Sarah Widmer

Just before 11 PM on August 11th, 2009, Ryan Widmer called 911, requesting help at his home in Hamilton Township, Ohio. According to Ryan, His wife, twenty-four-year-old Sarah Widmer, had fallen asleep while she was taking a bath and accidentally drowned. Police quickly became suspicious of his story. Join Mike and Morf as they discuss the death of Sarah Widmer. Ryan's story was picked apart, and discrepancies emerged. Also, the crime scene didn't seem to make sense. But the state's case was primarily circumstantial. And although Ryan has been convicted multiple times of Sarah's murder, there are many who believe he is innocent. You can help support the show through Patreon. We'd love to connect with listeners on social media. We are available on the following platforms: Facebook - Facebook Discussion group - Instagram - Threads - X Formerly Twitter - Blue Sky - Twitch - Tik Tok Criminology is an Emash Digital production hosted by Mike Ferguson and Mike Morford.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Criminology is a true crime podcast that may contain discussion about violent or disturbing topics. Listener discretion is advised.

• 0:37Speaker 01

  Hello everyone and welcome to episode 405 of the Criminology Podcast. I'm Mike Ferguson.

• 0:43Speaker 02

  And this is Mike Morford.

• 0:44Speaker 01

  Mr. Morford, how you doing this week, buddy?

• 0:47Speaker 02

  I'm doing pretty good. How you doing?

• 0:48Speaker 01

  I'm doing great. My, uh, my oldest daughter has been off for spring break. You know, she's a, she's a real adult now. I mean, she's got a full-time job. She's a speech pathologist at a school. She's just happy to get a spring break.

• 1:03Speaker 02

  Well, that's pretty cool to have a job where you do get to have some breaks now and then. I know you're always a teacher, so you get that little bit of time off and recharge the batteries.

• 1:11Speaker 01

  Yeah, they're excited for the summer because they're gonna be able to hang out together now. So.

• 1:18Speaker 02

  Very cool.

• 1:19Speaker 01

  Neither you nor I ever experienced that because, uh, we didn't get our summers off, but teachers deserve it. They put up with a lot.

• 1:27Speaker 02

  Yeah, gotta give them a lot of credit and deserve a little break, so.

• 1:30Speaker 01

  Yeah, absolutely. Let's go ahead and give our Patreon shout outs. We had Shannon Swinson and Scott Dislors. So great new support. We really appreciate it.

• 1:40Speaker 02

  Yeah, thank you so much, Shannon and Scott, and to everyone else that helps support the show. Anyone that wants to sign up, head over patreon.com/criminology.

• 1:48Speaker 01

  And just a quick reminder, it's kinda hard to believe, but Crime Con's only about six weeks away. It's happening May 29th through the 31st at Caesar's Palace, Las Vegas. And you know, if you've put it off and you wanna go, go out and book now because we wanna see you there. We'll be on Creator's Row. If you still need passes, use our promo code CRIMINOLOGY to save 10% on your standard badges when you check out at crimecon.com.

• 2:14Speaker 02

  And we're also excited to let everyone know that our annual joint Criminology TCAT meetup will be happening on Saturday night, May 30th at 8:00 PM in the Vista Cocktail Lounge. That's right on premises at Caesar's, so there's no need to worry about getting a ride or walking or any of that stuff.

• 2:30Speaker 01

  And you know, our meetups are always a lot of fun. We get to meet people, hang out, have a few Coca Colas. You know, I always look forward to it. So now that we have all that out of the way, it's time to get into this week's case. And we have a pretty wild one with a lot of twists. We're talking about the death of a woman named Sarah Widmer in August 2009 in my home state of Ohio. Her husband was found guilty of murdering her, not once, but multiple times. But he is always steadfastly denied having anything to do with her death. And he has more than his fair share of supporters who think that he was not involved. So the question is, what really happened to Sarah Widmer?

• 3:14Speaker 02

  Just before 11:00 PM on the night of August 11, 2009, Ryan Widmer dialed 911 requesting help at his home in Hamilton Township, Ohio. According to Ryan, his wife, 24-year-old Sarah Widmer, had fallen asleep while she was taking a bath and accidentally drowned. He could tell that she was already dead, but he didn't want it to be true. When officers arrived, Sarah was lying on the floor of the bedroom she and Ryan shared. She was naked and her hair was wet, but her body was dry. Her body was still warm when checking for a pulse, but she had none. Ryan was also in the bedroom wearing his boxers. There were no visible injuries to either of their bodies. Sarah was rushed to the hospital. Five different attempts to intubate her, some in the bedroom

• 3:58Speaker 02

  and others in the ambulance while en route to the hospital, were all unsuccessful. Finally, in the emergency room, a doctor was able to properly intubate her, but by then it was of no use. After nearly 30 minutes in the hospital, she was officially pronounced dead.

• 4:13Speaker 01

  And obviously more, you know, we have to talk about people dying a lot in the episodes that we do. Now, most of the time, we're talking about murder because let's face it, that's what makes up a large part of, you know, true crime cases. I just always try to put myself in, you know, people's positions. So, you know, Ryan's position in this case, and you know, it's hard to because I can't imagine what it would be like to find your significant other dead. Now, obviously, there's a lot more to this story that we're going to get into, but I, I think

• 4:57Speaker 01

  about that scenario and wow, it just is really hard for me to fathom.

• 5:04Speaker 02

  Yeah, it seems like a really chaotic scene too. Everything unfolding quickly and she's rushed to the hospital. He tried multiple times to save her. It was of no use. So it seems this would be a shocking death for Sarah's family. You know, she wasn't sick. She wasn't battling something that's happened suddenly. And Ryan called on family to come help him during this time.

• 5:28Speaker 01

  Yeah, Ryan asked his mother Jill to go to their home and get some of his clothes. He told her that he couldn't stand to step foot inside the home that Sarah died in. Just two years earlier, Ryan Widmer and Sarah Stewart were set up on a blind date by mutual friends. One of Sarah's friends had married Ryan's college roommate. In August of 2006, they met in a bar and then began dating. Friends would later describe in a courtroom that Sarah had finally met the man of her dreams. The two married in April of 2008 and had a beautiful honeymoon in Costa Rica. They were planning their future together, trips to Cancun, adopting a pet, maybe starting a family.

• 6:11Speaker 01

  Suddenly there was no future for the two of them.

• 6:16Speaker 02

  Ryan told investigators that on the night of the 11th, when Sarah died, after they both got home from work, they had dinner, which was leftover hamburgers, cheesy mashed potatoes and corn on the cob. And they sat down and watched some TV together. After a while, Ryan switched it to the football game. It was the Bengals versus the Packers. And Sarah decided to go upstairs and take a bath. It was a lazy, relaxing night up to that point. Sarah reminded Ryan to make sure everything downstairs was put away and the house was locked up before he came up to get into bed later. They exchanged I love you's and then Sarah went upstairs. When Ryan decided to head upstairs and get ready to go to sleep, he was surprised that Sarah was still in the bath. So he decided to check on her. That's when he found her floating in the water.

• 6:59Speaker 01

  So I think, you know, a lot of people may look at that part of the story more and say, well, there, you know, there's really not anything all that suspicious or unusual about Ryan's story. And I can relate it to my own life. My wife goes to bed way earlier than I do. So, you know, we exchange our I love you's, good nights. She goes up to bed. I usually go down in the basement where I stay up later and, and work and play games and whatever, but you know, I assume she's sleeping.

• 7:36Speaker 02

  Yeah, my wife and I are the same. We have the same kind of routine. I work sometimes at night. She's watching TV and then going to bed and, you know, sometimes I don't really see her until I get into bed or in the morning when we first wake up and talk.

• 7:49Speaker 01

  However, investigators became suspicious of Ryan after hearing his story. First of all, he created his alibi from the beginning. He called 911 and told the dispatcher, my wife, she fell asleep in the bathtub. I think I was downstairs. Ryan also told nurses in the emergency room that he found Sarah face up in the bathtub. But he had told the 911 dispatcher and later told investigators that he found her lying face down. He also told investigators that this was the first time Sarah had ever fallen asleep in the bathtub. But when he was talking to the 911 dispatcher, he said that she fell asleep while she was taking a bath quite often. So.

• 8:34Speaker 01

  Obviously, there are various stories or various versions of the story. So you could see why, you know, a changing story might arouse police suspicions.

• 8:47Speaker 02

  Yeah, I can see Ryan being upset. This probably happened a million miles an hour in his head and he could be confused. And maybe that could explain some of the differences in the story. But of course, him covering it up or having a part in it could also account for his changing stories because he just made mistakes in the retelling of it and it wasn't something honest and truthful. But one thing that stood out to me, I could see if someone fell asleep in the bathtub, they would most likely be in a sitting position. So their back would be to the water. But if she indeed was faced down in the water, that to me seems a little bit unusual

• 9:30Speaker 02

  for somebody that was simply taking a bath and fell asleep.

• 9:34Speaker 01

  Yeah, I get you there. I definitely could see why police would be a little suspicious of Ryan. I mean, first of all, he has to be ruled out, right? He's the, the husband. We know that. And then the changing of the stories, it never looks good. Now, there might be valid reasons for it.

• 9:54Speaker 02

  The entire scene in the bathroom didn't seem as wet as investigators would have expected for an accident like this. The bedroom floor wasn't wet and the bathtub was nearly dry. Most importantly, the bathroom floor was dry. There should have been a puddle of water from Ryan desperately pulling Sarah out of the tub and onto the floor, but there was nothing. Investigators also noted that her hands and feet showed no signs that she had been in the water for a prolonged period of time. We've all seen our fingers get wrinkled or pruney after a long hot bath, but Sarah's fingers hadn't done this. There was one used Lysol wipe found at the scene. Lieutenant Brayley, one of the investigators, believed that it could have been used to erase evidence of what really happened in that bathroom. Ryan said he didn't pull Sarah out of the tub until the dispatcher told him to.

• 10:40Speaker 02

  And that's kind of shocking to hear. Even in a panic or not knowing what to do, you would think that pulling your wife out of the water she was drowning in would be your first instinct. Maybe you don't know how to do CPR and would need the dispatcher to guide you through that. But most people know that when someone's drowning, the very first thing that needs to happen in order for them to get help is to stop them from drowning. Their face needs to be pulled above water. For whatever reason, Ryan waited until he was instructed to get her out of the tub. Still, despite pulling her out of the water while he was on the phone with 911, everything had dried by the time any first responders arrived.

• 11:14Speaker 01

  And it wasn't just that bathroom that held clues for investigators. The TVs in the home were also a clue. The TV downstairs was not turned to the channel showing the Bengals game that night, but the TV in their bedroom was. Ryan claimed he had been downstairs watching football while Sarah had a fatal accident. But it appeared that he had been watching TV in their bed, just feet from the tub. However, Ryan claimed that this discrepancy was because he had switched away from the football game to be able to check on what was going on with the Olympics. Police were intrigued by what they found and what they didn't find. And they hoped an autopsy would provide more answers.

• 11:58Speaker 01

  Warren County Coroner Dr. Russell Updegro found multiple injuries on Sarah's body that weren't obvious to the first officers who arrived at the scene. There were multiple bruises on her face and on her neck, one of them the size of a fingertip and contusions on her scalp. Investigators believe that Ryan drowned Sarah, holding her head underwater until she died. They just weren't sure where or how it happened.

• 12:30Speaker 02

  Investigators actually seized the bathtub and removed it from the home. There were apparent marks of interest left on its surface. Despite Sarah's fingernails being clean and undamaged, investigators think some of the marks, which left marks on the surface of the tub, look like they were made by human fingernails. So tubs are very hard, whatever they're made of, whether they're acrylic, hard plastic, cast iron, whatever it is. And we don't know what the tub in this home was made from. But you would think if Sarah's nails dragged hard enough along the tub to somehow leave marks in the surface, then her fingernails would likely show damage too. But that wasn't the case. Despite the fact that investigators couldn't prove what made the marks or when they were made, that was used as evidence.

• 13:14Speaker 01

  The neatness of the bathroom, shampoo bottles still on the side of the tub, no water splashed everywhere, works with both arguments in this case. If Ryan had frantically tried to pull her out of the bathtub to save her life, how did he not bump into anything? But at the same time, if Ryan held her head under the water until she died, how did nothing get knocked over during the struggle? How was she not thrashing and getting water everywhere? Investigators believe that items were placed back neatly after her death before he called 911. A delay in calling for help after the event would even help explain why things were so dry.

• 13:58Speaker 02

  According to the Cincinnati Inquirer, Dr. Updegro believed that Sarah's head was pushed over the edge of the tub or toilet or sink or forwards or backwards, either in running or full water. A struggle at the sink or toilet could explain why everything around the edge of the tub was still neatly in their designated spots. It would also explain why only the area near the bathtub drain seemed wet. Ryan could have run water and then claimed it all drained. And it would explain how only Sarah's hair got wet. Of course, if it didn't happen in the tub, then those supposed marks from fingernails or forearm don't matter anymore and probably aren't evidence.

• 14:36Speaker 01

  Detectives didn't waste any time and 27-year-old Ryan Widmer was arrested and charged with aggravated murder on August 13th, just two days after Sarah died. Though they hadn't been married long enough to discuss preferences for their eventual burials, Ryan decided to have Sarah's body cremated. Ryan was unable to attend Sarah's funeral because he was in jail waiting for trial. His bond was initially set at $1 million, something he would never be able to afford, especially in time to make it to the service. It was finally reduced to $400,000, which still meant a non-refundable payment of $40,000 if he wanted to be free before his trial.

• 15:20Speaker 01

  His father was able to pay the bond, but Ryan was released two hours after his wife's service. The same priest who was at their wedding is the one who performed the service at her funeral. It was a full circle moment. Ryan found himself in a tough situation if he had something to do with his wife's death. His plan to cover it up hadn't worked and he was going to be tried, but if he had nothing to do with Sarah's death, then he was in a nightmare of a situation, facing losing his freedom for something he didn't do.

• 15:54Speaker 02

  Ryan Widmer's trial finally began in March 2009. It had been nearly a year since Sarah's death. The trial moved swiftly and Ryan Widmer was found not guilty of aggravated murder, but he was found guilty of murder. Aggravated murder is a more serious charge and requires evidence of premeditation. However, this conviction wouldn't last long. It turned out that some of the jurors had disregarded the instructions given to them. One of the jurors contacted the defense team and informed them that multiple jurors had gone home during the trial and tried to figure out how long it took a body to dry. Based on those jurors' at-home experiments, they felt Ryan was lying because Sarah's body would not have completely dried off that quickly, thus leading to their decision to find him guilty.

• 16:39Speaker 02

  The problem is jurors aren't supposed to do any deliberating about the case when they're not all together and they're not supposed to consider anything that wasn't presented as evidence or testified to at trial. Getting wet and seeing how long it takes you to dry, or getting your carpet wet and seeing how long it stays damp are not things that came out at trial. Even if it proved that something was possible or impossible, you just can't take it into consideration. It's just one of the many reasons that being a juror can be frustrating. But jury service is something we have to take very seriously.

• 17:11Speaker 01

  And for me more, if this is a fascinating part of this case, and really you can extrapolate it out to many cases, right? Jurors are given very specific instructions, but we're all human, right? So if you were a juror on a murder case, I would think there would be a lot of temptation to try to, you know, analyze some of the things while you weren't in the deliberation room, right before you got to that point. So even though they probably knew they weren't supposed to, I could understand someone trying to do kind of their own experiments at home. I'm not saying it's right.

• 17:56Speaker 01

  I just, I can understand why or how someone would want to do that. And I'm sure it's been done in many cases that probably don't get publicized, right? Or it never comes to light because they don't tell anybody they did it.

• 18:13Speaker 02

  Yeah, and it makes me wonder, have people been convicted or not convicted based on similar type of things that somehow slipped through and one of the jurors didn't come to someone on one of the defense team or the prosecution or the judge, whoever, and say something about it? So it's definitely something you don't think about.

• 18:34Speaker 01

  No, I didn't really think about it much before, you know, getting into this case. Now, the one thing I will say is, how likely is it that, you know, that type of experiment would change that person's thoughts on the case? I get it, it's wrong. You're not supposed to do it. But in the end, is it really going to change in most cases, someone's opinion on the case? I don't know. I don't know the answer to that. Losing weight on your own can feel like a fight you keep losing. Weight loss by Hers offers access to the FDA-approved Wegovy pill and the Wegovy pen.

• 19:17Speaker 01

  Wegovy is the first-ever GLP-1 weight loss medication, available in a pill and it also comes as a pen. So you've got options. With Wegovy, you can lose up to 20% of your body weight. People lost an average of 14% body weight at 64 weeks in a clinical trial of Wegovy alongside diet and exercise. To get started with Wegovy, just go to forhers.com and complete an online consultation with a licensed provider, who will determine if a prescription is appropriate. And Hers doesn't stop there. Nutrition and lifestyle guidance are part of the plan, along with access to 24/7 messaging with your care team. So support is always in reach. Ready to reach your goals? Visit forhers.com/criminology

• 20:00Speaker 01

  to access personalized, affordable care for weight loss, hair, menopause, and more. Individual results may vary, and stopping treatment may result in weight regain. Weight loss by Hers is not available in all 50 states. Wegovy is the registered trademark of Novo Nordisk AS. To get started and learn more, including important safety information, Wegovy clinical study information, and restrictions, visit forhers.com.

