BREAKING: Netanyahu’s Terror Attack on Lebanon Destroys Trump’s Ceasefire. Tucker Reacts.

Netanyahu launches terror attack on Beirut, destroying Trump’s ceasefire. We need to detach from Israel immediately. Alastair Crooke is Director of Conflicts Forum, a small geo-political and geo-financial consultancy, former senior British MI6 officer, and former advisor on Middle East issues to Javier Solana, the EU Foreign Policy Chief. He initiated a number of ceasefires in the Occupied Territories on behalf of the European Union between Hamas, Hizbullah and Israel over a 9-year period. He has thirty-five years experience working with Islamist political movements. He’s the author and regular media commentator on politics and geo-financial issues. Find more here: https://conflictsforum.substack.com Paid partnerships with: Defend: Enter code "Tucker" for 20% off your purchase at https://defendcellcam.com Hallow prayer app: Get 3 months free at https://Hallow.com/Tucker American Financing: NMLS 182334, nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.196% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-685-5696 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit http://www. AmericanFinancing.net/Tucker. Last Country Supply: Real prep starts with the basics. Here’s what we keep stocked: https://lastcountrysupply.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Now, more than ever, we need someone on our side. But Rob Whitman? Whitman's votes drove up costs, cut Medicaid, and risked 350,000 Virginians' health care to pay for tax breaks for himself and his donors. He's not on our side. Shannon Taylor will fight corruption, cut taxes, and bring down costs. This November, vote for Shannon Taylor. She's for us. Paid for by HMP, the House Majority PAC dot com. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

• 0:34Tucker Carlson?

  Last night at 6:32 Eastern Time, right in the middle of dinner, Donald Trump sent out a Truth Post, his version of Twitter, in which he announced a ceasefire with Iran. Here's exactly what he said. This would be one hour and 28 minutes before the total destruction of Iran that he'd been promising, the use of, the implied use of nuclear weapons or some other weapon of mass destruction, a weapon powerful enough to eliminate an entire country in one night, as he said. So that, that's what people were expecting to see. That's what he promised to deliver. And instead, this statement. "Subjects to the Islamic Republic of Iran agreeing to the complete, immediate, and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz,

• 1:19Tucker Carlson?

  I agree to suspend the bombing and attack of Iran for a period of two weeks. We've already met and exceeded all military objectives and are very far along with a definitive agreement concerning long-term peace with Iran and peace in the Middle East. We received a 10-point proposal from Iran and believe it is a workable basis on which to negotiate. Almost all the various points of past contention have been agreed to between the US and Iran, but a two-week period will allow the agreement to be finalized and consummated on behalf of the United States of America as president and also representing the countries of the Middle East. It's an honor to have this long-term problem close to resolution."

• 1:57Tucker Carlson?

  Well, amen. Cold water on a hot day. The nation, the world breathed a sigh of relief. And particularly pleased were people who have fought in previous wars. People in the GWOT generation, people who are conspicuously absent from the Fox News analysis of this war. People know what it is to fight wars. Because one of the things that people who fight wars or see them up close learn is that almost anything is better than war. Even a step back or a step down, even giving up something you want, well bitter, is better than total war. Because there is nothing worse in this life than total war. And that's a generational lesson. Every generation that experiences total war learns that lesson.

• 2:42Tucker Carlson?

  And so the most eloquent writing about why war is bad is written by people who have seen it and experienced it. Every big war produces in a generation of writers calling for no more wars. And then predictably, inevitably, cyclically, the next generation forgets that lesson, maybe the key lesson of existence, and the cycle of wars continues. So last night seemed like a victory for the United States, even though it was, strictly speaking, probably a loss. Now, the president didn't explain what's in this 10-point plan, this proposed agreement that he'd received from the government of Iran. But we know roughly what was in it.

• 3:27Tucker Carlson?

  There've been a bunch of versions of it floating around. Are they real? 10-point, 15-point? It's impossible to know. But the big picture points are known. And first among them is the current government of Iran will stay in power. That's the first point. So regime change did not work. Everyone admits that now, including the Israeli government, with whom we're embarked on this adventure. Everyone understands that there is no way to dislodge the current government, short of nuclear weapons. And so when this ends, whenever it does, the regime, the ayatollahs, the terror regime, as they say on Fox News, will be in place. And that's not a win. That's a loss.

• 4:09Tucker Carlson?

  US military bases in the region have been destroyed, certainly badly damaged. From some of the military, US military personnel have withdrawn, retreated. That's not good. That's not a display of power. That's a display of weakness. So there's, there's no way to spin that. That, that's a loss. This war has cost hundreds of billions of dollars, of US dollars, taxpayer dollars. That money comes from debt, from selling our debt, our treasuries to other countries. So that's a loss. That's a big loss. Commodities prices have risen, not as dramatically as they might if this were to continue, but they've risen a lot. That's a loss.

• 4:52Tucker Carlson?

  That's a tax on people who buy things in the United States. And then, of course, Americans have been killed. It's not clear how many, because there's an awful lot of lying about it. But it's a substantial number, more than a dozen and maybe much more than that. We don't know yet. We will know at some point. So Americans have died. America's gotten poorer. America's become weaker demonstrably. We can't open the Strait of Hormuz, which is the overriding objective of this war. We can't do it by force. That's been proven. And the regime that we described as illegitimate, this crazed theocracy, these Stone Age people,

• 5:34Tucker Carlson?

  are going to, when this is all over, remain in control of Iran. So again, those are losses, just objectively. And yet, and here's the point, a ceasefire would still be a win for the United States because war, total war, is just that bad. It's so bad that even absorbing some humiliation and some measurable losses is still better than that. And most people understand that intuitively. You don't need to be ideological or interested in geopolitics to understand that Americans getting killed, the country going bankrupt, commodity prices wrecking the global economy. The uncertainty itself is a cost. You don't know what the future holds.

• 6:19Tucker Carlson?

  You can't plan for it. All of this is much worse than what we'd be getting with an agreement that diminishes us to some extent. Because it's very obvious we could be still further diminished and further wounded by this.

• 6:33Tucker Carlson?

  So that was the state of play. At 6:32, the president announces what is objectively speaking not a win, and yet most reasonable people accept it as a win. Because relatively speaking, that's a win. A ceasefire is a good thing. And anyone who doesn't think it's a good thing has to explain why it would be in America's interest, the tangible interest of the United States, to continue this. To what objective? What is the goal? No one has ever really explained what that is. Degraded Iran, changed the regime. What does that mean? Open the Strait of Hormuz. How? Tell us how. Is that one person in the Pentagon who can figure out how to do it? These people wage war for a living. Not all of them are stupid.

• 7:18Tucker Carlson?

  Some of them are pretty smart. They can't figure out how to do it by force, or they would have done it already. What's your plan? Well, there's no plan, of course. So anyone who opposes the ceasefire is not an ally of the United States, but an opponent of American interests, maybe even an enemy. So with that in mind, it's worth assessing what happened to the ceasefire. Well, it seemed to last a very, very short time. Now, not in name. No one is saying there's no ceasefire. But certainly in practice, because very shortly, within hours of the president announcing this, Israel, our unmentioned partner in this war,

• 8:01Tucker Carlson?

  decided to bomb civilians in Beirut, Lebanon. Bomb civilians. Apartment blocks. That's not anti-Israeli hyperbole. That's not blood libel. That is measurably true. Because there's video of it. A lot of it. Because Beirut...

• 8:25Tucker Carlson?

  is one of the greatest and most civilized cities on the planet. It's not Yemen. Lots of people have been to Beirut. Beirut is also, by the way, the capital of the only country in the Middle East whose president is a Christian. The president of Lebanon has always been a Christian since the founding of the country, over 100 years. So in some basic sense, this is a Christian country, certainly a Christian-led country. And it's not a primitive country. It's probably one of the top three most beautiful places in the world. But it's also one of the most civilized places in the world. And for many years, the southern portions of the country

• 9:10Tucker Carlson?

  have been controlled, or at least influenced by a Shiite militia group, which has become, in effect, the government of those parts of the country called Hezbollah. You've heard of Hezbollah. I think the US Congress has declared a terror organization. No one's defending Hezbollah. But Hezbollah's main... The main thing to know about Hezbollah is that they are sworn opponents of Israel. And that's why you know their name. That's why it's not just a regional problem in the Levant for you. It is an ever-present slogan that people are shouting at you all the time. Hezbollah, they're bad. Well, why are they bad? Well, they're against Israel. That's why. They're also the people, apparently, who perpetrated the 1983 barracks bombing

• 9:52Tucker Carlson?

  against US Marines and killed almost 300 American Marines. The United States was in Lebanon at the time. Why was the US there? Well, because Israel had invaded Lebanon. And so the Reagan administration, in response to what Israel did, decided to get involved on behalf of our closest ally. And almost 300 American Marines were murdered by Hezbollah.

• 10:16Tucker Carlson?

  I'm blaming Israel for that. Apparently, they had advanced knowledge of it. That's pretty clear. It's been documented. But Hezbollah did it. They did it, not Israel. But we were there because of our alliance with Israel. Fact. So Hezbollah has, for many years, been active in the southern parts of the country, south of the now-famous Lutani River, on the border of northern Israel. So it's a concern for Israel. But Beirut is a separate question. Beirut is a Mediterranean city that is not controlled by Hezbollah. In fact, it's filled with Christians. They define the life of Beirut. They may not be the majority, but they're in charge, and they certainly have defined

• 10:59Tucker Carlson?

  it culturally. And Israel is bombing apartment blocks in Beirut, Lebanon. You know what the name of the military operation was? Eternal Darkness. Israel named this operation, killing hundreds of civilians in Lebanon, mostly in Beirut, Eternal Darkness. Because, like, why even pretend anymore? Eternal Darkness, by the way, is mentioned extensively in the New Testament. It's a euphemism for hell. And that's exactly what Israel brought to Christians in Lebanon today. Here's a video of it.

• 12:32Tucker Carlson?

  Looking a little bit like Gaza. And of course, that's the point of Operation Eternal Darkness. But what does it look like on the ground? Again, these are civilians who were murdered by the Israeli military using American weapons and American tax dollars to do it in order to stop a ceasefire that the American president happily announced to the great relief of the American people. All of it stopped by Operation Eternal Darkness targeting civilians. But if you were a civilian on the ground in Beirut, what did it look like? Well, we have this video, which is distressing. This is a little Lebanese girl walking out on a sunny day with her father in a residential neighborhood in Beirut

• 13:15Tucker Carlson?

  when the Israelis came in and leveled the city. Here's what it looked like.

• 13:42Tucker Carlson?

  Operation Eternal Darkness. That's for sure. So the net effect was to end the ceasefire. Again, it hasn't been announced, but the Straits for Moves are closed once again. Not, not open, totally closed, apparently. And the Israelis are continuing to blow up Christians, murder Christians and other civilians in Lebanon. So this afternoon, the administration announced, well, there's been some confusion here. An agreement that Israel would stop destroying Lebanon was not part of the agreement with Iran. And so clearly, they thought it was. They thought somehow the United States would get Israel under control as its patron.

• 14:26Tucker Carlson?

  We never promised to do that. So this was all a mistake and we'd love to negotiate the terms, but exclusive of Israel's behavior. Israel's going to do what it's going to do. And, you know, they may kill more little girls in Beirut, but that has nothing to do with the bilateral we'd like to have with you. Well, it raises a couple really interesting questions that need to be resolved before we can fix this and fix our country. And the first is, why would you ever go into a war with another country when you don't have aligned interests? When you don't have the same goals? Israel has a whole separate goal from ours. Israel would like to leave Iran, a husk, a civil war between various ethnic groups, just a bleeding wound,

• 15:11Tucker Carlson?

  and therefore permanently weakened. They don't want a coherent nation-state in Iran because that wouldn't help them. The United States, of course, doesn't want that because you can't open the Straits of Hormuz unless you have someone in charge of the territory of Iran, because then pirates will close it. Anyone with mines or drones can close the strait. You need a central government in Tehran to keep the strait open. And the United States, being of course, subject to international commodity prices like everybody else and the big economy, doesn't want that. Doesn't want the refugee crisis in Europe and the US that will inevitably result if Israel gets its way. The United States would end there with goals that weren't exactly clear. I don't know, somehow ending the nuclear program because it's such a threat,

• 15:54Tucker Carlson?

  even though US intelligence had repeatedly concluded that it was not an imminent threat. They didn't have a nuclear weapon. They didn't have ICBMs, just didn't exist. It's the WMD story from 2002, Redux.

• 16:10Tucker Carlson?

  But the idea was to apparently push, brush them back a little bit and let them know that you can't do anything crazy in the region. That's not Israel's goal. So the first mistake was lashing ourselves to another country with separate goals. But more immediately, the mistake would be if you want to wrap this up with a ceasefire and a peace agreement. You would, of course, tell Israel to get on board because Israel is a tiny insignificant country with an infinitesimally small population and economy that only exists because you protect it and pay for everything. Israel is your client state. This is like taking orders from your housekeeper, which you would never do. Why would you do that if you had self-respect?

• 16:55Tucker Carlson?

  So the first thing you would do if you were sitting down to come to terms with your opponent, this big country, Iran, that you haven't been able to beat militarily, would be to tell Israel, "Hey, we're suing for peace. We're going to get this done. You knock it off." But the US didn't do that. This administration did not do that. In fact, apparently, according to the Israelis, they never even consulted Benjamin Netanyahu. They did not tell him that we are right in the cusp of ceasefire talks. Why? Because they were worried that he would do what he did with Operation Eternal Darkness, Operation Hell, and scuttle the whole thing by doing something crazy like bombing apartment buildings in Beirut, Lebanon.

• 17:40Tucker Carlson?

  So apparently, getting Israel under control so the United States could save its economy and the lives of its troops was not even on the table. Like, the one thing we know we're not going to do is tell the Israelis to behave. And that's why there is, in practical terms, in effect if not name, no ceasefire right now, the one that everybody in the United States desperately wants. So the question is, and it is the question unfortunately, why can't the United States get its proxy, its client state, its, effectively, its employee, Israel, under control? Why is that the one thing that's never on the table?

• 18:25Tucker Carlson?

  That's the question. It's the question that Joe Kent, one of the top US intel officials, asked when he resigned a few weeks ago. "We got into this war at the urging of another country, Israel. The war did not go well. Now we can't get out of the war because the behavior of that same country, Israel. Why? Why can't this president or any president say no to Israel?" And we have a right to know why. It's not just because we love Israel and it's the only democracy in the Middle East. And if it is, then our leaders are dumber than we thought they were, but it's probably not that. Because they understand perfectly well how bad this is for the US. And there are, believe it or not, a lot of people in the White House who care about

• 19:09Tucker Carlson?

  the United States. People with power in the White House. They're not all, whatever you think they are, zombies doing BBs bidding. Some of them can see very clearly where this is heading. It's heading toward a nuclear strike by Israel on Iran. That's obvious. And that would be a world historic disaster. It's also clearly terrible for the American economy, for the American people, not even to mention the Americans who will die in numbers if this becomes a land war. So there are people working really hard, really late, trying to fix this, to get a peace, even one that diminishes us, where we have to take some lumps. They are doing that. That's the only reason we got to where we were yesterday, is because people in the White

• 19:52Tucker Carlson?

  House, taking no credit for it whatsoever, were working to end this, because it's bad. But those people predictably were undercut, our country was undercut by Israel, and there's apparently nothing we can do about it. So, again, why is that? And, once this is over, even before it ends, every American has a right to know, why does this tiny country have so much control over our government? Is it consent? It doesn't look like it. Now, Joe Kent said, point blank, when he resigned. By the way, the day he resigned, he retained highest level security clearance. They tried to tell you, "Oh, he was a leaker, he was under investigation," it was a lie. They admitted it was a lie. He wasn't under investigation by the FBI.

• 20:37Tucker Carlson?

  Untrue. And you know it's untrue because he held his security clearance till the day he left the building. So there's no intelligence in the US government that Joe Kent couldn't see. None.

• 20:50Tucker Carlson?

  He was one of the most informed people in the world and his conclusion was there's something weird going on here. And one of the clues is the Butler shooting, the shooting in the summer of 2024 during the presidential election where President Trump was shot in the ear by a gunman a little over 100 yards away in the roof of a building called Thomas Crooks. And according to Joe Kent, who would know that investigation was closed before it pursued every possible lead. We can be fairly confident that Thomas Crooks pulled the trigger. We cannot be confident at all that he acted alone. And of course, we can't know because that investigation was shut down.

• 21:33Tucker Carlson?

  That's what he said. And Joe Kent, who you can dismiss as a wacko or a traitor, but you can't say he doesn't know what he's talking about. And you can't say the Trump administration didn't trust him with all available US intelligence until the day he left. You can't say that because they did. He has said out loud, he thinks the failure to investigate the Butler shooting, the shooting of our now President Donald Trump, and why wouldn't they investigate that? By the way, that alone is baffling. Why wouldn't they release all the information they have about Thomas Crooks? They haven't. Why? If it was a lone gunman, why didn't he tell us all you know? But they haven't. Why? He believes that is connected to the control that Israel has over the United States government, the demonstrable control. He said that.

• 22:17Tucker Carlson?

  He also pointed to a couple of pretty shocking violations of the president's personal security by the Secret Service. They allowed things to happen that never happen around a president. Now, maybe they were mistakes. You want to think they were. But who's been fired at the Secret Service over those mistakes? No one that we're aware of. There's not been a wholesale reordering of the Secret Service. Their job is to protect the president, the elected president of the United States. And you do that not just because you love the president, but because our entire system hangs on the idea that the people get to choose their president and he can't be removed by force. That's democracy. If you could just take out the president by force, then how is democracy real?

• 23:02Tucker Carlson?

  People choose someone that larger forces don't like and they kill him, then you don't have a democracy. So protecting the life of the president is essential to the functioning of our system. And yet, on at least two occasions, they've proven that they haven't been able to do that. And yet, has there been an investigation into that? Has anyone been fired over that? No. Now, those of us who don't work there have no real idea what that means. But someone who just worked there until the other day, Joe Kent, said, "I think that may be related to our inability to say no to Israel." Now, maybe Joe Kent's a total wacko. In which case, why was he head of the counterterrorism center for the Trump administration? That's another question.

• 23:47Tucker Carlson?

  But let's just say he's a total wacko. But what's the answer? The facts, the known facts, have never been explained. And at this point, watching Israel, once again, not for the first time, hardly for the first time, short-circuit American diplomacy, the expressed will of the American president, elected by the rest of us, to have some foreign country of 9 million people to say no, exercise veto power over our president, short-circuit our interests, "This is bad for us. We're doing it anyway because Benjamin Netanyahu wants to." You see that enough times. This is, again, not the first time we've seen this. It's not the 10th time we've seen this. We've seen it generationally.

• 24:31Tucker Carlson?

  You have to ask, "What is this?" And you have to find out. And you have to air it publicly, because it has to end. We cannot be a free and prosperous country until we are a sovereign country. What does that mean? Our leaders, elected by us, have to be able to make decisions in our interests. Not to the exclusion of everyone else. You don't have to end other people's civilizations in order for your own country to prosper. It doesn't work that way. But you have to put your people's best interests first, or it's not a legitimate system. And if there's another country in an arrangement with another country that's preventing you from doing that, you have to fix it.

• 25:11Tucker Carlson?

  And then there are also moral questions. If that partner, your closest ally, the only democracy in the Middle East, is killing kids in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Iran,

• 25:22Tucker Carlson?

  and doing so without apology, if it's committing war crimes every single day for years with your money and your weapons, at some point, you're implicated in those crimes. And you have to stop that, too. It's all bad. There's no upside. Where's the upside?

• 25:40Tucker Carlson?

  And so the United States has to, and hopefully, the first thing we do when and if this war is resolved, is detach from Israel. Not declare war on Israel or treat Israel as an enemy. They may treat us as an enemy, as they have before.

• 25:55Tucker Carlson?

  When they tried to sink the USS Liberty, an American naval vessel, a surveillance vessel, they treated us as an enemy. We don't have to treat them as an enemy, however, and we shouldn't. But we should treat them like we treat every other country as an ally, but with restrictions and reservations and red lines. No, you can't act against our interest. And this distancing should begin with a total end of aid of any kind, military or economic, to Israel by the US government. And people who love Israel, some of whom are pretty successful, can send all the money they want to Israel, and that's fine. But the US government should send not one more dollar to Israel and not one more piece of

• 26:42Tucker Carlson?

  military material to Israel, not one more fighter jet or bomb or missile defense system or small arm or ammunition of any kind.

• 26:52Tucker Carlson?

  Because Israel is aggressively acting against our interests. And so to continue to arm and finance them, their generous welfare state, for example, or their military, defend their nation.

• 27:05Tucker Carlson?

  Is not only contrary to core American interests, it's just masochism.

• 27:11Tucker Carlson?

  Watch us hate ourselves as we fund a country that's killed more Americans than most other countries have. That's just a fact and not just on the liberty. Every war that Israel has pushed us to join has resulted in dead Americans. And the fault lies ultimately with our leaders who are going along with us. It's their fault first. It's not the Israelis' fault. It's our fault. But they're implicated in it. This relationship has resulted in a lot of dead Americans, a lot.

• 27:42Tucker Carlson?

  And it's time not to end it, not to set up an adversarial relationship, but to set up a healthy, conventional relationship where Israel can pay its own bills and fund its own military and act within the constraints imposed on it by its own economy and population. That's what normal countries do.

• 28:01Tucker Carlson?

  Most countries live with neighbors that don't like them, with whom they have testy relationships, but they make accommodations because they have no choice. There's no country in the world that acts with total impunity because it knows a much larger country will backstop it no matter what it does. That just doesn't exist in the natural world because it's not natural. It's grotesque. And it's terrible for the United States, and now it's obvious. And by the way, unless our lawmakers, unless the US Congress restrains this relationship and changes its nature, there's going to be political turmoil in this country.

• 28:33Tucker Carlson?

  So no, mine's. It is really clear. Israel's pursuing what it thinks its own interests are, but those are not the same as our interests. Now, one of the problems with changing that relationship is, well, you're going to have to deal with Israel's agents and advocates in the United States. And there are many of those. There are many of those. And by the way, just to be completely clear, they're not all Jewish. In fact, most of them aren't. This is not about Judaism. It's about blind support for a nation-state called Israel.

• 29:09Tucker Carlson?

  To the extent that it harms our interests. And you saw that on full display in the last 24 hours. The president excitedly announces a ceasefire. A pause in the fighting in a war that cannot result in American victory, but only in further American defeat and degradation, and ultimately in bankruptcy and possibly in nuclear war. So this is a great thing. Immediately advocates for Israel appear on Fox News telling you that this is not acceptable. This is a loss. This is cowardice. Here's 83 year old former general Jack Keane on Fox telling you that this is disappointing, that the killing has paused just for a moment. Here he is.

• 29:54Speaker 02

  So there's a lot wrapped up in the deal. My preference would have been to keep the war going as leverage to make that deal. But we are where we are now. And I really do think if the deal blows up, it comes down to Carg Island and forcing either take control of Carg Island and take control of the distribution of oil or destroy it and force an economic collapse.

• 30:19Tucker Carlson?

  What do you say to something like that? Most people watch him like, oh, he was a general. He was a general. He knows what he's talking about. He's probably war gamed this whole thing out. He knows what it is to take Carg Island. Talk to anyone who actually has been to Carg Island or understands the geography of the Persian Gulf. How do you take Carg Island? Is General Jack Keane of Fox News the first person ever to think, hey, we should take Carg Island, then we control the commodity flow through the Persian Gulf? That would make us powerful. No, he's not the first person to think of this. Carg Island has actually changed hands quite a few times through history. Various empires have controlled it because geographically it's a critical piece of real estate.

• 31:02Tucker Carlson?

  And it's extremely hard to control at this point, or once again, we would already take control of the oil. Oh, really? Hadn't thought of that. How would we do that? And of course, no one ever asked a follow up question. How exactly would you do that? What would it cost us to do that? How long could we hold it? How far from mainland Iran is Carg Island? Is it within, I don't know, artillery range? Have the Iranians thought this through too? Do they see Carg Island, through which 90% of their energy moves, as a key piece of real estate? Have they taken extraordinary steps to defend it? What are those steps? And how do we mitigate those?

• 31:39Tucker Carlson?

  No, not a thought. Just take Carg Island, take control of the energy flows, collapse their economy. Well, then what happens? You collapse their economy and then what? Does that open the straits where it moves? What does that leave us? Where does that leave the seven countries that face Iran? No, no thought to that at all. Just do it. And by the way, it's kind of cowardly not to do it.

• 32:01Tucker Carlson?

  They're children. And not only they're children, we know they are because they have a decades-long track record of bad decisions, not just bad, but disastrous. These are the very same people who've gotten the United States into every pointless conflict, really, since the Second World War. How many have we won? Zero. Just a fact. A fact that you admit with sadness if you love the United States, as most of us do. None of this has worked. And if it has, tell us how. Just explain what the United States got out of any of these conflicts. With accelerating absurdity, each one more absurd than the next, you can understand. You don't want China to control South Korea. Okay, let's do the Incheon landing. You could sort of understand why you wouldn't

• 32:46Tucker Carlson?

  want Ho Chi Minh sweeping into Saigon, which is now called Ho Chi Minh City.

• 32:53Tucker Carlson?

  Couldn't you really understand why we invaded Iraq? Not at all. And this war makes the least sense of all if you view it through the prism that most Americans would, which is, is this good for us? No, obviously not. And there's no way to achieve it. And you know there's no way to achieve a military victory, meaning a return to the status quo of February 27th, because they never explain what those means might be. Because they have no idea, because they're children. And so really, it's incumbent on the rest of us to increase our self-respect and stop giving airtime or any attention at all to people with a long-proven track record of failure and absurdity and silliness, listening to 83-year-old generals who couldn't find Carg

• 33:33Tucker Carlson?

  Island on a map, pretending that they're experts on the subject. Because they're not.

• 33:41Tucker Carlson?

  And again, they've gotten it wrong again and again and again. Would you take real estate advice from a homeless person? No. Because they're not good at real estate, so they're homeless. Like, this is nuts. And so for this government to function...

• 33:58Tucker Carlson?

  People who've gotten it wrong again and again and again cannot be, persist in positions of leadership. Doesn't mean they have to be imprisoned. They'd like to imprison their enemies, but in a free country, you don't imprison people because of disagreement. They're saying out loud, anyone who disagrees with us should be in jail because they're authoritarians.

• 34:17Tucker Carlson?

  But it means

• 34:20Tucker Carlson?

  not allowing them in government. Why? Because they don't have the best interests of the country at heart. That's why.

• 34:28Tucker Carlson?

  Obviously, or they wouldn't be calling for military action that is by definition fruitless in Sisyphean. It doesn't work. Who does that help? Not us helps Israel. That's the whole point of the program.

• 34:43Tucker Carlson?

  So why do they still have positions of authority in the US government? Well, that's a really interesting question. But we could start, the great sorting could begin by disqualifying anyone from government service who holds a second passport. That's really simple. Not just an Israeli passport, but a Belgian passport, a Sierra Leonean passport, any other passport. If you're a citizen of another country, obviously you shouldn't be running our country. Because you have by definition dual loyalty. You can just leave and go to your other nation. No normal country would allow that.

• 35:19Tucker Carlson?

  Why would you allow that? Doesn't mean people with dual citizenship can't live here, though there's an argument for that, too.

• 35:25Tucker Carlson?

  A strong argument for that. Pick a country. If you don't like it, leave. That's fair. Can't use this as a place to park your money.

• 35:34Tucker Carlson?

  A place to hide out or hang out until you get in trouble and then flee to your other country? Like, why would any nation allow that? Most don't. We do. We got to stop it. But you could begin with, no, you can't serve in government if you've got two passports. Sorry. Period. At any level, DMV up to DOD. No.

• 35:51Tucker Carlson?

  And if you've served in a foreign military, come on now. Especially when the US is at war. You can't serve in the US government if you've worn a foreign uniform. Of course not. You can't hold elective office if you fought for somebody else's country, because by definition, you have fought for aims that are not the same as ours. In fact, they may be in opposition to ours. You may have fought against what's good for the United States. Certainly, if you serve in the IDF, you fought against what's good for the United States knowingly or not, probably didn't mean to, but you did. You shouldn't go to jail for that, but you can't be allowed to work at, say,

• 36:31Tucker Carlson?

  the Pentagon. But right now, you can. And by the way, there are IDF officers working out of the Pentagon because they have an office within the Pentagon, as they do at CIA in Langley. A foreign government has offices in our critical executive branch, headquarter buildings. That's just not healthy. That's crazy. And it cannot be allowed a single more day. Why would it? Oh, that's hateful. Of whom? Would Israel allow that? Would they allow Americans? I don't know, to open an office in the Demona complex? No, because they're not insane, but we are.

• 37:16Tucker Carlson?

  So we should stop that immediately. But the main problem with neocons, of all religions, just to be totally clear, is that not only are they not on board with the interests of the majority of our country, they work in opposition to those interests. Wars, you don't need mass migration into this country and the West, and that would include Canada and New Zealand and Australia, Western Europe and the United States. That migration, which I think even liberals would acknowledge, has not been good for anybody. In fact, it's destroyed these countries because

• 37:59Tucker Carlson?

  a country, a sovereign country, has control over its borders, can't just change the population in a generation, can't do that. That's all been abetted by the neocons, 100%. Now, why is that? Well, that's another question. But the whole thing is dark.

• 38:15Tucker Carlson?

  The owner of OnlyFans is one of the biggest contributors to AIPAC? Hmm, tell me how that works? Don't know the answer, but it's not good. It's not healthy. It's not good for the United States. None of it's good. AIPAC's not good. OnlyFans is not good. So maybe it's not surprising there's some nexus there. But above all, what is degrading to our country, bad for our strategic objectives, and just rotten for the nation is the lying, the nonstop lying, the refusable refusal to be straightforward about your aims. What are you actually arguing for? You never know. Because lying is totally acceptable among neocons, completely. You always cloak your real objective. You saw this in the 12 Day War.

• 38:59Tucker Carlson?

  Oh, no, no, we're just, we're just gonna get rid of their nuclear program because it's an imminent threat to the West. Okay, it's an imminent threat. And some people piped up and said, I don't know, this looks like the opening salvos in a regime change war. Oh, shut up, racist. Of course, it turned out to be. But nobody ever apologizes. Well, actually, you're right. You caught us the first time and now we know because we're in a regime change war or an attempted regime change war. Yeah, just keep lying. Just say whatever it takes, whatever's expedient to get to whatever the goal is. But you never know what the goal is because they'll never tell you. It drives people crazy. It makes people conspiratorial. That's the other problem with it. So many conspiracy theories. Well, there happen to be quite a few conspiracies. What's a conspiracy?

• 39:44Tucker Carlson?

  Well, it's a group effort to achieve something whose goal is never stated in public. That's what a conspiracy is. And there's obviously a lot of that. Here's one example. This is from Fox News yesterday, one of its top shows. Here are two neocons talking about what they think the US we should do next in Iran. Hopefully, if we can get arms in

• 40:05Speaker 03

  In the hands of the people, they'll take over. I'll give you the last word. We have about 30 seconds.

• 40:09Speaker 04

  That, that to me is very key. I've been talking about that in multiple appearances here and on radio. We have to arm the people because if we're not going to do regime change, they need to have the ability to do it. Reagan did it in Afghanistan. He did it in Nicaragua. He did it in Honduras. He did it in Angola. Donald Trump can do exactly the same thing. Somehow, some way, those people need to be able to get armed. They need to take their future into their own hands.

• 40:41Tucker Carlson?

  It's like they can't even hear themselves. Yeah, I mean, the other problem is, and one of the reasons you have to laugh at all the conspiracy talk about the neocons is a lot of them are not super bright. They don't really know very much. So here you have that guy just said Reagan did it in Afghanistan and Nicaragua.

• 41:00Tucker Carlson?

  So what happened? Well, let's see. When Reagan did it in Afghanistan, he sent weapons to a group of freedom fighters called the Mahajedin Islamic warriors. This is back in the 80s when we were on the side of Islamic extremism against the Soviets. And now you fast forward 40 years and who's in charge of Afghanistan? Well, Islamic extremists, the Taliban. Nicaragua, 40 years ago, we sent arms to the Contras. A lot of people supported it, including me, by the way, to be clear. Because the Soviets were making inroads in Nicaragua. They're funding a group called the Sandinistas led by a man called Daniel Ortega. And we were gonna regime change Daniel Ortega. So 40 years later, who runs Nicaragua? Anyone got Wikipedia? Oh, Daniel Ortega.

• 41:47Tucker Carlson?

  So whether you support it or not, it didn't work. It didn't work. You're pointing to those successes? Really? Countries that 40 years later are run by the Taliban and Daniel Ortega? And that's the argument for sending arms to the opposition?

• 42:05Tucker Carlson?

  But what's so revealing about that clip is how the actual point, the object of the strategy is never stated. In fact, it's hidden. And it's hidden in the most sinister way in the language of idealism and ideology. We have to end Islamism. We have to stop the threat of the terrorists. We have to bring freedom to the poor benighted people of Iran. When of course, the actual aim is Israel's aim, which is chaos.

• 42:37Tucker Carlson?

  The whole point of this, from an Israeli perspective, is not an attack on Israel. By the way, I mean, it makes a kind of evil sense. If you want to eliminate a threat, you can't kill everybody, even with nuclear weapons. But what you can do is set them at war with each other. And this has been the way that Israel has conducted asymmetrical warfare since its founding. You sow chaos among your opponents. You get them to fight each other. And that's the goal for Iran, which is just a little bit over 50% Persian. Not everyone who planned the war seemed to know that or advocated for the war seemed to know that. But the Israelis know it, and they know that the goal is to stoke ethnic conflict and to some extent, religious conflict in Iran.

• 43:20Tucker Carlson?

  Most Americans have no idea that there are up to 5 million Christians in Iran. They have no clue. But of course, the Israelis know that. There are lots of Jews in Iran. The Israelis bombed one of their synagogues yesterday. Why? Unclear. Maybe they're just a love of bombing things. But it is a multi-ethnic country with religious minorities. And countries like that are ripe for internal division. So the point of the exercise is not to get weapons in the hands of freedom fighters. Who's, who would those be? How do we identify an Iranian freedom fighter? No, the point is to stoke an endless civil war, which once ignited are famously hard to end. That's the point. How does that serve our interests?

• 44:05Tucker Carlson?

  Well, of course, it doesn't.

• 44:08Tucker Carlson?

  Israel, which seems to have an interest in destroying Europe, certainly a desire to destroy Europe, Prime Minister said it himself, "Rome is our real enemy." Still angry about 70 AD, 2000 years later, his words, not mine. So clearly, Israel wants to harm Europe. They've said so, they've helped do it. That would definitely harm Europe and the West. How does it help the United States? Well, not at all. But here you have two prominent analysts on Fox News telling you that for the sake of the Iranian people, we need to do this. Really? The same people who are being bombed? Whose infrastructure, civilian infrastructure is being destroyed? The same people who will starve to death if this keeps up? We're really doing this for them? How is starving me to death in my interest?

• 44:53Tucker Carlson?

  Are you really trying to help me? No, of course not. How much better it would be? How much more Christian would it be? Just to say what you're trying to do out loud, to tell the truth for once, and then the rest of us could assess it? We could argue against it on good faith terms? We could probably even accept it, even if we disagreed with it, if we knew what it was. But you never know what it is with liars, with people who are committed to saying whatever it takes to get their goal achieved without explaining what the goal is. So that mode of communication, of operation, that whole worldview is totally corrosive to our country. It is totally immoral. Lying is bad.

• 45:38Tucker Carlson?

  And because lying is now the currency of government, thanks to people like the people you just saw on the screen, some of us have lost track of this. So you can't accept anything the government says at face value. You have to parse every statement, "Well, maybe this means that," or "It's a bank shot intended to achieve this." You have no clue. That is so bad for your society. Living in a hall of mirrors gives you vertigo after a while.

• 46:05Tucker Carlson?

  Those kind of people should have no role in any decision the US government makes going forward, period. And if they support arming the freedom fighters of Iran, let them do it themselves. If they support overthrowing the regime, let them fly there themselves and attempt to do that, if it's that important. But for not one more day should people like that have access to the levers of power in this country, and they should absolutely not be allowed to write our legislation. This country needs to free itself from the influence of a foreign power and restore freedom to its own citizens. The freedom to criticize a foreign country, to boycott it if they so choose, to speak their conscience

• 46:47Tucker Carlson?

  without the fear of being arrested or accused of a thought crime? People like that have made this country increasingly authoritarian, where people who are born here no longer feel free to say what they really think. The last election was supposed to end that. Instead, it accelerated it. How did that happen? It's not even clear, but it did happen. And so, the first thing we need to fix when this is all over is the system that produced this disaster in the first place. Not just a change of presidents. That won't be enough. We've just proven it's not enough. You need to change the system that acts on not just this president, but every president, to produce results that are terrible for the United States. That's the first thing we need to do. The second thing we need to do is figure

• 47:30Tucker Carlson?

  out how exactly Iran was able to do this. How did that happen? It'd be fun to go back and look at the tape from cable news in the months preceding this war, and just clip the portions where they describe what Iran is like. All experts on Iran, not a Farsi speaker among them, but know a lot about Iran. This is before anyone had heard of Carg Island. They didn't know the population of the country, they knew nothing about the country, except that it was a primitive country. And so, when the presidents were going to bomb them back to the Stone Age, most Americans must have thought, "Well, I thought they were already in the Stone Age." Well, who knows what age they were in, Stone Age or Medieval?

• 48:09Tucker Carlson?

  Who knows what their caliphate was really like? It turns out that their military power and their economic power, we vastly underrated, vastly. They've done, and this is noted with real sadness, much better than anyone expected, including the Israelis, apparently. No one saw this coming. So how did this happen? How did this primitive country that shoots protesters in the street and beats up women because they're women, or whatever they were telling you on TV? How did that country chase away US aircraft carriers that aren't anywhere near the coast?

• 48:51Tucker Carlson?

  How did that country shoot down some of our most advanced aircraft? Warthog, Blackhawks, etc. How'd they do that? We have gotten as a society into a very bad and self-destructive habit of not allowing questions like that, honest questions about our own failures. And the reason that's bad is because unless you understand what you did wrong and repent of it, promise not to do it again, you tend to keep doing it. And yet, in this country, for some reason, the reasons are pretty obvious, we have allowed the people who make those mistakes to browbeat the rest of us into silence. And whenever someone pipes up and says, "Well, wait a second, we're spending a trillion

• 49:33Tucker Carlson?

  dollars a year on this military and we can't get our aircraft carriers within striking distance of the coast of Iran? Because why?" Shut up, Islamist! Were you siding with Iran? Well, no, I'm siding with the United States. But what's the answer? We pay for this military. We were told we had total dominance of the skies, but then they shoot down our aircraft? Apparently, a lot of them. We can't know because everyone lies about everything, but apparently, a lot of them. But one is shocking. How did they do that?

• 50:05Tucker Carlson?

  Is it worth having an aircraft carrier in 2026?

• 50:10Tucker Carlson?

  I don't know. But the people who build aircraft carriers certainly have an interest in telling us we need them. During the Ukraine war, at the point, maybe a year or two in, when the public was starting to ask like, "Wait a second, our airports are filthy, our schools don't work, I have to work two jobs just to pay my bills and I still can't afford a house," started to add those people, which is most people, started to ask the question, "Why are we sending all this money to Ukraine?" And by the way, where is Ukraine? And Putin, bad, okay, Zelensky's Jesus got it, but like, what has this got to do with us and why is it good for us? And the answer that we all received from members of Congress, Republicans in the Senate and Democrats was, "It's a great deal."

• 50:54Tucker Carlson?

  Actually, it turns out, and this is like congressional accounting, actually, that money, which seems like it's going to a foreign country, actually comes back to us because it goes to American defense companies, Raytheon and the rest, Lockheed. And so what we're really doing is funding American jobs. This is industrial policy, really. And so it's a kind of sleight of hand where we seem like we're being generous, but actually we're benefiting.

• 51:24Tucker Carlson?

  And there may be some truth in that, but it's not totally, I mean, you can assess whether that's like a the kind of country you want to live in, where the only real manufacturing base is weapons. Probably not, but that's where we are. And it's not a crazy argument to make on a practical level. I mean, there are military contractors in every congressional district or always were. And so it does produce American jobs. But it also sets up an incentive for those companies and the lawmakers who fund them to maintain the status quo. And the status quo is of course always going to favor larger, more expensive weapon systems because those are the most profitable.

• 52:11Tucker Carlson?

  A system like that will never invest meaningfully in, say, drone technology because there's just not enough money in it. But you watch the war in Ukraine and you watch the 40 odd days of the war with Iran and you realize, well, wait a second, maybe we should have invested more in drone technology or taken a big picture look at what the United States would need to project military power beyond its shores and maybe aircraft carriers and the whole suite of weapon systems, the most expensive in the world, aren't really the way to project military power because it doesn't work and they can be defeated or at least constrained at a thousandth the cost by less technologically advanced countries like Iran.

• 52:56Tucker Carlson?

  But that would be a very obvious conclusion. In fact, that was the conclusion of any smart, non-aligned person for the last five years.

• 53:04Tucker Carlson?

  Is it really worth having an aircraft carrier if you have to open the Straits of Hormuz? Maybe not. Well, apparently not. But we have been unable to have that conversation because the vested players in the whole economic chain, coming from the United States Congress, through the Pentagon and out to, well, the entire economy of Northern Virginia, has discouraged it. So we've continued to do the same thing, the same way, except at a higher volume for a very long time. And now we are seeing the results, which are embarrassing. And we actually can tell ourselves we're the strongest military in the world and you want to be the strongest military in the world because that's great.

• 53:46Tucker Carlson?

  But if you are the strongest military in the world, why can't you force Iran to open the bottleneck at the end of the Persian Gulf and let vitally needed commodities out to the rest of the world, including you? Like, if you're so powerful, why can't you get it done?

• 54:03Tucker Carlson?

  And so what we've learned is we're really not as powerful as we said we were and probably as we thought we were. And that's bad for us, but it's also dangerous because it invites aggression.

• 54:13Tucker Carlson?

  We need to fix that by being honest about what just happened. No more lying. We should learn something from what is happening right now. And that process will require the people who made bad decisions to be punished for them, not imprisoned or killed, but certainly humiliated because they deserve it. When was the last time a public official was ever really humiliated? Even the ones who get fired, get fired with like a statement like, "We thank you for your service. You're so great. You're doing something more important." How about, "You committed dereliction. You did a terrible job." You don't have to kill yourself or anything, but you can't work here again. And we're not going to endorse you. We're not going to pass you on to the next employer with like a fake letter of recommendation. "Oh, you did such a good job." No, you were terrible. That's why we fired you.

• 54:58Tucker Carlson?

  Only in a system like that, a true meritocracy, can you have excellence. But that's the opposite of what we have. No one is ever punished. No one is ever criticized. No one ever takes the fall. No leader is ever humiliated. Only the people beneath him who carried out his orders. That's the definition of a perverse system that produces, not surprisingly, perverse results, like the ones we're experiencing now. So that's the next thing we need to do. Be honest about how Iran, this primitive country, just humiliated us. That's not anti-American, that's pro-American. We love our country enough to want to know, and we need to know. And the final thing we need to learn from this particularly ugly experience is that

• 55:40Tucker Carlson?

  you have to have leaders who care about you. Because that really is the basis of good governance. It's not brilliance or superior planning. Those are important sometimes. But what really matters is intent, is the will to protect and serve the people you've been elected to protect and serve, to put at the very center of your agenda, the people who put you there, the people in your country. A love of those people gets you a lot farther than the best-funded government program ever made. It's a lot like parenthood. You don't have to know a lot, but you have to be totally committed.

• 56:24Tucker Carlson?

  And the commitment has to derive from the love that you have for your children. And if that is the case, you'll be a pretty good parent, good enough for sure. And if you don't have that, it doesn't matter how much money you have. Your kids are going to be screwed up because you will do a bad job. So it's about intent. How do you divine intent? How do you know what a person wants? Well, by the way he behaves. You judge the tree by the fruit. And so any leader whose focus is outward rather than on his own country is going to be a bad leader. And this is the core problem with maintaining a global empire. You are never going to find a leader. You will never find an American president who is more interested

• 57:06Tucker Carlson?

  in governing America than he is in governing the world. And honestly, would you be? What job would you rather have? King of the world? The world! King of the world! Colossus astride! Here I am, I'm king of the world. I'm making all the decisions. I'm going to eliminate your civilization for breakfast. I'm going to overturn your economy for lunch. And tonight, we may have Operation Eternal Darkness. I mean, there's an appeal to the megalomaniac to all of them. It's not just this one, it's all of them. That is irresistible to leaders. I run the world. Now, running America by contrast is hard and messy. And you know, a lot of the people, you're going to make them mad. You go to war with the Houthis, people don't know what a Houthis is. They're never going to meet a Houthis.

• 57:50Tucker Carlson?

  There's no cost to you whatsoever in the short term. But let's say you just ran America. How'd you like to fix Baltimore? Be responsible for Gary, Indiana, or Detroit? Or Los Angeles? Or New York? These are hard problems. How do you fix American schools? They're totally useless. No one's even trying. And the reason they're not trying is because they're totally distracted. Well, because it's hard, of course. The solutions are not obvious. But they're not even being attempted anymore. And this is a generational thing. 30 years ago, people still talked about our schools. We gotta, we gotta think of a way to make our schools better. School choice. Sound like a good idea? Did it work? I don't know. No one ever mentioned it again. Nobody cares.

• 58:34Tucker Carlson?

  Our leaders don't care. They don't care. And that's why the country is withering. Because people who don't care are inattentive. Sometimes they're actually a little bit hostile. Sometimes they're very hostile.

• 58:52Tucker Carlson?

  But no matter what their disposition, they're never going to save you because they don't care enough to save you. No leader who really loved his country, no matter what they tell you, would have embarked on this disaster. They kind of nod to caring, "We're going to save you from the nuclear threat of Iran." Was there a nuclear threat from Iran? Shut up, hater! Was there a nuclear threat? "Shut up!" Okay, okay. There's no even real attempt to tie what they do outside our borders with most of our money to any benefit to you whatsoever, because that's how little they care.

• 59:36Tucker Carlson?

  And that actually has to change. And it's not just a matter of the looming debt crisis, which is real, or the fact we spent hundreds of billions on a fruitless war that diminished us. It's not even about that. It's bigger than that. Coming out of this, we have to demand, regardless of party or even ideology, leaders who have a gut-level love and concern for the American people. That is the test. That's the acid test for holding office in the United States. You have to care. We can probably devise ways to measure whether you care. But if you don't care, you're going to have to join the neocons in doing something else. So that's what we've learned so far. For where we're going, whether this ceasefire, assuming it even is a ceasefire, will hold.

• 1:00:21Tucker Carlson?

  We want to talk to someone called Alistair Crooks, who is not famous in American media by and large, but is, outside the United States, I think, regarded as one of the most experienced and wisest observers, mostly non-aligned observers, of what's happening in the world, particularly in the Middle East. He spent most of his career as a British diplomat, intelligence officer. It's not endorsement of British intelligence, which has been much discredited in the last 25 or 30 years. But certainly, one of the most knowledgeable governments for most of its existence. I mean, they managed the world and they sent people out into the world who really understood how things worked at a granular level, not just a 40,000-foot level, but understood

• 1:01:06Tucker Carlson?

  the languages and the cultures and the geography of the nations that they were trying to influence. So he has spent his entire life outside his own country and has actually personally negotiated ceasefires in the Middle East and knows it very, very well, lived for years in Beirut. And so we asked him, where do you think this is going? Here's the conversation. Mr. Druck, thank you very much for joining us. Do you believe that the ceasefire that the President of the United States announced last night can hold?

• 1:01:37Speaker 05

  It's very tenuous. At the moment, it's very tenuous. It's already eroding somewhat, and I'm not sure that the contradictions and tensions, the underlying tensions within the ceasefire can hold. It may be that it's already eroding, that Israel has been attacking Lebanon. There is some dispute as to whether Lebanon was supposed to be a part of the ceasefire or separate to it. Initially, it was definitely a part of it. Now, Mr. Netanyahu is saying it is not, and it seems to be that that has been confirmed

• 1:02:22Speaker 05

  by the press secretary at the White House. But the Iranian reaction to that is that they have an equation. Either there's a ceasefire for all, or there's a ceasefire for nobody. I know that what's happening in the margins at the moment in the parliament in Tehran is that the security committee there are saying, okay, if Hezbollah is a target and is being targeted and being killed at the moment, and it is not part of the ceasefire, but maybe we'll consider that the whole of Israel is not part of the ceasefire and will continue to target there.

• 1:03:06Speaker 05

  So it is quite tenuous, and I understand that in the last period...

• 1:03:14Speaker 05

  The Iranian authorities have refused to allow ships to pass through Humboz. They've stopped at the moment.

• 1:03:22Tucker Carlson?

  Well, here's something that thieves count on. Security cameras usually stop where Wi-Fi stops, right? Makes sense. So if you've got a barn, a job site, equipment parked outside, a long driveway, criminals know there's a good chance that nobody is watching this because there's no Wi-Fi. And that's why we like Defend by TactiCam. It's a new sponsor of this show. Defense cameras don't run on Wi-Fi. They run on cellular, just like your phone. So they work everywhere. If you've got cell signal, you've got security. Middle of nowhere, edge of your property, construction site, wherever you need it, you don't need Wi-Fi. Big difference. And you can see why it matters. So we use these cameras in places where Wi-Fi doesn't reach. The setup is super simple.

• 1:04:05Tucker Carlson?

  You mount the camera, open the Defend app, and you are live. You get clear footage, night vision alerts sent right to your phone. It's great for construction sites, ranches, farms, or anyone with a property that stretches beyond a router. And here's something we really appreciate. Defend does not sell your data, not to tech companies, not to advertisers, not to China, no one. Your footage belongs to you, and that's big. Plans start at about five bucks a month. No contract, cancel anytime. Visit defendcellcam.com. That's defendcellcam.com.

• 1:04:37Speaker 06

  We all hear the radio ads about the IRS. They tell you to be afraid, to be scared, and they try to frighten you into calling. I'm not here to do that. Tax Relief Advocates is different. TRA is here to tell you that if you owe money to the IRS, whether it's $5,000, $50,000, or $500,000, we have a solution. It doesn't matter if you're sitting in your car, at work, or with your kids. No matter where you are, call now. 800-576-4705. Don't lose hope. TRA can eliminate or reduce what you owe to the IRS. Generous programs are now available that can give you a fresh start. Our passion is taxes and helping individuals fix their IRS problems. We have over 1,000 five-star reviews on Google and an eight plus with the Better Business Bureau. You don't need to be afraid of the IRS any longer.

• 1:05:22Speaker 06

  End your tax nightmare today by visiting us online at TRA.com or call 800-576-4705. That's 800-576-4705. Tax Relief Advocates, real solutions for real people. Have you ever heard of the Pelosi Stock Tracker? Well, here's the stock trading app.

• 1:05:41Speaker 03

  Behind it. Most of us don't have access to classified information, yet our politicians seem to. For years, they've been publicly trading stocks with some being oddly timed around certain legislation. Well, this team said, if you can't beat them, join them and build autopilot. It connects directly to your brokerage account like a Robin Hood or Schwab and mimics Nancy Pelosi and other politicians' stock trades automatically. So instead of debating what stocks to buy, you just trade alongside them hands-free. And the key thing here, your money stays in your own account. The app already has 1.3 billion invested so far. So if you wanted to check it out, search autopilot in the app store or go to join autopilot.com.

• 1:06:25Speaker 03

  That's join autopilot.com. Investing has risks like the loss of principal.

• 1:06:31Tucker Carlson?

  Can you describe what you referred to at the beginning as the underlying tensions in the ceasefire? The the the misaligned interests that may torpedo it in the end. What are they?

• 1:06:46Speaker 05

  Well, I would explain it not in terms of just sort of literal what is in and what is not in. I would say from the Iranian perspective, um, the purpose of what's happened, or at least the attack that took place on Saturday last, we killed the supreme leader. That has given an opportunity um to change the situation, to break the paradigm. They want to get out of the cage. What do I mean by the cage? Well, it's not the sort of physical cage of Gaza where there are fences and drones flying over.

• 1:07:31Speaker 05

  But nonetheless, it's been 74, 75 years of caging by, um. If you look at a map, you'll see all around Iran, every side it is hemmed in by military bases all around. It is hemmed in by stations, by tariffs, um, by siege, economic siege on the country, by political, even cultural isolation.

• 1:08:02Speaker 05

  And they see this, therefore, not as an attempt to, not as a process that will lead, if you like, to new deterrents, a new form of, as we go back, there'll be a ceasefire, then it'll end, and then there'll be another round of military. They want an end to war. They want this to bring about an end to the war, and they believe they're on a strong position. In fact, I know this will be seen counterintuitive to many of the audience, but actually Iran has emerged stronger from this month of war than it did at the end

• 1:08:46Speaker 05

  of the twelve-day war last June, in many ways. Firstly, because in economic terms, they are benefiting. For example, in the last month of this war, they have earned more revenue from their oil sales, from tankers passing from Cargillen from the Hormuz and being sold. In this one month, they have earned double what they've ever earned in previous years in one month. And just to take as an example, for example, on Sunday,

• 1:09:27Speaker 05

  they loaded five tankers in Cargillen at the terminal there. That was seven point seven million barrels of oil, and they earned eight hundred and fifty million dollars in one day from that. So the revenue from, if you like, the potential revenue from Hormuz will be enormous. It would be probably in a year just under a trillion dollars on the basis that they're charging at the moment. They're not only charging that, but they're also demanding it in one, which is part of the bigger, if you like, plan they have, which is to break the sanctions.

• 1:10:12Speaker 05

  Not only to break the hormones, but by insisting that carcas have to be charged in yuan, the Chinese currency, and not in dollars, to be, get permission to pass through Baqesem Island and Darad Island, and they are then escorted by the Iranians through, through the elements, the other. But in the other aspects, which will be seen, strike probably listeners a bit more surprising, is that their casualties are probably less than in the 12th day war. Why?

• 1:10:51Speaker 05

  Well, because what they learned from the 12th day war is evacuate all public buildings that you possibly can, obviously hospitals, but everything else empty.

• 1:11:06Speaker 05

  State buildings, security buildings, educational building, all are empty. And so the attacks, which are focused very much on those, have caused far fewer casualties. You know, there may be a caretaker or someone who unfortunately is killed in these, and of course civilians be killed. I mean, many civilians be killed where residential areas have been attacked. But on the whole, they have had fewer casualties. And the second thing is that their military is in better shape than it was at the end of the war.

• 1:11:47Speaker 05

  But first of all, the reason for that is again, rather strange one, the Iranians bought a lot of these decoys, huge numbers of decoys from the Chinese, that imitated airplanes and missiles and so on. But the Chinese gave them a twist, which was interesting, and I didn't know this before, but they have a heat source and... So the women picked up by radar or by sensors, it looks real because, you know, it's not only looks the part, but it actually emits the heat of a real missile or an airplane.

• 1:12:28Speaker 05

  And so largely, the Israelis and the United States have been bombing decoys. They've also been trying to bomb the main missile cities, but if you take a main one like Yaz, it is buried in a granite mountain, eight hundred meters deep, really deep, and there's concrete, and there's a whole railway system underneath this tunnels and railway systems under this mountain. And they deliver the missiles on railway trucks, and the railway takes it right up

• 1:13:07Speaker 05

  to the entrance, an airtight door opens, it moves to the entrance, and the missile is fired, the airtight door comes down and the train withdraws. Well, the Israelis have been bombing bombing us, and, you know, the mountain is getting blacker and blacker, but it's not affecting their missiles. And these missiles, and I've made this point many times, you know, what they haven't understood about the mosaic system that the Iranians started planning for this asymmetric war twenty years ago, is that they are dispersed across the extent of Iran, which is a huge

• 1:13:49Speaker 05

  country with mountains and forests, the size of Western Europe effectively, and they are buried deep, deep. That was the lesson that the Iranians learned from the attack on Baghdad in two thousand and three. They saw how an air pod could come in and could destroy the command center and the military capabilities of Saddam Hussein at that time.

• 1:14:19Speaker 05

  And they decided we have to manage a way that we will not suffer a decapitation strike. So they implemented this asymmetric role where the leadership is completely dispersed across the country. Again, autonomous, if you like, commands. They have their own missiles. The commander has the initiative to allow those to use troops. And they are completely immune from any cut off of communications or an assault or a decapitation strike because they have preset plans, sealed plans.

• 1:15:03Speaker 05

  Each commander has his sealed plans of what to do if the supreme leader is killed. And they tell him what the next proposals are. So it's like a sort of huge retributive machine that snaps into action the second the command is lost. And we'll continue the war, we'll continue with preset plans. And we saw that happen on that Saturday when the supreme leader was killed within the ark. Those plans were unfurled and attacks were starting on Gulf states or military, US military bases in the area.

• 1:15:46Speaker 05

  So all in all, what I'm saying to you is that, you know, and people I think could be quite surprised at the resilience that Iran has shown in this. And now they're trying to, if you like, leverage this resilience to bring about a major change in the situation. And the Iranians have, you know, some...

• 1:16:19Speaker 05

  Equations that is best to understand if you want to understand what their position is, it's like the one I mentioned about the ceasefire, but it is security for all or security for no one, prosperity for all in the region or prosperity for no one. If we are attacked, we will move up the escalation ladder accordingly. But the aim is to try and bring about a complete change, as I say, to change the

• 1:16:57Speaker 05

  region through the control over the hormones, to change the region away from being a petrodollar region, away from it being, if you like, a part of the economic, the economic sphere of Wall Street, and to try and to move to a different economy in the Gulf area. And also, by insisting on one, it is trying, if you like, to change the whole, if you

• 1:17:38Speaker 05

  like, basis and the whole geopolitical setting of Iran and for it to come back as a major political power in the region. That's it essentially.

• 1:17:52Tucker Carlson?

  It's probably pretty obvious by now that you definitely need the Hallow app. You need peace and the Hallow app can bring you there. And there's something pretty great, starting on Hallow, starting April 13th. Mark Wahlberg begins a new series called Stay Prayed Up. His message is simple, go to church, take your faith seriously and pray. And Hallow can help you with the last one. Millions follow that routine on Sundays. Then Monday comes, your life gets busy, the connection to God fades. Now with Hallow, Hallow offers daily prayer challenges, not just encouragement, but structure, a way to actually live out your prayers. Prayer is not complicated, but it's hard. It is a discipline. It's about opening yourself up to God's will, relinquishing control, and letting God lead your life.

• 1:18:38Tucker Carlson?

  And that can absolutely change your life. In fact, it's the only thing that can change your life. Hallow helps users embrace the rhythm of prayer and scripture into their regular routines. Listen, reflect, let it speak into your day. That's what it means to stay prayed up, showing up daily, even when you don't feel like it. And when you do that, God meets you directly. So stay prayed up. Download Hallow today for three months for free at hallow.com/tucker. There's nothing we recommend more strongly than this.

• 1:19:03Speaker 07

  This podcast is supported by GoFundMe.

• 1:19:05Speaker 06

  My name is Veronica. We started our fundraiser for Mariah. She was a close friend in my heart, but she was also family. She was my sister-in-law. She unfortunately passed from a car accident. So it wasn't something that we were prepared for. Shortly after we got the news, I was put in charge of helping with the funeral arrangements and everything. And just looking at the overall cost, it didn't feel right for me to ask the family that's grieving for money. That's what made me go to GoFundMe. And it just became a network of people that were willing to come together to help.

• 1:19:39Speaker 07

  GoFundMe is the world's number one fundraising platform, trusted by over 200 million people.

• 1:19:44Speaker 06

  You really do miss out on the opportunity to help people if you don't ask. When you actually put your heart, your soul into it, and you're like, this is the reason I'm doing it, it helps a lot.

• 1:19:56Speaker 07

  Start your GoFundMe today at gofundme.com. That's gofundme.com. GoFundMe.com.

• 1:20:04Tucker Carlson?

  If Iran, it's from what you've described, if Iran were to achieve those goals, or even the majority of those goals, it would be a major global power, not just a regional power, it seems to me.

• 1:20:17Speaker 05

  Yes, exactly. And this is why, I mean, you know, what is happening in Iran and with Hamas portends a big shift in the global path because already we saw see, you know, signs of this taking place. Their demand that every ship passed has got to confirm that it is, its cargo is paid for in one. And we're seeing, consequentially, Russia has already announced that in future, any sales, any purchases of Russian oil or gas or products by Europe will have to be in one.

• 1:21:01Speaker 05

  Uh, from now on, that's it. Then you've seen a big European bank, Deutsche Bank, now stopping, um, if you like, the issuance so much of their, their debts in dollars and are issuing tender bills. That is, uh, bottom, based in either the digital remembing or the ordinary remembing. And was a huge success. People have been, um, it's been oversubscribed, people coming back, uh, and taking this. So what they're doing is actually, if you like, in a small way, but they're trying to capitalize

• 1:21:41Speaker 05

  uh, an economic shift uh, away from the very, um, leveraged, financialized economic world. Um, which incidentally has been so damaging to America and, and Europe too, because it's prioritized the financialized world at the expense of the real economy and real jobs. Um, and it's all about trading and making money by trading or something else. But it isn't from making goods. No one does that now. Not enough money in it. You can make more money in an hour on the stock markets, trading across, um, futures markets and other.

• 1:22:27Speaker 05

  So it's also part of, if you like, that greater project that the Chinese and Russians are engaged in of going back to much more self-sufficient economies that are not just based on financialized products and dealings, but actually produce things for people, produce things for people and therefore can take salaries to people. And they think this is, you know, what they need to move towards and they want to change the Gulf in that direction by persuading them to deal with Iran, that they have no choice, but they

• 1:23:10Speaker 05

  need to deal with Iran and they should give up, if you like, all these big data centers by Amazon and AI centers and should change to a much more simple economy.

• 1:23:24Tucker Carlson?

  So it's, I think, it's been clear from an American perspective since the first days of the war between Russia and Ukraine that the US dollar as the global reserve currency was in retreat and it was obviously going to change at some point, it always was. And maybe that could be managed in some way. You're describing a very abrupt change. I mean, if a fifth of the world's energy is settled in Chinese currency, that seems like just the end of the dollar as the global reserve currency, or maybe I'm overstating it.

• 1:23:56Speaker 05

  I mean, I don't think, I don't think that is the aim. I think the aim at this point is to construct enough pain to get leverage over the West and to get them to understand because it's not just oil and gas are things who are what. It is also the precursors for, for equipment, helium and sulfuric acid and all these things that we need for our supply lines. So if, you know, if there's a parallel, I would say that the sort of second part of it is a parallel to what we've seen in China.

• 1:24:38Speaker 05

  When Mr. Trump imposed those tariffs, high tariffs, one hundred and fifty five percent, China started saying, well, I'm sorry, we're going to impose restrictions on rare earths and important minerals also until you bring down the tariffs. And that was achieved by China by using that leverage to bring about a change in the trading system there. And in a sense, Hormuz Straits gives the opportunity, particularly if the Red Sea is included, where so much of the world's commodities pass. And of course, Ansaal and the Houssis are quite capable of controlling that in a similar

• 1:25:23Speaker 05

  sort of way. So yes, it is a change in that direction, but China, I believe, is very, is very powerful. I was in, in China at the end of last year, and I was very much aware that they are cautious because the way they've applied AI and sound is not in the way we do it in the West. I was talking to some of the factory owners, and he said, look, you know, Alistair, when, you know, at the beginning of this year, I take a typical factory, I told his house man, it's now two hundred, one year later.

• 1:26:05Speaker 05

  And he said, all of that is because we apply soft AI, you can call it robotics or automation or automatics or whatever, but we apply soft AI for productivity to get our costs down. And our costs are falling, manufacturing costs are falling by two percent. And I, I turned to him and I said, that's terrible because, you know, we, we can never compete with that. We, you must be aware that's quite dangerous because you are entering a suicidities point when you, because we have cost inflation and You have caused deflation.

• 1:26:50Speaker 05

  This is not going to be a very easy thing, so you have to manage this. Your, you know, your thucydian point with great terror, otherwise you end up in in a worse conflict with uh uh uh with with the West. But the Chinese don't want to push themselves to the forefront, displace the United States. And the, you know, the special currency, but they could do it, you're right. You could do it tomorrow. For example, when I use WeChat um that in China. Um, you know, it has one point four billion users on that one platform. One point four billion.

• 1:27:32Speaker 05

  And you can pay, you can take insurance, you can get a loan, everything you want on that. They could roll that up so easy. I mean, you know, the scale is already there. They could roll it out across Asia tomorrow. But I don't think they want to do that. They're not trying to create a crisis that will affect the whole of the trading system of the world because China depends, you know, on trade. And it doesn't want to to break the system, but it wants to gently move the system in a different direction.

• 1:28:06Tucker Carlson?

  Cost of living is already making it hard to live here and it's not getting any better. Unfortunately, it's likely to get worse and a lot of Americans fill the gap with credit cards, not just for fancy dinners, but to cover things like groceries and bills. That is a disaster. It's understandable, but don't go down that road because there is a tax in effect, a survival tax of 20% interest or more. Why would you do that? Why would you hand money to the big banks when you can keep it for your family? Our friends at American Financing have a better way. If you're looking to buy your first home or refinance your current one, they're helping Americans achieve the dream of homeownership with monthly mortgage rates currently in the fives. American Financing saves its customers an average of 800 bucks per month.

• 1:28:49Tucker Carlson?

  That's nearly 10 grand every year back to you. This isn't just a loan, it's a total financial reset. So debt is tough, but there's a smart way to do it and a reckless self-destructive way to do it, credit cards. And so we recommend American Financing. They're salary-based, not commission-based, which means they actually work for you, not the banks. They're called America's home for home loans for a reason. Call 800-685-5696, 800-685-5696, or visit americanfinancing.net/tucker. You, you mentioned that Iran, between the end of the 12-day war in June and the

• 1:29:31Tucker Carlson?

  start of this war at the end of February, had received quite a few decoys from China? Is that the extent of the military aid that the Iranian government has received from the Xi government?

• 1:29:45Speaker 05

  No. But, you know, people say, "Well, I don't see anything." We don't see it in Iraq. No, because you wouldn't see it. Because what they have provided is that the Iranians used to use GPS, and the West was found it quite easy to disrupt GPS signals when they wanted to, or to spoof them, and to think he was a different location from it. The Iranians had gone on to the Russian system first of all, but now, at the beginning

• 1:30:22Speaker 05

  of this period after the June war, they moved into Beidou, the Chinese digital system, which is linked to their satellite. They have a complete satellite system. As you know, over the, uh, we've seen some of the pictures from them, they're very good. And they also, in the, in the agreement, in the cooperation agreement between Iran and China, agreed that they might have access to the highest-grade, military-quality, digital communication system of Beidou.

• 1:31:03Speaker 05

  So the satellite system, there are earth receivers in Iran. The satellite system is linked to that. And the radars are linked through Beidu to a single command post or to each single, if you like, missile city to provide the targeting and the data. And during the first stages of this, they also put one of their intelligence ships, they call Ocean One, off the coast, the Persian coast, which was able to intercept communications. It was also able to map undersea.

• 1:31:46Speaker 05

  In other words, they could map any Israeli or United States submarines that were operating. All of this was linked. And it's linked in a sort of huge digital map that is available, which gives the targets and it gives the way in which those targets can be attacked, what type of missile can be used. It was used by the Pakistanis in a rather simpler form in their war against India, which, you know, the pilots, the Pakistani pilot, didn't have to see its target on the radar because it could see the whole situation, the whole map.

• 1:32:30Speaker 05

  We call this in the West, the IRS, Intelligence, Reconnaissance, Surveillance. This was the big asset that the United States gave to the Ukrainians. The ability to have an integrated type of targeting and data all in one, all presented even down onto a laptop if necessary, but onto a cockpit or into a missile center. So what I'm saying is, and there's no confirmation from the Chinese or anyone, they keep quiet, but... But this time the the shoe is on the other foot.

• 1:33:14Speaker 05

  It's the Iranians that have the IRS. The intelligence reconnaissance that's available is quite clear. I mean, you know, I don't have to prove it because, you know, when a B one takes off from Fairford Airport RAF in in in England, they the Iranians pick it up within a second that it's taken off and know when they can block where it's going and what to do about it. So they obviously have much more sophisticated, if you like, targeting and data management than in the past. I think the Russians helped it in a different way, more with drones.

• 1:33:57Speaker 05

  You know, the Iranians helped the transmission with their drones, the shakim drones. I mean, the Russians asked for them for use in Ukraine and they took them and then they upgraded them and now some of that upgrading is coming back to Iran. Got to see, I think, a Russian.

• 1:34:19Tucker Carlson?

  How how difficult would it be for the United States to defeat militarily the Iranian regime at this point?

• 1:34:31Speaker 05

  Oh, I I as such, I don't think it's possible, not in that sense. If you mean to destroy their ability to continue a military conflict with Israel and the United States bases in the region, I don't think they can. The Iranians have even buried their construction plants for missiles. They're not on the surface and these missile, they come up. If they're not on in a mountain coming out on the train, they come up from silos, you know, 200 meters deep and they just come straight up out of the silo and then a new

• 1:35:15Speaker 05

  rocket, a new missile is automatically, there's a rotating. If you like, I don't know, chrome, and it moves the next missile directly. It doesn't get exposed. It's not out in the open. It's 200 meters underground. And then the attack door shuts as soon as the missile has left. I think it would be very, very difficult to defeat Iran, in that sense, to destroy its military capabilities. And it would be even less possible to take control of Hummus now from Iran. You have to look at the geography,

• 1:36:00Speaker 05

  I mean, and the terrain of Hummus to understand why this would just really be a nonstop.

• 1:36:08Tucker Carlson?

  Well, you've probably heard a lot about the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, Bibi, on this show and elsewhere. He's the guy who's always at the White House, working to suck the United States into some war of conquest on behalf of his country. But what you may not know is that the charges against Netanyahu are real. Corruption charges. They tell you a lot about him. What exactly do you know about this man who's apparently in charge of the United States? Well, we are now streaming The Bibi Files. It's a documentary that pulls back the curtain on Benjamin Netanyahu. This film traces the rise of the longest-serving prime minister in the history of Israel and the corruption cases surrounding him. Hear from former staff and Israeli insiders

• 1:36:50Tucker Carlson?

  describing what Benjamin Netanyahu is really like and see leaked interrogation footage from his corruption investigations, video that you were not meant to see and that they definitely don't want you to see. The Bibi Files, it offers a rare look inside Israel's power structure and the man whose decisions have once again drawn our country into another war, a big war. You can stream it now only at TuckerCarlson.com.

• 1:37:17Speaker 00

  Now, more than ever, we need someone on our side. But Rob Whitman? Whitman's votes drove up costs, cut Medicaid, and risked 350,000 Virginians' health care to pay for tax breaks for himself and his donors. He's not on our side. Shannon Taylor will fight corruption, cut taxes, and bring down costs. This November, vote for Shannon Taylor. She's for us. Paid for by HMP, the HouseMajorityPact.com. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

• 1:37:48Tucker Carlson?

  So if Iranian oil sales, as you described them, are potentially going to bring a trillion dollars US to the Iranian government over the next year, that would, I think, from an American perspective, increase the incentive to blow up Karg, to blow up Karg, where I think the overwhelming majority of Iranian energy is loaded onto ships. And you're hearing people talk about that. Well, let's just eliminate Karg Island. Is that, would that work? Is that possible?

• 1:38:26Speaker 05

  No, it wouldn't work. And, you know, this is a, first of all, Karg, first of all, Karg, as you know, lies at the far end of the whole moors. On the other shore, there are cliffs. And then behind that, it's barren, very, very barren, very, with no vegetation. The hills and mountains, those full-range mountains, goes right down to the straits. And so, first of all, is how would you get fruits to Karg? I mean, you can't sail them up the whole moors. In fact, the, what I understand is that,

• 1:39:10Speaker 05

  what they call, I think, MEU, the Marine Expeditionary Unit Ship, HMS something, or USS something, whether I can remember his proper name, did erupt with 2000. Marines on board. And Iran fired a couple of missiles across its bows. And it is now removed to about a thousand kilometers off the Persian coast. Because it doesn't want to risk moving any closer. Which is what happened to the, um, also which happened to the carriers. They had to move further and further back.

• 1:39:51Speaker 05

  So that they couldn't actually use the, uh, the, the, the fighter destroyed aircraft on their deck. Because it was too far. They'd have to start refueling them even over the target. And that is an unacceptable risk for, for them. So I don't think you could get troops, uh, could you land them on, on, on, on the borders? Well, Cog Island is in artillery range of, um, the, the, um, Iranian side of, of the homelands. Um, and it's certainly within ballistic missile. So your troops would be there and they would have both missiles. And they would have artillery fire, um, all the time.

• 1:40:35Speaker 05

  How would you resupply them? How would you deal with them? Would you create a sort of an airbase further back? Well, actually, the, the Iranians would allow them. Because they, they, in, in the Iran-Iraq war, they were specialists in opening corridors. And during the Iraqis go in their corridors because they thought they were unprotected. And then they close corridor. And then they kill the, uh, troops in it. Um, the Iraqi has a big mountain. Uh, it is a million men under arms.

• 1:41:19Speaker 05

  And the Basids are, they are another million. Um, they would, I think, not find it difficult to deal with a substantial landing of, of troops. It is terrible. The mountains that, you know, there are, the cliffs are full of anti-ship missiles. Um, and the mountains also, um, are, are full of sort of caves and tunnels where artillery is in position. Digging artillery out of mountains is a terrible, expensive job.

• 1:41:57Speaker 05

  And in any case, you can't get into, that wouldn't give you, if you had Falk Island, you wouldn't have control of Hormuz because the Iranians have, as I say, anti-ship missiles, but they also have, which we haven't seen used so far, submersible drones. These are small drones that are in tunnels under the water. They are submerged tunnels and they can exit under the water from those tunnels. They have lithium batteries which can last about four days. They have the capacity to loiter and then use artificial intelligence to select the target and to attack the target.

• 1:42:43Speaker 05

  Then they have surface drones, I mean, about 600 fast ship surface drones. Most of those are concealed also. And they have finally, which is not, not much, but they have about 25 to 30 mini submarines. And the, the draft in, the Hormuz is relatively shallow. But these submarines, I mean, these submarines are mini submarines, very small, and they can fly up and down Hormuz and they can fire anti-ship missiles from the first aircraft submerged, they are under the, under the waters.

• 1:43:26Speaker 05

  Or attack it with other forms of drones by these small submarines. So they would be very vulnerable to go in there and certainly even more vulnerable. We've seen what happened over the weekend where the US lost many aircraft, partly because of an attempt to rescue two crew from the F-15, but also the subsequent operation, which was probably an operation to try and take the enriched uranium from Isaha nuclear facility.

• 1:44:04Speaker 05

  They went wrong and there was an ambush and many planes were, and helicopters were, were destroyed in that process and it failed. I think that was what, you know, Trump was very much comfortable, you know, that they could, you know, do a Maduro, do a Venezuela, you know, the special forces would go in one night over a long Easter weekend when the markets were closed, they would go in, go to where Grossi, the head of the IEA, say, you know, there's half of the enriched uranium sitting in a tunnel in this Baham, and take it and then come back and before the market

• 1:44:46Speaker 05

  opens, we've won, it's a great success, but it went badly wrong. My guess is, you know, that's over, you can't repeat that exercise now, not because the Iranians know of it, they knew all along, I mean, you know, they're not stupid, they knew that a main aim of Trump would be to try and take, seize the uranium and then sort of put it out as a trophy. We destroyed their nuclear capabilities, now we have more than half. Grossi said it was sixty to seventy percent of the total four hundred and thirty kilos of fifty percent enriched uranium.

• 1:45:29Tucker Carlson?

  When the president threatened yesterday to eliminate the civilization and to destroy the country, what weapons do you think he was thinking about using?

• 1:45:41Speaker 05

  I really don't know, it sounded very ominous to me, I mean, that he could take out, you know, this is a big country, I mean, a huge country, ninety-five million people, you know, infrastructure and industry, I mean, the size of the whole of Western Europe across it, I mean, how could he, how, how would you do this by any conventional means? I, I don't understand, maybe he was deliberately hinting at some sort of nuclear device, but I can't tell.

• 1:46:19Speaker 05

  But that's, I suppose, one possibility of what he meant by this would be the death of a civilization and it would not return again in the future. It would be over. Well, what do you, how would you do that in such a big scape? I don't know. Or maybe he was just talking and didn't really mean what he was saying. It was bluster. We just, we just don't know. This makes it very difficult for not just the Iranians, but everyone to sort of negotiate in this time because they're finding it very difficult to understand

• 1:46:59Speaker 05

  what, what is now Trump's ambition? It seems to be that he wants to get out of, of the swarm to which he was invited by Netanyahu and enthusiastically accepted. Um, he wants to get out because he has this timeline. Uh, the midterm elections are coming up. He's always said, you know, I've got to, you know, we've got to get this Iranian thing settled, you know, in four to six weeks so that I can concentrate on trying, um, to save the midterm results. Um, but now after the failure

• 1:47:44Speaker 05

  of trying to extract the uranium from his hand, I think the only thing that was facing him was a long war or massive escalation. Um, and that wasn't going to work well for, for, for the midterms or his situation in the country. So I think he was hoping for a way out. Is it going to work? Can it work? Well, that's what I mean about the contradiction. Iran doesn't want a ceasefire. It wants an end to the wars, an end to its siege.

• 1:48:23Speaker 05

  It wants to be able to get out and play a role in the region. And of course, that is not the interest, not only of Trump, but particularly of Israel. Israel has been pressing, I read the Hebrew press regularly, we do sort of summaries of it. And they've given up on the idea of what they call a regime change in Iran. They realize it's not going to happen, it's not going to work. Maybe it never was going to work. I mean, they say this, you know, in the Hebrew press, much franker than in the English language. They say this very clearly, it wasn't going, uh, wasn't going to work.

• 1:49:07Speaker 05

  Then came Netanyahu said, they must take Kargh Island. This has got to be done, both on the ground. Kargh Island is the key thing that they have to do. Well, they have now come to a conclusion. I mean, the Israeli military experts who know the region, like the military defense agency have said, you know, you're not going to, what are you going to do? Please sit on Kargh Island, you'll just be sitting target. You will have huge casualties. And so even the Israelis understand that. So that's why we now have the switch that is taking place, which is over. Okay, now we have to destroy that infrastructure.

• 1:49:51Speaker 05

  Electricity, water supplies, railways. In this last day, the entire railway system of Iran was, has been attacked by, by Israel. Across the entire country, they've been destroying the railway system. I mean, it is civilian infrastructure. It is a criminal thing to do this to the civilian population. But that's what pressing on Trump.

• 1:50:21Speaker 05

  To do, to try and push him further down. They want it really so that Iran is not functional as a going state, that it is too broken. And then they want to see it divided up into sort of ethno sectarian spatelets, rather like Syria, this happened to Syria, so that it is weak and easily dominates.

• 1:50:56Tucker Carlson?

  What would it take to do that? Is that even, leaving aside whether or not it's evil, and of course it is evil, but if that were your goal, do you have a realistic chance of achieving it? And if so, how?

• 1:51:12Speaker 05

  It will be difficult, but you could do some of it. The Iranian electrical system is notably decentralized. This is all part of the rethinking of asymmetrical warfare from the 2003 period. So there are about, I think it's 150, 160 different, you know, electrical plants that are all interconnected. And so they have a huge number of small plants that are decentralized across Iran, rather than, you know, a few big platforms. And Bushehr is probably the biggest one that they have, but that's a joint project with Russia.

• 1:51:57Speaker 05

  But Iran has attacked that twice. And I think this was a message. And you asked me what was happening. But first of all, Israel attacked Nantaz, which is another nuclear site, facility. But Nantaz is still, you know, damaged from when Trump bombed it. But then they landed a missile quite near to Bushehr, which is a functioning power, nuclear power plant jointly run by the Russians. And it's under full IEA supervision because the Russians want it like that.

• 1:52:41Speaker 05

  And then they landed a missile quite close to Bushehr. And then now they've landed in the recent days a missile that has damaged it, not heavily, just but hit it. And of course, the I A were very concerned about this and the Russians have now withdrawn all their staff from it. But in my view, this was a message not to Iran, but to the United States. And the message was to say, you know, well, if you don't do it, we have the capability to eliminate these nuclear,

• 1:53:24Speaker 05

  to go down the road of it's like attacking the nuclear. In other words, to use a tactical nuclear weapons. So I think, I think this was a pressure point that was put on to the White House to say, look, either you do what we say and you'll destroy their capabilities, their infrastructure, or maybe Israel will be forced to move to a different level of attack.

• 1:53:58Tucker Carlson?

  To, to a nuclear level. That would not be the first time the Israelis have threatened that. They threatened that in 1973, so it's been over 50 years of the same threat. What would, do you believe that that's a real threat? Do you think Israel would use nuclear weapons in Iran?

• 1:54:18Speaker 05

  At the last resort, possibly, but not before. No, I don't think so. I think it would be very much a last resort. But, you know, Israel is becoming less, I've been writing for some years to say that, you know, it's no longer possible to see and understand.

• 1:54:40Speaker 05

  A large segment of the Israeli population through secular rationalist lenses, which we tend to do. We have to look at it through eschatological ideas and see what they are looking to. And there you see, I mean, you take somebody, someone, a minister like Spohtrich, I remember six, seven years ago, who said, you know, this is the plan. We're going to get rid of all of the Palestinians, all of the Arabs out of the territories. But we require one thing. This was seven years, six, seven years ago, and he said, we're missing one thing. We need a big crisis or a major war to finish off this project.

• 1:55:24Speaker 05

  In other words, there is a large segment that are not frightened of Armageddon, but actually are looking forward because this is the redemption in this, in this stew. So there's no point saying to them, you know, as you know, we in Europe do said, well, it doesn't make any sense to provoke a big war. It makes absolute sense if you're an eschatological, messianic believer to do these things. So, you know, we have to try and understand it in these terms too, I think.

• 1:56:04Speaker 05

  And there is the danger, the sort of eschatological, the messianic theme that is present, has been predicted that it would be present and has gripped probably more than half of the Israelis, the sense of Amalek, that they are fighting the war of Amalek. And this is going to lead to eventually to Armageddon and redemption.

• 1:56:32Tucker Carlson?

  Given that, how do you understand the pressure from Israel on the United States to continue fighting Russia? It's very clear now, it's always been clear, but it's rarely spoken in public in the U.S. that Israel and its advocates in the U.S. have been the prime drivers of the Ukraine war, pushing the United States to fund Ukraine in a fight against Russia and Putin. Why? What is this thinking there? What's the strategy behind that, do you think?

• 1:57:06Speaker 05

  I think it's the same people and it's the same supremacist thinking. The idea of control. And there is, I think, in the case of Russia, a great ancient resentment. I mean, dating back, first of all, to the failed attempt of the Bolsheviks to institute a society that ended all reliance on family, community, religious, to create people as

• 1:57:46Speaker 05

  just units, units in a society, in a sort of technocratic society. That failed and then Stalin was instrumental in, as they believe, in killing many of those people who, largely were originally, many of them came from the US and were prostitutes. And I remember watching a video of Putin addressing some of the Pacific members in Moscow and he was saying to them, you know, and he was warning them and he said, you

• 1:58:26Speaker 05

  know, that, I think, the figure he gave was eighty-three percent of the Bolsheviks were Jewish and most of them didn't speak Russian, basically, did it.

• 1:58:42Speaker 05

  So the Russians are very aware of this history. And then they were made aware of it again in the nineties, when the oligarchs, the period of the oligarchs, or Putin and down on that. Of the oligarchs, there were seven oligarchs, non, non, or six were Jewish and tied to financial institutions in the West, whether in America or in Europe. And the consequences of that period with the shock treatment, the shock economic treatment

• 1:59:27Speaker 05

  that was visited on Russia. I mean, what were terrible, the consequences on on on on this society. So I think Putin has always tried to carefully maneuver and manage, if you like. What he understands is a um a sort of a power system, which is um higher, larger than the power system in in Europe and the United States in the conventional way, based much of it on sort of finance and banking, going back to the 19th century, and the influence of people, the act of France and so on.

• 2:00:09Speaker 05

  And that has given them a very cautious to um to their relations. And we've seen that caution sort of obviously Syria at times, but also in in Putin's relations um with uh Israel. Um, I I don't mean it in any delicate way, delicate. I'm just saying that I think he's a cautious person, a lawyer by training, and he understands the the power, uh the global power

• 2:00:50Speaker 05

  and its ability to mobilize and its ability to use proxies to um work damage and maybe even defeat a country. And so, you know, this is, I mean, it's interesting because this is exactly the the parallel that we're dealing with now um with with Iraq. Um, i- in the sense uh that I think um the United States and would like and Iran would be content to find a security solution, a permanent security situation, not just a ceasefire,

• 2:01:36Speaker 05

  um to which would involve, um of course, things like sanctions, removal of sanctions. I think very similar to what Russia has been uh uh looking for. Uh, but just as in the Ukrainian. Um. Situation. The European determination to continue the war on Russia using the Ukrainian proxies has really stopped the ability to to find a a political solution. Um. A political architecture. Because what Russia wants is quite clear. I see Russia wants to set the boundaries. A very clear. What is the boundaries of the sphere of interest of nature?

• 2:02:21Speaker 05

  And what are Russia and China and Asia's sphere of interest? What? Where does the boundary between those lie? And what does that mean? That's what I think he means when he talks about security architecture. And this is what Iran is effectively saying. You know, you have to curb doing something about stopping Israel. Because otherwise Israel will not allow you to come to any, you know, any serious, meaningful um agreement uh with uh Iran. Um. And to, and if you don't, and then Iran will do it its own way, which is going to be.

• 2:03:01Speaker 05

  And you said what happens about Humos, but uh, you know, they only have to keep Humos tightly enclosed for three weeks. And the pain across financial markets in the West about about supply lines and about food and all these issues will become very, very severe. So, you know, they're saying, you know, this is your, these are our equations. It's either security for all or security for no one. Prosperity for all or prosperity for no one. And we are intent on it. And, you know, the the Iranians have a huge resilience.

• 2:03:43Speaker 05

  They're unusual people, remarkable in many sense, because they're reading of um the revelation of the prophet. Uh, is that you are mandated as a human being um to oppose the oppression of others. You are mandated. Um, similarly, um, to look after and to take care of the dispossessed. I mean, these are the fundamental things. You go back to Kabbalah, you see, that is the principles. These were the, the principles, these were the principles of the Imam in, in use.

• 2:04:25Speaker 05

  And the third principle was the need to have active minds. I want the people to have active minds, to think for themselves and to think well. And for that reason, made it compulsory that you, if you went to university, you had to, if you wanted to study Islamic philosophy, you also had to study Western philosophy. The two run together in Iranian universities. So this gives them a very strong, and it explains why Iran is viewed as an enemy by people who, who, you know, are oppressing others, people, um, with, who, uh, enforce these special rights

• 2:05:09Speaker 05

  on some people and not on others in the, in the region. Uh, and that is, you know, where it is. And I think that eventually, we're going to get to the point, because the tensions in Israel, huge, enormous tensions that are, are there. Um, you know, the, the, the, the, the Tifa star went to the cabinet the other day, um, and said, listen, the IDF, the military force is collapsing. We're totally overextended. It is collapsing.

• 2:05:47Speaker 05

  And, you know, there's nothing we can do about it unless you want to produce another four, four hundred thousand troops. We can't do it. We're overextended. We need to get out of Lebanon. We are failing. We have failed with Gaza. We have failed in, uh, Lebanon. We thought we defeated Hezbollah, and now it is in huge costs on us, huge damage on us. You have failed. They are saying that to Netanyahu. It's in the Hebrew press more than it's in the English language press. But it's a real crisis.

• 2:06:25Speaker 05

  And why it's such a big crisis is in Israel, the army has always been the spinal cord of the state. You know, left, right, religious, secular, all did their service in the army. It was the thing that kept it together. And the chief of staff was saying, it's broken, it's completely bust. And the political leadership says, no, you're just being defeated. We are on our way to a great victory. And we're going to establish greater Israel across the Middle East. And within Israel, people are saying, you're wrong. It's not going to do that.

• 2:07:10Speaker 05

  Actually, you're going from one defeat to another, to a bigger defeat. And that we have to take stock and think again of where we go.

• 2:07:22Tucker Carlson?

  Why, given the fragile state of the IDF, would the IDF be bombing residential apartment buildings in Beirut? Not in southern Lebanon, but in Beirut, you know, a country with a Christian president? Why would they be killing civilians in Beirut right now?

• 2:07:44Speaker 05

  Well, what some of the military people in Israel are saying, this is clearly a last gasp by the government there to present, if you like, a victory before they have to concede that they will join the ceasefire in due course. That this was a show of force, even though it was.

• 2:08:14Speaker 05

  Completely ineffective show of force, military stance. This was just simply destroying residential power blocks, many of them, many of them. And it was of no purpose other than for, you know, the political grandees to say, oh, no, look what we've done. We've got freedom of action in Lebanon. We can go where we want and destroy what we want. Um, well, maybe we will agree to join the ceasefire if Trump pushes us hard enough to do that. But it serves no purpose. And the idea, no, it is actually, um, they are going

• 2:08:55Speaker 05

  to, I think, completely withdraw, except that they say, and this is what the defense minister is insisting, they have to demolish all the houses for a depth of seven kilometers into Lebanon. Platinum, they have to be like Gaza. I mean, they don't hesitate to say it's got to be like Gaza. And that's going to be a buffer. And the military say, what is the point of that? The idea saying to their leaders, say, what is the point of that? Because actually, the, the, the Hezbollah's missile, most of them are north of the Litani. The Litani is the river that divides Lebanon. It's about, I can't remember how many kilometers, but it's about

• 2:09:40Speaker 05

  the third of the way up of Lebanon. And he says, they can still fire from north of Litani into northern Israel. And they're causing huge damage and huge losses. In one day, I mean, the, the idea of lost nearly a hundred Makova tanks, main battle tanks. Now, they, they, they, they did an ambush. And they've done it on other days. Another day, they've lost eighty. Um, maybe fifty in another day. It's like two thousand and six in Lebanon, when I was there, and they did the same thing with Makova there. Um, and, you know, of course, I mean, actually,

• 2:10:21Speaker 05

  I think a few of the lead tanks that could get out, but most of them, they don't get out. So there are big casualties taking place. I mean, the thing is a mess, a disaster. And this is why I think that ultimately, the demand for

• 2:10:41Speaker 05

  A real ceasefire is mostly going to come not from Trump and those associates around him that are close to Israel, but may come from Israel itself because they've experienced huge damage. And, you know, what is the point of this? I mean, they cannot, they cannot make political gain from this system. They've created mayhem across the region and nothing is working to their favor. There's not going to be a sort of loving with the Gulf states, Abraham, courts or anything

• 2:11:24Speaker 05

  after what has happened in these, in this period. So they have to rethink where they're going. And I think that probably will happen. Maybe not yet. It's not right yet. But I think they will. I think that.

• 2:11:41Tucker Carlson?

  I think in the United States, doesn't the US have to think about how to disengage from Israel, given that the cost to the relationship is very obvious to the American public now? We would not be in a war with Russia. We're not for pressure from Israel and its advocates. We would not be in a war with Iran. We're not for our relationship with Israel. So can the United States disentangle from Israel without getting hurt in the process, do you think?

• 2:12:10Speaker 05

  Well, there are those in Israel who advocate it. I know that's surprising, but on the right wing, there are those who say, and even Netanyahu said, it's time for us to disengage and be less reliant on the United States. I think he reads the writing on the wall. And frankly, he sees the writing on the wall. So let's anticipate it. But how they're going to do that, I mean, is, is, is a different question. As I was saying earlier, you know, the whole, it's not just geopolitics of the region is shifting because of hormones and the way the war is, but I'm saying that, you know,

• 2:12:54Speaker 05

  the mainstay of Israel has been the technical industries of the Gulf and the Gulf states and the money of the Gulf states which have supported it. And I think.

• 2:13:09Speaker 05

  That is probably going to change and change quite tremendously. I I'm not sure, it depends uh to the degree with which the Gulf states can also read the writing on the wall and realize some of them, I think, have begun to do that. They're thinking about how how to deal with how to deal with Iran, that they need to come to terms and to come to an arrangement so they can export their energy and whatever else they want. But that is going to mean, and the Iranians say that, you know, you can't do that and also be beholden to Microsoft and Amazon and have all of their data centers.

• 2:13:51Speaker 05

  And and because, you know, we understand what data centers are. They are for security. They are for surveillance, for monitoring every telephone call and every structure that takes moves in the Middle East, uh so that you can assassinate them if you want them. We are not going to accept these this type of um technology in in in the region. And that's why they've attacked them. And I think they've attacked that big Amazon center in the UAE. I think it costs thirty billion to set up. It's the biggest, you won't find it on Google Maps because it's hidden, but it's a huge AI center there.

• 2:14:33Speaker 05

  So I think, I think, yes, I I think, you know, that is the way. So where, what is the business model for Israel for the next ten years? That is going to be a question.

• 2:14:48Tucker Carlson?

  Where does this war leave the Gulf states, the GCC?

• 2:14:53Speaker 05

  Um, it leaves them badly damaged. Um, many of the people leaving, um, the particularly Dubai, um, and UAE, um.

• 2:15:07Speaker 05

  It leaves some needing to rethink how they can, if you like, manage a relationship with Iran, which allows them to export their goods, even though it will mean disengagement from the Western financialized world. But they will need to do that. I think they will find they have little choice ultimately. There's a moment of indignation and anger that they've been attacked and blah, blah, blah. But ultimately, you know, if they want to move their products either through the Red Sea.

• 2:15:49Speaker 05

  By the way, the Saudi pipeline to the Red Sea has just been attacked. I don't know if it's completely destroyed, but it's just been attacked. For that was their alternative to supplying oil. They could supply five million pounds a day from off the coast of the Red Sea. But that's been attacked now. So, I mean, the pressure is on the Gulf states to come to terms. And some of them will, I believe. Some of them will more easily, and others may not.

• 2:16:26Tucker Carlson?

  And finally, how do you think most likely this is resolved and over what time period?

• 2:16:38Speaker 05

  I think that this is going to be resolved in the way that I indicated. I think that initially, we will see the negotiations of the Americans, although they've said, the White House has said that the ten-point plan is the base for discussion about a political settlement. This is the base. This is the anchor, if you like, to the ten-point plan. That Iran has produced. It's a real, I mean, it's a real initiative. It's been signed off by the Supreme Leader, the young Supreme Leader,

• 2:17:23Speaker 05

  and by the Security Council. It's not one of these plans that have come in from Pakistan by talking to sort of ephemeral people. This has come out of the security structures and with the support of the IRG-C. And the Supreme Leader read it, asked for some amendments to it, and gave it its imprimatur. So it is a serious document. I think that inevitably in the negotiations, whoever is negotiating, if it is Vance or Whitcock or whoever, they will then revert or try and say, yes, but we have to go back to these other issues.

• 2:18:07Speaker 05

  You may not enrich uranium in Iran. And one of the principles that the Iranians have said is we have the right to enrich in Iran our uranium for as a source of energy. They will then say, well, you cannot have such missiles. You're going to have to dismantle your missile systems. And you will need to put limits on them, and we will have to inspect them, and we will have to monitor. And Iran will say, no way, that couldn't happen. And they will say, you'll have to give up the whole moose completely, that we'll have to, you'll have to give up the whole moose.

• 2:18:50Speaker 05

  And, and they will say, no, we are in control of it, and we don't intend to give it up. And then the negotiators on the American side will probably say, well, if you do what we set out in our fifteen-point plan, or whatever it is, then slowly sanctions will be lifted on you according to how you behave.

• 2:19:16Speaker 05

  And Iran will say, listen, you forget our basic equation. Prosperity for all or prosperity for none. If you do that, you're going to have an economic crisis. And I think probably that is where we're going to go. There will be eventually financial economic crisis. It is certainly in Europe, but in America too. Um, the debt market will will turn, the market, the stock market will go. It will be a crisis and people will eventually, you know, the unfortunately, pain is the greatest um instigator of change.

• 2:19:56Speaker 05

  I mean, I think when the pain becomes sufficient, then then there will be a decision. If in the White House, they have to rethink um how they approach this. And that maybe the ten point plan was something that they could actually work with. And that they understand that those were preconditions to a ceasefire. Not the discussion points during a ceasefire, but the preconditions. And they include the lifting of sanctions. And it's first primary sanctions and secondary sanctions that affect Iran. I mean, you've heard these same stories from Russia. I mean, this is the same, the same sort of thing.

• 2:20:38Speaker 05

  And either either people will face up to that or it's going to be a long and painful period in in in coming ahead for us, unfortunately.

• 2:20:48Tucker Carlson?

  Because of our.

• 2:20:49Speaker 05

  But I think it's important.

• 2:20:52Tucker Carlson?

  Well.

• 2:20:52Speaker 05

  I was gonna say, but nonetheless, I think that's not a bad thing, not a disaster. Because I do think, I mean, maybe I'm speaking, you know, I'm going too contrary. But I think we in the West need a process of capacity.

• 2:21:12Speaker 05

  We've sunk into nihilism and we've sunk into a sort of negative modernism and economic structures that damage the majority of our peoples.

• 2:21:30Speaker 05

  The minority get cheaply rich by doing very little, but many people are suffering today. I mean, it's hard. Jobs are getting scarcer and it's hard. And I think that we do need a sort of what I call creative destruction a little bit to help us rethink, for a start, what sort of economic structure do we need to address the problems we have? Because the economic structure we've had in this period has thought about this bipolar world. There is the world of the billionaires and the world of the rest,

• 2:22:14Speaker 05

  which is getting progressively... it's horrible. And our people, our only people, wherever it is in Europe and other states, think, well, you know, protest doesn't work because we protest, nothing happens. Voting doesn't work. We can vote for 3D or 3D. It doesn't change the economic system and bring about a change, and that's what we want to see. And I think the whole of this period, partly stimulated by what the Iranians are doing, and even by their sort of thoughts about it,

• 2:22:54Speaker 05

  is going to provoke people to think more deeply in Europe about, you know, how do we actually not just produce a cosmetic market relations type of paint, but how do we actually find a solution that would provide a decent living for our people?

• 2:23:22Tucker Carlson?

  I think that's the, uh, that's the most hopeful thing I've heard in a long time, and I'm grateful for your analysis. Aleister Crook, thank you very much.

• 2:23:32Speaker 05

  My pleasure.

• 2:23:34Tucker Carlson?

  So if you've made it to the end of this episode, one recommendation, go back, rewind the last three minutes of what Aleister Crook just said about what this crisis could lead to, that the shoots of renewal are poking up from the soil. They are there. If you look carefully, you can see them. What we're doing is not working. It hasn't worked for a long time. It's not even worth apportioning blame for that. It's enough to just observe it, acknowledge it, and know that it's true, because it is true. The majority of the American population is not being served by the current system. And yet, some sort of horrible revolution is the last thing we want. It is possible, and if we're wise, we could make it true, that what we're going through now leads to something better, a

• 2:24:19Tucker Carlson?

  better future for our country, the United States, and for the West, and maybe for the world. This doesn't have to end in total destruction. It could end in renewal. And no one has ever put it better than Aleister Crook's just did. So, watch it again if you have the time. Thanks so much for joining us. We'll see you next Wednesday.