Pod Insights How I Invest with David Weisburd E180: How J.P. Morgan Asset Management Picks Winners in VC & Private Equity About this episode What does it take to allocate billions in private markets—and what sets a top-tier LP apart?
In this episode, I speak with Patrick Miller, Executive Director and Portfolio Manager of J. P. Morgan Asset Management’s Private Equity Group, where he plays a central role in their alternatives platform, investing across venture capital and private equity. Patrick shares how a single energizing meeting with a Florida-based venture capitalist sparked his interest in the asset class and how his team has since built a differentiated barbell strategy combining legacy tier-one firms and new emerging managers.
We dive into what LPs can do to truly add value to GPs, why fund size and ownership matter, how AI is shifting capital dynamics, and what makes a venture firm truly “differentiated.”
Whether you're a founder, a new VC, or an allocator, this episode is full of real LP insights from one of the most thoughtful voices in the game.
Transcript Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:00 David Weisburd? Patrick, I've been excited to chat. Welcome to the How to Invest podcast.
0:04 Speaker 01 Great. Thank you, David. Happy to be here.
0:05 David Weisburd? So tell me about the story about how you got into allocating into venture capital funds.
0:10 Speaker 01 It was really one meeting that I had with a particular venture capitalist who is based in Florida that we currently work with. I left that meeting genuinely feeling energized and I knew I wanted to spend more time focused on this particular asset class. It wasn't his network that necessarily wowed me. While it is impressive, many venture capitalists have great networks, but it was the the value he created for people, whether he was an investor or not, which impressed me the most. And I asked myself, how can I do this from the role of an LP that is different from others? Right? It's how can I be additive to JP Morgan's private equity team in helping
0:54 Speaker 01 getting access to these differentiated opportunities? You know, it's expected from our managers that they will add value to the underlying portfolio companies. But how can I do that from an LP perspective? Will that put us in a better position to get access to some of the best new and emerging firms? And, you know, those are the type of questions that I think about quite a bit.
1:14 David Weisburd? How can LP go about adding value to GP?
1:19 Speaker 01 So I think it depends on the LP. And I recently had dinner with Patrick O'Shaughnessy, where we sat down and talked about this topic for a while. Number one, venture capitalists want long-term partnerships. Venture is not an asset class that you want to trade in and out of. Think of the companies that were created in times of volatility. Airbnb in 2008, now an $85 billion company, right? Uber, Venmo, both founded in 2009.
1:50 Speaker 01 We don't think you should trade in and out of venture and our general partners want stability in who their LP base is. The second is institutional experience. Our team has been investing in venture capital for 40 plus years. We have tremendous experience investing across multiple market cycles. We've seen multiple firm transition. We've been valuable members of LPAC boards. You know, we currently sit on over 215 boards across our platform. Within our experience, investing in venture capital, we have seen a lot and we can help provide best practices for these firms.
2:31 Speaker 01 And the third, and probably the most important, is introductions to LPs or other industry leaders. Who are some of the other LPs that we know that have unique insights or unique and differentiated access? How can they add value to their firm? You know, is their skill set additive in what you're currently focused on? We recently introduced one of our partners to a podcast to help raise awareness to the firm and really build their brand, right? So we really want to be partners with these GPs.
3:04 David Weisburd? The first value add aspect, I could summarize as steady hands. So in the, in the times when the market goes down, and it always goes down, those LPs are least likely to withdraw because of their institutional knowledge on the performance of asset class.
3:21 Speaker 01 That's right. I mean, we've seen swings, you know, hear a lot about valuations and that will dictate your investment, but we're also very focused on the early stage. Majority of our investments are focused on seed, series A. You know, it's a much steadier median valuation year over year than what you'll see in series C, D, et cetera.
3:42 David Weisburd? The way that people talk about asset classes is as if. You have to invest at one valuation to a certain NASA class. In other words, venture capital, early stages, always investing at a 20 million valuation or Series A is always at a 50 million. But in reality, it's supply and demand. It's just a matter of how much demand is going into the market and how many companies are there? And that dictates whether it's a good or not market.
4:05 Speaker 01 At the earliest stage, I like to say innovation does not care about valuation. Right? If the valuation of a seed, let's say a seed round is $20 million or $25 million, it ultimately doesn't matter if that company is a billion dollar company. Right? It's going to be wildly successful. Right? And so that's the reason why we don't like to trade in not a venture. We like to be very focused on the early stage, you know, and back venture capitalists who have great relationships with the next best founder.
4:36 David Weisburd? In 2024, the top 30 funds raised roughly 75% of the entire venture ecosystem. You're investing in emerging managers. Why is that?
4:46 Speaker 01 We are bullish on a handful of new and emerging managers, some not necessarily emerging, but smaller managers. Our venture capital strategy is building a barbell approach. As you would imagine, JP Morgan has very longstanding relationships with tier one venture firms that we all know of. These firms have tremendous resources and capabilities. They have a long track record of backing some of the most prominent companies in the world, whether it's a Meta, Uber, Stripe, Databricks, Scale AI, which was recently in the news at the various, very earliest stage. Again, they have deep teams, they have a playbook that continues to work and experience that
5:30 Speaker 01 generates that pattern recognition needed to continue to get access to great companies. I don't think that's going to change, and I think they're going to continue to get good access. With that said, the industry is constantly evolving, and we believe that there are some new firms that have raised smaller funds and proven the ability to get unique access. And in many cases, we're finding that some of these firms are investing alongside some of these tier one or multi-stage firms, but at a much smaller fund size. And at the end of the day, in venture, Fund size and ownership matter, right? And so what we found interesting about some of these smaller funds is if you look at the ownership relative to fund size,
6:16 Speaker 01 an LP can have a greater return, you know, being a smaller investor in a smaller fund than a larger investor in a large fund. And so we think as these funds become larger, they're going to be more reliant on having a higher hit rate in their underlying portfolio company, which is possible because given what I told you before, or be reliant on outsized returns. And as of the end of last year, there was 1,230 unicorns, but just 48 decker corns. It's much harder to hit that $10 billion mark where some of these funds could be more reliant on going forward.
6:53 David Weisburd? And the model for the smaller funds is one investment returns the fund and then everything's gravy on top. You get to your three, four X net. What's the model for these large managers, the $10 billion plus venture capital firms?
7:09 Speaker 01 I would expect a higher hit rate of success where they're getting access to the fastest growing leaders of the industry, but they're coming in at the series A and series B rather than the series, rather than the seed round. So ultimately, I think they're more reliant on having a higher hit rate than necessarily that one outsized return that is going to return the fund.
7:30 David Weisburd? It's kind of this breaking of this orthodox view in venture that it's all about the winners, the losers don't matter. They could all go to zero. That's been this kind of meme in the market. Now, as your fund gets bigger, yes, you want the fund returners, you want the outsized return, but also you want to lower your loss rate or increase your hit rate, two sides of the same coin, so that you could still get to a decent return for the rest of the portfolio.
7:55 Speaker 01 That's right. And again, we built this barbell approach where we really have both, right? And I think, I think our clients appreciate having exposure to both sides.
8:05 Speaker 01 You know, one trend that I am very interested in following over the next five to 10 years is what's going to happen to the earliest stage of venture capital compared to? Growth or opportunistic rounds. Seventy one percent of the venture dollars in Q1 went to companies focused on artificial intelligence. And what we have found, some of the earliest stages of AI companies is not only are they scaling very quickly, they're also doing it at a much more capital efficient level. Right. And so what does that look like to later stage or growth equity investing? If these companies no longer need to raise capital, raise their series C, raise their series D.