• 20:28Speaker 01

  In July of 2009, Ryan Widmer's conviction was overturned, and he was granted a new trial. Due to juror misconduct, this time, he could only be charged with murder, not aggravated murder. The acquittal on one charge of aggravated murder was still legally valid. Only his murder conviction had been overturned. It took nearly a year for the proceedings to actually begin. While he awaited his second trial, he was granted bail. He went on living his life, and even tried building a new one.

• 21:04Speaker 01

  Ryan's story drew many supporters over the years. There was a website, free ryan widmer.com as well as a Facebook group full of people who believed in his innocence. Bumper stickers reading free Ryan Widmer were slapped on cars. While Ryan fought to clear his name, he met a woman whose name was also Sarah and began an intimate relationship with her. She actually became pregnant and the two would go on to have a son together. So more of I guess got to take a minute here and talk about this. You know, we talked about the juror misconduct and that ultimately overturning his conviction.

• 21:48Speaker 01

  But the acquittal on the charge of aggravated murder, it was said was still legally valid. And I found that to be very fascinating. So basically they're saying that part is still okay. The acquittal on that charge, but the conviction on the charge of murder was overturned. You would think, and I'm not a legal expert, obviously by any means, but you would kind of think the whole thing would just have to be redone. But that's not the way it played out.

• 22:23Speaker 02

  Yeah, I'm with you. And maybe we have some legal eagles that are listeners that can chime in and social media let us know. But it seems to me that if the jury in any part of the trial is tainted, you have to redo the whole thing. That's what I would think. And just from the start and see what the outcome is not say, okay, we're going to go with what they came to a conclusion of despite that that improper stuff just doesn't make sense to me.

• 22:51Speaker 01

  Yeah, now I could understand the prosecution and a retrial, maybe not even trying to go after aggravated murder because, you know, the first jury didn't find enough, you know, premeditation there to warrant it, but to not even have the choice or not legally be able to do it. That whole thing seemed kind of strange to me.

• 23:17Speaker 02

  In 2009, an episode of Dateline NBC about Sarah's death was aired, and a woman named Jennifer Crew watched it from her home in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Afterward, she decided to contact Ryan. The two emailed and instant messaged each other before beginning to regularly speak on the phone. Jennifer claimed that on October 26th, after about a month of communicating with each other, Ryan made a shocking confession to her. According to the Springfield News-Sun, Jennifer claimed that Ryan called her upset, sobbing, and nearly impossible to understand, saying, "I did it. I did it. I killed Sarah." At first, Jennifer thought he was just feeling guilty for not noticing that his wife was asleep in the tub and had drowned,

• 24:01Speaker 02

  and for not checking on her sooner, that kind of thing. She tried to console and reassure him, but he interrupted her, saying, "No, Jen. Listen to me. I did it." He then admitted what really happened that night.

• 24:13Speaker 01

  According to Jennifer, Ryan Widmer said Sarah hadn't fallen asleep in the bathtub. She had confronted Ryan, accusing him of smoking and drinking too much, and of watching pornography. She even threatened to leave him, which made him furious. He followed her into the bathroom where she was preparing her bath. He told her, "No one leaves me", and he hit her in the chest. It made her fall and hit her head. Ryan said he must have blacked out when this happened, because the next thing he knew, Sarah was unconscious and unresponsive on the floor. Her hair was wet, and he immediately began to clean up the scene, drying the floor with towels.

• 24:55Speaker 01

  He hid the evidence of a cleanup before he finally called 911.

• 25:00Speaker 02

  This revelation shocked Jennifer Crew. She had truly believed that Ryan was innocent. It's the whole reason she ever reached out to him after seeing the Dateline episode. She didn't tell anyone about what Ryan said, because he had allegedly warned her, "I wouldn't want you to end up where Sarah is." Obviously, in light of that confession, she would have no reason to doubt that he was capable of following through with any threats. She eventually changed her mind about keeping his secrets when she saw how broken Sarah's mom, Ruth Ann Stewart, was during the second trial.

• 25:32Speaker 01

  Jennifer Crew certainly knew a lot about Ryan and his relationship with Sarah, even things that hadn't been revealed at either of the first two trials. She knew that Ryan and Sarah's couple song was Motley Crue's You're All I Need, and that Sarah's childhood nickname was Stewie. However, none of the information she gave about the confession actually lined up with the evidence. Remember, there was no evidence of any bruising on her chest. A blow there from Ryan so hard that it knocked her off balance would have likely caused some kind of mark. There were also no wet towels anywhere. Investigators thought the lack of water in the bathroom was odd, so they definitely looked for them.

• 26:16Speaker 01

  And the timeline she gave for the phone calls Ryan allegedly had with her didn't add up with actual phone records. So, a couple of questions come to mind. First, and I think most obvious, if you're Ryan and you had indeed killed your wife, and you were trying to cover it up, why come out and confess to someone that you don't even know all that well? That leads to another question, can we believe everything Jennifer Crew said? And if she's not being truthful, why isn't she being truthful? And more, you know, these kind of revelations are always tough for me just because,

• 26:59Speaker 01

  you know, whether it's a jailhouse informant, and I don't really want to compare Jennifer Crew to a jailhouse informant, but it's that scenario where one person who's on trial for their life confides in one person these unbelievably damning secrets.

• 27:22Speaker 01

  Right? And then it's impossible not to start asking these questions. Why would they do that? And this guy has to know that he's fighting for his life. He's fighting for his freedom. So whether he actually did it or not, what's the impetus for kind of laying his soul bare to this woman who he barely knows? Now, one could make an argument that, you know, his conscience just got to him and he had to unload all this stuff onto somebody. And that's possible.

