Emergency Pod: Anthropic's S-1 IPO Filing — With Dan Primack

Dan Primack is the business editor at Axios and author of the Pro Rata newsletter. Primack joins Big Technology for an emergency reaction to Anthropic’s S-1 filing, revealing the company’s financial performance ahead of its highly anticipated IPO. Tune in to hear why Wall Street may be willing to fund Anthropic’s extraordinary ambitions despite massive compute obligations, mounting expenses, and uncertainty about long-term profitability. We also cover Anthropic’s explosive revenue growth, improving compute efficiency, surprising risk disclosures, and what its IPO means for OpenAI and the broader AI industry. Hit play for an inside look at the biggest financial questions surrounding the AI boom and whether investors can keep funding its expansion. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Alex Kantrowitz?

  Well, the Anthropic S1 is here, so it's time for an emergency rapid reaction. And we're joined by the perfect guest to do it. Dan Primack is here. He's the business editor at Axios and the author of the Pro Rata newsletter. Dan, it's great to see you. Welcome to the show.

• 0:13Speaker 01

  Thanks for having me. Busy day.

• 0:15Alex Kantrowitz?

  Definitely a busy day, Dan. Really appreciate your time. You have joined us in the middle of crazy, breaking financial news, including the dissolution of Silicon Valley Bank. Hopefully, this is an event that doesn't lead to economic catastrophe. And I think that's the right place to start. I mean, people were saying that the tech, the tech trade and really the full market hinged on the numbers we were going to see from Anthropic's S1 document, which dropped at 9:00 AM Eastern this morning on Monday, October 26. So now we actually can see their revenue, their expenses, how much money they make per employee, the risk factors, the whole deal. So after taking a look at the document, where do you think we stand on that question? Is this economy going to hold up?

• 0:57Speaker 01

  It will, but although I think that the circularity of it is still like the issue, right? You know, you look, you look at the contracts in here that Anthropic has with SpaceX and Broadcom and all the rest of it, like the, all of these companies are so incredibly connected to one another. I think those concerns are still there, but look, what we got out of this is kind of what we expected, right? There'd already been leaked financials. You know, obviously, you know, revenue is going through the roof. So is spend for Anthropic. And what we didn't, the only thing we didn't get in here was the Q3 numbers, which have been leaked. My guess is before it actually goes public, those end up in an amended filing.

• 1:31Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay. And so from what you've seen so far, is this basically the company that you expected to see? And, you know, when you think about the IPO, I mean, obviously, we don't know how much they're raising right now. So that's a key question. We don't really know what their valuation is going to be. People are assuming it's going to be 100 million raised at a 200 million, sorry, 2 trillion, sorry, 100 billion raised at a 2 trillion valuation. Where do you think Anthropic stands on the ability to do that based on what you saw in the document?

• 1:59Speaker 01

  I, well, I don't think its ability is based on what I saw in the document. I think the document is not irrelevant to that, but largely irrelevant to that. Right? I mean, I, I think it's going to be able to get that because that's what it wants and the market is going to give it whatever it wants, just like the market was willing to give, you know, SpaceX 40 something billion dollars to buy GPUs today. I think the capital markets have a lot invested in the AI story and Anthropic and OpenAI are kind of the headlines of that. I think they're going to be able to get it. Now, it's worth noting, I wrote this morning that I think the Anthropic IPO, its success or failure or however, something in between, is going to be a referendum on the AI market. I think that's true or on the business of AI, although I don't think it's necessarily fair, right? And Anthropic is a company, this is a offering.

• 2:43Speaker 01

  If it comes in a little below that trillion or a little above, it's not that big a deal in the big picture.

• 2:48Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay. But you also wrote something else in your newsletter that I think we should talk about, which is that this is, and so you mentioned just now that you think the market will give Anthropic whatever it wants.

• 2:58Speaker 01

  I think the money's, I think the money's there. Yeah, I think the money's there. And, and you've got so many big investors who are so, I hate to say invested, but, but, you know, figuratively invested in, in this industry and in this story. And again, and everyone knows it's going to end up in the indexes, et cetera.

• 3:15Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay. But this is what you wrote today, so we kind of hold that up in contrast and you can explain why we're seeing some of it, why I see a discrepancy there. So you say Anthropic's news comes on the same day that SpaceX secured 40 billion in debt financing to buy GPUs. And Meta said it will seek up to 95 billion in equity financing for its AI build out. All of this poses a capacity test for Wall Street. Right? So basically, the question is, is, is the money there? Now, you've already answered it, but explain how we're seeing both a capacity test and Anthropic will effectively get whatever it wants.

• 3:47Speaker 01

  Yeah, well, I think it's a capacity test and I think Wall Street is going to pass said test. I think it's going to pass it with an A or maybe a gentleman's B. Yeah, so I think, I think there's plenty of money there. Look, there, there was questions, I don't know if you remember, when SpaceX went public, there was all these questions of, well, you know, SpaceX goes public, can anyone else get any money for anything, right? Like, look at all the money. But, you know, folks rotate out of other trades and they put money. I think there is plenty of cash here, but it is, I think if you add, if you assume that, that Anthropic gets their 100 billion dollars and you add those other two deals in, it's nearly, it represents nearly 1% of US GDP, not quite, it's like 0.7, but like it, it's an extraordinary amount of money. But yeah, I think there's the capacity and part of that is because those three deals

• 4:28Speaker 01

  you talk about, SpaceX hitting the, the investment grade debt market, Meta hitting kind of the regular equities market, and then Anthropic, which is kind of going for this new equities market, they're all going for different pools of capital, even if they're within the same institutions. I think this was, can I say, I think if this was three 100 billion dollar IPOs coming out at the same time, then I, then I think the passing grade would be a little more questionable.

• 4:52Alex Kantrowitz?

  Now, how is the Anthropic raise that different from the Meta raise? Cause they're both trying to raise off equity.

• 4:57Speaker 01

  Yeah, different, basically, if you're, it's just kind of how people are allocating your, a lot of the investors who are going to be in an IPO or the Anthropic IPO, you're talking the Fidelity's, the Wellington, the T-Rose of the world, who are really putting this in as a new name into their books, whereas Meta's an existing name. So even though they are both equity from a structural perspective, that it's usually coming out from different managers who are literally managing, if not different funds, at least different pools of capital within funds.

• 5:24Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay. And then one more question about this, specifically on the finances. You know, you said basically, you know, to get the money to Anthropic companies will rotate out of other companies. I mean, to do that, it takes like a real belief in Anthropic's business and Anthropic itself and its risk factors. So, hey, look, we're nascent. We're trying this out for the first time. We don't really know what's going to happen. So talk a little bit about why it's, why, you know, investors will feel so compelled to give this company what it wants based off of the fact, you know, that obviously it's growing tremendously, but there, there is that risk.

• 5:58Speaker 01

  There is that risk. And look, I mean, I've, I've never seen more risk factors and more pages of risk factors in S1 in my life.

• 6:03Alex Kantrowitz?

  I started writing them down on Twitter. I got to 80 and I just couldn't stop. I had to stop. It was so many.

• 6:10Speaker 01

  I mean, I think they could have just stopped with, we could end humanity and thus, you know, the capital markets are kind of a secondary concern. But the reason I have confidence in it is a little bit because of SpaceX, right? Now SpaceX comes out and you could argue it's this diversified business that has launch and has Starlink, but the, the valuation that SpaceX got, the money SpaceX got was really based on the AI compute piece of, piece of things. And, and the market was very happy to give that to them, even though they didn't really have a demonstrated business on AI compute. And Anthropic's a little bit different, right? It's buying the AI compute and, you know, more, but it's still, it's the same story in general and everybody is buying growth and Anthropic has shown it's got extraordinary growth.

• 6:48Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right. I want to talk to you now through, talk with you about the expenses here and the free cash flow side of things. So Rittenhouse Research pointed this out today. They say for the first six months of 2026, Anthropic generated positive free cash flow of 3.4 billion. So it's 3.9 billion of cash flow from operations, less 482 million of capex. So, you know, talk a little bit about Anthropic being cash flow positive and sort of, is all the compute, the money that they're spending on compute factored in that? Doesn't seem like it.

• 7:26Speaker 01

  No, it doesn't seem to. And, and the, and the compute spend is complicated when you go through the S1 a little bit because so much of what you have to think about as a prospective investor, if you care to really, you know, be doing this as a, as a traditional investment, not just a momentum play, is the contracts going forward, right? It's the compute spend that they have pledged over the next six months, year, two years. I think, I think that in the S1 goes out to the end of 2028, I think is maybe the longest. So it's a little hard to figure, figure that stuff out. So you've, you've got what they spent in the first six months, great. But that, with these companies, and when you look at the, the way the revenue is growing, the way the business is growing, the way the valuations are growing, I think the, the trailing indicators are almost become irrelevant, right? We're talking about through June 30th.

• 8:10Speaker 01

  Those numbers don't seem to me matter all that much. I mean, they matter, but they don't matter that much. The last three months is going to matter a lot more and then everybody will get new numbers, you know, we're, you know, we're already in Q4. This is, this industry is changing and more rapidly than any other industry we've ever seen, right? Usually, you know, you, you hope for small growth quarter after quarter, year over year. The year over year numbers are like, become irrelevant for a company like this. Like what, like what Anthropic did in 2025, honestly, who cares?

• 8:40Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right, but I mean, the growth, the growth is pretty crazy. But again, just to get back to this, because I feel like it's important to ask the critical questions about this, even though the numbers are big.

• 8:51Alex Kantrowitz?

  You know, if they have these massive compute outlays, you know, in the future. Again, like if you're an investor, how do you think about this, this company? I mean, clearly they're opening up a new category, but to me, like the, the sort of determination of how to, what box to put them in, how you think about it, when so much of the action is going to happen next year and the year after, and the year after that. And like you said, if they're going to move money to go invest in this company, how do you square that?

• 9:20Speaker 01

  I, I want to say it should be hard, except I don't think you're going to see any investors view it as hard, because I don't think, and this is kind of more pragmatic than balance sheet, right? I think most investors are going, most institutional investors, you know, have clients and, and clients are going to be outraged if they're not in the, not only just the hottest IPO, but one of the, you know, what's going to be one of the, you know, 10 most valuable companies in the world, most likely, when it goes public on day one. So I, I don't, I, I think that unless there is some flashing red light in there, there was something that people weren't expecting yesterday and they saw today. I don't think it's going to impact whether investors go into this and potentially leave other things. And I understand, you know, the market goes up, so you don't necessarily always have to rotate completely.

• 10:03Speaker 01

  But I, I just think everyone's going to still buy into this because everybody is buying a story more than anything else. And it's the same story, arguably, to some extent, they bought with SpaceX, and I think it's the same story they'll buy next year with OpenAI. And I, I think investors will look at this and say, all right, we're going to be wrong about one of these, but we need to take the basket because the basket as a whole is going to be extraordinary for us. And if one of the groceries falls to the floor and splats like a tomato, we'll take that hit. And it's too early to know which one that's going to be, and it's not going to be because of some of the numbers we're seeing today.

• 10:36Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, I mean, what is the story? You said it's the same story they're telling about all three. What would you say the story is?

• 10:41Speaker 01

  I think that, I think the story is, is that this is going, that Anthropic or OpenAI, or you know, pick, pick one of these companies is kind of going to become, you know, we talk about foundation models, I, but I think the story is, this is going to be the foundation for business and society going forward. Truly, truly foundational, much like, it's, it's complicated because people always talk about the internet and there's these, you know, the dot com boom and the question, are these really kind of the C-lex of the time, you know, the companies that were really putting fiber in the ground, which didn't work out very well for most people. It was stuff built on top of them. That's possible, but I think a difference here is that these companies themselves are actually building the, building a lot of applications, whereas the C-lex of the day and, and the fiber layers didn't build anything on top of it.

• 11:26Speaker 01

  They were just actually the utility. In this case, Anthropic is trying to be both, and so is OpenAI.

• 11:32Alex Kantrowitz?

  Right, I mean, the revenue growth itself is, is extraordinary. I mean, they went from 41 million in revenue three years ago to 16.3 billion in the first half of 2026.

• 11:44Speaker 01

  Correct, yeah.

• 11:45Alex Kantrowitz?

  That doesn't happen.

• 11:46Speaker 01

  It doesn't happen, and what's I think almost more remarkable is that it's only probably about maybe 18 months ago, that when I would speak to investors in OpenAI, they felt that this race, the frontier model race was already determined. They, they, they did not see, they knew Anthropic, but they didn't see it coming, because when you would talk to OpenAI investors about this, and I'd say, yeah, but doesn't Anthropic, you know, it's going to be kind of going after more of a B2B marketplace, you guys are more known, you know, for ChatGPT, and you know, my mom using it or me using it, you know, as a consumer. The answer would be, yeah, but owning the consumer is what matters. They, they would point to Google, right, you know, from years ago, owning the consumer is what matters. The B2B place is going to be small, and they misread that extraordinarily.

• 12:27Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, 6.6 million in revenue per employee. How does that rank with what you typically see technology companies IPOing with?

• 12:35Speaker 01

  I, I haven't done the math on it, except it's more, and by exponent, I mean, 6.6 million per employee, that, that's an insane number. It's just insane number, and it's even insane for Anthropic, right? I think last year, didn't they say it was like, the same number was 1.4? I'm saying this now off the top of my head, but it was something like that. It was in the ones. It's a crazy number.

• 12:54Alex Kantrowitz?

  1.4 million in September 2025.

• 12:57Speaker 01

  Yeah. Yeah, no, it, it's a ridiculous number, and it just shows how fast they are scaling on the top line.

• 13:06Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, and what's interesting also is that Claude Code and Claude Co-Work have been a big part of their ability to scale revenue, and I think that Claude Co-Work itself is actually growing faster than Code did.

• 13:19Speaker 01

  I think you're right about that. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think you're right about that.

• 13:24Speaker 01

  I mean, I, I think that you're going to, it will be interesting to watch with this company over the next, you know, several quarters, assuming they go public and we continue to get, you know, quarterly earnings from them as a regular public company. I think a lot of this stuff is going to keep flip flopping back and forth, just like we've seen flip flops back and forth between them and OpenAI when it comes to who's actually in the lead, either in terms of model performance or in terms of revenue. I think you're going to see the same thing internally at a company like Anthropic, you know, they spent an enormous amount of time, to me, in the S1, talking about biology and bio efforts, et cetera. Not that that's making them any money really yet, but you know, you almost read this and think, man, in three or four years, Dario kind of thinks that might be the core of their business in terms of where their money's coming from.

• 14:06Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, I mean, to me, the most interesting thing is, in the last version of this that we got, there was two customers making up 25% of their revenue. Here's the update today that I think was most newsworthy. No single customer represented more than 10% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30th, 2026. Approximately 79% of our revenue came from customers outside of our top five customers for the three months ended September 30th, 2026. I mean, that is, there's, there's a real diversification of revenue that they have going on there.

• 14:39Speaker 01

  Which they need, and that's, I mean, it's a very long tail, but I mean, which is what a company like that's going to need, right? If you want to be, you know, the foundation of business and of society, as I said, I mean, you need that, right? You need everybody using it, or at least close to everybody using it.

• 14:53Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yep, but they do have, they do have some concentration in, well, in the hyperscalers. I don't know what you'd make of this. 48% of total revenue comes from Anthropic, Google and Microsoft marketplaces. I guess that's still coming from a diverse base of customers, but it is interesting that they rely so heavily on the hyperscalers, two of the three of which have been, have invested in them.

• 15:14Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, I'm not terribly surprised by that, when you think about what, what the business is, but you're right, but what, the, the question becomes, and it's not really in there, but I don't even know how you do this, what are really the end users of that? As you say, you know, Amazon and Google marketplaces, okay, that's everyone, right? Essentially. And so, I mean, it's not surprising they're concentrated with the hyperscalers. Who else is going to sign giant contracts with them upfront and who's going to kind of go into them? But I, so it doesn't surprise me, but it's, again, so the, it, it is this broader diversification, though, of everything from consumers to the business use. And, and again, just to go back to the business use then, are the, you know, the B2B piece of this. They made a, they made a bet that most people weren't making, you know, a couple of years

• 15:56Speaker 01

  ago, to start there, or if not start there, to really hit there hard from a sales perspective. And it has paid, it has clearly paid off. And again, it's worth remembering, the decision to go public before OpenAI, or the decision to go public now and not push it into next year, was not a sure thing. There's all sorts of reasons. People for two months have been doing this, will they or won't they, should they or shouldn't they? Every time revenue comes out, obviously, when, when the safety stuff came out, the fact that they're going forward, I think, is, at least from their perspective, is a show of strength.

• 16:26Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, and I mean, one of the things that, you know, obviously you point to the revenue growth, which we've discussed, and then there's the compute efficiency, which is very interesting. This is a chart that came out in terms of the revenue per dollar of compute that they're making. In 2025 Q1, it was 40 cents per dollar, right? So they're losing money on every dollar of compute. Today, it is $2.02. That's wild, to be able to reverse that the way that they have. I mean, obviously, that's the Claude Code and Claude Co-Work effect.

• 16:57Speaker 01

  It is, it's also, it's interesting, you know, there's been so much talk, or a lot of talk, you know, with the data center build out and the enormous amount of money that's gone toward it and gone toward energy, towards data centers. You know, what if, what if all, you know, what if it becomes, what if data centers become just so much more efficient? Not, not incrementally, but become so much more efficient that we, or GPUs do, that we don't need all the stuff, or if the models do. And I, you know, for Anthropic, that's a big bull case for them going forward, right? That, that this is all going to become so much more efficient, which means that their spend is going to get to go way down, at least as a percentage, right? Obviously, their spend will continue to go up as more people use it, and there's more prompts, et cetera, et cetera. But if, if these models become much more efficient and, and, you know, don't need to use as much, that's their big problem, right?

• 17:42Speaker 01

  Is their spend side, it's not the revenue side, it's the spend side. The efficiency is kind of the ballgame for them, and if they can point to, to increased efficiency going forward, that, that's going to make these actually viable businesses, which right now they are still unprofitable. And again, Anthropic isn't just going public because it wants headlines. Anthropic is going public because it needs money.

• 18:03Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, although let me let me read you this from semi-analysis. I want to get your your reaction to this one in terms of cash on hand. Semi-analysis pointed this out. As of June 30th, 2026, we have raised an aggregate of 141 billion of capital and cash and cash equivalents of 112 billion in short-term investments. Oh, and had cash and cash equivalents of 112 billion and short-term investments of 19.3 billion. So that means what semi-analysis is reading there is that they've only burned 9.7 billion of that, and they also had a couple profitable quarters. What do you read on that on that front?

• 18:36Speaker 01

  I would have to look at those numbers, which I hadn't. Yeah.

• 18:39Alex Kantrowitz?

  So assuming that. Yeah, go ahead. They are committing the money.

• 18:43Speaker 01

  They are committing the money. They've well, they've got huge contracts, obviously, going forward, huge spend contracts going forward. That's interesting if they've got that much cash on hand because I but they are still on they might have had a couple profitable quarters in there. They are still unprofitable as a whole and are expecting to spend money. One thing that they're going to spend money on and they've started doing this, OpenAI has done it more than them, is probably going to be acquisitions, right? As I said, for a company like Anthropic to be more than the utility, they're going to have to build stuff on top of it, and they are. They're building a lot of stuff in-house. They're also going to buy a lot of that, and you could do that via stock. It's one of the good things about going public. You now have a public currency to trade. They're going to use a lot of cash to buy stuff, and they're going to need cash to buy stuff.

• 19:21Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, yeah, I just looked at the the S1. It looks like that matches up with what semi-analysis was going to say. Okay, one last thing here. It's the in the risk factors. The risk factors are very interesting. Way up top is the compute part of it. If we are unable to secure adequate compute, or if we fail to direct our compute effectively across our workloads, we may be unable to train models that remain competitive with those of our competitors or adequately serve our customers. You know, Dan, we've we've I think over the past week or so, just seen these up and downs with the Neo clouds and the market, you know, even questioning companies like Meta, it seems like, who've been, you know, eager to raise more money to build more compute. Just talk a little bit about

• 20:04Alex Kantrowitz?

  the about the the does the AI game just boil down to like, do investors trust you enough to buy the compute you need to survive?

• 20:12Speaker 01

  I think that's a piece of it. I think it's a good way to to sum it up. I have no concerns Anthropic is going to be able to buy the compute, right? Because, you know, for starters, it's one of the it's the biggest dog, one of the biggest dogs on the block. They are going to be at the front of the line. It's not going to be, you know, a new startup. It's going to be them, particularly if they go public and have all this extra cash on hand. But look, that I mean, it's not the most interesting risk factor in there. But no, I think it's probably the most practical risk factor in there.

• 20:36Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, I mean, the most interesting risk factor is like our product models can cause you harm, which they just you kind of knew that was going to be in there.

• 20:43Speaker 01

  Harm, it's end humanity. It's an existential threat to humanity. I mean, by the way, I love when you read it, and I'm going to paraphrase this, but it's kind of like, we, you know, that's that's a concern internally and externally. We could end humanity as we know it, which could impact our financial performance. Yeah, no shit. That that that could impact your financial performance.

• 21:02Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, yeah, I'll read it. Concerns have been raised both within our organization and by other researchers, regulators, policymakers, and industry participants that sufficiently advanced AI systems could, if not developed, deployed, and operated with appropriate safeguards, oversight, and security measures, pose catastrophic or existential risks to humanity, particularly if such systems were misused, replicated, weaponized, or allowed to operate with a high degree of autonomy. Dan, in the history of financial reporting, has there ever been a sentence like that in S1?

• 21:31Speaker 01

  No, because I don't think Oppenheimer went public. So, no, I don't know. We no, no, no, nothing like nothing like this. And there was a lot. I will say, there's been a lot of commentary over the last, what it's been, two months since the Cox and thing came out, about, well, you know, they're going to have to resolve this issue before they go.

• 21:48Alex Kantrowitz?

  Not possible.

• 21:49Speaker 01

  Well, whether possible or not, clearly not. They're not even really trying to. And that's not even a knock on them. I don't think they can. But no, they're this is going to be in there. And again, whether you invest in the IPO or whether you are invested in the IPO or not, is not going to impact the change the fact that Anthropic could or could not destroy the world, which will again render the rest of your portfolio meaningless.

• 22:11Alex Kantrowitz?

  How does how does Anthropic's performance here trickle to OpenAI?

• 22:17Speaker 01

  I mean, if at all. I mean, it will, right? Because it's the most direct comp. I mean, SpaceX is kind of a comp, and depending on how you want to suss out the meta piece of it. But I mean, this is the most direct one-to-one, right? These are essentially the same company. Again, SpaceX has Starlink, and it's got other launch, and it's got Elon. These are the most. So I think for for OpenAI, I think whatever Anthropic is trading at from even a multiples perspective, is going to impact what happens to OpenAI if and when it goes public, unless there's some major innovation or change in the interim between the two.

• 22:52Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay, you closed your newsletter with plenty of companies flip their S1s and then get cold feet. Anthropic can't afford to be one of them in terms of both its balance sheet and its reputation. Just elaborate on that.

• 23:04Speaker 01

  Balance sheet, I mean, despite the cash on hand, it needs money. And like, again, you see OpenAI out there right now, trying to raise $30 billion from the private markets because they both need money. They're they're cash hounds. And then from a reputation standpoint, this is just too big for them to not go, right? You know, this, if Anthropic weren't to go public outside of some, you know, catastrophic 9/11 hurricane sort of thing, you know, that everyone agrees has nothing to do with them. I think it would be a massive stain on them, and then there'd be questions of what can you ever go out? And I think I think it could start snowballing on itself. So I don't think they're going to let that happen. I think it is better for Anthropic to go public at a lower valuation or a lower price than what

• 23:47Speaker 01

  we're all expecting than to not go at all and to wait. I this isn't a company like Aura. I don't think they can afford to wait.

