Oracle Stock Roars 36%, Apple’s New Product Flop & Judge Blocks Lisa Cook Firing

Ed is joined by Gil Luria, Head of Technology Research at D. A. Davidson, to break down Oracle’s earnings and the market’s tremendous reaction. Then, Ed and Scott explore why Wall Street was not impressed with Apple’s latest product lineup. Finally, Ed takes a look at the decision from a Federal judge that President Trump cannot fire Lisa Cook for now. Check out our latest Prof G Markets newsletter Order "The Algebra of Wealth" out now Subscribe to No Mercy / No Malice Follow Prof G Markets on Instagram Follow Ed on Instagram and X Follow Scott on Instagram Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  Flowing ad budget on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them. That's bull spend and marketers are calling it out in dashboard confessions.

• 0:09Speaker 01

  I remember telling my boss, it'll be good for the brand when leads were slow. Yeah, it it wasn't.

• 0:17Speaker 00

  Cut the bull spend. LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title and more. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com slash campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 0:31Speaker 02

  This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends. Like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an ultra because it's not just a superior light beer. It's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com slash superior access to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.

• 1:01Speaker 03

  This episode is brought to you by Subaru. You know that place your mind always wanders to? The lake, the mountains, the homes of the people you love most? The completely redesigned 2026 Subaru Outback is built to help you get there. With legendary capabilities, standard symmetrical all wheel drive and the confidence to go further. The 2026 Subaru Outback. Love never looked so good. Visit Subaru.com slash Outback to learn more.

• 1:26Ed Elson?

  Today's number, 3.6 million. That's how many dollars the original Darth Vader lightsaber sold for at auction last week. That makes it the most expensive piece of Star Wars memorabilia in the world. It also makes it the most expensive oath of celibacy of all time.

• 1:46Speaker 05

  Money markets mad. If money is evil, then that building is hell.

• 1:56Ed Elson?

  Welcome to Profiteam Markets. I'm Ed Elson. It is September 11th. Let's check in on yesterday's market vitals. The S and P 500 and NASDAQ closed at record highs for the second day in a row. Following a tame reading from the Producer Price Index, the Dow declined as falling Apple shares weighed down the index. More on that later. Meanwhile, Treasury yields dropped on that PPI reading. And finally, it was a massive day for AI companies. Oracle's spectacular rally drove up stocks like CoreWeave, TSMC, Broadcom, AMD, and of course Nvidia.

• 2:33Ed Elson?

  Okay, what's happening? Oracle posted its best one day gain since 1992, driven by robust earnings and upbeat revenue guidance for the current quarter. The cloud company revealed it will collect over $455 billion in future contract revenue from the latest quarter. Part of that revenue comes from a massive deal with OpenAI, which will purchase $300 billion in computing power over five years. And in this fiscal year, cloud revenue is projected to increase 77% to $18 billion. Shares surged 36% on this news. It also made Larry Ellison the world's richest person, worth nearly $400 billion.

• 3:17Ed Elson?

  Okay. If you've been listening to the show for a while, you know, we have been bullish on Oracle for a long time now. I first laid out our bull argument for Oracle back in March of 2024.

• 3:32Ed Elson?

  One thing that makes me actually pretty bullish on Oracle here is, if you look at the cloud infrastructure market, there are four players, basically. It's AWS, it's Microsoft Azure, it's Google Cloud, and then there's Oracle. And Oracle is the only one out of those four that isn't developing its own LLMs and therefore that isn't competing with other AI companies. So supposedly, within the AI startup community, which is obviously growing, there's actually some real incentive to partner with Oracle because you want to partner with the guy who's not going to compete with you. They're all trying to eat Amazon, Microsoft and Google's lunch. They don't have to worry about that with Oracle. And so I think that's sort of the thesis,

• 4:17Ed Elson?

  and it's beginning to be reflected in the numbers. That was March 2024. Six months later, we said it again in September.

• 4:27Gil Luria?

  Oracle is kind of the fourth musketeer when it comes to cloud computing. The options are basically Amazon, Google, Microsoft or Oracle.