• 28:01Speaker 02

  If this alleged confession was made to someone, you know, that you're sharing a prison cell with, and you're, that's something that most of us can't imagine, and maybe there's some kind of bond there, or it was being shared with a close family member who he trusted or a longtime friend, I could maybe say, okay, that seems possible. But to me, it just seems unlikely that he would risk outing himself to someone, as you said, he barely knew and had only known a short time. I just, I have a hard time buying it.

• 28:37Speaker 01

  Well, I think here's the other problem with it is how do you verify? Right? There maybe are some things that Jennifer is saying that weren't public knowledge. You could also make the argument that, you know, how hard would it be to find out what their, their song was at their wedding? How hard would it really be to find out what her childhood nickname was? But then for me, the other big thing is if this is all made up, I mean, what's the, what would be the reason for someone like Jennifer to, to do that? I mean, we do know some people just like to insert themselves into the investigation or,

• 29:20Speaker 01

  you know, maybe there's an idea that there's going to be a 15, you know, minutes of fame from this or whatever, but. I don't know. The whole thing just seems odd to me.

• 29:32Speaker 02

  And interesting side note is that Motley Crue song, You're All I Need is one of my favorite Motley Crue songs. It's but it's very dark and it's about a couple in love that broke up and the male killed the female. So it's it's a very dark song. And if if it's not true, it seems like it was something she put out there that would make him look even more guilty because of the lyrics in that song. But if it is their real song that they that they liked as a couple, then you know, that's a pretty ironic song in itself.

• 30:10Speaker 01

  But it does seem kind of a strange song, maybe for the wedding song or and maybe it wasn't the song played at the wedding. It was just their favorite song. I yeah, I don't know.

• 30:21Speaker 02

  In Ryan's second trial, the second jury couldn't come to unanimous verdict and a third trial was on the horizon. Before going through the trouble of a third trial, the prosecution offered Ryan a plea deal and he turned it down. Ryan still hoped that the third jury would see the truth, especially knowing that more than one juror wasn't able to find him guilty. But on February 15, 2011, after a third trial, he was found guilty of murder. He was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison. At the time, his son was very young. His second wife, Sarah, who had uprooted her entire life to move to Hamilton Township and be with Ryan, was stunned.

• 30:58Speaker 01

  One of the jurors from the third trial revealed that Ryan's demeanor and behavior in court was a very important factor in their decision. He seemed to have zero reaction when the autopsy photos were shown. And it didn't sit right with at least one of the jurors. One juror told the Cincinnati Inquirer, he didn't react like a normal person whose wife is dead, should have. Three times Ryan sat there in a courtroom and didn't tell his side of the story. Now that may very well have been due to the advice of his counsel. Ryan would tell WLWT 5 News, there's nothing I can say to change anything. In his mind, He has told his story to the police.

• 31:42Speaker 01

  He was downstairs when his wife accidentally fell asleep in the bathtub or suffered some kind of medical emergency while bathing and drowned. He just found her when it was too late to save her. So there's two things here I want to touch on and you know, one is, is something we talk about quite a lot. And that's a person's behavior. Whether it's while they're being interviewed, while they have a loved one missing. In this case, you know, it's their behavior in court. And you have at least one juror saying that was a big deal to them. Didn't react like a normal person. Now, I think you could make an argument both ways, right?

• 32:25Speaker 01

  You could make one that says, how could you not react in some way? When autopsy photos of your late wife are shown in court? You can also make the argument that, you know, this is his third trial. He's been going through this. He also has a, a new wife and a child. So I, I don't know. I, I think it's tough to say how a person should act. I think that's always tough. But then you have the part where he doesn't testify in any of the three trials. And to me, that's not that unusual, right?

• 33:07Speaker 01

  Most defendants don't testify because their attorneys don't want them to. There's just too much downside in it. But what I will say is, I do think there are people, sometimes jurors, who view that negatively. Like this person is not willing to take the stand and tell us he didn't do it. Or get up there and tell his story, even though they really shouldn't, right? Because the defendant has that right not to.

• 33:38Speaker 02

  Yeah, and that's, you know, the frightening part, if you are a defendant who is truly innocent, the fact that you chose not to testify could be something the jury sees as fishy. And just the optics of how you react or don't react could also sway the jury one way or the other. You know, if he had cried and been emotional. Could the jury have said, oh, he looks like he's faking it? So, you know, it just, it seems like there's a lot of stock put into optics. When I guess in reality, it should be all about the evidence presented, testimony, the,

• 34:19Speaker 02

  the stuff that is factual and not how somebody's opinion is based on somebody's looks or behavior. All along, Ryan Widmer has maintained his innocence. He says he has no idea what happened in the bathroom that night, other than the fact that it was a tragic accident. The defense, all three defense teams, believe that Sarah may have had a previously undiagnosed genetic disorder that caused her to become unresponsive when she was in the bathtub. Ryan and his family argue that there is a good chance that she had something called long QT syndrome, which is a heart rhythm disorder that causes fast, chaotic heartbeats. It's common for people with this disorder to be unaware that they have it for much of their life.

• 35:01Speaker 02

  According to the Mayo Clinic page on the topic, long QT syndrome usually causes noticeable symptoms by age 40, and many of the symptoms can happen when someone is asleep.

• 35:12Speaker 01

  Sarah Widmer was only 24 years old when she died. There was no known reason she should have been unable to get herself out of the water or to wake up once she slipped under. An undiagnosed health condition could explain the inexplicable. And Sarah was born with some health challenges. She had a heart murmur and a cleft palate. The kind of heart murmur she was born with commonly resolved with age. And as far as anyone could tell from any of her checkups, Sarah's had resolved as she grew up. Ryan wasn't the only one to recall that Sarah didn't always feel the best.

• 35:52Speaker 01

  According to WCPO.com news, Ryan Widmer's twin brother, Aaron, described that Sarah had constant headaches and sleepiness she seemed to have all the time, though neither of those seemed to be common symptoms of long QT syndrome.

• 36:10Speaker 02

  Sarah's friends described her as someone who could and often did fall asleep anywhere. According to WLWT 5 News, they even gave her the nickname Sleeper because of it. Her boss, Dr. Benjamin Messmer, recalled that on the day she died, Sarah had a headache and some stomach issues. Ruth Ann, Sarah's mother, recalled that Sarah had headaches sometimes, but felt that they were sinus headaches, not a sign of a fatal health condition. But a cardiac test given to Sarah when she was just 10 months old showed no signs of long QT syndrome. And Sarah had a physical with her doctor just two months before she died. Nothing abnormal was found. Ryan's defense team had argued that if it wasn't some kind of cardiac event,

• 36:53Speaker 02

  then it could have been a seizure that caused her to lose consciousness before her head slipped under the water.

• 36:59Speaker 01

  Ryan Widmer came to believe that some underlying health defect could be the answer in his wife's death and might also help clear his name. He demanded a fourth trial. He also wanted Sarah's DNA to be analyzed for possible genetic diseases. Because her body had been cremated, there could be no more autopsies or examinations. All that was left, other than photos and records, was her DNA. A judge denied the request for analysis. His request for a fourth trial was also denied on the grounds that it would be objectively frivolous. In 2018, Ryan's written statement was rediscovered.

• 37:43Speaker 01

  It's detailed, but his story, other than whether Sarah was facing up or down when he found her, remained unchanged all those years. He mentioned that Sarah had walked up the stairs on her tippy toes and said she often walked like that. Thought to have just been a personality quirk of hers, the defense believes that this manner of walking could have been caused by a medical issue, which could have contributed to her death. Sometimes tippy toe walking may be a sign of someone with neurological disorders, like muscular dystrophy or spinal cord abnormality. But some people walk that way with no known medical cause.

• 38:30Speaker 02

  With his appeals, Ryan Widmer tried to attack Lieutenant Detective Jeff Brayley's credibility. He accused Brayley of lying on a job application over a decade prior to his getting the case. It makes sense, since Brayley was the one who suspected homicide from the beginning. According to Ryan's appeal papers, it was Brayley who told the coroner, Dr. Updegrove, before the autopsy, that something didn't sit right about the crime scene. At one point, there was concern that the 911 dispatcher who took the call that night had been literally sleeping on the job. According to the Dayton Daily News, in a report written by Nancy Machuski, dispatcher center's operations service manager, Ron Cronenberger, sounded as if he came out of a sound sleep and tried to handle a very

• 39:15Speaker 02

  serious nature to incident, and it seemed as though he was having a hard time comprehending what the caller was saying, and he kept repeating himself. Ryan's attorney, Jay Clark, said that information such as this brings to light just one of the many errors committed by the first responders. Cronenberger was suspicious of Ryan's behavior, accusing him of giving a performance on the 911 call. He believed that Ryan never attempted to give proper CPR to Sarah and made sounds by breathing into the phone while he pretended he was giving her mouth to mouth. So it makes sense to try to get rid of him as a witness, too.

• 39:49Speaker 01

  It was ultimately ruled that Cronenberger did not mishandle the call. There were three dispatchers working the night that Ryan called 911, and Cronenberger was the first one to answer. According to County Administrator David Gully, Ryan's call was answered within three seconds. He also followed the guidelines in place at the time. Cronenberger had answered a call three minutes before Ryan called. There was no time for him to have been sleeping on the clock. Ryan also argued that his attorney had been ineffective, because genetic testing of Sarah's DNA should have been ordered in the first place. He shouldn't have had to fight for it through appeals and motions.

• 40:33Speaker 02

  In May 2025, Ryan Widmer's conviction was upheld by a federal appeals court. Two months later, his first opportunity for parole was denied. Ryan's attorney, Michelle Berry, told WLWT 5 News, "Justice isn't being served. If anyone should ever be paroled, it's Ryan Widmer." She went on to make the point that if someone is truly innocent, sitting behind bars, they have zero chance of making it out of prison without lying and taking accountability for something they didn't do. "The board takes the position that everyone is guilty if they're in the prison. If an inmate says he's innocent, it backfires. They want you to say, 'I'm sorry, I did it.'" But because Ryan is innocent, he's a sitting duck to get bounced by the parole board. This is a sad day.

• 41:17Speaker 01

  And Morf, I do think there is some truth to that statement. You know, a parole board, or most parole boards, they do want to see remorse. And a person can't really show remorse if they're not admitting to what they have been convicted of. And so, you know, if you're truly innocent, that can be a real problem. Because there are innocent people who refuse to say that they did what they were convicted of, and it hurts them, right? In the eyes of the parole board.

• 41:55Speaker 02

  And if you're truly innocent, do you at some point just say, "Yeah, I'm sorry, I did it," knowing it's not true, just to get out of prison? I mean, that's a tough situation. Or do you, just based on your principle and knowing the truth, do you just deny it and say, "No, I'm not gonna say I'm sorry for something I didn't do"?

• 42:15Speaker 01

  We talked about Ryan Widmer having a lot of people who believed him, and he even had support from jurors. One juror, Janet Kaywood, who served as a juror in the second trial, doesn't believe Ryan Widmer should be behind bars. She told Local12.com News, "I do feel that Ryan was unjustly convicted for a lot of reasons, mainly the inconclusive evidence and reasonable doubt." Travis View, who prosecuted all three trials, disagreed. He told WLWT 5, "Mr. Widmer's had every opportunity to appeal every aspect of his conviction, and his convictions

• 42:58Speaker 01

  have been upheld at every level. Thirty-four of 36 jurors agreed with us that he committed the crime." BU also explained that Ryan wasn't really trying to better himself behind bars. He really hasn't engaged in anything that would be rehabilitation that we would look for in parole.

