What $200 of ChatGPT is really worth

AI and politics, politics and AI. That's the story of 2025. On this episode, The Verge's Kylie Robison joins the show to talk about ChatGPT's big new features, Operator and deep research, both of which promise to make the chatbot more useful and more autonomous. To access either one costs $200 a month — is it worth it? After that, The Verge's Liz Lopatto catches us up on the latest from Elon Musk and Doge, including why Musk is doing this thing, this way. Liz also makes the case that this isn't going to slow down anytime soon. Finally, Nilay Patel helps us answer a question from the Vergecast Hotline, and tells us how he felt about the Super Bowl's 4K stream. Further reading: OpenAI’s new Operator AI agent can do things on the web for you ChatGPT’s agent can now do deep research for you I tested ChatGPT’s deep research with the most misunderstood law on the internet Elon Musk’s rapid unscheduled disassembly of the US government DOGE wreaked havoc on the government in just one week Federal judge blocks DOGE from accessing sensitive Treasury records How Elon Musk’s Department of Energy access could pose a nuclear threat What we know about President Elon’s government takeover Email us at [email protected] or call us at 866-VERGE11, we love hearing from you. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Speaker names marked ? are inferred from speaking time and the show’s known hosts — they are not voice-verified.

• 0:03David Pierce?

  Welcome to The Vergecast, the flagship podcast of Chain of Thought Reasoning. I'm your friend David Pierce. It is the Monday morning after the Super Bowl, and I'm tired. It was a truly terrible football game. If you didn't watch, you really didn't miss anything. Congrats to all the Eagles fans out there, I suppose. But it was actually a pretty interesting tech evening. There were AI commercials everywhere, including some that were like really reminiscent of crypto commercials from a few years ago. I have a lot of feelings about that. A surprising number of people in my life are super into Gemini now, thanks to that Google commercial. I'll say this for Google, company has a lot of problems, very good at making commercials, just very, very, very good at making commercials. Also, Kendrick Lamar did the halftime show

• 0:47David Pierce?

  and spawned a bunch of memes that I suspect you're gonna see forever, for the rest of your life. Tubi streamed the Super Bowl for the first time and held up surprisingly well. Just a lot of interesting technology going on, and then a really crappy football game. Super Bowl 59, everybody. Anyway, that is mostly not what we're here to talk about. We're gonna talk a little bit about the Super Bowl on the Vergecast hotline at the very end, but before we get to that, we're gonna talk about AI, and we're gonna talk about Elon Musk. We're gonna talk about all of what's going on with ChatGPT, and the operator feature, and the deep research feature, and the tasks feature, and there's just something happening in the most expensive version of ChatGPT that I find really fascinating. So, we're gonna dig into that. Then, we're gonna talk about

• 1:28David Pierce?

  what is happening with Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency. Things have slowed down, I suppose, relatively speaking, the last few days, but there's still a lot going on. There's still a lot to talk about, and we're gonna try to make some sense of what's really happening here. Then, we're gonna talk about the Super Bowl, and then we'll get out of here. All of that is coming up in just a second, but first, I need to go watch the Z suite on Tubi, because this is just what happened to me. I watched Tubi, and now I'm a Tubi guy. I don't know, this is my life now. This is The Vergecast. We'll be right back.

• 2:02Speaker 01

  Companies shouldn't have to choose between speed and control. Amex Corporate connects cards with flexible spending controls and real-time visibility to help teams adapt faster. Built to simplify, designed to scale. This is Amex Corporate. Get started at go.amex slash Amex Corporate. Terms apply.

• 2:25Speaker 02

  Flowing ad budget on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them? That's bull spend and marketers are calling it out in Dashboard Confessions.

• 2:34Speaker 03

  I remember telling my boss, it'll be good for the brand when leads were slow. Yeah, it wasn't.

• 2:42Speaker 02

  Cut the bull spend. LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title and more. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 2:55Speaker 04

  College football is back. So Hilton called to me, the superstition concierge, to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Oh, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching band wake up call at 5:55 and 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for the sake.

• 3:27David Pierce?

  All right, we're back. Let's start by talking about AI. So over the last few weeks, ChatGPT has gotten a bunch of new features. OpenAI has been shipping stuff pretty fast. And there are three in particular that I'm really interested in. The first is called Operator, which is basically a way to let ChatGPT use the internet on your behalf. It'll actually like click around and do stuff. You say, you know, book me a reservation for dinner for tomorrow night. And the idea is it will actually go do that thing for you. This is the agentic AI we've been talking about for a long time. Super, super interesting. There's also this thing called Deep Research, which is one of OpenAI's most advanced models. Really puts to the task of doing longer term thoughtful work. It takes time.

• 4:12David Pierce?

  It like gives you a message that's like, come back later. I'll let you know when I'm finished. But the idea is it can go do much more thorough, much more accurate, much less hallucination-y research for you on almost anything. And I've been hearing from people over the last couple of weeks who are really, really excited about it. The third is ChatGPT Tasks, which is just a reminder system for ChatGPT. And no one is excited about this but me, but here we are. Kylie Robinson has been testing all of this stuff with me in the $200 a month ChatGPT Pro subscription. We both have some thoughts. Let's dig into this. Kylie, hello.

• 4:49Speaker 05

  Hello.

• 4:49David Pierce?

  Welcome back. It's been a minute. I feel like every week you should be on the show, but then every week I'm like, we can't talk anymore about AI. And so we're back. It's just time to do this.

• 4:58Speaker 05

  Yeah, listeners need a break. It's fair.

• 5:01David Pierce?

  And in part, you and I have spent $200 each on the ChatGPT Pro account. And so we are here for work so that we can expense this.

• 5:11Speaker 05

  Yes, exactly.

• 5:12David Pierce?

  This is very important.

• 5:13Speaker 05

  Yes.

• 5:14David Pierce?

  So we've talked a bunch about, I would say, the not great products coming out of OpenAI over the last couple of years. They've shipped a bunch of really interesting technology and a bunch of not very good things to do with said interesting technology. But it feels like just in like the last, what, two weeks? There's been this really interesting run of like actually shipping cool, impressive product. Where did this come from? What is happening here?

• 5:42Speaker 05

  Well, um, in competition and scared and we need to double our valuation in four months. Did you see that? They want to be valued at $300 billion. So.

• 5:51David Pierce?

  Oh yeah, this is all the SoftBank money, right?

• 5:53Speaker 05

  Yes, exactly. $300 billion doubling their valuation in four months as they last raised money. So yeah, that's where it's coming from. Like VCs, you know, Masa's over there like, what? Is he gonna get my groceries for me or what?

• 6:06David Pierce?

  And it won't, spoiler alert, but we'll come back to that. The thing I keep thinking about is what Sam Altman, the CEO, said right after DeepSeek came out. And we've talked a bunch about DeepSeek on the show, but he seemed caught off guard by DeepSeek in a way I found really fascinating. In the same way that like everybody else working on AI was caught off guard by ChatGPT two years. Like there was some sort of like rhyming thing that happened there that I thought was really interesting. But then he was basically like, we're gonna move up a bunch of launches. We have much better stuff. We're gonna show it too much faster. And my immediate reaction was like, well, that's obviously a lie. Like, there's no way that's, but maybe that was real. And maybe this is just the company that thought it had a big lead.

• 6:48David Pierce?

  Suddenly with a fire lit under it and it's going to start to move much faster. Like, is it, is that really what's happening here?

• 6:54Speaker 05

  I think that's the classic OpenAI move is if someone launches anything that takes the spotlight off of them for one second, they will figure out something to just drop immediately. Some blog post, some research prototype. It's very cutthroat in that way. But Sam Altman said in a Reddit AMA last week or earlier this week that they're going to have less of a lead. And I actually appreciated him just saying it. It's his first shot at humbleness this entire stretch of time. So, um, yeah, I think they're very aware of the, the competition. And even the people that helped co-found OpenAI and ran it are now building competitors that are quickly like taking up mind share in Silicon Valley. So, yeah, they're, they're noticing.

• 7:39David Pierce?

  Okay. Yeah, it's really interesting. And so there are three products that I want to talk about. Two, I think you also want to talk about, and one that I will barely make you talk about because it's ChatGPT tasks and I am a mirror because only person who is interested in ChatGPT tasks.

• 7:51Speaker 05

  Right.

• 7:52David Pierce?

  But let's start with deep research. The first thing I want to know, we've both used it and I want to talk about what your experience has been, but, uh, you're out talking to people all the time. And I would say my loose impression of the reaction to deep research has been like really, really positive. People are really impressed with what this new thing is able to do. What are you hearing from people who are using and trying this kind of stuff right now?

• 8:16Speaker 05

  Yeah. Did you see Gary Marcus's reaction yet?

• 8:18David Pierce?

  No.

• 8:19Speaker 05

  People are saying it's the Gary Marcus benchmark because he starts this tweet with, uh, deep research is actually good. And then people are cropping out the blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But he actually like compliments it. And for the listener, Gary Marcus, uh, is just a hardcore skeptic.

• 8:34David Pierce?

  And has been right a lot to his credit. He's been wrong sometimes, but he's also been right a lot. I, I take, he's one of those people I take very seriously, but also, uh, he's like one of those people, every time you read him, you have to read somebody who is like pie in the sky, AI will save us. And it, it lands you in like a nice, happy middle. I think it's good stuff.

• 8:51Speaker 05

  That's my day to day. Um, yeah, deep research, uh, people seem really excited about it. I have to temper what I see and what I hear from people. People quite a bit because I don't know how you feel, but in San Francisco and just, you know, in the AI communities, people are like, this is, this is AGI. This is the best thing that's ever happened to us, et cetera, et cetera. But I've seen really positive reactions and I've seen really cool use cases for it. And I jumped pretty quickly to asking my coworkers what I should ask it because it's $200. And for some reason, I just don't have enough questions in the world that I think would be good enough for this system.

• 9:25David Pierce?

  Just not a curious enough person, Kylie.

• 9:26Speaker 05

  Apparently not. Someone said, what was it like, you know, 100 bears versus one bear was a question that someone asked on the internet. I was like, I should get more creative here. But my first question was about tariffs and.

• 9:38David Pierce?

