Pod Insights Finshots Daily Do PSU stocks really rally because of elections? About this episode In today’s episode on 24th April 2026, we explore whether PSU stocks rally because of elections or because of policy, reforms, and market expectations.
Book a FREE call with Ditto https://ditto.sh/vx51ji
Transcript 0:00 Speaker 00 Hello folks, you're tuned in to Finchart's Daily. In today's episode, we explore whether PSU stocks rally because of elections or because of policy reforms and market expectations.
0:13 Speaker 00 Before we begin, here's a quick word from team Ditto. Life has a way of surprising us and not always in a good way. Sometimes it's a sudden illness or an unexpected hospital visit that can shake up everything. In India, families still pay about 39% of medical expenses directly from their own pockets and just one hospital's stick can wipe out years of savings. The easiest way to protect yourself is by getting a good health insurance plan. It's way cheaper than footing one huge bill. And if you're unaware where to start, book a free call with Ditto. No spam, just honest, jargon-free guidance. Trusted by over 8 lakh people for their health and term insurance needs. The link is in the description. Now, back to the story.
0:55 Speaker 00 Every election season, a familiar theory makes the rounds in Indian markets. Buy public sector undertaking stocks or PSU stocks because governments spend more, announce bigger projects and prefer visible economic momentum when votes are around the corner. And the logic feels almost too neat to question, right? After all, public sector undertakings sit at the centre of infrastructure, defence, railways, banking, oil, power, insurance, utilities and more. So, if the government wants to push growth, many of these entities are natural vehicles through which that pushes Delhi ward. That is why PSU stocks are often perceived as a direct player on the political climate. When elections approach, investors begin assuming that roads will be built faster,
1:37 Speaker 00 railway budgets will rise, defence orders will increase and disinvestment stories may return. And since these companies are tied so closely to state policy, many believe they must naturally outperform during election cycles. But history tells a more nuanced story. Sure, PSU stocks do react to elections, sometimes painfully and sometimes euphorically. However, they do not move simply because the government wins. To understand this better, let us take a step back and look at how Indian markets usually behave around elections. First things first, markets dislike uncertainty more than than almost anything else and elections are a perfect recipe for that. They create uncertainty by forcing you and me to think about multiple outcomes at once. Will the incumbent return? Will a coalition emerge?
2:21 Speaker 00 Will welfare spending rise? Will fiscal discipline weaken? Will privatization accelerate or slow down? All these questions matter because stock prices reflect future expectations and not present headlines. And historically, Indian markets have often performed well in the run up to elections. In fact, they've shown average gains of roughly twenty nine percent in the twelve months leading up to general elections, with positive momentum often building even in the weeks just before polling. But averages can be misleading because the path is rarely smooth. Election periods often produce some of the sharpest bouts of volatility in the market. And this is where PSU stocks become particularly interesting. Unlike export-heavy IT firms or pharma companies, PSU's are deeply tied to domestic policy decisions.
3:04 Speaker 00 So, when the government changes anything, these companies often feed it first. For instance, if the government prioritizes railway CapEx, railway-linked PSU's can benefit. If defense indigenization accelerates, defense PSU's may see stronger order books. If PSU banks receive recapitalization support or benefit from state-led lending cycles, their earnings outlook changes. So, yes, elections do matter in this context, but because they can reshape the policy environment in which these businesses operate. Take two thousand four, one of the most dramatic examples in Indian market history. Markets had largely expected continuity. Instead, the Congress-led UPA coalition came to power with support from the left. Investors feared slower reforms, resistance to privatization, and a less friendly policy direction.
3:49 Speaker 00 The reaction was immediate and brutal, with the Sensex plunging more than fourteen percent in a single day. Many investors still cite this as proof that coalition governments are bad for markets. However, that misses what happened next. Once fears eased and it became clear that the new government would still pursue growth and maintain economic stability, markets recovered strongly in the months that followed. And two years later, in two thousand six, the same index returned over one twenty percent. In this case, what changed was not just the election result, it was confidence around. Around the policies the left-aligned coalition would introduce. Now, let's consider 2009. The UPA returned with a stronger-than-expected mandate.
4:28 Speaker 00 And this removed much of the uncertainty surrounding coalition constraints and gave markets confidence that decision-making could continue with fewer obstacles. The Nifty surged over fifteen percent on the result day, triggering upper circuits. Once again, the market was not celebrating politics for its own sake. It was rewarding clarity, continuity, and the prospect of stable governance with the incumbent. Then came 2014, which became especially important for PSU stocks and investors. The BJP under Narendra Modi won a full majority and the markets interpreted this as the start of a more decisive policy era focused on infrastructure, manufacturing, state capacity, and most importantly, execution. That optimism did not emerge in a vacuum.
