The Rise and Fall of the Assyrian Empire

Was this the world’s first empire? To uncover the story of ancient history's most formidable powers, Dan is joined by Yale University’s Professor Eckart Frahm to explore Assyria’s military machine, its sophisticated communication networks and the monumental architecture that defined its dominance. But what caused this ancient superpower to fall—and why so suddenly? Produced and edited by Dougal Patmore Sign up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries, with a new release every week and ad-free podcasts. Sign up at https://www.historyhit.com/subscribe. We'd love to hear your feedback - you can take part in our podcast survey here: https://insights.historyhit.com/history-hit-podcast-always-on. You can also email the podcast directly at [email protected] mailto:[email protected]. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy https://acast.com/privacy for more information.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Dan Snow?

  Hey friends, if you love this podcast and want to decide what history we cover, then you need to become a Dan Snow's History Hit subscriber. Pitch your topic and if I like it, we'll make it into a subscriber exclusive episode. So far, we've covered the English Reformation, the Hudson Bay Company, the Trail of Tears, all of which have been decided by dedicated subscribers. So take the reins of your favourite podcast by heading over to historyhit.com/subscribe or sign up in your podcast player.

• 0:32Speaker 01

  This is the story of the one. As a shipping manager, he's running the dock, stocking supplies and making sure every order goes out on time. And Granger helps him stay prepared. From shipping supplies to PPE to hand tools, he counts on Granger to keep products moving and trucks rolling. So his operation runs smoothly, no matter the shift. Call 1-800-GRANGER, click Granger.com or just stop by. Granger, for the ones who get it done.

• 1:02Speaker 02

  This is a paid partnership with Apple Card. The coolest flex at brunch these days is not the Bloody Mary with the bottomless gold flake caviar topping. It's not whipping out your wallet to pay. It's not having a wallet at all. Jack's been an Apple Card user since 2019. That's the same year he tossed his wallet in the trash. Because Apple Card holders earn 2% daily cash back on purchases made using Apple Pay. It's the only credit card designed for the iPhone. I tap to pay with Apple Card at the grocery store, at the gas station, at restaurants. And yes, I use it at my second home, the farmer's market. Jack tapping to pay with his Apple Card with Apple Pay is his favourite thing to do. And the pleasant vibration and chime sound means I just got 2% daily cash back on my latest purchase. Apply in the Wallet app on your iPhone today. Subject to credit approval.

• 1:45Speaker 02

  Apple Card, issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City branch. Terms and more at applecard.com.

• 1:51Speaker 03

  Most AI knows data. Toast IQ knows restaurants. It helps turn Detroit 75's numbers, plus what works across thousands of restaurants, into insights we can actually use. That's AI that's worked a double without a lunch break. Visit toastapp.com to learn more. Pay testimonial from an actual Toast customer.

• 2:16Dan Snow?

  They called themselves kings of the world. In fact, they called themselves rulers of the universe. They were the lords of Assyria. You're listening to Dan Snow's History and this is the story of the first empire, an empire of enormous geographical extent, an empire of provinces, of bureaucracy, of monumental buildings, massive armies. The origins of the Assyrian Empire are a little bit complicated. It began with a city, as you'll hear, but that city morphed and changed partly through

• 3:01Dan Snow?

  internal pressure, partly because of disasters and external catastrophes and opportunities. But around about 1700 B.C. or so, a new royal dynasty seized control and it was the start of a remarkable run of hereditary monarchy. I'm not saying it always went father to son, but rule was parceled out from one generation to the next within that ruling family for a thousand years. The city-state grew. From the 800s B.C., it expanded dramatically through a series of stunning conquests. It became the Assyrian Empire of a million square miles, that at its very peak stretched

• 3:43Dan Snow?

  from modern Iran right up to and including much of modern Egypt. It had been quite the journey from the harmless little city-state to what historians now describe as the world's first empire. They conquered the famous city of Babylon, for example, and remodeled it extensively. They built the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. They built Nineveh, which at the time was another wonder of the world, had a wall 12 kilometers long surrounding it. They built the best road system in history to that date. You could pass along the so-called King's Road, so it's a distance of around 450 miles, in about five days.

• 4:23Dan Snow?

  One of the best things about this empire, one of the reasons historians particularly love it, is we have the archives. We have the libraries, not all of them of course, but significant portions. Preserved, as you'll hear, at the moment of their destruction by their enemies, we have thousands, tens of thousands of tablets on which were written the day-to-day business of running this vast empire. Because after its period of hegemony from the 800s B.C., in 609 B.C. or thereabouts, there was a dramatic and shocking collapse. None of this gradual decline and fall discussions around continuity and change you get with

• 5:04Dan Snow?

  the Roman Empire. This was the sudden and dramatic end. A coalition of enemies crushed the Assyrian Empire. And yet it left a legacy that later empires from Babylon to Persia to Rome would all embrace. You have to understand Assyria if you want to get a sense of those civilizations, those empires that followed, that we all recognise as foundational. And this, folks, will whet your appetite. This will give you a bit of an understanding of that. We're going to talk about that empire. We're going to also talk about how, really, only 60 years or so after it reached its peak, Assyria had ceased to exist. And so joining me to give us an extraordinary insight into this dramatic and important rise and fall is Professor Eckhart

• 5:48Dan Snow?

  Frömmrich. Eckhart Frömmrich is the John M. Musser Professor of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at Yale University. He's a specialist on the Assyrian and Babylonian empires and their wonderful cuneiform texts. His most recent book is Assyria: The Rise and Fall of the World's First Empire. So he's definitely the man to talk to about the first empire and how it toppled in what some scholars like to call the real First World War. This, friends, is Assyria. Enjoy.

• 6:37Dan Snow?

  Eckart, vielen Dank für die Einladung.

• 6:40Speaker 04

  Ich bin dankbar, dass Sie mich haben.

• 6:42Dan Snow?

  Wo sind wir im Moment, wenn dieses Empire an seine Form entsteht? Geben Sie uns die Geografie.

• 6:48Speaker 04

  Die Geografie ist markiert durch ein Dreieck von drei Städten, die in der nordwestlichen Region der Irakrepublik sind. Das ist die Stadt Nenewee, die auf der westlichen Seite des Tiger-Ver流s in der modernen Mosel liegt. Das ist die Stadt Ashur, von der Asyria seine eigene Name bekommt, 100 km flach von Mosel und Nenewee. Und in der Mitte der Zagros-Montänen, nahe der irakischen-Iranischen Grenze, liegt die Stadt Arbela, die moderne Arbile. Das ist dort, wo das Königreich Asyria entsteht. Ein Empire entsteht nur später. Man kann darüber debattieren, wann es genau durch die Grenze des Thessens zum Empire kommen wird.

• 7:31Speaker 04

  In meinem Blick ist das nur in der Mitte des 8. Jahrhunderts. Manche sagen, dass es früher war, etwa erst im 9. Jahrhundert. Es ist ein Empire, in meinem Blick, von ungefähr 745 bis zu, sagen wir mal, 640 bis 630, also innerhalb der letzten Jahrzehnte des 7. Jahrhunderts. Es hat eine große Krise erlebt, die letztendlich in einen sehr dramatischen Rückgang führen wird. Aber es ist tatsächlich bekannt als ein politisches Land, das viel länger ist. Und das ist eine der Gründe, warum es so interessant ist. Unsere erste geschriebene Dokumentation, eine extensive geschriebene Dokumentation, die uns etwas über die alten Asyriens erzählt, kommt aus den ersten Jahrhunderten des zweiten Millenniums, ungefähr zwischen 2000 und 1700 B.C.

• 8:14Speaker 04

  Zu diesem Zeitpunkt gibt es noch nicht wirklich ein Königreich Asyria. Es ist nur die Stadt und Staat Ashur. Aber es hat bereits einen breiten Horizont, weil die Menschen in Ashur in Langstreckenhandel eingreifen. Und dieses Handel, ja, führt sie tausend Kilometer von ihrer Heimatstadt weg, sodass diese breiten geografischen Horizonte bereits da sind, seit dem frühen Jahrhundert.

• 8:37Dan Snow?

  Wir haben also Ägypten brennend weg. Die Pyramiden wurden gebaut, 1000 Jahre vor dem Zeitraum, den Sie erwähnt haben. Was macht ein Empire? Warum beginnen wir suddenly über dieses Empire an diesem Zeitpunkt, an diesem Ort zu sprechen?

• 8:51Speaker 04

  Yeah, it's interesting look at the political development that Syria undergoes over these roughly fourteen hundred years that are documented in our written sources. It starts off, as I said, from roughly two thousand onwards as a city-state. That is actually not an empire at all. It's almost the opposite of an empire. It's a smaller place which engages in this long-distance trade, but has no territorial ambitions. It's very peaceful, actually. The people and leaders of Ashur during this time are not particularly diligent. It's also not marked by autocracy. On the contrary, you have in place what one could describe with the Roman historian Polypius as a mixed constitution. So you have a heritage of dynasties of political leaders, but they are not even allowed to use the title king.

• 9:36Speaker 04

  And they share power with an institution known as the city hall that deals with taxes and weights and measures and things like that, and a popular assembly that is also quite powerful. So you have essentially a monarchical, aristocratic, democratic elements in place. The changes, so in the second half of the second millennium, when Ashur morphs into Syria and becomes a territorial state and also becomes a kingdom. So at this point, actually, you have autocratic rulers who are kings, but the geographic horizon is still limited. And then in the first millennium, as I mentioned, suddenly there's this massive expansion. And Ashur and Syria becomes the predominant state of the ancient world, much larger than any other state had ever been before.

• 10:18Speaker 04

  And this is what I would argue Syria crosses the threshold, this imperial threshold. What makes an empire? There are a number of criteria. They include that a state rules territories far outside its original territory. That's clear the case because Syria during the later eighth and seventh century rules from southern Turkey to the Persian Gulf and from western Iran to the Levant, to Phoenicia, and the southern Levant for a while even actually rules over Egypt. So it's very, very large, about one million square kilometers. It's characterized by a kind of osmotic imbalance between center and periphery, with the center stifling off the wealth of the periphery.

• 11:01Speaker 04

  It's also characterized by a great deal of diversity, ethnic, religious, linguistic, many, many different peoples living in the empire, speaking different languages, worshipping different gods. And it's characterized by, well, using different types of political power, direct rule within Assyria itself, an area organized into fairly small provinces, some seventy provinces in the seventh century, and an outer area of Klein kingdoms where Assyrian rulers dominate the political scene indirectly, but where formerly local rulers are still in place. These, I would say, are criteria that can be used to describe this political entity Assyria as an empire. Of course, it's always the question, how big does a state have to be?

• 11:44Speaker 04

  How diverse does it have to be in order to qualify as an empire? There will never be a full consensus, so there will be others who would say that, let's say, um, you can, Egypt is an empire, or even the Akkot state of the time of roughly two thousand three hundred, two thousand two hundred B C E, in Viso Valhena. In one respect, though, I think one can say that Assyria really is the first empire in the world, and that is in later memory and tradition. Because there, with the Greek and Roman historians, and then throughout the Middle Ages in Europe, it is Assyria that is considered the world's first empire. So authors like Herodotus, or the Roman historian Papio Toros, or the Christian historian Rosios, and later on Dante in the Middle Ages,

• 12:24Speaker 04

  in his De Monarchia, they describe Assyria as the first empire in a long chain of empires that follow it, and that sort of sets all these other empires on their path. And in this regard, of course, Assyria really is also important in world history, because it provides a blueprint for all these many, many later empires. And as we all know, even though today, modern states don't like to call each other empires, we still have imperial political traditions in place even today.

• 12:51Dan Snow?

  We certainly do, we certainly do. Why, Eckhart, why does this, well, reasonably, sounds rather nice, Pacific, um, harmless city-state, morph into this mighty military autopsy, become the first empire? How does it do that?

• 13:07Speaker 04

  Yeah, that's of course, say, the one thousand dollar question. And again, you won't have answers that will satisfy everyone. So firstly, after the transformation of the city-state, this peaceful, commercially oriented city-state into a kingdom that already is pretty aggressive. So in the second half, the second millennium, that already expands, even though not to such an extent that it can be called an empire. That's a so-called Middle Assyrian period from roughly thirteen fifty BCE to one thousand BCE. During this time, we see that the Assyrians essentially replaced trade with conquest. And I would say that probably the trade in which they were engaged beforehand and that this trade network that collapses around seventeen hundred BCE or so under pressure from outside people, the Hittites and others, et cetera. That memory of this trade network played a role here.

• 13:51Speaker 04

  And well, the ability of the Assyrians, of course, also logistically to travel far away. And this idea that you want to be acquisitive, you want to acquire things. They found out at this point in the wake of this crisis that they experienced after seventeen hundred that besides trade, there is another way of becoming wealthy, and that is actually conquest. And they engaged in this conquest more intensely, I would say, than many of the other states of the ancient Near East, even though, of course, conquest was not alien to other states as well. It sounds a little bit perhaps like the story that Lenin tells of capitalism turning into imperialism. That's certainly not rule as Lenin makes it one that has to apply everywhere. But the story is a bit like that, I would say.

• 14:34Speaker 04

  It's a little bit perhaps also like the East India Company and the situation with Britain in India. First, a commercial enterprise, later on it becomes a political enterprise. And once Assyria is established as this kingdom, it experienced a number of other crises. First around eleven hundred, one thousand or so, and then again in the mid eighth century. And it emerges from each of these crises is stronger because it's faster than other places in the region that also probably underwent some crises during this time to recover. The last crisis is characterized by a set of plagues. So there's a plague in Assyria and probably also in surrounding areas, first in seven hundred sixty five and again in seven hundred and fifty nine. And I would argue that probably the loss of labour, the loss of wealth that occurred

• 15:17Speaker 04

  at this time prompted a very important Assyrian king, King Tigrapyleza III, which is also mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, to make up for this loss of wealth and labour by intensifying the conquest activities. Because it is during this reign of Tigrapyleza III, who rules from 745 to 727 BCE, that Assyria's territory more than doubles in size, and he creates many, many new provinces. So he reacts to this crisis that may have been prompted by plague through this massive expansion, which of course means the crisis cannot have been as massive that almost all the population of Assyria was wiped out, but probably some parts of the population were wiped out. There was economic crisis. Tigrapyleza reacts to

• 16:00Speaker 04

  that with intensified conquest. This leads to this stepping over the threshold of empire, in my view. And then for 120 years or so, Assyria really is an empire under great kings such as Sargon II and Akrib, as I had on Ashurbanipal, or perhaps to some extent known to some of your listeners, that's the height of the empire.

• 16:19Dan Snow?

  We'll get on to the height of the empire in a second, but let's just quickly, we talked about the plagues, and you talked about various crises that seem to affect everyone in the region. I mean, this is, it's no accident, this sees the end of the New Kingdom in Egypt. We enter what people refer to as the ancient Greek Dark Ages. People will be familiar with the term Bronze Age collapse.

• 16:36Speaker 04

  Exactly.

• 16:37Dan Snow?

  It's going on for, what, a couple of hundred years at the end of that second millennium BC. So it's, everyone's experiencing this kind of multi-dimensional crisis, these headwinds. But you just think Assyria is just able to roll with the punches, see the opportunity in this chaos and emerge stronger?

• 16:51Speaker 04

  Yes, it is. Of course, it's not easy to count for that, but I think what we can see is that first, this late Bronze Age collapse affects Assyrius a little later than other polypenites in the region, and a little less intensely as well. So unlike some places on the Mid-Ituranian, the city of Uburid, which are essentially completely wiped out, or the Hittite Empire, or let's say Kingdom in central Anatolia that is destroyed in the course of this late Bronze Age collapse, Assyria suffers from the consequences of this event only later, when groups of semi-normatic Arameans actually infiltrated. And on the long term, also really reshaped the cultural and linguistic landscape of Assyria. And this is especially in the 11th and early 10th century, when Assyria is at a kind of low point.

• 17:36Speaker 04

  And it emerges again faster than everyone else, perhaps because it manages to keep the memory of the conquest period of the Middle Eastern period alive and to instill in its military elites this belligerent spirit that enables it to reconquer, enact in a kind of reconquest, a reconquista period that leads to the recovery of the lost territories. You can see this memory in the names that are chosen by the kings of the first millennium. They all hark back to great kings of the Middle Eastern period, to the great conqueror kings like Adad Narawi or the Qultin Noltar. And this is not by chance. They deliberately put themselves into this tradition and their dynasty, and that's also important, the dynasty, the Syrian royal dynasty is never interrupted.

• 18:20Speaker 04

  So there is more continuity in Syria than in other places such as Babylonia and certainly you mentioned Egypt, such as Egypt. So Syria then, even though affected by these events of the Levant age collapse, emerges from them faster and profits from the chaos elsewhere. Because of course, in this situation where large parts of Syria and the Levant are essentially completely broken up in very, very small political entities, it's actually fairly easy to conquer. And that's what they do. That's when they really eventually emerge as this empire.

• 18:50Dan Snow?

  How interesting you mention that the the royal dynasties remain coherent, intact for generations. And that's something, of course, the Roman Empire suffers terribly from. The father-son succession is actually quite a rare event across the history of Rome. It's amazing it lasts as long as it did. And if you look at, you know, medieval France, you get the Capetian miracle, where you just get a long line of successful transfer of power in the male line of one family. So do you think that's important here as well? And if so, how do the Syrians manage that? Do they succeed in building up a culture or religion around the importance of transmitting power from from one generation to the next?

• 19:26Speaker 04

  Certainly, the role of the king from some point onwards, once kingship is established in Syria, is very strong. It has various reasons. In fact, it's a 1,000-year span of time that the same family is in power. It's not always sons, it's sometimes also nephews or so. But it really seems that we have no evidence that ever anyone from another family manages to usurp power. So that's Really quite unique and of course a sign of stability throughout all this change that Assyria experiences. And again, I mean, they are very good in keeping up certain traditions, but also adapting. That's one of their great strengths. They're not at all worried of when they see that, let's say, the Samarians in Israel have a great cavalry. They integrate that cavalry once they have conquered Samaria into their own military.

• 20:07Speaker 04

  They adopt the artistic language of the Neo-Hittite kingdoms of northern Syria. This is the origins of traditional of classical Assyrian Arab, the great beliefs and bull colossal that maybe some people know. At least those who have ever been in the British Museum. So they can do that. That's one of the reasons why they manage to to be flexible while at the same time also sticking to certain continuities. The Assyrian king is very closely associated with the god Ashur. So that provides ideological support. Originally, the king of Ashur is actually this very god. I mentioned that the first centuries of the second millennium, the Assyrian Heresy Dynast are not yet allowed to call themselves king. Only the god is king. Later on, they are calling themselves king.

• 20:50Speaker 04

  And they are very close to the Assyrian state god Ashur, who is very closely associated with the city of Ashur. This is a very compact ideological concept where indeed the king is the linchpin of the whole system. That is, to some extent, it seems really accepted by the elites who may try to get rid of specific kings. And we can see that there are actually very exciting moments of rebellion and internal strife. But it really is within the same families. This is Shakespearean like royal dramas where one king is killed. And one of his sons tries to defeat another royal prince to take over the country. It's not outsiders to do that. It's actually inside of some royal family.

• 21:32Dan Snow?

  And there's me thinking it was all the Plantagenets and the Mugals who had the dysfunctional families, but clearly the Assyrians.

• 21:37Speaker 04

  They are clearly dysfunctional in some regards, but also very functional in others.

• 21:41Dan Snow?

  Very functional, yeah. There's a resilience to the system. Okay, so we're around 750 B.C. Slight later, we got Tiglath Pileser III, you mentioned, after these terrible pandemics, he emerges, he extends the empire enormously. Then you get Sargon II. I love that name, one of the great names of antiquity. He rules towards the end of that eighth century B.C., so 722 to almost 700. And we have fascinating colour and detail about Sargon's reign, don't we? I mean, we know how they lived, what they wrote down in terms of governmentally, but also culturally. Looking at all that wonderful richness of information, to what do you credit the strength of this empire? How was it held together?

• 22:26Speaker 04

  Yeah, as the first you mentioned, the sources, and I think it might be of interest briefly, at least to mention that indeed, our sources for the imperial period of Syria are extremely rich. Most of this is of course owed to archaeological excavations, but the Syria is also mentioned in the Bible and in classical sources. But the really important discoveries were made from the middle of the 19th century onwards, first by British and French and then also by other teams, archaeological teams, including Iraqi ones, in the temples of Syria such as Nineveh, Ashur and Karlah and Nimrod located between Nineveh and Ashur. And what is particularly important is that many, many texts were found. Those include on one hand royal inscriptions, some of them very long.

• 23:05Speaker 04

  So Ashurbanipal's inscriptions are 1,000 or so lines long, that's much longer than the famous monument of Ankhiran, one of the longest leader inscriptions on the Roman world, both the Emperor Augustus. But we also have numerous letters, state letters. We have what has been recovered at Nineveh and at Nimrod, parts of the State Archives of Assyria. The reason for this recovery is the fact that the Assyrians, like all people in ancient Mesopotamia, beginning roughly 3,400 BCE, wrote not on parchment or on papyrus, but on clay. And clay is essentially, when used as a medium for writing, is nearly indestructible. So these tablets may break and modern scholars like me have to put them together again, which is kind of difficult but also fun, but they are not lost.

• 23:48Speaker 04

  And while the royal inscriptions describe what the kings wanted to read about. Themselves geared towards the gods and later generations, but also the contemporaries. It's essentially propagandistic if you want, even though the term has its problems. The letters written by spies and provincial governors and royal agents from far away, from various provinces, but also from scholars within the capitals of Assyria to the Assyrian kings. Those letters actually describe what goes wrong. You write a letter when things are not going well. And so we have this very, very extensive documentation. We also, of course, then from the seventh century have Ashurbanipat's libraries, which includes numerous thousands actually of religious and literary texts. We know about Assyrian culture very much actually indebted to Babylonian culture,

• 24:33Speaker 04

  like Roman culture was indebted to Greek culture. We know about that as well. And this enormous riches, of course, enables us really to paint a pretty detailed picture of some of these rulers, including Sargon, where we can see that he was in fact, despite his protestations to the opposite, not very much beloved at the beginning of his reign. He was probably kind of in the usurper again. He was a member of the royal family, but not a direct son of the previous king. Came from a side branch of the royal family and he, for instance, had to deport six thousand three hundred Assyrians to the periphery at some point, early in his reign, who had apparently opposed them nonetheless. So what he also did was quite remarkable that he created a new capital. So this is what some of these Assyrian kings during the imperial era do. They create new massive capitals. These are big, big cities.

• 25:16Speaker 04

  Nineveh eventually created by Sinakir, surrounded by a wall twelve kilometers long. That's very extensive and the palace is built by Sargon, by Sinakir, and later kings are enormously large. So we can see that Sargon does that as well. He also conquests though. He continues the previous expansion under Tigrapileus and Shamaes the fifth. But he takes a very sad end because when he's roughly sixty five years old or so, in seven oh five, he goes on the last campaign. This seems like a routine thing almost to the pretty nondescript place, Tabal.

• 25:51Speaker 04

  In central Anatolia, the Assyrian army is outed, the camp is conquered, and Sargon is actually killed, and his body cannot be recovered, which is a major crisis for the Assyrian crown, because this is, of course, important that you're able to bury your dead, and a powerful king like Sargon, if he's not buried, might lurk around as a dangerous ghost. So there's a lot of information on that. His death is probably even described in the Bible, even though in a context that doesn't mention his name, in Isaiah 14, mocking dirge on the king of Babylon, that's probably Sargon, who also was king of Bologna at the time. Because for the Israelites and the Judeans, of course, the death of that king was a reason to be happy. It was a triumph. They were not fond of this ruler.

• 26:38Dan Snow?

  You're listening to Dan Snow's history hit. More on Assyria coming up after this.

• 26:48Dan Snow?

  This episode is brought to you by TikTok. I never thought about the history of coffee. You make it, you drink it, nothing more to it. Then I've had a TikTok video about how people in the 1700s would pour their coffee into saucers to let it cool before drinking it. I love that sort of discovery, a detail, but suddenly you're imagining how people lived and drank and socialized. Now I wonder what all baffled historians about us: mugs. It's a ceramic vessel, but crucially, it has a handle. Well, that's the joy of TikTok, folks. You look for one thing and find yourself somewhere completely different. Your next discovery is waiting on TikTok. Learn more at tiktok.com/discovermore.

• 27:32Speaker 01

  This is the story of the one. As a shipping manager, he's running the dock, stocking supplies, and making sure every order goes out on time. And Granger helps him stay prepared. From shipping supplies to PPE to hand tools, he counts on Granger to keep products moving and trucks rolling. So his operation runs smoothly, no matter the shift. Call 1-800-GRANGER, click Granger.com, or just stop by. Granger, for the ones who get it done.

• 28:02Speaker 02

  This is a paid partnership with Apple Card. The coolest flex at brunch these days is not the Bloody Mary with the bottomless gold flake caviar topping. It's not whipping out your wallet to pay. It's not having a wallet at all. Jack's been an Apple Card user since 2019. That's the same year he tossed his wallet in the trash. Because Apple Card holders earn 2% daily cash back on purchases made using Apple Pay. It's the only credit card designed for the iPhone. I tap to pay with Apple Card at the grocery store, at the gas station, at restaurants. And yes, I use it at my second home, the farmer's market. Jack tapping to pay with his Apple Card with Apple Pay is his favorite thing to do. And the pleasant vibration and chime sound? Means I just got 2% daily cash back on my latest purchase. Apply in the Wallet app on your iPhone today. Subject to credit approval.

• 28:44Speaker 02

  Apple Card, issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch. Terms and more at applecard.com.

• 28:50Speaker 03

  Every restaurant wants to be busy. Most restaurants aren't ready for it. I'm Chef Mike from Detroit 75, and Toast helps us stay ready when the lunch rush hits. We prepare for lunch like we're preparing for battle. Orders are flying, tickets are stacking, and the guests should never feel the chaos. Toast keeps our team organized so we can serve more people, stay consistent, and keep growing. Visit toastapp.com to learn more. Pay testimonial from an actual Toast customer.

• 29:26Dan Snow?

  Is the death of Sargon in battle? Is this a decisive moment? Is this a death blow for the empire? Does it go on? Does it flourish?

• 29:32Speaker 04

  No, it goes on, but it is clearly a crisis. And we can see that the Assyrian elites made attempts to elaborate on what actually had happened, what had prompted the death of Sargon. They engaged in liver divination in order to figure that out and were looking for a sin that Sargon had committed. And what they came up with, in my view, the text is a little bit broken here, is that Sargon had worshipped the Babylonian gods too much over the Assyrian gods. I mentioned that he had conquered Babylonia. He was very fond of Babylonian culture, his successor Senacab not so much. Eventually he will actually completely destroy the city of Babylon. And so he establishes that Zargon's worship of these Babylonian gods had been excessive. So there is this ideological discourse about what had actually prompted his death. But Assyria continues. This is not the final moment of the empire.

• 30:17Speaker 04

  Nearly 100 years longer, the Assyrian Empire prevails. And in fact, in the 7th century, under Asahadon and Ashurbanipal, between 680 and 631, reaches its greatest expansion when Babylon is again conquered. Elam in the south east, in modern southwest, and Iran is conquered and even Egypt under Asahadon and later on again under Ashurbanipal becomes for a while, not very long, but for a while, part of the Assyrian Empire.

• 30:45Dan Snow?

  Just absolutely vast. So Egypt to Iran. Again, no state, no king has ever governed an entity this large in recorded history. Are all these sources, is the archive in fact the clue? Was the pen mightier than the sword? Was it about messengers and roads and instructions and communication allowing troops to move fast and nip problems in the bud? How is this empire governed?

• 31:09Speaker 04

  Clearly, the roads, actually is a good point, are strength of Assyria. So this is also an information empire. Information is being carried along those roads very fast. So there are road stations every 20 kilometers or so, the Beate Maldeety, as they are called in different sources. And you have sort of relays with horses and onagers that are being used by mounted emissaries, messengers who carry messages from place to the next. And that goes very, very fast. And it's of course important in order to keep up the empire because you need to be informed about crises in regions far away. And the Assyrians, by building roads, the royal road actually is not, as is often assumed, an invention of the Persians, the Persian Empire, but this already exists under the Assyrians. Those roads are the arteries through which this information runs.

• 31:54Speaker 04

  So this is very important, obviously. The discipline with which the provincial governors follow the king, with which the elites, the Assyrian elites that of course run in actual fact the various provinces and I'm in charge of political and economic administration, the discipline with which they too follow orders by the king, this is quite crucial. One reason why that works may be that the Assyrian kings use a lot of eunuchs for very high-ranking positions, for instance, those of provincial governors. And eunuchs, of course, by not having any offspring of their own, tend to be loyal to those who give them their prestige and their wealth. That would have been in the case of Assyria, the Assyrian king.

• 32:39Speaker 04

  So this too may have helped. Then there is the implementation of loyalty oaths to those very elites, but essentially to everyone in the empire, including even vassal rulers and their subjects. We have a number of those treaties, very long and elaborate, that require loyalty to the king and his chosen successor. They had to be sworn by all these different subjects of the king, and to some extent it seems they have worked. Then there is also a network of informers. I mentioned the informers so far away, but they are also informers within the Assyrian capitals themselves, so inside Syria, who inform the king, essentially the eyes and ears of the king, again, a term better attested for the Persian rulers of later times,

• 33:22Speaker 04

  used by Greek authors, but that can be applied to those Syrian spies as well. They really look out at everyone who may seem to be somehow disloyal. And whenever someone says something critical of the king, they report to the king. And this is required of them through the loyalty oaths. And we know that they do this because we have many, many letters that actually include such denunciations. It's not very nice, it has a certain Stalinistic ring to it, if you wish, but for a while at least, this works quite well. And the number of rebellions and insurgencies we know were actually quelled in this way. And under Asahadon, for instance, quite a large number of Assyrian members of the Assyrian elite were killed because they were apparently involved in one of these rebellions against the king.

• 34:06Dan Snow?

  You talk about the invasion conquest of Egypt. This might not be familiar to people. So this is obviously after Yerama sees the great, after the new kingdom period. The Assyrians managed to conquer, they become one of the pharaonic dynasties.

• 34:18Speaker 04

  They are at least for a while really the rulers of Egypt up to the city of Thebes. So there is an unsuccessful attempt by Asahadon in 674 BCE to conquer Egypt. It doesn't succeed, but then there is a successful one three years later in 671. And at this time, the Assyrians managed to take Thebes. Egypt at this time is kind of divided up into smaller kingdoms in the north in particular, with the 25th dynasty, the so-called Kushite dynasty ruling from Nubia in the south. And perhaps the Assyrians are able to conquer the north also because the northern small sort of traditional rulers of Egypt who kind of buy into the pharaonic ideology consider those Kushites also kind of aliens, not so clear.

• 35:03Speaker 04

  But the Assyrians clearly tried to present themselves as liberators, if you wish, and that works for a while, but not for that long. Ashurbanipas, Asahadon's successor, has to go back to Egypt twice. This is when the Assyrians actually seize the city of Thebes and among other things, take with them a gigantic obelisk apparently made of electron, must have been enormously valuable, take it to Nineveh and many, many other things they take as well. And during this time, they call themselves rulers of Pataresi, that's the southern land that would be Egypt. This is an Egyptian word, so we find these titles in Assyrian sources. We have no hieroglyphic inscriptions in which the Assyrian kings actually feature as pharaohs.

• 35:44Speaker 04

  That may be because in later Egyptian tradition, this phase of Assyrian conquest was considered an abomination. The Egyptians were not fond of it. So they essentially struck it from the official record. The Assyrian kings also don't appear in the Egyptian king list of Manisa also, but they do appear, quite interestingly, in a number of popular tales, mostly known from pretty late times, the so-called Inaros cycle, recorded in Demotic, the latest stage of the Egyptian writing system and language. And there we have reference to kings like Senakir and Asahadon, et cetera, and they are mentioned as conquerors of Egypt there.

• 36:17Dan Snow?

  Amazing. Where does this empire sit on the sliding scale of the amount of control that was exer-- well, the amount of uniformity that they tried to create over religious ideas, weights and measures, language. Was this a live and let live empire? Were cities and statelets allowed to have a degree of autonomy as long as they paid lip service and sent the odd bit of tribute to the imperial centre? Or were they trying to make the world Assyria? Were they building colonies, architectural styles, language, culture on all of their conquered territory?

• 36:47Speaker 04

  It's a very good and important question, of course, and the answer is quite clear. The Assyrians, unlike, let's say, the Romans, certainly unlike some modern empires, had no interest at all to, for instance, transfer religion, their own religion, to other places. On the contrary, they would have probably been quite annoyed if anyone somewhere in the periphery had suddenly started to build a temple for the god Ashur. The god Ashur was to be worshipped in Assyria, in Ashur, nowhere else. It would not have been okay if anyone had done this. That said, yes, there is uniformity on some levels, especially through the provincial system. They established a provincial system. Again, I mentioned, I think that in the end, in the 7th century, Assyria comprises some 70 provinces, ranging from the Zagros Mountains

• 37:29Speaker 04

  in western Iran to the southern Levant. And these provinces are kind of mini centres modelled upon the royal palace and its surrounding territory. So you have a palace in which the provincial governor, as the deputy of the Assyrian king, resides. He's kind of the mini-king within this province, and he's in charge, for instance, of collecting taxes and making sure that conscription activities occur, that is, people have to work for the crown, and they have to pay taxes, especially on farming. That's the basic area from which wealth is being produced. And that is, of course, implemented strictly. So these deliveries of taxes and the requirement of work, these are things that the Assyrian kings require,

• 38:14Speaker 04

  and they require political obedience. So-- The people in these various regions that are eventually conquered by Assyrians can continue to speak their own languages, they can continue to worship their own gods. There is no Assyrianization in the kind of way that you can talk of a Romanization, the Roman Empire, it doesn't happen. Kind of on the contrary, it's quite interesting, as I mentioned, the Aramaic language spoken by these other nondescript Aramaeans who entered the world stage in the late second millennium as of semi-nomadic people. This very language, Aramaic, becomes the predominant language in Assyrian administration and probably is spoken eventually throughout much of the empire, it's not Assyrian. So this is really interesting. Again, you can see the Assyrians are not interested in implementing their own culture

• 38:59Speaker 04

  and language somewhere else, but they want uniformity in terms of political order. They're very interested in order. For them, of course, that also means peace for the people there. You can say that sometimes the peace of the graveyard, when an enemy city has been destroyed. But from an Assyrian point of view, this is what they actually have to offer. They have to offer peace and protection to those who fall into line politically. And whoever falls into line can essentially do what they want in terms of their daily lives, as long as they are paying taxes and as long as they provide troops and workmen for building projects, et cetera. Of course, this isn't freedom in any way as we would consider it. These people are not free in that sense, but they're also not slaves, if you wish.

• 39:43Speaker 04

  They have areas in which they are autonomous.

• 40:00Speaker 02

  This is a paid partnership with Apple Card. The coolest flex at brunch these days is not the Bloody Mary with the bottomless gold flake caviar topping. It's not whipping out your wallet to pay. It's not having a wallet at all. Jack's been an Apple Card user since 2019. That's the same year he tossed his wallet in the trash. Because Apple Card holders earn 2% daily cash back on purchases made using Apple Pay. It's the only credit card designed for the iPhone. I tap to pay with Apple Card at the grocery store, at the gas station, at restaurants. And yes, I use it at my second home, the farmer's market. Jack tapping to pay with his Apple Card with Apple Pay is his favorite thing to do. And the pleasant vibration and chime sound? Means I just got 2% daily cash back on my latest purchase. Apply in the Wallet app on your iPhone today. Subject to credit approval.

• 40:42Speaker 02

  Apple Card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City branch. Terms and more at applecard.com.

• 40:48Speaker 05

  Granger knows, if you're a procurement manager at an industrial manufacturing facility, you're balancing inventory and budget while sourcing critical supplies across the operation. Too much inventory, costs climb. Too little, production slows. Granger's $2 billion in on-hand inventory helps you get what you need when you need it. So you can help keep budgets balanced and lines moving. Call 1-800-GRANGER, click Granger.com, or just stop by. Granger, for the ones who get it done.

• 41:29Dan Snow?

  Was the end of this empire sudden? Was it a decisive defeat, collapse because of human or environmental causes? Or was it a slow decline?

• 41:37Speaker 04

  It was a very sudden one. So I often really like to compare the empire to the Roman Empire. I think they have a lot in common. I mentioned their dependency, cultural terms on another ancient civilization. In both cases, the Greeks, in the case of Rome, and Babylon is the case of Assyria, et cetera. But the Roman Empire's fall, of course, was a long process, really a process over centuries, which no one knows when it really happened, what is really the moment when you speak of the fall.

• 42:01Dan Snow?

  Well, Eckhart, don't even, some people say it didn't happen. I mean, come on, we can't even get into that. We haven't got time here, jeepers.

• 42:07Speaker 04

  So in the case of Assyria, this is clearly not so. It's just within a decade or two that Assyria falls, between 626 and 609, basically. What happens is quite clear in terms of the political and military events. We have a Babylonian chronicle that describes this all in quite in detail. Essentially, Assyria fights suddenly two major enemies. Babylon had for a long time been dominated by Assyria, but in 626 manages to regain its independence under a ruler who comes from a family from the city of Uruk that actually worked for the Assyrians for a long time, that's Nabopulasa. So he knew how the Assyrians operated. He had inside knowledge of how. Military affairs were handled by the Assyrian, how this administration worked.

• 42:51Speaker 04

  The other big power, and that was a newcomer under the Bulidic scene, were the Medes. So Media had for long times, an area in western Iran, had for a long time been divided up in very, very small entities, had not been particularly powerful because of the disrupted nature of these different tribes which it comprised. But at some point in the later seventh century, the Medes unite. And then the Medes and the Babylonians together form an alliance and start actually attacking Assyria and attacking Assyrian cities. And that eventually leads to the conquest of those cities and to the complete destruction of many of the major cities of Assyria. Begins with the city of Ashor, the religious centre.

• 43:34Speaker 04

  This is a major blow with Syria in six hundred and fourteen. The city is conquered and destroyed by the Medes. And it culminates in six hundred and twelve, two years later, in the fall of Nineveh, which kind of ironically probably suffers strategically from the fact that under the Nakr, it had been surrounded by a big, big wall with gigantic gate buildings, eighteen altogether. Those gates were just too big, was too easy to get through. Archaeologists actually have found civilian military dead people lying inside the gates. So this is where some of the battling must have taken place. Must have been surprisingly easy for the attacking forces to get through there. So we can see what happens. We can see that Nineveh is destroyed, the palace is looted.

• 44:17Speaker 04

  Assyria, by the way, during these years in which it fights with Babylonia and the Medes, is supported somewhat ironically by Egypt. Apparently Egyptians were realizing at this point they have regained their independence, that Babylonia is now going to be the next really dangerous opponent to them. So they side with the Assyrians. Other players engage in this as well. And so some have called this whole scenario the First World War. And while slightly hyperbolic, the term is not entirely inappropriate because it really involves all the major powers of this period. The whole thing ends really with the fall of the Syrian royal dynasty, one thousand years old, as I mentioned. And since the royal family was so enormously important for the identity of Assyria, really embodied Assyria in such significant way.

• 45:03Speaker 04

  And since the civilian elites didn't really have an identity, let's say religious or civic or whatever, strong enough perhaps to continue Assyrian statehood in a different way, this really was the end of Assyrian statehood. There really never again was an Assyrian state as it had existed before, after 612 or 609. There is some evidence for continued religious activities of Assyrian style. The city of Ashor remains settled by people apparently speaking Assyrian. In Ashor, we can trace the worship of Assyrian gods, Ashor and his wife Shehu, well into the common era. We have inscriptions in Aramaic from the second

• 45:48Speaker 04

  and third century AD, where we can see that people there actually still worship the same deities they had worshipped in the period during festival times that had been in place already during the Assyrian Empire. So there is some continuity on the cultural level, but politically, it really is all over. What also comes to an end, and is also really striking, is cuneiform writing. So, once the Meads and the Babylonians have conquered in any way, essentially Assyrian writing ends. There are few tablets from places like Dukat Luma in Syria where we still have some Assyrian texts, but very, very few. Fundamentally, cuneiform writing comes to an end, and that also means it's a problem for us that it's a little bit of a black box. We really know exactly what happens

• 46:29Speaker 04

  in the centuries after the fall of the empire in Assyria. But even though we may not see certain things, I think it's clear that it was no longer an Assyrian state.

• 46:37Dan Snow?

  Wow. And so those tablets that we have, all the cuneiform, all the writing from the royal archives, we know exactly when the roof came down on that archive, on those libraries in Nineveh. I mean, that was the fall of Nineveh, that was the sack of Nineveh.

• 46:49Speaker 04

  Yes.

• 46:49Dan Snow?

  And they remained under all that, you know, collapsed debris and then dust and sand and earth, until they were dug up by 19th century explorers. So that wonderful archive dates from that, well, the preservation ironically of that wonderful archive dates from that exact moment of destruction.

• 47:05Speaker 04

  Yes, so um. Wow. Most of the tablets that were found probably really come from this destruction horizon. However, tablets were also found, for instance, in the fill of floors in the palace and of course also in private houses in various places in Assyria and various cities, which means we also of course have tablets from much earlier times. But we have a lot of evidence from the very late period of Assyrian history. This is always the irony that destruction layers of course are very, very revealing for archaeologists, so where you have destruction, you can learn a lot about what was going on. The same time must be said, of course, our information is also a little bit limited with regard to the last decades of Assyria because Assyrian kings no longer felt the great need to write the inscriptions. There was much to brag about at this time.

• 47:49Speaker 04

  So we also rely on sources from other places, especially from Babylonia, so the so-called Babylonian chronicles, the community from text that describes rather objectively, I would say, what's going on politically. A question I haven't answered, I should say very briefly, something about is, well, was it something like climate change? Or was it migration? So bigger, non-political issues that actually played a role in the fall of the empire, so that the military events are near epiphenomena, if you wish. This has been argued recently, and it is indeed true that during the 7th century, we can see at the beginning or in the 8th century, a decrease in rainfall in Assyria and surrounding areas, which probably led to some kind of decrease in agricultural production.

• 48:30Speaker 04

  But I'm not so sure that this really is a major reason for the fall of the empire. First, because, as I mentioned, the decrease occurs much earlier. And then second, because the Assyrians again adapt very well, this is one of their strengths, because they built massive canal systems in northern Iraq that they used to irrigate fields near their capitals, especially at Nidhav. So they actually managed to deal with the situation. The loss of Babylonia was probably a problem because Babylonia must have produced some of the grain that Assyria actually used for its people. But when I was excavating in Ashur with Peter Milos in 2001, in one palace, huge amounts of grain burnt, of course, were found, stored there, apparently in preparation for the media.

• 49:15Speaker 04

  Siege of six hundred fourteen, so it doesn't look like they were desperate in terms of not having enough to eat anymore. And I'm also not so sure about the idea that Sisian migrations, for instance, played a role as the Greek historian Herodotus claims. I do think, though, that leadership failure is an issue here, especially with the very long and culturally very glorious reign of King Ashurbanipal. You could see that the king very much is oriented inwards. He no longer goes on campaign. He doesn't seem to interact very much with his elites. You have royal cooks and singers suddenly assuming very high offices, such as the office of Eponim, after whom years are being named.

• 49:55Speaker 04

  Ashurbanipal is portrayed in later Greek tradition under the name Santanapal or Santanapolis as a weak king, essentially sitting with his harum, women inside his palaces and spinning wool and making love and otherwise not being interested in politics. This has often been presented or portrayed as orientalizing stereotyping, and it certainly is. It's not like this is how he was. Ashurbanipal did engage in hunting and things like that. So he clearly isn't exactly how he's portrayed here in these Greek sources. But I also think that this depiction isn't entirely wrong. This probably did actually diminish the authority of the late Assyrian kings quite substantially. And as those kings were so important for the oval identity of Assyria, I think this had a major impact on the fall of Assyria as well.

• 50:40Dan Snow?

  Given it was the first empire, did the Babylonians, did the Medes think, well, it's not empires we reject, it's just other people's empires? I mean, did the DNA, did the organizing principles of the Assyrian Empire then get absorbed into, well, all future imperial states? I mean, we're entering an age of empires now.

• 51:00Speaker 04

  Yes, I think actually it is. It is very much this DNA that is passed on. And that's actually, of course, very exciting, and that's one of the reasons why Assyria is important. It's not only that Assyria is remembered in later traditions as having been the first empire, I mentioned the Bible, I mentioned the Greek and Roman sources. It really is also that the institutions, the Assyrians create, the imperial institutions, the provincial system, the bureaucracy, the artistic language of empire.

• 51:25Speaker 04

  These massive monumental buildings and monuments and other things. These things are actually, the succeeding empires, they are actually adopted to a certain extent. The Neo Babylonian Empire, beginning with Nabopolasa, that follows the Assyrian, for instance, uses a bureaucracy whose leading officials bear titles that are very Assyrian. So clearly, the Assyrian model is important. With the Persians, who in five thirty nine take over. That's when the last Babylonian king Nebanides is defeated by the Persian king Cyrus. Cyrus the Great, as he's sometimes called, and the Persians create this much larger empire, much larger than the Neo Babylonian, also much larger than the Assyrian Empire.

• 52:06Speaker 04

  The Persians, quite emphatically, actually endorse Assyrian art, not Neo Babylonian art. They start off with essentially building in Persepolis, this is a recent find, very exciting. They start off with building a gate there that looks very much like the Ishtar Gate in Babylon, Babylonian style. But then they give up on this kind of architecture with these glazed mosaic, et cetera. And instead, in Persepolis, build these massive palaces out of of stone with bas reliefs and bull colossi and all these things that look extremely Assyrian. They also adopt Babylonian and Egyptian and other elements, but they look very Assyrian. And the stories that a Greek historian, Tzius, for instance, hears when he spends some years

• 52:46Speaker 04

  as the physician of King Attaxxerxes at the Persian court are all about Assyrians, not about Babylonians. They are distorted already, they no longer really reflect that much as a reality of the Assyrian Empire. But they are about Assyrians, it seems very much that Persians really quite deliberately imitated Assyria. I mean, already Cyrus, in this famous Cyrus Cylinder, the one document in which he speaks extensively about himself, found in Babylon, created shortly after the conquest of Babylon in five thirty nine, mentions King Ashurbanipal as an earlier builder of the walls of Babylon. And the inscription as such also has a certain Assyrian ring to it. The titles that Cyrus uses, King of the World, et cetera, are Assyrian titles. So, yes, Assyria looms large at the very beginning in this chain of empires.

• 53:31Speaker 04

  And of course, then it recedes at some point when eventually the Seleucids and then the Parthians, the Sassanians, the later on, other empires take over, of course, then there's no deliberate imitation of Assyria anymore. But you use this very nice metaphor of DNA, I think the Assyrian DNA stays with these later empires.

• 53:50Dan Snow?

  Well, Eckhart, thank you so much for telling us all about that. And I think people with a general interest in history will be able to spot so many parallels in the bits of history that they particularly enjoy and are familiar with. So Subskript History owes an enormous amount to Assyria. Thank you very much for coming on and telling us all about it.

• 54:06Speaker 04

  Yeah, thank you very much. It was a real pleasure.

• 54:11Dan Snow?

  Thank you so much to you for listening to this episode of Dan Snow's History It. We could not make this podcast without you. That's actually true. So make sure, if you want to keep it going, that is, to hit follow in your podcast player right now. You'll get new episodes dropped into your podcast library automatically by the power of tech. You can listen anywhere you get your pods, Apple, Spotify, even BBC Sounds. Imagine a world, just imagine, where you never miss an episode of this podcast. I mean, it's there. The technology makes that possible. That could be your reality right now if you hit follow. See you next time.

• 54:52Speaker 02

  This is a paid partnership with Apple Card. The coolest flex at brunch these days is not the Bloody Mary with the bottomless gold flake caviar topping. It's not whipping out your wallet to pay. It's not having a wallet at all. Jack's been an Apple Card user since 2019. That's the same year he tossed his wallet in the trash. Because Apple Card holders earn 2% daily cash back on purchases made using Apple Pay. It's the only credit card designed for the iPhone. I tap to pay with Apple Card at the grocery store, at the gas station, at restaurants. And yes, I use it at my second home, the farmer's market. Jack tapping to pay with his Apple Card with Apple Pay is his favorite thing to do. And the pleasant vibration and chime sound means I just got 2% daily cash back on my latest purchase. Apply in the Wallet app on your iPhone today. Subject to credit approval.

• 55:34Speaker 02

  Apple Card, issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City branch. Terms and more at applecard.com.

• 55:41Speaker 01

  This is the story of the one. As a shipping manager, he's running the dock, stocking supplies, and making sure every order goes out on time. And Grainger helps him stay prepared. From shipping supplies to PPE to hand tools, he counts on Grainger to keep products moving and trucks rolling. So his operation runs smoothly, no matter the shift. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click Grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done.

• 56:13Dan Snow?

  Have you been enjoying my podcast and now want even more history? Sign up to History and watch the world's best history documentaries on subjects like how William conquered England, what it was like to live in the Georgian era, and you can even hear the voice of Richard III. We've got hundreds of hours of original documentaries, plus new releases every week, and there's always something more to discover. Sign up to join us in historic locations around the world and explore the past. Just visit historyhit.com/subscribe.