Pod Insights Decoder The quest to keep OpenAI honest About this episode Despite being one of the most valuable companies in the world, OpenAI is still technically a nonprofit. That’s what set the stage for the dramatic board coup in 2023 that briefly ousted Sam Altman as CEO. And now, OpenAI is trying to shake this nonprofit structure so it can raise even more money and, eventually, go public. There’s a lot at stake here, and not just for OpenAI.
Links:
OpenAI abandons plans to become a for-profit company | Verge
Why California’s AG must continue investigation into OpenAI | CalMatters
An open letter to OpenAI | EyesOnOpenAI
OpenAI eyes $50B valuation in potential employee share sale | Reuters
OpenAI thinks its critics are funded by billionaires | San Francisco Standard
Credits:
Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.
Our producers are Kate Cox and Nick Statt. Our editor is Ursa Wright.
The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript 6,934 words · 12 speakers
0:01 Speaker 00 Company spending is complex. Managing it should be simple. This is AMEX Corporate, a single platform connecting cards, expenses, and payments to streamline the way you work. Flexible controls for when priorities shift, support around the clock, all backed by American Express, so you can stay focused on what matters most. Built to simplify, designed to scale. This is AMEX Corporate. Get started at go.amex/ammexcorporate. Terms apply.
0:35 Speaker 01 New and exclusive holiday decor just launched online at The Home Depot. Check out the viral Grand Duchess collection with smart holiday lights you can control from your phone. Easily customize the twinkle across trees, wreaths, and garlands to match your holiday vibe. Create stunning light effects, then switch it up with the tap of your fingers. Even the man in red will be impressed. Shop the holiday decor you want, online only, at homedepot.com.
1:06 Speaker 02 This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends, like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an Ultra. Because it's not just a superior light beer, it's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.
1:37 Speaker 03 Hey, everyone. Welcome to Decoder. I'm Alex Heath, deputy editor at The Verge and your Thursday episode guest host. We've covered OpenAI in several ways this summer, from how it's navigating the AI talent wars to how people are starting to feel attached to ChatGPT. Next week, we're airing a recent conversation I had with Brett Taylor, the chairman of OpenAI's board. But today, I want to zoom in on the battle that's brewing about the future of OpenAI itself. Despite being one of the most valuable companies in the world, OpenAI is still technically a nonprofit.
2:12 Speaker 03 That structure was designed back in 2015 to keep investors from steering artificial intelligence in ways that could harm humanity. It's also what set the stage for the dramatic board coup in 2023 that briefly ousted Sam Altman as CEO. And now, OpenAI is trying to shake this nonprofit structure so that it can raise even more money and eventually go public. There's a lot at stake here, and not just for OpenAI. To unpack why it matters, today I'm joined by Katherine Bracy, CEO of Tech Equity, and Orson Ailad, CEO of Latino Prosperity. They help run Eyes on OpenAI, a coalition of advocacy groups that's challenging OpenAI's attempted restructuring.
2:56 Speaker 03 As you'll hear, Katherine and Orson argue that OpenAI has enjoyed the advantages of being a nonprofit while drifting away from its mission. It's a complicated, fascinating story that cuts to the heart of how the most important AI company in the world is structured, and the impacts of that structure. Here, I should note that OpenAI declined to comment on this episode specifically. Instead, I was referred to a May blog post from Sam Altman, in which he wrote that the company's proposed restructuring will still create the "largest and most effective nonprofit in history."
3:29 Speaker 03 Okay, here's my conversation with Katherine Bracy and Orson Ailad from Eyes on OpenAI. Katherine and Orson, I'm so excited to have you both on because I think this is an important topic that more people should actually understand, and they may in the coming months as this all comes to a head. That said, no one from OpenAI is here in this conversation, so I also kind of want to play devil's advocate here a little bit.
4:12 Speaker 03 And so my first question for both of you is simply, why should we care about OpenAI's nonprofit status? Why does it matter?