8:51 Speaker 01 You know, what's going to happen to those funds? And so again, I don't, I don't have an answer for you. It's something I think about. But today we are seeing companies scale and in some cases become profitable at earlier stages than we have historically.
9:06 David Weisburd? One well-known example of this is Mid Journey. They've raised zero outside dollars, less valued at $10 billion. So it's these second order effects of, okay, so you have these AI efficiencies. What happens to the rest of the capital stack? And many ways it could also become bifurcated in that you only raise one or two rounds in order to get scale. And then at some point, money itself becomes a moat and you might want to raise a billion dollars. So it's like you raise five to 10 million dollars at early stage and then raise a billion dollars later stage to scale.
9:39 Speaker 01 That's exactly right. And so I just, it's something I'm starting to think about pretty regularly. And I think it's why we remain very focused on seed and series A. Make sure we're getting exposure to these type of companies as before they scale rapidly.
9:54 David Weisburd? There's a University of Chicago study that found that 52% of top quartile venture capital funds persist, meaning 52% of them end up in the 25th, top 25th percentile again. So. When you look at the emerging side of the market, it's not as studied frankly as the persistence of top firms. What data or what information do you point to that gives you conviction that emerging managers will outperform?
10:22 Speaker 01 It's a great question and something we think about obviously often. When I look at emerging managers today, you know, we have now over 3,000 venture capital funds in the US. I think it's going to be pretty difficult for many of them. Today, we're in an environment where we see a tremendous amount of spin outs from large tier one multi-stage firms that want to go on their own. Some of these might have less proven track records. And we're also seeing a number of operators or former founders who maybe have been doing some angel investing, but now want to build a career and build their venture capital firm. And we've obviously seen very successful venture firms start from that type of background,
11:06 Speaker 01 whether it be A16Z or COSLA or First Round. I think the key question for us is very simply, are you differentiated? Do you have a differentiated skill set that makes you unique? Right? Do you have a strategy that is complementary to the current lineup of venture capital managers that we currently work with? I think there's a lot more to it than just looking at, what is the TVPI? What is the DPI? Again, because that can be subjective. And then I think another key question is, why do founders want to work with you? What value can you bring to them? How are you going to win that deal? There's really three things that we really look at
11:50 Speaker 01 under this differentiated umbrella. I would say it's either a very deep and differentiated technical expertise. It is a differentiated network to access the best companies, or it is a differentiated strategy?
12:04 David Weisburd? Which one is the most important?
12:05 Speaker 01 I would say a differentiated network is probably the most important at the earliest stage. I think it's also the toughest to differentiate because many of these venture funds or venture firms have tremendous networks, right? And so figuring out who is differentiated from the others tougher. But when you find it, you know.
12:26 David Weisburd? Tell me about a couple of managers that you've recently backed and what made you say yes?
12:31 Speaker 01 The first is a differentiated strategy. So we recently backed a new and emerging residency program based in San Francisco. The team had built a solid brand and had a good track record of attracting repeat founders to attend this residency. The model is great. They're able to acquire a meaningful ownership percentage of each of the company at the earliest stage at a sub $5 million market cap. And then they leverage their founder and operator network in Silicon Valley to help scale that company. The company comes, lives with them for 10 weeks. All they do is build. They look to eliminate any distractions and then put on a well-attended demo day
13:15 Speaker 01 that has attracted many top venture capital firms to attend that.
13:21 Speaker 01 Interesting about that is most of the founders who have attended this residency are repeat founders.
13:27 David Weisburd? One thing that I've learned from talking to hundreds of investors, founders and business leaders is that planning for the future isn't just about growing assets. It's also about protecting the people who matter most. Life comes with a lot of important milestones. Maybe you're buying a home, starting a family, planning for college, or simply thinking more intentionally about your financial future. As those responsibilities grow, it's worth making sure you protect those you love. Not sure what kind of life insurance you may need? Concerned about how much it may cost? Think life insurance is too complicated? Your local State Farm agent can help answer those questions. They can help you explore your options for life insurance and choose coverage that you can adjust as your family's needs change over time. Financial protection for your loved ones when it matters most. Learn more about life insurance at StateFarm.com. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.
