FTC Chair Lina Khan: The Better Offline Interview

FTC Chair Lina Khan joins Ed Zitron to talk about competitiveness in the tech industry, controlling the cloud giants, and what should give you hope as we head into 2025. --- LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/ Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at https://discord.com/invite/QUUQUP9szv Ed's Socials: https://twitter.com/edzitron https://www.instagram.com/edzitron https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com https://www.threads.net/@edzitron See omnystudio.com/listener https://omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.

• 0:04Speaker 01

  Cash Flow Crunch. OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds, up to $200,000, right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 0:34Speaker 02

  Network freedom and flexibility. That's what you want in a healthcare plan. With a Humana Medicare Advantage PPO plan, you can see any doctor in the country who accepts Medicare, including specialists. No referrals. No kidding. Learn more at gethumana.com. See any doctor who accepts Medicare and is willing to bill Humana. Humana PPOs may not be available in all areas. Benefits and costs share may vary. Humana is a Medicare Advantage PPO organization with a Medicare contract. Enrollment in any Humana plan depends on contract renewal.

• 1:04Speaker 03

  In October 2021, my brother David was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. A year later, he convinced me to make a podcast with him. This podcast...

• 1:14Speaker 04

  My biggest fear is that I am afraid of being forgotten.

• 1:19Speaker 03

  My brother David is the story of the last chapter of my brother's life. It's weird, and messy, and vulnerable, and I'm gonna share all of it with you.

• 1:29Speaker 04

  Okay, so here we go.

• 1:30Speaker 03

  Listen to My Brother David on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

• 1:43Ed Zitron?

  Hello and welcome to Better Offline. I'm your host, Ed Zitron.

• 1:58Ed Zitron?

  Today I'm joined by the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission, Lina Khan. Lina, thank you so much for joining me.

• 2:03Speaker 06

  Great to be here.

• 2:04Ed Zitron?

  So, on a simple level, what does the FTC actually do?

• 2:08Speaker 06

  So the FTC enforces America's antitrust and consumer protection laws. And so these are the laws that try to ensure that our markets are fair and honest and competitive. And so that means we're looking to protect people from illegal monopolies. We're trying to protect people from all sorts of frauds and scams. We're trying to protect people's privacy and wanting to make sure that they're not subjected to all sorts of unfair practices. We were created 110 years ago, and so it's a pretty big mandate. We have oversight across markets, across the entire economy for the most part, with some exceptions, like in areas such as banks and airlines. So it's a really big job that this agency does, and it's been thrilling to get to do it.

• 2:54Ed Zitron?

  And it feels like you're a lot more aggressive than perhaps anti-monopoly and anti-consolidation has been in the past. What led to that?

• 3:02Speaker 06

  So, I came into this job wanting to make sure that we were, A, fully using the tools that Congress gave us. As I noted, this agency's been around for over a century. Our agency was given some pretty important authorities and tools, but over the decades, there had been a drift away from fully using all of the tools that we have, from fully embracing the law on the books. And so the first thing we did was kind of come in and just make sure that we are mapping out what are all the tools we actually have, and how do we make sure we're faithfully using those? The second thing that's been important is wanting to make sure that we're enforcing

• 3:43Speaker 06

  the law and taking action in response to how markets actually work today. And that meant making sure we were having top expertise internally. We started a new Bureau of Technologists that, you know, brought data scientists, data engineers, people who fully understand the ins and outs of how algorithms work. Previously, companies would view lawsuits as just a cost of doing business, and especially in digital markets where there's such a focus on chasing scale and chasing growth. You know, there was a bit of a ask for forgiveness later mentality, rather than everybody abiding by the law and making sure Americans were getting their rights on the front end.

• 4:25Ed Zitron?

  So how do you curtail that instinct where they have so much money that they can just kind of absorb the fee? Sorry, the fine, I mean.

• 4:35Speaker 06

  Yeah, it's a good question, and it's especially important because a few months before I came into this role, the courts had actually further limited the FTC's ability to get money. We mitigated that in a couple of ways. First, we used the tools we did have to their full extent to still get record-breaking sums. We also made sure we were looking at things like individual accountability. And so if a specific individual executive was involved in directing or participating in the lawbreaking, the lawsuit can be brought not just against the company, but also against the individual executive. And so we've done

• 5:15Speaker 06

  that in several instances where we had evidence that high-level execs knew what was going on, had the ability to stop it and didn't. And there's been a lot of empirical work that shows that actually holding individual executives accountable is really important for deterring lawbreaking in the first instance. So we've done that. We've also made sure that when companies, for example, have used illegal practices to hoard people's data, that they're having to actually get rid of that data or get rid of the models that were trained on the data. So we're actually getting remedies that make sense for today's markets.

• 5:57Ed Zitron?

  So you filed a case against Amazon. What is the case? What's going on over there? Because I know you have some history when at Yale Law School, you wrote that, the antitrust paradox, I believe. Like, what's the case against Amazon?

• 6:10Speaker 06

  So just to step back, we, what we see with digital platforms in particular is that there can be a life cycle, right? Initially, when a digital platform is entering the market, they're really focused on chasing scale and building up a large customer base on one side of the market, so then they can also attract a big customer base on the other end. And they want to basically achieve, you know, the flywheel of accelerated growth and momentum that especially in digital markets, once you've kind of hit that sweet spot of sufficient scale, there can be enormous acceleration. But what we've seen is that once firms achieve that accelerated growth, and if they're successful at knocking out

• 6:55Speaker 06

  their rivals, we can see a different phase kick in where the platform starts looking to milk the monopoly, right? And we can see that in a few ways. The company can start charging higher prices. Sometimes they can make service worse. Corey Doctorow has coined this term and shitification around just the degradation of the services that you see. And so the lawsuit that we've brought is about Amazon as it is in this second phase, where basically we allege they have hiked prices for both buyers on Amazon's platform as well as the small businesses that sell through its platform, where Amazon now collects

• 7:39Speaker 06

  one out of every $2.00. We also note that Amazon has kind of cluttered its search results page with irrelevant ads as a very deliberate strategy to be able to basically milk more ad revenue from the platform, even when it's not serving shoppers and serving consumers. And so we allege that Amazon's only been able to make things worse in this way for people because they've architected this anti-competitive scheme to block out rivals through illegal tactics. And so that's what the lawsuit is about. It's going to go to trial in a couple of years, and we brought it with a whole bunch of state attorneys general as well.

• 8:20Ed Zitron?

  Lovely. So. Some, one of the core thrusts you made in your paper, Amazon's antitrust paradox, is that they prioritized growth over being a profitable company. This feels like a problem across the tech firms, all of them, they all seem to be growth hungry. I feel, do you feel that this is anti-competitive at its core? Because growth doesn't seem to be about better, it just seems like more.

• 8:46Speaker 06

  Yeah, it's a really good question, and the antitrust laws in no way say that chasing scale or chasing growth is illegal, or even that being big is illegal. It really comes down to what are the mechanisms of chasing that growth, or the mechanisms of becoming big, right? And so in the same ways that we would recognize, hey, like, going across, you know, if you have a pizza shop that goes across the street and sets fire to its rival pizza shop, you know, that's not fair competition, that's an extreme example, but there are all sorts of other mechanisms that the laws say are not fair means of competing. And so that's what the law does, it tries to distinguish what is fair play versus not

• 9:31Speaker 06

  when you're looking to, you know, compete and grow and get big. And so chasing scale and chasing growth is not in any way by itself illegal, and instead is a really kind of, you know, core part of what incentivizes business is. What we have seen, though, is if law enforcers are not effective and are not timely, chasing growth can happen through playing fast and loose with the rules. Especially if companies know that, okay, sure, I might get hit with a lawsuit in five years, but guess what? I will have hit my targets by then, I'll be the biggest firm, I'll have achieved dominance, and so I can worry about that later.

• 10:12Speaker 06

  From a business perspective, it's actually better for the company to play fast and loose with the rules so that they get, gain that dominance and then deal with it later. That's really problematic as a mindset for law enforcement, and so that's something that we've been trying to figure out. How do we devise strategies to be much more assertive, be much more forward-leaning, be much more timely, so that we're not having to do that cleanup five years, 10 years after the fact?

• 10:37Ed Zitron?

  So what powers does the FTC have to actually tackle antitrust violators? And indeed, within those shortened time scales?

• 10:44Speaker 06

  So we oversee various facets of firms' behavior. One is if they are looking to merge or pursue an acquisition. If it's above, you know, $119 million, it gets reported both to the FTC and to the antitrust division, and we can figure out, is this an anti-competitive transaction? Is this basically going to reduce competition? And then we can also look at companies' business tactics, especially, you know, if they've become monopolies or are kind of using their dominance in illegal ways. And so we can bring lawsuits. We can also issue rules, and we've been very active in issuing rules, including in areas

• 11:26Speaker 06

  like fake reviews, you know, taking on things like government imposters. We just finalized a rule taking on junk fees in the economy. These, you know, hidden fees that companies just show at the very end that you don't know what you're exactly paying for, but suddenly the price of the ticket is almost doubled and you have no choice. And so we've issued a series of rules. We brought a series of lawsuits. We can also do various studies of the market, including in areas where things are moving very quickly. So we, a few months ago, launched a study into surveillance pricing. This idea that firms could be charging every single individual a standalone price based

• 12:10Speaker 06

  on the data they have on you. So these are just some of the tools and authorities we have.

• 12:23Speaker 07

  Empower is all about helping you invest well, so you can go out and live a little. And their Free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more. Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored. Cash Flow Crunch, OnDeck's small business line of credit, gives your business Immediate access to funds, up to $200,000, right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat.

• 13:07Speaker 07

  With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 13:27Ed Zitron?

  So let's talk artificial intelligence. From a regulatory perspective, what are your major concerns?

• 13:34Speaker 06

  So the biggest concern for me just right at the beginning was making sure we were making very, very clear to the market that there was no AI exemption from the laws on the books. And this can sound like a basic point, but it seemed incredibly important because we have seen, especially when new technologies come onto the market, we can see an effort by firms to say, okay, sure, you have these age-old laws on the books, but this new technology is different. And that means these laws don't apply, or they have to apply in dramatically different ways. And it's really important for enforcers to hear out those arguments, you know, make sure we understand how the technologies are working, but not get so dazzled by the novelty to say,

• 14:19Speaker 06

  okay, well, I guess we can totally abandon our core laws and suddenly we're saying, okay, fraud is illegal, but if you do fraud with AI, somehow that's okay, right? That's not a position we want to be in.

• 14:34Ed Zitron?

  And companies are making this argument, like that kind of argument they're attempting to sidestep. Not that specific one, but they're trying to dodge.

• 14:43Speaker 06

  Yeah, we do see arguments that, you know, the traditional laws around unfair practices or deceptive practices apply differently. The other big thing is, you know, America's been so fortunate to be such a key home of breakthrough innovations historically. And to my mind, a key ingredient of that has been making sure we have fair competitive markets, where you actually do have somebody with a great new idea, an upstart that's able to come in, that's able to fairly compete and knock out the incumbents. That's how historically we have gotten real major technological progress in our country.

• 15:24Speaker 06

  And what I wanted to make sure we were being very clear-eyed about is the risk of a few large dominant incumbents locking in the market in a way that shuts out a lot of that innovation and a lot of that next generation breakthrough that historically we've seen come purely from fair competition and open markets. So it was about wanting to make sure that companies are not using their existing heft to immediately lock up the market and shut out the innovation that we should be able to see.

• 16:00Ed Zitron?

  So with that in mind, are you worried about the consolidation we're seeing right now in the generative AI market? Because to build these models, the foundation models like Claude 3, or GPT, or Lama, or what have you, it requires financial heft. How do you avoid the monopoly that naturally comes out, the fact that you need billions and billions of dollars to even make one of these?

• 16:22Speaker 06

  Yeah, it's a key question. And one approach that we've taken is making sure that we are actually going layer by layer in the market, right? And so you want to understand, okay, what's happening with chips? What's happening with cloud and compute? What's happening with the models? You want to understand what are the key economic properties of each point in the stack? And then understand, okay, do we see this consolidation purely because there's such high fixed costs? And, you know, that's just going to be the state of the market? And how do we make sure that to the degree you do have dominant players in some of these

• 17:06Speaker 06

  layers, they're not using that dominance to then squelch out competition in a layer where you should actually be able to see more innovation, more competition? And so we're looking at, for example, some of the partnerships and investments between the big cloud providers and some of the newer firms. Famously, you know, the Microsoft OpenAI partnership, Amazon and Google have also made some investments. And we want to understand, you know, are these? Truly kind of independent companies, are these able to be independent firms in terms of the competitive decision making, some of the key strategic calls, when so much

• 17:48Speaker 06

  investment is being made, what is the structure of the contracts, what are some of the key requirements, are there kind of interlocking directorates here in ways that create conflicts that are problematic, are there contractual, you know, tying provisions here, so that's just the universe of what we're looking at, but of course, it's a fast moving market and we're very fortunate to have just top tier technological talent in-house to be letting us push forward here.

• 18:17Ed Zitron?

  So consolidation is a concern though in generative AI.

• 18:22Speaker 06

  It's certainly something we have to be vigilant about to make sure that, to the degree we do see, you know, monopolies or firms with enormous market power, we want to make sure, A, that that's not being achieved through illegal tactics, or that it's not being used illegally to snuff out competition somewhere else, so that's incredibly important.

• 18:45Ed Zitron?

  How about the training data situation, because that feels like a mixture of different parts of the government would be involved, but that also feels like a massive anti-competitive issue, is this something the FTC is looking into or would have to partner with other parts of the government potentially?

• 19:00Speaker 06

  So we are looking into it, actually, last year, we convened a roundtable with creators from all sorts of different sectors, so we had, you know, artists, authors, graphic designers, even people who work in fashion, sharing how their core creations had actually already been scraped in many instances, and suddenly they were waking up where their life's creation, having been ingested by this machine and spitting out outcomes that they had never consented to, and suddenly felt like they had no control over, and so that's something we've heard a lot about, interestingly, these creators, many of them were acknowledging that.

• 19:41Speaker 06

  These technologies could be quite fruitful for them as well. They're not kind of reflexively and viscerally anti-AI. It's really about wanting to make sure that the terms on which their creations are being used, that those are actually fairly negotiated and it's not some type of opt-out model after the fact that they actually should be able to consent, that they should actually be getting compensation that's, you know, can measure it with the value of what they're getting. So that's a lot of concerns we've heard. The FTC submitted a comment to the Copyright Office, which is considering some of these issues, kind of relaying what we had heard. And so it's certainly a live issue and to the extent

• 20:25Speaker 06

  the FTC can share expertise on it, we've been looking to do that.

• 20:29Ed Zitron?

  So generative AI is being crammed into every tech product. Do you see any potential for consumer harms from this happening?

• 20:38Speaker 06

  Well, generally, we've brought a set of lawsuits where that fall into a few categories. One of the big categories is around this idea of AI hype. So as more and more products are adopting generative AI services, they're making oftentimes commitments or promises about what these services can actually deliver. And sometimes we see that those claims are inflated. And so, you know, for example, the FTC a few months ago brought a whole sweep of enforcement actions against, for example, a company that was claiming to be the world's first robot lawyer, do not pay, but the product failed to live up to its

• 21:22Speaker 06

  claims that the service could substitute for the expertise of a human lawyer. Now, don't get me wrong, to the extent that these types of services and advances can bring things like way low cost, legal services to people, that's a great thing. But just we want to make sure companies are not inflating or hyping or falsely overstating what those services can actually do. So that's been a big strain of the cases that we've brought so far in this area.

• 21:52Ed Zitron?

  So do you see any anti-competitive issues in the cloud and the compute industry in general, even outside of AI? Because it really is just a few big players.

• 22:03Speaker 06

  It is, yeah, it is a relatively small number of firms. Um, the FTC did do a inquiry here. Uh, we got a lot of comments and some of the complaints that we heard about focused on things like, how easy is it to exit the cloud service and transfer your data elsewhere? And are you having to play, uh, pay these egress fees um, to the cloud providers in ways that inhibits, you know, switching? Um, we also heard just more generally about some of the software licensing practices, where some people suggested that some of the cloud providers

• 22:47Speaker 06

  limit their ability to use certain software in other cloud infrastructure provider environments. So that you can imagine could lead to lock-in. Or if one cloud provider is effectively degrading the ability to use other third-party softwares on that cloud, you could see some issues there. Um, and then we also heard some concerns that some provisions in cloud computing contracts could be incentivizing customers to consolidate their use of cloud services to just one provider that could further hasten consolidation. More generally, we looked at this not just from the competition lens, but also from a resiliency lens. I think we've all seen how when you have extreme centralization,

• 23:31Speaker 06

  that can also create a lot of fragility where you have a single point of failure, right? And we've seen how, uh, the single, you know, data service center somewhere goes out. Sometimes a corner of the internet also goes out. And so how do we make sure we're also thinking about the resiliency element here? Um, and then there are kind of similar data security concerns as well that we heard about.

• 24:05Speaker 07

  Empower is all about helping you invest well so you can go out and live a little. And their Free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more. Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored.

• 24:36Speaker 01

  OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 make it happen fast. Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of five-star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 25:08Ed Zitron?

  So, you've been, and I'm editorializing here, a tact I would describe some of the clammiest men alive. A lot of people in venture capital and within tech have come for you. How do you deal with that? How has that affected you?

• 25:23Speaker 06

  So, as a general matter, you know, I focus on making sure we're hearing from Americans across the country. And sometimes it's very easy in these jobs to actually become very insulated and only hear from the people who have access to power or kind of know, you know, where to be ranting in a way that it gets to public enforcers very easily. So it's really about just making sure that you're keeping good perspective, keeping a broad purview of who it is that we serve. So we've done listening sessions across the country, for example, going to places like Baraboo, Wisconsin, or Ames, Iowa, hearing from, you know, the gig drivers that use

• 26:08Speaker 06

  some of these ride-sharing platforms. To understand what are they seeing, what is their experience? Uh, we talked to a lot of farmers who are concerned about the ability to repair their own tractors and why there's been, you know, increasing friction there. And so keeping just a broader set of voices in mind as we're making our decisions, um, I think has been incredibly important to just keep a North Star that's properly focused on, you know, the public as a whole, rather than a handful of, uh, well-resourced, well-connected individuals that can sometimes have an outsized role in policy decisions.

• 26:48Ed Zitron?

  So what do you think, what are some of the big wins, what are the ones you're most proud of in your time?

• 26:55Speaker 06

  Well, we, uh, because of the FTC's work, uh, Americans saw the cost of inhalers go down from hundreds of dollars to just thirty-five dollars. Uh, in the digital space, you know, we've really helped set new rules of the road. I mean, one trend that we've seen is as more companies have become reliant on subs- uh, service-based revenues, they've introduced subscriptions and become much more reliant on subscription revenue. And so we firm, see firms make it very easy to sign up for a subscription, but then extraordinarily difficult to cancel. Uh, we brought a whole bunch of lawsuits, including against Amazon, including against Adobe, for their illegal subscription practices that were thwarting Americans

• 27:40Speaker 06

  from being able to cancel, uh, in ways that resulted in people, you know, overpaying, uh, for months and months. We had people tell us, "The only way I could cancel my subscription was to cancel my credit card." Right? I mean, just deeply anti-anti-consumer practices. We also finalized a rule that will go into effect next year, such that all companies would have to make it as easy to cancel a subscription as it is to sign up for one. We've also been very active in taking on data brokers. Um, you know, there's been a wild, wild west out there and how people's personal information is bought and sold. And we've brought a whole set of law enforcement actions when data brokers-