  That's so funny. That was my first question.

• 9:39Speaker 05

  Really?

• 9:40David Pierce?

  This is what's going on in the world right now. It's I'm like, what do I barely understand that maybe the internet can teach me about? It's like, oh, it's tariffs.

• 9:46Speaker 05

  Right. We yearn for more tariff information because it is so weird. So that's a question I get asked a lot is how are these tariffs going to impact the AI industry? And I'm like, so much is up in the air. I don't know. So I asked, I asked a pretty detailed question because I figured a more detailed question would get me a better result. And it crashed like three times.

• 10:04David Pierce?

  Oh, boy.

• 10:05Speaker 05

  And it never gave me my answer. So I pinged OpenAI and I was like, this is dog shit. And they fixed it and everything's been good since.

• 10:12David Pierce?

  So you're the reason it's good, basically?

• 10:14Speaker 05

  Right. My one question of like, I'm going to write about how this is dog shit. So can we figure this out?

• 10:19David Pierce?

  So what's your understanding of what's going on here technically? Because there's been this big thing with reasoning and chain of thought and this idea that like, these things should be allowed to take their time and show their work and that will make them better. Is that all the deep research is? Or is there something else going on here that it's doing that's different?

• 10:38Speaker 05

  I think that most frontier labs have realized that inference time compute and, you know, the model thinking longer, giving it more time to do its thing is sort of the next frontier. It's the next, you know. Parallel that we need, you know, more data, more compute and inference time compute is going to be really important. And that's why we're seeing like these reasoning models crop up. And sort of my argument, I try to take the position of my angry as verge commenter. And I, and I think like, you know, well, okay, we're just getting products that are slower. Like, no one wants a product that is slower and perhaps still inaccurate. I think in the press release, they said, you know, deep research is still a prototype and it might get like up to half of the things wrong. It gave some data point about how it gets,

• 11:23Speaker 05

  it still gets a lot of things wrong. So it's hard to make that argument for something that costs $200, still gets tons of things wrong and is slower. But what I will give this whole product idea in this whole industry is that it is so nascent. And I still think it's a cool thing to try out. And, you know, as long as you're not doing it with high stakes tasks, you know, it's not your lawyer, your doctor, or anything like that. I think it's a, it's a cool tool.

• 11:48David Pierce?

  Yeah, I think one of the things I've spent a lot of time thinking about recently is what the stakes are for things I should do with something like AI. So like, let me just give you an example of the thing I did with deep research that actually that was really fascinating. So do you know what JetFlix is?

• 12:02Speaker 05

  No.

• 12:03David Pierce?

  So it was, it was basically this illegal streaming service that they built some really interesting technology that basically went and combed like every pirate site and torrenting system and just pulled in all of the content they could possibly find illegally. And for $9.99 a month, you could sign up and stream it. So it was like Netflix, but crimes was like literally the whole pitch. Ran super successfully for a really long time. And then I think last June, a bunch of people who were running it were convicted of running it and just got sentenced like this past week.

• 12:38Speaker 05

  Wow.

• 12:38David Pierce?

  I, I find this all fascinating. I just told you literally every single fact I know about JetFlix. And I was like, I feel like there's a story here. There's something I want to do. And so I just went to deep research and I was basically like, where do I even start? Like, tell me in, in relatively short order, sort of the story of JetFlix. Did they have any interesting technology? Who were the people? What are the legal fights going on? It did a shockingly good job.

• 13:01Speaker 05

  Nice.

• 13:01David Pierce?

  Um, it's, it's a really interesting thing because I don't, I haven't thoroughly fact checked it enough to know what it got wrong. And I'm sure it missed stuff and got stuff wrong. And like, it's not perfect, but in terms of like, I went from knowing two facts about a thing to having a pretty good, at least like textbook primer of a thing that I can play with. I was really honestly impressed and it's relatively well cited. There are a ton of links and like, I came to the end of that and I was like, oh, this is, this is actually useful. Like, I'm a person who likes to like, read Wikipedia pages. Uh, and I don't know, are Wikipedia pages famously always correct? No. And we, we like, kind of understand how that's supposed to work. And I got to this point where I was like, is deep research just something I should think about the way that I think about Wikipedia?

• 13:44David Pierce?

  Which is like a useful starting point to understand something. But again, like, don't cite it in your paper or your teacher will fail you. You know what I mean?

• 13:51Speaker 05

  You totally waded into some fun AI drama that's happening post-deep research. Is that a researcher at OpenAI tweeted, I feel bad, but you tweeted, um, you know, basically Wikipedia is dead and good riddance because we have, we have deep research. And then people are like, fuck you. Like, he got so much blowback. He ended up deleting the tweet, but it was, you know, that's some drama happening right now. Is it, is this the end of Wikipedia? But people were like, you guys train on Wikipedia? This is an awful thing.

• 14:17David Pierce?

  I was gonna say, without Wikipedia, this doesn't work. So I think there's that, there's that part of the whole thing.

• 14:22Speaker 05

  Exactly.

• 14:22David Pierce?

  That's really interesting. But yeah, I, I sort of felt twinges of that. Like, I, I wouldn't have tweeted that because I've tweeted dumb things before and I know what happens. But I felt it a little bit. It was, it was very interesting.

• 14:33Speaker 05

  Totally.

• 14:33David Pierce?

  Uh, what else have you been doing with deep research? What, what have you figured out to throw at it?

• 14:38Speaker 05

  Um, you know, the tariffs question was interesting. And here's an error. I'm wondering if you noticed this, or if you looked at your query close enough to notice this. But, um, you know, all of my colleagues had myriad of questions, really, really variable. Um, I think Sean asked me about the smallest phones. Um, Jess asked me about like, the best like horror movies, uh, stuff like that. And I gave everyone their query. And then my editor, Addie, who wrote about this, asked about, um, section 230. Is that the one?

• 15:03David Pierce?

  She wrote a great piece about it, by the way. We'll put it in the show notes, but she did a, she like then called a scholar to go through what she got back. And it was, it was very good.

• 15:11Speaker 05

  So dope. Um, so that was cool to give everyone their queries, but all of them tended to have, oh, and Jake asked about Apple earnings. And we both agreed, you know, as I was watching it pool 10 Ks, I was like, oh, thank God, I never have to do that again. So like, that's actually useful. But all of these queries had the same issue, which is they missed a whole year. They missed 2024. They stopped at 2023.

• 15:33David Pierce?

  Oh, interesting.

• 15:34Speaker 05

  And it's funny, because in that same Reddit AMA, Sam Altman was asked about, you know, the knowledge cutoff. And he's like, oh, I don't think about the knowledge cutoff at all anymore, because we have web search. But clearly, like, there's some sort of training bug there that misses a whole year. So that's really annoying, because when I'm asking for deep research on something, I want the most up-to-date information. So hopefully, they figured that out.

• 15:56David Pierce?

  Yeah, it turns out like, a lot of stuff happened between 2023 and today.

• 16:00Speaker 05

  Believe it or not.

• 16:01David Pierce?

  Yeah, some things went down.

• 16:02Speaker 05

  Exactly. So I kept running into that error. But another thing, not to totally shit on it, but like, during my tariff query, I thought, this is kind of annoying to read. Like, I just don't know how you would change the interface for such a thing. But it was just, it was a block of text where I was already snoring by the end. But I guess that's what I get for asking about tariffs. But yeah, like, I saw a really cool use case from a researcher at OpenAI who posted, like, you know, he picks a topic, and like, every day before bed, he reads the deep research on that topic. And I thought, that's, that's kind of cool.

• 16:37David Pierce?

  Yeah. I don't know if that's fascinating or terrifying, or a little bit of both. Probably a little bit of both. But it makes me think of like, I've used Notebook LM from Google a lot for similar sorts of things. I just find like, the, its process of outputting stuff really fascinating. And it, like, OpenAI needs more Notebook LM things, where like, that fake podcast that Notebook LM makes is very compelling. Like, a lot of people really like it.

• 17:01Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 17:02David Pierce?

  And it's really good at making flashcards, and it's really good at making study guides. And I think, I kept being struck through this whole thing by, OpenAI is still stuck on the idea that you can do all of this in a chat interface. And it's just wrong about that. Like, the idea that what I actually want is what looks like a text message, but it's 9,000 words long. Is incorrect.

• 17:25Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 17:25David Pierce?

  And and I think there's still some like UI and human factor interface stuff here that OpenAI has not done.

• 17:32Speaker 05

  Totally.

• 17:32David Pierce?

  Which brings us to Operator, which is the other thing I want to talk about. Which is, I think if you're OpenAI, this is the thing you hope.

• 17:39Speaker 05

  Sure.

• 17:39David Pierce?

  Works, right? Like, this is the thing, right? Am I crazy? Like, the Operator is the one that, when it works, is gonna be the one that everybody thinks is like going to change the way we do everything forever.

• 17:50Speaker 05

  Yeah, well, everyone's building the exact same thing. Anthropic has, I think, a computer use. Google is doing Project Mariner. And it's funny, when I was, when I used Operator for the first time, it's, it's, I, it's weird, because I'm like, this is so slow. I could make this reservation in two seconds. Why am I using this? But when I watched Project Mariner at the Google campus get groceries for me, I was actually pretty compelled by that. And I don't, I don't know what the, I don't know what the difference is. Maybe because this is in my hands and not useful, whereas that was a demo. But yeah, I don't know.

• 18:20David Pierce?

  So what have you done with Operator? So Operator's thing, I should just explain how it works, because I was sort of surprised at how it works. It's much more basic than I realized. You, you open Operator, which is, again, I think only available to ChatGPT Pro customers who have $200 a month to spend on this. Thank you, Vox Media. And you, you type in your query, and it literally just opens Chrome.

• 18:42Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 18:42David Pierce?

  Inside of ChatGPT and starts doing web things for you. Like, it, it browses the web kind of like a person, in a way that I found sort of unnerving. But it just opens up a Chrome tab, and, at least in my experience, every single time, bings something.

• 18:58Speaker 05

  Yes, I was gonna say Bing.

• 18:59David Pierce?

  Which is the first thing about it that I don't trust. Don't like that at all. So, and then, but then it goes and like tries to, with clicks and typing and normal web stuff, accomplish all of your goals for you. So what have you tried with Operator?

• 19:12Speaker 05

  Did you try to break it yet? Because that was the first thing, when I noticed I could click around in their little, like, you know, siloed Chrome. I was like, how do I break this immediately?

• 19:21David Pierce?

  It's rude of you. Let the computer do its work.

• 19:23Speaker 05

  I know. Now I feel bad. But seriously, I'm like, I want, I want to crash this thing. I didn't succeed. I asked my friends pretty immediately, you know, where should we go to dinner? My friend recommended a place. I put it into Operator, and I watched it click around, and it was so painfully slow. And then. It gets to like the checkout and it was $250 a person. I was like, my friend fucking sucks. I'm not doing that.

• 19:43David Pierce?

  Goodness, yeah. I don't like very many people that much.

• 19:46Speaker 05

  Yeah, so I'm going to Japan in a few weeks. I asked my mom what I should do and she asked, you know, like tell it to book our train tickets, asked it to do that. I didn't find the use cases so compelling for how slow it is because I'm, I think I'm just naturally sort of neurotic and impatient. So watching it do something for me when I could just do it faster myself made me feel a little crazy, even though I could see, you know, if this is the start of this technology, I can only imagine how much better it gets over time. But yeah, pretty quickly I got frustrated with it. And then I told David, do you want to take this article? Cause I'm annoyed with this technology.

• 20:22David Pierce?

  And then you want to know the first thing I did? I told it to go to the Amtrak website to try and book train tickets because the Amtrak website is the single worst website that I interact with on a day to day basis. And so I was like, I wonder if ChatGPT can figure this out. It is horribly designed. It's broken all the time.

• 20:40Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 20:41David Pierce?

  And I had the most vindicating experience. So I was like, tell me the price of a round trip train ticket from Washington DC to New York tomorrow. Just want to know what it costs. And it was like, it asked me follow up questions, which it always does. And this took me a minute to get used to, both in deep research and in operator. You like plug it in and you're like, okay, I'm going to go away and wait for it to come back with information. But almost always it has follow up questions.

• 21:02Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 21:03David Pierce?

  Which I get and there it's trying to sort of refine your prompt and that all makes sense, but it's also kind of annoying. I'm like, just, just shut up. Just go do it. I asked you a simple question. But anyway, so it follows up and then it goes, it opens a Chrome tab. It goes to amtrak.com. It pretty successfully plugs in the, the days I want to go. And then it asks me for confirmation that this is what I want to search for. And I'm like, again, if I have to sit here and babysit this.

• 21:25Speaker 05

  Right.

• 21:26David Pierce?

  What is the point of this? Like, it's actually less efficient because it's slower and I just have to sit here and watch in case you have questions for me.

• 21:34Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 21:34David Pierce?

  Didn't like that. But then it found a train ticket to, to go to New York. I'm in DC. It found a train ticket to go to New York and then tried to go and find the return ticket and the Amtrak website crashed and sends it all the way back to the beginning. And I was very impressed because it, it figured out what had happened and started the process over and actually just ran the process again. Got through the thing and it shows you the steps as you're going. So it was like, it said something like trying the Amtrak.com again. And it goes to the same thing and it crashed in the same spot. And it was like, I'm just imagining this little robot just getting increasingly frustrated.

• 22:10Speaker 06

  Yeah.

• 22:11David Pierce?

  And so then it goes back to Bing, searches for train tickets, finds a whole different like third party booking website that had, as best as I can tell, completely wrong information about Amtrak tickets.

• 22:21Speaker 06

  Oh.

• 22:21David Pierce?

  Does the thing and then presents it to me as like, here are the prices of the Amtrak ticket. Do you want to book it? And I'm on like a website I've never heard of. And I was like, no.

• 22:31Speaker 06

  No.

• 22:32David Pierce?

  But thank you. But it was really fascinating. I was like, on the one hand, this is actually pretty resilient, impressive technology. Like it, it understands what it's doing enough to compensate for things that go wrong, which is pretty cool. What we've seen with a lot of these models is they just like, once they're off track, they just keep getting further and further and further off track. And with all of these thinking models, one thing they're able to do is be like, oh, I'm off track and go back and start over.

• 22:57David Pierce?

  But then it got to the end and it was like this, we accomplished nothing. It took 10 minutes and I had to sit here and babysit it and we accomplished nothing. The one good experience I had, again, thinking about like steaks, right? I was like, what? I've been rewatching Schitt's Creek for the 9,000th time because it's the greatest show in the history of television. And I was like, find me some fun Schitt's Creek merch. So I went, had it go, it went to Bing and then I think landed on Etsy. And then as far as I can tell, just like combed the page for things with a high number of five star reviews.

• 23:28Speaker 06

  Oh.

• 23:29David Pierce?

  And just opened three tabs with pretty cool, highly reviewed Schitt's Creek merch. I was like, that's a victory, right? Like you just, you just did a thing that I would have done roughly the same way.

• 23:40Speaker 06

  Yeah.

• 23:40David Pierce?

  But I didn't have to do it. Love it. I'll take it. And then I was like, okay, do you want the, do you want the mug or the keychain or the greeting cards? I was like, I'll take the greeting cards. And I was like, okay, you can get one for this price or two for this price. It's like, okay, I'll take two. And it says, great, it's all in your cart. Here's the link. Sends me the link. I click on it. Guess what happens?

• 23:58Speaker 06

  They're not there.

• 23:58David Pierce?

  My cart's empty because it wasn't in my cart. It was in this virtual computers Chrome cart. And this is the thing, there's this like, at every time I've used Operator, there's this fundamental disconnect where it actually can't do the job because it's not on my computer. And I don't know if I want it to be or not. That's a separate question, but like, it actually doesn't have access to all of the stuff that I need, which is like.

• 24:20Speaker 06

  Yeah.

• 24:20David Pierce?

  My shipping address and my credit card number and all of this stuff and like. It can't even send me a cart because it's on a virtual computer somewhere and not on my computer.

• 24:31Speaker 05

  Well, you could sign in. I feel like that would have changed the outcome if you had signed into Etsy or wherever it was.

• 24:36David Pierce?

  Yes, if I had gone to Etsy on the virtual computer and signed in, but that's not what it had me do. It just sent me a link.

• 24:42Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 24:42David Pierce?

  On in the in the chat GPT message. It was just like, here's your cart. And I clicked it and it said, your cart is empty.

• 24:47Speaker 05

  Perfect.

• 24:48David Pierce?

  It's just like, there's, there's, it's doing something cool, but there is so much left to do before this stuff actually works on your behalf. And I was just like, I was like, I can see it, but we're not there yet.

• 24:58Speaker 05

  Totally.

• 24:59David Pierce?

  And I'm not even sure we're all that close.

• 25:01Speaker 05

  And why do you think that OpenAI released this on that $200 tier and Project Mariner is not getting released in the same way? Because it's, they're essentially the exact same thing. I don't understand why Google's holding theirs back.

• 25:14David Pierce?

  Okay, I have a theory about this. It's based on nothing, but I also think I'm right. And I'm curious what you think. So I think if you're OpenAI, you have a bunch of people who pay $200 a month for this thing. That is by definition going to be a group of people who really believe in AI, right? Like, it's so perfectly self-selected for people who want to use the bleeding edge stuff. There's kind of no risk for OpenAI, right? Like, these are people predisposed to thinking it's cool and who want to try it and test it and poke at the edges of it, but aren't. Obviously, this is not a mainstream thing. It's $200 a month.

• 25:47Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 25:48David Pierce?

  Google, on the other hand, I think, is increasingly only interested in mainstream things. Like, Google seems totally uninterested in rolling out AI experiments, because every time it does, it backfires. And it's a mess and it tells you to put glue on your pizza. And so I think what Google has learned is like, there's only value in this stuff if we can put it in front of a billion people. And we have to get that more right than we have, whereas OpenAI is like, sick. We have this group of people who just loves AI to pieces and we can just throw every experiment we have at them. Which I think in a certain way was kind of genius of OpenAI to like, create this tier of people. They seem to be losing money on hand over fist, but

• 26:28Speaker 05

  Sure.

• 26:28David Pierce?

  It's a good idea to like, put that group of people in a bucket together and be like, we're just all going to experiment together over here. That's my theory.

• 26:35Speaker 05

  Totally. I agree. I think, you know, also, I felt, Google doesn't have to worry about this because they have buckets of money, but You know, it feels deeply abusive to the GPUs whenever I use deep research. I'm like, oh, my God, I have burned so much trying to get this one query I don't really care about. And I don't really have a choice on refining it after it starts. And so, so, yeah, I see, I really do see the potential of both deep research and operator. Both are fundamentally frustrating to use. And I don't have a ton of use cases that would make them a part of my everyday life. But I do use AI tools quite a bit. What I factor into what I want is I want it to be accurate and fast. And neither of these tools are there.

• 27:18David Pierce?

  No.

• 27:18Speaker 05

  At all.

• 27:19David Pierce?

  They're neither of those things.

• 27:21Speaker 05

  No.

• 27:21David Pierce?

  So what, what are you using it for right now, day to day? Because I think we, we did a thing on the show last week where we just had a bunch of people call in and tell us what they use AI for. And overwhelmingly, it was pretty low stakes stuff, but also just conversational. Like, people just want something to hang out with and talk to and get ideas from. And that's, they're both like, is and isn't a tool in the sense that we're talking about.

• 27:45Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 27:46David Pierce?

  But I'm curious, from your perspective, like, what, what have you found that's actually working for you in day to day life?

• 27:50Speaker 05

  What I use it for is, I use Claude. I'm obsessed with Claude. I think it's really, it has a really good personality. It's very conversational. It understands nuance. And what really changed the tides for me is when I was working late, it was like seven or eight PM here. And I had this like 5,000 word story and I had just finished it. And I'm like, okay, before I hand this over, let me plug it into here and you tell me what you think. Because I had been like cracked out on this. I don't know if the flow is good and I feel bad delivering it if, if it's just like complete shit. So tell me if it's complete shit. And it focused on TKs, which are like, just like empty spaces where I'm going to put in more information later. And I was like, no, don't focus on that. Focus on the actual substance and like how I organized it. And then I was like, okay.

• 28:34Speaker 05

  And then it switched into this casual mode. And one of the notes that really stood out to me was like, you say this one thing and then immediately it's like you apologize and undercut yourself. So don't do that. And I was like, man, that's something Kevin would tell me, something an editor would tell me. That's, that's actually really interesting and compelling. And I can't believe it said that or caught that. And yeah, I, so I use Claude for that. Or sometimes I'm like, what am I trying to say here? It's all a variation of what made me use ChatGPT for the very first time, which is I had tweeted like, Average day for me and it was me Googling how to say like a cuss word politely in writing. And someone was like, this is exactly what I use ChatGPT for. And I had been staunchly against it. I was like, no, I don't want to use that stupid like I was, I really was not about it.

• 29:17Speaker 05

  And then I used it for synonyms because I'm always like, what am I trying to say here? Uh, and that was my first use case. And now it's just more advanced versions of that. Like, okay, I'm going to type a bunch of stuff. Do you understand what I'm saying? Like, where could I like be more concise? And yeah, I think it's really helpful in those. But and, and I said this for our Vergecast, like, uh, end of year stuff was, you know, I use SearchGPT quite a bit, a little less often now because it just isn't reliable. But I find it helpful for getting links, whereas Google has just failed me in that regard.

• 29:52David Pierce?

  Yeah, Google, not great at links, which you would think would be a thing Google knew how to do.

• 29:57Speaker 05

  Right.

• 29:58David Pierce?

  Yeah, there's, there's another thing we're going to have to do here at some point about how Google just incredibly fumbled the bag on all of this stuff. Because what everybody is just looking for is like, what if Google was good? And it isn't. But at any rate, I think there's, there's a thing in that interaction that I find really interesting, which is like, AI is fine as long as it's not the last step in the process. Like, this is kind of what I'm coming to is.

• 30:22Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 30:23David Pierce?

  Like, I think, I think with the danger of something like deep research is that it seems very confident. It looks very well sourced. It took its time and so you're like, okay, this thing is authoritative.

• 30:32Speaker 05

  Yep.

• 30:32David Pierce?

  It's going to be wrong about a lot of things. It's going to miss important nuance. It's going to miss whole years of time that are very important. But like, if, if you take it on the understanding that, okay, I'm going to take this information and do something with it, I think all this stuff can be really useful. And what you're talking about is like, there is necessarily like a you between everything that ChatGPT is doing there or Claude is doing there.

• 30:57Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 30:57David Pierce?

  And it going to your editor, right? If you were just like using Gemini to find and replace your grammar and then just shipping it to your editor, like, I would have so much more of a problem with that.

• 31:09Speaker 05

  Really? I don't use Gemini at all. I should, but I mean.

• 31:13David Pierce?

  Gemini is fine. I like, my hottest take on all of this is that they're all the same. And I'm going to get a lot of emails about that, but I basically believe that to my bones.

• 31:21Speaker 05

  No, I endorse.

• 31:22David Pierce?

  But, but, and I think again, it goes back to like what the people were telling us last week. It's like using it for like advice and input and information and kind of as a starting point. Fine. I think I'm actually increasingly good with that. But it's the thing where you're just like, make this for me and ship it off. Or like even in the operator world, it's like, just go buy me groceries. I'm like, I don't trust you and I have a thousand questions and it's actually less work for me to go get my groceries than to ask you the thousand questions. And there's a, there's a tipping point for that, that I don't think we're anywhere close to where like, I want the AI to be the last step of the process. And until then, I don't think we should let it be the last step of the process anywhere for any reason.

• 32:00Speaker 05

  You even saying that filled me with dread, imagining it being the last step of the process at all.

• 32:05David Pierce?

  Like truly, if you were just like, chat GPT, order me groceries.

• 32:09Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 32:10David Pierce?

  Like, and they just, they just appeared at your door. Well, I'm not even confident they'd appear at your door. But if you were just like, chat GPT, order me groceries for delivery tomorrow morning. What percent chance do you think there is that that would go well? In like, meaning that you would be like psyched about everything that it delivered you. And it came at the right time and it charged you what it should and it came from the right place. Like, it's zero, right? Like, I, I can't imagine a world in which that goes well.

• 32:37Speaker 05

  Negative.

• 32:38David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 32:38Speaker 05

  No. No, I mean, I would like to see in the next 10 years. I think AI leaders who are building this would like you to believe it's in the next six months. But I think maybe in the next 10 years, 15 years, we might see AI that is reliable. But that's like, really like just a complete stab in the dark because right now, no, I cannot do that whatsoever. And that's the one thing I want it to do is I'm about to board a flight coming home. Can you restock my fridge and blah, blah, blah. No, it cannot.

• 33:06David Pierce?

  The dream.

• 33:06Speaker 05

  Do that. The dream.

• 33:07David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 33:07Speaker 05

  The dream. And I, I feel the same way, same way about deep research because everyone I gave that their query back to, they're, they have to fact check it. And it takes twice, three times as long just to make sure it's accurate. And so much of it isn't. So, you know, it's not in this place where they claim, we know super intelligence is coming soon and it'll replace, you know, economically valuable positions that come, it'll, it'll be whole companies. They even say this year, you're going to see agents in the workforce proper and. From what I see, when I wrote, when I was starting the draft, I was like, this reminds me of the dumbest, most eager intern I could have. And I really appreciate how happy it is to do the job, but I don't think I'm converting it to a full-time position.

• 33:51David Pierce?

  Okay, A, you and I have both been that intern at various times in our lives.

• 33:54Speaker 05

  Oh, yes.

• 33:55David Pierce?

  I'm sure. So be kind to those interns.

• 33:57Speaker 05

  Exactly, exactly. But I'm like, get it together.

• 34:00David Pierce?

  I was not to be trusted when I was that intern.

• 34:02Speaker 05

  A hundred percent.

• 34:03David Pierce?

  Yeah. Yeah, I, the more I use AI, the more I am trying to figure out how to balance that between like, and I go back to the JetFlix thing, and I'm like, what that gave me is a bunch of names of people to go research. It gave me a bunch of like technological terms that I should go look up for how this worked, and it linked me to a bunch of court cases. And if that is the value that I derive from it, terrific. If I read that thing and think, oh, now I know the JetFlix story, I have gone wrong. And I think, again, we're like, it's the same thing with everything on the internet. We have this like incredible media literacy problem where

• 34:35Speaker 05

  Yes.

• 34:36David Pierce?

  we just, it's so hard to know what is real and what isn't. And we just don't usually have time to go fact check everything we see on the internet. And so I think, like, deep research is good enough that I am actually optimistic that it's going to get better.

• 34:49Speaker 05

  Yeah.

• 34:49David Pierce?

  But we're still in this weird liminal space of like, it seems trustworthy, but it isn't. But it's so much work to figure out in what way it's not, that I don't quite know what to do with it. And one thing I liked about Operator was I could just watch what happened. Like, I just, I asked it to find me an Airbnb and then sat there and watched while it looked for an Airbnb. And I know exactly where it went wrong. And there's something really helpful about that. Like, I know the problem, and then I could just pick it up from there and go.

• 35:15Speaker 05

  Yeah. I was looking for use cases for like how people were using it. And I watched this whole YouTube video of a guy using Operator to make changes to his website, which was really interesting. I don't know if you've seen this.

• 35:25David Pierce?

  No.

• 35:25Speaker 05

  And it was successfully executing, like, I need you to change like the thickness of these lines or something. And, and before it would execute, though, it recognized that this is like a high stakes task. So it had like this huge pop-up, like, are you sure you want to do something? Because he was like editing live on this website. And it was really compelling because it worked for him, but obviously it was really slow. So those are the use cases I could see. I was just talking to somebody about like why I use Claude and versus ChatGPT being really good or supposedly very good at coding and mathematics. And someone was like, because that's what the people building it care about.

• 36:01David Pierce?

  Totally.

• 36:01Speaker 05

  They don't care about writing, they care about mathematics and coding. So that's why it's good in those domains. So I have faith that it will be useful for those kinds of people, but for right now, not so useful for me.

• 36:14David Pierce?

  Yeah, that's fair. We got to learn to code, Kylie.

• 36:16Speaker 05

  Oh, God.

• 36:19David Pierce?

  I didn't make you talk about tasks.

• 36:21Speaker 05

  Thank God.

• 36:21David Pierce?

  I would like you to appreciate that I didn't make you talk about tasks.

• 36:24Speaker 05

  Yes, thank you.

• 36:25David Pierce?

  But some other time, we're going to talk about tasks.

• 36:27Speaker 05

  Merciful. Thank you.

• 36:28David Pierce?

  Kylie, thank you as always. All right, we got to take a break and then we're going to come back and talk about Elon Musk. We'll be right back.

• 36:38Speaker 02

  Flowing ad budget on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them? That's bull spend and marketers are calling it out in Dashboard Confessions.

• 36:48Speaker 03

  I remember telling my boss, "It'll be good for the brand." When leads were slow. Yeah, it wasn't.

• 36:56Speaker 02

  Cut the bull spend. LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title, and more. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 37:09Speaker 04

  College football is back. So Hilton called to me, the superstition concierge, to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Want to make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Oh, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching band wake-up call at 5:55 and 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for the sake.

• 37:39Speaker 07

  This episode is brought to you by Nordstrom. For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story. The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview. The first pair of walking shoes for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. Celebrating 125 years with new moments still ad. Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at nordstrom.com.

• 38:11David Pierce?

  All right, we're back. So we've talked a bunch about the Department of Government Efficiency and what Elon Musk and his crew of engineers have been doing inside of the US federal government. But I thought this was a good moment to sort of pull back a little bit. This has been happening for a little while. Things have slowed down a little bit. There have been some legal challenges. It felt like a good moment to try to figure out what's really going on here. Who are these people? What do they want? What is actually happening? Is this all actually going to work? And there's no one on earth I would rather talk that stuff through with than Liz Lopatto, who has been covering Elon Musk in various ways, shapes and forms for many, many years. So Liz is going to help me understand what in the world is actually happening here. Liz, welcome back.

• 38:56Speaker 08

  Thank you. It's good to be here.

• 38:58David Pierce?

  I feel like you're like the unofficial insanity correspondent of The Vergecast, which I didn't mean to happen, but whenever it's like, is everything falling apart? We have to call Liz and they explain it to us.

• 39:08Speaker 08

  The chaos correspondent, if you will.

• 39:09David Pierce?

  Yeah, I like this for us. Um, I think what I want to try to do is back up slightly from like the minute to minute chaos of what's going on and try to just make sense of the whole sort of Doge experiment, uh, which I think is also what you've spent a lot of time trying to do over the last couple of weeks. Uh, so I guess like at the, at the risk of asking like an outrageously broad question to start us here, what is your sense of what Elon Musk and Doge are actually in reality trying to do right now?

• 39:40Speaker 08

  So I think they're essentially politicizing what was previously neutral infrastructure. So if you think about a lot of what they're doing, it's taking over stuff that was just sort of there to help the government function. So like the General Services Administration, for instance, which is kind of like the IT for every part of the bureaucracy. It's like the thing that lets everything else function. That's where they started. And, you know, the, the sort of metaphor for this is you might remember, um, after Russia invaded Ukraine, um,

• 40:18Speaker 08

  They were kicked out of SWIFT, which is how banks message each other. And that was a moment where a previously neutral infrastructure had suddenly become weaponized. And so we're watching this happen now within the United States government.

• 40:32David Pierce?

  How strategic do you think this group is being inside of that? Because I think on the one hand, there is a way to look at this that is just absolute abject chaos. And I think one of the things we learned from the first Trump administration was that sometimes things that look like chaos just actually are chaos. And we spent a long time sort of assigning strategy to chaos. And it's like, no, it's, it's actually sometimes it's just chaos. But it also feels like something is happening on purpose here, like you're describing that like, I heard someone ascribe it to basically like, somebody tweets the name of a government agency at Elon Musk, and he's like, let's go kill him. And I don't think that's right, but I also don't think that's wrong. So like, how on purpose does all of this feel to you right now?

• 41:18Speaker 08

  Well, it feels varying degrees of on purpose. Let's say broadly, I think that there is a purpose here. And if you step back, you sort of see it, which is he's after the money. That's why he's like so incensed that a judge has ordered him away from the Treasury. Like, that's, that's where the power is, is the US Treasury. That's where he wants to be. That's the thing he wants to control more than anything else. And if you think about his ambitions for X, that makes sense, right? Like, he wants it to be the everything app, the payment app. And so, you know, when he went after the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau and tried to illegally close it,

• 42:00Speaker 08

  part of that is like in line with trying to make X a major payment app, right? Because that's a regulator that he doesn't have to deal with anymore. The other thing that I would keep in mind here is his AI interest. And what I think is going on is there essentially, there is essentially an attempt to replace bureaucracy with AI. And I, I, I think that's not going to work out great for a wide variety of reasons. But if you've seen like the list of banned words that they're trying to remove from the government, one of them is privilege.

• 42:37David Pierce?

  Oh, interesting.

• 42:38Speaker 08

  Right. Because as soon as you start thinking about privilege, you think about things like IT, like who has privileged access? Or for instance, like if you're in the NSA, you're thinking about things like privilege escalation, which is when an attacker like starts moving up the chain. Like there are ways that these words get used that have nothing to do with the so-called woke ideology that they are theoretically seeking to uproot. But because there's such a blunt tool being used, looking for these specific keywords, there's a bunch of stuff that potentially gets knocked over. So it's, there, there seems to be sort of a mix of like total chaos, in part because of how they're choosing to do this.

• 43:23Speaker 08

  And what I think is a little bit strategic, which is like, how do you get power? You control the payments.

• 43:30David Pierce?

  Right. And I think it, it seems like part of this is also just something that Elon Musk is like uniquely suited to do in this really weird way. Like one thing I've been thinking about a lot, and I'm curious for your thoughts on this, is if you just replaced Elon Musk with some other incredibly self-interested billionaire, put, put Jeff Bezos in here, right? Somebody else who is tied up in a lot of government contracts and has an awful lot to gain from having more control over the systems of government. It feels like it would be really different. And so there is something to the Elon Musk-ness of it all, outside of just like, my dude would like Grok to be used by the government for billions of dollars, right?

• 44:12David Pierce?

  You've been following Elon Musk for a long time, like what? Put, put this man in this moment together for me. I feel like this is the thing that breaks my brain the most is like, how did it happen that this particular guy is doing this? And that it is going this way so much like in his own specific image?

• 44:30Speaker 08

  I mean, he bought the government, right? Like, that's what happened.

• 44:33David Pierce?

  For not even that much money.

• 44:35Speaker 08

  Not even that much money. Like, he financed, you know, an incredible part of Trump's campaign. And, like, look at Donald Trump. That man does not enjoy being president. He doesn't want to do the hard shit. He wants to go to his rallies and have people cheer for him and give a press conference. He doesn't want to think. He's not good at thinking.

• 44:56David Pierce?

  He went to the Super Bowl. That's like, he was the first sitting president to go to the Super Bowl, which I thought was very odd. And then I was like, well, wait, if I'm Donald Trump and I got elected so that I don't go to jail, I'd go to the Super Bowl. Like, hell, yeah, I'd go to all the things.

• 45:08Speaker 08

  I mean, he's taken over the Kennedy Centers for the Arts. Like, those are his priorities. He's entertainment, right? Like, that's all he cares about. So, like, that leaves a real power vacuum, which we've seen other people exploit. We saw other people exploit in the first Trump administration, and arguably Stephen Miller is still exploiting. But that's, that's what Musk is doing. He is, he is arguably the actual power center, rather than the person who got elected president. And one of the things to keep in mind about Elon Musk is that he is like chaos at every company he's at. He is total chaos. And at the companies that he's been at for a long time, like SpaceX, which he founded, and Tesla, which he took over,

• 45:53Speaker 08

  there's padding around him to keep him from doing damage. They essentially keep him, like, pinned off.

• 45:59David Pierce?

  There are, like, people whose job description includes managing his chaos, right?

• 46:04Speaker 08

  That's right.

• 46:04David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 46:05Speaker 08

  Yeah, like, they absorb whatever nonsense he's up to. And we saw what happened at Twitter when that doesn't exist, which is, you know, he just starts ripping out wires. He does a bunch of stuff like moving servers randomly, like, over Christmas break.

• 46:21David Pierce?

  Oh, right.

• 46:22Speaker 08

  Remember? Or, like, you remember when retweets broke for some reason? Or, like... You know, like, just like, it's, there's no, there's no plan. He's just like, well, let's do something and see what happens. Um, and that is the plan. And so, you know, when people talk about comparing what's going on in the government to what happened at Twitter, that's, that's right. I mean, like, I have seen reporting of government employees reading books about what happened at Twitter, so they know what to expect.

• 46:55David Pierce?

  Oh, wow.

• 46:56Speaker 08

  Okay? And like, they're not wrong. Like, he's gonna barge in as loudly as possible and he's going to just see what happens. And like, if you think about somebody like Jeff Bezos, this is a man who is strategic and who is thoughtful and who you can say no to. Like, you can be in a meeting with him and say no to him. Jeff Bezos has not surrounded himself with yes men to the extent that Elon Musk has. And everything in Elon Musk's life is within Elon Musk's control, as far as he is concerned, including now the US government.

• 47:33David Pierce?

  Right. A thing you've said over and over, over the years, that I think has continued to be more true, every time you said it, is that, uh, history has taught Elon Musk that there are no consequences.

• 47:43Speaker 08

  That's right.

• 47:44David Pierce?

  And that he can essentially do whatever he wants. And like, again, history suggests he's not wrong. Wouldn't you, if you were Elon Musk, wouldn't you also think there are no consequences?

• 47:54Speaker 08

  Yeah, I mean, like, remember the time he tweeted on the Joe Rogan Show? And then, like, NASA gave him another contract?

• 48:00David Pierce?

  Right.

• 48:02Speaker 08

  Like, you know, like, there, there are arguably no consequences for Elon Musk. And so, why, why would he behave in the way that any of the rest of us behave? Because he has learned that laws don't apply to him. And the only place I can think of in recent memory where that isn't true is the Twitter takeover, where the Delaware Tansery Court made him buy the thing he promised he was gonna buy.

• 48:25David Pierce?

  Right. The only judge left in America, it turns out. Uh, to that end, actually, what is your sense at this moment? We're talking on, on Monday afternoon, uh, which I should say, because God only knows how much will change between now and Tuesday morning when this publishes. Uh, what is your sense of how well this is working? I think if I'd asked you a week ago... It seemed like this, this sort of running roughshod over the federal government in the US was working very well. And there was this big question of like, who is going to fight back? Where are the Democrats? Why is no one doing something about the fact that this seems clearly illegal and must be stopped? That seems to have shifted a little, but I can't quite get my hands around how much I feel like it has shifted. Where do you think we are right now?

• 49:10Speaker 08

  I don't think we're in a very different place. I mean, I'm just going to be real with you. We've had judges making orders, but this is Elon Musk we're talking about. He does at times ignore court orders. Like you may remember, you know, when he pretended he was going to take Tesla private.

• 49:27David Pierce?

  Oh, right. The funding secured tweet.

• 49:29Speaker 08

  That's right.

• 49:30David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 49:31Speaker 08

  And he made a settlement with the SEC where he was supposed to have a Twitter sitter, like somebody who watched his tweets about Tesla. And he just never did that. And we went all the way through the court system and they were all like, yeah, you need to do this. And there is still no Twitter sitter. So he has a history of ignoring legal orders. And I don't know who's enforcing any of these orders. I don't know who is interested in enforcing these orders. I don't know who's checking to see that he's following them. So there is a sense in which, you know, there is a real question right now of like, do the courts matter? Cause I feel like we're about to find out and we might not like the answer we're going to get.

• 50:12David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 50:13Speaker 08

  So there's that. But the other thing that I have noticed is that Steve Bannon, who notably hates Musk, has been daring Musk to go do his, I hate saying Doge because that like, nice dog didn't do anything wrong. You know, like

• 50:33David Pierce?

  It's really true.

• 50:34Speaker 08

  That's, I'm sorry for that, she, but you know, like, I really am. Like this is not, this is not the dog's fault. But he's been daring Doge to go in and do what they're doing with the military, which is another moment where it's like, that's where the rubber hits the road. Like, you know, we have some pretty severe national security risks already with the treasury stuff, but I suspect when you go into the place where everybody's armed and you try to do stuff that's a national security risk, that runs a little differently. So I really think that we are in a very frightening place. And part of the reason I think we're in a very frightening place is because our lawmakers are not doing anything.

• 51:15Speaker 08

  You know, they're, they're writing strongly worded letters and they're allowing themselves to be turned away from government buildings. You know, those are the Democrats. And then the Republicans, the ones who are not like vociferously like approving of this, um, they're Milford men. They're allowing their power to be stripped from them as members of Congress because they are scared of this guy, which is embarrassing. It is embarrassing. I cannot imagine right now being like, yeah, all right. Like, I'm cool with just being, you know, being useless as a lawmaker and like having my power stripped from me. And like the things that I vote for may or may not go through, like have some dignity, my God.

• 51:57David Pierce?

  Yeah. Yeah, it's, it's been very funny watching people like go back to the founding fathers and talk about the, you know, the separation of powers and the extent to which they were like, they, they thought people would, you know, jealously guard their own power. And now everybody's just like, ah, who cares? Letting on do whatever it wants.

• 52:13Speaker 08

  It's so embarrassing. It's so embarrassing.

• 52:16David Pierce?

  Yeah. Yeah. So let's, let's talk about the money of it all for a minute because I think, I've been thinking a lot about the reaction to this. And I think one of the strange things about the whole Doge chaos of the last week or so has been that it's, it's both very real and very kind of theoretical. Like we're talking a lot about access to systems and what's read only versus right. And everybody's talking about it as like an insider threat and a, and a hack. These are the kinds of things that you say to like people in the world and no one ever knows what to make of it. Right? And there's this sense of like, okay, they have access to some data. This is like the data privacy argument that we have, right?

• 52:53David Pierce?

  Like I, I think it's very hard for people to understand the risks of someone unauthorized having access to things like treasury payment systems.

• 53:05David Pierce?

  Help, help me make this real for people and myself. Like what, what is the actual issue and risk at hand here with these people having access to these systems?

• 53:13Speaker 08

  I can do this pretty easily, actually, because it's tax season. It's tax season and-

• 53:20David Pierce?

  It's so funny you say that. I just filed my taxes literally yesterday as we're recording this. And I had a moment clicking the button of being like, is this a stupid idea? Like, should I? But then I'm like, oh, that information's in the system anyway. Like, I don't know, maybe it's fine. Hopefully I get a refund. I don't know.

• 53:34Speaker 08

  So let's think, let's think about tax system, like the tax season for a minute, right? Like, everybody's filing taxes. I filed mine, you filed yours. Those of you who are listening, if you haven't filed yet, like, file your taxes, you know, it's time.

• 53:47David Pierce?

  Kudos for us being ahead of the game, though. So let's just briefly pat ourselves on the back here.

• 53:51Speaker 08

  Good for us. So let's imagine the, you know, 12-year-olds that he has hired are in the COBOL, which is one of the programming languages. A language they don't know well, they don't have a lot of experience with because they're not old enough to have experience with it. And they create a bug. That is a bug that potentially affects the tax refunds of every American.

• 54:16David Pierce?

  Right. That's a good one.

• 54:17Speaker 08

  Okay. This is, again, this is not, this is not like the grim scenario. This is the he-broke-retweets scenario.

• 54:25David Pierce?

  Right.

• 54:25Speaker 08

  Except it's your tax payments.

• 54:28David Pierce?

  I saw somebody who tweeted the other day, they were just like, "No IRS, I don't have $200,000 in student debt. That's a bug in the system."

• 54:35Speaker 08

  That's right.

• 54:36David Pierce?

  Prove it. And I was like, "All right, let's do this."

• 54:39Speaker 08

  So, you know, that's, that's the minor end of things, is like, there's an accidental screw-up because this is an understaffed office filled with people who aren't expert in the programming language that most of our government systems are in. So they screw something up and then it affects every single last one of us.

• 54:57David Pierce?

  Right. I have to say, I find that very compelling, but it doesn't feel like that's the way it's being talked about, right? The like, "What if they just break it?" Is, is really scary and really complicated and really interesting, but it does feel like the way this stuff gets talked about in broader strokes is like Elon Musk is gonna have your social security number, which feels, is like a different thing that I think is harder to wrap your head around. And maybe we're just talking about it the wrong way.

• 55:22Speaker 08

  Well, there, again, there's a range of risks and I have just gone with like, the most benign. That's the most benign one, is they fuck up your, your tax returns.

• 55:33David Pierce?

  Yeah, okay.

• 55:35Speaker 08

  But if you think about, you know, for instance, that they've had these unsecured servers that they've been doing stuff with, it doesn't just mean that like Elon Musk has your social security number, it might also mean that everybody else in the world has your social security number. So that's cool. On top of that fun.

• 55:54Speaker 08

  One of the things to keep in mind about Elon Musk, and one of the things that I think is driving a lot of this anxiety, is that he is a deeply vindictive man. And he likes to pursue his enemies. And so if you were a person who has ever said anything negative about Elon Musk, for any reason, the idea that he might potentially have access to all of your secure financial data and like be able to mess with you personally is not beyond the pale. And like you think about the ways that he has, for instance, targeted specific government employees or specific reporters with his Twitter account, where he has, you know, essentially like, put them on blast with the understanding

• 56:37Speaker 08

  that his audience is going to then dox and harass them. And you imagine him now having a bunch of sensitive data about all of these people who are speaking out about him. That is a much more precarious scenario. That's the sort of thing that can have a real chilling effect at minimum. And at maximum, can be quite dangerous.

• 57:00David Pierce?

  Yeah. Can you explain the Peter Thiel of it all to me? Speaking of deeply vindictive men,

• 57:07David Pierce?

  I keep seeing his name connected with this and I'm like, I sort of assumed he'd be involved here somehow. But how does Peter Thiel figure into this entire equation right now?

• 57:16Speaker 08

  Oh, that's sort of a question mark to me, but he is associated, I think. I mean, he and Elon obviously have a history. They're sort of frenemies. And some of Elon's hires have Thiel ties. J D Vance, who has been busily kissing ass, has Thiel ties. So there is this kind of network that Thiel is associated with that Musk is obviously drawing from.

• 57:43Speaker 08

  Thiel did sit out the election financially. So, you know, who knows what's going on there? And unlike Musk, Thiel doesn't generally barge around loudly. However, like a number of companies that are associated with Peter Thiel, for instance, Palantir, stand to benefit from. This sort of new order, right?

• 58:05David Pierce?

  Right.

• 58:05Speaker 08

  Where there's a more AI-focused government and where defense contracting suddenly has to run through a number of TL allies. And you can also imagine a world in which a number of government functions get privatized. Like, if you read Project 2025, which it seems pretty obvious is like what's being executed here.

• 58:30David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 58:30Speaker 08

  The entire idea is to wreck the government as we know it and then privatize stuff so people will just be happy that things function again.

• 58:40David Pierce?

  Right. Yeah, I mean, I think I keep vacillating between wanting to boil most of this down to essentially government contracts and privatizing the government, because there's a huge amount of money in it for the people who get it and they can hand it to themselves, and thinking that can't possibly be the whole answer and that it has to be more complicated than that. And I think, like, leaving aside the fact that some of the people involved in this, I think, do genuinely believe the things that they're doing for political and moral and whatever value-based reasons. Like, is most of it defense contracts? Like, is it, is it? If you boil it all the way down, is it kind of that simple in a lot of places here?

• 59:19Speaker 08

  I think that is a pretty big motivator. Yeah, because, like, think about how expensive AI is and how terrible it has been and how widely made fun of it is. Like, I personally have switched away from using Google Search. Like, I pay for Coggi now, which, by the way.

• 59:37David Pierce?

  Same.

• 59:37Speaker 08

  You know, for those of you who are listening, who are like, gee, I wish Google functioned like it did in 2012. Boy, do I have a service for you. Highly recommend it. But like, yeah, I mean, like, this is made a lot of, AI has made a lot of things worse. And like, you can, you can see it. You interact with it, you know it doesn't work. And so thinking about ways to essentially bail themselves out, like the funder of Last Resort at this point is the government. So I think that is a huge part of it for sure. There's also obviously ideological motivations, like the idea of privatizing everything is like a conservative wet dream. And then on top of it, there are a bunch of like weird conspiracy theories that, you know, people are varying degrees of bought into about what the government does and doesn't do.

• 1:00:22Speaker 08

  Like every once in a while, I see some like weird stuff from like Musk where it's like, can you imagine that the government has your social security number? And it's like, okay, but like, who, do you know who has signed me my social security number?

• 1:00:35David Pierce?

  Right.

• 1:00:36Speaker 08

  Like, do you know what it's for? Like.

• 1:00:39David Pierce?

  This is what I mean. It's like how, it's hard to know what of this stuff is very scary. What is a little scary and what is actually just like how things already were. But it does feel like everything is sliding in the direction of very scary, because it is just a bunch of people you've never heard of doing things no one elected them to do. And that on its face is a problem. Like even absent the rest of it, that on its face is part of the problem.

• 1:01:06Speaker 08

  Right. And the chaos is a problem too, because like, if you think about it, one of the reasons why America is a dominant global power has to do with the fact that our treasury bonds are considered to be the safest investment on earth. You know, they're used all over the place as like guaranteed money. And on Sunday, which as we're talking right now was yesterday, Donald Trump came out and was like, oh, well Elon Musk has discovered that some of those treasury bonds aren't real. And it's like, you know, you can crash the entire global financial system by saying that, right? And the the reaction in the market has been muted because they, you know,

• 1:01:51Speaker 08

  you can't tell whether grandpa is sundowning again or whether he actually means it. But, um, you know, these are two men who have a history of not paying their debts. So that's very exciting. You know, it's it's the uncertainty in particular that I think is a problem beyond everything else, because one of the reasons why, you know, for instance, people incorporate in Delaware is because there is a certain amount of certainty about how things turn out. You know how this is going to go. There's like a history and like, people generally follow the history and like, there is a, you know, an amount of de-risking that goes on because of that. So separately from whatever, you know, sort of other terrifying things may be happening,

• 1:02:33Speaker 08

  inserting this kind of uncertainty into a previously like, almost taken for granted, baseline of certainty is in and of itself really destroying something important.

• 1:02:46David Pierce?

  Totally. And so just to end on a true bummer of a note, uh, I have been sort of assuming that this would eventually in some way kind of, I don't know, if not peter out, then at least like, slow down, that that there the legal fights would slow things down. You kind of make the case, it's the opposite, that if anything were due for this to accelerate.

• 1:03:06Speaker 08

  Yep.

• 1:03:06David Pierce?

  Can you just tell me why? And then I'm going to go feel sad about myself while we take a break?

• 1:03:12Speaker 08

  Well, here's the thing, I think this is an all or nothing gamble for Musk. At this point, he's broken so many laws that he is looking at a number of serious legal fights, if not actual jail time, if he is stopped. So this is, you know, this is very much a, is a big gamble. It's and if he wins, he's the king of the United States. And if he loses, uh, his life becomes incredibly, incredibly, incredibly painful, much more so than any kind of pain he's ever experienced before. So I don't think he's going to slow down because he can't slow down, because if he slows down, then he increases the likelihood that he is in fact stopped.

• 1:03:54Speaker 08

  And that is one of the reasons I think we are in a really scary moment is because this is such an existential gamble for him personally, that he's going to do whatever it takes to remain in charge.

• 1:04:07David Pierce?

  Fair enough. All right. Well, I desperately hope you're wrong. But I fear that you're right. Uh, we're gonna have to do this again. This is, as you said, not going away. Uh, but until then, thank you as always, Liz.

• 1:04:17Speaker 08

  Yeah, my pleasure.

• 1:04:20David Pierce?

  All right, we gotta take one more break, and then we are gonna come back and do a question from the Vergecast hotline. We'll be right back.

• 1:04:28Speaker 02

  Are your ad campaigns lighting up the dashboard? But not the pipeline? That's bull spend. And marketers are calling it out in Dashboard Confessions.

• 1:04:37Speaker 03

  My boss asked for results, so I opened my dashboard for the only positive sounding metric I had: impressions.

• 1:04:45Speaker 02

  Cut the bull spend. See revenue, not just reach. LinkedIn delivers the highest return on ad spend of major ad networks. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit. Go to LinkedIn.com/campaign. Terms and conditions apply.

• 1:04:58Speaker 04

  College football is back. So Hilton called to me, the superstition concierge, to make your fan rituals a reality. Need a room to match your lucky number? We got you. Wanna make sure our team doesn't wash your lucky jersey? Oh, that smells lucky. Hilton's unmatched hospitality can keep up with any superstition. Even a marching band wake-up call at 5:55 in 55 seconds. Hit it! When you need a team that will do whatever it takes on game day, it matters where you stay. Hilton, for the stay.

• 1:05:29Speaker 07

  This episode is brought to you by Nordstrom. For 125 years, Nordstrom has been part of your story. The stylist who found the perfect outfit for your big interview. The first pair of walking shoes for your one-year-old. The tomato soup you shared with your sister at the cafe. These are the moments that make Nordstrom Nordstrom. Big or small, we're here for all of it. Celebrating 125 years with new moments still ad. Discover it all in Nordstrom stores and at Nordstrom.com.

• 1:06:03David Pierce?

  All right, we're back. Let's get to the hotline. As always, the number is 866 VERGE11. You can also email [email protected]. We love all of your questions. The hotline has been so, so fun the last few weeks, and I am extremely grateful to everybody who's reached out. Thank you again for all of your questions, all the time. We try to do at least one on the show every week, but frankly, we're getting so many good ones that we're gonna have to figure out how to start doing more. This week, we have a question about the Super Bowl. Here it is.

• 1:06:32Speaker 09

  Hey, it's Peter in Brooklyn, and I'm watching the Super Bowl on, yep, Tubi. And it's so clear that the on-screen graphics are in 720p. Not even the 1080p that's being upscaled to 4K, but the same 720p it's on broadcast. The edges are like jagged and gross, and it just bugs the crazy out of me. Thanks. Bye.

• 1:06:59David Pierce?

  Neil Patel is here, America's number one upscaling correspondent.

• 1:07:04Speaker 09

  Was that a question or a comment, sir?

• 1:07:06David Pierce?

  I think sometimes you just need to have feelings at the Vergecast hotline. I have no problem with this. If you just want to have feelings about the state of technology, call us. Verge11, we'd love to hear from you. So you posted something on Blue Sky during the Super Bowl in which you were annoyed at the on-screen graphics, which is why I brought you here, because I just wanna, I just wanna hear how you feel as a man with a lot of thoughts about upscaling and fake Dolby Atmos. How'd the Super Bowl go?

• 1:07:32Speaker 09

  Well, the right team won. I didn't say who it was in the last episode, but the right, the right team won.

• 1:07:38David Pierce?

  Yeah, that's fair.

• 1:07:39Speaker 09

  So that was good. I don't think those graphics were in 720p, just the way that Fox's pipeline works. They produce the show in 1080p HDR, and then they go down to 720p for broadcast, and they went up to 4K for Tubi. And so from what I understand...

• 1:07:58Nilay Patel?

  The whole production was in 1080p from tip to tail. The graphics did look bad, though.

• 1:08:04David Pierce?

  They did.

• 1:08:05Nilay Patel?

  I don't think that's like a technical system problem. I think that's a design problem. Like, there were drop shadows. It was very 90s.

• 1:08:14David Pierce?

  It was very 90s, but I do think I noticed it looking fuzzy also. Like, the KC for Kansas City was like, it looked like it had been like vector stretched and didn't look right.

• 1:08:25Nilay Patel?

  So I think they used a custom typeface based on the Fox logo for those letters, which is weird. And then, maybe this is only because I have a gigantic TV, because I thought it was blurry too. But it turns out they were using a border around the letters.

• 1:08:43David Pierce?

  Oh.

• 1:08:43Nilay Patel?

  That was a slightly different color that made it look fuzzy. So I think at a small size, you were seeing this like weird gradient fuzz. Because there was a slightly different color border around the letters.

• 1:08:57David Pierce?

  Interesting.

• 1:08:58Nilay Patel?

  So it's a border. So on Kansas City, it was white letters with a very thin yellow border.

• 1:09:04David Pierce?

  Oh, I see what you mean.

• 1:09:04Nilay Patel?

  And on Philadelphia, it's white letters with a very thin, light green border. So, and that's not high contrast enough against the colors of the blocks. So they just look, it totally looks fuzzy. I completely agree. And then if you look above or any other stuff, the clock doesn't have the border, so it looks sharp. The score itself didn't have a border, so it looks sharp. It's just.

• 1:09:26David Pierce?

  Right.

• 1:09:26Nilay Patel?

  I think a lot of people saw that. And then bizarrely, the stats where they were like, Jalen Hurts, four for five, 51 yards. They have a drop shot, which makes them pop even more.

• 1:09:39David Pierce?

  Yeah, it was terribly designed. Yeah.

• 1:09:42Nilay Patel?

  Uh, so I agree. This is, this is just a mess of design. I, people who responded to my tweets saying that it looked like it was made in Print Shop Pro.

• 1:09:54Nilay Patel?

  The point they were making is this is better for phones and people are watching this on phones now. I don't buy, I don't think people watch Super Bowl phones.

• 1:10:02David Pierce?

  No.

• 1:10:03Nilay Patel?

  And I think prioritizing that audience is weird. Right? Because most people watch Super Bowl around televisions or with people or in bars.

• 1:10:12David Pierce?

  Yeah, like famously, it's the thing everyone watches on televisions.

• 1:10:15Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 1:10:15David Pierce?

  That is like, that's the Super Bowl's thing. Yeah.

• 1:10:18Nilay Patel?

  And so you can make an argument even in that case, that maybe what you want to do is, you know, if you're watching in a bar on a TV, you want to make it very obvious what's going on. But I actually don't think this served that goal either. It made everything bigger. But in terms of information design, did not make it easier to understand what was going on in a way. Because it looks so crazy.

• 1:10:42David Pierce?

  Yeah. Yeah. My favorite tweet was from Tom Fornelli, who's a sportscaster for CBS and stuff. And he said, after giving Tom Brady $375 million, Fox only had 25 bucks left to spend on a scorebug design. Which feels about right.

• 1:10:55Nilay Patel?

  That's good.

• 1:10:56David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:10:56Nilay Patel?

  I, I tried to workshop a joke like that and I couldn't get there. So I, I appreciate that someone, someone nailed it.

• 1:11:02David Pierce?

  Yeah, I will say I'm looking at a screenshot of the bug and you're right that it is both sharp and blurry at the same time somehow, which suggests that it is correctly rendered bad design. How did you watch the Super Bowl? What was your, what was your setup?

• 1:11:16Nilay Patel?

  Uh, I watched on Tubi. I only paid for YouTube TV 4K for one month. When they had the Packers in the playoffs and then I canceled it. Which I felt was appropriate. Like I will pay the extra money and then they lost their playoff game. So I canceled it.

• 1:11:31David Pierce?

  Saving money.

• 1:11:32Nilay Patel?

  Yeah. I was like, I'm done here. And then I was like, crap, I didn't cancel it. Like I didn't wait the extra two days to get to the Super Bowl. So I watched on Tubi and 4K. It looked great. Uh, Fox, I think, did a good job.

• 1:11:42David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:11:43Nilay Patel?

  Like as good as they could have done. They, I read somewhere that the highest bitrate was 14.4 megabits, which is not great. It's not the 80 megabits of Sony Picture Core on my Bravia television.

• 1:11:54David Pierce?

  Oh, wow.

• 1:11:55Nilay Patel?

  But it was, I think, good for live. It didn't block up. I always look at the confetti at the end of the Super Bowl. To see how bad it is, like where they've made the trade off and it wasn't bad. It wasn't great. It wasn't bad.

• 1:12:07David Pierce?

  There have been broadcasts where the confetti looked like a like 1990s video game like that. We've, we've seen that in the past.

• 1:12:13Nilay Patel?

  Uh, and that's, that's literally just, uh, compression and bit rate. If you don't have a high enough bit rate stream, you can't move enough data. So you're going to compress everything down and the confetti is moving too fast. So the compression can't create keyframes. So you just get blocks, like every block on the screen gets pixelated. That I think that's like, I can see it and the, you know, people are like, well, you only get confetti once a year. I'm like, yeah, at the end of the Super Bowl.

• 1:12:39David Pierce?

  Yeah, it doesn't, it, it is pretty important, confetti.

• 1:12:41Nilay Patel?

  It's the one time you actually need it. Uh, and so that's the trade off, but I thought, I think 14.4 was enough. At least on my stream on Tubi, the way I was watching it to, to handle it. That's I can think of a cat, the fake HDR was okay. And the, I think the upscaling was not good. Like I watched the halftime show again on YouTube in 1080p HDR, which is the highest YouTube has it at. Or at least last night when I was watching it, it was, that was the highest it had it at. Um, and it looked substantially the same.

• 1:13:11David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:13:11Nilay Patel?

  Like my TV was doing a good enough job of scaling the 1080p HDR to its 4K display is Fox's native 4K upscaling. That's not, you know, like I presumably they have more budget than Sony did when they built the upscaler in my TV.

• 1:13:27David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:13:28Nilay Patel?

  Um, so I, I think it was just fun.

• 1:13:31David Pierce?

  Yeah, I, it, it held up, which is not nothing, uh, for something like Tubi, which I'm sure has never had the volume of people watching one specific thing as it did on Sunday night.

• 1:13:40Nilay Patel?

  And Sportico, uh, which is just like a business of sports publication. I read an interview with the, the Tubi folks and they were really concerned about signups. Where like people signing into Tubi, downloading the app and getting all this stuff. And they were paying attention to how their competitors and Fox had done it in the past to get people to download the Fox Sports app. And they, they realized that there was a ton of friction around. You know, having an account, doing a credit card number. And the Tubi executive was like, yeah, we don't even, we can't even take a credit card number. Like, we're just like not, we're just not that thing.

• 1:14:13David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:14:14Nilay Patel?

  Like, we're just like, open the app and please start watching ads. Um, so they were very confident that people would get the app. And like immediately start watching. And I think that, that kind of like zero friction TV experience is very much what Tubi is betting on.

• 1:14:27David Pierce?

  Yeah. And it felt like old school TV. It was like two clicks and I was watching the thing. It was awesome. I like, it made me feel like I was watching the pre-roll ad before the thing starts that you get on a lot of these services now. And I was just like, oh no, this is just like a Super Bowl ad. It's just, it just started playing the television show. It was great. Uh, did you try any of the, the Dolby Atmos shenanigans? Oh, I guess you don't have Comcast, so you couldn't try the shenanigans.

• 1:14:52Nilay Patel?

  Um, I don't think Tubi's audio is very good. Uh, it, you know, when you watch a football game and like true 5.1, you get the crowd behind you and all the stuff. Uh, none of that. It was a very flat stereo mix. My, my T, you know, my Shever was like doing its own virtual up mixing, but even the halftime show was like kind of quiet and muffled.

• 1:15:11David Pierce?

  It was. It, that was one of the things I was most struck by from the halftime show was it was, I couldn't tell if it was not well mixed on their end, or if it was just coming out of my speakers incorrectly. Uh, as you know, my speakers are not famously fabulous on my television.

• 1:15:28Nilay Patel?

  Your alarm clock that you play music through.

• 1:15:30David Pierce?

  Yeah, exactly. But that seemed to be an experience a lot of people had, that the, the sound on the streaming side of things was not super impressive.

• 1:15:39Nilay Patel?

  Yeah, I think they prioritized for delivering a 4K HDR.

• 1:15:42David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:15:43Nilay Patel?

  Quote unquote 4K HDR to a lot of people for free and people will be impressed by that because it's free and they can see it. And most people don't have the audio setups. Right? Or they, they have an inexpensive soundbar. So I think they just didn't prioritize that. I would like to see them prioritize that next time.

• 1:15:57David Pierce?

  Yeah, agreed. Uh, yeah, I feel like this is a victory. Uh, like, all things considered, we've had some truly messy football streaming experiences over the years. This felt like a good one.

• 1:16:07Nilay Patel?

  It was a good one. I, I, I think overall, everyone has like learned a bunch of lessons.

• 1:16:12David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:16:12Nilay Patel?

  But the, the part where It's still just not possible to watch a true 4K football game remains devastating in the United States of America.

• 1:16:23David Pierce?

  You know what I'm forever struck by is like the, the, when they started using those Sony cameras in the end zone that get actual honest to God Boca on the players.

• 1:16:32Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 1:16:33David Pierce?

  And all of a sudden, everybody was like, they're streaming this in 8K. It looks and it's like, no, they just, they just have apertures now.

• 1:16:39Nilay Patel?

  Yeah.

• 1:16:40David Pierce?

  They're just doing Boca. It's like.

• 1:16:42Nilay Patel?

  The first time they were doing it, they were using YouTuber cameras. They were using just A7s. Now I think they're using fancier cameras.

• 1:16:48David Pierce?

  But like the gap between what we're getting and things that will look substantially better is actually pretty small. And it's just little things like, what if the background was blurry? That all of a sudden makes everything feel better. So it's like, there's actually so much room to make this stuff better without like fundamentally rewriting the architecture of the internet.

• 1:17:07Nilay Patel?

  There's that. There's also the, the reason they were able to bring the A7s to the broadcast. We wrote about this a bunch at the time. A bunch of other like business of sports websites wrote about it at the time. Because what they needed to do to make that work was one, they needed to try it in like a low cost way. Like these broadcast operations are big, integrated, third party operations. Like they should, like Fox hires a production company and show up with trucks and just like, do this. So there's not a lot of forward investment, right? Like it was pretty low cost to like throw an A7 out there on a gimbal.

• 1:17:43David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:17:44Nilay Patel?

  In the scheme of things, but then they weren't just, they weren't prioritizing just delivering to broadcast. And so if you, you have a A7 on a wireless thing, like you might have to re rethink your entire broadcast system for that. And then because you're sending out over there in some cases, CBS still sends out 1080i. Like, that's weird. Like they have to rethink all of that and make it work with all the graphics packages. And they had just gotten to the place where enough digital video. Had just like taken over the production, they're being like, screw it, send somebody out there with a wireless A7 and like, let's see what happens, like was possible. And then the A7s were good enough.

• 1:18:26Nilay Patel?

  And now that's all changed because people liked it so much, they like, they fully invested in it. But it's a really interesting sort of, the distribution had to flip over so that enough of the gear they were using was already prepared for it as opposed to being prepared to send out broadcast signals.

• 1:18:42David Pierce?

  Yeah.

• 1:18:42Nilay Patel?

  And that, like, that's a great, like, Verge story. We could write that story all day. And at the time, we kind of did because it was so much fun. But now, all of that, like, all of that production pipeline is more geared towards internet delivery, because that's where the industry is, than television delivery. So they're able to do more YouTubery things, I guess you could call them.

• 1:19:01David Pierce?

  Interesting.

• 1:19:02Nilay Patel?

  Including completely cheaping out the graphics.

• 1:19:07David Pierce?

  Yeah. All right, well, next year's Super Bowl is going to be on Peacock, so we have a whole year of weirdness to be expected there. It's gonna be great.

• 1:19:15Nilay Patel?

  Hopefully, they can stream one football game in 4K. I just beg you. Produce natively, distribute the thing in 4K. I beg everybody. We can get this done in America. Executive, order a 4K football game, man. Do it.

• 1:19:28David Pierce?

  This is our job. We have 12 months, Neelai, you and me to get this done.

• 1:19:31Nilay Patel?

  He saved from just like randomly ordering the treasury to not do pennies anymore. 4K football.

• 1:19:36David Pierce?

  Love it. All right, Neelai, thank you.

• 1:19:39Nilay Patel?

  See ya.

• 1:19:42David Pierce?

  All right, that is it for The Vergecast today. Thank you to everybody who was on the show, and thank you, as always, for listening. There's lots more on everything we talked about at theverge.com. All of our stuff on OpenAI and operator and deep research, I'll link it in the show notes, but there is a ton of news ongoing there. There's even more news, maybe unfortunately, ongoing with all of this Elon Musk and Doge stuff. So keep it locked to The Verge. We are doing our very best to keep it all up to date and all on our homepage, so keep it locked. And if you have thoughts, questions, feelings, or other government agencies you're curious about, you can always email us at [email protected] or call the hotline, 866-VERGE11. We really, honestly, love hearing from you. It is the best. This show is produced by Will Poor, Eric Gomez, and Brandon Kiefer. The Vergecast is

• 1:20:26David Pierce?

  Verge Production and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Neil and I will be back on Friday to talk about all the AI news because it just keeps coming, all the government news because it just keeps coming. I think there's some interesting gadgety news coming this week. Lots to do, lots to talk about. We will see you then. Rock and roll.

• 1:20:51Speaker 11

  New and exclusive holiday decor just launched online at The Home Depot. Check out the viral Grand Duchess collection with smart holiday lights you can control from your phone. Easily customize the twinkle across trees, wreaths, and garlands to match your holiday vibe. Create stunning light effects, then switch it up with the tap of your fingers. Even the man in red will be impressed. Shop the holiday decor you want, online only, at homedepot.com.

• 1:21:22Speaker 12

  Everyone's got a hard question about AI. Your job, your kids, where it's going. Anthropic was built to surface those questions and share what it finds along the way, because there's hope in hard questions. Ask yours at claud.ai/spotify and keep thinking. That's claud.ai/spotify.

• 1:21:46Speaker 06

  I work here. You know, that thing you have to wake up for every day? I know, I've made things a little difficult in the past. Okay, a lot difficult, but I got some help from UKG and finally, I understand. Now I'm making work work better. I've even got AI agents helping me find new ways to help you, your people, and your business. Because when work works, everything works. UKG, HR, Pay, and Workforce Management.