14:12 Speaker 01 And as you'd imagine, when I first heard about it, I was surprised by that, right? You would think that repeat founders wouldn't need to attend that residency. But I think they found that model to be differentiated and the value that they've been providing to be very meaningful.
14:31 Speaker 01 The second example is a differentiated network. We recently backed a team that referenced incredibly well from our existing tier ones. We actually met this venture capitalist through a reference call from one of our other venture managers. This firm is not an emerging manager, but is very focused on the seed and early-stage venture capital market and has a great track record. So interestingly, his graduation rate from seed to Series A was two times better than the industry average. And notably, he has 75 companies across his platform that he's received follow-on financing from a very well-known, established, multi-stage venture capital firm.
15:16 Speaker 01 And as one of our references from one of these tier one funds said, when you see a deal come from this particular firm that they're going out to raise their Series A, you stop what you're doing because it's probably something you want to look at.
15:32 Speaker 01 And the third is a differentiated technical expertise. And so think about AI today, and I believe that AI is a generational technology. In the 90s, it was the internet. In the 2000s, it was mobile. AI is that of today. I think we're at the early stages of AI. We've seen it, we've read about it. It's really changing the world. And so we backed an emerging manager who was really at the forefront of this technology. One partner at this firm was an early employee at OpenAI. She is credited for helping writing, to write the code for ChatGPT.
16:14 Speaker 01 And the other partner was the founder of FAIR, which is Facebook's Artificial Intelligence Research Team. You know, certainly one of the first employees focused on AI at Facebook or now Meta. You know, these people are very technical. They understand the technology well, and you can see a clear reason why a founder focused in this area would would want them on the cap table.
16:37 David Weisburd? And all three of these cases, you have a team that's very attractive to a certain type of entrepreneur that's picking them. Because essentially, at the early stage with the hot deals, it's actually the founders that choose the VCs, not the VCs choosing the founders.
16:54 Speaker 01 That's right. For the hottest deals in venture, they're gonna, you know, these founders are gonna be able to take their pick for which venture fund that they want to work with. And so we think it's very important that one of these skill sets will be able to prevail and and that they'll be able to get access to the deal.
17:13 David Weisburd? And on your team, you also invest in private equity managers. What do you look for in private equity managers?
17:19 Speaker 01 Private equity is really the backbone of our investment capabilities. We deploy about $3 billion a year in private equity across primary investments, co-investments, secondary investments. We are very focused on the small to mid-market. There's a number of reasons why we like this. First is the opportunity set. 90% of US private companies have revenues between $10 to $100 million. That is a pretty large pond for us to fish in and find unique deals. There's also much less competition on this end of the market. And so we're often seeing much more attractive purchase price multiples.
17:58 Speaker 01 You know, we're currently seeing deals anywhere in the nine to 13 times range, sometimes, sometimes cheaper. You know, depending on obviously sector and and growth. We're not looking to financially engineer returns. We're looking to Really create value through operational enhancement, right? And so we're partnering with sector experts to do just that. Historically, companies would exit by either going through an IPO or they'd be sold to a strategic. But if you look at the private market, private equity industry today, you know, there's over a trillion dollars of dry powder in the US private market alone.
18:40 Speaker 01 And so we have seen this trend of larger private equity funds coming down market and acquiring companies across, across our platform to use as their initial investment. And so, you know, interestingly, we've had four different companies recently sold on our platform. And I know that, you know, you read about how clients talk about the lack of liquidity in the market, but you know, we continue to see a meaningful amount of liquidity across our platform. In fact, distribution activity through June 1st is up about 23% year over year. And so again, this end of the market, we think you can really deliver meaningful upside performance.
