Freakonomics Radio
Hosted by Stephen J. Dubner
Why is unemployment still so high? It may be because of something that happened well before the Great Recession.
1,874 words · 7 speakers
Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Progressive. Whoever says saving money is hard doesn't know that new customers who bundle and save with Progressive save hundreds because switching your home and auto insurance is better than cutting down on the things you love, like those iced lattes that help you get ready to face the day. So switch your home and auto to Progressive and see if you could save and keep sipping away. Get your quote today at progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by PNC Bank. Boring. Great word, bad rep. Yet, time and time again, here at Freakonomics, we find that when something culture-changing happens,
boring things like calculations and careful planning are usually behind it, which begs the question, why not apply it to other aspects of life, like banking, for example? Well, PNC Bank did since its inception, proving time and again that the best banking strategy isn't the exciting type, but the steady, reliable, definitely not YOLO type. PNC Bank. Brilliantly boring since 1865. Brilliantly boring since 1865 is a registered mark of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC Bank, National Association, Member, FDIC. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Mint Mobile. With Mint Mobile's summer sale, all of Mint's
plans are $15 per month, even unlimited. Free yourself from big wireless and switch to Mint for high-speed data and coverage on the T-Mobile 5G network. To get your new wireless plan for just $15 a month, go to mintmobile.com/freak. That's mintmobile.com/freak. Upfront payment $45 for three months, $90 for six months, or $180 for 12 months. Plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50GB may slow when network is busy. Includes up to 20GB hotspot. Capable device required. Availability, speed, and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com.
Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work is a new way to work in ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work can pull info from across your apps and connect to your tools to help you create finished work. You can even automate work in ChatGPT with the Scheduled Tasks feature, and the whole time you stay in control. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chatgpt.com by selecting Work Mode, available on Plus and Pro plans.
From APM, American Public Media and WNYC,
this is Freakonomics Radio on Marketplace. Here's the host of Marketplace, Kai Rizdal.
Time now for a little bit of Freakonomics Radio, that moment in the broadcast every couple of weeks where we talk to Stephen Dubner, the co-author of the books and the blog of the same name. It is the hidden side of everything. Dubner, how are you, man?
Hey, Kai, I'm great. And I bet you just can't wait to see the new unemployment numbers on Friday. That's kind of like catnip for you, isn't it?
It makes my day, pal. Come on, I live for that stuff.
Let me say this, whatever the numbers say on Friday, the general picture is pretty clear, which is unemployment remains relatively high. Everyone has, you know, a pet theory. But I'm here to tell you today about a trio of economists who have a new research paper out with a pretty interesting angle to explain the unemployment.
Three economists, three times as much fun. Dubner, what have you got?
All right, let's start with something that we know to be true, okay? That on average, the more education you get, the better you do in the labor market. There's no question about that, right?
Yeah, it's ROE, baby. It's return on education, much like return on investment.
Exactly right. And that's thought to be especially true for what are called knowledge workers, which are people who primarily use their brains for their job, managers and tech jobs, things like that. But one author of this new paper, his name is Paul Bowdre, looked at 30 years' worth of hiring data, and he found that demand for knowledge workers actually stopped growing quite a while ago.
But then you start noticing It's plateaued in 2000, even though more and more people are getting educated. It should have kept on going.
So Dubner, you know 2000 was like 13 years ago, right? That's before the recession, the whole deal. What happened?
Well, what happened is the tech boom. In the 1990s, the tech boom led to much higher demand for knowledge workers. So more and more people started getting the appropriate college degrees. But in 2000, remember, we had the tech bust, which meant that that demand for knowledge jobs fell, fell fast. Bodri and his colleagues actually call it the great reversal.
So wait, Dubner, let me try this one more time. 2000 was 13 years ago, man. Make this make sense in the unemployment situation today.
Here's the thing. All those highly educated workers who educated themselves up from what was supposed to be the everlasting tech boom, they didn't get jobs that they thought. But those workers don't go away, okay? And then there are new graduates in the pipeline every year, but there still aren't enough high-end jobs to suit them. So what happens? Well, here's Paul Bodri again.
These educated people aren't getting their jobs in that sector. They must be pushing down. And that's when we started noticing all this cascading. I wouldn't want to kind of exaggerate. It's not like everyone's kind of getting a barista job, but that's exactly the feeling. It's kind of like this pushing down.
So that's a pretty word that he uses, cascading, to describe a pretty ugly effect. Too many highly educated workers aren't able to find the jobs they're expecting, and as a result, they get shoved down the labor ladder a couple of rungs. Here's a fellow named Clayton Thomas. He's a software consultant in Salt Lake City. When he graduated from Duke a few years back, he studied life sciences. He was expecting to have no trouble finding a good research job.
And I went to job fairs where I would discuss openings with companies, and I found that I was competing with people that had master's degrees, even PhDs, for basically entry-level positions, which was pretty scary.
All right, so Dubner, what's that saying? I heard it in the service a lot. Stuff, shall we say, rolls downhill, right? I mean, what happens to the people on the bottom rungs of those ladders then?
Exactly right. As the top pushes the middle, the middle pushes the bottom, the crowding at the top pushes everybody down. But, you know, let me say on the top for a minute. As much as we hear about needing to educate more STEM workers, STEM stands for science, technology, engineering, and math. There's another new research paper out, which argues that there is, in fact, no shortage of STEM workers, that only half of US STEM graduates end up with a STEM job already.
This is the most depressed you have ever made me, my friend. There must be some silver lining here. You've got to hit me with that.
Um, let me try. If you go back several decades, you'll find that a huge share of the college-educated women in the US labor force worked as schoolteachers, right? So even though the job didn't pay that well, a lot of the best and brightest women in the country were teachers because they didn't have as many opportunities as they do now. When the feminist revolution opened up those opportunities, it was great news for women who became doctors and lawyers and radio show hosts, on and on.
That's right.
But, bad news for the classrooms. Well, see what you think of this idea.
All right.
This cascading-
Is this the hidden side? Is that where we're going?
This is so hidden. This is so hidden. This cascading that we're seeing now with the top pushing down, what it means is that it might be good news for a field like education, because more and more highly educated people, women and men, could end up working as, say, teachers or elsewhere in education. So this year, for instance, Teach for America, which recruits from elite college campuses, had the most applications in its 20-year history. It accepted only 17% of the applicants, which means that on some campuses, it's almost as hard to get into Teach for America as it was to get into the college itself. So if selectivity is any measure, that means that the core of potential teachers, at least, is drawn from a very, very talented pool.
All right. I think we could say silver lining found there in a roundabout way.
Got away with one there, yeah.
Stephen Dubner, Freakonomics.com is the website. He's back in a couple of weeks. We'll see you, man.
Thanks for having me, Kai.
Hey, podcast listeners. Next week on Freakonomics Radio, what do a bunch of medieval nuns- The abbess with an heroic spirit took a razor and with it cut off her nose. ...have in common with Bo Jackson.
I said, "You draft me if you want. You gonna waste the draft pick." I said, "I promise you that."
Answer: they cut off their noses to spite their face. Next time on Freakonomics Radio, spite happens.
Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by EverPure. Is the value of AI not living up to the promise? The problem is probably your data, not your AI models. When it's scattered across different systems, getting your data AI-ready is a challenge. You keep your AI waiting and everything slows down. EverPure unifies your data so you can see it, understand it, and control it all from one simple place and get it AI-ready fast. Unlock the true value of your AI at everpuredata.com. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Ozempic. Innovation happens through rethinking what's possible, and when it comes to GLP-1s, Ozempic pill does just that.
Learn more about Ozempic semaglutide tablets, 4 in 9mg, by calling 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit ozempic.com to view the medication guide and ask your doctor what's possible with FDA-approved Ozempic pill. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern Company. The world and its energy needs are always changing. Southern Company's commitment to meeting this demand stays the same. That's because Southern Company believes energy is more than a utility, it's what powers possibilities. So they are looking ahead and investing $80 billion in infrastructure upgrades and are committed to fueling growth in ways that benefit all customers so that reliable and
affordable energy is accessible for generations to come. Go to southerncompany.com to learn more. Southern Company, building the future of energy.
This episode is brought to you by Charles Schwab. Is there a right time to sell a stock? Are you taking the right risks with your portfolio? Financial decisions can be tricky, and often your own cognitive and emotional biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Join host Mark Reapy as he offers practical solutions to help overcome the cognitive and emotional biases that may affect your investing decisions. Listen at schwab.com/financialdecoder.
Page updated September 30, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated