Freakonomics Radio
Hosted by Stephen J. Dubner
Do host cities really get the benefits their boosters promise, or are they just engaging in some fiscal gymnastics?
1,743 words · 8 speakers
Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern New Hampshire University. The best investments are the ones you make in yourself, and no one knows that better than Southern New Hampshire University. With more than 200 online degree programs, no set class times, and low online tuition, Southern New Hampshire University is built to fit your life today and set you up for success tomorrow. Education is an investment. Why not make it a smart one? Apply for free at SNHU.edu/freakonomics. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by PNC Bank. Boring. Great word, bad rep. Yet, time and time again, here at Freakonomics, we find that when something culture-changing
happens, boring things like calculations and careful planning are usually behind it. Which begs the question, why not apply it to other aspects of life? Like banking, for example? Well, PNC Bank did, since its inception, proving time and again that the best banking strategy isn't the exciting type, but the steady, reliable, definitely not YOLO type. PNC Bank: brilliantly boring since 1865. Brilliantly boring since 1865 is a registered mark of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC Bank: National Association, Member FDIC. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Amica. You know what they say, if you want to go fast, go alone; if you want to go far, go
together. So, go with Amica and get coverage from a mutual insurer that's built for their customers, one that looks after what's important to you together. Auto, home, life, and more, coverage that fits your unique needs. Amica helps you protect what matters most. Visit amica.com and get a quote today.
Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work is a new way to work in ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work can pull info from across your apps and connect to your tools to help you create finished work. You can even automate work in ChatGPT with the Scheduled Tasks feature, and the whole time you stay in control. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chatgpt.com by selecting Work Mode, available on Plus and Pro plans.
From APM, American Public Media and WNYC,
this is Freakonomics Radio on Marketplace. Here's the host of Marketplace, Tess Vigeland.
It's Freakonomics time. Every couple of weeks, we're talking with Stephen Dubner, co-author of the books and the blog about the hidden side of everything. Good to talk to you again, Stephen.
Hey, you too, Tess, and happy Summer Olympics to you.
Happy Summer Olympics to you as well.
Thank you.
Looking forward to it. Any favorite events for you?
Oh, you know, synchronized swimming, of course.
Of course, yes.
I don't, however, want to talk about gold medals. I actually want to talk about real gold, okay? The big economic boost that a host city like London is supposed to get, okay? But Tess, I'm here to tell you that, well, you can probably guess where I'm going with this, can't you, Tess?
No gold in them, are hills?
Let's bring in the economists, okay, to throw a little cold water and everything. Alan Sanderson at the University of Chicago has looked at previous host cities, and he measured their economic gains against what he called twin cities, okay? So nearby cities that didn't get to host the Games.
So we use Madrid in Spain, but didn't have the Olympics. Or we use Charlotte, close to Atlanta, but didn't have the Olympics. Or Melbourne in Australia didn't have the Olympics. And tried to look at tourism, construction, tax revenues, both before and after, and we could not find any significant difference between the city that had the Olympics and the city that didn't.
But Stephen, how can that be? I mean, you have thousands upon thousands of people descending on these cities. How does that not bring in a ton of cash?
Well, it does bring in a ton of cash. So the Olympic Games between TV rights and sponsorships and so on are expected to gross more than $3 billion, which is real money, even to people like you and me, you know? But the host city pays a big cut to the International Olympic Committee, and then, of course, there's the cost of putting on the Games themselves. And that is where things can get really funky, okay?
Well, what are we talking about, though, there? You know, is this your standard cost overruns, construction, things like that?
Yes, yes, yes. But you also have to go even further back, and you have to look at the incentives of the cities when they bid for the Games, okay? So these cities, they need to send out two different signals at the same time. So to the International Olympics Committee, they want to look rich. They want to show off the amazing facilities they're going to build. But back home, they want to appear frugal, to show off that, you know, there will be plenty of money left over after they build everything. The friction lies between those two signals. So Andrew Zimbalist, who's a prominent sports economist at Smith, says that last year, the London organizers sent around a letter looking for economists who could produce just the right kind of economic impact study.
