Why India’s new Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules matter

In today’s episode on 17th December 2025, we dive into India’s new Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, and why they matter not just for the oil and gas sector, but for the broader economy too. ⁠Save your spot for Ditto's FREE insurance masterclass⁠ https://events.joinditto.in/?utm_source=Finshots&utm_medium=Podcast

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Hello folks, you're tuned into Finshots Daily. In today's episode, we dive into India's new petroleum and natural gas rules and why they matter not just for the oil and gas sector, but for the broader economy too.

• 0:14Speaker 00

  But before we begin, here's a quick side note from Team Ditto. This weekend, we're hosting a free two-day insurance masterclass where we'll walk you through simple rules to pick the right insurance plan and the common mistakes that you should avoid. So, head to the link in the description and book your spot now. Alright, now on to today's story. For a while, I've lived in a place called Ashok Nagar in West Bengal, about 50 kilometres from Kolkata. You've probably never heard of it, and that's fair, because it's a small town, not particularly known for anything out of the ordinary. But in 2018, something unexpected happened. ONGC struck its first commercial crude oil discovery just 10 minutes away from my home. Test production followed between 2020 and 2022,

• 0:55Speaker 00

  and since then, ONGC has gone on to make a few more discoveries nearby. And yet, years later, commercial oil extraction still hasn't begun. The reason? ONGC and the West Bengal government got stuck arguing over a deceptively simple question. What exactly is the value of the lease on which stamp duty should be paid? To see why this stalled everything, you need a bit of context. When a company wants to do upstream oil business, basically find oil and gas and extract it, it needs something called a petroleum mining lease. If the oil field lies within the state, the state government grants the lease. If it's offshore, the central government does. This lease gives the company exclusive rights to explore, develop, produce and sell oil and gas. Think of it like renting land.

• 1:40Speaker 00

  Here, the state is the owner and the oil company pays an annual lease rent. On top of that, it also pays royalty, which depends on how much oil is actually produced and sold. All of this is governed by the Oil Fields Regulation and Development Act of 1948. But before the lease becomes operational, there's one more step. The company has to pay stamp duty or a one-time tax where the lease deed is executed. For the state, this is upfront revenue, and it's calculated as a percentage of the lease's value. And that's where Ashok Nagar's project hit a wall. ONGC and the West Bengal government disagreed on what should count as the value of the lease for stamp duty purposes. Should it be the lease rent paid over the full period? Should it include future royalty from oil that hadn't even been produced yet?

• 2:25Speaker 00

  Or should stamp duty be charged on whichever number turn out to be higher? The problem was that petroleum and natural gas rules, we'll just call it PNG rules, written back in 1959, never clearly defined this. That single ambiguity was enough to slow down the lease approval by quite a few years. And the cost of that delay has been massive. ONGC has actually spent over 1,000 crore on exploration and appraisal, yet production hasn't started. The state hasn't earned any royalty or revenue. Now, to put this into perspective, the Ashoknagar Field, being the first identified oil field in West Bengal, is estimated to produce oil worth around 45,000 crore,

• 3:06Speaker 00

  with West Bengal's potential revenue at roughly 4,500 crore over the field's life. None of that has come in yet. There's also been no jobs boost and no local services boom. The kind that usually follows drilling and accompanying operations. The cost doesn't stop at the state level. For the country as a whole, this delay matters because India still imports about 88% of the crude oil it consumes. Sure, Ashoknagar wouldn't have transformed that equation overnight, but it definitely could have helped chip away at the dependence a little. Instead, its barrels are still stuck underground. But that isn't an isolated case. For years, the old PNG rules quietly held back India's entire oil and gas sector. The most visible damage showed up in domestic production.

• 3:48Speaker 00

  Under an uncertain and cumbersome regulatory regime, India's crude oil output steadily slipped. Production stood at about 34 MMT, that's million metric tonnes, in 2019, but by 2024, it had fallen to around 29 MMT. In simple terms, we were extracting less oil from our own ground, which automatically pushed us to rely more on expensive imports. ONGC tells an even sharper story. In FI25, its crude production fell by about 3%, despite capital expenditure more than doubling to 62,000 crore. Yes, the government has rolled out several policy reforms over the years, but the fact that ONGC spent twice as much and still got less output suggests something deeper was broken. The regulatory framework was choking productivity, even as investments kept rising.

• 4:33Speaker 00

  This decline fed straight into India's import bill. If you look at the numbers, you will see that India spent roughly 161 billion dollars importing crude oil and petroleum products in FI25, which is about 3% more than the year before. And since oil imports are paid for in dollars, even small movements in the rupee makes a big difference. A one rupee depreciation, for instance, can add about 8,000 to 10,000 crore rupees to the annual import bill, putting pressure on foreign exchange reserves and the currency. It's a vicious cycle, and the old rules did little to break it. Perhaps the most damaging consequence, though, was how India scared away global oil majors. On paper, the country allowed 100% FDI in oil and gas, but in practice, a dense regulatory maze kept international players at bay.

• 5:16Speaker 00

  Projects required multiple approvals across different stages of exploration, development and production, often from different government ministries, taking years to secure. So it wasn't unusual for companies to spend years chasing just one permit. Pricing policy made things worse. Under the administered price mechanism, fuel prices were capped by the government. That meant even if a company's cost went up, it couldn't just sell fuel above government's set prices. State-owned firms like ONGC were compensated for losses, but private and foreign players were not. This created a lopsided risk equation where investors bore the downside if costs rose but had limited upside even when things went well. Add to that lease terms that were temporary and could be changed or withdrawn at government's discretion, and it became hard to justify pouring billions of dollars into long-term oil and gas infrastructure.

• 6:02Speaker 00

  The result was predictable. Despite its scale and energy needs, India attracted a very little upstream oil and gas FDI. At this point, you might be wondering, if these rules caused so much damage, why did we have them in the first place? The answer is pretty straightforward. These rules were written for a very different India, shaped by memories of colonial extraction. After decades of foreign exploitation, the instinct was to keep strategic sectors like oil firmly under state control with private capital viewed with suspicion. That made sense back then, but as India changed and the country opened sector to 100% foreign investment, even in public sector firms, the old rules began to work against it. So what was meant to keep private capital out became a roadblock just when India needed investment the most. Turns, load development, cut output and chased away foreign money.

• 6:46Speaker 00

  But just last week, the government amended the Oil Fields Regulation and Development Act and notified the new PNG rules 2025. These rules replaced a decades-old 1959 framework and more importantly fixed the core issues that kept upstream oil projects stuck for years. First, the new rules remove all ambiguity around what counts as the value of the lease. They clearly state that the value of the lease is the total lease rent payable over the entire lease term. Royalty is treated as a completely separate stream. In simple terms, rent is what the company pays to hold the lease while royalty is what the state earns later as oil is actually produced. That gives everyone a single objective way to calculate stamp duty. Take the annual lease rent multiplied by the number of years in this lease. Say thirty years and that number becomes the value of the lease for stamp duty purposes.

• 7:31Speaker 00

  So the old debate over lease rent or royalty, whichever is higher, simply disappears because royalty isn't part of the lease valuation at all. Second, the rules finally put a time limit on approvals. Any application for a petroleum lease now has to be decided within one eighty days. This means disputes and paperwork can't drag on endlessly the way they did in Ashok Nagar. If lease falls under the centre and no decision is taken within this period, the application is deemed approved. If it falls under a state and there's no decision after one eighty days, it's deemed rejected. Third, instead of forcing companies to juggle multiple licenses at different stages, a single petroleum lease now covers exploration, development, production and even related activities like renewable energy projects. Lease periods have also been extended.

• 8:13Speaker 00

  Companies can now hold leases for up to thirty years with extensions tied to the economic life of the field. That kind of long-term certainty is crucial if you're going to sink billions into drilling rigs, pipelines and processing facilities. There's also quite but important fix around infrastructure. Companies are now required to report unused pipeline and facility capacity every year and make it available to others on fair terms. Earlier, large players could sit on spare capacity and block smaller operators. This change improves utilization, lower costs and makes the sector more competitive. And perhaps the biggest signal to global investors is that the new rules let foreign investors settle disputes through international arbitration. Even outside India if they want. Since Indian courts can be slow, this gives investors more confidence and makes India

• 8:58Speaker 00

  an equally attractive destination as other oil-producing countries. Which brings us back to Ashoknagar. As Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri told the Rajya Sabha just a couple of days ago, oil production in the town could start within the next few weeks and an issue that's been stuck for years now has a clear path forward. Sure, the new PNG rules won't work miracles overnight and better rules can't conjure up new reserves and even the oil we do have will take years to explore and extract. But they do remove some of the biggest self-inflicted roadblocks and that makes this a clear step in the right direction.

• 9:33Speaker 00

  Thank you for listening to today's episode. And if you want to share your feedback or suggestions, do drop us an email to [email protected]. Until next time.