4:22 Speaker 04 I think it might be helpful for your listeners to just be reminded of OpenAI's history and why it was founded, which is important to understand the governance structure. It was founded in order to ensure that this technology that its founders believed was imminent was going to benefit humanity and not undermine it. They had a strong understanding of the potential risks of AGI and they wanted to build something that could harness that technology for good. And that was a lofty mission. And I think a lot of us at the time were very supportive of it. They structured themselves as a nonprofit
5:04 Speaker 04 explicitly to protect that technology and that mission from the imposition of investors onto the technology. And I thought this was very telling. I just wrote a book about venture capital and interviewed Sam Altman for the book and wanted to understand his thinking behind setting OpenAI up as a nonprofit. I didn't know that he would be so explicit about doing so because he wanted to protect it from investors, but that's exactly what he told me, that he knew, and he knew very well because he was running Y Combinator at the time. He knew what investors would ask of this technology and he knew that those asks would create risks for AGI to not achieve the mission of benefiting all
5:49 Speaker 04 of humanity, but instead be focused on profit. And in the focus on profits, create a lot of risks for humanity in the process. So the nonprofit structure was explicitly meant to protect society. And I think the fact that since I've had that conversation with Sam, they've taken a turn away from that mission and that structure to protect the technology and protect the mission is worrying. And so Orson and I and a coalition of other organizations are trying to make sure that at least the mission itself is protected, if not the governance structure.
6:26 Speaker 03 Talk about this coalition and who makes it up? What is its mission? How did it come together?
6:33 Speaker 05 This coalition came about, you know, we were all reading the same articles. We're hoping I wanted to basically abandon its nonprofit roots and go fully private. Many of us were concerned.
6:49 Speaker 05 One, OpenAI clearly is developing technology that will have severe consequences for society, will impact a lot of things. But we were looking at it mostly from a charitable asset law, where we knew that there was precedent saying that if you do convert to a for-profit and abandon your nonprofit roots, then you have to leave behind your public assets, your charitable assets, which at the time that we came together were valued roughly around 100 billion. Today, it's about, could be 500 billion. So the coalition came together, various nonprofit organizations,
7:29 Speaker 05 economic organizations, social justice organizations, educational organizations, and also some labor organizations. And so today, it's a coalition of over 60 organizations that continues to press the Attorney General in California, who has, can oversee charitable mission and charitable law to ensure that OpenAI truly acts as a nonprofit and that they truly stick to their mission statement.
7:57 Speaker 03 For those who don't understand how this all works, can you give us a sense of the legal and monetary benefits that OpenAI has enjoyed so far as a nonprofit? And also are there restrictions legally that it operates under being a nonprofit?
8:14 Speaker 04 Neither one of us is a lawyer, so should make that caveat here. But both of us are founders of nonprofits and have boards and lawyers ourselves that tell us what we can and can't do. So, I mean, I think we can speak to it from that perspective. Obviously, any nonprofit can take donations tax-free to the donor, and nonprofits also don't have to pay taxes. And then they operate under, you know, a set of rules that in exchange for that tax-exempt status, they must, you know, do things that are in service of a public mission and not to benefit a private profit motive. There's a variety of different ways that can look conflicts of interest and private inertia and other things.
8:59 Speaker 04 But essentially, OpenAI, starting as a research lab, created this mission. And I think as part of this mission, which made sense at the time, they were going to build this technology that could be in service to humanity, over the course of time, crept away from that mission. And I think at a certain point, became, for all intents and purposes, a for-profit startup that was competing with other for-profit companies that were building similar technology. And they were able to do so under a nonprofit banner with all of those tax benefits in place.
9:34 Speaker 03 This is wild to me. So are you saying that, and I think just people need to understand this if this is true, that OpenAI, the hottest tech company in the world, that's about to be the most valuable private company in the world at 500 billion potentially in the coming months, is taxed exempt?
9:50 Speaker 04 The nonprofit entity is taxed exempt now.
9:52 Speaker 03 The nonprofit entity, okay.
9:53 Speaker 04 Yeah. How much money they're running through the nonprofit, I don't think anybody's out now donating money to the nonprofit and, you know, getting a tax benefit on that donation. But again, not a lawyer.
