Pod Insights All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg E82: All-In Summit: Claire Cormier Thielke on China + Q&A with Flexport's Ryan Petersen About this episode This talk was recorded LIVE at the All-In Summit in Miami and included slides. To watch on YouTube, check out our All-In Summit playlist: https://bit.ly/aisytplaylist
0:00 Claire Cormier Thielke's AIS talk: "Tomorrowland: China Placemaking and the Future of Innovation"
17:40 Claire takes Q&A with the Besties + Ryan Petersen: Understanding the China/US rivalry
24:08 How the Evergrande debt situation impacts the greater Chinese real estate industry, China's still-nascent middle class, How China is subsidizing its negative birth rate
34:30 Ryan Petersen breaks down Flexport's business, the tumultuous past few years, and how DTC might be in major trouble
46:34 Asset-heavy play as a hedge against the popular trend of asset-light, velocity vs. speed, Flexport.org's humanitarian relief shipping, China's influence
Follow the guests:
https://twitter.com/clairethielke
https://twitter.com/typesfast
Follow the besties:
https://twitter.com/chamath
https://linktr.ee/calacanis
https://twitter.com/DavidSacks
https://twitter.com/friedberg
Follow the pod:
https://twitter.com/theallinpod
https://linktr.ee/allinpodcast
Intro Music Credit:
https://rb.gy/tppkzl
https://twitter.com/yung_spielburg
Intro Video Credit:
https://twitter.com/TheZachEffect
Transcript 10,897 words · 6 speakers
Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
0:00 Jason Calacanis? We're really excited to have Claire with us. Come on out Claire. Are you here? All right. What are we... Welcome Claire. What will we be talking about today?
0:10 Speaker 01 We're gonna be talking about China. You know? Just as everything has been all spicy.
0:15 Jason Calacanis? Yeah, well, just again, we're trying to make today about just easy breezy topics, you know, the most easiest things to manage. So we... Armaments, Ukraine. Let's go to China, sure. Uh, please welcome Claire.
0:28 Speaker 01 Thanks.
0:49 Speaker 01 We are going to actually keep this pretty apolitical today and maybe talk a bit about the parts about China that are less discussed in the headlines. And, you know, Jason reached out and he said he wanted to really understand what were some problems and I wanted to see solved, that we wanted to see solved. So, I'm a property developer. I run Greater China for Heinz. We're the largest private real estate firm in the world. And we have an incredible Greater China team. I know I see this folks in the front, they're like, "Where is she? I can't possibly spot her in there." Uh, so...
1:31 Speaker 01 So, we have a team that is working across Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Dongguan, and Hong Kong. And we get to work really across the real estate spectrum. So, we built the greenest skyscraper in China. We built some of the first international service departments in the country and are doing some really interesting innovative projects. Like in Hong Kong, we bought a distressed hotel that we're turning into really a new kind of living, collaborative living that's super technology enabled for a young population there, where the average white collar young person, it takes them 20 years of salary to be able to buy an apartment.
2:15 Speaker 01 So we get to approach these problems that are not unique to our part of the world, but often the solution is a combination of east meets west. So, back to kinda what's the problem. Well... We're sitting right now in Miami, a place that is super exciting, thanks to a lot of the things that are happening right here that have been hyped by a pretty awesome mayor. Right? What did he do? He got on Twitter and he talked to all of us about what this city had to offer. It had key ingredients. It had universities. It had an upward trajectory. It had young people looking to collaborate. And at the end of the day, that's where we want to be, right? We want to be sitting together in awesome spaces like this,
3:00 Speaker 01 exchanging ideas with other interesting people. That's how you do cool stuff. And so as property developers, we think, how do you create spaces where people want to be their best? Right? Collaborate with others and build a better future. So that's a lot of jargon, but what does that actually mean? Back to the problem. Well, first, these ingredients are pretty clear. I teach a class at Stanford on this called "Who Owns Your City", and the students usually pick it up in the first 10 minutes. It's a place that has pretty good infrastructure. Can I get a job? Can I afford to live here? And is there cool cultural stuff that keeps it from being too bland?
3:44 Speaker 01 But then, you know, you'd say, okay, well, cities can learn from each other, right? You can just take those ingredients and apply it. And that's what Swara did a great job of here. But we are living in a time where the East and West have never been more divided. Right? And building a city, building buildings, is really hard. It's like the most extreme version of hardware. So as a property developer, we spend our time really thinking about what are the big macro trends? What are startups focused on? Where do they want to be? Because our spaces need to be relevant for 50, 70, 100 years, and we can't pick up our building and move it somewhere else. And so you try to take the arbitrage of what's working in one part of the world
4:29 Speaker 01 and try to apply that to another and solve problems. And that's where you find great returns, but it's also where you build places that are going to be relevant for folks. And so, you know, just a couple of examples up here behind me. So, you know, we talked about the living challenges. So for folks to be able to afford a place to buy, but the concept of rental apartments, so like multifamily, if anyone lives in a multifamily building with one landlord, that isn't totally a thing in Greater China.
4:59 Speaker 01 Often people are left to rent from an individual landlord, pay a deposit that's enormous, cost prohibitive, and get quality of product that really is not up to what they would expect. And so, taking a very, in some ways, kind of Western concept, and applying it in a place that technologically is probably about 10 to 15 years ahead in terms of what that average user is used to, okay? They're used to unlocking a door with their phone. Their WeChat is their ID. It's the way they meet new people. They can physically shake hands on WeChat to introduce themselves to a friend. It's where they keep their coupons. It's how they pay their rent. It's how they pay their taxes in some regards, right? We don't have that in America.
5:44 Speaker 01 But if you're like me and you live in Greater China, you do. And so, how do you combine those things together to create something that doesn't exist? You see up behind me a logistics building, but it's actually six stories high. Something we're developing that is a giant, almost like a refrigerator, but a high-rise, super-tech-enabled. And that's because, you know, they've got a lot of people. That building will be sitting within a 45-minute driving radius to 45 million people. And yet, China only has a quarter of the cold storage capacity per capita that the US does, okay? It doesn't take a genius to see that this trajectory is, you know, lower-left to upper-right.
6:26 Speaker 01 And so, again, you're taking this concept of east meets west. Building up here, just behind me, is in Shanghai. It's about a million-foot tower. You have a lot of those here in the United States. Big fancy office buildings, you know, where people used to go to sit at their computers and do work. But this one is very different from one that you may have walked into earlier this week. This entire building is on WeChat.
