167. The Three Hardest Words in the English Language

Why learning to say “I don’t know” is one of the best things you can do.

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:01Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Progressive. Whoever says saving money is hard doesn't know that new customers who bundle and save with Progressive save hundreds because switching your home and auto insurance is better than cutting down on the things you love, like those iced lattes that help you get ready to face the day. So switch your home and auto to Progressive and see if you could save and keep sipping away. Get your quote today at progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by PNC Bank. Boring. Great word, bad rep. Yet, time and time again, here at Freakonomics, we find that when something culture-changing happens,

• 0:43Stephen J. Dubner?

  boring things like calculations and careful planning are usually behind it, which begs the question, why not apply it to other aspects of life, like banking, for example? Well, PNC Bank did since its inception, proving time and again that the best banking strategy isn't the exciting type, but the steady, reliable, definitely not YOLO type. PNC Bank. Brilliantly boring since 1865. Brilliantly boring since 1865 is a registered mark of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC Bank, National Association, Member, FDIC. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by hotels.com. Hotels.com helps you find and book the right

• 1:25Stephen J. Dubner?

  stay for work faster. With business preferences, save your travel must haves, like gym access or breakfast, just once, then get tailored results whenever you search for work travel. Plus, with a free membership, you can save up to 20% on hotels and earn rewards on every stay for future travel. Book now at hotels.com. Visit hotels.com for details. Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work is a new way to work in ChatGPT. ChatGPT Work can pull info from across your apps and connect to your tools to help you

• 2:05Stephen J. Dubner?

  create finished work. You can even automate work in ChatGPT with the Scheduled Tasks feature, and the whole time, you stay in control. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chatgpt.com by selecting Work Mode, available on Plus and Pro plans.

• 2:32Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hey, it's Stephen Dubner. Our new book is out, Think Like a Freak, and we want to talk about it with you. So, we are forming the Think Like a Freak Book Club. How's it work? You send in your questions about the book, and we will answer them on this podcast. There are nine chapters in the book, so why don't we do the first installment of our book club with chapters one, two, and three. Those are: What does it mean to think like a freak? The three hardest words in the English language, and What's your problem? Just send your questions to [email protected] with the subject line "Book Club", and if we choose your question for the podcast, we will send you a signed copy of Think Like a Freak or a limited edition Think Like a Freak t-shirt. Thanks.

• 3:21Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hey, Levitt, can I read you a story? Sure.

• 3:24Speaker 01

  Okay. So, I'm going to tell you this story.

• 3:29Stephen J. Dubner?

  A little girl named Mary goes to the beach with her mother and brother.

• 3:32Speaker 01

  A little girl named Mary goes to the beach with her mother and brother.

• 3:37Stephen J. Dubner?

  They drive there in a red car.

• 3:38Speaker 01

  They drive there in a red car. At the beach...

• 3:42Stephen J. Dubner?

  They swim...

• 3:43Speaker 01

  Eat some ice cream...

• 3:44Stephen J. Dubner?

  Play in the sand...

• 3:45Speaker 01

  And have some sandwiches for lunch. So that's the end of the short story.

• 3:50Stephen J. Dubner?

  Now, Levitt, let me ask you a few questions about it.

• 3:52Speaker 01

  So now I'm going to ask you the questions. Ready?

• 3:56Stephen J. Dubner?

  Number one: What color was the car? I think it might have been red.

• 4:00Speaker 01

  What color was the car? The car was red. Fantastic.

• 4:05Stephen J. Dubner?

  Number two: Did they have fish and chips for lunch? No, they had sandwiches.

• 4:10Speaker 01

  Uh, yes, they did have fish and chips for lunch. No, they do not have fish and chips for lunch. What do they have? Sandwiches. They had sandwiches.

• 4:23Speaker 02

  Number three, did they listen to music in the car?

• 4:26Speaker 03

  No, they didn't.

• 4:27Speaker 02

  I'm sure they did. Doesn't everyone listen to music?

• 4:29Speaker 01

  Did they listen to music in the car?

• 4:32Speaker 03

  No, they didn't listen to music in the car.

• 4:37Speaker 02

  And number four, did they drink lemonade with their lunch?

• 4:40Speaker 01

  No, they didn't drink lemonade with their lunch.

• 4:43Speaker 02

  Probably not. Most people drink soda.