10:05 Speaker 05 It's difficult because if you look at their structure today, they're interconnected with a variety of LLCs, strong connection to Microsoft. What we do know is that the nonprofit status implies a strong legal and an ethical obligation to put the public interest ahead of shareholder returns. That's what we want. And if that mission gets diluted, right, if they override that mission by private motives, and they shift towards maximizing revenue instead of maximizing public good, then you're in violation of your nonprofit charter, right? We both run nonprofits. We can't get rich of our nonprofits. We are highly regulated as nonprofits. We have to put together reports, audits that are available to the public.
10:51 Speaker 05 The same thing applies for OpenAI, and we just feel that they are operating with enormous amount of secrecy and that they're putting together the profit motives ahead of mission.
11:03 Speaker 04 It's a little bit of a charade to say that they are operating as a nonprofit in the same way that like a traditional charity. This idea that they should receive the same benefits that like a soup kitchen receives is kind of ludicrous at this point. And, you know, if I was competitor to OpenAI and I was having to follow a set of governance laws that apply to for-profit companies and OpenAI didn't, then I don't know, that would make me kind of upset. So I just think it's time to throw off that charade and stop allowing them to use this nonprofit banner in their interest. They want all the benefits of a nonprofit status without any of the responsibility. And I think that's wrong.
11:44 Speaker 03 We have to take a short break. We'll be back in just a minute.
11:55 Speaker 01 New and exclusive holiday decor just launched online at The Home Depot. Check out the viral Grand Duchess collection with smart holiday lights you can control from your phone. Easily customize the twinkle across trees, wreaths and garlands to match your holiday vibe. Create stunning light effects, then switch it up with the tap of your fingers. Even the man in red will be impressed. Shop the holiday decor you want online only at homedepot.com.
12:26 Speaker 02 This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends, like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an ultra. Because it's not just a superior light beer, it's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser-Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.
12:56 Speaker 06 This episode is brought to you by Subaru. You know that place your mind always wanders to? The lake, the mountains, the homes of the people you love most? The completely redesigned 2026 Subaru Outback is built to help you get there. With legendary capabilities, standard symmetrical all wheel drive, and the confidence to go further. The 2026 Subaru Outback. Love never looked so good. Visit Subaru.com slash Outback to learn more.
13:24 Speaker 03 Welcome back.
13:27 Speaker 03 I'm glad you brought up competitors. Competitors have actually weighed in on this issue. Meta, for example, sent a letter to the California AG's office about this. And they made the specific argument that OpenAI, quote, "should not be allowed to flout the law by taking and re-appropriating assets built as a charity and using them for potentially enormous private gains." And it also made the point that this would be a, quote, "seismic" thing for Silicon Valley and would essentially allow a path for other companies to do the same thing, for them to start as a nonprofit with taxes and status and then switch later on when they decide they want to start making money. What do you guys think the second order effects are if OpenAI
14:11 Speaker 03 gets its way here ultimately and gets to pull this off? Maybe they pay a fine, back taxes, or they have to give more of their assets to the charity than they want. But essentially, they get through all this because the train has left the station. What are the effects on other companies? You both run nonprofits. What are the effects on other nonprofits?
14:33 Speaker 04 The reason the law exists and the way that it exists is to prevent companies from doing exactly this. I mean, it is legal. If they want to transition to a for-profit, they can. But they cannot take the assets that they built as a nonprofit with them as they do so. So I suspect that they had a conversation with the Attorney General about this transition and were told, I mean, I don't know, but, you know, they were told that they would have to leave a certain amount of those assets behind if they decided to make this transition. And they have since decided that, in fact, no, they're not. They're going to maintain that their current status as sort of a Potemkin nonprofit that oversees the for-profit and at the same time, remove the profit caps on investors
15:18 Speaker 04 and let investors do whatever they want and take the company public. And that's the kind of thing that I think is not acceptable. They were just transitioning to a for-profit and leaving the assets behind in the charitable sector, then that would be fine. I would totally support them leaving. But by trying to take the money with them, they are making a mockery of the rule of law, which I think is one of the, you know, impacts it would have on California and the entrepreneurial environment, and mocking its competitors, creating a permission structure by which any startup could try and do the same thing. If they are allowed to do this with no consequence, no real consequence, then it will provide
15:59 Speaker 04 the blueprint for other companies to do the same thing and the AG won't really have as much, you know, moral authority to stop that from happening.
