S1E19: The Skeptic Who Couldn’t Debunk The Telepathy Tapes | Talk Tracks

In this episode of The Talk Tracks, we meet Becca Cramer—nuclear engineer, mother of two, and self-proclaimed skeptic—who set out to disprove the claims made in The Telepathy Tapes. What began as a rigorous attempt to debunk the series transformed into a months-long investigation that challenged her worldview. Motivated by scientific integrity, Becca combed through over 100 peer-reviewed studies, interviewed experts across fields, and meticulously examined the most common criticisms, including the infamous “ideomotor effect” or "oujia board" effect. But as she dug deeper, she found that many long-held assumptions about spelling, communication, and telepathy didn’t hold up under scrutiny. In a conversation with Telepathy Tapes coordinator Katherine Ellis, Becca shares the “aha” moments that shifted her thinking, the flawed science behind Clever Hans-style dismissals, and how the skepticism that fueled her investigation ultimately opened the door to a more expansive truth. This episode is a powerful reminder: true skepticism isn’t about cynicism—it’s about inquiry, curiosity, and the willingness to evolve in the face of new evidence. _______ Join The Telepathy Tapes Backstage Pass https://thetelepathytapes.supercast.com/ to get ad-free episodes, never-before-heard interviews, behind-the-scenes documentary footage, and access to our private Discord community. This is your invitation to come closer. To help shape what’s next. To be more than a listener… to be a co-creator of this paradigm shift. So if you’ve felt moved, if you’ve felt seen, if you’ve felt the call, subscribe today and join us: thetelepathytapes.com. https://thetelepathytapes.com/ See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Ky Dickens?

  By now, you know we're big fans of energy healing here at the Telepathy Tapes. And in particular, we're big fans of Luminara. We've talked about the science, the stories, the results for a year now. Luminara.Care is the best platform for energy work and makes it easy to experience energy healing from your own home. Every practitioner is vetted by Luminara, so you're not guessing about credentials. And Luminara is currently working with researchers at Florida State University to study the science behind energy healing even further. It's exciting to see this practice becoming validated by science and data by the day. I booked a Luminara session, and what surprised me most was how grounded and tangible the experience felt. I noticed a deep sense of calm afterward, better sleep, and a real softening of tension in my body. Luminara is HIPAA compliant, and I appreciate how safe, supported, and approachable they're making this kind of healing. The sessions are private, personalized, and gives you access to gifted healers from

• 0:45Ky Dickens?

  all over the world. Whether you're looking for support with stress, pain, sleep challenges, mood shifts, hormone changes, digestive issues, emotional well-being, or you're simply ready to operate at a higher level, the benefits are real. If you're already a believer like we are, and you're finally ready to try it for yourself, Luminara is offering 10% off your first session for Telepathy Tapes listeners. Just go to luminara.care. That's luminara.care and use code TAPES10 at checkout for 10% off your first session. Life is all about making decisions. Sometimes you make questionable ones, like buying a new TV that's too big for the wall because the electronics store employee was a little too good at their job. Then sometimes you make great ones, like protecting your home and auto with Progressive. You get customized coverage options, so you can be sure you have the right coverage

• 1:27Ky Dickens?

  for you, along with 24/7 claim support and great customer service. So when you think about it, that's like four great decisions. That more than makes up for the TV debacle. Get your quote today at progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states.

• 1:44Ky Dickens?

  Hi, everyone. I'm Kai Dickens, and I'm thrilled to welcome you to the Talk Tracks. In this series, we dive deeper into the revelations, challenges, and unexpected truths from the Telepathy Tapes. The goal is to explore all the threads that weave together our understanding of reality, science, spirituality, and yes, even unexplained things like psi abilities. If you haven't yet listened to season one of the Telepathy Tapes, I encourage you to start there. It lays the foundation for everything we'll be exploring in this journey. We'll feature conversations with groundbreaking researchers, thinkers, non-speakers, and experiencers who illuminate the extraordinary connections that may defy explanation today but won't for long.

• 2:28Ky Dickens?

  Becca Cramer is a nuclear engineer by training, a writer, and a mother of two. She first reached out to our team because, in her own words, "she was on a mission to disprove the claims made in the telepathy tapes." What began as a skeptical deep dive turned into something much more complicated and much more human. Motivated by her scientific instincts and intellectual honesty, Becca set out to fact-check every aspect of season one. She read over 100 peer-reviewed studies, spoke with experts across multiple fields, and carefully analyzed everything from the eye-tracking data to the scientific foundation behind the idiomotor or Ouija board effect that some people like to point to when they try to invalidate spelling and therefore disprove the telepathy. Her intention, though, was not to validate.

• 3:13Ky Dickens?

  It was to find flaws. But what she found challenged many of her assumptions. I thought it was critical to feature her on the talk tracks because she did the legwork that I was hoping many journalists would have done by now. Many professional journalists, who I truly believe want to do a good job, keep pointing to old arguments about spelling that just don't hold up. It takes someone to go through this history, page by page, to understand all the nuances and complexities to end up where Becca did. Katherine Ellis, our series coordinator, sat down with Becca to unpack what this journey was like: to be confronted with evidence you don't expect, how science sometimes fails to ask the right questions, and why some phenomena may not be explainable by the frameworks we've relied on.

• 3:57Ky Dickens?

  This conversation is a reminder that skepticism, when paired with humility and openness, can become a bridge to the truth. All right, Catherine, take it away.

• 4:07Speaker 01

  Becca, thank you so much for doing this and being on the podcast. I would love it if you could just briefly introduce yourself and give us a little bit of your background.

• 4:16Speaker 02

  Absolutely. Hi, I'm Becca Cramer, actually an engineer, nuclear engineer by training. But right now, I'm a mom of two little kids and a writer. So I was actually doing research for a book, and that's kind of how I stumbled into all of this.

• 4:35Speaker 01

  So Becca hears the telepathy tapes and she becomes obsessed with reconciling the unbelievable claims she was hearing with the concrete world. And she really, really dove into the research in many ways. It was like she was doing an extensive fact checking on Kai and the families.

• 4:51Speaker 02

  So it's been several months in the work, over a hundred peer reviewed studies, read several books. I've talked to several experts in different industries. It's been quite the journey. So for me, I'm such a diehard skeptic and truth be told, like annoying atheist. It was kind of how I came into this. But I have been working on that side of myself.

• 5:20Speaker 01

  I think your first email was like, I listened to the telepathy tapes and I couldn't stop thinking that I need to prove it wrong.

• 5:28Speaker 02

  I was feeling really inspired by the tapes. And I remember thinking, how has this not been like on CNN? Like we've proven fricking telepathy people? How is this not just what everyone's talking about? It's all I could to talk about. I mean, I was recommending the podcast to everyone. Like this is the most clear cut, you know, captured footage of any kind of sci phenomena that I'd ever heard of. So I was so interested. So when I hadn't seen it, I just hadn't really thought much about it. And then I saw that it had been, you know, widely debunked by specialists and was just shocked, but it'd been a couple of months since I had listened to it.

• 6:13Speaker 02

  So I was like, okay, maybe, maybe I just was really wanting something to be out there, but I couldn't, I couldn't move past it. So I re listened to the tapes.

• 6:27Speaker 02

  The re-listening was such a different experience after reading what experts were saying. And since it's audio only, you don't see them communicating. So you don't know how, I mean, crazy it is to say that they're communicating through their parents. So it just seemed, it was heartbreaking and I was almost gonna turn it off. And then I hear Katie mention how Houston always finds what she hides. Physically, he goes and finds it. And I was like, that has nothing to do with how they're communicating. There's just like little crumbs. So I kept listening. It's just little crumbs like that.

• 7:08Speaker 02

  And then I, you know, you know, get my engineering hat on and I take notes, listen to the whole thing, watch the videos. And yeah, seeing Akil reading his mother's mind, Manisha, from the other room. There's no, there's no way. And I was like, couldn't believe too, that experts were aware of this. And we're still saying there's a perfectly reasonable scientific explanation for how this is occurring. So I was like, all right, I'm gonna prove Akil's not reading his mother's mind. And that's kind of what I set out to do. That's how it started. And then it just kind of,

• 7:53Speaker 02

  it was so bizarre. It was like, I would kind of get discouraged and I almost say, you know, okay, and then some big aha thing would happen. There's a few things that I uncovered.

• 8:07Ky Dickens?

  One of my favorite things about the holidays is having an excuse to slow down, curl up on the couch and get cozy. And lately, everyone in our house has been fighting over our Lola blankets. If you haven't felt one, they're ridiculously soft. They're made with this luxurious faux fur that has just the right amount of stretch. And our rescue dogs, Remy and Rue, have decided that the blankets belong to them. Which is why I love that Lola now makes an entire collection just for pets. They have blankets, beds and pads, all designed with that same incredible softness. Their pet bed, even- Even has an orthopedic foam base and a removable, machine washable cover. So for someone with a house full of animals and kids, I appreciate that the regular blankets are machine washable, too. And they make such great holiday gifts because they're something people will actually use and love.

• 8:50Ky Dickens?