• 4:47Speaker 01

  What flavor ice cream did Mary have?

• 4:51Speaker 02

  I don't know.

• 4:51Speaker 03

  Mary had chocolate flavored ice cream.

• 4:54Speaker 01

  What flavor ice cream did Mary have?

• 4:56Speaker 03

  Mary had vanilla ice cream.

• 4:58Speaker 01

  What flavor ice cream did Mary have?

• 5:03Speaker 01

  You can say I don't know.

• 5:06Speaker 03

  Strawberry?

• 5:18Speaker 04

  From WNYC, this is Freakonomics Radio, the podcast that explores the hidden side of everything.

• 5:26Speaker 04

  Here's your host, Stephen Dubner.

• 5:40Stephen J. Dubner?

  Steve Levitt and I have just published a new book called Think Like a Freak. One chapter is called "The Three Hardest Words in the English Language." Now, what do you think those words are? In the past, some may have argued that people have a hard time saying "I love you." I don't think so. People run around saying "I love you" all the time to friends, pets, strangers. So what are those three most difficult words? So Levitt, one piece of business advice that people give all over the web, LinkedIn, and you just read all the regular kind of job searching career advice places. One big piece of advice I give is when you're in a job interview,

• 6:23Stephen J. Dubner?

  there's one thing you should never say to the person interviewing you, which is "I don't know." You should never admit you don't know the answer to a question. Think that's pretty good advice?

• 6:36Speaker 02

  That actually probably is good advice for an interview. That probably is.

• 6:40Stephen J. Dubner?

  Just say "energy."

• 6:43Speaker 02

  That probably is good advice for a job interview, but it is terrible advice for life.

• 6:50Stephen J. Dubner?

  And why is that such terrible advice for life?

• 6:53Speaker 02

  Let me try to answer that by example. So we wrote Freakonomics, and because it was deemed a business book, and we sold a lot of copies, that made us business experts. And since we wrote that book, I've been asked a ton, you as well, to go talk to companies and give them advice. And what's amazing to me, and I've kept very close attention over the last decade almost, is I could count, on one hand, the number of occasions in which someone in a company, in front of their boss, on a question that they might possibly have ever been expected to know the answer, has said, "I don't know." Within the business world, there's a general view that your job is to be an expert, and

• 7:37Speaker 02

  no matter how much you have to fake, or how much you're making it up, that you just should give an answer and hope for the best afterwards. And I've seen it teaching the business school students, that they're incredibly good, the MBAs, at faking like they know the answer when they have no idea. But that's so counterproductive. I mean, think about it. It might keep your job for another week or another month, it might make people think you're good, but that's not the point. I mean, what fun is life if all you do is go through life trying to fake like you're something that you're not, when really, the goal is to be good, and to improve, and to learn, and to make things better? And the only way to do that is to start by saying, "I don't know," when "I don't know, I don't know."

• 8:23Stephen J. Dubner?

  All right, so it's easy to ridicule the fakers and bluffers of the world, but we can understand their motivation, can't we? Everyone wants to look smart, look competent, look like we belong. But wouldn't it be even better if, as Levitt says, we could improve and learn, actually make things better? If you think so, listen on. Let's try to figure out where this reluctance to say "I don't know" comes from. Hi Amanda. Hey Stephen. Amanda Waterman teaches developmental psychology at the University of Leeds. A lot of her research is about people's willingness, especially children's willingness, to say "I don't know."

• 9:06Stephen J. Dubner?

  Her early research looked at whether kids would say "I don't know" when asked a patently ridiculous question.

• 9:14Speaker 01

  What do feet have for breakfast?

• 9:18Speaker 03

  toenails if you chop them off. Smelly socks.

• 9:22Speaker 01

  You can say "I don't know."

• 9:24Speaker 03

  They have your... They have your skin. They have a walk for breakfast. Shoes. Socks for breakfast!

• 9:35Speaker 01

  Okay, next question.

• 9:39Speaker 01

  Is red heavier than yellow?

• 9:44Speaker 03

  Don't believe me.

• 9:45Speaker 01

  That one. Is red heavier than yellow?

• 9:51Speaker 03

  No, because yellow is my favourite colour.

• 9:57Speaker 01

  Bella, what do you think?

• 9:58Speaker 03

  I think it is heavier than yellow because... Because, because, because.

• 10:07Speaker 03

  Red is in hell. And then yellow's in the sky, isn't it? Yeah, so it's down below, down there.

• 10:19Speaker 01

  Is a jumper angrier than a tree?

• 10:25Speaker 01

  No.

• 10:27Speaker 01

  Is a jumper angrier than a tree?

• 10:29Speaker 03

  No, because trees look like they have faces.

• 10:35Speaker 03

  Yes, a jumper is angrier than a tree because you can pick jumpers up and that's how they move. And trees just go like this. They sway from side to side in the wind.

• 10:58Stephen J. Dubner?

  So Amanda, is a sweater, what you there call a jumper, angrier than a tree?

• 11:04Speaker 05

  Okay, well, that's perhaps where this research started, where we asked children very silly questions about whether a jumper, or indeed a sweater, was angrier than a tree, to see whether they would indicate in any way whether they were confused by the question, or whether they would just go along with the sort of fun spirit of the question. And we found that often children did want to decide whether a jumper was angrier than a tree. But we moved on after that. I was more interested in looking at-

• 11:30Stephen J. Dubner?

  You got bored by that stuff, didn't you?

• 11:31Speaker 05

  I got bored. Jumpers are obviously more angry than trees, right?

• 11:34Stephen J. Dubner?

  Oh, really? I thought trees-

• 11:37Speaker 05

  No, no, jumpers were definitely angrier, because I think they're kind of used by people. You know, they have to be put on and off all the time, that kind of thing.

• 11:43Stephen J. Dubner?

  I see, okay.

• 11:44Speaker 05

  But we were more interested in looking at perhaps something that would be a little bit more applicable to real life, because generally, adults don't ask you very silly questions all the time. But you do come across questions to which you do not know the answer. So it might be a perfectly sensible question, but you just happen not to know the answer to it. So the research went on from silly questions to what we've called unanswerable questions.

• 12:06Stephen J. Dubner?

  Which brings us back to the story you heard earlier, about the little girl named Mary.

• 12:13Speaker 01

  A little girl named Mary goes to the beach with her mother and brother.

• 12:17Stephen J. Dubner?

  This story was part of a study that Amanda Waterman ran to see how children will answer a question that is essentially unanswerable, a question to which the most sensible answer is, "I don't know." In the story about Mary and her family going to the seashore, we learn several facts. The car was red, they ate sandwiches for lunch. But other facts are not given to us. Did they listen to music in the car? We aren't told that. Did they have lemonade with their sandwiches? We don't know.

• 12:47Speaker 01

  Did they drink lemonade with their lunch? No, they didn't drink lemonade with their lunch. Did they listen to music in the car?

• 12:58Speaker 01

  You can say "I don't know."

• 13:02Speaker 03

  No, they didn't listen to music in the car.

• 13:07Stephen J. Dubner?

  The vast majority of children pretend they know the answer to unanswerable questions.

• 13:13Speaker 05

  It has varied between studies, but you're looking at maybe two thirds to three quarters of children, and we're talking in the age range here of about five to eight years old, would say yes or no to a yes no question that we know they don't know the answer to.

• 13:27Stephen J. Dubner?

  So these kids are preparing themselves very well for careers in business or politics, maybe as a pundit of some sort, or wherever else in society people pretend to know more than they do. Now, why is this impulse so strong among children?

• 13:44Speaker 05

  Personally, what I think's going on is that the children are very used to a classroom situation. Obviously, you do get asked questions by your parent as a child, but a lot of question answer exchanges happen in school. Teachers ask kids questions all the time to ascertain what they're picking up from the lesson, et cetera. And generally, in that situation, it's sensible to have a go. You know, you don't generally earn many points for saying, I don't know, when a teacher asks a question. So having a go and actually feeling good that maybe you have that piece of knowledge and that you can show, you know, that you are clever. So I think that when it seems like a test situation, they fall back on what they've already started to learn from the context that they spend a lot of time in.

• 14:27Stephen J. Dubner?

  I guess when you describe that as an academic setting, even an academic setting among children, it reminds me of certainly academic settings among older people, university and so on. But it also reminds me of settings in the workplace where very often when a question is raised, someone is expected to know the answer. And maybe the asker of the question, if they don't necessarily know the answer, they certainly have strong opinions about it. So I'm curious about how you would connect what you see in young children with what you see among the rest of us, adults, in whether it's the work world, or politics, or policy, things like that.

• 15:01Speaker 05

  Yeah, well, I think that ties back into this whole social aspect of any kind of conversation, or dialogue, or question answer exchange, where you

• 15:10Speaker 05

  A lot of how you respond is affected by how you perceive the expectations of the person asking the question. So it's not just about giving a straight factual answer as to the state of your knowledge. It's actually trying to work out all the other contexts that surround why that question's been asked, what do you think the interviewer wants from you. And I think children do start to do that from a very young age. I think one of the things that happens with kids, but you can actually definitely apply this to adult conversations, is that there's quite a power differential between a child and an adult who's asking them a question. And the child will feel that the adult is the person that has more of the power, and therefore perhaps they feel slightly disadvantaged, they feel like they want to show what they

• 15:55Speaker 05

  can do, they don't feel as comfortable admitting when they don't know something. That clearly applies across into the work context with adults where you have a boss with an employee, or you have somebody who's higher up the hierarchy than you are, and you feel that expectation that, as you say, somebody should know the answer to this.

• 16:24Stephen J. Dubner?

  As it turns out, Waterman also tested some adults with unanswerable questions. How'd they do?

• 16:29Speaker 05

  We found that about a quarter of the adults tried to answer the yes/no unanswerable questions.

• 16:37Stephen J. Dubner?

  At least that's better than the three-quarters of the kids who couldn't bring themselves to say, "I don't know." But still, not very encouraging. Think about it for a minute. When's the last time someone you know, maybe even yourself, gave a firm answer to a question that you really didn't know? Maybe a week ago? An hour ago? Maybe just now?

• 17:04Stephen J. Dubner?

  Coming up on Freakonomics Radio, the consequences of not being able to admit what you don't know.

• 17:11Speaker 02

  It's easier to spend a billion dollars pretending they knew than to actually find out the answer.

• 17:16Stephen J. Dubner?

  And what we can do about it.

• 17:18Speaker 02

  There's only one way to learn, and that's through feedback.

• 17:39Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio, sponsored by Granola. You know that moment when a meeting ends and someone says, let's circle back on this next week, and everyone nods, but no one writes it down? Then next week rolls around and it's radio silence? That's why Granola exists. Granola is an AI-powered notepad built for the way real people actually meet. You take rough notes like you normally would, and in the background, Granola securely transcribes the meeting. Then it turns everything into clean, structured, actually useful notes when the meeting ends. And the best part? Granola works through your device's audio, which means it integrates seamlessly into the video conferencing tools you already use. No setup, no awkward bots. It's just your normal meeting with superpowers. If meetings are eating up your day, Granola is a no-brainer. You can try it totally free.

• 18:24Stephen J. Dubner?

  Just head to granola.ai/freakonomics. That's granola.ai/freakonomics to get your time back. Try it for free at granola.ai/freakonomics.

• 18:42Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Quince. You know those pieces in your closet that you find yourself wearing on repeat? The sweater that goes with everything? The perfect pair of pants? Or the tea you somehow always reach for first? Those are the pieces that make getting dressed easy, and that's what Quince does best. Quince focuses on high-quality wardrobe staples made with premium materials like 100% Mongolian cashmere, organic cotton, and merino wool. The styles are timeless, versatile, and designed to become the dependable pieces you reach for day after day. And it's not just clothing. Quince brings that same approach to everything they make, from hotel-quality bedding and bath to kitchen essentials and thoughtfully designed furniture. Find your next fall favorites at Quince.

• 19:25Stephen J. Dubner?

  Download the Quince app for app-exclusive offers, or go to quince.com/freak. Get free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK, too. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com/freak.

• 19:46Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Progressive. Whoever says saving money is hard doesn't know that new customers who bundle and save with Progressive save hundreds because switching your home and auto insurance is better than cutting down on the things you love, like those iced lattes that help you get ready to face the day. So, switch your home and auto to Progressive and see if you could save and keep sipping away. Get your quote today at progressive.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, affiliates and other insurers. Not available in all states.

• 20:21Speaker 04

  From WNYC, this is Freakonomics Radio. Here's your host, Stephen Dubner.

• 20:31Stephen J. Dubner?

  One of the first steps in learning to think like a freak is learning to say, "I don't know." Why? Because until you can admit what you don't know, it's virtually impossible to learn what you need to. Because if you think you already have all the answers, you won't go looking for them. But let's be clear, simply saying "I don't know" isn't a solution. It's just a first step. You have to figure out what you don't know and then work like a dog to learn it. And how do you learn?

• 21:03Speaker 02

  There's only one way to learn, and that's through feedback.

• 21:07Stephen J. Dubner?

  That's Steve Levitt again.

• 21:09Speaker 02

  The thing about always faking is that if you fake like you know the answer, you don't have the freedom to explore other possibilities. But if you actually care about the outcome and the truth, saying "I don't know" is critical. One thing we've learned is that the only way to learn is through feedback. That whether you're a human being, an animal, an organization, the way that you learn is by trying different things and seeing the outcome when you try different approaches and comparing those outcomes.

• 21:44Stephen J. Dubner?

  Feedback comes in many flavors. It might mean going out and asking a lot of questions. It might mean gathering a lot of data. If the data don't happen to be just lying around, waiting to be plucked, you may have to generate data yourself. How? One great way is to run some kind of an experiment. If you want to think like a freak, you need to fall in love with experimentation. Now, scientists have been doing this for centuries. The rest of us, not so much. But why should scientists have all the fun?

• 22:19Speaker 02

  So, something that puzzled me for the longest time when I started working with firms, that I would preach to them the gospel of experimentation, of either randomized experiments or accidental experiments, just all the things that I do. And always, it was met with great enthusiasm. Of course, yeah, you know, experiments, that's the way to go. And then, when it actually came down to it, we could almost never convince anyone to do things experimentally.

• 22:46Stephen J. Dubner?

  Why don't they want to do it? What are they reluctant about? Are they afraid it's going to be expensive? That they won't know how to do it? That it's going to embarrass them? What's the problem?

• 22:54Speaker 02

  For years, I struggled with trying to understand what it was. And I thought, was it expensive? Well, no, I could design it in ways that it really wouldn't cost them anything. Would it take too long, too many resources? I mean, it was none of that. And it finally hit me, what was totally obvious, is that in order to run an experiment, you have to start from the premise that you don't know what the right answer is. So, I don't know if I should do the red version or the blue version. Should I price high? Should I price low? Should I give people a money-back guarantee or should not? So, all of those are questions that might be perfect for trying to answer with an experiment. But in order to be willing to run the experiment, you have to say, "Well, jeez, I don't know the answer." Wait, but you're the expert. You're in charge of marketing. You're in charge of pricing. You're supposed to know the answer.

• 23:36Speaker 02

  And so, the people in the firms we were working with felt so much pressure to be the expert, that they wouldn't run the experiments, because that was an admission, that they weren't really as expert as they maybe had been pretending to be, or other people wanted them to pretend to be.

• 24:02Stephen J. Dubner?

  Levitt, in addition to teaching at the University of Chicago, helps run a consulting firm.

• 24:07Speaker 02

  One of my favorite early stories. This might have been the very first company that I went to visit.

• 24:13Stephen J. Dubner?

  This was a company whose unwillingness to experiment, to admit what they didn't know, had pretty big consequences. It was a huge multinational retailer. They spent many millions of dollars in advertising in the US alone. But they weren't sure how effective the advertising was. So far, they'd come to one concrete conclusion: that TV ads were about four times more effective, dollar for dollar, than print ads. Now, how'd they know this? That's what their sales data told them. They advertised every week in newspapers. But because TV advertising is so expensive, they only bought ads three times a year: Black Friday, Christmas, and Father's Day.

• 24:53Speaker 02

  So then I said, "I think I might understand why your TV ads seem to have a return on investment that's four times as great as your newspaper ads." And they said, "Why?" I said, "Well, every single time you go and do a big advertising campaign, your sales go through the roof right afterwards." And they're like, "Yeah, it's Father's Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas." I said, "But don't you think maybe even if you didn't do the ads, you would sell more stuff around Christmas and on Black Friday?" And they said, "Yeah."

• 25:24Stephen J. Dubner?

  So basically, this company is spending hundreds of millions of dollars on TV advertising to persuade people to go to their stores to buy stuff on the three times of the year when people were already going to be going to stores to buy stuff?

• 25:38Speaker 02

  Exactly right.

• 25:40Stephen J. Dubner?

  So what about the print ads? This retailer had run newspaper ads pretty much every Sunday for 20 years in more than 200 markets. How effective were they? It was hard to know.

• 25:52Speaker 02

  So I go to them and I say, I think you cannot learn from the existing data, the answer to your question. And to their credit, they said, well, geez, this is a really important question for us. How could we learn the truth? And I said, well, TV ads are tougher. I don't even know how we'll ever learn that. But the newspaper inserts, that's an easy one. So you said you have a couple hundred markets. And I did some calculations about how much power we would have if we did a randomized experiment. And I think I would need you to give me about 40 of your newspaper markets. And I would randomly assign 20 of those to a control group where we wouldn't do any newspaper inserts for about three months. And we will compare the sales in the markets where you kept on doing the inserts, the ones where you didn't do inserts.

• 26:33Speaker 02

  And by doing that comparison, we would learn with a great degree of confidence what the impact of newspaper inserts on sales.

• 26:41Stephen J. Dubner?

  And did you expect them to say, hey, that's a fantastic idea. And just think of all the money we'll save by not buying the ads that's even cheaper. Did you expect them to be enthusiastic about it?

• 26:51Speaker 02

  They were spending hundreds of million dollars a year on these newspaper inserts. They had no idea if they worked. And they even had this belief, which I'm almost certain was erroneous anyway, but they had reason to believe the newspaper inserts weren't that good relative to TV. So I thought, for sure, this is a no brainer. This is easy. Of course, you know, let's get rolling. How fast can we get it started?

• 27:11Stephen J. Dubner?

  And what was their response?

• 27:13Speaker 02

  So we went to them with the proposal. And their reaction surprised me. They said, are you crazy? We can't not advertise in 20 markets. We'll all get fired.

• 27:28Speaker 02

  And they went on. One of the other guys chimed in and said, yeah, you know, we once had this summer intern, an MBA that we had hired. And one of his jobs was to do the ordering of the media in different cities. And, and the guy was so incompetent that for reasons we never really figured out, he just forgot to order the newspaper inserts for a big chunk of Pittsburgh for the entire summer. And just kind of joking around with him, I said, well, I hope you hired that guy. And he said, hired him? He was terrible. We would never hire him. Why should we hire him? I said, well, at least he was terrible in just the right way that you're all too chicken to be terrible. Because I said, what happened to the, to the sales in your stores in Pittsburgh when this guy forgot to do the newspaper inserts?

• 28:11Stephen J. Dubner?

  So what did happen?

• 28:12Speaker 02

  To their credit, they went and they looked at the data. And they called me with a spring of excitement in their voice. And they said to me, "You are not going to believe what we found. We found no impact whatsoever on the sales in Pittsburgh when this guy didn't put in the ads." And I said, "Wow, that's amazing. All right, so when can we start the experiment? Again, I just need 40 markets and I'll randomly sign them and we'll stop the ads for three months." And they said, after a pause, they said, "Are you crazy? We can't not advertise in 20 markets. The CEO will kill us."

• 28:46Speaker 02

  And it's truly amazing that the only piece of real learning they had, the only piece of real feedback that they were given is that the newspaper inserts didn't work. And yet, it's now five years later, and they've probably spent close to another billion dollars putting ads in the newspaper. And the reason was because if they tried to do an experiment to see whether newspaper inserts worked or not, it would be admission that they did not know whether newspaper inserts worked. It's easier to spend a billion dollars pretending they knew than to actually find out the answer.

• 29:28Stephen J. Dubner?

  It's easy to criticize people who get locked into pretending to know answers that they don't. But as we said at the beginning of this program, those three little words, "I don't know," can be really hard to say.

• 29:42Speaker 02

  First, it takes a lot of confidence to be willing to say, "I don't know." And I think actually it's easy for someone like me to say, "I don't know," because, you know, I've had some success. We sold some books. I've done well in academics. So if I say, "I don't know," people say, "Oh, isn't that cute? The Midwestern self-deprecating, blah, blah, blah." But if you're just, you know, a middle manager in a firm and you say, "I don't know," people look around, they're like, "This guy doesn't know? What's wrong with him?"

• 30:13Stephen J. Dubner?

  So the incentives to fake it, to never admit you don't know an answer, are pretty strong. But maybe there's a way to flip those incentives, to encourage people to say, "I don't know," when they really don't know. Remember Amanda Waterman, the British psychologist who studies kids? We went back to her with this. So in our new book, we make the argument that people should be much more willing to admit what they don't know, especially in settings, whether it is business, or academia, or politics, where you're dealing not just with a simple set of facts, or even a simple set of beliefs, but with a process, or when you're trying to tease out cause and effect, which can

• 30:56Stephen J. Dubner?

  be very complicated, not only in the-- certainly in the future, what policy will work, but even trying to understand what has worked in the past. And we make the argument that it would be better if more people admitted what they didn't know, because that is the first step on the road to learning and discovery, and getting feedback, and running some experiments, perhaps, to find out what's real. I'm just curious whether you would endorse that argument of ours, or whether you think that's not really a principal obstacle.

• 31:26Speaker 05

  No, I absolutely endorse it. And I would go back a little to saying that I guess at least part of the responsibility lies with the people who are at the top of whatever hierarchy you happen to be talking about. If you create a culture where it's okay to say, "Do you know, I don't know the answer to that, but wouldn't it be good to find out?" Then I think you can-- that then perpetuates through the organization. But I think the problem is, I guess, that the people that have come up to the top are maybe used to having got to the top, possibly by not admitting when they didn't know the answer. So perhaps that-- you get that cycle. But no, I absolutely agree with you that saying you don't know appropriately is a good thing.

• 32:16Stephen J. Dubner?

  So let's break that cycle, shall we? Let's start with the generation that really matters.

• 32:22Speaker 01

  You can say, "I don't know." Uh...uh...

• 32:29Speaker 01

  I don't know. I don't know. I know. Adonomus. I don't know. That's perfectly fine.

• 32:51Stephen J. Dubner?

  Hey, podcast listeners. On next week's show, we stop making fun of children and start learning from them.

• 32:57Speaker 02

  Sometimes, doing things differently and simply and with a kind of joy and triviality leads you to a really special place that, as an adult, you don't get to go to very often.

• 33:14Stephen J. Dubner?

  Why we should all spend some time thinking like a child. Let's next time on Freakonomics Radio.

• 33:25Speaker 04

  Freakonomics Radio is produced by WNYC and Dubner Productions. Our staff includes David Herman, Greg Rosalsky, Greta Cohn, Borey Lamb, Shruti Pinnamaneni, Susie Lechtenberg, and Chris Bannon, with engineering help from Jim Briggs. If you want more Freakonomics Radio, you can subscribe to our podcast on iTunes or go to Freakonomics.com, where you'll find lots of radio, a blog, the books, and more.

• 34:05Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Ozempic. Innovation happens through rethinking what's possible, and when it comes to GLP-1s, Ozempic pill does just that. Learn more about Ozempic semaglutide tablets, 4 in 9mg, by calling 1-833-OZEMPIC or visit Ozempic.com to view the medication guide and ask your doctor what's possible with FDA-approved Ozempic pill.

• 34:36Stephen J. Dubner?

  Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by Southern Company. The world and its energy needs are always changing. Southern Company's commitment to meeting this demand stays the same. That's because Southern Company believes energy is more than a utility. It's what powers possibilities. So they are looking ahead and investing $80 billion in infrastructure upgrades and are committed to fueling growth in ways that benefit all customers so that reliable and affordable energy is accessible for generations to come. Go to southerncompany.com to learn more. Southern Company, building the future of energy.

• 35:14Speaker 06

  A thick, juicy cheeseburger. A cheesy, gooey quesadilla. Both family favorites, so how do you choose? At Applebee's, you don't have to. Introducing Applebee's new OM Chez Adia Burger. Part juicy beef burger, part irresistibly cheesy quesadilla. Served with tortilla chips on the sizzling skillet of even more cheese. We dare you to resist the pull. Right now, the OM Chez Adia Burger is on Applebee's $2.25 menu. A full-sized appetizer and two entrees, including the OM Chez Adia Burger, for just $25. That's eating good in the neighborhood.

• 35:44Speaker 07

  This episode is brought to you by Charles Schwab. Is there a right time to sell a stock? Are you taking the right risks with your portfolio? Financial decisions can be tricky, and often, your own cognitive and emotional biases can lead you astray. Financial Decoder, an original podcast from Charles Schwab, can help. Join host Mark Reapy as he offers practical solutions to help overcome the cognitive and emotional biases that may affect your investing decisions. Listen at schwab.com/financialdecoder.