6:55 Speaker 01 You can interact with the building on WeChat. You can interact with the landlord. You can interact with your other tenants. You can have chance encounters or organize a yoga trip in the afternoon with the people, with the space, using this digital interface. So in a way, it's really combining the way we live right now. We live in a physical world, but so much of our idea sharing, our collaboration, is happening in the air, right? In a digital experience that we can't see. And so it's another combination of this east meets west. And so what becomes a problem and an opportunity. A problem, when you sit in the middle of this world, like my team has the honor to do,
7:39 Speaker 01 is you see that there are all of these opportunities for us to be able to share this, really the best of what the West has to offer with the innovation that's happening on the ground in China, but it is so hard to talk about in this very divided world. And so we like to take the positive side and say, you know, we're living in this world of like magic and Larry, and how can we make each other better? So I thought I'd use just a few minutes, and then we'll hang out with the besties, to maybe share a story that maybe y'all haven't read so much about, so that you get the benefit of knowing a little bit about what's happening over there. And you can see an example of where sort of east meets west and that collaboration
8:24 Speaker 01 can make us all better. So up here is a gentleman y'all will probably recognize. It's Deng Xiaoping, famous for really the opening up of China. And, you know, he was an experimenter. You know, he had this vision of what China could be, and he saw what the importance of the physical world, the physical infrastructure, what a role that could play in to enable the economy to jump further. And so, the picture to the other side is Shenzhen, which in 1980 was barely a fishing village. It had about 58,000 people, very few paved roads. And Deng Xiaoping, he was from Sichuan,
9:08 Speaker 01 so he really understood what it was like to not be from the big city. And so, he declared it a special economic zone, special economic zone, so Jingji Tuo Xiu. And that meant that it would be this place to experiment with bits of capitalism, with free trade, etc.
9:28 Speaker 01 So, what is it today? Well, first, there's that same road along progression just a few years after it was declared a zone. And then up here behind me is what it looks like now. Shenzhen is over 12 million people. The average age is 29. It's really the tech hub of China. So, companies like DJI, which makes 70% of the world's drones, they call this area home. And just within this area, if you were to go shortly from where this picture is taken, you'll have two of the world's five biggest ports by tonnage. Okay? So, how do you take that head start and turn it into something further?
10:14 Speaker 01 Well, they took a lesson out of the Book of the West, and they created something called the Greater Bay Area. It's like the... Yeah, okay, you guys get it. And so, what is the Greater Bay Area? Well, it is a collection of nine cities on the mainland side, some of which may be familiar to you guys. So, Shenzhen, as mentioned, and Guangzhou. Guangzhou is about 18 million people. Places like Zhuhai. Do y'all remember, you know, several years ago, there was this thing about China building the longest bridge in the world? Everyone's like, "Where is that?" Okay, it was in Zhuhai. And then, so nine cities on the China side, and then Hong Kong and Macau.
10:57 Speaker 01 And together, this area, it's about the size of, call it, West Virginia, today has a GDP that's sitting right around Canada and South Korea. Okay, about 1.7 trillion.
11:12 Speaker 01 In 2017, they declared this Greater Bay Area name. And it was there to really back up a lot of the investment, frankly, that had already started, to join these cities together to create a super region. So within that super region, they spent about $300 billion to build infrastructure to further connect it. So within just four years, they'd built 2,000 miles of speed rail, like high-speed trains. Here we have like a little, you know, one from here that goes to Fort Lauderdale. You know, Texas is going to get one in the year 2090. And so, so what does that mean?
11:53 Speaker 01 That means that I can walk out of my office with my teammates in Hong Kong, which is right next to that big Ferris wheel thing that everybody recognizes. I can take one stop onto Metro in 13 minutes. On a speed train, I could be in Shenzhen. Or I could keep on going, and I could access about 23,000 miles of high-speed trains and get to Beijing, get to, you know, further than Guangzhou, get to Western China. It is amazing, and it is happening so quickly. And that number will soon be 40,000 as they continue to build. But it's not just speed trains. These are interconnected nodes with further metro, right?
12:36 Speaker 01 With transit-oriented development on top of the meetings of these trains. So, back to the "so what?" So we know that if you take cool people and put them in cool places and you give them an opportunity to interact, well, what can you do? So this area, again, the size of West Virginia, now with 70 million people who are all quite young, and again, back to the ingredients. We talked about what sort of fosters innovation. Well, they've incentivized universities to put additional campuses here. And these are the best universities in China, so Tsinghua, Fudan, et cetera. They funded further life science.
13:20 Speaker 01 They funded further tax increment zones to encourage businesses to come and set up nodes of activity focused on areas of excellence. So remember, we talked earlier about in 1980, there were 58,000 people in all of Shenzhen.
13:40 Speaker 01 So just between 2010 and 2020, in one small neighborhood on the western side of Shenzhen, they filed 58,000 patents.
13:53 Speaker 01 It's pretty amazing. And that shouldn't be scary. That should be exciting, guys. This is where we get innovation. This is how we get better. Back to the magic and Larry, right? Thank you. Yes, you can clap for that. You can clap for that.
14:12 Speaker 01 So what does that mean for us? What does that mean for folks who are sort of getting to work in this interstitial space in between, getting to live within it? You know, up here, you know, behind me, I have, I'll clear the visual for you. It's further just connecting, showing these metro lanes, these trams, buses, et cetera, leading to these speed trains. Back down here, that's Hong Kong Island. And then this takes you through a bit of the Bay Area before you get out to the rest of China. Well, why does it matter? It's because these things layer together. Okay, so China's e-commerce percentage
14:54 Speaker 01 is about 25% of their overall retail. Here, it's about 14%. Again, y'all are smart. We can see where this is going. So you can take some notes on the preview and see what things and trends may be coming here. In China, about 85-ish percent of their transactions are mobile. Here, that's barely 30%. Where is that going? How does that work? And you can see what's happening. Another is you can look at trends that are just part of the world there that haven't made it here. And you sit there and you're like, wow, what a chance to iterate. So the example there, again, we'll stick with shopping
15:37 Speaker 01 and retail, is social shopping. So this idea of streaming while shopping that's layered with a full experience. And imagine what it can do. Again, if you layer that on top of this WeChat platform we were just talking about, a place where I can go and I could make a new friend right now, you, by looking at you, showing my phone to you, putting them together so we can introduce a product, introduce a lecture, a concept together. Imagine what we can do. Elon likes WeChat. He was just talking about it yesterday. So, the point is, that we all have this opportunity to really, you know,
16:17 Speaker 01 again, the headlines can be exciting, they can be crispy, but to look beneath them. And to take an opportunity to further connect with the people. Because, again, those folks who are hopping on these trains for, you know, probably the equivalent of about 45 cents, right, to get on the public transit here, going around and exchanging ideas, these people, most of them are not politicians, right? Most of them are not big world global leaders. They're folks who are trying to create something for themselves, to create something for their children, to build a better world, right? So we're really all on the same team.
17:01 Speaker 01 So with that, bring the besties out, I guess. Trying not to get too spicy.
17:07 Jason Calacanis? All right. Center stage, free you.
17:09 Speaker 01 Right here?
17:10 Jason Calacanis? Right there in the middle seat.
17:11 Speaker 01 Oh, baby.
17:12 Jason Calacanis? Well done, well done.
17:13 Speaker 01 Be nice, guys, be nice.
17:16 Jason Calacanis? Of course. Well, Sax is in here, so of course we'll be nice. It's kind of by default. And meet our Ryan Peterson from Flexport. Claire, or maybe you guys, Ryan, Claire, Ryan. I'm interested in you two guys, Claire, Ryan, Ryan, Claire. Ryan.
17:33 David Friedberg? You guys met?
17:35 Speaker 01 We follow each other.
17:38 Jason Calacanis? So, what do we, as Americans, not understand about our rival? And what does our rival most not understand about us, in your estimation, having operated in both countries for so long?
17:57 Speaker 01 You know, the term rival is an interesting one. Obviously, I love sports analogies and came from the track and field world myself.
18:06 Jason Calacanis? Claire was in the Olympics, guys.
18:08 Speaker 01 Claire was injured.
18:09 Jason Calacanis? I used to go running sometimes. Kind of fast. At the Olympics.
18:16 Speaker 01 But, you know, your job in the sport is to find the person who is better than you in some ways, and maybe they're strong where you're weak, you're weak where they're strong. You find each other and you shore up together. And I think that is what becomes so clear when you, you know, live there, when you live on the other side of the world. But maybe we're born here, or, you know, I'm a minority, so I've maybe always lived in that interstitial space personally. Or even our team. Our team is very representative of modern China.
18:58 Speaker 01 We have people from nearly every province, they're really across the education bracket, highly trained engineers, but who might be quite young, to folks in their 60s who have really seen China evolve. And so, I do think the thing that can get missed is almost that concept like we talked about, that as, quote, rivals, you know, they're not monoliths, just as America is not a monolith, right? And we can take the best of each other.
19:26 Jason Calacanis? So we're best of rivals in a way?
19:28 Speaker 01 There we go. That's well said.
19:30 David Friedberg? Is there a model for the century for cooperation between the two nations that's enhancing to both?
19:36 Speaker 01 I think it's happening in enterprise. I really think it is. So, when I look at, again, younger people, the products that they use, or the things that the young tech entrepreneurs in China are working on versus here, they're approaching a lot of the same problems, right? So on the social side, you know, looking at Douyin and what made it so catchy, right? Explain what it is for us. It's TikTok. It's TikTok. And back to that one about, you know, cheat codes and a preview, you know, Douyin was popular years ago.
20:15 Speaker 01 And so, you know, I remember first looking at the app and being like, wow, this is very catchy. And there's effectively no difference between
20:25 Chamath Palihapitiya? So do you read and write Mandarin fluently as well as speak it?
20:29 Speaker 01 Well, you will never confuse me for a local Well, you'll have to go to a hotel. But, you know, enough to get by.
20:37 Chamath Palihapitiya? And so when you do business in China, do you conduct it in English or do you conduct it in Mandarin?
20:41 Speaker 01 Yeah, so with the team, we work fully across what's appropriate because we also work in Hong Kong where it's Cantonese.
20:46 Chamath Palihapitiya? Right.
20:47 Speaker 01 But all of my communications that go out to my full team, everything in full team is in Mandarin. We do have a large part of our team that only functions within Mandarin.
20:57 Chamath Palihapitiya? So when you're, for example, like, you know, you showed some of these buildings and the idea that came to me is this is a massive coordination problem that's almost impossible in the United States, which is if you have this idea of like this living, breathing, monolithic building that is connected via the internet, it'd probably be 50 organizations in the United States that would have to have a say or want to say. The perception that we get is there is an individual that can effectively make that right decision in China, whether it's at the city level or at the state level. Is that how it's really like? Like when you guys have super ambitious ideas, is there one place you go to and then it just kind of all gets decided? Or is it just like here where it's messy?
21:40 Speaker 01 So it's kind of neither, actually, and this is where I think it takes the best of both, which is at a local level, so you have, you know, a local, we have a party secretary, you have a block leader and ultimately it goes all the way up to, you know, the big guy. But China does this amazing thing. They have a five-year plan. They call it the five-year plan. Last year was the 14th five-year plan and it sets KPIs and areas of focus for the entire country. And those are things around carbon neutrality, education,
22:18 Chamath Palihapitiya? Agriculture.
22:19 Speaker 01 Care for seniors, agriculture, industry. And it's a lot like, you know, for you guys who are running companies, setting goals and how are you going to get there? What's the roadmap? But that filters all the way down. And so at a local level, those KPIs for the local leader are, you know, how did you make your district greener? How did you increase revenue from higher quality services and technologically advanced companies?
22:46 Chamath Palihapitiya? Like what happens if you don't achieve it? You get fired? You get kicked out of the party? Like what is the... Mechanism of reward.
22:53 Speaker 01 Yeah.
22:54 Chamath Palihapitiya? Or.
22:55 Speaker 01 Well, it's quite high accountability. And so if you perform very well within that system as a leader, then you can move to higher and more advanced posts to a bigger city.
23:04 Chamath Palihapitiya? City mayor becomes a.
23:05 Speaker 01 Right, so yeah, so from a block to a bigger city to a higher, you know, up to a.
23:11 David Friedberg? So your political career stalled out if you don't hit them, but it gets accelerated if you exceed them.
23:15 Speaker 01 Right, and so that creates a very interesting set of opportunities. And so to put it to maybe a tangible example is so for the things that, you know, are really great for communities like park space or building a building that's green. The last building that I showed up there is right, sits right on top of a metro and is next to a natural history museum. And we needed to work with the local government to ensure that we were relating to the area properly, creating, like leaving it better than we found it. You know, we look at projects where you can't do the project unless you show that it's going to be green and additive or restore historic buildings in the area.
24:00 Speaker 01 There's a real handshake there that I firmly believe creates better outcomes. I know our team would say the same thing.
24:07 Ryan Petersen? Claire, what's going to happen with the capital markets for your business with Evergrande and like some of these big kind of property developers that have had major debt problems? And have you seen that already flowing over? And you understand the market very well. You probably are able to navigate this, but the foreign capital and other investors like might group everybody into the same block and get scared off.
24:28 Speaker 01 Sure, sure. So certainly we get a lot of questions. But it's another one where the headlines out versus, you know, inside the country, certainly the built environment, the construction and the real estate industries. If you combine that all together, you've got about 27% of the economy. If you include the full integrated stack, one of the things in five-year plan is to diversify away from that in a way. But is, you know. Evergrande and the other developers, the real focus at the local and the higher level is to help the regular people get good on their deposits and ultimately get the homes that they were promised.
25:12 Speaker 01 So it's very interesting for developers like us and acquisitions people, as for some of those smaller developers who got into trouble.
25:19 Chamath Palihapitiya? Has there been a bailout? Is that the wrong word, the way that it's been characterized in the US media, that the Chinese government had to step in, shore up the balance sheet, make sure Evergrande wouldn't default on some of their loans?
25:29 Speaker 01 I think there was a concern that there would be an entire meltdown of the full Chinese economy, which is not what we feel on the ground. And I think if anything, it's created a set of opportunities to really level set, especially on the living sector. It's really accelerated some policies to make it easier to build and to create rental housing, which creates more access, which therefore maybe takes away some of the pressure on the condominium system. You know, for the debt markets, to create a space that is maybe taking on projects that are appropriate for the system, a little bit, again, more diversification and development in the right places in the right markets.
26:14 Jason Calacanis? When we look at the relationship between the United States and China, we've had 300, 400, 500 million people come out of abject poverty on the planet because of this great engagement. I don't know if that's a term, but I'll call it the great engagement. We started using their factories, we started making iPhones there. This has created, despite all of the hand-wringing about the relationship and all the various issues on both sides, a lot less suffering in the world.
26:43 Speaker 01 Absolutely.
26:44 Jason Calacanis? And so there is something that I think we don't recognize sometimes, is that people who are living for under a dollar a day, 300, 400, 500 million of them are now gone. And that leaves some areas in Africa and Southeast Asia that we still need to do that work, which paradoxically, or ironically, it seems like China is doing in Africa.
27:03 Jason Calacanis? What I'm curious about is what you're seeing on the ground with their middle class, which to me seems analogous to what we went through in the 30s, 40s, and 50s. This establishment of a middle class, which then established, you know, education and prosperity for the decades to come, and specifically for the boomers and Gen X. So tell us about that middle class that's emerging. We hear about it.
27:26 Speaker 01 Yeah.
27:27 Jason Calacanis? But how many of them are there? Qualitatively, what do they want from life?
27:33 Speaker 01 Yeah. Well, Jason, in a word, it's incredible, right? Like, again, I talk about infrastructure so much because you see it up there, right? China's only as urbanized as the US was in about 1950. So we read a lot about these...
27:49 Jason Calacanis? Today.
27:50 Speaker 01 Today, today. So we read a lot about these...
27:52 Jason Calacanis? Bullet trains.
27:54 Speaker 01 Right, and so that leaves this incredible consolidation of people to cities and younger people to cities. It's a demographic, you know, spark that maybe gets talked about a little bit less. But also, if you look at the change that that person you're talking about has seen in their lifetime. So they went from a rural lifestyle, frankly, most of them, and something of a village setting that had not changed in decades, to this future world that in many ways can only be imagined in movies. And so I think, you know, I sort of struggle to put it into terms because you ask, you know, what do they want? What are they looking towards? And I'd say, you know, to use a personal example, right?
28:39 Speaker 01 I'm the luckiest girl in the world. I get to live in this amazing place and work with this incredible team. And, you know, yet, you know, my parents graduated in a fully segregated world. The elder people, when they were growing up, were not just slaves. They were the slaves that we talk about on Juneteenth. The ones in Galveston who walked across the bridge and followed railroad tracks to Houston, Texas, right? That's amazing. [applause]
29:09 Speaker 01 That is amazing. And so I think when a generation or a collection of generations sees that amount of change, what they want is, first of all, they're grateful, but what do they want? They want to be able to build and create and be people.
29:26 Chamath Palihapitiya? Themselves.
29:27 Speaker 01 Yeah.
29:27 Chamath Palihapitiya? I have a question. Japan in the 80s had a moment where everything came together for that country. Great population growth, great economic growth, great systems like kaizen and all of this other stuff that they would export. And the headlines in the 80s was Japan was taking over the United States or Japan was going to lap the United States. But really, one of the biggest things that had working against it was a demographic wave, right? And you had massive negative birth rate that has really compounded Japan's stagnation. China is on the precipice of this because of this one China policy. I think the stat that I saw, which is stunning, is there's 1.2 billion people in China? 1.4?
30:10 Chamath Palihapitiya? By 2100, it's going to be around 600 million. If that's true, the point is just that there's a real issue.
30:18 Speaker 01 Yeah.
30:19 Chamath Palihapitiya? Is there something in these five-year plans around how to become sort of more culturally integrated with the rest of the world? You know, meaning, how do you use immigration as an example to subsidize some of the negative birth rate? Do you teach English more so that you're more integrated into the world economy? All of these things, can you just talk about that?
30:38 Speaker 01 Uh huh. So first, I think the urbanization trend of folks consolidating to the cities really can't be overstated, just in the way that it shifts sort of how the country will work and what's happening on the ground. You know, it's still relatively early days, but when we look at things like Belt and Road, you know, as I walk around Beijing and I compare it to, you know, when we first started there or when we were working with capital partners there, I see a lot more brown faces.
31:11 Jason Calacanis? Really?
31:12 Speaker 01 Going to the universities around Beijing. Now, these are still-
31:14 Jason Calacanis? Explain what Belt and Road is for folks who maybe haven't heard the term.
31:17 Speaker 01 Yeah, yeah, so many places you guys can read about it. And before I forget, talking about, sort of, just, I know everybody loves recommendations here. So, if you haven't read Dalio's latest book on changing world order, or there's actually a great- You read it!
31:33 Jason Calacanis? Friedberg made us all read it.
31:34 Speaker 01 She read it, you read it.
31:35 Jason Calacanis? Friedberg, Friedberg made us read it. Friedberg talked about it every podcast for the last 20, as you know.
31:39 Speaker 01 So, you've got to read it, listen to your besties. There's also a very good, very good illustration of it, as you guys have talked about.
31:49 Speaker 01 But, you do, do read that, because, you know, China's been a major participant in the global south. So, you know, the short version of Belt and Road is working really across a set of countries around Southeast Asia and Africa, bringing in infrastructure and kind of what it sounds like, roads, roads, ports, airports, et cetera, really building out this network for that part of, part of the world. But I think what gets sort of bumped over on that is, again, things like, like this. So, folks coming to China to be educated, the number of folks on the African continent now learning Chinese. And again, I think this is something that is exciting at the end of the day.
32:34 Speaker 01 The opportunity to, to further exchange, to lift more people out of poverty, to create further infrastructure and-
32:43 Jason Calacanis? Claire, I was hoping you would stay with us and be a bestie for Ryan, who's the next speaker. Would you be willing to help us interview Ryan?
32:50 Speaker 01 I would be honored! You want to switch seats?
32:53 Jason Calacanis? No, no, there we are. Oh, yes, switch seats!
32:55 Speaker 01 Okay.
32:56 Jason Calacanis? Perfect idea. Switch seats.
32:57 Speaker 01 Get in, I warmed it up for you.
32:58 Jason Calacanis? And you're the guestie.
33:01 Jason Calacanis? I like it, I like it.
33:05 Jason Calacanis? So give it up for Claire. Now, Ryan, congratulations. CNBC does their Top Innovator or Private Company Awards every year, and you made it to the top 50 list today. I didn't check which ranking you got, but being on the list in and of itself is a big win. What do they call it, disruptors list?
33:24 Ryan Petersen? Disruptor 50. And my view of these lists is you should never share any list about your company unless you're number one. And we were number one this morning, so I can share it.
33:36 Jason Calacanis? You truly helped us navigate, I think, the challenge of us as besties and the audience understanding supply chain. We appreciate that. You've been on the show twice, I think?
33:47 Ryan Petersen? Just once so far.
33:47 Jason Calacanis? Just once so far, and then here, so this is your second time on the show.
33:50 Ryan Petersen? Apologies, I was filming the interview for that during Palmer's talk this morning. You didn't miss anything. I don't know what I missed.
33:58 Jason Calacanis? Nothing much happened.
33:59 Ryan Petersen? But when Palmer and I woke up this morning, we're writing our speeches together and deciding what we were going to say.
34:04 Jason Calacanis? Oh, do you have some feelings you'd like to share with the class? Seems to be a theme. I mean, this is turning into therapy.
34:12 Ryan Petersen? No, I don't have any enemies.
34:13 Jason Calacanis? I have some emotions.
34:14 Ryan Petersen? I don't have any enemies. It's sad.
34:15 David Friedberg? He just says nice things about people, J. Cal.
34:17 Ryan Petersen? I got COVID. I couldn't think of a single person. Who do I want to give this to? I was like, I like everybody.
34:22 Jason Calacanis? So, tell us.
34:24 David Friedberg? He was going to do a talk, right? Are you doing a talk for a couple of minutes?
34:27 Jason Calacanis? Well, he's going to talk from there.
34:28 Ryan Petersen? Yeah, I'd love to share a little bit about what we're seeing. So first off, what Flexport is, is we're a global logistics platform. We help businesses of all sizes ship products all over the world, from anywhere in the world to anywhere else in the world. We do a lot of business in China. Probably about half of all of our volumes come out of China.
34:43 Speaker 01 I know a landlord, if you're looking for one, Ryan.
34:47 David Friedberg? If you need some range.
34:48 Ryan Petersen? We'll do some business after this. And so we see a lot. We're sort of like a front row backstage pass to the world economy of what's really happening and unfolding. And it's been a crazy few years. We, to give you context, so Flexport started in 2013. Its first revenue was in 2014. We did $2 million in revenue that year. We're on track this year to do $5 billion in revenue. So from, it's very exhausting, yeah. And...
35:22 Ryan Petersen? This time period is, I assume it's always like this in this industry. I have only been in the business for about eight or 10 years here. But just to take you through that timeline, in 2015, there was a port strike on the West Coast and you couldn't import anything into the United States for like three months. Total pandemonium. By the way, that might happen again. July 1st, their contract that they negotiated back then is up for renewal on July 1st. So we might talk about that. 2016, there was so much excess capacity of ocean shipping. Oh, so many extra ships were purchased that the price of ocean freight hit the lowest in all of human history. It was like $600 to ship a container. This past year was $20,000 in 2016. So we go through these boom and bust cycles. It's an asset business that'll happen.
36:05 Ryan Petersen? 2017, 18, and 19, our president would launch a new tariff war every couple of months and you couldn't predict anything. 2020, a pandemic hits. You couldn't ship anything for a couple of months out of China where like they were really hard, zero COVID, shut down factories, shut down all the purchase orders. Everyone thought the Great Depression was coming. Cancelled all the purchase orders. Then it turned out the opposite happened. It was this crazy boom and you couldn't import anything because the ports were overcrowded. It went from, 2019, it took about 50 days to ship a container from like when the goods are ready, when the factory raises their hand and says, hey, come and pick up these goods, to right now it's about 120 days. So doubling, more than doubling the transit time.
36:49 Ryan Petersen? And it is just incredibly hard to operate in this environment if you're trying to run a business. And so we've, we've had to learn how to navigate through chaos as Flexport. It's like, we kind of welcome it at this point. We found that it's probably, it might actually be good for our business. We try not to talk about that because it's so bad for our customers and it's been hard to fulfill the customer promises. But if you put yourself in the shoes of those customers, so like a direct to consumer e-commerce business, and we ship for probably 80 or 90% of the hot new D to C brands, a lot of IPOs recently, a lot of, a lot of really cool, hot new brands, they're going through. Almost a perfect storm right now. In like a really, really bad way, like the movie The Perfect Storm. Because ocean freight rates are sky high.
37:35 Ryan Petersen? Mentioned this, ten, twenty thousand dollars to ship a container. Rule of thumb, long term is like two grand. So really, really elevated costs. Walmart announced really high costs this morning. And so it's not just small companies, but Walmart announced their costs were through the roof from supply chain and their stock fell 10% today. Wiping off forty billion dollars of market cap this morning. So it hits companies of all sizes. But these D to C brands got a double whammy because Apple last, I think it was last year when they changed their privacy rules. And their customer acquisition models on Instagram. Facebook. Facebook, all these things stopped working. And so at the same moment, your CAC that stops working, you can't acquire customers, your supply chain costs are through the roof.
38:17 Ryan Petersen? And then add to that, that consumers are now starting to come back to conferences like this. Go back to the restaurants and the clubs and doing the travel. And during the pandemic, everybody just bought stuff. You gotta get your dopamine from somewhere and everybody was just buying goods. So that is like a triple whammy for these companies. I'm incredibly worried about the whole D to C brands, the whole D to C space.
38:41 Jason Calacanis? The D to C space, just anyone in physical goods.
38:44 Chamath Palihapitiya? You saw it in like the, I think it was Thrasio that just announced they're laying off 25% of their.
38:49 Jason Calacanis? Thrasio was buying a collection of those Amazon D to C brands, putting them together and trying to have some economies of scale. But when your supply and your demand both get 10x'd in the wrong direction, it's game over.
39:02 Ryan Petersen? It's, I don't know if it's game over, but it definitely changes the rules of the game. The reality is, look, people are still gonna buy stuff. There are gonna be successful, there are gonna be some winners, there are gonna be brands that survive.
39:10 Jason Calacanis? At what price though, at what price?
39:12 David Friedberg? Well, so you're saying that your thesis that you're making, the statement that you're making today is, hey, we're seeing real significant risk to D to C companies because of this confluence of issues right now. And this could be a big threat to a lot of businesses, particularly in an environment where venture funding is.
39:28 Ryan Petersen? I think, again, venture funding.
39:30 Jason Calacanis? Oh my gosh, triple storm.
39:31 Ryan Petersen? Capital markets are driving.
39:32 David Friedberg? Capital markets, public and private.
39:34 Ryan Petersen? Investors are like, you all will look at this and go, hey, maybe I, you know, put more into SaaS.
39:37 Chamath Palihapitiya? Like Pete said, it's just easier to not do anything.
39:39 Ryan Petersen? It might be easier to not do anything. So what does that mean? How do you manage this? And fundamentally, one of the problems that.
39:47 Ryan Petersen? That comes about in all supply chains, it's been written about the famous PhD paper from like the 60s or something called the Bullwhip Effect. And a bullwhip, if you like, crack a whip, the end of that whip is moving incredibly fast. And it's a bit like that in supply chains because you have imperfect information. And so the people doing demand planning are living in one system, they're selling goods, they're looking at this data set. The people producing stuff, it's on a different system. How long is it taking to produce things? That's getting longer, the transit time's getting longer. This data is living across all these different domains and becoming very, very hard for a brand to make a decision, how many goods should we buy? When should we buy them? How much do we want to have in stock? How do we avoid being way overstock?
40:32 Ryan Petersen? And then, and what we're seeing right now is these warehouses are overflowing and people can't...
40:37 Speaker 01 So what changes that? Like what breaks it open? So, you know, like in China, Pinduoduo didn't exist in 2015. Now, 800 million plus, right, users. But it was technology that broke it open. Like what's the breakout moment to solve this exact problem you're talking about?
40:51 Ryan Petersen? Yeah, I mean, actually China's got, one of the companies to watch is Shein, S-H-E-I-N. It's this Chinese, kind of like the new Zara that is taking over the world. I think they're going to do $20 billion in revenue this year. Fast fashion? Fast fashion. They're launching 1,000 SKUs a day. 1,000 new SKUs a day, all like AI-generated and then if people order enough, they produce it. And it's like a really incredible company. Wait, you're saying a robot says, make these SKUs?
41:19 Speaker 01 This is where this shirt is from, actually.
41:23 Ryan Petersen? No way!
41:24 Speaker 01 I can do not.
41:25 Ryan Petersen? Yeah, see?
41:26 Speaker 01 Do you like it?
41:27 Ryan Petersen? I did that shirt. And it, now it's going to be a million of them to be ordered after this. Hold on, sorry, sorry. Tell us, sorry, this shirt you bought?
41:34 Speaker 01 So it's literally a shirt from Shein, but, but yes, so if Zara, so if Zara is seeing something on a runway, determining that that trend will hit, and then they can have it in stores, I think within like eight or nine days, something, you know, pretty wild. Shein's about as close to instantaneous as you can get. So very fast-moving SKUs, it's sort of hyperspeed fashion, so they can have things...
41:56 Ryan Petersen? Yeah, but you're kind of like pre-com.
41:57 Chamath Palihapitiya? Like for minority, but they're predicting that this puffy shirt is going to be like, women are gonna wanna go for pirate.
42:04 Speaker 01 But it's a fly shirt.
42:06 Chamath Palihapitiya? It's fly as fuck. I agree.
42:08 Ryan Petersen? And I think one of the, one of the key things here is, is that transit time of how long does it take you from when the thing is made to when it gets to the customer? Because if it stretches out the way it has right now in ocean freight market where it's taking forever. If that takes three months, four months, five months.
42:22 Chamath Palihapitiya? Might not be flying no more.
42:22 Ryan Petersen? Six months, all of a sudden you've placed these orders and then the demand went away because people started going to nightclubs instead of buying their gardening equipment. And so the tighter you can make that, and it does speak to spending a little bit more on logistics where, where you know, traditional procurement person in logistics only thinks about like, I'm just gonna buy the cheapest freight I can ever buy. Because they don't understand that your goods in transit are just money that's taken a different form for a period of time. And money has a cost to it. And if you're sitting there on six months, it's already expensive because you know, you gotta pay interest on that. There's opportunity cost. What else could you do with the money? But now that cost has gotten much worse because by the time the goods arrive, maybe nobody wants them.
43:02 Ryan Petersen? You saw that with Christmas where, you know, you import Christmas, that's the classic thing. You import Christmas stuff and in January it's worthless.
43:09 Chamath Palihapitiya? At what price? Do people just find alternate ways, whether it's you establish domestic 3D printing or you buy a fleet of planes or like, there's gotta be a work, because like I saw this image, I think maybe you tweeted it of this entire massive traffic jam. Basically trying to get the ships even into China because the COVID-19 lockdowns are so strict. But that's also exacerbated all of this.
43:32 David Friedberg? And last year Walmart, didn't they announce they're spending $10 billion verticalizing their supply chain and building out their own? Infrastructure for moving goods.
43:40 Ryan Petersen? You're seeing a lot of companies do this, much easier said than done. You've seen at least a few of the big box retailers, Walmart, I wanna say Home Depot, Costco, a number of these guys have said, hey, we're gonna charter our own ships.
43:51 David Friedberg? Target was the other one.
43:53 Ryan Petersen? Target, Amazon, of course. Go charter their own ships, go solve the problem their own way. It's really hard to do, run these things at scale and operate it. It looks good at the PowerPoint slide. You know, when, when you have to get down to it, it's really hard.
44:05 David Friedberg? So is there a big capex play here, Ryan, for the next decade?
44:09 Ryan Petersen? I think.
44:10 David Friedberg? Like a big capital equipment, hard asset play?
44:15 Ryan Petersen? The world's ocean carriers, that's what we call the people that own the ships, have actually ordered 25% more ships, increased the fleet by 25% over the next three years.
44:25 David Friedberg? Wow.
44:26 Ryan Petersen? So it could be ugly the other way, real quick. You have too many ships and nobody, you know, the ship owners can't make any money.
44:30 David Friedberg? Same's happening in mining. I mean, like, it's a similar sort of, but anyway.
44:33 Chamath Palihapitiya? Ryan said it best. The problem is you can't forecast demand accurately for these long lead time categories that are highly capex intensive.
44:41 David Friedberg? Totally.
44:41 Chamath Palihapitiya? Whether it's mining, or whether it's shipping. How do you make a $500 million capex decision for a business demand cycle that's five years into the future?
44:49 David Friedberg? But they're all taking, they're all taking profit hits and saying, "We have to make this investment because we need the security, we need the redundancy." I mean, Walmart did it, right? They were optimized to a T, and then all of a sudden, it's like, "Hey, that optimized system doesn't work."
45:00 Chamath Palihapitiya? Look, the way that mining, for example, deals with this, which is really interesting, is they get these companies to sign up what's called "take or pay" agreements, right? And so they can actually smooth out the demand curve five or six in the future.
45:12 David Friedberg? Can't do that with the consumer.
45:12 Chamath Palihapitiya? Take or pay means, "I'll do a deal that says, 'Okay, I'm gonna rip the lithium out of the ground. You take it, or you pay for it. I don't care what you do, but I'm gonna get the revenue assurance I need to go to Wall Street to get the money.'"
45:24 Ryan Petersen? And we've started to see those signed for the first time. So we've signed three-year contracts. Flexport was the first ever to sign a multi-year contract where we commit, "We will pay for this freight whether or not, uh, whether or not we ship anything."
45:33 Chamath Palihapitiya? Take or pay.
45:34 Ryan Petersen? We're gonna pay upfront. Yeah, okay, take or pay. Um, and, and you asked a little bit, air freight, what's gonna happen there. Well, remember, 50% of all the world's air freight flies in the belly of passenger planes. And there's way less people traveling to and from Asia than there were.
45:47 Chamath Palihapitiya? Is that right?
45:47 Ryan Petersen? Yeah, 50% of the world's air freight. Which is a little scary when you think about, like, what's under the belly of that car.
45:52 Chamath Palihapitiya? Yeah, is that getting scanned?
45:53 Ryan Petersen? Uh, it is, it is. There's, there's good controls on that, but, uh, but you never know. It's always, it's always...
45:57 Chamath Palihapitiya? Yes, Jason, it's getting scanned.
45:58 Ryan Petersen? A little nerve-wracking. Um, so, and in fact...
46:01 Chamath Palihapitiya? He seemed to be not so sure.
46:02 Ryan Petersen? Uh, you know, you work in any industry long enough, you start to question whether everything's perfect. Um, so, we've actually got 10 passenger planes that we've leased, and we'll, we'll keep doing more, that are not flying any passengers. We're just filling them with freight. We started doing this in the pandemic.
46:18 David Friedberg? Are there seats in them?
46:19 Ryan Petersen? Flying masks.
46:20 David Friedberg? Are there seats at the top?
46:21 Ryan Petersen? There's still seats in some of them, some we've ripped out the seats.
46:23 Speaker 01 It's like Castaway. You've got the big plane with basically holding staff.
46:28 Ryan Petersen? If you want to go to Asia, God, 787, there's nobody on there, it could be a private flight, just you.
46:34 Speaker 01 But exactly, this is why you've seen the rise of logistics real estate as a deeply institutional asset class. Because that math that you talk about, the algorithms determining what is ordered, how long will it sit? And how fast do people want it? That takes an infrastructure on land to be able to get it to people as well.
46:51 Ryan Petersen? And coming back to the question about assets, is there a play here? Probably yes, because most of Wall Street has been trained, they've gone to all the same business schools and everybody's been trained that like, assets are terrible, get them off your books, don't carry them.
47:02 David Friedberg? Well, this is what happened with oil and gas, you know, going into last year.
47:06 Speaker 01 Asset light market.
47:07 Ryan Petersen? And everyone missed it.
47:08 Speaker 01 You want to be asset light.
47:09 Ryan Petersen? It's still the trend and almost everywhere until somebody like TSMC comes along and says, you know what? You don't want assets, Intel, like, fine, we'll build the fabs. Another $400 billion company because they're willing to have assets on the books. But it's a different investor positioning.
47:22 David Friedberg? And now they have a power in the equation and they can get a better share of value.
47:26 Speaker 01 And I've been answering this question.
47:28 David Friedberg? That's the real estate investor.
47:29 Ryan Petersen? The hardest question for me to answer, and I know that there's some entrepreneurs out there who have the same question. Anytime someone asks me, is Flexport a software company or a logistics company? Are you going to own assets or not own assets?
47:40 Speaker 01 Yes.
47:41 Ryan Petersen? And, you know, I think the correct answer is to ask the investor which one they'll give you a higher multiple for and then just say that. Try to figure out who you're talking to, but it is on some level, you know, maybe another answer is like kind of Buddhist dualism, like you can't do logistics without the tech, you can't do the tech without the logistics.
47:58 Chamath Palihapitiya? I think you're bringing up something which is that today, the problem with the capital markets is actually that it is very Balkanized, so meaning, you know, let's just say you take a company public like yours. The problem that you'll have in the public markets is that there are folks that you'll go to in that room that understand SaaS software, understand margin structure of a software business, et cetera. And then there's folks over here who run the industrials business and folks over here who run consumer. The problem is those three folks don't talk. They have three completely different conceptions of what a good business is. And the problem for you will be, and I'm not forecasting this for you to be a problem.
48:33 Ryan Petersen? No, you're correct.
48:33 Chamath Palihapitiya? Is that you can get orphaned in any one of these groups and now all of a sudden the capital markets could be totally shut for you. This is a very important point that you're bringing up. The thing that I think we need to change is like the capital people that control the money flows do need to have a little bit more of an open mind. Sure, it's true that you'd love a 90% gross margin business. But it is also true, in the TSMC case, you'd rather have a business doing 20% on $500 billion.
48:58 Jason Calacanis? Well, and if we look, Chamath, we also have some examples of Amazon. The market seems to have worked out this business that's very factory and asset-heavy in delivering goods to us and the cloud business.
49:12 Chamath Palihapitiya? Even Amazon, like, look, Amazon got a scape philosophy on less than $1 billion of invested capital. The problem is, if Ryan, for example, decides, "Hey, I'm gonna go and actually vertically integrate and buy an entire fleet of ships," that's probably a $10 billion to $20 billion capex cycle over 10 years. And you think about replacement costs, it may make a ton of sense, actually.
49:33 Jason Calacanis? Right. I wonder when Amazon's cap expenses for those servers started to hit.
49:38 Speaker 01 He's thinking about it.
49:41 Ryan Petersen? But getting the capital markets. A little boy in me definitely wants to do that.
49:45 Chamath Palihapitiya? You want to own a fleet of ships?
49:46 Ryan Petersen? You already own a fleet of ships. But no, we're not gonna do that. I don't think, you know, there's two plays. Fundamentally, your bullwhip effect means the data can't flow. And people can't make decisions optimally because the data is trapped in multiple places. You don't know how to run an efficient supply chain because you don't know how many trucks do I need when the ship arrives. Like, actually, not even like long-term demand forecasting how many ships, but like, literally, that ship is gonna arrive. How many trucks should I dispatch? When should I dispatch them? Like, there's two ways to solve this problem. One is to own the asset. And the other is to create a data network effect such that the asset owner benefits enough from putting it on your platform. Your machine learning, your algorithms are helping them make more money from their asset. They want to tell you.
50:28 Speaker 01 Or you can invest further down into the chain.
50:31 Ryan Petersen? One of them's a lot, hopefully, simpler and don't need to manage as many people. And life is easier if you can solve the data machine learning problem.
50:37 Speaker 01 Well, you look to Alibaba and Alibaba investing down into China. Like, there is a middle road of being able to go.
50:42 Ryan Petersen? Investing into who?
50:43 Speaker 01 China. So logistics warehouse.
50:45 Jason Calacanis? I mean, in a way, Ryan. As stupid as it sounds, you having. Purchased a shipping company and putting it over here, to your point, Claire, and saying, "Here's the little thing we bought. It's a bunch of ships. It's its own balance sheet. And then here's the really great business." But we have this little subsidiary over here is a potential middle ground.
51:03 Ryan Petersen? It's what makes Flexport a fun business. There's like a million strategies and ways to play out. And I'm not a big believer in predicting the future. And you want to have a vision and know where you're going, but I think be sort of flexible.
51:14 Jason Calacanis? Yeah.
51:14 Ryan Petersen? In that.
51:15 Jason Calacanis? It's in the name.
51:16 Ryan Petersen? We talk about our culture a lot. What's the goal of a company's culture? And Elon talks about the goal of a company, the purpose is like, hey, we've got to create valuable products and services for fellow humans, right? But the goal of your culture is how do you maximize your velocity in that direction? And velocity is a really important word because we forget, like, normal people forget that velocity is different from speed.
51:38 Jason Calacanis? Yes.
51:39 Ryan Petersen? If you remember your physics, velocity has a direction. You've got to know where you're going. And sometimes going really, really fast is actually negative velocity because you're going the wrong way. And so how do you stay agile? The world's going to throw all kinds of chaos at you. Be nimble, be able to change. We don't know exactly the strategy. I don't have everything knocked out.
51:54 Jason Calacanis? As we wrap here, question for both you and Claire, which is, China has big asset.
52:00 Chamath Palihapitiya? Before you do your wrap question, can I just, can I ask him to, can you tell us the audience about what you did during the UK crisis?
52:07 Jason Calacanis? Oh, this is beautiful.
52:08 Chamath Palihapitiya? It's just like 30 seconds about.
52:11 Ryan Petersen? I didn't go there like Antonio, crazy man. But what, so we started this group in 2017 called flexport.org to do humanitarian relief shipping, really at that time of the crisis with Syria and trying to help refugees. It was really a simple idea. It's like, look, we got all this stuff here. We know they need stuff at the refugee camps. What if we shipped it there? Seemed like a radical idea. We maintain a database of partners. So we have agents that we can operate on behalf of Flexport in over 120 countries. And at that time, I simply emailed our Syria partner, who was literally based in Aleppo, where a lot of this destruction was happening. And I emailed, I said, hey, we'd like to ship a container to this refugee camp down there. And he was like, sure. What's the address? Where do you want to ship it? And I was like, wait, is that easy? Like, I thought this was like, and I realized you could do that. And we didn't ship into Syria because we didn't know
52:56 Ryan Petersen? who was going to end up in. So we shipped to refugee camps in Turkey and Jordan. So we've been doing this now for five years, shipping to over 50 different countries. Any kind of, anytime there's a hurricane, earthquakes, but we're a warp.
53:09 Ryan Petersen? And so when we saw this happening in Ukraine, we immediately kicked into high gear. The flexport.org team has about 12 full-time people and then we have a model where employees at Flexport can surge onto that. So we've had about 60 people working on this. In this case, you know, usually we offer pro bono shipping because shipping is expensive. We can't just eat the full cost. We are profitable, but not enough to really solve the world's problems all by ourselves. So we created a GoFundMe campaign partnered with Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis. Ashton's an early investor in Flexport and we raised 25 million bucks to pay for shipping, to deliver goods. Yeah, thank you.
53:46 Jason Calacanis? Well, and the way you did it was-
53:47 Ryan Petersen? And thanks to Ashton and all of our investors, a lot of great people stepped up.
53:51 Jason Calacanis? You emailed the besties and said, "Hey, it's $4,400 a container." Was that the number, 42 or 44?
53:57 Ryan Petersen? It depends on where it's coming from.
53:58 Jason Calacanis? For Ukraine specifically.
53:59 Ryan Petersen? I mean, for example, we shipped nine ambulances from Gibraltar into Ukraine. I thought we wouldn't be able to ship into Ukraine because it's a war zone. It turns out most, I don't know if most, but a huge percentage of European truck drivers are Ukrainian and they were just like stoked to go and do this.
54:14 Jason Calacanis? So I-
54:15 Ryan Petersen? So we delivered nine ambulances. That cost like around 10 grand.
54:18 Jason Calacanis? Yeah, so a bunch of-
54:19 Ryan Petersen? We delivered nine ambulances.
54:20 Jason Calacanis? I replied back to him and I said, "No problem." And he said, "Hey, mention on the podcast." I said, "No problem." And I donated a $4,400 container. And then Chamath said, "Oh, I donated the plane that 12 containers went on."
54:31 Ryan Petersen? He did.
54:32 Jason Calacanis? So it was a flex on a flex for Flexport. It was like a multi-layered flex.
54:37 Ryan Petersen? So, and then it just snowballed and this hasn't gotten much attention, but Yuri Milner, who's an early Flexport investor, just donated $100 million.
54:46 Jason Calacanis? Wow.
54:46 Ryan Petersen? To, yes.
54:47 Speaker 01 You're really putting pressure on their side of this team.
54:50 Jason Calacanis? It was a flex on a flex on a flex.
54:52 Ryan Petersen? I didn't hear the last part. Anyway, keep going.
54:54 Jason Calacanis? Keep going. Let me wrap.
54:56 Ryan Petersen? Everybody does what they can and it is an amazing model where, but by the way, over 60,000 people donated a little bit and I'm almost as, just as proud of that. It's like people are getting involved, stepping up, realizing, "Hey, you can do something."
55:08 Jason Calacanis? Flexport dot org, everybody.
55:09 David Friedberg? People go there and support Congress.
55:11 Jason Calacanis? Final question for you two. We had this great moment where, you know, we engaged China. We built a bunch of iPhones, Amazon Basics, you know, whatever it is, Nike shoes. And it raised, you know, the standard of living for a lot of people. We understand China's doing this now. And they're doing it in Africa and some other places. What are you seeing in terms of that relationship? How China is looking towards other countries to become producers of goods? And they're kind of now becoming incredibly influential. What's their intent? And how is that going? Claire, maybe you can start.
55:46 Speaker 01 That's a big question. But I think it's... This is a long-term play. We're all in this for a long-term, right, play? And whether, you know, you take maybe the spicier view around, you know, resources and protectionism versus one that's more just around progress. And as we may have an increasingly balkanizing East and West, the ability for them to control the bigger piece of their own supply chain. But the end result, as you're sort of saying, is you look at places like Niger, right? The average mother there is having six children. We have a very young global South. And the important thing is that they're fed, they're clothed, and that they have an upward
56:31 Speaker 01 trajectory. And so, that's the outcome.
56:33 Jason Calacanis? People living in abject poverty will probably end in our lifetime. You know, the only places it won't end is in places with dictators. What are you seeing in terms of the shipping containers? Because you must see shipping containers increasingly leaving certain ports. Where is China sort of exporting production to? And what are the up-and-coming production areas in the world?
56:56 Ryan Petersen? You know, there's some really interesting trends going around, around labor costs. And China, the reason people went there over the last 40 years, to be honest, was like cheap labor. But over time, they became quite sophisticated. They really learned how to manufacture things, especially electronics. If you want to make electronics, you pretty much have to make them in Shenzhen, the Greater Bay Area, as she called it. So, and that's... But stuff that's just for cheap labor, because that's no longer about cheap labor. This is a whole supply chain ecosystem of components and other things. And if it's just cheap labor, two years ago, Mexico became cheaper than China in labor costs.
57:27 Jason Calacanis? Wow.
57:27 Ryan Petersen? Which was a huge shift. And now Mexico doesn't have the manufacturing capacity, they don't have the skill sets, they don't. But they'll build it, you know, and people will respond to that trend. As long as it takes 120 days to ship stuff from China to the US and we can't get this sorted out, brands are going to respond to shipping closer to home. So that is a trend that you're going to see more and more of if the delays stay the way they are. I think China's big challenge is if they become labor costs too expensive, how do they keep moving up the value chain? And this is what they're made in China 2025 thing is like, they've got to make more and more sophisticated products because it can't just be about dirt cheap labor.
58:06 Jason Calacanis? And then eventually migrate to services and...
58:08 Ryan Petersen? Yeah, and that's a huge challenge and very few, if anyone's really done it, no one's done it at that scale because they're the biggest country in the world, but Japan, Korea have kind of done that, but not 10 times bigger.
58:19 Jason Calacanis? India as well, moving to a services-based economy, India with IT comes to mind. And then they'll become entitled and want to retire at 55 like Europe.
58:26 Ryan Petersen? And by the way, my favorite answer, someone at, I think it was Zuck, although Toby from Shopify told me he lifted this line, his employees were asking him about the four-day work week. And he was like, "Well, you know, I do think we should do some experimentation around how many days a week we work. So, but we're going to start with the six-day work week like China does. And then we'll try the four-day work week later."
58:47 Jason Calacanis? Ladies and gentlemen, please join me in thanking...
58:51 Ryan Petersen? Thank you.
58:51 Jason Calacanis? ...Adam and Claire. Well done.
59:11 Speaker 05 Besties are gone.
59:18 Speaker 05 That is funny how a dog can get a hush in your driveway.
59:25 Chamath Palihapitiya? We should all just get a room and just have one big, huge orgy because they're all just... It's like this sexual tension that they just need to release somehow.
59:33 Speaker 05 What? You're the bee. What? You're the bee. What? You're a bee. Bee? What? Where did you get merch? Besties are gone.
Previous E81: All-In Summit: Bill Gurley & Brad Gerstner on markets, downturns & investment cycles Next #AIS: Antonio Garcia Martinez & Glenn Greenwald debate Ukraine, moderated by David Sacks Page updated October 26, 2026 · transcript and summary are machine-generated