Think Like a Child (Rebroadcast)

When it comes to generating ideas and asking questions it can be really fruitful to have the mentality of an eight year old.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern New Hampshire University. There's no hiding how convenient Southern New Hampshire University makes college. They offer over 80 career-focused graduate programs online. Classes have no set meeting times, so you can balance life and learning, and online tuition rates are some of the lowest in the country, making it all a little more manageable. A school this willing to work with you is worth the investment. Visit snhu.edu/freakonomics to learn more. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Progressive. Whoever says saving money is hard doesn't know that new customers who bundle and save with Progressive save hundreds, because switching your home and auto insurance is better than cutting down on the things you love, like those iced lattes that help you get ready

• 0:46Stephen J. Dubner?

  to face the day. So switch your home and auto to Progressive and see if you could save and keep sipping away. Get your quote today at progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by hotels.com. Hotels.com helps you find and book the right stay for work faster. With business preferences, save your travel must haves, like gym access or breakfast, just once, then get tailored results whenever you search for work travel. Plus, with a free membership, you can save up to 20% on hotels and earn rewards on every stay for future travel. Book now at hotels.com.

• 1:30Stephen J. Dubner?

  Visit hotels.com for details. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work is a new way to work in ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work can pull info from across your apps and connect to your tools to help you create finished work. You can even automate work in ChatGPT with the Scheduled Tasks feature, and the whole time, you stay in control. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chatgpt.com by selecting Work Mode, available on Plus and Pro plans.

• 2:16Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hello, podcast listeners. This is Stephen Dubner. On May 5, Steve Levitt and I are publishing a new book. It's called When to Rob a Bank and 131 Other Warped Suggestions and Well-Intended Rants. It is, how shall I say this, the best book in the history of the printed word. Can't promise there wasn't something better before Gutenberg, but, well, my point is, you should probably read it. So find the pause button on this podcast and go order When to Rob a Bank. Go ahead, I'll wait. Waiting, waiting, waiting. By the way, if you want to learn more about the book or keep up with our media appearances for the book, just go to Freakonomics.com or keep up with us on Twitter, Facebook.

• 3:01Stephen J. Dubner?

  Waiting. Okay, welcome back. Now, as for today's podcast, it is called Think Like a Child. We originally put this one out last year, but given how busy your life is, I'm guessing even if you heard it back then, you will have forgotten everything about it. And next week, we'll be back with a brand-new episode. And if you decide, based on the advice in our new book, When to Rob a Bank, to actually rob a bank, let us know how that worked out. We do accept collect calls from prison.

• 3:39Stephen J. Dubner?

  On today's program, we begin with a magic show. Because if there's ever a medium that's made for magic, it's radio, right?

• 3:49Speaker 01

  Hey, guys, how you doing?

• 3:50Stephen J. Dubner?

  The magician's name is Alex Stone.

• 3:53Speaker 01

  Okay, so I'm going to start out with something really simple. Maybe some of you have seen it, maybe you haven't, and then we'll go from there and maybe get a little more sophisticated and more complicated.

• 4:01Stephen J. Dubner?

  And the audience is kids, a bunch of middle schoolers from IS318 in Brooklyn.

• 4:06Speaker 01

  I don't know if you've seen this or not, but I'm just going to take a handkerchief here. Do you want to check it out? Make sure it's normal, nothing weird. I only blew my nose in it like just once. Ah, it's okay.

• 4:17Stephen J. Dubner?

  With the thumb of his right hand, Stone stuffs a handkerchief into his left hand, and then...

• 4:23Speaker 01

  Watch.

• 4:24Stephen J. Dubner?

  Yeah, you've seen this before.

• 4:25Speaker 01

  It's gone.

• 4:26Stephen J. Dubner?

  It disappears. But then, he reaches behind one kid's ear and pulls out the handkerchief.

• 4:32Speaker 01

  If I reach out, there it is. I think I can get it. I can catch it, see?

• 4:35Stephen J. Dubner?

  Did you feel that come out of your ear?

• 4:37Speaker 02

  Um, no.

• 4:39Stephen J. Dubner?

  Where did it come from?

• 4:41Speaker 02

  I don't know.

• 4:46Stephen J. Dubner?

  Now, they try to figure out the trick. Does anybody have any guesses? His sleeve. His sleeve?

• 4:53Speaker 01

  Sleeves are rolled up, okay?

• 4:55Stephen J. Dubner?

  What do you got?

• 4:55Speaker 03

  He probably has like, on his hand, he has like, a pocket that he clues it out.

• 5:01Speaker 01

  Guy's getting warmer now.

• 5:02Stephen J. Dubner?

  They get warmer?

• 5:02Speaker 01

  It's good thinking, that's the very-

• 5:03Stephen J. Dubner?

  And then they get hot.

• 5:04Speaker 04

  Something that involves your thumb?

• 5:07Speaker 01

  What's your name?

• 5:08Speaker 04

  Jennifer?

• 5:09Speaker 01

  Jennifer. Jennifer gets every- give everyone Jennifer a round of applause.

• 5:15Stephen J. Dubner?

  Stone reaches into his right front pants pocket-

• 5:18Speaker 01

  Check this out.

• 5:19Stephen J. Dubner?

  And pulls out-

• 5:20Speaker 01

  See that?

• 5:20Stephen J. Dubner?

  A fake thumb.

• 5:22Speaker 01

  Yeah, it's a fake thumb. It's called a thumb tip. It's one of the most valuable tools in magic. There's thousands of tricks you can do with it. And it's pretty darn obvious once you know it's there.

• 5:30Stephen J. Dubner?

  Man, very obvious. Now it looks like a sore thumb.

• 5:32Speaker 01

  But magicians even just to prove how no one knows, sometimes they'll do it with like a red one or a metal one. No one notices. You're not looking for a fake thumb, right? And that's how it works. And then it's gone, and then it's back just like that.

• 5:44Stephen J. Dubner?

  Now, we had also invited some adults to see this magic show. How well did they figure out the trick?

• 5:51Speaker 05

  I was with the sleeve theory, but clearly that's wrong.

• 5:54Speaker 06

  I was wondering if it could be related to the ring at all.

• 5:57Stephen J. Dubner?

  Oh, the ring?

• 5:58Speaker 01

  Totally way off.

• 5:59Stephen J. Dubner?

  Can we see the ring for a second?

• 6:01Speaker 01

  That's just, that's really the dumbest theory ever. That's so stupid. Go home.

• 6:06Stephen J. Dubner?

  So, we asked the kids why they seem to do better than the adults.

• 6:11Speaker 04

  I think kids could think out of the box.

• 6:13Speaker 07

  Maybe adults are more serious than kids. When you went to the adults, they didn't have any clue.

• 6:18Speaker 04

  Because they're focusing on the handkerchief instead of the thumb.

• 6:27Stephen J. Dubner?

  None of this was surprising to Alex Stone. He's seen it all before, and he says other magicians have too. If you are a magician and your life depends on fooling an audience of adults versus an audience of kids, you would choose the adults every time.

• 6:45Speaker 01

  There's a sense that when a kid watches a trick, they're asking a question every second. They're really approaching it with this sort of constant sense of curiosity and constant sense of sort of trying to understand what's going on. And I feel like their brains are just always awake when they're watching it.

• 7:05Stephen J. Dubner?

  All right, then, if kids tend to be more curious and more alert when it comes to magic, what about the rest of life? What about coming up with good ideas, even solving problems? Is it possible that we'd all be better off if we could think like a child?

• 7:31Speaker 08

  From WNYC, this is Freakonomics Radio, the podcast that explores the hidden side of everything. Here's your host, Stephen Dubner.

• 7:51Stephen J. Dubner?

  Steve Levitt is my Freakonomics friend and co-author. We have just published our third book together, Think Like a Freak. Hey, Levitt, what's your favorite chapter in Think Like a Freak?

• 8:04Speaker 09

  So I'm going to give you a childish answer to that question, which is that my second favorite chapter in the book is to think like a child, because most adults wouldn't answer any question by telling you what their second favorite thing is. But that's the kind of thing that a child might do all the time. And I think that the beauty of thinking like a child and the beauty of that chapter in our book is that sometimes doing things differently and simply and with a kind of joy and triviality leads you to a really special place that, as an adult, you don't get to go to very often.

• 8:43Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hey, Levitt, let's talk about some of what we label the characteristics of thinking like a child, like the good characteristics of thinking like a child that adults might want to smuggle into adulthood because they're productive. So thinking's small. So when adults think about problem solving, most of us kind of shy away from the little ones because we figure they won't look important or whatnot, and the big ones really need our help. So talk about the power of thinking small.

• 9:08Speaker 09

  I think there's a temptation to try to be something special and to take on a big problem, but it's actually getting into the realm of thinking about a tiny little question that maybe you could come up with an answer to, and maybe, once you learn the answer, would actually tell you about a lot of other things you might be interested, might be able to generalize. Actually, I'll tell you the best example I can think of of my own research of thinking small was the research we did on the bagel man.

• 9:42Stephen J. Dubner?

  The bagel man was a guy named Paul Feldman. He's a retired economist who started a business delivering bagels to different companies around Washington DC. He used an honor system payment setup, a wooden box with a slot where you'd put the money. In our first book, Freakonomics, we analyzed the bagel man's payment data and wrote up the findings, what the payment rates told us about honesty as it relates to the size of a company, time of year, company morale, things like that.

• 10:11Speaker 09

  And I'll never forget a seminar I gave at the University of Chicago where one of my colleagues, a really smart colleague, his name is Luigi Zingales, he came to the seminar and I said, I'm going to talk to you today about this guy who sold bagels. And he blurted out, oh, this is ridiculous. What could I possibly learn from one guy and what he does selling bagels? And I said, maybe you'll be surprised. Bear with me. And I have to say, at the end of the seminar, Luigi raised his hand and he said, I didn't think it was possible, but I actually think I learned something general from what you just taught me about the bagel man. And that was actually, I would say of all, I would say that ranked as one of the top 10 moments I've ever had in academics, because I really

• 10:52Speaker 09

  believed it was true that by thinking small, I had learned something from the bagel man and that others could too.

• 10:58Stephen J. Dubner?

  Something else that kids do is they will state facts or describe something that's pretty obvious. Whereas adults, we tend to think that, well, if it's obvious, it indicates that we aren't thinking very hard. Talk about the power of acknowledging the obvious.

• 11:13Speaker 09

  The best examples I've seen about stating the obvious have all come in a business context. So I'll Come in as an outside consultant and people in the company will think I'm the academic. I'm going to have these really complicated ideas and do complex econometrics. And really, the biggest values that I've ever added to firms comes usually in the first day I'm talking to them, when I know absolutely nothing. And I ask a question or make a statement which is so dumb and so obvious that no reasonable person could ever propose it. And a lot of times, it's because it is so obvious and people who have been doing it for so long can't, they think about it a different way. And it would be embarrassing. It would be embarrassing to ask the questions I ask.

• 11:57Speaker 09

  And a lot of times, it is embarrassing because it is such an obvious or dumb question. But every once in a while, it turns out that that obvious question is the absolute breakthrough. It's the thing that once you step back and look at it through the lens of a, in this case, a childlike ignorance, it opens you up to seeing what the truth is.

• 12:17Stephen J. Dubner?

  Okay, so Levitt, kids spend a lot of their time playing and otherwise having fun. Adults out of duty and out of necessity spend considerably less, at least most adults. What's the advantage of keeping your eye on fun or injecting fun in your work, even for something as, you know, serious-ish as public policy? Why is fun something that's underutilized or could be utilized better?

• 12:44Speaker 09

  Video games are fun. My son Nick, who's 11 years old, can play video games for eight hours straight. Could Nick work at a job, say at McDonald's, for eight hours? No. So it seems to me, what you take away from that is if you could make a job as fun as a video game, then you'd have all the 11-year-old boys in the world and probably the 15-year-old and 20-year-old, maybe even the 30-year-old boys lining up at your door trying to take that job. I think fun is so much more important than people realize. And I've seen it in academics. When I interview young professors and try and decide if we should hire them, I've evolved over time to one basic rule. If I think they love economics and it's fun for them, then I'm in favor of hiring them.

• 13:29Speaker 09

  And no matter how talented they seem otherwise, if it seems like a job... Or effort or work, then I don't want to hire them.

• 13:37Stephen J. Dubner?

  Well, persuade me that they won't just be nice to have around because they love fun, but that having fun at what you do actually makes you better or different in some way that's positive.

• 13:47Speaker 09

  Yeah, enjoying what you do, loving what you do, is such a completely unfair advantage for anyone you're competing with who does it as a job. Because people who love it, they go to bed at night thinking about the solutions. They wake up in the middle of the night and they jot down the ideas. They work weekends. It turns out that effort is a huge component of success in almost everything. We know that from practice and whatnot. And people who love things work and work and work at it because it's not work. It's fun. And so my strongest advice to young people trying to figure out what they want to do is I always tell them, try to figure out what you love. Okay? And especially something that you love that other people don't love. Sure, everyone wants to be a rock star. Everyone wants to be in the movies, but that's terrible. You don't want to compete head on. Find something.

• 14:32Speaker 09

  If you love ants, go study ants because no one else loves ants. And you'll have a big advantage over the people who are just studying ants because they can't think of what else to do.

• 14:41Stephen J. Dubner?

  The E.O. Wilson crush continues.

• 14:44Speaker 09

  Yeah, E.O. Wilson's a perfect. E.O. Wilson was one of my mentors in college. And indeed, that's what he did. He loved ants more than anything, and he became the world's greatest expert on ants. And he had a great career and not just success, but joy. He got true joy. I mean, that was the thing that inspired me about E.O. Wilson, even as he was in his 70s and his 80s, he loved what he did. He loved ants.

• 15:22Stephen J. Dubner?

  Coming up on Freakonomics Radio, if you're a scientist studying the way kids think, what do you learn?

• 15:29Speaker 10

  It's exactly the opposite of what we used to think is an easy way to describe it.

• 15:35Stephen J. Dubner?

  And what else can we learn from that magic show?

• 15:38Speaker 01

  With kids, you get this sense that at every step of the way, they're trying to understand it. And from the second they see it, they're always coming up with theories.

• 15:46Speaker 04

  You're listening to Freakonomics Radio. Freakonomics Radio.

• 16:05Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio, sponsored by Granola. You know that moment when a meeting ends and someone says, let's circle back on this next week, and everyone nods, but no one writes it down? Then next week rolls around and it's radio silence? That's why Granola exists. Granola is an AI-powered notepad built for the way real people actually meet. You take rough notes like you normally would, and in the background, Granola securely transcribes the meeting. Then it turns everything into clean, structured, actually useful notes when the meeting ends. And the best part? Granola works through your device's audio, which means it integrates seamlessly into the video conferencing tools you already use. No setup, no awkward bots. It's just your normal meeting with superpowers. If meetings are eating up your day, Granola is a no-brainer. You can try it totally free.

• 16:50Stephen J. Dubner?

  Just head to granola.ai/freakonomics. That's granola.ai/freakonomics to get your time back. Try it for free at granola.ai/freakonomics.

• 17:08Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Quince. You know those pieces in your closet that you find yourself wearing on repeat? The sweater that goes with everything? The perfect pair of pants? Or the tee you somehow always reach for first? Those are the pieces that make getting dressed easy, and that's what Quince does best. Quince focuses on high-quality wardrobe staples made with premium materials like 100% Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton, and merino wool. The styles are timeless, versatile, and designed to become the dependable pieces you reach for day after day. And it's not just clothing. Quince brings that same approach to everything they make, from hotel-quality bedding and bath to kitchen essentials and thoughtfully designed furniture. Find your next fall favorites at Quince.

• 17:51Stephen J. Dubner?

  Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers or go to quince.com/freak. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com/freak.

• 18:13Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern New Hampshire University. The best investments are the ones you make in yourself, and no one knows that better than Southern New Hampshire University. With more than 200 online degree programs, no set class times, and low online tuition, Southern New Hampshire University is built to fit your life today and set you up for success tomorrow. Education is an investment. Why not make it a smart one? Apply for free at SNHU.edu/freakonomics.

• 18:47Speaker 08

  From WNYC, this is Freakonomics Radio. Here's your host, Stephen Dubner.

• 19:00Stephen J. Dubner?

  You will remember at the start of this show that we brought in a magician to do some tricks for kids and adults.

• 19:06Speaker 01

  Well, my name is Alex Stone.

• 19:08Stephen J. Dubner?

  That's him.

• 19:09Speaker 01

  And I'm a journalist, author of a book on magic and science called Fooling Houdini, and a lifelong magic enthusiast and performer.

• 19:17Stephen J. Dubner?

  So on the scale of 1 to 10 of magic expertise, with me being a zero, let's say zero to 10, you're where? How good are you?

• 19:25Speaker 01

  Well, that's a sensitive question. A lot of magicians would get angry if I...

• 19:29Stephen J. Dubner?

  But I know that you're not that kind of magician.

• 19:32Speaker 01

  I'm probably somewhere in the 7.5 range, I think.

• 19:36Stephen J. Dubner?

  Very good, but not an all-time great, not a Hall of Famer.

• 19:40Speaker 01

  I mean...

• 19:41Stephen J. Dubner?

  But good.

• 19:42Speaker 01

  I know a lot about magic.

• 19:45Stephen J. Dubner?

  One thing that a magician does a lot, that you did a little bit today, is misdirection, right? So talk about that and how vulnerable kids are versus adults.

• 19:54Speaker 01

  Yeah, you know, what I find is that kids are better at paying attention to more than one thing. Their attention is more diffuse. Adults are really good at focusing on one thing and ignoring peripheral distractions, whereas kids are really good at sort of shotgunning their attention all over the place, which is a good way to learn. It's good when you're first learning how things work, when you're first exploring the world. But in magic, you really want the person to focus on one thing. You want to direct their attention to one particular thing so that they won't see what's going on in the shadows.

• 20:29Stephen J. Dubner?

  You want to seduce them so that you can trick them.

• 20:31Speaker 01

  Exactly. I think it's also that they're approaching it with this curiosity and it's just like this sponge-like desire and that they're always making theories. That's the other thing. I feel like, I don't feel like adults are like that. I sort of feel like they watch it and they're waiting for the punchline and then they sort of see it and then they maybe go back and think about it. With kids, you get this sense that at every step of the way, they're trying to understand it and from the second they see it, they're always coming up with theories. Oh, it was in his sleeve. Oh, he had a fake thing in his hand. And they come up with theories that adults just aren't doing that.

• 21:04Speaker 10

  You're much more likely to be able to manipulate adults' attention than you are to be able to manipulate children.

• 21:13Stephen J. Dubner?

  That's Alison Gopnik.

• 21:14Speaker 10

  I'm a professor of psychology and philosophy at the University of California at Berkeley.

• 21:19Stephen J. Dubner?

  Gopnik does not study magic. What does she study?

• 21:22Speaker 10

  Young children's minds, particularly how it is that young children can manage to learn as much as they do about the world as quickly as they do.

• 21:30Stephen J. Dubner?

  She's also written books about her research. The Philosophical Baby was one. The Scientist in the Crib was another. Gopnik's work reinforces what the magician Alex Stone told us, that children tend to see things fundamentally differently than adults.

• 21:46Speaker 10

  They're not very good, as we all know, at just focusing on one thing. They get distracted incredibly easily. They notice anything that's interesting or that changes or that they might learn from in their environment and that makes them more subjects of magic.

• 22:04Speaker 10

  When I wrote my book, I had a beautiful letter from someone who was actually a store detective. And he said, one of the things that he'd do was he'd perch up on top of a balcony, up on the top of the store floor, and then he'd look at what people were doing below him. And he said, what would happen is you'd see people walking along this floor and someone would be holding the hand of a three-year-old and then the three-year-old would look up and we'd see him on the balcony and would wave and say hello. And the adults never did that. It never even occurred to the adults to look up on the balcony and see what was there.

• 22:36Stephen J. Dubner?

  Can you summarize?

• 22:39Stephen J. Dubner?

  What we've learned and a little bit about how we've learned it, about how children think and especially establish things like causal understandings?

• 22:47Speaker 10

  Yeah, well, it's sort of easy. It's exactly the opposite of what we used to think is an easy way to describe it. So people used to think that children were illogical. And what we've discovered is that even little babies are capable of making logical deductions. A really dramatic one is that people have thought that even adults are terribly bad at understanding probability. Well, it turns out that babies and very young children, if you give them the problems in the right way, are actually amazingly good at doing probabilistic inference. Let me give you one more example. The conventional wisdom has been that children are egocentric and they can't take the perspective of other people. And one of the really dramatic things we've discovered is that, again, even infants are

• 23:30Speaker 10

  capable of figuring out what's going on in someone else's mind and figuring out how they think and feel about the world.

• 23:37Stephen J. Dubner?

  Okay, so you've given us a number of traits that children exhibit in much larger measure than we might have thought before. What about the ways in which the old wisdom was right? What are the ways in which children really are kind of a dormant or latent version at best of what they will become?

• 23:57Speaker 10

  Yeah, it's interesting. So the kind of conventional wisdom was really that children were sort of defective grownups. So they were grownups but missing pieces with bits that hadn't developed yet. But if you think about that from a biological or an evolutionary point of view, it doesn't really make a lot of sense. An alternative way that you might think about them is think of the kids as being like the research and development division of the human species. And we're adults, we're production and marketing. So from the production and marketing perspective, it might look like the R and D guys are really not doing anything that looks very sensible or useful. You know, sit around all day in their beanbag chairs, playing pong and having

• 24:38Speaker 10

  blue sky ideas. And we, poor production and marketing people who are actually making the profits, have to subsidize these guys. But of course, one of the things that we know is that that kind of blue sky, just pure research, actually pays off in the long run.

• 24:54Stephen J. Dubner?

  So I can imagine that an adult listening to you say these things would say, sure, that makes sense. That resonates with me. I believe that children have these traits in maybe a different shape or dimension than the traits I have. But I think it's probably hard for most adults to think about the idea that there are traits that are valued in adults that children may actually be better at than adults.

• 25:21Speaker 10

  Mm-hmm.

• 25:22Stephen J. Dubner?

  So tell me a little bit about that. Are there some that would fit that category?

• 25:25Speaker 10

  Part of the reason why we adults are really good at learning things quickly is because we already know a lot about the world. So when you look at how adults learn, the way that we typically learn is we take all those things that we've already learned and we already know, and they weigh really, really heavily in our decision making and in the kinds of solutions that we're going to consider. And then maybe we have a little new evidence, but most of the time we sort of ignore it, or we might just tweak a little bit what we already think. But you know, mostly, the way our brains are is they're not broke, so we don't want to fix them. They are working just fine. We'll just leave them the way they are.

• 26:01Stephen J. Dubner?

  And implicit in that is that we have this strong set of priors, right? Prior beliefs that we act on. And we also, I guess, implicit in what you're saying is that we have a lot of heuristics. We have a lot of shortcuts that we've learned work well enough, and so we do them always, right?

• 26:15Speaker 10

  Exactly. Let me give you an example. In the universities, for example, it's a good example. My world, we give lectures and The origins of that are the days when there weren't printed books so that you had one manuscript and the professor was reading from the manuscript because the students didn't have books. That's literal, it is literally a medieval instructional technique. But we've been doing it for hundreds and hundreds of years. This is kind of what you do when you're a faculty member. And the fact that we have no evidence at all, and in fact, we have some evidence to the contrary for this being a good way to get anybody to learn anything, doesn't keep us from doing it. Mostly, we're doing it because we've always done it.

• 26:57Stephen J. Dubner?

  Right. The students aren't dying of boredom, at least.

• 26:59Speaker 10

  Exactly.

• 27:00Stephen J. Dubner?

  They may be bored, but they're not dying. And when you ask yourself the question of why do we do it, what does even a very smart person say? How does a very smart person answer that question for themselves?

• 27:09Speaker 10

  Yeah, I think what they say is, well, we've kind of always done it and it seems to work OK and we're good at doing it. And I think here's the most relevant thing. It would take so much work to try and think through all the alternatives and try them out and see which ones work and which ones don't. That would just be such an effort that even if maybe in the long run it would be a bit of an advantage in terms of my short-run utilities, and in particular, just for me, it's not going to make a difference. I think the general picture, you know, when you talk about risks as adults, when we're trying to decide on a course of action, we're always balancing the risks and utilities, whether that's a risk to my reputation or my ego or my future interactions with other

• 27:51Speaker 10

  people or just a risk to, you know, my profit margin. And kids aren't in that world of, or at least if they're being taken care of properly, they're not in that world of risk and utility calculations. That liberates them, that frees them to, as we say, play. And we just sort of take for granted, yeah, of course, kids play. But what play means, what do you mean when you say someone's playing? You mean they're doing something without really having a specific goal, without having to worry about whether it's going to be productive or not.

• 28:22Stephen J. Dubner?

  So where do all these wonderful and productive, potentially at least, childlike traits go? Do they magically evaporate? Is there a switch in our genes that clicks over at age 21 and we stop thinking this way? What happens?

• 28:39Speaker 10

  What we're trying to figure out now is exactly the answer to that question. So one thing that could happen is just that we all have the same brains, but as we accumulate more and more information, and we know that this happens, that some of the pathways get strengthened and become more efficient, and then other pathways just are what's called pruned. They just disappear. So it could be that it's just a matter of as we get to know more and become more efficient, we lose the capacity for flexibility. But it could also be that there's something about being a child, about having that particular childlike mind and brain, that is the thing that's letting you explore more and, in some sense, be more creative, and that there are things that we could do even as adults that

• 29:24Speaker 10

  put us back into that kind of state.

• 29:26Stephen J. Dubner?

  A state that's kind of magical, maybe? We went back to Alex Stone. What was your favorite moment of your magic show today?

• 29:40Speaker 01

  I loved how quickly they figured out the card trick, the double lift. I mean, that was just bam. And, God, adults never figure that out. I'm going to give the deck a shuffle. I don't know if you guys can hear. I'm shuffling here. I'm going to give the deck a cut.

• 29:51Stephen J. Dubner?

  This trick is called the ambitious card. Alex Stone asks one kid to pick a card-

• 29:58Speaker 01

  Three diamonds.

• 29:59Stephen J. Dubner?

  -and place it back in the deck. Then Stone shuffles the deck, but somehow, the kid's card makes it back to the top of the deck.

• 30:06Speaker 01

  Turn over the top card. Yeah, OK. This trick tells a story. And the story is that no matter how many times you try to bury this card, it's kind of like a Houdini escape told in miniature. No matter how many times you try to take this card and put it in the middle of the deck, it's ambitious. That's why it's called the ambitious card. It always wants to pop back up to the top, always. And you keep doing it, and then every time you do it, it gets more and more amazing.

• 30:32Stephen J. Dubner?

  Again, it didn't take long for the kids to figure out the trick.

• 30:36Speaker 01

  Where'd it come from? How'd it happen?

• 30:38Speaker 04

  He has a different card on top.

• 30:42Stephen J. Dubner?

  The ambitious card, like a lot of tricks, relies on a double lift. That's when the magician presents two cards as if they're one. The kids figured it out.

• 30:51Speaker 01

  She just busted your whole act. Get the heck out of here. All right, good job. How did I... You still don't know. I don't understand. They still can't figure it out. Even after they have an explanation. The grownups need more help.

• 31:05Stephen J. Dubner?

  So I'm curious if your observation that kids are more perceptive when it comes to magic has led you to consciously try to engage or magnify any kid-like traits in your life as an adult?

• 31:20Speaker 01

  Absolutely.

• 31:21Stephen J. Dubner?

  Like what? Name some.

• 31:23Speaker 01

  Like, I love listening to the Bach Lutesweets. You know? Especially the John Williams on guitar. And when I'll listen to that, or I like any kind of classical music that's sort of multi-voiced, try listening to the Lutesweets and always focus on the bass. Because the bass is always less... You're less conscious of the bass, right? Because the higher frequency notes are always the ones... They're the lead notes. It's like, you know, when you're listening to a song and there's a singer singing "Hi", you're drawn to that. That's the flash of light in the magic. So that's the hand that's waving the handkerchief.

• 32:04Speaker 01

  So when you force yourself to sort of focus on the bass, what I find at least, is that it kind of levels out everything else. It kind of turns down the sort of middle voice and the high voice. And you end up sort of, I find, hearing everything sort of simultaneously. And it allows you to kind of divide your attention so that you're experiencing the piece as a whole, you're hearing all the voices more clearly. And it's hard to do it at first, actually, because your attention keeps snapping back to the high voice. But if you kind of train yourself to do it, I think it brings out a richness in the music that's amazing, because then you really start to hear everything at once. And that's kind of the same idea as focusing on the hand that's not doing so much in the magic trick.

• 33:07Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hey, podcast listeners. Next week, we are back with a brand-new magic trick. It is an episode about one man's unusual $350 million attempt to remake a city.

• 33:19Speaker 06

  A lot of city revitalization projects are really top-down, master-planned, and we're really anti-that. It's really more about backing the entrepreneurs and their passions.

• 33:30Stephen J. Dubner?

  The Biggest Gamble in Las Vegas. That's next time on Freakonomics Radio.

• 33:46Speaker 08

  Freakonomics Radio is produced by WNYC and Dubner Productions. Our staff includes Greg Rosalsky, Caroline English, Susie Lechtenberg, Merritt Jacob, and Christopher Wirth, with help from Anna Hyatt, Rick Kwan, Daniel DeZula, and Paul Schneider. This episode was produced by Greta Cohn and mixed by David Herman. If you want more Freakonomics Radio, you can subscribe to our podcast on iTunes or go to Freakonomics.com, where you'll find lots of radio, a blog, the books, and more.

• 34:38Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Ozempic. Innovation happens through rethinking what's possible, and when it comes to GLP-1s, Ozempic Pill does just that. Learn more about Ozempic semaglutide tablets, 4 and 9mg, by calling 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit Ozempic.com to view the medication guide and ask your doctor what's possible with FDA-approved Ozempic Pill.

• 35:09Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by US Bank Smartly Checking and Savings. You know, US Bank Smartly Checking and Savings are bank accounts that work harder for you. You get better savings rates, fee waivers, and rewards from day one, so you spend less time worrying about money and more on what matters. Sign up for US Bank Smartly Checking and Savings today at usbank.com/smartly. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026 US Bank.

• 35:42Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern Company. The world and its energy needs are always changing. Southern Company's commitment to meeting this demand stays the same. That's because Southern Company believes energy is more than a utility. It's what powers possibilities. So they are looking ahead and investing $80 billion in infrastructure upgrades and are committed to fueling growth in ways that benefit all customers so that reliable and affordable energy is accessible for generations to come. Go to southerncompany.com to learn more. Southern Company, building the future of energy.

• 36:19Speaker 11

  This episode is brought to you by Charles Schwab. Is there a right time to sell a stock? Are you taking the right risks with your portfolio? Financial decisions can be tricky, and often your own cognitive and emotional biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Join host Mark Reapy as he offers practical solutions to help overcome the cognitive and emotional biases that may affect your investing decisions. Listen at schwab.com/financialdecoder.