Why US tariffs just got slower

In today’s episode on 23rd Feb 2026, we tell you why US tariffs just got a whole lot slower and what it means for the next phase. ⁠Book a FREE call with Ditto⁠ https://ditto.sh/vx51ji https://ditto.sh/vx51ji

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Hello folks, you're tuned into Finshots Daily. In today's episode, we tell you why US tariffs just got a whole lot slower and what it means for the next phase.

• 0:12Speaker 00

  Before we begin, here's a quick word from Team Ditto. Life can be unpredictable and if the main earner is not around, the bills won't stop. That's why term insurance is so important. It gives your family a fixed payout so they can cover school fees, EMIs and daily expenses without stress. If you buy it early, you can get a one crore cover for as little as thousand rupees a month and the premium stays the same for your entire policy term. That's real peace of mind at a very small cost. And if you're not sure which plan is right for you, book a free call with Ditto. No spam, just honest guidance and we're trusted by over 8 lakh people for their health and term insurance needs. Now, back to the story. Last year, tariffs slapped into the world the way higher prices often do.

• 0:58Speaker 00

  There was no single moment when everything changed. Goods became a little more expensive, negotiations a little harder and decisions a little more cautious. Before long, everyone behaved as if this was simply how things were going to be. Not just India but every major economy, from China and the European Union to the UK and Australia. The tariffs were broad and applied across countries. That scale forced companies and governments to respond as if the rules had genuinely changed forever. For India in particular, the stakes were high. The US is one of India's largest trading partners with annual goods trade crossing 120 billion dollars in 2024 and key export sectors exposed to tariff risk. India was also among the countries facing high reciprocal duties, making the hit feel both immediate and structural.

• 1:41Speaker 00

  Up until very recently, we were on the verge of signing our own trade deal with the US and the alternative to not having one was being exposed to ridiculously high 500% tariff. As a result, countries began accelerating trade negotiations with the US and with each other. All of this was just to hedge against what looked like a prolonged phase of American protectionism. Supply chains were adjusted, investment plans were reworked, the assumption was simple, tariffs were here to stay. That assumption broke abruptly last year. Last week, when the US Supreme Court ruled that tariffs imposed by the president were in fact illegal. Now, that single judgment didn't just undo a set of duties, it actually questions something far more fundamental. Whether tariffs can be imposed quickly and kept indefinitely without congressional approval?

• 2:25Speaker 00

  Here's why. When the tariffs came into effect last year, governments and companies worked around them without much protest, more focused on what to do next. But almost no one stopped to ask a basic question first: Were they even legal? You see, the tariffs were imposed by President Trump by using a law called International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or I E E P A. This is a law meant for genuine national emergencies. Now, what constitutes an emergency are things like threats to national security, state-sponsored terrorism, and foreign government aggression. But what doesn't count as emergency per se are trade deficits, general economic imbalances, and of course tariffs. That difference is exactly what the US Supreme Court pointed out too. In its six-three ruling last week, six justices agreed that the tariffs were unlawful, while three dissented.

• 3:09Speaker 00

  It stated that emergency powers can't be used as a shortcut to run long-term trade policy. Tariffs are in a short-term fix, they change how businesses plan for years. The court's view was that emergency powers weren't meant to be used that way. But this ruling didn't say that the tariffs can't be imposed at all. It only said it can't be imposed this way, that is through I E E P A. The ruling also landed at an awkward economic moment, with the US growth slowing. Doing nothing wasn't really an option, even if the fastest legal route had just been shut. That one distinction led to what came next. The White House complied and removed the previous tariffs it imposed, but in turn, it took a different route. They did it by imposing a temporary import surcharge capped at one fifty days using a narrower trade law design for short-term balance of payment stress.

• 3:52Speaker 00

  The surcharge was applied across all countries and later raised from ten percent to fifteen percent. It may be called a surcharge, but for global trade, it looks and feels like a tariff, just one with an expiry date. So what does this mean now and what does future look like? Well, for starters, the tariffs haven't disappeared completely. They're just changed form. They're now more temporary, more legally fragile, and harder to sustain without backing from Congress. But the repercussions are what could make this a case study for future generations. The importers who are actually paying the tariffs in the first place. They are already preparing to challenge the duties that they've already paid. And even though it hasn't been that long, the US Treasury could be looking at an eye-watering $175 billion of refunds from three lakh businesses.

• 4:35Speaker 00

  This isn't the first time the US government has had to refund companies. Back in 98, when a different import-related tax was partly struck down, roughly $730 million was eventually refunded, a process that nearly took two years to complete. The tax in question was hub maintenance tax, introduced by Congress in 1986 and calculated as a levy on the value of cargo moving through US ports. The Supreme Court later ruled that applying the tax to exports was unconstitutional, forcing the government to roll it back and issue refunds. For the current scale and size, it could be years before businesses actually start seeing refunds. When asked about the refunds, Trump himself said they'll end up being in court for five years. In the meantime, any effort to make tariffs last will have to pass through slower channels: formal investigations, national security reviews, or Congress itself.

• 5:19Speaker 00

  More importantly, the ruling shifts the balance of power. Earlier, tariffs were imposed first and questioned later. That sequence is now reversed. Speed no longer guarantees durability. Any tariffs announced overnight is far more likely to be temporary, challenged in court, or rolled back unless it survives a longer political and legal process. Because the US Supreme Court literally stated that only Congress had the power to levy taxes and duties under the Constitution. Already, the EU, China, and other major countries have stepped forward and are reconsidering past agreements. The EU clearly stated that it won't be accepting any tariff increase from the US, given how they already signed a trade deal last year. Beijing has said it is conducting a full assessment of both Supreme Court ruling and their new temporary tariffs. But India's response stands out for what it hasn't done.

• 6:01Speaker 00

  Rather than rushing to finalize or rewrite trade commitments, India has paused, reassessed, and waited. Officials are studying how the Supreme Court ruling and temporary tariffs affect earlier assumptions baked into negotiations. The Supreme Court ruling doesn't close a chapter on the US tariff. It opens a more complex one. For countries watching closely, including India, this moment calls for patience rather than urgency. Were trade policies still up in the air, decisions made too quickly may age faster than tariffs themselves. So, nothing about this moment feels settled yet. Tariffs are still in place, numbers are still shifting, and negotiations are still unfinished. But the idea that trade policy can be imposed quickly and treated as permanent has been gently unsettled. I'll see you folks in the next one.

• 6:43Speaker 00

  Thank you for listening to today's episode. And if you want to share your feedback or suggestions, do drop us an email to [email protected]. Until next time.