India is in a dilemma over cabotage laws

In today’s Finshots on 21st April 2026, we talk about cabotage and why India is in a dilemma over the relaxations it introduced to its cabotage rules. Sign up for FREE insurance masterclass by Ditto https://ditto.sh/2cgegs

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Hello folks, you're tuned into Finshots Daily. In today's episode, we talk about Kapital and why India is in a dilemma over the relaxations it introduced to its capital rules.

• 0:14Speaker 00

  A quick side note before we begin, we're hosting a free two-day insurance masterclass that helps you build real financial security by understanding both health and life insurance the right way. Now, you can save your spot by heading to the link in the description and registering yourself. By the way, it's completely free and you can find the link in the description. Alright, let's get on to today's story. Today is April 21st. This date may or may not mean much to you, but it does for India's shipping industry. Because from today, the government was actually supposed to scrap a few exceptions it introduced in 2018 that partially eased Kapital rules to boost coastal shipping. Now, we know that line sounds a bit confusing, so let's slow down and first understand what

• 0:59Speaker 00

  Kapital rules really are. Kapital simply refers to a foreign shipping or transport operator carrying goods or passengers between two ports or places within the same country. For instance, Blue Whale Shipping Inc. (a foreign transporter moving cargo between Mumbai and Chennai), now that's Kapital. But India's rules are quite clear here. Under the Merchant Shipping Act, only Indian ships are allowed to engage in coastal trade. Foreign ships can step in only if Indian ships aren't available or if they've been granted a specific exception or license. And that exception came in 2018. India's Ministry of Ports temporarily allowed foreign flagged container ships to carry certain domestic cargo along Indian coastal routes without needing a license.

• 1:41Speaker 00

  Stuff like export or import containers, some agricultural and fertilizer cargo, and even transshipment empties or simply empty containers that are transferred at an intermediate port while heading to the final destination. Now, this was done because even though Kapital rules were meant to protect the Indian shipping industry and promote local ships, restricting foreign vessels had started to slow down the movement of goods by sea and push up costs. To put this in perspective, let's assume there's cargo That needs to be exported from Bengaluru to Australia. Normally, this cargo would move from Bengaluru to a Chennai transshipment hub. Now, that's a port where cargo is transferred from one ship to another before heading to its final destination. And from there onwards to Australia.

• 2:26Speaker 00

  Now, since this is an export, it would make sense to choose a foreign carrier that can handle the Bengaluru to Chennai leg and then directly ship the goods to Australia as part of one integrated service. It's simpler, cheaper and more efficient. But with strict cabotage rules, the Bangalore Chennai leg has to be handled by an Indian coastal freighter ship. And that's a problem because now the exporter has to deal with two different carriers. One, Indian for the domestic leg and one foreign for the international journey. Naturally, this pushes up logistics costs for anyone using Indian ports. Besides, higher costs make Indian goods more expensive and less competitive in a global market. So, shippers start looking for alternatives.

• 3:10Speaker 00

  For instance, instead of routing cargo from Bangalore to Chennai, they may choose an international carrier that takes the goods straight to a global transshipment hub like Singapore and then onward to Australia. The end result is fewer transshipments at Indian ports and more India-bound cargo quickly moving up through hubs in Singapore, Sri Lanka or, well, Malaysia. Now, this might sound like just one example, but situations like this were playing out often enough that Indian ports were losing nearly fifteen hundred crore rupees worth of business every single year, which is a significant hit to their revenue potential. And that's exactly why the twenty eighteen relaxation came into the picture. The government's idea behind this relaxation was fairly simple.

• 3:51Speaker 00

  It believed that easing these rules could increase transshipment at Indian ports and even pull back nearly ten percent of Indian cargo that was otherwise being transshipped abroad. But a couple of months ago, after nearly eight years of this relaxation, the government decided to scrap these cabotage relaxations. It felt the policy hadn't quite delivered on its promise. Stakeholders had raised concerns that foreign carriers were indulging in predatory practices or undercutting competitors by offering lower freight. Rates partly because they had more vessels at their disposal. And as a result, cargo movement via Indian flagships wasn't really growing. It had more or less staggered. So, the government thought if these relaxations are hurting our domestic fleet, why not roll them back?

• 4:35Speaker 00

  That way, it could boost Indian flag container tonnage, support shipbuilding, reduce dependence on foreign carriers, and strengthen India's own shipping lines. Now, all of which ties into the larger one trillion dollar exports goal by twenty thirteen. Now that sounds reasonable, right? After all, protecting Indian ships was the whole point of cabotage rules to begin with. But, there's a problem. Of course, the problem of Indian exports becoming more expensive and less competitive globally already exists. But there's another issue too. At any given time, only about thirty feeder vessels operate along India's coast, which can go up to around fifty depending on demand. Now that's simply not enough to handle all transshipment style demand efficiently.

• 5:18Speaker 00

  So with fewer ships available and no competition from foreign flag carriers on these routes, freight rates for coastal container legs could end up rising. Another thing is the Middle East conflict. Now especially around the Red Sea and the Gulf, which have made traditional routes riskier and more expensive. Carriers have rerouted ships, cut sailings and raised freight rates. This has already pushed up logistics costs for Indian exporters and importers. So, even before any cabotage roll back, shipping lines were under pressure. And Indian shippers were already paying more for ocean freight. On top of that, because of the disruption, ships are getting held up at sea, things aren't moving as per schedule. Now, this means fewer Indian feeder vessels are actually available to carry the next set of cargo.

• 6:02Speaker 00

  And that's exactly why after representations from lobby groups representing both Indian and foreign container shipping lines, the government has decided not to roll back the cabotage exemptions from today. Instead, it has extended the relaxations for another six months until October and will reassess the situation after that. But that just sets up another dilemma. Because, see, if the relaxations continue, Indian shipping representatives argue that the movement of cargo through foreign ports.

• 6:30Speaker 00

  Hasn't really reduced nor have costs for Indian exporters and importers come down. On the other hand, foreign carriers claim the opposite. That these exemptions have slashed freight rates to a long haul destinations by as much as eighty percent and brought down the cost of coastal movement of transshipment cargo to some of its lowest levels. Besides, there's yet another issue building in the background. After eight years of partial liberalisation, even the talk of an abrupt rollback has raised concerns about policy consistency. For foreign carriers, this uncertainty is a problem because if rules can change suddenly, they may think twice before building India-focused coastal feeder networks fearing another regulatory u-turn. So, how can the government solve this, you ask?

• 7:13Speaker 00

  Well, there are a couple of fairly simple options. One, give Indian flagships the first right to carry cargo. And only if they don't have enough capacity, allow foreign ships to step in. In special situations like the current geopolitical tensions, foreign ships could be allowed more freely. Second, if the government does introduce relaxations, it should clearly define an end date or proper sunset clause. That way, the policy doesn't drag on and feel like the default option like the current relaxations that have stretched on for eight long years. At the same time, India also needs to build more shipping capacity if it wants to protect both its container lines and its ports. And that's already starting to happen, by the way. India's shipping fleet capacity crossed fourteen point two million gross tonnage for the first time,

• 7:57Speaker 00

  with ninety-two vessels added in FY26. Out of these fifty were coastal vessels, the kind that matter for domestic transshipment. Now, that's roughly a twelve percent increase over last year. Plus, the one point five million gross tonnage added in FY26 is nearly thrice what was added the year before. This simply shows that fleet expansion is picking up pace. So, yes, folks, things are moving in the right direction, but we'll have to wait and see what happens in six months. All right, folks, I will see you in the next one.

• 8:27Speaker 00

  Thank you for listening to today's episode. And if you want to share your feedback or suggestions, do drop us an email to [email protected]. Until next time.