16:07 Speaker 05 If I can add, I, I highly doubt that the AG would let them go on just because they might feel as though the train has left the station, just because of the issues that Catherine raised, the precedence, right, the appearance of public interest governments to attract goodwill and resources and then just abandoning those. If they get the green light, I can't imagine how many other nonprofits would try to do the same thing. So because of that, I, I do think that the AG would sue them and we would, of course, urge the AG, who serves the people of California, to sue because of the precedent that this sets.
16:46 Speaker 03 At the same time, I think you both can appreciate that for them to theoretically leave charitable assets behind, I mean, that's, that's essentially the whole company. I mean, what else is there? They've become the ChatGPT developer platform company. The charity as it exists is really nothing. I mean, the, the charity entity, I'm not sure what it does. The last time I saw the IRS report on it, it had negligible assets. It was like maybe tens of millions, whereas the rest of OpenAI is worth hundreds of billions. So for them to, like you were saying, Catherine, properly leave behind the charitable assets, they have to basically start over from scratch. Is that what you guys are asking them to do?
17:29 Speaker 04 Legally, that is what the law says. I think the AG has some latitude on.
17:37 Speaker 04 What kind of settlement he could negotiate with them? I think he does have to balance the interests of maintaining California's position as a place where innovation can happen and also the public interest. But it is true that these assets were created with the support of the people of California. And the law says that if you make this transition, you have to leave behind assets. And so those assets, some significant number of those assets should remain in the public interest so that they can be used to advance the mission of AI benefiting all of humanity.
18:13 Speaker 03 And practically, this looks like the assets are shares of OpenAI, like it's just straight money. I'm being kind of silly here, but it's not like the people of California will all of a sudden get governance over like ChatGPT usage in California, right? We're talking about financial assets.
18:31 Speaker 05 Can I clarify? One of the things that we are pushing for is essentially OpenAI has two functions as a nonprofit. One is to adhere it to its mission, and that means safeguards to ensure that AI is used for the benefit of humanity. So there's the governance piece there that we think still should continue. And there's a second piece, which is the distribution of assets, which they mention also in their mission statement. What we're arguing is that they continue to govern with that mission in mind because they have to, they've decided that they want to stay a nonprofit, but that the distribution
19:10 Speaker 05 of assets be free of conflict and that those assets be spun off to an independent entity. Nobody here thinks that that independent entity should receive the full 500 billion, right? I think right now the AG of Delaware and the AG of California are trying to value what the assets might be. But our goal is that there continue to be strong governance so that OpenAI adheres to safeguard some of the things we really need in the AI sector, but then that we have an independent entity that is fairly valued and perhaps over time funded, right? It can remain connected to the OpenAI so that there are a lot of talks of OpenAI going
19:53 Speaker 05 public one day, this independent nonprofit could get shares of that. So we are asking for two things, the ongoing governance and an independent entity that will oversee the distribution of assets.
20:06 Speaker 03 Let's talk about the governance piece and the mission statement a little bit more because I think the first time a lot of people probably realized that OpenAI was still controlled by a nonprofit was when its CEO, Sam Altman, was briefly fired by the board of directors in 2023. This ruined my week. I reported on this extensively, very dramatic.
20:29 Speaker 04 R I P your Thanksgiving.
