Extra: Ken Burns | People I (Mostly) Admire

The documentary filmmaker, known for "The Civil War," "Jazz," and "Baseball," turns his attention to the Holocaust, and asks what we can learn from the evils of the past.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern New Hampshire University. There's no hiding how convenient Southern New Hampshire University makes college. They offer over 80 career-focused graduate programs online. Classes have no set meeting times, so you can balance life and learning, and online tuition rates are some of the lowest in the country, making it all a little more manageable. A school this willing to work with you is worth the investment. Visit SNHU.edu/freakonomics to learn more. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Hotels.com. Hotels.com helps you find and book the right stay for work faster. With business preferences, save your travel must haves, like gym access or breakfast, just

• 0:45Stephen J. Dubner?

  once, then get tailored results whenever you search for work travel. Plus, with a free membership, you can save up to 20% on hotels and earn rewards on every stay for future travel. Book now at hotels.com. Visit hotels.com for details. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Mint Mobile. With Mint Mobile's summer sale, all of Mint's plans are $15 per month, even unlimited. Free yourself from big wireless and switch to Mint for high-speed data and coverage on the T-Mobile 5G network. To get your new wireless plan for just $15 a month, go to mintmobile.com/freak. That's mintmobile.com/freak.

• 1:28Stephen J. Dubner?

  Upfront payment, $45 for three months, $90 for six months, or $180 for 12 months. Plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50GB may slow when network is busy. Includes up to 20GB hotspot. Capable device required. Availability, speed, and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com.

• 1:55Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work is a new way to work in ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work can pull info from across your apps and connect to your tools to help you create finished work. You can even automate work in ChatGPT with the Scheduled Tasks feature, and the whole time, you stay in control. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chatgpt.com by selecting Work Mode, available on Plus and Pro plans.

• 2:36Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hey there, it's Stephen Dubner, but this is not an episode of Freakonomics Radio. It is a special bonus episode of People I Mostly Admire, a show hosted by Steve Levitt, my Freakonomics friend and co-author. People I Mostly Admire is one of several shows we now make within the Freakonomics Radio network, and this episode was so fascinating and important that I didn't want you to miss it. Levitt speaks with all kinds of people on his show, economists and other academics like himself, but also technologists and athletes, entrepreneurs and explorers. This conversation is with the documentary filmmaker Ken Burns.

• 3:17Stephen J. Dubner?

  When you're done, you can find more episodes of People I Mostly Admire in your podcast app. Thanks for listening.

• 3:30Speaker 01

  My guest today is the renowned documentary filmmaker Ken Burns. His epic 11-hour mini-series, The Civil War, is the most-watched show in the history of public television. He's covered baseball, jazz, the national parks, country music, and the Vietnam War, just to name a few. But I have to say, as much as I enjoyed his earlier work, nothing he's done has affected me as deeply as his most recent film, On the Holocaust.

• 3:57Speaker 02

  The film is basically asking at elemental levels, what did we know? What didn't we know? What should we have known? What did we do? What did we not do? What should we have done?

• 4:10Speaker 03

  Welcome to People I Mostly Admire with Steve Levitt.

• 4:18Speaker 01

  I've been thinking a lot lately about how people learn. And I've become increasingly convinced that film is the most powerful teaching tool we have. So I'm really looking forward to talking today with Ken Burns, who's probably taught Americans more about history than anyone else.

• 4:36Speaker 01

  Hey, Ken, thank you so much for being here. It's an incredible pleasure to talk to you today, even more so because I've recently moved to Germany and I'm missing the US. And you've come to symbolize America as much as baseball, hot dogs, and apple pie. So I feel a little bit more at home with you here.

• 4:53Speaker 02

  Well, if you see the US and the Holocaust, we can connect the bridge, but not in the best of ways.

• 4:59Speaker 01

  So your latest documentary is called The US and the Holocaust, and it's airing September 18 to 20 on PBS. And I have to say, my first knee jerk reaction to hearing you were covering the topic was, do we really need another film about the Holocaust? But watching your film, I was shocked at how I had lost my sense of horror over the events of the Holocaust, and I was shocked at how little I knew about the facts. And I was shocked at the degree to which the United States was complicit in the Holocaust and its unfolding. I watched it a week ago, and it's just been careening around inside my head ever since. It's an incredibly powerful piece of work.

• 5:42Speaker 02

  I'm so glad that, I can't say you enjoyed it, I'm glad that you feel that way on behalf of my co-directors Lynn Novick and Sarah Botstein, and on behalf of the writer Jeffrey Ward, and indeed, the whole tiny team that put this together. We had to face over the last seven plus years, the kind of resistance to why do we need another? And we get that often, our film on Muhammad Ali, we don't need another Ali documentary. But we really felt that we hadn't explored the aspects of it that ask questions about who we were. I'm nervous about the word complicit, because I think what happens is, we begin to understand that human nature doesn't change.

• 6:25Speaker 02

  The susceptibility to this kind of behavior of racism, of antisemitism, of nativism, xenophobia, treatment of indigenous peoples is common throughout, I am sorry to say, the human race and human history. And so what we have are kind of echoes and parallels and... Awkward, shameful connections between them and a lack of a real effort on our concerted part because we took in, this is so hard to say, we took in more than any other sovereign nation, more people. But if we'd done 10 times that, I think we would have failed.

• 7:06Speaker 01

  Failed, in what sense?

• 7:09Speaker 02

  In what our obligations were to this catastrophe that was going on. We just did not do enough. And it is easy to say, well, the president should have done this, but he wasn't a king. He wasn't a dictator like Hitler. He had a congress and laws that he had to obey. He understood very well, public opinion, which throughout the lead up and the war and then afterwards was implacably anti-immigrant. It's just a really tough story, which I think we need to confront. We need to have a kind of reckoning and a conversation about, just at a time when our own institutions seem fragile, the democratic institutions that have held us together for 240 plus years, seem fragile and susceptible

• 7:52Speaker 02

  to the lies of a demagogue. It's time to revisit the story.

• 7:56Speaker 01

  Now, you worked on this Holocaust documentary for seven and a half years. Did it not take a toll on your mental health? It's an intense experience to watch it, but I imagine it was even more intense to create it.

• 8:09Speaker 02

  I want to say yes. And I do have experiences with this film and our film in the Second World War, where you really come in after a night of dreams or nightmares and feel that there is a kind of toll. I remember coming in in World War II to the building I'm talking to you from, and my editor looked like hell. And I said, where were you, you know, in his dreams? And he said, the bulge. And he said, you don't look so good. Where were you? I said, Pelelo, which is this speck of land in the Pacific that didn't need to be taken, but thousands of lives were lost. We're in the business of telling stories. And the overriding impulse every single day was to get up and do just the best we

• 8:51Speaker 02

  could do, to complicate it where it needed to be complicated, to remember. But at the same time, that's what we do. That's what we're supposed to do. We're supposed to not only give you those six and a half hours, but honor all the stuff that's not in there. How to calibrate the horrible footage, how to not just have it be kind of Holocaust porn in which you accidentally privilege the perpetrators by the way you do it. Understand when you needed to go back to the United States, when you needed to stay in Nazi occupied Poland, when you needed to move to another place, when you needed to introduce a ray of light. It's not without some spectacular heroic people and organizations that never get credit, like the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee,

• 9:36Speaker 02

  the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the YMCA, the Friends Service Community, the War Refugee Board, the single greatest entity created by any of the Allies to help get refugees out.

• 9:50Speaker 01

  Could you talk more about the War Refugee Board? They are one tiny but enormous bright spot in this avalanche of unthinkable horror.

• 10:01Speaker 02

  John Paley, in the Treasury Department from Nebraska, is this guy who just realizes that the Jews are being exterminated and the United States of America has to do something about it. And he goes to his boss, Henry Morgenthau, the only Jew leading a cabinet position in the Roosevelt Administration, and they conspire. They need an exception so that they can get money to places where they're not allowed to have money, like in your enemy's territory. And what it does is it simply sends money where money is needed, to pay forgers, to bribe guards, to do the things that we're not supposed to be able to do. And we had laws and at least regulations against that. And they get the approval of it,

• 10:45Speaker 02

  and then it goes back to state, and state sits on it. And then finally, there's a kind of an outrage, and it comes out. And in fact, we underwrite the celebrated Raul Wallenberg, who's a Swedish diplomat in Hungary. He and other people in the international community in Budapest saved tens of thousands of people. And it's us. He saw himself, Raul Wallenberg saw himself as working in an American program. And that, to me, is one of those bright lights. But it doesn't happen unless you have this guy, this anonymous bureaucrat, who actually fights above his weight and gets something done. He's one of many people who are struggling to do that.

• 11:25Speaker 01

  Somehow, I've lost touch with the scale of the killing. Two thirds of all European Jews were killed.

• 11:32Speaker 02

  Right.

• 11:32Speaker 01

  That's 6 million. And numbers that big are difficult to understand.

• 11:38Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 11:38Speaker 01

  Did you have a conscious strategy for trying to make those big numbers real?

• 11:44Speaker 02

  Six million is just one of the most opaque phrases I've ever come across in my life. It's an impenetrable fortress. First experimenting in our film on World War II that came out in 2007, and following the lead of the Holocaust Museum in Washington then, that one way to say it is that in 1933, there were nine million Jews. In 1945, two out of three were dead. And we recapitulate that configuration in the opening of this film, so that you can see as a young woman is looking out her window, happy and bright, and she is joined momentarily by two other people, we presume her parents. And you can

• 12:26Speaker 02

  see that two out of three of them aren't gonna get through this. And that's an important thing. And then you have Daniel Mendelsohn, the beautiful writer, who has spent a good deal of his life finding out what happened to six of those six million, his great uncle Schmuel Jaeger and his wife and four daughters, from a tiny little town called Bulahav. And he needs to particularize this. And there's a wonderful moment, I think, in the film when three different people are basically saying, I exist, know that I exist. And at one point, a young man says, I just want the world to know that a person named David Berger lived. People were tossing notes out of the railroad cars, burying them in canisters

• 13:11Speaker 02

  in the Warsaw ghetto, writing to a friend when they knew that at any moment, they'd be taken away. We need to particularize so that we are not anesthetized by the sheer volume of the numbers.

• 13:24Speaker 01

  Just by chance, I happened to have been at the Anne Frank House just a few weeks ago. I was just in Amsterdam. And that is another case where focusing on a single life really gives you a sense of gravity that's hard when you look at the big numbers. But thinking like an economist, I just was trying to find another way to think about how to characterize what six million was. And the best one I've hit upon is roughly 3,000 people died in the 9/11 terrorist attack. That's an event that has deeply scarred the US psyche.

• 13:59Speaker 01

  But the Holocaust was like nine eleven, every single day of the year for four years. And I think that's another way to get at this incredible scale of what happened.

• 14:09Speaker 02

  I agree. To think of it in that terms helps us to first identify what would it be like to have the kind of personal losses that we took in, not just from people we knew, but also collectively as a country from nine eleven, as you say, deeply scarred. And then understand that after a while, when you've got 10 of those in a row, something happens, something shuts down. Daniel Mendelsohn himself says, you know, talking to survivors, "When it was happening to us, we could not believe it was happening." And so how could we possibly imagine anyone else across the Atlantic in the United States to understand exactly what was happening if they could scarcely believe it?

• 14:54Speaker 02

  It's kind of poetic dilemma, which we struggle as economists, as filmmakers, as human beings, to put some new way to explain the calculus. One of the things that we try to show in the film is that there are 2 million Jews that are murdered before anyone starts employing gas. Trenches are dug and people are just shot in the head and dirt is put over them by the dozens at a time. And there's unfortunately some pretty painful footage that we use very sparingly, but it's the home movies and the pictures of the German soldiers who were doing most of this work.

• 15:36Speaker 02

  Before our popular image of the Holocaust happens, which is people being led to their death in a gas chamber, that you have all these other particularities that are taking place in concentration camps, not the killing centers of Poland like Auschwitz, Birkenau and Belzec and Sobibor and Chelmno. It's happening by starving to death at Dachau or Buchenwald or Nordhausen or Mahlhausen. But also in these individual moments or a place where a particular town, Baba Yar, outside of Kiev, a communist Podolsky or Vinnytsia. These are places that were now, believe it or not, showing up on our maps of the Ukraine debacle.

• 16:21Speaker 02

  This is basically the sadness of it. This is territory that has just known its share of suffering.

• 16:27Speaker 01

  A second thing I should have known about the Holocaust but didn't is how slowly events unfolded initially, stripping Jews of basic rights over the course of years. And at least initially Hitler was content to have Jews leave Germany rather than kill them. And many German Jews, maybe even the majority of German Jews, tried to leave, but no country would take them, certainly not the US. If the US had just embraced these fleeing Jews, it's conceivable that the worst genocide in history could have been at least dramatically reduced in scale.

• 17:02Speaker 02

  I don't know if dramatically reduced, it could have been reduced. There are 560,000 approximately German Jews, more than half got out, as did the 200, nearly 300,000 Austrian Jews, more than half got out. And you are absolutely correct that other nations, and particularly the United States with its pernicious quota system, which is basically designed to keep people out, is not going to accept them. The Frank family, which we all see Anne Frank's story as just this isolated little girl tragedy, her father had to apply for a visa to the United States. It wasn't turned down when the Germans bombed Rotterdam, the application along with 300,000 others went up in flames.

• 17:44Speaker 02

  The real question and the hard thing for humanity to get its head around is, how could we have helped those Jews in Nazi occupied Poland and then later Lithuania and Belarus and Latvia? How do we rescue 3.3 million Polish Jews? I think screaming louder might have helped, we didn't do that. Maybe relieving the pressures at all the places where Jews could get out might have made it easier for people. Daniel Mendelson's great uncle had been to the United States in 1912 and had gone back. He found that the streets of the Lower East Side were not paved in gold and went back

• 18:26Speaker 02

  to a place where he could be a big fish in a relatively small pond and was until the rising antisemitism and... Pre-war Poland, and then, of course, the horrors of Nazi-occupied Poland begin to transpire, and he loses his life and his wife's and his daughter's lives in all these different kinds of horrible ways. I want to believe that there was a way to stop this. I think going back to the beginning of your question is the key, that this happens in drip, drip, drip. The Germans are looking. What can we get away with? What can we do? Deborah Lipstadt, perhaps the number-one scholar of the Holocaust, says in her film, "The time to stop a Holocaust is before it happens." And so then it falls back onto

• 19:08Speaker 02

  us. There's a reporter from Chicago writing in Berlin in 33, just accurately, about what Hitler's up to, and he's kicked out of the country. Edgar Mauer is his name. And when he's being escorted to the train station, his minder says, "When do you think you will be back?" And in 1933, he says, "With two million of my fellow countrymen." Mm-hmm. So it is not impossible to have foreseen, but the exigencies of day-to-day politics and life, and "I don't want to get involved," and "I'm not really interested in that," "I don't have a job," "It's the middle of the Depression," "I don't know how to feed my family," all of these things conspire to create this tragedy. There's no one thing

• 19:53Speaker 02

  that could have been done. You could pull out the inspirational Jim Crow laws that the Germans used early days of the '30s to model their anti-discrimination laws against the Jews. It's still probably going to happen in some way. You could take out just our own interest in eugenics, which is touted by progressives and conservatives alike as a way to make things better for society. This is take-your-breath-away kind of stuff, not to mention just virulent antisemitism that is suffused in American society, thanks in large part to people that we consider titans of our past, like Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh.

• 20:32Speaker 01

  You bring down a lot of American heroes in this documentary, people who somehow their reputations have been relatively unscathed, given their positions.

• 20:41Speaker 02

  I'm not sure I subscribe to the idea of takedown. It's just if you tell a complicated story, there's going to be really uncomfortable things to deal with. And Henry Ford was certain that the Jews were responsible for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He bought a newspaper and he printed over many editions, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which is the worst anti-Semitic track, a hoax written in Russia. And then he put together all of these problems of international Jewry and published it in a book, which got read in German, too. Lindbergh is leading the America First, hmm, that sounds familiar, the America First Movement,

• 21:21Speaker 02

  which is the largest anti-war movement in the country. And by the end, he's spouting just outright anti-Semitic bile. And it catches up. And just as you hope today, that somewhere along the line, somebody says, stop, this is racist, or this is anti-Semitic, or this is anti-democratic. Waiting for that kind of moment. And you begin to see how complicated the individual human is, how easy it is to appeal to grievance, to make a them out of people who are also us. It's the same old story, as the song goes, this is how we are as human beings. Mark Twain is supposed to have said, history doesn't repeat itself,

• 22:04Speaker 02

  but it rhymes. That's a really good way to put it. The Old Testament, the inherited Jewish part of our common religious traditions, says in Ecclesiastes, what has been will be again, what has been done will be done again. There's nothing new under the sun, which tells you that human nature doesn't change. And so, this is a pretty discouraging prospect, coupled with the fact that nobody gets out of their life alive, right?

• 22:31Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 22:32Speaker 02

  These two things close in like walls on us. And so what we're left with... Is faith and art and courage and love and bravery to do that. And we're also equipped with story. The novelist Richard Powers said, "The best arguments in the world won't change a single person's point of view. The only thing that can do that is a good story."

• 22:56Speaker 01

  Mm-hmm.

• 22:57Speaker 02

  And within it is the complications of the human condition. And it's filled with, obviously, in the case of this film, horrific things. And it is also, even in the midst of that, with some heroic points of light. And in other places, has been a magnificent display of human potentiality.

• 23:18Speaker 01

  So as I watched the documentary, I suspected that you had made it, at least in part, as a word of caution about some of the nativist trends we've been seeing in recent years, especially during the Trump administration. But then I did the math.

• 23:34Speaker 02

  Mm-hmm.

• 23:34Speaker 01

  And you worked seven and a half years on this project, which means you started it long before anyone imagined that Trump would be president.

• 23:42Speaker 02

  Yeah, before he even announced that he was running for president. Here's the problem. It's always there. The antisemitism is always there. The racism, it's always there. The nativist and xenophobic tendencies, it's there. Right now, like in other periods, it's been given more permission. The genie out of the bottle, the ills out of Pandora's box, whatever analogy you're interested in doing, it doesn't matter. But right now, it matters because so much of the playbook resembles the early days of the previous playbook.

• 24:20Speaker 02

  And that's where we felt as filmmakers that these are things that are part of our body, our collective American story. And we have this kind of sense of ourselves as having a bigger role and a more important role to play in the progress of mankind. As Lincoln said in his address to Congress in December of 62, "The last best hope of earth." If that's the case, we gotta do a hell of a better job.

• 24:52Speaker 03

  You're listening to People I Mostly Admire with Steve Levitt and his conversation with Ken Burns. After this short break, they'll return to talk about Ken's filmmaking process.

• 25:14Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Quince. You know those pieces in your closet that you find yourself wearing on repeat? The sweater that goes with everything, the perfect pair of pants, or the tee you somehow always reach for first? Those are the pieces that make getting dressed easy, and that's what Quince does best. Quince focuses on high-quality wardrobe staples made with premium materials like 100% Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton, and merino wool. The styles are timeless, versatile, and designed to become the dependable pieces you reach for day after day. And it's not just clothing. Quince brings that same approach to everything they make, from hotel-quality bedding and bath to kitchen essentials and thoughtfully-designed furniture. Find your next fall favorites at Quince. Download the

• 25:58Stephen J. Dubner?

  Quince app for app-exclusive offers, or go to quince.com/freak. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com/freak.

• 26:19Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern New Hampshire University. The best investments are the ones you make in yourself, and no one knows that better than Southern New Hampshire University. With more than 200 online degree programs, no set class times, and low online tuition, Southern New Hampshire University is built to fit your life today and set you up for success tomorrow. Education is an investment. Why not make it a smart one? Apply for free at SNHU.edu/freakonomics.

• 26:51Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by PNC Bank. Boring. Great word, bad rep. Yet, time and time again, here at Freakonomics, we find that when something culture-changing happens, boring things like calculations and careful planning are usually behind it. Which begs the question, why not apply it to other aspects of life? Like banking, for example. Well, PNC Bank did, since its inception, proving time and again that the best banking strategy isn't the exciting type, but the steady, reliable, definitely-not-yolo type. PNC Bank. Brilliantly boring since 1865. Brilliantly boring since 1865 is a registered mark of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC Bank, National Association, Member FDIC.

• 27:43Speaker 01

  The topics that Ken Burns tackles are often big and complex, with so many possible angles. How does one tell the story of the Vietnam War, or of jazz? I'd love to understand how Ken gets from an idea to a finished product. And I also want to talk to him about a film on teen mental health the executive produced that was released this summer. In my opinion, it's a film that every teen should get to see.

• 28:10Speaker 01

  So I want to step away from the content of the documentary to talk more about the process of it. So we've said you spent seven and a half years making it. How many people work on a big project like this?

• 28:24Speaker 02

  So you watched the final credits, and it correctly thanks hundreds of people, but it's really handmade. Basically, we end up with a nucleus of about 15, 16 people who made this film. There's a kind of perception that you do a certain amount of research, maybe it's three weeks, or maybe it's three months, and then you do some writing, maybe it's three weeks or three months, and then out comes the script out of which you shoot, and you edit, and it's boom, done. We never stop researching. We changed something the other day in masters that had been delivered for more than a month to PBS, just to fix something. Took away an adjective that somewhere worked its way into a quote, and when we went

• 29:07Speaker 02

  back for the fifth time to check, we realized that adjective wasn't there, and somebody in the translation had added it, and it needed to go out. And we never stop writing. In our script, there isn't a word that hasn't been considered or say, yep, that works. If you don't say Nazi occupied Poland, you have insulted the Poles who had no control over what was taking place in their now occupied country. If you start referring to the final solution or extermination, in certain ways, you don't do justice to individual agency. If you call the concentration camps where people were gassed, you've made a mistake. They were never gassed in concentration camps. They

• 29:48Speaker 02

  were gassed only in Nazi occupied Polish killing centers in the places like Treblinka and Auschwitz and Sobibor and Belzec and Chelmno. Just being aware of language and how incredibly precise it must be as we try to take the temperature of all the scholarship and most importantly, the most recent scholarship, so that we're doing it right. So we never stop writing and we're already shooting. We want to interview people, not saying, you need to fit in here on page three of episode two to get us from this paragraph to the others. No, we will let that bite influence what we've got, add to it, conflict it, make

• 30:29Speaker 02

  it more interesting. And likewise, we're also recording music so that we're permitting a piece of music to determine the pace and rhythm and emotional undertow of something, not adding it at the very end where you hope the music will amplify emotions you hope are there. We want that organic. So we do our music early. And so this takes years and there's money to be raised. This is PBS. There's no profit margin. There's no contingencies. You just do the film and at the end, there should be nothing at the bottom of that jar. And that's a complicated process. It's got one foot in the marketplace and the other very proudly out. But what it allows us is to spend seven and a half years. I can walk

• 31:11Speaker 02

  into a premium cable or a streaming service and with my track record, I could get whatever I wanted in an instant on a project, but they wouldn't let me take 10 and a half years.

• 31:23Speaker 01

  You probably don't think about the world this way, but do you have a rough estimate of the person hours that would have gone into creating the Holocaust documentary?

• 31:31Speaker 02

  Oh, you know, that, no, we don't. I know there's not a day I'm not working, right, on this or the other films I'm working on. Same with Sarah and Lynn. I remember on my first film called Brooklyn Bridge, cost $180,000 to make, and that over the five years it took me to do it, mainly because I looked like I was 12 years old. But I calculated that I, over the course of it, got paid less than two cents an hour.

• 31:56Speaker 01

  So I'd never seen the Brooklyn Bridge documentary, but I went to watch it in preparation for talking to you now. It's been over 40 years, and I really expected it to be maybe amateurish or dated.

• 32:10Speaker 02

  Rickety.

• 32:11Speaker 01

  But honestly, it's like your style just emerged in whole cloth in that very first film. It's really amazing.

• 32:17Speaker 02

  Look, I knew, out of tragic circumstances, I knew I wanted to be a filmmaker at 12. My mother had cancer for most of my childhood, and she died when I was 11, just a few months short of my 12th birthday. And my dad, after she died, would let me stay up with him and watch old movies, or go out to the cinema, or go to a film festival. And I watched my dad cry for the first time, not when she was sick, not when she died, not at her funeral, at a film called Odd Man Out by Sir Carol Reed about Irish independence. And he cried. And I just went, that's what I want to do. And that meant being Alfred Hitchcock, or John Ford, or Howard Hawks. And I ended up going to Hampshire College, and all of my

• 32:57Speaker 02

  teachers were social documentary still photographers and documentary filmmakers. And they reminded me that there is as much drama in what is and what was as anything the human imagination. So by 18, I knew what I was doing. And maybe that I didn't have as much talent as others did, but I was bullheaded and persevering. And after being turned down hundreds, literally hundreds of times, was able to make this film with the help of, as always, lots of really important and talented people, including David McCullough, who'd written a book that I'd read about the building of the Brooklyn Bridge called The Great Bridge. And I just devoured it and said to my partners, let's make a film on this. And they looked at me like I was crazy.

• 33:41Speaker 02

  Why would our first film out of college be about a bridge? Come on. But it worked out. And in the course of it, I moved up to this tiny little village in New Hampshire because I needed to get a real job and I didn't have one. And I starved for a couple of years. And then everyone presumed that when it was nominated for an Oscar, that I would go back to New York or go to LA. And I stayed here.

• 34:03Speaker 01

  So obviously, the way you made that first movie and the way you make your movies now is very different. Just reflecting on my own career as an academic economist, when I was getting started as a grad student, I did every aspect of a project. I came up with the idea, I typed in the data, I cleaned and analyzed the data, I made tables and figures, and I did the writing. And then, as I advanced in my career, I had big budgets to hire people. And what I found was that the primary task that I could actually delegate was data analysis. But the sad irony is that I love doing data analysis and I don't really like doing the writing. So I ended up delegating away what I loved in pursuit of higher productivity.

• 34:46Speaker 01

  And in the end, I was productive, but honestly, all the fun went out of it. And I soured on academic research because of it. It sounds like you were a lot more successful in figuring out how to delegate what you didn't want to do.

• 34:59Speaker 02

  No, it wasn't delegating what I didn't want to do. It was stuff that I did like to do, but I saved the most important stuff, the final decisions. Don't miss a script meeting, don't miss a script pass or an edit pass. And that was important. I was superstitious, so I wanted to do it exactly the same. And so I did, for Brooklyn Bridge and for many films, I did all the interviews, I did all the shooting, rarely delegate to somebody else. And then, all of a sudden, I realized I have really talented people working on me. As early as the baseball film, I was delegating most of the interviews to my co-producer, Lynn Novak, because she was a good interviewer. And so, I realized that part of growing was also delegating, but not losing the thing. I'll tell you the thing that I would love to complain endlessly about is the

• 35:44Speaker 02

  digitization changed a dynamic of relationships with the photographs. We used to go to the Library of Congress, say, the Civil War film. We'd come in at 8:30 in the morning. We'd go off into a corner with two scoop lights and a two by four with a groove in it and stick a piece of sheet metal in there and hold up a Matthew Brady photograph with magnets at the corners with white gloves on. And then we would shoot the wide of that shot and then we'd move the camera a little bit closer, shoot it medium, put it in a little bit closer, shoot it at a close up. Then we'd add up close up attachments and we'd do an extreme close up. We'd do a pan, we'd do a tilt. We'd isolate certain details in the photograph and if we liked it a lot, we'd order a copy print for five bucks.

• 36:25Speaker 02

  And then we'd come back and take it first to an analog and then a computerized animation camera that would shoot the movement. Now, you just go and you digitize stuff or you download digitized stuff of high res and then you make moves within your computer editing system. And so, everybody's job is a keyboard and a mouse and a screen. I really miss that, but I don't have the time to do it. So, in some ways, there's a nice little dissembling that's going on as I talk to you, too. I just spent the last week working on a film on the history of the American Revolution and we were on an all week Zoom with the writer and with the two co-producers with

• 37:07Speaker 02

  me and a couple of other people and we were just going over the script, just making it shorter, making it better, making it complete. What are we going to show? There are no photographs of the revolution, so we're dealing with graphics, we're dealing with paintings, we're dealing with drawings, we're dealing with live cinematography of the places now. And sometimes those places are like Brooklyn Heights or Bunker Hill, which are all modern and overgrown, so you have to figure out visual equivalencies of what it looks like. And I am higher than a kite. I cannot begin to tell you what it's like to make a film better and put your head on the pillow that night. You just want to wake up and do it again. That I have never lost. That I have never given up.

• 37:52Speaker 01

  We'll be right back with more of my conversation with Ken Burns after this.

• 38:05Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio, sponsored by Granola. You know that moment when a meeting ends and someone says, let's circle back on this next week, and everyone nods, but no one writes it down? Then next week rolls around and it's radio silence? That's why Granola exists. Granola is an AI-powered notepad built for the way real people actually meet. You take rough notes like you normally would, and in the background, Granola securely transcribes the meeting. Then it turns everything into clean, structured, actually useful notes when the meeting ends. And the best part? Granola works through your device's audio, which means it integrates seamlessly into the video conferencing tools you already use. No setup, no awkward bots. It's just your normal meeting with superpowers. If meetings are eating up your day, Granola is a no-brainer. You can try it totally free.

• 38:50Stephen J. Dubner?

  Just head to granola.ai/freakonomics. That's granola.ai/freakonomics to get your time back. Try it for free at granola.ai/freakonomics.

• 39:08Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by hotels.com. Hotels.com helps you find and book the right stay for work faster. With business preferences, save your travel must-haves, like gym access or breakfast, just once, then get tailored results whenever you search for work travel. Plus, with a free membership, you can save up to 20% on hotels and earn rewards on every stay for future travel. Book now at hotels.com. Visit hotels.com for details.

• 39:40Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Amica. You know what they say, if you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together. So go with Amica and get coverage from a mutual insurer that's built for their customers, one that looks after what's important to you together. Auto, home, life, and more, coverage that fits your unique needs. Amica helps you protect what matters most. Visit amica.com and get a quote today.

• 40:14Speaker 01

  So people who listen to my podcast regularly know that one of my favorite pastimes is complaining about what we teach and how we teach in the United States. And I suspect you must share some of my views because as a teenager, you did something radical in your own education. You chose to attend a brand new, highly experimental college called Hampshire College. Could you talk a little bit about that?

• 40:38Speaker 02

  Yeah, God, I'd love to. I do not recognize the human being that started class there on September 13th, 1971, and the human being who graduated in late May of 1975. I do not recognize that person. It rearranged all my molecules. It's like graduate school at an undergraduate level. So you tap in to the roiling nuclear core of an 18 to 22 year old, but you give them the responsibility of graduate school. It is definitely not for everybody, but if you know what you want or know how to look for what you want, it is the perfect place. I was a faculty brat. My dad was at the University of Michigan. I could have probably gone essentially for free.

• 41:21Speaker 02

  And I chose to go to the most expensive college on earth. I heard about it from my best friend, whose family subscribed to Newsweek. If I hadn't seen that article, I wouldn't have gone. We had time. I read this article about Hampshire's opening in the fall of 70 and I went, I need to go there. And I assembled every resource, quit high school early because of advanced placement courses and went to work full time in the record store I worked in part time and got with grants and scholarships and stuff enough to go to the most expensive college on earth, $4,730 in the fall of 1971. And that was like saying $65,000 today. And I went and I figured I'd go for one year and then I'd come back and go to the University of Michigan.

• 42:05Speaker 01

  Because you only had enough money for one year. You basically put all your money in one number and roulette or something like that.

• 42:10Speaker 02

  I moved all my chips over to that one number. That's exactly right. And I was going to accept that. I mean, University of Michigan is a phenomenal institution. It wasn't like I was going to some bad place. I loved Hampshire so much that I took the next year off, but I stayed there and got a job that was even more hours at the bookstore and moved off campus and raised enough so that I could go for the next two years. So I did Hampshire in four, but I only attended for three. And I don't know how I did it, but I arrived without any debt. But I went out of there with enough naivete about what I was going to do that I started my own company rather than going to New York and working my way

• 42:50Speaker 02

  up some production ladder. And I started a film company with two of my fellow classmates, Roger Sherman and Buddy Squires, called Florentine Films. We are still working together. We still love each other and ended up, for all the terrifyingness of it, my own boss from that moment on.

• 43:08Speaker 01

  And getting paid two cents an hour for, for the first seven years.

• 43:12Speaker 02

  And getting paid two cents an hour. How great is that? But I'll tell you this funny thing. I came home and in February, it's really cold and you hope the wood stove, when you leave it, you blaze it up and then you turn it down and you hope it's still going. And I came back and I saw that it was out. Oh, no, I'd taken off my coat. But then the answering machine had 10 messages. If I got one a month, it was something. And what I could infer from hangups from the Associated Press and from the Concord Monitor and from Boston Globe and stuff is that I'd been nominated for an Academy Award for Brooklyn Bridge. So I'm dancing up and down and then I realize it's still cold. And so I ran outside, not putting my coat back on, got a big load of wood, but I'm so excited that I missed the

• 43:57Speaker 02

  ice. I slip on it and I twist and I fall into a snowbank. Very lucky. Still holding on to the wood. But my shirt has pulled up from my back and the snow is melting and going down my pants.

• 44:10Speaker 02

  And I'm looking up, still holding on to the woods, and saying, "Thank you. There is no other person who's found out they've been nominated that has been given such a strong message, right?" And therefore, I cut out shortly thereafter a New Yorker cartoon that I still have now framed in every place that I live that shows three men standing in hell, the flames licking up around them, and one guy says to the other two, "Apparently, my over 200 screen credits didn't mean a damn thing."

• 44:47Speaker 01

  Of all the content you've created, there's one film, more than any other, I think, should absolutely be required viewing in every high school, or maybe middle school in America, and that's the movie you produced called "Hiding in Plain Sight: Youth Mental Illness." Could you talk about that piece?

• 45:05Speaker 02

  First of all, it's not my film. I'm the executive producer. My longtime editor, Eric Ubers, and his brother, a freelance cinematographer that we use all the time, made this film. And it is so beautiful that when I saw it, a fine cut, I just said, "Eric, take my name off this. This is your film. It's so beautiful. It's going to save lives." And we felt that after Vietnam, that maybe a veteran watching it could feel that somebody had heard the story, somebody had gotten it right, because we dealt with some of the problems that veterans had, that they would also begin to choose not the bad way out. But this is a film that, without a doubt, a two-part film, that is sort of like Dante. The first half is Inferno, and the second half is Paradiso. It's not.

• 45:49Speaker 02

  It's just you get to the depths of 20 kids, very honest, very brave, comment about their particularities of their mental illness, and then how they worked to get out of it and where they are. There are a few films we've made that are of this ilk. I made a film on this school for boys with learning differences in Vermont that each year, despite their ADHD or whatever it might be, are asked to memorize the Gettysburg Address and then publicly recite it from memory. And it's a real tough task for you and me, the 10 complicated sentences where he rearranges the furniture of the word "here" so many times in the last several sentences, and these kids learn it. And we made a little film about that without any narration.

• 46:32Speaker 02

  That has the same sort of thing, but nothing like hiding in plain sight.

• 46:36Speaker 01

  Can I ask you, acknowledging that it wasn't your film, there are these 20 young people, and as I began to watch it, my expectation was that I would relatively sequentially hear the stories of the 20 young people. But that is not at all what the directors did. It is short clips, I'm gonna say five, 15, 20 second clips, jumping back and forth between people for four hours, which sounds like it would be crazy and impossible to watch, but it has this effect of making you understand both the uniqueness and the similarity of what kids are going through.

• 47:19Speaker 02

  Basically, when we have talking heads, it's just like that, just a little bit of somebody talking, 10 seconds, 20 seconds. But if you're relying on the totality of the commentary to carry you along, you've got a different kind of thing. I can't say it's easier or harder, but what happens in that film is exactly the accumulation of their bravery and willingness to expose the intimate details of their own mental illness and their own lives, because certainly some of it is just genetic, but a lot of it is also because circumstantially, there might be abuse, there might be divorce, there might be illness in the family, there might be questions about one's own gender or identity that are part of an equation.

• 48:03Speaker 02

  And the honesty with which these kids, as young as, you know, 10 or 11, all the way up to young adults, talk about this is so riveting and so refreshing. That we realize that we spend most of our lives hiding behind the facade of the mask, the kind of kabuki mask that allows us to go on. And here they are, wrestling with the deepest, most existential questions about their own lives. And it's just so impressive that you can't take your eyes off the people who are talking. And somehow, we have, as we began this conversation, failed them by not focusing as much attention as we need to be doing on youth mental illness, mental illness in general.

• 48:46Speaker 01

  And I've long thought that mental health should be a central focus of our school curriculum. What other skills are more central to leading a good life than understanding one's own emotions or building healthy relationships? Do you have a take on why we don't devote a big chunk of the school day to teaching kids these kind of skills?

• 49:07Speaker 02

  Because we're frightened. It's the same way prejudice comes in or homophobia does this. There's so many things that frighten us that we'd rather adjust the makeup or the mask and go on. But you're absolutely right. This should be central to our education, our well-being, and not just mentally, but physically. And so, we basically fail ourselves and fail our children in an important way. And there are consequences to that inattention. And yet, we can just basically share stories and then we are closer. We're a little bit closer to everybody else. Even that person who is the exact opposite of you politically or religiously, whatever

• 49:49Speaker 02

  it might be, all of a sudden, you share in common that, yeah, my son had that. Or my cousin, my dad took his own life. And you wake up to the fact that the politics stuff, the simple, binary, boring stuff is really just that, superficial, and that the depth of the human condition is what's so important. Just as David Berger in Poland wished to let his friend know that he wanted the world to know that he had lived.

• 50:22Speaker 02

  We all too have a kind of existential urge to speak beyond the mask, beyond the limitations, behind the prisons that society creates and that we ourselves create out of understandable self-protection, but need also to have spaces where we can be heard and where we won't be ridiculed, where someone will say, "I still love you."

• 50:50Speaker 01

  I have to say, I rarely run into anyone who can talk like Ken Burns. He speaks in paragraphs, dropping in facts and quotes like he's a living encyclopedia. It's surprising that someone like that ends up behind the camera rather than in front of it. It hadn't really occurred to me, until I started preparing for this interview, how much Ken Burns has shaped the way Americans think about ourselves as a country. I'm hard pressed to think of anyone else who shaped the current view of what it means to be an American more. Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt? I'm curious to hear your views. Am I crazy to think Ken Burns has that much influence? Who's shaped American storyline more than he has? Our

• 51:32Speaker 01

  email address is [email protected]. That's [email protected]. Drop us a note.

• 51:42Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hey there. It's Stephen Dubner again, and that was Steve Levitt in conversation with Ken Burns. Levitt's podcast is called People I Mostly Admire, and if you don't already follow it, there are more than 80 episodes just waiting for you in your podcast app. Meanwhile, we will put out a new episode of Freakonomics Radio right here at the usual time.

• 52:06Stephen J. Dubner?

  People I Mostly Admire is part of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which also includes Freakonomics Radio, No Stupid Questions, and Freakonomics MD. All our shows are produced by Stitcher and Renbud Radio. This episode was produced by Morgan Levy and engineered by Jasmine Klinger. Our staff also includes Neil Carruth, Gabriel Roth, Greg Rippon, Rebecca Lee Douglas, Julie Kanfer, Zach Lipinski, Eleanor Osborne, Jeremy Johnston, Ryan Kelly, Emma Terrell, Lyric Bowditch, Jacob Clemente, and Alina Coleman. Our music is composed by Luis Guerra. As always, thanks for listening.

• 52:42Speaker 01

  You can say you wouldn't be a good president, but I think that's a lie.

• 52:48Speaker 02

  You need to ask my daughters. I've got four of them.

• 52:56Speaker 03

  The Freakonomics Radio Network. The hidden side of everything.

• 53:04Speaker 04

  Stitcher.

• 53:10Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Ozempic. Innovation happens through rethinking what's possible, and when it comes to GLP-1s, Ozempic pill does just that. Learn more about Ozempic semaglutide tablets, 4 and 9 milligrams, by calling 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit ozempic.com to view the medication guide and ask your doctor what's possible with FDA-approved Ozempic pill.

• 53:41Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern Company. The world and its energy needs are always changing. Southern Company's commitment to meeting this demand stays the same. That's because Southern Company believes energy is more than a utility. It's what powers possibilities. So they are looking ahead and investing $80 billion in infrastructure upgrades and are committed to fueling growth in ways that benefit all customers so that reliable and affordable energy is accessible for generations to come. Go to southerncompany.com to learn more. Southern Company, building the future of energy.

• 54:19Speaker 04

  When you shop at Publix, you know you and your family are getting the best products. From freshly baked bread to green-wise organic ice cream to delicious subs custom-made just for you. Publix, where shopping is a pleasure.

• 54:34Speaker 05

  This episode is brought to you by Charles Schwab. Is there a right time to sell a stock? Are you taking the right risks with your portfolio? Financial decisions can be tricky, and often, your own cognitive and emotional biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Join host Mark Reapy as he offers practical solutions to help overcome the cognitive and emotional biases that may affect your investing decisions. Listen at schwab.com/financialdecoder.