• 4:35Ed Elson?

  We discussed it again during the summer of this year and now here we are. And indeed, we have an AI company that is paying hundreds of billions of dollars to Oracle to be the compute provider. Since that first podcast we put out in March of 2024, Oracle has tripled in price. And now, as of today, Oracle is up 98% year to date. So, very exciting day to be an Oracle investor. Also a huge day, as I mentioned, for Larry Ellison, whose net worth increased more than $100 billion within 40 minutes after the markets opened yesterday. Okay.

• 5:15Ed Elson?

  For more on Oracle's earnings, let's bring in Gil Luria, Head of Technology Research at DA Davidson.

• 5:26Ed Elson?

  Gil, good to have you on the program.

• 5:28Gil Luria?

  Thanks for having me.

• 5:29Ed Elson?

  So, Monster Quarter for Oracle. Let's just start with your headline reactions. What stood out to you?

• 5:36Gil Luria?

  They added more than $300 billion to their backlog, which is something I don't know I've ever seen. I don't know that that's ever happened. So that's the very, very positive reaction we see today has to do with that, with the fact that they said that by 2030, they're going to get $144 billion of revenue. That's 10 times what they're doing in that cloud business right now. So that was the great news, completely unprecedented and what got everybody excited today.

• 6:10Ed Elson?

  So, that was what got me excited too. I've been bullish on Oracle for a while. The way I've sort of, we've been describing it and discussing on the program is it's kind of like the fourth horseman in AI. You've got Microsoft and Amazon and Google and Oracle basically nipping their heels. And then, yeah, we see this. Four hundred fifty five billion dollars in remaining performance obligations that that booked revenue. But then we also get this report from the Wall Street Journal, which I'd like to get your reaction to, which is reported that Oracle and OpenAI have signed this compute purchasing agreement and it's worth three hundred billion dollars. In other words, it sounds like all of that new revenue coming in from the cloud business, it sounds

• 6:55Ed Elson?

  like it's all OpenAI. Is that right?

• 6:57Gil Luria?

  Uh huh. So yeah, sometimes when you see something for the first time and it looks fantastical, it's because it is fantastical. You know, I live in the Pacific Northwest. If I walked into the forest and thought I saw Sasquatch, my initial reaction would be to get super excited. But then my next reaction would be, wait a second, is that just a mangy bear? And I would say that what we found out from the Wall Street Journal today means that maybe this is a little bit of just a mangy bear. OpenAI is a not for profit that hasn't raised enough capital yet to write this big of a check. It's a not for profit that's in the process of fundraising and has negative gross margins. We're all very

• 7:41Gil Luria?

  excited about their product, but that's a very far reach from them being able to commit to three hundred billion dollars through two thousand thirty in addition to their commitments to Microsoft, to CoreWeave, to Stargate, to SoftBank, to Crusoe, to Lambda, to Google. So that may be a little bit of a reality check on what the Oracle announcement from last night actually happens to be.

• 8:14Ed Elson?

  Yeah, it's really interesting. It sounds like you you don't believe that that three hundred billion dollars is realistic in terms of converting that from these remaining performance obligations into real revenue. But I guess what might be helpful is some color on what what is a remaining performance obligation? I mean, if they're coming out and saying in their earnings, yes, we have four hundred fifty five billion dollars in revenue in the pipeline, where it's up three hundred fifty nine percent, it's ready, it's there. Does that not mean that it's signed and sealed that OpenAI, whether or not they can afford it, they're going to have to figure out some way to show up with the money and pay it to Oracle?

• 8:55Gil Luria?

  It means that there's a contract.

• 8:57Ed Elson?

  Yeah.

• 8:57Gil Luria?

  In this case, a contract between Oracle and OpenAI. No purchase orders, no revenue, no delivery of services, none of that's happened, but there's a contract. And the contract could be very good, but it's one thing to have a contract with Microsoft or Google or Amazon, which is what we thought we heard last night. To having a, who are the most credit worthy companies in the world versus having a contract with a company that again, is negative gross margin, is going to lose a lot more than it's going to have in revenue this year. And is still organized as a not for profit, is still renegotiating terms with its key investor, Microsoft, which has been dragging out for months.

• 9:39Gil Luria?

  Until they're done renegotiating those terms with Microsoft, they are limited in their ability to raise capital, which they're going to again need hundreds of billions of dollars of capital to pay all the obligations that they've made. So it's not quite the same as saying that you have a contract with Microsoft when you're saying you have a contract with OpenAI.

• 10:03Ed Elson?

  So just looking at the stock's reaction, because this was what jumped out to me too. And I was, I've been trying to think, okay, how are they going to pay them the money? Maybe they'll just take on a load of debt to do it. Perhaps they'll just borrow and then they, they give the money over to Oracle. But looking at the market's reaction, we saw a tiny bit of a pullback, but not really. I mean, Oracle's still up thirty six percent on the day. It was, it was up forty percent and then pulled back a little bit. It sounds like the market believes maybe this isn't as incredible and fantastical as they originally thought. But it's still pretty great. Any thoughts on the market's reaction?

• 10:43Gil Luria?

  Speaking of the market reacted very strongly to believing in the Atri, in the AI trade more than ever.

• 10:50Ed Elson?

  Yeah.

• 10:51Gil Luria?

  That's what you saw today. That's why Nvidia was up a lot, even. Companies like CoreWeave, which is a direct competitor to Oracle and didn't win the business, they were up twenty percent today. So it was absolute euphoria around AI. So I think by the time the journal article came out, I don't think there was a lot of critical thinking. As folks and investors start to digest the news and realize what's real and what's not real, I imagine the reaction will be a little more subdued. Having said that, we're not saying OpenAI can't live up to those obligations. Yeah. The success of ChatGPT is also unprecedented, right?

• 11:32Gil Luria?

  Seven hundred million weekly active users, two years after it was zero, is quite impressive and they're very likely to continue because as we know, we're now ChatGPTing things. We're now Googling things. So it's very possible that OpenAI will able to restructure, raise capital, grow the business, live up to these obligations. It's just not a foregone conclusion, which also means that the capital is not going to be as easy to get. We're talking to fund all this build out, we're mostly going to be relying on debt capital, on lenders being willing to lend to OpenAI and many others now.

• 12:15Gil Luria?

  And the competition for those loans is going to get a lot more serious. If the market for borrowing to build data centers was mostly CoreWeave, in the last year, CoreWeave's raised ten billion dollars of debt to build data centers. That was most of that lending market to, in order to satisfy OpenAI's need and Crusoe's need and Stargate's needs. And by the way, Meta wants to borrow to build data centers and XAI, Elon's company, wants to borrow to, to satisfy all of that capital, we're going to need a lot more debt issued into this market, which again is not a foregone conclusion. It's possible it's not a foregone conclusion.

• 12:54Ed Elson?

  Yeah, this is so interesting. It all kind of, I'm so glad you brought up the creditworthiness of OpenAI, the idea that this gigantic, the fact that we now have the richest man in the world who is Larry Ellison, and when you really think about it, it all kind of hinges on the creditworthiness of OpenAI. Can they raise enough money in debt? Because that's the only way that they're going to be able to fund this thing. Having said that, Oracle is expecting cloud revenue to hit $144 billion in 2030, as you said. Do you think that's realistic? Do you think that that is something we can really expect? Do you believe that number? What do you think?

• 13:34Gil Luria?

  No, I don't think it's realistic, which doesn't mean they can't grow the cloud business in a very significant way, especially this year, next year. It's one of those, you know, if you shoot for the stars, sometimes you land on the moon type of situations. But for Oracle to have a business go 10 times bigger, while Microsoft is growing its Azure business 39% and Google Cloud 28% and AWS growing a much bigger business 17%, and all these other upstart Neo clouds like CoreWeave and Nebbit, to believe that all those data centers are going to get built over the next five years to generate all that revenue is very far-fetched, which isn't to say we're not going to grow AI, we're not going to grow compute, we're not going

• 14:18Gil Luria?

  to grow data centers. All those things are happening, will happen. The tools that AI is providing, those models are getting so powerful, so useful, we're bringing them into the workplace, right? It's not even IT departments that are giving us these tools.

• 14:31Ed Elson?

  Yep.

• 14:32Gil Luria?

  That's all going to happen. But to get from here to 10 times as much revenue and have that happen across the whole industry, there aren't enough chips, there isn't enough energy, there isn't enough capital to get to those types of numbers. But again, maybe they shoot for the stars and land on the moon.

• 14:48Ed Elson?

  All right. Thank you very much. We appreciate your time. Gil Luria, Head of Technology Research at DA Davidson.

• 14:55Gil Luria?

  Thank you, Ed.

• 14:59Ed Elson?

  So let's review $7 billion in cloud revenue last quarter. A big number, but still behind Google, which did 14 billion, still behind AWS, which did 31 billion. The big three in cloud infrastructure are still Google, Microsoft and Amazon. Amazon is the number one with around 30% market share. However, we are now looking at nearly 80% cloud growth for Oracle in fiscal 2026. That is a big deal. We are also looking at a projected average growth rate of 70% over the next five years, which would mean that by the year 2030, according to those projections, Oracle's cloud business will be as big as Google's cloud business.

• 15:44Ed Elson?

  Now, do we know that that will happen? Can we really believe in that 100%? No, as Gil said, this is a prediction. This is a projection and so much of it hinges on that $300 billion contract with OpenAI. And we don't know for sure that OpenAI is going to make good on that contract. So we will see. But the net net of these earnings, the reason we are seeing this huge run up is the following. The fourth horseman of AI has arrived and it is Oracle. Hot on the tail of the three largest cloud providers in the world. And in the year of AI, that is all that really matters. After the break, a look at the latest products from Apple.

• 16:29Ed Elson?

  If you're enjoying the show, give Profty Markets a follow.

• 16:38Speaker 00

  Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard? But not the pipeline? That's bullspend and marketers are calling it out in. Dashboard Confessions.

• 16:47Speaker 01

  My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had. Impressions.

• 16:54Speaker 00

  Cut the bullspend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 17:09Speaker 02

  This episode is brought to you by Michelob Ultra. Good times mean competitions between you and your friends. Like seeing who can throw some pigskin the farthest or rush the field the fastest. Winner gets an ultra because it's not just a superior light beer. It's also giving fans superior access to their favorite sporting events. Superior is worth playing for. Visit michelobultra.com/superioraccess to enter. Enjoy responsibly. Copyright 2026 Anheuser Busch InBev Michelob Ultra Beer, St. Louis, Missouri.

• 17:38Speaker 03

  This episode is brought to you by Subaru. You know that place your mind always wanders to? The lake, the mountains, the homes of the people you love most? The completely redesigned 2026 Subaru Outback is built to help you get there. With legendary capabilities, standard symmetrical all wheel drive and the confidence to go further. The 2026 Subaru Outback. Love never looked so good. Visit subaru.com/outback to learn more.

• 18:08Ed Elson?

  We're back with Profi Markets. Apple unveiled its new product lineup on Tuesday. We got a very thin iPhone Air. We got the iPhone 17 and the iPhone 17 Pro, a new Apple Watch and AirPods Pro 3. Apple called the event "air dropping." Interesting new phrase. However, Wall Street did not agree. Shares of Apple closed down one and a half percent following the event and the next day they slid another 3%. Here to break down this product launch, we have Apple's most loyal customer ever. This individual has purchased more AirPods than the rest of America put together. He also says that if you don't own an iPhone, you can't get laid. And that actually is not a joke. That is actually what he believes.

• 18:52Ed Elson?

  Here he is, the one and only Scott Galloway. Scott, how are you doing?

• 18:56Speaker 07

  I'm good. I didn't say can't. I just said less likely. I mean.

• 19:02Speaker 07

  But.

• 19:03Ed Elson?

  So, so, yeah, let's, let's, let's talk about the product launch.

• 19:06Speaker 07

  Okay.

• 19:07Ed Elson?

  We've got the iPhone seventeen, the iPhone seventeen Pro. We've got the thin iPhone Air. Were you excited by any of it? What did you think of all of these new products from Apple?

• 19:17Speaker 07

  I know it was a handjob and an Advil. I think it was kind of fine, but it just wasn't what we were hoping for. You know, it's just sort of, um, like, okay, a super thin iPhone. Was anyone saying my iPhone is too thick? The, the iPhone, I think it seems very incremental, seems very boring. I believe that the, the only thing that seemed kind of interesting is this multi-lanch automatic or AI-driven, Siri-driven, and AI and Siri are becoming oxymorons. But essentially, real-time language translation. Now, there's, uh, there's, there's equivalent products already out there. We'll see on the execution. But what I have said about AirPods is that it's the most underrated tech product of the last 10 years.

• 20:03Speaker 07

  And that is what, essentially what AirPods are, which I'm wearing right now, is they're not a tech product. They're the most ubiquitous profitable piece of jewelry ever sold. These are $300 earrings that 75% of America has purchased at whatever it is, 50 or 70 points of gross margin. So this is, AirPods is the most successful piece of jewelry in history. Their ability to transfer health information to your phone and Apple Health is basically saying, kind of just borrowing utility from the Apple Watch. I think it makes the Apple Watch less, less util. The upgrades or improvements to the Apple Watch seemed just incredibly mediocre. I thought the, I would describe this entire product release as meh.

• 20:48Ed Elson?

  Yeah.

• 20:48Speaker 07

  What are your thoughts?

• 20:50Ed Elson?

  I'm in complete agreement with you. Meh on everything. We've seen basically the same device for, I would say, almost 10 years now. I mean, the iPhone really hasn't changed. If you look at all of the new specs on the new iPhone, they're basically like, this one is better and it's newer and it's better and it's better. That's all they're really saying. I mean, you can zoom in further on the camera than you could on the previous iPhones. Also, it comes in orange. So on those points, that is where I stand. And by the way, we've been saying that on, on the product launches for the past. I don't know, one or two years.

• 21:29Speaker 07

  Yeah.

• 21:29Ed Elson?

  This is part of my confusion as to why this company is still valued as a growth company. They haven't been doing anything that should, that has actually really been growing their product lines. They haven't come out with any devices that are any, that are really any good. The only new thing they've come out with is the Vision Pro. And as far as we can tell, the Vision Pro has been dead on arrival. And we're still waiting for them to actually report the numbers on that device. But anecdotally, from, from what we have heard from, from external reporting, it's not doing very well. Now, the one thing that they did do that I think was interesting and new in this product launch, as you say, is that AI translation on the AirPods.

• 22:12Ed Elson?

  The fact that you can have your AirPods in, walk over to someone who's speaking another language, and it will translate in your ears in real time. And then you can actually respond to them, say what you want to say, and then hold your iPhone out in front of the, in front of the person, and it sort of translates it for them in real time. That, to me, is kind of a game changer. That's pretty legitimate. I'm wondering if you feel the same way.

• 22:40Speaker 07

  Yeah, but Ed, when daddy is rolling up to the bar after a couple of cappuccino cokes, his shoulders are multilingual communication vehicles. I get the same thing accomplished with this rhythm. Look, you know what I'm saying here, ladies, you know what I'm saying. Anyway, look, these, how do we recover from that? The, the, let's go meta.

• 23:03Ed Elson?

  World renowned professor of marketing, Scott Galloway.

• 23:06Speaker 07

  There you go. Everyone understands that, Lingua Franca, my brother. Look, what's the larger point here? You know, AirPods that give you real time language, that's just not what the most valuable and arguably innovative company in the world, or if it's number two right now behind Nvidia, should be doing. And this represents, and there'll be some heckling from the chief seats, a transition that's taken place since Jobs left the company. And that was, Jobs was considered a builder. He refused to do stock buybacks. He called them financial engineering. He wanted to amass an enormous cash hoard, which gave him the flexibility to take big swings and make big bets on really interesting products. He was a builder.

• 23:48Speaker 07

  Book came in, and about the same time, there was pressure from activist hedge funds who wanted. Uh, uh, share buybacks initially Carl Icahn, uh, Cooks, probably to his credit said it's not worth fighting. And he initiated a series of share buybacks that have amounted to, I think, seven or eight hundred billion in some. Apple could have purchased Eli Lilly or Novo Nordisk with the money they have spent buying back shares.

• 24:11Ed Elson?

  Yeah.

• 24:11Speaker 07

  Uh, so you've gone from builder to operator. He will get a lot of second guessing that this is a mature company trading at a growth multiple. And in order to maintain that growth multiple, which is about thirty-three or thirty-four, he should be not doing financial engineering and buying back shares, which admittedly for a mature company are a good way to return money to shareholders, but taking some of that money and frankly, maybe having an AI strategy or trying to come up with a new, you know, a new vehicle for distribution.

• 24:39Ed Elson?

  Uh huh.

• 24:39Speaker 07

  But what this will seventy-two hours post this, this um, kind of product thud will be a lot of, a lot of second guessing around, all right, has this company become mature before it needed to? And should be they taking some of that cash or they've purchased forty percent of their outstanding shares back in the last ten years, which means in twenty-five years, which isn't, you know, is long but not long. They would effectively be taking themselves private. So this is, this is a thud. The market doesn't like it. And it'll bring up a bigger question around the balance between financial engineering, returning capital to shareholders and take your bigger swings.

• 25:19Ed Elson?

  Yeah.

• 25:19Speaker 07

  When your company is valued as a growth company.

• 25:21Ed Elson?

  Yeah, exactly. Product innovation. And to your point on AI, what is so interesting is we heard almost nothing about AI in this product launch. I mean, you'd expect that the world's most innovative company would be innovating in the most ascendant technology in the world right now, which is AI. We basically heard nothing. And what we heard was we have this real time translation and that's kind of part of the AI story. But other than that, not really anything on Apple intelligence. Um, and so it appears that the company is still behind the ball when it comes to AI. But Scott, we won't take any more of your time.

• 25:58Speaker 07

  Just one more point, Ed.

• 26:00Ed Elson?

  Yep.

• 26:01Speaker 07

  That, um, if you think about.

• 26:06Speaker 07

  I totally lost my train of thought.

• 26:10Speaker 07

  I went, where am I? Mom? Read my suit, Manny. Where am I?

• 26:16Speaker 07

  Oh, God.

• 26:17Ed Elson?

  Too many beers.

• 26:18Speaker 07

  Oh, AI. There we go. Look, so this is what I think happened. Tim Cook knows he needed to talk about AI. Apple has to have an AI strategy, and this is their strategy and why they didn't bring it up. Their strategy is the same as their search strategy, and that is they want to focus on their hardware products and then lend out their interface in custody of the billion most aspirational consumers in the world and license it and make the, just as they made that, uh, Apple iOS, kind of the, or Chrome, uh, the preferred browser of, of Apple phones, and they took a $25 billion royalty payment from Alphabet, of which 24.9 billion drops to the bottom line.

• 27:01Speaker 07

  I believe Tim Cook's strategy around AI was, we don't want to get into this capital arms race. We're just going to let everyone else raise a shit ton of money, and then we're going to go to Anthropic.

• 27:10Ed Elson?

  Pay for access.

• 27:10Speaker 07

  And we're going to go to OpenAI and say, highest bidder gets to be the default AI amongst the billion wealthiest consumers in the world, or basically anyone that matters. And my guess is he cannot bring that up in the middle of a DOJ, uh, uh, in the midst of a, uh, uh, uh, an environment where Google was just found guilty of monopoly power, and the remedy was they can't do direct dealings around a royalty payment for exclusive access to Chrome. This would just raise so many legal antennae. If he said, no, we're announcing a deal with Anthropic, and they're giving us, giving us $10 billion to be the exclusive, uh, AI LLM for iOS.

• 27:54Speaker 07

  So my guess is this, this case that came down, um, uh, against Google had kind of, if you were, will cleared the, the announcement a little bit around AI.

• 28:06Ed Elson?

  Interesting. All right. We appreciate your time, Scott.

• 28:09Speaker 07

  Where am I? That's, that's what happens when you get to my age, Ed. You literally don't know. I don't even buy green bananas anymore. I'd. All right.

• 28:19Ed Elson?

  You're working too hard.

• 28:20Speaker 07

  Yeah, I'm working too hard.

• 28:22Ed Elson?

  Okay. Appreciate your time, Scott. Good night.

• 28:24Speaker 07

  Thanks, Ed.

• 28:29Ed Elson?

  Trump just hit a roadblock in his attempt to fire the Fed Governor Lisa Cook. A federal judge in DC ruled he cannot remove her from the Federal Reserve Board. This decision comes just weeks after Trump said he fired Lisa Cook. The first time in US history a president has tried to remove a Fed Governor. Judge Cobb wrote that Trump showed, quote, "nothing related to Cook's conduct or job performance that would justify firing her." Translation: Cook stays for the time being. And yes, she will be voting at the Fed meeting next week, where Wall Street expects that the first rate cut will come since December. Again, we did predict this. A couple of weeks ago, we discussed how the president can fire a governor of the Federal Reserve, but only if it is for cause. Our view is that the judge would

• 29:13Ed Elson?

  determine that this does not qualify as for cause. Here's what he said.

• 29:19Ed Elson?

  This dismissal, this firing, is far from over. I mean, it's going to go to the courts now. It might even go to the Supreme Court. It's a very big deal. And it will be up to the courts, it will be up to the justice system to decide whether an allegation of fraud meets the definition of cause. That's where we are in terms of the legal proceedings. My prediction, no, no court's going to say that just a claim meets the definition of firing for cause. Indeed, the judge has said no. But let's get some more analysis on this ruling. Our producer Claire Miller spoke with Sarah Binder, senior fellow in Governance Studies at Brookings and also professor of Political Science at George Washington University.

• 30:02Speaker 08

  The key question here in this ruling that comes from the judge is, what does for cause mean in this context? And how was it determined? And what rights does Lisa Cook, as the governor accused of malfeasance, what rights does she have essentially in face of these charges, which have not been, obviously, not been convicted or indicted? So what does this mean? Well, the judge sort of parsed through the history of both the Federal Reserve Act and both other cases around the time when that provision was put into law in the 1930s. And she probed the government, the DOJ lawyers, when they were in court in a

• 30:47Speaker 08

  hearing, what do they mean? What does Cook's lawyer think it means? And she comes down and essentially says, really, two things. That for cause can't be whatever the president says it is. It can't just be, you know, something, it has to be something more than policy differences. But it can't be as low as what the government has basically hinted at. And she says, her reading of the statute and the history, it can't be for behavior before you were confirmed to office. So she argues really first, government hasn't met the threshold here of what counts as cause.

• 31:30Speaker 08

  And she said there's a procedural part, too, which is Cook is asking for basically notice of the charges in detail and also a hearing to defend herself. And so the judge says, Fifth Amendment, due process clause of protection, she hasn't, that hasn't been established here. And for those reasons, she comes down to say, there is for cause protection and it's not demonstrated that there is cause yet.

• 31:55Speaker 09

  And just for context for the listeners, the allegation that Trump is levying at her is that she committed the fraud in 2021, but she didn't assume her role at the Fed until 2022, correct? So, in other words, she didn't do this while she was in office, so it doesn't fall under for cause.

• 32:16Speaker 08

  That is the judge's interpretation here.

• 32:18Speaker 09

  Okay. So all of the reporting on this decision describes it as a roadblock for Trump, but not the end of the discussion. So my question is, what more is there to talk about? Did the judge not just decide that this firing was illegal?

• 32:36Speaker 08

  Our court system at the federal level, it's a hierarchy. So it gives the losers here, the defendant, the government here, the opportunity to appeal. And in this case, it goes to the DC, the appellate court that sits above the DC circuit. And then, of course, were the president and the government to lose again? There could be a second appellate review, but ultimately, the Trump, were he to lose in the appellate court again, would appeal to the Supreme Court. And at the end of the day, what the Supreme Court says is going to be the final say here. So this, I would think of this as a road bump. I don't know, really, is it a blockade here for, for the administration?

• 33:19Speaker 09

  Is your prediction that this makes it to the Supreme Court?

• 33:22Speaker 08

  This will undoubtedly make its way there, assuming that the administration loses again at the appellate court. But even my guess is Cook would eventually appeal to the Supreme Court to get a final say.

• 33:37Speaker 09

  I want to get your take on this line from the decision from Judge Cobb. She wrote, quote, "The public interest in Federal Reserve independence weighs in favor of Cook's reinstatement." So really, this decision is not just as simple as this firing wasn't for cause. Case closed. Actually, Judge Cobb is kind of weighing in on this larger issue of Fed independence. So I'd like to get your take on that line.

• 34:06Speaker 08

  So she's doing that for a reason, which is, think of it this way. We've had many other cases during 2025 where Trump has summarily dismissed agency members and commissioners, even though their statute also said you have for cause protection. But the Supreme Court has let those firings go ahead while the courts, these cases play out in the lower courts. But the Supreme Court did say, in one roughly similar case, they said, "Don't think this applies to the Federal Reserve, because the Federal Reserve is this unique institutional body."

• 34:45Speaker 08

  So what the judge is doing here is, is using, she quotes directly from the Supreme Court, what some people call a bespoke arrangement to protect the Fed. And she's saying, "Look, the Fed is special. We do expect it to be insulated from political pressures and insulated from just summarily dismissing a governor because you don't like their votes on monetary policy." And so that, that's what she's doing here. She's, she's not making a rule for all independent agencies. She's making one specific and saying, regardless of what happens to other agency positions, for sure, this is one where The statute envisioned protection, right?

• 35:27Speaker 08

  Congress wanted to protect these governors from the president just picking them off because he didn't like them racing rates, for instance.

• 35:36Ed Elson?

  That was Professor Sarah Binder from George Washington University. As you just heard, this will now likely go to the Supreme Court. The next question is, of course, how will the Supreme Court respond? They do often rule in line with this administration. However, the case here, it simply looks too weak. I mean, until Lisa Cook is proven to have engaged in fraud, until a court rules, yes, she did commit a crime, she was unable to serve properly as governor, until all of that happens, you don't have much of a case here. And so our prediction, unless a criminal offense is proven, Lisa Cook stays.

• 36:18Ed Elson?

  Okay, that's it for today. This episode was produced by Claire Miller, edited by Joel Paston and engineered by Bench with Spencer. Our associate producer is Alison Weiss. Our research team is Dan Shalan, Isabella Kinsel, Kristin O'Donoghue and Mia Silverio. And our technical director is Drew Burrows. Thank you for listening to Prof G Markets from Prof G Media. I'm Ed Elson. If you liked what you heard, give us a follow and join us tomorrow for our conversation with Justin Wolfers.

• 36:47Speaker 10

  Now at Kroger, your points add up to more ways to save every trip. Use them your way to take dollars off groceries at checkout or save at the pump. You can even save up to $35 on your next fill-up. Same points, more choices. And with low prices on fresh, quality food, plus digital and personalized offers tailored to how you shop, your dollar goes further. Redeem your points online or in the app. Kroger, fresh for everyone. Restrictions apply. See site or store for details.

• 37:17Speaker 11

  Close your eyes, exhale, feel your body relax and let go of whatever you're carrying today. Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-CONTACTS. Oh my gosh, they're so fast. And breathe. Oh, sorry. I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry. Namaste. Visit 1-800-CONTACTS.com today to save on your first order.

• 37:45Speaker 12

  1-800-CONTACTS.

• 37:51Speaker 05

  But you're running to get game day deals on Uber Eats. Keep everyone at tonight's watch party fed with deals from your go-to restaurants. Or stock up with deals on your favorite snacks and groceries. Whatever the occasion, get game day deals on Uber Eats all season long. It's not football without food. Uber Eats. Order now. Terms apply. Product availability varies by region. See app for details.