• 28:20Speaker 06

  Are illegally using or collecting people's health data, people's precise geolocation data, sensitive data like browsing data. Just to make clear that the default assumption is not that all of this sensitive data can be bought and sold, even if people have not affirmatively given permission. Um, we just brought the other week two cases against significant data brokers, uh, Mobo Wala and Gravy Analytics for some of their illegal practices involving geolocation data. The Mobo Wala case was especially interesting to my mind because it involved account about real time bidding data. And there's been all this research suggesting that the online auctions of real time bidding

• 29:04Speaker 06

  end up exposing people's sensitive data. And we brought a case noting that that exposure could be, um, you know, and and companies using the real time bidding data unlawfully is problematic. And so those have been, you know, some of the advances that we've made.

• 29:22Ed Zitron?

  So you were confirmed with broad bipartisan support. J D Vance spoke fondly of you. Do you have hope that your kind of your legacy continues in some level?

• 29:33Speaker 06

  Well, I can't predict what the future holds. I do know that there has been strong bipartisan support for taking on unchecked private power. Um, that's true in technology markets. That's been especially true when it involves people's privacy, uh, when it involves kids' privacy. Um, I think we've seen, you know, people recognize that if you're freaked out by unlawful surveillance when the government does it, you should also be freaked out by surveillance when private companies do it because the, you know, the line there can be quite porous. And so I do think there are a set of areas where there is strong bipartisan concern and commitment to taking on corporate law breaking. And so I hope that will continue.

• 30:19Ed Zitron?

  All right, one last question. So right now, I would describe the mood as not great out. I think the people are feeling a little dark, feels like the ultra wealthy are kind of gaining speed and seeping into the government. What would you tell people to give them hope?

• 30:32Speaker 06

  Oof, that's a, that's a tough one. I mean, you know, I, I'm a patriot, you know, I, I really believe in America. I think there have been moments before where the path ahead was not clear. Um, and one approach that I've taken to this job is there are no inevitable outcomes, right? Be it in terms of how our markets evolve, be it in terms of what our government does or doesn't do, and how people in positions like at the FTC act have huge consequences for, you know, whether you have markets that are premised on on track surveillance, or whether you can imagine people's data and privacy being protected, right? There can

• 31:14Speaker 06

  sometimes be an effort to say, well, there's just this inevitable march of technological progress, uh, where outcomes are sort of already baked. And, and I don't believe that. I think how we use our laws, how we use our policies is incredibly important. Um, a priority for me at the FTC has been to engage with the public, and that's partly so that we hear from them, partly so that we share with them what we're doing. But it's also to make sure that people know that they can hold future people at the FTC accountable as well for what decisions are not being made. So I think we've seen, um, you know, that having a strong government that's focused on protecting people is important and, and people should be expecting that.

• 31:58Ed Zitron?

  Lena, thank you so much for joining me. It's been such a pleasure to have you. Um, thank you for doing this.

• 32:04Speaker 06

  Thanks so much.

• 32:06Ed Zitron?

  You've been listening to Better Offline, nearly forgot to name my own podcast there, Lina Khan, Chair of the FTC. Thank you so much for listening, everyone.

• 32:21Ed Zitron?

  Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matt Osowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at mattosowski.com. M A T T O S O W S K I dot com. You can email me at [email protected] or visit betteroffline.com to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat.wesyoured.app to visit the Discord and go to r/betteroffline to check out our Reddit. Thank you so much for listening.

• 32:53Speaker 07

  Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

• 33:26Speaker 07

  Empower is all about helping you invest well, so you can go out and live a little. And their Free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more. Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com, not an Empower client paid or sponsored. Wait, I came in for two things.

• 34:01Speaker 02

  How is this forty-seven dollars? All right, we're gonna need a plan here.

• 34:06Speaker 00

  Just start simple with Bank of America Advantage Safe Balance Banking. No overdraft item fees, no monthly maintenance fee if you're under twenty-five. Oh, that's actually really simple. Safe Balance Banking, one less thing to figure out.

• 34:21Speaker 01

  Learn more at BofA.com/simplebanking. Terms and conditions apply. Bank of America and a member FDIC. Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds, up to $200,000, right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 34:57Speaker 00

  This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.