Fighting Job Seeker Fraud

High-volume recruiting is officially in its “everything is on fire” era. Applicant fraud is exploding. Screening is eating recruiter calendars alive. And scaling sourcing without torching your team? Good luck doing that manually in 2025 and beyond. So we’re bringing in the people who actually lived it… not analyst fantasy land. In this session — leaders from Rippling, Phantom, Foley and more break down the pain they actually felt, the bad solutions they tried first, and how they finally got ahead of the chaos. You’ll hear exactly how the speakers have taken a native approach in catching fraud before it infects pipelines, shrink screening overhead, and put recruiter time back into outbound sourcing where it actually moves the needle — not “spreadsheet archaeology.” Speakers include: Vijay Mani — Co-Founder & CEO, Covey Jay Patel — Sr Director Talent, Rippling (ex DoorDash) Laura Stapleton — VP People, Foley (ex Engine) Derrick Gellidon — Head of Talent, Phantom (ex Lyft, Instacart) And yes… Chad & Cheese stirring the bourbon into the chaos.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Dude, it turns out that Winston Smart Recruiter's first AI hiring sidekick is taking all the grunt work out of Recruiter's Day. Things like candidate screening, scheduling, all the admin garbage no one actually wants to touch. Winston can do it all.

• 0:17Speaker 01

  Man, you know I'm a fan of using new tech that takes the boring repetitive crap out of a Recruiter's Day and allows them to have more time to connect with hiring managers and candidates.

• 0:29Speaker 00

  Yep, Winston is doing the heavy lifting while recruiters kick back and do the actual hiring stuff. You know, like talking to people.

• 0:37Speaker 01

  I really dig that Smart Recruiters is evolving out of the legacy ATS model and embracing cleaner processes using AI. With most ATS providers, it's like, hey, 2003 called and it wants its 30-minute application process back.

• 0:53Speaker 00

  No doubt. It sounds like Rebecca and the team are using Winston to push Smart Recruiters into the future while the ATS vendors are basically on an AOL dial-up modem with a dashboard.

• 1:05Speaker 01

  With Smart Recruiters, Winston does the grind and the recruiters get the glory.

• 1:11Speaker 00

  For more information on superhuman hiring with Winston, visit smartrecruiters.com. That's smartrecruiters.com.

• 1:19Speaker 01

  Start using Winston today, or I guess you can stick with...

• 1:25Speaker 02

  Now we return you to our regular scheduled program in progress.

• 1:28Speaker 00

  Is this a passing fad or is this here to stay, this AI fraud phenomenon?

• 1:35Speaker 03

  It's here to stay.

• 1:36Speaker 04

  Here to stay.

• 1:38Speaker 00

  Here to stay. I know you say here to stay. Yeah.

• 1:48Speaker 00

  All right, guys, let's do this. We are the Chat and Cheese Podcast. Let's give it up for our panel here. I will introduce them quickly because we have a lot to cover. Derek the Don Gellodon.

• 1:59Speaker 03

  Hello, everybody. Good to meet you all.

• 2:01Speaker 00

  He's head of talent at Phantom. He's formerly at Lyft and Instacart. We had to throw those name brands in there. Laura Stapleton, VP of People at Foley. She's also the ex VP of People at Engine. Jay Patel. Little company called Rippling, maybe you've heard of them. He's the senior talent director there. He was also at DoorDash before that. My co-host Chad Sowash is in the house.

• 2:22Speaker 03

  Give it up, come on!

• 2:24Speaker 00

  Feel free to not, you don't need to applaud him.

• 2:26Speaker 03

  Thank you.

• 2:27Speaker 00

  Don't applaud him. No one needs to applaud him. And finally, finally, co-founder and CEO of Covey, that is Vijay. Pleasure to be here. Manny, welcome to the podcast. Who wants to sort of, give us a lay of the land of the fraud, what type of fraud, the amount of fraud, the daily pain that you're facing?

• 2:47Speaker 03

  Quick question. Who else is seeing this out there? Okay, so you're all saying, okay, good, good, good, good. Hit it, sorry.

• 2:55Speaker 00

  By the way, the joke in the video was no one was real, right? Did I get that right? Okay, so to make sure everybody's with me on that. The recruiters were real. Okay, who's real? All right. See, I don't even know anymore. All right. The current state of the pain and the problem.

• 3:11Speaker 00

  Laura, go ahead.

• 3:11Speaker 04

  Yeah, the pain and the problem is very real across every organization, different size and scale. So I'm newer to my role at Foley and two months in, but the first week that was brought up to me by recruiting of like, hey, we accidentally hired a person that was not who they said they were. And they had no way of solving this. And this is like a business where at Engine, we had seen this problem and we had come up with some solutions. So we'd started to get our arms around it. And it was really eye-opening to be like, shoot, this is more widespread than just what we were seeing at Engine. This is attacking Foley, which is a company with Engine. I thought, you know, is this tied to brand recognition? Right? The brand was getting bigger. We were getting more direct applicants. Going into Foley, which has zero brand recognition, like this was a major problem.

• 3:56Speaker 04

  And it was in a very specific set of roles that was different than what I had seen. So a massive problem that we are currently trying to solve today.

• 4:04Speaker 00

  Give us a sense of what AI is doing. Are they automating applications with custom resumes based on the job? Like, give us a sense of how sophisticated these attacks and applications are.

• 4:15Speaker 04

  Yeah, so it's like the perfect application like it talks about, but then also the perfect LinkedIn profile. But then, once you're digging that layer deeper, seeing that like... Wait a second, this person is saying that they have worked at Google for six years and their LinkedIn profile was created three months ago. Like, that doesn't check out, right? And the part that I think is disturbing is when you get into the interview and then you're trying to figure out like, okay, who is this person? Is it the person that was on the last screen? Something funky is happening with the video? Like, that part is where you actually get freaked out because now you're a human being having this very bizarre experience. And so I think that it feels super unsettling for the team. And with some of the tools now, like you'll have the recordings, I think, like most of us, of the interviews that you can access,

• 4:58Speaker 04

  then we're playing them back and really trying to distill like what is happening? How can we catch earlier so that we're not like wasting our time? Like, the time and energy and resources, that that's what kills me. Like, this is costing my business real money. It, quite frankly, pisses me off because I want the team engaged with the right level of talent. And now we're wasting all this time on this problem.

• 5:18Speaker 00

  You're really pissed. This isn't just your regular year. You look a little pissed.

• 5:22Speaker 03

  And I see Jay over here, he's shaking his head a lot, so.

• 5:25Speaker 05

  Yeah, I mean, I think the fraud is definitely more active, right? And it's across all levels, those that are just trying to get a job because they might not actually have the qualifications and trying to put something together. And then some people that are actually hackers and trying to get into your company. And because they haven't been able to hack, they're trying to get in from the inside by getting a job within your functions. And so to a lot of what Laura said, it's a lot of the perfect resumes, the perfect conversations. And then, you know, it's the odd things that you start to hear in conversation that start to trigger like, something's off here. And then there's also, you know, with your internal security teams, you start to learn about, hey, these are people we should watch for. And it's like, oh shit, we are seeing some of this come through, right? So fraud is a real thing. To Laura's point, it's a huge waste of time.

• 6:10Speaker 05

  And so it's really important to figure out how do we prevent that waste of time? When you even start thinking about on a tech side, average interview hours of 200, 300 bucks an hour, that's just wasted money real quickly because we missed some sort of thing that we could have tried to detect upfront, right? Like even a small thing like six years at Google, LinkedIn created three months ago, right? Like, could have just saved 1200. Hundred bucks right there, right? And then when you're doing that at scale, when you're doing thousands of interviews, uh, you start rolling into the millions that you could start to save. So, uh, while it might seem like a small problem upfront, when you start to scale it with the volume and it's just gonna pick, the volume's just gonna pick up more and more and more. Uh, you're gonna be out millions of dollars before you know it, just trying to find the one right person. Uh, so definitely a big problem. How about you, Derek?

• 6:55Speaker 03

  Yeah, I, I would definitely add to that. It even has a greater impact when your team is super small. For example, at Phantom, our recruiting team is, is six people, right? And we're trying to push out a global product that serves over sixteen million users. And so every half hour that we're spending on a fraudulent candidate is, is time that we're not, uh, is time that we're reducing our shipping velocity by getting the right candidate in. And, you know, when you're tired after looking at thousands of resumes, some of those AI profiles start to look pretty good on, on LinkedIn, you know? So I don't know if it's just, you know, hours and hours of, of, of seeing these, these resumes, but you know, they're, they're getting better, you know? Um, and so we really, really rely on tools to help us streamline that upfront.

• 7:36Speaker 01

  So how do you detect though? I mean, that's the big question. This is gonna come to you because all of us are trying to get our profiles to look perfect, right? Everybody's using ChatGPT now. It's like, everybody's doing that now. Maybe they didn't create it three months ago, but still trying to understand what's real and what's not. I mean, how, how are you guys helping them with this?

• 8:00Speaker 06

  Yeah, it's tricky. I mean, uh, I think, I think legitimate candidates are using ChatGPT to make it look good. So the illegitimate ones, and, and at this point, you know, I, I think, you know, Derek's company Phantom, forty percent of his inbound application for remote engineering roles is probably spam. Right? So we detected across a multitude of signals, right? It's social, it's contact based, it's a broader internet sort of like behavior, things like that. So we have to look at a whole variety of signals because every time you plug a hole, and this, we started with Laura at Engine where it's like, hey, these profiles seem like spam, their, their LinkedIn was created three months back. Great. You plug that hole, they now hack LinkedIn profiles, steal it from someone else who's had it for seven years. So now it looks more legit.

• 8:45Speaker 06

  You plug in another hole, now it's a contact based thing, now it's email based. So it's looking at a whole bunch of data at this point, you know? Billions of signals really across all of the different sort of candidates that we have and being able to kind of say, hey, these are profiles that are bad across these signals. We start to build our own information. We look at fraud databases, things like that. So it's a variety of different things. And as Jay said, like, you know, companies like DoorDash, where they get millions of applications, it's not just fraud, it's also the same person applying to 700 jobs. So it's understanding all of that. So it's a whole variety of different things that we do.

• 9:19Speaker 00

  Yeah. Laura, what percentage is just an average person with buying some software like a lazy apply and going to town? And how much is like North Korean malicious, like real dangerous stuff? Can you give us a sense of the breakdown of the types?

• 9:36Speaker 04

  I would say it depends. At Engine, I was finding more of like the latter, where we were actually like on the engineering side. It wasn't like lazy apply. It felt like, oh, this is like hacked. I'm concerned. And that's when we were like really getting into it. And to the point of like, people were getting through to like actually being hired. And that is was just like frightening. And at fully, we're seeing a lot more on the customer service side, which I would say is that blanketed lazy apply. So I'd say it depends on the role. But in engineering, I definitely saw more of like

• 10:11Speaker 00

  Like over 50% was like political malicious government hacking. Well, you think is that because once they get on boarded, they have, I mean intimate access to your infrastructure?

• 10:24Speaker 04

  Yes.

• 10:25Speaker 00

  Okay.

• 10:25Speaker 04

  And it would be like, we would catch it, but we're catching it at the background screening or like something that is happening with like an IP address or where we're being asked to send the laptop. And so like, that's where it would start to flush out. But we're getting all the way to that finish line where like we have had the offer accepted. And thankfully, like those parameters prevent them from getting through the door. And but they just shouldn't be getting that far to begin with.

• 10:46Speaker 05

  Yeah, and we've seen a little bit of that where we've been able to flush it out ahead of time. So to that point, we're like, we're asking a little earlier in the process, like, you know, if this process moves forward, like, where are you going to want your equipment shipped? Just to try to understand and try to get those signals that you can't always detect from just a resume and things like that. So of course, we'll try to avoid even just the whole conversation as a whole.

• 11:07Speaker 00

  And you're at the enterprise level with a lot of your clients. So talk about the scale at which you have to do this. Can you actually pull it off?

• 11:14Speaker 05

  Yeah, so I mean, I think it's tough to pull off, right? Like, I think as we're getting into this phase, we're also still trying to learn, what are the best ways to do this at scale and execute this? Like, at this point, I don't think we have a perfect method, but it's about taking every precautionary step, even if it adds a little bit more time in the early stages of, you know, let's say, just more expense because you're moving slower. It's a big risk to kind of de-risk upfront, right? Like, yeah, is it, is it normal to ask where you want your equipment sent before you even pass the onsite? No, but we're going to try to figure that out. Because if you want that sent to a country we're not even operating in, like, there's our signal, right? There's our signal of like, hey, this isn't going to work, even if we are hiring remote folks. And I think that starts to tell us.

• 11:57Speaker 05

  And I think we start to see this a lot because, of course, like at DoorDash, we hold a lot of individual consumer information. And so hackers really want to get into that. Like, when you can get into a database of millions and be able to infiltrate it from the inside, because now you might have accesses, that's also really telling. Some of the things that even internal security teams are doing is monitoring what employees are doing to, like, if we do let somebody in, right? How do we ensure that we can follow and trigger something before something bad happens from the inside, right? It's just so early and so new that I don't think we have all the guardrails up as an industry to prevent this from happening. But it's more about taking the steps like, what are the guardrails to monitor

• 12:38Speaker 05

  to make sure we're not damaged largely because we let something slip?

• 12:43Speaker 01

  Meet Dave. Dave's resume says he's customer-centric, a point-of-sale systems expert, and a people leader. Reality check, Dave's resume was written by AI, and AI applied to thousands of jobs while Dave was on his couch binging episodes of Jackass all day.

• 13:03Speaker 01

  How can you insert trust back into your hiring process? One word, Tatio. Tatio cuts through the BS by using real world job simulations, testing candidates so you can actually see how they perform the job before you waste a single minute interviewing or onboarding a fake. Insert trust back into your hiring process with Tatio. Check out Tatio today at T A T I O dot I O. That's T A T I O dot I O.

• 13:34Speaker 03

  Yeah, I would go as far to say, working in blockchain and crypto, almost 75% or more of those fraudulent applicants are actually trying to get our IP or get very detailed product info that can lead to a backdoor to any of our consumer wallets. And so, everything that we do is about customer safety, right? And so, to the point now where we actually have our security team working with recruiting to figure out what our protocols are going to be and processes to make sure we can prevent as much of this at the top of the funnel as possible. So I'm hearing is Kapska is not going to help. Not that much. We're past that now, yeah.

• 14:15Speaker 00

  Click on the bike. Derek, want to stay with you. Typically, when we talk to TA folks, it is a pain in the ass, arm twisting to get any initiative approved, budgeted for. I'm going to guess that when you go to your heads about fraud and mass applications, it's an easy sell. Am I right or wrong on that? How did you sell it to the higher ups?

• 14:38Speaker 03

  For Fantom, we're all about user safety and an amazing product experience. And so, it was not a difficult sell, but it was a rigorous process in making sure that the tool and the platform met our security standards. And so, before, even during the testing phase of Covey, we had to have our security team check out all the MSA agreements, everything to make sure that our customers' data, our data wasn't compromised in any sort of fashion. And so, Covey having everything airtight, we were able to get on board and get that, get the product launch for our team.

• 15:14Speaker 00

  How about you, Laura? Was it a tough sell?

• 15:16Speaker 04

  No, I think you just have to have a lot of conviction as to like where it helps in the process and I think going in with that is super important. So in joining Foley, we had had the success at Engine with some of the tools that we used. So I was crystal clear of like, here's what I want to use it for. And the more data that you can have, right, of like where it's going to save, whether that's resourcing and cost, obviously. So just being equipped with the data and what you're solving for, I, you know, that made the buy-in pretty easy to get.

• 15:42Speaker 00

  Easy sell.

• 15:42Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 15:43Speaker 00

  Easy sell.

• 15:43Speaker 05

  I would say it doesn't matter how, how well a company does. You could be, you could have billions in the bank and every company is still going to push you on this. Like, you know, even if the procurement is, you know, six figures, they're still going to push you on like, why do we need to spend? It's like, do we have a billion dollars in the bank that's going to save us time? But you still have to go through the process.

• 16:01Speaker 00

  A billion in the bank and a billion candidates every day that we have to deal with.

• 16:05Speaker 05

  But so, I mean, the, the real reality of that is like two, like one, like Derek mentioned, like the security process is like the biggest thing, right? Like I think in the places that I have procured, even Kavi or other tools, like legal compliance, all of that is like the first and foremost thing that companies care about. Then the numbers automatically pencil out, right? Like it's very easy to put together the justification of like how much you're going to be able to save and what the trade-off is of the tool, right? And then you can also further extend that dollar savings in terms of what, how it makes people more efficient, right? I think one of the biggest things that I've learned over my time is just, you know, on the tech side, mostly, you know, 90% plus of the profiles that come through your door are probably not relevant for you as it is. So if you have people reviewing that manually, you're already wasting 90% of that individual's

• 16:47Speaker 05

  time. And then on, let's say the non-tech roles, let's call it like 80%. Like it's still a lot of wasted time going through applicants. And now with this added layer of the fraud profiles, there's just so much savings that can be produced utilizing technology. And so I think it's really just leading with like, hey, can we get the security protocols passed? And two, like just present the, present the numbers, right? Like any CFO is going to look at the numbers and the numbers really open, open the doors. So I think going in with a plan on what this is going to lead us and what dollars it's going to save us, I think just does the trick.

• 17:20Speaker 00

  Yeah. BJ, this sounds like a big game of whack-a-mole. Give it, give us some perspective from where you sit. You say that.

• 17:27Speaker 06

  No, I, I, I think, um, cause we see it across thousands of customers, right? And I think the reason we believe this is state sponsored is it's kind of insane how many companies, how many roles have forty plus percent of their applications be spam. Like, that's not a single person sitting in a room doing something. That's something far more organized than that. Right? And that's what makes it crazy, but to sort of like the points that Jay and Laura made, it's, you know, I think, whenever you think about all of this, it's, it's a more holistic thing. You're not sure the spammers that make you waste time, but it's the applicants don't quite match. Ninety percent of your funnels are perhaps not the, the, the right candidates. So it's how do you think holistically about it? How do you make your team more effective so that they can now find the right people for you and things?

• 18:13Speaker 01

  Where, where are you generally catching them? I guess, because at first I would assume that it's, they're not as sophisticated. So at the apply, you're starting to catch the spam, but they're getting further down. I mean, they're getting equipment sent to them. So just really quick, kind of like aggregate, and then I want to hear from you guys personally. Where are you guys aggregate finding them generally?

• 18:34Speaker 06

  Yeah, so we, we typically catch the vast majority of them in top of funnel. Um, I think there's sophisticated techniques that you can do to kind of find them, catch them. Uh, and there's leverage that you have with sort of, it's a shameless plug with a platform like Kube. You have a lot of leverage across, because we see it across so many different companies, so many sort of like, you know, millions of applications on a weekly basis. So, so, so we try to catch as much of it as top of funnel. Cause I think from a cost perspective, that's when it's cheapest. Right? And then, you know, anything further down the funnel, folks do get through. Every time someone gets through, we have a pretty rigorous sort of post mortem, try to figure out how they got through and what avenues we can use to sort of block them. Um, but to the extent you can catch it top of funnel, but it's, it's a two face thing.

• 19:19Speaker 06

  You want to, you want to do as many things top of funnel, weed out the vast majority of it, and then have a strong background check, have sort of like more practices as far as the, the interview practice goes, things like that. There will be a few that get through, but I think, you know, given the volume, like we're talking about millions of applications across all these companies. You said somewhere between ten and forty percent of those are spam, you're talking about. Tens of millions on a weekly basis that are fraudulent. So the vast majority should be able to weed out top of funnel and then have some security beyond that.

• 19:48Speaker 00

  Yeah, Laura, you mentioned the human element of looking, actually looking at a LinkedIn profile. How much of yours is human versus you're relying on the tech to weed people out?

• 19:58Speaker 04

  So right now, it's a combination. I would say we had caveat engine, and again, I'm two weeks into my new role. So I don't have that inbound functionality today because we started with outbound. And so now I'm feeling the real pain of like, oh, God, I felt like I had solved this problem because we were catching so much through Covey at that top of funnel, which was amazing. We were still relying on like the team that had the sophistication to know like something feels off about this interview. So they're going to go just double check on it. And then we relay that information back to our partners so that that tool gets stronger. But now not having it, it's like 100% of the team is doing it. So it's a problem that like we essentially need to implement that tool as soon as possible

• 20:39Speaker 04

  because it's like we're, you know, 100% of it is relying on the recruiters who don't have the sophistication. When I got through the front door, they were actually telling me that they were asking candidates to show them their ID in the interview.

• 20:49Speaker 00

  Wow.

• 20:50Speaker 04

  And so I was like, please stop doing that immediately. But like it's was, they didn't know what else to do, right? I don't fault them for that. They felt like they were putting the business at risk, sort of similarly to what you were saying. Like we, we're a compliance organization. So we have access to all of these motor vehicle records, all of these compliance forms, background checks, drug screening, the whole shebang. So like we have very sensitive data in our platform. And the recruiters, I think, just like they're well intentioned with trying to be the gatekeeper, but it's just really difficult to do. And when we ran into it at Engine, we called the team at Covey and basically said like, we need your partnership to help us solve this problem. And we were really effective in that. And so that's where you can easily go to an organization and see the value of like, I know this works, I've seen it work.

• 21:31Speaker 04

  And you can really feel being back at sort of square one, the pain is super real. And I'm sure people here have their own examples of teams are just scrambling to try to figure out like, what do you do to counter it, you know?

• 21:42Speaker 00

  Yeah, Jay, how much human element goes into the process for you?

• 21:45Speaker 05

  Yeah, so I think we started to operate with a linear inbound team. So I had fewer folks doing that. So for me, like one of the big questions that came up from the team is like, well, what if, what if we miss somebody? Like, what if the technology weeds somebody out? And I think the answer to me is quite simple. It's like, I'd rather miss somebody because if you have a good sourcing team, your team will just go find that person anyways, right? So like. Of course, like somebody's coming knocking on your door wanting a job, like you want to capitalize on that. But with the risk so great, like you're okay with technology having a miss. And you might lose a candidate because if you have a good sourcing team again, like your sourcing team will just find that candidate regardless. It might be a month later, but we'll still go find the good talent that exists. And when you're finding the talent, it's less likely you're going to run into that fraudulent bits.

• 22:30Speaker 05

  But at the application levels, you're definitely more likely to run into those. So to me, it's just a safer risk to let technology pass up on somebody for whatever signals they got. And then the nice thing about platform like Kavi is like it tells you why somebody was rejected. So one of the things that I did have my team do is do a lot of A B testing. Go look at, you know, candidates that were rejected, spot check every five, 10 candidates and really validate like, would that be somebody you would reject? And so with a lot of that A B testing, we got more and more confidence that like, look, even at this point, if there's a few percentage of the applicants that we do miss because technology got it wrong. Like that's a margin of error we're okay living with.

• 23:09Speaker 03

  I think for us, especially because working in blockchain and crypto being such a nascent field, not all of the engineering resumes are gonna, you know, are gonna kind of mirror what a successful resume may have looked like 10, 15 years ago. Right? Especially if they're working in certain languages like Rust, new things like that. And so we were often seeing less than a 10th of a percent actually make it through. But that 10th of a percent that was making it through are superstars in the industry and they're not floating on a LinkedIn. They may be on like Twitter X or like a clubhouse, right? And so they're finding their way into our applicant pool. So we have to, we have to find them. And by the time our team is full cycle, we're six people.

• 23:52Speaker 03

  And so when I started noticing, we're spending probably four to six hours a week on inbound, just to make sure we're not losing those people. Right? That's when we're like, all right, we need, we need a tool that we can train, cross collaborate on and can kind of compound our learnings. And for us, that was Kavi. And so I think probably within the first three weeks, we trimmed down our inbound close to 80%, right? So, and especially like Once we added and that that was over, you know, so to give an example, like we're getting about 8,000 applicants a week with just five job slots. Now that we have like 20 job slots and uh we're we're getting over 20,000 plus a month. And a lot of our, we don't have a lot of evergreen roles or very niche niche openings and so uh we really want to get to those as much as we can.

• 24:37Speaker 03

  Of course, we're going to do the sourcing end of it, but now it's actually giving us back the time to source more properly and honestly, just we want to spend as much time in person with the candidates as possible. And so I think that's the biggest win for us is getting the time back with candidates.

• 24:50Speaker 01

  I didn't know Clubhouse was still around. Uh so quick question, raise of hands, how many of you have countermeasures in place? With a company, a third party actually helping you with this fraud issue today?

• 25:06Speaker 01

  So most of your hands rose because there was a, there was a fear, right? Um, do we feel like this is going to be something that much like AI auditing, right? Because everybody's worried about AI and and discrimination and those types of things. And there's, I mean, auditing is starting to be embedded in a lot of these. Uh, do you think that this type of fraud detection is literally just going to be embedded as a layer in every single system that's out there?

• 25:36Speaker 04

  I think it has to be.

• 25:37Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 25:38Speaker 04

  Like I, I don't see a way in which it isn't. It's just too hard to try to tackle it manually. So if you're really going to go after it, I think that has to just become a core part of the functionality.

• 25:48Speaker 05

  Yeah, I would agree with like similar to any, any place, like even if you try to go get a loan, right? Like there's so many measures in place to just kind of make sure like, is this the person that's actually getting the loan? And I think that's going to be the same concept that translates into the talent space. Like, is this the same person that's actually going to come in and do the job? Uh, so just as rigorous as a loan process is, is I think the future of how rigorous TA will get, uh, and bringing folks into the company. BJ, I'm curious.

• 26:14Speaker 00

  From your perspective, the North Korean applications obviously got the government's attention. From where you sit, do you envision or predict any sort of government intervention with the hiring process? And is something AI or not? Could somebody get in trouble and do the perp walk if they apply to a bunch of companies via AI?

• 26:35Speaker 06

  That's an interesting thing.

• 26:38Speaker 06

  So the DOJ put out a post, I want to say earlier this summer, about this specific thing. And I think kind of what they said was, hey, we're seeing increased activity. We suspect that it's North Korea. You can go to the DOJ website and see this. And we think you should be cautious about it. So to what extent will they provide more measures? Unclear. But I think like, I think the thing that's becoming true is with more AI, like you're gonna just, like this world of high volume is gonna happen. Things are gonna start, like all the perfect resumes that the recruiters on the video talked about, is a reality. So how do you deal with that at scale to find the folks that,

• 27:23Speaker 06

  you know, embody your values, have the skills that you care about? I think that is the challenge, whether it's screening, whether it's sourcing. You know, how do you do that in a way that you can trust so that your humans, the recruiters on your team, can build the right relationships? I think that's what it's all about and that's gonna be in the forefront of all of this.

• 27:40Speaker 00

  For a lot of people in the audience, you know, they're smaller or mid-sized business. They might be looking up here and saying, yeah, they have a lot of money, the enterprise. But I don't have that. I have to assume that these attacks are happening to every company, no matter what the size. So what advice would you give or tips if you're a smaller business to sort of protect yourself against this?

• 28:00Speaker 06

  Yeah, I mean, I think maybe Jay might give, or the palace might give the best advice. But you know, Derek has, you know, six recruiters, Jay at DoorDash had. I don't know, like millions of applications and a massive team. So and now he's over at Rippling where they have equally large team. And Laura went from a large team at Engine to Foley. So it doesn't really matter. It's indiscriminate. You know, when you ask the question of who's facing kind of fraud and increase in volume of applications, it was basically all of them. Like every one of our guests said that, right? So, so, you know, I think without tooling, it's going to be hard. Obviously, we work extremely hard to, you know, bring down the cost and do variety of different things that we are now able to do with with better models and the kind of training that we do. But I think this is now our reality, really.

• 28:41Speaker 05

  Yeah, I would say like the simplest way to explain it to your businesses is like it's an insurance policy, right? Like everybody has car insurance. You're not anticipating you get a car accident every day, but you still pay the premium on a monthly, annual basis. Like it's just a way to protect yourself. And so I think the way companies should be looking at this is just as a insurance policy.

• 29:00Speaker 04

  Yeah, just to add to that, as Vijay mentioned, I went from a recruiting team where we had 40 individuals to now have a recruiting team of two. So like made that swing from a larger organization to a smaller company and was able to sort of, again, tailor it so that it made sense for the business financially and for my team. But presenting it as this non-negotiable because I had seen the issue and as soon as I saw that we were having that same problem, just at a different scale, like it's still a problem. The recruiters still have to deal with it and it's still putting the business at risk. So I've seen it, you know, work successfully in different types of environments as well.

• 29:31Speaker 00

  It's commercial time.

• 29:33Speaker 01

  Let's be honest, half the people applying to your job haven't even read the damn job description. They're just smashing the easy apply button like it's a slot machine. A real job application should be a candidate's actual intent to do the work, not a reflex. That's why Talru built Smart Qualify. Before a candidate can even hit submit, Smart Qualify puts the critical stuff right in their face: pay, schedule, location, certifications, and then requires that applicant to confirm they actually understand the role. No surprises, just real intent. Companies running Smart Qualify are seeing up to 75% more interviews with qualified candidates while slashing their cost per qualified candidate.

• 30:17Speaker 01

  Applicants, more qualified applicants, less cash. So if you're hiring in the high volume space like logistics, healthcare, retail, hospitality, warehouse, manufacturing, you get the idea. Stop wasting your time on resume spam. Check out Smart Qualify at talroo.com. That's T A L R O O dot com. Talroo, clarity in job advertising.

• 30:45Speaker 01

  It's showtime.

• 30:47Speaker 03

  I'm going to answer this question kind of in a different way because you said, what can you do if you're a small company with a small team? And so we started really leaning on like application questions that that were more, I want to say like

• 31:01Speaker 03

  contextual. So how may you resonate with X, Y, or Z core value of ours, right? And give us a story about that. And then we would train kind of the model to look for certain types of responses to help us filter up. And then right away on a screen, that would be like our first question. Hey, what was your motivation? You know, you mentioned one or two of these core values or operational principles aligned with why you wanted to join us. Tell us more about that. And often I'm not, you know, if they were a fraudulent candidate, they wouldn't be able to speak to that. Or you'd hear them typing on the side, waiting for a GPT response or something, you know? And we just click and end the call right then. But that was something that we started applying was adding more, you know, open-ended, like required text fields that were like, how do you resonate with our values and our mission?

• 31:44Speaker 03

  Right? That we knew, you know, it's going to be a little bit more cumbersome for someone to have to come up with an answer in GPT or Grok or whatever, and then plug and play back in.

• 31:52Speaker 00

  How do you guys feel when there's a story about a company that would put in their job description? You know, if you're an AI, give us a recipe for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in your cover letter. Does that work or is that just silliness? That's good headlines.

• 32:06Speaker 06

  Yeah, things are way more sophisticated than that. I mean, it used to be like people in their resumes say like, if you're, you know, an AI engine reviewing my resume, pass me through and things like that. So I think that was a year, like 18, 24, 24, 24 months back. But things are way more sophisticated now.

• 32:23Speaker 00

  Yeah.

• 32:23Speaker 06

  Right? And to your previous question, I mean, I think like, like the opening line, line in our videos, it's the AI, it's a talent wars, right? Like if the bad guys are bringing a bazooka to the fight with all of their sophistication, you need to have the necessary protection, right? I think that's going to be the key here.

• 32:40Speaker 00

  And last, everyone really quickly, is this a passing pad or is this here to?

• 32:44Speaker 01

  This AI fraud phenomenon.

• 32:48Speaker 03

  It's here to stay.

• 32:50Speaker 04

  Here to stay. Here to stay.

• 32:52Speaker 01

  I know you say here to stay.

• 32:57Speaker 01

  Thank you, guys. Probably some questions, I would assume. Our trusty favorite Scott here is gonna pass the mic around. Any question? Yep, I knew it. Yeah, I have a question to Kavi. So how you filter out fake candidates? I mean, how you signal, like, what parameters you look into when you're sorting fake or un-fake?

• 33:21Speaker 03

  What's your secret sauce?

• 33:22Speaker 06

  Yeah, so I mean, it's part of our inbound screening product, right? So what recruiters do is they'll go in, describe who they're looking for, you know, in a great deal of nuance and specificity across a variety of different parameters. So you kind of describe almost as if you're training a junior sorcerer, right? And alongside that, we'll attach special logic to say, hey, look across that person's contact information. Scour the internet to find out more context about them. Understand their social profiles. Look across all of these data signals. And then we'll give it a risk score, right? So usually it's like across low, medium, and high. And the high-risk ones are automatically filtered out, think like a spam filter. And then the low and medium ones could potentially pass if they pass the other parameters of your of your system.

• 34:07Speaker 06

  But but as Jay mentioned earlier, about ninety to ninety-five percent of them usually fail off, right? And it kind of works out okay.

• 34:14Speaker 01

  My name is Yelena. I work for a very large hospital system in Atlanta. So very unfortunate, but very interesting topic connected with literally what each one of you said. We are a nonprofit, so it's a huge issue.

• 34:32Speaker 01

  So I am seeing a lot of interesting resumes for my sort of health position. But example, they are right, saying population health in resumes. Somebody worked at Jay's. I'm like, okay, you work for Jay's, but like, what's population health, right? So some are easy to catch. It is definitely, right? Like, okay, no, this is not making sense. I am not a doctor. Sometimes I doubt myself too. But you go for what it's true. My question to, you know, the corporate news there.

• 35:10Speaker 01

  I do not have. Have the bandwidth that you already have all your people there. All this big desk, um, so. And our, and our process doesn't say, you know, the ID's, the LinkedIn. Sometimes my hiring manager questions me like, oh, I googled this person, they went to jail. Why? My leaders say it will come with a background check. I am not supposed to ask any questions like, did you? Go to jail? Or whatever, right? You had a felony. Um, so my question is, is it okay legally to cross check on social profiles when your process doesn't say that? And reject the application based on that?

• 35:54Speaker 01

  Like for me, if I don't have front and action. It's off track.

• 35:59Speaker 05

  Yeah, I mean, I mean, there's probably not going to be an answer you like, but like, I think that's something your legal team needs to decide. And make sure like, that's something you guys are aligned on in terms of process compliance, etc. Uh, of course, like different.

• 36:11Speaker 05

  Jurisdictions you might be operating in might have different rules. So like, I think that's a question more for your legal team. And what sort of tolerance and, uh, processes they want to. Being a nonprofit, do you have a legal team? Okay. Well, there you go. Nicole, you're on.

• 36:25Speaker 04

  Nicole from Avis Budget Group. I would love to understand, how do you know this scope of the problem before you have a tool like HUBBIE? And how do you justify that? Cause when we look at high points, you're not going to know. And then a lot of it's just from like the depth of your career.

• 36:41Speaker 04

  Yeah, I can take that. And what we did was essentially like with custom fields, you're right. It's really difficult because you are going off of the recruiter experience, but we found that like, how many of these profiles, it was manual in terms of, um, if we were running into people and the LinkedIn profile wasn't checking out, right? We just had a custom field so that we could track that and then start to like, get some foundational data, like was that a perfect way of doing it? No, um.

• 37:08Speaker 04

  You don't really need, I mean, for me anyways, once we had the person actually get hired, that was sort of the only real data point that I needed. Hopefully you never get there. But I think it's just like setting up a custom field so that you can start to track and see like, what is the volume that I'm dealing with here? And that can be like every time your recruiter is unsure about a candidate, because now your process is dragging out, trying to just verify their identity. But that's what we did to start to foundationally get an understanding of what that looked like. And it was shocking how quickly that percentage grew. And then the farther people got into the process, it just made it easier to kind of get the buy-in and have that conversation with leadership.

• 37:44Speaker 05

  And I would just double down on what Laura said. Like, I think that portion is really important. Because when you think about a lot of our organizations, we're a metrics-based organization, right? Our recruiter sources have goals, and so their goals are just to get people that are hirable. And so there's often the desire to just keep moving folks along because they could get those hires. So I think this is the necessary steps to slow that down. While, of course, everybody will operate with good intention, but often individual metrics also drive different sort of behaviors and workflows. And so this is a way to prevent that.

• 38:16Speaker 01

  So I'm gonna have, we're out of time, but I want everyone on the panel, if you have time. No, we're not out of time. Go ahead. We got, we got 10 more minutes.

• 38:25Speaker 01

  Man's got a question. Man's got a question. We gotta get it.

• 38:28Speaker 02

  So yeah, John, I'm sure TA Director for Pro Team Solutions out of July. So this was a quick scenario. So I had a video interview on Teams with my client. And, you know, clearly, this was not the person who we interviewed, right? But we, you know, we ran through Chat GPT, and Chat GPT couldn't detect. So that opened my eyes to, okay, these guys are developing new ways to get around stuff. How do you guys combat that with AI moving fraud so fast? The capabilities of it, how do you combat that on your side?

• 39:07Speaker 06

  I mean, it's, that's a great question. I think it's just a constant. Sort of whack a mole game where we're adding more and more bits of technology to find it, right, and to catch it. And to the sort of earlier thing, we started with inbound screening, right, which is find me the best candidates. You know, companies like Dordache started using where they're like, we're spending way too much time. We get millions of applications. Let's spend time on the ones that matter most. I think most folks didn't really realize how big of a problem this was. Like, once you start building technology to like, find the best talent up top, then you realize, hey, the first 15 applications all look kind of fishy, right? And then you realize, oh, wow, most folks don't actually know that this problem is way deeper and runs

• 39:49Speaker 06

  way deeper than you actually envisioned. And then you start analyzing it. And it's not just like, you know, it used to be the, hey, this person is based out of Clearwater, Florida, worked at Netflix and Uber, and now at some startup. Something looks off. Like, it's far more sophisticated than that, right? So you cannot just rely on intuition and gut feel. It has to be much more based on data that you can collect based on a variety of different factors. So I think it's all of those things. And yes, to the point mentioned, you know, folks do make it through the funnels. Always have sort of a downstream detection. Downstream detection costs you probably an order to orders magnitude more money in terms of a background check or something more sophisticated than that. So to the extent you can kind of like, figure this out upstream, you can weed out the vast majority. So I think that's going

• 40:34Speaker 06

  to be the case.

• 40:38Speaker 01

  And no more questions. That's awesome. Give it up for our panel, everybody.

• 40:43Speaker 00

  I will ask, if you guys have time, just move over here. And if anyone has a question they want to ask you, they can come upstage and do that. Otherwise, stick around. Chad and I are up next with Dolly.

• 40:53Speaker 02

  We're not, we can't stop. We can't stop this.

• 40:55Speaker 00

  Can't stop, won't stop.

• 40:56Speaker 02

  Thank you for listening to, what's it called? A podcast. The Chad, the cheese. Brilliant. They talk about recruiting. They talk about technology. But most of all, they talk about nothing. Just a lot of shout outs of people you don't even know. And yet, you're listening. It's incredible. And not one word about cheese. Not one chatter. Blue.

• 41:21Speaker 02

  Nacho, pepper jack, Swiss. So many cheeses and not one word. So weird. Anywho, be sure to subscribe today on iTunes, Spotify, Google Play, or wherever you listen to your podcasts. That way you won't miss an episode. And while you're at it, visit www.jadcheese.com. Just don't expect to find any recipes for grilled cheese. So weird. We out.