• 23:53Alex Kantrowitz?

  Okay.

• 23:54Speaker 01

  Now that they've started, they could have spawned, but now that they're we're here. Yeah.

• 23:59Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah. All right. Really, last one for you. We've seen an unprecedented run of fundraising from both OpenAI and Anthropic over the past, you know, two years. They're going to go public. They're going to get, you know, this initial the IPO, it's going to be out there. They'll obviously have the opportunity to do like, I guess, some more equity raises like Meta is doing right now. Eventually, Dan, does the, you know, they have to like make a profit and, you know, start start being able to fund, being self-sufficient and be able to fund these investments out of the money they're making? Or can this, you know, sort of treadmill go on forever?

• 24:36Speaker 01

  Eventually, they need to make a profit. I mean, the, you know, I think a little bit about Amazon with this, right? You know, it was unprofitable for so long, and Bezos was able to to talk the story about reinvesting. The difference, a difference, though, being the the quantum of capital weren't nearly as much, even when Amazon was growing, you know, by leaps and bounds. He what they weren't losing, or they weren't spending this kind of money. So yeah, do they eventually have to become profitable? Yeah, they have to prove that these can be viable businesses. I absolutely think so. I'll add one thing, you know, when you talk about the money and the money that these companies have raised historically, one thing that's interesting to me about the S1 is that none of that's really in there with a couple of small exceptions. It doesn't talk about it. And what it really so what that means is, for those of us who care about kind of the venture side of things

• 25:20Speaker 01

  and deals and the potentially kind of the virtuous flywheel this could create, right? Because funds get their money back and can raise more funds, and then can fund other startups. We don't. It's going to take a long time for us to actually figure out what venture firms have made on Anthropic despite the price. Like, you can look and be like, oh, well, you invested a $200 million valuation or $200 billion valuation. It's now worth $2 trillion. We don't know anything about preference stacks. We don't know. We don't know anything about conversions. We just don't have. None of that's in the S1. For a smaller offering, it would be. But one of the reasons it's not in the S1 is you can be a venture firm that's literally invested $1 billion into this one company, which is more than most VC firms had ever even raised total. And you're not mentioned in there. You're not even close. You could have done $5 billion. You're not in there because you're too small compared to the expected valuation. The only firm in there is Spark, and that's

• 26:05Speaker 01

  because they've got a board seat. So there's some related money transactions.

• 26:08Alex Kantrowitz?

  Yeah, no investor had more than 5% of the company.

• 26:12Speaker 01

  Which also, it's worth noting, despite, you know, that $100 billion plus invested in it, no investor has any actual real say. Again, you have one VC on the board who, in theory, could be voted down. She's one voice on the board. Nobody has any control, not even control, but really has any say over anything that happens at this company, which is probably the most valuable investment for most of them.

• 26:32Alex Kantrowitz?

  The website's Axios.com. Dan Primack is the business editor. You can find his Pro Rata newsletter. Highly recommend you subscribe. Dan, great to see you. Thank you for joining us.

• 26:41Speaker 01

  Thanks so much.

• 26:42Alex Kantrowitz?

  All right. Crazy times ahead. Thanks, everybody, for listening. We'll be back on Wednesday with another interview, this time with Ethan Malik from Wharton, talking about where the AI productivity is. And then Ranjan and I will be back on Friday. Thanks for listening, and we'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast.

• 27:01Speaker 02

  Hey, Bose here. When your next track starts, listen for the decisions that the artist makes. The vocal pushed right up front. The bass that waits half a beat. That sample from a 70s underground gem. Every choice deliberate. With Bose, you'll hear it all. Your music deserves Bose.

• 27:27Speaker 03

  Now at Kroger, your points add up to more ways to save every trip. Use them your way to take dollars off groceries at checkout or save at the pump. You can even save up to $35 on your next fill-up. Same points, more choices. And with low prices on fresh, quality food, plus digital and personalized offers tailored to how you shop, your dollar goes further. Redeem your points online or in the app. Kroger, fresh for everyone. Restrictions apply. See site or store for details.