CZM Rewind: The Man That Destroyed Google Search

In this episode, Ed Zitron tells you the disgraceful story of how Prabhakar Raghavan, Google's former head of ads - led a coup so that he could run Google Search, and how an email chain from 2019 began a cascade of events that would lead to the outright decay of the most important website on the internet. Original Air Date: 4.25.24 --- LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/ Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at https://discord.com/invite/QUUQUP9szv Ed's Socials: https://twitter.com/edzitron https://www.instagram.com/edzitron https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com https://www.threads.net/@edzitron See omnystudio.com/listener https://omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.

• 0:04Speaker 01

  OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 make it happen fast. Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of five-star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 0:32Speaker 02

  Empower is all about helping you invest well, so you can go out and live a little. And their Free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more. Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored.

• 1:08Ed Zitron?

  Hi, Better Offline fans. It's me, your host, Ed Zitron. Now, here in America, it's Thanksgiving, so we're all given the week off. Robert and Sophie have told me I'm not allowed to podcast, and if they find out, they're going to, once again, put me in the carnival prison, and, once again, I was sent a low-quality JPG of a gun by Robert. Unclear what it means. Nevertheless, this is one of my favorite episodes I've ever recorded. It's about a real shithead who destroyed a product I love, you love, and we both are doomed to use every day. Now, if you're not in America, and this is a big problem, I don't know what to tell you. The podcast doesn't cost you any money, unless, of course, you pay $5 a month for our Cooler Zone Media, in which case, I apologize deeply.

• 1:50Ed Zitron?

  I will be sleeping not at all this week as penance for what I've done to you. For the rest of you in America, no penance necessary. Please enjoy this episode.

• 2:03Ed Zitron?

  Hello and welcome to Better Offline. I'm your host, Ed Zitron.

• 2:17Ed Zitron?

  And in the next two episodes, I'm gonna tell you the names of some of the people responsible for destroying the internet. And I'm gonna start on February 5th, 2019, when Ben Gomes, Google's former head of search, well, he had a problem. Jerry Dishler, then the VP and GM of Ads at Google, and Shiv Venkateraman, then the VP of Engineering, Search and Ads on Google Properties, had called something called a "code yellow for search revenue due to," and I quote emails that came out as part of Google's antitrust hearing, "steady weakness in the daily numbers and a likeliness that it would end the quarter significantly behind in metrics that..." Kind of unclear. For those unfamiliar with Google's internal kind of Scientology-esque jargon, which

• 3:00Ed Zitron?

  means "most people," let me explain. A code yellow isn't a terrible need to piss or some sort of crisis of moderate severity. The yellow, according to Steven Levy's tell-all book about Google, refers to, and I promise this is not a joke, the color of a tank top that a former VP of Engineering called Wayne Rosling used to wear during his time at the company. It's essentially the equivalent of DEFCON 1, and activates, as Levy explained, "a war room-like situation where workers are pulled from their desks and into a conference room where they tackle the problem as a top priority. Any other projects or concerns are sidelined." And independently, I've heard there are other colors, like purple. I'm not gonna get into that, though, it's quite boring and irrelevant to this situation.

• 3:45Ed Zitron?

  In emails released as part of the Department of Justice's antitrust case against Google, as I previously mentioned, Dishler laid out several contributing factors. Search query growth was significantly behind forecast, the timing of revenue launches was significantly behind, and he had this vague worry that several advertiser-specific and sector weaknesses existed in search. Now, I wanna cover something, because I've messed up, and I really wanna be clear about this. I've previously and erroneously referred to the code yellow as something that Gomes raised as a means of calling attention to the proximity of Google's ad side getting a little too close to search. I'm afraid the truth is extremely depressing and so much grimmer. The code yellow was actually the rumble of the goddamn rot economy,

• 4:28Ed Zitron?

  with Google's revenue arms sounding the alarm that its golden goose wasn't laying enough eggs. Gomes, a Googler of 19 years that basically built the foundation of modern search engines, should go down as one of the few people in tech that actually fought for an actual principle, and he was destroyed by a guy called Prabakar Ragavan, a computer scientist class traitor that sided with the management consultancy sect. More confusingly, one of their problems was that there was insufficient growth in queries, as in the amount of things that people were asking Google. It's a bit like if Ford decided that things were going poorly because their drivers weren't putting enough goddamn miles on their trucks. This whole story has personally upset me, and I think you're going to hear that in this,

