Are Insurgent Democrats Breaking the Party — or Rebuilding It?

With just a few months left until the midterms and President Trump’s approval ratings hovering in the 30s, Democrats believe they’re poised to retake power in Congress this November. But party leaders worry a slate of primary wins by insurgent-left candidates could undermine their chances. And yet, Democratic voters made it clear they are looking for change by rejecting some of the establishment’s top recruits in primaries from Colorado to New York and beyond. Kara is joined by three experts to talk about the rise of these insurgent candidates: Adam Jentleson, president and founder of Searchlight Institute and author of the forthcoming book "Supermajority: How Democrats Can Build Lasting Power”; Amanda Litman, co-founder and president of Run for Something, a progressive group that works to recruit and support first-time candidates in state and local races; and Roshni Nedungadi, founding partner and chief research officer at HIT Strategies, a public opinion research company that specializes in researching young people and people of color. Kara, Adam, Amanda and Roshni explain why these candidates are gaining traction, what voters are looking for, and how Democrats can navigate these divides in the party over the next few months. Questions? Comments? Email us at [email protected] or find us on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Threads, and Bluesky @onwithkaraswisher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:00Speaker 00

  If you don't like DSA, it is possible for the establishment wings of the party or the old guard to offer a different vision. The fact that they have instead chosen to punch left, it's like, make an argument.

• 0:23Kara Swisher?

  Hi, everyone. From New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network, this is On with Kara Swisher, and I'm Kara Swisher. We're just a few months away from the midterm elections, if you can believe it. And with President Trump's popularity in the toilet, Democrats have a great chance of winning back power in Congress. But the party has been rocked by a group of insurgent progressive candidates that have unseated some longtime incumbents. We saw it happen in New York and Colorado, and all eyes are now on Michigan's Senate primary in a few weeks to see whether a progressive or centrist can win there. It's an existential election year for Democrats, and the party will have to navigate these divides in real time as it tries to chart a path out of the political wilderness. The cautionary tale, of course, is Graham Plathner in Maine, who wrote a wave of populist

• 1:06Kara Swisher?

  enthusiasm to the party's Senate nomination, only to drop out earlier this month when a former girlfriend accused him of rape. He denies it. I've got three experts here to talk about this. Adam Jentleson is the president and founder of Searchlight Institute, a Democratic think tank. He also served as chief of staff to Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman, and his new book, Supermajority: How Democrats Can Build Lasting Power, comes out in September. Amanda Litman is the co-founder and president of Run for Something. It's a progressive political group that works to recruit and support first-time candidates in states and local races. And Roshni Nedungadi is founding partner and chief research officer of Hit Strategies, a public opinion research company that specializes in researching young people and people of

• 1:51Kara Swisher?

  color. I think what's really important right now is that the Democrats seem to always form a firing squad that shoots inward. And what's really important is to shoot outward, and it'll be interesting to see if they can tolerate differences of opinion, including from the left and the more conservative parts of the Democratic Party, and still win elections. And that's what I want to talk about. All right, let's get into my conversation with Adam, Amanda, and Roshni. Our expert question comes from Democratic political strategist Liz Smith. Don't go anywhere.

• 2:29Kara Swisher?

  Support for this show comes from The Guardian and their new show, Stateside, where journalists Kai Wright and Carter Sherman use the entire independent reporting resources of The Guardian to slow down the news and wrestle with the questions we all have about what is actually happening in the world. Join Kai and Carter three times a week as they utilize all the reporting resources The Guardian has across news, international coverage, climate, culture, wellness, and more. And The Guardian's not owned by a billionaire, they fearlessly report the facts without interference. Go to theguardian.com/stateside to learn more and listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on YouTube. That's theguardian.com/stateside.

• 3:13Speaker 02

  Ripple has been powering modern finance for a decade. We're leading the charge to bridge the gap between existing financial systems and the future of finance. You can have it all: legacy, stability, and digital innovation. Systems that work with your other systems. Because with the right partner, the question isn't crypto or traditional finance. The question is simply, why choose? A new standard of modern finance. It's happening with Ripple. For informational purposes only, availability of products can vary and may be provided by different Ripple entities.

• 3:44Speaker 03

  Support for this show comes from Canva Enterprise. Design is the face of your brand. It's how you stand out in a noisy world. That's why Canva Enterprise is the all-in-one visual communication platform that lets your organization create, collaborate, and publish high-impact, on-brand content at scale. Canva Enterprise was designed to clear up bottlenecks so your teams move faster, stay on brand, and create content that stands above the rest. Whether it's social, presentations, docs, or video, scale your content without scaling your team. Give your team the power to create their best work today with Canva Enterprise. Learn more at canva.com/enterprise.

• 4:31Kara Swisher?

  Adam, Amanda, and Roshni, thank you for coming on ON.

• 4:34Speaker 04

  Great to be here.

• 4:35Speaker 00

  Thank you for having us.

• 4:35Speaker 05

  Thanks.

• 4:36Kara Swisher?

  So, there's been a lot of ink spilled on the rise of these insurgent candidates in the Democratic Party. I'd love, for each of you, what is the lens through which you're viewing this divide? Is it moderate versus centrist, insider versus outsider, young versus old? Why don't we start with you, Adam, then Amanda, then Roshni?

• 4:53Speaker 04

  I mean, there's definitely an ideological component to it, right? You can't avoid that. I mean, the platforms that a lot of these insurgent candidates are running on are very clear. They often have a lot in common, things like Medicare for All. The war in Gaza is a huge issue, driving a lot of this. But I think you also, if you were doing all those positions, but you didn't have the outsider versus insider dynamic, they wouldn't be getting the traction they're getting. So, I think it's a combination of those two things. They happen to be young, they are definitely outsiders, but there are also, a lot of the passion behind them, what's driving the movement, does have these strong ideological components to it as well.

• 5:27Kara Swisher?

  Okay, Amanda?

• 5:28Speaker 00

  So, Run for Something, the organization I run, had nearly 100,000 people sign up to run for office in the last 18 months. That's more than we had in the entirety of Trump's first term. And the thing that we heard this time around that was different than Trump 1.0 was very specific frustration with the Democratic Party, with the sense that, like, my leaders are not fighting for me, they're not showing up for me, they don't care about me, they haven't delivered for me, I am not going to wait my turn, I'm not going to get to the back of the line, I am done being told to just, like, be patient. So, when I look at these insurgent candidates, you know, in congressional levels, we're seeing them on the state ledge levels and municipal levels, it is a deep frustration with the status quo. And as you think, it is generational in many ways, it's not a coincidence that so many

• 6:07Speaker 00

  of them are millennials and Gen Z leaders, but it's not even outsider so much as anti-return-to-normal and anti-establishment so much as the establishment is the status quo.

• 6:19Kara Swisher?

  Roshni?

• 6:20Speaker 05

  Yeah, I very much agree with what Amanda was saying, and I'm a partner at Hit Strategies, which is a full-scale public opinion research firm. We do expansive voter population research, but we also focus in on audiences that are typically underrepresented in voter research, so people of color, young voters, women, LGBTQ, and all of the intersections of those voters. And they really make up the core of the Democratic Party, and I feel like should be the leaders on what the Democratic Party is. Democratic Party positions are. And exactly like Amanda said, over the last few years, we've been hearing them say they are fed up with the Democratic Party. They don't see elected leaders as fighting for them.

• 7:05Speaker 05

  They don't believe that the systems are advocating for them. And they believe that the Democratic candidates are taking their votes for granted. And so all of this is creating an environment for them that is opening a lane for a more progressive insurgent left who are more responsive to the issues of the day to step in and fill the gap that they feel is lacking in their candidates.

• 7:32Kara Swisher?

  You know, Sisri, even though, Adam, you mentioned Gaza, you didn't mention policies as much as the vibe, right? I guess the feeling that people aren't representing them on policies, is that correct?

• 7:44Speaker 04

  That's, that's right, but I really think you can't understate how important the Gaza conflict is to a lot of this. I really think it's-

• 7:49Kara Swisher?

  I have two sons, twenty, twenty-one, and I know. I have very, I hear-

• 7:54Speaker 04

  It's hugely important, because, you know, there are young anti-establishment candidates running in other races who sort of don't fall into this category of, of left-wing insurgents. You know, people like Bobby Palito, who's running in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas, Bob Brooks, who's running in Pennsylvania's 7th District. You know, they're outsiders, they're anti-establishment too. But, but I think what's a differentiator between them and this sort of insurgent left is those ideological components. And there's some policy overlap with them as well. But I think it's, you know, you couldn't be included in this left-wing insurgency that, that is largely driven by the DSA and others if you had a centrist position on the Israeli conflict, or if you were unwilling to call it a genocide. And I think that's a big, big differentiator.

• 8:35Kara Swisher?

  I just have noticed from my children, two of whom have very different political views. Interestingly, they do come together on the same idea of focus on the Democrats. They don't like Trump, that's for sure. And none of you mentioned not liking Trump, correct, Amanda?

• 8:49Speaker 00

  It's the water people are swimming in. It's not the bait that's hooking them. Because you have to remember, for this generation of leaders, this new generation of leaders in particular, it's always been Trump. Like, it has been the Trump era since they came into political awareness. For most of them, at least especially if you're Gen Z, the first election you voted on Trump was on the ballot.

• 9:07Kara Swisher?

  What do you think, Roshni?

• 9:08Speaker 05

  Yeah, I mean, he is wildly unpopular, especially among the Democratic base. And when we're in focus groups with a lot of voters and trying to talk about all of the bad things that Trump has been doing, they are very well aware of what is going on in Trump's administration. They hear it from their social media, they hear it from the news, they hear it from people in their community. We're not giving them new information when we talk about Trump's bad policies and bad decisions. So it's very much the context that they're operating under already.

• 9:44Kara Swisher?

  So let's talk about some of the candidates that represent what we're talking about here. Progressives saw two big wins in Colorado this month in the governor's race. State Attorney General Phil Weiser beat Democratic Senator Michael Bennet. That was a huge surprise, I think, to a lot of the establishment. And Democratic Socialist Mayla Kiro's unseated Democratic Representative Diana Deget, who held the Denver seat for almost 30 years. Adam, Colorado is a blue state, but not a bright blue state. Talk about the dynamics of these races, in particular, how the insurgents were able to oust these incumbents.

• 10:15Speaker 04

  Yeah, it's ironic, because if you know Michael Bennet, as I have had the privilege of getting to know him a little bit over the years, this guy was very against the current Democratic leadership. He had lots of problems with Chuck Schumer. You know, he was a big critic, both in private and in public. But I think, you know, it wasn't part of his public identity in a major way, and that is ultimately what really sort of did him in in this race, because he was seen as a D.C. insider. Phil Weiser, who beat him, isn't exactly a left-wing progressive. This definitely sort of is evidence for the idea that this is a lot more about outsider versus insider, because Phil Weiser doesn't adopt Medicare for All as one of his policy positions. He actually is in line with us at Searchlight on free primary care for all. But then on the House race side, you kind of have the opposite dynamic, where Diana Deget is a cosponsor.

• 10:59Speaker 04

  Of Medicare for All, right? A big advocate for it and has been for a long time.

• 11:03Kara Swisher?

  Right.

• 11:03Speaker 04

  But she didn't have as far left a position on Israel and Gaza. And that was part of the avenue that that Malac Kuros and others used against her also. The fact that she's taking corporate money and some of these other aspects that were ultimately what did her in. So it's it's a mix of things and and there are different things in different races. But, you know, some combination of outsider versus insider and some of these deep ideological issues that are driving this. When those things come together, incumbents really got to watch out because they could really be in trouble.

• 11:30Kara Swisher?

  Right. Now, in New York, three progressives backed by a New York City mayor, Zoran Mamdani, ousted House incumbents. Two of those candidates are also members of the Democratic Socialists of America. House Speaker Hakeem Jeffries was not pleased with Mamdani's decision to endorse these candidates. Amanda, what lessons do mainstream Democrats still need to learn about what's resonating with voters right now? And and certainly, the mayor is.

• 11:53Speaker 00

  What I thought was so interesting about those races, Claire Valdez and Daria Lisa Chevalier, it while they got the attention for their comments on Gaza, and I think that speaks to sort of like their moral character, their campaigns were really focused on cost of living issues. It was about housing. It was about childcare. It was about infrastructure. The things that they were knocking doors about were the same things that Mamdani was talking about in his campaign. It was, you have problems, we have solutions, and the current leadership has not delivered them. I mean, in many ways, it speaks to kind of what Trump was getting at so long ago, which is like, this swamp is not serving you. I'm going to solve all your problems. I can fix it. This new class of Democratic leaders, and, you know, DSA or not, they are saying, we hear you.

• 12:35Speaker 00

  We hear how broken you feel everything is, how much it feels like the system is not working for you. I don't care even if you are aligned with them or not in terms of like policies. These folks in power have not solved it. They just haven't. We've given them the chance. They've been in office, in some cases, as long as you've been alive. Throw them out. Give us a new try.

• 12:54Kara Swisher?

  Now, Roshni, Republicans are already trying to tie Democrats to Mamdani and these other DSA candidates. I've never heard the word communism so much since I studied in school. But for young voters and voters of color, how potent an attack line is that?

• 13:08Speaker 05

  I actually think that he is very popular nationally and has only grown in popularity since he's been elected. And so his ideas and the policies that he is pushing and the candidates that are pushing these ideas and policies are very, very popular nationally. And so I don't think he is as effective of a boogeyman for Republicans because people are seeing him make real change in New York City and seeing the voters of New York City be really appreciative of the work that he's doing.

• 13:40Kara Swisher?

  Why are they doing it then? They must have some poll they're dragging out or is it a knee jerk, say communist and hope it works?