  And if you're shopping for someone who treats their dog like another member of their family, Lola has you covered there, too. For a limited time, our listeners can get 35% off select Lola Blanket products with code TAPES at checkout. Just head to LolaBlankets.com and use code TAPES to get 35% off your order. After you purchase, they'll ask where you heard about them. Please support our show and let them know we sent you. Wrap yourself in luxury with Lola Blankets. Around 3 o'clock each day, I'm ready for a little treat. And I'm definitely one of those salty and sweet people. And one of my absolute favorite flavors is salted caramel. And salt seems like such a small thing, but it brings the whole flavor to life. Suddenly, something sweet becomes so much more interesting. And that's why I'm so excited to try Kachava's new salted caramel flavor. Kachava is already part of my afternoon routine, so this sounds like a delicious way to mix

• 9:35Ky Dickens?

  things up. Caramel with that little salty edge. And Kachava brings more than flavor. Just two scoops provides plant-based protein, fiber, greens, and so much more in one simple shake. There are no artificial flavors, colors, or sweeteners, and no preservatives. It's a way to satisfy that craving for something delicious while supporting whole-body nutrition. And there are so many flavors to choose from. Chocolate, vanilla, chai, matcha, coconut acai, strawberry, and coffee. I love having something to look forward to in the middle of a busy day that also helps me take care of myself. So embrace your own salty side. Go to kachava.com and use code TAPES for 15% off your first order. That's Kachava, K-A-C-H-A-V-A dot com, code TAPES.

• 10:16Speaker 01

  And what were the big aha things along the way?

• 10:20Speaker 02

  I'm gonna tell you a story about a horse.

• 10:22Speaker 01

  Okay, great.

• 10:23Speaker 02

  This famous horse from 1904, its name's Clever Hans. And Clever Hans was discovered to be an intelligent horse who could also read people's minds. So he would, people would travel from all over the world to meet Clever Hans and ask him, how old am I? Or what year was I born? Or mathematical questions, truth or false questions. Scientists came to study him, and the owner was like, please, like, my horse, he was just as convinced as anyone. After extensive studying, they find that clever Hans, the way he communicates is he taps with his hoof.

• 11:07Speaker 02

  So you say, how, how, so I'd go, how old is my son? And he would tap six times. What you don't realize, the questioner makes some subtle movement. Once you tap the right answer. So, you know, he tapped six, I would slightly lean back. Clever Hans is a clever horse. He'd stop tapping and he's right. And they definitely confirmed that and they coined this the idiomotor effect. Idiomotor effect, that is like turned into, I think, like sci phenomena's worst enemy. Because idiomotor effect has been assumed to be capable of, I believe, much, much more than it's truly capable of.

• 11:49Speaker 02

  Um, so that movement is kind of what led clever Hans to be mislabeled as intelligent. What's interesting is the current research now, like disproving spelling, still mentions clever Hans. It still mentions idiomotor effect. So I learned that that is the primary explanation for how non-speakers are being controlled by the facilitator. Somehow the facilitator's subconsciously cueing them to select the letters. But there's this big gap that occurs to what's actually humanly possible.

• 12:34Speaker 02

  And I wanted to understand that. How can researchers be so convinced of this idiomotor effect? This isn't even terribly important, but the main study they reference. This Kazuka study out of Japan was like 1997.

• 12:52Speaker 01

  Mm hmm.

• 12:53Speaker 02

  Um, but since I have a physics background, I could figure out that the way the study was set up is terribly flawed. They really simplified their measurements, almost with confirmation bias to kind of get the results they were looking for. But regardless, so that mean, that doesn't even need to make sense because regardless of that, just this cueing theory that they're somehow being cued. It doesn't, it doesn't hold up when you really dig into it.

• 13:26Speaker 02

  So for the cueing theory, I think clever Hans tapping and you lean back when he said the right answer.

• 13:33Speaker 01

  Mm hmm. Why can't that be true about the non-speakers?

• 13:36Speaker 02

  Wow. So technically, it could if the non-speaker is scanning every option. So imagine you're the non-speaker, just you, you know, I would use my keyboard right in front of me. If I'm trying to guess what someone wants me to select, I would have to scan each letter and then you sense maybe a shift in pressure, an exhale, whatever. It's a little convoluted, but let's just hypothetically say that that's possible. You would need to at least be closest to that letter to select it if you're just guessing,

• 14:17Speaker 02

  which is what they're claiming is happening. So I see that, or I, you know, start to really figure that out. But then I see these proficient spellers, you've seen them. I don't know if I've seen any do that level of scanning. You know, occasionally they have to sort of get their finger oriented, but I've never seen just pure scanning in that, in that way to where it would even make cueing possible. So I even kind of dug into it and all my plans to write this up. But if you look into information theory, you really can only transfer one bit of information with a cue, regardless of what that information is, if

• 15:00Speaker 02

  it's to select or move a little over or down, whatever, one bit. To get them to a letter, it would require five bits of information. That's just impossible. That's like superhuman, superhuman cueing and superhuman sensing.

• 15:19Speaker 01

  Mm hmm.

• 15:20Speaker 02

  But why are scientists so comfortable with these assumptions? And that's what really kept me coming back. Like if, if this is true, idiomotor effect is the most fascinating thing happening in science right now, because that's Crazy.

• 15:38Speaker 01

  Right.

• 15:38Speaker 02

  So that's kind of where I had my other eureka moment. So this is while I was in a down moment, thinking, maybe this isn't happening. And I'm trying to learn more just about spellers in general. And I watch the documentary, Tell Them You Love Me. Dare you familiar?

• 15:59Speaker 01

  Yeah, I've seen it.

• 16:00Speaker 02

  What this led me to find is they show footage of the test that they use to prove that communication's invalid.

• 16:09Speaker 01

  With the double blind.

• 16:10Speaker 02

  Yes. So they're the double blind, they call message passing tests. And it's this young girl, Betsy, and her partner, they're sitting on a couch next to each other. But Betsy appears calm. And the facilitator next to her is not touching her, not controlling her arm or her hand. And they're using a letter board. They show Betsy and the facilitator a picture of a key. And Betsy, on her own, points to the letters K E Y, spells key. But then they show, they show them a picture. I can't remember what the pictures are, but assume the facilitator sees a dog. Betsy sees a cat.

• 16:54Speaker 02

  Betsy writes D O G. She writes dog. She writes what the facilitator saw. But watching it, you know, watching it on the film, Betsy, one, is barely even looking at the board. Which, after hearing Akil say that he can see through his mother's eyes, made a little more sense. What if she's using telepathy? And that's how she can so effectively type what her facilitator sees? And that would make sense. So then it was like, holy, holy crap, what's happening? So I just start going through all the studies. There's like 40, like almost exactly 40 studies analyzing.

• 17:37Speaker 02

  They're considered the robust studies of facilitated communication because they include these double-blind tests, these message-passing tests. All of these message-passing tests involve showing the facilitator something or asking the facilitator something, and then asking the non-speaker something else. It's actually like a perfect test for telepathy, you could argue. So I was like. Oh, well, that's not gonna help me disprove Akil reading his mom's mind. So I was like, I can't use any of that in this research. So I had to stick with it. And honestly, it was the figuring that out.

• 18:19Speaker 02

  And then that's kind of when I got into like the neuroscience of it as well. It's called psychophysics. And there's this, there's this study of reaction times and, you know, the thresholds of perception, human limits of detecting stimuli. This is a whole science. The people claiming idiomotor effect is happening are not psychophysicists. There's speech and language pathologists who are like, this is crazy. There's no way someone could just start spelling like this. So they just pick the first answer they're even familiar with, which is idiomotor effect, which I completely get.

• 19:01Speaker 02

  I totally understand why scientists have made these conclusions. I don't think it's been negligence or ill will. I think that it's just the perfect storm of, you know, misinterpretation. And then, of course, a completely new phenomenon possibly that was causing lots of false negative tests that gave us a lot more confidence in idiomotor effect. So it's all just kind of wild.

• 19:29Speaker 01

  Right, yeah. I appreciate what you're saying about why scientists have come to the conclusions they've come to. I mean, it's certainly easy to explain this with the idiomotor and sort of just leave it at that. But what's great is that there are also scientists who are digging deeper than that conclusion and are interested in exploring the fact that this form of communication is in fact authored by the non-speaker and valid. I think that's interesting, what you said, that the idiomotor effect could really only account for one, one aspect of cueing. Like, it couldn't be five different things at once.

• 20:08Ky Dickens?

  There's nothing quite like having pieces in your closet that you love and know you can count on for any occasion, except maybe giving someone else that same feeling. This holiday season, Quince is where I'm finding those pieces. Quince makes elevated everyday essentials using premium materials like Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton, and premium stretch denim. Quince also has gifts that keep giving all season long, like their high-quality down outerwear and cozy cashmere gloves and scarves. Everything at Quince is priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen, so you can give luxury-quality pieces without the luxury price tag. My closet is stacked with their clothes, but recently I've discovered their jewelry, and I love their 14-karat gold diamond bezel station bracelet. It's beautiful

• 20:51Ky Dickens?

  and slight, and more than 50% off what you'd pay retail. And when it comes to gifting, Quince has a lot more than clothing. Think leather bags, hotel-quality bedding, chef-grade cookware, and five-star luggage. Basically, plenty of ways to find something special for everyone on your list. Give the gift of quality this season. Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers, or go to quince.com. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns, now available in Canada and the UK, too. And when Quince asks where you heard about them, let them know it was The Telepathy Tapes. It's the best way to support our show. This episode of The Telepathy Tapes is brought to you by Alloy Health. Here's something we don't hear enough about. The skin changes that show up in your 40s can be hormonal. Estrogen helps maintain collagen, support elasticity, and keep skin hydrated. As it

• 21:35Ky Dickens?

  declines, skin can become thinner, drier, and more sensitive. What I appreciate about Alloy is that they're paying attention to those changes and giving women options designed with this stage of life in mind. You've heard me talk about M4 skincare from Alloy, made specifically for estrogen-deficient skin. Now they've added two new prescription treatments. Copper Peptide Cream RX is made for women in perimenopause and beyond. It helps smooth the skin on your face and neck, improve firmness, and visibly reduce redness and flushing. Their Hyperpigmentation Treatment RX is a three-in-one cream for your face and chest. It helps fade dark spots, sunspots, and uneven patches by targeting overactive pigment cells while leaving your normal skin tone alone. You start with a simple online form. A physician reviews your information and prescribes what is right for your Skin. Once approved, your prescription ships straight to your door.

• 22:20Ky Dickens?

  No pharmacy. It is truly amazing and has changed my life. Try Alloy's new prescription treatments, Copper Peptide Cream RX and Hyperpigmentation Treatment RX, or add them to your M4 routine. Head to myalloy.com and use the code TAPES to get 20% off your first order. Your menopause specialized doctor will help you build a skincare plan for your needs. Plus, you get $0 unlimited messaging with your doctor. Head to myalloy.com and use code TAPES to get 20% off your first order. This code is valid on products only. These are compounded products, not subject to FDA approval. You know those little things that keep getting pushed to the bottom of your to-do list? If getting new glasses is one of them, ZENI makes it easy. I have so many pairs of glasses, sunglasses, readers, transition lenses, and all of them are prescription.

• 23:05Ky Dickens?

  I love having different options for whatever I'm doing. And honestly, I couldn't have all these pairs if it weren't for ZENI. ZENI is an online eyewear shop with stylish prescription glasses and customizable lens options with frames starting at under $30. Typically, a pair of glasses can cost a few hundred dollars, and when you add on special features, it skyrockets above that. With virtual try-on, you can see how frames look before you order. Just find a pair you love, enter your prescription, customize your lenses, and have them shipped right to your door. Check new glasses off your list today with ZENI. Go to zeni.com/podcast and use code PODCAST15 for 15% off plus free shipping over $65. Sales sell out, so don't wait. That's z-e-n-n-i.com/podcast, promo code PODCAST15.

• 23:50Ky Dickens?

  ZENI.com/podcast, code PODCAST15.

• 23:56Speaker 01

  So, keeping that in mind, what would be a good way to test this to eliminate that sort of, that thought?

• 24:06Speaker 02

  Yeah, I think, you know, we could do more measurements, like perhaps have EMGs attached to muscles and just evaluate muscle movement between pairs. I think you could reduce sensory potentials. So, you know, like a keel, if, you know, maybe sound. But even then, you only can cue in one way. Their finger has to be by the letter. So, you can really show a cue cannot contain specific letter information.

• 24:46Speaker 02

  It's just, that's just not possible. I wonder if you could study that at like, how far would their finger need to be from the board before they make a selection to ensure it's not idiomotor. But to be frank, we have not ever proved that the idiomotor effect is responsible for failed message passing tests. We've never proved that. We have failed message passing tests. We know idiomotor effect is a thing. We assume it's idiomotor effect. But that's what I was surprised by. That was like the Kazuka study out of Japan that was poorly

• 25:29Speaker 02

  designed. That's what it was attempting to do to show it was actually, you know, the idiomotor effect. They didn't provide the muscle measurements and they used a strain gauge that didn't even tell you what direction the forces, who the force was coming from. And then it cherry picked its data at the end. So it was flawed in multiple ways. But so yeah, it's like, one, we haven't even actually confirmed. A false message passing test does not mean idiomotor effect. That's just, that was just the reasonable explanation at the time. And that was given, you know, when they thought they were overtly controlling their arms, like you said, with facilitated

• 26:11Speaker 02

  communication. And what I learned through the debunkings to experts, scientists, researchers, spelling is facilitated communication to them because it involves a communication partner, which they consider a facilitator. And that's when I learned, like, these message passing tests, I mean, they've been anointed the gold standard. And until a method can pass one of these message passing tests, researchers almost feel like they're able to just turn their heads. Did you pass the message pass? Oh, no message passing test? Okay, nope. And I don't need to speculate why one hasn't been passed yet.

• 26:54Speaker 02

  But you can make a really strong case for regardless of passing this test or not, for reasons we don't understand, it's just not reasonably possible to

• 27:06Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 27:06Speaker 02

  to control the letter selection in the way they're claiming. It just isn't. And I think that's why you have so many families now that are maybe even losing a little faith in in the scientific process because they're like, it's right here. It's right in front of you. How, how can you tell me this is explained that we know what this is like that? But I get it because they have 40 studies seemingly explaining it. But if you really dig in, they're not, they're not explaining it at all. They're just

• 27:41Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 27:41Speaker 02

  failing.

• 27:43Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 27:43Speaker 02

  So.

• 27:44Speaker 01

  What, can you explain what you mean by a message passing test?

• 27:47Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 27:47Speaker 01

  What is that exactly?

• 27:48Speaker 02

  Yeah, you know, for most, for rigorous scientific studies, you gotta have a double blind, the, which essentially means the, the, I'm going to say communication partner. The communication partner and the non-speaker have to be blinded to what the other is seeing. They can't know what the question is to either or. They can design these studies where they're still sitting next to each other. It's still respectful. It's, you know, that I know that is possible. But they'll do these studies and they'll show the partner, let's say, one image. They'll show the partner a dog and then they'll show the non-speaker a cat.

• 28:32Speaker 02

  And there's no published studies of the non-speaker, you know, saying the answer is cat. There may be a miscommunication or something where they will answer the non-speaker. They'll answer what the facilitator was asked.

• 28:48Speaker 01

  Yeah, I am interested in knowing what is told to the non-speaker before starting that test. Do they know that they're supposed to be typing out what they're shown?

• 28:58Speaker 02

  That's a really good question. Like, how is it, and I'm, and I know there's been so many that there's probably different ways. And then you have to wonder, like, well, are they, is there a gotcha moment? Or, you know, wording is so critical. And also the stress of, you know, being, one, knowing your intelligence is being dismissed and tested, you know, that I can only imagine how that could affect the results as well.

• 29:31Speaker 01

  Yeah, yeah, I would love to know that information. And then I think it's also a lot of people with autism, whether they're verbal or not, have issues with regulation. And I think being in these settings where, number one, you can feel that the energy of the person doing the test is sort of this gotcha, or I'm gonna prove you wrong, is never an environment where someone can thrive. I mean, I always compare it to like, you know, when I used to play sports, it's like, playing at your opponent's home is always more difficult because you have a crowd full of people discouraging you and not wanting

• 30:12Speaker 01

  you to succeed. And then when you play at your home, it's a crowd of people who support you and believe in you. And you always, that, that really affects you and, and changes the way you perform. And then to be in a body that you don't feel connected with, that's easy to be dysregulated, you're in a strange environment, you're with people you don't know, the only person you know is your communicator who you trust, I can see why that might not be the best way to test somebody on something like this. So I would love to see tests done where, instead of trying to have them conform to the way we function, maybe we go and meet them where they are. And have them explain it to us because after spending

• 30:55Speaker 01

  time with this population, it is so obvious to, I mean, anybody who spends, spend a whole day with someone who's nonverbal and you will not walk out of it going, ah, there's nobody in there. They don't know what's going on. It's so obvious that they're in there, that they understand everything happening. You know, just my personal experience watching people spell from, you know, we've started shooting the documentary and I've seen some of the non-speakers who were mentioned in season one, and I watch them move their eyes to the next letter that they want to tap on the letterboard. Now, how is that someone else telling them what to do? I see them motor planning. Oh, I want to go for the I, I'm going to look to the upper right.

• 31:38Speaker 01

  Now I'm gonna, I want the A and I'm looking to the left down before my finger even goes there. That could be something that's studied, like can we track their eyes? Can we, you know? I do think there hasn't been enough taken into consideration.

• 31:54Speaker 02

  Absolutely. I'm glad you mentioned that, the eye tracking study. That's Dr. Joswell's work and he, it's interesting because I read them, those studies and they're, they're excellent. They are rigorous, they're peer reviewed, they are not included in these decisions of whether or not to allow it because they don't include a message passing test. And I've even gotten to speak with a researcher that doesn't believe in spelling, doesn't accept the pro spelling research. And they're a speech language pathologist and have more than one reason to think seemingly miraculous, but

• 32:38Speaker 02

  this eye tracking study is so, it's so critical. Because when we get into talking about what the human brain is able, like cueing, you know, what the human brain is able to sense. And then move toward. The eye tracking study really does show unless the partner is just literally putting the board in front of the finger, you know, just overtly controlling the communication, which would be so obvious.

• 33:08Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 33:08Speaker 02

  You know, the only, there's no way to cue, like we said, the specific letter or even a location on the board. It's just, it's not possible. So it feels like a little bit of a bad faith argument. When I see reasons for what could be happening that make more sense, and the reasons, interesting though, because the reasons given, they all, they make sense. They add up individually. But then when you're in the reality of it and you're viewing it from as a whole picture, it is not possible. So it's like these little individual parts are technically possible.

• 33:51Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 33:52Speaker 02

  But it's what is being claimed with a proficient speller, with a keel, the speed he goes to each letter. I watched one video that was actually getting debunked on YouTube. And I'm watching this video and he's going quickly, like less than a second to each letter. And then maybe he has to hover a second to kind of gain control and then he selects. And because Manisha's in the shot, just kind of slightly moving, they're like, see, she's controlling the communication. And then the key here is, that's not a bad

• 34:31Speaker 02

  faith argument. There, it's just based on studies that could very well have been impacted by consciousness sharing. Because there are many, many studies out there that show.

• 34:46Speaker 02

  A non-speaker can spell what their communication partner sees when they're not touching. And so since that has been, that is on the record in many scientific papers. Two people sitting side by side, they're not touching. The one person can spell what the other person is looking at. That's freaky. They never thought, oh, maybe it's something else, guys. They go, oh, no, it's idiomotor effect. Cause they were comfortable with idiomotor effect. We studied it. They just, it just makes, they just never, I mean, it brings in like five different disciplines in science, you know?

• 35:31Speaker 02

  We've got physics and psychophysics and neuroscience and a little engineering. And so it's convoluted for sure.

• 35:39Speaker 01

  And that's what's so cool. And a little bit what frustrates me is that why can't we be more comfortable with not fully understanding something instead of just quickly slapping on something that, like you said, feels comfortable or is an easy conclusion to draw? Because to me, the study of science and math, you know, when someone is interested in that, I always think, oh my gosh, there's so much I don't know. And there's so much about the world that I want to learn and explore. And I think that's how science came to be in general. So why as scientists or experts are we not more open to a possibility? Instead of just quickly dismissing it or not wanting to look into it?

• 36:24Speaker 02

  That was really something that's been kind of eating at me is like, how is this happening? And I've learned that I really, you really have to separate it out. Because there's two different, there's two different claims being made. And they're both, they both involve a lot of different science and they're tricky. The one claim is telepathy is possible, which is a lot for a researcher to, to consider. So they're going to go for the first explanation so that that is not happening. Because it's, I mean, it's the biggest paradigm shift of our. Ever, ever? I mean, it's crazy. It's why I'm obsessed with this. It's nuts.

• 37:08Speaker 01

  Yeah, yeah.

• 37:09Speaker 02

  But so they, you know, to shift that, it's like, of course, you're going to cognitively choose idiomotor effect. You're going to land there. It's a way more comfortable place to land, I think, for researchers. It's been studied. It's all the reasons I gave. And you can just land there and move on. And that's what all the debunking articles have done. They're just landing there. And I'm, that's why I'm so shocked. No one has dug in more. Like, we're all just okay with this idiom root? Like, I keep, like, the emperor has no clothes, you guys. This is nuts. So I think, you know, we start there, but to get

• 37:49Speaker 02

  back to like, how, why can't, you know, why don't we be open? These, these recommendations to not use spelling are coming from major scientific bodies that set the standards for education. And the truth is, there are education methods out there that don't work and that are even harmful. It's just unfortunate, but it's true. And so we have science and these bodies of researchers to help us determine what actually works, what's safe. You know, I don't want my kid being tested out on some weird method that doesn't work or could

• 38:30Speaker 02

  actually hurt them. When you provide it to the masses, it needs to be vetted and understood. And so there's this, you know, expectation of using, they call it evidence-based methods in teaching. And since, you know, all the FC studies and the lack of double-blind studies for spelling, they claim it's not evidence-based. And I totally get it. They believe it's dangerous. Because when this all started in the 90s, facilitated communication, there were a lot of Abuse allegations. And what's heartbreaking is, you know, looking back, that's not surprising. It's an extremely vulnerable population.

• 39:14Speaker 02

  And they used these message passing tests to determine whether or not these non-speakers' words were valid. And what if they were connecting to some, I don't know, something else, telepathy? There's just, that's what we call it because it's what we're familiar with. Their words could have been valid. So that broke my heart to even consider. But that being used as the sole reason why this is dangerous, this is harmful. Don't use this as a parent because you could harm your family. That, to me, seems unacceptable. So looking at Vermont, they have guidelines in place for if any kind of allegation comes up,

• 39:58Speaker 02

  you just get an independent facilitator, an independent communication partner, and you can validate claims. Done. If that's the only thing, keeping it, you know, to claim it's not safe. You know, it's the whole, um, the least harm principle in medicine and education. You know, you have to make the least harmful assumption above all else, above evidence-based, least harmful assumption. And from what I can see, and I, I don't want to get too like, this is not my area, but I would love to help others that, man, it sure looks like, from where I'm sitting, the evidence is inconclusive

• 40:43Speaker 02

  at least.

• 40:45Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 40:45Speaker 02

  And if we can deem it inconclusive, then I think, once, once it's all out there, I mean, this could be a serious human rights violation to not consider this and to not act immediately. If there is any chance this is what's happening, you know, copy Vermont, put a, you know, put protection in place, get some guidelines down, but let these non-speakers communicate. And then go study more. Go learn more. Who knows? But it feels like they're requiring them to provide, make it evidence-based, when to me, it's like,

• 41:27Speaker 02

  No, no. If there is any chance this is what's happening, we ethically are responsible to allow it. And right now, not only are we not allowing it, we're penalizing it. I get it. Again, like, no one's purposely being harmful. I think everyone in this space really believes they're protecting these people and doing what's best.

• 41:52Speaker 01

  Absolutely.

• 41:54Speaker 02

  And I think Akil and everyone in the telepathy tapes was so brave to come out because not only are they in a fringe group of spellers, they're in a fringe, fringe group of spellers boldly claiming telepathy. Because telepathy has always been the thing that would push a speller back into darkness to, no, we don't, don't talk about telepathy because the message passing test, a failed message passing test looks just like telepathy. And so I get why there's, it's just this huge disconnect. And nobody's wrong, you know, there's no bad guy.

• 42:36Speaker 02

  And I, from what I'm seeing, it's like, wow, if we could get people to see these truths and to open just a little, we could, I mean, it could, it's like, I think like 500,000 people have non-speaking, minimally speaking autism in the US. Like, it could, it's a big deal, you know?

• 42:59Speaker 01

  Yeah.

• 43:00Speaker 02

  And that's why I just can't, I can't drop it. So, thank you so much for giving me a little time to tell you about it.

• 43:09Speaker 01

  Yeah. Well, thanks for having a heart for this. It sounds like you've been sort of called to be invested in this, which is cool. What are your plans moving forward?

• 43:21Speaker 02

  I'm working on an article, I'm getting it submitted, that kind of outlines a lot of this research. So in the near term, really just getting this out there and communicating it as good as possible and maybe trying to connect the right people. Just kind of seeing where this crazy universe takes me.

• 43:43Speaker 01

  Yeah, yeah.

• 43:44Speaker 02

  Yeah.

• 43:44Speaker 01

  Well, thank you for explaining all the research you did and your findings and everything like that. And, you know, hopefully, there will be more studies, I think there are, in the pipeline, to help better understand spelling to communicate and potentially telepathy. I think there are people out there who are open to researching more. They're just maybe not the people in charge of, you know, getting it in schools or having it widely accepted. But it seems like we're probably on the right path, which is encouraging.

• 44:18Speaker 02

  Yeah, just leading with truth and leading with love seems to be the best way forward.

• 44:24Speaker 01

  Absolutely. Okay, well, thank you so much, Becca. This is so great.

• 44:29Speaker 02

  Yeah, thank you so much for having me on. I've been really enjoying this work, and I hope I can continue.

• 44:38Ky Dickens?

  That's it for this episode of The Talk Tracks, but new episodes will now be released every other Sunday, so stay tuned as we work to unravel all the threads, even the veiled ones that knit together our reality. Please remember to stay kind, stay curious, and that being a true skeptic requires an open mind. Thank you to my amazing collaborators. Original music was created by Elizabeth P. W., original logo and cover art by Ben Kendor Design, the audio mix and finishing by Sarah Ma, our amazing podcast coordinator Jill Pachesnik, the telepathy tapes coordinator in my right hand, Katherine Ellis. And I'm Kai Dickens, your writer, creator, and host. Thank you again for joining us.

• 45:22Speaker 03

  This December, the magic of Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol returns to Virginia Repertory Theater in downtown Richmond. Experience the transformation of Ebenezer Scrooge as he's visited by the ghosts of Christmas past, present, and future, and rediscover the joy and true meaning of the holiday season. Performances run November 18 through December 27. Tickets on sale now at virginiarep.org or by calling 804-282-2620.