• 5:13Ed Zitron?

  but going through these emails is just very depressing. Anyway, a few days beforehand on February 1st, 2019, Kristin Gill, then Google's VP Business Finance Officer, had emailed Shashi Thakur, then Google's VP of Engineering, Search and Discover, saying that the Ads team had been considering a code yellow to close the search gap it was seeing. Vaguely referring to how critical that growth was to an unnamed company plan. To be clear, this email was in response to Thakur stating that there is nothing that the search team could do to operate at the fidelity of growth that the Ads Department had demanded. Shashi forwarded the email to Gomes, asking if there's any way to discuss this with Sundar Pashay,

• 5:58Ed Zitron?

  Google's CEO, and declared that there was no way he would sign up for a high-fidelity business metric for daily active users on search. Thakur also said something that I've been thinking about constantly since I read these emails: that there was a good reason that Google's founders separated search from ads. I want you to remember that line for later. A day later, on February 2nd, 2019, Thacker and Gomes shared their anxieties with Nick Fox, a vice president of Search and Google Assistant, entering a multiple-day-long debate about Google's sudden lust for growth. This thread is a dark window into the world of growth-focused tech, where Thacker listed the multiple points of disconnection between ads and search, discussing how the search

• 6:42Ed Zitron?

  team wasn't able to finally optimize engagement on Google without hacking it, a term that means effectively tricking users into spending more time on a site, and that doing so would lead them to, and I quote, "abandon work on efficient journeys." In one email, Fox adds that there was a pretty big disconnect between what Finance and Ads wants and what Search was doing. Every part of this story pisses me off so much. When Gomes pushed back on the multiple requests for growth, Fox added that all three of them were responsible for Search and that Search was, and again I quote, "the revenue engine of the company," and that bartering with the Ads and Finance teams was now potentially the new reality of their jobs.

• 7:26Ed Zitron?

  On February 6th, 2019, Gomes said that he believed that Search was getting too close to the money, and ended his email by saying that he was concerned that growth is all that Google was thinking about. On March 22nd, 2019, Google VP of Product Management Darshan Kantak would declare the end of the Code Yellow. The thread mostly consisted of congratulatory emails until Gomes made the mistake of responding, congratulating everyone, saying that the plans architected as part of the Code Yellow would do well throughout the year. Enter Prabhakar Ragavan, then-Google's head of Ads and the true mastermind behind the Code Yellow, who would respond curtly, saying that the current revenue targets were addressed

• 8:08Ed Zitron?

  by heroic RPM engineering and that the core query softness continued without mitigation, a very clunky way of saying that despite these changes, query growth was not happening at the rate he needed it to. A day later, Gomes emailed Fox and Thacker an email he intended to send to Ragavan. He led by saying that he was annoyed both personally and on behalf of the search team. In this very long email, he explained in arduous detail how one might increase engagement with Google Search, but specifically added that they could increase queries quite easily in the short term, but only in user-negative ways, like turning off spell correction or ranking improvements, or placing refinements, effectively labels, all over the page, adding

• 8:52Ed Zitron?

  that it was possible that there are trade-offs here between the different kinds of user negativity caused by engagement hacking, and that he was deeply, deeply uncomfortable with this. He also added that this was the reason he didn't believe that queries, as in the amount of the things with people searching on Google, were a good metric to measure search, and that the best defence against the weaknesses of queries was to create compelling user experiences that make users want to come back. Crazy idea there, what if the product was good? Not good enough for ProBarker. So, little bit of history about Google here. They regularly throughout the year do core updates to search. These are updates that change their algorithm, that say, "Okay, we're going to suppress this kind of thing, we're going to elevate this kind of thing."

• 9:37Ed Zitron?

  And they are actually the reason that search changes. It's why certain sites suddenly disappear or reappear, it's why sites get a ton of traffic, some don't get any, and so on and so forth, but they do a lot of them.

• 9:51Ed Zitron?

  The one that's really interesting, I'm a little bastard and I went and looked through pretty much the last decade of these, the one that stood out to me was the March 2019 core update to search, which happened about a week before the end of the Code Yellow, meaning that it's very likely that this was a result of ProBarker's bullshit. So this was expected to be one of the largest updates to search in a very long time, and I'm quoting Search Engine Journal there. Yet when it launched, many found that the update mostly rolled back changes, and traffic was increasing to sites that had been suppressed by previous updates like Google Search's Penguin update from 2012 that specifically targeted spammy search results.

• 10:31Ed Zitron?

  There were others that were seeing traffic as well from an update that happened on the 1st of August 2018. That was a few months after Gomes became Head of Search. While I'm guessing here, I really don't know. I do not work for Google. I do not have friends there. I think the timing of the March 2019 core update, along with the traffic increases to previously suppressed sites that 100% were spammy, SEO nonsense, I think these suggest that Google's response to the code yellow was to roll back changes that were made to maintain the quality of search.

• 11:04Ed Zitron?

  A few months later in May 2019, Google would roll out a redesign of how ads were shown on Google Search, specifically on mobile, replacing the bright green "Ad" label and URL color on ads with a tiny little bolded black note that said "Ad" in the smallest font you could possibly put there, with the link looking otherwise identical to a regular search link. I guess that's how they managed to start hitting their numbers, huh? And then in January 2020, Google would bring this change to desktop, and the verges John Porter would suggest that it made Google's ads look just like search results now. Awesome!

• 11:41Ed Zitron?

  Five months later, a little over a year after the code yellow situation, Google would make Prabha Karthiwaran the Head of Google Search, with Jerry Dishler taking his place as the Head of Ads. After nearly 20 years of building Google Search, Gomes would be relegated to the SVP of Education at Google. Gomes, who was a critical part of the original team that made Google Search work, who has been credited with establishing the culture of the world's largest and most important search engine, was chased out by a growth-hungry managerial type. Several of them, actually, led by Prabha Karthiwaran, a management consultant wearing an engineer costume. As a side note, by the way, I use the term "management consultant" there as a pejorative.

• 12:25Ed Zitron?

  While he exhibits all the same bean-counting morally unguided behaviours of a management consultant, from what I can tell, Raghavan has never actually worked in that particular sector of the economy. But you know who has? Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google, who previously worked at McKinsey, arguably the most morally abhorrent company that's ever existed, having played roles both in the 2008 financial crisis, where it encouraged banks to load up on debt and flawed mortgage-backed securities, and the ongoing opioid crisis, where it effectively advised Purdue Pharma on how to growth-hack sales of OxyContin, an extremely addictive painkiller.

• 13:01Ed Zitron?

  McKinsey has paid nearly $1 billion over several settlements due to its work with Purdue. But I'm getting sidetracked. But one last point. McKinsey is actively anti-labor. When a company brings in a McKinsey consultant, they're often there to advise on how to cut costs, which inevitably means layoffs and outsourcing. McKinsey is to the middle class what flesh-eating bacteria is to your skin.

• 13:31Speaker 02

  Cash flow crunch? OnDeck's small business line of credit gives your business immediate access to funds, up to $200,000, right when you need it. Cover seasonal dips, manage payroll, restock inventory, or tackle unexpected expenses without missing a beat. With flexible draws, transparent pricing, and control over repayment, get funded quickly and confidently. Apply today at ondeck.com. Funds could be available as soon as tomorrow. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval. Empower is all about helping you invest well, so you can go out and live a little. And their free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more.

• 14:16Speaker 02

  Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored. Sponsored by GSK, the makers of Extenture, Depamocumab ULAA. If your asthma keeps interrupting,

• 14:41Speaker 02

  it may be time to try something else. Extenture is an ultra-long-acting prescription maintenance treatment for severe asthma, eosinophilic type, ages 12 and older. It isn't for sudden breathing problems. Extenture is the first and only add-on treatment that can help deliver protection from asthma attacks with two doses a year. Just one dose, every six months. That's a lot of time for everything in between. Serious allergic reactions can occur. Get help right away for swelling of face, mouth, tongue, or trouble breathing. Don't change Or stop medicines, including steroids, unless told by your doctor. Report if you have a parasitic infection. Common cold, sinus infection, inflammation in the nose, flu or fluke-like symptoms, joint pain or sore throat may occur.

• 15:23Speaker 02

  Carry on with fewer attacks and ask your doctor about Extensura. Learn more at Extensura.com or call 1-833-393-3678.

• 15:35Speaker 04

  The world is transforming faster than ever and standing still isn't an option. At Oppenheimer, we're working at the forefront of the innovation economy to invest where progress begins, finding opportunities that build and protect wealth for individuals and institutions that want a seat at the edge of tomorrow. Put the power of Oppenheimer Thinking to work for you. Wealth Management, Capital Markets, Investment Banking.

• 16:07Ed Zitron?

  But back to the emails, which are a stark example of the monstrous, disgusting rot economy, the growth-at-all-costs mindset that's dominating the tech ecosystem. And if you take one thing away from this episode, I want it to be the name Prabha Karagavan and an understanding that there are people responsible for the current state of the internet. These emails, which I really encourage you to look up, and if you go to wheresureed.at, you'll be able to see a newsletter that has links to them. Well, these emails tell a dramatic story about how Google's finance and advertising teams, led by Raghavan with the blessing of CEO Sundar Pichai, the McKinsey guy, actively worked to make Google worse to make the company more money.

• 16:50Ed Zitron?

  This is exactly what I mean when I talk about the rot economy, an illogical, product-destroying mindset that turns products you love into torturous, frustrating quasi-tools that require you to fight the company to get the thing you want. Ben Goems was instrumental in making search work, both as a product and a business. He joined the company in 1999, a time long before Google established dominance in the field, and the same year when Larry Page and Sergey Brin tried to sell the company to Excite for $1 million, only to walk away after Vinnit Kostla, an Excite investor and co-founder of some microsystems that's now a VC who tried to stop people going to a beach in Hoffman Bay, well, he tried to lowball them with a $750,000 offer, also known as

• 17:35Ed Zitron?

  a 100-square-foot apartment in San Francisco. In an interview with Fast Company's Harry McCracken from 2018, Gomes phrased Google's challenge as taking the PageRank algorithm from one machine to a whole bunch of machines, and they weren't very good machines at the time. Despite his impact in tenure, Gomes had only been made Head of Search in the middle of 2018, after John Guian Derea moved to Apple to work on its machine learning and AI strategy. Gomes had been described as Google's search czar, beloved for his ability to communicate across Google's many quite decentralised departments. Every single article I've read about Gomes and his tenure at Google spoke of a man deeply

• 18:17Ed Zitron?

  ingrained in the foundation of one of the most important technologies ever made, a man who had dedicated decades to maintaining a product with a, and I quote Gomes here, "guiding light of serving the user and using technology to do that." And when finally given the keys to the kingdom, the ability to elevate Google's search even further, he was rat-fucked by a series of rotten careerists trying to please Wall Street, led by Prabha Karagavan. Do you want to know what Prabha Karagavan's old job was? Well, Prabha Karagavan, the new head of Google Search, the guy that ran Google Search, that runs Google Search right now, that is running Google Search into the goddamn ground, do you want to know what his job was? His job before Google?

• 18:58Ed Zitron?

  He was the head of search for goddamn Yahoo from 2005 through 2012. When he joined the company, when Prabha Karagavan took over Yahoo Search, they held a 30.4% market share, not far from Google's own 36.9%, and miles ahead of the 15.7% that Microsoft's MSN search had. By May 2012, Yahoo was down to just 13.4% and had shrunk for the previous nine consecutive months, and was being beaten by even the newly released Bing. That same year, Yahoo had the largest layoffs in its corporate history shedding 2,000 employees, or 14% of its overall workforce. The man who deposed Ben Gomes,

• 19:44Ed Zitron?

  someone who worked on Google Search from its very beginnings, was so shit at his job that in 2009 Yahoo effectively threw in the towel on its own search tech, instead choosing to license Bing's engine in a 10-year deal. If we take a long view of things, this likely precipitated the overall decline of the company, which went from being worth $125 billion at the peak of the dot-com boom to being sold to Verizon for $4.8 billion in 2017, which is roughly a 3,000-square-foot apartment in San Francisco. With search no longer a priority and making less money for the company, Yahoo decided to pivot into Web 2.0 and original content, making some bets that paid off, but far, far too many that did not.

• 20:28Ed Zitron?

  It spent $1.1 billion on Tumblr in 2013, only for Verizon to sell it for just $3 million in 2019. It bought Zimbra in 2007 ostensibly to compete with the new Google Apps productivity suite, only to sell it for a reported fraction of the original purchase price to VMware a few years later. That's not his fault. But nevertheless, Yahoo was a company without a mission, a purpose, or an objective. Nobody, and I'll speculate, even those leading the company, really knew what it was or what it did. Anyway, just a big shout-out right now to Kara Swisher, who referred to Prabha Ka as "well-respected" when he moved from Yahoo to Google. You absolutely nailed it, Kara. Bang-up job.

• 21:11Ed Zitron?

  In an interview with ZDNet's Dan Farber from 2005, Raghavan spoke of his intent to align the commercial incentives of a billion content providers with social good intent while at Yahoo, and his eagerness to inspire the audience to give more data. What? Anyway, before that, it's actually hard to find out exactly what Raghavan did. Though according to ZDNet, he spent 14 years doing search and data mining research at IBM. Hmm.

• 21:40Ed Zitron?

  In April 2011, The Guardian ran an interview with Raghavan that called him Yahoo's secret weapon, describing his plan to make rigorous scientific research and practice to inform Yahoo's business from email to advertising, and how, under then-CEO Carol Barts, the focus had shifted to the direct development of new products. It speaks of Raghavan's scientific approach and his steady, process-based logic to innovation that is very different to the common perception that ideas and development are more about luck and spontaneity. A sentence that I'm only reading to you because I really need you to hear how stupid it sounds, and how specious some of the tech press used to be. Frankly, this entire article is ridiculous, so utterly vacuous that I'm actually astonished.

• 22:24Ed Zitron?

  I don't want to name the reporter, I feel bad. What about Raghavan's career made this feel right? How has nobody connected these dots before? I have a day job, I run a PR firm, I am a blogger with a podcast. And I'm the one who said, "Yeah, okay, Dracula is now the CEO of the blood bank." Nobody saw this? Nobody saw this at the time? I just feel a bit crazy. I feel a bit crazy. But, to be clear, this was something written several years after Yahoo had licensed its search technology to Microsoft, in a financial deal that the next CEO, Marissa Mayer, who replaced Barts, was still angry about for years.

• 23:04Ed Zitron?

  Raghavan's reign as what ZDNet referred to as "the search master" was one so successful that it ended up being replaced by a search engine that not a single person in the world enjoys saying out loud. The Guardian article ran exactly one year before dramatic layoffs at Yahoo that involved firing entire divisions' worth of people, and four months before Carol Barts would be fired by telephone by then-chairman Roy Bostock. Her replacement, Scott Thompson, who previously served as president of PayPal, would last a whole five months in the role before he was replaced by former Google executive Marissa Mayer, in part because it emerged he lied on his resume about having a computer science degree. Hey, Robocar, did you not notice? Anyway, whatever.

• 23:59Speaker 01

  OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 make it happen fast. Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of five-star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans in amounts subject to lender approval.

• 24:27Speaker 02

  Empower is all about helping you invest well, so you can go out and live a little. And their free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more. Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com. Not an Empower client paid or sponsored. Sponsored by GSK, the makers of Extenture, Depamocumab ULAA. If your asthma keeps interrupting, it may be time to try something else.

• 25:09Speaker 02

  Extenture is an ultra-long-acting prescription maintenance treatment for severe asthma, eosinophilic type, ages 12 and older. It isn't for sudden breathing problems. Extenture is the first and only add-on treatment that can help deliver protection from asthma attacks with two doses a year. Just one dose every six months. That's a lot of time for everything in between. Serious allergic reactions can occur. Get help right away for swelling of face, mouth, tongue, or trouble breathing. Don't change or stop medicines, including steroids, unless told by your doctor. Report if you have a parasitic infection, common cold, sinus infection, inflammation in the nose, flu or flulike symptoms, joint pain or sore throat may occur. Carry on with fewer attacks.

• 25:51Speaker 05

  And ask your doctor about Extensure. Learn more at Extensure.com or call 1-833-393-3678.

• 26:00Speaker 06

  Financial growth begins long before the first investment. It comes from understanding what you're building toward, what's at stake and what success looks like for you. At Oppenheimer, we bring bold thinking guided by the full strength of our expertise to put capital to work building and protecting wealth that lasts generations. Put the power of Oppenheimer thinking to work for you. Wealth management, capital markets, investment banking.

• 26:33Ed Zitron?

  Bartz joined Yahoo in 2009, so about four years into Pravakar's brain of terror, I guess.

• 26:41Ed Zitron?

  And she joined in the aftermath of its previous CEO, Jerry Yang, refusing to sell the company to Microsoft for $45 billion. In her first year, she laid off hundreds of people and struck a deal that I've mentioned before to power Yahoo's search using Microsoft's Bing search engine tech. With Microsoft paying Yahoo 88% of the revenue it gained from searches, a deal that made Yahoo a couple hundred million dollars for handing over the keys and the tech to its most high-traffic platform. As I previously stated, when Pravakar Raghavan, Yahoo's secret weapon, was doing his work, Yahoo's search was so valuable that it was replaced by Bing. Its sole value, in fact, I mean, maybe I'm being a little unfair, but there's a way of looking at this. You could say that Yahoo's entire value at the end of his career

• 27:26Ed Zitron?

  was driven by nostalgia and association with days before he worked there. Anyway, thanks to the state of modern search, it's actually very, very difficult to find much about Raghavan's history. It took me hours of digging through Google and at one point Bing, embarrassingly. To find three or four articles that went into any depth about him. But from what I've gleaned, his expertise lies primarily in failing upwards, ascending through the ranks of technology on the momentum from the explosions he's caused. In a Wired interview from 2021, Gladhandler Steven Levy said Raghavan isn't the CEO of Google, he just runs the place, and described his addition to the company as a move from research to management. While Levy calls him a world-class computer scientist who has authored definitive texts in the field,

• 28:10Ed Zitron?

  which is true, he also describes Raghavan as choosing a management track, which definitely tracks with everything I found out about him. Raghavan proudly declares that Google's third-party ad tech plays a critical role in keeping journalism alive in a really shitty answer to a question that was also made at a time when he was aggressively incentivizing search engine-optimized content, and a year after he deposed someone who actually gave a shit about search. Under Raghavan, Google's become less reliable and is dominated by search engine optimization and just outright spam. And I've said this before, but, look, we complain about the state of Twitter under Elon Musk, and justifiably, he's a vile anti-Semi racist bigot.

• 28:52Ed Zitron?

  We all know this, it's fully true, we can say it a million times. However, I'd argue that Raghavan, by extension Sundar Peshar, deserve 100 times more criticism. They've done unfathomable damage to society. You really can't fix the damage they've been doing and the damage they'll continue to do, especially as we go into an election. Raghavan and his cronies worked to oust Ben Gomes, a man who dedicated a good portion of his life to making the world's information more accessible, in the process burning the Library of Alexandria to the goddamn ground so that Sundar Peshar could make more than $200 million a year. And Raghavan, a manager hired by Sundar Peshar, a former McKinsey man,

• 29:36Ed Zitron?

  the king of managers, is an example of everything wrong with the tech industry. Despite his history as a true computer scientist with actual academic credentials, Raghavan chose to bulldoze actual workers, people who did things and people that care about technology, and replace them with horrifying toadies that would make Google more profitable and less useful.

• 30:00Ed Zitron?

  Since Propacar took the reins of Google in 2020, Google Search has dramatically declined. With these core search updates I mentioned allegedly made to improve the quality of results, having the adverse effect, increasing the prevalence of spammy shitty search optimized content. It's frustrating. The anger you hear in my voice, the emotion, is because I've read all of these antitrust emails. I have gone through this guy's history, and I've read all the things about Ben Gomes too. Every article about Ben Gomes where they interviewed is this guy just having these dreamy thoughts about the future of information and the complexity of delivering it at high speed. Every interview with Ragavan is some vague bullshit about how important data is. It's so goddamn offensive to me.

• 30:45Ed Zitron?

  And all of this stuff happening is just one example of what I think are probably hundreds of things happening across startups, or that have happened across startups in the last 10 or 15 years, and big tech too. And it's because the people running the tech industry are no longer those who built it. Larry Page and Sergey Brin left Google in December 2019, the same year by the way as the Code Yellow thing. And while they remained as controlling shareholders, they clearly don't give a shit about what Google means anymore. Propacar Ragavan is a manager, and his career from what I can tell is mostly made up of did some stuff at IBM, failed to make Yahoo anything of no, and fucked up Google so badly that every news outlet has run a story about how bad it is.

• 31:27Ed Zitron?

  This, this is the result of taking technology out of the hands of real builders and handing it to managers at a time when management is synonymous with staying as far away from actual work as possible. When you're a do-nothing looking to profit as much as possible, who doesn't use tech, who doesn't care about tech, and you only care about growth, well, you're not a user, you're a parasite, and it's these parasites that have dominated and are now draining the tech industry of its value. They're driving it into a goddamn ditch. Raghavan's story is unique, insofar as the damage he's managed to inflict, or if we're being exceptionally charitable, failed to avoid in the case of Yahoo.

• 32:08Ed Zitron?

  On two industry-defining companies, and the fact that he did it without being a CEO or founder is remarkable. Yet, he's far from the only example of a manager falling upwards. I'm going to editorialize a bit here. I want you to think about your job history. I want you to think about the managers you've had. I've written a lot about management and specifically to do with remote work and the whole thing around guys who don't do work, who are barely in the office, telling you you need to be in the office. This problem is everywhere. Managers are everywhere and managers aren't doing work. I'm sure someone will email me now and say, well, I'm a manager and I'll do work all the time. Yeah, mate, sure you do.

• 32:51Ed Zitron?

  That's why you're emailing me, telling me how good you are at your job. People who actually do work don't feel defensive about it. People who do things and are part of the actual profit center, they don't need a podcast to tell them they're good at their job. What I think the problem is in modern American corporate society is that management is no longer synonymous with actually managing people. It's not about getting the people what they need. It's not about organizing things and making things efficient and good. It's not about execution. It's about handing work off to other people and getting paid handsomely. And if you disagree, [email protected]. I will read your email. Maybe I'll even respond.

• 33:35Ed Zitron?

  But the thing is, management has become a poison in America. Managers have become poisonous because managers are not actually held to any kind of standard. No, only the workers who do the work are. What happened to Ben Gomes is one of the most disgusting, disgraceful things to happen in the tech industry. It's an absolute joke. Ben Gomes was a goddamn hero and I really need you to read the newsletter and read these emails. I need you to see how many times him and Thacker, great guy as well, were saying, hey, growth is bad for search. The thing that Ben Gomes was being asked to do was increase queries on Google, the literal amount that people search.

• 34:17Ed Zitron?

  There are many ways of looking at that and thinking, oh shit, that's not what you want. Surely you don't want no queries. You don't want people not using it at all. But queries going upwards linearly suggests that if you're not magic it to user growth at least, the people are not getting what they want on the first try, which by the way, kind of feels like how Google is nowadays. When you go to Google and the first result and the second result and the fifth result and the 10th result just don't get what you need. Cause it's all SEO crap. Now, this is all theorizing, but what I think Prabha Gargavant did was I think he took off all the fucking guidelines on Google search. I think he rolled back changes specifically to make search worse, to increase queries,

• 35:03Ed Zitron?

  to give Google more chance to show you adverts. I am guessing, don't have a source telling me this, but the pattern around the core search updates, the fact that Google search started getting worse toward the middle and end of 2019 and unquestionably dipped in 2020. Well, that's when Prabha Car took over. That's when the big man took the reins. That's when Dracula got his job at the blood bank. And this is the thing.

• 35:33Ed Zitron?

  There's very little that you and I can actually do about this, but what we can do is say names like Prabha Gargavan a great deal of times. So that people like this can be known, so that the actions of these scurrilous assholes can be seen and heard and pointed at and spat upon. I'm not suggesting spitting on anyone, no violent acts. No, can be pissy on the internet like the rest of us. Now I'm ranting, I realize I'm ranting, but this subject really, really got to me. But it's not the only one. In the next episode, I'm going to conclude this sordid three-part fiasco.

• 36:13Ed Zitron?

  With a few more examples and how many of these managers, these bean counters devoid of imagination or ability or anything of note, save for that utter slug-like ability to protect oneself. I want to talk about how these people managed to obfuscate their true intentions by pretending to be engineers, by pretending to be technologists and pretending to be innovators. I want to tell you all about how Adam Mosseri destroyed Instagram. And I want to tell you how little Sam Altman has achieved, other than making him and his friends rich. See you next time.

• 37:01Ed Zitron?

  Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matt Osowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at mattosowski.com. M A T T O S O W S K I dot com. You can email me at ez at betteroffline.com or check out betteroffline.com to find my newsletter and more links to this podcast. Thank you so much for listening.

• 37:25Speaker 05

  Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

• 37:56Speaker 02

  Empower is all about helping you invest well, so you can go out and live a little. And their Free Empower Personal Dashboard shows you your full financial life in one place. You'll be able to see your net worth, monitor budgets, analyze your portfolio, set retirement goals, and more. Whether you're saving for something big, want to treat yourself, friends, or family, or meet long-term goals, Empower helps you see where you stand. You've worked hard for your money, and Empower can help you make the most of it. Download the Empower Personal Dashboard or visit empower.com. Not an Empower client, paid or sponsored.

• 38:27Speaker 01

  OnDeck is built to back small businesses like yours. Whether you're buying equipment, expanding your team, or bridging cash flow gaps, OnDeck's loans up to $400,000 make it happen fast. Rated A+ by the Better Business Bureau and earning thousands of five-star TrustPilot reviews, OnDeck delivers funding you can count on. Apply in minutes at ondeck.com. Depending on certain loan attributes, your business loan may be issued by OnDeck or Celtic Bank. OnDeck does not lend in North Dakota. All loans and amounts subject to lender approval.

• 38:55Speaker 02

  Sponsored by GSK, the makers of Extenture, Depomocamab ULAA. If your asthma keeps interrupting... It may be time to try something else. Extensure is an ultra-long-acting prescription-maintenance treatment for severe asthma, eosinophilic type, ages 12 and older. It isn't for sudden breathing problems. Extensure is the first and only add-on treatment that can help deliver protection from asthma attacks with two doses a year. Just one dose every six months. That's a lot of time for everything in between. Serious allergic reactions can occur. Get help right away for swelling of face, mouth, tongue, or trouble breathing. Don't change or stop medicines, including steroids, unless told by your doctor. Report if you have a parasitic infection.

• 39:38Speaker 02

  Common colds, sinus infection, inflammation in the nose, flu or flulike symptoms, joint pain or sore throat may occur. Carry on with fewer attacks and ask your doctor about Extensure. Learn more at extensure.com or call 1-833-393-3678.

• 39:55Speaker 05

  This is Iris Palmer from Against All Odds with Iris Palmer. You know it's the holidays when somebody in the family starts cooking before the sun comes up. The babusas are grilling in the pan, everybody's sneaking bites, and somehow there's always room for one more person at the table. And nothing goes better with that first holiday plate than a delicious Coca-Cola. That crisp, refreshing taste makes everything that much better. Because the best holiday traditions aren't just about what we're eating. They're about who we're sharing those moments with. So check that shopping list twice. Stock up on Coca-Cola for all your family fiestas y disfrutas, Coca-Cola.

• 40:32Speaker 00

  This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.