Red Flags at OpenAI — How One Company Could Burst the AI Bubble

Scott Galloway and Ed Elson dissect red flags at OpenAI and debate whether problems at the company could burst the AI bubble. Then, they turn to the Supreme Court’s high-stakes tariff case and discuss an arbitrage opportunity in the middle of it. Finally, they dig into the surge in prediction markets and why the Trump administration has steered clear of cracking down. Subscribe to the Prof G Markets newsletter Order "Notes on Being a Man," out now Note: We may earn revenue from some of the links we provide. Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice Follow the podcast across socials @profgmarkets Follow Scott on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

• 0:26Speaker 01

  Hey Spotify listeners. When you travel with American Airlines, you'll enjoy comfort and convenience at every altitude. Before takeoff, unwind in the Admirals Club Lounge with curated self-serve offerings of hearty bites and refreshments. In flight, stay connected with high-speed Wi-Fi. Sponsored by AT&T. Your journey is designed to feel easy from the moment you check in to the moment you arrive. No matter where you're going, American gets you there. Book now at aa.com.

• 0:52Speaker 02

  Hey, I'm running out to drop off a stack of letters and packages. Need anything shipped while I'm gone?

• 0:58Speaker 03

  Save the gas. Stamps.com lets you print postage and schedule pickups right from your desk. Sync your contacts into the address book, get detailed accounting insights, and get notified the moment your certified mail is delivered.

• 1:09Speaker 02

  All from my desk?

• 1:11Speaker 03

  All from your desk.

• 1:12Speaker 04

  Join the 4 million businesses using stamps.com right now with code PODCAST and get your free welcome gift. Stamps.com code PODCAST. Taxes and fees apply.

• 1:21Scott Galloway?

  Today's number 63. That's how many hours Americans spend in traffic each year. Ed Tristore, I was driving down in Florida with my 13-year-old son, and of all things, a dildo hit the windshield. And trying to protect his innocence, I said, oh my God, did you see that bug? And he said, yeah, I can't believe bugs have dicks that big.

• 1:55Scott Galloway?

  What'd you do last night, Ed? What'd you do? I went to your book launch, Scott. Say more. You're not getting off that easy.

• 2:02Ed Elson?

  I had an incredible time. I met many of your friends who are wonderful people. You had your 92nd Street Y

• 2:13Ed Elson?

  performance with Ben Stiller. I don't know what you'd call it, but I do know that it was the fastest sellout in the history of the 92nd Street Y.

• 2:21Scott Galloway?

  I don't like these commercial metrics, Ed. That was so nice, wasn't it? I was really happy with that.

• 2:26Ed Elson?

  I had a great time. It was great to see you.

• 2:28Scott Galloway?

  You forgot that I was on The Daily Show right before that.

• 2:30Ed Elson?

  I forgot. Yes, that's a very good point. You were on The Daily Show.

• 2:33Scott Galloway?

  Second time I start crying this week. Jordan Klepper actually had to reach across and grab my hand.

• 2:40Scott Galloway?

  That's a good luck.

• 2:40Ed Elson?

  I'm a little annoyed that they're not putting you on with Jon Stewart there. They're giving you sort of like the Jon Stewart's Ed Elson's to interview you. What's going on with that?

• 2:49Scott Galloway?

  Jon Stewart intimidates me. I think I'd be too nervous. But yeah, I love, I love Jordan. He just, his type of humor really. And I get the sense, I kind of relate to him, that maybe he was tall and didn't have a lot of social capital in high school. So I sort of relate to him, like a little too tall.

• 3:06Scott Galloway?

  And he's got a five-year-old kid. Yeah, I like, I love, I think they're, they've done such an amazing job with their backup cast. God, how do I find better people? Memo to self. How do I get better people? Yeah. I'm about to, I'm about to head on the Pivot Live Tour, seven cities in seven days.

• 3:25Ed Elson?

  When is the Markets Live Tour happening?

• 3:27Scott Galloway?

  We'll do one next year. I think, I think we'll do one in Q1 of next year. So if you're watching this YouTube, tell us which cities we should go to. I just thought it was so funny. We're doing Toronto, DC, New York, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, LA. And I thought the funniest comment was, why do you hate Arizona?

• 3:50Scott Galloway?

  That was so funny.

• 3:52Ed Elson?

  We'll do it. Phoenix, 2026.

• 3:54Scott Galloway?

  Yeah. So if, for those of you watching this pod, we're going to be doing a Prop G Markets Live Tour. And whoever has the most comments from any city, we don't care if it's Madison or, I don't know, whatever, Little Rock will come to that city if we get a lot of comments.

• 4:12Ed Elson?

  Who are going to be the groupies?

• 4:13Scott Galloway?

  Well, this is the problem. This is what I'm scared of. Uh, don't tell her I said this, but whenever we do a live tour, more people come up to see me than Cara. And it really pisses her off. It really pisses her off. And I have this really awful dread that the same thing is gonna happen to me with you. That if a line is at any point longer to get a selfie with you, I'm gonna freak the fuck out.

• 4:42Ed Elson?

  There was a very interesting moment for me when we had the, the South by Southwest event where someone had your book and they brought it over and they asked me if I could get, they could get my signature. I was like, what am I supposed to do with it? Cause it was your algebra of wealth. I was like, no, I can't do this. You gotta give, you gotta give this to Scott.

• 5:04Scott Galloway?

  I can just sense it. People were constantly coming up to me and like on the street, they're like, Prof G, where's Ed? Where's Ed? And all these, all these women and gay men are like, so is that single? Is that, is that single? Cause you know, I don't, just a crazy idea. Do you wanna set up a total stranger who just accosts you on the street with your podcast co-host?

• 5:28Ed Elson?

  That's a great idea. Well, look, I'm, I'm very excited for that. I think, I think I'll need, I think I'd need a few more years before I'm at that level, Scott. I'll be honest with you. I don't think I'm anywhere close.

• 5:42Scott Galloway?

  Brother, I, I hate to say anything nice about you, but you are literally like Muhammad Ali meets, I don't know, LeBron meets Messi at your age compared to where I was. When I was 26, I was just out of grad school. I had started a market research firm, pivoting to a strategy firm. I was working out of my apartment. I had no idea what I was gonna do. And I was, my highlight was I used to take my dog for long walks and my girlfriend at the time was supporting us and she was not happy about that. She was, she was pretty, she was pretty cool about it, but I don't think she was really happy about it.

• 6:24Scott Galloway?

  Uh, you know, when she came home, she wouldn't be like, do me, you indigent loser. That wasn't an enormous turn on for her. I'm starting a market research, I mean, a strategy, I mean, an e-commerce company, the internet, the internet, the internet.

• 6:41Scott Galloway?

  I was, I don't want to say I was flailing, but I was definitely doing what you're supposed to be doing in your twenties. I was workshopping my career, trying to figure out what to do. So you're

• 6:51Ed Elson?

  I was thinking though, 26 is the age that you started, uh, it was Profit, right?

• 6:57Scott Galloway?

  Profit, yeah, yeah.

• 6:58Ed Elson?

  Yeah, which turned out to be a massive success. I feel like 26 was kind of a big, that was a big year for you now. I, I haven't started a company. I mean, I've sort of semi-started a podcast, but

• 7:10Scott Galloway?

  Well, I don't know. You're, you kind of own this little business and you're, you're extracting the majority of the margin by telling me you're having coffees with Andrew Ross Sorkin, but don't be threatened as we're going into bonus season. I love how you drop that little gem.

• 7:25Ed Elson?

  Boom.

• 7:27Scott Galloway?

  But yeah, 26 was a huge year for me on a lot of levels because I moved in with my girlfriend. I got a dog, which is the first time I, anything was dependent upon me for like, like, I, I remember thinking at one point, you know, my friends are like, I got one out and we got ridiculous fucking truck. I'm like, let's go to Vegas. And I'm like, yeah. And then I'm like, oh, wait, if I do this, my dog will die. If I head to Vegas right now for two days, there is a living being at home that is dependent upon me. And also my mom, that was the year my mom got very sick. That kind of changed my life. Um, yeah, that was a big

• 8:03Ed Elson?

  It wasn't, wow. Yeah, that's a lot of big things.

• 8:05Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, it was the early nineties. We were coming out of recession. Get this, when I graduated from business school and the House School of Business, 40% of the graduates had a job on graduation day. And now when the kids graduate from Stern, they like, it's whether they have three offers or five offers. I wonder if that's going to change because of all the things we've been talking about in AI.

• 8:25Ed Elson?

  Yeah, exactly. I think that's just about, just beginning to change now in the last year or so, I would say.

• 8:30Scott Galloway?

  There you go. Maybe that's a good segue into what, why people actually listen to this podcast. Should we get?

• 8:34Ed Elson?

  That's a good idea. Yeah. Let's talk about what we're supposed to talk about.

• 8:39Scott Galloway?

  Now is the time to fly. I hope you have plenty of the world at all.

• 8:46Ed Elson?

  It was a week of red flags for OpenAI. First off, the deposition of OpenAI's co-founder Ilya Sutskever was released, which shed new light on his time at the company and the drama around Sam Altman's firing in the deposition. Ilya referenced a memo stating that Altman was fired due to a "loss of confidence" and also alleging a "consistent pattern of lying", so that was not good for OpenAI. Meanwhile, Sam Altman appeared on Brad Gerson's podcast, we've of course had Brad on our podcast too, and Brad Gerson pressed him about OpenAI's financial commitments, their spending plans, and he was quite visibly frustrated. Let's look at the clip.

• 9:28Speaker 07

  You know, how can the company with 13 billion in revenues make 1.4 trillion of spend commitments? And you've heard the criticisms, Sam.

• 9:38Speaker 08

  First of all, we're doing well more revenue than that. Second of all, Brad, if you want to sell your shares, I'll find you a buyer. I just, enough. Like, you know, people are, I think there's a lot of people who would love to buy OpenAI shares. I don't, I don't think you would want to sell it.

• 9:51Speaker 07

  Including myself. Including myself.

• 9:55Speaker 08

  Who talk with a lot of like breathless concern about our compute stuff or whatever, that would be thrilled to buy shares. So I think we could sell, you know, your shares or anybody else's to some of the people who are making the most noise on Twitter, whatever, about this very quickly.

• 10:07Ed Elson?

  So that wasn't great. And then after that, the company CFO, Sarah Frye, she went viral after she told the Wall Street Journal that OpenAI is seeking support from the federal government to help finance future data centers. She later kind of walked those comments back, but that is what she said in this interview. So, Scott, we've discussed OpenAI's precarious financial situation, and we've discussed that at length, the fact that they're generating, as Brad said, around 13 billion dollars in ARR, according to most recent reports. Sam Altman says it's more than that, but they're also spending more than double of that currently, and the plan is to spend more than a trillion dollars over the next several years. So the

• 10:51Ed Elson?

  question we've been asking repeatedly on this podcast, how on earth are they going to pay for all of this? Well, Brad Gerson asked that question directly to Sam Altman. You would think that he would have at least a canned or rehearsed answer. His answer was I think horrendous. I mean, I couldn't think of a more defensive frantic

• 11:16Ed Elson?

  kind of sociopathic response is what I would say. If you're trying to shake investors confidence in OpenAI, I would say this is how you do it. Flustered, concerned, very triggered, et cetera. First, let's just start with your reactions to those three things. The deposition, what we learned about the firing, the appearance on Brad Gerson's podcast, and then, of course, the CFO saying that they are going to need a federal backstop.

• 11:44Scott Galloway?

  All of this is a signal headed towards an IPO. The company is definitely going to file, in my opinion, sometime in 26 because the valuation based on the revenue multiple is getting to the point where no institutional investor is probably going to want to buy more. So they stop at the last stop of where it could potentially become a meme stock, and that is disconnect from any underlying valuation metrics, and that is the retail market. So I do think they're going to go public. When you are on an earnings call and someone asks you a fair question, you, no CEO that I've heard who holds on to his job turns around and says, well, if you don't like it, you can sell your shares. That could not be, that's a rare misstep for Sam. And I think it

• 12:28Scott Galloway?

  probably reflects some of the stress he's under right now, probably having to get subpoenas and depositions where his co-founder is saying that he's can't be trusted, that he lies and created a chaotic environment. That can't be fun for the guy when he's trying to justify a half a trillion dollar valuation, getting incoming from the press, is somehow trying to wallpaper over the fact they said they weren't going to do porn, but wait, someone told me I can increase usage by 20% if I offer porn. I mean, the guy has got to be under a lot of pressure right now. And this was a moment where he lost his shit from an investor standpoint. You don't tell investors, we'll sell your shares, because guess what? They will. If you can't answer, that is a fair

• 13:13Scott Galloway?

  question, and it should have been something along the lines of, well, actually, if you look at other companies that have become trillion dollar companies, we're further ahead in terms of zero to a million users. We're faster zero to 10 billion than any company in history. Our ability to raise capital. He could have come up with a bunch of responses that said, actually, We are trading in a multiple of revenues that is extraordinary. I want to acknowledge that, but it's not unprecedented. What is unprecedented is some of the metrics we're delivering against. He had a chance to respond in a thoughtful, metric-driven way. Even if it was hard to justify the valuation, he could have said, no, this is a self-fulfilling prophecy. We're the fastest zero to $10 billion company in history. This technology is going to make

• 13:57Scott Galloway?

  everything else look like small ball. And some evidence that we can, in fact, justify this valuation is X, Y, and Z. And this is, this has happened before. And even at these valuations, other investors who have invested in this type of valuation at similar companies at similar points in their lifecycle have made money. He could have, he could have and should have had that teed up. This is not, this isn't like an unexpected question, that your valuation and multiple on revenues is really rich.

• 14:26Ed Elson?

  That question, not only is it a fair question, but it is the most important question in the markets right now. Because the, the answer to that question, how are you going to pay for it, is the question that determines the entire stock market right now. The fact that the stock market has returned, that, that AI has been responsible for 80% of the stock market returns since ChatGPT was launched. The fact that the valuations of Nvidia and Oracle and AMD and Microsoft, all of the best performing companies right

• 15:08Ed Elson?

  now. The fact that those valuations are determined by these contracts that have been not signed, but handshake agreed upon with OpenAI, the $300 billion that they say that they're going to pay to Oracle. I mean, this question, not only is it like fair and an obvious question that's going to come up, but you have to have an answer to that question. Sam Altman is the high priest of AI right now. And AI is essentially, as we've discussed many times on the podcast, AI is what is holding the stock market together and also holding the economy together. And we've discussed the stats about how if you didn't have AI,

• 15:51Ed Elson?

  GDP would be flat this year. He was asked the question.

• 15:57Ed Elson?

  He completely fumbled the answer. And you say, well, it's a tell that he's under a lot of stress. Agreed. But also, maybe it's a tell that he doesn't have an answer. Maybe it's a tell that when he got that question, how are you going to pay for it? The answer is, he doesn't fucking know how he's going to pay for it. And he doesn't even believe that he's going to be able to pay for it. And that is the question that we have been proposing on this podcast constantly. I mean, we added up all of the investments that they have in the pipeline, the cash that they have on the balance sheet. It's about $150 billion. So they're short $1.2 trillion. And yes, they're going to go IPO and they're going to raise money in the public markets.

• 16:41Ed Elson?

  You can't raise a trillion dollars in an IPO. It's not going to happen. So what they have to do at this point is they have to go out and they have to find different forms of financing. We had another tell where the CFO says, oh, maybe we'll get a backstop. Maybe the government will bail us out. Maybe the taxpayers will be the ones who pay for this gigantic AI builder that is holding the entire stock market together. Or, and this is my belief, they're going to have to go for some debt and not just some debt, but a fuck ton of debt. And that could be the beginning of the end for the AI bubble. That could be how the whole thing unravels. And when we look throughout history, that is generally how it goes.

• 17:26Ed Elson?

  And we've discussed that as well. We talked about it with the railroads and the electric grid, and we talked about it with the internet. But I think that this was a big moment in the AI story where he had his chance. And maybe he wasn't that well prepared because, you know, it was just a podcast with his buddy, but he had his chance to assuage investors and be like, no, no, don't worry. I know what I'm doing here. I know what this looks like. I know how, everything that you guys are talking about, but just, just trust me, everything's under control. He did the total opposite. He had a meltdown. And what wasn't included in that recording is the fact that a few minutes after that, he randomly bailed on the podcast and left the Zoom. Poor little Sam.

• 18:07Scott Galloway?

  Sam's like, I'm out of here. You're not being nice to me. It's like when Trump left, left poor Leslie Stahl. He couldn't, he couldn't handle the hard hitting questions from an 83 year old journalist.

• 18:19Scott Galloway?

  I mean, a couple of things here. This is super interesting. So Sarah Fryer, the CFO, she has some splaining to do. She's had a bad day because she clearly communicated that OpenAI is seeking federal support to backstop. She said that the depreciation rates of AI chips remain uncertain, raising debt to purchase them is costly, government or private sector guarantees can really drop the cost of the financing. They might be able to secure government backing. Trump loves this shit. He loves thinking he's innovative and using your credit card to sustain or to juice these companies that right now are driving the S and P. America's a giant bet on these 10 companies. So Trump has a vested

• 18:59Scott Galloway?

  interest in keeping the, you know, the music spinning. And also, to be fair, if you look at Apple, if you look at Google, if you look at Amazon, they're built on the backs of tax, taxpayer subsidies. Apple is built on a technology that costs tens of billions of dollars that taxpayers paid for such that we could deliver an ICBM missile into the Kremlin. GPS was, was initially conceived to give missiles, the ability to go, like to hit its target within four feet. And then they said, oh, wait, maybe we could use this technology

• 19:41Scott Galloway?

  to triangulate off of the satellites and do things like help cars get where they need to be and help people get cell coverage everywhere in the world. Apple's been massively subsidized by public taxpayers.

• 19:53Ed Elson?

  Well, I think, I mean, if we're making a comparison, what you're describing there is government money that was used to create technologies which were then used to build the products that we're describing. But it wasn't, it wasn't a bailout. You know, it wasn't just, here's hundreds of billions of dollars for you to do the thing that you're going to do. It was like, here's technology that we've built as the government and you can now use it in your products, right?

• 20:20Scott Galloway?

  Ed, I just want you to know, it's going to impact your future earnings if you thoughtfully contradict my logic.

• 20:28Scott Galloway?

  Okay, fair point, fair point. Let me skip to what I'm doing. I'm not giving investment advice, what I'm doing. I have been for a long time thinking about, do you know, I think it's called Drexel. They do all these kind of innovative ETFs where they figure out a way to short things or have triple the exposure and their fees are higher, which I don't like to pay, but they're very innovative. So the ETF X mag by Defiance ETFs is, is not as short of the mag, it was at seven, but a large cap X magnificent seven. So it basically holds large cap stocks, including the 40% of the mega caps, because at some point the S and P 490 will have their day. So the Q Q Q D by Drexel is a bear one X ETF

• 21:13Scott Galloway?

  targeting the inverse. So it's minus 100% of the return of the magnificent seven index. I am trying to figure out a way to go short the magnificent 10. Why? For some of the reasons you're talking about, they've just gotten out way over their skis and these circular deals feel like a late stage. I don't know if it's 98 or 99, but I feel like if I can hold on to these things, these short vehicles long enough, I'll be, you know, I want to hedge my exposure right now because if these things come down, there's going to be nowhere to hide. Everything is going to come down. When 40% of the S and P is riding on 10 companies, if they get cut in half, nobody gets out alive. The strafe and shrapnel here is going to be extraordinary. The moment there's any sort of check back or slowdown or the consumer base enterprises who are all signing up

• 21:57Scott Galloway?

  for these expensive site licenses from OpenAI or Anthropic, the moments they announced their, the moment PepsiCo CEO says, we made these huge 10, 20, 50, 100 billion dollar investments in AI and in the LLM site licenses, chips, whatever, and we're scaling it back dramatically because it hasn't offered the ROI we expected. If a bunch of other companies jump in and say, yeah, actually it seems true here. These companies, I mean, if the music stops, there's not only not any chairs, there's like, there's like hot coals they're all gonna sit on. It's gonna be ugly.

• 22:31Ed Elson?

  It is a house of cards, which is built on AI, which is built on OpenAI, which is built on Sam Altman and his response to that question, which again is why that question is so important. It's just so phenomenal how bad the answer was when it's, it's not just AI resting on this, but America, it's actually the presidency. I mean, so much is riding on this. But just going to like, how the bubble would pop, you're just, you're saying that you think the bubble would pop. And so you're saying, you're thinking about shorting some of the, some of the big tech stocks. I mean, my view, markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent. And as we've discussed, I just don't think there's actually that much alpha in going short.

• 23:16Ed Elson?

  I just that, my recommendation is to stay away from that stuff, but you know, have at it. And there are people who've made a lot of money.

• 23:23Scott Galloway?

  I want to be clear though, I'm not Jim Chanos. I'm not trying to find alpha here. I'm not that guy, Michael Burry or the big short guy, who by the way, just took a huge position, shorting Palantir. What I would, what I'm considering doing is quite frankly, just as a hedge. I don't like to short either. The, the natural trajectory of the market over the medium and long term is up. And you constantly have to ask yourself, what could go right, as our friend Josh says. But I do think, I, I feel like, no matter what we do right now, if you're invested in the markets almost anywhere, you're uncomfortably levered to the magnificent 10.

• 23:57Ed Elson?

  That's right.

• 23:58Scott Galloway?

  And so I like the idea of putting 1% of my net worth in a short basket. And that way, if shit really gets real and my whole thing goes down 40%, I'll get 10 or 15% of it back.

• 24:11Ed Elson?

  I like that. I think that's a good idea. And, and you're uncomfortably leveraged to OpenAI as well. But just going to like, how the bubble. Could pop, how the whole thing could come crashing down. I think one thing that that is important to recognize is the way that these things happen. It's not like you see a sequence of bad earnings calls and earnings reports. And then suddenly everyone realizes, oh, it wasn't what we thought it was. What has to happen, and Josh Brown has talked about this with us before. There needs to be some narrative shock to the system. You need to have some spectacular story, some spectacular event, which hits people all at once,

• 24:55Ed Elson?

  causes this massive shock to sentiment. And then suddenly everyone starts pulling their money out and it starts this chain reaction. That's how this always goes down. Like, just the most recent example would be FTX. You know, Sam Bankman Fried, who was the high priest of crypto at the time, he has this big blow up. Everyone says he's fraudulent, he goes to jail. This unbelievable story that captures the imagination of millions. And that's what brings the crypto markets down. Another good example would be Evergrande in China, another recent example where they had this massive blow up. They went insolvent, they had $300 billion in liabilities. And then that was sort of the moment where suddenly all the investors in China freak out.

• 25:38Ed Elson?

  And then you see this big, big correction in the Chinese stock market. So for the bubble to pop in AI, you're gonna need a story. You're gonna need something that is spectacular, that captures the imaginations of the investment community. If you had to bet on a story happening, it is the implosion of OpenAI. I just, there is, there is nothing else.

• 26:05Scott Galloway?

  Well, Nvidia, if a chip, if they announce that purchases of chips, if somebody, if, again, a Chinese manufacturer or someone else, or a Northern European or a US manufacturer, or even Amazon, which is now producing AI chips, says, we've come up with a comparable chip at 60% of the price. And Jensen, for the first time, has to announce that sales seem to be slowing. There is points, the attack surface here of vulnerability is pretty broad. Because when the bubble gets this inflated, it doesn't take a lot to pop it, right?

• 26:34Ed Elson?

  Right.

• 26:35Scott Galloway?

  And what we forget is, that's not to say this isn't an amazing company.

• 26:40Ed Elson?

  That's right.

• 26:41Scott Galloway?

  And leaders in a technology that will change the world. A standard unavoidable part of the cycle is the following. A major 12 month destruction in value. And that's why it's dangerous to lever up and buy these things on margin. Because as long as you can wait out these things, and in fact, it's a great company that in the technology that ends up being assembled technology, you can hold on, you know, hold on for dear life, right? So for example, Amazon and Cisco from 99 to 2001 lost 90% of their value. Amazon, if you held on to your Amazon shares, you recovered and then some. It's a whatever 100x since then, but let me just go through some. These are one year declines of these companies.

• 27:24Scott Galloway?

  In 2022, Meta lost two thirds of its value. That was crazy. Right? In that one year, real recently, why? Post Apple iOS privacy changes that crushed their ad targeting. Remember that they turned off whatever it was opt in or opt off. And also the Reality Labs Metaverse losses ballooned and investor confidence credit lost two thirds of their value. By the way, since then, up three or five fold. Nvidia in 2022, lost 58% of its value. It was a chip cycle downturn, crypto mining bust, export controls to China. It rebounded massively the following year as the AI boom took off.

• 28:02Scott Galloway?

  Netflix, just three years ago, just three years ago, Netflix saw a drawdown, a destruction in the value of its shares of 70% in a 12 month period. Subscriber loss for the first time in a decade, growth to value rating, uh, growth to value rerating and rate hikes. What is every amazing company in the midst of a technology boom that has done incredibly well, the best performing long term holds? What do they all have in common? In a 12 month period, they were down at some point between 50 and 70%. But the problem is if these guys go down 50 to 70%, if they follow the cycle of every other tech company in history that has had reached these types of valuations and they

• 28:47Scott Galloway?

  come down 50 to 70% in a 12 month period. Hold on tight, says the global economy, because it's no longer a company worth, you know, Netflix at the time was worth. Probably a hundred billion going to, or 150 billion going to 50 billion. It's a company worth five trillion going to two trillion. It's a $3 trillion destruction in value. They're going to lose the GDP of Germany, one company. That will send a chill across another dangerous concentration in our economy. And that is the consumer confidence of the top 10% who are now responsible for 50% of consumer spending. And I go, I don't feel as rich as I used to.

• 29:31Scott Galloway?

  I can take my spending down, my discretionary spending down 50 or 80%. You can't, Ed. You're spending the majority of your income on rent and trying to do a little investing and living in the cost of living in Manhattan. You could take it down 10 or 20%. You can't take it down 70 or 80. So what do we have? At some point, these companies are going to experience this type of drawdown. Except it is now so much more, it'll, this isn't the ripple effect of a stone. This is the ripple effect of the, you know, the Millennium Falcon or a Starship Cruiser crashing into a lake. Starship, that's a, I think that's a Star Wars reference. Are they called Starship Cruisers, Ed?

• 30:11Ed Elson?

  I think that's right, yeah.

• 30:12Scott Galloway?

  My ability or my desire to short some, even if it's a little amount, I just want mental health insurance. Cause what I see here, and by the way, these companies could double in the next 12 months. I don't know. But if these companies get whacked and go through the same cycle as every other great technology company, the impact it's going to have on everything is going to be much more dramatic. There's going to be no, P and G's going to be off 20%. I mean, everybody, there's going to be nowhere to hide.

• 30:42Ed Elson?

  I would also add though, that the difference between a company seeing like a 50 to 60% drawdown versus a 99% drawdown and going out of business. The difference between those two companies is always leverage. It's which company was financially managed such that they were able to withstand a downturn. And this is exactly what Andrew Ross Sorkin talks about when we had him on. And he talked about what went wrong in 1929. The companies that go- bankrupt that just get completely wiped out. It's always leverage. I mean, Evergrande, which I just used as an example. Great example of that, the most indebted company in the world, $300 billion in liabilities. Lost 99% of its market value.

• 31:27Ed Elson?

  Lehman Brothers is another good example. I mean, some banks made it out alive, but Lehman Brothers was so overly leveraged, 30 to one at some points. And so when they started to see the defaults on the CDOs and all the mortgage backed securities, they were insolvent, they couldn't pay back their creditors, and then it started the chain reaction. And again, this was too much debt, too much leverage and long term financial mismanagement. So I think for sure, every company is going to be susceptible to a downturn. But I think the question when that happens is which of these companies are being responsible about the amount of debt that they're taking on?

• 32:08Ed Elson?

  Which of them are making accurate and responsible projections about how they can cover their losses in the future? If there is a downturn, if there is a drop off in demand. I think you look at many of the big tech companies, I think you look at Nvidia and Meta and Microsoft and Google and Amazon. These companies are expertly managed from a balance sheet perspective. So yes, they might see some drawdowns, but they're not going to get wiped out. I mean, these companies, they have incredible technology teams, but also incredible financial teams. OpenAI is a fucking train wreck from a financial management perspective.

• 32:44Scott Galloway?

  Whoa.

• 32:44Ed Elson?

  It is.

• 32:45Scott Galloway?

  It's going gangster. Why would you say it's a train wreck?

• 32:48Ed Elson?

  Look at the numbers. They want to spend $1.4 trillion. They've got $13 billion in revenue.

• 32:54Scott Galloway?

  How much of that, though, do you think is just marketing?

• 32:56Ed Elson?

  It probably is, but the market is pricing off of it. The market is pricing in a $300 billion contract to Oracle. So even if it's just marketing, the market believes it isn't. The market believes it's real and Sam Altman is going around and saying it's real. I don't know if you saw the Financial Times report, but the Financial Times learned that they're not even seeking legal counsel on these deals. They're having their. Head of product, lead these deals with AMD and Nvidia, they're having Greg Brockman figure out the paperwork. They don't have a financial team. And then, of course, they brought in Sarah Frye, the CFO. She said, in order for this to work, we're going to

• 33:37Ed Elson?

  need a backstop from the government. That is like all of the red flags of a company that is not figuring out how to manage their balance sheet in a responsible and reasonable manner. I mean, this is the biggest red flag in AI by far. And that says nothing about the technology, says nothing about the product, which is amazing and which I use and everyone uses. But the question being like, who gets wiped out in a downturn? It's the companies that are over leveraged. And OpenAI is that company.

• 34:12Scott Galloway?

  I wonder how much of it, quite frankly, is trying to this fake signal and manifest success that the market will believe that if this guy is willing to sign a contract for 300 billion, I'd love to see the terms and conditions of this contract.

• 34:25Ed Elson?

  Please. Exactly.

• 34:26Scott Galloway?

  You gotta think, I wouldn't be surprised if Oracle and OpenAI said this is more like, Trump's favorite word, a framework. It's a framework. And that if, if quote unquote, they don't need it, they have a little bit opt out, they gotta give them notice. I think that agreement is basically, they said, I know, let's announce that you're buying 300 billion dollars with Oracle compute. It'll send my stock up, it'll increase my net worth by 93 billion dollars. It'll signal to the market that you as someone who has insight into your revenue growth and the subsequent demand it inspires. The more I listen to you, Ed, quite frankly, I think you're right. I think this is the mother of all fucking jazz hands, these agreements.

• 35:11Ed Elson?

  And this week was our proof. I mean, he was offered the opportunity to correct that. And he bailed. He freaked out. He said, sell our stock then. And then he left the room.

• 35:21Scott Galloway?

  When Trump comes back from a meeting with Xi and says, okay, they've agreed to continue to ship rare earth materials or delay the suspension of rare earth mineral exports by a year. And he comes back, which means it's still, they're still like pointing at us with a gun cocked. Basically, he comes back and he says, oh, it's him and Bessent go on all those shows, an amazing agreement, historic leadership. And the reality is, he didn't get dick. Basically, she knows he's, she's like, look, this is bad for us, but what we have that you don't have is I can starve tens of millions of people and I'm still going to be in power. If fucking Nvidia gets cut in half, you're going to have real trouble. You're going to

• 36:06Scott Galloway?

  lose Congress, right? And probably your, you know, Vance or Rubio or whoever you anoint is going to lose. So he, again, his big error was she, I'm getting off script here, was not understanding their willingness to sacrifice. But I'm kind of with you as we kind of, I don't know, unfold all of this stuff. It does appear like there's a lot, a lot of jazz hands going on.

• 36:35Ed Elson?

  But what's funny is what happened with Trump is that the markets originally priced everything in. And then the taco, the taco vacation came in and then they said, screw it. We're not going to price this anymore because we don't believe it. The question is, when does that happen with AI? When does the talkification of AI happen? Where you start seeing these press releases and these handshake deals? We're going to spend $100 billion on AI. At what point does the market just go, you know what, dude, we don't really, we don't really buy it. So far, not happening at all. You could announce a multi-billion dollar contract with a hyperscaler tomorrow and the stock will go up invariably at least 5%. That's just how it works right now. But the question is, when does that run out? What is going to be the moment?

• 37:19Ed Elson?

  I'll tell you my prediction, then let's move on because we have more to get into. But if the bubble pops, my prediction is the reason it will pop is because of an implosion at OpenAI. It was because they said they were going to spend one and a half trillion. They made all these commitments. They borrowed money. They haven't borrowed that much yet, but they will. And that will be their downfall, as it has been for many companies throughout history.

• 37:46Ed Elson?

  We'll be right back after the break. And if you're enjoying the show so far, send it to a friend and please give us a follow if you haven't already.

• 38:01Speaker 00

  This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18 plus.

• 38:27Speaker 01

  Hey Spotify listeners. When you travel with American Airlines, you'll enjoy comfort and convenience at every altitude. Before takeoff, unwind in the Admirals Club Lounge with curated self-serve offerings of hearty bites and refreshments. In flight, stay connected with high-speed Wi-Fi. Sponsored by AT&T. Your journey is designed to feel easy from the moment you check in to the moment you arrive. No matter where you're going, American gets you there. Book now at aa.com.

• 38:52Speaker 09

  Still waiting in line? Again? That's time you'll never get back. Save time and money with stamps.com. Over 4 million businesses have skipped the line with stamps.com. Join them to save up to 90% off carrier rates from your computer or phone right now. Print postage for certified mail, registered mail, and packages in seconds. Then schedule a pickup right from your home or office. For a limited time, go to stamps.com and use code PODCAST for a free welcome gift. Taxes and fees apply.

• 39:27Ed Elson?

  We're back with Prof G Markets. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the tariff case last week. Multiple justices expressed deep skepticism that a 1970s emergency powers law gives the president sweeping authority to impose tariffs. Here's just some of what they said.

• 39:42Speaker 10

  It's a congressional power, not a presidential power, to tax. And you want to say tariffs are not taxes, but that's exactly what they are. Degenerating money from American citizens, revenue.

• 39:54Speaker 11

  AIPA is a sanction statute. It's not a tax statute where Congress gave away the store. Congress knows exactly how to delegate its tariff powers. Every time for 238 years, it's done so explicitly, always with real limits. AIPA looks nothing like those laws. It uses regulate, which Congress has used hundreds of times, never once to include tariffs, and it lacks the limits of every other tariff statute.

• 40:20Speaker 12

  You're admitting that there is some non-delegation principle at play here, and therefore major questions as well. Is that right?

• 40:26Speaker 13

  It's very limited, very, very deferential. And again, the phrase that Justice Jackson uses, it just does not apply.

• 40:33Speaker 12

  I know, but that's where you started off, and now you've retreated from that, as I understand it.

• 40:38Speaker 13

  Well, I think we, as our frontline position is certainly a stronger position, but if the court doesn't accept it, then if there is a highly deferential position...

• 40:44Speaker 12

  Can you give me a reason to accept it, though? That's what I'm struggling and waiting for. What's the reason to accept the notion that Congress can hand off the power to declare war to the president?

• 40:53Speaker 13

  Well, we don't contend that. Again, that...

• 40:55Speaker 12

  Well, you do. You say it's unreviewable. There's no manageable standard, nothing to be done. And now you're, I think you, tell me if I'm wrong. You backed off that position.

• 41:06Speaker 13

  Maybe that's fair to say.

• 41:07Ed Elson?

  So it wasn't a great showing for Trump's legal team, and we know that because by the end of the week, markets were pricing just a 23% chance of the court ruling in his favor. Before the hearing, it was closer to 45%. This is per prediction markets. So just to kind of like go over the arguments that are being made here. Basically, generally, it's agreed that you need Congress to approve major policy, economic policy decisions. But the government is saying that doesn't apply to foreign affairs. It's a foreign issue. The plaintiffs are saying, no, it is a domestic issue because, as Sotomayor was saying, that tariffs are a tax on U.S. citizens. There are some other arguments at play here.

• 41:49Ed Elson?

  But the summary here, the TLDR is, didn't go great for Trump and for Trump's legal team. And then if you just look at the prediction markets on Calci, the chances that SCOTUS will rule in favor of Trump, they have gone from 45% to now 23%.

• 42:08Scott Galloway?

  In a weird way, we talked about on this pivot, and Kair's view was this actually would be good for Trump. It would give him an elegant way out of this mess. That it would, it would basically do, well, the Supreme Court, I don't agree with them, but basically unwind what is probably the worst economic decision in a long, long time. Well, let me just say what I'm doing.

• 42:26Ed Elson?

  You're not buying the refund claims, are you?

• 42:28Scott Galloway?

  I feel shamed.

• 42:29Ed Elson?

  No, no, no, because that's an amazing investment trade. I was going to bring that up. Is that what you're doing?

• 42:33Scott Galloway?

  That's what I'm trying to do. A market is developing in the private markets to purchase claims. So if you're Mercedes of Wisconsin and you're importing, or Mercedes USA, say they do a $2.5 billion business in Mercedes, I don't know what it is in the US. So they're importing in, and some of them are domestically made, so maybe that's, maybe that's not the right analogy, but you get the point. If it's 15% and they're bringing in 200 million of Mercedes a month from Germany, they're paying a $30 million tariff. If this court case ends up going against Trump, then essentially the Trump administration is going to owe Mercedes of USA $30 million a month, or say the tariffs have been, when did Liberation Day happen? I forgot.

• 43:18Ed Elson?

  April 2.

• 43:20Scott Galloway?

  Okay, so they call it, call it six months of tariffs, then the government owes Mercedes USA $120 million.

• 43:27Ed Elson?

  That's the important thing here. If Trump loses, not only does he have to revoke the tariffs, he actually has to return the tariff revenue that he brought in. He's going to have to issue refunds to all the people who paid the tariffs.

• 43:38Scott Galloway?

  Well, there's some question here, and that is, it's not immediately A equals B, even if they rule against them, that there could be nuance where maybe the government doesn't have to pay it back. Maybe the government, and we've seen Trump do this, refuses to pay it back. So even if the case is ruled against them, we don't know the nuance of the remedy. It might be you can't continue to do this, right? Or they might say, all right, they have a legal claim, and then the individual companies have to sue the government, which, I mean, I, anyways, it's not immediately a fait accompli, I think, if in fact, I've been thinking a lot about this, trying to game theory it out. But there's a private market developing, but unfortunately, you have to, right now, it looks, at least the

• 44:21Scott Galloway?

  stuff I've seen, that I've been shown, you have to invest at least $10 million. So you have to put together an SPV if you don't have the $10 million yourself. And these claims are trading in the private market for anywhere from 5 to 30%. And I think

• 44:38Scott Galloway?

  The greater likelihood is somehow these people don't get their money back. But I think there's a greater than one in 10 chance they get their money back. So if I can pick these things up, these claims against the Trump administration for tariffs that were charged illegally based on the Supreme Court decision, if that in fact, if they deemed them as illegal, that I think there's a greater at this point, one in 10 chance that that this claim will be refunded. It might take a couple of years, it might take two or three years in court, but I like the asymmetric upside here.

• 45:18Ed Elson?

  And very similar to the FTX claims that you made a killing on back in the day. But just to sort of explain how this is working here. So if you're a company and let's say you owe a dollar in, or you paid a dollar in tariff revenue, now there's a question of do you have a claim now to receive a dollar back? And what Scott is going and doing is he's buying that claim from you for five cents, or that's the plan. There is a market right now where people say, I don't think I'm going to get my money back. I want a little bit of money right now, so I'll sell you the claim for five cents. And so I think it's an incredible arbitrage opportunity, but I was going to bring this up to you. I was going to say, maybe you should look at this.

• 46:02Ed Elson?

  You took the words out of my mouth. You already are looking at it.

• 46:05Scott Galloway?

  And I like these deals because they're hard. And that is, so it's unlikely would be a claim. It's unlikely Mercedes USA would sell the claim. What's a more likely seller is a chain of 14 hardware stores in the Southeast has been paying, you know, over the last six months has paid $7 million in tariffs. And if you show up and say, I'll give you a million dollars for these claims, they're like, fuck it, I don't, yeah, fine, give me the million bucks. I need to operate my business and I've already paid the money and I've already sort of incorporated into my costs in my business. This guy's going to give us a million bucks and yeah, good luck to you trying to get that money back. So my guess is though, since this goes rolling and quite frankly, after this podcast, you're

• 46:47Scott Galloway?

  going to see, you're going to see, this is the kind of thing that a diameter capital or an Apollo come in with a team of 12 analysts.

• 46:58Scott Galloway?

  And MBA interns and they just crawl all over the US trying to find these claims and make really big bets. So I'm wondering, I'm trying to figure out if I can connect with a fund that's already doing this and call them and say, hey, remember me, you know, I advised you on the Yahoo deal.

• 47:18Ed Elson?

  I was your keynote speaker in 2014.

• 47:21Scott Galloway?

  Remember when I was talking about happiness and how relationships are everything back in 2019? Remember me at your conference you held in August in Tucson? Wow, that was great.

• 47:34Ed Elson?

  No, I think it's an amazing trade. As Scott Goodwin, diameter guy, said on the podcast, the whole game is finding forced sellers. And to your point, there are a lot of small companies, small to medium sized companies that have been put under so much pressure because of the tariffs. I mean, you look at the difference in the way that the small caps are returning right now versus the large and mega caps in the stock market. Tariffs have fucked one group in particular, and it's small and medium sized businesses who are gonna need some liquidity soon. So the idea that they were, I mean, I'm sure there is a market where these smaller companies are down to sell these claims for cents on the dollar. So I think it's a great trade.

• 48:17Ed Elson?

  We'll be right back. And for even more markets content, sign up for our newsletter at profgmarkets.com/subscribe.

• 49:01Speaker 01

  Hey Spotify listeners. When you travel with American Airlines, you'll enjoy comfort and convenience at every altitude. Before takeoff, unwind in the Admirals Club Lounge with curated self-serve offerings of hearty bites and refreshments. In flight, stay connected with high-speed Wi-Fi. Sponsored by AT&T. Your journey is designed to feel easy from the moment you check in to the moment you arrive. No matter where you're going, American gets you there. Book now at aa.com.

• 49:26Speaker 09

  Still waiting in line? Again? That's time you'll never get back. Save time and money with stamps.com. Over 4 million businesses have skipped the line with stamps.com. Join them to save up to 90% off carrier rates from your computer or phone right now. Print postage for certified mail, registered mail, and packages in seconds. Then schedule a pickup right from your home or office. For a limited time, go to stamps.com and use code PODCAST for a free welcome gift. Taxes and fees apply.

• 50:01Ed Elson?

  We're back with Prof G Markets. Robinhood posted earnings that topped expectations after doubling revenue year over year. The stock is one of the best performers in the S&P this year. It has soared 450% since Trump's election. A key driver of that momentum is prediction markets. Events contracts traded on Robinhood more than doubled quarter over quarter to 2.3 billion as election speculation pushed volumes to all-time highs. Calci and Polymarket also saw record volumes in the past month, surpassing the presidential election of last year. And now Truth Social, Trump's social media company, is rolling out its own crypto-based predictions platform. So Scott, we've been talking about the gambling

• 50:45Ed Elson?

  economy. You talked about it with Kyler Scanlon. All of these trading apps, these platforms which facilitate gambling betting. You've got Robinhood, and yes, people are investing properly on Robinhood, but also there's a ton of options trading, a ton of crypto trading. As we discussed, events contracts trading, people betting on prediction markets. That stock is up 230% this year. Coinbase stock is up 50% in the past Six months. Calci's trading volumes are up one hundred and fifty X since last year. There has been an explosion in what we would call the casino economy over the past few months, and much of it is certainly to do with Trump and his sort of pro casino economy policies.

• 51:29Ed Elson?

  I just want to get your reactions here. What do you make of the proliferation of this market? Crypto plus prediction markets, sports betting, options trading, all of this stuff that is exploding right now.

• 51:41Scott Galloway?

  I just think it's out of control. And now the problem is, I don't think you're going to tantalize a twenty-two-year-old. I think they get to make decisions, including stupid decisions. But I think they need to be educated about the risks they're taking. So gambling has the highest suicide rate of all addictions, because most people, Ed, if you developed meth addiction, we'd figure it out and we would try and move in. You could get on your phone and get addicted to gambling and lose everything. You know, guy spends his kid's college fund, mortgages his house. No one has any idea, and he decides, okay, I'm in too deep. Highest addiction rate.

• 52:17Scott Galloway?

  Yet there's no dedicated federal budget for gambling, addiction treatment, or research. By comparison, the National Institute for Drug Abuse allocated one point six billion for drug addiction research, and the CDC allocates about three hundred and ten million to tobacco control. And because there's so much money in this, it runs unregulated. Personal bankruptcy filings increased by twenty-eight percent in states where sports betting gets legalized. So basically, bankruptcy surged by almost a third the moment you legalize gambling. It also disproportionately affects young men and low-income people. Approximately fifteen percent of US adults aged eighteen to thirty-four have problematic gambling behaviors compared to only two percent of people aged fifty-five plus.

• 53:00Scott Galloway?

  Twenty percent of male gamblers have a gambling problem compared to just eight percent of the female gamblers. Again, see above, immature prefrontal cortex. Households with lower savings balances spent. Thirty-two percent more in gambling as a share of their income than high savings households looking for a way out. But it's increasingly difficult to regulate this because we know, we no longer call it gambling. It's been rebranded as a prediction market. And these are casinos. They're more interesting. They might feel more substantive to bet on the outcome of the mayoral race, but be clear, folks, this is gambling. According to Cal Street, prediction markets are not gambling, but a form of financial market exchange. Yeah, fuck you. We're not that stupid. This is gambling. Whether gambling on the Jets or

• 53:41Scott Galloway?

  among Donnie, it's gambling. So the most profitable companies in the world all do the same thing. They tap into an instinctual flaw and they start monetizing this flaw despite the impact it has on consumers, whether it's tobacco companies, getting people addicted to tobacco and then spending a ton of money to try and argue that nicotine wasn't addictive. And then when our mothers and our sisters continue to die, we finally figured this shit out. The same thing is happening here. And the thing that got me initially kind of, inspired is the wrong word, but very interested in this is Alex Kearns. And that is this young man, a 19 year old, I think he was a sophomore at Oklahoma State. Nice kid, no history of

• 54:24Scott Galloway?

  mental illness, good family. You know, you see this kid and you just see your son. I don't, I don't care who you are. You see your kid and you see like, okay, there by the grace of God, go my kids. Bought options on Robinhood, got messages saying he was down $60,000. He wasn't. They were errant messages, spent all night, sleepless, emailing Robinhood to try and get some sort of response from customer service because, you know, they're in the business of hyperscaling and because they didn't place any sort of regulation or any sort of safeguards, they didn't get back to the kid and the kid, the kid leaves a note for his parents saying, I don't want to leave this debt for you and throws himself in front of a train. These are the people we want to trust with, with an addiction? These are

• 55:07Scott Galloway?

  the people. So we have Trump, the, the, the crime family Trump, and we have the mendacious Fox at Robinhood.

• 55:18Scott Galloway?

  Uh, deploying at scale using technology, a drug that is highly addictive. So I'm, I'm horrified by this shit. And I think it, I think if Congress had any stones or anyone under the age of 90 fucking five years old that actually understood what is going on with young people and especially young men here, they would do their goddamn jobs and prevent a tragedy of the commons and weigh in with legislation or at least age gate shit. So this is, I think this is hugely distressing. I think this is the next major opioid scandal.

• 55:55Ed Elson?

  I mean, gambling is pretty bad for society. I mean, like, it's pretty indisputable. I mean, consistently leads to financial ruin, as you've said, one of the most common causes of bankruptcy, as you said, in states where sports betting is legalized, bankruptcy filings have risen 28%, disproportionately affects poor people, disproportionately affects young men, one of the most predictive causes of domestic violence, also one of the most common causes of suicide.

• 56:26Ed Elson?

  But we kind of like it because it's fun. Now, I think one of the big questions is like, what counts as gambling? Clearly, we agree mostly that there should be some form of regulation or at the very least, we should like draw some line in the sand as to what is gambling and what isn't. I had the founder and CEO of Calci on First Time Founders and we talked about this for a long time and he has a very interesting perspective. Of course, he's biased because he runs Calci. His view is it's gambling when the house is involved and Calci isn't really gambling because you're not betting against the house, you're betting against other people in the system, you're matching traders up with other traders, similar to the way the stock market works.

• 57:10Ed Elson?

  But I mean, my view on gambling is you know it's gambling when you see it. I mean, day trading, options trading, especially very short term, like zero day options trading, sports betting, crypto trading, meme stocks, meme coins, prediction markets.

• 57:28Ed Elson?

  All of this stuff is gambling. It's gambling in one sense or another. And we could talk about the very specifics of how actually the transaction works. But when you're just kind of betting on on something happening or something going one way or the other versus investing over the long term, putting your money and letting it sit there and building an asset base. Those are just by nature, very, very different things. And I think it is clear that people are interested and very excited by the gambling stuff right now. Many reasons why that could be. I'm sure the fact that young people just don't have the economic prospects that their parents and grandparents did, that certainly plays into it in large part. That sort of explains the crypto obsession and the meme stock obsession.

• 58:12Ed Elson?

  But I think the thing that is so interesting and what has changed this year is now the government is behind it. There is a very obvious support system for all of these types of gambling platforms and gambling mechanisms. I mean, Don Jr. is an advisor to Calci and to Polly Market. Trump Media is launching their own prediction market. Trump is getting into crypto. He's pardoning Changpeng Zhao, who pled guilty, or Binance, his company pled guilty to money laundering. He's pardoning Justin Sun. He's launching his meme coins.

• 58:52Ed Elson?

  So the government and the administration is deciding for one reason or another that we like this stuff and we should have more of it. We should deregulate and defund the CFTC. We should deregulate and defund the SEC. We should invest in prediction markets. We should create our own prediction markets. We should have society gamble more. And I think the big question for us citizens is why do they want that? I mean, most, most people are in agreement that this stuff is dangerous. And many Americans say it's, it's flat out a problem. Actually, 43% of Americans say that sports betting should not, or they say that the fact that sports betting is legal, they say that it's bad for society.

• 59:37Ed Elson?

  And it's gone up and up and up in recent years. So we're all kind of in agreement, like this is at the very least kind of dangerous. And yet, the administration is pushing it.

• 59:47Ed Elson?

  I guess my question to you, why do you think that Trump and the administration has decided pro gambling, pro casino economy, pro prediction markets, pro crypto, pro meme coins, all of these things that while, yes, they can be kind of fun, every now and then, in a lot of cases, they lead to the financial ruin of thousands, in some cases, millions?

• 1:00:10Scott Galloway?

  Well, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that perhaps his own economic enrichment supersedes his care concern for, for the public. I know that's a, that's a stretch, but look, we know why he's doing it. He's doing it, he's doing it for money. And what I would say to young men is that sacrificing and investing is a means of having less anxiety and more relationships in your life, more healthy relationships. Gambling is going to reduce your mental wellbeing. It's going to make you be seen as undependable by friends and potential mates.

• 1:00:55Scott Galloway?

  And it's going to result in a level of self-loathing, if you're not careful, that oftentimes leads to extreme depression and even self-harm. In sum, you know, if you're listening to Andrew Huberman and Peter Attia and taking the right supplements and creatine and getting the right sleep, it's all for fucking not. If you wake up one day and you're broke because of really stupid decisions you made in search of DOPA and have convinced yourself that you're investing, not gambling, no, you're gambling. And I'm not going to infantilize you. If you want to gamble, gamble, but call it what it is and assume you're going to lose it all. You want to do these things? You need to assume you're going to lose it all. The danger is when you think this is investing and you're going to make money.

• 1:01:40Scott Galloway?

  You're not. These companies aren't building anything. The reason there were so much money is that over time, everybody loses. Everybody, no one beats this market, these markets over the long term.

• 1:01:53Ed Elson?

  Unless you're on the platform.

• 1:01:55Scott Galloway?

  There you go. Those are the winners. So if you're going to gamble, buy Calci or, or Polly Market stock. And you could argue that's investing even. But these companies are preying on young people and

• 1:02:10Scott Galloway?

  And instinct that hasn't caught up to industrial production. So anyways, just be honest with yourself. Are you gambling or are you investing?

• 1:02:19Ed Elson?

  There's this quote from Alexander Hamilton, 1792, which I love. He said, quote, "There should be a line of separation between respectable stockholders and mere unprincipled gamblers." I just find it hilarious that this has been around for hundreds of years and we know where Alexander Hamilton stands on it.

• 1:02:42Ed Elson?

  Let's take a look at the week ahead, Scott. We'll see earnings from Rocket Lab, AST Space Mobile. So these are these space companies that we've discussed in the past. Also Paramount Skydance and Disney. Any predictions?

• 1:02:54Scott Galloway?

  Well, I already said it. I think the market for claims against tariffs paid is going to become an active investment market, and I think it's going to do well for those. The price may already, I mean, I get the sense, I've been working on this for a few weeks. I get the sense my guys are going to call me back and say, oh, prices have doubled, like sellers have caught on to this and have jacked up their prices. But I think this is going to become a really interesting market that we're going to hear about, that's going to be actively traded. And I actually think that even if before the decision, I think there's going to be a lot of people who trade, who, I think these things are going to go up even before the decision or the collection of revenues. I think they're going to start to trade up. So I think the best stock right now or the best investment, and granted, most people

• 1:03:38Scott Galloway?

  don't have access to it because there's certain minimums and it takes time.

• 1:03:41Ed Elson?

  10 million minimum. Put me in the SPV.

• 1:03:44Scott Galloway?

  Yeah, but this is what will happen. A bunch of people will create SPVs and charge fees and give access to retail investors. You're about to see claims against tariffs become an active private asset class.

• 1:03:56Ed Elson?

  This episode was produced by Claire Miller and engineered by Benjamin Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Mia Silverio is our research lead. Our research associates are Isabella Kinsel, Dan Shilon and Chris Donoghue. Drew Burrows is our technical director and Catherine Dillon is our executive producer. Thank you for listening to Prof G Markets from Prof G Media. Tune in tomorrow for a fresh take on markets.

• 1:04:52Speaker 14

  This podcast is supported by Anthropic, the public benefit corporation behind Claude. Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way, because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at claude.ai/spotify and keep thinking. That's claude.ai/spotify.

• 1:05:19Speaker 02

  Hey, I'm running out to drop off a stack of letters and packages. Need anything shipped while I'm gone?

• 1:05:24Speaker 03

  Save the gas. Stamps.com lets you print postage and schedule pickups right from your desk. Sync your contacts into the address book, get detailed accounting insights, and get notified the moment your certified mail is delivered.

• 1:05:36Speaker 02

  All from my desk?

• 1:05:38Speaker 03

  All from your desk.

• 1:05:39Speaker 04

  Join the four million businesses using stamps.com right now with code PODCAST and get your free welcome gift. Stamps.com code PODCAST. Taxes and fees apply.

• 1:05:49Speaker 15

  I see you.

• 1:05:50Speaker 16

  Avatar: Fire and Ash is now streaming on Disney+. It's the film critics are calling the best Avatar yet.

• 1:05:58Speaker 16

  A true epic and completely jaw-dropping.

• 1:06:00Speaker 15

  This is the only pure thing in this world.

• 1:06:03Speaker 16

  Return to Pandora on Disney+. It will be an adventure for the whole family. And watch the Oscar-winning phenomenon at home.

• 1:06:10Speaker 15

  This is sick!

• 1:06:14Speaker 16

  Avatar: Fire and Ash, now streaming on Disney+. Rated PG-13.