"We Want to Be Bigger Than the CME" | Kalshi's John Wang

Kalshi’s ambition extends far beyond winning prediction markets. It wants to become the largest exchange on Earth. John Wang joins David to explain Kalshi’s regulated crypto-perps push, upcoming gold and silver markets, international expansion, and the strategy for turning retail event contracts into serious institutional hedging infrastructure. --- 📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24 https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium --- BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS: 🔓NEAR | TRADE CONFIDENTIALLY, GET 20% BACK https://bankless.cc/near-pod 🔑BITKEY | GET 10% OFF USE CODE: BANKLESS | #bitkeypartner https://bankless.cc/bitkey 🎯THE DEFI REPORT | ONCHAIN INSIGHTS https://thedefireport.io/bankless 👑BANKLESS CONTENT MCP https://www.bankless.com/premium --- TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Is Kalshi a Crypto Company? 3:56 Global Expansion and the Regulated Edge 14:55 The Regulated Perps Bet 21:38 Combining Perps and Predictions 27:51 The Insider Trading Problem 38:50 Who Owns Market Information? 45:58 From Sportsbooks to the CME 55:24 Prediction Markets for Institutions 1:02:40 Kalshi Versus Polymarket --- RESOURCES John Wang https://x.com/j0hnwang --- Not financial or tax advice. See our investment disclosures here: https://www.bankless.com/disclosures

• 0:03Speaker 00

  Bankless Nation, I'm here with John Wang from Kalshi. John, welcome to the podcast.

• 0:07Speaker 01

  Thank you for having me.

• 0:09Speaker 00

  John, is Kalshi a crypto company?

• 0:12Speaker 01

  I think so, yeah. I think in the crypto world, like, there's obviously an on-chain definition of like on-chain or crypto company. I don't think we're an on-chain company by any means, and there are on-chain prediction markets out there for sure. But crypto is our second largest business line behind sports.

• 0:33Speaker 01

  We have 90% market share in the crypto predictions world. We, a lot of our biggest partners are in the crypto industry, like Coinbase, Robinhood Crypto, like Phantom, and some others. They route their orders and trades through us. And so I think we're pretty deeply embedded in the industry. And that's pretty much what my role is, is to help us get even deeper.

• 1:02Speaker 00

  Okay, so crypto is like, there's the crypto sphere of influence. And I think what you're saying is Kalshi is somewhat inside the crypto sphere of influence in a number of different ways. But you're distinguishing it from Kalshi is not an on-chain company. Does Kalshi want to be a non-chain company?

• 1:17Speaker 01

  Ultimately, we just want to build like products that are super easy to use and accessible to people. Like, normal people that don't necessarily, aren't necessarily like super experts in crypto. And so our approach has always been to like go the regulated route. I think US regulations are heading more towards being on-chain, you know, with all the different legislature that's coming out. But at the current state of US regulations, like, it's not compatible. I think in, you know, several years, that's somewhere where we want to get to.

• 1:59Speaker 01

  But product-wise, I think the products that we've been building have been either like, you're around trading crypto. For example, the largest crypto companies in the world, I would say, are like Binance, Coinbase, Kraken.

• 2:17Speaker 01

  Decentralized exchanges, they are all about allowing their users to trade the price of crypto. And that's pretty much what our crypto prediction markets offer to our users. We also have our new regulated perps offering, which is the first regulated perpetual futures exchange in the US. That's like the first time essentially, you have a perp app on the App Store. You have your legal, no VPN access for normal US users. Kind of like your mom, your cousin, even like your friend could access it.

• 2:55Speaker 01

  And also, US institutions like can compliantly access it via like the type of infrastructure that they utilize. Also, I think like the deposits and withdrawals aspects of being like a centralized exchange is a large reason why many people still use centralized exchanges. And for us, crypto is an important rail for depositing and withdrawing from the platform. So obviously, we have like the ability to just deposit and withdraw stable coins or crypto assets in the US. But internationally, we're open in 140 countries. The crypto rail is the only rail that we currently accept for people to come into platform, put their money in.

• 3:40Speaker 01

  Because we found it's the most frictionless way to get like, you know, global monetary access. And sort of the most frictionless way to convert from, you know, the local currency to the actual US dollar that we accept.

• 3:56Speaker 00

  I see, I see. So for Kalshi to accept international customers, the only on-ramp that's viable and easy to integrate is like the stablecoin or, yeah, local, local stablecoin, local fiat stablecoin on-ramp into Kalshi. How much of Kalshi's businesses, business volume and trading volume is from outside of the US? Like, how dominant is that side of Kalshi?

• 4:18Speaker 01

  Yeah, we're still predominantly a US company in terms of user base. But I think the international side is a huge focus of ours.

• 4:30Speaker 01

  We are taking a somewhat unique approach there, which is, obviously, like, even in the US, there's these two paths to growing a prediction market, you know, six, seven years ago, which is you go offshore and you kind of take the unregulated route, or you go onshore and work with the regulators in the US. And kind of like, that's like the really hard, hard path, right? Like, spending years just doing legal stuff while like shipping a product in beta and not even being able to, you know, market it and such. So we're kind of taking a similar long-term approach to our international markets as well. Where we're working with like either the regulators or like the largest brokers in each country

• 5:18Speaker 01

  to sort of embed our prediction markets inside their products, similar to how we've been embedding them into Robinhood or Coinbase. And so we've been able to secure deals with like Wealthsimple in Canada or like XP, which is the largest broker in Brazil. So overnight, like, it's the long game, but overnight, we can essentially unlock like the entirety of like a country's tradable, like trader-user base if we get some of these partnerships. But we're also doing a lot of like on-the-ground efforts to try and, you know, find a dialogue with each individual regulator.

• 5:53Speaker 00

  As Ryan and I have watched the growth of prediction markets, we have frequently used the comparison between Kalshi and Polymarket as kind of like Tether and Circle. You have the compliant on-chain, onshore version, which is the Circle, you know, who wants to work with the regulators, be very compliant. That's kind of the structural edge that Circle has. And then there's Tether, which is kind of like playing in the offshore Euro-dollar world, which is a very big world. And Tether has been able to grow, actually grow pretty aggressively because it's actually not onshore and because it's not really constrained by the regulations. And we kind of took that same growth story between the two largest stablecoins, Circle and Tether.

• 6:37Speaker 00

  And we kind of have applied them similarly to the prediction markets between Kalshi, the onshore version, and Polymarket, the offshore version. Do you think that that is an accurate comparison? And where do you think that comparison, or, yeah, that comparison breaks down, if it does?

• 6:54Speaker 01

  Yeah, well, it's always good to have some analogies to like reason a cross off. But I think with stablecoins in particular, it's, the product ultimately is like selling the US dollar. And there's a much greater product market fit or like need for the US dollar, at least historically, in like these third-world country nations or offshore countries. So I think Tether has just like found a greater pinpoint for the customer. And therefore, like their growth internationally has been quite astronomical. Whereas with prediction markets, I think it's less about like, you know,

• 7:38Speaker 01

  we're shipping something that is like US-centric to the rest of the world. It's more about like each country and each type, type of, really just group of people, they have different questions about the world that they care about. And ultimately, all our markets are just about creating like the types of relevant events and markets that people want to trade.

• 8:02Speaker 01

  And so obviously, both, like, all the leading prediction markets in the world right now have mostly had US teams that are like focused on creating US-specific markets. But we found like, even some of our like markets in certain, like, whether it be like cricket, good, great adoption internationally. The World Cup was great for international adoption. Crypto has been actually quite a strong, like, you know, everyone in the world knows about Bitcoin. Everyone in the world knows about ETH. And so that's also crossed a lot of borders.

• 8:43Speaker 01

  So, no, I don't think it's exactly a one-to, well, it's not, I think the analogy breaks down in terms of like what the product actually is. But in terms of the approach, I think, yeah, it could be somewhat similar. Although I think we are like, compared to like most regulated companies, like a Coinbase or a Circle or inside other regulated company, Kalshi is much leaner and much more aggressive than these other companies, in my view, just like my personal view. We have a team of around 180 people, which is probably like 20 to 40x smaller in terms of headcount than these other types of companies.

• 9:27Speaker 01

  And we're just have like an insane, insanely aggressive like product velocity and shipping speed. And also, even from the regulatory side, like, we pushed to legalize prediction markets and perpetuals. For prediction markets, we actually had to sue the CFTC.

• 9:46Speaker 01

  So it's, it's, it's, by no means like, we're not really, you know, pushing for what's best for our customer.

• 9:55Speaker 00

  What's the steel man for why the onshore compliant strategy for prediction markets is the right one?

• 10:02Speaker 01

  The steel man, you mean like, why, why it might be the right choice?

• 10:07Speaker 00

  Give me the argument. So like, I think you could make two arguments. One is like the offshore version of the prediction market platform is going to be able to win based off of XYZ. Or you can make another argument saying the onshore platform for prediction markets is going to win because of ABC. I want, I want you to give me the one where like, well, Kalshi is the onshore prediction market platform. It's trying to lean into regulatory compliance and clarity and work with, work with all the three-letter agencies. Why is that the best strategy? Why is that the winning strategy?

• 10:41Speaker 01

  Well, CFTC is a four-letter agency, actually.

• 10:44Speaker 00

  That's a good point.

• 10:45Speaker 01

  But we love, we love our, we love our agencies.

• 10:50Speaker 01

  Yeah, the steel man, I would say is you always have this choice of of going, you know, offshore and like VPN and that does act actually it does make like doing no KYC and stuff like that. It does make onboarding the like crypto native user base easier, I would say, uh, because they've jumped through these hoops before. It's kind of what they're used to.

• 11:14Speaker 01

  But for like the 99% TAM of the world, which I really think is the TAM that we should be trying to tap into at this stage, where we're trying to find the marginal user to bring into the crypto industry or to trade this like very exciting new instrument, well, not new, but like very exciting instrument that was born out of the crypto industry, perpetual futures. That is the user set that we should be hunting for. And the only way to tap into that user set, I would say, is you're able to like run paid ads on Facebook and Instagram, able to like put up billboards, you're able to partner with like household consumer names and like find get integrated

• 11:58Speaker 01

  into large brokers and financial institutions, be on the App Store. And like as you grow to a larger scale as well, you're obviously like under much more regulatory and compliance scrutiny. So I think it's really a critical thing to take this like on regulatory approach if you want to tap into that user set, which I think is like the next user set that that is up for the taking.

• 12:27Speaker 00

  I've been trading crypto for almost a decade and I've used so many different wallets, exchanges, aggregators, different front ends over the years. And I'm always kind of looking for the same thing, just one interface with deep liquidity across a bunch of chains and assets where I can access all the markets like perps, earn yield, trade confidentially, and still control all my own funds. And I've never really found this experience and I'm always switching wallets, juggling gas fees and just getting eaten by slippage. Near.com is not that. It feels fundamentally different to me. I can do everything I want from any chain and I keep all my activity confidential. I can even earn yield confidentially. It's the way crypto should work. The near.com wallet is powered by near and it's moved over $25 billion cross-chain using

• 13:10Speaker 00

  post-quantum signing and has run over five years on mainnet with zero downtime. Near.com is simply the best way to be on-chain and be in control. Get 20% of your trading fees back using the bankless link in the show notes, not investment advice. Self custody won, but it still has a usability problem. A seed phrase on paper is still a single point of failure. Phones get lost, devices break, backups disappear. Bitkey is a self-custodial hardware wallet built for that reality. It uses a two of three multi-sig with keys split across your phone, the bitkey hardware device, and block. No single key can move your Bitcoin and block can never move it alone. There's no seed phrase to lose or expose. And if you lose your phone, your bitkey or both, built-in recovery gives you a path back. The hardware screen also lets you verify the destination

• 13:54Speaker 00

  before approving a transaction. And that's the point, more control without one mistake putting everything at risk. So download Bitkey today and use promo code BANKLIST to get 10% off of your bitkey. This episode has been sponsored by Bitkey. You talked about the perps platform that Kalshi is is building out. Perps is a pretty competitive place to be in right now. Like, perps are pretty hard. Two of the best perp platforms that I really pay attention to, hyper liquid and lighter, have just some pretty insane technical chops to them. And they're they're really just becoming hyper optimized around trading and the perpetual as an instrument specifically. So what makes Kalshi think that it can compete in this very competitive landscape around the perpetual?

• 14:34Speaker 01

  Yeah, I mean, the the landscape for perps is competitive, but I think even the the larger landscape of like futures is is, you know, I guess even more competitive because the there's, I mean, there's tons of futures platforms out there. CME is like an order of magnitude larger than even like our like perp exchanges in crypto right now. So it's a very competitive landscape. But the reason why we are throwing our hat in the ring is because firstly, I think we can deliver a product experience on par with like some of the crypto like trading platforms

• 15:18Speaker 01

  that, you know, I personally am familiar with, you're familiar with. For example, we shipped a Kalshi Pro recently, which is the first like official prediction market for a trading terminal, like released by a prediction market. But we also have like a perps pro interface, which is like more similar to the types of interfaces that you'd see in across the industry. And so our fees for that are quite competitive and our liquidity is actually it's it's still there is obviously like a ways to go, but you can throw in like a six-figure order size and

• 16:00Speaker 01

  not experience like too much slippage. And we're still working to grow that even more. So from like a pure like trading execution, competitive enough competitiveness of economic standpoint, you're at no disadvantage trading on Kalshi perps. And we're soon to launch like our non-crypto asset classes as well. I think it was announced that we filed for a gold and silver, which should be coming in a matter of weeks. And obviously, we're looking to expand to other asset classes beyond beyond just that. And really, that is the frontier, right, for perps, the perps industry nowadays, like hyper liquid, I think around half of their volume nowadays is from these

• 16:45Speaker 01

  real world assets. And the the center of all this real world asset liquidity is the United States. It's the US retail and large US institutions that are currently providing liquidity or trading on all of these traditional financial platforms that need to access like a regulated, easy to access US platform. But they so far hasn't haven't had the opportunity to sort of get the benefits and the innovations of perpetual futures, you know, no, no needing to like roll your futures, no expires, cheaper costs, all these things they haven't had access to until

• 17:29Speaker 01

  until now with Kalshi. So I think in this like next frontier of real world assets, we'll also be able to sort of like, I think, actually be the industry leader in terms of liquidity, access, distribution, and also just product experience. Although, you know, we still haven't released it yet, so we can only celebrate it once we've done that. But I think that's that that's the thesis, at least.

• 18:00Speaker 00

  The last I checked, it was still just the Bitcoin perp contract that the CFTC had approved. Is that still accurate? Or what are the markets currently available on the Kalshi perp platform?

• 18:13Speaker 01

  Totally, yeah. So we get a CFTC approval, like this quarter of 40.3 filing for every single new asset class that we list. So the Bitcoin one essentially approved crypto as an asset class for us. We now have like over a dozen crypto assets on our perp exchange.

• 18:29Speaker 00

  What are they? Just really quickly, just Bitcoin, ETH, Solana? What are the crypto perps that you guys have?

• 18:35Speaker 01

  Yeah, we Bitcoin, ETH, we have Hype, we have Solana's, Zcash, Near, Sui, Doge,

• 18:46Speaker 01

  XRP, if I haven't said that already.

• 18:48Speaker 00

  Did the Bitcoin, did the approval of the Bitcoin contract from CFTC, did that give Kalshi the ability to, what was it called, self, like self-register or like auto-register?

• 19:00Speaker 01

  Self-certification, yeah.

• 19:01Speaker 00

  Self-certification, thank you. Yeah. So you guys can self-certify crypto asset perps now?

• 19:07Speaker 01

  Yeah, exactly. Obviously, we have to run our own risk models that that have been CFTC approved. So it kind of like follows the same process that it would for a Bitcoin perp. But it is much easier to like list something like.

• 19:22Speaker 00

  So the Bitcoin perp gave you guys like a framework that like if the Bitcoin can be approved with these risk frameworks, then any other crypto asset that also passes the risks frameworks can therefore also be approved?

• 19:34Speaker 01

  Exactly, yeah. And I think, you know, our leverage limits are lower than other sort of offshore platforms. And there are trade-offs to that, like obviously, some some traders don't want to, like, they don't want to take like lower leverage limits. Based on our like, sort of like data analytics on like, you know, on-chain and other perp platforms, only like 20 to 30% of users trade above like our perp leverage limit, which is like 6X. Most traders, we actually find they trade between 2 to 4X. So that captures like the vast lion's share of traders. So it's actually not as prohibitive as you might think. But for our like.

• 20:18Speaker 01

  Upcoming non-cryptic perps, the leverage limits for those will be much higher, given that they're like much less volatile of an asset class. So you'll actually be able to get similar leverage limits to the existing per RWA platforms that you've been seeing out there via Kalshi. And our economics or like our fees are pretty competitive. I think you're compared to like Binance or like a hyper liquid. We have lower fees at every year currently.

• 20:50Speaker 00

  What's the plan for the Kalshi per platform to evolve from here? And just as a frame of reference, I'm pretty familiar with like the lighter roadmap, for example, or at least what they want to do. And one of the things they really want to do is they want to get tokenized real world assets. So like a real basis for the perp to also trade on spot. So you have like three ingredients here. You have the actual tokenized equity or tokenized real world asset. You have a spot market also built into the platform. And then you have the perpetual itself. And with those three ingredients, you can really blossom into a bunch of different like optionality, strategies, baskets, you know, is kind of like open ended in the permutations.

• 21:34Speaker 00

  And so that's how that's like lighter's opinion for how it kind of grows as a as a platform. Does Kalshi also want to grow in that direction? Because you would also need to have like a spot market and then also try have like a cash settled underlying. What's the evolution plan for like the Kalshi perpetual platform?

• 21:54Speaker 01

  Spot is definitely something we've considered. And if it makes sense to add to it, for example, like margining in Bitcoin or like non cash, that's pretty interesting. It depends on regulatory unlocks, but it's definitely something that I've been pushing for internally. In terms of like actual roadmap, I would say we're primarily concentrated on. Well, firstly, we're rolling about out a bunch of interesting incentive programs soon. So those would make it pretty attractive, I would say, to trade on our platform. Also to trade specific coins.

• 22:33Speaker 01

  And also, if you're like a big trader, you can, you know, we'd like to make it such that our platform is like the best place for you to place your trades, most liquid. Or like you don't have any troubles around order execution and stuff like that. Secondly, I think our Kalshi Pro product, we're leaning into pretty hard. So obviously, like the perps side of things, we have like the trading view integrations and the types of other integrations that you might want to see with like a more traditional brokerage for stocks or options, like Amumu, a Tasty Trade, stuff like that.

• 23:18Speaker 01

  So providing like a product experience with parity to those that user that user set. And then also like cross selling our existing predictions traders and acquiring new like more advanced traders that might be interested in predictions. Like that's where we see our like differentiation being. And then we're working really hard on unlocking these new asset classes. As I mentioned before, like starting with gold and silver and metals. I would, I think like perps is, well, where we lie with perps, like our perps product isn't just like shipping a great perps product, but it's also like, how can we

• 24:02Speaker 01

  co mingle it with the benefits of our predictions product? So on our perps product, not only do we have like this, like we have this Kalshi social, which is similar to like FOMO or like Robin Hood social recently released something that looks similar to our platform. So that's quite, that's quite exciting. There's like a troll box on perps that is similar, almost like gives me flashbacks to BitMEX back, you know, 2017, 2018. But our predictions product itself, we have like, these traders are able to price the

• 24:44Speaker 01

  odds of Bitcoin hitting a certain price, like predicting the price of Bitcoin on a hourly, daily, monthly, we like annual basis. And we sort of distill those insights into our perps product as well. So people are able to like see the odds on the chart in the inside section, like the stats around like what the market expectation is. And that's like actually, we found that's helped a lot of our traders who might be, it's their first time trading perps ever. And these types of like market expectations, or just like the way we package perps into like up or down instead of long or short.

• 25:25Speaker 01

  And the way we like make leverage much more understandable for our user base. Like those types of things have helped a lot. And I think we're going to keep leaning more into that in terms of our roadmap, which is like, how do we combine the best parts of perps and predictions together? And build it to like a user base that is new to pups and they may be like a simple pups trader or like a more advanced day trader.

• 25:53Speaker 00

  Is there a vision of just like a single unified Kalshi platform where predictions and perps and that social feature that you were talking about is all kind of unified in one single interface? Because as I understand it now, like perps and the prediction markets are just not the same thing, a separate platform, siloed. Is there like, is there a grand unified version of Kalshi in the future? Or how do you guys think about just like the synergies of these products actually coming together?

• 26:22Speaker 01

  So our perps, like at least like the simple product is quite integrated into our app already. So if you go on our mobile app, we have a tab for perps. If you go onto our web app, we also have a tab for perps. And then the current bifurcation is more so with like our simple experience and our pro experience. And we're working to like combine that a bit more or like make it a bit seamless, more seamless in switching. But it is quite integrated and I would say that we do want to provide a like a pretty cohesive experience.

• 27:03Speaker 00

  Let's get into into prediction markets, since that's the main bread and butter of Kalshi. There's, there's this essential trade off around prediction markets that I think prediction markets just kind of have to figure out how to walk the line here. And what I'm talking about is like prediction markets are accurate because they pay people who have private information to reveal it with their traits. Like that's kind of the whole point of prediction markets. Like if you have alpha, you can come to a prediction market, you can come to Kalshi and you can sell that alpha to the market. And you're basically selling it to noise traders, the uninformed retail crowd. And so the retail crowd, the noise traders, they come and they basically fund the incentives for people with private market information to reveal their private market, market information

• 27:48Speaker 00

  to the market. And that's how we gain information from these prediction market platforms. But there's a tension here between if Kalshi or any, or you know, prediction market platform, whatever, is too permissive with the insider trading, quote unquote, the, the, the alpha traders coming and selling their market information to the market. If they're too permissive, prices are very accurate, but retail kind of just feels that the game is rigged and they can't really, they're, it's not fair to them because they don't have any of the alpha and they're the ones financing the information coming into the market. On the flip side, if it's too restrictive, if like overly restrictive surveillance cuts

• 28:30Speaker 00

  off the informed flow from the market, the market degrades into just being like a sentiment poll rather than like actual news or actual information. And so there's a tight rope that a prediction market has to walk here where you do need to attract retail customers to incent information to come to the market. But you can't allow for too much extraction from retail or else then the retail won't come. They'll just, all the fishes at the poker table will get milked and then they won't be able to come back. What's this strategy for Kalshi to find the equilibrium between these two polarities?

• 29:05Speaker 01

  Yeah, that's a great framing, you know, I think it is definitely a spectrum. Where we sit on that spectrum is we are like a markets first company, like ultimately we are building an exchange. One like strong bright product of that is that people are using our website to get better informed about the world or like see what people, you know, the market is expecting, what people's consensus is currently. And then also for traders who do have special, like, you know, insights into a certain topic or have done more research than others, are more like resourceful or curious.

• 29:49Speaker 01

  They are able to also profit off of that, those, you know, their, their actual research and their curiosity. So we do draw a bright red line about insider trading. And I think there are also many markets that like, it's like insider trading, I think, is. You know, like, there are many markets where like users would actually be able to do research and get edge without resorting to sort of insider information or quote unquote, like private alpha. There are these types of things where as long as you're curious and

• 30:32Speaker 01

  resourceful and you're, you can build systems which are actually easier to build now in the age of Claude AI. We've seen a lot of traders just like do exceptionally well. Even in our like music chart markets where you might think that, you know, it's, it's kind of like voodoo magic. That's, it's kind of just like what you, what you might think as, as kind of like an outside observer. But if you're in the trenches, you're like looking at these music charts all day. We have this guy called Grind A Top Ten. He's basically been like a music chart, like

• 31:11Speaker 01

  YouTuber, like ranking sort of type of guy and super in the weeds of Ariana Grande billboard charts, et cetera. He's just consistently been able to find edge by being super involved in these communities and these like different information sources. And so, you know, there are definitely fair ways to find edge. We have a ton of like infrastructure around preventing insider trading from even happening in the first place, but also surveilling the markets and tracking it when it does happen. For example, like we have lists of politicians, people in

• 31:55Speaker 01

  their campaign groups or sporting teams, people who work at the sporting team, like people peripherally around them. There are like already these types of like surveillance platforms that offer these services to sports companies, sports betting companies, prediction market companies, and for stocks for insider trading, there are companies that provide lists of like executives and all their associated people. So yeah, I think we've done like a lot of work

• 32:35Speaker 01

  around preventing and enforcing against insider trading. And then there's this like philosophical question that you mentioned, which is, is it even like worth preventing insider trading if the goal is to be kind of this like, like information is what's the truth type of platform? And so my response to that, and I thought about this a lot when I was joining Kalshi is,

• 33:02Speaker 01

  you know, ultimately, we want to service people at scale and like scale our financial markets to their greatest TAM. And at, at, at scale, right? That's when these types of markets work the best because you have the most people pitching in, you have the most accurate consensus, you have the greatest liquidity. And the only way you can achieve that is by preventing insider trading. The, the reason why insider trading is banned, for example, in the stock markets, you might think it's kind of like for an ethical reason, which there is definitely an ethical component. But the greater reason is actually like a market structure reason,

• 33:45Speaker 01

  which is like, once you have a lot of toxic flow of like informed traders coming in, market makers aren't going to quote anymore. Liquidity providers are going to pull their quotes. And therefore, like, no one will have a liquid market to trade against. And then you won't have a signal anyways. And so you just have to draw this line against insider trading if you want to have market integrity and healthy markets that thrive in scale.

• 34:13Speaker 00

  Is insider trading properly defined for the prediction market use case? I, maybe I should have looked into this a little bit better before doing this podcast, but like insider trading, I think is very well defined for the securities context. Do you think that the definition of what secure, what insider trading is appropriately carries over in like a high fidelity way into prediction markets? Or do you think prediction markets as a platform could use a, an alternative definition of insider trading to be more permissive in certain types of markets or more strict in certain types of markets? Like, do you, do you think, do you think we need to reconsider what insider trading means in the prediction market context?

• 34:57Speaker 00

  Or do you think that those laws are actually pretty well defined in the first place?

• 35:02Speaker 01

  Yeah, well, the great thing is, we actually defined like insider trade, what insider trading is on every market. And we flag those types of markets that are at a higher risk of insider trading. So

• 35:18Speaker 00

  Kalshi defines what insider trading is for its own markets. Is that, is that what you just said?

• 35:24Speaker 01

  Well, no, there is a framework for defining insider trading at like the regulatory level. But then like, when it comes to sort of communicating the, and setting the bounds for our users, we have like extra guardrails up at the market level. So for example, we,

• 35:46Speaker 01

  on the UI, we say that politicians or politically associated persons, congressmen, et cetera, are not allowed to trade on our political markets. They can trade on our sports markets and stuff like that, but they can't trade on our political markets.

• 35:58Speaker 00

  They can't, they can't trade on any political markets? They can't trade inside the political category?

• 36:04Speaker 01

  Well, I'd have to check on like this specific, because it, I think it depends a lot on like what type of person, political person you are. Also, I'm more so on the crypto commodities and perpetuals side of the business. But I, I think like generally, we, we don't want people who are like in Congress to trade political markets. I think, I think I'm pretty sure of that one. Like 90% sure of that one is true, that we, we prevent them. And so,

• 36:42Speaker 01

  yeah, like there's, there's like the preventative step, and then there's like the at the market step here on the UI. And then even, even for like our markets, we, like, as you mentioned, like, sometimes insider trading does happen. Like, it's, it's, there's no bulletproof solution to prevent insider trading in the stock market. Same thing applies in prediction markets. And there are different types of trade offs and risks that we also face here. The best thing what we can do is to make the traders, our traders as aware as possible of like the risks

• 37:24Speaker 01

  that they're facing and like the types of precautions that we have put in place, just so that when you're entering this type of market, that you're not called, called off guard, right? And so we, we do have flags, like before you enter certain types of markets. I think sometimes on, on like our, some different faces, like every single market, that it like, we just have kind of this like disclosure about like the risks of insider trading and, you know, how to report it, how to prevent it, and how, how we, what we do to, to prevent it.

• 38:02Speaker 00

  I do think it's interesting that prediction markets have run up against the whole notion of IP, intellectual property. And maybe could to kind of go back and like set the same stage of the, the original question. We had, we had the, the famous case of the 2024 presidential election, the guy in France, I think, who financed a bunch of polls domestically in the United States to go get information. And so he paid, they paid, this one trader paid for a bunch of polls to be made in, in swing states. And like the nature of the poll was very precise. And this trader just got in this information. And then they, as a result

• 38:43Speaker 00

  of hearing those, the, the outcomes of the polls, they made a very large position on Donald Trump. Is that insider trading? Absolutely not. Like, not in the slightest. That is a very motivated trader, just being very shrewd and clever and extracting information from the world to make a trade on, on a prediction market. So is that insider trading? Definitely not. And then, and then there's like other examples of like the Google employee who made a, a trade about when like the next Google model was going to get released. Now, that information was owned by Google, in a sense, like Google as the corporation owns the information as to like what day of what month of what year is it going to release its

• 39:28Speaker 00

  next models. And like the Google employee came to some, I can't remember which prediction market platform, came to a prediction market platform and then sold that information to the market, if you will, sold information, sold IP that wasn't his. I don't know if that counts as insider trading, because again, insider trading is like typically in the securities context, but

• 39:48Speaker 00

  From a property rights perspective, it makes sense to me that that Google employee ought not have sold information that was owned, again, in theory, by the company. And it seems to be that, like Kalshi, the private market is just sticking its finger up in the air and be like, that doesn't feel right. And so therefore, we're not going to allow it to happen on the platform. But I'm wondering if it would be better if we could actually create a framework of what insider trading is or intellectual property as it relates to prediction markets? If that needs to be something worked out by the regulators for the benefit of prediction market platforms, because it would make your guys' job easier and you guys would actually

• 40:30Speaker 00

  have to regulate less if this was just like, I don't know, a law in Congress or something just stated as a rulemaking from the CFTC. What do you think about that?

• 40:39Speaker 01

  I would say all our public comments so far about this type of topic is that we're in full support of it. Like, we want more clarity. We want the regulations to be there and clear and to protect our traders and to also, you know, satisfy people's concerns. And really, it's just codifying the types of things that we've already been doing on our own, like extra steps that we've been taking purely because it's in the best of our interests to protect our traders and the integrity of our markets. Just so happens to be that it's also like the types of things that people want codified

• 41:22Speaker 01

  in actual wars in the regulatory world as well. So yeah, that's something we've been pushing for. We're very pro-regulation when done the right way. And when it comes with benefits such as like giving everyone a better sense of clarity.

• 41:39Speaker 00

  Now, I really like your point about the best market structure is the most fair one, which is an argument for like a more restrictive constraint on alpha traders, traders with alpha, traders with information. And so like you need to be, in my previous example, you really need to be the person who does a lot of effort, makes a lot of work to find information in the world, fair information in the world that anyone could have aggregated through whatever means possible. And then now you have that alpha and now you get to sell that to the market because you harvested it from the real world, as opposed to somebody actually doing insider trading. And so like, you know, one is fair, one is less fair.

• 42:20Speaker 00

  And I take the point that the more fair version of the prediction market creates a more healthy market structure. You attract more market makers, retail feels that it's more fair and less extractive. But also at the same time, I do think that just like a little bit of insider trading is good too. Just a smidge, just like just on the line, across the line of like what insider trading is on occasion, just because like, that's the whole point. And this is something that Robin Hanson says, who's like one of the originators, progenitors of like the concept of prediction markets. It's like, yeah, like this is how we get information out. This is why the, from an information perspective, this is how we attract it.

• 43:01Speaker 00

  And prediction markets can bring more information into the world if they're allowed to do this. And there, in addition to prediction markets, there's whole like second, third, fourth order consequences of like different layers on prediction markets that could be built if this was the case. Things like Futarki, for example, need this information to come, be financed and come into the market. And so like, how would you respond to that? Just like, what if we just were allowed just a smidge of insider trading in order to really lean into the information side of prediction markets?

• 43:35Speaker 01

  Those types of prediction markets, they actually were the predominant type of prediction markets before, I guess, like Kalshi really took off commercially over the past two, three years. Prediction markets, they originated from being kind of like either this play money or like, like not really like commercially scalable thought experiments by like academic institutions and research think tanks to get to what you just said, which is like this like sort of really accurate beacon of truths where people, you know, they don't

• 44:18Speaker 01

  really have any like many rules, I guess. And so I guess like my answer is like, yeah, if you have that, then it'll probably look something like that. And it probably won't look like a multi-billion dollar asset class that is like very liquid and traded by a lot of people. And so it's, you're just going to get into this kind of like cycle of you're not increasing your liquidity and your scale and being forever kind of constrained to like a much smaller

• 44:55Speaker 01

  scale as like a nice thought experiment, but not super, I guess, useful beyond, beyond the pure like number that you create, if that makes sense.

• 45:10Speaker 00

  Let's talk about what prediction markets want to be when they grow up versus more or less kind of like what they are today in their current form. In the current form, sports trading across all prediction markets is more or less the dominant category for prediction markets, something like 80, 70 to 80% of like trading volumes in like the sports category. Obviously, prediction markets as a platform want to be more than an alternative to like the sports books, you know, sports books. And currently where prediction markets are valued in the two-digit billion dollar value range, like the 10, $20 billion value range, that kind of positions prediction markets as just like a valid and upgraded competitor to sports bookies, to like the FanDuel, the DraftKings of the world.

• 45:55Speaker 00

  But I think everyone who's paying attention to prediction markets wants more from prediction markets. And prediction markets themselves are trying to like look towards the CME, you know, something in the three-digit billion dollar valuation, like the 100, 200, 300 billion dollar valuation. And that also comes with that some level of like financial utilization, some sophistication, like we're talking about insurance companies and, you know, financial hedge funds coming in. And you would, I would guess, you would see a very big drop in sports trading volume because everything else grew, like, I don't know, with the weather or, you know, more markets around like the Federal Reserve, things like this.

• 46:38Speaker 00

  How do we get from where we are today where the prediction markets just kind of look like an upgraded version of sports betting venues to competing with a CME? What's the plan from getting A to B?

• 46:51Speaker 01

  That is our ultimate goal, is to be the largest exchange on the planet, you know, scientific derivatives, for example. And we, our positioning is that we're kind of like the CME or the New York Stock Exchange in that we're taking a very strong regulated approach, but we have the mix of also being a very like fast shipping tech company while being kind of like a very aggressive, like a consumer growth company as well. And so being able to own the trader relationship has been quite important. I think it's been important to the growth of Robinhood.

• 47:33Speaker 01

  It's been important to the growth of IBKR as well. So we have that as a differentiating factor, where you own the trader relationship. We also, I think, have a, like a leading position in the two, I would say, like newest asset classes when it comes to the traditional global financial scene, that, or like instruments, I guess, being prediction markets and perpetual futures. So at least from like a regulated onshore perspective. So that's like our foot in the door when it comes to really having a fighting chance at getting to that, to that stage. And taking that institutional...

• 48:20Speaker 01

  Like motion and seeing it all the way through is something that we're currently like allocating a lot of our time to. We've been doing a lot more block trades and doing a lot more sort of broker relationships as well. Like we're in basically all of the largest broker broker platforms in the US now. We've plugged into a lot of the FCMs, which is kind of like the infrastructure or trading terminals that a lot of these large hedge funds and institutions utilize. We've done some interesting hedges as well through like our weather markets. We

• 48:59Speaker 01

  had like an ice cream shop do stuff there for the World Cup. There are dozens of bars that hedged promotions through Kashi. So they would offer, for example, like free drinks for everyone if the US won the World Cup, like for that game that night. And that proved to be quite successful and actually like have a lot of utility when it comes to like hedging out the risk of these types of promotions. But we've also had like much more serious large trades, like, you know, seven to eight figure trades based on our clarity odds and

• 49:43Speaker 01

  block trades happening through our platforms as well. Whether, you know, the odds of whether the clarity act will pass. But beyond that, I would, I would also push back against like Kashi being like a primarily sports business currently. Firstly, we have Perps, which is doing an order of magnitude, more volume in the first, you know, month than any of our prediction market, markets, I guess, like since launch. Perps are just like a monster in terms of volume. But our crypto prediction markets are actually very large, very large

• 50:24Speaker 01

  part of our business. Like, I think they're 20 to 30% of total exchange volume now. And that's just for crypto, excluding, you know, politics, economics. We recently launched a lot of the same types of markets and user interface and like our growth motions got kicked off for our commodities markets. I think we're going to see a similar growth trajectory as our crypto market prediction markets there. And so, you know, we see another 20% category from there with commodities. I think sports quickly go from where it is

• 51:02Speaker 01

  now to becoming like only 20 to 30% of the exchange volume. And yeah, so far, like commodities markets have done really well. Like they've grown at a rate, a rate of 100x within the first few days of compared to like when we first launched our crypto markets. I think we've learned a lot, a lot of lessons from scaling the crypto side of things. And now a lot of people are interested in trading gold, silver, oil instead. So I think that's going to be super interesting. And, you know, Perps is entirely like a non-sports category.

• 51:42Speaker 01

  So that's going to diversify us more. And then on our like political markets, we've been taking a more researchy approach to it, similar to like a Bloomberg or like even like a Citrini or something like that, where we're creating like indices around our prediction markets, like batching them together and weighting them. So you can actually trade, like we have this thing called K-Pow, which is kind of like the S and P 500, but for the US political landscape. And then seeing how like different shifts in macro and in

• 52:23Speaker 01

  political developments affect that index. So there's a lot of stuff that we're doing that, yeah, makes us a much more diversified platform than sports. And I think currently as well, we, crypto is just such a large part of it that, that it's by no means only a sports platform.

• 52:44Speaker 00

  Bankless Nation, we've built something for you. Introducing the Bankless MCP. ChatGPT and Claude are great at a lot of things, but ask them anything beyond the basics of crypto about protocol mechanics, tokenomics, or just what happened last week in crypto, and the gaps will start to show. The problem is context. Bankless, on the other hand, has spent almost a decade building one of the deepest archives of crypto data anywhere. More than 2,000 podcast transcripts, 10,000 articles, and countless conversations with the people actually building this industry. And now we've structured all of that data into the Bankless MCP. So you can go and connect it to your Claude or ChatGPT, and suddenly your AI can answer your crypto queries with the entire Bankless archive behind it. And every new Bankless article or episode gets added automatically, so the context

• 53:27Speaker 00

  keeps staying up to date. The Bankless MCP is exclusively available to Bankless Premium subscribers. So you can go to bankless.com, upgrade to Premium, and connect the MCP in just a few minutes. And all of a sudden, your crypto queries to your AI LLM, whatever you use, will get a thousand times better. So go check it out. There is a link in the show notes. And once you become a Bankless Premium member, you can hop into the Bankless Discord and let me know how you like it.

• 53:49Speaker 02

  Some exciting news. We are launching a new podcast to help people figure out the crypto cycle, how to navigate it. The best crypto cycle investor I know, his name is Michael NATO, he runs the DeFi Report. This is the guy that sent me a sell alert before the 1010 price drop happened. His cycle analysis has been absolutely on point. I've been following him for years. And this year, we started recording weekly podcast episodes. Each one, we get into his portfolio, what he's holding, the market structure, entry targets, fair market value of Bitcoin and Ether, and where we are in the cycle. There's new episodes that are released every Wednesday. They're 30 minutes, they're short, they're punchy. I think this crypto cycle is harder to navigate than most, so let's do it together. Go subscribe to this podcast, search the DeFi Report, wherever you get your podcasts, YouTube, Apple,

• 54:32Speaker 02

  Spotify, or find a link in the show notes. There's a new episode waiting for you now.

• 54:36Speaker 00

  Prediction markets have this thing where they're similar to crypto in the sense that they are just, they're very bottom up. Prediction markets as an instrument just feels like it all, it just organically, naturally starts with retail and as more retail comes, larger and larger participants arrive. And my question is, how far we think that we can take prediction markets up that stack? Like, how far up the pyramid of capital can, can prediction markets really, really go? And back in 2017, I think when the crypto industry's imaginations about what crypto could do was at its wildest. We all kind of imagined this idea that prediction

• 55:14Speaker 00

  markets ultimately would kind of just like democratize or make very efficient markets for the end industry. Like the classic example is like the farmer, right? The farmer needs to like hedge an entire season of weather to, to protect the value of their crops. And if their crops dies because it's a desert, the farmer gets paid all the same because of, because of some bet that was placed on like the rainfall in the region over this month of time. And maybe it's not the farmer making that bet, but a farmer buys insurance. And the insurance company can sell insurance to that farmer at a better rate because of

• 55:59Speaker 00

  prediction markets, because prediction markets allow for this like grand hedging. And so it's not the farmer, it's not the end farmer, it's not like the retail farmer person that's making this bet, but it's this massive sophisticated, quant orientated insurance company that's using prediction markets and weather to be able to sell insurance to this farmer at a much cheaper, more beneficial rate to the farmer. It's like this idealized version of a prediction market. And my, my concern about prediction markets is they kind of feel like a retail instrument, like inherently, like the, the prediction market is just like a really good platform for retail. And as we get further and further up the capital

• 56:40Speaker 00

  stack, it gets harder and harder for large financial institutions to use prediction markets to make very precise opinions and express very precise trades about the market. Like hedging is a very precise thing. And so if you want to hedge something, you need to make sure that the event contract that you buy is actually doing the hedging that you want it to do. And prediction markets, at least so far, seem kind of blunt in that, in that pursuit. And so the, the broader question is,

• 57:12Speaker 00

  How far do we think prediction markets as an instrument can get sophisticated to attract the largest and then the larger and largest amounts of capital in the world to become more like the CME, like quadrillions of dollars of yearly volume trading hands about very precise hedging and create financial opportunities and make finance more efficient? How far do we think we can go and just simulate for us like how we actually get there?

• 57:40Speaker 01

  You know, I think it's this retail first adoption is pretty symmetric across all types of new markets. You need early adopters and speculative capital to bootstrap liquidity and interest in new markets before it reaches the scale that institutions are able to size into. I think we are at that scale now where institutions can actually come in and we've seen this institutional adoption happen. For example, and I think they can make very precise trades. Our first block trade, for example, was by some Houston-based environmental

• 58:23Speaker 01

  hedge fund and they wanted to hedge against whether a specific price for May carbon allowance auctions in California would occur. And there was a counterparty for that and multiple traders that were able to come in and sort of like help provide liquidity for that trade and price it. And so you are able to reach out to the Kalshi team if you're an institution, ask us to create a market for a specific hedge or contract or idea that you have and

• 59:02Speaker 01

  we can spin that up for you. It can be very bespoke. And then that market is then available to the rest of the world to go and price and provide liquidity to, to give you like a more efficient price than you otherwise would. So ultimately, the bet that we're making here is that, once you take this OTC structured products market, which is basically bilaterally negotiated deals in dark markets and you bring them into the light, into what we call lit markets, like openly traded marketplaces, that increases the TAM and

• 59:44Speaker 01

  the activity and reduces the barrier to entry by an order of magnitude, like 10x. So we can, for the institutional world, I think we can take this, like the entire OTC industry, bring it into prediction markets, take the entire structured products industry, bring it into prediction markets, and then create a much more liquid and more readily accessible version of it. And we're still, where we are iterating on like the types of feedback that institutions give us. For example, like getting margin on prediction markets is probably our top requested feature for our event contracts. And that's something

• 1:00:26Speaker 01

  we're working towards. I think in the meantime, like our perps are like, do provide that margin. And a lot of institutions have found that to be valuable as well to get capital efficient exposure to these types of assets they want without having to roll their contracts. So yeah, I think we are climbing into those later stages of the capital stack. And there are like the crypto and commodities, politics types of markets, especially politics, for

• 1:01:09Speaker 01

  example, you're not able to find, you're not really not able to enter those types of contracts anywhere else. Like Kalshi is the only place that you can get that type of hedge. And politics is just so central to the way that like our markets have been functioning over the past year, that it is really crucial for any hedge fund to establish some sort of position in prediction markets if they want to achieve like the best risk parameters or pricing efficiency across that portfolio.

• 1:01:51Speaker 00

  There's been this like mirror, mirror image of Polymarket and Kalshi with partnerships and like announcements, like both, I don't really remember this happening too much recently. So maybe it's a thing in the past, but I still want to ask about it. It's like Kalshi and Polymarket both announced like a partnership with XAI inside of the same week back in 2025, like both announced being like the official partner of the NHL inside the same week. Like first guy, Kalshi was the official prediction market partner of the NHL, then like the next day, Polymarket announced it. You guys both announced like this pop-up grocery store thing. There's just been this, if Kalshi does it, Polymarket does it. If Polymarket does it, then Kalshi does it. And it's, that happens like consistently for

• 1:02:34Speaker 00

  like over a year. Why did that happen?

• 1:02:38Speaker 01

  It must be infuriating to see that from the outside.

• 1:02:41Speaker 00

  I'm just so confused.

• 1:02:42Speaker 01

  It's more infuriating to see that from the inside. Yeah. It's like a whole bit. Honestly, I think it's just what happens when you have two big companies pushing each other. And like, it's kind of like two teams like rowing their boats, right? Like usually, you're just like rowing really hard and it makes you perform better. I think it has subsided a bit over the past, like six months, maybe. I guess we've just, I mean, just honestly, like if you look at the metrics, we've, we've really grown to be like four to five times larger. At least in crypto, we're 10 times larger than them in volumes. And so, yeah,

• 1:03:27Speaker 01

  like it's, it's just, we're like not, I guess we're no longer competing as hard for the deals. Usually partners just like go with us. Otherwise, we're, like, otherwise, like those deals are getting overbid heavily and people are just like burning money in the air. But I think, yeah, it's, we've also found our own lane a bit more, you know, like we're focused more about perps, on perps, we're focused more on institutional adoption.

• 1:04:05Speaker 01

  We're focused more on growing our computer and commodities markets. And I think Poli is not, at least in the areas that I've talked about, they haven't really got into the same stage that we have yet. So like we are, we're still like, we're the first to rip a compute forward curve and grow our compute markets. Our perps platform, we got regulated and released first. I don't think Poli's has come out of beta yet. On the institutional side, we've just seen a lot more adoption, block trades, hedges

• 1:04:47Speaker 01

  happen through us as well. So yeah, I think we're just, we're ultimately probably pulled ahead and are no longer like fighting as hard over like tits and tats day to day, but looking more at, more at like the larger types of businesses that we can expand into now.

• 1:05:07Speaker 00

  One rumor that I heard was that the, like, I don't know if it was the NHL specifically, so I'm not calling them out specifically, but like there were so many of these where like some third-party organization, like a sports league or whatever, both would partner with both prediction markets. One rumor that I heard was that like they could smell the competition and so they would offer, like they would bid it up between both Kalshi and Polymarket and extract from, from both platforms? So it was actually like, kind of like the NHL, again, not trying to pick out on the NHL, but it was like the NHL as an example, just saying like, oh, like, we'll, we'll sell you, we'll let you guys be our prediction market partner and then also go back to, you know, your rival and like allow

• 1:05:51Speaker 00

  you guys to bid up the opportunity and then just accept both. Was there any sort of malice by any of these third parties? Was, is there anything to that rumor about like a third party like smelling blood in the water and kind of like swimming like a shark?

• 1:06:05Speaker 01

  Honestly, I don't know about the NHL deal. I wasn't part of that deal. But I think in general, like that type of activity, or it's just like, it's like something you do, you know, if you have two job offers, you're going to like try to make them give you a higher offer. We haven't seen as much of that in the past six months.

• 1:06:26Speaker 00

  Okay. Just a rumor. Oh, but it did, stuff like that did happen?

• 1:06:31Speaker 01

  I mean, it was like, I was dealing with that type of stuff and like, just like random creators that had like 20K followers. Like everyone thinks they're, everyone thinks, you know, they can, they can just like play us.

• 1:06:43Speaker 00

  Command the price, right?

• 1:06:44Speaker 01

  Yeah, it kind of worked for a bit, but maybe, yeah, like not so much anymore. Yeah.

• 1:06:49Speaker 00

  Cool. John, thanks for coming on the show.

• 1:06:51Speaker 01

  Thank you, man. Take care.

• 1:06:52Speaker 00

  Bankless Station, you guys know the deal. Crypto is risky, so are prediction markets. But the risk is why we are here. The institutions have landed, so we are going even further west. This is the frontier. It's not for everyone, but we are glad you're with us on the bankless journey. Thanks a lot.