• 13:47Speaker 05

  I think the label of communism and socialism still has not caught up to Mumdani himself. I think voters are still unwilling to vote for a candidate that is explicitly socialist. And so the label is a potent attack. However, using him in addition to the label, I feel like cancel each other out.

• 14:10Kara Swisher?

  Adam, how do you look at that? And then Amanda.

• 14:12Speaker 04

  Regardless of what you thought about Mumdami coming in, I think purely as a sort of game appreciates game, no one's doing it better than he is right now. I mean, he's really doing an incredible job. And I think that if you're trying to sort of draw lessons from it, it's his energy. You know, yesterday he was watching the World Cup games and Rikers Island.

• 14:30Kara Swisher?

  And Rikers Island, yeah.

• 14:31Speaker 04

  You know, I mean, this guy is everywhere and everything he's doing is conveying that he sees all of New York. You know, his love for the city is infectious, but he's also been very pragmatic in his governing choices so far, right? I mean, he sort of distanced himself from his previous comments about defunding the police. He embraced Jess Tisch, the New York City Police Commissioner, and kept her on, even though a lot of folks on the left wanted him to fire her. And he embraced a lot of sort of the critics on the sort of abundance, you know, YIMBY movement who have a, you know, sort of deregulatory approach to housing and the idea is you need to build more to lower prices. He's really shifted in their direction and embraced a lot of their ideas. So part of what he's doing well, you know, a lot of it's his energy, his youth, his enthusiasm, his good looks, his charm, all that comes through. But he's also governing in a smart and pragmatic way. And I think those two things together.

• 15:15Speaker 04

  The last point I'd make is that crime is way down. He's not dealing with huge influxes of immigrants being shipped up from Texas. And I think some of the fundamental conditions for his affordability message to break through are those sorts of things of having, you know, New Yorkers feeling like they have basic security in their homes and their neighborhood and their everyday lives. That really clears the way for that focus on affordability and day-to-day life improvements.

• 15:36Kara Swisher?

  Amanda?

• 15:37Speaker 00

  I would add one other thing, which is that he helps the credibility gap that Democrats have right now. You know, within eight days of taking office, he did that press conference where he announced the expansion of 3K and beginning a pilot program for 2K towards universal childcare in the city. He's working towards fast and free buses. He has frozen the rent. You know, whether you maybe liked those policies or not, which especially as a parent of toddlers, love the universal childcare, it is really proof that you can keep your promises. I think one of the challenges the Democratic Party has right now is even if you promise the moon, voters don't believe we'll deliver it. So I honestly think making him the face of the party in many ways, as someone who promises to do big things and then actually gets them done, helps close that credibility gap, which we're going to

• 16:20Speaker 00

  have a big problem with going into 2028 because all of these people running for Congress right now, they're promising big legislation. They're not going to be able to govern until Trump is no longer president. So it's one of the challenges of this moment.

• 16:33Kara Swisher?

  Yeah, it is. So every episode, we get a question from an outside expert. Here's yours.

• 16:39Speaker 06

  Hi, I'm Liz Smith, and I am a Democratic strategist and advisor to majority Democrats on the bench. My question for you is, since 2024, we have seen Democratic voters embrace a lot of anti-establishment candidates and insurgent candidates and all of the energy around them. But of course, we're seeing the pitfalls with this, with the main Senate race. So my question for you is, how do Democrats harness that energy? And given your preferences, what do you think the basic vetting standards or thresholds should be for outsider candidates going forward so we avoid another platner-type situation?

• 17:17Kara Swisher?

  Adam, Amanda, and then Roche.

• 17:20Speaker 04

  Yeah, I think this is where you can sort of envision a big tent, right? This is where big tentism, which is sort of a core principle for us at the Searchlight Institute, really comes through, which is like, you know, welcome DSA into the party. But for folks who are running in tougher races, they should have the anti-establishment vibe. They should criticize Democratic leadership because it very much deserves to be criticized. But then don't take some of these far-left positions that are going to be hard to defend in swing states and purple states. You know, Maine is still pretty much a blue state. Kamala Harris won it by, I think, seven points. You know, so Plattner could have probably gotten away with some of those left wing positions if he hadn't had the scandals. And then, yeah, I mean, I think vetting people properly is a good idea. I mean, there were signs. It's worth doing some introspection. I mean, I supported him probably long past when there were a lot of red flags that should

• 18:05Speaker 04

  have signaled where this was going. We knew the circumstantial information about him having this decades-long struggles with PTSD and a passion for violence and, you know, disrespectful and dismissive attitudes towards sexual assault. I mean, like, there were signs, right? And so it wasn't a shock. So the lack of vetting was bad. And then I think ignoring a lot of these signs was also a mistake in retrospect. But fortunately, we'll get a, hopefully get a, you know, good candidate in that race soon and beat Susan Collins.

• 18:30Kara Swisher?

  Amanda?

• 18:31Speaker 00

  So Raff for Something over the last 10 years has endorsed more than 4,000 candidates. We do deep vetting on each one. We do background checks. We do social media scrubs. We do local operatives who check us and tell us the context. We've had to rescind endorsements less than 10 times in 10 years. It is possible to run a candidate recruitment program at scale that brings in people with integrity and also strong character. Now, to Adam's point about the Big Ten, the way we have structured this is that we are tight on values and flexible on policy, knowing that those values are going to show up differently in a city council race in New York than they might in a school board race in Alaska. That's how we were able to elect like a DSA person to the Atlanta City Council, but also a former Republican who left the party after January 6th, so was there all the way through

• 19:16Speaker 00

  Trump I in rural Pennsylvania, who's now running for State House, Andrew Harbaugh. It is possible. I do think you have to operate not as a kingmaker. I think one of the challenges that happened with Plattner is they were doing, you know, Mad Libs-style candidate recruitment. We are looking for X kind of occupation, an X demographic, with X kind of political engagement, because that's who we think can win. You cannot do top-down kingmaking. We have learned this. Voters smell the bullshit. They don't like it, and it inevitably backfires, as we saw in Maine. We cannot puppet master candidates anymore if we ever could. What we have to do is empower people who say, you know what, I think I can see myself in leadership, and then give them the tools to succeed, and do that in as wide a way as we can.

• 20:00Speaker 00

  Like, throw the doors open to as many people as possible. If we try to manufacture people, we'll get either inauthentic, unvetted, or the combination of the two that voters will reject.

• 20:09Kara Swisher?

  Right. Or something blows up in that case. Rochny?

• 20:14Speaker 05

  I think that this is an opportunity for us. I mean, we saw what happened to the Republican Party when the Tea Party took over. We have those lessons to learn. We are experiencing the same ground swell of anger from our base, anger and frustration. We have the opportunity now to listen to that and amend the way that we are running candidates and promoting policy and just treating our voters. And so I think we just have to stop digging in our heels and actually listen to the voters and do hard things in order to prevent candidate disaster.

• 20:51Kara Swisher?

  Candidate disaster can come in many forms, though, correct? I mean, presumably, this one was vetted, and he seemed to be a king maid, essentially, rather than he was interested in doing it in the first place.

• 21:02Speaker 00

  And I think the flip to that is also worth noting, which was that he was up in opposition to also someone who was not, if talked from obscurity, chosen for this race. Like Schumer at all recruited Janet Mills, who did not want to run. And you can tell because she did not then throw herself into this opening now, did not really want to be campaigning, was deeply unpopular as governor, and was so obviously not the right fit for an anti-establishment, anti-garyon bureaucratic moment. People did not want the 78-year-old governor to be dragged out of retirement to run for office. And that, I think, is what made so much of the last couple of months in Maine so frustrating is that it actually didn't have to be this way. It didn't have to be Plathner versus Mills and then ultimately the outcome against Collins.

• 21:46Speaker 00

  There was a really interesting, diverse field of folks running for governor. Some of them could have run for Senate. We're now seeing there's a pretty exciting bench in Maine that we're starting to build up. Like, there are villains on nearly every side of this story. And I think it is worth pointing to that as we go.

• 22:01Kara Swisher?

  Yes, absolutely. Schumer did try to king make there and made a mistake there.

• 22:06Kara Swisher?

  We'll be back in a minute.

• 22:16Kara Swisher?

  Support for this show comes from The Guardian. Trying to locate news sources that reliably separate fact from fiction can seem like looking for a needle in a haystack these days. Social media feeds, cable news, and subscription-based news outlets might be able to give you one version of the news, but not in the way that you need. You want news fast, but slow enough to actually absorb the information. Stateside with Kai Wright and Carter Sherman is here to do just that. The podcast tries to slow down the news and wrestle with the questions regarding the world at large at your own pace. Three times a week, hosts Kai Wright and Carter Sherman bring their expertise together to showcase different and engaging perspectives regarding the world today. They will use their collective knowledge to discuss the news, international affairs,

• 22:59Kara Swisher?

  climate, culture, sports, lifestyle, fashion, and wellness. Plus, The Guardian wants to emphasize they're not billionaire-owned, meaning they're free to report the whole picture without interference. Go to theguardian.com/stateside to learn more and listen wherever you get your podcasts, or watch on YouTube starting May 13.

• 23:20Speaker 02

  Ripple has been powering modern finance for a decade. We're leading the charge to bridge the gap between existing financial systems and the future of finance. You can have it all: legacy, stability, and digital innovation. Systems that work with your other systems. Because with the right partner, the question isn't crypto or traditional finance, the question is simply, why choose? A new standard of modern finance. It's happening with Ripple. For informational purposes only, availability of products can vary and may be provided by different Ripple entities.

• 23:50Kara Swisher?

  Support for this show comes from Lisa. If you've got kids in the house like me, then you know better than anyone, good sleep can be hard to come by. Yet, study after study has shown how important getting good sleep is for your health and well-being. So if you're looking for a great way to start getting better sleep, you might want to check out Lisa mattresses. Lisa mattresses are meticulously designed and assembled in the USA with specific sleep positions and field preferences in mind. And they back it all up with free shipping, easy returns, and 120-night sleep trial. I got a great Lisa queen mattress that's in my home in San Francisco. I've slept on it many times. I will not be returning it in any way. It's incredibly comfortable. It is made beautifully, and it has really improved the quality of my sleep. I'm very particular about mattresses. This is a terrific mattress. Plus, Leesa

• 24:34Kara Swisher?

  is committed to eco-friendly materials. That's important to me, and sustainable manufacturing practices. Go to leesa.com for 20% off select mattresses, plus you get an extra $50 off with the promo code Kara, exclusive for my listeners. That's L-E-E-S-A dot com, promo code Kara, K-A-R-A, for 20% off select mattresses, plus an extra $50 off. And when you use our code, you're supporting our show. Leesa.com, promo code Kara. The next big test will be Michigan Senate primary. Progressive Abdul El-Sayed is challenging Representative Haley Stevens, a third candidate who is trying to strike the middle ground between the two. Michigan Senator Mallory McMorrow dropped out. She just never caught

• 25:19Kara Swisher?

  on. Democrats have to hold on to the seat if they want any chance to take back the Senate, but for progressives, it's their last chance to show one of their Senate candidates can win in a purple state. It would be a big win if he won. The primary is August 4. What are you all watching right now? Rashni, you start, and then Amanda, then Adam.

• 25:39Speaker 05

  I've been looking at the polling. It's going back and forth, but it seems like he's gaining a lot of momentum. He is running a similar playbook as Mamdani in New York City. He is money back in your pockets, hold corporations accountable, and take corporate money out of politics, Medicare for all, reducing cost of living for voters, and reducing that economic crunch that voters are feeling. And he's very consistently on message with those policy points. And voters are really resonating with that message in Michigan.

• 26:14Kara Swisher?

  What about you, Amanda?

• 26:16Speaker 00

  I'm looking at the spending discrepancy. They have spent, I think, over 50 million on behalf of Haley Stevens. She is outspending El-Sayed, I believe, 10 to 1 at this point. If that's how much you have to spend to get her over the finish line in the primary, is there going to be the enthusiasm for her in the general? If she wins this, I don't know.

• 26:35Kara Swisher?

  So that's what you're looking at, is this amount of money?

• 26:37Speaker 00

  I'm keeping an eye on that of like, how can you, again, can you king make in a state like this?

• 26:43Kara Swisher?

  Adam?

• 26:44Speaker 04

  I'm looking at whether El-Sayed decides to make some of the pragmatic choices in the way that Mamdammi has in order to appeal to a broader audience as we approach the general election. Because, you know, he was pressed on a CNN interview recently on his previous comments supporting defund the police, and he stood by them, and I thought that was unfortunate. You know, that's, there are real electability concerns, but it's not about, you know, anything about him as a person. It's about some of these positions that he's taken that are going to be difficult to defend in a Michigan general election race. Now, on the other hand, similar to the dynamic in Maine, I'm no big fan of Haley Stevens either. I don't think she's been a particularly compelling candidate. There's not a really strong electability argument for her either because her past performance, you know, her numbers are OK, but they're not amazing. So it's another one of these dynamics where the choice is difficult.

• 27:29Speaker 04

  El-Sayed is probably a better political athlete. He's very talented. He's great on social media, but he has taken some positions that unless he starts making some pragmatic choices, and there's still time left for him to do so, I do think those things are going to be liabilities in a general election.

• 27:41Kara Swisher?

  Do either of you think, Amanda, do you think that, or Rocha?

• 27:44Speaker 00

  I think he has some liabilities. I go back and forth a little bit because on the one hand, like, if he genuinely does believe we should defund the police, or whatever statement he's saying, like, there is some value in really saying what you believe.

• 27:55Kara Swisher?

  Right.

• 27:55Speaker 00

  Even if he knows that it's not a practical position to take, and I think part of that is it can signal to people that they can trust you. So, you know, I think this is where you get into some tension here of, do you? Contort your policies for an electorate? Or do you still true to what your value like? It's a tough call, and I think you have to be a really talented communicator to be able to do it.

• 28:14Speaker 04

  Well, Mamdammi, you know, Mamdammi just 100% reversed himself on, you know, apologizing to the to the New York City police officers and and just distance himself from defund the police. As we've talked about here, he's wildly popular and doing a great job. So I think it's possible to do it.

• 28:28Kara Swisher?

  Well, he's already mayor.

• 28:29Speaker 04

  He's already mayor, but you know, listen, Woke One was crazy. Everybody said a lot of stuff that they probably didn't get caught up in the moment. I think there's also a level forgiveness of saying, hey, listen, we all got a little carried away there. And with with the benefit of hindsight, I've decided to sort of reevaluate those things. People don't, you know, mind people changing their mind if they're open and honest about their reasoning there.

• 28:46Speaker 00

  Yeah, I think it comes to whether he can like articulate how he got to a new place. And I think Mamdammi is able to do it in part because he has the trust of voters. I don't say he does like does has not earned that yet. I think he's still got a little bit of work to do there.

• 28:59Kara Swisher?

  Where actually do people are people allowed to change their mind if even if it's not genuine necessarily?

• 29:04Speaker 05

  I think if it's a genuine change, then yes, they are allowed. Voters really, really value authenticity in candidates. And to voters, that means staying true to your beliefs. And so I think if you can explain to voters, here's why I believed in defund the police, and here is why I have now changed my mind. That's not just, you know, I saw poll numbers that say it's unpopular, and so now I'm going to change my mind on it. Or my big corporate donors have told me this is not a popular position for me to hold. So now I'm going to flip flop on it. If they can display that level of authenticity, I think it's totally appropriate to change change your mind.

• 29:46Kara Swisher?

  All right, let's talk about what's driving the rise of these insurgent candidates. Amanda, like you mentioned, run for something saw a record number of people sign up to run for office after the 2024 election, mainly because they were angry at the Democratic Party. Talk about specific ways these people felt the party was failing them and how it's driving where we are. I mean, angry is one thing, but particularly, what's the specific thing?

• 30:08Speaker 00

  Back at 25 and 26, the biggest moments we saw for candidate recruitment were first big wave of Doge firing. So there's frustration with the federal government and like, how could you let people lose their jobs? And a lot of it was laid off federal workers who had public service experience and wanted to to run in a different way. The second was Schumer's failure to resolve things during the first shutdown fight. They were pissed. They're like, how can you hand off our government to this guy? I thought we said that this was the end of democracy. If this is actually an existential crisis, why are you playing games with him? The third big moment was Mumdani's win. Like after Mumdani won in June of last year, we had 10,000 people sign up in those two weeks. I think part of that was, you know, his joy, the inspiration, but also this idea that the establishment

• 30:50Speaker 00

  is not unbeatable. They just go unchallenged. And like, you can take them on if you try. The fourth big one was right after the elections in the fall, when you see people like, you know, yes, Mumdani, but also Spanberger, Mikey Sherrill in New Jersey, just like, oh, yeah, people can do this. Good people can run and good people can win. Now, I would say the thing that I have come back to a bunch over the last year is how much housing comes up in these conversations. And in particular, young people feeling like Democrats have not done enough to make it possible to buy a home, they have not done enough for renters. And it is, I think, part of a larger sense that young people do not have agency over their lives. They don't have an ability to choose where they live, where

• 31:31Speaker 00

  they work, how they live, if they can start a family. Housing is the number one issue people are talking about when they talk about running for office. And I think it's connected to how young voters are feeling.

• 31:41Kara Swisher?

  That's a very good point. The political strategist now, James Carville, recently unloaded on these democratic socialist and progressive candidates trying to challenge incumbents. He said they were, quote, "So fucking stupid. I don't know what to say about it." Adam, you mentioned the need for a big 10 approach. Do you care what Carville has to say about this, speaking of gerontocracy? To what extent is he emblematic of the generational divide that's animating some of these candidates?

• 32:03Speaker 04

  I think he's very emblematic of the generational divide, you know? I think he's wrong on this. Look, you know, there was a picture on Twitter the other day of a DSA meeting, right? And there were two things that I took away from it. One was that half the people in the room were wearing face masks, right? And so in July of 2026, that is an indication. That a lot of these people are not representative of the broader American public. Right. But the other thing that was equally important, if not more important, was that the room was packed and you had 50 or so people, you know, deeply committed to the civic process, who care deeply about issues, who are debating, you know, Robert's Rules of Order and all these sort of, you know, arcane procedures that, you know, the DNC should be extremely jealous of that level of commitment and energy and organization.

• 32:43Speaker 04

  Right. And so we may not agree on every issue, but that passion and that commitment has a place in our big tent and it must have a place in our big tent. You know, we can all disagree on issues and say what we believe and where we draw lines and distinguish ourselves and what's right for New York City is not right for Texas. But that energy is incredibly valuable and we would be very dumb as a party to try to run it out of the party.

• 33:06Kara Swisher?

  Why are people like him doing that then, Amanda?

• 33:09Speaker 00

  It threatens people like his power. I mean, the institutions will always protect himself. Carville and many other of the older leaders like him are creatures of these institutions. They have built them from the ground up. They are scared. When we talk about the leaders who got us into this mess will not be the ones to get us out of it. We also mean people like him. This is not to say he did not do some good things in his service, but that dude does not understand what it's like to be a 20 or 30 something in the United States right now. He does not understand why people are angry. He and so many others of his sort of generation of leaders, both literally and figuratively, are so removed from where people are. And I would just posit, if you don't like DSA, it is possible for the establishment

• 33:51Speaker 00

  wings of the party or the old guard, such as it is, to offer a different vision. Like, they could avail themselves of selling something that would solve the problems and speaking to the anger people feel. The fact that they have instead chosen to punch left or to, you know, blame the young people who want these wild and crazy things, like... Make an argument.

• 34:10Kara Swisher?

  Yeah, I made that argument to one of them. Go ahead, Roshni.

• 34:13Speaker 05

  I would add that I think the older generation too often minimizes the intelligence of young voters. And because a lot of young voters get their information on social media or from their friends, assume that it's not as good of information as they're getting in newspapers or on cable TV. And at least what we're seeing in our research and talking to young folks, that could not be further from the truth. They're so well informed on the issues.

• 34:41Kara Swisher?

  I would agree.

• 34:42Speaker 05

  They really understand what's going on. They are just saying consistently over and over again, they're fed up with the system. And so I think it's a really wrong take.

• 34:50Kara Swisher?

  Right, I do, again, I think of my sons, they're very well informed. They just don't agree with them. That's, you know what I mean? And that's what, it's really hard because one of the things I said, you tell young people to be involved and to vote, and when they do it, you tell them their vote is stupid. Like, I don't understand. They're doing what you said, and you just don't like their choice, which is very different. I also had political journalist Seth Herndon on the show a few months ago. He talked about how voters now don't fit into neat ideological boxes. I think that's another truism. And it's more important for candidates to be clearly articulate in their values than it is to fit neatly into an ideological box. First, Roshni, how does that square through what you're seeing in the research with young and minority voters who've been moving away from the Democratic Party? And what animates them now?

• 35:35Speaker 05

  I think we've heard a lot about young men, particularly young men of color, over the last few election cycles, moving further away from the Democratic Party or voting more for Republicans. And so we've undertaken a lot of research over the last couple of years with our partners at Third Way and at Black Men Vote to dig into what's going on there, what is leading to these votes. And now that we're seeing these young men slowly move back towards the Democratic Party, what is driving that as well? And what we've found a lot is young men, young people are severely economically strained. They heard Democrats in 2024 say, "The economy is fine."

• 36:18Speaker 05

  Getting better. We don't have to worry about it. And so they were looking for candidates in that time, Trump, who were making arguments that identified the pain that they were experiencing and found some sort of solution for it.

• 36:33Kara Swisher?

  Now they're hearing Trump say that.

• 36:35Speaker 05

  Yeah, now they have noticed that he is not going to help them at all. He's making their lives a lot worse. And so they're looking for an alternative. And I think that's where some of these insurgent candidates too have come in. But I think an important point there is to note that at no point, even while they were voting for Trump, did these young men, particularly young men of color, identify as MAGA or Republican. They're still overwhelmingly progressive or Democratic or moderate. They just needed a place to land in the last election because they didn't feel like they had a home in the Democratic Party. And so I think what we're seeing is more and more young people

• 37:16Speaker 05

  are not identifying cleanly with parties in the way that they have in the past. And so we have to be a little bit more flexible with our messaging and our policy positions.

• 37:28Kara Swisher?

  Now, Adam, you had some examples of what Roshan is talking about in your book. Can you share some of those?

• 37:33Speaker 04

  Yeah, that's right. I mean, I think the overarching frame here is that the defining feature of the American people is their ideological heterodoxy, right? The American voters are not rigidly ideological. And so they don't take all their positions from the left or the right. You know, they mix things from column A and column B. And so when you've seen candidates who've been successful, especially in resisting attacks as being socialist or Republican smears, it's because they mix those positions together and convey this heterodoxy that connects with the American people and makes people think, oh, when you face a tough decision, you're going to be an independent thinker. You're a different kind of Democrat. You're going to think like me. And so, you know, when you look around the country now, the candidates who are succeeding in some of these redder areas, people like James Talarico are mixing in non-traditional Democratic positions with their sort of liberal values. So Talarico, running in Texas,

• 38:18Speaker 04

  is talking about how valuable the oil and gas industry is to the Texas economy. It supports hundreds of thousands of working class jobs. Hundreds of thousands of working class Hispanic men, you know, are employed by the oil and gas industry. And so, you know, for a candidate like him, who clearly is deeply committed to liberal values, if you're going to win in a state like Texas, you got to mix in some of those heterodox positions. And that's part of why I think we're seeing him succeed.

• 38:40Kara Swisher?

  So I mean, one of the things that's really isn't usually a top concern for voters, but like we talked about, support for Israel and taking money from AIPAC is still really dividing Democrats. You just saw this vote in the House, which was unprecedented, I think. Even if it's not voters' top concern, like the economy, talk about the role of the issue of support of Israel is playing now on the campaign trail.

• 39:02Speaker 00

  I think it's twofold. One is that it's a moral limis test, especially for young voters, but even for older voters, too, is sense that can you call a spade a spade? Can you call what we are seeing in Gaza a genocide, as it so clearly is? Can you see the atrocity and can you name it? And I think for younger voters in particular, that kind of moral clarity is necessary. The second is the way that AIPAC is trying to buy elections speaks to the larger problem of money in politics, for people feeling like their voice can be drowned out by amount of money that feels undemocratic and unfair. I think AIPAC has become the boogeyman for that, but they are not alone here. We're seeing that from crypto, we're seeing that from tech.

• 39:43Kara Swisher?

  I think Elon Musk has $90 million in right now.

• 39:45Speaker 00

  Yeah, them, the gambling, but I think the combination of the moral clarity around the issue and the money being spent that is so clearly removed from where the American people are, which I think is also the challenge here.

• 39:56Kara Swisher?

  We'll be back in a minute.

• 40:07Speaker 07

  Support for this show comes from Indeed. When the pressure's on and you need to hire the right person for the job, Indeed Sponsored Jobs has got your back. Instead of forcing you to spend tons of time searching, Indeed Sponsored Jobs matches you with quality candidates fast. According to their data, sponsored jobs posted directly on Indeed are 95% more likely to report a hire than non-sponsored jobs. Join the 3.3 million employers worldwide that use Indeed to connect with quality talent that fits their needs. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more results. When you need the right person to cut through the chaos, this is the job for Indeed Sponsored Jobs. And listeners to the show will get a $75

• 40:50Speaker 07

  $5 sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves at indeed.com/podcast. Just go to indeed.com/podcast right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. That's indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need the right hire fast? Then this is the job for Indeed sponsored jobs.

• 41:18Speaker 07

  Visible puts the ultimate wireless hack in the palm of your hand with unlimited 5G wireless data and hotspot designed to keep you connected powered by Verizon's 5G network.

• 41:30Kara Swisher?

  And no contract holding you back. Plans start at $25 a month or get the premium Visible Plus Pro Plan and save $10 on your first month when you use promo code HACK. Make the switch at visible.com. Terms apply. See visible.com for details.

• 41:48Kara Swisher?

  I'm Kara Swisher and I like people who say the quiet part out loud. In fact, I love it. That's Tiger Sisters, a new podcast that recently joined the Vox Media Podcast Network. Cherie Brooke Lu and Jean Lu are real sisters who built their careers at LinkedIn and Goldman Sachs. On their weekly podcast, they're giving the next generation practical tips on how to get ahead, how to write emails people actually answer, how to make your LinkedIn profile stand out, and how to keep learning as an adult. It's straight talk about money, career, and relationships every Monday. Follow Tiger Sisters wherever you get your podcasts.

• 42:24Kara Swisher?

  We're just a few months out from the midterms. The Democrats are going to have to figure out how to navigate these divides in real time if they want to retake power in Congress. Most people feel they have a lock on the House. We'll see. Senate is in play. I think that's probably the fairest way to say it. But the big fears that Democrats are facing a moment like the Republicans did in 2010 and 2012 during the Tea Party wave when unqualified or just bad candidates cost them a Senate majority. Although 2010 was still a wave election for Republicans, let's be clear. And when you're looking at how can Democrats avoid that same fate between now and November, although I think the candidate quality is pretty high from what I'm looking around the country.

• 42:59Speaker 04

  Yeah, I mean, you know, I lived through those elections. Candidates like Christine O'Donnell in Delaware, who famously had to run an ad saying, I'm not a witch, you know, losing a, well, which should have been a winnable seat for Republicans because Mike Castle, she beat Mike Castle.

• 43:12Kara Swisher?

  Being a witch today might win you a seat, but go ahead.

• 43:15Speaker 04

  That's true. Times change. You know, she should, hey, she should make another run. You know, so, right, so we don't have anybody that's that bad in terms of candidate quality. But I think, you know, this is why we really got to hone in on questions of electability. We only have a few primaries left, and I really genuinely believe that any of the major candidates in any of these primaries we have left on the Senate side can win, right? Especially in an environment that is really strong up for us on the fundamentals. People are deeply upset about Trump. They're really angry. They hate the economy. All that makes for a good midterm for Democrats. We just have to get really smart and not let these, you know, people need to be more focused on winning an election than winning an argument. And if Abdul El-Sayed is the nominee, his job is to beat Mike Rogers, the Republican, right? And that, put that first above everything else, even if it means conceding some issues

• 44:00Speaker 04

  on factional purity, you got to focus on winning. It would be not in his interest or the interest of his faction for him to lose. So everybody's just got to get really smart as we turn into general election season and focus on winning. And I think we don't have any candidates who are incapable of doing that as long as they put beating the Republican over winning these factional arguments.

• 44:17Kara Swisher?

  Amanda, does money play as big a role, do you think? There is enormous, I mean, Ken Griffin, that Elon, the tech people are putting a lot in. Trump has some slush fund. Is that going to make a difference? It didn't make a difference in Wisconsin when Elon tried to get those judges put in. And it didn't make a difference for Tom Steyer in California, for example.

• 44:35Speaker 00

  I think money matters to the extent that candidates and their outside partners have the ability to run strong campaigns. I do not think you can buy elections the way that you used to. I think it is much, much harder to make the case that simply outspending your opponent will guarantee an outcome. I think especially in this election where Democrats and Democratic voters were ready to crawl over broken glass to vote, and their job is going to be convince Republican voters that Trump's not on the ballot, you may not love the economy right now, you're sort of souring on this, but still show up. It's just a much harder case to make. I don't know if there's enough money that can sell a shitty product.

• 45:09Speaker 05

  I would add too that voters are a lot more skeptical of information that we're feeding them these days with the rise of AI and information coming on social media. They want to know who is responsible for the message and why they're spending all of this money on political ads. And we hear that so often in focus groups when we test messages, when we test ads, when we test content. Who's responsible for this? What's their angle? And so I think voters are a lot more skeptical when they look at the amount of money that's being spent in politics now.

• 45:41Kara Swisher?

  Absolutely. So a lot more progressive candidates are campaigning on the message abolish ICE. A poll in March showed about half voters supported the idea. I think it's higher now. And we just saw two more fatal shootings this month. It looks like it's animating a lot of voters. Is that the case? And Rajni, you first. What are your surveys revealed about ICE enforcement as a vehicle? And then Amanda and Adam, please weigh in.

• 46:03Speaker 05

  I think voters hold a very nuanced view on this actually, in the same way that they do around the slogan defund the police. They very much are supportive of having some sort of immigration enforcement mechanism in the country, but they are very, very unsupportive of the actions that Trump's ICE is taking in murdering Americans and forcing people into camps and kicking people out of the country. They do not like the way that ICE is operating. I think this is especially true among Latino communities right now and why he's losing so much ground that he gained in the last election among Latino communities.

• 46:47Speaker 05

  They are seeing their neighbors and their friends and family being targeted. And so voters do hold a nuanced view in this. And I think running on the idea of abolishing or reforming ICE is a popular position for candidates now.

• 47:03Kara Swisher?

  Amanda?

• 47:04Speaker 00

  I totally agree. I also think this is one of those places where the Democratic Party leadership's failure to show sufficient anger really matters. Like Chris Van Hollen traveling to El Salvador and like putting his body on the line, or even Brad Lander doing the same in New York, some of it is performative, but voters want to see that you're validating their feelings, that this is an atrocity, that this is horrific, that ICE should not be able to murder people in the streets. I also think the flip is also true, which is that voters have seen now over the last 18 months, totally ordinary people stand up against ICE in a way that I think is deeply inspiring and in some ways restores some faith in the American people and in this idea that like you can be responsible for your neighbor, that while our elites and our billionaires have been deeply cowardly,

• 47:49Speaker 00

  ordinary Americans have been incredibly brave. So watching our leadership fail gives them an opportunity to rise.

• 47:55Speaker 04

  Yeah, I think we did a poll at Searchlight after the shooting in Minnesota, and what it showed two things. One was that ICE was unpopular. The other was that people still wanted interior enforcement of our immigration laws, right? And so however you message it, you have to make clear, and what people are saying is, you know, not like this, right? They want interior enforcement, but they don't, they're horrified, rightly so, by what they're seeing. So they want enforcement that abides by the rule of the law, that treats people humanely, that isn't pulling people out of cars and certainly isn't shooting them in the head, you know, for just trying to get out of the way. So that's the line that Democrats have to walk, where, you know, they should absolutely be harsh in their criticism of these atrocities that we're seeing and this incredibly reckless approach

• 48:39Speaker 04

  to interior enforcement while still making clear that we are a nation of laws and we do need interior enforcement of our immigration laws. It just has to be humane and it has to abide by the rule of law.

• 48:50Speaker 00

  Yeah, it's interesting because I do think it's a communications issue. There was a really interesting video, some guy going on about what happened in Maine, a Mainer. And he's like, well, if it was in this country legally, he's in trouble, da-da. And then the guy was like, well, you know, he was in this country legally. And he goes, oh, and he goes, and he was just trying to leave. Oh, and he had all his papers, right? Oh. And it was so interesting to watch in real time, this guy who was very loud mouthed.

• 49:14Kara Swisher?

  Shift rather quickly. He was actually shifting. It was an interesting moment to watch.

• 49:19Speaker 04

  Real time persuasion, you know?

• 49:20Kara Swisher?

  Right.

• 49:21Speaker 04

  Amazing to see, yeah.

• 49:22Kara Swisher?

  Now, you all, I have two more questions. You all talked about the need to prioritize winning over ideological purity. But, you know, some of these progressive candidates, as they're pivoting to the general, how can they appeal to a broader electorate without compromising so much that they no longer seem genuine, especially in purple states and districts? I'd love each of you to answer, and then I have one final question.

• 49:41Speaker 00

  You know, I think keeping it focused on the problems you want to solve and like speaking from a place of values, understanding that if you are clear about what your goal is, there's a lot of different ways to get at that goal. And that's, that's kind of what the policy conversation is about, is we can all agree that everyone should have access to affordable healthcare. What are the different ways we can get there? And when candidates have a strong sense of values and of what they believe, the, the conversation about tactics and, and how you communicate that is much easier. I think candidates get screwed, and we see them fail at this, when their campaign or themselves have to spend time figuring out what is it I believe, as opposed to how do I communicate what I believe?

• 50:18Kara Swisher?

  Adam?

• 50:19Speaker 04

  Yeah, I think part of being authentic is saying what you believe. And most people don't hold ideas that are consistent with an ideology on every single topic, right? And so liberals are going to have mostly liberal views, and that's great. And that's what the role we play in this system. But they probably have a few things that they believe personally that does diverge a little bit from sort of leftist purity tests. And they should just say that too, right? So that's part of what being authentic means is saying all the things you believe out loud. And that's the right balance for a general election where, you know, you're mostly going to agree with the left, but on a few things, you're going to have an independent point of view. And that is authentic because it's what you believe. And it also demonstrates to general election voters and swing voters

• 51:02Speaker 04

  who might have voted for Trump last time, that you're going to be someone who thinks for themselves and who's going to be guided by your own core values and commitments, not by a rigid ideology.

• 51:11Speaker 05

  And I also think outreach for candidates is paramount, making sure that they are speaking to voters where they are, addressing the issues that are important to them and coming in at the level that they understand those issues. I mean, for example, Mam Donnie, in New York, AAPI voters had been voting more and more Republican over the course of the last few years. And Mam Donnie, in the general election, drove AAPI turnout higher than it has been in New York City in years, and actually got 87% of the South Asian vote in New York City, which is much more than Democratic candidates have been getting over the last few years. So having an authentic candidate and then having a candidate that is willing to go

• 51:55Speaker 05

  into their communities and authentically speak to their issues and problem solve with them is the key there.

• 52:03Kara Swisher?

  Yeah, yeah. I had suggested to a presidential candidate, I'm like, go where they are, not where you are. Like, they were in Nantucket, and I was like, leave Nantucket immediately. As we head into the 2028 presidential election, the eventual Democratic nominee is going to have to appeal to both sides of this divide and the broader electorate to win back the White House. Is this the start of a serious alignment for the party or just another cyclical swing to the left that could prove politically costly, like it was for Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024?

• 52:32Speaker 04

  I think this is an opportunity to build a lasting realignment and dominate not just the next election, but the next generation for Democrats. And I think it requires us to make some smart choices, starting now with the midterms and going into 2028. I have this book coming out called Supermajority, and the idea is that this is what we need to think. We need to think about how to build a supermajority and reject these narrow majorities that we've been trapped in for the last 10 years or so. And that means thinking about how to win in places like Nebraska and Texas and Ohio and the Dakotas, where Democrats used to hold Senate seats. And if we make the choices we need to to do that, we can build durable power that's not just going to swing back and forth, because you can't, you know, everybody here wants to pass big, ambitious change, but you really can't do it on narrow majorities.

• 53:16Speaker 04

  I'd be the first to say we should eliminate the filibuster in the Senate. My first book was about that, you know, we should Definitely get rid of it, but you're gonna need large Senate majorities to pass big ambitious bills and to reshape the courts, which are gonna strike down anything we pass if we don't reshape them anyway, right? So we need to be smart and thoughtful about this and say, look, we will accept divergence from purity tests, especially in purple and red states, because it's the cost benefit is a no brainer. And we need to be smart and strategic, starting now with these midterms, but but taking that mindset forward into 2028 as we think about how to beat Republicans and win back the White House.

• 53:50Kara Swisher?

  Roshni?

• 53:51Speaker 05

  At a base level, the Democratic Party brand is wildly unpopular right now. So it is ripe for realignment and to start from the beginning. And all of the populist and progressive policies that we've been discussing over the last hour are wildly popular, not only with progressive, self proclaimed progressives, but also with moderates and independents and even some right leaning voters. And so to build that big tent back for the Democratic Party, I think it is time for that realignment.

• 54:22Kara Swisher?

  Amanda?

• 54:22Speaker 00

  I don't know if any of your listeners are romance novel readers, but there's a trope in romance novels about, you know, the looks like a cinnamon roll, but could actually kill you of like the nice guy with like, so like a little bit, little bit mean. I think that's where the Democratic Party is going in the sense that I suspect after this cycle, we are going to be looking for a national leader who is both like kind and earnest and optimistic and imagines a world that is better, but also tough on accountability and is not going to mess around with holding Trump and the Republican Party accountable for what has been done. And the the winning candidates, sort of winning part of the party that can combine those two things is gonna be the the part that moves us forward.

• 55:02Kara Swisher?

  All right, then I can't resist. Who's your cinnamon roll? And then who is Adam and who is yours, Roshni?

• 55:08Speaker 00

  Oh, I think there's, I think Ossoff has certainly got it. I think AOC's got it if she wants it. I think Warnock, Loki is a sleeper. He's got it if he wants it. There's lots of variations of cinnamon roll.

• 55:18Kara Swisher?

  With a little bit of could actually kill you underneath. Adam.

• 55:22Speaker 04

  I'm shaking my head because those are literally the three that I would name. I mean, I think all of them are. I would also add, I would not be shocked if there's a total outsider candidate who takes us all by surprise and swoops in with that outsider energy, given how much passion there is for that right now.

• 55:37Kara Swisher?

  Anyone you can think of?

• 55:39Speaker 04

  You know, someone like Mark Cuban from the who has a business background, but deeply held.

• 55:44Kara Swisher?

  He's not running, just so you know. We talk about it every three days.

• 55:46Speaker 04

  Okay, well, that's hey, that's news. You know, this is me just sort of fantasizing, but you know, I saw Matthew McConaughey, you know, getting in on the action a little bit with the 250th anniversary. He's shown an interest in in politics occasionally.

• 55:56Kara Swisher?

  Can I give you some advice? Go listen to my interview with him and then you'll you'll change your mind.

• 56:01Speaker 04

  Okay, I'll do that right after this. Well, you know, but someone like that, I think, who's sort of, you know, comfortable in their own skin, good on social media, you know, but but has it has a commitment to deep American values and wants to do more, you know, we'll see, we'll see.

• 56:12Kara Swisher?

  Yeah, Rochny, you finish.

• 56:15Speaker 05

  I mean, I very much agree with the list of those three, and I think those are the three names that we hear voters bring up most often in focus groups as well. When we ask who are candidates who are working for you right now, we hear those three names pop up a lot.

• 56:28Kara Swisher?

  There's a lot of Georgia in there, a lot of cinnamon rolls from Georgia. All right. Thank you, three all so much, Adam, Amanda and Rochny for being here today. I really appreciate it.

• 56:36Speaker 05

  Thank you.

• 56:37Speaker 04

  Thanks for having us.

• 56:38Kara Swisher?

  Thanks. Today's show was produced by Michelle Aloue, Catherine Millsop, Madeline LaPlante-Duvey, Megan Burney and Kalen Lynch. Nishat Kurwa is Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Special thanks to Eamonn Whalen, Dave Shaw, Corinne Ruff and Julia Sharp Levine. Our engineers are Fernando Aruda and Rick Kwan, and our theme music is by Track academics. If you're already following the show, you are not a witch, or maybe you are. If not, you're part of the establishment, so you need to go. Actually, where you need to go is wherever you listen to podcasts, search for On with Kara Swisher and hit follow. Thanks for listening to On with Kara Swisher from Podium Media, New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network and us. We'll be back on Thursday with more.