20:30 Speaker 03 Exactly. And that board, that same board, it's not the same, it's almost completely changed over, but legally that same board still controls the company to this day because OpenAI, despite the headlines and a lot of people probably think OpenAI has not been a nonprofit for the last while, it still is legally a nonprofit because it hasn't done this transition. So it's the same governance structure as what it had fundamentally when Sam was fired in 2023. There's a scene from that saga, that board coup that I remember vividly where a bunch of OpenAI execs got in a room at headquarters and they got on the phone with the group of board members who fired Sam. And I'm paraphrasing, but at one point, one of the execs said something like, what you're
21:15 Speaker 03 doing is killing the company. You know, OpenAI will go to zero if you follow through with this and you don't bring Sam back. And one of the board members on the other end of the call said, that would be perfectly in line with the mission that we have as the board. And everyone that worked at OpenAI, the quote unquote for-profit company was just like aghast at this because it's it is a crazy thing because like OpenAI at that time was already a super commercial entity. It was resetting the tech industry fundamentally and the AI race. And so to hear that, wait, like, we're controlled by this board that the interest of the board could mean that the company shuts down. It's a very strange concept. And I'm wanting to double click on that with you guys. Like, what exactly is the governance
21:58 Speaker 03 role of the board as it exists today? And what does that mean? Does it mean they can just shut the company down?
22:04 Speaker 04 You say they are still legally a nonprofit. I would say they're actually a nonprofit on paper, but I we don't think that they are operating legally, which is sort of the point you were making. And in order for them to be operating legally as a nonprofit, yes, the board, its only commitment, its only fiduciary responsibility is to the mission of the organization. My sense from OpenAI is that they don't understand their responsibility to the mission. They do treat this like a for-profit company, and they have sort of deluded themselves into thinking that by building the most powerful, valuable for-profit entity, that is ultimately in service to the nonprofit, because it will deliver more
22:48 Speaker 04 financial benefits to the nonprofit that it could then do something with to further the mission. And that's actually not the point at all. I mean, as a nonprofit leader myself, my responsibility is to turn down money if it is going to affect my ability to execute against the mission. And it is the board's legal responsibility to provide oversight to ensure that I do that as the CEO. So there is no world in which maximizing the profitability of this company for shareholders, for employees, for whoever, is always aligned with the mission of the nonprofit. And when the mission diverges from the profit motivation,
23:29 Speaker 04 the mission has to always override, even if that means taking the company to zero. And if they can't live with that, that's totally fine. They should spin off the for-profit and leave a significant set of assets in the charitable sector. That's all we're asking them to do. It's not really clear why they refuse to do so.
23:48 Speaker 03 And we should just be clear that the nonprofit mission is to develop AGI that benefits all of humanity. I have a lot of problems with that because it's inherently very squishy and can be defined however you want. What does benefiting mean in that context? What is all of humanity? But yeah, maybe we can talk about that. Like, does the mission need to change for the nonprofit? Is it too vague? Because at the time in 2023, when Sam was fired, that board decided that firing Sam was in the benefit of AGI for all of humanity. But, you know, it's hard to get there perhaps now. It's hard to see exactly how you execute that day to day, I guess.
24:27 Speaker 05 We haven't weighed in much on the specifics of the mission. I think what's important, does the governance and the practice align with their current mission? I think their current mission is fine. What's not fine is the conflicts of interest that we see. We asked earlier, what is the board doing now? I think that's the biggest question. We're not sure who's really in charge here, right? Is it Microsoft? Is it the investors? Is it the employees? It appears employees were given shares, right? Current and former employees were given shares of this company. And so, of course, they don't want to see their nonprofit go down because their shares would go down.
25:06 Speaker 05 But that's, again, a big reason why there's a huge conflict here is because when you're giving shares to your employees, we know that they're not going to be in service to the mission. They're going to be in service to wanting to get paid, right? It's the tech mentality, the startup mentality, and it seems like they built it that way. So I think that the mission we can live with, what we just need more answers is on the governance and the practices that align with the mission.
25:33 Speaker 04 One set of people we haven't talked about yet very much are the investors. And I just cannot reconcile. This current proposed structure that they want to live under, maintaining the nonprofit ownership of the for-profit, but converting the for-profit into a, basically no different from a normal startup, where shareholders can have equity stakes, Sam Altman presumably can have equity stakes, the employees can have equity stakes, that they can eventually go public, and that SoftBank and Thrive are going to be okay with the nonprofit board being able to drive the company to zero. I'm sure there was a conversation at some point
26:16 Speaker 04 before the $40 billion funding round, where they said, "We're not going to do this unless you can guarantee that the nonprofit does not have the control to do that." And I suspect they were told that, "Yeah, we would make sure that the nonprofit didn't have control." And so they tried to spin out into their own entity. I think the major question is, why they decided to stop going that route and to maintain their current structure with the nonprofit ownership? And what assurances they've given to those investors that make them okay with maintaining the nonprofit ownership of the for-profit company? It doesn't make any sense that they would be if the nonprofit is still in a position
27:01 Speaker 04 to put the priority of the mission above the profit priority. So do they have some agreement between the shareholders and the company that the nonprofit only has control on paper and will not ever challenge the for-profit? These are questions that have not been answered. And I think that their decision not to actually spin out the for-profit into its own standalone entity raises more questions than it answers. And so that's why we are still asking the AG to investigate.
27:33 Speaker 05 We met with OpenAI's team shortly after the decision where they retreated for-profit. Not only would they not answer the questions, but they said they didn't have the answers to a lot of the questions. So to Catherine's point, it seems like something happened and they retreated quickly without truly knowing how this was going to play out.
27:56 Speaker 03 We have to take another quick break. We'll be right back.
28:07 Speaker 01 New and exclusive holiday decor just launched online at The Home Depot. Check out the viral Grand Duchess collection with smart holiday lights you can control from your phone. Easily customize the twinkle across trees, wreaths, and garlands to match your holiday vibe. Create stunning light effects, then switch it up with the tap of your fingers. Even the man in red will be impressed. Shop the holiday decor you want, online only, at homedepot.com.
28:39 Speaker 02 This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends, like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest, or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an Ultra. Because it's not just a superior light beer, it's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser-Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.
29:08 Speaker 06 This episode is brought to you by Subaru. You know that place your mind always wanders to? The lake? The mountains? The homes of the people you love most? The completely redesigned 2026 Subaru Outback is built to help you get there. With legendary capabilities, standard symmetrical all-wheel drive, and the confidence to go further. The 2026 Subaru Outback. Love never looked so good. Visit subaru.com/outback to learn more.
29:36 Speaker 03 And we're back. Because this is just very complex, I want to explain to the listener how this for-profit subsidiary works. So, we should explain why they created this in the first place, which is that they needed a way to raise money, and they couldn't do it feasibly through the nonprofit. They needed to raise billions of dollars for compute. But they have caps, it's like 100x roughly cap, to align with the nonprofit mission that an investor can make in its investment. And the website for OpenAI used to say, like, "All investors should treat this as a donation." We're not even legally obligated, like a normal for-profit company, to ensure or work in our best interest. Interest to make a return on your investment.
30:17 Speaker 03 But they did that. And so there's this cap. They want to remove the cap so that more investors can come in, put billions more in, and then eventually they can IPO with a potentially unlimited upside as well. And to do that, they've been trying to get rid of the nonprofit. And what happened in the last couple of months, which we've been talking about is that basically they realized they couldn't do that, that there was too much opposition, I think, from your coalition. They created their own commission to look into this and their own commission said that the nonprofit needed to stay in control. Uh, OpenAI. So that's why they, I think, decided to keep the nonprofit in play as they realized there was going to be no legal path forward to fully getting rid of it.
30:59 Speaker 03 But yeah, I also have the questions you have, Catherine. I don't really understand how they can have it both ways. How can you have a nonprofit board still in quote unquote control? When it really is just sitting over to the side with a bunch of shares that it got from this conversion?
31:13 Speaker 04 Just to be clear, their commission, the nonprofit commission that made the recommendation around independent governance happened after that report came out after they they made this decision. So in terms of the sequence of events, and I would say it's not accurate to say that they can't transition. They can absolutely transition to a for-profit and there is precedent. The proposal that we're making to the AG is actually built on the precedent of the healthcare companies in the 90s that transitioned from nonprofits to for-profits. And when they made that transition, they negotiated with the AG to leave a certain amount of their assets behind. They have now gone on to be very successful for-profit healthcare companies and they endowed
31:55 Speaker 04 a couple of foundations in California, the California Wellness Foundation, the California Endowment, and I think the California Healthcare Foundation that now maintain the mission and distribute those benefits to support the health of Californians. And so it's perfectly possible there is legal precedent for them to spin off and go about their for-profit business. And that's the path they were on. The question is, why did they decide to forego that path? And try to now, as they are saying, maintain this nonprofit ownership structure, which, as we've discussed, isn't viable in the long term. You cannot reconcile the nonprofit and the shareholders imperatives. So. That's the question they haven't answered.
32:39 Speaker 04 They also apparently have not worked out a deal with Microsoft. Microsoft did not know about this before they made the announcement that in fact, they were going to maintain their nonprofit status. It is very fishy that they were on a path to doing what was very clearly the legal thing to do. And then all of a sudden, they decided not to do that and have created what I think is a bigger mess for themselves in trying to like say that this nonprofit has some meaningful control over the for-profit. So, you know, until they answer that question, I think it's right for people to be suspicious of what's going on here.
33:13 Speaker 03 And just so people understand what you're saying about Microsoft. Microsoft is obviously OpenAI's largest shareholder. What's essentially happening with this nonprofit conversion is the dividing of the pie. All the investors are realizing that the division of the pie is about to change because OpenAI is about to have to leave behind at least some significant chunk, TBD on what size of the chunk of the equity value in the for-profit subsidiary. They have to leave it behind with the nonprofit to complete this conversion that they want to do, which is not the original one they wanted to do, but is still going to convert them into a uncapped commercial entity. And now that leaves Microsoft going, wait, well, how much are we going to get? How much do we have to dilute ourselves? How much do other investors have to dilute themselves?
33:57 Speaker 03 And if OpenAI were making billions of dollars in profit, I'm actually not sure this would be such an interesting story. The reason to me this is so interesting is because OpenAI is doing a very high-wire, blitzkrieg run on the tech industry and raising billions of dollars and immediately pouring those billions of dollars back into more training, more compute, hiring more researchers. They're not profitable and they actually don't plan to be profitable anytime soon. So, any kind of major financial hiccup on the way where all of a sudden they have to pay a ton of money or leave a bunch of equity behind could actually make them stumble in a way that I don't think people fully appreciate, just considering OpenAI seems so ascendant
34:41 Speaker 03 and so untouchable. And it is huge, but financially, it's not profitable. And so, all of this really matters because it's not like they can just afford to pay off the state of California billions of dollars. Do you all agree with that?
34:56 Speaker 05 I do agree. Yeah, for OpenAI, it was their decision to be a nonprofit. It was part of Sam Altman's vision. And I do think that it has created problems for them. That's their making their nonprofit. It's up to us to ensure they act as nonprofit. But I do think that they have a unique structure that they want to just go on and race ahead and beat the competition. It's different for them because of the things that they've said and the things that they've committed to.
35:26 Speaker 03 So what do you guys want to see happen next? We've talked about governance. The board control sounds like a key piece. They still haven't committed to the size of the equity that they're going to leave behind for the nonprofit. Obviously, that matters.
35:39 Speaker 05 Yeah, we're waiting for the Attorney General. We're continuing to meet with the Attorney General to see where they're going up to. Now, they say very little. But we do have to see more specifics around the governance piece that we've raised, right? How are they going to remove all the conflicts of interest? Are they going to put together strong whistleblower laws to ensure that the company truly is mission driven or not for profit driven? And then on the other end, we want to ensure that there's an independent entity that is free from the conflict, free to pursue the mission, that is fairly valued and can be set up similar to the previous foundations that Catherine mentioned, the California
36:24 Speaker 05 Endowment Wellness. But the biggest thing now that we're waiting for now is from the AG. They have to complete their investigation and they have to put together, they have to show these specifics to the public. They, this is a deal behind closed doors. I think it would just be a huge setback for nonprofit integrity in the state. And so we truly believe that the AG will do the right thing, be transparent, show us what the investigation yields, and protect nonprofit integrity in California.
36:57 Speaker 03 We've been talking a lot about the business of this, the industry stuff. It's a very heady, complex topic that people in tech and AI will obviously find interesting. But I think what I'm still trying to understand, I think, from the both of you is what is it that everyday people should care about on this topic? You're talking about the integrity of like how nonprofits work in this country. Obviously, that matters. But if you're just an everyday person who maybe uses ChatGPT or doesn't, why does this matter? Isn't this just more just corporate drama?
37:31 Speaker 04 This is a conversation we're having about one company and its governance structure, but it is ramifications for the entire AI industry. And OpenAI kind of set itself up as a nonprofit that was going to set an industry-wide standard for this technology before there was an industry. When they released ChatGPT, they became just another player in that industry. And I don't blame them for this. Like, they have to compete with Anthropic and Google and Meta and all the other model builders. And that means that their nonprofit is hamstrung. It can't really do the work of advancing its mission because it is so tied to the fate of this one player in the industry.
38:16 Speaker 04 What would be possible if the AG did what we're asking him to do and there was a spinout organization or set of organizations that had control of a significant amount of assets to ensure that AGI was benefiting all of humanity is they could do work that would cross the industry. It wouldn't just be about OpenAI. It would be about making sure that the entire industry was responsive to the public. It could fund advocacy. It could fund public option for compute. It could fund research that would happen at universities and not in private labs that are only owned by shareholders. It could fund workforce training. It could fund education. It could fund all of these things that currently the state is just not in a position to fund.
39:01 Speaker 04 And that would benefit everybody, the public, to take advantage of this new technology. And hopefully, that would ensure that AI was being used as a benefit and being used by us and not on us. And that would affect all of the companies who are operating in this space, not just apply to OpenAI in a vacuum.
39:22 Speaker 05 People are watching this because they know that AI It's going to have huge ramifications on society. And where OpenAI goes, the industry could follow. We should make sure that the benefit to the public truly comes out forward on this. And it would be a shame if we lost the benefit to the community on this.
39:46 Speaker 03 I'd like to thank Catherine and Orson for taking the time to speak with me. And thank you for tuning in. If you'd like to let us know what you thought about this show or what else you'd like us to cover, drop us a line. You can email us at decoder at theverge.com. The team really does read every email. We also have a TikTok and an Instagram. Check those out at DecoderPod. And if you like Decoder, please share it with your friends and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Decoder is a production of The Verge and is part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Our producers are Kate Cox and Nick Statt. Our editor is Ursa Wright. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. See you next time.
40:25 Speaker 01 New and exclusive holiday decor just launched online at The Home Depot. Check out the viral Grand Duchess Collection with smart holiday lights you can control from your phone. Easily customize the twinkle across trees, wreaths, and garlands to match your holiday vibe. Create stunning light effects, then switch it up with the tap of your fingers. Even the man in red will be impressed. Shop the holiday decor you want online only at homedepot.com.
40:54 Speaker 07 At Zocdoc, we know you care about your health. You wouldn't do that early morning cardio if you didn't. So the fact that your annual physical is overdue just shows how hard it can be to get seen by a doctor.
41:05 Speaker 08 Sorry, that doctor's not in network.
41:08 Speaker 09 Press 1 for more options. You've reached us outside normal business hours.
41:12 Speaker 08 The next availability is in three months.
41:14 Speaker 07 But Zocdoc makes finding the right doctor easy. Download the app and search by specialty, insurance, and availability. Read real patient reviews, then book instantly. Zocdoc, ready to be seen?
41:24 Speaker 10 Mr. Monopoly here. Miss me? Monopoly is back at McDonald's with millions of prizes. A 2027 Jeep Cherokee, a Carnival Cruise vacation, gift cards from DoorDash, and Best Buy. Feel free in the McDonald's app. Get your bag.
41:42 Speaker 11 No purchase necessary. 50 U.S. and DCH, 18 plus. See playatmcd.com for rules and playatmcd.com/amoe for info and playing without purchase by mail by November 2nd. Chance card game ends November 8th. Game ends November 22nd, 2026. See rules for prize details. Monopoly is a registered trademark of Hasbro.
Previous Rewind: Bookshop CEO's crusade to save books from Amazon Next Sal Khan is hopeful that AI won't destroy education Page updated October 26, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated
