Was The Sharing Economy Way Overblown? — With Emil Michael

Emil Michael is the former chief business officer of Uber and the current chairman and CEO of DPCM Capital. Michael joins Big Technology Podcast to discuss what's happened to 'sharing economy' darlings Uber, Lyft, AirBNB, and more. With deep insight into these companies' business models, Michael breaks down how they've reacted to our shift away from a zero-interest rate environment, examining who might win — if anyone. Stay tuned for the second half where we discuss Michael's thoughts on the latest AI wave, and whether his hometown of Miami is really a budding tech hub. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Alex Kantrowitz?

  LinkedIn Presents.

• 0:14Alex Kantrowitz?

  Welcome to Big Technology Podcast, a show for cool-headed, nuanced conversation of the tech world and beyond. Emile Michael is our guest today. He's the former Chief Business Officer at Uber, and he's the Chairman and CEO of DPCM Capital. And Michael joins us at a fascinating moment for the ride-sharing business and the sharing economy overall. Let's start with the fact that Uber is sitting at a market cap of $63 billion, which is less than its last private market valuation, and its share price is trading below its IPO price, and its CEO is giving rides himself to figure out why his company can't recruit drivers. Lyft, meanwhile, is down 87% since its IPO, and its founders just resigned for

• 0:59Alex Kantrowitz?

  "personal reasons." I mean, come on. Then you look at Airbnb, which has effectively been flat on the stock market since its IPO years ago. And you begin to wonder whether there was a sharing economy at all, or whether zero-interest-rate environment investments from VCs and public market investors have propped up non-businesses this entire time. Well, the answer is not a clear yes, but it's also not a clear no, at least for some companies. I discuss this all with Emile Michael, who's had a front-row seat to this at Uber and has followed it closely afterwards, and I think has some very valuable analysis that you're going to enjoy a lot. My conversation with Emile, coming up, right after this.

• 1:44Alex Kantrowitz?

  This episode is brought to you by Genesis. What does it actually take to put a Gentic AI to work across an entire enterprise? I recently spoke with Genesis Chairman and CEO Tony Bates about why orchestration is emerging as a competitive advantage in customer experience, and what companies need to get right in the AI era. Then, I sat down with Adam Mitchell, Head of Enterprise Business Solutions at Voya Financial, to go inside a large-scale agentic CX transformation, including the business decisions, trade-offs, and lessons along the way. You can watch both conversations now on my YouTube channel today. It's never been more challenging to get Frontier Compute. How do you know where to look, who to trust, or how much to pay?

• 2:28Alex Kantrowitz?

  Akash is an open cloud that provides easy access, flexibility, and peace of mind. That's how companies like Razor were able to cut their inference costs by 15 times. Visit akash.network/alex for a free consultation. That's akash.network/alex for a free consultation.

• 2:49Alex Kantrowitz?

  Emile, welcome to the show.

• 2:50Speaker 01

  It's good to see you again. Been a couple of years.

• 2:53Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, you were one of the first, we were just talking, you were one of the first guests we've ever had on the show. And it was in the thick of COVID and we were talking about whether people were going to continue to do ride sharing after COVID ended and whether that people had, you know, were going to just travel with their own cars. I bought my own car. All right. So I'm doing a lot less and the businesses have struggled. So actually, it's maybe a pretty good place for us to start. What do you think the rebound from COVID has been like for ride sharing companies in particular?

• 3:22Speaker 01

  Well, if you look at the data, the revenue part of ride sharing is all the way back and more. However, I think what's buried in there is the price increases have been dramatic since pre-COVID times. If you look at sort of like the same ride cost. So the number of rides probably has slowed. It's still probably growing a bit, but because the price increases have been material, the total revenue has grown. Contrast that with food delivery, which is sort of shot out of nowhere, was bigger during the pandemic for Uber for a bit than rides. And now that's slowed a little bit and rides is taken back over.

• 4:01Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, Emile, I got to tell you, so I was in San Francisco, came out of the airport and, you know, I had been away for a little bit. I'd moved back to New York and I was so used to just getting out of the airport, calling an Uber or a Lyft, going to my house, in the mission, and, you know, it being a very easy process. The Uber, I might, maybe it was surging or something, it was over a hundred dollars. I had never done this before. I walked down, went to the, um, the, the black car drivers and, and said, hey, can, can you take me home? And we negotiated a price, which was still double what I used to spend, uh, you know, with Uber, but it was also much, uh, much cheaper than the Uber prices. Is that, was that a unique experience, do you think? I know you're not there day to day anymore, but was that a unique experience? Or is this sort of the, you know, par for the course right now?

• 4:46Alex Kantrowitz?

  And if so, what does it say about the long-term trajectory of these businesses?

• 4:51Speaker 01

  Yeah, so two, so two things are happening. I don't think your experience is unique. Prices are going up for two reasons. Both companies, Uber, Lyft have said, we gotta get profitable. And Wall Street has said, well, you know, you guys have to get profitable or your stock's not going to move. So them, amongst other tech businesses, have sort of made that move to profitability, which meant raising prices. That's the easiest way to get closer to profitability, right? The second thing that's happened is there've been a ton of taxes, surcharges, fees that cities, states and localities have added to rides.

• 5:29Speaker 01

  In California, Prop 22 added, added some costs. So there's two buckets of costs, the profitability cost and the regulatory cost has added to this. And I think that's what you're seeing kind of across the board, across the country, across the world. And what is going to happen is on the margin, it's going to make people take Ubers or rideshares less. Right? It's like we learned this very early in our time at Uber. Price elasticity for transportation is super important. Like you raise the price a dollar, fewer people use it, just period. So I think you're going to end up having slowing growth in the number of riders because of this.

• 6:13Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. And there's also one thing you didn't mention is the fact that there's much less drivers are having trouble getting drivers on these platforms. So there's this recent Wall Street Journal article with, and, and we gotta talk about it because it has, it's basically documenting Uber's CEO, Derek Coser Shaw. He's moonlighting as a driver with, with Uber. And I'm just going to read you a little part of it. So this was the first time, he's been CEO for a while. This is the first time he's tried to drive Uber. And he's found all these different issues. So he's, this, this is from the Journal story. He struggled to sign up as a driver. He saw firsthand something called tip baiting and was punished by the app

• 6:54Alex Kantrowitz?

  for rejecting trips. Surprisingly hard to take was the rudeness of some riders. And they say that it's part of a campaign by him and his lieutenants to better understand and improve Uber's experience for drivers whose scarcity has become a critical challenge for the company in the US, which think about supply and demand. I think that's probably one of the issues. And here's one of the amazing lines from the story. He hadn't driven on Uber before because it wasn't his biggest priority. Drivers had always been in abundant supply. And it's one of those interesting profiles where it's like you have access. So you're trying to be nice to the guy. But like, as it continues to reveal details through the story, you're like, is this person really an effective leader?

• 7:39Alex Kantrowitz?

  So, you know, I'm curious hearing, hearing about this. Was this a practice that, that you guys did when, when you were at Uber during the Travis era? And had you'd been driving Ubers, had Travis been driving Ubers? Not to, you know, get too deep into that because I feel like that's been talked about to death. But I'm curious, when you see a CEO try, you know, driving for the first time this many years in, and finding all these, these issues, what does that mean?

• 8:04Speaker 01

  I'd be surprised if that's the first time he's driven. But yeah, we used to drive all the time. We used to, I think Travis used to do Halloween. I would do a weekday night and the product managers would do it all the time. Um, we had a program that, uh, asked all employees to try to do it once a year. All of them, not just product managers, including engineers, so that they could feel the experience. Um, so that would, that would sound surprising, uh, that your biggest product, uh, would be something that you didn't experience. Um, and shows a little bit of distance between the product you're building

• 8:46Speaker 01

  for billions, millions of people around the world and your effective, uh, ability to effectively lead a company that's supposed to do that. Um, that being said, they did make a, a lot of product decisions in the last couple of years, which I think have been a big mistake to both the driver experience and the, and the user experience. And maybe they're figuring those out now. I don't know, but we have never had plentiful drivers. That's not true. There was always been a supply constraint on average at Uber, um, all the time. It's because demand is, it was, you know, was always rising faster than supply. So again, that, that's a, that's an interesting quote that I wouldn't have predicted.

• 9:24Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. And you know, I guess I kind of give him credit for, for, I mean, the, the knock on him is fair that it took this long for him to get into the product and start doing this. I give him credit for starting to implement some fixes. The article really gets very interesting when he starts doing delivery. So he finds all these problems in the app that they, I guess, confessed to the journal. And, you know, I guess it's good and transparent. But it was just astonishing to me how many glaring problems that they found. Let me read a little bit more. So this is again, Derek going through the delivery experience. I guess I shouldn't laugh. It's good that he's trying it out. But there's something comical about the whole situation. So here it is. So one time he clicked on the notification and the app started navigating him to a

• 10:09Alex Kantrowitz?

  new address, hiding directions for the current order. New orders are now queued after existing orders, even if drivers click on them. Okay, so that's a change that he made. So information about the current one isn't lost. On another occasion, Mr. Kostasari showed up to a restaurant to pick up what he thought was one order, only to learn that involved two separate deliveries. Uber was combining orders along the same route, but the app didn't make that clear. So now the company is introducing better labeling for trips that involve more than one delivery. He also ran into a problem. This is an interesting one. He also ran into a problem. Delivery drivers had been complaining about tip baiting. Customers would entice workers to pick up their food quickly by entering big tips

• 10:52Alex Kantrowitz?

  on the app, but then reducing them after the food was delivered and they're trying to work on fixes for that as well. I mean, that's really disgusting for people to do that to delivery drivers. But what so what do you think about all these problems that he's finding in this service? And also, what do you think about the fact that it's kind of taking the CEO to actually do this and sort of, you know, force down changes, you know, down the org? Doesn't really speak to the strength of his lieutenants, I guess.

• 11:20Speaker 01

  What's baffling to me is that it's been almost six years, right? So this is not one year into one's tenure.

• 11:29Speaker 01

  And it just baffles me as to, you know, this is the core of a product manager's job. What is going on in the product management part of this company? Um, like you, there's those TV shows, the undercover boss things, which are kind of, you know, a boss goes undercover in his own company. He's like, holy, holy crap, what's going on here? And he comes back up. Um, this is sort of so surprising that, that it's hard to put into words, but, but if you look at what Expedia was, when he ran Expedia, um, and you try to translate that into the mobile world where it was just sort of a lot of pop ups

• 12:09Speaker 01

  and, and things that weren't designed for a consumer, um, to sort of easily understand what's happening on. And in this case, drivers and delivery people are consumers of the platform too. They're users of platform as well. So you have to make them happy. It's sort of a jumbled kind of mess. And, uh, there was a lot of tweets the other day about some of the messiness in the Uber, uh, apps as well. And I just, I just think there's no fundamental design point or principle in the apps themselves that are organizing how new features are pushed out. It's just feature on top of feature on top of feature, and then they start conflicting with each other.

• 12:51Speaker 01

  So it's to make the thing unusable. So I, again, if I were him, I'd go write to a product management team and, and some heads would probably roll.

• 12:58Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. So, uh, Dara is, is widely, um, viewed positively, I think, by the public. Do you think he's getting a pass? I'm kind of curious like what you think about the public perception of him now that, well, let me even read. All right. I'm going to go read the stats because I have it here on what, what the situation is with Uber. So the market cap is, um, 62 billion. Last private valuation was 76 billion. It's trading at $31 a share. It was priced at 45 at the IPO. With that in mind, rate the leadership.

• 13:29Speaker 01

  Look, it's the tale of the tape, right? Warren Buffett, the stock price is a voting machine and over the long term, it's a weighing machine. It's been six and a half years. Stock price is below the IPO. The stock price today at $31 is where it was in 2014. So you're almost a decade of a flat stock price, right?

• 13:50Speaker 01

  And you could argue, sort of, whatever Travis and I had left him, had some challenges that he did work out and he was a better diplomat and sort of was someone who the press liked a lot more. But I'd say that likability and effectiveness are separate things. I do really want to be both. He clearly ranks high in the likability score, but from an effectiveness standpoint, if you're measuring by stock price, that's been, you know, a D.

• 14:25Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right.

• 14:26Speaker 01

  A D minus, even when you compare it to the NASDAQ or other tech stocks. Now, the one other thing I'll mention is behalf, just to be, you know, to be fair, Uber's done better than Lyft.

• 14:37Alex Kantrowitz?

  Oh, yeah.

• 14:38Speaker 01

  Grab.

• 14:39Alex Kantrowitz?

  Getting right into my next questions, yeah.

• 14:40Speaker 01

  Yeah, Uber's done better than Didi. Uber has not done better than DoorDash. DoorDash has whooped Uber on food delivery in the US. So that's the mixed bag on that, but stock price is really the summation of all of it. And I think he says he's disappointed in it. I'm not sure why Wall Street isn't, you know, asking for more radical change there.

• 15:03Alex Kantrowitz?

  Interesting. What do you mean by more radical change?

• 15:06Speaker 01

  Well, usually, you know, when you have a stock price that's languishing, as this has, and you promise, well, here's what we're going to do, and it's not achieved, what happens is, you know, you have some change in incentive structures, right? I was looking at the 10K just came out, the annual report for 2022. Stock price was down in 2022 by 20%. All the executives, all of them, made 200% of their target bonus.

• 15:37Alex Kantrowitz?

  Doesn't seem right.

• 15:38Speaker 01

  Doesn't seem right. Well, incentives are obviously not working. So the public shareholders suffer, the management team wins. That misalignment is something that, yes, should the board be fixing that and should investors be pressuring alignment there? Yeah, I think that's one easy fix, right? Whose head rolled when they lost the food delivery war to DoorDash? What's going to happen with all these product issues that were found? Who's going to be responsible for those things? So accountability, I guess, is what I think the key thing that's missing, not just in Uber, but in a lot of public companies when management gets entrenched.

• 16:18Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay, so speaking of accountability and speaking of Uber's ability to, or the fact that it has crushed Lyft, there has been some accountability there. Now, the reports are that these founders, they left to go spend time with their families or do personal reasons stuff. It's amazing to me that people today are even venturing those type of excuses when you know that the business has performed miserably and this is almost certainly a business-related change. I mean, the numbers for Uber are not great. The numbers for Lyft are downright embarrassing. Lyft is down 87.96% since it's open. They definitely had the likability thing going. I spent time with John Zimmer, who's one of the founders, and one of his, a couple of times,

• 17:03Alex Kantrowitz?

  actually, I went with him when he was driving himself on New Year's and sort of getting firsthand experience with the product. I thought he was a good guy. I mean, I do think he's a good guy, but obviously, the management has not been there for Lyft. I think you had a tweet saying that you're expecting the price to go effectively to zero or something like that. So, talk a little bit about the Lyft, the challenges that Lyft has had, why you think those founders are out, and where you think that company is going.

• 17:30Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 17:32Speaker 01

  Let us be very clear. So here's another stat that's really important here. Lyft in its lifetime, including its IPO, raised eight billion dollars. And they're worth today three and a half billion. So they're worth a fraction of the amount of money they raised. So it's been like WeWork raised all this money and it's worth less than that. That's not the case at Uber, but that is the case at Lyft, and that's a big thing to consider. Uh, the other thing to note, though, that's I think not intuitive, Alex, is the founders before they went public got voting control of the company. So they didn't have to go if they didn't want to. Maybe they were pressured, but ultimately it was their choice to go because they could have voted to keep themselves in.

• 18:14Speaker 01

  Um, I think, you know, what happened there is, this is my guess, right? Earnings are about to come out in early May for Q1. My guess is those are going to be a disaster for Lyft. They're going to show real problems. And they didn't want to be responsible for that, so they put some, someone new in. He'll take the heat and say, well, you know, I'm new here. Give me another quarter or two. Um, and then also when they're on the board and not management team, they have better ability to sell their shares. So I think this is a bad sign for the whole company. And I said five dollars a share, plus or minus. Um, and today it's, it's, uh, it's about nine dollars a share. So we'll see what happens in a month. I said May. You know, you could hold me accountable for that. But, but we always knew this was going to happen to Lyft, and I'll tell you why.

• 18:59Speaker 01

  Um, and it's not because they're, they were, uh, bad leaders or whatever. It's just the nature of ride sharing is that it has a local network effect. The more riders you have on your platform, the more drivers want to be on that platform because they get rides quicker, shorter distance between rides. The shorter distance between rides, the lower price you can, you can charge consumers, uh, per ride. And, and the, the more drivers make because they're taking more rides. That was always going to work in a zero interest rate environment. Until the zero interest rate environment was over, when there was no more cash and you start to have to make money. Then you can't subsidize the riders and drivers anymore.

• 19:42Speaker 01

  And market share was going to start to go to ninety, ten, and that's where it's headed in my view.

• 19:47Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, he always talked to me that he envisioned that ride sharing networks would be like mobile networks where you have a Sprint and a Verizon, for instance, and you decide which one you want to use. You're shaking your head.

• 20:00Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, it's sort of a nonsense analogy in that you're like, you know, they're totally separate networks. One's not dependent on the other. Whereas the more people and drivers on a rideshare network, the more valuable it is. It's more like a telephone network, it'd be more valuable, the more people that are on it. That's not the case with mobile because a Verizon customer can call a T-Mobile customer. That doesn't change sort of the value of either's network.

• 20:27Speaker 01

  Maybe that's why they didn't succeed is because they don't really understand the basic talents of of network effects in business. I don't know.

• 20:33Alex Kantrowitz?

  That seems like one candidate. Yeah.

• 20:35Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 20:35Alex Kantrowitz?

  There's also been this, there's been this

• 20:40Alex Kantrowitz?

  talk, and we talked about it last time you were on, but it's worth updating now that that self-driving would come in and kind of save the business. I mean, that's basically all John was talking about was how close we were to self-driving. This was 2015, 2016, I think. We're in 2023 and we're not there yet. So how bad has the fact that self-driving is not available yet been for these companies' business and their ability to prosper?

• 21:05Speaker 01

  You know, and I still think we're seven to 10 years away from material percentages of cars being self-driving on the road, right? Travis and I always disagreed on the timeline on this. Both companies-

• 21:17Alex Kantrowitz?

  I feel like it's always seven to 10 years. It's always seven to 10 years.

• 21:20Speaker 01

  It's always seven to 10 years away, right? Both companies spent a lot of money on this, but it was never going to be the savior. I think for for both Uber and Lyft, it was a defense against Waymo and Google. The fear was that if we didn't do self-driving and Google did and deployed it fast, well, that would eat rideshare. So we had to be in both camps so we weren't disrupted. It was a, it was more defense than offense. The thing I found really strange about Lyft's strategy here is that they did this ballot initiative in 22 to raise taxes. For electric cars, which that was going to save them somehow, too. So sort of these weird Hail Marys that they were doing instead of expanding into food

• 22:03Speaker 01

  delivery or to Europe for rides. They're focused on autonomous and on electric vehicles, which I just think were bad, bad business choices.

• 22:12Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, I want to say for the record before we move on, John Zimmer. I've been trying to get you on the show a couple of times, sent you an email. You have an open invite and even though I'm not at BuzzFeed anymore, I hope we can still talk, so just making it known.

• 22:28Speaker 01

  Yeah, well, like he's, he's, everyone says he's a nice guy. Dara's a nice guy, you know, behind the scenes, John, I've tangled with him a few times, he's, he's pretty, you know, he has his moments as well.

• 22:40Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, well, okay, hopefully Johnny come in, we can talk about it. So let's talk a little bit, you brought up zero interest rate policy, which is something that I wanted to talk about. So, I mean, how does, because these companies have been subsidizing, like you mentioned, drivers and riders for so long. And of course, when interest rates were zero, you could lose money or be break even and the market still loved you when they looked at growth. So I'm very curious to hear from your perspective, how the raising of interest rates has changed the nature of the business for these companies, because you can't take those shortcuts you used to anymore and get the same benefit.

• 23:14Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, it's, it's super simple. The way Travis used to describe it, you're like, at some day, there's going to be a musical chair and, and there's going to be one less chair. And if you've been betting on zero interest rate environments or your ability to raise money and subsidize and subsidize and subsidize and not doing the efficiency thing, it's going to, when, when that breaks, you're going to break. The valuation multiples were getting pumped because there was so much money in the system and you don't want to mess, miss the next big thing. And entrepreneurs were rightly saying, okay, I, what am I going to do with this money? I got to spend it so I don't get smaller than the next guy or gal. So that ethic was a ethic about who could grow faster, which was, again, you have to play the game on the field.

• 23:59Speaker 01

  Now that that's changed. And those multiples are come down and some, some sense of rationality has entered into the picture, which is, well, I can invest in treasuries and get a 6% year over year return, or I can invest in Uber stock, stock, and if that does not grow 6% year over year, or 10% to account for the risk, well, why am I putting my money there? And then the money flows out from an Uber stock to there. So then your ability to spend money and raise it without being diluted is changed. So it's sort of a very natural reaction, especially in tech, which was inflated, you know, almost any other sector in the economy.

• 24:38Alex Kantrowitz?

  So the knock against these companies has always been that they're just, you know, VC subsidized carpool rides. And when that, when the, you know, the band stops playing, that's going to be the end of these businesses. I mean, we're starting to see that it's made it harder for them to operate. I got, I got, I've got you shaking your head again. So clearly you have a rebuttal here. So what is it?

• 25:00Speaker 01

  No, no, I was gonna, I was gonna add context to what you said, which is, you were right that those were VC dollars subsidizing it, but you had to do that because if you didn't, the other company was going to do that. But our theory of the case was we will subsidize as long as we have to and as long as the money's available. And then when it comes down to it, the bigger party is going to win when there's no more money available. And that's what I'm saying is, is happening today. The bigger party, because of the dynamics of the rideshare market, is going to win and it can be highly profitable. And that's what I think is going to happen.

• 25:38Alex Kantrowitz?

  You're just out of the 10K. What's the profitability, profitability picture for Uber right now?

• 25:42Speaker 01

  If you're using normal accounting metrics.

• 25:46Alex Kantrowitz?

  Let's try that.

• 25:47Speaker 01

  If you start there, it's losing a couple billion dollars a year still. Now, to be fair, a lot of that is because of the stock they hold in Didi and Grab and some of these other rideshare companies around the world. Those are mark to market every year or quarter. So depending on how, you know, it's not really a cash cost to Uber's balance sheet. So if you strip that away, then, you know, they're still losing money, especially, you know, you know, to the tune of probably a billion dollars a year. They're paying, I think last, last year they paid, you know, one or two billion in stock-based comp, which is another.

• 26:27Speaker 01

  Kind of current trick that tech companies are using and taking out of EBITDA. So adjusted EBITDA doesn't include all the money you pay your employees anymore. Um, which is something that I don't think so is, is, you know, it clouds the picture a bit.

• 26:45Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. Um, one more question about these companies, and I think we're going to start to cover some other stuff. But, uh, you mentioned DoorDash has given Uber a run for its money, or I think you said that they whipped them in North America. What has been the secret to DoorDash's ability to do so well?

• 27:01Speaker 01

  Tony Jew is an entrepreneur, um, not sort of a, you know, caretaker diplomat type CEO. So he is in the product. There's zero percent chance in my, I don't know, Tony. Zero percent chance he hasn't made deliveries on DoorDash frequently to see what that experience is like. So they've just innovated. Some of the innovative innovations they've done that are really material. Dash Pass, a huge innovation, right? It, because people are ordering so much food during the pandemic that if you could sign up for this nine nine nine subscription plan and have free deliveries, it was a deal all day long. And then why would you use Uber Eats?

• 27:41Speaker 01

  So the loyalty they got with that, they're way ahead of Uber by years on that piece. Smart. Second thing is suburbs. They went to the suburbs faster. Um, and they were the only party out there for a long time because remember the old Grubhub? Grubhub was like dense urban areas. They went and attacked a new market in the suburbs again during the pandemic. Super smart move. Um, and then third, they did this brilliant thing where it's called over the top. So turns out that when any human wants, opens a food delivery app, and we learned this at Uber. They want to see as much variety as possible, even if they know they want Chinese. They want to know there's Italian. They want to see seven Chinese restaurants. So DoorDash saw this early. So what they did is they went to every Chinese restaurant in town

• 28:26Speaker 01

  and they just put their menu on the app, whether or not they had a deal with the restaurant. And they would pay retail for it. And so you ordered it, the customer gave it. And then at the end of the month, the sales guy would call this Chinese restaurant and say, hey, do you know we bought you $2,000 a business this month? Or you want to sign up? So, you know, they sort of hacked the, the variety problem. And it was an incredibly smart move.

• 28:50Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, we have, uh, Ron John Roy comes on every, from margins comes on every Friday. And he wrote this story about his friend who owns a pizza place. I'm sure you've seen this story. And they realized that DoorDash had put their restaurant on the app, but like marked up the pizza. So they just kept ordering pizza on DoorDash and then pocketing the difference. Um, anyway, okay, one, one, one big picture question, then we'll go to a break. Sharing economy. This was the hottest thing about 10 years ago. People could not stop talking about the sharing economy, sharing your cars, sharing your house with Airbnb. I heard people talking about sharing lawn mowers, uh, whatever it might be through an app.

• 29:34Alex Kantrowitz?

  Where is that promise gone? Because we've talked about the struggles for, for Lyft and Uber already right now. I mean, Uber might have a path. Seems like it's in better shape than, than Lyft, but also still not profitable. And then Airbnb has effectively been flat on this, on the stock market and has its own well documented struggles. So I, I think you're coming at this from a perspective where, okay, you're probably going to say no, but I want to hear your, your thoughts anyway on this. Why, why isn't the sharing economy, looking back, something that was completely overblown and actually in reality, has not measured up to the hype?

• 30:10Speaker 01

  I think that the sharing economy, if you kind of look back on it, should have only applied to high cost assets. Right? So asset like a home, a car, when you start applying it to lawn mowers. You know, the transaction costs don't make sense, right? So, so we were, how many times do you say we're going to be the Uber for massages? The Uber for lawn, you know, dry cleaners, the Uber for this, that? It went so down the line because people were like, I want the convenience of Uber. So let's call it the Uber of this and I'm not using my lawnmower all the time. So why don't I rent it out? But you're like, yeah, but someone has to drive 20 minutes to borrow your $150 lawn mower

• 30:53Speaker 01

  or drive back and you know, the economics just don't make sense. So, um, I think it was overblown because it was applied to everything as applied, as opposed to being applied to the things where it makes clear economic sense. Homes, cars, there's actually a company called Equipment Share that does farm equipment, where the equipment is actually really expensive and they have a sharing platform and it works. Right? So, um, there are categories where it makes sense to do that. Uh, but, but the world applied it to everything, just like every, every hype. AI is now apply, what shouldn't we apply AI to right now? Brick making, you know, I don't know, pick your, pick your thing.

• 31:36Speaker 01

  It's sort of the, it is the natural hype cycle. Um, and then now we're in the hangover period on it.

• 31:42Alex Kantrowitz?

  Emile Michael is here with us. He's the chief, uh, former chief business officer at Uber, chairman and CEO of DPCM Capital. Joining us here on Big Technology Podcast, talking about the sharing economy, Uber lift and all that stuff. Well, he mentioned AI, so we're going to talk about AI and what it's like to invest for him when we're not in zero interest rate days anymore. More on that when we come back right after this. This episode is brought to you by App Point. Everyone's racing to roll out AI right now. Co-pilots, chatbots, agents doing real work. But here's the part nobody loves talking about. All that AI runs on your data and most teams have no single way to see it, secure it, and prove it's under control. That's exactly what App Point does.

• 32:27Alex Kantrowitz?

  For 25 years, they've been the trusted layer beneath the world's most demanding data, now extended across your entire AI estate. Your data. Your cloud and the agents acting on your behalf. It's how more than 28,000 organizations deploy AI with confidence. So innovation scales without scaling risk. AVPoint, the unifying trust layer for AI. Head to AVPoint.com to see how enterprises deploy AI with confidence. Learn more at AVPT.co/bigtechnologypodcast. That's AVPT.co/bigtechnologypodcast. Violent threats against executives are growing at an alarming rate.

• 33:10Alex Kantrowitz?

  When a company experiences backlash, executives are the first people blamed. When their address and other personal details are sitting online, this backlash can lead right to their front door. The team at Ironwell knows this better than anyone. They've protected some of the most targeted executives and individuals on the planet for almost two decades. As a wide-glove enterprise security service, they protect your people with continuous personal data removal, proactive prevention tools and human-led emergency support. So when someone goes looking for your executives, Ironwell ensures they hit a dead end. So here's what to do. Go to ironwell.com/bigtechnology, fill in the quick form and request your free risk assessment. Their team will show you just how exposed your executives are and how to lock it down before a threat reaches their front door.

• 33:55Alex Kantrowitz?

  That's ironwell.com/bigtechnology. Learn how to stop online threats before they become real-world attacks. The link's in the show notes.

• 34:12Alex Kantrowitz?

  And we're back here on Big Technology Podcast with Emile Michael, the chief, the former chief, I should have written former in the notes here, the former chief business officer at Uber and the chairman and the CEO of DPCM Capital. Emile, great to have you with us. So, okay, so obviously, we're not applying AI to brickmaking, but this technology is going to be undeniably disruptive. I think that your perspective is, you know, given the way that you talked about it before the break, that people are blowing it a bit out of proportion. So I'm curious where you see the actual action happening on this front? What makes you excited about it and where you think people should kind of chill out?

• 34:51Speaker 01

  Yeah, so I am trying to be more sober about it just because.

• 34:58Speaker 01

  You know, all the companies I advise and I invest in, what do I do about AI? And just like self-driving cars, like there are some things that will happen quickly with AI. And there are some things that will take a long time for AI to impact or disrupt. And so let's just be thoughtful about that, right? Um, like you don't need to go build your own L L M as a, you know, um, as a, uh, someone who sells expense management software just yet. Let's, let's, let's just see what, let's, let's think about where this is going to be applied. So I'm a believer that AI is going to change the world in lots of ways, going to change learning, healthcare,

• 35:40Speaker 01

  even dating, I think it's going to change because it'll be able to match people better. There's a lot of dramatic changes it's going to make. Um, I do not have a fully formed opinion where all the rents are going to go to the big tech companies. Or is there going to be an ecosystem around the tech? That allows other companies to thrive like the iPhone app ecosystem did. Because when you stick L L M's and in, into Bing, into Google, into Office, just like you stuck Alexa and Siri into all these things, does it just become a component of everything that exists today? And therefore the big tech companies sort of take, get all the value out of it? Uh, or not? I, I don't know yet.

• 36:21Speaker 01

  Um, so that's sort of, you, you know, something I'm concerned about, but the, but the, but the valuations you're seeing now are exactly what the valuations you saw for the sharing companies back then. And that's, it still might be a smart bet net, net for a V C. But that you're seeing that bubbletious environment happening there as well, right?

• 36:44Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right. And we, we talked about this on the podcast in the past, but it is very interesting where you get into this place where, with the iPhone and apps at least, okay, the iPhone was the operating system. The apps were distinct. You weren't in the same user interface when you're using the apps versus using the app, using iOS. I mean, even though you were on iOS, you were in the app. But when you're using something like a chat G P T, you're, you know, going to be in that same user interface as you would be with the apps. And if the AI gets better, then it sort of, you know, throws the whole value of building on top of it into question.

• 37:19Speaker 01

  Right. So then you're like, well, can you build a data set to the side? That uses both in some way, like take medical information. Could you take the Mayo Clinic's whole database of all the outcomes they've had of all the treatments that they've had since the beginning of time? And have that be something that's proprietary to them, but use everything else that's on the internet to combine it to to get, you know, sort of a worldwide, um, you know, uh, uh, trial of certain drugs or procedures and get better answers faster. Is there a way to do that? That would be interesting if there were, because then, then you could have companies innovating around it, not just getting subsumed by it.

• 38:04Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, and it goes back to like, well, I think what's happened with the evolution of technology recently, which is that, um, you almost get all the consumer applications, you know, set by the big companies. And then there's places in the enterprise field and like places like medical, where you can build something with value. So for instance, Character AI, which is one of those companies that raised 150 million on no revenue at a billion dollar valuation, one of those bubbletous companies that you refer to. Why can't, you know, a user then go into one of these big chatbots? And instead of chat, wanting to chat with one of the characters from Character AI, just say, okay, ChatGPT, you're George Washington right now. You don't necessarily need a billion dollar app to create that functionality.

• 38:48Alex Kantrowitz?

  You can just instruct the big bots to figure it out.

• 38:51Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, so those, you know, I'm not enough of an engineering, uh, no, I don't have enough engineering know how to know,

• 39:00Speaker 01

  um, you know, how that will work and can you do it better outside or, you know? But, uh, these are all important questions. I do think there are some scary AI questions, not to be the doomsayer here, but I was with Eric Schmidt the other day and we were talking about it. And obviously he spends way more time thinking about this stuff. And I was like, what's your greatest fear? He said, well, what if you could subsume all the physics papers that have ever been written? And that teaches Iran or North Korea how to make a nuclear bomb, or you could. You do the same thing for viruses or to the Chinese or some adversary can use their own version of AI to spit answers out that are propagandizing our, you know,

• 39:43Speaker 01

  our citizens and worried about sort of the dark uses of that that can happen today and fast. And there's no way to regulate this stuff very easily outside of our own borders, much less in our own borders.

• 39:56Alex Kantrowitz?

  And Schmidt right now is even working on some warfare projects or AI projects meant to counter China. So do you guys speak about that at all?

• 40:05Speaker 01

  We do. We spoke about it a lot because the Chinese for years have been investing a lot of manpower on this problem and it's been state funded, state directed, right? Where we have four companies that have been doing off their own balance sheet this stuff, more or less. And so we talk a lot about, oh, can we get the four companies to agree that you can't, you know, you can't chat GPT how to make a bomb and it gives you a clear answer. And so can we get our four companies to agree? And I said, Eric, well, yeah, that's great. We get our companies to agree, but how do you get the Chinese to not have their capability available to some, some lone wolf in our country to learn how to make a bomb? And there's no answer to that just yet.

• 40:49Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. So are you investing in any of these companies or looking into them? What's your, what's your exposure to them as an investor?

• 40:55Speaker 01

  I mean, as a limited partner, a bunch of VCs, I'm kind of have some exposure through those things directly not yet because I'm so flummoxed by the, by how the ecosystem and how it's going to work just yet. And to be honest, I'm not in San Francisco and this is not, this is happening in San Francisco, not in Miami right now. It's the first time I was like, huh, it's like, you know, that is the density of San Francisco engineering talent is allowing that to progress in that city more than any other city in the world right now.

• 41:31Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, it's interesting. You're the third investor that we've had on the show in recent weeks talking that have discussed this type of topic. Joe Marchese and Mike McNano were on from Human Ventures and Lightspeed a little bit ago. And they were also like talking about just the struggle to figure out what's investable here.

• 41:50Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 41:51Alex Kantrowitz?

  So what, yeah, what are you investing in these days or looking at?

• 41:56Speaker 01

  You know, I, I started, I, you know, slowed slash stopped investing directly.

• 42:03Speaker 01

  Probably, you know, mid 21, just because, you know, I'd made a lot of investments and I just, at some point got, the, the web three stuff was so nuts in terms of my inability after being in technology for 25 years. I was like, my brain's going to break because I must not be understanding this. And maybe I'm too old now, right? And it was like, you know,

• 42:28Alex Kantrowitz?

  I don't think that was it.

• 42:29Speaker 01

  What?

• 42:30Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, I don't think that was it. I think a lot of it was built on a, you know, inflated dreams of what could be versus what was.

• 42:37Speaker 01

  So then I said, I must be, I, I need to go re-educate myself and, you know, go hang out with a bunch of young people to just understand what I'm missing. So I stopped investing then. It was, turned out to be a smart decision, at least with that wave of companies that had come out there. But now I'm, I'm kind of more excited about, I've never been excited about enterprise software, but now I'm kind of getting more excited about it these days. Not because it's steadier, but just because there's a lot of innovation happening in this stuff. And I do think AI is applied to enterprise is going to be clear moneymakers. And so I'm looking for companies that are doing stuff in that way. And that's what I like. I'm, I'm a little worried about emerging markets right now because of currency

• 43:22Speaker 01

  devaluation, especially in Latin America because of political instability. So, you know, I'm kind of keeping it enterprise and keeping it, keeping my eye open in AI stuff right now.

• 43:36Alex Kantrowitz?

  Interesting. Okay. Let, let's end with this, this part of the discussion because you brought it up and we have to talk about it. Man, I think two years ago, I couldn't, you know, go five minutes without hearing about how Miami was the new capital of tech.

• 43:50Alex Kantrowitz?

  It's died down a little bit, but you know, living there and saying what you've just said about AI in San Francisco. What's your perspective on the state of that city?

• 43:58Speaker 01

  So, you know, I love this city. I've been here five and a half years before sort of the pandemic rush. So I came to know it before it had started to attract a lot of the people it did. I'm excited that it has. I do think there has been an outflux from New York, LA, Miami, from VCs, hedge funds, some founders, some people, some technology folks who want the lifestyle here, but the remote work sort of revolution allowed them to be here in a place they wanted to live. I still think there's a dearth of engineering talents here that'll be

• 44:36Speaker 01

  a leading indicator as to when Miami can build its own startups. There are a few great startups here that are homegrown and have engineers here, Lula, Papa, GoPuff, sort of essentially high quarter here. So you have three or four companies that make it, then, you know, could it be like New York or Austin in terms of the outcomes in a couple of years? Yeah. San Francisco still, still is a 5X from any other city in the country in terms of the density of talent and the speed of money, talent and ideas. So I love it here. I'm friends with Keith, boy, I like him a lot. I love that he's boosting it.

• 45:16Speaker 01

  I agree with him that Miami's increased its relevance in the tech world by a factor of five, but there's still another factor of five to go to get to, to be on the same tier as these other places.

• 45:30Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay. And before I let you go, so you said you took a break. You wanted to study what the web three stuff was all about. What did you conclude there? Because you seemed fairly happy that you didn't invest.

• 45:40Speaker 01

  I mean, I concluded that, that there are use cases for a blockchain. If you think about a blockchain as a, as a network that.

• 45:54Speaker 01

  You know, doesn't have human intervention. So it has an unbiased way of delivering

• 46:01Speaker 01

  information, data or property from one place to another and securing it in that way. Right? You know, I was talking to a company that was doing, you know, wanted to use blockchain for for home titles. How do you trade home titles? Now it's like a little piece of paper. You go to the county recorder's office. Why shouldn't that all not be electronic? Or you sell a car and you know, you just send the title over. It doesn't have to be blockchain. You know, you can argue with that, but the the notion of a network where property is traded makes sense. The notion of the the shitcoins. Okay, I think we all agree. Like, we were like, I don't know what was happening there. People were bored in their mom's basement. You know, trading.

• 46:40Alex Kantrowitz?

  When you call it shitcoin, just to begin with, I mean, it seems like the answer is in the question right there.

• 46:46Speaker 01

  Yeah, no, no. So I but I do spend a lot of time thinking about what Balaji says and how he thinks about Bitcoin and why it's different. And it has proven to be somewhat different than everything else. But so there are parts of it I I get, but there's parts of it that are proven to be non utilitarian. There's no use case for them.

• 47:09Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right. So you're not taking that billion. What is the million dollar bet that Balaji was making?

• 47:13Speaker 01

  Oh, they that that bet is a bet on on the Fed's hyperinflation, what he believes are hyperinflationary policies, right?

• 47:20Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. Are you on board with that?

• 47:23Speaker 01

  I have sixty days left in the bet. I'd take those odds. I'd take those odds.

• 47:28Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, yeah.

• 47:30Speaker 01

  I forget what the hyperinflation was defined by, but my recollection is I'd probably take that bet, a friendly bet because I like Balaji.

• 47:37Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay, Emile, thanks so much for joining. Great to speak with you as always.

• 47:40Speaker 01

  All right, good to see you. Take care.

• 47:41Alex Kantrowitz?

  Take care. And that'll do it for us here on Big Technology Podcast. Thank you so much for listening. Thank you, Emile, for coming your second time here on the show, which is awesome. This was super fun. I appreciate you being candid, speaking about the issues. Thank you, Nate Guattini, for handling the audio. Special shout out for Nate. You know, I've been working with Nate for three years and if you're looking for a podcast editor, I highly recommend Nate. Just get in touch with me, [email protected], and I'll put you in touch with Nate. Thank you, Nate, as always. Thank you also to LinkedIn for having me as part of your podcast network and thanks to all of you, the listeners. A special treat for you coming up this Friday, Jim McKelvey, who's the co-founder of Square and currently the founder of Invisibly. We've had him on

• 48:25Alex Kantrowitz?

  the show before. He's going to come on the show with Ron John and I to discuss the current state of the economy, looking at the Fed, looking at what some people are calling a credit crunch and much more. So stay tuned for that. That'll be 11 a.m. Pacific, 2 p.m. Eastern on LinkedIn and also here on the feed if you miss it. So stay tuned. Jim McKelvey coming up Friday and I'll be back next Wednesday with my standard flagship interview with Congressman Ro Khanna, talking about his trip to Taiwan. Excited to bring that to you. Excited that you're here. Appreciate you listening as always. Thanks again. And that will do it for us here on this edition of Big Technology Podcast.

• 49:10Speaker 02

  Now, more than ever, we need someone on our side. But Rob Whitman? Whitman's votes drove up costs, cut Medicaid and risked 350,000 Virginians healthcare to pay for tax breaks for himself and his donors. He's not on our side. Shannon Taylor will fight corruption, cut taxes and bring down costs. This November, vote for Shannon Taylor. She's for us. Paid for by HMP, the House Majority PAC dot com. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.