And in that letter, it said that we anticipate we're going to get a lot of criticism from the media and from people saying that we've spent so much money on the London Games that it's not going to have an economic payoff. And we would like to hire somebody to do a study that will contest that criticism and present a rosy picture of what the economic impact will be.
Yes. Can we please have a study that will show exactly what we want it to show? But, you know, again, here, tourist dollars, tourist dollars, tourist dollars, not just during the Games, but doesn't that play out supposedly, predictably, for years later?
Well, you know, keep in mind that a place like London, right, already has plenty of tourists. So to some degree, what you're doing is you're really replacing a Trafalgar Square tourist with a synchronized swimming tourist, right? And as Alan Sanderson points
You've got a thing with synchronized swimming, don't you, my friend?
I am kind of fond of it. But Alan Sanderson points out furthermore that the idea of a local economic benefit is just much more complicated than you might think.
Just because a credit card gets swiped in a particular hotel, or a particular restaurant, or department store, doesn't mean that the money stays there. It has a life of its own. It's going back. If you're buying a sweatshirt in Boston, was the sweatshirt really made in Boston? Was it made somewhere else? Is this a hotel? Is central headquarters are in Boston or not?
Now, Tess, let me play devil's advocate for one minute. It may be that all these American economists are, you know, poo-pooing the Olympics because we haven't been getting the Olympics ourselves lately. Okay, so New York and Chicago were the most recent losers, US losers on Olympic bids. But if you listen to Alan Sanderson, he says that's okay because there may actually be more value in losing an Olympic bid than in winning one.
You want to signal something. We're a world-class city. And one way in which you could do it is to bid for the Olympics. Say it costs us probably, all things considered, $80 to $100 million to bid. But then you want to lose.
Okay, Tess, so how's that for your new Olympic spirit? I have the new chant now. We're number four. We're number four. Close enough to get the recognition, but we don't have to actually have to pay the bills.
I like that. A little reverse psychology. Stephen Dubner, our Freakonomics correspondent, he puts out a podcast, too, and you can get that on iTunes and hear more at Freakonomics.com. Great to talk to you, and we'll talk to you again in a couple of weeks.
Thanks much, Tess.
Hey, podcast listeners. Coming up on next week's podcast, the first of a two-part episode called Freakonomics Goes to College. Now, we all know how challenging college can be and how expensive. Don't you wish there were an easier way to get a degree?
We negotiated the price for my bachelor's, master's, and doctorate with no work whatsoever.
Wait, you bought a bachelor's, master's, and a doctorate all at once?
Sure, triple combo, have it backdated, you know, with transcript.
So next week, fake degrees and real ones, too, on Freakonomics Goes to College.
Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by EverPure. Is the value of AI not living up to the promise? The problem is probably your data, not your AI models. When it's scattered across different systems, getting your data AI-ready is a challenge. You keep your AI waiting, and everything slows down. EverPure unifies your data so you can see it, understand it, and control it all from one simple place and get it AI-ready fast. Unlock the true value of your AI at everpuredata.com.
Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Ozempic. Innovation happens through rethinking what's possible. And when it comes to GLP-1s, Ozempic Pill does just that. Learn more about Ozempic semaglutide tablets, 4 in 9mg, by calling 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit ozempic.com to view the medication guide and ask your doctor what's possible with FDA-approved Ozempic Pill.
Hey, this is Will Arnett, host of Smartless. Smartless is a podcast with myself and Sean Hayes and Jason Bateman, where each week, one of us reveals a mystery guest of the other two. We dive deep with guests that you love, like Bill Hader, Selena Gomez, Jennifer Aniston, David Beckham, Kristen Stewart, and tons more. So join us for a genuinely improvised and authentic conversation filled with laughter and newfound knowledge to feed the smartless mind. Listen to Smartless now on the SiriusXM app. Download it today.
This episode is brought to you by Charles Schwab. Is there a right time to sell a stock? Are you taking the right risks with your portfolio? Financial decisions can be tricky, and often, your own cognitive and emotional biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Join host Mark Reapy as he offers practical solutions to help overcome the cognitive and emotional biases that may affect your investing decisions. Listen at schwab.com/financialdecoder.
Page updated September 30, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated