Why The Bond Market Is Starting To Revolt — ft. Katie Martin

Ed Elson and Scott Galloway are joined by Katie Martin to discuss why bond markets are flashing warning signs and what’s driving the global debt selloff. They also break down how AI spending, Fed policy, and government borrowing are reshaping markets. Katie Martin is the markets columnist and editorial board member at the Financial Times. Subscribe to the Prof G Markets Youtube Channel Check out our latest Prof G Markets newsletter Follow Prof G Markets on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram, X and Substack Follow Scott on Instagram Send us your questions or comments by emailing [email protected] Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration blog, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

• 0:27Speaker 01

  Hogging seats on a crowded train, not saying, excuse me, watching videos on your phone with no headphones in. Sometimes it feels like we don't know how to act anymore. What we have been seeing increasingly is people breaking rules. Why should I play by the rules if nobody else is going to do that for me? This week on Explain It To Me, how to mind your manners. New episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts.

• 0:56Scott Galloway?

  Today's number 70,000. That's how many pints of Guinness were stolen near Liverpool last week. Yet I've taken inspiration from Trump's renaming of geographic bodies of water. It's no longer Lake Ontario, but Lake America. I'm starting a water park called Lake America, where with admission you get chlamydia.

• 1:24Scott Galloway?

  I went to a pub last night here in the UK.

• 1:26Ed Elson?

  Did you?

• 1:26Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, I did. It was a Monday night and a friend of mine called and I was, I had cabin fever. And so I went and met him and we could not find trouble for the life of us. There needs to be way more drinking and clubs and hot people. Where, like, where are the Eastern European hot people and the douchebag tech guys that drive the nightlife scene of New York during the week?

• 1:49Ed Elson?

  It's a good question. We got, we're going to need to investigate that. Maybe we can do an episode on that. Where are the hot people?

• 1:54Scott Galloway?

  How's New York right now? You, I am so jealous. U S Open, is it, is the city on fire right now?

• 1:59Ed Elson?

  Not on fire. I mean, the World Cup, the World Cup was a different level. The city really was on fire, but you know, it's nice. The weather is good. U S Open is great. Our team is going, it'll be a lot of fun. Yeah, New York's, it's not on fire, but it's calm and it's pleasant is how I would characterize things here. While we're on the topic of pubs, by the way, just so I know, what is your pub order? I don't think I, I don't think I, I know the answer to that.

• 2:26Scott Galloway?

  I typically just get a lot, a lager or, um, yeah, I don't, sometimes I do. I like a beer called Roter Burger, which nobody ever has.

• 2:35Ed Elson?

  What is that?

• 2:36Scott Galloway?

  I think it's a German beer. My father-in-law drinks it and I adopted it from him. I, this is going to freak you out. I've started drinking Michelob Ultra.

• 2:45Ed Elson?

  Interesting.

• 2:46Scott Galloway?

  It's lower carbs and it actually tastes pretty good. Do you know what the fastest growing beer brand in the U S is right now, Ed?

• 2:52Ed Elson?

  No.

• 2:52Scott Galloway?

  Bush Light.

• 2:53Ed Elson?

  Really?

• 2:54Scott Galloway?

  People your age are drinking Bush Light.

• 2:56Ed Elson?

  Weird.

• 2:57Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, it's making a comeback. I don't, I'm not a Guinness fan. What is your, what, what do you saddle up and to with beer?

• 3:05Ed Elson?

  Yeah, lager for me. I mean, every now and then a Guinness does actually really hit quite nicely. But it just, it's very, very heavy. And for me, it's usually just sort of a standard lager or a pils. I usually like a Stella or Peroni.

• 3:21Scott Galloway?

  I do like Stella. The problem, I've, I've done this as a trick in, in an effort to reduce my alcohol consumption and reduce my blood pressure and stick around to keep this Joey Bagadon at enterprise podcast going.

• 3:35Scott Galloway?

  I am starting to move from alcohol to beer because I find beer more filling and I don't drink as much.

• 3:41Ed Elson?

  I've got to say I'm drinking a lot less hot alcohol. I'm not drinking spirits as much.

• 3:48Scott Galloway?

  When you do drink spirits, what do you drink?

• 3:50Ed Elson?

  Usually a Negroni.

• 3:51Scott Galloway?

  Jesus Christ, I forgot you had a vagina.

• 3:57Scott Galloway?

  Sorry.

• 3:58Ed Elson?

  Negroni, Negroni is not, is not a weak drink. Negronis are strong. Actually, it's one of the strongest drinks.

• 4:05Scott Galloway?

  Do they make that drink for a man?

• 4:08Ed Elson?

  Let's hear your cocktail order.

• 4:10Scott Galloway?

  Let me get a, do you order a cosmopolitan?

• 4:13Ed Elson?

  Do you know what a Negroni is?

• 4:14Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, I get a romance drink. I got a Maker's Mark and ginger ale. By the way, just a little bit of a podcast trick hack. Drink bourbon because it makes your voice deeper the next day and you sound more authoritative. And then ZipRecruiter wants to advertise. So I need you to start drinking bourbon or whiskey. It doesn't make your voice, I might, see how my voice is kind of, kind of feminine and Ed-like right now?

• 4:35Ed Elson?

  No, no, no. It's not.

• 4:36Scott Galloway?

  It's because I had beer last night. I should have gone to the hard stuff.

• 4:39Ed Elson?

  You should have gotten the bourbon. Okay.

• 4:41Scott Galloway?

  Yeah.

• 4:41Ed Elson?

  Yeah, you need the gravelly voice. Okay, I'll try it out. Market research, maybe it'll sell more ads. I'll give it a try.

• 4:47Scott Galloway?

  Commit.

• 4:48Ed Elson?

  Well, let's get into this interview. We have a very, very fascinating conversation with the one and only Katie Martin. Stay with us. Stocks are up, but the bond market is starting to tell a very different story. Last week, yields on government bonds in Japan, the UK, Germany and France all hit multi-decade highs. And in the U S, the 30-year Treasury yield recently reached its highest level since before the financial crisis. As we've discussed, Treasury Secretary Scott Besant tried to bring down long-term borrowing costs by buying back Treasury bonds. But the effort failed to move yields lower and instead through criticism from investors across Wall Street, including Stanley Druckenmiller, who was once his mentor.

• 5:34Ed Elson?

  So while the stock market has largely shrugged off Trump's policies, the bond market is actively speaking out against them. And we wanted to understand why that is happening. So today we are speaking with our friend Katie Martin, markets columnist and editorial board member at the Financial Times. Katie, it's great to have you back on the show. I want to jump right into the bond markets and what we're seeing. The 10-year yield topped 4.8% today, the highest since October 2023. The 30-year is back above 5.25%. This episode will come out later, so we'll see where it is by the time this is published.

• 6:15Ed Elson?

  But the story remains that the bond market is not looking great, at least in the U S. Bond investors are not very happy right now. And I'd like to start with why.

• 6:26Speaker 04

  Yeah, there's a lot going on. The bond markets globally are not looking very happy at all. And I guess it's a bit of a paint your own adventure kind of picture, right? You can kind of stick on to this, whatever kind of narrative you want. But I think the, the most powerful one is that governments are just borrowing too much damn money. You know, the U S national debt has of course crossed through $40 trillion for the first time. You've got a whole bunch of countries, including the U S, that are now spending more money on keeping current with their debts than they are on defense. And that's just a bit of a kind of marker that this has all got pretty out of hand.

• 7:09Speaker 04

  I feel like there's a lot, a lot of countries, including the UK, that just seem to have forgotten how to talk to the electorates about trade-offs and taxes. And instead it's much easier to just keep going, cap in hand to the debt markets, keep borrowing more and more money to keep the lights on, pay for your defense, fix your roads, build your schools, all the rest of it. And at a certain point, bond investors say, look, I'll, I'll buy these bonds, but it's going to cost you. I'm going to want a higher return on them. And that's exactly what's happening here. And, you know, inflation plays a little bit of a role here. Bonds famously hate inflation. It eats into their returns.

• 7:51Speaker 04

  So again, investors ask for a higher return if they're going to be investing in bonds in an, in a high inflation environment. But they're the kind of main reasons why we have this horrible malaise in debt markets at the moment. As, as you say, the U S has been most activist, shall we say, in trying to calm this situation down. But it still doesn't seem to be ready to have a proper conversation about properly cutting spending or raising taxes. So it's difficult to see how they can properly turn this around.

• 8:24Ed Elson?

  We'll come back to inflation in a moment, but just on government borrowing. My understanding is that governments have been borrowing like crazy for years. And yet it seems as though something happened in the past month or so. Investors decided that something changed. What exactly are they reacting to? What changed in terms of both the U S and its relationship with debt, but also the world?

• 8:51Speaker 04

  It sounds silly, but it is nonetheless true that things don't matter in markets until they do. And once you get enough people who are worried about a particular point, whether that's private markets or AI or government borrowing levels, suddenly it becomes an issue that people are focusing on. And honestly, I think a lot of this is a kind of Streisand effect kind of thing that's going on with the U S. You know, that moment at which, you know, last time you and I spoke, Ed, it was around that time that the U S was helping Japan to support the yen. And Scott Besant and the administration had various reasons that they were sort of, you know, inviting us to believe why they were doing this.

• 9:34Speaker 04

  But the reason that the market settled on was, hang on, you just don't want Japan to sell down its U S government bond holdings to support its currency. You're telling us that you're worried about people selling Treasuries. And now I'm worried about people selling Treasuries and I'm worried about your borrowing costs getting much higher. And so I think there was a certain, you know, particularly when you build into this, the fact that the U S has increased the size of its debt buybacks and it's done various other things in relation to its Japanese yen intervention that just brings focus and attention to the fact that the U S is uncomfortable with its borrowing costs. And that has sparked a little bit of soul searching across private investors around,

• 10:18Speaker 04

  hang on, maybe we should all be a bit more worried about the U S borrowing costs because they are pretty painful.

• 10:24Ed Elson?

  Part of my theory, which I'd like to get your reaction to. It seems as though in the past few weeks, it has become abundantly clear to investors that despite what our leaders might say about our need to get fiscal spending under control, they don't ultimately, at the end of the day, give a shit. They don't really care. And it seems evident from Trump's actions and his words, where he said he would balance the budget. That was kind of like part of his main platform. And then he goes out, he increases our deficit to whatever it will be this year, probably $2 trillion. He explodes the national debt to $40 trillion. He launches these wars and doesn't seem to care much about the inflation that will make all of this worse. And then you have Scott Besant, who goes out and says, my solution to the bond problem

• 11:09Ed Elson?

  is I'm just going to use more money, government money. Spend it and hopefully that'll fix the problem and bring yields down. Is that also what investors are reacting to, that it's clear that our leadership actually doesn't care?

• 11:25Speaker 04

  Yeah, there is a sort of fiscal incontinence thing going on. And look, the US is not alone here. Look, I invite you to look at France or the UK or Japan or any of these, these high debt countries. The, the other element here is that we've had a lot of mixed messaging recently from really senior kind of finance people in the US recently that is unhelpful. So you'll remember when Kevin Walsh first took the reins at the Federal Reserve, he used his first couple of press conferences to say, look, in the time since I've been appointed, yields have risen, bonds have weakened, borrowing costs have risen, and that's fine. I, you know, I welcome that. I think there are various benefits that come from that.

• 12:10Speaker 04

  And then you fast forward to Scott Beson and he's saying, no, no, no, yields are too high. The market is wrong. I know something that the market doesn't know and yields shouldn't be this high. And I'm going to try and massage them lower. And then you, you've got the kind of fiscal incontinence piece that comes on top of that. And you just think, guys, what, what is going on here? Someone, someone tell me what, what to believe. The other optimistic way of looking at this is the kind of analysis that Stephen Moran has put to work on this. Steve Moran, if you'll remember, he was appointed to the Fed by the Trump administration. He was Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers. He's like that guy, right? He's, he's around, he's advising the administration on economic matters.

• 12:53Speaker 04

  And he's saying, he wrote in, in the FT, you know, you could pick a lot of holes in, into what he wrote. But one of the reasons why he was saying that yields are higher is that the market is moving to price in a higher growth environment in, in the US. Sounds kind of wacky and I would dispute the idea that this is what kicked this whole thing off. But it is reasonable to say that we've got pretty robust growth actually in the US. And that, all things being equal, does mean you have a higher inflation environment, the good kind of inflation that comes with a lot, lots more growth. Maybe we do need to level set differently and think that benchmark interest rates from the Federal Reserve really do need to be higher. Now, Trump won't like that.

• 13:38Speaker 04

  He has been very active in calling for lower interest rates, even after the blowout jobs report that came from the States the other day. But maybe that really is the environment that we're living in, in part due to the AI miracle and that whole build out. Maybe we do have a higher growth, higher inflation situation in the US that calls for higher interest rates. And that means higher borrowing costs and, and higher yields in the bond market. So again, this is why I say it's a paint your own adventure. You can say this actually is great because it means that the, that the US is growing really fast and people are really optimistic. You can say this is terrible because the US is, is borrowing too much money.

• 14:20Speaker 04

  You can say this is a result of these kind of horrible mixed messages that we get all the time. Ah, I guess on some level, does it matter? Fact is borrowing costs are really high and it costs the US a lot of money to stay current on this debt. And this is money that the US doesn't really have to spare.

• 14:37Scott Galloway?

  I heard one analogy that the market or stocks are dating Donald Trump and bonds are married to him. And when you're married, you notice things more. Why do you think there's been such a divergence between the equity markets and the bond markets?

• 14:52Speaker 04

  One reason for that is they are literally different people in the bond markets and the equity markets. They are different tribes. And I think if you're outside finance or finance, people kind of look the same. They're not the same. People in different asset classes think very, very differently. People in bonds, you're never going to double your money in bonds, right? Because you're only going to get back what, what you put in, in the first place.

• 15:15Scott Galloway?

  And you want to limit your downside.

• 15:17Speaker 04

  Exactly. So your mindset is why is this lying liar lying to me? And what can go wrong and how much money can I lose? In stocks, you're thinking, what's the upside? You know, so, so they do come from very different places, almost kind of philosophically. But the other thing is, you know, you look at stocks and the earnings are just great. And it's not just in AI. These company, you know, companies in the US stock market are making bucket loads of cash. And you know that whatever the policymakers say, if the brown stuff hit the fan, you know full well that the Fed would cut rates and do something to stop the bleeding

• 15:59Speaker 04

  if the stock market really took a hit, in part because so many Americans own stocks and it would be such a problem economically for, for wealthy households. So there's a bit of a moral hazard thing going on, I think, in, in that regard. But there is just this idea that it's very hard for stocks to lose at the moment because companies are just making so much damn money.

• 16:21Scott Galloway?

  I love what our friends at Ritholtz Management always ask. They always say, what could go right? And I see, I'm a hammer and everything I see is a nail. I see everything as an elegant transfer of wealth from lower middle income households to, to the rich, specifically from the earners to the owners. Is there a scenario, or let me put forward a thesis. Our politicians, and they're just responding to the electorate. We like to think that the voting public are saints and it's our leaders. Leaders respond to the electorate and the electorate has said, I know, let's go to war and cut taxes. I like that. And so the, the US public is, is voted for and embraced these deficits. And they like the idea of spending more money than they're paying in taxes,

• 17:06Scott Galloway?

  realizing that all they're doing is creating inflation and greater debt burden on Ed and his colleagues or a younger generation. Is there a scenario, or what it seems to me, is that the, the biggest, most trusted economies in the world have all adopted this propagate spending strategy, this debt fueled spending orgy, which results in inflation. But if you already own assets, you're already rich, you're somewhat protected. Which again, is nothing but a transfer of wealth. Inflation goes up, our debt goes up, but the landowners, the gentry, the people who are already rich are protected. It's wage earners and people whose wages can't keep up with inflation, they get hit hardest.

• 17:47Scott Galloway?

  This is just, we're just doing what we've always done or have done for the last, I would say, 30 or 40 years. And that's, that's how can we keep the populace with cheap calories and Netflix somewhat happy while continuing to transfer wealth from lower middle income households to upper income households? And I would also add to your point, everyone's doing this. We're not unique. Everyone in a Western economy, I can't, it's hard for me to point to an economy, a large economy that is fiscally disciplined right now. Anyways, isn't this just more of the same?

• 18:25Speaker 04

  Yeah, I think it is. And that kind of goes back to my earlier point really, which is that things don't matter until they do. And people have been saying this about, about, you know, debt fueled fiscal spending for a really long time. And I think we've just reached the point where people think that the system is, is starting to creak. But, you know, you can, you can sense this around the, the UK, you know, it, it is absolutely everywhere. You know, the, the, the government under the previous prime minister tried to make some moves to cutting welfare spending. You can argue about whether that was the right thing to do or not, but it was actually a reasonably, you know, it would have helped UK public finances and they just cannot get it past members of parliament.

• 19:08Scott Galloway?

  Who are we talking about?

• 19:08Speaker 04

  This was Keir Starmer.

• 19:10Scott Galloway?

  Starmer.

• 19:11Speaker 04

  Yeah. It's difficult to keep on top of who's prime minister in the UK sometimes, but it's currently Andy Burnham. It was Keir Starmer and the Starmer government tried to cut some welfare spending. And again, politicians in the constituencies where people are very reliant on welfare spending simply will not let it pass. But at the same time, you know, we want good schools, we want good hospitals, we want good roads, we want all of that. And there is no real solution to how to pay for it. And you have, you know, left wing parties that are talking about like poorly defined kind of wealth taxes, which I really don't think sustainably fill the gap. And so while we haven't figured this out, the much, much easier thing to do is go cap in hand, as I say, to, to the bond markets.

• 19:54Speaker 04

  And the UK issued some government debt today. I think I'm right in saying the borrowing costs on that were the highest since 1998. You know, we're having to really pay up for this stuff because when you go to investors and you say, yes, inflation is high, yes, there's a war in Iran that's, that could still push inflation much higher again still. We're pretty close to a hundred dollars a barrel on, on oil again. And yes, I'm going to be borrowing an absolute shed load after this. I'm going to come back to you again and again and again, asking for more and more money. It's no surprise that investors say, absolutely sure, I'll lend you the money, but I just want, I want a better return for it. And that's where your higher borrowing costs come in.

• 20:33Scott Galloway?

  Ed, I just want to warn you from this point forward, I'm going to use the term shed load. If you take away anything from this podcast, go ahead.

• 20:47Ed Elson?

  Yeah, I just want to linger on the fact that this isn't just an American story. And then maybe we'll come back to what is going on in America. But we're seeing the same reaction in Germany and France and Japan and the UK. As you mentioned, they're all seeing their own bond yields touching multi-decade highs. Could you talk a little bit more about what is going on in Europe? It sounds like it's just kind of a mirror image of the US. But by all accounts, it seems like things are going quite wrong over there.

• 21:18Speaker 04

  Americans like to catastrophize about Europe and it's not normally as bad as it looks. It is still quite bad, however. So, look, German borrowing costs are very, very low for a big developed economy, but they are much higher than they used to be because Germany has just recently caught on to this idea of debt fueled spending. It's been absolutely allergic to it for decades. It's getting back on that train now and that has pushed German borrowing costs higher. But like I say, they are still pretty low. France has an extremely polarized political system. You have candidates for the presidential election next year from the far right and the far left and not very much in between.

• 22:01Speaker 04

  And it's very, you know, France just cannot pass a budget. It can't reach agreement on really anything to do with financial matters or anything else because you've got nothing in the middle. You've got this hollowed out middle and you've just got voices on the far left and the far right. So there's a serious risk that when we have the presidential election next year, that this could, this could lead to a real loss of investor confidence in France. Now, the difference for France is that it's got the European Central Bank behind it. With the Brits, we don't have this, right? But France has got the full backing of the European Central Bank. And we, last time we saw a serious debt crisis in Europe, which was sort of back in sort

• 22:40Speaker 04

  of 2010, 11, 12, the European Central Bank unleashed this torrent of rescue packages and rescue measures and things that were sort of, you know, they were basically rescue packages, but sort of wearing a sort of disguised pair of glasses and disguised moustache so that people wouldn't think they were rescue packages, but they really are. And those, all of those programs, all of those support programs for national bond markets within the euro area that get into trouble enjoy enormous levels of credibility and confidence from the market. So there is a low appetite for testing the European Central Bank's nerve on that. So personally, I think there is no way that the European Central Bank would let France

• 23:25Speaker 04

  fail on its debts. It would come up with something, doesn't matter how ungainly it is, it would come up, come up with something to stop that happening. Nonetheless, you, you have got an awkward situation now where, for example, Italian borrowing costs are a little bit lower than France's. Italy is always sort of put out there as the kind of problem child of Europe. And actually, it's done a pretty good job with fiscal consolidation. Market likes what Italy's been up to. France is your problem right now. So, yes, it is possible to construct a scenario in your head whereby Europe is heading for a really awful reckoning with the debt markets.

• 24:07Speaker 04

  But I do find it hard to believe that the European Central Bank really would let that happen. The UK similarly, you know, you get lots of voices on the right saying that the UK is in a horrible debt crisis and we have to go to the IMF for a bailout, which is just bullshit. And you have lots of people on the left who say, why are we being bossed around by the bond market? We should tell them what the yields are, not the other way around, which is also bullshit. You've got a government that's trying to pick away, you know, a path in between those two things. And the new chancellor, so our new finance minister is making all the right noises about there is nothing progressive about high borrowing costs. There is nothing progressive about spending more money on, on servicing your debts than you spend on nurses, you know?

• 24:52Speaker 04

  So they're trying to find a way through this, but we have a budget coming up in, in the UK and that's always a high drama moment for our bond markets. So everyone at the FT is just waiting for that to land.

• 25:09Ed Elson?

  We'll be right back after the break. And if you're enjoying the show so far, send it to a friend and please follow us on YouTube, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.

• 25:24Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Vanta. When you run security for a company that's scaling fast, the stakes just keep climbing. More compliance frameworks, more vendors, more risk and a board that wants to see it all in one place. But your compliance data can be all over the place. Controls in one tool, vendor risk in another, customer commitments buried in contracts. Your team has to spend more time stitching it all together and less time running the program. And every quarter, you're basing decisions on last quarter's data. Vanta connects it all. Its market-leading Agentic Trust platform is built for enterprise scale with 400-plus integrations and continuous monitoring. Vanta automates evidence collection, surfaces the risks that matter and organizes your audit around your auditor's requirements. And that Vanta agent works around the clock from full-program contacts, so nothing slips through the cracks.

• 26:09Scott Galloway?

  The numbers back this up. Vanta delivers a 526% return on investment over three years and pays for itself in three months. Vanta is trusted by more than 16,000 companies, including Snowflake, Atlassian and Ramp. Learn more at vanta.com/markets. That's spelled V A N T A dot com slash markets.

• 26:32Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from V C X, the public ticker for private tech. For generations, American companies have moved the world forward through their ingenuity and determination. And for generations, everyday Americans could be a part of that journey through perhaps the greatest innovation of all, the US stock market. It didn't matter whether you were a factory worker in Detroit or a farmer in Omaha, anyone can own a piece of the great American companies. But now, that's changed. Today, our most innovative companies are staying private rather than going public. The result is that everyday Americans are excluded from investing and getting left further behind while a select few reap all the benefits. Until now. Introducing V C X, the public ticker for private tech, now available wherever you buy stocks. V C X by Fundrise gives everyone the opportunity to invest in the next generation of innovation,

• 27:17Scott Galloway?

  including the companies leading the AI revolution, space exploration, defense tech and more. Visit getvcx.com for more info. That's getvcx.com. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other information can be found in the fund's prospectus at getvcx.com. This is a paid sponsorship.

• 27:42Ed Elson?

  Support for the show comes from Quince. With the weather shifting, it's time to reach for your old favorites. Maybe a soft cardigan you can layer with anything, a solid pair of boots or a sweater that you can dress up or down. Those are exactly the kinds of timeless, durable staples that Quince specializes in. Quince makes elevated everyday essentials from premium materials like Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton and washable silk. Everything is thoughtfully designed to be worn season after season. Their 100% Mongolian cashmere sweaters start at just $50, giving you the softness and quality of luxury cashmere without the luxury price tag. I wear Quince. I have several Quince sweaters. I love the feel of them.

• 28:24Ed Elson?

  I love how they look and my favorite thing about them is honestly how affordable they are. Find your next fall favorites at Quince. Download the Quince app for app exclusive offers or go to quince.com/markets. Get free shipping on your order and 365 day returns, now available in Canada and the UK too. That's Q U I N C E dot com slash markets.

• 28:55Ed Elson?

  We're back with Prof G Markets. Something we covered earlier this week was the regional election in Germany where the AFD, Germany's far-right party, won by a much larger margin than anyone had expected, than the polls had predicted. And a lot of people in Germany, especially the establishment politicians, are very, very worried about this. How significant was that election in your mind and how much, to what extent does it say something about Germany's economic position and potentially Europe's economic position?

• 29:32Speaker 04

  My hunch is that it's more significant politically than it is financially. I don't think there's any possibility, you know, to the extent that the AFD has a clearly articulated financial, you know, government borrowing platform, for example, I don't, it hasn't been enough to really spook the market. It's the politics that really matter on that front and it, and it is significant. You know, there are some, it's, it's a small region. It's a part of East Germany that has lots of kind of, you know, very old hangovers from the time when the country was divided. I think it's possible to over extrapolate what you see from, from Saxony and Halt.

• 30:17Speaker 04

  But I think also, you know, this is a demonstration, apart from anything else, that the chancellor, so that the leader of Germany, Merz, is in trouble. You know, he, he's effectively like Keir Starmer was in the UK and you have a local election and the, and the far-right does very well, just like we did it in the UK. And then it is deemed that the current national leadership hasn't had a strong enough voice in pushing back against the rise of the far-right and then they end up having to go. So, yeah, Chancellor Merz does appear to be in, in trouble here, but I, I can't see that being a big problem for European bond markets. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but I don't, it's not cited to me by investors as a big risk right now.

• 31:00Ed Elson?

  Just going back to the question of what changed in the bond markets this year, there was perhaps the idea that there was just sort of a change in sentiment about how politicians and our leaders actually think about fiscal responsibility. But the other more obvious thing to me is the war and the fact that The price of oil, as we record this, Brent crude is nearing $100 a barrel. It's been going up and up and up, went down for a bit, but then it went back up, which is almost even worse. And from my understanding, it doesn't affect just the US. In fact, it affects the US a little bit less than everyone else.

• 31:41Ed Elson?

  It affects the entire world and and the costs of of living for everyone. So to what extent do you draw a relationship between the Iran war and the crisis that we're seeing the bond markets right now?

• 31:55Speaker 04

  There's definitely a link between the two, but the levels of energy dependency and sensitivity in major economies today is not what it was in the 1970s and 80s. We do have alternatives. The US is self sufficient in this stuff. So it is a slightly different picture. Also, one of the things that bond investors have been saying to me that just doesn't make sense about what's been happening in debt markets recently is that actually inflation expectations have been pretty well contained. So it's not inflation that's been doing the heavy lifting in weakening bonds over the past few weeks. It's more of this, the fiscal side, the what the hell is going on with the Fed kind of

• 32:39Speaker 04

  side, the mixed messages, all of these signals from Besen that this this really is a problem. If you package all of that together, I think that's much more of a factor weirdly than the oil price in and of itself.

• 32:52Ed Elson?

  What do you make of Kevin Walsh and his first couple of months as Chair of the Federal Reserve? What are some of your takeaways? What do you think?

• 33:02Speaker 04

  It's a hard job. And it's very easy to kind of, you know, throw shade from the peanut gallery and say, you know, well, I would be doing this much better if I were in charge. And then all of a sudden you are in charge and, oh, holy crap, this is actually really difficult.

• 33:17Ed Elson?

  Well, we'll never be in charge, so that's why we can do it.

• 33:22Speaker 04

  And I think there is a recognition that it hasn't gone terribly smoothly and that Walsh's efforts to say to the markets, hey, you're on your own, you you price the bonds as you see fit, and I'm not going to stand in your way. I'm not going to give you forward guidance. So I'm not going to tell you where rates are going. I'm not going to spoon feed the market. I think it became clear pretty quickly that what the market would take from that is a signal that it's fine, you know, with the administration and with the Fed, if if government bond yields are much higher, and so I'm going to push them higher. So it kind of backfired. What I'm expecting to see, and what we've already seen signs of actually, is somewhat

• 34:03Speaker 04

  of a more conciliatory relationship really with markets, a recognition that it's all well and good to talk about not wanting to spoon feed the market, but you do need some sort of dialogue, because if things get really problematic and if bonds really get whacked, you want that kind of trust and connection with the market to be able to guide them on what you think you should do next to to calm that down. So we have seen somewhat more of a conciliatory stance. We have seen strong signals from Kevin Walsh that inflation is higher than we want it to be and that interest rates are the way to deal with inflation, right? Pretty kind of conventional stuff. But then it does get interesting in the sense that you have that blowout jobs report the other day from the States.

• 34:48Speaker 04

  What did you add? Hundred and sixty something thousand jobs?

• 34:51Ed Elson?

  Yeah, 162, I think, yeah.

• 34:53Speaker 04

  Yeah, way in excess of what the market had been expecting. Decent revision higher on the previous month's number, which had been negative and flip positive. So all of a sudden, the market has gone from pricing in a one in three chance of higher of of a rate increase later this month to a two in three chance of a rate increase later this month. And then you have Donald Trump saying the Fed needs to get smart, and if they don't cut rates, then I'm going to impose some sort of new trade tariffs. And you just think, what? So the difficulty, I think, for for Kevin Walsh, if he really is going to demonstrate that he's his own man and that he has an orthodox position towards the role of monetary policy

• 35:34Speaker 04

  in taming inflation, he's going to have to raise rates this month, about six weeks ahead of your midterm elections. Good luck with that, Kevin Walsh. Hope that works out nicely for you. So you have had a big reset in market expectations around what he's going to do.

• 35:52Speaker 04

  There's lots of people now saying that the feds like to do three 25 basis point rate hikes, so three quarter point rate hikes, so one in September, one in December, maybe one in March. For me, the kind of the interesting bit and the drama is what does Donald Trump say and do about that? And does he turn on Kevin Walsh in the same way as he turned on Jay Powell, who, let's not forget, was his appointment? You know, his urge, Trump's urge for lower rates, you know, this is not like a new position for him. He's been calling, you know, he'd been a low rates guy since he was a real estate guy in in the 80s. He believes in low interest rates and high trade tariffs.

• 36:36Speaker 04

  So I do think there is a bit of a potential clash coming, again, just ahead of these midterms. And I think it's possible that, for example, the Fed gets a lot of blame for stuff that's actually not its fault if if Trump is trying to deflect tension away from, you know, problems in the US economy that are pretty squarely down to his war in Iran.

• 36:56Scott Galloway?

  When I think about the markets, that we kind of get what we deserve in terms of leadership, and we referenced this earlier, and that is, until the markets respond, until a leader stands up and says, we're raising taxes and cutting spending, and we have an eight year plan to get the deficit, the growth in the deficit below economic growth, and the market responds really positively, until that happens, I just think we're going to have more of the same. It doesn't seem to me that the markets really want to have this conversation yet. And until the markets reward some sort of fiscally responsible rhetoric or narrative

• 37:38Scott Galloway?

  out of one of our potential leaders, I mean, we have a ton of Democrats and people jockeying for, you know, to be number one on Calci for the Democratic nomination or to be president in 2028. I don't, I haven't seen one of them talk about fiscal discipline. I don't, I just don't see that as a talking point yet. Isn't it going to be, can you point to any economy where a leader has said, look, we got to get the debt deficit under control and it's going to be hard choices? I don't see it anywhere. Do you see it anywhere?

• 38:11Speaker 04

  No, and it is a very difficult conversation to have with an electorate that is not necessarily particularly financially literate. And, you know, I I get that. I guess, you know, the only mini example that immediately springs to mind is after the disastrous mini budget in 2022 in the UK, when Liz Truss was Prime Minister, which blew up the the UK government bond markets and then tripped over a tripwire and it blew up still further. And, you know, pretty much one of the very first things that happened when she went was that a new Chancellor, so a new Finance Minister was installed, who just unwound pretty much everything that had been in that mini budget and said, right, all of that,

• 38:56Speaker 04

  just forget it ever happened. We're going to kind of get get back on on track. So a pretty humiliating moment really for for Liz Truss and for Kwasi Kwarteng, who was her her Finance Minister at the time. But generally speaking, no, I mean, it's just not a vote winner to kind of stand up on a podium somewhere and say, guys, I've got this great idea. How about you all pay more taxes? I just, we have forgotten as developed economies, how to how to do that, how to say to people, you know, if you want all these lovely things, you want lovely, you know, schools and hospitals and roads and yada yada, then that costs money. There's just this idea that you can lean on the bond markets to do it. And and particularly since COVID, that is just what we've done.

• 39:41Speaker 04

  So that's, I think that's why we're in the situation we're in today. You know, as as you've been asking, you know, why is the market freaking out about this now? I think we, just the amount of borrowing stepped up so high around the time of COVID. And don't get me wrong, that was the right thing to do. There was a pandemic going on and and governments had to had to step into where the private sector was before. But the the right thing to do after that period would have been to say, okay, look, that was all emergency borrowing. We're now getting back to normal. And instead, governments were like, this is awesome. We've found this magic money tree. Let's just keep plucking money off it. And, you know, now here we are in 2026 and the money tree is bare.

• 40:25Speaker 04

  And it's, you know, it's it's just a fundamentally more expensive exercise to to borrow.

• 40:31Scott Galloway?

  There's a great line in the show Billions.

• 40:35Scott Galloway?

  Where someone says to Bobby Axe, you know, this, this thing's going to cost $10 million. And he's like, well, it's like I'm a rich man. And I feel as if the US gets not a hall pass, but can kind of say, well, it's like I'm a rich man. The growth, the economic growth in the economy in the US, as much as I like to shitpost it because I'm hoping for a change in the administration. I think the economy, any honest analysis, there's, there's, there's red flags or there's blinking yellow lights. But I would, I would challenge anyone to point to an economy that's stronger than the US is.

• 41:13Speaker 04

  The US has a couple of advantages. Yet it does have, you know, great growth envy of the world. And that's the other way that the US can get out of this problem is just to grow really, really fast.

• 41:24Scott Galloway?

  You're stealing my thunder. I'm going to interrupt you because I want to ask a question here. Growth solves almost all problems.

• 41:31Speaker 04

  Yeah.

• 41:31Scott Galloway?

  I want to talk, go back to the UK. We are growing. The US still isn't growing fast enough to, in my opinion, maintain this ridiculous spending. But we're less screwed than everyone else. The UK is not growing. For all the noise around Canada being such good people and I'm on the side of Canada, the Canadian economy is a shit show. It hasn't grown in 10 years. The UK economy is a shit show. It hasn't grown in 10 years, as far as I can tell. Other than, okay, so there's the AI. But what are some of the fundamental pillars of non-growth in the UK and in Canada? Because we, we talk so much about managing our house,

• 42:16Scott Galloway?

  but you can order champagne and ketamine if you're killing it at work and you're making a shit ton of money or a shed load of money. And the UK and Canada aren't. When, if you were advising the UK or the, the British government around how to inspire growth, what would your, what would your recommendations be?

• 42:34Speaker 04

  Well, the kind of original sin with the UK was Brexit. You know, it's, it's 10 years now since we voted to leave the European Union, world's biggest trade bloc, right across the water from us. You can practically see it from, from the, you know, the South Coast. And we left. And then that meant that we spent a lot of time and effort as, as a government and as a civil service in trying to sort of figure out how to fix that and how to reconfigure that relationship. And that just like was a huge effort sink that we never got back. And it just threw sand in the gears of, of, you know,

• 43:15Speaker 04

  every single trade transaction or export or import from, from, from Europe that, you know, we're really still seeing the, the effects of that. And it's not just the trade. It's the UK as an investment destination. And we kind of blew up quite a lot of credibility and, and, and. So, you know, you do see, you know, politicians in the UK talk about the need to rekindle a more friendly relationship with Europe. But it's just politically a nightmare because, you know, the vote for Brexit cut across traditional party lines. So you have lots of traditional Labour voters who, who voted for it.

• 43:58Speaker 04

  And so, and you have lots of traditional, you know, Tory party voters who voted against it. And so neither party is really able to have a proper conversation about what the effects of it have been. We're only now 10 years after this bloody vote, having a proper, honest conversation about what the impact of this whole thing has been. And it has been horrible. So that's, you know, that's kind of, that's the core of a lot of problems, certainly in the UK. I'm not an expert in the Canadian economy, but there is just a kind of comparison kind of effect going on here where the US has just been such a success story. It has owned AI. Now, what kind of moat has the US really got around that?

• 44:42Speaker 04

  What does China have up its sleeve? Could there be even another deep-seek moment? Is there a possibility that all of these companies, which by the way, are borrowing unbelievable amounts of money to build these data centers? Is there a possibility that they're building data centers for a technology that people simply will not pay for or politically will not tolerate? Yeah, absolutely. There's a bunch of things that could go wrong with AI. But, you know, for now, to kind of use that hackneyed phrase in markets, you know, the, the music's still playing, so people are still dancing. And, and that's just, you know, it is not correct to say that AI is the only thing that is making the US economy grow. But it is a large part of what behind, what is behind making the US economy grow.

• 45:25Speaker 04

  And for reasons that, you know, maybe the rest of the world, the world should regret, and maybe we shouldn't, we've just allowed the US to have enormous leadership on that.

• 45:38Ed Elson?

  We'll be right back. And for even more markets content, sign up for our newsletter at profitemarkets.com.

• 45:54Scott Galloway?

  Support for the show comes from Gusto. Be honest, there's probably one task on your list you constantly push in the next week because it's just so tedious. For a lot of business owners, that task is payroll. Gusto is here to take that entirely off your plate so it becomes the easy part of your job instead of the dreaded one. Gusto is an online payroll and benefits software built for small business. It's all-in-one, remote-friendly and incredibly easy to use. So you can pay, hire, onboard and support your team from anywhere. Automatic payroll tax filing, simple direct deposits, health benefits, commuter benefits, workers' comp, 401K, you name it. Gusto makes it simple and has options for nearly every budget. Unlimited payroll runs for one monthly price. That means no hidden fees and no surprises. You can save time with built-in automated tools,

• 46:37Scott Galloway?

  offer letters, onboarding docs, direct deposit and more. It's quick and simple to switch to Gusto. Just transfer your existing data to get up and running fast. Plus, you don't have to pay a cent until you run your first payroll. Try Gusto today at gusto.com/markets and get three months free when you run your first payroll. That's three months of free payroll at gusto.com/markets. Again, that's gusto.com/markets.

• 47:04Scott Galloway?

  Today's show is brought to you by Vanguard. To all the financial advisors listening, let's talk bonds for a minute. Capturing value in fixed income is not easy. Bond markets are massive, murky, and let's be real, lots of firms throw a couple flashy funds your way and call it a day. But not Vanguard. Vanguard bonds are institutional quality. This isn't just a tagline, it's a commitment to your clients. It means top-grade products across the board. Vanguard's been in the game a long time and their scale gives them a serious edge. The lineup includes over 80 bond funds. They're actively managed by a 200-person global squad of sector specialists, analysts and traders. Some managers out there promise big returns, but those usually come with big risks. And that can mean a roller coaster ride for investors. Vanguard takes a steadier approach. They don't go all in on risky bets.

• 47:48Scott Galloway?

  Instead, they focus on reliability and consistency. It's not always flashy, but it sets the standard for what dependable investing should look like. So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go see the record for yourself at vanguard.com/audio. That's vanguard.com/audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, distributor.

• 48:15Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies, 18 plus.

• 48:45Ed Elson?

  We're back with Profty Markets. I really appreciate how you are showing the sort of chain of events that are worth caring about if you care about economics, if you care about the state of, of the United States and also just the world. And it seems as though what we have here is a situation where we're borrowing unprecedented amounts of money in our governments. And the answer to why that, that is okay, that we hear from many of our leaders and that we hear from Scott Beson, that we heard from everyone who is in the White House in America today, is that we will grow our way out of that. And maybe we should have a conversation in a moment about how legitimate that argument is. But that is the argument, we can grow our way out of it.

• 49:28Ed Elson?

  We can just create more and more prosperity and that will solve the problem. But the growth has become so highly dependent on this one thing, which is AI. And if we look at AI and we look at why it has become so successful, we learn that it is because it is highly dependent again on a handful of companies and their ability to spend, specifically the big tech companies right now, who are now borrowing huge amounts of money, but also OpenAI and Anthropic, for whom that is the majority of the revenue that is coming in for these big tech AI efforts. So the whole thing is extremely concentrated. And we talk a lot about this problem of concentration risk.

• 50:13Ed Elson?

  It's a very well-known thing in economics, in finance. And it seems like the entire structure of our system has become heavily dependent on this thing that when I look at it and when I look at the economics of these companies and also what we don't know about these companies, which is a lot. To me, I'm thinking this is incredibly unstable. I'd be curious to hear if you agree.

• 50:33Speaker 04

  Another little thread that you can kind of tease out of that as well is that a couple of years ago, there was this huge AI capex spend coming from the big hyperscalers, the kind of, you know, Metas and Microsofts and Amazons of the world. And 18 months ago, they were paying for all this out of, you know, out of their free cash flow. And then they ran out of that free cash flow. So they started paying for it out of money that they are borrowing from the bond markets. And again, I don't want to go all kind of always sunny in Philadelphia and kind of, you know, get my kind of pin board and all the rest of it. But everything is connected in the sense that these companies are now borrowing so

• 51:13Speaker 04

  much money that that is sucking some demand out of the government bond markets. So if you're an investor and you've got a huge debt issue over here from the US government, but you've also got another debt issue over here that you could buy into on the same day that's from Meta. And you think, you know, actually, when I think about it, who is the safer credit here? Is it the US government or is it Meta? Which of these bonds should I buy? And then you think, well, the Meta one is actually a little bit more generous because this is a corporate bond and it's got pretty much the same duration. It's, you know, I'm pretty comfortable with Meta as a credit risk, so I'm going to buy the Meta bond instead. And all over the world, this is leaching demand out of government bond markets at

• 51:55Speaker 04

  precisely this time that people are worrying about the fiscal incontinence and about the sheer levels of borrowing that governments have got to do. You know, in Europe, you know, an investor was telling me the other day, there are some government bond issues that had been planned by smaller European governments. They've had to move the timing of these issues so that they can negotiate their way around these massive hyperscaler bonds that are hitting the market on the same day, so that they can try and ensure that the demand is there to buy these government bonds. It's messing with the whole ecosystem. You know, I think this is one of the big kind of underappreciated stories in global finance at the moment, I've written about it a couple of times, is that the corporate

• 52:35Speaker 04

  bond markets are, you know, getting new wings attached to them and a new engine while they're flying along through the air and nobody is noticing what a big impact that has both on the corporate bond market in and of itself, but also the second round effect on government bond markets. And yet, so again, you know, where does that leave us if the AI trade does fall over? Not in a great place, I would argue, though it would free up more demand maybe for the government bonds. But, you know, when people talk about, oh, the AI trade is really dominant in stock markets, that is not even half the story. It's also super dominant in private markets, private equity, private credit and public corporate bond markets.

• 53:19Speaker 04

  It's bending everything out of whack.

• 53:21Ed Elson?

  Which to me is a very good reason to think very critically about the probability that the AI trade could fall over. And it does seem as though whenever we have this conversation, we have the conversation on this podcast a lot, because as you can tell, I think it's really important. But it seems like when we do have the conversation, what I hear from the AI bulls is, you know, you're missing out on the greatest thing of all time. Like, they think that it means that I'm shorting something. They think that it means that I'm just like this perma bear, which is not the case. But to me, it's just like, it's something that we have to care about and we have to get to the bottom of. You mentioned what we're seeing in the corporate bond market, also exclusive reporting from

• 54:03Ed Elson?

  the FT, which just came out today, which is that Anthropic and OpenAI are now having conversations with credit agencies about getting an investment-grade credit rating. And it sounds like their strategy is just to ask them nicely to give them a low rate, which to me is another red flag. I mean, it feels like this is extremely big deal and I almost wish, I'm surprised that people don't care enough about it. I know people care, but I feel like they should care more.

• 54:32Speaker 04

  I think it's not unusual for companies to talk to credit rating agencies in an effort to get those credit rating agencies to understand what they do in the hope they will give you a low rating. I, you know, I hear your point that it can look a little bit iffy from the outside. But again, you know, yes, you know, even if you think you're not a tech investor, you're a tech investor. If you've got any money in any market anywhere, whether that's through a pension or through allocations that you make to ETFs or whatever it is, you think of just how much of the S and P 500 is tech. You think of how much of emerging market stock indices are in tech and AI, you know, it's the entire Korean stock market, it's a large part of the Taiwanese stock market,

• 55:15Speaker 04

  it's a huge part of the Japanese stock market. Even if you think you're just buying an index because you want exposure to a certain country, you are buying an active tech fund. And so, yes, it's in everyone's interest to think carefully about what can go wrong here. I don't have the answer, you know, I'm not a tech pointy head, I don't know whether this technology makes sense, I don't know whether it is, you know, remunerative over time, whether people really will pay for this technology. But I do know this is like, to a large extent, the only game in town. And I was talking to a large asset management firm earlier that was saying that clients are coming to them and saying, I don't want to think about the world and countries anymore. I want to think about, okay, I've got my tech allocation over here and maybe that's

• 55:59Speaker 04

  a kind of pretty plain vanilla US national stock index. And I want exposure to things in the rest of the world that are not tech. So I want you to take the tech and AI, you know, out of that part of my portfolio. And guess what? You know, the UK and Europe look pretty good from that regard as diversifiers. So they're actually doing, you know, surprisingly well in this environment. But yeah, you know, the tech is just shot through absolutely everything at the moment. And if it were to go wrong, big if, I have no crystal ball, I don't know, but there's a lot of things that would go wrong at the same time.

• 56:39Scott Galloway?

  Looking at the bond market or the credit markets right now, do you feel like any one credit market is underpriced or overpriced?

• 56:47Speaker 04

  I just think there are some credit markets that have been traditionally really, really tiny, that are suddenly actually operating at scale. So the bad thing about the fact that the hyperscalers are kind of coming in and borrowing huge amounts of money in loads and loads of different currencies is that the hyperscalers are bossing around the rest of the borrowing markets for other companies, you know, that are domiciled in those smaller currencies. The good news is that the hyperscalers are demonstrating that you can borrow in size in little currencies, like, you know, little in corporate bond terms, like yen, sterling, Canadian dollar, Swiss franc. So actually, what they're doing is kind of offering this proof point that it can be

• 57:30Speaker 04

  done and that this is an area where there is the potential to borrow much more.

• 57:37Speaker 04

  In terms of which bits are overpriced, you know, again, it all comes back to the same question, which is, does it make sense to have such a large allocation to the AI story? And, you know, credit investors generally operate under stricter rules than stocks investors in terms of concentration they're allowed to have in one sector or another or one company or another. So it does throw up all sorts of kind of technical and complicated problems for credit investors. But yeah, we're all just sort of circling around that same question, which is, does this stuff make sense? And it is quite sort of gratifying to me, actually, that in corporate bond markets,

• 58:19Speaker 04

  you do get somewhat of a sort of stricter treatment from investors than you do in stocks. Stocks investors are like, sure, I'm sure this thing will go up, I'm going to buy it. Whereas credit investors ask some pretty awkward questions about, okay, where's the money coming from and how can this go wrong for me?

• 58:35Ed Elson?

  Just going to tariffs, just what I've said about the tariffs thus far, to me, the tariffs are like America's Brexit. It's like our way of throwing sand into the gears, as you said, for no real reason other than a sense of like patriotism, nationalism, we don't like those other countries, we prefer America, rah rah rah. And ultimately, in the case of Brexit, it led to basically economic stagnation, it basically ruined an entire country.

• 59:08Ed Elson?

  Do you see tariffs the same way? Do you think it could have those levels of effects?

• 59:13Speaker 04

  For the US?

• 59:15Ed Elson?

  Yes.

• 59:15Speaker 04

  The beauty of the US is that it is a massive and very closed economy. You can get along just fine without really anybody else. So it is somewhat different in that, you know, the UK, you know, don't tell the Brits, but it's a small island and we need like stuff from abroad. Whereas, you know, the US is in a much better situation, not least because of its shale oil to get by on its own. I think really the victim of the tariffs, and, you know, I know there's a school of thought among colleagues of mine who are much bigger specialists on trade than I am, like Alan Beatty and Samaya Keynes, that, you know, we've passed peak tariff, you know,

• 59:59Speaker 04

  we've gone past the point where, you know, Trump is like threatening and executing tariffs on anyone for any reason whatsoever. But yeah, this old line that he's taken since the payrolls report that happened, I've written down in front of me, lower the interest rate or I'll stop trading with countries with which we have a deficit.

• 1:00:21Speaker 04

  I'm really struggling to get my head around this one. Not sure how it makes sense for the US to shoot itself in the foot because it's because he doesn't like interest rates. Really struggling with this one. He's still fixated on it on some level. And I, you know, it's, it's interesting as well that one of the reasons why Scott Besant has been arguing that government bond yields are much higher is because the revenue, when the US isn't getting the revenue in from the trade tariffs anymore. You know, again, goes back to my first point, paint your own adventure. If you really want to argue that that's an input into higher yields. Not sure I get it, but be my guest. Um, so, uh, yeah, it, it, it's not helpful geopolitically.

• 1:01:05Speaker 04

  And it, uh, but I, I think, I just don't think the world takes Trump terribly seriously on threats of tariffs anymore.

• 1:01:13Ed Elson?

  You mentioned the midterm elections, um, and the fact that we're in a position where a rate hike is on the table, um, in the months leading up to the midterm elections and the politics and the drama around that. Um, it does seem to be a very good example of how politics really does matter in economics and in markets. I feel like sometimes we get criticism like, why are you talking about politics? I thought this was a market show. It's like, because the two are connected, they relate. In terms of the midterms, to what extent do you think that the midterm elections might have an impact on markets, might have an impact on, uh, the US economy?

• 1:01:55Ed Elson?

  Um, is, is it an important event in that regard? And what are you focusing on in the buildup?

• 1:02:02Speaker 04

  I think investors are, you know, from the notes that I read in the conversations that I have, they're just trying to start getting their head around what it would mean if there was a big tilt in power in Congress. And I don't think anybody really knows just yet. You know, a lot hinges on, you are going to do these elections, right? And it is all going to kind of be normal and you are going to respect results, you know, and, and, and, and, you know, there are some pretty kind of meaningful questions. But there is also an idea that, you know, the more that Trump is perceived as a, as a, you know, he should technically be, you know, a lame duck president.

• 1:02:43Speaker 04

  He should be getting towards the end of, of his position in, in the White House. Does that embolden aggressive regimes around the world to think, well, I'm going to get done all of the terrible stuff that I want to get done while this guy is still in the White House and I've only got like a year to do it. So does this ramp up the pressure on Taiwan is obviously the big one. Does this ramp up pressure still further on poor old Ukraine from, from the Russians? Um, so I think there's a possibility of, you know, depending on how cornered Trump feels after the midterms, and you would have much better insight into that than, than I would. It is possible that we get this kind of flurry of worrying geopolitical news that comes

• 1:03:26Speaker 04

  after it while people perceive that he, he really doesn't have long left in the job.

• 1:03:30Ed Elson?

  Just going into the, the second half of 2026, in your mind, what are the biggest, most important things, uh, to look at and to examine, um, in terms of their effect on global markets? I mean, just to list off a few things, there's the war in Iran, there's, uh, the Fed, Federal Reserve and the decision on interest rates. There's the IPOs, the incoming IPOs of Anthropic, which is supposedly going to happen at the end of the year. Um, potentially OpenAI, though they've started to push it out. I mean, what do you think is most critical?

• 1:04:08Speaker 04

  Because I'm like a sad macro person, I'm going to say that like a lot comes down to the credibility of the Federal Reserve and a lot comes down to the extent to which Walsh really is willing to demonstrate that he's an orthodox policymaker, even despite, you know, the, the Howells and Whales from what might be a somewhat kind of cornered US president. I think that is incredibly report important. I think if Walsh gets this wrong, then that will be another unhelpful factor for the bond markets. And, you know, heaven knows it is a bit of a mystery why equity markets have been ignoring debt markets, you know, up, up until this point. But if something really did snap, then, uh, then I think we'd all have something to worry

• 1:04:53Speaker 04

  about. So I think keep a close eye on, on what Walsh says and much more importantly, does in the months ahead.

• 1:05:00Scott Galloway?

  I was shocked to see that Cal she has the likelihood of a rate increase at 74% by the end of the year because I thought it's like biting or performing surgery on the hand that writes your check. And then as I think about it, it's a 12 year appointment from a president who can't remove him, at least legally. And quite frankly, at some point, worse probably goes, hunting badger, don't give a shit. Like, uh, this is my opportunity for a profile and courage, and this is a guy who can't remove me. And then it's all of a sudden a rate hike started making sense to me, whereas I thought of it as unthinkable just a week ago. What do you think? Do you think we see a rate hike before the end of the year?

• 1:05:42Speaker 04

  I do, yeah. Whether, whether it's, you know, next week, you know, whether it comes in September, I don't know, but I think there will be something before the end of the year. If you carry on with inflation being sticky, we've got a big CPI report coming up from the States in, in a few days. If inflation stays sticky and payrolls keep doing what they're doing, I don't see how Walsh has a choice. You know, he, he has to stick to the script because we've seen how unhelpful it is when, when he doesn't.

• 1:06:10Ed Elson?

  You mentioned earlier, Katie, that Walsh needs to get this right or he can't get it wrong. What would getting it wrong look like?

• 1:06:18Speaker 04

  I think it would look like another quite explicit acceptance from Walsh that it's fine if bond yields keep pushing higher. You know, that, that I think was a bit of a misstep. Um, and, you know, if, if he keeps signaling that, you know, actually I'm very happy for the market to do my job for me and I, and I want yields to be much higher, then they'll push higher because, you know, Walsh, like, you know, he used this analogy that, you know, I, I don't want to be a player on the pitch. I want to be a referee. Tough, you're a player, so play properly.

• 1:06:52Ed Elson?

  Do you see the merit? Cause part of me almost likes where he's coming from, which is like, I'm, I'm not, I don't, I want to intervene as little as possible. I want the markets to do their thing, uh, and I don't want people to be, I don't want to game anything. And I, I see your point, but do you see those merits? Like what, where do you find it problematic?

• 1:07:15Speaker 04

  There's absolutely merits in, in that. And I'm not suggesting that the Fed has been a perfect institution over the past sort of decade or so. What I am saying is that, again, you need that dialogue and trust and predictability in situations where something bad happens, whether that's a recession, reshock or an inflation reshock. You, investors need to know where the Fed is. And if they really don't know where the Fed is, then the only thing they can price is not knowing. And that means just not buying so many treasuries, you know, buying something else instead. Um, because, you know, the, then you don't have the US currency risk and you don't have the US institutional risk.

• 1:07:56Speaker 04

  So I think one thing that is, would be helpful to US policymakers is a more kind of explicit acceptance that, uh, investors don't have to buy these bonds, you know? Up, up till now, there's been no efforts to put a gun to the head and make them buy them, that we don't have any kind of particular kind of efforts at financial repression right now.

• 1:08:15Ed Elson?

  So except for when the president threatened military intervention in the bond markets, except for that.

• 1:08:20Speaker 04

  That was good. I did, I did enjoy that. That was great. You know, we will, we will fight them at the discount window. Um, there is a choice. Investors have a choice about where they put their money. And this is something that governments in the UK and France and Japan and everywhere else have got to take much more seriously.

• 1:08:38Ed Elson?

  Katie Martin is a markets columnist and member of the Financial Times editorial board. She writes the weekly long view column on market trends and appears weekly on the unhedged podcast. Previously, she spent four years as the F T's markets editor and also several years on the F T's live news service. Prior to joining the F T in 2015, she spent 11 years at the Dow Jones Wall Street Journal Group. Katie, always love having you.

• 1:09:01Speaker 04

  Pleasure.

• 1:09:01Ed Elson?

  Thanks, Katie.

• 1:09:04Ed Elson?

  This episode was produced by Claire Miller and Alison Weiss and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our video editor is Jorge Carty. Our research team is Dan Chalan, Chris No Donahue and Mia Solverio. Jake McPherson is our social producer. Drew Burrows is our technical director and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer. Thank you for listening to Property Markets from Property Media. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow and join us for a fresh take on markets on Monday.