19:21 David Weisburd? Shouldn't you like sector specialists in private equity? What other characteristics are you looking for from the managers that you end up investing in, in private equity?
19:32 Speaker 01 So private equity is certainly much different than venture capital. There's much, there's certainly much more of a flywheel that you're able to implement on the private equity side compared to venture. I understand in venture, you want to add value and that's something we're very focused on. But in private equity, there's, you know, sector experts who have a right to win in their particular field and they're able to stick to that flywheel. So you're really able to, from a, from a manager perspective, do much more work on the underlying team and process. And a track record really drives a lot of future success.
20:09 David Weisburd? Thank you for listening. To join our community and to make sure you do not miss any future episodes, please click the follow button above to subscribe. What's the highest leverage thing that they're doing? Is it implementing management teams? Is it executing playbooks? What exactly are they doing?
20:23 Speaker 01 It's people. I think one of the biggest things that I've learned across private equity and venture is people drive performance. Right. And so it's finding the best people to back. It's finding the best people to hire.
20:34 David Weisburd? Just to contrast, people versus what? It's people versus advice. So it's not the private equity fund sitting down and saying, let me tell you about my experiences. Here's a person that's running from 10 to 100 million. Here's a salesperson that's running from 10 to 100 million. That's higher leverage than trying to coach up essentially somebody that's never done it before.
20:55 Speaker 01 Absolutely. A lot of these private equity funds, they're sector experts, right? And they've partnered with operators and they've seen these operators work before. And in many cases, have a track record of success. Right. And so if they're investing in a new company, a similar company, in many cases, they'll bring a the same or former operator into this company to execute the same playbook. And so they've seen this before and they know how to do that.
21:19 David Weisburd? You've been at JP Morgan now for over a decade. What one piece of advice would you give Patrick starting out 10 years ago that you could maybe whisper in his ear? What lessons would you want him to have earlier on in his career?
21:34 Speaker 01 Find a, find a good mentor. That's probably the best advice that I would give anyone. Whether they're starting their career or starting in a new role in private equity or venture or any role. But finding a good mentor is probably the most important.
21:51 Speaker 01 Most important advice I could give.
21:52 David Weisburd? How do you find a good mentor?
21:54 Speaker 01 What you need to do is you need to show some initiative, right? I mean, I think you want to show initiative about his or her career. I think you want to get to know them as a person. And then at the end of the day, I think you want to ask them to work with them. You know, I've been very fortunate enough on our team where I have a number of different mentors and I, I won't name them because I'll miss, I'll miss, I'll miss a name and I'll hear about it. But I've been very fortunate to be mentored by a number of portfolio managers and you know, for me, I, I think it's important to.
22:26 Speaker 01 To be bold, I think it's important to ask them for guidance. I think it's important to ask them about their career and I think it's important to ask them about what their lessons they've learned that they can pass down to the next generation of people. And I would tell people, try to create value for this person before they ask for it, right? I think that would really go a long way in developing a good working mentor, mentee relationship with whoever that might be.
22:53 David Weisburd? Patrick, what would you like our listeners to know about you, about your team at JP Morgan, or anything else you'd like to share?
22:59 Speaker 01 I'm certainly always open and willing and wanting to connect with people. I think having a large network and a growing network is very important for everyone's career. And so I'm happy to connect with anyone for that matter. So feel free to reach out.
23:16 David Weisburd? Thank you, Patrick, and looking forward to continuing the conversation live very soon.
23:20 Speaker 01 Great. Thanks, David.
23:21 David Weisburd? Thanks for listening to my conversation. If you enjoyed this episode, please share with a friend. This helps us grow. Also provides the very best feedback when we review the episode's analytics. Thank you for your support.
Previous E179: How UCLA's Endowment Wins in Private Equity w/Deputy CIO Michael Marvelli Next E181: Why Portfolio Construction Beats Manager Selection w/$7 Billion CIO Page updated November 3, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated