Written by a model from the transcript; not yet reviewed.
Pablo Torre and film critic Wesley Morris unpack the controversial documentary You Can See Everything, directed by Lance Oppenheim and Nathan Fielder, about Elizabeth Holmes in the final month before her federal prison sentence. The host and guest debate the film's complex layers of manipulation, documentary ethics, and performance, contrasting the established legal record of Holmes's corporate fraud with the film's intimate, disorienting framing. They analyze how actress Amanda Seyfried enters the project as a disruptive, truth-seeking agent who challenges both the filmmakers and the subjects. Ultimately, the discussion explores how the documentary destabilizes the viewer's trust, raising uncomfortable questions about media, manipulation, and human connection.
The episode opens with Pablo Torre welcoming listeners and introducing the Apple Card sponsor, setting the stage for the show.
Pablo shares alarming statistics about teens’ mental health and introduces a tech solution for safer devices for kids.
Pablo shifts focus to the main guest, Pulitzer‑winning critic Wesley Morris, and sets up the context of the film being discussed.
The hosts clarify that the film is not a traditional documentary about Elizabeth Holmes but a meta‑documentary about making a film about her.
Discussion of the film’s structure—pre‑prison days, the role of Nathan Fielder, and the strategic framing of Holmes’ story.
Exploration of how the filmmakers manipulate narrative through the interactions of Holmes, Billy Evans, and the actors, focusing on strategy and ethics.
Pablo and Wesley examine the inclusion of Amanda Seyfried and how her portrayal adds a layer of meta‑commentary on the film’s subject.
The conversation turns to questions of truth, representation, and the ethical responsibilities of documentary filmmakers.
The hosts wrap up their analysis, reflecting on the film’s impact and the broader implications for media and storytelling.
The episode concludes with the Apple Card sponsor message and final credits, marking the end of the show.
The episode opens with a critique of Nathan’s claims, highlighting how the film’s footage contradicts his statements.
The hosts discuss the insights gained from viewing the movie, questioning its narrative reliability.
Discussing Blake Griffin's Charmstory
The host and guest kick off the episode with an unexpected, humorous tangent about basketball player Blake Griffin's physical presence and commercial appeal, setting a lighthearted tone before diving into a heavy film.
The host outlines the setup of You Can See Everything, where filmmakers Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim spend 34 days with Elizabeth Holmes and Billy Evans before Holmes reports to federal prison.
The host pushes back against any notion that the film questions Holmes's guilt, citing specific government records, SEC findings, and deceptive practices like forging Pfizer logos.
Billy Evans on the Phoneinsight
The guest analyzes the opening shot of Billy Evans on the phone in a tight, ambiguous frame that reframes once the camera widens to reveal Elizabeth Holmes caring for a child.
Nathan Fielder tries to explain the classic Abbott and Costello comedy routine to Elizabeth Holmes, who fails to grasp that the routine is actually a coded argument.
Editing the Script by the Firestrategy
Nathan Fielder and Amanda Seyfried review a script by a roaring fireplace, meticulously debating word choices like changing "it" to "something" to sharpen the accuracy of memory.
The Horse Fart Interruptioninsight
Just as Nathan Fielder pontificates about the documentary's purpose being to convey events accurately rather than convince people, a nearby horse loudly farts, puncturing the pretentious tone.
“Researchers found teens who spend more than five hours a day on their phones are at double the risk for suicidal thoughts.”
“I just can't believe I get to sit in a room where Blake Griffin maybe just was.”
“Because Wesley Morris, multiple Pulitzer Prize-winning critic for The New York Times, critic at large.”
“I think as Nathan's reliability as a narrator is undermined, as has everyone's reliability as a narrator in this movie been undermined,”
“I do feel somewhat destabilized.”
“And that, that's what you can see everything is about.”
“This thing in us that wants to understand who and what we are to each other.”
Nathan Fielder's new film has been presented as a documentary about Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of notorious Silicon Valley scam Theranos. But this doesn't begin to describe the strategies and structure that make Fielder and Lance Oppenheim's collaboration so artistically wondrous (and journalistically frustrating). Wesley Morris — The New York Times' Pulitzer Prize-winning critic-at-large — helps us dissect (and SPOIL!) the most "culturally destabilizing" movie of the year. • Previously on PTFO: The Secrets of Nathan Fielder and Sportswriting, with Mina Kimes https://pod.link/1685093486/episode/OTUzMjBjNWEtODRkZC0xMWYwLWFjNDUtODMwM2EyYjVmN2U0 • Plus: Submit your confidential tips to Pablo https://www.pablo.show/tips (Pablo Torre Finds Out is brought to you by Apple Card.) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy https://acast.com/privacy for more information.
9,715 words · 8 speakers
Speaker names marked are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.
Page updated · transcript and summary are machine-generated