think why the USSR failed is they, they would complete a four-year plan in five years, but nothing was built. That's one way to get ahead. So the numbers were real.

• 1:00:29Speaker 01

  They would put them in the ledger and publish them, but the physical thing didn't exist. Here we have fake numbers, maybe, probably, but there is actually real stuff that's being built. And I mean, I don't wish anybody to be in the wrong side of that trade. That sucks, right? That could be ruining to people's lives and it is oftentimes. But I think the, the reason why America has been so successful is that we end up building things faster than anyone else.

• 1:00:58Tom Bilyeu?

  That's it for part one. Make sure you are subscribed so you do not miss part two coming up soon.

• 1:01:07Tom Bilyeu?

  Let's talk about a pattern that is guaranteed to be killing your progress. You know what you need to do. You need consistent nutrition. We all do. You need vitamins, probiotics, greens. We all know that we should be doing more of it. When your morning gets chaotic, you skip it. When you travel, you skip it. When your routine breaks, everything tends to break and that inconsistency compounds against you every single day. AG1 is designed to solve the execution problem. One scoop, eight ounces of water and you're done. You're getting 75 plus ingredients, vitamins and minerals, pre and probiotics, nutrient dense superfoods, everything that used to require six, seven different supplements and perfect

• 1:01:48Tom Bilyeu?

  planning now happens in one drink that takes about 30 seconds to make. Right now, AG1 is giving you $87 worth of free gifts with your first subscription. You get a welcome kit, travel packs, vitamin D3 plus K2 and flavor samples. Click the link in the show notes or visit drinkag1.com/impact to claim this offer.