• 43:19Speaker 02

  Those people that believe Ryan Widmer is innocent, believe it fully. In fact, it doesn't seem like there's much that would ever convince Ryan's family or supporters that he did kill Sarah. His brother Aaron even told local12.com news that if they were able to test Sarah's DNA and nothing was found, or even disprove their theories, he would still believe Ryan was innocent. He said, "If it came back negative, it still wouldn't change my mind about anything."

• 43:46Speaker 01

  And I don't know more if that shocks me all that much. I mean, there are a lot of times, I think, in these cases where family is just never going to believe that their loved one, you know, committed this heinous crime. They just can't bring themselves to do it. And while Ryan has people in his corner, not everyone is convinced of his innocence. And testimony from Sarah's mother, Ruth Ann Stewart, didn't paint a rosy picture of the couple's relationship, even when they were just dating. Ruth Ann testified that the couple was, quote, "on edge" before their wedding and nearly constantly arguing over very minor issues.

• 44:32Speaker 01

  She also described controlling techniques on Ryan's part, remembering that one time when she and Sarah were out shopping, almost as soon as she had completed her transaction, Ryan called to ask what she was buying. Ruth Ann said he asked her why she bought it, and did she really need it?

• 44:52Speaker 02

  Ruth Ann Stewart described her relationship with her daughter as very close, but also made it clear that Sarah was more of a nurturer, who always tried to take care of her mother, especially after her father died of cancer, leaving her mom a widow. Ruth Ann believed that the relationship between Sarah and Ryan may have been worse than she knew because Sarah kept any relationship problems to herself so that she wouldn't stress out her mom about them. The same goes for any health issues after having her father so sick for so long. She knew that any mention of symptom could cause serious anxiety in her mom.

• 45:25Speaker 01

  So, one thing that most people ask is, what's the motive here? Why on this night would Ryan choose to murder his wife? Now, the prosecution does not have to present a motive for murder, but it does help people put the pieces together, especially in cases where there is a lot of circumstantial evidence. One of the jurors who served at the first trial revealed that a lack of motive was the reason they found Ryan not guilty of aggravated murder. Unlike so many recent cases of spouses charged with murder, there was no life insurance policy for Ryan to receive. Sarah's murder wasn't a way for him to get rich quick. It's

• 46:09Speaker 01

  possible that he thought there was, since she had filled out an application for a policy through her job just two weeks before she died. And maybe there would have been financial issues for Ryan if the two split up.

• 46:25Speaker 02

  The couple's finances also appeared to be stable. Sarah was a dental hygienist. She worked just over the Kentucky border in Fort Thomas, less than an hour from their home. Ryan worked as a sports planner for the county. Sarah's job apparently paid a bit more, about $10,000 more annually than Ryan's. All in all, it seemed like there was no clear financial gain to be had by Sarah dying. And those that knew the couple, friends and neighbors, mostly had good things to say about them, and it appeared that they had a solid relationship.

• 46:55Speaker 01

  And for me, you know, motive is one of those kind of really big things in any case. It's often what helps lead police to their suspect, right? Who has a motive? What is the motive? And I think for most jurors, they kind of want that in a murder trial. Okay, you're telling us that this guy did it. You have your evidence. It's mostly circumstantial. Tell us why? What's the reason that he would want to do this? But they don't have to, and they don't always know what it is.

• 47:35Speaker 02

  Sometimes there's not a motive. Sometimes people snap, an argument happens, something maybe in the heat of the moment happens and a person snaps and does something that they never would have dreamed of doing or hadn't planned to do, and they do it in, at that moment. So there doesn't always have to be a motive.

• 47:55Speaker 01

  And we did hear talk about, you know, Sarah possibly confronting Ryan about his drinking, his smoking, and the watching of pornography. You know, like you said, there could have been a heated argument, and it could have got out of control very quickly. That does happen. You know, not every case is this elaborate plan, right, to get life insurance or to get out of paying alimony because you want to be with someone else. There are a lot of those, but not every case of spousal murder has that element. According to the prosecutor,

• 48:39Speaker 01

  even though he didn't need to provide a motive in court, there was a real motive for Sarah's murder, even though it didn't make it into evidence at any of the three trials, despite being newlyweds, married for just four months. They weren't in that honeymoon period anymore, or at least Ryan didn't seem to be. He often visited the website Adult Friend Finder, which according to their website, is an internet-based, adult-oriented, social networking service, online dating service, and swinger personals community website. Ryan was on that website a number of times, including the weekend before Sarah died. Regarding Ryan's visit

• 49:24Speaker 01

  to the site, Warren County Prosecutor Rachel Hutzel said, "That's contrary to claims of the defense, that this was a happily married couple."

• 49:37Speaker 02

  There's some interesting reading on the legal side of this case. University of Cincinnati law professor and innocence project attorney Donald Castor explained to WCPO.com that just being innocent of a crime on its own isn't a reason for habeas relief and clarified that you have to prove there was a constitutional error in trial. So even if there is evidence that you are innocent, there is no hope for a new trial if everything was done by the book during the trial. You have to hope someone steps in with a pardon or an exoneration. Ryan's parents, who were divorced, spent nearly half a million dollars on his defense and in trying to clear their son's name.

• 50:16Speaker 01

  And let's break down that statement, right? Being innocent of a crime on its own isn't a reason for habeas relief. And he went on to say, even if there's evidence you're innocent, that doesn't mean you're going to get a new trial if everything was done by the book during the trial. So, I mean, that can be shocking to people because you kind of think, just common sense wise, that if something comes to light that proves a person's innocence, well, obviously they're going to be granted a retrial, right? And he's saying, no, that may not be the case.

• 50:58Speaker 02

  Yeah, that's pretty frightening because if you're in prison for a crime you didn't commit, somebody else committed it, say, and that person comes forward and, you know, has a guilty conscience and finally admits to it and lays out exactly what happened. And even at that point, it sounds like unless you are pardoned by somebody high up, that you're going to be stuck in prison and that's, it's pretty scary.

• 51:21Speaker 01

  And that's why in most appeals, they go after, you know, something that they say didn't occur correctly in the case, right? Whether it's ineffective assistance of counsel or jury misconduct.

• 51:39Speaker 01

  Bad jury instructions from a judge, you know, there's always something like that. Jill Widmer passed away in 2013. Her son Aaron found her after being unable to get in touch with her for days. Ryan's attorney, Michelle Berry, had no doubt that Jill's death was due to the stress of Ryan being in prison. She told WCP09, Jill's decline in health was triggered by the tragedy in Ryan's case. The emotional toll of seeing her son wrongfully incarcerated ate her alive. Ryan wanted to attend her funeral, but was unable to.

• 52:18Speaker 01

  Now 44 years old, he will have his next chance to plead his case for parole in July of 2030. Ryan Widmer maintains his innocence. So I think as we wrap this one up, Mor, you know, there's really only two possibilities here. I think the first is that Ryan Widmer is guilty and he is right where he belongs. And the second is that, you know, he was wrongfully convicted. And if he truly had nothing to do with his wife's death, then obviously that would be a terrible injustice.

• 52:56Speaker 01

  But either way, a young woman died and her husband has lost his freedom. And to me, these are very interesting cases because, you know, the evidence is mostly circumstantial. You don't have that kind of one piece of smoking gun evidence that kind of proves to the jury conclusively that this person is guilty. Right. It's a, it's a building the mountain of evidence that hopefully shows the jury what happened.

• 53:36Speaker 01

  But sometimes those are not as satisfying because there's still questions. And it's not like there's DNA that proves.

• 53:47Speaker 01

  That this person to the exclusion of all others, or one in however many quadrillion, right, it could only be the person who did it. We don't have that here. And sometimes those are a little tougher to, I guess, kind of live with, for lack of a better term.

• 54:09Speaker 02

  Yeah, and you just mentioned DNA, which made me think of something we were, you know, we talked about earlier. And that was the autopsy results in this case, and the fact that Ryan had his wife cremated. Now, you could almost look at it two ways is if he was guilty and had murdered his wife, maybe he wanted that cremation to hide evidence, to get rid of things that might come back to show he had something to do with it. But it's the same thing that had he not done that, had he not made that choice, could be helping him now. So, you know, a second autopsy,

• 54:52Speaker 02

  further medical testing on her body might have found something in her DNA that could have, you know, perhaps led to more answers. And, you know, fortunately, because she was cremated, you know, that that's not happening. And one other thing that made me think of is sometimes when there's a suspicious death, the authorities will freeze any funerals or cremations and and keep that body in evidence until they feel it's time to release it. So, you know, I'm a little bit surprised that didn't happen. If they were so sure that Ryan had committed murder, why would they let that cremation take place?

• 55:34Speaker 01

  Yeah, it's a good point you bring up because in most cases that we talk about, where one spouse kills another, and they pretty quickly determine that, you know, they want the person cremated, it's because they want to Completely get rid of the, the chance that evidence from another autopsy or examination could come back to bite them. But there's a, a possibility here, if you subscribe to the camp that Ryan is innocent, that having Sarah's body cremated could have actually worked against him. But what I will say is, you know, in the reporting, and we did

• 56:19Speaker 01

  talk about it, they have her DNA. You know, he has fought to get it tested for, you know, possible genetic conditions that maybe could have caused her to, to pass out and drown. He just hasn't been successful in, in getting that to happen.

• 56:42Speaker 02

  Yeah. And I, I personally would love to see that happen. And, you know, her family deserves to, to know the truth. Now, maybe they believe that Ryan was guilty and he's right where he belongs. But at the same time, if, if this was my family member, I'd want that testing done to see if there's any possibility that she had some kind of condition or something that could have led to her death. I'd want to know the truth if it was my family member.

• 57:10Speaker 01

  Yeah, I'm with you on that. Now, I do believe they, they probably think that, uh, yeah, he did. And they're, they're fine with the outcome of the case. But like we said, he does have some, or I shouldn't say some, he does have a lot of supporters. People are split on this case. And I don't know that that's all that unusual in a case where there isn't that bombshell piece of evidence, right? It is largely circumstantial. So you can see why people have varying opinions.

• 57:46Speaker 02

  And if you're in Ryan's camp, then you're you're upset that he's there. You don't believe he should be behind bars. And if you believe he's guilty, then you're happy that he's where he belongs. And unfortunately, I just don't think we're ever going to know the truth in this case about what really happened that night.

• 58:05Speaker 01

  Yeah, I agree with you. I don't know that we ever will. But that's it for our episode on Sarah Widmer. As always, if you love the show, but haven't done so yet, take a minute, go out, leave a rating, leave a review. Also, keep telling your friends. Word of mouth about the criminology podcast really goes a long way.

• 58:25Speaker 02

  If you want to find us on social media, we're on every major platform. Just search for criminology podcast on your favorites. You can also visit our website, criminologypodcast.com to find more information about the show, past episodes, and more. And if you want to join a discussion about the show and the cases we cover, head over to Facebook and search for the criminology podcast discussion and fans group.

• 58:47Speaker 01

  So that's it for another episode of criminology. But Morph and I will be back with all of you next Saturday night with a brand new episode. So until then, for Mike

• 58:56Speaker 02

  And Morph.

• 58:57Speaker 01

  We'll talk to you next week.

• 58:58Speaker 02

  Take care, everyone.