5:09 Speaker 00 BJP's campaign itself was heavily built around economic revival after years of stalled projects, slowing growth, and corruption scandals. Investors heard repeated themes such as better roads and ports, cleaner governance, more manufacturing, more jobs, reliable electricity, financial inclusion, and a government that would move projects from announcement to completion. In simple terms, markets believed India was moving from an era of drift to an era of delivery. And if that were to happen, PSUs were naturally positioned to benefit first. So, defense PSUs such as HAL and BEL began benefiting from indigenization narratives, domestic procurement pipelines, and later, export ambitions.
5:49 Speaker 00 Railway-linked companies benefited from a multi-year CAPEX cycle focused on electrification, track upgrades, station redevelopment, and freight efficiency. PSU banks eventually benefited from balance sheet cleanups, recapitalization, and credit growth. And it would be incorrect to say that all of this happened because of the election loan. The election may have changed sentiment, but the real gains came later through budgets, reforms, healthier earnings, and investors assigning higher valuations to businesses they had long ignored. And that is an important difference. Take 2019 to understand this better. The BJP returned to power decisively, but the immediate market response was far more modest than in 2014. And why was that the case?
6:31 Speaker 00 Because much of the narrative had already been prized in beforehand. Since it was the incumbent, investors already expected stable policy. As a result, the election itself did not create the same magnitude of upside or downside. This teaches another important lesson. Even a positive result may not drive markets much if expectations have already been factored in prices. Then came 2024. Perhaps the clearest example of why PSU elections folklore can be dangerous. Exit polls had encouraged expectations of an overwhelming mandate. Instead, the ruling party fell short of a solo majority and required coalition support. As a result, markets sold off sharply while several popular defence and railway PSU names corrected hard as investors suddenly questioned whether capital expenditure would slow.
7:16 Speaker 00 Yet, once markets understood that major policies were still broadly intact, panic eased and prices stabilized. Again, the lesson was clear. PSU stocks were not reacting to the dance of democracy itself. They were reacting to what investors believed the result meant for future spending and reforms. This also explains why PSU performance around elections is never homogeneous. Some PSU sectors are driven by budgetary support, others by commodity cycles, others by interest rates. For example, a power utility may respond differently from a defence manufacturer. A PSU bank may respond differently from an oil producer. So lumping all PSUs into one election basket can therefore be misleading. So, how can one make sense of all this, you ask? Well, there's another factor investors often overlook: valuations.
8:00 Speaker 00 For years, PSU stocks stayed at steep discounts because markets saw them as inefficient, overregulated, politically influenced and poor allocators of capital. But in recent years, many of these names have recovered significantly. Some now trade on expectations of continued earnings growth, strong dividends, strategic relevance or sustained capex support. That means future returns may become harder to earn if expectations are already high. A good election outcome may help sentiment, but if valuations are stretched and earnings disappoint, the stock can still underperform. Likewise, a temporary post-election sell-off may create opportunities in fundamentally strong businesses with long growth runways. This is why election investing often looks Easier in theory than in practice. Retail investors tend to focus on the headline event of who won.
8:45 Speaker 00 However, it's important to also focus on second order questions specific to policies and individual sectors or companies. These include what is the administration's stance on capital expenditure and infrastructure? Will the new regime introduce stricter regulations for specific industries? Will there be continued support for domestic manufacturing and indigenisation? Is there a clear economic blueprint for structural reforms? How will the government's agenda affect FII sentiment? Can the government effectively manage inflation and the fiscal deficit? And the second layer usually matters more over time. Which brings us back to the big question. Do P S U stocks really rally around elections? Well, sometimes they do, sometimes they fall and sometimes they do both within weeks.
9:28 Speaker 00 But the better answer is that P S U stocks rally when elections increase confidence in future policies and they struggle when results create uncertainty or challenge expectations that were already priced in. In that sense, elections are catalysts and not guarantees. And for most long-term investors, the bigger lesson is not about timing the resultant moves. It is that wealth that is usually built through a focus on the fair value of a stock as well as disciplined asset allocation rather than getting carried away by political speculation. Either way, what has consistently proven to win over the long term is owning a diversified portfolio bought at reasonable prices, aligned with your risk appetite, time horizon and financial goals. Because portfolios built on diversification, quality, patience and sensible risk management tend to outlast all of them.
10:14 Speaker 00 All right, folks, I will see you in the next one. Thank you for listening to today's episode. And if you want to share your feedback or suggestions, do drop us an email to [email protected] . Until next time.
Previous EU wants better phones. But at what cost? Next The missing piece in quantum computing Page updated November 10, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated
