How Sundar Pichai is rethinking Google for the AI era

Connecting with Google CEO Sundar Pichai at I/O every year is one of my favorite Decoder traditions. This was our fifth year doing it, and there’s always a whole slew of new things to talk about. This year, in addition to the news, we talked about Google Zero; picking fights with YouTube creators and publishers; and what being at “the foothills of the singularity" even means. Read the full interview transcript on The Verge. Links: If Google can’t make AI agents useful, maybe no one can | The Verge The future of Google is a search box that does everything | The Verge Large language mistake | The Verge You can now remix other people’s YouTube Shorts with AI | The Verge Condé Nast calls Google Zero | The Verge Demis Hassabis said this may be the ‘foothills of the singularity’ | The Verge Google I/O 2026: All the news and announcements | The Verge Subscribe to The Verge to access the ad-free version of Decoder! Credits: Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Decoder is produced by Kate Cox and Nick Statt. This episode was edited by Kabir Chopra. Our editorial director is Kevin McShane. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Company spending is complex. Managing it should be simple. AMX Corporate connects cards, expenses, and payments to streamline the way you work. Built to simplify, designed to scale. This is AMX Corporate. Get started at go.amex/ammexcorporate. Terms apply.

• 0:24Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends. Like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an Ultra. Because it's not just a superior light beer, it's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser-Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.

• 0:52Speaker 02

  Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard, but not the pipeline? That's bull spend, and marketers are calling it out in. Dashboard, confessions.

• 1:02Speaker 03

  My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had: impressions.

• 1:09Speaker 02

  Cut the bull spend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 1:23Speaker 04

  Hello and welcome to Decoder. I'm Neil Ippatel, editor in chief of The Verge, and Decoder is my show about big ideas and other problems. Today, I'm talking with Google and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai in a conversation we recorded just after the Google I/O developer conference. This is the fifth year Sundar and I have sat down after I/O, and it's become one of my favorite Decoder traditions. There's always a lot of news at I/O, and this year was no exception. Google has powerful new Gemini models, it's putting AI agents in everything, and it's making huge changes to search on both the web and YouTube that will once again reshape the information ecosystem. That's a lot to talk about, and Sundar and I got into all of it. But I also realized that it's been a long time since I'd asked Sundar the Decoder questions about structure and decision-making, so I started there.

• 2:06Speaker 04

  You'll hear Sundar say he realized he needed to rethink how Google worked a few years ago in response to ChatGPT, and he made a lot of executive changes and big decisions to get the company in a more aggressive posture. Of course, we also talked about all of those search changes and how it seems obvious that the future of Google Search is bringing things like the new intelligent search box together with Google's new Gemini Spark agent platform. So that searches can set off tasks, not just deliver results. That's exciting, but it seems likely to yet again change the dynamics of the open web. If you're a Decoder listener, you know that I coined the term "Google zero" a few years ago. That's the idea that Google traffic to websites would fall to zero as the company answered more and more queries directly on the search results page.

• 2:49Speaker 04

  That's gone from an idea that Sundar batted away in previous interviews to something that the entire media industry is grappling with. The CEOs of major publishers like Conde Nast are now publicly saying they're planning for a world of zero search traffic from now on. Google is also training its models on YouTube videos and changing YouTube search to summarize and index videos so they get dropped directly into the relevant parts. That sure to cause some creator angst. So I asked Sundar if he's ready to fight the same battles with YouTubers as he currently is with publishers. Finally, I had to ask Sundar about Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis ending the I/O keynote by saying that we are at the foothills of the singularity. It's no surprise that Sundar agrees with Demis, but his thoughts on the timeline to AGI are worth paying attention to. Like I said, this is one of my favorite episodes to do every year

• 3:34Speaker 04

  because Sundar is always game to actually take the questions and even look at search results on my phone with me. I think you're really going to like this year's conversation. Okay, Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet and Google. Here we go.

• 3:59Speaker 04

  Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Alphabet and of Google. Welcome back to Decoder.

• 4:02Speaker 05

  It's great to be here. Nice to see you again, Nilay.

• 4:05Speaker 04

  Yeah, this is one of my fair yearly conversations. I think we've done I/O now almost five, five times.

• 4:10Speaker 05

  Wow, I quite didn't realize it's been five times, but I enjoy it. Thanks again.

• 4:14Speaker 04

  Yeah, I want to start with a little bit of a lightning round. I was thinking about this. We've talked a lot. We always get deep into the weeds of the web and search and big, heady ideas. And I realize I have not asked you the Decoder questions in quite some time. And I was just looking back at our previous conversations and Google itself, you've made quite a lot of changes to Google. I think a number of your direct reports have changed over time. You've obviously restructured DeepMind, Platforms and Devices, and Android has been restructured itself. Tell me how Google is structured right now.

• 4:45Speaker 05

  Okay, it is Google and Alphabet, you know, obviously we have Alphabet as well. But broadly, I think about about it as, you know, there are three main businesses in Google. Search, YouTube, Google Cloud. There are enormous platforms we run, which is Android Chrome and the whole area to do with it. And powering it all is all these important technology areas, which is AI and our infrastructure work.

• 5:21Speaker 05

  And then you have the functions to go with it. But at a high level, you can think of it as, you know, Search, YouTube, Google Cloud, and then our big computing platforms. Those are the main, main groups. And obviously powered with Google Deep Mind and our, our infrastructure teams. So that's one simple way to get a mental model around it. And of course, we have other bets beyond that. Waymo being the most prominent of them all, but there are many, many other bets like Isomorphic Labs and so on.

• 5:54Speaker 04

  Yeah, I want to stay focused on the Google of it. I feel like we could do an entire hour on Alphabet and how that's structured and how that works. It's a public company with many bets. But just to stay focused on Google for one second. The knock on Google historically is this is a company that ships lots and lots of products. You cancel lots of products. There's not tons of focus. There's like thousands of names of different products that are overlapping in kinds of different ways. And where that comes from, at least in my view, is that you do have these big infrastructure bets. You have all these capabilities and the people running the businesses can use those capabilities to spin up products. And there's maybe not a lot of overlap or central planning on like, did we launch two of the same thing? How do you resolve that tension? It does seem like Google has gotten a little more focused, but that is the company's culture, right?

• 6:39Speaker 04

  We're going to make a lot of bets and see which ones work. How does that resolve for you?

• 6:42Speaker 05

  Look, I think there's a lot of intent in what we do too. I think it's not an accident. You know, we have 13 products with a billion users each and we've been as committed to those products longer term. You know, you can go back and think about when Gmail launched or Maps launched or Google Docs launched or Search launched or Chrome launched and like, you know, so I've been, we've been deep and consistent in many, many areas over a long period of time as well. I do think one way I've internalized in the AI moment is for the first time we have such a common infrastructure powering all of them. With with our Gemini models and the underlying AI infrastructure.

• 7:26Speaker 05

  So we are more able to intently, you know, with intent, do things which cut across things, right? So personal intelligence is a great example of it. It's one effort. Obviously, users get a choice to turn it on in each of the products. But you know, it's built with one common infrastructure so that it works consistently across across your products. The underlying Gemini models itself is an example of it. So we are able to bring that model in the context of the products, like Ask Maps in the context of, you know, the Maps product. But a lot of the technology powering it, the voice tech, the model, the intelligence is all one work.

• 8:08Speaker 05

  So which is why I think the AI moment offers us a new, really new way to think about it. And not just across Google, across Alphabet too, over time. I think that's what makes this moment so uniquely powerful is that you can invest so much in R and D and infrastructure and develop a technology which then you can apply across all these areas. You know, obviously, in a context in which they are useful for users, but the underlying technology platform is is common. So there's a lot of intent that way and and so on. You have to give room for innovation. Otherwise, saw loving room for innovation where teams on the margin are able to ship some new features.

• 8:51Speaker 05

  Sometimes you later work to harmonize them. Take Notebook, Notebook LM. And notebooks are now showing up in Gemini, right? And like, you know, you know, it's effectively projects as notebooks. And you can create a notebook in Gemini, you can go to Notebook LM, you will see the same notebooks, vice versa. So that's an example of where you innovate it first and then you're harmonizing later.

• 9:15Speaker 04

  Yeah. I was watching the keynote yesterday and I I saw a lot of intent and confidence from Google. We we have this core technology, we can express it in lots of ways. It's still essentially Googly, like there's lots of products, lots of Gemini words, I'm going to figure them all out, I promise. I would contrast to, I don't know, three, four years ago when. You know, there was the chat GPT moment, everyone worried about what Google would do, could open AI show up and take your market share and search away. Between that and now, you have changed Google, right? You have restructured it, there are new people in leadership roles. How, connect those dots for me. How did you think about, okay, I need to actually change how the company works with the competitive moment you were in that got you here?

• 9:59Speaker 05

  That's a great question. Look, I think for me, I always internalized that moment. It was tough to convey it outside.

• 10:07Speaker 05

  But I was, you know, we had set the company, you know, I pivoted the company to be AI first. We had all the ingredients. So in some ways, I felt like the overton window had changed. People were adopting these technologies faster than we had expected. And so to me, it was a way to go and actually express ourself through our products. But I realized we had to organize ourselves for it. And going back to my earlier point, I realized we need a core models and a core infrastructure team to power everything we are doing across Google. So a lot of my initial energy was to go set that up.

• 10:46Speaker 05

  One AI team, we had world-class research teams in Brain and DeepMind, bringing that together as Google DeepMind.

• 10:57Speaker 05

  You know, which was, you know, hotter than it sounds because it's like saying, go put Stanford and MIT together and create a department out of it. Or a university out of it. So I think doing that well. And then at that time, I also set up with, with Amin Vada, who's our SVP of AI Infrastructure now.

• 11:16Speaker 05

  A centralized infrastructure team, which is, which has paid great dividends. And then another evolution was realizing we need a chief AI architect to kind of architect this technology across Google. And Cori, you know, taking on that role as well. So those were important changes. We obviously, you know, made sure search needed to move faster. So search was split across many leaders, so pulling it under Elizabeth Reed with Nick Fox being responsible for the overall area.

• 11:49Speaker 05

  Josh Woodward coming to help with our labs product and working on Gemini later, driving innovation, as well as, you know, obviously, extraordinary leaders in the company, other leaders like Philip Schindler, who runs all our operations and so on. So it is stepping back and end to end, thinking about the structure and make sure we are set up well for this moment where we need to move faster as a company, which meant we needed to make faster decisions. I set up these new product reviews once a week. These were, you know, they were AI product reviews, making sure we are intentful about

• 12:29Speaker 05

  how we apply this technology, where we apply them, and wanted to review everything firsthand, that anything to do with AI, which we were shipping to users, went through that channel. And I spent time directly with who was working on it.

• 12:45Speaker 04

  Yeah. The other decoder question I ask everybody is about decisions. You're describing a lot of big decisions, some of them uncomfortable as you change people around. How do you make decisions? What's your framework?

• 12:55Speaker 05

  A big part of my framework is over time, understanding that there are very, very few decisions which are really consequential, and most decisions aren't. So what matters much more is that you make the decision, because that's what determines the velocity of an organization. And so the more you're able to make those decisions and keep the company moving forward, you're generally better off. Of course, there are a few decisions like combining and setting up Google Deep Mind. You know, those are more consequential and you want to take your time deliberating and doing it. But a lot of decision making is about just making them. And so the more you're able to do that, you do develop over time, some pattern matching

• 13:40Speaker 05

  and, you know, some intuition for you've seen a version of the problem before. And so I think it's good to rely on that and separate the signal from the noise. So that the signal is that this is a really important decision and you want to really deliberate around it versus this is just. You know, it may look big, but it is more a normal course of action you need to take.

• 14:04Speaker 04

  Yeah, I'm looking around the industry. Your peers in big tech have some of the wildest org chart ideas I've ever heard in my entire life. I think Meta wants to have fifty engineers report to a single manager with the power of agents. Jack Dorsey at Block wants all six thousand people to report to him. Are you having similar thoughts that you should invent some of the craziest org charts with AI ever?

• 14:25Speaker 05

  Look, I think leaders and people are incredibly important, and I think our companies, it depends on what the company, some companies are, you know, have a much more narrower suite of products. And so, you know, different structure may work. When you're running something at the scale of, like, take the scale of Google Cloud, right? I think it's important that there is a CEO in charge and, you know, we are serving all the top enterprises in the world at a scale. You know, and so how do you, how do you set up for that? So I think, I think, I think great leaders end up mattering a lot, like we have Thomas there. So I do think, I think, think about it. But what I do think about it is how, how are we using AI more effectively?

• 15:06Speaker 05

  And we've seen the transition internally, particularly amongst our developers, where we have transitioned from using AI tools to assist coding to, you know, them, a portion of the engineers, working, directing teams of agents effectively more and more. And so I think those are, those are transitions underway, and I think that will flow beyond just engineering into the rest of the organization. It's all, it's already happening. Like even the work we are doing in Gemini Spark is to give that superpower to the hands of consumers, what you can do with these agent tech workflows, et cetera. So I'm more focused on making sure we are actually deploying that capability in a native way and that it's working well.

• 15:50Speaker 05

  Because far as it's more than just making the company efficient, because it's the products we provide to others. Right? So I look at it with a very different lens. How we do it internally is what we are giving to users outside. We use anti-gravity internally. That's what we are providing outside. So the agents in anti-gravity is what our developers are using. And so that's what we are trying to put outside. So it has that extra dimension to it.

• 16:16Speaker 04

  The number one question to kind of listeners want me to start asking CEOs.

• 16:20Speaker 04

  Just asking straightforwardly, how close is Ed replacing you as the CEO?

• 16:23Speaker 05

  Uh, no, I, uh, it is today, you know, still, I, I just think the CEO job is not, uh, that complicated, right? You know, it is, uh, it is not complicated. There's a big, uh, there are aspects of it where I think it's going to be very, very helpful in terms of decision making. I joke around that, uh, partially joke around, which is like, I have to spend a lot of time allocating compute. And I'm like, well, that seems like the AI is going to make more rational choices over time. Uh, because I deal with a lot of appeals and emotions as part of working through a process like that. So I think you look everywhere what I see and which may be a bit different to how I think.

• 17:06Speaker 05

  I think done correctly, these tools are going to kind of allow us to operate at the next level in everything we are doing. Like, you know, it's not like you won't do what you were doing before. You will start from a higher foundation. Uh, I wasn't there when like, I don't know, spreadsheets rolled out to companies, right? And like, I almost have to go think back, how did people do all this financial analysis before? Right? And, and I'm sure it changed over a period of three to four years fundamentally, and we got used to it. I think agents, et cetera, is a version of it. Uh, it's not like you're not going to plan birthday parties. Uh, it is just that, you know, what you, let's say you're planning a trip somewhere.

• 17:50Speaker 05

  Maybe you're actually spending your time thinking about the actual things you want to do with your time. This is chasing opening times and how to get tickets and, and so on. So I think it elevates everything to a different, different foundation is how I think about it.

• 18:05Speaker 04

  We have to pause here for a quick break. We'll be right back.

• 18:17Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends, like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an Ultra. Because it's not just a superior light beer, it's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.

• 18:45Speaker 02

  Flowing ad budget on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them? That's bullspend. And marketers are calling it out in Dashboard Confessions.

• 18:55Speaker 03

  I remember telling my boss, "It'll be good for the brand," when leads were slow. Yeah, it wasn't.

• 19:03Speaker 02

  Cut the bullspend. LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title, and more. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 19:16Speaker 06

  College football is back. So Hilton called to me, the superstition concierge, to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Oh, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching band wake-up call at 5:55 in 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for the stay.

• 19:51Speaker 04

  Welcome back. I'm talking with Google CEO Sundar Pichai about some of the announcements the company just made at Google I/O.

• 19:59Speaker 04

  Let me ask you about that. In agents, some of those demos are fascinating. The idea that the search is going to build custom software for everybody, that seems like a... An idea in software engineering, a first impression, right? The idea that the computer, you're going to ask it a question and the response will be for it to make you software that helps you get to an answer. I'm fascinated by this idea, but that is fundamentally changing search. And then you kind of look at Gemini Spark, which is your agent platform in the cloud where you're at, you will say, go book me some tickets and Spark might run around and book you some tickets or do some task for you. And then there's anti-gravity, the agentic coding platform. Broadly, every year, there's like a new paradigm for AI, right? There was LLMs first, and then maybe we're going to chain some LLMs together, then there's

• 20:44Speaker 04

  reasoning, and then now we're agents. Is this the foundation or is there another paradigm shift to come?

• 20:50Speaker 05

  I think it's a great question. You know, we are laying most of the building blocks in place, I think. I think, you know, fundamentally being able to reason, use tools and code, you know, or a lot of like, you know, having intelligence and reasoning, being able to plan, being able to look up things, use tools, and if you need as part of that to build something. So you are kind of laying all the primitives and, and obviously anti-gravity is for developers, but the anti-gravity engine, the harness is built into Gemini now, right?

• 21:33Speaker 05

  And, and you know, Spark is just a mode of Gemini. Over time, it's a feature, we're positioning it, but you know, it's just a tab within Gemini. And so you're bringing that agentic harness. Users don't need to think about, developers will understand it. Over time, in Spark, they can code powerful things, but, but as users, you may be building something, creating something, planning a trip, and all that is working behind the scenes. So I do think we are, you know, laying a lot of the primitives of what we need agents to work end to end, or more importantly, AI to work.

• 22:15Speaker 05

  You know, this long-running vision of assistant we have all had and worked through myriad forms of it and, you know, and failing to fully do it well. I think we are closer than ever before to deliver on that promise. We haven't delivered it yet, you know, but that's the, that's the, uh, that's the journey which I think is closer than ever before.

• 22:35Speaker 04

  I look at all the products and they, they do seem like they should converge, right? You have the new intelligent search box and I definitely want to talk about search in more detail. But you look at that search box and then you look at, it's Canvas that makes you the apps. But you're planning a wedding and it'll just make you an app to help you plan a trip or a wedding or something. And then you have Spark where it can go off and do things. And I looked at that and I was talking to people yesterday and it just seems obvious that that should be one product.

• 23:00Speaker 05

  It, you know, it will. So the agents, just like I gave the earlier notebook example of like, you know, you're creating notebooks. What are notebooks? You're effectively putting all the context you want in one place and then working off it. It's folders as they've always existed in, uh, in, for people. And, and, you know, notebook should be a consistent primitive across the Google products you use. I just view agents that way. It shouldn't matter. Uh, and so I do think when you're at the earliest stage of innovation, you create the capability. I think teams, uh, are, are experimenting with it.

• 23:37Speaker 05

  But for a user over time, if you fire off planning a trip, it should work across both places. This is how I would think about it. You're right in that.

• 23:47Speaker 04

  There's something very important about Google search. It is a source of truth for people for however many years, decades now. The go Google it and you'll get an answer and that answer is the same for you and me generally has been a very important idea. Like it's, I think a fixture in the culture. Maybe Google is the last company saying it will just tell you the truth out of all the companies out there.

• 24:07Speaker 04

  Okay, we're going to infinitely personalize the search box. We're going to infinitely personalize the search experience. And we're all going to get different answers to queries. We're all going to maybe even look at different interfaces depending on what we're asking, what our personal context is, how much data Google has. Do you think about that profoundly? Like, how, how much can you destabilize the last sort of common source of truth most people experience on, on the internet?

• 24:31Speaker 05

  Look, I think there are factors well beyond our control, which is people today have a wider variety of sources than ever before. So I think, you know, people are getting content from so many different sources. But within the world of Google, I still think we deeply care about this being a source of knowledge and information.

• 24:52Speaker 05

  I think there are objective experiences and subjective experiences, right? What's the capital of the USA? You know, it's not going to be custom created for anyone, right? These are objective things. Help me plan a nice trip to Montreal for a weekend. You know, naturally, the answers don't need to be the same for everyone, right? So there is a continuum there. I do think the more, you know, so we deeply care about, you know, for certain categories of information, we do still anchor around authoritative information to present as much of a objective view as, as possible.

• 25:31Speaker 05

  And, and if it is health-related queries, we naturally tend to show more authoritative

• 25:41Speaker 05

  answers than if you're saying, you know, what sweater should I go buy?

• 25:47Speaker 04

  Yeah. Can I, can I show you a search result? A few years ago, I showed you a search result. I've been tracking this one for years.

• 25:52Speaker 05

  I always love amongst the 10 trillion queries.

• 25:55Speaker 04

  Yes. Well, this is, this one's a favorite.

• 25:57Speaker 05

  We have a very scientific statistical way of doing this.

• 26:00Speaker 04

  I think that's important. I, I, and I want to get into how consumers might be experiencing these products. So this is a search I just do all the time for best Chromebook. I'll just show it to you. There it is. And so it starts with an AI overview, which is very confidently tells you the answer. And then there's a bunch of sponsored boxes. And then the one that gets me is right below that. I believe the result is Reddit and it has a top result in Reddit. It's actually a different answer than the AI overview. And then there's like the Times, which has a different answer. And you kind of scroll this and you're like, the AI overview is telling me one thing. The first organic result is like fairly down the page. And all of these are different answers. And I hear what you're saying about objective results and subject results. What laptop should I buy is somewhere in the middle of those things, right?

• 26:42Speaker 04

  And I'm just curious how you think that experience for consumers is today in AI mode and where you think it should go.

• 26:51Speaker 05

  Look, I think, I mean, to be very clear, in the world of AI overview and AI mode, we are organizing, giving context, but there are sources throughout. So you're still presenting organic content in a different way, right? So I mean, there are links and sources you're giving to. But there is an opinion to go with it too, which is what you're you're talking about.

• 27:12Speaker 05

  I do think, you know, some of this will be iterative with users, right? I think

• 27:18Speaker 05

  one of the great things we find with with searches, it's easy to measure user satisfaction. For 25 years, we've learned to measure user happiness, user satisfaction in a correlated way with improving the quality of the product, not for short term. So that's why we do these long term studies. And if we get wrong, or gets get any experience wrong, it shows in the metrics and we course correct.

• 27:43Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 27:43Speaker 05

  Right? And and we pride on the ability to track this over long, longer term, be it engagement sessions, you know, returning to a topic, the number of bounce backs they do. So very, very sophisticated way of looking at it. I think in some areas like that, I think the experience will continue to evolve.

• 28:06Speaker 04

  Do you think that experience is good today?

• 28:07Speaker 05

  I think it's probably more opinionated than it should be for for that particular query you showed me. That's how that was my reaction as a user, right? So I think that's a scope for improvement is how I would say in a fast evolving space. And, you know, but but I would expect that to happen in the product, right? Like my intuition there is, oh, that's way more opinionated. There is some chance that's personalized to, you may be testing it in a way that you're uniquely personalizing. You are, the reason that query might not be exactly representative, though I think, I think because I know how you review all these things like, you know, so there is some chance you're on the point zero zero zero one percentile.

• 28:51Speaker 04

  This is kind of why I'm asking about infinitely personalizable results, right? And I'm also asking if the experience is good because I would bet that most people experience AI in Google search like all the time. They have that experience or they get kicked to AI mode. And there's the stuff you can measure about user satisfaction. And then there's how the public feels about AI. And I think there's a pretty yawning gap in, hey, there's these user numbers going up and we're close to a billion users and the free products people are experiencing, how good they might be. And then just the polling data, young people dislike AI. It is as objective as that gets. You can go ask them and they will tell you in measurable ways they dislike it. Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google, was booed at a college graduation speech he was giving.

• 29:35Speaker 04

  Seven in 10 Americans oppose data center construction. There's some gap between the product experiences people are having and how they feel about the technology. Do you think you can close that gap? Do you think these products are good enough?

• 29:47Speaker 05

  I think it is a very profound topic and I feel like you're linking the two things. I think people rightfully so. AI is the most profound technology humanity is going to deal with. It's happening at a very fast pace. I don't think humans are evolved for processing this much change and the rate of change, particularly over the last few years is incredibly high. And people rightfully so, particularly with all the, what they are hearing, I think people

• 30:27Speaker 05

  are trying to understand the future and in the personal context of their lives, including, you know, what it means at an economic level and so on, right? And so to me, it really makes sense why there is anxiety around this technology. And I think we should be very attuned to that. And I think that's an important topic and I think that's much broader and bigger than the facets of what's happening. People don't directly associate these two all the time. In some cases, yes, they're linked in certain ways.

• 31:04Speaker 04

  Wait, can I? I think people experience the free versions of these models and various products. I think they open their social media feeds and they see slop. I think they see headlines about all that stuff. I think they have the tools just sort of presented to them. The Gemini Sparkle shows up in all the Google products, whether you ask for it or not. And then I do think you link it to, oh, they're asking for a lot of electricity and maybe my rates will go up and maybe all the jobs will go away. And that's pretty scary. And I, I don't know if the value exchange is there.

• 31:35Speaker 05

  I think these are good things to study. I think you're being too specific on what's happening versus I'm just broadening it out. I'm saying that might be part of the explanation. I do think there are other deeper factors too.

• 31:47Speaker 04

  Do you think it's just a marketing problem? I've heard your peers say that AI just has a marketing problem.

• 31:51Speaker 05

  No, I don't think so. That's the point I'm making. I mean, in fact, arguing against it. I think it makes sense to me why people would feel consensus about it. It feels natural to me. You know, you're, people are standing and telling about how AI could make a lot of jobs go away. Right? And like, you know, why wouldn't you feel a sense of anxiety about it? Right? And like, you know, I think those are deeper, deeper issues which we have to tackle as a society. That doesn't mean, yes, there's concern about AI slop at a product level. All that are true. All I'm pointing out is it's a multi-layered problem. And, and, but I don't think all the source of the data center angst is directly related to one specific experience you're having in a product or something alone like that. That's all the point I'm making. Right?

• 32:34Speaker 05

  It is, it is broader and bigger than that. I do think there's a lot of AI slop out there. Like I, I feel it. And so, you know, in an early phase of technology with the competitive dynamic that exists, I think a lot of things are getting rolled out. But we also see empirically how people are using these products in very deep ways. And, and, and, you know, I think not all of it is. If you go in a place where Waymo hasn't come and you just poll people talk about self-driving cars, what you get in the polls is different from how they feel when they use these cars. So technology also goes through these things. People have pretty negative views of the internet too, by the way, if you go poll, right?

• 33:17Speaker 05

  If you ask about the internet as they, you know, and, and, but it's a fabric of our lives and we have to adapt to it. So all of that is simultaneously happening, I think. It's a complex topic. To me, it feels like.

• 33:32Speaker 05

  People are worried about rising energy prices and if so, they want to make sure these AI is not exacerbating the problem. Right? And that's a valid concern. And I think, uh, and it's up to us as an industry. To make sure if you're building data centers, what can we do to make sure we aren't contributing to that problem? So I think that I view as our responsibility, not just us. And, and the government, I think, you know, there's bipartisan concerns around some of the stuff. So for example, there's a rate player, rate pair pledge we all signed up to with a set of commitments. Maybe there needs to be more done. Um, I think all of that is, uh, goes, goes hand in hand.

• 34:16Speaker 05

  I think it's important to talk about topics like skilling, workforce, uh, you know, adaptations. I think we are driving a lot of change very fast through society. I think those end up being very important, uh, topics as well. So I think, I think there's concerns at all those levels. And I expect this concerns to be, uh, meaningful as we go forward. I, I think it is.

• 34:42Speaker 05

  You know, many years ago, I said, this is, this is more profound than fire or electricity. And so you have always felt that. And so, uh, you know, or think about deep fakes and how do you know what, whether something is, you know, these models are getting better at simulating reality.

• 35:00Speaker 05

  This is why we were working so hard, we built Synth ID, we are open sourcing it, we are pulling many, many partners together. And it's great for me to see the industry collaborate on a topic like this. Cybersecurity is another good example. I, I think these are all real concerns, right? So I, I, I do think as an industry, we need to do more. Governments will have a stronger role to play. So all of that, and the public needs to be involved. You cannot have the most consequential technology rolling out to the world in a way, uh, in democracies without the public citizens rightfully having a voice around it.

• 35:36Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 35:36Speaker 05

  So to me, it, it is, uh, uh, really important that we go through this phase and like, you know, that's how we, we learn how to adapt.

• 35:45Speaker 04

  Yeah. I'll leave it. I think my argument is that the products do the marketing work and that that's my push. I'm still waiting to see that the killer app for consumers that does it. I think we have the killer app for enterprise. I want to talk about the web, though.

• 35:58Speaker 05

  One point. There are times I've gone through a hell of a journey in Gemini. It feels more than a killer app to me.

• 36:05Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 36:05Speaker 05

  Better than anything I've ever done before. So, you know, so I think it's, you know, so people are going through those experiences, too.

• 36:13Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 36:16Speaker 04

  We have to take another short break here. We'll be back in just a minute.

• 36:27Speaker 01

  This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends, like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an ultra because it's not just a superior light beer. It's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser-Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.

• 36:56Speaker 02

  Blowing ad budget on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them? That's bull spend and marketers are calling it out in Dashboard Confessions.

• 37:06Speaker 03

  I remember telling my boss, "It'll be good for the brand," when leads were slow. Yeah, it wasn't.

• 37:13Speaker 02

  Cut the bull spend. LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title, and more. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to linkedin.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 37:26Speaker 06

  College football is back. So Hilton called to me, the superstition concierge, to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Oh, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching band wake up call at 5:55 in 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for the stay.

• 38:01Speaker 04

  Welcome back. I'm talking with Google CEO Sundar Pichai about what Google and AI search have done and might continue to do to the open web.

• 38:09Speaker 04

  I want to talk about the web, the health journey in Gemini that requires a rich data set of health information on the web to exist. VO requires, I believe, you're training Gemini in YouTube videos, right? VO requires the YouTube ecosystem to operate and to be fruitful, to make new work in. You and I have discussed the concept I call Google Zero for many years, the idea that you will stop sending traffic to the web. You've disagreed with me that this is real.

• 38:34Speaker 05

  Very much so.

• 38:36Speaker 04

  This last week-

• 38:36Speaker 05

  It hasn't happened in the last many years.

• 38:38Speaker 04

  Well, I'm just gonna read you a quote. It's this time, it's not me, and I didn't feed this to him. Roger Lynch, the CEO of Conde Nast, he did an interview with TVPAN last week, and he said, I'm just gonna read you a quote, "Every year, our search traffic was down more than we had forecast. So last year, I told our teams, assume there is no search. You have to have your businesses planned as if search is zero." That is Google Zero. Conde Nast is saying, "We're assuming that search will go to zero." How would you respond to that, right? The idea, one of the biggest, most iconic publishers in the world is saying, "I can't depend on this anymore."

• 39:08Speaker 05

  Look, first of all, the information ecosystem is so much broader beyond Google. By far, we see it in the data. You see it everywhere. So if any publisher over the last 10 years, I would look at Verge, and I would say where you were when you first took over, how much it's evolved since then, the types of content you make, where all you put that content out, how all you users are coming to you. I think it's exceptionally dynamic, and so it makes sense to me, every publisher is adapting to this new world. We are adapting to the evolving world, how users are consuming technology. We had to

• 39:49Speaker 05

  do when the world shifted from web to mobile. We are shifting it from a world of mobile to people having ongoing conversations, chatting with these products, talking to them, consuming it in voice and many different form factors. People are expressing preferences for various types of content. They're looking for user-generated content. They're looking for podcasts. They're looking for that.

• 40:17Speaker 05

  Through it all, we are very committed to both meeting user expectations and also getting them to connecting them to what's out on the web. And just even in the last year, even since we've launched these features, we've gone back, we've added more links. Another area where behavior is changing, many publishers, rightfully so, are thinking about subscription models.

• 40:40Speaker 04

  Sure, but I'm just saying, Conde Nast is saying we're going to assume our search traffic is zero, given the trends that we see. Should they assume that?

• 40:48Speaker 05

  This is, you know, I always view, people understand their businesses better. I'm not in a position to tell, you know, such an iconic publisher what they should think about their business or plan.

• 41:03Speaker 05

  You know, if they are building content which is high quality and people like it, I expect us to be to reflect that in our products, that much I can commit to them, right? So that's, that's what my, my, you know, so, but I think more than any other company, through this evolution, we are working very hard to make sure people can get connected and we are planning to do it in search and Gemini and that's still underpins a lot of what we do. But there is evolution, like as the technology improves, low quality clicks get filtered out. That's a natural evolution we see. We see it in our metrics, bounce clicks are going down. And so those are all dynamics and people are going to a wider array of information.

• 41:48Speaker 05

  So, you know, and, and, and there are more people producing information than ever before. So that pie is growing faster than, so all these dynamics are happening. It's a complex ecosystem, but our commitment to, you know, making sure we reflect.

• 42:10Speaker 05

  The vastness and diversity of the content and we do think people want to connect ultimately to these sources and but we are trying to meet them in those moments and people come with very different intent and very different moments. One of the small features we have done, but very important, I think, is if you've subscribed to something, reflect that as a preferred source for you as a user. But that's a new change which we didn't have before. We are adapting to the fact that publishers are increasingly, you know, turning to subscribe offerings to.

• 42:45Speaker 04

  Publishers, YouTube creators, should they be able to opt out of training to get surfaced in search?

• 42:51Speaker 05

  I mean, this is a much broader topic. I do think, you know, I think both, you know, laws and regulations will have to evolve, the courts will have to bend. It's important to protect copyright. It's important to protect fair use and, you know, and so, you know, these are constructs which will evolve dynamically through that.

• 43:13Speaker 04

  But do you want to be in a bunch of lawsuits with YouTube creators? You're in a lawsuit with publishers in the UK. The rhetoric in that lawsuit is getting increasingly heated. Google has said that the proposed solution is a quote free writer charter. Every year the News Media Association sends me a quote to read to you. And, you know, they say Google calling us free writers is obviously ridiculous and in other words, basic supply chain economics. If the value were really all on Google's side, they would simply allow publishers to opt out. Do you want to be in that same fight with a bunch of creators on YouTube about opting out?

• 43:43Speaker 05

  Look, I, um, we are constantly, you know, as part of Gemini, uh, developing, uh, you know, we did offer a new opt out with Google extended and we are in conversations with publishers. We'll take feedback and over times, you know, work through what makes sense and right, you know, obviously it is a, we are not the only player in a big ecosystem. You know, we are also trying to put out products which are competitive to other products out there, right? And I think, uh, All the publishers will also write an article saying the product is not very, you know, so it is more complicated than it looks.

• 44:22Speaker 04

  I just, I think you have spent more time thinking about the web and the health of the web and the necessity of the web. Paint me the picture for what a healthy web looks like.

• 44:31Speaker 05

  You know, I actually find-

• 44:32Speaker 04

  In an agentic search world.

• 44:34Speaker 05

  One of the arguments I've made over time, and I actually see it playing around a little bit more, I've started using the web more again over the last year, year and a half. I think all these AI experiences have brought the web back more. You know, there was a time and it felt like, you know, but I always felt the web would be vibrant. In fact, I've argued the web is going to be vibrant every year.

• 44:55Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 44:55Speaker 05

  And, you know, I would still argue it today. You know, the web is constantly evolving. I've never seen anything as dynamic as the web, which is why it's been such a privilege to be part of that evolution. I look at agents, that is the next evolution of the web, which we will deal with and, you know, and I think it will evolve the web pretty profoundly. And there will be a lot of debates about what's okay, what's not. And, but I think the web will continue to be, people want to put out information, connect with other people, people want to be connected, you know, people aren't trying to be in a siloed world detached. That doesn't reflect the reality of the human experience. I think

• 45:38Speaker 05

  the web is going to play as central a role on it as ever before. In fact, the Universal Commerce Protocol, if anything, what we announced yesterday, I think people slightly are underestimating the impact of it.

• 45:50Speaker 04

  Can I juxtapose that? There are a lot of muscular announcements about new products, new features and agentic tools you can use and UCP and Amazon and Walmart, we're going to use a new standard we're building for shopping. And all that is very tangible. And then I O ended with Dennis Sabas, the CEO of DeepMind, coming out. And he said this thing that I have not been able to stop thinking about. He said, "Google's cutting-edge research and products will help unlock AGI's incredible potential for the benefit of the entire world. When we look back at this time, I think we will realize that we were standing in the foothills of the singularity." Can you tell me what it means to be in the foothills of the singularity?

• 46:29Speaker 05

  Demis and I have had long, deep conversations on this topic.

• 46:31Speaker 04

  I figured.

• 46:32Speaker 05

  I think in this context, I think for him, the advent of AGI is what he thinks of as the singularity and, you know, and I-

• 46:39Speaker 04

  Do you have a definition of AGI? Have you debated? Do you have an agreement?

• 46:41Speaker 05

  We, we, we debated a lot. I think both Demis and I are very close to how we think about and, you know, think about, we think about AGI and, you know, in a, there is a harder definition of AGI, which is, you know, that, that it has to be more comprehensively do, you know, the wide range of tasks, including cognitive tasks, in a way that's comparable. So I think we'll at some point actually put it out as a company, I think, and we are working on that. But I think that, that's what he's talking about in this context. By the way, I think it's important for us to understand that this technology is progressing

• 47:23Speaker 05

  very rapidly and, you know, later today I'll be going and spending time with our AI researchers and not just in, in, in our company, but amongst the frontier labs. I think there's wide consensus that this technology, you know, AGI is, people may quibble around like, you know, is it like three years, five, but the technology is sooner rather than later. And so I think it's more important to communicate that because that's what, you know, to an earlier part of the conversation, it's important that we as a society understand it and are preparing as much as possible.

• 47:57Speaker 04

  I see this question that maybe the first time we ever talked about AI, I asked you if language was intelligence and, you know, the, the progression here is we're layering more and more on LLMs. We're doing longer chains of reasoning, we're building harnesses, we're, we're doing all this stuff and that, but the core technology is still, you know, transformers, it's still the thing Google invented all, all so long ago. Can LLMs get you to AGI? Is that path clear?

• 48:20Speaker 05

  You know, the the trajectory over the last three years has been incredible. And looking ahead, uh, you know, it looks the L L M's of today are, you know, have evolved in many ways too. So we are constantly evolving it. And and to me, it's like asking like, can computers get us to like the way, you know, the one Neumann architecture is still what powers most computers today. But, you know, he won't recognize the modern one of our TPU pods, right? And like, or maybe he would, you know, there's still a lot of commonality to it. So I think the underlying technology keeps evolving so profoundly. Um, I look at every year we have had major breakthroughs. I recently, I mean, you just saw his demo in anti-gravity

• 49:05Speaker 05

  and ability to prompt and create an operating system.

• 49:08Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 49:09Speaker 05

  And like, you know,

• 49:09Speaker 04

  It's very dangerous for Google to be able to make new operating systems.

• 49:12Speaker 05

  We'll have to, we'll have to make sure we don't talk in Max on creating. Uh, I'll give you that. Uh, it's fair, but but, you know, that is the power of what these things are doing, right? There are the top mathematicians in the world, top physicists in this world who are interacting with these tools and using them in important ways. But we still, you know, can these tools go fundamentally make novel scientific discoveries on their own? Not yet, right? And so it's both remarkable how much it's progressed. Um, I do think it has, uh, uh, um, important evolutions to happen. And then there are strong opinions out there in the world about, you know, uh, you know,

• 49:56Speaker 05

  you know, how how much of a real understanding of the world you need, uh, you know, to to to to take that next leap. You know, I'm I'm pretty optimistic that we will continue to make a lot of progress.

• 50:08Speaker 04

  Yeah. All right. So give it, well, last question. What is your timeline? Is it three years, five years, AGI? Where are you at?

• 50:14Speaker 05

  You know, I have always answered it this way. I think that timeline doesn't matter because the rate of progress means you're dealing with ever more intelligent systems in a profound way. So the way I would answer that question, I three years from now, whether you and I call it AGI or not, doesn't matter because it will be very, very powerful and we have to prepare for it.

• 50:38Speaker 04

  Yeah. Sundar, this was great. Thank you so much for letting me talk again.

• 50:40Speaker 05

  Thanks, Nella. Pleasure.

• 50:45Speaker 04

  I'd like to thank Sundar Pichai for taking time to join me on Decoder, and thank you for listening. I hope you enjoyed it. If you'd like to let us know what you thought about this episode, or really anything else at all, drop us a line. You can email us at [email protected]. We really do read all the emails. Or you can hit me up directly on Threads or Blue Sky, or also on YouTube. You can watch full episodes at DecoderPod. It's the same handle on TikTok and Instagram. They're a lot of fun. If you like Decoder, please share it with your friends and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. If you really like the show, hit us with that five-star review. The show is produced by Kate Cox-Nixtath. This episode was additionally produced by Victoria Barrios and shot by Owen Grove and Brett Putnam. It was edited by Kabir Chopra. Our editorial director is Kevin McShane. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. We'll see you next time.

• 51:25Speaker 07

  Fall savings are happening now at The Home Depot. Save up to $500 on select appliances. Plus, enjoy free delivery when you spend $998 or more. From prepping to cooking to cleaning up, Frigidaire has you covered. The custom Flex Temp drawer switches from fridge to freezer. With more than 15 cooking modes, including stone-baked pizza mode, you can enjoy restaurant-quality pizza in as little as two minutes. Then clean up with the Frigidaire dishwasher, featuring the industry's fastest normal wash cycle. Shop fall savings now at The Home Depot. Offer valid through October 21st. U.S. only. See store online for details.

• 51:55Speaker 08

  I work here. You know, that thing you have to wake up for every day? I know. I've made things a little difficult in the past. Okay, a lot difficult. But I got some help from UKG, and finally, I understand. Now I'm making work work better. I've even got AI agents helping me find new ways to help you, your people, and your business. Because when work works, everything works. UKG, HR, Pay, and Workforce Management.

• 52:25Speaker 09

  Close your eyes, exhale, feel your body relax, and let go of whatever you're carrying today. Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-CONTACTS. Oh my gosh, they're so fast. And breathe. Oh, sorry. I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry. Namaste. Visit 1-800-CONTACTS.com today to save on your first order. 1-800-CONTACTS.